BK’s Bluster: All Bark, No Byte: I Challenge Him to Debate on Sandusky’s Innocence
BK’s Little World: Big on Claims, Short on Courage
There is a tiny person who calls himself BK Corruptible. He is a moderator of a small Reddit thread. He is deathly afraid of me, so he remains anonymous. I do not know what BK stands for. Blubbering Kitten?
I do not know his real name or what he looks like. I use this picture of him, which might be precisely what he looks like, or maybe not.
BK the Timid.
At Frank Report, we call him “The Littlest Guy.” Or “KC” (for Keyboard Coward.)
A Feud with Faceless Foe?
People ask me why I do not bother disputing what Reddit’s recluse says about me.
To paraphrase Judge Garaufis – “I’m just a local guy from Buffalo, and you’ve got an anonymous guy who hasn’t the guts to use his own name. Why should anyone look upon that person as someone who is worthy of respect?”
The other problem with BK is that he is no journalist and not a critical thinker. When he brings up me, I laugh at his smallness. He would not dare meddle with me if he signed his own name. But since he brought up Sandusky and claims he is guilty, I sense an opportunity to prove that BK is either:
Stupid
A coward
Dishonest
All of the above
Therefore, I will challenge this timid taunter to a debate on Jerry Sandusky. Though I doubt my invisible critic will dare take me up lest I expose his lack of logic.
Jerry Sandusky…
Now, let me deconstruct BK’s latest foolishness, which he posted on Reddit recently.
The Little Guy’s Tiny Tantrum
The self-righteous BK, AKA The Littlest Guy
In a recent post, BK wrote:
For a while on (BK’s Reddit thread), I have shown some tolerance to the posting of links to Frank Parlato’s blog, even as I spoke up against him.
This was on the off chance that there was some redeeming value to Frank Parlato’s “journalism” to somebody.
Parlato’s latest article convinces me that he has no redeeming qualities at all. So I would like it clear:
FR writes:
I laughed when BK wrote, “I spoke up against him,” when he cannot stand behind what he writes with his real name?
BK continued:
Parlato and his employees are not welcome here (under any pseudonyms)
Direct links to his content are not welcome here.
If there is any reason to post material as necessary context, you can use org or Archive.is.
Unlike Reddit’s little rascal, I welcome differing opinions on my site.
BK Fumbles Facts
BK: I will give the rationale in full.
Parlato –who is likely desperate for anyone’s money — has taken to working for the supporters of Jerry Sandusky, former coach of the Penn State University football program.
For the record, I believe Sandusky is innocent, and I am not making any money from it. Once he is freed from prison, I may opt to take some financial opportunity that comes my way for my work in showing he is innocent.
BK: Sandusky was criminally convicted of the rape and molestation of over 10 children;
BK does not know the case. They were not children when they testified. They were men. Most of them claimed they had repressed memory recollections right after they got civil lawyers. Every one of the eight (not ten) men who testified (falsely) against the innocent Jerry Sandusky got more than one million dollars.
Bogus Millionaires
Here is the list of so-called victims and the amount of money they got for their untrue stories about Sandusky from Penn State.
Aaron Fisher, $7.5 million
Aaron Fisher, “victim”#1, provided this photograph as an answer to his detractors.
Jason Simcisko, $7.25 million. His story kept changing as the green kept enlarging,
Brett Swisher-Houtz, $7.25 million. Investigators and his civil lawyer, who was with him from the start, were caught on tape conspiring to lie to Houtz and, in effect, get Houtz to lie about Sandusky.
Michal Kajak’s story changed many times, not only as to what happened, but also when it happened. He changed the dates to maximize Penn State’s payments [i.e., after 2001]. He wound up with $8.1 million
Zachary Konstas, $1.5 million for a single hug.
Dustin Struble, $3.25 million. This young man was persuaded to remember Sandusky abused him after his civil lawyer set him up with a memory therapist.
Sabastian Paden got $20 million for a story that even BK could discern was a lie.
Criminal Ryan Rittmeyer, $5.5 million. He probably never met Sandusky, but no one checked out the “victims'” stories.
Other Thinkers on Sandusky’s Innocence
I am not alone in thinking Sandusky is innocent. Among those who preceded me in this belief are:
Dr. Frederick Crews is a former chair of English at UC Berkeley and a best-selling author. He wrote the Random House Handbook, which more than one million college students have used.
Famed radio personality, John Ziegler: This in your face, hard nosed investigator did the compelling series, “With the Benefit of Hindsight.”
I defy anyone to listen to all the episodes and not walk away a lot smarter than BK. Indeed, BK represents the kind of shallow judgment that allows innocent people to go to prison.
BK has not studied the case, but he is ready to proclaim Sandusky is guilty. Why? Because he does not like me. But that’s no reason to fail to investigate.
Ziegler is the opposite. This guy digs in relentlessly, and when the world said Sandusky was guilty, this brave man came out publicly and said he was innocent. And he said it in his own name.
Then there is Philadelphia’s top investigative reporter, Ralph Cipriano,
John and Patti Galluppi, of Justice for Jerry.
Former Rutgers Head Coach Dick Anderson.
The Penn State Voice of Wrestling Jeff Byers.
NCIS Special Agent John Snedden, who hosts Search Warrant. He did a comprehensive federal investigation of the supposed coverup at Penn State in 2012, only to find no coverup. Sandusky is innocent, and famed coach Joe Paterno, went to his grave discredited for absolutely no reason.
Well-known author Mark Pendergrast, who wrote the forensic masterpiece The Most Hated Man in America, Jerry Sandusky and The Rush to Judgement
One may also consider reading Dr. Graham Spanier’s In the Lion’s Den to look at the collateral damage and behind-the-scenes politics of this false prosecution.
Back to BK’s Tirade
Penn State’s civil settlements suggest the actual number of victims may be several multiples of that.
Penn State settled with 34 liars. Most came on board after the trial, when the legal community knew that Ira Lubert, a trustee of Penn State, was giving away millions of dollars of Penn State’s money to anyone with a BS story, provided they had the “right” lawyer.
The stories were so ridiculous that Penn State’s insurer refused to reimburse and went to court. That’s a story for another day.
BK: Sandusky’s appeals and motions for retrial have been thrown out, and there is little doubt of his guilt.
Unlike BK, I investigated the case and I see significant doubt about Sandusky’s guilt.
BK: Somehow, Parlato has managed to take working for this pedophile’s fan club even worse than at first blush.
News broke yesterday that one of the victims who testified against Sandusky was recently stabbed in a fight. That victim is now 30 years old; he was 11 when Sandusky began grooming him.
The so-called victim, Aaron Fisher, lied about his victimization. He claimed he went every weekend to Sandusky’s basement when he was 13-15 and was abused. But he forgot it the moment he left and then went back the next weekend to do it over again.
BK: The stabbing incident had nothing to do with Sandusky. Police accounts indicate the 30-year-old man was not the aggressor but was stabbed in the back while trying to disarm a man menacing people with a sword.
Fisher is a man who always gets into fights and loses. He was a good runner – a track star. He should have run away.
Aaron Fisher could run pretty fast, but he lost every fight he was in.
BK’s Lament
BK: Parlato saw fit to publicize and celebrate the attack on Sandusky’s victim, using it as an opportunity to once rehash personal attacks on his character and his family. Despite several winks and nods, the response of more than one of Sandusky’s supporters shows the kind of bloodlust Parlato is all too happy to sate.
It is at this point that any kind of traffic to Parlato is helping Sandusky revictimize people who should be allowed to walk away from that episode of their lives.
I can get along without BK sending traffic my way.
BK: In close, I want folks who have illusions that Parlato was some kind of avenging angel for the victims of Keith Raniere to remember: this exact kind of material –“smash mouth” retaliation– was why NXIVM hired Parlato to start.
And if you ever wonder why victims of Raniere did not come forward for decades, it was because Parlato and people like him exist.
Victims in NXIVM came to me for help, for I was the one man who stood up to Raniere and wrote stories that took him down. But then again, what would BK understand about that? I spoke up against NXIVM in my own name.
In the meantime, little guy, show me where I was wrong in my stories about Sandusky. Don’t worry, you don’t have to use your real name.
Here are some of my stories:
Sandusky’s Wrongful Conviction Discussed by the Voice of Penn State Wrestling and Frank Parlato
Accuser #1 in Sandusky Case, Aaron Fisher, Stabbed in Knife Fight in Jersey Shore
Another Phony Accuser: Blames Killing on Sandusky’s Abuse That Never Happened
Prisoner Describes Jerry Sandusky in Prison
Memo to Publisher: The Jerry Sandusky Conviction Was a Miscarriage of Justice
Fisher vs. Paden: Unequal Pay for Equal Lies in False Conviction of Jerry Sandusky
Changing Claims: Shubin ‘Amplified’ Accusers’ Stories in Sandusky Case
Frederick Crews: A Shower of Lies: Spanier, Sandusky, and the Mess at Penn State
All the World’s a Stage and Penn State Had Some Pretty Bad Actors in Sandusky Case
Renowned Academic, Authors, and Investigators Challenge Jerry Sandusky’s Conviction
The Plan to Expose the False Conviction of Jerry Sandusky
I
Did Aaron Fisher Mislead Authorities in Sandusky Case? Looks Like He Did!
The Unheard Side of the Sandusky Story: Did Aaron Fisher Lie?
Did Jerry Sandusky Get a Fair Trial? – The Answer Is ‘No’
Changing Memories: The Impact of Repressed Recovered Memories in the Sandusky Case
Questioning Millionaire Victims: Doubts Arise in Sandusky Trial
