After publishing Wake up, Suneel; Raniere Lied About His Baby Son & Mother, not surprisingly, I heard from Suneel Chakravorty almost immediately. Here is what he had to say:

If there was truth in advertising required of the judiciary in Connecticut, notice would be required to be displayed prominently, like it was said Dante displayed at the gates of Hell: Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch’intrate Tribunale di famiglia di Connecticut. [Abandon all hope ye who enter CT Fami

First, a guest view by an anonymous reader and then my comments – directed at Suneel.

On January 30, 2022, I wrote a story about Geoff Herzog, of Stamford CT, who got custody of his children despite the fact that they wanted to live with their mother.

By Suneel Chakravorty

MK10ART- Portrait of John Tighe

The question was posed by Nice Guy : “I wonder how Mike Rinder ran afoul of the great Alonzo….?”

Someone posted the following comment concerning the post Bronfman Appeal: Never in DOS, While Allison Mack and Lauren Salzman Were ‘Elbow Deep in DOS’, and Got Lighter Sentences: “She got 7 years for being a mean S.O.B. Payback from Garaufis for the victims of Raniere? I have no love for Clare Bronf

I happened to write two posts on Elizabeth ‘Lizzie’ Harding Weinstein, the woman who accuses her lawyer husband of being a pedophile, without evidence, and lost custody of her children.

In a recent article in the Insider, Clare Bronfman’s attorney, Duncan Levin, argued on behalf of his client that she deserves to have her six year, 9 month sentence reduced because she got punished for DOS, something she never participated.

It is no joke to put this kind of story out there, a deeply personal one that delves into the close personal space of a family in dispute. I am writing this for the children of this family who are suffering from the loss of their mother. At their ages, 15, 15, and 11, their voices should be heard. T

I recently wrote, Parlato to Suneel: ‘Put up or Shut up!’.

Here is the press release from Warner: Rich & Shameless; Does Fame, Power, Success, and Money Really Buy Happiness?TNT Announces Summer 2022 Launch of Original True Crime Anthology, “Rich & Shameless”From Girls Gone Wild to Pharma Bro to Pam & Tommy, This Eight-Hour Unscripted Series Tells the Shock

The divorce and custody case that got me interested in CT Family Court is Ambrose v. Riordan.

By Suneel Chakravorty

By K. R. Claviger

After publishing Despite Suneel’s Bizarre Claims, Evidence Shows Raniere Abused Cami at Age 15, attorney Neil Glazer wrote to me seeking a correction of the facts.

A Message for Suneel

While it is a matter of record that supremely intelligent and observant individuals often make comments on the Frank Report, Foxibot has a rare talent for expressing things in a remarkably accurate way.

Suneel Chakravorty fired off a screamer in his opening presentation of his challenge. I am giving him the full amount of rope he needs for his task.

The civil case, Sarah Edmondson, et al against Keith Raniere et al, is moving apace – which is to say moving as it should for a civil case of this magnitude – slowly.

Ed. Note: This is the first part of Suneel Chakravorty’s challenge. I am, whenever possible, using his last name so whatever internet record he creates he can get the credit or calumny. Below is the picture of the kid.

Suneel Chakravorty challenged me to debate him over his magic man, Keith Alan Raniere, the unpretentious, modest gent whose followers bowed before him and called him, Vanguard. So humble was he that he had a 10-day birthday celebration – instead of a whole month.

Here is a guest view from someone who apparently does not like the fact that Suneel Chakravorty has issued me a challenge and I accepted it. I have added images with captions, and will answer her questions at the end of the post.

US District Court Judge Eric Ross Komitee, the presiding judge in the matter of Edmondson, et al, against Raniere, et al,, has experience with wealthy people, whether sophisticated, or the type who have more money than brains, such as perhaps two of the defendants, Clare and Sara Bronfman.