BREAKING: Audio: Keith Raniere Contacts Frank Parlato From Prison – Seeks Help to Show Prosecutorial Misconduct!

There are many ACTUAL innocent people that are being manipulated and coerced in a corrupt legal system. I think precious time would be better spent saving the children from people like Keith Raniere and his cult rather than defending and helping a convicted sex offender and child abuser.

I don’t know you, Frank. But I’d definitely implore you to spend your time defending the children and abused victims, rather than a manipulative, perverted cult leader.

(That’s not to say I condone “prosecutorial misconduct”, but I also don’t condone CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY MISCONDUCT either. Was Keith thinking about all the innocent children and women he scarred with this cult? Was he thinking about the horrible exploitation and ruination of these people’s lives? Was he thinking about the psychologically damaging effects he and his cult have on the minds of all of his “recruits”? I think not.)

I hope you reconsider going down this avenue. Instead of using up time and effort to help a known offender, perhaps use that time wisely to help protect and defend the innocent and less financially stable.

To be clearer,

I understand your intention of trying to appear as impartial and fair by saying you’d stand up against prosecutorial misconduct regardless of the character of the accused.

You absolutely cannot be impartial due to your personal experiences with this cult.
Keith knows this and wants you to add credibility to his bullshit “fairness for all” campaign.
He always gift wraps his personal agenda in the guise of “for all humanity”.

He has shit loads of money to launch his own fight.

Send the file back to what’s left of the cult.

To Frank Parlato and Mark Elliot

I’m very glad both of you are getting together and that Frank will examine and evaluate the evidence transparently. We are in desperate need of bi-partisanship as a country to renew faith in American democracy. I can’t imagine this will be an easy task for both of you. Blame and vengeance have guided us for too long. My hope is simply for open discussion, mutual respect and an honest and accountable appraisal from both sides.

Frank, I’m actually going to say you have a conflict of interest.

Don’t do it.

What happened to discourage Keith Raniere from having his attorneys engage themselves, on his behalf, in pursuing proof of prosecutorial misconduct? Are they too dizzy or bizzy?

Keithy-Weethie has been somewhat touchy about Agnifilo lately, and that is evaluated from words straight out of Van Kiddiehunter’s mouth on the phone to his little harpie, Sundial. So deep. Wheel Suppository surname like an ayurvedic pharmacist. A blast from the past. Who can resist not getting lost in translation and the thrill of Sanskrit?

Not I, Romeo. Still, this began with a genuine question. No hellos to his lawyers? Yes or no or I don’t know? So what gives, besides all of the shattered eyeglasses?

How come Raniere is trying to produce an eleventh-hour gameshow, featuring jigsaw puzzles with half of the pieces missing? The guy doesn’t change.

The con. He is on a roll.
Living the life at Brooklyn’s finest address. Spinning the last empty toilet paper roll and imagining a brief view of the Rockies. On his way to you know where in handcuffs.

Ooh my gawd. It is Grace Jones!

Pull up to the bumper, baby
In your long black limousine

But that’s a jail wagon, Vangourd
And you’re one skinned sardine

The desperate master manipulator has taken Frank’s bait. I can picture the thoughtless NXSCUM drones now suddenly believing in what Frank has to say. Ironic.

I just listened to the audio and am saddened to hear K’s description of the injustice done to him. Keith – What about the injustice done to Rhiannon, Gina, and so many others??

What about those who sleep in their graves, for whom you will never be held to account?

Hello, NDNY! That said, I DO care deeply about prosecutorial misconduct. Personally, I believe far too many in this country are brutally imprisoned for non-violent offenses. But the silence from NDNY and the State of New York is deafening. By the way, KR, you cannot be considered non-violent, IMHO. Not when you demand starvation, sleep deprivation, obedience, forced servitude, damaging collateral, and imprisonment of trusting Mexican immigrants coming here to (hopefully) work legally.

C’mon, NDNY, the whole sorry bunch did their deeds in your backyard.

I totally trust Frank’s judgment, but as others have said, it’s clear that the K is using carefully-designed flattery and manipulation, as is his wont. Am I wrong? Possibly. He sounds convincing. I should know. He almost gypped my old boss out of his company.

P.S. Frank correct me if I’m wrong but you’re a journalist, not a lawyer or judge. How can you look into this matter without the proper education, without the knowledge how do you know the nuance of the law? How could you possibly know what you’re looking for or looking at?

Asking for a friend

Knowing what we know about narcissists and psychopaths, I would say you’re playing with fire. I wouldn’t do it.

I agree that it’s important that prosecutors conduct themselves according to the law. That said, I hope you are going into this with clear eyes. Raniere is clearly following the same pattern with you that he has followed with many others: i.e. appealing to a higher ideal (one he may or may not actually care about, and probably not) to get you to do what best serves him personally. On top of that, he’s also flattering you by mentioning you answer to no one, and praising you – a move that makes it look like he’s in the dominant position. It’s like a pat on the head.

I do find it odd that a man [Raniere] who, on several occasions, preaches the fluidity and social construction of the law, specifically as it applies to age of consent and incest, is now so very concerned about it being upheld.

When accused of raping young girls, he asks his accusers to see how the laws are merely suggestions and should be viewed critically as they differ based on location and timing. Now, he and his devotees are pleading with the country to focus on nothing but the laws as they are written.

The hypocrisy and narcissism are rampant and exhausting with these people. If the laws keep him from doing what he wants, they mean nothing, If they provide an out so that he might again get his way, there is nothing more important.

There are no ultimate victims, until now that he is the ultimate victim. Is Nxivm changing their views on victims and the law or is this group representing an opposition to their once coveted “technology”? I mean for a movement that is supposed to embody ethics, one would think that they might take a second to get clear on the values and ethics for which they truly stand.

Frank, I think you just made your 1st tactical error. And it’s a bad one.

It’s an extremely subtle, and highly cunning move (especially the timing) by Mr. Raniere.

First, you’re giving Keith Raniere a national platform to present his case!

How do you know what information he’s got? 250 million bucks can buy a lot of evidence! Just one piece of real evidence of legal malfeasance and the case turns on a dime, and he’s portrayed as an innocent victim.

And by presenting such evidence, he substantially discredits your professional reputation. He’s trying to out YOU.

Also, I think he’s trying to link his case – emotionally – to George Floyd and Brianna Taylor;

If he raises doubt as to his guilt, he can tie himself to “injustice riots” of the left as well as the ambient controversy circulating around the election.

Could “We are as you” have been a dry run to gauge the effect on the national media of “organized groups” assembling at correctional facilities in New York State?

What would happen if Antifa or BLM shows up at MDC? A story that is definitely worthy of national media attention.

Third, Keith Raniere could insert himself into the election, through your connection with (convicted but pardoned) Roger Stone straight to Mr. Trump!

Ask Roger Stone.

Speaker Pelosi is a contrarian who will fight for the opposite of anything Trump says, and if Raniere can get Trump to even mention Nxivm, this case will be immediately politicized and go sideways fast.

I’m sure the President would love to have Nxivm added to the mix of things he presently has to deal with.

Giddy from your legal victory over Clare Bronfman, you’ve let down your guard.

I think it’s a trap. There is no winning outcome. Not one, including the conceit that it serves justice (which would take considerable time to prove anyway). And it could affect the election.

In your place, I would find another way to deal with it – after Nov. 3rd.

But hey, I’m just a working guy with “no dog in the fight”.

Perhaps John Tighe would like to have a conversation with Keith about prosecutorial misconduct, and specifically, chain of evidence. I’d tell Keith that you are busy working on John’s case right now, and when you’re done, you’ll take a look at his case. And any info he has about John would help expedite things.

Just be careful not to be fed lies as they seem good at hacking, changing things and making things up.

Oh, the Irony!

If Keith Raniere, the self-proclaimed Vanguard, had been so magnanimous towards his enemies years ago perhaps he would not be in this predicament.
The idea of suing critics and defectors into bankruptcy was counterproductive from the get-go.
And when a person has no end of willing sexual partners, there is no need to brand and blackmail women.

That said, the major error I see with the trial was that the judge cut short the cross-examination of Lauren Salzman.
It is a Constitutional right for a defendant to be able to confront a witness through cross-examination.
If only Raniere had not been so confrontational during Salzman’s highly emotional testimony.

I do expect that if the Democrats elect the semi-comatose Joe Biden as President and Andrew Cuomo becomes Attorney General, there is a chance that Raniere’s sentence might be reduced.

A number of years ago, I read a very good book called “A Peculiar Crusade: Willis M. Everett and the Malmedy Massacre“. It’s about the American JAG corp attorney who defended the SS soldiers who murdered American POWs at the Battle of the Bulge. He worked long on their defense, eventually getting their death sentences commuted to relatively short prison sentences. He said It did not matter to him whether they all swung at the end of a rope; what mattered was that they got a fair trial.

So, Frank, I think you’re doing the right thing. Prosecutorial misconduct undermines our faith in the judicial system. Your investigation might show that the prosecution did just fine. If the prosecution bent the rules, we should know. If they played by the book, we should be reassured of that too.

Do not open anything emailed from them. Demand hard copies!