US v. Roger Stone – Much Ado About Not Very Much – Except Draconian Penalties DOJ Seeks

The FBI raid Roger Stone's home in Florida to arrest him. It is a gripping example of the police state.

On January 25, 2019, Roger Stone was arrested by FBI agents who conducted a pre-dawn tactical assault on his Ft. Lauderdale home (Rodger Kirsopp probably had an orgasm when he saw all the vehicles and weapons that were involved in the raid).

For those who were watching CNN at the time, they got to see the event in “real-time” because a CNN film crew “had a hunch” that the raid might occur that morning.

The indictment that resulted in Stone’s arrest included the following charges:
– Count 1: Obstruction of Proceeding
– Count 2-6: False Statements
– Count 7: Witness Tampering

While the charges against Stone are relatively straightforward and easy to understand, the reasons why those charges were brought – and why he’s facing 50 years in federal prison – are much more complicated.

Here is some background information – and the essential facts regarding each charge (Since all the background information is taken directly from the indictment, the word “allegedly” is implied within each statement).


Even if he did help elect Donald Trump, should Roger Stone be facing 50 years in prison?

Background Information

In May 2016, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) became aware that its computer system had been hacked.

During the period from July 2016 through November 2016, Wikileaks released tens of thousands of DNC documents (It also released tens of thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails).

During the summer of 2016, Stone was contacted by representatives of Donald Trump’s campaign – and asked if he could find out if/when Wikileaks was going to be releasing more documents.

In August 2016, Stone made some comments that indicated he had been in touch with Julian Assange, the head of Wikileaks.

Wikileaks immediately responded that the organization had not had any contact with Stone.

Stone then clarified that his contact with Wikileaks had been through a person he described at various times as a “mutual friend”, a “go-between”, and an “intermediary” (Various news organizations have asserted that Stone was referring to an author named Jerome Corsi).

In a series of emails and text messages that took place in September and October 2016, Stone asked Randy Credico, a comedian and talk-show host, to pass along messages to Wikileaks.

Credico responded by saying “OK,” and added in a later text message, “[j]ust remember do not name me as your connection to Julian Assange; you had one before that you referred to”.

Shortly after the 2016 presidential election, the U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) launched an investigation into the alleged involvement of Russia in the 2016 election.

On September 26, 2017, Stone appeared as a witness before the HPSCI.

During the course of his testimony, he denied having any documents concerning Assange.

He also did not mention that Corsi had been his original go-between with Assange.

And he claimed that all of his communications with Corsi and Credico had been in person or over the phone – rather than via texts and emails.

Finally, he denied having shared any information that he received from his intermediaries with members of the Trump campaign.


RE: Count 1: Obstruction of Proceeding

This charge alleges that Stone interfered with the HPSCI hearing by testifying falsely, by failing to turn over documents that the HPSCI had requested, and by misleading the HPSCI about who had been his intermediary with Assange in mid-August 2016. It also alleges that Stone attempted to have Credico provide false testimony when he appeared before the HPSCI (Credico actually involved his Fifth Amendment rights – and refused to answer any questions from the HPSCI).


RE: Counts 2-6: False Statements
All these charges are based on what the government claims were “materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements and representations” that Stone made during and after his appearance before the HPSCI. The specific allegations regarding each of these counts are as follows:

– Count 2: He testified falsely that he did not have emails with third parties about Assange – and that he did not have any documents, emails, or text messages that refer to Assange.

– Count 3: He testified falsely that his August 2016 references to his intermediary with Assange were references to Credico.

– Count 4: He testified falsely that he did not ask Corsi to communicate anything to Assange – and did not ask Corsi to do anything on his behalf.

– Count 5: He testified falsely that he and Corsi did not communicate via text message or email about Wikileaks.

– Count 6: He testified falsely that he had never discussed his conversations with Corsi with anyone involved in the Trump campaign.


RE: Count 7: False Statements

This charge alleges that Stone “knowingly and intentionally corruptly persuaded – and attempted to corruptly persuade” – Credico not to testify before the HPSCI.


An Awful Lot of Firepower for Very Little Fire

While I certainly won’t assert that Stone did nothing wrong, it does seem to me that the government has turned what appears to be, at most, a simple perjury case into a multi-count indictment that could result in a prison sentence of 50 years.

50 years – for this kind of chicken shit?

Seriously – in the USA?

I know we love to incarcerate people in this country. That’s why even though we represent 5% of the world’s population, we have almost 25% of its prisoners.

But 50 years?

I don’t care what your politics are. Threatening to put someone in prison for 50 years for what Roger Stone is alleged to have done is way over the top.

He didn’t collude with Russia.

He didn’t try to overthrow the country.

He didn’t kill anyone.

Hell, he didn’t even brand anyone.

About the author

K.R. Claviger


Click here to post a comment

Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us! (Email & username are optional)

  • Threatening the life of a witness in an ongoing FBI investigation. Is pretty serious …and
    He said he was gonna kill his dog too….did you see what John Wick did over his dog…

  • Re The FBI raid:

    I am disgusted by the FBI raid. I am fairly certain that the FBI Hostage and Rescue team was used to arrest Roger Stone.

    The FBI Hostage and Rescue team is the FBI’s version of a SWAT team. The term “Hostage and Rescue” is just a euphemism or moniker in place of SWAT.
    They are all highly-trained killers with many former military personnel in their ranks.

    I respect and admire the FBI Hostage and Rescue team but they were used for political purposes. It’s not their fault.

    The FBI’s actions were like sending in Delta force commandos to take down some wayward Girl Scouts.

    The raid was totally over the top and complete overkill.

    The FBI even had cameras rolling and the press corps in attendance.

    How is any US citizen supposed to get a fair trial when they’ve been portrayed as being public enemy number one by the FBI?

    History will show…

    …… Roger Stone is a political Richard Jewel.

    • That’s how they strike in a case like this. So people don’t have a chance to destroy evidence …

      • Corbin,

        And why was a CNN journalist and cameraman at the arrest of Roger Stone?

        According to CNN the reporters just happened to be staking out the Rogers’s address in the wee morning hours when the FBI showed up.

        I believe the reporter knew the arrest was imminent and recieved a heads up or hint the arrest was coming. Local law enforcement do the same thing all of the time. It’s called PR.

  • Oh for crying out loud… Stone is guilty of so much more than perjury. And consider WHY he committed perjury – he was obviously trying to cover up something shady, right?
    Why’d you lie, Roger?

    The truth will come out eventually, I think. I wouldn’t be too surprised if Roger and his little rat pals were reading this blog (and all our comments here….)

    If so, you know what I know about you, Roger, and you know who she gave all her info to. Lol

    • Agree. Frank likes to play two sides of the coin at once. Stone is just another slimy con, an opportunist. I hope he is found guilty and serves out the rest of his life in prison, just like Raniere.

      • Do you seriously believe that Roger Stone and Keith Raniere deserve similar outcomes? Good Lord, I understand partisan politics – but that’s just bat-shit crazy talk.

          • You and the dummy flowers are two cheeks on the same ass. The only thing Stone is guilty f is making some of your democrat asshole heros look like the slimy a-holes they are.

        • Krclaviger,

          As the Frankreport commentator Willard once mentioned to me…..

          “Welcome to the world of extremist politics”.

          As long as the crucified and victimized individual is on the other team who cares?

    • Flowers,

      I am not nominating Roger Stone for sainthood. Roger Stone is an elderly man.

      How much of a threat is a single elderly man?

      Roger Stone was not barricaded in a fortress in Waco Texas with dozens of followers or hiding out in remote cabin on Ruby Ridge armed to the teeth with his family.

      Roger Stone could have been arrested by 2 FBI agents or a handful. It was unnecessary and unprecedented to arrest him in the manner that he was.

      When the government takes somone down publicly the way the FBI did like they are Manuel Noriega or Pablo Escobar the government makes the individual citizen look guilty as hell.

      • Roger has done more harm throughout his life than Keith ever did….you just don’t realize it because so much was done indirectly. He needs to pay for his crimes, regardless of his age.

        • Instead of popping open your piehole and spouting your filthy hate, how about some proof sweet cheeks. Stop writing checks with your keyboard that your ass can’t cash

          • I’m not going to post the name’s of any innocent prople here, anon. Why dont you do a little research yourself, starting with Stone’s sleazy and insane co-author Robert Morrow. Why don’t you start by trying to figure out their motive for suggesting Ted Cruz’s father killed JFK. Did Stone just suddenly go totally wacko, or did he have a hidden agenda? Hmmm

            And what about his reason for working for NXIVM? Though, I haven’t figured that one out yet, I doubt if it was strictly coincidental. Birds of a feather…..

      • They do it like that so suspects dont have a chance to destroy any evidence since they had warrants for
        searching as well….

About the Author

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in hundreds of news outlets, like The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CBS News, Fox News, New York Post, New York Daily News, Oxygen, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, The Sun, The Times of London, CBS Inside Edition, among many others in all five continents.

His work to expose and take down NXIVM is featured in books like “Captive” by Catherine Oxenberg, “Scarred” by Sarah Edmonson, “The Program” by Toni Natalie, and “NXIVM. La Secta Que Sedujo al Poder en México” by Juan Alberto Vasquez.

Parlato has been prominently featured on HBO’s docuseries “The Vow” and was the lead investigator and coordinating producer for Investigation Discovery’s “The Lost Women of NXIVM.” In addition, he was credited in the Starz docuseries 'Seduced' for saving 'slave' women from being branded and escaping the sex-slave cult known as DOS.

Parlato appeared on the Nancy Grace Show, Beyond the Headlines with Gretchen Carlson, Dr. Oz, American Greed, Dateline NBC, and NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, where Parlato conducted the first-ever interview with Keith Raniere after his arrest. This was ironic, as many credit Parlato as one of the primary architects of his arrest and the cratering of the cult he founded.

Parlato is a consulting producer and appears in TNT's The Heiress and the Sex Cult, which premieres on May 22, 2022.

IMDb — Frank Parlato,_Jr.

Contact Frank with tips or for help.
Phone / Text: (305) 783-7083