Kevin Is Wrong – 9 Reasons Why Allison Is Guilty
Suzanne doesn’t agree with Kevin. In fact, she doesn’t like him. She previously wrote The One Most Important Point: Camila Accused Raniere of Abuse.
But this is not about Camila. This is about Kevin, who recently wrote:
Kevin Slams Lionsgate Worst Practices in Seduced; Defends Marc Elliot – Not a Criminal
Kevin Doesn’t Like Two People; Defends Allison, Nicki and Danielle
Kevin Calls Bullshit on DOJ Making Volunteering ‘Forced Labor’ – First It’s ‘Sexist’
Kevin Hates What Happened to Allison – Innocent Victim Got Worst of It
Kevin Defends Three NXIVM Victims: Allison, Nicki and Marc
Kevin: Stop Blaming Allison Mack and Others as Worst Offenders
In short, Kevin thinks Allison Mack has gotten a raw deal. He thinks Sarah Edmondson, who indirectly recruited her, got away with the cash. And Allison paid the price.
Kevin intimated Sarah may not have been a good mother, which I refuted. Sarah always put her child first when I worked with her – which was in the heat of the fight.
But Kevin thinks it unfair that Damon Brink lost a contract with the Vermont Department of Children and Families to host supervised visits between noncustodial parents and their children – because officials were concerned he was unfit to be near children – because of his NXIVM connection. [I defended Brink despite his animus toward me.]
Kevin points out that Sarah made money from Allison, Nicki, and others in prison or exiled to a world where everyone thinks they are fools or pedophile enablers.
MK10ART
Most followers of Raniere, including Brink, struggle to make ends meet because they are tagged as Raniere supporters. Google them, and you will see why they can’t easily find work.
Kevin thinks the case against Raniere sounds bad, but does not trust the government’s version. He thinks the forced labor charge is bullshit. That Allison and the others did not sex traffic Nicole or anyone.
He think that the NXIVM heroes – Mark, Sarah, and India – are more guilty than the so-called bad guys. And as to that, he thinks Raniere might not be so bad.
And, of course, Allison, Nicki, and the other “dead-enders” who support him are innocent. Since their entire support for Raniere is based on their belief he is innocent, they are therefore sincere and hence innocent.
They are following their ideals – which is their Vanguard is ideal.
Suzanne could not disagree more, and she is outspoken about it. And I don’t think she likes Kevin very much.
By Suzanne
Kevin, you wrote that people should be concerned about Sarah Edmondson caring for her children. Why do you think you have the moral high ground to go after people who imply Damon Brink is unfit to be around kids?
Kevin, you are a hypocrite.
You don’t know Sarah (allegedly). Frank knows Sarah. Frank said Sarah Edmondson is a wonderful mother. Repeatedly.
Did you apologize for these egregious, false claims you made about Sarah? No, you just kept doubling down.
The first person on this blog who repeatedly went after a stranger and their trustworthiness around their children was you, Kevin.
You have a shifting, fluid, hypocritical call for morality.
Why don’t you set a sterling example and apologize to Sarah for what you said about her and her children? Then maybe your contradictory stance on Damon would be credible.
Practice what you preach.
Now let’s consider your all-knowing attack on Sarah compared to your, “I don’t know nothing about Raniere, good or bad.”
If you sit in a room with your revered leader, and he tells you:
1. That moms give blow jobs to their infant children in unspecified and unverified countries.
Allison Mack leaving court
2. That many children enjoy being sexually molested.
3. That women frequently can only orgasm for the first time while raped.
Allison Mack autographed photo
You are part of the problem as a devoted, paying follower.
If you are part of a community that supports and endorses these ideas, you are a menace to society. And an enabler of the abusive pedophile Vanguard.
4. If you lie to your friends about your boyfriend’s involvement in an all-female sorority, and conspire to brand your shared boyfriend’s initials on their pussies deceitfully, you are an asshole.
Allison Mack
5. If you are getting your friends to pose for graphic pornographic photos, then sending them to your cult leader-boyfriend, and he is responding, “all mine?” with a devil emoji – when they are supposed to be strictly for women only, and kept safe and hidden from anyone else’s view, you are part of the criminal organization.
Keith Raniere kisses Allison Mack
6. If you encourage women who entrusted you to care for them, mind, body, and soul, to starve themselves to meet the physical ideal of your pedophile boyfriend, you are evil.
The fabulous MK10Art's depiction of Allison Mack reflecting on her threesome with Keith and Dani.
MK10ART
Sex slaves Allison Mack and Dani Padilla were nexi - or slaves to Keith Alan Raniere. Raniere had to beat Dani with a paddle for various reasons and was distressed that she seemed to enjoy it, a true case where it hurt him more than it hurt her.
Allison with Dani Padilla
The debate continues as to whether or not Allison Mack's initials were included in the brand. While most say it was not, including Keith Raniere, it has been speculated that her initials are included and that Raniere did so in order to put the blame on her if she was caught. While there is no hard evidence of the latter, it is interesting that the AM can be seen right side p but in order to see the K -R one needs to see the brand turned 90 degrees counter clockwise.
7. If you are getting people to perform free labor and, to quote the DOS slave handbook, “at their highest ability” through coercion and blackmail, you are part of a criminal conspiracy.
I told Allison Mack that she drew her eyebrows too high. She seemed surprised.
1Allison Mack
Blackmailing people is illegal. The people you defend actively participated in blackmailing people. It is a criminal activity.
8. If you are participating in immigration fraud, you are part of a criminal conspiracy.
DOS First-Line Slaves with their master in the middle.
9 If you are planning meetings with eight frontline slaves and their hidden, shared boyfriend, who is the master of a slave ring doing sex trafficking, pimping, forced labor, immigration fraud, identity theft, and all the rest, you are part of a criminal racketeering organization.
Lauren Salzman and Allison Mack give each other a fine hug.
A barefoot Allison sings before her often-barefoot master Keith Alan Raniere AKA Vanguard - at Vanguard Week.
Allison Mack and Keith Raniere on the day they met in 2006.
Allison Mack meeting Keith Raniere for the first time; November 2006
Keith did the things the government accused him of doing. The time for argument was in the criminal court. A jury of his peers found him guilty.
Are you aware that most dead-enders did not sit through the entire trial? They didn’t see and hear all the evidence the jury saw and heard. The dead-enders are not in a position to render as comprehensive a judgment as the seated jury.
Neither are you.
Kevin, keep spinning your wheels. Keith is never getting out of prison.
MK10ART's painting of Keith Alan Raniere where he presently resides.
MK10ART’s painting of Keith Alan Raniere where he currently lives.
raniere in shu painting
My comment was designed to point out that people who associated with this organization were being treated differently based on whether they continued to support the group or not, and not based on what they actually did or their levels of involvement.
That if it had been someone else besides Sarah who defected and went to the NYT, and if Sarah remained loyal to the organization that made her so much money, that the same people who defend and support her would be calling her an unfit mother, just as they make comments about Damon Brink, even though he's never done anything to hurt kids.
Why is it fair to say that a low level, rank and file member is unfit to be around kids due to his association with that group, when not making the same judgement about someone who had much higher rank and was much more involved in the running of the organization?
It's a double standard that punishes people for their beliefs and associations, and not for what they actually did or their level of involvement.
Sort of like how Sarah and Mark are suing Danielle and Nicki in a lawsuit that references the unsafe nature of NLP psychology when practiced by an unlicensed person, when it was the lead plaintiffs who used EMs/NLP on the defendants, and not the other way around.
When we hold everyone to the same standards, only then do we see how unfair these standards are, how unfair it is that one group is held to them in the most strict manner, while the other group, whose members had more involvement, isn't held to them at all.
Regarding Allison, she hasn't had a chance to speak for herself in almost five years. I think I'll wait to get her side of the story before I put my faith in institutions that lie to me every day and actively work against my interests and the interests of every person trying to make an honest living.