Wrongful Convictions
Investigations
Why Should MAGA Give a Damn About Steve Hassan?
MAGA will be next if Trump doesn't stop the so-called cult expert from making every group into a cult
MAGA will be next if Trump doesn't stop the so-called cult expert from making every group into a cult
What a cast of characters we have in the wrongful conviction of Jerry Sandusky. All the supposed good guys were the bad guys in this story.
In my opinion, Judge John Cleland takes the cake for the most corrupt and biased judge. This prosecutor in black robes is the only judge I have ever heard of who conducted a secret court meeting, with no court reporter, hidden from the public and not in his courtroom.
On November 7, 2011, the Pennsylvania Attorney General filed an indictment alleging retired Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky had sexually abused ten boys over the past 14 years. All the accusers were men at the time of the indictment. Eight showed up at the grand jury (and trial), but two ne
In 2012, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania falsely convicted Jerry Sandusky as part of a panic-frenzy that required the sacrifice of an innocent man. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania conducted itself much like the Province of Massachusetts Bay did in 1692 when they burned witches.
Here is another distinguished individual who has studied the Sandusky case and has written to Frank Report to give his opinion: Jerry Sandusky is innocent and deserves a new trial!
Board of Trustees to Vote on Borrowing Plan
People often say Jerry Sandusky must be guilty, because there were so many accusers.
John Ziegler Breaks Sandusky Story
Jerry Sandusky, 80, is a victim of Pennsylvania’s justice system. People think Sandusky must be guilty, because there were ten alleged “victims” of underage sexual abuse. Of the 10, only eight appeared at trial. All were over the age of 18 by the time they testified. Six were over 21. None ever repo
Frank Parlato appeared on 98.7 The Fox radio show, with hosts Scott Geesey and Jeff Byers on May 7, 2024. The interview featured an in-your-face Parlato chastising the accusers of Jerry Sandusky and two Penn State Board of Trustees for refusing to even look at the evidence of Sandusky’s innocence.
The Board of Trustees for Penn State chickened out today, declining to hear a letter sent by this writer and 60 other people asking the university trustees to examine evidence of Jerry Sandusky’s innocence.
The following is a letter endorsed by over 60 people and sent by email to every one of the Penn State Board of Trustees. The board comprises thirty-six voting members and two ex-officio non-voting members—the President of the University and the Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The lette
