I received the email below. I am changing the name to protect the sender’s identity, but this is a typical formula in family court.
Jim Johnson:
I am a “canceled dad.” I am also a business owner and United States Marine. I think my attorney conspired with my wife’s attorney on this whole injustice, and I don’t understand why.
All I know is that I asked the court for help, and everything got flipped onto me once Lisette Giacobbe hired Cohen and Wolf. Everything went bad. The GAL turned on me. I literally have notebooks of proof that she is absolutely 100% alienating my children from me, and all she had to do was block therapy so the kids couldn’t even go.
I have one, and I’ll give you copies of what they are alleging against me. I’m sure the judge will try to order me not to talk on social media about my children, because that’s what they’re shooting for. I won’t be silenced. I hope we can catch up, man. I’ll send you a copy of this latest court proceeding.
Frank Report Reply
Family law attorneys often pretend to be on their client’s side and opposed to the adversarial party. It is a ruse. In almost every community, the family law legal circle is collegial. And “family law attorneys who stay together, prey together.”
They know each other and conspire together. But the beauty of this scam is that they do not have to say it aloud. It is unspoken. The playbook is simple: Have a settlement talk with the opposing lawyer to analyze the case to determine how to extract the most money from the warring parent/clients.
The two best methods of extraction are “parental alienation” and the “silver bullet.”
The Silver Bullet
The term “silver bullet” in family law cases refers to an allegation or tactic used to gain a significant advantage, in a decisive, swift and dishonest manner. In most cases, this is done by a false accusation of domestic violence, abuse, or other serious misconduct that can dramatically influence the outcome of custody disputes and divorce proceedings. The accusation must be powerful enough to immediately shift the balance of the case, leading to restraining orders, supervised visitation, and loss of custody for the accused parent, even if the allegations are later proven unfounded. The accusation alone is enough to shift the case and destroy the reputation of the accused. This happened in the case of Luigi DiRubba where his adulterous wife accused him falsely as the evidence later proved. But there was no punishment for Annamaria Mongillo.
Just the opposite. She got custody and all the money.
Victory, by the way, does not always go to the parent who has the most money. Take the case of Luigi DiRubba. He had the money, but he was naive. He thought the court was a place of justice. If you think family court is about justice, you are ripe for plundering, and you will possibly lose contact with your kids. I would compare it with people who think crocodiles are cute and stick their hands out to pet them.
But Annamaria knew better. She hired the notorious Mary Ann Charles and used the silver bullet – laid false charges against DiRubba for abuse. The wife, Anna Mangello seems the actual criminal. But it does not matter in family court.
She got full custody of the kids and she and Mary Ann Charles (and the GAL) split the marital assets, leaving DiRubba – who is a popular chiropractor – without his life savings and without contact with his six children. His adulterous wife took all.
In DiRubba’s case, the wife alienated the kids, but the attorneys decided not to employ parental alienation because it would not be as lucrative.
Parental Alienation
I remember the first case I covered: Ambrose-Riordan. Chris Ambrose had stolen all the marital money. He froze his wife of 17 years out of everything – about $2 million.
The children were afraid of him – and rightfully so. He had been an absent father, and at his insistence, the mother, Karen Riordan, had given up her job as a teacher and raised the three kids full-time. The father was an attorney who became a Hollywood TV writer (and got fired for plagiarism). But he knew the family court game and was ready to buy custody. So, leaving Hollywood (he was unemployable), he came home to CT.
The mother was naive and foolishly thought family court sought justice, not money first and foremost. Funny, there are many otherwise intelligent people who have this same misconception. If they wind up in family court, they will pay a woeful price for this lack of knowledge.
I would compare it with a person who has heard good things about Piranha fish, how they are good swimmers and love to gather together to share a good meal and then decides to go swim with them.
Ambrose was a Textbook Case of Parental Alienation as a Revenue Generator
Where this became a peach of a deal – what lawyers call “high conflict” – is that while Ambrose had unlawfully taken the money, this mother would fight for her children. She cared more about the kids than the money.
That means if the lawyers set it up right, they could make Ambrose pay a lot to fight off his wife. On top of that, the mother would borrow money and cash in her pension – anything to protect her kids. A perfect high conflict.
But to be blunt, the mother would only fight if she did not have any custody; she was willing to split custody. She even encouraged the children to be with their dad regularly.
So, the plan was to take all custody away from her.
Her first attorney, Rich Callahan, arranged with Ambrose’s attorney, Nancy Aldrich, on how they were going to set up Riordan, the mother, to lose custody. The father wanted this as well. This was the way he could keep all the assets and not pay alimony or child support.
The first thing to do was get a GAL, who is just another family law attorney, to steal the kids. They chose one from the same firm as your case – Cohen and Wolf, and the GAL chosen was Jocelyn Hurwitz.
Now these players all know each other. They shift positions too. Hurwitz might be an attorney in one case and in another the GAL. It doesn’t matter.
Now, the plan was laid out to Hurwitz with a simple one line in an email by the mother’s attorney (in a conspiratorial act of betrayal): “The father has control of the money and will be paying.”
Once the GAL knew this, the playbook called not for the silver bullet but for parental alienation.
The GAL’s first job was to get a custody evaluator, who would know her job was to find parental alienation. Everything is easy if the children’s best interests are not a factor.
The Worst of the Dregs of Society
The custody evaluator, the ruthless monster of CT Family Court, the porcine Jessica Biren-Caverly, AKA Biren-The Terrible, of course, found parental alienation. She recommended taking the kids away from the mother and giving them solely to the abusive father, who in fact paid her some $17,000 for her services.
Her custody report is a masterpiece of deceit and distortion, and will no doubt be studied one day for how these criminal writings once passed as the rule of law.
Loss of Custody = Cash
The lawyers all knew that once then mother lost custody, there would be years of fighting (billings), since this mother would fight to protect her kids, and simultaneously did not comprehend the corruption of the family court system.
The lawyers had one problem. The judge was one of the rare honest judges — Judge Eddie Rodriguez. They needed a dishonest judge to protect the lawyers’ financial best interests.
Judge Rodriguez knew the kids were better off with the mother. He gave temporary custody to her. After all, they had lived with the mother all their lives.
Rodriguez also realized Ambrose had stolen all the money. He demanded a financial affidavit from him. The attorneys knew this would end the financial game, so the attorneys conspired to move the case to a judge who played their game — Judge Jane Grossman.
It was a perfect setup.
The Predictable Creature
Why Grossman? For one thing, she was up for reappointment. And she needed the approval of the state legislature’s judicial committee.
Ambrose’s attorney, Nancy Aldrich, had a son – State Senator Will Haskell – who was an important figure on the judiciary committee.
Kids for Cash
Ambrose was willing to pay six or even seven figures to buy custody.
Judge Grossman knew what she had to do. She knew there were instances where judges who did not play ball did not get reappointed. In fact, there was one judge who did not get reappointed who had to land at Cohen and Wolf as an attorney. Her name is Jane Emons. Look her up.
Now Grossman did not want to end up like Jane Emons.
So she destroyed three children’s lives by removing them from the mother – using the lie of parental alienation.
Imagine the utter cruelty. Three children – then 13, 13, and nine – who lived with their mother their entire lives, and to whom their father was largely a stranger and a scary and abusive one at that.
Without notice on a Friday, Judge Grossman ordered them removed from the only home they ever knew, and forced them to live with their father, whom they do not know and are afraid of. More than that, the judge ordered that the mother and kids cannot even speak.
This sounds like hell. It is not. It is right here on earth, and it is done for money. Nothing more.
Artist’s depiction of Jane Grossman earning her final reward for her work in family court. The artist shows how when Grossman retires from the bench, and all her labors, she is welcomed to a gated community with a nice warm climate.
Money That Is Not His
Of course, Riordan fought, and she spent all she had. Not only that, Ambrose, now in the midst of the fight, spent about a million dollars. But it was not so bad for him. He just spent his wife’s share of the marital assets and kept his own.
Judge Grossman never required Ambrose to file a financial affidavit. So the clever attorney/plagiarist bought custody of the kids for about a million dollars but by using his wife’s million.
OPM – using other people’s money. That is also called leverage.
The kids ran away last year to go to the mother, but Ambrose spent about $100,000, he said, getting the kids back.
The case is still in court, and the mother is still barred from talking to her kids. But they never forgot her love and the years of their lives together. Sometime in May, however, things might get interesting. Two of the kids are almost 18 – and still forced not to see their mother.
According to reports, Judge Thomas J. O’Neill will bring the three teenage children to his chambers to hear their desires, something that no judge in this four-year-old dispute has ever done. I understand further that the judge will hear them in chambers without their father present to intimidate them.
I have interviewed these teenagers, and they are brave, articulate, and intelligent. The worm may turn on Ambrose suddenly if Judge O’Neill listens compassionately to the torment these children have undergone.
Collaborating Grifters
Someday a book, movie, or documentary will show what happened in this case. But frankly, it is not unique; it is one of a million similar cases where the children’s best interests were ignored for money.
Riordan, by the way, realized her attorney Callahan was in league with Ambrose’s attorney and sold her down the river. But it was too late.
She blundered a second time and retained the selachian Edward Nusbaum, the shark of Westport. She spent her last $100,000 on this predator, who did nothing but collaborate with Ambrose’s attorney to force the sale of the family home – her last remaining asset to pay the attorneys – himself included.
Below: an artist’s depiction of attorney Nusbaum.
Frank Report’s study shows large-scale fraudulent billings to (falsely) justify the $100,000 he billed her.
In Particular, for Mr. Johnson
My point is this: Mr. Johnson. I would almost guarantee your attorney and your ex-wife’s attorney have worked many deals together and, along with the GAL, are working this deal together.
You apparently were chosen to be the goat. Not because they do not like you, but because by making you the goat, that is where the money is.
In the Ambrose case, he did abuse his children, but the attorneys decided to use parental alienation (falsely) because it was more lucrative. In DiRubba’s case, he really was a good father, but his wife and her attorney chose the silver bullet.
And that’s how the game is played.
You appear to have been chosen to be the goat, my friend. Not just by your wife or her attorney, but by your own attorney.
It will only get worse if you play along.
The details are superfluous. Please remember that family court is never about justice; it is only about extracting money. If taking away your children will make more money for the lawyers, they will take them away. If giving you your children will make more money for them, then you will get your children. And never forget that the lawyers are all colleagues. They only pretend to fight for show.
I would compare the decision-making process to four hungry wolves (your wife, her attorney, the GAL and your attorney) and a lamb (you) all voting on what to have for dinner.
The vote will be 4- 1.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
[…] Family Law Fraud; Courtroom Collusion; Lawyer’s Underhanded Tactics – A Sickening Stew […]
We can express speech means that opinions that are unpopular with and ones that powerful people and ones that powerful people might disagree with. Connecticut law extends to constitutional freedom of free speech to private employers When you become a public figure with your story. You are subject to public opinion. Based on public information. When you represent organizations, people are allowed to express options based on information presented to the public. If you can go onto the internet and present unfavorable onions on others, you are subject to the same. Freedom of speech and public opinion when you put yourself in the eyes of the public people can ask questions. Express opinions based on public information. When you publicly publish stories to further your opinions and objectives people have the right to disagree. The frank report and other publications is supposed to be an open dialogue. If you are unable to take criticism, why would you continue posting others in a negative light?
It has become common place for political leaders, judges and select groups to want to be able to express their opinions without back lash. If you can go on comment section and pay to post a story you should be willing to allow people to disagree. Write a rebuttal. The frank report has given an opportunity to the government and the people. To see and possibly solve a situation that has been a problem in the U.S. Unless you are threatened and something completely untrue is told these conversations are needed.
If you cannot take critics, the frank report is not for you. In my opinion.
Mom made son, 3, say ‘goodbye to daddy’ on camera before shooting him dead in murder-suicide a day before custody hearing (nypost.com)
Will are resident alienation expert conclude the women was possibly alienated? As she stated about a father who shot the mom at the front door at a custody exchange. On a slam the gavel podcast. Will Peter conclude he would still be alive if he just split the assets? Or will she be just a dangerous woman?
They say that it’s unethical for a judge to have personal relationships with a lit again or an attorney in cases that they’re overseeing.. For example if a law clerk works for a judge there are certain ethical guidelines that they shouldn’t cross or if a psychologist was on a case there’s different ethical guidelines that they shouldn’t cross in their professional relationship together with the judge in the cases that the judge is overseeing….
Then why was Richard Blumenthal and his wife married by the judge that she clerked for?
Seems a bit of a conflict of interests…
Why is he still being voted in all of these years and why is little Matthew who ran around that place since a little boy and knows all the in and outs which is not a good thing in politics…. Who the hell was voting these people in that is the big question…
People need to start looking at who’s donating to this people that are running… And who is supporting them…. And then what kind of conflicts arise after they are placed in their offices because I’m sure you can uncover some information.
Unless this is not real journalism and everybody just waits for stories to come to them.
Access/Visitation, OSCE, Fatherhood, program funds are supporting fraudulent custody and support litigation. The investigation needs to occur at a micro-level. Who are the Counselors? Parenting Coordinators? Researchers? Who advises on domestic violence and why are HHS programs NOT relying on qualified experts who refer to unbiased and first hand experience? Why are mental health practitioners and Judges purposely omitting abuse from custody (and support) records? Has a network of pro-abuse profiteers infiltrated HHS programs aimed at helping families instead created systematic Court abuse of women and children who attempt to dissolve abusive relationships by forcing Fatherhood over protection from abuse?
I have a compilation of research on problems and some possible solutions, as well as proof of the accusations I’ve made.
The fab 4 ignoring Connecticut’s safety.
Rep. Craig Fishbein, Senator John Kissel, Rep. Steven Stafstrom, senator Gary Winfield Judiciary members in the state of Connecticut.
SB 289 as the domestic violence in Connecticut increases.
An act concerning oversight of the fatherhood initiative of the and establish funding. Human services Commitee Michael Winkler and Larry Butler.
” All Connecticut fathers to be engaged in the lives of their children” Bringing more money into the state. All part of the Welfare reform program.
November 1, 2022. Ct inside investigator. Police were called to a little league game in Vernon over an argument between Democratic State representatives candidate Micheal Winkler and little league coach Kevin Brown. ” It was an absolute spectacle” a bystander says.
“I don’t feel that our residents and students are best served by a person who can’t behave at a youth sporting game, argues with the refs, and has the police called on him.” Peter Sticesen.
Criminal Justice reform. The state of Connecticut sjc project supports Govenor Malloy’s second chance chance to non-violent an opportunity to become productive members of society and REDUCE SPENDING ON INCARCARATION COST. How many pleas and Nolle prosequi have been given to domestic batters?
The supreme court of Connecticut decision in Connecticut V. Qinxuan Pan marks a pivotal moment in the states bail reform journey. The ruling allows challenges bail amounts with evidence (while prosecutor is still gathering evidence), shifting the responsibility to prosecutor to justify why high bail is necessary.
Qinxuan Pan plead guilty to the 2021 murder of Kevin Jiang in New Haven a Yale grad student.
Pumping the breaks. Earlier this year Republicans raised the alarm bell about increasing commutations or shortening sentences. Leading to Govenor Lamont issue a pause to interduce failed legislation to give law makers more say in the process.
” I think that we should continue the path of trying to move forward in terms of being progressive” Ct Sen. Gary Winfield. New Haven co-chair of the legislative Judiciary Committee. New Haven has a high rate of Domestic Violence and sexual assault in CT. New Haven has a higher level of poverty in CT.
Protecting Sexual Predators
Official advantages bills address police interrogation, parole eligibility, and prosecutorial accountability, while falling short on bail reform, modifying sentences, AND ENDING THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTERATION REQUIRMENTS FOR PEOPLE RETROACTIVELY ADDED TO THE REGISTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A position Richard Blumental CT D and Sarah Russel support. Sarah Russell is heavily involved on the criminal justice reform and is affiliated with yale and Quinnipiac. Matt Blumenthal representative CT son of Richard Blumenthal is a Yale Grad. Yale University is partnered with the MOU. Rep. Matt Blumenthal is attempting to stop FOIA request in the state.
A common theme during the session (often closed doored) was compromise. It’s an ideal that Steven Stafstrom D house chair of the Judiciary Commitee, believes was necessary given diversity of legislation. Stafstrom feels there are two overreaching problems. The inability to detain violent offenders and the low-income people locked up for who aren’t dangerous but can’t bail out. The Bridgeport democrat states the outdated constitutional provisions, which holds the state (like pedophilia and sexual abuse).
Bridgeport has a high incidence for domestic violence in the state. As well as sexual assault. Higher levels of poverty.
Craig Fishbein leads house to protect Domestic Violence from coerced Dept. However, there is no mention to check into access and visitation grants in the state increasing domestic violence victims cost in the family court system and the use of prenatal alienation and forcing domestic violence victims pay for reunification therapy.
As long as the judges and legislators continue to laugh all the way to the bank. I’m going to keep speaking out.
Arm patrols continue in Hartford. The citizens are fed up about how crime is being handled. Communities are reaching out to the armed patrols for assistance. According to yesterday’s media coverage.
These legislators are hell bent on leading ” criminal justice reform” at the cost of law abiding citizens. They are not upfront with the constituents. They are bypassing the governor. The welfare reform act and funding is benefiting who? The family law industry, the state employees. They ignore the family court system and place barriers to criminal prosecution. Where is the public defender reform? Especially with the child welfare attorneys? Making misogynistic post, hanging banners in state offices. When the chief attempt to clean it up they want to remove her. No one fighting crimes and standing up for victims is allowed anywhere near a judicial bench. It is time to re look at who is representing Connecticut. They are not representing the public interest.
Jan 22, 2024
the
In Connecticut 23.2% of women and 13.9% of men face severe physical violence from an intimate partner in their lifetime. (it would be nice to get a break down of who is perpetrator, male on male violence). The alarming reality all too often takes a deadly turn, with an average 14 individuals. 21 last year. Their lives taken each year by current or former intimate partner. It should be no shock that 20% of divorce and contested custody case are brought to Connecticut family court. Cases are going under reported. The stigma being associated with reporting to family court. The use of parental alienation, Looking for handouts. 50/50 is not going to help the Domestic violence problem in Connecticut. It’s not going to clean up the family court system.
If we focused on eliminating GALs we would all have a greater chance of making our families work
Absolutely!
The most celebrated “victory” by many of the commenters on here is Jennifer’s Law PA 21-78.
They celebrate a hollow victory because this law which is supposed to protect women and children has already been used as a weapon by the abuser!
This case is known it has demonstrated and Jennifer’s law is not only useless, but dangerous for women and children.
Why are you women ignoring this? What have you done to remedy the misuse and abuse of your celebrated law?
Precedence has been set yet you’re allowing this to happen. You attack innocent men – this is not a male v female problem.
It’s the weaponization of all laws. We didn’t need Jennifer’s law. We have laws that are not followed. Jennifer’s law is just another toy for family court to fuck over both male and female parents. It’s about the money.
Let’s stop the game about 50-50. No one is saying abusers should get their kids. They’re saying 50-50 should be the norm unless abuse is proven.
But the family court cabal creates the abuse they need to secure the family’ savings. They will make an innocent parent the abusive parent to make that money flow.
It’s all about the money.
A Hypothesis and leading question to the weapon of Jennefer’s law. Connecticut’s role in coercive control.
I Don’t think those who fought for Jennefer’s law where aware of how deeply entrench the state of Connecticut is in fatherhood funding. Welfare reform funds. How far the family court industry would go to protect it. Attorneys are supposed to disclose third party payers. It’s a don’t ask don’t tell situation in Connecticut. Access and visitation grants and other fatherhood program money is not divulged in family court. The money is used to subdue the opposing side financially. If the money was disclosed the judge would have to consider the financial fairness to the legal proceedings. Or possibly be questioned in appeal. It’s a form of financial abuse assisted by the legal industry to engage in coercive control over domestic violence victims and contested custody matters.
I have the feeling Cuda, and the bar association is going to be none too happy if the money is exposed. The more the state of Connecticut shows the need for funding the more they request and receive. This money is being pumped into the divorce industry by the state of Connecticut and health and human services, MOU partners. UConn for sure. The state of Connecticut government and judicial branch are aware of how the funding works. Probably one of the reasons they don’t want people foia some information. It appears they have been assisting in financially fueling gatekeeper alienation claims assisting in coercive control in some contested custody battles. The fathers’ rights attorneys know it, women’s attorney know what they are up against in some cases. Apparently Nichola Cunha didn’t know. The court wants you to their psychologist get evaluated and do reunification therapy on the governments dime in some cases. If you protest like several moms, it’s a custody flip.
The cash flows to the father’s attorney. It’s all surrounding the welfare reform act funding. How many Attorneys are political figures sitting on judiciary? How do you think some of these judges have been allowed on the bench for so long? This doesn’t always take place, but I wonder how many of the 20 % cases have bring fatherhood funds into the state. How many prisons reform Father’s come out and engage in custody battles? Cost savings on incarceration and cash into the divorce industry?
Enough with the father crap
Psychopathic borderline woman are ALSO a very huge part of the problem
Entitlement , false allegations, embellishing claims all for financial gains, custody and child support
Milking the process. With trashy attorneys coaching them.
Enough BS cleanup your house before you come at gender. Children need both parents for healthy development mentally, emotionally and physically ( yes physically) . ( you make the exception case and pitch it as the norm. ) be a parent not a gender.
The law trash profession are using you to gain wealth that could have been used for children and family
Not true. You are told not to bring up DV. Borderline just like Jennifer? Borderline personality disorder is I hate you, but don’t leave me. I’m pretty sure these women are not interested in getting the husband back. Know your disorders before you start tossing them around. I think we are definitely on to something with the funding. “All Connecticut father’s to be engaged in their childrens lives.” With funding attached. Big conference with Sean Scanlon in the shoreline about funding. There is Very little DV funding. Ccadv asking for donations. Scraps from the fatherhood initiative they are partnered with. Big money at Uconn health and human services. Do your homework. No one is labeling all the dads narrastist. Cut the BS
Those who fought for Jennifer’s law were women mothers who have been ignored and denied the truth of their lived experiences it says and their family that they love their children those are the women that justified because they were never capable of testifying prior anywhere else.
Jessica Biren Caverly is done as a custody evaluator. Investigations into public corruption surrounding Caverly are underway. Shes a child abuser and child abductor who uses her degree to traffic kids.
Good news! One down several to go!
where can we follow updates? 🙂
We keep hearing this but there’s no fact that this accusation or allegation is actually true share one news article where they are actually investigating her I call b*******
It’s more likely she is washed up in the family court industry because she was caught. She is probably still have a license or now retired. There is NO accountability in the state of Connecticut. Immunity. The protections of the funds to health and human services. A big part of the problem is the department of public health. The state funded programs. Self reported
Clear as day
Not if they dress up like women.
Every time you say 100s of women are going to court entitled because they are mothers is an attack. These are 20 percent of cases. Women are going to remain anonymous out of fear. Fear of the family court system. The state of Connecticut. Abusers who comes out of the woodwork. Just as the problems are being exposed and Domestic violence is coming to the forefront the push is for 50/50. Women are learning about the welfare reform act and fatherhood policies. The 100 million dollar project. This is America. Put the American flags back up. Stop excusing criminal behavior. The family court is being run just like these college campuses. Negotiating violence and destruction. Hate speech and fear .
May 1, 2024
Exclusive DOJ CIVIL RIGHTS LEADER SAYS SHE WAS A VICTIM OF ABUSE IN EXTRAORRDINARY STATEMENT.
The leader of the the Department of civil rights division Christine Clark, said she was a victim year’s long domestic abuse and choose not to expose expunged arrest record.
I would rather hear the truth from a person who can’t spell than from a man who thinks it’s ok to subject children to domestic violence and sexual abuse. Equal and shared parenting has done a lot of harm to Domestic violence victims pushing alienation claims to the broken and problematic court system. There are women of all socioeconomic statuses complaining about the family court system. I have spoken to several with low income. Spoken to women in Connecticut of all colors, religions and income levels. I have spoken to men who are single parents. Men who have been victims of abuse in the court system.
There is much truth to what is being exposed in the Frank Report. Misspelled or not. You can continue to attack several 100 women in CT. It does not cover up the truth about family court fraud and the fraudulent use of parental alienation in the state of Connecticut. I will not make the Mou and legislation and plea bargains in the state of Connecticut any less untrue. Or discriminatory. If you want to go after the women in Connecticut, you are welcome to come after me. I do not support 50/50. I have plenty of evidence to support fraud and material misrepresentation in the family courts in my case. Railroading of the courts. The Department of Labor and the Connecticut Labors Union. If you want to personally attack a woman in the state of Connecticut fighting for equal rights and child safety, go right ahead. It will never make me support 50/50.
You have hijack family court to guide cases into alienation since 2014. I fought hard to keep my child safe from mostly the corrupts family court system using parental alienation claims. Which created a giant disaster. Forced a GAL on a 16-year-old and a court appointed psychologist who provided no documentation. Allowed a GAL to engage in reunification sessions. Badgering me and more importantly a child. I have plenty of abusive emails/texts and conflicting financial documents. Got stuck with a judge who is unwelcoming and doesn’t want to have litigants in his court. So, he can run the welfare reform racket. Spends less the 30 minutes listening to a case while I was stuck in the hall. I would contest custody all over again. You are free to call me an alienator or whatever you wish.
People have the right to disagree with you. People have the right to oppose 50/50 legislation. People have their own experiences. The Inside investigator has the right to report on Domestic Violence and parental alienation. People have the right to go to the court system and have a case judged by its merit. People have the right to let the courts be trained and laws on domestic violence change before we rush to 50/50. These are 20 % of cases.
Everyone should be discussing their own cases. Just because someone goes to court and disputes custody doesn’t make them a gold digger. It cost me about 20 thousand dollars. I got approximately $163 dollars a week for 2 years to support the child. My former spouse had his legal fees paid for by Union dues. The GaL fees were covered by the union which they failed to disclose in the beginning of the case. I wouldn’t be shocked to learn the “reunification” therapy was covered by an access and visitation grant. The GAL took a same day appointment. I never got any other names. She had a huge conflict of interest so I think I have the right to use the word curruption. Even Mouckwsher admits the courts are currupt. The department of labor is a partner through the MOU. The labors union is 76 percent men. No one is being held accountable. Women are lead in a giant circle when they complain. I don’t discuss all the things involved in my case in public for my child and her father’s sake. I wish I knew then what I know now. I would have never hired an Attorney. I would never have agreed to GaL or the psychologist. Fix the family court system.
Heidi, thank you. I give you a ton of credit for not being “Anonymous” 🙂
No one is “attacking 100 women.”
No one has “hijacked family court guides.”
There is no factual basis to support any of the made-up numbers being thrown around.
The point remains that criminal claims simply do not belong in “family” courts for several reasons. The main one being that the Divorce Industry and “family” court judges use them to prolong conflict, prolong cases, and increase flows of money to state “family” court actor’s pockets.
DV cases belong in criminal courts and/or DCF. Period.
“Family” courts are courts where the parent who tells the greatest lie, or pays the most, “wins.” They are not courts of evidence or law. They do not protect or respect the rights of parents. Do you disagree with this?
If not, then why do you continue to believe strangers in suits and robes would do anything to help parents and children given the overwhelming profit motive behind promoting and rewarding abuse?
The fact remains that knee-jerk legislation like “Jennifer’s Law” that hands even MORE power and control to divorce attorneys and “family” court judges, to allow them to play God and social experiments with parents and children’s lives, is a complete disaster.
Each of us are products of our own individual experiences.
But we all need to rise above this and start working together towards actual and meaningful reforms. All of the personal attacks and mudslinging against those of who know shared and equal parenting works to address the actual problem, accomplishes nothing.
Any divorce attorney or “family” court judge is dying of laughter watching what this post as evolved into.
The problem is a very small group of women who continue to believe men should be completely cut of out of children’s lives. That women should be in completely control and have full custody by default.
Just say it. That’s the one and only reason they believe 50-50 should NOT be a starting point and a norm.
This is why every effort at reform in this state has either failed miserably or been used against us. You can’t hate and cut out 50% of the parents and families suffering and claim you are doing any good.
ALL OF US have been taken, harmed and abused by the state of CT “family” court system.
ALL OF US.
Men, women, children, parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, nephews, nieces, etc.
This is what you, and the women you are listening to, are disagreeing with. Portraying that it’s just you and women and your children that have been harmed. That’s a problem.
Claiming Parental Alienation “doesn’t exist” or that it is only used by “abusive men” to gain custody is a problem when its kept *millions* of children from seeing their parents and families for no valid reason. I am wrong about this?
>> See Jennifer’s Law and how it’s been manipulated to harm women and children.
This is not a man vs. woman problem. It’s a problem of the Divorce Industry and the state preying on parents, children and families. For profit and greed.
Much of it fueled by DV money, not the mythical MOU that was never funded and was not what it has been falsely portrayed to be.
Please take the blinders and rose-colored glasses off and let’s all get to work. And start doing what has been working great in other states.
Thank you
I believe it is time for family court to get educated and have transparency. I don’t have rose color glasses. I think a good look at the fatherhood funding is in order. The entire welfare reform needs to be investigated. I do believe the funding is being used inappropriately. I think the state is trying to turn it into healthcare crisis and not a criminal matter. I don’t oppose fatherhood. I oppose the state not managing the system appropriately. 50/50 is working great in your opinion. I’m inclined to agree with the 500 cases where parental alienation is being used inappropriately. I support the UN study . I don’t think the Connecticut criminal courts are doing enough to prosecute crimes. Many residents are expressing the same. I think Connecticut needs more accountability and investigation from the federal government.
Peter you obviously did not read one word that Heidi Wrote. 5050 is not the best interest and should not force a mother to co-parent with her abusive ex-husband or abusive child’s father. I will not support 5050 custody until the courts take the abuse seriously and address it correctly. No abusive parents should have access to any children anytime anywhere whether they are a father or not.
And I personally heard you make that statement about Jennifer dulos, How she would still be alive to day if she parted with her finances….. You are a sick individual hiding behind a facade of a man that actually cares about women.
You do not care 1 bit about women and the abuse that they have to face in the family courts with an abusive ex-husband or ex-boyfriend child’s father…
Maybe you should listen a little more instead of thinking about what you’re going to be writing next.
K.C. I don’t you and don’t believe we’ve ever met or spoken. So how is it you claim to know so much about me (or Luigi or Joanie, or anyone else who dares support shared an equal parenting as a standard, **absent a finding of abuse or neglect in a court of evidence and law.**)
It’s always interesting note how those who hate shared parenting forgot the second part of the above.
If I may correct you:
I read every word Heidi posted and know where and who it comes from. It’s the exact same made-up nonsense that has been circulated for over 20 YEARS now. None of it is supported by any peer reviewed factual evidence.
You wrote: “I will not support 50-50 custody until the courts take the abuse seriously and address it correctly. No abusive parents should have access to any children anytime anywhere whether they are a father or not.”
Parents are either fit parents, or they are not. “Fit parent” is a legal term. That determination does not belong in a “family” court, because they are not courts of evidence or law. If you don’t know what that means, please ask.
That determination must be made in an evidentiary hearing in accordance with due process of law. That is what DCF is for and does, that is what the juvenile court is for and does. NOT the “family” court.
It may surprise you that our court operating procedures and law are very clear that if there are open “family” and juvenile court matters, “family” court matters are *stayed* until the juvenile matters are first resolved. To determine the fitness of both parents.
This makes complete legal and logical sense because the state cannot assume harm, it must prove it. That’s’ what due process of law is.
Not the “he said/she said” of “family” court. Not cutting off a child from a parent and entire family because a parent is unhappy and makes a false and unproven claim of abuse, as encouraged by their divorce attorney.
So riddle me this – why do our “family” courts violate and ignore our laws and due process of law – every day? Follow the MONEY to be made.
Direct your anger there if you worried about abusive parents being allowed access to children. Direct your anger there when a parent loses access to a child based on a claim of abuse. Direct your anger where it belongs.
NOT against fathers seeking equal access or fit parents. NOT against shared and equal parenting.
You then repeat exactly what the 372 posts here have degenerated into by making derogatory personal comments about me. Because you don’t like what I’m posting.
“And I personally heard you make that statement about Jennifer dulos, How she would still be alive to day if she parted with her finances….. You are a sick individual hiding behind a facade of a man that actually cares about women. You do not care 1 bit about women and the abuse that they have to face in the family courts with an abusive ex-husband or ex-boyfriend child’s father…”
Where exactly did you “personally hear” me say what you claim? Do tell. All ears.
The many women I helped over the years would disagree with you that I ‘don’t care about women.’ How many men have you helped?
The “statement” I’ve made about the Dulos case, and have shared with legislators, is based on what very reputable sources and people who knew them for over 10 years have said — that there were no problems in their case UNTIL the divorce attorneys and “family” court got involved. One of those attorneys is still in jail – and why are the records sealed to this day?
What do you think the state and Divorce Industry have to hide?
Ask yourself this question – when the judge who oversaw the case came up for reappointment last year, did you notice that not a single member of the attorney packed Judiciary Committee asked her a single question about her (mis)handling of the case?
Not. One. Question.
Have you noticed how they all sit silent as “Jennifer’s Law” is being used against mothers?
The disastrous law YOU and the “protective mothers” wanted passed? Which we cautioned you against?
People like Joanie, Luigi and myself care very much about PARENTS, CHILDREN and FAMILIES. The difference we don’t fall into the mom vs. dad trap and game the Divorce Industry wants us all to play. Because we know it’s pointless and used against us.
We don’t personally attack and slander people who have different viewpoints or experiences or lie about them and their cases. Because that’s juvenile and pointless as well.
My mother was a loving Polish grandmother who survived the Nazis, Stain and two husbands. She wasn’t able to see two grandsons she helped raise and drove out to see nearly every day in the twilight of her life. Because of CT “Family” Court corruption, perjury, false claims, lies and attorney misconduct.
You should read her testimony sometime. Happy to send it to you.
From an amazing *woman* who always placed her children and grandchildren first.
Peter,
I would like to ask a few questions. I personally asked Joan about studies and information on reports of false allegations of parental alienation. She told me there are none. I also reached out to other parental alienation “experts” in Connecticut who didn’t respond. How is the system supposed to be educated without this type of information? I have read up on the subject when I was in court. I have read older more in-depth information when the claims where less popular. Estrangement is a whole different animal. So, when we are discussing peer studies they are limited. We continue to hear from “parental alienation” experts on what it is, but never on what it is not.
The United Nation study is not popular among some groups, but it’s important. Who is determining fitness? I spoke to a GAL out of East Hartford who told me all fathers would have access to their children unless they were severally physically abusive or severally sexually abuse. There was no mention of emotional or psychological abuse. Who is determining a little abusive is alright? For either parent. The family courts are ill equipped or trained. I question GALs fact finding abilities in Connecticut to determine this and report to the court. They are not investigators or mental health professionals. Not experts on child abuse. These are attorneys with a few extra hours of training. There is a clear problem with psychologist in court matters, we all agree. DCF is no place for this either. They had kid in a place where they were abused. Under question for their conduct in Connecticut. Many past cases have had outside professionals substantiate (experts) only to have the court ignore them. Criminal courts are no place for this either. They plea them down and toss a lot out. So where do we go? Should we not resolve this type of issue before 50/50 legislation is pushed for in a state everyone agrees is broken and many believe is corrupt?
There are actions and conduct to the contrary. Luigi is relentlessly bashing women on social media and pushing parental alienation. Joan attempted to obstruct women from speaking out. A copy of the email has been passed around. Joan pushes that women are perpetrators and insist women are dishonest for reporting. Many believe the majority of the group are domestic batters. Plenty of families testify which doesn’t make the situation any different. Like Michelle’s family. The equal and shared parenting with the ” family” often projects stepparents into the mix. Which partners have been contributing to a deadly mix. Should not be involved in family court procedures. No one on either side trust a word the Gals or psychologist say. I think the women are inclined to believe the 6 kids. That is coming from no one.
Both sides stand behind stories and people they should not. Both Peter and Joans case are public record. We think the judges are laughing because they know about Joan’s settlement in the divorce. 20 % of women are looking for money? Peter thinks only children should be sent to therapy in the corrupt system for reunification. Many of the comments are men insisting that they have been wronged and women have been harassed and stalker on the internet that go public with their case. Frankly are afraid of some the 50/50 followers.
Nothing the person write in is not public information. Equal and shared parenting continues not to talk about fatherhood funding as a source of the problem. The criminal justice system is being designed to plea bargain, reduce charges and let as many people as possible out of jail for cost savings. DCF is a mess and partnered with the MOU. The fatherhood initiative has pitted the minority community against white women. The women in Connecticut are sick of the entire mess. Feel Peter, Joan, Luigi and equal and shared parenting are instrumental in keeping the stigma for women contesting custody and parental alienation fraud going. Statistically speaking the 20 % of cases majority real domestic violence cases. With a small percentage false.
HS programs ignore abuse.
GAO Report 05-701, August 2005, TANF State Approaches to Screening for Domestic Violence Could Benefit from HHS Guidance, “Thirty-one states reported using federal TANF funds for marriage or responsible fatherhood programs, and limited research indicates that such programs generally do not specifically address domestic violence.”
CHILD ACCESS AND VISITATION PROGRAMS: PROMISING PRACTICES” Prepared by Center for Policy Research and Policy Studies, Inc.
The Summary and Recommendations confirms that TANF and Access Visitation funds are heavily influential in court litigation, often, they are the driving force.
“It seems to us that the most effective programs have staff based in courts where paternity and child support (custody) matters are heard. There appear to be many advantages to this location for services.
– In court settings, judges and hearing officers can make immediate referrals to mediation, and negotiation sessions can be conducted on the spot… the court can instruct the noncustodial parent to file a pro se motion for visitation that will lead to a mandatory referral to mediation at the next scheduled court date. Further, agreements generated in court settings are easily promulgated as legally enforceable court orders by either being incorporated in the child support order or entered as a separate (custody) order.
– Court-based AV programs tend to enjoy subsidies from the court, including access to mediators, administrative personnel, and facilities. This stretches AV program resources and enhances their capacity to serve a greater number of families.”
This same report confirms erroneous knowledge of abuse and how it plays out in custody litigation.
HHS programs are calling abuse “high conflict.” They are forcing victims to “conciliate” with abusers. These programs are blaming the victims for the abuse. They give equal responsibility to the victim for the abuse. Over time, the victim is termed “uncooperative,” “alienating,” “mentally ill,” or abusive themselves, often merely for acting to protect children from abusive Fathers. Leaving abuse out of HHS programs has generated custody litigation that places children with the abuser and even denies access/visitation to the protective parent!! HHS should not be funding pro-abuser counseling, mediation and custody orders!!
SECTION 3, SERVICES FOR HIGH-CONFLICT FAMILIES, SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
“Families at the high end of the dispute continuum consume a great deal of court time. They also pose the greatest dangers for children who may be exposed to violence, the threat of abduction, and other forms of parental misconduct. For these reasons, many states have used their AV dollars to create or help to support interventions for the most contentious families. A review of state AV grant activities shows that jurisdictions are experimenting with different ways to serve high-conflict families. Some interventions involve generating needed information for the court so that it can make access decisions in a timely manner and refer families to appropriate services. Others focus on monitoring visitation exchanges and actual visits to ensure that visitation occurs as ordered by the court in a safe manner. A few jurisdictions are experimenting with techniques aimed at modeling appropriate parenting and co-parenting behaviors by providing assistance on an as-needed basis in unsupervised settings over a sustained period of time, or taking a more activist approach to visitation in supervised settings by participating in the visits and giving parents feedback on their parenting behaviors. One limitation with all these programs is that they focus exclusively on parents with court orders
concerning custody and visitation. Necessarily, this means that the primary focus is on divorcing and divorced families seen in the family court, and/or never-married parents who have an order dealing with visitation. It is more challenging to identify and serve IV-D populations who have serious conflicts about access and/or safety issues that make visitation questionable. Programs in California try to accomplish this through the state’s mandatory mediation program, which is
available in all courts at no charge to litigants. Like their counterparts in Family Court, judges in Support Court can refer couples to court-based mediators for assistance with the development of an agreement dealing with custody and/or visitation. Thus, if a visitation matter is raised in the course of a proceeding dealing with the establishment or enforcement of a child support order,
the judge may refer the family for mediation services. And if the mediation plan includes an agreement for supervised visitation, the family can access the court’s high-conflict service mix. If the parents fail to reach an agreement, their case will be heard by a family law judge who can order supervised visitation. Without the ready availability of court-based mediation services, however, it would be impossible to link child support populations who have severe conflicts
about parenting with remedial services. Thus, a key requirement to the effective provision of services for high-conflict families is having services like mediation for families with lower levels of conflict.”
“The following describes how states have used their AV funds to promote the enforcement of visitation orders. The range of interventions that we describe below includes providing pro se legal assistance, legal representation, and/or creating a complaint process under the supervision of the court.”
By ignoring abuse in custody litigation and in Fatherhood, HHS (unwittingly?) supports pedophilia and a network of counselors intent on silencing the victim.
“The vast majority of children who appear in child pornography have not been abducted or physically forced to participate. In most cases they know the producer—it may even be their father—and are manipulated into taking part by more subtle means.”
“Physical abusers: Offenders who sexually abuse children and for whom an interest in child pornography is just part of their pedophilic interests. They may record their own abuse behaviors for their personal use, in which case, from a legal standpoint, the possession of pornography is secondary to the evidence of their abusive behavior that it records. They may or may not network. By definition, a physical abuser directly abuses victims and his security depends upon the child’s silence.”
HHS funds counselors intent on deprogramming victims of abuse, forcing them to “love” their abuser and remain silent. These counselors work with Courts to manufacture false records. One therapist is Dr. Barry Bricklin. Dr. Bricklin confers with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, trains other counselors in bogus methodology including Parental Alienation Syndrome (a legal tactic used by sexually abusive Fathers), and authors “tests” that can be scored improperly to show favorable results. A deprogramming institution is The Rachel Foundation. The Rachel Foundation was given a $50,000 DOJ grant for operation of a deprogramming facility in Texas.
“Some children have reported receiving treatment involving threats and coercion. The child may be told that he or she may not return home until they have accepted a more favorable view of the denigrated parent. Sometimes reunification therapy does not involve confinement and separation from the primary parent, but involves forced therapy sessions with a rejected parent. Many of the same ethical questions apply to this type of therapy as well, as the child is often forced to attend these sessions against his/her will. If the child is being forced to reunify with a parent he has clearly stated was abusive to him or her, the child may react with increased symptoms, suicidal ideation, or even suicide attempts.”
The National Fatherhood Institute (NFI) received HHS grant funds for a media, research, and program development. The NFI has helped develop a network of professionals working in custody whose sole intent is to help Fathers avoid support payments by obtaining custody. Abuse is ignored! The best interests of the children are ignored! Victims are punished by continued abuse by proxy of family court even to the extent of jail! Support incomes are often fictional in order to reward the abusive parent.
HHS has funded the proliferation of profit-motivated court-affiliates who have a vested interest in prolonged litigation. I have expanded on problems in my second attachment titled “ATTACHMENT: Doreen Ludwig’s comments in response to Pennsylvania plan to increase funding of Counselors, Parenting Coordinators, etc. using HHS OSCE and TANF funds.”
There is NO accountability for HHS programs funding Court litigation, at the State or Federal level. Courts are denying appeals for fraudulent cases! Judicial Boards of Conduct do NOT hold Judges to the requirements of due process! State Ethics Boards excuse unethical conduct by counselors, mediators, etc! Pennsylvania has even passed a law forbidding filing of ethical complaints against mental health practitioners involved in custody litigation!
I specifically request that Pennsylvania be included as part of the investigation. My experience, documents and research prove that Pennsylvania’s Berks County is rigging child custody cases by manufacturing false records and denying due process. There are many reasons for case rigging, but the principle motivator is the awarding of custody and control to Fathers with NO regard for negative parental habits such as abuse, alcoholism, criminal records, etc. A custody evaluator is hired to provide a false report meant to award themselves with counseling or parenting coordination. The County uses TANF payments. Berks County treasurer will NOT release payment documents. A parenting class is run through the Court which is designed to blame abuse on the victim. This class is called Children in the Middle. Berks County has purchased this video-program from Ed Hanna, who is not the author of the program. I suspect HHS funds were used to pay for this purchase. The County has refused to release purchase price. The Court Administrator, Lisa Siciliano, tracks and approves payment and referral/orders to unethical counselors such as Dr. Timothy Ring. Attorney Jacqueline Mark double bills in order to pass-on funds to other parties through non-profit gifts (grants to family members) and honorariums (for non-existent speaking engagements).
The FBI/DOJ acknowledge that court cases are rigged, yet the FBI claims they have “no resources,” “do not work for me” and “are not my private investigator.” The FBI/DOJ should have a separate department for investigating of judicial color of law crimes (18 USC 241 and 242). Color of law crimes in family court have increased with the increase of HHS funding aimed at helping fathers decrease support payments by obtaining custody and by permitting family courts to have “favorite” mental health practitioners who are NOT held to any legal, ethical or scientific standard.
There are men’s rights groups and fatherhood initiative groups. KC doesn’t need to help the fathers. Women are in desperate need of advocy in the United States. There are hundreds of women complaining. It’s not an inflated number. There is a war on women in the United States. The fatherhood initiative/ gatekeeper alienation claims. Isn’t Joan stating 99 percent of DV claims are false an attack on women? Considering the majority of victims are women? Joan has placed herself in the spot light. Peter has placed himself in the spot light. Promoting Luigi’s case. People have the right to question your personal case. What the motives are for pushing legislation. Equal and shared parenting uses much of the fatherhood initiative language. Pushes parental alienation claims. No meaningful reform can take place when women are targeted and obstructed from speaking out.
Dyslexia is not a sign of an unintelligent person. Are the judges laughing?
Just as with everything else going on in our country, apparently the extremist lunatic fringe is alive and well when it comes to this issue as well.
We now have 370 posts. 90%+ of them from the mysterious ”Anonymous”, with a very good guess at who she is.
She apparently has plenty of time to post volumes and volumes of misspelled, repetitious, and made up nonsense that has been out there and debunked over and over again the past 20+ years.
She’s now stooped to the level of personally attacking those of us who have been working to promote equal and shared parenting.
We have seen and witnessed the disastrous consequences of unwarranted separations of children from their parents and family members, how destructive false claims are, and the devastating effect this has on parents and children.
My guess at what’s going on….
In the wake of the Dulos case, a very small group of very wealthy women down in Fairfield County co-opted the actual issues and problems in our ‘family’ courts. To advance and promote their caustic and offensive gender bias-based agendas.
They were all emboldened and cheered when the disaster of “Jennifer’s Law” was passed and investigative news reporters put them in the limelight.
But now reality has set in.
Now they are seeing what a disaster “Jennifer’s Law” has turned out to be. And how it’s being used >>against mothers.<<
(Which we warned everyone and legislators would happen. Fell on deaf ears.)
They’re seeing that nothing has changed for the better.
In fact, everything they’ve done – has accomplished absolutely nothing. Except to pour gasoline on an already raging fire. They made things worse.
With the Divorce Industry and “family” court judges laughing at them, and all of us.
They’re seeing more and more states moving towards shared parenting.
They’re seeing thousands and thousands of victims of PA organizing on Facebook like never before, and their panicking.
So rather than engage in intelligent discussion, or to work together with us towards actual reform, they personally attack people who dare challenge and question them, and their open agenda of gender bias and hate.
Once again, we have nothing to be ashamed of, or to hide.
Only “Anonymous” and her cohorts, do.
If you wish to be taken seriously, kindly take your mask off. Come to the table.
Instead of just slinging mud from behind a rock…..
Peace and love 🙂
Dulos family case and the players sniffed out the $$$ and set it up! catastophy!
No judge rules on the temperature of the day but the climate of the season. It’s time for a change of season. Time for the family court to move beyond the welfare reform act and rule on the true best interest not to MOU funding the state.
The gender Roles is not what is being discussed. 80 percent of cases people can work out their roles in the childrens lives. As well as the economic needs to raise the children. WE DISCUSSING THE 20 percent of CONTESTED CASES. WHERE CHILDRENS WELFARE IS AT RISK. It’s the relentless spiraling down the child support rabbit hole. We are discussing child abuse and the use of a group of Attorneys, GAL attorneys and psychologist engaging in uneithical conduct to award custody to a dangerous individual. With federal resources. The misuse of the welfare reform act to generate state funding. Cost savings on criminal protection and incarceration. Turning pedophiles into a mental health centered approach instead of criminal. ATTEMPTING to reengage them with the children! We are talking about rolling a red carpet out for domestic batters for health and human services funding. We are taking about failing to address criminal actions of domestic batters. Plea bargains and nulling it to bring money into the state at the expense of women and children. The profit to the family court industry to keep the entire mess going! We are taking about false alligations for fathers. This is a prime example of the push for 50/50. The relentless skirting around important issues to prompt an agenda. The failure of a court system to protect the children in the state of Connecticut even though DCF.
Which is why claims of abuse and neglect do not belong in our broken and corrupt “family” courts. Because they are not courts of evidence or law. And because divorce attorneys and the states have powerful financial incentives to promote and prolong conflict.
I will never be known as a woman who would remain silent. Silence is a deadly killer. The criminal justice system and the public defender’s office and the criminal justice reform is absolutely to blame for hiding domestic violence, Plea bargaining and child welfare attorneys running the state programs for monitory gain. Cost savings, victims of abuse have nowhere to go. The welfare reform and fatherhood initiative are to blame. As well as criminal justice reform. I have been watching the state of Connecticut alongside of many other people. You must know the financial incentive to hide the entire system. Your ongoing chatter to go to criminal court is of no help. The criminal justice system is just as corrupt. I have read and watch and spoken to many people. Until Connecticut cleans up criminal law the family courts will continue to be corrupt. The entire system is run on fatherhood and welfare reform. Has absolutely no concern for the truth. After 20 years I am sure you know this. I’m sure both mothers and fathers are victims. However, having experienced the system and the parental alienation industry fraud. For state funding I have absolutely no faith in the state of Connecticut or the ENTIRE LEGAL SYSTEM.
“In court cases where parental alienation is claimed mothers lose custody of their children to abusive fathers at an “alarming” rate…
Through analysis of 500 trial court cases, these claims were found to be false”
Delighted to see the brilliant Associate Professor Dr Jennifer J Harman’s research debunking academic misinformation, wins a national award 👏
https://lnkd.in/eDTcpDxp
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-jennifer-jill-harman-5a235a24?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=ios_app
I wonder how much fatherhood funding she received number 12 create this video and number 22 write her book….. She got funding from somewhere and I’m sure it Was through HS and we all know that is a federal funded government’s organization fatherhood.gov there’s no motherhood.gov why because the laws don’t have to be equally applied to women like they are to men under the United States constitution and because America is biased towards women especially mothers.
Daddy’s have millions and billions of dollars now supporting them while mothers are just fading into birthing people
Title: The Exploitation of Traditional Gender Roles in Family Court Systems: A Case of Psychological Extortion
Introduction:
Family court systems are meant to provide fair and equitable solutions in cases of divorce or separation, particularly regarding custody arrangements and financial support for children. However, beneath the surface of these seemingly just systems lies a complex interplay of traditional gender roles and psychological tactics that can result in what can be described as a “snatch racket.” This essay explores how governments exploit traditional gender norms within family court systems, leading to emotional and financial extortion, particularly against fathers.
Exploitation of Traditional Gender Roles:
Historically, traditional gender roles have dictated that women often lacked financial autonomy, with men assuming the role of primary breadwinners. In the context of family court systems, these roles are inadvertently reinforced through custody arrangements that often favor mothers. By awarding automatic custody to mothers, governments perpetuate the notion that mothers are the natural caregivers, while fathers are relegated to secondary roles.
Psychological Tactics:
This exploitation of traditional gender roles taps into the deep emotional bond between parent and child. Much like in a kidnapping scenario, where a parent would pay anything for the safe return of their child, fathers in family court systems may feel compelled to pay exorbitant amounts to maintain contact with their children. This emotional leverage is further exacerbated by the prolonged legal proceedings within family courts, which can drain fathers financially and emotionally.
Financial Extortion:
The prolonged legal battles within family court systems serve as a breeding ground for financial extortion. Fathers, often lacking the same level of legal aid and support afforded to mothers, find themselves at a disadvantage. The legal system becomes a tool through which mothers can extract more money from fathers, prolonging the issue and forcing them to continue paying to navigate the complexities of the system and maintain a relationship with their children.
Conclusion:
The exploitation of traditional gender roles within family court systems creates a fertile ground for emotional and financial extortion, particularly against fathers. By awarding automatic custody to mothers and perpetuating the notion of the primary caregiver, governments inadvertently perpetuate a scenario akin to a “snatch racket,” where fathers are coerced into paying significant sums to ensure their continued involvement in their children’s lives. Addressing these systemic issues requires a reevaluation of custody arrangements and a more equitable approach to family court proceedings, one that recognizes the evolving roles of both parents in modern society.
Correction. The courts are supposed to act in the best interest of children. Assets are divided equally as applied by law. Children are not assets.
This is very disputable essay. The fatherhood initiative pays for legal battles in family court for contested cases. Services for restraining order are the only thing they are assisted with. If you are stuck with a neglectful father. Such as addiction issues and using financial resources of the house hold to maintain extra martial relationships it is not considered. Gender roles vary in every household and again blanket statement and making blanket legislation does not provide justice for the individual cases. The courts of equity are for assets. Children are not assets. The are lives the parents are responsible for. The decision to have a child or failure to use birth control is on both individuals. The role of third party is should be removed out of the equation. The raising of children is in the hands of the people who created the children. When one is unfit is where the child custody dispute begins in 20 percent of cases. Much alienaton and fathers rights propaganda has clouded the legal system. The problem is not father or mother in the majority of cases. It’s the individual who is abusive and misleading the system. The system in these cases is financially filed and infested with fatherhood funding. If the alienation industry doesn’t find parental alienation there profession diminished and the fatherhood money minimizes.
Everything is disputable when it doesn’t follow the false narrative
Complete hogwash. Have you read Keith Harmon Snows book? Have you been following along on the frank report? Have you been living under a rock for the last several decades? Or where you court ordered to pay child support so you decided your former spouse was alienating your child?
Follow the supreme Court. Gender rolls are going backwards to the days before women had rights.
the woman bought the woke culture now they are paying the price the most. for example, they lost the use of “womens” restrooms exclusively! Facebook helped this woke agenda and now biting them on the rear! I am gen x man and have problem sharing a bathroom to be honest. but i can see that many women would!
Bottom line, mounchousen Daddy or mounchousen Mommy the government funding being spent towards the parents has caused a broken and currupt system. The majority of the welfare reform funding should be allocated for the children. How about instead of an mou for either gender an MOU for child welfare. The money used for access and visitation be put towards the children. NOT ONE of the PARENTS.The money follow the children. To unbiased the system. Be used for the sole purpose of protection of the children from whoever in the 20 percent of cases. Strong and severe punishment for the legal predators misusing the nations resources. Stop bankrupting the parents. We need as a civilized nation to get the welfare of children straightened out.
Signs and symptoms of child abuse.
infants excessive crying or developmental delays
fear, anxiety, clinging
phobias
nightmares, sleep problems
bed wetting.
social withdrawal
hyperactivity
poor concentration/distractibility
decreased school performance.
chronic school absences
speech disorder
SEEMS AFRAID OF PARENTS
eating issues
depression, passivity
increased verbal abuse or physically aggressive behavior with others.
destroy objects or pets.
substance abuse
self-harm such as cutting.
sexualized behavior
symptoms of PTSD
avoid undressing.
withdrawal of touch
overly compliant, especially with difficult or painful parts of the exam
Symptom clues
Headaches
abdominal pain
Vague somatic complaints, often chronic
Worsening medical problems such as asthma
frequent unexplained sore throat
abnormal weight gain or loss
reluctant to use extremity.
difficulty walking or sitting.
genital discomfort or painful urination/defecation
unexplained symptoms
vomiting, irritability or abnormal raspatory may represent head trauma.
Wouldn’t you take your child to the doctor?
Physical clues
poor hygiene
dressed inappropriate for the weather.
failure to thrive, poor weight gain. malnutrition
lack of care for medical needs
bites, burns,
Many of the symptoms continue because of reunification therapy and forced visits.
Traumatized children that have positive interactions are less likely to demonstrate somatic symptoms. When they are forced into reunification therapy and forced visitation the symptoms persist. Doctors visits are regular because no one can identify a physical problem. The problem is emotional and psychological. Turned into mounchousen by proxy. As another form of defense. When parental alienation accures. Children often don’t report abuse for a long time. Are often scared and threatened by the abuser. Often feel sick and try to use various methods to avoid the abuser. The court appointed psychologist knows all of this. Yet, they twist these things in to mounchousen to perpetuate the case. The alienation industry is making a lot of money off the fatherhood initiative and alienation claims. It’s a transference of diagnosis due to the alienaton defense loosing credibility. Mounchousen by proxy is a rare diagnosis. Often targeted at women. More cases of mounchousen by proxy involving father’s. The persistence of parental alienation when there is conflict in custody issues when they don’t get their way. Much attention is given and sympathy is given by the court as well as financial assistance when father’s claim alienaton.
children can get that from social media and general anxiety! I am not down playing abuse issue but the children today have it much more difficult than kids up to 2012 when Facebook launched and online video games and adding social media, lock downs etc… we are failing them to reach their full potential! we need to prioritize children. Supposedly, we are a western civilized nation! stop fetynal and ticky tok!
Tiktok is the only place that we can actually get boots on the ground real evidence and information as to what is happening along the lines of our governments and around the world. So saying that an app is harmful is really ludicrous. We get more truth and information from a tiktok app than from our own media.
Stop blaming the apps and start blaming the actual perpetrators that are causing the harm aka men.
Male perpetrator of mounchousen by proxy. Arrested multiple times for domestic disputes . Children report abuse. Father insist on reunification insisting that the children are brainwashed. To enduce Stockholm syndrome. Doesn’t receive counseling for himself. To receive the red carpet fatherhood initiative treatment. Receive sympathy and preferential treatment from the court.
Covert Narcissistic traits. Teflon Dons. Many articals gaining fame, attention and notoriety. Portrait of victim. The use of flying monkeys who feel sorry for them. Get others to help them.
yep believe all woman. people with common sense and no financial ties can wake up from a drunken stupor and give 11 reasons right off the bat. Entitlement facade has faded and pathology exposed
,
They were both abusive in the relationship. Toxic dysfunctional relationship.
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/Qqw6vKn9Cjv7ccDk/?mibextid=xCPwDs
BOOK: Understanding and Managing Parental Alienation, by Janet Haines, Mandy Matthewson and Marcus Turnbull.
In Understanding and Managing Parental Alienation: A Guide to Assessment and Intervention, Janet Haines, Mandy Matthewson and Marcus Turnbulloffer a comprehensive analysis of contemporary understanding of parental alienation. Grounded in recent scientific advances, this is the first book of its kind providing resources on how to identify parental alienation and a guide to evidence-based intervention.
Parental alienation is a process in which one parent manipulates their child to negatively perceive and reject the other parent. Recognizing this phenomenon and knowing when to intervene is often the biggest challenge faced by practitioners and this book provides a guide to this process. Divided into six parts, it examines what parental alienation is and how it is caused, how it affects each family member as a mental health concern and form of violence, and how to assess, identify and intervene successfully from a legal and therapy standpoint. Taking on a gender-neutral approach, the book is filled with contemporary case examples from male and female perspectives, cutting-edge research, practitioner-client dialogues, and practitioners’ reflections to show the difficult realities of parental alienation.
You can order this book on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3UGKNqo
#parentalalienation #understandingparentalalienation #parentalalienationawareness #naopas
Can you explain estrangement? Can you explain the process in which a parent is at odds with a child and continues to blame the other parent? Can you explain why someone would continue to claim parental alienation when none of what you describe is happening. A long history of counseling prior to the filing because a major event cause the final straw in the relationship. A good explanation of what parental alienation is not would be helpful. Can you explain mounchousen by proxy when someone one continues to run to court and cry alienation and the child are going to the parents house. They are at odds and the parent then starts filling DCF reports that are bogus cause parental alienation claims are unfounded. Even information on what is perceived as alienation. When will someone in the industry explain what it is not? How many years will the court system entertain ” parental alienation claims that there is no evidence or findings of? Before it’s litigation harressment? How many cases are” alienators claims ” are not found. Until someone can answer all the questions should it be allowed to continue to be used as Connecticut’s weapon of choice?
These authors are a bunch of nobody’s…. literally NOBODY’S.
STOP LYING TO THE PUBLIC!!
This is what is so damn infuriating.
You MENS RIGHTS GROUPS get together and FEED of each other’s bullshit. Then you SPREAD MISINFORMATION EVERYWHERE LIKE A DISEASE.
I think I’ve made my points with the research I’ve posted.
Peace to all Mother’s struggling to protect your babies.
#I BELIEVE YOU, YOU ARE HEARD!
I am out.
It’s important for people to realize criminal justice reform and fatherhood initiative welfare reform do not just effect the minority community. The minority leaders in Connecticut are often placed in the forefront during public hearing. This projects effect the entire population. When you are not part of the minority community and ask questions you look like a racist. Often people like Gary Winfield are in charge of the public hearings. Making it very difficult for someone to ask questions and speak against these programs. The use of privilege white women in the fatherhood initiative to make it look like there are racist motivation to object to these projects. Minority women are also tremendously effected by the welfare reform projects. Are loosing custody along side ” the privilege white women”. Crimes against them are going unpunished or plea bargained as well. These are not minority issues these are people issues.
The Connecticut legislators have gone rough. They are pushing through legislation even Lamont is trying to pump the breaks on. There is little informing of constituents.. The project are packaged to the public and the repercussions of the legislation is hidden. Gary Winfield is a big part of the federalist programs. The welfare reform act and fatherhood initiative has harmed especially women in the minority community. He appears out of touch with women’s issues in the state. He’s a part of the judiciary committee. Reforming the criminal justice system is necessary, however the victims of crimes is being ignored. Including minority women. He’s done little to nothing to remove the same family court judges the public continues to bring to his attention. Disapprove of the senior prosecutor and promoting prosecutor reform. Will not reform the child welfare attorneys in the public defender office. Has not spoken out against the hate speech against women from the public defender office or anti somatic bannor. If we are going to element hate and discrimination it needs to be across the board. We need a balance in our judicial system. The scale is being tipped by our elected officials. Bringing wealth into state projects that do not consider the entire population.
National Survivors of child abuse. Family violence prevention.
The most common form of childhood sexual abuse in the United States. Father =daughter 75% of total cases.
75% of cases involving mothers is for neglect and medical neglect.
Fathers as sexual abusers. Characteristics and treatment Office of Justice programs: NCJ NUMBER 123435
Most incestuous appear to be regressed pedophiles, although a few are fixated. A DYSFUNCTIONAL MARITAL RELATIONSHIP PRECIPITATES THE ONSET OF FATHER -DAUGHTER INCEST. The nature of the dysfunctional marriage tends to be an imbalance of power in the relationship., with at least one partner passive and dependent in nature.
When the father has a dominate and authoritative personality, social isolation and restriction of those activities of both activities of both mother and daughter. BECAUSE OF THE DANGER OF IMPRISSIONMENT, IT IS RARE THAT THE SEXUAL ABUSER SEEKS TREATMENT PROGRAMS ON HIS OWN.
THE MORE TYPICAL PATTERN IS ONE OF DENIALAND DEFERNSE.
WELCOME TO PARENTAL ALIENATION CLAIMS
These programs generally view sexual abuse as a symptom underlying psychological stress and seek to help abusers become more aware of the CONTROL factor that reinforce deviant sexual arousal patterns. Epithetical relationships between therapist and client.
The admission of responsibility on the offender’s part is necessary for outpatient therapy to be viable. In addition, individual therapy with the father should proceed FATHER DAUGHTER COUNSELING. Reunification therapy
The department of justice and judicial branched are well aware of the problem. Would appear this is the Protocall for sexual assault and child abuse?
Women are more dangerous for neglect and medical neglect often due to poverty?
It’s is Congress that approves department of justice funding. The Attorney generals office is involved in the funding. The money can come from non government sources. Who is paying for this? Who is paying for the fatherhood initiative? The American public deserves to know? William Tong should have some answers. Vice President of Attorney generals. Connecticut Congress members should be answering questions about these ” projects”. We the people deserve some answers about the welfare reform act. It’s time for senator and Congress to answer to the public the secret business of family court.
Medical neglect or monchouser by proxy. The ALIENATION Industry surely has figured it all out. You are neglecting your children if you don’t seek medical attention. When you seek medical help it’s Monchouser by proxy.
To date New cases of mounchousen by proxy are coming forward against fathers. Including the use of parental alienation to gain leverage in family court cases.
The feminist and DV has iit all figured out, oh wait thier façade is crumbling ( for those who abused its purpose)
“Oh but he looked at me the wrong way!!!! Oh my god I’m threatened “ crap isn’t working anymore
And using your children as bait to initiate some of these coercive tactics to finance yourself or you were encouraged by a shady “attorney “. The BS narrative has lost its plot.
We are not talking about that . We are taking about documented evidence. I sure would not want someone falsely accused to be punished for something that they didn’t do. I sure don’t want someone to go unpunished for something they did. I sure would want children to be protected from harm from a mother or father. he point is that the 20 percent of cases be managed and handled correctly.. What is your goal? Punishing for reporting?
Cause they want alimony ,child support , and all those “poor is me” handouts.
The deflecting of the core issues. Children are getting abused. Someone is guilty of manipulating the system. The blanket application and statement that an entire group is lying. This is the entire problem with the fatherhood initiative and welfare reform system. It’s based on anger and resentment from paying support obligations. A child centered approach to contested custody cases has been muddy up. 50/50 is not children focused. It’s a focus on the wants and needs of the parents. Mandatory counseling for the parents on the onset of contested custody cases. No more parental alienation and REUNIFICATION THERAPY. Good old fashion counseling recognized by professional organizations. No more secret business of family court system. Do you wish to fix the court system or punish people cause they don’t agree with you? Stop the federal welfare fatherhood red carpet treatment for the financial wealth of the states from the federalist. Using constitutional rights over human rights. Stop trying to dominate the family court.
lol wake up from your fairy tale, there is no poverty in the US only spoiled entitled expecting handout individuals who never grew up. .
I live in poverty because Connecticut gal, law enforcement and judges violated my rights, stole my autonomy and, caused irreparable harm upon both me and my child and the abuser daddy was cradled, given plea deal, given every support to violate LAWS, and handed a no child support award to punish MY CHILD for their MOTHER utilizing her RIGHT to protect her child from a dangerous threatening FATHER.
So FUCK YOU for saying that MY CHILD AND I ARE SPOILED, EXPECTING A HANDOUTAND THAT WE NEVER GREW UP.
WE ARE TRYING TO HEAL FROM 20 PLUS YEARS OF ABUSE, NEGLECT AND DISCRIMINATION.
There is poverty in America and there are also rich white men who are f****** spoiled and entitled and expecting their children to be a hand out.
You are a piece of s***.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5fHK1eyqIo/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
National children Alliance. More than 600.000 children are abused in the United States each year. The actual number of children is likely underrepresented. Types of abuse Almost 60 % sexual assaulted 20 % physical abuse. About 5 % neglect about 5% witness abuse. 5% other. About 2% drug endangerment. 77% victimized by a parent. Sexual assault leading the pact. 2021 stats
In 2021 stats show mothers abuse the children more than fathers. Double more.
Here is the link.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/254893/child-abuse-in-the-us-by-perpetrator-relationship/
Gender bias fatherhood propaganda. The numbers are inflated by parental alienation claims. In the state of Connecticut children are sexual and physical abused by father’s at a significant larger rate. We are talking about CT legislation. Self reporting survey and fraudulent family court psychologist.
They are only biased Fraudulent and self interested because you say so lol that’s right! Self proclaimed Leading expert
You must also believe that you were identified as a unicorn that’s right unicorns are real
Not an expert. Invested in fixing the system. I’m sure you very invested in 50/50 legislation. Information may not be favorable to meet your objective. Questioning the statistics that don’t always break things down to present a clear picture of the situation. I’m definitely in favor of the court treating every one fairly. The well-being of the next generation should not be taken lightly. A microscope and accurate statistics should be under a microscope. Blurry vision during important legislation is not going to result in a happy ending. Funding should not be the main objective. Self reported studies with limited information on all important data should not be a standard anyone should except. Children only get one childhood .
Unicorn, guard dog, anything but a sheep. If you are unwilling to break down the information it’s generally because there’s something to hide. This is a heated topic. One in which children have to live with. They are voiceless. If only the courts were doing their job without the influence of federal funding each child/ children would be considered. It’s a shame we even have to have these conversations.
Robert, REALLY???
National children alliance is a father funded organization and it’s full of misinformation and misguided research.
Why don’t you try sharing some real research instead of bias discriminatory fatherhood funding research that we all already know about and we are attacking and getting rid of it because we’re sick of the b********.
https://nationalassociationofparentalalienationspecialists.com/resources/
Cleaning up the Ct family court system. Based on reported cases.
Nov 4, 2011, Child custody and support
Court decisions regarding!
1. child custody and visitation
The determining of child custody and visitation
Parents with joint legal custody to decide schooling, religious upbringing, and ongoing medical issues.
Physical custody day to day childcare and residence
When parents do not agree, court mediators, retired judges, or volunteer attorneys will attempt to help resolve the differences. If this fails a family court judge or magistrate will attempt to help them resolve their differences. The judge or magistrate will determine to be in the best interest of the child. This is where 20 percent of the cases are clouded by the fatherhood initiative and blanket legislation has altered the best interest in some cases with DV and pedophiles. The relentless 14th amendment rights of fathers over mothers in the supreme court reversing federal protections and equal rights for women. Human rights are being ignored as pointed out by the United Nations. Largely due to federalist on the supreme court federalist reverting back to times where women had no rights. Equal rights and protections are being eliminated. Much money from wealthy federalist is being pump into the nations system. Including Connecticut through very large donations to Yale and UConn with past and current cases. Even from California. John Hammell a psychologist from California, who believes women are often the perpetrators embarks on the Connecticut family court divorce market. Through the parental alienation /gatekeeper claims. A theory started by Richard Gardner and has been increasingly popular with the welfare reform act. Based on low economic value of women and declaring single mother a financial burden on society. Now has moved on to declaring women requesting child support as greedy, selfish and using their children.
A Custody and visitation schedule, including holidays and vacation time. Child abuse and domestic violence are not considered unless there are significant sexual and physical abuse. Emotional and psychological abuse are rarely, if ever addressed. When women go to court, they are unaware that the All-recognized forms of dv are not recognized. The coercive control laws are twisted and contorted because what a normal person would consider signs and symptoms of abuse are not considered and are downplayed. Because they are not illegal and won’t be prosecuted. Coercive control experts are not recognized and supported in family court, yet the ” parental alienation” experts are forced onto cases supporting the gatekeeper claims started by the fatherhood initiative. Excusing unhealthy behavior, substance abuse, socially inappropriate behavior (sexual) are not allowed or focused on in the family courts unless there is documented penetration. It’s alright to be slightly abusive it’s only criminal or a problem if the child is severely hurt. The prosecutor’s office will not get involved unless it’s extreme. Your considered false reporting and not creditable until something significant happens. Even then it’s usually a plea deal or conviction for a lesser charge. So, the family court judge will not recognize or allow it in family court. These are also the risks you run in jury trials. The jury may not be allowed to hear your evidence. You will be accused of being an alienator and somehow mentally ill. The bar for proving dv and abuse is extremely high due to the fatherhood initiative, and you are severely punished for bringing up abuse unless it’s significant and prosecuted. The definition of significant abuse has been tainted and downplayed by fathers’ rights groups focused on constitutional rights that don’t take human rights into consideration. Coercive control laws are changing the definition of abuse. They do not consider the coercive control prior to court filing. Use reporting and an attempt to protect a child is being labeled coercive. It’s being used in Connecticut much like parental alienation. To protect fatherhood funding. The attorneys in the Connecticut state bar know where the money is at. They are aware of access and visitation grants and the health and human services funding. So doesn’t the Judicial branch and Joseph Ditunno and the gang at family services. This doesn’t mean men are not unjustly accused of DV or sexual abuse. It’s less likely to happen in the 20% of cases.
Joint custody is the most common arrangement. Gives both parents legal and physical custody. Doesn’t mean time needs to be divided equally. But must ensure child has frequent visits with both parents. THESE ARE 80% OF CASES. Where parents are able to co-parent and make choices on the child’s needs not their own. A presumption of 50/50 is not needed in the majority of cases. A clean up of court procedures and the definition of abuse needs to be redefined and addressed by family court. The high threshold for prosecution of sexual abuse and other forms abuse are causing children to live in unsafe and abusive conditions. That don’t always lead to death. Cause long term damage none the less. Gals, family services and the court appointed psychologist have a financial vested interest to ignore several forms of abuse in the 20% of cases for fatherhood funding brought to the state. The judges are aware of it also. The judicial branch signed the MOU to receive fatherhood funding. Follow the federal welfare reform act/fatherhood initiative polices designed to leave some forms of abuse to be ignored by the court. Not prosecutable because of weak laws designed in collaboration with the MOU to bring in federal funding through the mou. Focused on alienation rather than abuse at profit for these 20 % of cases. The push for 50/50% is to combat the changes in the judicial branch recognizing and getting educated on all forms of abuse. The loss of several lives and the exposure of the death of Jennifer. The courts and the state of Connecticut’s incompetence and financially fueled ignorance to recognize dangerous situations. The failure to uphold the civil rights of women. The human rights of Connecticut children.
Provisions to shield the children from prenatal conflict. The child welfare attorneys are often placed on cases and ignore abuse because it’s not illegal. Flip these cases into alienation cases. Because of the fatherhood imitative welfare reform and criminal justice reform. They are following the fatherhood policies and blanket legislation. Granted immunity and do not have to follow the code of conduct and get forced on cases by judge who know they will follow the fatherhood initiative. Force access and ignore their fiduciary responsibility to the children for the states interest. All fathers to be engaged in the lives of their children with attached funding. Follow the welfare reform blanket procedures to have the children engage in relationships with a parent who is abusive by has not been prosecuted. Call it alienation and force therapy to follow the welfare reform act that is generating money for the state. Use the psychologist who will act in the state’s financial best interest and force relationships even when they are not healthy for the child. They are part of the judicial branch and follow the mou. All may not follow these procedures but there is a trail of cases pointing to the ones used most often are doing so. Are allowed to continue by the Connecticut state bar grievance committee. Using immunity and consider the money access and visitations grants and justice reform money. Using children to keep their fathers out of jail. Fathers deserve protection in family court matters; however, it looks to have taken it a step beyond forcing the MOU and for generated state funding. At the cost of women and children. The minimal definition of abuse and minimal efforts to prosecute it with influence from the state government and federalist systems. A low level of definition of parental alienation and the use of symptoms of abuse and stress from joint custody in the 20% of custody contested cases. As defined as a negative aspect of 50/50 equal and shared parenting. Where parents are unable to co-parent. The use of new partners, stepparents being allowed to engage in the custody battle. ” Fathers and families”. Custodial interference from a third party to assist a spouse in gaining a leg up in the custody battle. Kassenoff v Kassenoff, Dulos v Dulos and many others. Resulting in deadly cases. It’s difficult enough to fight in family court between the two parents. THIRD PARTIES ARE CREATING MORE PROBLEMS IN FAMILY COURT CASES WITH FINANCIAL VESTED INTEREST IN PROPERTY, ALIMONY AND CHILD SUPPORT. MUST IMPORTANTLY CHILD CUSTODY.
Each Parents obligation to cooperate and compromise when working out child’s best interest. The welfare reform has forced fatherhood involvement even when it demonstrates emotional and psychological and physical harm to children. Forced reunification. Equal and shared parenting. Peter Szymonik refused court ordered counseling for himself. Yet Joan and Peter believe children should be forced into unregulated and unrecognized reunification therapy in all cases. Many parents are not in therapy and continue to force the children despite unhealthy and problematic parenting. Insist that mostly women are the problem and somehow mentally unbalanced. Using parental alienation. Loosing access for not being able to force children into therapy or visits. Why was Peter granted access to his children despite defying court ordered therapy for himself? Yet Joanie believes everyone else should play by different rules. Not all abuse is prosecutable and who determines the impact and level of abuse a partner engages in? When doesn’t a family court judge allow it in family court? The Gals fact finding has become in significant question in the state. 29 complaints and counting. How many let off the hook because of fatherhood programing and procedures lead by the mou? How many parents are led into parenting plans that are impossible to follow because of an abusive parent. The resistance of a child that is being abuses, but the court won’t hear about it. How many gals should have been removed and an AMC should have been placed? After 12 years of age when a child is absent from a diagnosis that they are incapable of understanding should be automatically transferred to AMC. With a new Attorney. What has and continues in the Ambrose case is an extreme injustice to the three children. Appears to reject and ignore their human rights. Further demonstrating the federalist fatherhood agenda run in the state of Connecticut Family courts. Bringing in tons of federal funding to protect.
The child’s temperament and emotional needs
Any relevant information material to proceedings obtained from the child and informed preference. This is being obstructed by the GALs. They bare using parental alienation/gatekeeper due to the welfare reform act and incentivized funding through the MOU.
The parents’ wishes for custody. Only a right given to fathers through the access and visitation grant. Organizations such as equal and shared parenting have dominated the courts with parental alienation claims against anyone who is in a contested custody battle. Especially women. If you are labeled an alienator, you will be denied services. Peter and Joan have been running the show in Connecticut until women have been educated and representing themselves. Until the United Nations has exposed the alienation industry that has targeted mothers/women on behalf of men’s rights groups since the welfare reform has started gaining financial wealth. Women have been brought on board to promote the langue and push the alienation theory. Convinced 50/50 is the only option in a corrupt system they have perpetuated. With the attacking of DV and promoting fatherhood funding and programs biasing the courts. Failing to discuss the mou and the significant funding that controls the entire state. Brings John Hammel a PAS industry promoter targeted at women to attempt to dominate the Connecticut family court system. A state being exposed for ignoring pedophilia and DV violence. Generating federal funds and cost savings in prosecution and incarceration. Funding PAS story’s to Combate the press on the uncovering of a bias system using parental alienation claims. Prompting punishment for reporting. At the onset of the cleaning up of the family court we are pushing 50/50. Alienation claims are being debunked and exposing the financial insensitive of state government by rich federalist deeply embedded in government politics. Like the welfare reform act and fatherhood imitative policies
Each parents’ ability to be active in the child’s lives.
The child’s adjustment to his or her home, school, and community. Abused children often have difficulty in many areas of their lives. Being called a liar by adults that are supposed to be protecting them has done significant damage and a growing distrust in government in the generations coming up. Children are on tic toc and other social media sights desperately trying to get help.
The length of time the child has been living in stable environment and home. The court may consider a parent who leaves the home to relieve stress. As long as they have alternative housing. I’m guessing a dv shelter won’t be considered. Women often stay to keep a roof over the children’s heads. Women have been obstructed from going to court to separate the household. In some cases, nesting is pushed leaving continued tension in the households.
The stability of purposed residence.
The mental and physical health of an individuals, involved except that it the proposed custodial parent or other party disability cannot be used against them in and of itself. Unless it’s not in the child’s best interest. This is why PTSD and CPTSD are flipped into personality disorders like in Jennefer’s case. Borderline and Munchausen by proxy are pushed by the alienation industry and narcissistic labels are given to men because it fits a gender not necessarily the person. Since parental alienation is being eliminated the big push is for Munchausen by proxy because women are seeking outside help for their children. Gives the courts a reason to take children away from parents who are contesting custody. Force compliance with the federal system and pushes the need for more money in the fatherhood system. Discredits women and decreases funds from Violence against women which is an objective of the father’s rights groups which the alienation industry is greatly profiting from.
How the child has been affected by an abuser if DV has bas uncured in the home. Between parents or another person. If siblings have been abused or neglected. There is story of a case where a father raped his stepdaughter resulting in pregnancy. After release from prison access and visitation of the biological children was forced. This was from a reliable source. Demonstrates the federalist system the use of the fatherhood initiative and the state of Connecticut’s negligence to protect children with federal policy of the fatherhood system. Pedophiles do not change according to the experts and are being given access to situations that are not in the best interest of children. Connecticut is turning pedophilia into a type of sexual attraction looking to protect it. Why would are state leaders continue to cover up these types of issues and not protect the public?
Since equal and shared parenting and the alienation crew has been on the frank report many convicted pedophiles and sexual predators appear to be on the blog and professing innocents. They grabbed onto Karen’s case to profess to be a group for parents. Prior to pointing out the targeting of women they probably would have supported Ambrose. The podcast has changes to change the sexist image. Due to many women comings forward exposing the system. Victims of family court can be either gender, but harming children is the main problem. Little attention is given to them. Equal and shared parenting is pushing for children to be forced into reunification therapy, but not for the adults. As seen in the Szymonik initial case. If the system is corrupt, why would you push for children to be serviced in it? Children are voiceless told they are liars, and these Gals are running the state programs instead of remaining unbiased. It’s where the state paycheck is coming from, and the MOU is what they are following. Based on the needs of the father not the children.
Unclear if there is new information to explain the court proceedings. They are not working properly. These are 20 % of cases and they are not managed properly. These same procedures will be endured even after 50/50. If you don’t comply even for good reason, you will be punished. Despite the CCADVs definition of DV its not illegal to emotionally abuse and the police will not arrest. Sexual assault is plea bargained and reduced to a lesser crime. Abusers are put through programs and charges are nulled and the family court then considers them cured and the federal government gives the state money for a family court battle.
Man, or women can be a victim of the system. The system is bias and DV is being ignored, sexual assault, pedophilia are just coming to the surface. Connecticut looks to be protecting it. Criminal justice reform and child welfare are all part of the welfare reform system. Until the financial incentive to the state is changed, we will never fix the broken system. 50/50 is another way to punishing people from reporting. If you don’t send your children to an abuser’s house, you will be punished by the courts and your children will be taken away a lot faster. This is an obstacle for DV victims protecting abused children who are finally understanding the funding, legal procedures. The ability to represent themselves in family court, gather evidence and have a fair shot in the family court system. As well as professionals outside the alienation industry to have a good look at what is really happening in family court cases. The unethical conduct of the unregulated Alienation industry. Since Jennifar died, evidence on the alienation industry has mounted in Connecticut. The United Nations has spoken. This is a reaction to the system beginning to work to fix it. It’s parental alienation that is the money maker in family court. DV victims and children are suffering for it. Connecticut is one of the worst and most complained about for corruption there is, no quick fix.
An editorial of the push for 50/50 in Connecticut
f
.
We have our own box of crayons .
As the state of Connecticut spends resources on the battle of the public defender office against Bowden -Lewis they are neglecting an investigation into the child welfare attorneys. Attorneys in charge of the prison transition is openly bashing women. Attorney’s are hanging banners against the support of Israel. William Tong will not investigate the family or criminal court because of the money. It’s not up to victims of a case if it’s prosecuted. It’s weighed by the prosecutor office. Limited due to criminal justice reform. The federal resources are focused on the public defender office. When a senior prosecutor attempting to prosecute is labeled as aggressive. Blocked from sitting on the judicial bench. The child welfare attorneys are maliciously going after DV victims and removing children from protective parents. William Tong and the state of Connecticut are ignoring it because of the federal funding. William Tong ignoring the mess in DCF. Limited resources are available during a poor economy. State employees are caught mismanaging federal funding in DCF. Tong can’t explain almost 10 million dollars that is missing. The judiciary committee is trying to limit Foia. The entire system is not designed to protect the public. It’s designed for monetary gain to the state of Connecticut. Federal welfare reform funding and cost savings. Poor legislation and failed protection of children and crime victims. To save money on prosecution and incarceration. Until the state of Connecticut can get their priorities in line with the protection of the public, most importantly children no more legislation to fast track the broken and currupt system.
Frank where is the about Peter and the court orders for mental health services? In contemp. Joanne doesn’t encourage him to seek help? While she wants kids to be forced into services Con artists .
Court order for mental health services are governmental overreach and coercive control to keep you oppressed in family court.
Lawyers are determining parents need mental health support. These are criminal, for profit enterprises. Stop playing into the bullshit.
“Why is it that when you are deemed “a danger” to your own children to such an extent that you cannot be trusted to be in their presence without a 3rd party supervisor, you are still allowed full unrestricted access to be alone with any other child on earth?
Step children, nieces, nephews, baby sitting friends children.
And actually, even your own children if from a different parent?
Could it be because it isn’t so much that you are a danger to your children, as it is a legal tactic to add as much stress as possible to the parent/child relationship and yourself that you break?
Could it simply be a tactic to cause capitulation in a custody battle?
To further my point, consider this.
If ordered to 3rd party supervision of your own children during a custody battle, cause you are deemed so dangerous…
What happens if the other spouse, were to pass in a car accident or something?
I’ll tell you what happens in such scenarios…
Supervised visits would end immediately and full custody of the children would revert to you.
So you’re only dangerous to your own children while involved in a custody dispute in an attempt to be more involved in their lives?”
Respectfully,
Thomas Fidler
When other people’s children report the person and nothing is done and they are given access to everyone. Is another good question.
Peter Szymonik and the false Narrative in the Family Court
Peter Szymonik has been running the family court racket with Joan Kloth Zanard for several years now.” In addition, the plaintiff (Stephanie Szymonik) seeks to modify court orders so that the defendant must cease publishing on, the internet, through email and other communication defamatory statements about the plaintiff, her counsel and various professionals that provide services and continue to provide services for the minor children. Seeking orders so the defendant (Peter) stay away from her home. (Stalking.?) Confronting the children at her home and school. (Harassment?) The defendant (Peter) either ” sorely lacks insight into his own behavior with an effect on the plaintiff, or, after years has learned the plaintiff’s weakness, failing and foibles, he has formulated a Machiavellian plan to overwhelm and overcome her. Listed in court transcripts. Failed to comply with court ordered therapy services. Yet wants children bound and gagged into reunification therapy. Kloth Zanard continues to carry on in slam the gavel about children who did not wish to engage in therapy. Yet, in her adult friend with Peter, Joan could not convince him to engage in court ordered sessions.
It’s time to unravel Peter, Joanie and the gang at Equal and shared parenting pushing for 50/50 in order to by passing court procedures. The courts are only corrupt when they don’t find parental alienation according to dynamic duo attempting to dominate Connecticut family court.
f
Pay close attention to the people you entrust to represent your interest in the state to address legislature.
Tell your own story cause these two are NOT going to tell the truth about their own. They are hypocrites. Have a one-sided agenda. To dominate the family court.
Wow you sure hate Peter. Seems quite personal.
The only ones dominating family court are the bottom feeding attorneys and gals.
You are delusional to think Peter or anyone dominates family court.
Maybe the CT media could do their jobs and report the crimes of child kidnapping and abuse- recommended by gals. It’s the guardianship racket.
It’s all about money.
My distrust of Peter is pushing parental alienation. The misguiding of the Connecticut family court system. He has conveniently skirted around fatherhood funding. The continued stigma he propetutes to single mothers. Single motherhood is born out of nessesity and situations out of control of some mothers. I have have heard the recording of a conversation about the Dulos case. Jennifer would still be alive if she just settled. He turns every conversation on reforming the courts on fatherhood. Closed minded on domestic violence and child abuse. I don’t believe Peter wishes to reform the court but dominate it. He continues to push a one side fits all narrative. I am just as much against the attorneys using these cases for a financial feast Currently people are representing themselves and the GALs are being exposed. We are on the brink of exposing the industry. He has been a huge part of the problem. Pushing and guiding the cases in to parental alienation cases. He is not focused on the children. He knows what is happening in criminal court to plea bargain, null DV charges. Pushing 50/50 on the expansion on DV laws. I don’t trust Peter.
Elizabeth Ricther – is that you? 🤔🤔🤔
Why so hostile? How can Peter and Joan dominate family court? I wouldn’t be so threatened. They’re not as powerful as you seem to believe.
Focus on the courts themselves. That’s where the criminals feed.
33,000 is nation wide or world wide. Break the numbers down. How many are from Connecticut? How many are men? How many are women accused of parental alienation? Statistics and self reporting leaves much room for creating illusions that Do nothing to fix the broken system. Stop tossing numbers out with out the specifics. A fair break down of the family court system to clean up the mess. Neither side is 100 percent correct and facts not puffed up statistics. The misleading information. You want to improve Connecticut use the accurate numbers. Enough grandstanding and clouding the issues
Over 40 thousand CT residents received DV services in the state of Connecticut alone. We don’t have a false reporting and alienation problems. We have a DV problem that is not being addressed. Including the family court.
Thats because speaking at a higher volume than usual can trigger the other person to call PD and say “they feel uncomfortable”. Next will be that the other person gave me a mean look! you wanted girls to play with the boys now you have “boys” wanting to play with the girls what do you expect. eventually you eat your own!
I’m calling your bluff. You may angel and manover like a snake. We are going to go toe to toe. Your fin is out of the water. You may have won some battles but you will not win the war. Equal and shared parenting is a dirty organization. Joanne is is getting exposed. The state of Connecticut is ducking for cover. Responsible for the deaths of DV victims. The sexual abusult of women and children. We are coming for our own. Keep trededing buddy.your a predator . Peter, Peter pumpkin eater.
Not all DV is the same! When used in FC it is a tool many times a narcissist will use! We all have issues at different levels! DV is not good!
There is a level of shame and embarrassment to admit you have been in an abusive relationship. It usually happens at a rate that initially you don’t notice. By the time you try and get out it’s because it became that bad. The continued punishment and labeling people mentally ill has caused a culture of stigmatization and fear. When you report even with evidence. When the child who has been taken out of the situation report the “parental alienation” games begin. Since 2014 court reform has been advocating for parental alienation and punishment for reporting. The 20 percent of cases are not just monitized parents. All of the processes described are not just for the monitized. The wealthy and increased amount of money is what is being reported . I would place a bet that 5 percent is false reporting. Until the state can get a better handle on the domestic violence situation our courts will continue to be problematic. The relentless attempt to silence people trying to clean up the failing system. Fast track the system at a time where cases are exposed. Many books and stories have been written about the ignoring of abuse has been going on for decades. Most people can figure it out. The 20 percent of cases where abuse is reported deserves careful handling. The use of parental alienation through access and visitation program triggers the money maker. The MOU for fatherhood and blanket legislation bring financial resources to the state. The policies of the fatherhood initiative are discrimination. All of the money is placed in gatekeeper alienation claims. Until the state of Connecticut is not running on the federal welfare reform act, fatherhood initiative domestic violence will continue to increase. The money is placed in batters programs and rehabilitation. Minimal funding is being used for the survivors including the children. We can argue all day but the focus continues to be the best interest and basic human rights. Best interest and protection of children is being overshadowed by constitutional rights. The federal funding needs to follow the children and not the father. Jennifer and Julie are both dead. Children have no parents. These are the worst cases. There are many others fighting a system stigmatizing them. Consider not credible and using unregulated practice of psychology. It’s finally being exposed. This is the reason for the push for equal and shared parenting with parental alienation backing it up. Running the legislators around the funding racket . Collecting battered women and teaching the fatherhood language to promote the cause. Your statistics are misleading. Fail to break important information down. Equal and shared parenting knows that the bar to prove DV is high. The guardian ad lithiums from the public defenders office are running the fatherhood initiative and welfare reform program. Cause that’s what brings money to the state. The continued focus on the fatherhood language and agenda to discredit people coming forward and reporting. I have no doubt that innocent people are accused of abuse that is not happening. There are a larger number of people being abused not coming forward cause of the stigma and states focus on saving money and distorting the problem. The organization designed to help people is tarnished and tainted with the MOU agreeing to place fatherhood first or they will not receive money. This is the design of the state of Connecticut. The more the need the more money flowing to the state. No one should have to turn up dead to be heard and believed. Stop silencing and stigmatizing thousands of people including children. Punishing them for reporting a nationwide problem being ignored.
True that. No one ever seems to care about the abuse I endured, instead they trip up on why I didnt leave. When the abuser is has ties to the police and politicians and tells you no one will believe you and the times you do report the abuse to the police, and they do nothing, absloutely nothing, and your spouse is threatening youll never see their kids, the humans who grew in your womb, who you cared for and raised, it is very hard to know what to do.
WOMEN NEED THE ERA, EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ARCHIVED!! TELL BIDEN TO “MAKE THE CALL!!”.
National Parents Organization ·
The second annual International Shared Parenting Day event is tomorrow evening! Join our amazing speakers at 6PM Eastern on April 25th and celebrate this important day with us. The event is free and virtual, but don’t forget to RSVP here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/international-shared-parenting-day-virtual-event-registration-855621666437?aff=oddtdtcreator
ANR Law: A Negotiated Resolution The Anti-Alienation Project We the Parents – Movie Good foundation Jennifer Jill Harman Americans for Equal Shared Parenting
10 signs You are in a cult.
Demented state.
Algorithmic discrimination. It’s important to have discrimination by vested interest groups to spread discrimination.
such archaic bs. men have much more power.
That makes sense!
Teflon Don stricks again
Demented state
Teflon Don stricks again
“A child is the best gift you can give to a pathological parent.
The weapon of all weapons, their possession, to use against you long after the relationship ends.”
Absolutely. Watching them abuse a child is the worst thing a human can experience.
Thank you for confirming Alienation. Your opinion is so crucial in this world since you are such an expert as a DARVO queen.
One thing that many victims of abuse have learned is to stop being a people pleaser. Thanks for demonstrating that a simple statement that doesn’t fit the opposing side is quickly turned in to a parental alienation alligation. There is nothing about the comment that is darvo. A simple statement is quickly turned in to the narrative. This is why there will be little hope to meet in the middle. If your x punched your daughter in the face or made sexually inappropriate comments to your sons 15 year old friends would you want your x wife to be alone with the children? I’m guessing probably not. No women would blame you.
which is why they do it, they know its what hurts us the most
Shared and equal parenting, absent a finding of abuse in a court of law, must become the norm in our country.
Maybe every start of day every public government office local, state and federal should play the american national anthem and the pledge of allegiance! When we were kids that kept us united! I went to several ct graduation ceremonies and the national anthem was not played! I was saddened! corruption is being taught from our educators and tikkity tok!
After reading so many of the off the rail comments by self interest groups, it is sad to see how money poisons your mind from the true issue at hand.
Because of $$$! Without $$$ nothing happens!
That includes federal funding
More alienation industry propaganda. It never ends.
just like your constipated mind of misogynistic propaganda.
The great thing about living through an abusive relationship is no longer being a people pleaser. One would have to respect the person expressing an opinion. I think we are hitting a nerve exposing what it’s all about. Just say no to drugs and no to the abuser. They don’t like it when you set boundaries.
We the Parents (2023) – Gateway Film Center
Premier’s in two days.
Looks good, Peter!
“… At the heart of the problem is a Family Court System devised and unchanged since the 1950’s. Further, corruption is centralized and apparent with billions of dollars changing hands as child support orders are made, and parenting time and parenting rights are absolutely obliterated.
These parents are not without hope. A fight is underway to eliminate the money-making industrialization of family court, as well as fighting for the simple presumption of 50/50 equal shared parenting. …”
These are 20 percent of cases with abuse alligations. These are not normal cases. It’s about safe and not finances.
Actually, family courts changed A LOT since the 1950s.
For example: AFCC, Inc started the for-profit public-private networks around the 1970s … then, Richard Gardner toured the nation and the world to spread his criminal junk science in the 1980s … from then on, state government offices enabled those criminal networks promoting quack evaluators as “experts” and turning a blind eye as the same small groups of attorneys and “experts” have passed the most dangerous cases to/from each other etc.
This is it in a nutshell. False alarm of DV is not the problem. The family court system profiting from false alligations of parental alienation.
It’s equally shocking, troubling and telling that the “family” court reform efforts have been, and continue to be, stuck and not progressed in 20+ years over the same pointless and circular arguments regarding “parental alienation” and “what it is”. And ridiculous gender bias claims the Divorce Industry uses against US.
If anyone believes parents are not encouraged to tell lies in court regarding abuse, and that many parents keep children from seeing their other parent and family members for no valid reason, they’re deaf, dumb, blind and delusional.
This is engrained in our society and the Divorce Industry as a norm and standard operating procedure.
This is also why shared and equal parenting, absent a finding of abuse in a court of law, must become the norm in our country.
And one which more and more states and countries are adopting – with very positive outcomes and results.
positive outcome for who? The children in contested custody litigation? The United Nations has found differently. Define parental alienation and what is estrangement? What is the difference? It’s time to put an end to parental alienation. Mandatory evidence and no more fatherhood initiative running the family court. These are 20 % of cases where the welfare of human beings’ lives are on the line. Thousands of children were abused and sexually assaulted by parents. THEY DESERVE BETTER.
This is absolutely bogus. You relentlessly ignore domestic violence and sexual assault. The death toll increased in Connecticut has increased. Since equal and shared parenting has gotten involved in the family court the situation has gotten worse. You ignore facts and toss numbers out that are not broken down or accurate. You are trying to force a system that doesn’t allow for victims to protect themselves and the children. The criminal justice system doesn’t address domestic violence. No psychological abuse or financial abuse. Recognized form of domestic violence that are not illegal. YOU relentlessly skirt the issue. You are actually aware of how the system works and your running a one way agenda wrapped in a pretty package. There is statically probability that the 20 percent are abusive or sexual predators. Only a small percentage are false alligations .
The men’s rights push for 50/50
Equal and shared parenting is a men’s rights agenda. The contested custody cases are 20 %. These are cases where one of the parents’ fitness is in question. This is being sold to the state and women who have lost custody to abusive spouses. If you are stating that the courts are corrupt how will 50/50 help? THE TRUTH IS IT WONT. This makes absolutely no difference in these 20 % of cases. With the hopes of getting out of child support obligations. Arrearage for monetized men who refuse to pay. We are not talking about men in poverty.
The family court system Wonder Bread Factory. I’m a monitized white man. I’m entitled to not take responsibility for my actions and financial responsibility. It’s my constitutional rights to have control over my former spouse and the children. I’m entitled to take ownership over my children. I will hide behind the projects that are advertised as a minority project. I will go to court and destroy anyone who dares to challenge my behavior. My attorney knows all the ins and outs. Years experience working the fatherhood system. I know the guardian ad lithiums and together we can move the case along. Your x wife’s attorney knows all about the loosing battle that brings money to state and so does the judge. We are all on the same page. It’s costly to deal with abusive behavior. So the state will ask for money and call it a health care crisis. We will get government funding and not have to pay or prostitute family violence. Women are of low economic value so we will use the system against them. We will sell parental alienation to the legistors and 50)50 to make it harder. The judge won’t discuss Domestic violence and sexual abuse. It’s taboo. Will cost the state too much money. We will label it false reporting so women and children will keep their mouths shut. The federalist program for economic growth and development of the state and the nation.
Only 20% because thats where the $$$ is! why do bank robbers rob banks?
Even the poor are suffering because of the fatherhood funding. A gaint disaster created by the federalist. Moved along by Clinton. Epstein Island visitor and cigar club member. Too many pigs have sat in the oval office.
I could see 20% as Narcissistic. Makes sense. Add one parent or both with sizeable assets and $$$ then it rolls into the mess!
Sounds like you have a lot to lose financially because you’re comments come down to one simple statement
Why is it a win for a father to have equal custody and it’s a loss for a mother to have equal custody? That’s not a father mother issue it’s an equal parent issue. You’re sensitive to this because it affects something else not the custody issue most likely it’s a financial one
The same excuse. It’s getting old. Put your children first. It’s that simple.
not when 1 parent is hateful and spiteful! they hide behind FC to do their dirty work!
its only a men’s right agenda in your world because it doesn’t fit your narrative of entitlement.
You can thank the parental alienation industry for making it a gender issue. The relentless targeting women. This is and continues to be the mens right groups agenda. The welfare reform stinks to high heaven. Only men’s rights groups were invited. Know your history of the family court and where the problem was originated. Let’s look at funding and legislation. How many are ” Michelle’s” ? Let’s get the real statistics. How many were accused of parental alienation? Don’t have the information on fatherhood funding or policies?
Correction: 50-50 is a PARENT’S agenda.
It’s about the kids not the parents. Thanks for pointing out the push is really all about.
Peter I think Connecticut is starting to get your number.
The Ugly sorted details from someone who doesn’t belong to either group.
Both are well aware of the bias funding that is running family court. Yet afraid to out the state of Connecticut politicians.
Equal and shared parenting is using it to their advantage and will back even the most abusive men. Even defending the murder of the Jennifer’s murder. If she just split assets (that belonged to the mother-in-law) Jenifer would be alive. Alive until when? Another issue came up? Until Michelle was angry again about 5 children that were not hers? The 50/50 legislation. Peter Szymoniak has been using the healthy marriage father’s rights propaganda for years. In the original divorce his former wife made slightly over $400 a week. Peter made over $3000. Clearly did not want to pay child support. Was allowed to hold the courts up for his work schedule. Brought 2nd wife Monicia into court litigation. “Father’s and family”
Monicia Szymonik, Peter’s second wife attempted a run at office with 2 more children added to Peter’s family. On green party ticket promoting healthy marriage and two parent households. For reasons unknown to the public, Monicia decided to file for divorce and extricate the marriage. With Judge Leo Diana. Peter has a history of going after the courts when they don’t rule in his favor. Which was pushed to mediation? Paid for with fatherhood funding I bet. Several children switching back and forth from 3 or more different homes. Yet, we are still promoting “Healthy Marriage ” father knows best and women are liars and fabricate domestic issues. Are greedy and selfish for asking for financial support. No one has heard a peep out of Monicia Szymonik the once very vocal court reform advocate. Promoting two parent households and stigmatizing single mothers.
Joan Kloth Zanard has been complaining about the state of Connecticut for years. Despite walking away with large support payments and the marital property. Custody of her children. She hired a forensic accountant to collect every penny she felt was owed to her. According to court documents of her case with the right address wrong town.
Married a twice divorced father and the relationships fell apart. By her own account the problems began when she came into the picture. Reports she called her former therapist RICHARD GARDNER and realized it was PARENTAL ALIENATION. It’s unclear as to what exactly was going on, but the kids from the second marriage were not into Joan and have not repaired the relationship with Dad. No one has heard from Chris Zanard publicly about his custody issues and relationship. Only Joan. Perhaps the adult children would be better off discussing it with their dad. No need for stirring the pot like Michelle.
Betsy Keller still fighting in family court with her former husband over financial matters. It is unclear if any abuse allegations were made. Still has access to her children. Many protective mothers do not. There appears to be no protest or gathered reports to the federal government in regard to the more than 400 cases. Many of the original members who fought to pass Jenefer’s law that have come forward to tell their Storys are gone from the group. Childless and ostracized by the New Board members who could care less as to the history of how the family court system evolved into the federally funded misogynistic mess it is today. Failing to understand how and why legislation has been turned against them. Controlling the information to women in Connecticut. Involving the state leaders and our federal government. Womens suffrage has been going on for years. Many women in Connecticut have historically been persecuted in family court. Paving the way to shed light on the sexist bias family court system. With the welfare reform act, the rich white man’s project. The control of father’s rights groups taking over the fatherhood initiative. Using federal money. Doled out by Senator Richard Blumenthal. The legislators of Connecticut passing laws that they know will not help against the mandates of the fatherhood program. Running the entire state financially. Discriminating against all women of all colors, religion and economic status.
If you want to fix family court know who is involved. The state of Connecticut could care less about children. Look at DCF. William Tongs mess. Look at the number of people dead over the years. They care about who is going to bring in the most funding. Children for sale to the highest bidder. Right now, it’s the federal government. The MOU, federal welfare reform, fatherhood initiative HHS grant funding and men’s rights groups through legal donations. The legal right to rape, abuse, childless and left penniless. Inhumanly dragging people to court and children through your horrific process. God help anyone who exposes or whistle blows. Disbarred, loose your medical license or wind-up dead.
Fix your three-ring circus Connecticut. You have left a trail of evidence the public deserves the truth. Every ugly detail. Sincerely, Voter, Taxpayer, homeowner with a designer handbag.
Dear Anonymous,
Instead of making up fairy tales and lies about my two cases, please feel free to call me anytime so I can answer any questions you may have. I have nothing to be ashamed of, or to hide. You apparently do.
Your gender bias is a huge part of why we have made near zero progress at reform in over 20 years. And why Jennifer’s Law is such a disaster and being used AGAINST women.
I work with more women than men in the area of reform. I’ve known many of them for over 15 years. You are free to speak to any one of them to get an accurate picture of “my agenda.”
You are also free to speak with my former wife from my second marriage. She’ll explain how we both opted to settle everything out of the nightmare court system when our adult relationship ended. How we both have always supported and fought for equal and shared parenting. How we are very successfully sharing equal time with our daughters, and how her son from her former relationship also still spends time with me.
Leo Diana, was my first wife’s divorce attorney.
Thank you
No one made anything up. Your divorce information is public record. All the information is on the Internet for anyone to read.
FA- 05-4003406-s September 27, 2007. kloth v kloth
Leo Diana another one who is in the batter of filth.
Leo Diana appears to be a good judge who has inherited a BIG PROBLEM . A currupt system the state of Connecticut won’t straighten out. Stuck with the pressure of a system that is financed by fatherhood funding. Exposed is abusive and infested with uneithical Attorneys the bar association won’t disbar. Where child welfare attorneys are granted immunity and should be prosecuted. Answering to the legislators who just want the money brought into the state. Sitting on judiciary committee ignoring the problems. Judge Albis and Patrick retired. I can’t imagine the guilt they will live with.
Why wouldn’t Leo Diana excuse himself from your second divorce proceedings? Quickly pushed to the mediation. Did you attempt to stop the divorce proceedings in your adult relationship with your second wife? Did you refuse counseling in your first divorce procedures? Do you think if you received counseling your second marriage would have worked out? Do you believe you bare any responsibility in the failure of your marriages? Do you think your children have been effected by the consequences of having to endure the divorce proceedings?
Syzmonic v syzmonic FA 064027147s January 6, 2017
You want to go after people on the Internet and the frank report. Defend your own case. If you feel the courts are currupt and people are alienators. Step up to the plate and talk about your own case. You are quick to judge people and run a public trial in the frank report and in Richards substack. Talk about your own cases in public.
Incredible that everything you wrote about Joan Kloth-Zanard is not only false but easily proven to be false. You have one vivid imagination that cannot be supported with any legal evidence. I dare you to find proof of anything you have stated besides Joan’s personal comments which can be found anywhere. Prove that she got all the assets in a marriage that never existed. Prove that she spent time with her step children? Prove that her relationship with Dr. Gardner was somehow toxic. You are clearly have issues if it is this important to you to lie, distort and deceive in an attempt to control the narrative to fit your needs. Get your facts straight because this could be seen as a criminal act instead of a mental health issue for you.
You wrote:
If he were still alive today, would Dr. Richard Gardner’s clinical skills lead him to think of that as bullying or an attempt at societal alienation … or just a passive aggressive comment … or a threat + ad hominem attack?
If you have a religion, what does your religion tell you about all of this?
We have her divorce documents on the record. She has made podcasts stating everything listed. Joan we know you use the name Ashley. We can send the information to Frank and was all accessed on the Internet public information. The facts were listed. We will send them to frank
Why was Joanne involved in a tort case?
Joanne, if it’s alright for you to discuss other people’s cases in the Internet why are you sending Ashley to threaten people? Talk about your own case. Your a hypocrite. Why don’t you defend your own case? You are quick to run a podcast and discuss other cases why is yours not up for discussion? You attack other people, but when it’s time to judge your case you are ready to threaten criminal charges? Mental illness? For stating the court documents from your personal divorce cases? You can go after people in the frank report and Richard’s blog and you threaten people.. you can dish it out but you can’t take it.
Joanie it’s you that distorts truth. Man pleaser
Dear FBI, in the interest of the public perhaps an in investigation in the largest non profit organization for parental alienation may be in order. This is an organization that involves the welfare of children. The Richard Gardner hypothesis and theories are unregulated and unrecognized. This is an organization that has influences the public. Teaching and promoting an ideal escalating the court system. As well as hatred towards individuals. Effects the lives of children. With a network of affiliates receiving profit in our nations court system. The information is all over for you to see. Plenty will testify as to how the information dumped into the Internet has been harmful. Children have been man handled and traumatized dragged off to camps and forced into a therapy not recognized in the profession and the continued advocacy to engage in these practices at great profit. The united nations has cautioned the world and we are praying you take it seriously. If you are willing to investigate cults like one taste harming adults. This is an organization affecting children.
Please check out the associates go fund me page. Then go to the slam the gavel podcast. Joanie, your kitchen is beautiful. Women accused of parental alienation are living in domestic violence shelters and have no place to live. Parents in family court are bankrupt. Joan has helped many of you out. She needs money for retaliation for a court case. What was the tort case about. Would Jennifer and Julie still be alive if experts were not stating 99 percent of the domestic violence claims are false in my experience. Parental alienation became popular with the welfare reform act. What a money generator. Thousands of dollars not covered by insurance and can charge what ever they want. Covered by access and visitation grant. Lots of insensitive to keep the hypothesis going.
What is criminal about disclosure of public information and interviews on the Internet? From a woman running a group out of her house with out a license To counsel folks on what she says is a mental health issue? The facts are all over the Internet. Is it illegal or criminal to question the motives of an individual who claims to be an expert based on public information? How many people mostly women would testify about the information on the Internet and the information that’s public? . Nothing in the comment is not public. Joan should stop doing podcasts if she doesn’t want people to talk about it. She tries to get money from lawsuits. Vexious litigation? You can not question the women she runs to the courts and trys to get money. ( On belief of the Internet and history of court look up) . She can speak for herself and correct the information if it’s not correct.
So we have this correct “Anonymous”…
You believe a Special Education teacher with a Masters degree, employed full time at $86,000/year (documented as a public record), makes $400/week?
That’s less than a school lunch aide makes 🙂
Court transcript is incorrect?
The defendant ( Peter) finds the court order offensive to participate in individual therapy for himself. He feels that the best therapy he can receive is through court reform group. He was unable to identify a licensed therapist in the group. When we are unable to self reflect and admit our faults we are destined to repeat the same mistakes. When we are blinded by our selves, we blind others. When you can not unalter a distorted perception and pass that perception onto others. Family court is not Burger King and the judge should not be giving your whopper. A man or woman who is unable to discuss their own family court case has absolutely NO BUSINESS JUDGING OTHERS.
This is the starting point for both, parents and children
Not in high conflict cases. The starting point is a court system that is not bought and paid for by father’s rights groups. A state willing to punish crime. Sign the ERA and we can get an even playing field to be heard in family court.
Until false allegations become a full punishable crime equivalent to the claim made the fathers rights and to be brought front and center.
When the state of Connecticut stops hiding abuse and NOT punishing it. Currently they will not discuss it in family court. GALS have been caught withholding information and calling the prosecutor’s office to have charges dropped, like in Luigi’s case. The state does not do a good job. The gals are following the fatherhood initiative programs. 50/50 is the batterers and irresponsible father’s way of getting out of child support. Having extended family and new partners baby sit the kids. Parental alienation is being abused and DV is going unpunished. Emotional psychological abuse and financial ignored. These are 20 percent of cases. Julie and Jennifer died because of the neglect of the state to believe DV happens. Especially in white families not in poverty. White children are sexually assaulted in almost all the cases by white fathers. At a higher rate than any other race. Larger rates than a mother’s new partner. Judges are giving custody to x convicts Soley because of the fatherhood initiative money. These women are left defenseless, no attorney. . Not for the children’s sake in an effort to stop them from re-entry. IT’S NOT A FATHER’S RIGHT TO CONTINUE TO ABUSE THEIR CHILDREN OR THEIR MOTHERS. UNTIL THE GOVERMENT STEPS UP TO THE PLATE TO PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE TO HAVE A PROBLEM. Front and center must be the accountability of the JUDICAL BRANCH AND THEIR CONDUCT IN CONTESTED CUSTODY… CHILDRENS BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS. UNTIL IMMUNITY IS ELIMINATED IN THE JUDICAL BRANCH FOR GALS, PSYCHOLOGIST AND FAMILY SERVICES OUR COURTS ARE UNSAFE AND UNFIT TO DETERMINE FALSE CLAIMS Stacking the deck with fatherhood money to bias cases.
Sounds like you are upset because you are going to lose money! Stop screaming
Deflecting. This is the problem, while you are obsessed with money some people are concerned about the well-being of children. The financial aspect are the least of the problem. Yet, that’s what people like you continue to bring it back to. Plenty of people have tried to stop child support so the abuse will stop. The judges don’t allow it. Not best interest. It’s about controlling people. It’s got nothing to do with the money for the people trying to protect their children. Your manipulative tactics to try and deflect from the real problems are getting old. The attorneys are focused on the cash and taking as much as possible. The protective parent is focused on the kids. The abuser is focused on deflecting. Thanks for continuing to demonstrate how it’s always deflecting from the safety and well-being. Unfortunately I know your type all to well.
Hey lady whomever you are ( corrupt attorney, pseudo psychologist whatever) you seem to know it all by your comments ( Maybe you need a job oh, that’s right You don’t need one you have child support, alimony, incentives, grants) The list goes on.)
The days of false DV reporting the days of embellishing claims the days of lining pockets, a slowly coming to an end for Oh the multitude of fabricated DV reporting. You and your entourage/flying monkeys Will repent for the harm you have caused so many children and families You’re screaming of fire in a crowded theater is fizzling very fast your psychobabble does nothing to those who have been through the trenches of this vile and corrupt agenda
You’re not a protective parent but a coercive one. you’re just a malicious parent. You remind me of a little girl with glasses and braces in the schoolyard and she can’t play so she starts having hissy fits so no one else can play.
The whopper. The court system is currupt when it’s convenient. Punish these Domestic Violence victims for reporting. So we can dominate the narrative and family court. It’s real 😅 old and finally coming out publicly. Swiss cheese.
punish the FALSE FABRICATED EMBELLISHED DV CASES get with the program sweetie.
by the way wopper is trash and I prefer pepperjack.
Put boundaries and accountability to false DV claims , equal shared parenting ( fit parents… stop blaming fathers you sound stupid, mothers are just as bad false reporting, BS stories, and fathers who just don’t report abuse) and you eliminate a majority of PA since it used as custodial interference for financial leverage. you are trying to bandaid everything , get to the cause and resolve the effects. Stay on point.
A house of cards. There is a parent who is unfit in the 20 percent of cases. We see through the house of smoke and mirrors. According to the real statistics. The contested custody cases 20 percent are accurate. A significantly smaller portion are false alligations of abuse. We are on point. Much has been exposed to demonstrate that abuse and sexual assault is occuring in multiple family court cases. The continued focus on deflecting from the root cause. Your running out of false narrative. There is nothing to gain with making false accusations of domestic violence. Control, manipulate, control, manipulate, control, manipulate, control manipulate, control manipulate. Grandstanding. Place another fire cracker in the corner of the room in the court house. Parental alienation, Monchouser by proxy, the kitchen sink, undiagnosed mental health issues. Fatherhood initiative, 14 th amendment rights. You have been leaving a trail of evidence and a pattern. Are you upset because someone is outing the truth? I think you are. Years of macurading and deception will eventually catch up to you.
False and fabricated information. Father’s are not the problem. It’s abusers. Either gender. Parental alienation is eliminated and gender specific funding we can’t reform the court. Pomp and circumstance and presentation of altered statistics that are not broken down. These are 20 percent of the cases. I’m sure 20 percent are accurate amount of DV occuring in the state. The push to bypass court process. Much headway has begun because of self representation. DV victims learning the court process. The cause of the failure is parental alienation in the majority of cases. The lack of evidencery hearings. The ALIENATION Industry psychologist forced on cases.
The only good thing about the transgender genocide agenda is there are going to be less people on this planet ( for a while, until the man women are all birthing artificial babies or growing them in little holly hubby stem cell ovens. )
Earth has become a total mess.
No More legislation until the court house and the state are cleaned up!! This is more bullshit to muddy up the waters
Well it looks like I’m gonna have to be the bearer of bad news for all Mother’s because nobody else is going to be honest with you all and that is all of you mom’s that have lost custody your children will possibly never ever get your children back and nobody will ever be held accountable for it and this is why
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_v._Reed
And remember all these people that claim to be supporters of women and speakers for women they’re really not they’re just clowns dressed in robes and then you have men spreading mischiefs little part truth little part lie.
https://search.worldcat.org/title/Reed-v.-Reed-at-40-:-equal-protection-and-women's-rights/oclc/801984789
Please please please moms learn the law learn how you are a second class citizen under the United States constitution and that the laws do not have to equally apply to you and states will not ever be at all accountable for it no matter what.
Demand that Biden passes the ERA or he doesn’t get our vote in November that’s the only way we will ever fight and have any equal rights in the family courts as if we have the archives archive the ERA.
Under the US constitution you do not have the laws equally apply to you as a woman and no one will ever be held accountable for it because it’s written into the Constitution.
Please learn how to research please it is so worth it and you will help save other mom’s
Why is it that “Courts have for many years been moving toward sex-neutral standards in family court decisions, and legislatures have been writing laws with increased attention to sex-neutral language and intent”?
https://www.equalrightsamendment.org/faq/
Bogus, number one When a mom who is a domestic violence victim asks for alimony that triggers a program to support the father to have access and visitation and 100% access to those children. So that does not work in the benefit of domestic violence victims who are mothers trying to protect their children from abusers.
Mothers who are domestic violence victims or sexual assault victims do not have protections when it comes to child custody and social security payments that’s why so many women are actually losing custody so again false information.
Why don’t you try actually reading the ERA and then we can have a discussion on to whether it is harmful towards women or beneficial towards women.
I myself have read the entire ERA have you? Because snipping posts that are really just opinions by writers does not tell me that you have actually read the ERA, nor does it say that you understand it.
“When a mom who is a domestic violence victim asks for alimony that triggers a program to support the father to have access and visitation and 100% access to those children.”
Custody flipping for mothers in poverty. Children born out of wedlock. ABSOLUTELY no legal representation for these mothers. You are robed and depleted of your assets by these pieces of crap holding a Connecticut bar card on purpose. In the imstrest of federal funding to the state of Connecticut.
Next time use protection
Absolutely
Check into the silver alerts. Convicts getting out of prison going after their children. Please contact Anthony Jenkins for FOYA into the access and visitation grant program. Perhaps a good hard long look at Joseph Ditunno and the violent offender program. Diana Ditunno health and human services Uconn fatherhood initiative. They are hiding information from the public and trying to stop FOYA. Someone is trying to cover their backside. Check out child support enforcement office. Perhaps the state of Connecticut would do their Job and investigate. The DCF train wreck. These people are not held accountable for anything. It’s in the state contracts.
Hidding statistics among other things.
Who would it not benefit by women having equal constitutional rights in the United States of America, Man. So please just sit down and be quiet Peter.
“Would the ERA adversely affect existing benefits and protections that women now receive (e-g., alimony, child custody, Social Security payments, etc.)?”:
Most family law is written, administered, and adjudicated at the state level. Court decisions in states with ERAS show that the benefits that opponents claim women would lose are not in fact lost. They remain constitutional if they are provided in a sex-neutral manner based on function rather than on an assumption of stereotyped sex roles. That same principle would apply to laws and benefits (e.g., Social Security) at the federal level.
Based on the text of the ERA, legislators would have two years after the amendment is ratified to change sex-based classifications in laws that might be vulnerable to challenge as unconstitutional. Those laws can be brought into conformity with the ERA by substituting sex-neutral categories (e.g., “primary caregiver” instead of “mother”) to achieve their objectives.
Courts have for many years been moving in the direction of sex-neutral standards in family court decisions, and legislatures have been writing laws with increased attention to sex-neutral language and intent. It is unlikely that the ERA would have a significant impact on those trends.
“Does the ERA shift power from the states to the federal government?”
Opponents have called Section 2 of the ERA (“The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article”) a “federal power grab.” In fact, that clause, sometimes including enforcement by the states as well, appears in eight other amendments, beginning with the 13th Amendment in 1865.
The ERA would not transfer jurisdiction of any laws from the states to the federal government. It would simply be one more legal principle among many others in the U.Ss. Constitution by which the courts evaluate the constitutionality of governmental actions.
“What level of public support exists for a constitutional guarantee of equal rights for women and men?”
(THE FATHERS/MENS RIGHTS GROUPS ARE NOT TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION HERE, THANK GOD BECAUSE MOST AMERICANS ARE TIRED OF THEIR RHETORICAL BULLSHIT AND MANIPULATING LANGUAGE).
The remarkably high level of public support for a constitutional guarantee of equal rights on the basis of sex continues to rise.
According to a 2016 poll commissioned by the national ERA Coalition, 94% of Americans support an amendment to the Constitution to guarantee equal rights for men and women. This support reached as high as g9% among 18-to
– 12 – 24-year-olds, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanic Americans. However, 80% of those polled thought the Constitution already guarantees equal rights to males and females.
You wont get Peter, Luigi or Joan to sit down. They love the spot light. God forbid a domestic violence survivor speak up. 99 percent of the D claims are false. Even the body count doesn’t matter. 21 dead. How many injuries? No statistics on that. Unless you are dead, your not to be believed.
there aren’t enough crayons and time to explain this to you.
Prime example of the insulting nature of the people who think everything is sun shine and roses. There is little expectance and acknowledgement of the obvious information no one talks about. There is little ability to see beyond a personal objective. There is definitely a financial insensitive to keep cases going. No one interest to control a system that is supposed to be built on fairness, equality and justice. The focus on children has been lost. Rights and entitlements. The system is NOT designed to find out the truth. Until the system starts to investigate the truth and not designed to defend abusive people no legislation should be passed. It never stops amazing me how people would claim a system is currupt and then ignore the facts. No need for crayons. Enough research to point out the state of Connecticut is either not investigating for financial reasons. Frank is not alone in demonstrating the system is hidding pedipiies and abusers. The voices of victims are being over shadowed by a group of people who want to bypass and fast track. The financial cost of divorce proceedings are a problem. The equal and shared parenting relentless insistance to run parental alienation and the narrative to gain leverage over family court has been going on since 2014. The Connecticut family court system is an even larger mess than ever. The death toll is climbing. Neither Joan or Peter will discuss their personal divorce, but push cases that get them what they want. Possession and dominance. The use of parental alienation in family courts is a money maker. Equal and shared parenting is a big obstacle in fixing family court. A dog and pony show.
When parents (and their divorce attorneys) are held accountable for fraud, perjury and making false claims of DV in “family” court, to erase a fit parent and family out of a child’s life, please let us know.
when the slime bag attorneys are held accountable for coaching their narc clients it will begin an end to to unethical crap. the courthouses will decdline to a fraction of what they are now… no more lucrative CHA CHING!!!! for all the trash.
Who is coaching who. You are not ALLOWED to bring up abuse. Your told to shut up and are threatened. When the GALs are calling the prosecutor office and stopping an investigation? When GALs are NOT allowing outside mental health and doctors to testify or consul? Dirty tricks are played by many. NOTHING is done about it because of the fatherhood initiative money running the state of Connecticut!
When the alienation industry is held accountable for fraud and perjury, obstruction of justice and hindering prosecution we can talk. Your insists to deny DV in the 20 percent of cases looses credibility. There are both mother and father who should not have direct access to children with out supervision. Until all the curruption is addressed we will never move forward.
Correct. We, and the people we work with, and the 30,000+ members of the Facebook Parental Alienation pages, will never stop fighting to have our states and courts recognize, protect and uphold the fundamental and federally recognized rights of ALL parents and EVERY parent.
Including pedipiies and abusers cause that is exactly what this is about. 80 % can figure it out. Looking at your case, don’t see curruption. People who won’t take responsibility for their own behavior.
Break it down. Cause 33, 000 world wide doesn’t reflect the situation in Connecticut. The human rights of children to live free from harm and abuse should not be overshadowed by the perception of entitlements. There is arguments for everyone. Please State the amount of CT members and break it down by sex of the parents. Step parents should not be factored in the numbers. 33,000 world wide is a small percentage.
A LOT of misinformation is being given by AGENDA groups. These things are all surrounded by money. State and federal funding and policies. People have to search out the problems going on behind the curtain.
Why would a group often advised by a policy Maker not be advocating for changes in the core issues and problems? Why are women attempting to educate other women be treated so badly they have to leave the group? Not just a handful. Why would people be obstructing people from speaking out and hidding information? Let’s hope someone can tell the real facts .
It’s called entitlement syndrome
Who has the data to show what’s going on behind the curtains?
Who is asking? We want some one who is willing to do something about it.
Stratford CT superident on paid leave for Domestic Incident resulting in an arrest. The prosecutor office dropped the charges. Cause that’s what currupt CT does. The Bridgeport chapter of NNACP demand he be placed back on duty. In Connecticut domestic dispute are swept under the rug. The culture of Connecticut. Free pass.
There was much more prior putting him on paid leave.
Yea! In the real world your employer would release you off their payroll! Facts!
The public defender commission will launch and investigation for 100 attorneys. They have not launched an investigation into the child welfare attorneys for thousands of Connecticut residents? They are are taking votes about the confidence in leadership of the Chief Public Defender, but they they don’t take a survey or a vote on the confidence of the child welfare attorneys? Where is the commissions open hearings on the child welfare attorneys who should be fired.
Perhaps William Tong can hire a firm outside of the state of Connecticut to investigate the child welfare attorneys? The public defender office can eliminate discrimination and hatred within it’s agency. To restore the publics faith in the public defender office. Focus on the people they serve THE CHIlDREN. Not the state of Connecticut and their programs. Perhaps those child welfare attorneys can be fired and charged with hindering prosecution of sexual assault, and abuse when applicable?
The criminal justice system, reform and racism and the welfare reform system.
Billions if not trillions of federal dollars have been used to gain financial edge in the state of Connecticut. The ACLU and the ignoring of a gender. Reverse racism in Connecticut when it’s convenient.
The leader and the head of the snake.
For more than 10 years Connecticut has a model for criminal justice reform. Significant cost savings in prosecution, plea bargains and eliminating.10 prisons. ACLU and smart justice. There is no question to the endless problems in the justice system. The state of Connecticut has taken it to an epic level. Including turning domestic violence into a non-criminal issue and failing to protect women and children. 21 people died in Connecticut due to Domestic violence. Including children. There were over thousands of children sexually assaulted by a parent. Connecticut has stopped reporting by which gender in reports made public. Why? Because of the fatherhood initiative all lumped in with welfare and “reform”. The self-reported studies’
As our state leaders grandstand and hide under a minority mask. Thousands more women and are subject to abuse. The states court system questioned for covering it up. For cost savings and grant money. Domestic violence and poverty ignored in the minority community. Fathers in prison let out with financial resources and legislation to engage is custody battle. While legal aid ignores them. For the greater good to Connecticut cost savings and increased state use of TANF. More fatherhood money.
As senior prosecutor Devant Joiner is nominated and then used as a public spectacle by the state.in media coverage. Accused of aggressive prosecution. A man who found his way out of poverty. While the Child Welfare Attorneys Evade investigation for what appears to be possible HINDERING PROSECUTION of sexual assault and abuse of Connecticut children involved in complex child custody litigation. As well as DCF care.
A misogynist leading the prison reform and transitioning program looks to be supported by the colleges. Cause there is tons of grant money to be had in the men using the prison reform programs and fatherhood funding.
Good Luck to Bowden -Lewis today. The state of Connecticut is going to pull out all stops protecting their money. Raises, benefits and retirement. The state of Connecticut only cares about your color, gender, and religion when it brings them money or prevents them from receiving it.
As we can see from the comments
No one is hated more than the one who speaks the truth in facts not opinions. Cases are corrupt from onset when their is lots of money and children to use as pawns for $$$
Yes, the reality is the state is selling the rights of children to a parent. The federal government has funded these courts. Failing to provide appropriate investigation of cases. Opinions can and cannot be based on the evidence and investigation of a system. The court system is neglecting the highest standard of conduct and investigation for financial gains. The truth of the family courts has been shown time and time again of false psychological evaluations guided to present and past alienation claims. Using and grandstanding a false narrative in a triangulated system. When you are publicly and relentlessly claiming a position, The public is entitled to hear the entire truth. Questioning the circumstances surrounding the cases is what people should be doing to get to the bottom of the truth. That is why we are all here. Answering the questions and facts of the court of public opinion helps everyone understand what is happening. Deflections of a group that is unhappy with the imperative information to figure out the corruption and if there are people falsely making claims. CHILDREN ARE VERY IMPORTANT, ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT ABUSE AND ELIMINATING THE QUESTIONS IS PERFECTLY EXCEPTIABLE. EXPECTING A BLANKET BELIEF THE PROTECTIVE PARENT AND CHILDREN ARE DISHONEST IS NOT EXCEPTIBLE.
False allegations of DV jail time. False allegations of PA jail time. Remove all financial incentives until proven or disproven. Criminal issues dealt with in criminal court first prior to any vial court/family proceedings. ALL individuals will think twice before making a false claim AND they will understand that their will be accountability for any embellished claims. Jail time for sleazy attorneys/GAL/Evaluators (referral networks) who coach their clients for padded alimony child support, & custody. Children need both parents and both parents need to parent their children.
Alimony and child support are calculated. Again these are a small group of cases. One would have to be allowed an evidencery hearing. A judge would have actually be trained and not have federal funding insensitive. Cases can’t be based on these fraudulent psychologist evaluations.
As in false and fabricated so abuse allegations The system is rigged for no accountability on false claims
Which is the firestarter for all the other factors involved?
Psychological evaluation are valuable tool. They just need to be used properly and need to be heard properly.
The problem is the disagreement is
The psychologist. When the psychologist get weeded out and face license removal. Charged with fraud. Where is the investigation gone for Calvery? When will the AFCC psychologist be investigated? When will the alienation industry and reunification therapy be investigated? It is real easy to pay for a cover up. Way to easy to misguide cases.
The definition of abuse is the problem. Unless you are dead or half dead anything goes. ” Overcoming barriers” . Even supstanced abuse is a money generator. Connecticut doesn’t recognize the abuse Psychological abuse and financial abuse in Connecticut are not yet illegal. Obviously DCF is not doing their job. It’s all related.
Psychological evaluations are only a valuable tool to abusive fathers who have a lot of money they are not a valuable tool for domestic violence victims who are mothers of these children.
Children NEED HEALTHY PARENTS, NOT BOTH PARENTS. CHILDREN NEED A NON VIOLENT, NON MANIPULATIVE, NON ABUSIVE PARENT. CHILDREN NEED THEIR HEALTHY PARENT OVER THEIR ABUSIVE PARENT.
CHILDREN DO NOT NEED BOTH PARENTS, ESPECIALLY A HARMFUL PARENT. To say that children need both parents is a blanket statement made by the father’s rights group industry.
Cottage industry AKA father’s rights groups.
Father’s rights group spread misinformation about what children truly need. Stop listening to them.
Cross examination
no cross if corrupt attorneys fix case prior to even entering the courtroom… don’t fool yourself .attorneys, GALS , terrorists and judges ALL collude on cases when there is a buck or donation to be made. There is no concern where or what about the children as long as they get their 2/3 of the pie.
Funny how you can openly hate women and post an antisemitic banner in the PUBLIC Defenders office and keep your laws license. The public defender was suppressed with pay. Nichola Cunha was disbarred on the spot.
Suspended not disbarred . The media committee is doing what the California police department.Bitch burning. When the Hartford Current starts writing uncensored articles maybe people will start subscription again.
Even Clinton regrets signing the 1996 welfare reform an address’s Congress and the sen at sating that something needs to be done to undo the harm that the welfare reform is doing specifically to women and children.
https://youtu.be/Y9lfuqqNA_g?si=oGkks3IXQg3iEa-v
Welfare reform is the deep core of family court system. The States are using TANF for themselves. CT having to pay back 1.4 million from DCF. Millions of dollars and is causing the removal of children for profit. Including in family court. Collecting millions of fatherhood funding. Using government resources through the MOU. Many payouts to family law attorneys, psychologist for ” parenting plans”. If DCF in Connecticut can be caught misusing funds. How many more federal funded programs are being misused related to the welfare reform act. Absolutely no one is investigating the “self reported programs? Why are states like Connecticut refusing to launch an investigation? The entire state financial structure is based on the MOU for fathers. If the money is being misused and dangerous the funding stops. The money used for the poor is being used to benefit the state employees and the people surrounding family court. Is at the heart of the insensitive to create family court system problems. Criminal court and court reform are all surrounded the welfare reform.
More Tong and the Attorney possible Witch hunting to take place in Connecticut.
THE FOREVER MEDIA CENSORSHIP OF THE Hartford Current
April 10,2024
The Media Committee on behalf of the Attorneys in the Public Defender’s office has managed to leave out some facts leading to the First Black Women to be appointed to be Chief Public Defender. Now to be embattled on April 16, 2024 at an open hearing starting at 2 pm in Hartford.
Tasha Bowden-Lewis made the decision to make it public. Which I am glad she did. The child welfare Attorney’s should be coming out from under their desks for this one. Considering that is where they are running out of. Perhaps they didn’t like the oversight being given and the cleaning of house that was taken place. Perhaps they were upset she wasn’t hiring their friends?
November 16,2023 Court and Justic
Darly McGraw was co-chair of the state POLICE TRANCPARENCY and ACCOUNTIBILITY task force. Founder of Formerly Inc. a criminal justice consulting firm. that DEVEOPES INNAVATIVE RE ENTRY STRATIGIES FOR FORMER PRISON INMATES AND THEIR FAMILIES. (Part of the welfare reform act. going hand and hand with fatherhood funding)
Bowden – Lewis was raised by her mother and grandmother.
Cleaning house
Connecticut Division of Public Defender Division moved to suspend. Based on an offensive MISOGYNISIC social media post. He never intended to make women in the division to feel disrespected. Who care if he is biased and disrespectful to the women living in Connecticut paying taxes that he gains a salary? Misogyny contempt /hatred for women or girls. Appears to be the lay of the land in the legal arena in Connecticut.
November 17, 2023, Jushua Peridine from the New Britain Public defender’s office was suspended with pay for using the public defenders. Office for political agenda. Placing anti-Israel. Anti Joe Biden.
The lovely Black WOMEN sent out an office email stating.
The Public Defenders Office as a Zero tolerance policy for any and all HATEFUL and/or
DISCRIMINOTORY CONDUCT.
Perhaps the child welfare Attorneys got scared?
Bowden Lewis painted in the media as some kind of monster allowing morale to plunder. Perhaps they were upset about not being able to make jokes and hate speech about women and Jewish people? Prior to Bowden- Lewis Lamont let the Black female in charge of the department of Public Health go. William Tong gave her a settlement with a gage order. Devant J, Joiner a black Attorney from the prosecutor’s office came under heavy fire when up for a Judicial Nomination. Considered aggressive for attempting to prosecute crime. Not fashionable or favorable under the welfare reform trying to let everyone out of jail. Maybe he would have put a damper on the Shenanigans going on in the family courthouse? Some pedophiles, abusers and perjurers may have even gone to JAIL. Wouldn’t that have been something? Maybe some other Attorneys would have lost their licenses? Maybe the Psychologist would have been prosecuted?
Attorney William Tong hired an outside consultant firm from Connecticut. More Connecticut bar card holders. To lead an unbiased investigation.
It should be interesting. I wonder if they will offer her a settlement with a gage order.
Stay tuned.
Criminal attorneys and family law attorneys are running the state of Connecticut. At great profit to themselves. A woman just addressed Congress stating that parents are being come after just like Donald Trump. The Democrats are trying to bankrupt him in the courts and using legal warfare. They absolutely do this to parents. Everyone laughed. Did they laugh because they knew it was the truth?
Dead give away. Under different circumstances Attorney General William Tong and Senator Richard Blumenthal would swoop in and make a public announcement about Antisemitism. Perhaps Bowden -Lewis is about people and not running a federalist agenda She fell under the woman umbrella. Misogyny in Connecticut. Women are punching bags and targets in the state of Connecticut. The public defender office is a money generator for the welfare reform act. So it appears they are going to try and hang her. If she doesn’t take a settlement and keep silent.
” The culture” . The politicians in Connecticut only put on their capes if it’s financially lucrative. The public defender office is plea bargains and minimal accountability for breaking the law. Using child welfare attorneys to run a political agenda. Welfare reform. ” All father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children” . Under what ever situation. Using gatekeeper/alienation claims at the forefront generating millions of dollars in to the state budget. THIS IS WHY no investigation. PEOPLE not protecting the “culture of hatred towards a gender” are quickly removing by the people profiting off it. Using funds to let people out of jail to go back to the poverty they came from. With no consideration for victims . Including family court victims. Getting rid of anyone who wants to clean up the system.
Doom and Bloom didn’t show his face in front of Sikorsky with the layoff announcement! I am sure he would be their with cameras on if they were hiring 400! The issue is 40K state employees grifting! then add city and county! GRIFTERS!
Will E Tong terrorism to protect the money that Blumenthal is passing to run the court system in the state.
This what our AG Tong is concerned about! headline chaser like Bloomer!Paying more for groceries? CT investigating if stores are price gouging (news12.com) Going after legitimated businesses trying to pay their employees and ct payroll taxes. Why dont they look into all these fires and accidents at our farms and so called “bird flus”??? Put more Bodegas out of business so they can all go to Amazon, Target & Walmart! How about the price gouging to people going through divorce having to pay $500 hour attorneys and gal’s and the assets FC’s take away from families in CT! AG get the priorities straight! Kids are being stripped from parents and you are worried about things you cant control.
Tong is an insult.
Incompetent. Protecting the money. Where is the almost 10 million dollars? Hiding the family court system curruption. For federal funding.
The fool costello out of business? The court jester! Go to the court judiciary in civil and see how many lawsuits he has against his own clients. Now he is selling his building? Retiring? Quitting ? A client took him to court in Stamford for 1/2 million i think that they lost because he didnt do his job correctly or should i say his little minions! I believe he settled as it disappeared! Maybe the client got his building! Biz dried up? Over the holidays he was advertising like crazy on optimum channel 12! He used to be a credit collections lawyer! https://febbraiocommercial.com/property/1232-post-rd-fairfieldct/
Watch my husband’s case. He’s pro se. He had to come to an “agreement” to reposition himself away from the narrative and focus on rights and federal law. Forget lawyers, it’s money making for them….period. They don’t practice law. They practice corruption like coh– and 🐺 to keep the BUSINESS AKA FAMILY COURT going. No GAL is needed and don’t let the court make you believe otherwise. Ambrose…I mean just look at what law firm their GAL is from.
I honestly don’t know how any of them go to bed at night knowing they destroy families to pay their bills as you go bankrupt trying to fight for a relationship with your children (when all along there was no fight to be had) They kidnap children from fit parents claiming “a judge is not going to give you 50% time” and not advising and representing your 1st and 14th amendment rights. If everyone went in pro se with the confidence the Constitution gives you the
Family court system would fall on its face.
The corruption of their business would be exposed. Wake up America. They are not practicing Justice. Many men and woman died for your rights to your children. The state courts can not rule otherwise without extreme findings. Stop letting their fear “your crazy to go into family court without a lawyer”, when it is the opposite, intimidate you.
“With all do respect your Honor, DO NOT TREAD ON ME!!!!”.
Thanks for your input Anne Oakley third party gun blazer.