Editor’s Note: It is gratifying to hear from people researching the pirates and mercenaries in family court that they are finding Frank Report. Here is an example from author Lisa Kerr who went through the vicious system:
By Lisa Kerr
I stumbled upon your website today after searching for information about Linda Gottlieb, who is entrenched in the family court system as a “reunification camp” specialist. I hear stories from safe parents who are stripped of custody by her methods, ordered by the judges, of course.
I’m a victim of domestic violence and family court abuse. My abuser has won everything he requested. I don’t want to rehash my story, because it has been a dark two and a half years, and I’ve finally walked away from family court despite still being married. I’m actually fortunate enough to have 50/50 custody, unlike so many moms in my situation.
I refuse to spend another dollar on family law attorney fees or another hour missing work to defend myself and my children’s wellbeing from judicial officers who know nothing about children, their developmental stages and their health. Let alone biological connections between a mother and her children, especially in the post partum stages.
I’m a former member of Master’s Commission, which I used to write about as a fundamentalist Christian cult. My story appeared on Huffington Post TED Weekends at some point. The irony is that family court reunification camps are so similar to the troubled teen industry, which is similar to the group I was in, yet orchestrated by the law.
I’m now an award-winning children’s author and grant writer. I’m not sure what path to pursue in family court reformation. My goal is to build as much grant funding support for groups that are actively protecting children and safe parents and who are educating the community partners who serve them. It may take a lifetime.
Until then, I’m reading as much as possible from families like mine who have suffered at the hands of the sociopathic parent, their criminal defense attorney (I mean, family law attorney) and the judges they paid off. My own judge just won his election despite sending our then 8-month-old away for 4 overnights.
Thank you for sharing your work with us. Many of us are thrown into court without realizing the disturbing corruption we’ve walked into. Your advice here to stay out of family court is correct. There’s no winning. The system is intentionally broken.
Frank Report Reply:
Thank you, Lisa, for your excellent analysis. As for the reformation of the family court, I have a few suggestions. The first and most obvious is to stay out of hell.
Or adopt the adage that you must “abandon all hope once you enter family court.”
It is the injustice mill of last resort.
The reason is incredibly simple: There is no jury. Therefore, you have an all-powerful judge. As toothless as modern juries have become in the USA, they still have the power, on occasion, to “gum” the forces of injustice, even if they do not bite like old-time juries who knew their rights – and understood that a jury’s true purpose is to keep the government (including judges) in check – not just be a finder of fact.
The New King of Your Life
In family court, you have a monarchy, with the judge being the king. A king will almost always do what is best for him, not his subjects. This is why most countries in the world have abolished monarchies. Most countries are headed for something similar—dictatorships or tyrannical governments. Family court is a form of tyrannical government.
With a jury, there is always the possibility that the judge cannot control the results, and this even-if-remote chance of an uncertain outcome keeps everyone more honest, if only because they are uncertain of the results (or said another way – lawyers cannot sell the results).
Judges Can Be Trusted?
Now, I hear many people say a jury cannot be trusted (but a judge can?).
Or the inconvenience would be too great to convene a jury for every family law case. But, of course, it could be done. I believe there would be far fewer trials if there were a jury in family court. People would settle because the richer parent could not be guaranteed a good result, because the judge and the attorney wink at each other.
Juries are funny; they might not care if an attorney is a judge’s friend. They might not give a damn that the wealthier parent wants custody because a guardian ad litem or custody evaluator has a bought and paid-for opinion that defies all common sense and is oblivious to the obvious needs of the children.
Unpredictability Is Not Profitable, Though Its Pretense Is
The mere threat of it possibly happening – where the family law attorneys cannot predict (for themselves) the results of an outcome to extract the maximum money (usually the wealthier parent can buy custody), the $ystem will crash.
Big Money
Today, family law attorneys, who are among the highest earners in the legal profession, manage most cases to maximize their billings. The cast of supporting actors – the GALs, the therapists, the custody evaluators, the custody or visitation supervisors, and the reunification therapists, and their indoctrination camps, are there to support the attorneys billing the most from parents in dispute.
So where does the judge come in?
Judge’s Are Usually Politicians and Just as Honest
The old quip that “a judge is merely a lawyer who knows the governor,” says it all. The judge is a lawyer, and he knows lawyers. If the judge is in family court, they know the system is based on profit first, children second.
A transfer of wealth from the family court litigants to the family court lawyers is the sole objective of the family court. The judges know this (and if they seek reappointment or reelection – or if they seek a nice cushy retirement, perhaps associated with some family law firm with a nice salary and little work on top of their pension), then they will support the system of “lawyers first” in family court.
The adage of family court is not “best interest of the child,” but the “best interest of the lawyer’s child.”
Never forget that. The judges and family law attorneys are in league for their best interests, and in many cases, they are friends.
This does not mean there are outright bribes. Though there may be. But there are many ways to bribe people into the conduct that is mutually beneficial. Things are cozy and congenial, and for that to occur there must be no surprises among the regular players in family court. Though the actors may act surprised. Even when attorneys on opposing sides seem to fight, it is often an act to rev up their clients and get them to pour more money into the fight “out of principle.”
The point is that the regulars usually know the outcomes, and the game is prolonged only to maximize the bleeding of money from the disputants.
A jury would make it possible that the bad actors cannot always know the results. Sometimes, real contests for justice will occur, and with a jury, the judge is not all-powerful. It is what the founding fathers had in mind when they insisted that in all criminal cases and any civil cases where the matter in controversy is more than $20, then the citizen is entitles to a jury.
Kids, officially not being worth even $20 in family court, have been monetized into millions for the attorneys and their supporting characters.
Stay out of family court. Shut them down by making them obsolete. And if you go there, at least be aware that you should abandon all hope. For the moment you enter, you have given your children as hostages to a judge who most likely cares nothing about justice. The judge does not have to care about justice. They are king, and justice to a king is whatever he deigns.
Appeals in Family Court Is Baloney
There is no valid appeals process, because judges respect each other’s fiefdoms. For one king to question another king’s authority is to disturb every judge’s kingdom. And the jury-less family court is a kingdom all to itself. The appellate judges respect that. Sure on rare occasions they will grant an appeal. But that is not about justice. That is all about making it look like there is an appeal process so that their employment is secure. The appellate judges in family law appeals consider the judge’s feelings first and look for rare cases to grant an appeal to support the fiction that there is a valid appeal process.
Let me be blunt about appeals. They decide first what they are going to do and then they fashion their written decision based on their decision. If you think it is the opposite – where the judge studies the merits and then rules based on the law – you are naive.
The appellate judges for family law rule first, then find the law/reasoning to support their decision. They could just as easily have ruled the opposite way and found an appropriate reasoning/law. It is set up that way – to support the judges/lawyers.
Family Court Foolery
Come here to pay tribute or be abused. The seeker of justice, of fairness, will be punished (for stupidity), and the payer of tribute – no matter how psychopathic – will be rewarded. It is not about your kids – it is about the kids of the bad actors of family court. This is something the fool forgets.
Don’t be a fool. Stay away from family court, if you can. As bad as your spouse is, try to work out something. Be reasonable. Try to remember that you once may have loved this person and at least were close enough to create a child together.
If your spouse has more money, you will have as much chance in family court as in a casino for a favorable outcome.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Mom made son, 3, say ‘goodbye to daddy’ on camera before shooting him dead in murder-suicide a day before custody hearing (nypost.com)
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
RESULT: Order 8/29/2019 HON GERARD ADELMAN …
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=NNHCV235055601S
What shit show is this?
Adelman (again) … Pullman and Comley (again). In that case one day, Mr. Adelman gave $250,000 to the attorney from Pullman and Comley.
Maybe it’s significant in some way that Lynda Munro and Robert Holzberg both went to work at Pullman and Comley after stepping down from their thrones around the time the news broke about the Connecticut AFCC, Inc.’s public-private network of judicial authority and judicial immunity running that non-profit-for-profit. 🙄
Did the involved judges get away with that extortion racket claiming “judicial immunity”?
How many Connecticut judges directly or indirectly involved in the AFCC Inc. racket step down from the bench to work for Pullman and Comley?
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68370704/kerwick-v-state-of-connecticut/
Video depositions could save the state of Connecticut if the husband, involved attorneys and judges don’t kill her first. Forty years of Connecticut’s covered-up crimes are a lot of crimes to keep covered up.
The angry mob demanding a jury trial also knows that a judge can stop a jury from hearing evidence. Block testimony.
This what our AG Tong is concerned about! headline chaser like Bloomer!Paying more for groceries? CT investigating if stores are price gouging (news12.com) Going after legitimated businesses trying to pay their employees and ct payroll taxes. Why dont they look into all these fires and accidents at our farms and so called “bird flus”??? Put more Bodegas out of business so they can all go to Amazon, Target & Walmart! How about the price gouging to people going through divorce having to pay $500 hour attorneys and gal’s and the assets FC’s take away from families in CT! AG get the priorities straight! Kids are being stripped from parents and you are worried about things you cant control.
The fool costello out of business? The court jester! Go to the court judiciary in civil and see how many lawsuits he has against his own clients. Now he is selling his building? Retiring? Quitting ? A client took him to court in Stamford for 1/2 million i think that they lost because he didnt do his job correctly or should i say his little minions! I believe he settled as it disappeared! Maybe the client got his building! Biz dried up? Over the holidays he was advertising like crazy on optimum channel 12! He used to be a credit collections lawyer! https://febbraiocommercial.com/property/1232-post-rd-fairfieldct/
Does Yale University guide 3-year-olds through “gender journeys” in “family courts”, too?
https://nypost.com/2022/08/19/yale-professor-helps-3-year-olds-with-gender-journey/
Yale is a federalist agenda. Home of the federalist society. Using United States federal funding to run their agenda. Partnered with the state of Connecticut through the MOU to receive funding to force ideals that best suit the wealthy. A privileged agenda to gain leverage over the masses. Freedom of choice, to identify as you wish and autonomy are a thing of the past. Systemacily redefining and overturning laws protecting the civil rights of the people. Running the narrative. This is unruly bunch who bangs on the walls because a case was won on freedom of religion. These people have no respect, eithics and professionalism. Tossing fits and targeting people with different views. Spoiled brats being pumped out to society with no respect for the rights and protection of individual citizens. The new breed of medical and legal professionals regards as higher prestigious education. To run the world based on personal ideals rather than the individual rights and protection of the citizens to live free. Using freedom of speech when it benefits them. Punishing people with different positions. Disgrace
“Yale is a federalist agenda.”? What does that mean?
The federalist society at Yale. The rich mans political agenda. The federalist are erasing women’s rights. There are all about the division of race, class and gender. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
Extortion, greed, pedipiies. Sociopath running the countries family court judicial system. Satins kingdom. The devils playground. Open the door and you are walking through the gateway to hell. These are not lawyers these are brokers of human flesh. Soul suckers.
It is very hard to stay out of family court once your child has been sexually abused. Imagine your own child, who came through you, the emodiement of pure love. That child who literaly changed every single cell in your body, who you love more than existence- looks you in the eyes, in your soul and they show you what their parent, your spouse, the one you trusted with all your life, or you wouldnt have married them in the first place, what that person did to them. Everything shatters. The courts do not care if the child was sexually abused. No, they do care. They care to bury it. So, what the h— do you do?
It’s true. The courts will punish those who claim their children are sexually abused. It seems like you have to strategize by saying something else. The courts do not have the best interest of the children. The judges have supervisors that tell them what to do. It is so wrong and disgusting.
It’s the fatherhood initiative. If you have had a child or love one murder while in court add the fatherhood initiative to your law suits. THE Policy’s state NOT To bring abuse or sexual assault up in family court. It’s in their policy.. Our nations Disaster of family court is lead by the welfare policies.
Julie Minougue death was in part to the gross and negligent culture of the. Criminal reform and fatherhood initiative. It’s all in the policy. It was not the police officer, but the prosecutor office. They don’t want to punish the father. Instead Julie is dead. Kids are parentless. Economic progress. Jennifer Dulos is dead because of a gross and negligent psychologist report. It’s the culture. The children will keep the parent from reoffendinding. Save on cost. It’s all in the welfare reform document. I hope the Attorney for Julies family checks into it. It’s to be assumed women are to be discredited. Hysterical, vengeful and only seeking children support and alimony.
Of course, you have legitimate claims but unfortunately as the system has been abused and corrupted from all its difficult to see the real from the fake!
AMEN.
The great state of Texas 2024 Ethics unwrapped the university of Texas. Austin
McCombs school of business. The welfare reform act. In 1996 Democrat Bill Clinton and republican lead congress passed the personal Responsibility Act. This changed how the government funded welfare operated.
The decade long debate about individual responsibility verses the government alleviating poverty. Currently the entire state is experiencing economic hardship except the wealthy federalist. Including Richard Blumenthal one of the wealthiest.” To end welfare as we know it. ” Bill Clinton an Epstein Island visitor. Role model for Healthy marriage in the US. Newt Gingrich and his colleagues in congress pressured Clinton to make it even more austere. Arguing core values of America for individual responsibility. Reduce the number of out of wedlock births.
Critics argued negatively affected the most vulnerable of society. (Women, children, domestic violence victims and the poor). People let out of jail now we have armed citizens patrolling the streets. Criminal defense Attorney and family law taking over the bench. Federalist on the Supreme court bench.) The American economy is in the toilet.
Peter Edelman argued welfare reform would not solve the problem. (we agree). Driving millions into poverty, many single mothers and their children (perhaps CT has decided just to give the custody to the father rather than give financial support through divorce transition).
Edward Kennedy called it LEGISLATIVE CHILD ABUSE. ” All fathers to be engaged in the lives of their children”. No guard rails on that legislation. Hundreds of women in the state of Connecticut would absolutely agree with Edward Kennedy. In the late 1990s through 2000 the economy welfare loads were at an all-time low. Wages barely covering the poverty line and cannot withstand a change in economy.
There is no mention of the fatherhood initiative and the role all this plays into family court. What is happening in our nations court systems is directly related to the welfare reform and the economic state of the country. The continued money being driven to the gatekeeper alienation claims. The AFCC was born from the welfare reform act. The parental alienation claims were taught. The entire family court system is run on it. Connecticut being the leader. Just look at the mess in the state of Connecticut.
Please read the policy for the fatherhood initiative. The focus on conflict. The policies are written specifically NOT to discuss sexual assault of children or domestic violence. The use of children to decrease reentry into prison. FORCING children to responsible for keeping their fathers out of jail. ALL of the answers are in the fatherhood initiative! Couresive control over women and children in the state of Connecticut, by the state of Connecticut. Using federal funding and the welfare reform. The state government is absolutely responsible for the problems in family court. Changing linguistics. Blumenthal D-CT is sending the money to the state to discriminate against women. The legislation is pushing it. The governor is signing off on all of it. William Tong is changing the legal policies and procedures to protect the state. FOR THE LEGAL DISCRIMINATION against WOMEN AND CHILDREN. THEY ARE FIGHTING FOYA to hide their DIRTY DEEDS! They are not afraid for their lives. They are afraid of getting caught.
The Emotional malnourishment of society and gender apartheid in the United States of America.
The University of Chicago. Becker Fieldman Institute for Economics. (it’s all about the money) August 30,2023
Effects of the Welfare Reform on Parenting and quality of young children’s home Environments.
Welfare reform did not affect the amount of time and maternal resources mothers devoted to the cognitive stimulating activities with young children, but it did have SIGNIFICANT negative effect on mothers’ provision emotional support, with STRONG effects for mothers LOW HUMAN CAPITAL.
Among older children welfare reform had adverse effects on engagement in parent-child activities, children feeling close to their mothers, and knowing their children’s whereabouts, with the effects generally concentrated among boys.
1996 Welfare reform laws, welfare reform act. PRWORA made major revisions to welfare benefits. (As well as guiding the favoritism towards fatherhood under the societal notion fathers would transform the economic state of the country). The quality of children’s lives has dropped approximately negative 13 percent according to the study.
It’s more than an empirical question. THE WORK HAS ADDRESSED THE KNOWLEDGE GAPBY ESTIMATING THE EFFECTS OF WELFARE REFORM IN THE US – A MAJORPOLICY SHIFT THAT ESTABLISHED THE CURRENT CASH ASSISTANCE LANDSCAPE IN THE COUNTRY-ON PARENTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The state of Connecticut has designed its financial structures around the Fatherhood initiative around the fatherhood Memorandum of understanding and partnership. Child custody cases and legislation are designed around economic growth and development.
financially not the best interest of children in their individual capacity. Domestic Violence and pedophilia are now a public health crisis not illegal act. The batterers programs are being used as a magical cure for the problem. Leaving people and children in great risk.
The Department of health and human services and UConn are making a killing of the federal funding. If you want to fix family court, it begins with the Leader and the head of the snake The state of Connecticut. The leader in using unrecognized, unregulated hypothesis to control divorce rates holding children hostage. Taking them away from their mothers for federal funding. Lowering crime rates punishing people for reporting. Excusing crime, failing redress, limiting the inspector general’s office. Using the Attorney general’s office to protect the money instead of the people. Filling the judges’ benches with family law attorneys and criminal defense to protect the policies and procedures. Using bogus statistics, changing Linguistics including calling the women in Connecticut crazy and hysterical. After they are practically waterboarded women and children in ” reunification therapy”.
All hiding under a minority facemask. Blaming white women of privilege based on a type of handbag. Manipulation, trickery, gaslighting the American public. Dividing genders, ethnic groups and social classes. The culture of the state of Connecticut.
Family Court Atrocities. Extremely cruel, wicked acts
Combat stress, also known as battle fatigue, a common response to the mental and emotional strain that can result from dangerous and traumatic experience. It is a NATURAL reaction to wear and tear of the body and mind after and demanding operation.
The labeling of protective parents. The alienation industry is well versed in psychological warfare. They are using it on children. The appointment of special court psychologist. The discrediting of outside professionals.
How many of these protective parents with professional jobs, stay at home moms volunteering in the community have been turned into a former shell of themselves? Many of them look very different after the years of family court war. These guardian ad litems, psychologist, attorneys, and judges are well versed in this battle. Tossed in jail from the reaction to attack on person and their children? Judges this is why people Karen missed hearings. Refuse supervised visits. At some point we all gain the knowledge that we are the target of the battle. Endless court filings and judges with personal and political agendas.
Children are paying the ultimate price. It’s time to hold the political leaders responsible for allowing the atrocities to continue. These are wars waged on innocent people. With unregulated and unethical practice. Those with the knowledge of these atrocities are accessories. What would happen if they had to face a jury of the public?
Perhaps a hearing should be held on the political leaders allowing this would have better results. Cause they are protecting the family court operations. In Connecticut it’s the governor placing these judges on the bench. Can quickly be taken off the bench if they don’t follow the political agenda.
STOP BLACK ROBE DIEASE. PERHAPS ROBE ITIS’ IS CODE FOR NOT FOLLOWING THE POLITICAL AGENDA?
Louis Creeh should write a report. Great idea
America allowed Sidney Gottlieb to experiment on people, too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Gottlieb
News – Close Up – Mind Control: Project MKULTRA (1979)
Was “NXIVM” a mind control experiment?
…
Can we get an update on Nicki Clyne? Its been over a year since we have heard anything meaningful!
Connecticut house passes bill to protect pedophilia which is exactly what we’ve seen in CT family courts.
“Minor attracted persons” will soon replace pedophilia and pedos will be a protected class.
Under this same act that defies Gods law, CT public school curriculum will teach gender identity- obliterating their God given biological sex.
I believe the absurd “furbies” are also protected so grown men can identify as animals and speak with howls and barks while parading through stop and shop with furry ears and tail
Congratulations to the constitution state for defying gods law and engaging in the destruction of families. Well done Lamont
MAPS flag embraced by the house
http://www.ctfamily.org/the-map-anti-discrimination-bill-hb6638/
The state is an embarrassment . Move out as soon as possible.
Complete fucking mess the state of Connecticut
If more people in Connecticut were allowed to know about government employees not protecting children in the state, more people would care enough to protect the children in the state.
Local mainstream news is on the multinational corporate train: deceiving, distracting and entertaining. Destroying families, children and religion used to be called “conquering nations”. Now it’s called “politics”
Sold through the financial resources provided by the United States government funding these courts. The ALIENATION Industry unlawful restraint and capture of innocent children . Unregulated and uneithical practices sanctioned on the public through an unlawful court system. Guided by policy and procedures. Evidenceless court system. Selling children for profit to the industry. Despite the united nations report someone in power is making a lot of money. Our Senitors and Congress persons are ignoring it.
Agree with your position. Th UN report is being wholly ignored.
We need Freesh to write a paper banning it- his word i$ gold.
When is our government going to put a stop to all this? Why not cause some people with political power are greatly benefiting. Time for American citizens to have those people held accountable. Politicians have no immunity.