In our exploration of the juryless family court system, FR looks at a contentious case involving Matthew Lodice, a building contractor, and Theodora Antar, a law student at the University of Connecticut.
Unending Battle: The Custody Case of A.L.
Lodice and Antar were never married and never lived together.
They were co-workers, and Antar “became pregnant with A.L. unexpectedly in September 2018.” The child was born in May 2019. She is now four years, five months.
Antar at first had primary custody, but Lodice actively involved himself in the child’s life.
From when A.L. was about six months old, there was contention between them. Antar sued Lodice in a dispute over child support, and they have been fighting in one court or another ever since.
In 2022, Antar stepped through the doors of the family court and filed an emergency ex-parte motion for custody before Judge Jane Grossman. It backfired. Judge Grossman granted custody to the father. Antar is now allowed only supervised visitation at the discretion of Lodice.
She has not seen her child in more than two months.
Theodora Antar
A Web of Accusations
In response, Antar filed a sweeping RICO lawsuit against Lodice, Judge Grossman, and over 300 other individuals, including an extensive list of court professionals and members of her own family.
Her allegations include fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, abuse of process, and violations of the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
Antar claims Lodice and Judge Grossman colluded to strip her of her parental rights and claims Lodice unlawfully prevented her from seeing or contacting their daughter.
According to her amended complaint, Antar is not only suing Lodice and the officials as mentioned above but also Lodice’s:
- father,
- mother,
- stepfather,
- ex wife,
- son,
- girlfriend
- two brothers,
- sister-in-law,
- ex-sister-in-law
- brother’s brother-in-law
- business,
- customers of his business
- subcontractor of his business
- partner in his business
- friend
- ex-landlord
- police officers who refused to arrest Lodice based on Antar’s complaints
- police departments that refused to arrest him based on Antar’s complaints: New Britain Police Department, Waterbury Police Department, Middlebury Police Department, Wallingford Police Department, New Haven Police Department, Woodbridge Police Department, Orange Police Department and Milford Police Department –all refused to arrest Lodice
Lodice’s Side of the Story
To date, we have yet to hear anything from the father, Matthew Lodice.
In the following opinion editorial, Lodice offers his perspective on this complex and emotionally charged battle with the mother of his daughter.
By Matthew Lodice
I am the father of A.L. –Theodora Antar’s little girl.
First, I will say my daughter is finally safe from the abuse of her mother. There is a clear distinction between facts and fiction.
I encourage anyone curious or concerned about our case to download the transcripts from the court proceedings.
From there, you will see the facts and why Ms. Antar lost custody of our daughter.
Also, all police reports are a matter of public record.
Ms. Antar has psychological issues that are not being managed. It is the state’s job to determine what is in the child’s best interest and make decisions based on that, not on what people are feeling or wishing. Facts matter. Here are some facts:
Since our split, Ms. Antar has been doing everything she can to try to ruin my life. In doing so, it skewed her better judgment and started significantly hurting our child.
Ms. Antar has contacted every immediate family member of mine, friends and acquaintances, and potential love interest.
Ms. Antar has sent hate messages and threatening messages. She’s even sent pornographic images and videos that she and I shared while dating – to my mother, father, family, and friends.
None of my family or friends ever responded with anything hateful back.
She has messaged people I haven’t talked to in over 20 years just because they have commented on pictures and stuff I posted.
Friends don’t even want to pose in pictures with me anymore for fear of her retaliation.
She has contacted people I’ve dated since her and harassed them.
She’s even gone as far as contacting where they work, saying anything she could to get them in trouble.
She has filed 15 protective orders against me in four jurisdictions. All were found false and denied.
We must still appear before a judge for the seven new protective orders she recently filed. She has filed 20 contempt motions. All were found false.
She has filed nine ex parte emergency custody motions. All were found false and denied.
Family Court Judge Jane Grossman awarded custody to Matthew Lodice.The system is not against her at all.
The facts of the case are what’s against her.
My oldest son babysits our daughter regularly when I have work or engagements. Ms. Antar didn’t want him to do this. So he became a target of her attacks. She has made four allegations of sexual abuse against him towards my daughter. After two forensic interviews and four detective investigations, with DCF involved, they were all found false and done in retaliation.
Not being satisfied, she took our daughter to have a rape kit done on her, which was negative. Imagine that. Imagine your four-year-old girl subjected to a rape kit based on her mother’s delusions.
She even left a fake review of my son at work, leading to his termination.
We knew the review was fake because it was at the wrong location and falsely identified my son’s job description. But his employer said the backlash from her was too much of a risk for them to keep him.
She has tried to sue me and my company.
Ms. Antar is currently on supervised visits and supervised phone calls only. She continues to harass my family and me by constantly sending the police to do “wellness checks” at our home.
Think about it.
Do you believe every judge in multiple jurisdictions, every DCF employee, every police officer and detective, every children’s hospital and pediatrician, and everyone in her and my own family are all trying to make Theodora’s life difficult?
We all want what’s in the best interest of our daughter.
Ms. Antar is now facing trial for filing a false report and disorderly conduct. It is the second time police have charged her for filing a false report against me.
Both times, police arrested her, and she called the cops.
The disorderly conduct charge is because she harassed my children and me during a visitation exchange with our daughter.
I encourage anyone to go to the Orange Police Department, New Haven Police Department, Woodbridge Police Department, or Waterbury Police Department to review police reports.
She was also recently arrested for violating the protective order I have against her for showing up at our daughter’s doctor’s appointment. She was told multiple times not to be there by the doctor’s office and by myself.
Ms. Antar has not seen our daughter in two months because she refuses to follow the court order and do supervised visitation. She demands that A.L. be brought to her immediately upon request, without supervision.
Two weeks ago, I was arrested for interfering with an officer and risk of injury. The reason this happened was because Ms. Antar spoke with our daughter during one of their phone calls. Our daughter claimed her butt hurt her from not wiping well since she wipes herself.
Ms. Antar called the police and said A.L. was being molested at my house again. When the police came, they came with many units demanding I open the door so that they could have the medics and police come into our home, strip down my daughter, and subject her to have her private parts checked again.
Upon refusal, they forced entry, arrested me, and took my daughter to the hospital. She was cleared at the hospital again, and allegations were found false, and she was sent back home to us the same night.
I’ve since terminated phone calls between my daughter and Ms. Antar until the court addressed these issues.
She hasn’t paid one child support payment since I’ve taken over custody. She claims to be unemployed and have no income, and at the same time claims to have $1,700 a week in bills. Her financial affidavits are public record.
The allegations she made about me drinking and driving with my children are false. It’s just something she says. She is willing to say and do anything to make our lives a living hell.
All we and anyone want is for her to be a good mom and be there for our daughter. Just to leave everyone alone and focus on what she needs to focus on.
This is just some of what has been going on. There are so many other things Ms. Antar has done to many people. Anyone who has ever dated her in the past couple of years has faced retaliation from her once that relationship ended, especially litigiously.
Though the court system has flaws, it is not corrupt against Ms. Antar. It has just listened to the facts from both sides and has been doing what is in our daughter’s best interest.
My daughter is doing so much better now. She is happy and well-adjusted. She is learning so much while growing and getting better every day. All I care about is the well-being of my children, and I will continue to do so.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Some people really should not have children. I feel bad for their daughter. Psycho mom and loser dad
Another mother denied her rights. Another child motherless.
But for the mother asking him to court, they’d be no court ordered supervision. The wrath of the robe.
There’s that circular logic again.
Circular logic? On going patterns of conduct in family court system. Denial of the family court system discrimination. Deflection, women have the right to be heard. Men have a right to be heard. Stop obstructing woman from speaking out.
Does she get to choose the “supervisor”?
Is there a document stating the purpose of the supervision and the costs? How long they’ll last and why they’re necessary?
Was this the decision of a medical rofessuonal or the whim of Grossman?
It seems they like to “strike a pose” at exact same angle. Too bad nothing else aligns for them.
Theodora-
I’m sorry for being rude. The fact are even reading my comment should point out to you that…..
You are at a weird place in life.
Is everyone wrong or are you right?
Please think about it.
Who’s “everyone”, NiceGuy?
Maybe the 300 people she is suing?
Anonymous –
Who supports Theodora?
Name three or even one.
Take care.
I support Theodora. This does not mean that I endorse everything she has attempted, either in her filings, or in her interpreting that court-ordered supervision could be satisfied by a person of her election (e.g. the pediatrician). My not endorsing her legal or extra-judicial efforts in whole cloth is separate and apart from whether I support the woman.
I know her well, and have had a close-up view of what I would consider increasingly desperate efforts to see her child, and her escalating pain. Simply reviewing the text messages (an Exhibit in her mass filing) reveal a woman absolutely shut out of having the ability to meaningfully parent her child. The entire locus of control belongs to the father, who does, in writing above, and in the text messages (in an app required to be used by the court) come across as more measured than Theo. Let’s not be so quick to credit him for his comparative equanimity; it is markedly easier to maintain composure when one holds all the cards, and is not sleepless in worry over A (rightfully or wrongly).
Theo has the dubious benefit of some legal training, without yet having had years to learn the appropriate (meaning: likely to yield results favorable to her) manner in which to accurately, narrowly, and succinctly set out her claims.
That said, she is playing in a most familiar playground well known to us, the systematically dysfunctional Connecticut Family Court system also terrorizing the Riordan children. Theodora’s experience is eminently comparable to Karen’s, notwithstanding her more aggressive cries for help. Unless one is trapped in a self-feeding vortex of a powerful legal system, it is difficult if not unimaginable to fathom the degree of helplessness one feels, which amps up every mammalian motherly instinct.
The story here, at core, is not about the ways in which Theo has “acted out” in court papers or an ill-considered (given the prohibitions in place) pediatrician visit. Her behavior cannot be construed as injurious to A, but does weaken her own position in the eyes of this system bearing down also on Karen Riordan and the three Ambrose children.
Let’s keep our eyes on the ball here, and desist with wholesale personal attacks if you have not walked a mile in the shoes of a parent legally cut off from her children, as both these women, and as all these
children, are so suffering.
She is not unsupported either
Do you really need a protective order when a child’s mother wants to attend a doctors appointment? Are you really in fear? Do you believe imminent harm would be done?
The abuse of handing out restraining orders is a weapon of family court. Based solely on judicial discretion.
Family court does this to make litigation more contentious. One parent must be evil and the other good.
Where are the medical experts that support isolation of a mother from child?
If you stand up for your rights and that if your children you will be targeted and maligned.
The pattern is established. They will try to incarcerate this mother.
Where’s the evidence of a mental health condition? Where is the duct or that advocates isolation from the mother?
What us the basis for supervised visitation?
Who is the supervisor? What credentials do they have? What is the goal? How will remedy be brought to strengthen relationships and not tear them apart?
Grossman is known for this. It’s a sick pattern that will keep this child from her mother indefinitely.
It will result of years of litigation in family court. Total scam.
all roads lead to gross man! dear jane if you read these comments, please reform! you are not a monarch! “we the people”! you are one of us!
How much 💰 do taxpayers pay state employees and lawmakers who were supposed to answer those common sense questions a few decades ago?
I agree with your post but feel the need to add two things. Both men and woman should be protected from undeserved attacks by mentally unstable people. And if what was written in this article is true, that is the proof of an extreme personality disorder(s).
The doctor appointment was just a routine wellness check. The child wasn’t sick or anything like that. There was no reason the mother had to be there. Especially when she knew there was a restraining order against her.
Maybe that mom is a little upset that someone took her child.
Regardless of what Bolsheviks, Connecticut state government and the CCP prefer, most good mothers still get upset when their children are taken.
Can you provide any if the evidence of what you’re saying? Where are the harassing emails and attacks directed at your family and friends?
What medical professional made the mental health diagnosis? Name and date of report of medical finding?
There’s no reason for the mother to be cut off. She raised her without issue until she went to family court. But for that – and Grossmans judicial discretion, this child would still have both parents.
This is a message forum; not a court of law. Not the place to paste evidence or prove his case. Not a place to violate her healthcare privacy (HIPA) as well.
You do not know what’s in the many, many police reports about her. I’m sure some info is attainable & available if you seek public records (police reports, court transcripts, etc.) He is openly inviting others to go for a look-see.
That being said, it seems apparent he was seeking to publicly defend himself w/o overly disparaging her. AND I strongly disagree- no one can make that assumption that she deserves or doesn’t deserve to be cut off. The court saw/knows something and WE don’t.
Who’s “WE”?
Men don’t air dirty laundry as women do. Have you noticed that all the men condemned on FR have stayed mum while the women have posted every detail on tik tok?
I agree! most “men” hate drama! My ex, come to find out, all about the drama! Still about the drama. New husband will be next victim! They dont change!
Most men complaining about “not liking drama” are the guys who don’t have communication skills. And are the ones who are incapable of compromise. self centered and can’t maintain healthy relationships. Arguing in some level is healthy in relationships and unavoidable. They insist on it their way. Are incapable of seeing the needs of others.
Of course he can provide evidence. How do you think he got the restraining order?
That’s questionable. It a Connecticut court
Thanks to Matthew Lodice for taking the time to explain what’s up. Sorry you’re going through this. Wow…
Unfortunately dcf and the police often align in these court ordered no contact.
Has dcf made any finding against this mother? Why is custody taken without any charge by dcf?
Typical family court racket.
Thank you for including his response. This situation in particular is well beyond – “He Said, She Said!” When you add up all the pieces of the puzzle, my opinion is – it’s a story more or less – of a jilted, unhinged ex-girlfriend/mommy with some significant emotional issues. How did I conclude this:
1) Look at her arrest record: it goes on and on and on. Clearly someone who can’t respect authority or rules
2) Look at the amount of law suits she has filed. She is literally suing everyone. It’s a pro-se abuse of the judicial system at this point.
3) Read her lengthy law suit. She’s suing 300+ ppl all at once on a RICO. So she believes their some kind of master plan contrived against her encompassing not only her ex-boyfriends, but also other family members, Judges, DCF, court operations clerks, police, etc. etc. Does this sound like a sane person?
3) Don’t forget, she’s already been cited/arrested for knowingly making false/unsubstantiated reports?
Anyone can easily take young lions and young cubs from mother lions and momma bears. Human mothers who don’t happily give up their young children are unhinged.
Her arrest record shows how crazily she tried to protect her child.
Except she was “unhinged” before she lost custody. She lost custody due to her unhinged behavior.
Not to abusers. Mess with the cubs you going to get the claws.
Grossman is a sick bitch.
Judges should not be permitted to eliminate any parent based on judicial discretion!
It’s unconscionable and the public has gotten brainwashed by a system of lunacy.
We blindly hand all our power and thinking over to the courts – family courts take away unalienable rights in CT solely on judicial discretion! Judges play God!
They are for- profit businesses!
We need to boycott and bankrupt family court!
Agreed. Evidence based proceeding. My attorney told me more than once it depends on what mood the judge is in. We are subject to the bias and God forbid you attempt to argue your case with a judge who has to be right for the sake of being right. The sake of siding with an attorney. You can not even get your complaints in Connecticut heard unbiasly. They want you to file and pay more attorneys fees. The greed of the industry is causing people to have to become their own attorney. I’m sure the judges are pist about e.
Being in CT FC and watching pro se cases the judges are not kind at all to them! They believe they are monarchs! everything our fore fathers fought against! I hope they read these comments and take the many frustrated writers and use to make FC in CT somehow and fair, unbiased and not deplete family resources!
Thank you so much for your comments. We need insider whistleblowers to save this world.
They act like kings and queens! No jury! People I know that got divorced long ago did not have all these issues! Why? Law firms made $ practicing other types of law. FC was seen as for lawyers that could not or were not capable of practicing in a law firm and were probably independents and no one wanted to associate with them. Probably did not have as many lawyers as we have today with QU stamping them out! Marriage should not have to be this difficult to unwind! Needs reform!
Sir,
Trying to be as objective as possible, please make an effort for the child’s mother to visit her, try to repair your relationship with her, both your daughter and her mother will alway’s be in your life, sincerely wishing you the best kind Sir, maybe a short letter to her, asking her to start over, admit some shortcomings, and happiness for all parties involved.
Prayers to you again.
And the Frank Report, by enabling her delusions and encouraging this ridiculous lawsuit, maliciously “helped” this mentally ill woman to believe she was in the right here, when clearly she is not. That’s probably why she thought she could show up at the doctor’s office. Frank and Luthmann likely encouraged her to do that.
It is covert misogyny in action.
Just like they have enabled Karen Riordan to ruin her own life. Foxes in the henhouse.
How do you know what didn’t happen and what did happen?
Luthmann ripped the lawsuit apart. Did you read that?
You don’t make sense. The angle you’re trying to play doesn’t fit.
He didn’t rip it apart. He gave her constructive criticism to try to make it better. It looks like she followed his advice and submitted an amendment. Instead of enabling her, he should have told her to stop wasting her time and go get mental help.
He told her the lawsuit was garbage and she needed to fix it in order for it to hold water. People suing the Grossmans of the world seems positive. This girl needs mental help. Doesn’t mean Grossman is good. Doesn’t mean Frank and Richard are covert misogynists. Your dots don’t connect.
Trying to negatively connect Karen Riordan to this woman is also a stretch. Do you not think Frank is helping people in their fights against corrupt family courts? Do you just want Frank to shut his yap and let the corruption carry on? Either you want him to shut up or you have a different “Frank Sucks” agenda. Whatever the agenda, him helping women who are getting fucked over by corruption seems like one you should sit out.
(Trying to make Frank out to be bad because he helps women would have fit nicely into a couple of Vanguard’s modules)
She has PTSD. Difficult to focus and considerate. Someone out of the court needs to file.
“ Do you not think Frank is helping people in their fights against corrupt family courts?”
No, I do not think he is helping any of these non custodial parents. He helped Karen get another restraining order slapped on her. He has only hurt her custody case by what he has done. Sorry, but the proof is in the pudding. Not only does she still not have any custody, she has a new strict RO and could do 5 years in prison if she violates it. In what world is that considered a “helpful” outcome? Doesn’t “help” imply helping these parents achieve their goals of gaining custody? Frank has helped no one in that regard. The opposite.
Is Frank the problem? Or is the need for the family courts to continue in a profitable manor the problem? The judiciary committee, the judges and attorneys are all bent out of shape over the exposure. They are angry 😡. Instead of the light bulb going off. The Connecticut family court running on hypothesis, connections with a desired outcome connected with a monitary gain. People are being silenced and children are being held hostage. The Connecticut family court is an embarrassment to the state. Rather than cleaning it up they are punishing everyone who dare to complain. Many of the judges in Connecticut are intoxicated with power and control. They can not stand people pointing out short comings or blatant uneithical conduct. Not everyone speaking out is doing it for the right reasons. Many however are attempting to speak out for the greater good of the children and adults trapped in the worst family court system in the country.
Luthermann is receiving money for coverage for the parental alienation advocates.
Frank “maliciously” “enabled” and “encouraged” the Antar lawsuit by reporting on it only after it was filed? And then Richard did so by deconstructing an already-filed (with stated intention to amend) Complaint with his legal scalpel?. That suit was salted peanuts to him, and his assessment intrinsically newsworthy, particularly given its emanating from the Connecticut Family Court system. Richard has never met an argument that he cannot improve with his razor-sharp mind. I know. I was his law partner for eleven years.
And misogyny leveled at the man credited with bringing down a cult leader systematically abusing women?
Methinks you bluster, and you do not do so well.
Sorry Stephanie but you havent got a clue.
What is the timing or these behaviors? Bc if it’s after she was stripped of custody of her child then OF CoUrSE she will be going crazy. But what about before she filed in 2022 ? What complaints had you then? I don’t think it’s ever ok that a parent keep a child isolated from a parent. Ever. He’s getting off on the control. She’s only permitted supervised access and you can’t even permit phone calls? What a fkin sicko he is
Power and control. That’s why these guys do it. The video say something could be happening.
Thats called circular logic.
It’s called being able to present your side of the case to the court. It’s not happening. Maybe She went a little over zealous with the law suit. Naming too many people. She is not crazy in raising a red flag to the entire state of Connecticut family court industry. The worst in the entire nation.
Sorry, but your argument is like saying if your sister says she is suicidal and has a plan to take her own life, and you have her involuntarily commited for her own safety, if she then tries to hurt herself while in the psych hospital, she only did it because you put her in the psych hospital. Not because she was suicidal to begin with. On the contrary, it is confirmation that she really belongs in the psych hospital.
Similarly, this woman Antar has demonstrated she should not have custody of her 4 year old until she gets some serious mental help.
The very reason we are on the frank report commenting is because there is a big problem in family court. The woman may need mental help but not because she is crazy. Because she is under extreme distress. The family court system is not designed to hear all sides or be objective. I’m not sure that the law suit is going to be successful. I hope to some degree it is. Maybe all the people named in it don’t nessarrly belong but the concept is valid. There is a tendency to dismiss legitimate complaints of conduct that is leading to a prolonged case for financial gain. Taking a child away from a parent especially one who feels their is potential harm to the children. The courts are an extension for the controlling parties. Completely labeling her complaint as a crazy litigant is an excuse not to look into the on going failing and broken system. Allowing for the industry to continue to harmful fraudulent for the people in the industry to continue to profit on a faulty and incompetent system. Leading to emotional, psychological and financial harm. Divorce is never easy. No one is ever happy in contentious cases. It’s the misuse of the system that has no oversight. Granted blanket immunity. Using parental alienation as an excuse to not allow evidence. The child in this case is 4. What about all of the other cases with the children being the target of reunification therapy not designed to address any conflicts. The paperwork being with held and could be completely disrespected by mental health leaders not profiting off the system. There is absolutely something wrong with a system forcing the same people on cases. No room for second opinions. Hidding the system and related agencies financing to keep it going. She maybe not completely correct but she is absolutely not completely wrong. Stop dismissing the Connecticut family court system curruption. Expose the family court system for what it is an absolute purposefully designed for the best interest of the people who profit. Protected by the state government.
Logical thinking. Circular family court system. Leading to the discusting excuse of legal system. The courts are a shit hole and the entire family law industry knows it. Defending the fraudulent family law industry. The professional flamers are going to keep defending. A lot of people watching the Frank report.
“ The woman may need mental help but not because she is crazy. Because she is under extreme distress.”
Sorry, but being “under distress” does not excuse abusive behavior.
Who is she abusing? She is concerned her child is being sexually abused. She is an abuser for asking for an evaluation and to protect her child? You must be the daddy.
Seems like that’s maybe an old photo of the Mr.?
Theodora-
Better an old photo than a photoshopped one—like every one you post.
I can’t wait for your OnlyFans page!
Beautiful name for a beautiful young woman. And, photoshopping is as expected as false eyelashes for young women online trying to survive in a shallow day and age such as this.
Detective skills tell us the age of his sons make him about the same age of his sons in that photo up there. Right?
He sounds like father of the year – ugh!
Bleck __ judges are useless. Grossman is an idiot and knows nothing about family conflict other than making it worse for the child. Judges must stop giving full custody and sole discretion of visitation to one parent. These judges are traumatizing families. You don’t de-escalate a situation in a divorce or custody case where there is already conflict by creating more conflict. It is idiotic to think you are helping the child when you are traumatizing a parent. Judges are throwing bombs into a campfire and making it explode into a war. Please train these judges to make orders to resolve conflict and stop the family wars they are creating.
All roads lead to gross man! Almost every case in FR comes down to the same judge! Coincidence?
I have a very close friend in another state that began a similar case of divorce and they have a small child about the same age. I got to know them both over the past few years. I have to say she was always a protective mother and he is a great dad. I can definitely see them going down the same road as these two. He is not pro child not being with mother she is more anti child with dad. they went to custody hearing and after not seeing his child for 6 months he got 50/50. She fired her attorney and now hired a $700/hour attorney. I went through a divorce and had the experience without child custody and its a horror show! A mother will do anything and everything to be with her child! I know the daughter is happy they she has both parents in her life. The mother did claim in court that the father has psychological issues and needs to be evaluated. These are games!
Here we go again. Another dad under the microscope bc of a mentally ill mother and ur audience starts with he’s preventing her from seeing the child therefore he’s bad. Nooooo stop the madness. This woman had subjected this child to multiple rape kits. That’s insanity. Stop the insanity. These courts need to get these women help. I’m a woman and I’m telling u get them help. This guy owes no one as explanation. Go mind ur own business and let her get help and him raise this child without another rape kit
Grossman gave the green light for the War!
Are you a mother? If you have not lived through what’s happen to families stop speaking. The state of CT needs to do their job!!
Maybe she is psychotic?
Many women experience “Post Partum Psychosis” after rearing birth.
Theodora, if your baby-daddy is telling the truth, get help.
You’re welcome,
Pilgrim
Joanie you have working really hard a blaming mothers for family court system problems. You have been busy trying to get the discrimination against women across the board in family court.
“Joanie”?
Right.
Who is Joanie?
Seems like something is not adding up with what Antar has been saying. She seems just sue happy when life doesn’t go her way. Looks like she filed another lawsuit 192 pages naming even more respondents. Giving a lot of details into her personal life and early adult hood. Sounds like a person who blames everyone else when she gets in trouble
Kinsey, the Kinsey Institute at the United Nations, trillion-dollar multinational corporations, Ruth Westheimer, Herbert Marcuse, Netflix, Disney and Hollywood hyper-sexualized America. Judith Reisman and Lori Handrahan received DOJ finding to study how Playboy pushed pedophilia on their customers. Hugh Hefner was a criminal and a CIA guy. Jeffrey Epstein was a criminal and “Intelligence”. Family courts are wholly inadequate to manage the fallout.
Why was the child sent to live exclusively in the home in which the identified perpetrator has access to his alleged victim? Young children exhibiting sexualized behaviors is NOT normal. Either Ms. Grossman doesn’t know that or she thinks differently about young children exhibiting sexualized behaviors. Ms. Grossman also apparently doesn’t know that children who are victims of sexual abuse speak most freely about the abuse after they are protected from it.
One hospital sent the child to another hospital for the test — and then how long did it take for the test results to be done? Was it two months?
Ask any good mother anywhere how she would feel and what she would do if she couldn’t see her child every day.
The mother was good enough to raise her child for four years?
How was that four-year-old’s health and well-being before she was totally and abruptly removed from her mother’s care? Did anyone notice any problems before the family court nightmare began?
Isn’t it weird how he never truly addresses what the eminent fear is for him to need this protection order in the first place? To have a protection order one must be an imminent fear of their life or danger so what fear or what threat is she by wanting to be a mom he says that all he wants that all anyone wants is for her to be a good mother yet he prevents her from being a mother altogether by preventing contact. He also interrupts every one of their video calls it does not allow her to have full on contact with her daughter so how was she supposed to be a good mom if he doesn’t allow her to have contact it makes no sense
Anonymous (Theodora Antar)
You hot as all hell and batshit crazy.
***
Ask yourself:
“Why isn’t anyone on my side?”
I thought the same thing!
Men don’t expose their personal lives like women do. Women want the validation, men want the privacy
If I am a peach than Theodora is a banana. Didn’t they teach her in school how to dress for success? She is suing respected and successful people. No one is going to take her seriously, at least I’m not. I think her Instagram should be reported for what she’s doing to her daughter. It seems nothing penetrated the innocent child until Theodora made it so, by forcing a rape kit to be done on her little tiny innocent insides. Why is she exposing her daughter slightly undulating a stuffed animal on Instagram? At this point I’m totally disgusted and feel so bad for the little girl. Theodora belongs in jail and will probably end up there sooner or later.
Respected by who. Colleges that practice the same antics. Winning at all costs? Respected by those who secure salary increases and top of the line benefits? If you ask most lawyers tell their clients that the court system is a mess. Family court is cut throat. Family court system and related agencies have been criticized for years. The success is due to the lack of accountability. Connecticut has books, articles and years worth of accusations of curruption. Are these people respected or feared? I’m going to say the ladder. Jane Grossman and several other judges are feared for the power that they have. There is no balance. Fear is not respect.
What is an “opinion editorial,” Frank? Was this piece published in some other forum (a newspaper, a blog, or a post, et al.)? Or were these remarks prepared solely in expectation of publication in Frank Report?
Matthew Lodice’s statement was submitted to the Frank Report for publication.
Thank you, Frank.
Visitation at the discretion of the other parent is illegal.
Thanks to Margaret Sullivan’s appeal on this very issue.
A law went into place stating the court could not delegate judicial responsibility to the legal guardian. It’s a license to abuse and that’s exactly what’s done.
please share that case!
R. H. v. M. H. Appellate Case # AC45186
The father disagreed with the ruling and asked for a hearing en banc (all nine justices to hear the matter). The Supreme court took up the case and it is expected to be heard on oral argument during the fourth term – December.
Hmmmm Something soundtruthful that he is saying however being a witness to some of the actual calls myself I would have to say that I have seen him hung over and I have also witnessed this child’s doing behaviors that most children her age do not do in making statements about men touching her in ways that young kids do not just make up…
I would tread very lightly with both of their statements to be honest with you I think both of them are liars and both of them have some truth..
Yes, but that does not make it right for a judge to give sole discretionary visitation to one parent. I blame the judge for harming the child.
100%