Is She Dead? Final Post From Mother Who Lost Her Kids Through Family Court to Wealthy Attorney Husband

The Family Court cult
we all Must and Shall obey
all over the world.

I’m curious who shut her Fb page done?

Please make an effort to report this cae to CPS, the attorney General for a Criminal Rico filing, to the New York DA. Keep fighting for the children and the now deceased mother. We need to do this in an orderly systematic way. Answering Allan and assisting him in fruther abuse will do no good in the long run. Write letters, report this travesty to the proper authorities.

With someone like him he needs to be bundled into the boot of a car and beaten within an inch of his life. Over and over, every time he abused you or the kids. That monster needs to shake with fear instead of inflicting that same misery on others. Hell is too good for that piece of crap. We see him.

This is a common theme for Ireland. The government was removing kids from their poor families and sending them to US, Canada, and Australia. These kids were used as indentured servants. This was common practice until 1965. Only the poor we’re targets.

He should have just left if he was with another woman, didn’t want the kids or her but couldn’t resist being on top. May he fall and crumble with no way of rising again as for Catherine may she be okay and if not rest in peace 🥺

This is terribly sad. I’m so sorry for all you had to endure. God bless you dear Catherine, your girls, and your family. May Allen get all he deserves, and go to hell for all he has done.

https://www.facebook.com/catherine.y.kassenoff/posts/10210295435139796

We must coordinate about this and do something for this mother and bring this joke of a father and those that enabled him for money to justice! Please reach out to me on Twitter @sarah_g_barker to formulate a plan to get on this. I live half the year in CT close to New York as well

H

Please look into carolyn Mc Guffolks pay per play . It’s not ethical and it’s not right .

Looks like Allan Kassenoff got to these documents and deleted them, thank goodness I saved a few, in the memory of Catherine Youssef Kassenoff. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ZitsXgychSTNxN4FXFjjoip93w4E6EaN?usp=drive_link

I’m sure both women and men around the world will agree on a few things. There is a profound and significant amount of emotional and psychological pressure on the falsely accused. Weather it is parental alienation or abuse. Catherine and parents like her are aggressively and relentlessly attacked. It completely exhausting mentally, spiritually and physically. No matter what evidence you present it is either ignored or swept under the rug. It’s years of relentlessly fighting to prove the truth or falsehoods. You are stuck in the machine called family court with no end in sight. The decent lawyers are often chewed up and spit out. You are constantly weeding out the ones who are adding to the problem. Unless you have gone through the family court system, you have no idea how damaging it is to everyone including the children. Catherine was a mother and a warrior. May her children understand how hard she fought for them. How much she had an effect on others trying to stop the machine called family court. Thank you Frank for the article and all your hard work to stop the harmful machine called family court.

There is no escaping Karma. If this is all true, what awaits him will be of Biblical proportions.

Thank you for honoring Catherine. We need to ask ourselves why no other news agency has brought this story to light.

It is tragic, but brings forth current issues impacting the lives of children and protective parents.

Few brave people willing to be a target themselves for the good of our children.

My heart breaks for her and her children. As someone who is going through something so similar and the court system fails horribly by protecting the narcissist and continue to allow his bad behavior. He has and is mentally destroying my daughter and making ppl believe there is something wrong with her when in reality it’s his failed parenting. But like her the courts fail the mothers who try so hard to parent their child like should be done. I hope anyone and everyone who is going through this stands their ground and continues to fight in the end our kids will see who the real caring parent is. My heart breaks so bad for this woman and I pray for one day that man gets his day when he has to answer to all he has done to this woman and her children 😢😢

Happy Memorial Day Weekend.

How many died in the “Family Court” war since the Hartford Courant published this article three and a half years ago?

Do attorneys involved in these cases see no need to advocate for family court reform?

This is from February 2, 2020 …

“Four months before his estranged wife went missing, a frustrated and financially strapped Fotis Dulos wrote a scathing letter to judicial authorities opposing the reappointment of the judge handling his then two-and-a-half-year-old divorce case.

“I feel like a passenger in a runaway train that is headed to nowhere,” Dulos wrote in the Jan. 30, 2019, letter to the Judicial Selection Commission and obtained by The Courant.

“I have very little faith left at the judicial system, and I am reaching out to you as a last resort.”
The letter by Dulos criticizing Superior Court Judge Donna Heller lays out Dulos’ frustrations with the family court system and with his wife’s attorney, Reuben Midler.

It reveals not only his anger at not seeing his children “for more than one percent of the time in 2018” but also his frustrations with the cost of the divorce.

“My soon to be ex-wife has waged war against me by employing the law firm of Wayne Effron and specifically attorney Reuben Midler,” Dulos wrote. “I have been representing myself because I cannot afford legal fees of $70,0000 per month as she does. The result is I have been railroaded.”

Dulos complained that Heller allowed Midler to “always get his way” and controlled the proceedings. Midler could not be reached for comment.

Records detailed the financial drain of the bitter divorce.

The court-appointed guardian for the couple’s children, Michael Meehan, who Farber Dulos wanted removed from the case, was paid $175,000 through December 2018, records show. Dr. Stephen Herman, a child psychiatrist who authored a custody report, was paid more than $40,000 despite leaving the witness stand during cross-examination by Midler, and refusing to finish his testimony, which could make his report moot in family court.

Herman’s report has been sealed by Heller, although search warrants released recently indicate that Stamford/Norwalk State’s Attorney Richard Colangelo obtained a copy through a search warrant. At the court hearing when the report was sealed, attorneys for Dulos intimated that Herman’s report was favorable toward Dulos.

There also are costs for a family therapist, three psychologists and court-approved monitors, paid about $150 an hour, who were required to supervise Dulos’ visits with his children. Records show Dulos had at least 20-25 supervised visits with his children since Farber Dulos filed for divorce in 2017.

“Judge Heller has ruled against me over and over. I am not an alcoholic, I am not a drug addict, I am not an abuser,” Dulos wrote. “I am a good father and my children adore me.”

Dulos was angry that he was unable to see his children. Heller had restricted his contact with them after he lied about them having contact with his then-girlfriend Michelle Troconis.

Troconis has been arrested three times since the disappearance of Faber Dulos. In the most recent arrest Jan. 7, she was charged with conspiracy to commit murder in the disappearance of Farber Dulos. Her case is pending.

“I speak to them on the phone once a week on a recorded line!” Dulos wrote, referring to the arrangement he had to talk to his children.

It’s unclear what Dulos expected to get from writing the letter, although he does ask the commission to take a closer look at his case and claims that he is being discriminated against because of his Greek origin.

Heller was unaware that the letter was written and told Dulos she should have been informed. She also told Dulos at a court hearing that it didn’t matter anyway.

“And — so I’ve been approved for reappointment. I’ll put it that way. So whatever complaint Mr. Dulos made, the Judicial Section Commission has approved me for reappointment. But I did not have any knowledge of it, and I think I should have been informed,” Heller said, according to court transcripts of a March 2019 hearing.

But a day after that hearing, Heller issued her new custody orders, which increased the amount of time that Dulos could see his children to every other weekend and Wednesday evenings as long as a court monitor was present.

The last time Dulos saw his children was on May 22, when he spent more than an hour at their New Canaan home eating dinner in the backyard while Farber Dulos and the nanny for the children, Lauren Almeida, were inside.

Dulos spent more than an hour outside the home but never went in, according to Colangelo. “

Blood on the faucet
says more than Colangelo.
Family court is war.

https://www.courant.com/2020/02/02/i-feel-like-a-passenger-in-a-runaway-train-that-is-headed-to-nowhere-a-frustrated-cash-strapped-fotis-dulos-fought-against-judge-overseeing-his-two-year-contentious-divorce/

“… Plaintiff and Defendant were married in November 2006 and have three minor

children (“the Children”). In August 2010, Plaintiff filed an action for dissolution of marriage,

which was withdrawn in September 2010. The parties then proceeded to reside together until

May 2019, when Defendant filed a divorce action captioned, Allan Kassenoff v. Catherine

Kassenoff, file no. 58217/2019, in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, New York (“the

Divorce Action”). Defendant was and remains represented by Dimopoulos and the Firm in that

proceeding.

The three-year period prior to the filing of the Divorce Action was contentious

and marked with physical and emotional abuse by Defendant and repeated police involvement.

In the months preceding the filing of the final Divorce Action, Defendant began making near-

daily threats of divorce against Plaintiff. In February 2016, Defendant assaulted Plaintiff in their

home, for which Plaintiff was treated at a nearby hospital. That same year, Defendant

unilaterally declared an “open marriage.”

Throughout the marriage, Plaintiff owned and utilized a number of electronic

devices for personal and professional use. For portable communication, she used a periodically

upgraded Apple iPhone to which number (917) 836-5200 was assigned. Additionally, Plaintiff

utilized various features specific to Apple products such as Facetime, SMS text messaging and

the Apple calling features that she transferred to each succeeding device she acquired. Plaintiff

also incorporated other outside applications such as Google and Yahoo that enabled her to

transmit and receive email messages via her hosted Gmail and Yahoo email accounts.

In order to protect her iPhone from tampering or unauthorized access, Plaintiff

activated and maintained the iPhone’s passcode feature on each iPhone she used. The Apple

iPhone passcode is a four-to-six-character user-selected numeric sequence that unlocks the

device when it is turned on.

Throughout the marriage, Plaintiff did not share her iPhone passcode with

anyone, including Defendant, nor did she permit Defendant to directly access her device.

At all relevant times, Plaintiff utilized Verizon Wireless for all her iPhone

services, including text messaging, email, phone calls, Facetime and internet browsing services.

Plaintiff’s hosted email accounts addresses were ckassenoff@yahoo.com and clkassenoff@gmail.com.

Plaintiff was the primary account holder for her family’s Verizon account through which

Defendant used a shared family telephone plan; Defendant was a secondary user.

Notwithstanding that one Verizon account was maintained for both parties, neither party had

access to the other’s iPhone passcode or credentials so as to enable access to the other party’s

communication applications.

At a point in time prior to 2016, Plaintiff and Defendant purchased a MacBook

Pro laptop computer for their joint use (“the Laptop”). Each established separate user accounts

that were separately password protected. Accordingly, each user could only access the data and

applications established under each respective account. Although the Laptop was jointly

accessible, Defendant subsequently used the Laptop far more frequently than did Plaintiff.

Apple products are designed to be interconnected such that applications and data

accessible through one device can also be accessed from other connected Apple devices. In order

to accomplish this, Apple requires that users obtain an Apple ID and password. Once this is

obtained and activated, each device that has been integrated can access Apple services and all

personal information and content associated with the account holder.

In 2016, Defendant stated that he wanted to purchase a particular song for his

iTunes music library that he compiled on the Laptop. He asked Plaintiff for, and she provided,

her Apple ID and Password to him for the express purpose of enabling him to make this purchase

from the Apple iTunes Store. Defendant did not receive or obtain Plaintiff’s authorization to use

these credentials for any other purpose beyond this one-time purchase of music.

While in possession of Plaintiff’s Apple ID and Password for this one time

purchase, Defendant activated the “Find My iPhone” application on the Laptop with respect to

Plaintiff’s iPhone. This application enables an individual to track the location of other connected

Apple devices.

Plaintiff was not aware that Defendant had activated the Find My iPhone

application on the Laptop.

Defendant continued to use Plaintiff’s Apple ID and Password in other ways,

including to “sync” Plaintiff’s iPhone with the Laptop. Once synchronization between devices

has initially occurred data can be subsequently directed by using access to the iCloud to

automatically and remotely transfer files and data stored on the iCloud to interconnected devices.

After the syncing of Plaintiff’s iPhone with the Laptop, Defendant accessed and

intercepted Plaintiff’s text message communications over the course of several years, an activity

that Defendant has admitted to doing. Through such synchronization, Defendant received copies

of Plaintiff’s text messages at the same time Plaintiff received the message.

Plaintiff never authorized or consented to the use of her Apple ID and Password

beyond the limited purpose of allowing Defendant to make a one-time purchase of a song on

iTunes. At no time did Plaintiff agree to the “syncing” of her iPhone with the Laptop or with any

other device. At no time did Plaintiff agree that Defendant (or anyone else) could access and

intercept her private, confidential, and privileged text message communications, emails, or other

data.

At all relevant times herein, Plaintiff considered her text messages and other

electronic communications to be private and their contents confidential. Said communications

included text and email messages with her attorney, Cynthia Monaco, Esq., an individual who

Defendant, himself a lawyer, knew was a lawyer. Plaintiff also had numerous private and

confidential communications by text message with family members, friends, and others.

The electronic communications Defendant accessed and intercepted from

Plaintiff’s iPhone included Plaintiff’s private, confidential, and privileged electronic

communications with various third parties, including her attorneys. Plaintiff did not know that

Defendant had intercepted her electronic communications by using her iCloud account to

synchronize the Laptop with her email and text message accounts.

Given that Defendant was receiving real-time incoming and outgoing text and

email messages, including attorney-client electronic communications during the period of early

2016 to the filing of the Divorce Action in May 2019, Defendant had access to communications

that discussed matrimonial litigation strategy, domestic abuse, and related issues and concerns.

Immediately upon the filing of the Divorce Action, the Firm, through Dimopoulos

as Defendant’s counsel, brought an ex parte Order to Show Cause in the Supreme Court of

Westchester County which sought to exclude Plaintiff from the marital home and grant

Defendant temporary custody of the Children.

Attached to Defendant’s supporting papers were multiple screenshots of actual

text messages transmitted by and between Plaintiff and Attorney Monaco discussing legal

strategy. Defendant’s affidavit included at least eleven text messages dated from September 2018

onward and several that were listed as “undated” (“the Text Messages”).

This ex parte application was granted and Plaintiff was immediately removed

from the marital home and Defendant was granted temporary sole legal and residential custody

of the Children.

Plaintiff’s opposition to the order to show cause was heard on June 7, 2019 at

which time Plaintiff’s counsel informed Dimopoulos that the text messages attached to the order

to show cause were privileged attorney-client communications that Defendant had obtained

without having obtained Plaintiff’s consent or authorization.

Despite Plaintiff’s counsel’s express warning that these electronic

communications were privileged, confidential and private, Dimopoulos did not withdraw the

Text Messages. Instead Dimopoulos continued to use and disclose these communications to

additional individuals as the Divorce Action proceeded.

In the Summer of 2019, Defendants provided the Text Messages to Child

Protective Services who was investigating Defendant for child abuse.

On or about September 6, 2019, Defendants again published the Text Messages in

submissions to the court in the Divorce Action.

On or about October 7, 2019, Defendants provided the Text Messages to Dr. Marc

Abrams, the court-appointed custody evaluator in the Divorce Action.

On or about March 16, 2020, Defendants again republished the Text Messages in

a filing in the Divorce Action.

On or about March 25, 2020, and shortly after the COVID-19 pandemic was

declared, Dr. Abrams, in reliance upon Text Messages provide to him by Defendant,

recommended to the court that Plaintiff be excluded from her home and lose custody of the

Children.

On or about March 27, 2020, Defendants obtained an ex parte order excluding

Plaintiff from her home and granting temporary sole custody of the Children to Defendant;

Plaintiff was rendered childless and homeless overnight.

It remains unclear how many private, confidential or privileged communications

Defendant and Dimopoulos have accessed and/or intercepted, used or disclosed; Plaintiff is only

aware of those electronic communications that have been published and shared with the court

and third parties associated with the Divorce Action on an ongoing and continuing basis.

Accordingly, the full extent and timing of Defendant’s and/or Dimopoulos’ disclosure of

Plaintiff’s electronic communications is not known.

Defendant obtained Plaintiff’s electronic communications either by intercepting

them while they were transiting through her iCloud account or downloaded said communications

while stored in Plaintiff’s iCloud account, and in so doing violated provisions of the Electronic

Communications Privacy Act. To the extent that Plaintiff’s electronic communications were

intercepted, as opposed to retrieved from storage at the internet service provider (ISP) level,

Defendant, Dimopoulos and the Firm have also knowingly used and disclosed electronic

communications protected by the Wiretap Act provisions of the Electronic Communications

Privacy Act. …”

Any special flames?
Any special tombs for this?
They’re family court wars.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomb_of_the_Unknown_Soldier_(France)