Ex-ESPian: Nancy’s explanation of Keith’s behavior require ESPian assumptions

Dear Espians.
What kind of assumptions do the current members of the ESPian community need to make in order to accept Nancy Salzman’s explanations for ESP’s failures and Keith’s curious conduct?
Nancy’s explanations are in red.
“It’s hard to bring ethics into the world”
Assumption: This explains anything?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
“It’s because of the negative press, enemies want to destroy Keith”
Assumption: Keith’s negative press is because of otherworldly unnamed powerful forces who are conspiring to harm him, rather than first-hand accounts of his management style (Example: Having sex with as many members as possible, including under-aged ones), unethical conduct, and business failings reported to the media.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
“Keith is working around the clock so hard to save the Mission, he didn’t know if he could make it”
Assumption: Keith works hard – and is only interested in the ESP mission, rather than himself.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
“It’s easier to train an ethical person then make an experienced person ethical”
Assumption: Keith appointing women he sleeps with to positions of authority in the company has everything to do with ethics.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
“That is your issue, nothing from the outside world will ever fill your inner deficiency. Keith is bringing up your issue so you can work it. If he gave you what you wanted, it would cover your inner deficiency and you would never grow.”
Assumption: Keith’s sex drive is all about him trying to help people.
Assumption: The process of Unification exists in reality.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
“Focus on yourself and your issue. When you integrate your disintegration about monogamy, you will see the world differently.”
Assumption: You cannot evaluate other people’s conduct and work on yourself simultaneously.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
“Keith can work with women in a way that he can’t work with men.”
“Keith’s sexual energy is so transformative. A woman he works with in this way can become unified much easier than a man using only EMs. He will raise your whole vibrational level.”
Assumption: Keith has magical sexual powers.
Assumption: Keith’s sex drive is all about him helping women.
___________________________________________________________________________________________




True. Especially if you're part of an MLM that hides a cult for the ego and sexual escapades of a charlatan which isn't ethical but only pretending to be.
“It’s because of the negative press, enemies want to destroy Keith”
LOL. Don't make me laugh. I think she must have meant to say “it's because the fraud's own actions destroy himself” but coughed and something else came out.
“Keith is working around the clock so hard to save the Mission, he didn’t know if he could make it”
ROFL. This is even more hilarious. There is no “Mission”, except to maintain a pyramid scheme that feeds the needs of his cult which requires women to ingratiate his ego and his penis.
“It’s easier to train an ethical person then make an experienced person ethical”
This is true too. Especially if the person trying to train the ethical person isn't ethical. You cannot give what you don't have. See the first response.
“That is your issue, nothing from the outside world will ever fill your inner deficiency”. “Keith is bringing up your issue so you can work it. If he gave you what you wanted, it would cover your inner deficiency and you would never grow.”
Hey stupid. Everyone is “deficient” in something. For example, Keith is deficient in a conscience.
It is part of the human condition to be born into deficiency, and not all deficiencies are destructive. Some are “intentional” as far as Nature is concerned, e.g., the male/female relationship.
Also, where the fuck are you guys “growing” to?
“Focus on yourself and your issue. When you integrate your disintegration about monogamy, you will see the world differently.”
Yeah, it's always about someone else's issue. All these enemies are out to get Keith, or all these former members are leaving Keith because they are suppressives, or some other contrived bullshit reasons, and none of it is ever his issue.
In other words, if only you do what we say – let Keith fuck around – then you will be integrated. Otherwise, you will be disintegrated.
“Keith can work with women in a way that he can’t work with men.”
This is unsurprising because Keith needs to be the alpha male in his group of castrated men. Most alpha men (not the beta males of the Society of Protectors) see through his bullshit and would kick his ass intellectually or physically if he tried it on them.
“Keith’s sexual energy is so transformative. A woman he works with in this way can become unified much easier than a man using only EMs. He will raise your whole vibrational level.”
Blah, blah, New Age bullshit, blah, blah.
Cult leaders and their groupies are as old as time.