Guest View
Editor’s Note: Frank Report makes its standing objection to all family court proceedings: As long as there is no jury in family court, the abuse will continue on the simple principle that power corrupts and that juries were designed solely as a check and balance to the power of the judge and the power of the king. In family court, the judge is the king.
Now some excerpted recent correspondence by CT activist Peter Szymonik.
By Peter Szymonik
Constitutional and Civil Rights Activist
Autism Advocate
It remains a fact that not a single “family” court judge in Connecticut was ever held accountable for flagrant violations of rights and laws in our broken and corrupt “family” courts, and denied reappointment by the attorney-packed Judiciary Committee.
Judge Klatt barely made it through the legislature eight years ago.
Barry Amarta, “GAL in Chief in Hartford”, was made a judge by only 14 votes. If attorneys on the Judiciary Committee did not vote in his favor, he would not be a judge today.
Judge Jane Emons: Eleven Lawsuits and a Legacy of Abuse
Jane Emons, a notorious “family” court judge who had eleven (11) federal lawsuits filed against her, was known for standing up on the bench and SCREAMING at lawyers and parents who had the misfortune of being before her. She sailed out of the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 30-3.
Judge Bozzuto’s Stunning Admission: ‘Due Process Is Not Important’
Our Chief Court Administrator, Judge Bozzuto, is on the record as stating her belief that “due process is not important” when it comes to fleecing parents to line the pockets of millionaire attorneys.
She is also on the record as testifying that “her family courts” are not equipped to handle cases involving Domestic Violence because “her family courts” do not have access to the same resources DCF does. (2019 – Judiciary Committee testimony.)
So why then, pray tell, are “her family courts” continuing to (mis)handle cases involving criminal claims of DV?
Coercive Control or Government Overreach?
I recently received a broadcast email from Connecticut Rep. Nicole Klarides-Ditria, voicing her support for a new law that will permit unwarranted government intrusion into personal lives and unjustified expansion of the definition of “Domestic Violence” (DV).
Rep. Klarides-Ditria proudly touted her support for the new bill:
“I supported this bill, which seeks to end control tactics used by abusers to keep victims of domestic violence tied to them. I hope this legislation will help victims gain financial security for their long-term safety by providing them with critical consumer protections.”
This law has absolutely nothing to do with “protecting victims of DV” or “providing consumer protections.”
This law allows more unwarranted government intrusion into people’s personal lives, their children’s lives, their families, and curtails their individual liberties and personal freedoms.
It represents further groundwork for state government, DCF, and “family” courts to invade their liberties and freedoms by criminalizing acts and choices that are not criminal.
Why would the state do this?
Domestic Violence Laws or Financial Manipulation?
Expand the definition of DV to where it does not belong, criminalize parenting, criminalize personal choices, and that means more federal $$$ flowing to the state.
Let’s discuss the fallacy and state manipulation of “coercive control” and “coercive financial abuse.”
Here is the Divorce Industry and State Playbook:
- File a false or manufactured claim of “abuse” against a targeted parent or former partner claiming “coercive control.”
- Immediately get access to DV resources. Paid for by TAXPAYERS and the STATE, with FEDERAL FUNDING.
- Destroy the life of the targeted parent using baseless DCF substantiations and perpetuating false claims in our broken and corrupt “family” courts.
- Remember!! There are no penalties for perjury or knowingly making false claims, even under oath, with DCF or in our “family” courts.
Judicial Terrorism in Family Courts: A New Form of Coercive Control?
When “family” court judges routinely seize ALL a parent’s assets, seize their children, destroy their ability to hold employment, and make them homeless, then JAIL THEM for being unable to pay “child support” because of what the state did…. Isn’t that also COERCIVE CONTROL and FINANCIAL TERRORISM?
Perhaps our legislators should ask prosecutors to issue arrest warrants against “family” court judges who promote and reward abuse, promote DV, and engage in coercive control against the parents they knowingly destroy in their courtrooms.
Like Judges Corinne Klatt,
Margaret Murphy, Erika Tindill, Jane Grossman and Thomas O’Neil.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Shared parenting is funded through the access and visitation. The fatherhood initiative. How much money are Peter and Joan getting paid to promote fatherhood initiative objectives?
Peter Syzmonick you forgot to call Yale. The rich philanthropist funding for ” research grants” for the experimental psychology departments. The fatherhood initiative is not just for incarcerated fathers living in poverty. None custodial fathers. You forgot to call the department of child and family services passing out the grant money. The numerous experimental psychology social services studies. Running through social work departments. Perhaps this is why the Connecticut fatherhood initiative statistic planning for 2019-2025 is looking to recruit more males in their social worker programs?
Brigham Young University. Fatherhood studies and research . Experimental psychology founded by the church of laderday Saint. The Pennsylvania University. Allen J Hawkins fatherhood initiative first coined the phrase material gatekeeper. Women who believe their children father are dangerous. Grants for the study of experimental psychology like parental alienation.
What’s “laderday” and what do those random phrases mean?
Latter-day Saint. Believe women should only have sex when they are married. The man is the disciplinarian for the family.
… About FraudNet
GAO maintains the FraudNet hotline to support accountability across the federal government. If you suspect fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement of federal funds, FraudNet can help report your allegations to the right people. After reviewing your allegations and obtaining additional information as necessary, FraudNet will refer your allegations to federal, state, or local agencies or departments, as appropriate. FraudNet also supports congressional investigations and audit requests, provides audit and investigative leads to GAO staff, and offers support to government at all levels for establishing and operating hotlines. …
https://www.gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud
Note:
https://firstliberty.org/cases/marisol-arroyo-castro/
One newspaper reported:
… The district suspended Arroyo-Castro for two days without pay before placing her on administrative leave on Dec. 16, the letter said. It claims she was threatened with termination, and pressured to resign or retire early.
The letter asked the district to reinstate her without the condition she remove the crucifix “to avoid litigation” because all the internal political attention on Paul Boyne’s case — combined with public attention on the Arroyo-Castro case — could probably overturn court rulings in 70% of the state’s family court child custody cases since the 1970s.
What’s the difference between regular control and coercive control?
Coercive control is sneaky.😏
Meanwhile, Connecticut’s lawless AG wants all people from everywhere in the world to cross our national borders.
All Americans in Connecticut must now refer to each other as “the immigrant community”. Those who just crossed our border last summer now have the same constitutional rights as the descendants of immigrants who arrived at Ellis Island an hundred years ago!
Connecticut’s AG expects all Connecticut residents to say the following phrases if approached by ICE officers. (Apparently: “Police Chief Roderick Porter recently stated at a community forum that local police do not cooperate with federal authorities in pursuit of the immigrant community.”)
So, remember everybody (except for families in family courts) …
AND … “We the People” have rights!
And, “We the People” now means: Everyone’s a citizen of United States, except for families in family courts. 🤫
William Tong is a citizen, but he has no idea what it means to be an American.
Dr. Kyle Pruitt. Distinguished educator, Marsha Kline Pruett husband . Child c as study center as director of medical and undergrad studies. Expert in forcesic consult on child parental involvement. Family development, children mental health, creativity and effects of trauma. MEDIA and divorce on young and very young children. Early intervention , co chair of child custody conflict placement committee ( children in the ER after custody flips) Yale law school, toddler, infant sesame work shop. Npr, New York times. Dr. Pruitt serves as the principal investor pioneering longitudinal studies of primary nurturing fathers. Divorce in legal context. Collaborative divorce Network ( many AFCC gals and psychologist can be traced back to this) . California department of social services child abuse prevention positive fatherhood engagement. On going supporter of the fatherhood initiative. Many children are sent to Yale New Haven hospital for sexual assault exams. $250 million dollar was donated to Yale from a gentleman from California. Who’s son was arrested for domestic abuse. Shattering his wife’s occipital bone. How much fatherhood funding is involved? How many divorce collaborative professionals names have come up? How many do Peter and Joan recommend? I know of at least one. Her cases often involve parental alienation claims. They left her in charge of the Attorney who killed himself and his wife on Christmas Day. She got left in charge of the files. There is no money in the fatherhood initiative?
Peter Syzmonick called the number the number his friends in the Connecticut state government told him to. The wrong number. Why did you join the lawsuit with the woman ? Is it the same reason you contacted Theadora Antar? Along with several other men in the men’s rights groups? It would be interesting 🤔 to find out how many women have been accused of parental alienation after 2014. It would be interesting to know how many custody flips have taken place. It would be interesting to see how much more money the state of Connecticut has received for equity and inclusion. The fatherhood initiative and non profit funding for health and human services. How many more women you will tell it’s domestic violence funding that’s the problem. 50/50 legislation will fix everything? It’s the child support making money.
Klot zanard connection to Smith college. Friend and classmates. Emunah Rappaprt. Marriage and family social work trainer.
The greatest manipulation is when someone convinces you that you are in control. ( Through legislation) When in fact they are the puppet master. There is no greater deception to America public then to place a person in the public that deceives, maniplates and triangulates. For the benefit of a chosen few. The big mistake is not claiming to have all the answers, it’s believing the person who says he has all the answers.
How many Connecticut state officials and employees are too politically cemented to wonder about how the following three goals would help the people of Connecticut break free from the state’s Marxist “family courts”?
https://nypost.com/2025/01/21/us-news/trump-to-remove-over-1000-biden-appointees-youre-fired/
Syzmonick and the man behind the desk. 2023 Smith college. Marsha Kline Pruett over $700 thousand dollars secured funding in grants . Professor Kline also with the Yale burning bunch. Co parenting and family development. More inclusive family Marsh Kline Pruett supports fatherhood involvement. The project is for ” problem Makers” father’s who are absent, ABUSIVE, and inconsistent me Creating a positive role ( image) in the family. I fairly surtin Peter Syzmonick is not going after Marsh Kline Pruett for her date. I’m sure he has no interest in shining a spot light on the project. In the interest of children. These are the funded experimental inclusive projects being promoted. Kline Pruett husband is the director of the children psychiatric department at Yale New Haven hospital. A supporter of the fatherhood initiative. Connecticut pushing fatherhood under neglectful and abusive conditions. The Connecticut judicial branch is partnered with the fatherhood initiative.
Correction data not data. . If you are going to claim to be advocating for parents, please stop hidding information from the public.
Monique Mason. The good men project and reunited stepmother. A Coach. All these so called ” alienation Industry Warriors”. The triangulation and splitting of the family. A majority of the ” coaching” and teaching of these people is to use the symptoms of abuse and turns it back on the victim. This could be outlined in the case of Joan klot zanard. Joanne has been relentlessly attacking her stepson on line for years. A complete review of her online interviews state she herself has had very little contact with her step children. She admits to showing up to places where her step child is. Despite the awareness that contact is not wanted. Stepping over and failure to respect boundaries set by a now adult person. Which would be provocting, especially since she has gone on line attacking his cognition. Because as an adult this individual has decided to go no contact. Then portrays herself a victim. Lacking insights and awareness on how her own behavior has effected the family dynamics she insists on inserting herself in. This is often the behavior of an individual who has made the situation about themselves. Lacking insights and respect for boundaries. States that the problem begins with her relationship with the children father. Grandiose self importance? It’s interesting how the so called alienation experts and supporters often bad mouth and attempt to disqualify other conventional therapists. How often they attack the intelligent, well rounded therapy world. When another mental health professional weigh in they are automatically labeled incompetent. Only alienation industry professionals are the elite group who can testify in the court house. Grandiose self importance? It’s amazing how many times a so called court professional will attack other mental health processionals with a different perspective. Professionals qualified to make judgments on abuse. It’s amazing how often these gaurduim ad lithiums will insist only these people can see the truth. This is often the case of people claiming to be eliminated. The lack the ability to self reflect and adjust their own behavior. Forcing a relationship based on their own needs. Would Joan’s step children be having a relationship with their father if Joan stayed out of the battle? Was further damage caused by her on line crusade to shame embarrass and insult to the stepson’s intelligence? Is that healthy behavior of a step parent? Is this the behavior of a qualified expert?
Third parties in custody cases. These are often the people who support the initiative. Love fraud and domestic abuse by proxy. Shame and humiliation on the children who are stuck in the middle. Who goes on the internet and says these things about their step children and expects to help repair the relationship? Michelle, Joan and the yoga instructor.
CT general status ( CGS) modernization project. DCF partnered and provided a porthole for parents and third parties. Doggy doo doo at the doorstep. The intimate know of how the system works and how to manipulate it. Alienation industry silver bullet tactics. The fatherhood initiative and shared parenting. Degree in government and employed as a paralegal.
In 2022 a go fund me page was put up for Joanne ” in dire straight” retaliation for family court work. In 2013 the marital property she equired was sold for over 800 thousand. About $5000 was raised from alienation warriors. An urgent plea was then put out that it wasn’t enough from the alienation industry team. Professionals or con artists?
What presentation did Joanne give the Connecticut bar in association in 2019? Perhaps if the New Haven FBI is not going to investigate, perhaps the FBI office in Massachusetts will.
In October of 2024 an article by Yale states Connecticut has the 2 lowest prevalence of mental health issues. Yet, all the women at the family court house is nuts. 😂
Marsha Kline Pruett. The hand that rocked the cradle. ” Maternal gatekeepers” the gender profiling of women in divorce proceeding. Promotion of fatherhood funding for the state.
Smith college. Research on experimental psychology and government affairs. It’s an all womens college with a co -ed graduate program.
Friday, January 24, 2025 at 10:00 AM
Judiciary Committee January 24th Public Hearing and Meeting
Link to Connecticut Network Livestream:
https://ct-n.com/Default.asp
January 16, 2025CancelledAnyone in Connecticut (including Hartford Courant reporters) know or care why the Connecticut Judicial Branch Committee on Judicial Ethics scheduled… then cancelled so many meetings? 🧐
👇 the actual Agenda for the last meeting held April 18, 2024
part of the actual summary 👇
https://jud.ct.gov/committees/ethics/#Agenda
How many times have how many pawns of the actual movers and shakers of “the Charter Oak state” knowingly covered for Mr. Adelman’s destruction of confidence in the judiciary?
So many years have come and gone and Mr. Adelman still hasn’t told the public or judiciary committee members about the crimes he committed as the so-called “director” of the CT AFCC Inc. public-private racketeering.
Why wasn’t Mr. Adelman disqualified from holding any office or employment in the state 10 years ago when Ms. Munro stepped down from the bench?
During yesterday’s charade, Mr. Adelman looked a little nervous when he spoke about his relationship with Ms. Munro. After Mr. Adelman spoke about his relationship with Ms. Munro, did no one on the judiciary committee think to ask him about his relationship with Sidney Horowitz?
Does no one on the judiciary committee know about the charade of the case against Paul Boyne? How much taxpayer dollars have been tossed at that case so far?
Mr. Adelman mentioned yesterday that he wants more funds. He wants taxpayers to pay for state mental health evaluators to evaluate parents and children in Connecticut’s for profit purposely adversarial family court child custody cases.
After Mr. Adelman told committee members how taxpayers should spend more money to manage families in “family courts” what would have happened if committee members would have asked Mr. Adelman to describe his extrajudicial activities and co-mingling of profits in the CT AFCC Inc. racketeering scam?
If ten years ago, Hartford Courant headlines and articles would have reported to the public how “Dr.” Horowitz and Mr. Adelman taunted Paul Boyne when they managed the Boyne “family court” case, the state would have saved all the money tossed at the Boyne case and Jennifer Dulos would still be alive today. Fotis Dulos would still be alive today. Michelle Troconis wouldn’t be in jail.
And, all those state funds tossed at the Dulos case would have gone where?
The people of Connecticut haven’t demanded a new AG and a new governor because the people of Connecticut have no idea what’s been happening in Connecticut.
As judiciary committee members cover for Mr. Adelman, they also cover for the state’s AG — who was head of the judiciary committee during family court investigations and family court reform ten years ago.
Remaining silent about the corruption and crimes committed for so long in Connecticut could be what prompts the new Nazi “doge” office to calculate how many taxpayer dollars would have been saved had the New Haven DOJ office investigated and prosecuted the CT AFCC, Inc. racket ten years ago.
Look up the meaning of the word “doge”. Here’s a hint: “The Doge of Venice acted as both the head of state and head of the Venetian oligarchy.”
Your choice, Connecticut. Be pawns in the game or free yourselves.
Maybe if everyone reads Andrew Kraig’s book, Spiked and if whistleblowers in the family court system are courageous enough to resist threats from the small group of deceitful individuals who control Connecticut, the people of Connecticut could set themselves free.
https://archive.org/details/spikedhowchainma00krei
“… In order to understand the international situation as it is to-day, we must recall what has happened since Lenin established the totalitarian dictatorship in Russia in 1918. It has been proved that the dictatorship was established to provide the Western Internationalists with the opportunity to put their totalitarian ideas and theories for a universal dictatorship into effect. They wished to iron out any wrinkles by the process of trial and error. …
… Molotov was the one man best able to judge what was going on in Stalin’s brain. During the post-war period Molotov was the Soviet’s Foreign Minister. He represented the Kremlin at the United Nations for many years. Molotov married the daughter of Sam Karp of Bridgeport, Connecticut. Thus Molotov became the connecting link between the Kremlin and the international financiers of the Western World. …”
https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=carr&book=pawns&story=dangers
Call The Fatherhood Initiative.
Ask them to tell you about their mission statement (to help good fathers).
Ask them to provide data showing recipients of federal funds.
Call the recipients of those federal funds. (Probably the names of those who show up in the most corrupted cases.)
Ask them to tell you about their mission statements. (They will probably lie.)
Ask them how many federal dollars they received. (They will probably lie.)
Ask them for the follow up data they collected to support their methods.
Do they ever follow up to check on the health, well-being and financial progress of the families they exploit?
Actually, you should probably find out about that first to save time. Call your legislators. Ask them if anyone’s ever followed up to check on the health, well-being and financial progress of the families exploited in “family courts”.
Your legislators probably won’t blame Peter for the hell Connecticut families go through in the “family courts”.
Maybe you could ask the lawmakers about how and why “family courts” ruin families. Have you tried that yet?
It is unnecessary to call them. ” All Connecticut father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children” it doesn’t say just the fit or good ones. ” Prioritizing fatherhood over criminal matters”. They will never tell you about the research funding. Self reported. They will never tell you that the men behind the fatherhood initiative have never lived in poverty, been incarcerated or accused of domestic violence. The government it self has it’s own reports. The crime statistics are under reported. This is an organization that represents the sale of men and the image of women as an obstacle. Has the non profit agency requested information on there negative effects on the lives of other people? Has there ever been an objective to reduce harm or the elimination of mothers? Have they paid domestic violence victims to see what programs are not working?
Where’s the evidence to show they’re “prioritizing fatherhood over criminal matters”?
Has anyone asked for the data on their “research funding”?
Are only men supporting the fatherhood initiative?
And you know for sure none “have never lived in poverty, been incarcerated or accused of domestic violence”?
Such generalizations don’t tell legislators what they’d need to change public policy.
Legislators are busy people. Ask not what your country can do for you … etc. is a pretty good idea.
It’s in the 2019 – 2025 strategic planning
The fatherhood initiative is supposed by many. Especially step parents. In the beginning phases of the men’s rights movement happening during the welfare reform act. The majority of complaints were of financial obligations and harming the ” new family”. Perhaps some one could speak to the former head of health and human services. Ask his opinion during the time he was governor of California. Trump is not wrong in his quest for human services re structure.. it’s difficult to find a government office to bring information. When both parties have decided to back a project that brings so much money. It’s with sincere hopes that our new attorney general for the people would be interested in fixing a system with a tent of equity and inclusion. Many people trapped in the system with court transcripts. Afraid to come forward with retaliation. When children are held hostage. A stakeholder is aggressively promoting and implementing a project. Folks missing and in jail for attempting to speak out. A good indication of criminal justice reform and the state project is the city of Hartford. It is going to hell in a hand basket. Perhaps our new attorney general may take a look around the CT attorney general’s office and department of public health. The republicans have asked her to clean up the department of justice and FBI. Perhaps she could ask Richard Blumenthal and William Tong to step aside for the American people living in the state of Connecticut. Both men and women have filled complaints in the attorney general’s office. Maybe the new attorney general office could ask to place fresh eyes. As well as the Connecticut bar association complaints.
Who at the top of the national fatherhood initiative or the steakholer government services has been any of those things? Why did or did Trump do away with the civil rights division of the DOJ?
Peter..“Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names.”
Good advice in any state as corrupt as Connecticut.
The truth should never be an enemy. It’s on utube the position of the leader of court reform. The alienation industry specialist has already been collecting names of people who don’t support the unregulated practice running CT family court. What are they planning to do with it? Keith Harmon snow spoke in 2014 on behalf of the children trapped in family court. As Katherine a blogger pointed out the men’s rights groups took over. Parental alienation took over the day. The welfare of children took a back seat for the rights and entitlements. The court obsession with parental alienation has become an obstacle for the safety of children. Created a stereotype of divorcing women. Equity over best interest. Mothers are being made disposable. Father’s and families are the Daddy and the new bride. Third parties entitlement for people who have no legal rights in the family court battle.
Meanwhile, with the residents in the state outrage by the Democrats money grab legal system. The Attorney General has decided to fight the newly elected president. Using time effort and resources and ignoring the American people living in one in the state regarded as one of the most curpt in the entire country
The entire judicial branch is being run by a 503c non profit organization. Equity and inclusion. The tent that purchased the justice system.
A “503c non profit” runs “the entire judicial branch”?
If that’s a reference to what the AFCC Inc. racketeering did to the state, most reading this have no idea what that’s about.
Mainstream news outlets never reported the scandal to taxpayers in Connecticut, right? The DOJ never prosecuted those involved in that racketeering, right? Mr. Adelman was a director of that racket and here’s a partial description of the charade that will play out tomorrow:
Judiciary Committee
MEETING AGENDA
Friday, January 24, 2025
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING A PUBLIC HEARING AT 10:00 AM
IN ROOM 2E OF THE LOB AND ZOOM AND YOUTUBE LIVE
I. CONVENE MEETING
II. REMARKS BY THE CHAIRS
III. NOMINATIONS FOR REVIEW …
… d. To be a State Referee
1. The Honorable Holly Abery-Wetstone of West Hartford
2. The Honorable Gerard I. Adelman of Meriden …
Mr. Adelman should have been in jail years ago.
Of course citizens in Connecticut can’t know what legislators, government officials and mainstream reporters won’t tell them.
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2025/juddata/ca/pdf/2025CA-00124-R001000JUD-CA.PDF
If The Connecticut Mirror published the article Lamont, who diversified CT’s judiciary, set to nominate more judges in preparation for today’s hearing, why didn’t they also publish the link to the hearing and information about that hearing?
Was the Mirror reporter not allowed to look into the damning details of what’s been actually happening in Connecticut’s judicial branch since the 1970’s?
Who and/or what has been censoring the mainstream press?
Since when must all reporting about the state’s judicial branch be so shallow?
Mirror reporter Mr. Pazniokas wrote, “… By the administration’s count, Lamont gave 98 of the 179 judges their jobs. They include 51 women and 47 men, with diverse racial backgrounds …”
Does the reporter not know about Mr. Stafstrom’s giddy enthusiasm for Mr. O’Neill’s nomination? Do no reporters at the Mirror know Mr. O’Neill heard the Ambrose child custody case after Mr. Gould and Mr. Cuda somehow pushed Ms. Nieves away from that dangerous child custody case?
Ms. Nieves should have heard that case because she was far more qualified to protect children in dangerous family court cases — and because that was one of the first cases set to involve the use and abuse of Jennifer’s Law.
All of that was a big deal and Mr. O’Neill was the perfect judge to protect Mr. Adelman.
O’Neill was also the perfect judge to protect the 40 years of racketeering in Connecticut’s family courts under the heat of Frank Report’s articles on corruption in Connecticut family courts.
If someone at The Connecticut Mirror eventually reads these two official nomination announcements and wonders what happened in Adelman’s Ambrose case, the context will have nothing to do with skin color and gender.
Gladys Idelis Nieves, 49, of New Haven: Nieves is currently a Family Support Magistrate in the Connecticut Judicial Branch, where she has served since 2014. Immediately prior to being appointed to that position, she worked in the Law Offices of Gladys I. Nieves, serving as sole proprietor and representing parents and children involved in child abuse and neglect proceedings, including termination of parental rights. Prior to that, she served as a Senior Staff Attorney for the Center for Children’s Advocacy in Hartford, and also worked as an attorney for the Legal Aid Society in the South Bronx. She earned her undergraduate degree from Yale University, and her Juris Doctor from the New York University School of Law.
Thomas J. O’Neill, 57, of Fairfield: O’Neill graduated from Stonehill College and obtained his Juris Doctor degree from Suffolk University Law School. He is currently a partner at Day Pitney LLP and a member of the firm’s Finance Probate and Commercial Litigation Business Unit and Pro Bono Committee. His practice focuses on a wide range of commercial and civil litigation matters in both state and federal courts, including landlord tenant disputes, foreclosures, lender liability, corporate ownership disputes, tort claims, and alleged unfair trade practices. Prior to this, he was a Victim Compensation Commissioner presiding over appeals from denials of applications for victim compensation.
This morning, if Mr. Boyne, Mr. Luthman and Mr. Volpe are sitting comfortably in a living room somewhere waiting to testify today via a Zoom call, it might not be too early for bourbon and cigars.
https://ctmirror.org/2025/01/23/ct-judicial-nominations-lamont-diversity/
The AFCC has close relationships with the initiative partnership with the judicial branch along with the health care delivery. Is there a record for the hospital in New Haven of children with suicidal ideation after custody flip? How much of the alienation industry is now blaming it on the parents the child was being taken away from. These people are all aligned together. How many AFCC members are claiming alienation. Perhaps you could ask Marsha.
Which state and/or federal offices have documented the harm guardians ad litem have done to Connecticut families since 2014?
Has the state’s judiciary committee or any legislative committee found a way to collect data on the harm guardians ad litem have done to families in the “family courts”?
Jennifer Dulos asked the “family court” to investigate the guardian ad litem in her children’s “family court” case in 2019. …
Meehan was Connecticut family court’s guardian ad litem. 👈
The 2014 petition:
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2014/JUDdata/tmy/2014SB-00494-R000331-The%20Connecticut%20Coalition%20for%20Family%20Court%20Reform-TMY.PDF
“The hardest question is what to do when human rights give way to profits. . . . Complicity is a story of the skeletons that remain in this nation’s closet.”
The second hardest question is what to do when legislators, law enforcers and news reporters are complicit in crimes committed.
https://www.amazon.com/Complicity-Promoted-Prolonged-Profited-Slavery/dp/0345467833
In which years was The Hartford Courant not complicit?
How many of the worst “human development experts” are willing to discuss their theories and practices with signed releases?
Honest disclosures of current “family court” philosophies and methods used throughout American “family courts” would serve many purposes. For example, the new Department of Government Efficiency and HHS would probably appreciate that kind of help.
“ … David F.
Business Owner
Sep 4, 2024
Kate, I’m not sure who you are and I cannot comment on any specific cases I’ve evaluated. If your family member wants to sign a release of information I can comment more specifically. In either case I’d like to point out a “hired gun” typically produces an opinion they have been paid for. Unlike a hired gun, I am willing to be neutral and objective which unfortunately results in people sometimes not getting the results they were hoping for and being upset with me as a result. I don’t “disappear”. I return calls and emails. I begin my evaluation services with a clear contract setting forth fees and expectations. I do not “take off” with anyone’s money. The fees assessed are a result of the time that is spent on an evaluation. In some cases only when it is appropriate I may convey my results to a parent’s attorney who will direct me not to write a report. In other cases my report requires the notes or a report from a 3rd party treater. If those notes or report are not provided, I might be unable to produce a report as the third party treater has reached conclusions that are different than mine and that I must know the basis of. Suffice it to say, I appreciate your comments, but they are not accurate. Again, if your family member is willing to identify themselves and sign a release, I might be able to comment more specifically about the evaluation you are referring to in your comment. …”
https://www.yelp.com/biz/associates-in-human-development-consulting-inverness
Mr. Finn seems willing to share his family court policies and practices with the public. His comments on Yelp look like he might be willing to help Americans better understand how and why American family court evaluators do what they do.
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/family-court-fraud-psychologist-david
HOW HARTFORD COURANT HEADLINES STARTED …
8/21/23
Man accused of internet threats against CT judges faces trial. Free speech showdown expected.
10/20/23
Former CT man accused of stalking judges extradited from Virginia, faces trial
January 16, 2024
Federal court dismisses CT lawyer’s attempt to collect damages from judge who disbarred her
March 12, 2024
Bail reduced for notorious blogger charged with stalking CT judges. He claims it’s free speech.
July 16, 2024
CT judge sends case of alleged cyberstalker to trial: question is where protected speech ends
July 30, 2024
Notorious CT anti-judge blogger and First Amendment advocate seeks diversion program that seals case.
October 15, 2024
A man allegedly stalked CT judges. Why his mental competency is being questioned.
October 22, 2024
Man accused of cyberstalking judges refuses to submit to court-ordered competency exam.
October 31, 2024
Man accused of harassing CT judges found competent to stand trial, fires lawyers.
January 11, 2025
Bond reduced for man accused of cyberstalking CT judges. He awaits trial on 18 counts.
HOW HARTFORD COURANT HEADLINES ARE GOING …
<< crickets >> ???
In this world of “Epstein, Blackmail, and the Blue World Order” … most people who know the reputation of Connecticut family courts think there’s corruption somewhere in Connecticut family courts. Has local mainstream news even mentioned the possibility of corruption in Connecticut family courts for the past forty years?
After all the hype from Ms. Katz and Mr. Doyle for the past few years, shouldn’t a Hartford Courant article about Connecticut v. Boyne be in local headlines this weekend?
If President Trump saves his son, what will happen to the criminal administrators who committed crimes against so many families in state “family courts”? 🤔
https://globaloccurrences.substack.com/p/trump-will-save-my-son
Big pharma and the United Way.
Looks like Paul Boyne took the midnight train in broad daylight back to Virginia. After a year and a half in jail.
Boyne made controversial statements in his blog. A blog that exposes children exploited by the Connecticut family court. Sexually abused child , physical and mentally. God speed, safe travels and stay out of trouble.
A year and a half in Connecticut’s prisons because he exposed a few of the criminals running the “family court” racket!
An attorney lost her license for exposing the crimes in the “family courts” and families are still destroyed in the “family courts”.
WHAT IS LAW ENFORCEMENT DOING TO HELP VICTIMS OF CRIMES “FAMILY COURT” JUDGES AND LAWYERS COMMIT AGAINST FAMILIES?
Sorry for yelling. What else can we do to get people to pay attention?
Connecticut is looking for a new inspector general. I wonder 🤔 if the next one will be able to investigate the lethal family court?
Our Anarchy is of the German school, which is more nearly akin to Nihilism than to the doctrines taught in France. It is founded upon the teachings of Karl Marx and his disciples, and it aims directly at the complete destruction of all forms of government and religion. It offers no solution of the problems which will arise when society, as we understand it, shall disappear, but contents itself with declaring that the duty at hand is tearing down; that the work of building up must come later.
Sounds like a position that the great Gary Cohen would be perfect for!
Family Courts are not legit. They use laws written by a group of family lawyers and nothing that’s been through legislation. I’ve noticed how abusive parents are in these courts via their lawyers. They are destroying families to their core using money and children. But it’s even worse for those who are dealing with the abusers who are wealthier than most. There’s zero rights here. Zero protection. Their lawyers are networked with the police departments, FBI, and even the Intel community. You will lose more than your children. You’ll lose your apartment, everything in it, your car, driver’s license, family, friends, and no one will help.
Any ideas for simple posters and flyers we can print and circulate around the most affected states to warn fellow Americans?
Mainstream news outlets have failed us.
I’ve thought a lot about that. I think it’s a good idea
The cesspool of CT: family court….Corrupticourt full of lowlife scum who eat their young.
Cordell and Cordell is now advertising as a domestic litigation firm instead of a father’s rights attorney. They still claim father’s have bias against them. They must not have looked into the sexist legislation for fatherhood funding. All father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children. With funding attached. They must not know that the entire state is partnered with the fatherhood initiative. The must not know it’s prioritized fatherhood over criminal matters. Or are they well aware of all these things. Would rather represent men because they have more legal system bias to win in the family court?
Some one should bring a lawsuit for false advertising. The family court system has several different ways to screw over parents.
Frank you are missing important comments.
Hearing today at 10:00 AM …
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/paul-boyne-set-to-walk-free-on-bail
“Exposing the Truth About Family Court Abuse: Why Stronger Protections for Domestic Violence Survivors Are Essential”
-Rebuttal in response to “Judicial Terrorism in Family Courts: A New Form of Coercive Control” written by Peter Szymonik.
“Peter Szymonik’s recent critique of Connecticut’s domestic violence laws, including Jennifer’s Law, claims these reforms are an overreach that unfairly target fathers and grant excessive discretion to courts. While his arguments may resonate with some, they fail to acknowledge the harsh realities faced by domestic violence survivors who are left vulnerable by systemic failures in Connecticut’s legal and social services. For survivors like Kailani Carlson, these laws are not an attack on fathers—they are a lifeline.
The Reality of Coercive Control and Financial Abuse
Domestic violence is not limited to physical harm. It includes coercive control: the use of psychological, emotional, and financial manipulation to dominate and isolate victims. Abusers often weaponize the legal system to maintain control over their victims, especially in family courts.
A common tactic used by some fathers to evade their child support obligations is exploiting loopholes in wage withholding orders. In many cases, fathers can make token payments as low as $1.00 every six months—just enough to avoid jail time—while leaving the mother and children in financial ruin. This tactic, often encouraged in online father’s rights groups, is not an isolated issue but part of a deliberate strategy to perpetuate financial abuse.
Despite clear evidence of underreported income and fraudulent behavior, Connecticut’s system consistently fails to hold these individuals accountable. This leaves survivors without recourse, forcing them to bear the financial burden while the state turns a blind eye to the abuse.
The disparity becomes even more glaring when compared to how the system treats mothers. A mother who is forced to accept TANF welfare benefits because the father refuses to pay his court-ordered child support can face harsh penalties, including threats of prison time, if she underreports income changes. Meanwhile, a father can evade child support payments by crossing state lines, underreporting income, or working under the table, and face little to no legal consequences—even if he owes the state money for TANF payments made to support his child. This double standard highlights a systemic bias that punishes victims while enabling abusers to manipulate the system without accountability.
For Kailani, this meant 10 years of battling a system that allowed her child’s father, who is a documented physically violent criminal abuser, to manipulate wage withholding policies, evade child support, and leverage baseless legal motions to control her through intimidation and financial ruin. His actions are emblematic of a broader pattern where abusers use the courts as a weapon against the survivors, all while hiding income, working under the table, and falsely claiming poverty with no accountability standards in place.
Systemic Failures in Connecticut
Connecticut’s judicial branch exacerbates these issues by disproportionately prioritizing services for fathers. Programs offering employment assistance and legal aid are far more accessible to fathers than to mothers who are victims of domestic violence. This imbalance leaves survivors like Kailani to fend for themselves, often falling into poverty while their abusers exploit state resources to maintain control.
The criminal justice system also fails victims by misusing diversionary programs for violent offenders. These programs, designed to save the state money, are often applied to offenders who do not meet eligibility criteria, allowing abusers to avoid accountability. This prioritization of cost savings over victim safety leaves survivors at continued risk of harm.
Weaponizing Family Courts and Police Resources
Abusers often turn to family courts to perpetuate their control, falsely accusing survivors of parental alienation, all in an effort to undermine the survivors credibility, and shift focus away from their own abusive behavior. These claims are a direct attack on the survivor’s efforts to protect their children. They serve a dual purpose: evading child support and regaining custody, not out of genuine interest in the child’s welfare but as a means to continue punishing the survivor. Abusers don’t like paying their victims, they like controlling their victims. Abusers don’t want their victims to become survivors.
Even more egregious, however, is when law enforcement is weaponized against victims. In 2013, Kailani and her child were no longer residents under Connecticut jurisdiction for over two years, however she was subjected to gross violations of her right to privacy and safety by the Connecticut State Police, who acted on false claims made by the abuser, along with his friend and “previously appointed” Guardian ad Litem Attorney Sharon Peters. They both falsely accused Kailani of kidnapping her own child, which she has full sole custody of. Together after emailing each other and creating their scheme, they made verbal reports with Connecticut state Troop F law enforcement to intimidate and locate Kailani. The Connecticut State Police Trooper Debra-Ann O’Mara/Turner, in clear violation of the law, and violation of state police policy, used her authority to run Kailani’s private information through law enforcement databases, with no probable cause of any crime being committed.
This breach of privacy and misuse of police resources revealed Kailani’s out of state safe relocated address, placing her and her child at serious risk. The information was shared by the state trooper to the abuser without any warrants, subpoena, nor a court hearing. The abuser then used this information to further harass Kailani through the courts and manipulate the system to his advantage. Instead of protecting a domestic violence survivor and her child, the Connecticut State Police trooper aided in his continued abuse and stalking, highlighting a systemic failure that prioritizes the convenience of bureaucracy over victim safety.
Why Jennifer’s Law Matters
Legislation like Jennifer’s Law, which broadens the definition of domestic violence to include coercive control, is essential for addressing these patterns of abuse. Critics like Szymonik argue that such laws unfairly target fathers and grant courts too much discretion, but this perspective ignores the lived experiences of survivors who face systemic barriers at every turn.
These laws provide critical tools for identifying and addressing behaviors that perpetuate abuse, such as financial manipulation, legal harassment, and the misuse of law enforcement resources. Without them, victims are left vulnerable to ongoing harm, and abusers are emboldened to exploit the system further.
A Call to Action
Connecticut must take meaningful steps to reform its judicial and social systems to better protect domestic violence survivors “in practice”, not just on paper and in theory:
1. Close Wage Withholding Loopholes;
Stricter enforcement mechanisms are needed to ensure that wage withholding orders are honored and that abusers cannot manipulate the system with token payments.
2. Equitably Allocate Resources;
Survivors of domestic violence need access to the same support services—employment assistance, legal aid, housing support—afforded to fathers, ensuring they have the tools to rebuild their lives.
3. Reform Diversionary Programs;
Limit the use of diversionary programs to offenders who meet strict eligibility criteria, prioritizing victim safety and holding violent offenders accountable.
4. Address Coercive Control in Courts;
Provide comprehensive training for judges and court-appointed representatives to recognize and address coercive control and financial abuse.
5. Ensure Accountability for Law Enforcement;
Implement stricter oversight of police practices to prevent the misuse of resources and protect the privacy and safety of victims.
Amplifying the Voices of Survivors
The stories of survivors like Kailani Carlson aren’t just cautionary tales—they are calls to action. Her experience reflects the struggles faced by countless others who are failed by a system designed to protect them. It is time to listen to these voices and prioritize their safety, well-being, and justice.
For years, Kailani fought against a system that allowed her abuser to manipulate legal, financial, and law enforcement frameworks to continue his control. Despite her documented evidence of abuse, financial coercion, and neglect, the system favored his rights over hers and her child’s safety.
Connecticut’s judicial and law enforcement branches must stop treating the rights of abusers as equal to the rights of victims. Abuse isn’t a “parenting conflict”—it’s a crime. Systems and laws that treat them as such perpetuate harm, forcing survivors to relive their trauma while fighting for basic protections.
Let’s Stop the Cycle
Kailani’s story is not unique, and that’s precisely the problem. Too many survivors face similar challenges, navigating systems that seem designed to protect the abusers instead of them. It’s time to break this cycle. We need to stop treating abusers as misunderstood parents and start holding them accountable for their actions. We need to stop forcing survivors to fight uphill battles for safety, dignity, justice, and their right to autonomy.
Let’s ensure that survivors no longer have to live in fear of the systems meant to protect them. Let’s create a Connecticut where justice truly serves those who need it most.
The time for change is now.
Amen.
The system is relentlessly going after survivors and their children. Relentlessly attack on women has become common place in Connecticut.
Best Comment of 2025! God Bless you Kailani and your family!! Keep exposing the TRUTH!!
The entire system is an epic failure. Most domestic violence victims have learned to stay the hell out of social services in Connecticut. BECAUSE Of THE FATHERHOOD INITIATIVE. Most victims have learned that the entire judicial system is running on the FATHERHOOD INITIATIVE. A men’s rights organization controlling the entire state of Connecticut. The only case of overreacting so far is the Ambrose Riordan matter. The judge took himself off the case. The judicial branch has been uneducated because they get to pick and choose who educates them.
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1KSAwHHqdN/?mibextid=UalRPS
https://ctmirror.org/2025/01/10/ct-inspector-general-police-shootings/
He is way too racist and antisemite. Unfit for the job
You know the inspector general was supposed to investigate the corruption in the judicial branch and didn’t, right?
I’m not shocked. The Connecticut government is not going to allow this to happen.
While failure of law enforcement to investigate or punish clear evidence of criminality in the elites is becoming increasingly evident, the parallel history of interference with government
investigations may be less well known.
https://ia800509.us.archive.org/29/items/mkultra-kinsey-rockefeller/MKULTRA_Kinsey_Rockefeller.pdf
“ … Details are murky, but she reportedly was found at her office desk. …”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/17/remembering-judith-reisman-anti-pornography-crusad/
https://original.antiwar.com/cook/2025/01/12/judge-threatens-to-break-the-uks-wall-of-secrecy-around-assanges-persecution/
The American political system is broken and corrupted and that’s what we have to address.
Family court is definitely being used as a tool of coercive control! IMHO, however, this is not “new.” Courts were designed to protect the rights and property of wealthy white male property owners. Therefore, “power over” has always been a foundation of their operations.
Identity politics divides all who share what some call “lived experiences” (aka “life”).
You are correct.
The womder bread daddy hidding behind minority community projects
The wonder breads daddys are running the court house
Aka. Peter Syzmonick and the silver bullet divorce tactics band.
“Courts were designed to protect the rights and property of wealthy white male property owners.” you need a suppository for a ignorant statement like that. .
Unfeminine half of the peace sign. Minis the index finger. The truth is difficult to except. Buying justice should be illegal. CT doesn’t see it that way.
The “big picture” here is: Family court orders are the singular cause of most child abuse in Connecticut — mostly because The Hartford Courant has been running interference for the corruption for the past forty years.
As a result of The Hartford Courant’s interference, the people of Connecticut have had no idea what’s been happening in state “family courts” — just like we had no idea of what was happening in “the Diddy case” until that case made headline news.
Another big picture: What’s been happening in California has been happening in Connecticut, where “family courts” have been corrupted since the 1970s.
Individuals orchestrating corruption and crimes in Connecticut’s now fully politicized judicial branch want the people of Connecticut to think that law enforcement offices didn’t already have enough evidence to silence Paul Boyne … until they found Michael Volpe’s information.
Who in state and/or federal offices want the public to believe that the best modern technology in the world today couldn’t tell them what they wanted to know until they heard Michael Volpe say one or two sentences?
The flak fired toward Michael Volpe (NOTE: That kind of flak from government offices does actual harm) followed Mr. Volpe’s interviews with Emma Katherine.
Mr. Volpe knows the back story of what’s happening in Connecticut “family courts” and he hasn’t been too afraid to talk about it. Will a few individuals in state and/or federal offices silence Michael Volpe now, too?
Any courageous DOJ office employees and mainstream journalists reading this and wanting to know more about the horrible circumstances surrounding Connecticut’s current judicial politicization should consider researching the work of the late great FBI agent Theodore Lee Gunderson.
”Ted” Gunderson worked in the New Haven FBI office. He found credible and actionable evidence of the kinds of horrible practices in Connecticut that Michael Volpe discussed with Emma Katherine on The Imagination Podcast.
Ted’s experience and investigations led him to begin his national tour to advocate for a mother in Connecticut family courts who “ran” with her children to protect them from horrific abuse — the kind of practices and abuse whistleblowers spoke about in “the Diddy case”.
Whistleblowers and independent journalism broke “the Diddy case” after four decades of complicity in state and federal offices. News of “the Diddy case” included eyewitness accounts of occult practices in Hollywood … and then came the mainstream news that topped that news: “Fires in Los Angeles”
Looking at the smallest details, many wonder how much evidence, witnesses and whistleblowers in “the Diddy case” will have been lost in those fires when the last flame is extinguished.
Meanwhile, for those running interference for Connecticut’s “family courts” at The Hartford Courant, Paul Boyne’s blog serves the same purpose those fires in Los Angeles serve and the politics of today are the same politics of 2,000 years ago and the angels and the demons from 2,000 years ago are apparently still here on Earth.
https://michaelvolpe.substack.com/p/the-hartford-courant-runs-interference
23:00 “… Based on my research, there’s about 4 million plus practicing Satanists in America today — about one and a half percent of the population. I derived that figure from a confidential source in the South Bay Area of Los Angeles where there’s about 200,000 people. And I was told by an informant that there’s about 3,000 in that area.”
29:00 “… and what were they doing with them – – they were they were driving them from Omaha to Sioux City, Iowa — 184 miles away. Placing them in private jets. Flying to Washington DC for sex orgies and – – and with politicians and Congressman. Senators in Washington DC at Larry King’s mansion. He had a house there and they had a private parties. I’ve talked to the official photographer, Rusty Nelson – – took a statement from Rusty. And he would – – they would have a party of a regular group of people. And the legitimate honest people — so to speak — would leave. Then they’d have a private party afterwards where they had these sex orgies with these children.”
50:00 “… You have to crawl before you can walk. Well, that’s what’s happening. We’re starting to walk. We were crawling for years as far as knowledge of this is concerned. Now we’re starting to walk. Pretty soon, we’re going to be trotting. Pretty soon we’re going to be running because people are learning more and more about what’s going on now.”
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Ted+gunderson+bleepintruth
“We went to some, like, underground dance party … underneath a bank on Wall Street … We were all rolling, we’re all taking molly [MDMA] and everybody’s high. And I was so happy because I hadn’t done that in like a year and a half,”
“I had to be kind of sneaky about it … because I was running the entire COVID response in the city,”
https://nypost.com/2024/09/19/us-news/nyc-covid-adviser-brags-in-secret-recording-about-drug-fueled-sex-parties-mid-pandemic-had-to-be-sneaky/
The court system is a money grab. The Dulos spent 20 thousand on a family psy evaluation. It got tossed out. The garduim ad lithiums cost thousands. Jennifer was murdered anyway. Many have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to get forced into agreements. It’s the same story over and over again. It’s the same story through out the United States. Children are murdered , they are forced into homes they don’t want to be in. Parents are angry.
Anyone know if the GaL in the Dulos case has learned from his mistakes? Is he still engaging third parties in custody disputes? Is he still ignoring warning signs? Has the Dulos case effected the GaL services provided in the public defender office? Are judges smartening up? Are prosecutor’s raising a red flag?
Absolutely not!
not even a little. this system is still catering to the highest bidder.
Hey Peter, whoever these women are commenting. Sounds like they got the hots for you…. Wish they had a real man.
No one loves Peter more than himself.
How unhelpful to the issues of family court.
Yes, unfortunately Peter is in many ways unhelpful in fixing family court. He’s got his own agenda and will not address many problems. He’s platform is centered around discrediting child abuse, domestic violence and doesn’t want the judges to do anything other than what he wants.
Why, sure. Peter caused all the problems in Connecticut family courts and it makes total sense to go after him.
That’ll help a lot.
It makes good sense to have Peter go after domestic violence victims. Crusade for people not to be arrested for child support arrange. Having people abusing the court pay legal fees. Promting the arrest of protective parents/DV survivors to be arrested for custodial interference. Working with CT legislators to keep violent crime statistics down. Let only men out of jail. Push for incarceration including minority women. Many mothers. Making women look like perps. Running after female victims and DV perpetrator to scream parental alienation.
Wonder bread daddy: monetized white man resting on the shoulders of incarcerated black and brown fathers. Disproportionately living in poverty and incarcerated. Using criminal justice reform to get off on DV charges. Sending women traumatized to jail for protecting their children. In all colors, shapes and sizes. Monetized white man who doesn’t want to pay child support resting on the shoulders of men who can’t. With the he assistance of ” woke” legislators. Prioritizing mens economic value over the lives of women. Taking programs away from women of color and white women while increasing the financial resources of men in all arenas in the legal system.
Jan 6 2006 . Claims of false search and seizer. Computer seized during a criminal investigation. On or around October 13, 2004 a freshman at Quinipiac made a complaint stating he computer problem indicated someone had been interfering with his Quinipiac assigned registered account. To which no one else had the password. The complaint specifically complained of concerns that he was being stalked by an x girlfriend. Angry over a breakup. With technological accuracy and up address was determined. The Hamden police were contacted. The IP address belonged to the father of the x girlfriend. No criminal charges were brought forward against the angry x girlfriend. This is how intimate partner violence is handled in the collision to end domestic violence.
Some years later she met and married another one of Murphy’s interns. He was elected to watch the money.
Jan 15, 2025. $ 340 million dollars found under a couch cushion. 2.8 billion dollars of emergency pandemic relief found since 2021. Was invested instead of paying the light bill. Senator Kissel R. a corporate attorney for eversouece. While the entire state gets changed for the non payment of electricity during the pandemic. The state of Connecticut invest money supposed to be used for relief 😮💨 of it’s residents during the pandemic. Instead of paying for the electric bill. The state of Connecticut decided to burden the little people to pay the bill. Is William Tong really interested in the residents of the state? Is he really going after eversouece? Is Ned Lamont really interested in the economic growth and development of the state residents or the economic growth and development of the state government and employees. Is Kissel working for the people or big business in the state of Connecticut? Hidding money. What happened at the comptroller’s office? Who lifted the couch cushion?
Eversouece report $160 million dollars in unpaid bills. The state very easily could have handled it.
Any articles in any local papers about that incident?
At Quinnipiac, “… reporting a violation became mandatory after the academic integrity policy revision in 2017. …”
Connecticut needs a few integrity policy revisions.
Start with the lawmakers, the law enforcers and the mainstream news reporters.
Please be advised of the monetized gentleman taking advantage of your initiative. 2/3 of of fathers don’t pay formal child support. This includes men who have good jobs and are not incarcerated. $113 million dollars in arrange is not responsible fatherhood. 9.8 million children are living in single parent households.7. 3 million single mothers. 2.5 single fathers. Only 7% of absent fathers were married. 1-4 black children are living with out fathers. 1-10 Latino and 1-25 white children.626, 800 father’s are incarcerated. 57,700 mothers. 48% increase in father’s from 1991. 96% increase for mothers. These initiative speak of gatekeeping and alienation. Yet never mention DV against the mother or child abuse. The majority of the children sexually assaulted are white in Connecticut. Fatherhood is more than a biological entitlement. Which your programs attempt to teach. Your initiative are being used for all father’s in Connecticut including abusive ones. There is a financial value based upon father’s to promote fatherhood programs. What is the value of the mothers? Many women are experiencing discrimination and the devaluing as their role as a parent. The project is not supposed to domestic violence victims in jail when children are reluctant to engage with the father. The initiative is not to transfer custody to a monetized parent who has abused children. Father’s who have substance abuse issues overlooked for statistics. Fatherhood inclusion is being used to exclude mothers in some cases. False alligations of abuse unfortunately have created an over looking of credible issues brought to the court house. I don’t believe that this is your intention of inclusion. Over looking criminal behavior and jailing women has resulted in the quest for funding. A social project for equity and inclusion has created significant problems for the entirety of the state population. An agreement to promote a specific gender effecting criminal and family court system. Many statistics and objectives are being misused and weaponizing and devaluing motherhood. # Jennifer Dulos, Julie Mingue. Many women who don’t make the news. It’s not just ” white women of privilege”. As the picture is being painted.
Christopher Brown is responsible for the fatherhood initiative. He’s president of the national fatherhood initiative. All of his platform focuses on father’s as the ” families”. He’s relentlessly going after politicians and promoting one gender. Many reports lead to the failures and harms the initiative has caused especially to mothers. Domestic violence victims and children. This organization has been making the rounds for funding. The ” families” refers to the father. This is a sexist organization that has been used as a weapon to discriminate in family court. Relentlessly going after politicians to prioritize fatherhood over everything else. The entire reform movement in Connecticut is focused on the promotion of fatherhood linguistic and promoting male superiority in family matters. Connecticut is the first state to pass fatherhood legislation. Continue to weaponize the court system. They coined gatekeeper and extreme gatekeeping. The “alienation claims are tied to the welfare reform act. This is a monetized business selling men and devaluing women as a financial burden. Not only to start welfare benefits, but to a divorcing spouse. When you use parental alienation claims in court taking the children away from their mother relieves the state from possibly providing benefits. The father is not responsible for financial assistance for raising children. Connecticut has promoted women/ mothers as a significant the” big ” problem. Now back peddling. The majority of problem is unwed birth. When a father strolls out of the children lives for years. Suddenly changes his mind and the red carpet is rolled The mother important is ignored and made irrelevant. Why because of federal funding to the state. Jennifer law is not gender specific and neither are other protective parent laws. The fatherhood initiative has turned a program on its surface to promote fatherhood responsibility and healthy parenting behavior. Now it’s an all out attack on women and priorities fatherhood because of the economic value of the father. Criminal behavior is overlooked and blamed on the mother. Children are taught that the father is more important. This is not healthy marriage and responsible behavior. It’s weaponize the court system with federal funding for male superiority. Connecticut has made significant financial gains for promoting this. To the point inclusion is duscluding mothers. Instead of promoting single mother household as a factor in school shootings. Let’s promote gun safety. The inappropriate purchase of guns for children. The failure to store them properly. Stop promoting women are the problem for unhealthy marriage, father’s who don’t want to financially support their children. Reform projects that promotes fatherhood langistic that benefit one gender. Stop sending the message that children in single mothers household that are beyond the circumstances are inferior to the rest of the children in society.
The national fatherhood initiative is a private 503-c organization. It’s not part of the government. The government partnership effecting the judicial system. Controlling health and human services. Has a lot to do with the alienation industry.
Psst. If you are a woman who has had your children taken. away. Little to nothing has been accomplished by the United Nations unfortunately. You are better off with a class action lawsuit against the nation fatherhood initiative.
Wade Horn a psychologist was a former president of the fatherhood initiative. He’s was the head of children and family services for a bit. Is involved in health and human services. He left the Position during the Bush administration due to a cloud of questions around this spending. In 1981 a report of Connecticut criminal justice system came out. The increase in incarceration and cost became a heavy burden on Connecticut. It was determined that alternative measures needed to be taken. Wade Horn and his equity project. The psychologist sure did have his hand in a lot of places.
Omg gross! No way! Peter literally is just gross.
https://frankreport.com/2022/03/18/interview-buying-custody-of-children-in-ct-family-court/
https://frankreport.com/2022/04/07/family-court-judge-jane-emons-forced-retirement-brings-hope-that-corrupt-ct-judges-will-be-removed/
https://frankreport.com/2022/04/09/high-conflict-in-family-court-fiction-in-connecticut/
https://frankreport.com/2022/04/10/ct-family-court-high-conflict-cases-designated-for-attorneys-best-interest/
https://frankreport.com/2022/04/12/atty-marianne-charles-screams-i-want-my-f-king-bill-paid-at-ct-family-court-judge-james-kenefick/
https://frankreport.com/2022/06/05/cunha-issues-defiant-statement-i-am-not-anti-semitic-i-will-continue-to-expose-corrupt-ct-family-court/
https://frankreport.com/2022/10/17/10-reasons-why-ct-family-court-is-most-vile/
https://frankreport.com/2023/02/20/20-reasons-destructive-family-court-is-money-maker-corrupt-and-unmonitored/
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DD8Ycz3CYII/?igsh=MTBkNXJwZmFpM3p4eQ==
For years this outlet has written about the overt corruption in CT family court. Has any judge been removed? Has any GAL been thrown off the list of GALs? Have any lawyers been disbarred for their actions?
The issues highlighted in this forum will never be addressed unless thousands of families adversely affected by the corrupt system march on Hartford demanding change.
The judges retire rather than face the process of getting in trouble. He has sentence children to a life of abuse God has a special place for people like him
Whatever you call it, it’s happening in “family courts” all over America.
See also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_control_in_popular_culture
https://thelibertydaily.com/not-going-be-pretty-retired-nypd-intel-officer/
Good to hear President Trump mention the need to address the problems with “social engineering” in politics.
One quote: ““I will end the government policy of trying to socially engineer race and gender into every aspect of public and private life.”
A few people at Yale probably didn’t like that very much. 😀
There goes the gravy train. UConn won’t like it either.
For the record, the great Gary Cohen does not partake in this alleged corruption. He earns his money and status within the legal community through honesty and his brilliant legal skills
” plan your divorce between than you plan your wedding” a Facebook post from Syzmonick second wife. Forced into mediation in all likelihood because Peter Syzmonick wants everything his way.
Are you stalking Peter and his family? 😳
Peter presents himself as a political activist and civil rights advocate. He’s made himself a political figure. It’s not a good idea to blindly follow. If you are going to join a movement, one should know what the movement is about. Who is running the movement. Never join a cult without knowing the cult leaders.
Go fund me. It’s interesting 🤔 how many folks will have different alias to hide assets and information. Project an image of victimhood. Several posts back Peter told people to contact her if they had questions about the adult relationship. The once political candidate has gone to length
Another mother on a midnight train of sorts. Let her live in privacy and peace 🕊️. No need to ask her.
Peter is involved in politics because he and his family were victims of Connecticut “family courts”. He’s advocated for civil rights for all families in the “family courts” and never boasted. He’s done great work for families for free and the reform from 2014 happened in part a result of Peter’s great work.
If your insults are an attempt to undermine Peter’s credibility, please look for a different way to help. More than ten years have passed since that great petition.
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2014/JUDdata/tmy/2014SB-00494-R000331-The%20Connecticut%20Coalition%20for%20Family%20Court%20Reform-TMY.PDF
Please stop attempting to jail domestic violence victims. Stop using parental alienation to explain the fraud. It’s a weapon in family court. Stop using the langistic of the fatherhood initiative and protection of the money. Stop hijacking the entire family court debate. * All people stop backing documented abusers and advocating for people of both sexes who are misusing the court. * Let’s hold everyone accountable. Be transparent and stop blocking people from speaking out. We need more than one individual to weigh in. To clean up the mess.
A change of the guard. Perhaps it’s time to get the legislators on the judiciary committee off. Perhaps when the new US attorney general takes over Tong and Blumenthal should completely step out of the way for an investigation.
I would like to know what you consider personal freedom? A woman from CT ask a lawyer FB , asked if her husband should be buying a $60,000. Truck during divorce process. A woman uses $10, 000 during divorce process to get a mommy make over ( plastic surgery). With marital assets. A man shut heat and electricity off on divorcing spouse during divorce process. A woman backs up a moving truck and cleans the house out while the spouse is at work. Do you want to fix the court or do you want to engage in silver bullet divorce tactics? Emotional abuse is not illegal in the state of Connecticut. Should we wait until someone is dead for interaction? Many legislators are well meaning. Some I question. The problem is not the law. The problem is misapplication and lack of education. Currupt family law industry. What you are proposing is a free for all. DV violence in various forms exists. You have done little to no effort in your court crusade to protect victims. The majority of your platform is been disbelieve people. For the last 10 years you have pushed parental alienation claims against anyone who goes to court and complains about substance abuse, sexually in appropriate behavior in or around minors , corporal punishments and controlling behavior.. judge klatt stood her ground and refused to issue a restraining order. The police got mad because she would only issues one for both parties. One would think you would be happy about that. Is part of your cruisade against Tindel and Klatt because of the Werth case and division of assets? Are you trying to create a fair and just court system or keeping the cookie jar at all costs? Didn’t your PA friend have Buzzotto in 2007? By most standards she took her x husband to the cleaners. There doesn’t appear to be any scheduled parenting time for him in the paperwork. You started that Karen Riordan and Chris Ambrose did nothing wrong it’s all the attorneys. Yet , you use Karen’s case to further your platform. Either you believe Karen and her 3 children are not telling the truth or it’s okay to split custody with the type of person they are reporting to the court. You talk outside both sides of your mouth. We need a family court system that is working properly. Not a wild West free for all. DV support is a drop in the bucket compared to the tax dollars spent on batters programs and fatherhood initiative. It’s been a long time project of men’s rights groups to leave DV victims with no financial resources to help them. Are you really working for parents? Are you really working to clean up family court? Unfortunately I don’t believe you are part of the solution. I believe you are part of the problem. In your 10 years you have managed to help get the messed up family court where it is.
If you want family court to work you need the following
Maybe 🤔 one of you investigative journalists should contact the former spouse of the PA expert. See if he’s still alive. See if he has seen his children. According to court documents their are two children. Why was the PA expert on the child abuser list for social services in the first place. She sued to get off of. Maybe the state of Connecticut department of public health should put a stop to the practice of false information. The use of hypothetical theory from a licensed person for accountability. If you can’t tell the truth in your advocacy work. You wouldn’t tell the truth in the court house. Or in any other capacity involving the welfare of children. Perhaps some one at the department of public health could stop ignoring it. Promotion of psychological disorders. Labeling advocates * narrastist ” poking holes in the unrecognized unregulated hypothetical theory. Trying to split DV victims to turn against the financially handicapped advocates trying desperately to help them and their children.
Wouldn’t it have been nice if the police department would have pitched a bigger fit for Julie Mingue. The state of Connecticut doesn’t even know if there violent offender programs are working. The fatherhood initiative is paying DV prups to report what programs are working for them. Self reported studies. Maybe as Doug Edwards can add the family court house in Hartford to his list of rounds. Perhaps he can see the gentleman misusing the program initiatives legislation and funding. . Real dad’s are more than biological rights and entitlements. Perhaps he can run a few classes for the fellas hidding behind his programs.
Peter wrote:
A few days ago, a different writer posted this question:
In light of current events, if new and improved DOJ employees actually do start work in DOJ offices, what should we expect?
Actual accountability for judicial branch employees and vendors?
Actual protection for children and families going forward?
Actual compensation for harm done?
If forty years of Connecticut’s judicial terrorism against children and families doesn’t prompt the start of real accountability, protection and compensation for harm done by this summer: Connecticut might as well be Alabama.
If no change comes with the new administration, all journalists (except Ed Mahony, of course) reporting about family court cases will have to fall in line or face consequences.
Multiply the number of parents, children, judges, lawyers and whistleblowers who faced consequences for speaking out against racketeering in the “family courts” by the number of days that follow January 20 if no real accountability happens. That number will give you some idea of how silenced we’ll probably be a year from now — and then two years from now — if the “new administration” isn’t actually a new administration.
Father’s rights propaganda. Please look at the CGS government solutions contract and the fatherhood initiative objectives. Under the condition of these stakeholders . Court personal and vendor father’s are held accountable for nothing. Syzmonick called Anthony Jenkins and stated it’s one man behind a desk. He conveniently didn’t look any further for the lawsuit filed by a mother attorney and jumped on without all the details. Peter also jumped on a law suit to stop alimony and doesn’t believe in child support. On face value the fatherhood initiative is a project to assist low income dad’s. Living in poverty stricken communities. Commiting crimes outside the family. A majority minority representative of the prison population. Unable to meet child support obligations. What about the mothers in the prison system? As it’s coming to light white middle class and upper middle class women are suffering DV at higher rates then reported. Jennifer law was passed for everyone suffering. Including some men who’s spouses engage in DV behavior that doesn’t include beating them up. Where is your out cry for the misuse of social projects? Prioritizing fatherhood over criminal matters including DV and child abuse? Where is your out rage in the arrest of DV victims majority women. How many minority women have you fighting for that are loosing their children to convicted criminals? Poverty stricken and no access to legal advice? Following the state contract and social projects? Yelling and screaming about the money the state makes in child support. There is no outrage for the death and children missing in the state care. No out rage over child trafficking that accrued. The judge in the Dolus case is not responsible for the actions of Fotis Dolus. She tossed the bogus evaluation out. She ensured Fotis didn’t squander any more of Jennifer’s families money. He had visitation. Which is more than many people including women guilty of nothing have. Cause of the fatherhood initiative. ” All Connecticut father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children” . With funding. Yet you attack any funding for DV victims and women. You want protecting parents to go to jail on costodial interference. Yet, you believe that the system is currupt. State legitimate claim of judicial misconduct and violation of rights that the judges have been doing. Are you mad because the judges are financially realizing how to apply Jennifer’s law? Are you mad because you personally can’t master manipulate the family court system?
State legislators and mainstream news outlets ignore Peter’s articles on Frank Report.
Mainstream news outlets reporting about family court cases — such as the Dulos case — spin the facts they don’t ignore about Connecticut’s for profit public-private “family court” partnerships.
None of it is too difficult to understand. Mainstream news reporters, state legislators and judicial branch employees must already know that mandatory for profit monopolies are a really bad thing. They must know it’s a bad thing to have mandatory public-private monopolies managing purposely adversarial proceedings with immunity from all prosecution.
Mainstream news reporters, state legislators and judicial branch employees
must have noticed that everyone managing family court cases enjoys something called, “judicial immunity” in Connecticut. For those who don’t know what that means, it means that the judges, lawyers and random vendors involved in each “family” case can do and say as they please and not get in trouble when something goes wrong. That’s why the DOJ hasn’t prosecuted Dr. Herman and Mr. Meehan for their roles in the Dulos “family court case” which resulted in two gruesome fatalities and exponential harm done to countless others.
For the past forty years, a small HHS loophole let DOJ let CT AFCC, Inc. off the hook. That small HHS loophole let CT AFCC, Inc for profit vendors and their collaborators run the “family court” show which generated massive profits for a few cunning individuals who orchestrated the show.
Last year, the Supreme Court’s overturning of the Chevron decision shifted the oversight of criminal activity back to the DOJ in the CT AFCC, Inc. Kids for Cash racketeering cases.
Peter (who knows about Communism) wrote:
”… When “family” court judges routinely seize ALL a parent’s assets, seize their children, destroy their ability to hold employment, and make them homeless, then JAIL THEM for being unable to pay “child support” because of what the state did …”
Franklin D. Roosevelt (who some called a Communist) wrote:
“… The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism—ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. …”
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/message-congress-curbing-monopolies
On March 1, 1848, when a man who was called:
a statesman
a politician
a prime minister
a member of the Tory, Whig and Liberal parties
an interventionist
a nobleman who ranked below an earl and above a baron
a friend of Edmund Burke
no orator with unstudied language and somewhat embarrassed delivery
an opium smuggling kingpin
a collaborator with the Carbonari
said: “We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow …”
which legislators, politicians, publishers and law enforcement officers didn’t notice?
Don’t pay attention to Peter’s article.
Here’s why: Peter is said by associates to be consumed by what he believes was unfair treatment in his divorce and custody case.
https://divorceinconnecticut.blogspot.com/2025/01/update-on-paul-boyne-bond-reduced.html
Peter and his associates are consumed with not paying alimony, child support and the courts being allowed to investigate DV claims.
Does Peter or his message make you angry? 🤔
Kindly consider this information published on Wikipedia: