An MSN opinion-editorial “How Judge Aileen Cannon once again ruled in Trump’s favor” written by former Connecticut Family Court Judge Thomas G. Moukawsher discusses Trump’s trial of alleged mishandled classified documents at his Florida home.
Moukawsher claims:
Trump’s strategy is to delay his trials past the 2024 election. Trump’s lawyers use delay tactics by:
-
- filing motions,
- challenging jurisdiction,
- challenging the legal interest of the plaintiffs,
- attack the legality of the prosecution’s claims
- appealing the trial judge’s decisions
Moukawsher suggests the Judge Canon should combat these defense strategies by:
- Managing the flow of motions by combining them
- Taking charge of the discovery process.
- Recognize defense efforts as delay tactics and seeing things up.
Moukawsher writes:
The first way to delay a case is to drop a hailstorm of motions. First, you challenge where the lawsuit is located. For instance, Trump has claimed his election fraud case should be moved out of Washington, DC, because he can’t get a fair trial there. Next, you attack the people suing, claiming they have no recognized legal interest at stake. Trump just attacked the election fraud case on this ground. Next, you attack the way the claim was drafted. It’s defective and should be dismissed. Trump is using that one in DC and in Georgia, too….
[E]ach motion can take months to resolve….
Trump can keep the cases marching in place… until after the 2024 election….
What’s more, Trump can use the number of pending motions to justify motions that he needs more time. That’s the thing Cannon just fell for: You create work and then complain about the volume of it.
Moukaswher has a remedy:
A judge [can combine] challenges on the legal sufficiency of the claims, attempts to move the case and efforts to change the trial date….
Compressing pre-trial motions just takes care of the first wave of delay tactics.
The longest part of lawsuits is often the exchange of evidence between the two sides — what’s known as the discovery process. Both sides demand documents from the other side. The other sides object. They take the matter to court. And so on. There are always more documents, so there are always more opportunities for motions.
To slay the discovery beast, judges should take charge of the process…. Since most of the documents and witnesses the parties will require are obvious, the judge should… simply issue a court order listing the documents that must be exchanged between the parties within 30 days and ….what depositions of witnesses are allowed within 60 days…
In particularly complex cases, the judge can schedule a couple hours each week to ride herd on the evidence gathering process, hearing and resolving the parties’ claims from the bench on a single day instead of waiting weeks or months after a hearing to decide them…
Trump’s strongest timeout card is… an appeal. It used to be that you would appeal after you lost a case in the trial court. But the new rules of asymmetrical court warfare say you appeal every major ruling at every point in the proceedings. No one can stop him from appealing unfavorable final results. Normally this appeal process would buy Trump years — until long after the 2024 presidential election. But it doesn’t have to be this way. When the national interest is at stake, appeals courts should simply expedite the appeals by hopscotching other cases on their dockets…..
Moukawsher’s viewpoint reveals a disregard for due process and constitutional rights.
Motions and challenges are not mere delay tactics, but elements of the constitutional right for a defendant to attack overreaching or flawed prosecutions.
Moukawsher’s oversimplification of labeling legitimate legal maneuvers as tactics to stall proceedings fails to recognize the decisions lawyers make to win the case for the defendant – just as the prosecution, which has many inherent advantages, seeks to win its case.
Moukawsher’s suggestions to combine motions, and take control of the discovery process, reflect an enormous misunderstanding of judicial responsibilities in an adversarial system where a defendant’s liberty is on the line.
The parties have the right to present their case as they see fit. Moukawsher’s proposal to have judges dictate the exchange of documents in discovery fails to consider the complexity and nuance involved in litigation. A judge cannot predetermined the discovery process at the beginning of a case.
Another point that rises to the absurd is when Moukawsher calls appeals a delay tactic. Appeals provide a mechanism to rectify errors or injustices in lower court decisions. Suggesting that some appeals should be expedited by hopscotching over others would simply expedite some cases and delay others, and is not unfair and impartial justice.
I understand. Moukawsher wants Trump to lose, and go to prison. Lots of people do. I can imagine Moukawsher can see himself on the bench during a Trump trial, deciding the sentence first, and doing the trial afterwards. In this, he reminisces of his days as a family court judge, where there was no jury and little due process.
In family court, judges often decide which party should win and which will lose before the trial. He didn’t need a trial. He made his decision in advance. Discovery and motions were unnecessary. Appeals are merely a joke.
It doesn’t work that way outside of family court. In fact it shouldn’t work that way in family court but always will until family court tempers judge’s unbridled power with a jury.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Maybe the ACLU could use their project flashlight to gather family court system injustice? Transparency.
Connecticut culture center around men. The majority of financial contribution to the economic development of the country. Old fashion values outdated father’s the head of the family. Father’s and families. Mothers are second class citizen. With less earing potential. Birthing person. Linguistics. Women are be seen and not heard along with the children. They are property of the fathers. Less equal due to decrease earning capacity. Lives are worth less than that of the father. Risked for the economic development. Cultural perception that women are a financial drain on society. Dad is less likely to require financial assistance. Women are culturally perceived as hysterical, vengeful and alienators based on gatekeeping. To blame for unwed pregnancy.
Has anyone asked them for help, yet?
Yes, multiple times
What did they say?
workshops/training presentations
Staff development training Dept of social services and JUDICAL DEPARTMENT, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
Fatherhood training classes ST. Joseph’s college school of social work, Goodwin college Early childhood program
Staff development training for voluntary paternity testing (Manchester Community College, Tunxis Community College, Housatonic CC, Three rivers CC, Asnuntuck CC.
Staff development training for Capital Regional Education Council and State Department of Education.
Staff Development Training for East Hartford, Manchester, Bristol. Board of Education Head Start
Fatherhood Workshop for state department of education, school, family and community partnership administration
Staff Development Training for Community renewal Team Head start/early learning programs
Staff Development training for Thames Valley Counsil for community action. Norwich CT
Presenter ‘ parental involvement /parent leadership Conference training institute. 100 black men of America annule Leadership conference, Miami FL. Jacksonville Mississippi, Los Vagas Navada.
Presenter ‘Transcending Fatherhood Challenges” Corrigan-Radgowski, MacDougall Walker at Suffield. Osborne at Somers, Correctional Institutions of Connecticut.
Keynote Speech in California DSS, Parent Leadership Conference /Sacramento CA.
Development conducted and presented “A need assessment. A father’s perspective. Issues related to grief. Area Health education Center East Hartford CT.
GRAND ROUNDS WITH OB-GYN PHYSICIANS AND MATERNITYNURSES. Hartford and St. Francis Hospital. A father’s perspective on grief and loss.
Workshop on THE ART AND SCIENCE OF ENGAGING MEN IN THE LIVES OF THEIR CHILDREN. AT THE TOGETHER WE WILL!!!!!! CONFERENCE IN CROMWELL.
Presenter: Why do children need fathers need MEN. child conversation in Windsor CT.
Workshop presenter The value of MEN in the lives of a child. CT association of foster and adoption parents.
The presenter Connect Forever: Centering pregnancy with real dads. Heathcare conference in San Antonio TX
Why do you do to help your child succeed in school. Ct association Education Stratford
Engaging Dads and men. Marlboro Ma
Paternal Prenatal Early Attachment MATERNAL CHILD HEALTH New Haven, CT
Do kids really need Men. UConn NEAG school of education PACT
The L.I.F.E conference, The Childs workshop Tauten MA
Together Dad and MOM build a nest. (this is the forced sharing living space approach) for family Workers, MSPCC. Fathers and families Network. Holyoke MA.
Children need healthy and safe moms and dads.
Corruption, greed and Marxism pushed on children and parents in family courts is what’s wrecking families. Zero oversight and zero accountability have kept it going. Men, women and children have all been destroyed.
“For the wages of sin is death: but the gift of God is eternal life …
Maximus inc contract. The economic development of the state. Modeling the state insurance after the companies that provide minimal benefits and red tape coverage. Reduction of Medicare benefits. They are also reducing TANF benefits. There is no focus on a safe plan how. Reducing the number of mothers head of household with children in need of assistance. Through family court? DCF? Maximus inc contribution to organization. Possibly the fatherhood initiative. Maximus inc is a business plan focused on to increase money to the state. How is the state of Connecticut going about that? It would appear reduction of incarceration costs, welfare assistance to mothers including domestic violence victims. Awarding custody to the monetized parent. The states slashing of benefits for the people. Increase pay for political leaders. Balance budget for benefits and retirement funds. Surplus. The ignoring of the needs of the public. I’m sure that the police are pressured to pass out tickets in Connecticut. The bogus tickets scam just didn’t come out of nowhere. While state employees receive raises and great benefits. Secure retirement funds the little people paying taxes and working to fill low paying jobs are quickly facing insecure future. The ACLU is focused on individual groups effected. Is aware of politics hurting the minority community. Yet, the larger number of women effected of all colors and religion and background is not being addressed. State is making money off child support. Crimes, the family court system and reduction of blanket immunity. This is effecting women, men of all colors and religion. The intentions of welfare reform act was to reduce the government cost. Allowing for enough money to address the issue facing the country. The people in the United States are suffering financially as the state employees are benefiting. No one wants to investigate or bring suit and case law to address it or possibly expose the problem. Because it would reduce state surplus for “filling in the budget gaps” trips to the beach. GALs over the family relations office. Evidenceless family court. A court of equity. It’s all about the economic development of the top and sacrifices to the less prominent members of society. A good look at the federally funded welfare reform act and the criminal justice system is long overdue.
Where do we focus first?
Maybe narrow those generalizations to a few specific causes >>> effects >>> results?
Some one should ask William Tong why he has allowed a gender and culture specific program to be run through out state business without out equal representation for the opposite gender and leaving out other customers?
Maybe start with a letter to his office to publish the letter and the response? 🤔
According to the website. Real dad’s area forever it’s gender specific and services culture. Connecticut organization and the court system services all genders and cultures. Education and promotions of responsible fatherhood are a multi cultural issue. Motherhood has no voice in the family court system and no funding. Women have been systematicly through funding being discriminated against, devalued and turned into a birthing person and no longer considered a parent. Is a multi cultural problem.
The Bias and discrimination in the family Law courts. The head of the sneak. May I interduce you to Doug Edwards. Real Dads are forever hailing out of Manchester Connecticut! Doug Edwards is the founder of Real Dads are forever, A fatherhood strategies Development organization. He has facilitated for and consulted for the department of social services,
State department of Education
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Department of Corrections
School readiness and head start
Many public and private schools
Family Development Centers in New England
FOCUSING ON FATHERS AND FAMILIES
Doug is a founding member of the Advisory Council of the Fatherhood Advisory Council of the fatherhood initiative of Connecticut and members of the executive committee. AS WELL AS THE PAST PRESIDENT OF THE CHILDRENS FAMILY LAW CENTER OF CONNECTICUT!!!!!!!! (the GALS)!!!!!!!!!
He was formally the statewide Coordinator For parents supporting educational excellence,
and master facilitator trainer for the parent leadership training in addition he has received and certified Family Development credentials. He provides for triple P. (positive parenting program). He is a trainer and consultant for the department of social services.
He currently chairs the advisory board for family development Network in Manchester and is on the BOARD ADVISING BOARD OF THE CONNECTICUT JUDICAL SYSTEM PARENTING EDUCATION PROGRAM!!!!!!!
Doug travels throughout the country presenting at conferences, developing conferences, developing and facilitating workshops. Providing professional development, training staff and motivating parents
MOST OF ALL!!!! Doug Edwards IS A MEMBER OF THE CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADVISORY BOARD FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH ADVISORY BOARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A member of fetal infant mortality cases and community review teams.
He is an author of the curriculum, parental prenatal early attachment. He designs and facilitates the fatherhood curricula and father and parent workshop. He has spoken to hundreds of groups and thousands of MEN. Dozens of school groups.
Welcome to the reason women’s complaints in Connecticut don’t go anywhere and why the department of public health complaints against the psychologist go nowhere.!!!!!!! Why the FBI has to investigate CALVERY. Why the ” gatekeeper/parental alienation ” keeps alive and well in Connecticut family court. The labeling of Maternal (mothers) as mentally altered during divorce proceeding continues. More fatherhood programs and recruitment more federal funding for the state. No domestic violence training or legislation to include mothers in Connecticut. GAL complaints go nowhere!!!!!!
What is the education this gentleman 😮 involved in family court and state programs? Women have no representation or funding for mothers and families.
The near-total lack of public participation in government is what got us into this mess, not criminals who weaseled their ways up to the top of the heap for profit and prestige.
Comments, likes and complaints help in public forums, but they don’t help enough. Speaking at public hearings helps more, but it hasn’t helped enough. We need better people in government and better people in law enforcement. Millions of crimes have been committed against children and families for decades in family courts and who’s addressed those crimes?
Would grand juries help? The former director of Connecticut AFCC, Inc. seems to be afraid of grand juries. If he’s afraid of grand juries, is it because grand juries would help?
A small law firm in Pennsylvania took on the kids for cash scandal in Pennsylvania and justice snowballed from there. May all of New England get lots of snow this winter.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
The public is absolutely in the dark. The Media is censored. The public is labeled as discruntaled. People appear to be tossed in jail, run out of the state or murdered. Silenced. Grand jurys don’t exist in the state.
Grand juries don’t exist in Connecticut? 🤔
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2017/TOB/h/2017HB-07257-R00-HB.htm
Federal funding for a specific gender and culture . There is a unilateral problem in the state of Connecticut. It’s not being addressed. Financially disadvantage women are being tossed in the trash 🗑️ by the system
“Federal funding for a specific gender and culture. …”
It is listed on the website. Specifically states genders specific. A federally funded program. Would be interesting to see the content. Cultural specific. The education is about father’s. It’s applied to all cultures. There is no equal education on motherhood.. The important of mothers. It’s definitely federal funding to promote a specific gender effecting the family court. Wonder how they define culture? It’s definitely effecting women of all colors and religion. It’s a fatherhood initiative program collecting funding. It’s gone nationwide. It’s would running through the prison system. Moms loosing custody with out counsel. Women are reporting discrimination by the school system. Department of education. Two documented cases in Connecticut. Unanswered complaints with the department of public health.
Can Rhonda Stearley-Hebert do more to help Connecticut courts than Tom Moukawsher?
https://epaper.theday.com/article/281797108743935
If she knows about CT AFCC, Inc. crimes, can she even say she knows?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UuY19WNovwiGGYFG9ktZAhTaT-eXfJGa/view?usp=sharing
https://sz.linkedin.com/posts/susan-bassi-48783879_i-cried-when-i-read-the-coroners-report-activity-7054299158119137280-oH9e
“ A judge cannot predetermined the discovery process at the beginning of a case.”
Welcome to Connecticut! 😂🤣😂🤣
Everyone can name today’s monopolies.
Call today’s governor’s office and ask the staff how Microsoft will monopolize business in the state in the next few years. The worst politicians, judges and lawyers protect monopolies, not citizens.
It’s gone on for quite a while.
“… In 1645, he obtained title to lands in southeastern Connecticut and founded New London in 1646, where he settled in 1650. He built a grist mill in the town and was granted a monopoly on the trade for as long as he or his heirs maintained it. This was one of the first monopolies granted in New England. …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Winthrop_the_Younger
Does Mr. Moukawsher only write to pontificate? Will he ever write to prompt effective investigations and actual court reform?
For example, yet another case:
https://portal.ct.gov/DCJ/Press-Room/Press-Releases/09142023Gardner
If Mr. Moukawsher knows about the Gardner case, does he wonder how the state failed that child for so long?
Who in Connecticut wants to seal that case?
Which state office should have protected that child and didn’t?
Mouckwsher appears to want to fast track the states most concerning cases. Does he even mention the safety of the in his book?
Bernadette Conway and Gerard Adelman probably ordered this therapy for the teens:
“… Through his initial questions, Koetsch seemed to try to shed doubt on the victim’s memory by asking questions about things like what Gardner was wearing and what color the walls were in a room during acts of sexual abuse the victim claimed occurred …”
https://www.newstimes.com/news/article/danbury-teacher-kenneth-gardner-sex-abuse-trial-18338488.php
Something’s wrong with Connecticut family courts.
Was it this past spring when Gerard Adelman offered a lecture to (the Middletown?) Senior Center? After his lecture, he opened the floor to a question and answer session. The first question from his audience was from a senior who asked him about the grand jury system in Connecticut. Whoever was filming Mr. Adelman’s lecture tapped loudly (with a ring, maybe?) on the camera a few times. Mr. Adelman looked toward the camera as though som kind of message was received. He answered the question saying something about Connecticut not using grand juries, something about the grand jury system being used rarely — “very rarely” — he then moved on to answer the next question from his audience.
Is the grand jury system used “very rarely” in Connecticut?
I just read this in the news today:
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/weston-man-embezzled-890k-from-milford-company-18497423.php?src=rdctpartribbon
Records of:
should be stored in some office, somewhere.
Which office has those records?
Judge Gerard I. Alderman On How Ct. Courts WorkAt The Senior Center Tuesday April 25th
The last video shows the audience questions … and Mr. Adelman’s interesting answers.
https://patch.com/connecticut/middletown-ct/judge-gerard-i-alderman-how-ct-courts-work
April 25th is “Parental Alienation Day!”. 🇺🇸
According to the Connecticut judicial website statewide lega.l aid is supposed to provide low income residents legal services. Including in civil matters.
Be careful. When my child’s custody case started, I asked Connecticut Legal Services for help. At the time, I had no idea how the corrupt networks work in Connecticut.
My child’s father was mentally ill and dangerous so I asked Connecticut Legal Services to file motions for a guardian ad litem and a psychological evaluation. I thought the guardian ad litem would know how to protect my child. A CLS attorney who seemed to be a decent person took the case and filed the motions.
The guardian ad litem assigned to the case refused to look at the police records — about 50 incidents. I gave her two huge file folders of information when she took the case. She told me to go to her office and when I got there, she gave me the files and told me she didn’t look at them. She told me her children couldn’t wait to see their father at the end of each day. It was so totally bizarre. I remember crying in her office, thinking “how is this happening?”.
The whole case was then so mishandled and a total nightmare. That total nightmare approach seemed to be deliberate. Horrible people somehow control the “family courts” in Connecticut. If your children are in danger, leave the state if your case isn’t in “family court” yet.
Find a list of the best states/countries that protect children in family courts. Raise your children in one of those states/countries if you can.
Many of women have been wondering ” ,why this is happening to them and their children”. Connecticut is no place to keep your self or your children safe.
Just wondering how come people act like conneticit is worse than other place. NYC /WASH /LA ARE INCOMPREHENSIBLE
FR is covering a few cases in Connecticut, New York, California … You’re right. The same corruption/racketeering is in so many family courts all over America and many nations, too. New Hampshire, New Jersey, Maine, Florida, Texas … Canada, The Netherlands, Australia, Spain … the same exact pattern of corruption hit family courts all over the world — just like the mandatory masks and mandatory injections… Hmm.
The Fall of Connecticut the leader is the key. They are legalizing pediphia and abuse. Once the government of the state Connecticut falls and the curruption is predicted. It will all be exposed. . Several states employees and government officials need to be prosecuted for crimes against humanity. It’s the policy figures. The warfare reform. Fatherhood initiative funding. The biggest criminal and problem in family court appears to be senitor Richmond Blumenthal. The leader and the head of the snake.
Why do you think Senator Blumenthal is a big part of the problem? I wouldn’t doubt it – – just wondering if you have evidence of something actionable.
What’s the explanation for that?
Maybe it should be a day of self reflection.
Only one percent of the world population has hystronic personality disorder. 1.5 have borderline personality disorder. 5 percent have narrsatic personality disorder. The majority of these cases are a narrsatic parent. Narrsatic personality disorder is the inability to see how one’s actions effect another. Grandiosity and placing one’s self as more important than another. Narrasist are unable to see their self as being at fault in any way. I don’t think judge Mouckwsher is knowledgeable and savvy enough to see what is happening in his family court. He’s been blaming women for the family fall out. He appears to want to skip over the fact finding and ignore it.
Moukawsher is a scumbag appearing to play a god role protecting other scumbags in the Connecticut Family Court system. Just criminal
So says the judge Moukawsher that never awarded and respected the parental rights of a mother to have a relationship with her children and also let a man off the hook on paying alimony that he was actually supposed to pay!
Then allowing that father to continue to have custody after the GAL made on the record onTranscript specifically that the only reason that the children do not speak to the mother is because they are afraid of the WRATH OF THEIR FATHER….. So the judge allowed the father to continue to have custody even though the CHILDREN ARE AFRAID OF THE WRATH OF THE FATHER, AND IS THE ONLY REASON THEY ARE NOT IN CONTACT WITH THEIR MOTHER.
This SO CALLED judge Moukawsher did absolutely nothing to help facilitate, encourage, support, and nurture a relationship between the 2 children and the mother, by NEVER reversing custody and allowing the mother to continue to raise these children in a loving nurturing manner!
Instead, Moukawsher the LAME AND PUPPY OF THE CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL SYSTEM allowed the father to continue his abuse and put fear into these children with his WRATH; and so the children decided that living with him and the abuse they endure whenever they speak if their loving mother was just too much to handle and so felt they have to cut off contact to the mother.
Screw this CONNECTICUT CORRUPT PUPPY JUDGE MOUKAWSHER!! He is full of shit, and he’s retired now, and he’s writing books to make MORE MONEY, AS IF MONEY LAUNDERING AND FRAUD DOESN’T MAKE JUDGES IN CONNECTICUT ENOUGH MONEY, HES OUT TO BLEED THE VICTIMS UNTIL THEYRE DRY.
NOTICE HOW NO JUDGES SAY A WORD ABOUT MORE PROTECTION FOR MOTHERS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE??
NOT ONE!
Moukawsher is DELUSIONAL, thinking he is just the big man in the big seat, wanting to be the savior of all people in family court having their rights violated and he was a horrible judge he’s a horrible book writer and he’s a horrible person to take advice from.
Why don’t YOU JUDGE MOUKAWSHER just go on your trips like you want to and just stop making comments on what is best for the courts and the cannon to follow and to run things, because if you believed any of this JUNK YOU’RE SAYING IN YOUR INTERVIEWS you maybe would’ve done it all yourself instead of actually assisting in being a corrupt judge and ruining children’s lives and parents lives, especially mother’s lives.
GO RETIRED AND JUST DISAPPEAR, PLEASE 🙏
You suck.
Muck is a gender bias over inflated ego. Connecticut is only concerned about father’s rights because they were bought and paid for. There is no honor in the majority of judges sitting on the Connecticut benches.
Muck is another CT judge pushing the scam of parental alienation.
Again, we have the gender groups always looking at things one-sided
You should use the word parent, not mother or father, because it happens both ways and he’s not the only judge who violates parent rights.
The system thrives on causing the vision they only look at the money to see how to extract as much as possible if they got a throw one parent under the bus to get more money that’s how they will do it they couldn’t care less on who is the more stable parent
Stop with the mother and father crap
When the state of Connecticut stops enacting gender bias legislation and MOU I will stop. I’m for humane rights. I’m NOT supposed to father’s rights. Even helped a father who was taken back to court for more money by a greedy x wife. Using the children. The linguistics are being changed to discriminate against women in particular. The number of cases reeking of curruption is significantly against women. When we can agree pedophilia and abuse are recognized as accruing we will better be able to close the divide. When the funding for the court system is not based on gender of the parents and directed to the children. We can close the divide. When I see the support for the safety of children . When I see judges equally concerned about the relationship of children with their mother I will stop using mothers. When I see the state of Connecticut being concerned about Mothers of low income socioeconomic status not having legal counsel I wil start using the parents. When I see the state of Connecticut taking sexual assault complaints seriously. When I see the council on women, children and seniors advising legislators on the needs of women and children in the state involved in family court I will stop using the word mother. When I organization funded by the state standing up for the women I will use the word parents. Discrimination is ramped and real. When you have been discriminated against solely based on gender. Your entire case is focused on false alligations of parental alienation, The GAL and the judge ignoring everything else . When I can call an attorney office for legal assistance to sue for fraud and not get a lecture on fatherhood initiative I will stop talking about the discrimination against women/mothers in the state of Connecticut.
Probate fraud, DCF under federal supervision AGAIN! Connecticut family court curruption and discrimination against women. I would say that that Karen and the co chair should be FIRED! Despite his Pacific ilander status. You are discriminating against women. Failing the state. Your Pacific ilander status doesn’t give you the right to discriminate against women. Stop the failing appointments in the state of Connecticut. People belong in jobs who can actually perform them.
Why don’t you tell the father’s rights groups to stop funding the bias against women/mothers, or the hhs program FATHERHOOD. GOV, or the CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ACCESS AND VISITATION GRANT PROGRAM, or the MURDERED MOTHERS CONNECTED TO FAMILY COURT, or better yet Congress who passed GENDER SPECIFIC PROGRAMS.
THEYRE FUNDING THE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MOTHERS.
HOW MANY FATHERS ARE MURDERED BY MOTHERS CONNECTED TO FAMILY COURT IN CONNECTICUT?
YOU DONT WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE VERY CLEAR AND HISTORICALLY KNOWN BIAS AGAINST WOMEN/MOTHERS BY STATES, EVEN THOUGH THERES A TON OF RESEARCH ON IT?
THATS NOT MY PROBLEM, THATS YOUR PROBLEM.
I MEAN MOST ABUSIVE MEN “LOVE” TO MAKE FALSE STATEMENTS AND REDIRECT ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE CLEAR AND KNOWN BIAS AGAINST MOTHERS, ESPECIALLY MOTHERS/WOMEN WHO ARE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS.
YOU KNOW LIKE ABUSIVE FATHERS RIGHTS GROUPS ATTACKING VAWA, CLAIMING 8TS BIAS, GETTING THE REDIRECTED FUNDING FOR MEN NOW.
WHY WOULD FATHERS RIGHTS GROUPS OF MEN EVEN ATTACK VAWA WHEN ITS MEANT FOR VICTIMS OF ABUSE, NOT ALL WOMEN IN FAMILY COURT.
JUST FROM YOUR BULLSHIT REPLY TO MY POST, PROVES TO ME YOU’RE MORE THAN LIKELY AN ABUSIVE FATHER YOURSELF.
IF SO, PLEASE SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP.
WE NO LONGER CARE ABOUT YOUR RHETORIC.
OBVIOUSLY YOUR SO BIAS AGAINST WOMENS RIGHTS THAT YOU JUST NEED TO “TELL ME WHAT I SHOULD WRITE AND NOT WRITE”.
MY ANSWER TO YOU IS “SHUT UP, ILL SCREAM THE TRUTH ABOUT THE BIAS AGAINST MOTHERS AND WOMEN AND THERES NOT ONE DAMN THING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT. GO EXPEL YOUR BULLSHIT SOMEWHERE ELSE YOU ABUSER, CONTROLLER, LIAR, MISINFORMER”!
FACTS ARE FACTS. TRY TO DISCREDIT EMPIRICAL RESEARCH, I DARE YOU!
ILL DROWN YOU WITH SO MUCH PROOF OF BIAS YOU’LL DROWN.
To whom did you write your comment?
Well as the biological mother I am broke I don’t get any child support and I’m disabled from my abusive ex who is the father of my children abusing me physically.. So there was no money to make on my case except through fatherhood funding especially the access and visitation grant program funding that is handled by child support enforcement. So sit down and shut up with your oh which parent has the most money that’s where the courts decide b*******. Not saying the courts don’t enjoy money when parents do have the money but even as somebody who is low-income and disabled still having bias against them because they are the mother and a woman it does not always have to do with which parent has the most money it actually has to do with the fact that historically we all know Congress has created programs and policies and procedures that are biased towards women get your head out of your a**
I think by even using these fatherhood funding programs helps perpetuate these family court frauds. This article is a look into Mucks inner thoughts and exposes him. This should help build his victims case to make a very strong point of his corruption.
Women are under attack in the state of Connecticut!
There is probable cause to believe that family court is gender bias. Women as a class of people have the right to speak out and stand in unity. It’s doesn’t have to mean we are anti men. Against fatherhood. We are being systemically punished for divorce. “Healthy marriage” and the prioritizing of fatherhood over motherhood. Organization are receiving funding and failing women and children. Abuse is being ignored and swept under the rug. We have the right to be angry, the right to express opinions that don’t want to be silenced and labeled any longer by the political leaders, dominating men. So called professionals labeling us alienators and gatekeepers. We are loving caring mothers advocating for our children and ourselves to live free from the threat of abuse and harm. So called women’s work and raising children is worth something. We are fed up with being silenced and treated poorly in the legal system.
Barry Goldstein was pushing the idea that gender bias is the only problem in family courts.
Does he still? Don’t we all understand by now that gender bias, religious bias, racial bias, economic bias are all too broadly focused, too insulting and too unproductive?
Why did Evan Stark think the term “coercive control” was needed in legal dictionaries and new laws to describe the lack of human decency in some families? How did “Coercive Control” become the new “Parental Alienation Syndrome” for money-making strategies in public-private for-profit purposely adversarial Kids for Cash networks in family courts?
Judicial authority and immunity protecting money-making strategies in public-private for-profit purposely adversarial child custody cases (in some cases, guaranteed profits in litigation for 18 years) is a great deal for willing participants in that Kids for Cash scandal. The willing participants are both genders. Their victims are both genders, too. In the national family court Kids for Cash scandal, gender bias, religious bias, racial bias, economic bias doesn’t matter — except when economic bias matters most.
For example,
Since ”family courts” have been an official business for the past 40 years, is there a calculator for expected profits for the “family court” attorneys “family court” random vendors in that “family court” case?
https://pagesix.com/2023/11/22/parents/elon-musk-filed-custody-case-in-texas-to-get-better-deal-on-child-support-lawyer/
We agree that the courts don’t need anymore labels buzz words. Financial indicated legislation. Muddying up commons sense. The father’s rights groups are just as bad. Buying of the court with funded programs. Coercive control is natural. Fatherhood initiative is not. The courts are financially insensitivrsed.
It is money driven. Most mothers get isolated bc the father enters court with control of the finances.
As FR pointed out, attorney Nancy Aldrich told gal Jocelyn Hurwitz, “my client holds the accounts. Is it a $7500 retainer? he’ll write the check”
Game was over then.
This is beyond monetized cases. We have been seeing low income mothers suffering the same fate. The father’s are not wealthy. No legal aid for these women. All father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children. Languestics. The Connecticut mirror has received donations from John s. ? John s Martinez. Why would a federally funded welfare reform program donate to the media? The Media outlet in Connecticut are not reporting doners. The money in some cases are not as significant but it crosses socioeconomic lines. This is not to say men are not victims, however it appears predominately an issue for women. The alienation industry has repeatedly targeted women. Women are remaining silent in the advice of organization due to retaliation. The number of cases reported in the frank report has been limited due to the retaliation of the court. It’s predominately discrimination against women for federal funding.
Where is Connecticut protective Mothers in all this? Why if there is such a large group and Connecticut is soooo bad why isn’t their a discrimination case against the state? The woman in New York, New jersey, and California have been waiting to see what happens. Jennifer’s law is now a weapon. There has to be enough cases of fraud. Using parental alienation.
I’m wondering the same. Controlled opposition, maybe? Or, maybe grants are only given to those who won’t mention the obvious extortion, racketeering etc.?
Why hasn’t The Hartford Courant told the public about CT AFCC, Inc.? 🤔
The CT AFCC, Inc. public-private purposely adversarial mishandling of obviously dangerous cases for massive profits should have been all over headlines by now.
Mr. Moukawsher disbarred a Connecticut family law attorney for raising the issue of corruption. What followed next was all over the news for the next few weeks. So, only the consequences of speaking up about corruption in the family courts is newsworthy?
Fully documented corruption in a state’s family courts isn’t newsworthy?
Reporters at The Hartford Courant can easily find information about CT AFCC, Inc. online.
Any dangerous custody case involving (AFCC Inc. director) Gerard Adelman and (AFCC Inc. treasurer) Robert Horwitz should have been a big red flag. The Ambrose case involves both of those individuals. A formal investigation of CT AFCC, Inc. should have been all over national headline news by now — just as Mr. Moukawsher disbarring Attorney Cunha was.
Paul Boyne’s arrest was in the headlines, too. So far, The Hartford Courant has framed that case as a case involving the issue of the freedom of speech.
Where are the headlines about his radicalization stemming from his victimization in the public-private purposely adversarial CT AFCC, Inc. “family courts”?
If Mr. Boyce was truly radicalized — rather than proving a point about Ted Taupier’s freedom of speech — does The Hartford Courant no longer consider causes of radicalization to be interesting or important?
None of it makes sense. The Pennsylvania Kids for Cash scandal was all over the news. Why isn’t the Connecticut Kids for Cash scandal all over the news?
The only thing that makes sense is: There’s something very wrong somewhere.
What is it?
Same experience. He’s barbaric.
Judges in CT hate when people exercise their rights-
Mouk who violates the 14th amendment daily by severing mother child bonds.
He’s a sick man
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/vatican-confirms-ban-catholics-becoming-freemasons-2023-11-15/
Mao was a Yale guy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes
Today’s Exercises:
A quick check online shows that like many jurisdictions Connecticut family courts are courts of equity and not law. Equity uses different standards than law. Common words used to describe equity are “fair” and “equal.” While the rules of evidence are the same, the standards by which the court rules are different, as are the remedies available to the court when ruling on disputes. It reads to me like Moukawsher is suggesting equitable remedies for legal proceedings. They are two very different arenas.
Fair and equal— nit sounding like any CT family court 🤣
That’s right equity for the attorneys as long as they’re getting their cut that’s the equity that’s important.
Their cut. The aren’t done until they get the entire pie. Not just a piece. Preditory legal practice in the court of equity. Land of the lawless.
We need people like you to straighten things out. We need the help of honest attorneys who wish to practice in a fair and just system. We are in desperate need of assistance in Connecticut to cut through the misuse and currupt system we are forced to use to get out of bad situations. People continue to weigh in if you are an attorney dedicated to unraveling and straightening the family court system out.
We need attorneys interested in a balanced and just legal system in family court. We need attorneys to speak up. Those who are interested in fixing the family court system.
Attorneys interested in a balanced and just legal system in family court don’t want to have anything to do with the current “family court” kids-for-cash charade.