In the throes of a contentious divorce battle, attorney Catherine Kassenoff turned to Facebook to chronicle her struggles against the Westchester County Family Court and her ex-husband, lawyer Allan Kassenoff.
She posted videos, court documents, and personal medical records. She painted a picture of her husband as an abuser, manipulating the legal system to wrench away their children and tarnish her reputation.
Gathering support, many of Catherine’s followers were mothers who faced similar custody battles.
Despite numerous setbacks, Catherine’s perseverance led to some legal triumphs, including the dismissal of a judge, a court-appointed attorney for their children, and a custody evaluator.
Nevertheless, Allan retained sole custody, with Catherine granted only supervised visits.
By April, Catherine gained occasional unsupervised visits and even purchased a nearby house, hopeful for a shared custody arrangement.
Goodbye on Facebook
On May 27, 2023 – almost four years into her divorce battle – Catherine Kassenoff, 54, shared her last Facebook post.
In her last post, Catherine revealed her intention to pursue assisted death in Switzerland. She expressed anguish over losing her children, property, home, pets, health, career, and dignity.
She suggested that the massive legal fees spent by her ex-husband, Allan Kassenoff, benefited court-appointed professionals at her expense.
Her final post began, “This is a story that ends with my own assisted death in Switzerland.”
She wrote that she was taking her life not only because of what Allan had allegedly done but because a recent diagnosis of a “virulent and life-ending cancer” gave her no other choice.
She wrote:
“I cannot survive this torment and the grief that comes from such a prolonged separation from my children. I am a 2-time breast cancer survivor with a new dire diagnosis that makes continuing this fight impossible…. Perhaps if I had not been re-diagnosed with cancer, I could have lasted in this fight longer. But I do not have the strength to go forward. More importantly, I do not want to traumatize my children any longer in this court system, where Allan… used them to continue their abuse.”
Hours after her Facebook declaration, Catherine died. A few days later, her post made national headlines.
In the wake of the publicity, Greenberg Traurig required Allan to resign from his $800,000-a-year position as a top patent lawyer.
Husband Claims Catherine Lied About Cancer
In September, Allan filed a defamation lawsuit against one of the prominent influencers in amplifying the story, TikTok celebrity Robbie Harvey, with 3 million plus followers and 39 million views of his videos on the Kassenoff divorce made dramatic by her suicide.
In his complaint against Harvey, Kassenoff claims Catherine lied about terminal cancer “to gain public sympathy.”
Oncologist Said Catherine Did Not Have Cancer
In the Harvey lawsuit, Kassenoff revealed a conversation with his late wife’s oncologist, Dr Dekiva Gajria of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. She confirmed Catherine was cancer-free as of November 2022 – which was at the time of her last annual checkup.
Catherine successfully battled cancer in 2008 and 2017. Dr. Gajria successfully treated Catherine during her 2017 bout with cancer.
If not in November, when did Catherine develop terminal cancer, if at all? Did she consult a different oncologist?
Being insured under Allan’s plan, any oncologist visit would appear on their United Healthcare statement. If Catherine saw another specialist, it wasn’t through their insurance.
Why Switzerland?
Most countries with legalized assisted dying mandate a terminal illness prognosis of six months or less. Some, slightly more lenient, consider “unbearable sorrow” from incurable pain.
Catherine, being Canadian, could access medically assisted suicide (MAS) if she was terminally ill in a number of provinces — or in nearby New Jersey, despite potential residency requirements.
She opted for Switzerland, which, uniquely allows MAS without requiring a terminal illness.
Catherine also chose the Pegasos Swiss Association, internationally famous as Switzerland’s most radical dying center.
Pegosos champions suicide rights for those of sound minds and healthy bodies to choose when to end their lives.
It costs $11,000.
Dr. Brewer
To establish she had the required decision-making capacity, Catherine sought out Dr. Colin Brewer, a renowned advocate for the “right to die” for those without terminal illnesses.
Although he lost his UK medical license years earlier, Swiss law still recognizes him for qualifying patients for suicide, sparking controversy when he approved healthy individuals, including a healthy 35-year-old.
By teleconference, Dr. Brewer assessed Catherine. His April 9 report didn’t cite a cancer diagnosis.
He noted her primary reason for seeking assisted suicide was “the unlikelihood of any agreed access [with her husband] to her children”. He confirmed she didn’t suffer from psychiatric illness.
Interestingly, Brewer revealed Catherine considered assisted suicide for over six months. She scheduled a session in September 2022, two months before her cancer-free declaration from her oncologist. After postponing that and a subsequent January appointment, it’s clear her suicide plans preceded any potential terminal diagnosis.
She bought a House Cash
Financial records show Catherine paid $900,000 in cash on April 18, 2023, 39 days before her MAS, to purchase a home at 51 Myrtle Blvd in Larchmont – the village where her children lived with their father.
If she knew she had terminal cancer, why invest in a future she would not experience?
By the end of April, with her new house, Catherine had both supervised and unsupervised time with her daughters. She said nothing to the children about cancer. She said nothing to her husband to win sympathy for relaxed visitation.
Catherine saw her daughters for the last time in the week leading up to May 2. On that date, custody evaluator Kathleen McKay filed a report with Judge Susan Capeci.
The report concluded:
- Catherine posed a danger to Mr. Kassenoff and their children.
- She prioritized her needs over the children’s.
- Supervision was essential when she was around the children.
- She aimed to “annihilate” Mr. Kassenoff.
- Catherine held a skewed perception of reality.
“With McKay’s report,” Catherine wrote, “I went from having at least some minimal visitation with the girls, eventually unsupervised, to the indefinite suspension of all visitation.”
On May 4, 2023, just two days after Dr. McKay’s forensic report submission, Judge Capeci decreed, “[a]ll visitation between the parties’ children… and the defendant mother is suspended until further Order of the Court.”
This was three weeks before her suicide.
In a hearing on May 6, Judge Capeci clarified that she was merely suspending Catherine’s access to her children until the parties could agree on a new visitation supervisor. They left the court without an agreement. They never did agree.
Her Psychiatrist Says Nothing About Cancer
On May 9, just three weeks before Catherine’s MAS, her New York psychiatrist, Dr. Stephanie Brandt wrote a long and comprehensive letter to Judge Susan Capeci about her patient Catherine’s mental health and mentioned nothing about her terminal diagnosis of cancer.
Dr. Brandt, who is a medical doctor, wrote the letter to the court at Catherine’s behest. Why bother to write a letter disputing the findings of Dr. McKay by arguing Catherine is healthy and fit to raise her children if Catherine is about to die?
Mother’s Day
Despite having no agreed upon supervisor, Catherine requested a visit with her children. She did not mention she had cancer – a strong argument and one hard to deny.
On May 12, 2023, Judge Capeci ordered that Catherine could see her children on Mother’s Day, May 14, in the company of their maternal grandmother. Catherine didn’t appear. Her children never saw her again.
Legal Fights
Throughout May, Catherine vigorously fought legal battles despite her alleged cancer.
On May 6, she appeared in court seeking a restraining order against Allan.
By May 12, she submitted a detailed 20-page brief challenging Allan’s motion to dismiss one of her lawsuits against him.
On May 17, just ten days before her MAS, she filed a grievance against Allan with the New York bar, her second effort to have him disbarred. If she knew she was dying, why would she seek to ruin his career and chances of earning money when he would soon be the sole support of her children?
Did she want her children to grow up destitute with their father unemployed?
No Mention of Cancer Before on Facebook
Catherine’s public Facebook posts revealed plenty about her and her children’s health information, including otherwise confidential medical records. There is no mention of her terminal cancer until her last post.
Her Friends and Lawyers Did Not Know
Frank Report spoke to several friends and four of her lawyers, including the executor of her estate. All of them said they were unaware of her terminal cancer until her Facebook announcement on the day of her death.
Attorney Harold Burke stated in a court document, “Prior to May 27, 2023, I was not aware of my former client’s then medical status, what she was apparently contemplating, let alone the steps she had undertaken to initiate the publication of her evidence memorializing Mr. Kassenoff’s actions towards her.”
Dueling Stories About Her Earlier Cancer
While Catherine may be telling the truth about her last terminal cancer, it appears she lied about the cause of her earlier bouts with cancer.
She informed the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund that her cancer stemmed from her proximity to Ground Zero post-2001 attacks, leading to a $300,000 award in 2022.
However, in court filings, we learn she attributed her cancer to complications from an early 2000s abortion before marrying Allan and subsequent intensive in vitro treatments after marriage.
How She Announced Her Death
Dr. Brewer told Frank Report, “She told me she had devoted much thought to the least traumatic method and timing of informing her children, and I think it was done through a trusted third party in NY.”.
Such a person never existed.
According to her death certificate, Catherine Kassenoff died at 6:51 pm [Swiss time] in a Pegasos’ apartment in Liestal.
Her children learned about her suicide and supposed cancer through friends who told them about her Facebook post.
They went online and saw it for themselves. They came to their father, who sat them down and explained it.
There was no farewell message to her children. No advanced warning.
Lie About a Terminal Illness?
Would someone fabricate a terminal illness? If she did, it could be to protect her legacy and shield herself from the stigma of abandoning her children when she was healthy enough to continue the fight.
Of could it be to annihilate her husband.
Framing her suicide story as due to a battle against her husband might not evoke enough compassion. Yet, introducing a sudden terminal cancer diagnosis tilts the scales toward sympathy.
She could then quit the field having taken her best shot at destroying her husband without regard to the future prospects of her children.
Dying Declaration
Dying declarations are a recognized exception to the general prohibition against hearsay in court. There’s fundamental trust in the notion that a person facing death will speak truthfully, as deceit serves no purpose in one’s final moments. Catherine’s dying proclamation was her terminal cancer diagnosis.
Why would a mother fabricate such a claim?
Dr. McKay asserted, “Ms. Kassenoff has a distorted sense of reality” and aimed to “annihilate” Mr. Kassenoff.
It worked. Her Facebook post cost him his job and their children’s security.
And while there are undeniable shortcomings in the family court system, Catherine, if dishonest, isn’t the right champion for its reform.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
https://www.davisvanguard.org/2023/11/records-reveal-suspicious-timing-surrounding-divorce-attorney-death/
Since I can’t respond directly to the post about Catherine suing the children’s psychologist for reprogramming I’ll comment here, seriously?! U guys have the nerve to blame Allan for their lengthy divorce and the litigiousness of their divorce, seriously?! Catherine sued anyone who disagreed with her. No one was safe so when u throw those stones and say Allan was litigious this was one of many lawsuits she filed and lost. Move on
ALLAN FILED 9 EXPARTE MOTIONS IN A YEAR TO ABUSE CATHERINE!
SINCE YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE LAW, PLEASE SHUT UP.
THANK YOU.
Do you even know what an exparte cotton ?
Where do get 9 for Allan ?
You don’t mention how many exparte motions Catherine filed ? Nor how many motions filed ? How many times she sued the same people
She turned her case into A Circus & proved to be a terrible ring-master
Family Court Psychologist Sued in New York for ‘Reprogramming Children’ and … https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/megan-fox/2021/12/15/family-court-psychologist-sued-in-new-york-for-reprogramming-children-and-labeling-mom-a-parental-alienator-n1541474
And all of us on tiktok did not rely on Catherine’s cancer diagnosis we came to our conclusion about the kind of father you are and person you are by your own behavior being captured on video that you are well aware of so good luck trying even mention that in court against Robbie Harvey.
It didn’t matter whether she had cancer or not.
Ugh more people that don’t understand the complaint probably bc u never read it. More people that could see Catherine with a gun in her hand and a dead body at her feet and would blame Allan. More people that think Allan is commenting on this as if no one can see that Catherine was the abuser. More people that can’t see a woman running around with a camera taunting her husband and abusing her kids especially the oldest. More people that can’t see Catherine for who she is/was.
The suit has nothing to with her very selected videos it has everything to do with Robbie’s false narration. Has everything to do with if she lied about her cancer what else did she lie about that robbie relied on.
More people changing their minds bc of the truth and understanding Catherine and Robbie harmed the kassenoff kids.
What a joke. U got ur information off if TikTok. U think that’s real information. 3000 court filings r worthless bc a 5 minute TikTok knows better. 🙄
This case has many complaints against Robbie Harvey . Your conclusion that Allan can be judged today & even pre filing for divorce based on videos that are over 6 years old ! Catherine also had damaging videos back then . Allan’s stopped videos stop 6 years ago whereas Catherine’s videos & audios cont up until before she passed . So who really is the abusive parent ? The one who sought therapy , never is seen raging at his girls or lay a hand on either Catherine or the girls? Or is the better parent the ones raging at her daughter numerous times , the one admitting she can use the oldest child manipulate her to saying the father abused her bec she knows the daughter craves her love & attention ! Or the better parent is the one who refused to seek professional help ?
The problem here wasn’t who was a better parent rather did any parent pose an immediate danger to the children ?
**EDIT: he edited the GFM, taking Allan’s name off. That’s why it was (temporarily) down **
It appears the GFM has been shut down
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=337259802207609&id=100077707749679&mibextid=Nif5ozW
The page still appears to be active: https://www.gofundme.com/f/robbie-harvey-defense-fund
That is a clear sign he knows he is in trouble by removing the name of the person who is suing him for defamation.
Did some searching through many comments on many SM sites ! I was shocked to come to the conclusion that after numerous articles printed, videos played, audios played , that even if you believed a Catherine to be a saint what gave Robbie Harvey the right w/out proof to claim a man to be abusive & that he received temporary custody of his 3 minor children bec courts in Westchester sell children to the more affluent parent ! Still never proven , but didn’t stop Robbie Harvey from inciting his 3,000,000 followers to cause a man who not only needs to be able to provide for his family , has his & his daughter’s trauma to deal with!!! How proud & gleeful he was to have him fired & have his #1 account drop him . An account he built up over 7 years v& a profession over 25 ! As one of the children reached out to Robbie Harvey saying stop you don’t know the whole story Robbie ignored . This man who claims to champion for Children somehow even misled a charity to support children to raise money for his legal fees in a situation he caused & was reckless! Where’s the outrage at Robbie Harvey ,who gives him the right to decide which kids to help & which to destroy because it benefited him. Without the Kassenoff children & court case you still had the ability to moved ahead w/ promoting & fighting for Family Court Reform . You just might not have profited from your campaign but aren’t you supposed to be altruistic ?! All of you who called a man’s place of business still have yet to show any remorse or shame in not only doing so , but at the vulgar ways you went about it. So shut the fuck up already judging Allan & his girls whom you put into danger & stop analyzing Catherine , rather take a good look at yourselves and focus on your OWN families ! And maybe then you will find a bit of humility & muster up the strength to say “holy shit ,I did wrong – how can I make it right ? Instead of seeing you’re being conned into believing Robbie Harvey is being sued for defeating & not all the other causes he brought upon this family , wake up & realize Free Speech is had he just played videos , Free Speech doesn’t give you the right to spew false information as facts , to incite ,& to cyber stalk . And no this suit if one will NOT hinder your right to say to someone “you suck”, but what it will do is hold influencers accountable for what they post .
JUST REMEMBER TODAY IT WAS ALLAN KASSENOFF & HIS THREE MINOR GIRLS :
TOMORROW IT COULD BE YOU
Wake up ! Everyone videos everyone now !!! Everyone had a social media platform where they can say whatever they want! Even a loser like you !
I just have to reply to this because it is so idiotic that you would even write this long of a paragraph just full of nonsense….
Number one there is evidence that Allen was abusive and probably still is it’s on video you can’t refute it so stop saying that there is no evidence because there is…
Number 2 all of us mothers who are victims of violence from our Children’s fathers and have been forced to go through the family courts And forced to co-parent with said abusers, KNOW FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE the ongoing of selling custody of children to the parent with the highest amount of money, and also we know in the language In the state contracts for federal funding for “fathers specifically”, states that a father will have access, Period. And do not say anything about whether there should be no access if the father is abusive…. Because of the funding And because they are written up by men’s rights groups also known as father’s rights groups who have a history of distorting facts and using false research to advance in the family Law and legislature.
Number 3 Allan is so good at being an attorney that I’m sure he will have no issue finding a job doing something else…. He has not been destroyed and can never work again, He can easily go and find another job doing something else and make an income to support his children…. Just like many of us Mother’s who are victims of abusive x, Are also forced to do when they are forced to say leave their home and have to get a whole new home leave their neighborhood and everybody that they knew and built relationships with and also find a new job in the location that they are now living…. If moms can do it after being abused for years I’m sure that Allan can pull it off as well he is not incapable…
Number 4 Robbie Harvey did not make a choice to only expose the abuse of this court case and the abuse these children have suffered from, If more abuse mothers would come forward with their evidence I’m sure he would cover that as well…. But look at the lash bag that us mother’s face when we do come forward…. Why is it any wonder that most mothers do not come forward and say anything especially when they don’t get the support they need and they constantly are not believed even with evidence Supplied. So it’s not him that made the choice to only expose this abuse, He has exposed multiple other abuses upon other women in the past and I’m sure that he will continue to expose abuse against mothers by the fathers of their children in the future should these women be brave enough to expose themselves to the criticism and judgment that you all provide to them…. Instead of support and understanding, you know like you gift to abusive fathers like Allan Kassenoff and Chris Ambrose.
Number 5 mothers who are abused have been constantly ignored and silenced when coming forward and trying to change the family courts…. No one is using this case to move forward and are chances at reform are not ruined by this case being exposed in fact it is going to help us. Catherine coming forward has given Mother’s who are abused and have not come forward out of fear the strength and Bravery to now come forward and share their documents and they are also starting to record and document everything for proof because Catherine showed us that that is the correct way to go, Remaining Silent about abuse only fuels the abuse to continue.
So Catherine deserves great Respect an honor for her bravery.
Number 6 You claim all of us who called Allan’s work to expose his abuse so that they would not employ someone so violent and horrible towards women and children, Do not show any remorse or Is shame at such actions…. Maybe you should look at yourself and Show some remorse and shame for your actions towards your wife in front of your children and also the abuse that you directed towards your children verbally all on video…. Or maybe some remorse for the death of your now ex-wife who is the Mother of your children…. None of us have yet to see you make any kind of a remorseful impact statements on her death and how it affects your children instead you have continued to attack a dead woman and attack anyone who supports her and pushes for the truth to continue to be revealed… Maybe some self-reflection would be really good for you and your supporters….
Number 7 maybe You Allan Kassenoff and your sidekick gurlfriend should find a bit of humility & muster up the strength to say “holy shit ,I am doing wrong – how can I make it right ? Instead of seeing yourselves as the victims you are NOT!!
Number 8 just remember that today it is Catherine who was the victim of her abusive ex-husband and the family courts allowing the Abuse towards her, preventing her from accessing her children, And giving Allan all control as to when she had access or when she could contact her children, Causing so much grief that she had decided to kill herself… Tomorrow that could be any of us mothers that are abused and it’s facilitated through the family courts….
Allen is not the victim here, His children are by the loss of their mother Due to the choices actions and behavior of Allan Kassenoff, and his minions in Westchester family court.
One last thing there are dozens of Mother’s in the Westchester family court that have lost access to their children to their abusive ex and their lives are completely controlled. Also these mothers have specifically spoken to me about how badly they would love to just be able to kill themselves because they don’t want to go through another day of this constant ongoing abuse however decide not to because they continue to fight everyday for access and visitation rights….
Now again let’s discuss the access and visitation grant program that New York State has…. How come that access and visitation grant program wasn’t facilitated for Catherine to be able to see her children?
Because it’s for father’s only.
Bias against mothers in the court especially if they are domestic violence victims and sexual assault victims it is documented it has been researched and it is a fact.
Blah blah blah more of the same. Y must be Catherine. Either actually Catherine or another mother who couldn’t follow the court orders and lost custody of your children. Mothers like you who take resources away from real victims like me. I’m not Allan. I’m a mother who really was abused not yelled at 6 years ago as I held a camera in the face of a man I claimed was abusive with no fear that he would attack me. I was the mother whose face was bashed to the floor bc I did record. So don’t go lecturing mothers or people u think May be Allan. Whoever that writer is wasn’t blinded by her own bias
Let me guess Catherine is justified in all her videos where she wakes up her child over a chocolate bar. Catherine is justified calling her daughter less than a year disgusting and liar bc the child called her out for accessing her email and writing herself emails from her account to say she wants to live with the mom and unalive herself.
I could go on but your Cathryn r so you’ll never see the error of ur ways. I hope I’m right and u lost custody of ur kids bc if u r Catherine they’re safer as far away from u as possible.
I’m going to hug my babies (even if they’re older) tonight bc I do have custody. 🎤 drop loser
Just because Catherine’s experience doesn’t match yours doesn’t mean hers was not real and was not abusive towards her stop disregarding other victims I understand that you’re in pain and you’re hurting and I’m very sorry for that but you shouldn’t be blaming victims when they come forward you should be supporting them or blah blah blah
Catherine was not abused. She was the abuser. It’s so obvious.
His legal defense gofundme is a bust and no longer is active. People are finally waking up to the sham that RH is.
There’s no where that says Catherine didn’t nor did have cancer, that’s confirmed.
She decided that the pain and exhaustion was enough, and took her personal power back and made a decision in her life that was not controlled by an abusive husband abusing her through litigation, through access to her children, and controlled by a judge or court appointed specialists.
NO ONE WILL EVER UNDERSTAND the EXHAUSTION A MOTHER FEELS WHEN THE SYSTEM IS ABUSING HER ONTOP OF YEARS OF PREVIOUS PARTNER ABUSE. NO ONE, UNLESS YOU TOO HAVE WALKED IN HER SHOES.
I Believe her.
Her behavior is one that represents an abused woman, Dealing with covers have control tactics that are mind exhausting every day…. Just going through my documentation for court exhausts me after an hour and I could sleep all day because that’s how dreaming this abuse is. Especially when you keep speaking the truth and no one believes you because they hold you to a higher standard…
And usually mothers are held to an unrealistic standard.
We’ll say this she did not break his bank she did not make it so that it is impossible for him to support his 3 children by reporting him to the grievance committee as an attorney. He is very capable of getting a different job and supporting his children because he is alive and he has custody of them.
He is not incapable, if he is an attorney then he can do a lot of things, He’s not stupid.
So it’s not like she broke his bank and it’s not like Anyone sharing the videos of him and the documentation of his abuse is damaging him, Or making it impossible for him to make an income… It’s his behavior That is damaging himself, he knew he was being recorded and he chose to behave the way that he did.
It’s really telling as well the fact that she is dead and he has their 3 children and not once has he come out and made a statement that is warm or any kind of care for her now that she has passed on in the benefit of his children…. At 1 kind word nothing just constant attacks on a dead woman and everything being about him..
Abusers never grow up past the age of 12.
Maybe she did not know that she had a cancer diagnosis until she got to Switzerland… Saw a different doctor… And did not wish to tell anybody.
That’s her right she does not have to tell anybody….
And to use the language that telling her abusive ex-husband would get some kind of softness from him to allow her to see her children or any kind of sympathy is a joke remember he is abusive he doesn’t offer that no matter what the situation is whether she’s dying or not remember when she was laying on the bed after just having surgery from cancer and he was verbally abusing her I think there’s 2 videos up at least…..
Abusive husband’s abusive ex-husbands and abusive boyfriends do not offer sympathy in any situation when you are leaving them or when you have successfully left them they have no room for sympathy for their victims especially once they’re on the discard.
Please try to see this for exactly what it is…. He is not broke he can get another job to support his children, She was obviously showing signs of being an abused mother who had no access to her children, She had people making fake reports about her and had to refuse them with other doctor reports which she successfully did, She was arrested on false allegations which she then had those overturned and dropped improved that they were false allegations, Anytime she tried to access her children when there was no protection order or nothing preventing her like a court order Alan constantly stalked her gave body language that was threatening would call the police on her and lie and say he had a protection order to try to get her arrested and actually tell her that her children do not want her there while her children can see and here and witness this.
Do not concentrate on these things there’s a little one thing and you know what I don’t even care if she didn’t have cancer and she lied about that the evidence does not lie the videos do not lie and the documentation does not lie and no matter what anybody says about Catherine no mother is perfect I am not perfect I don’t know any perfect mother.
But what she is, is dead and he is an abuser; a document at one now.
Agreed. She is not the villain here. She is, as she always was, an imperfect victim of abuse who had finally had enough. To make her out as callous when that abuser relentlessly sought her annihilation is to completely dismiss the reality of what happens to one’s faculties as they are dehumanized.
Maybe Allan was the victim of abuse as were the children. The children don’t look scared of him but they look terrified of her in the videos. She’s chasing him around with a camera after she taunts him and never tries to comfort the kids. He’s in the shower she’s filming, like seriously?! R u so narrow minded that u can’t see u got played by the master manipulator known as Catherine Kassenoff?!
Is this Catherine? Or Davidofff? This is ridiculous
You lost me at maybe she didn’t find out she had a cancer diagnosis until she got to Switzerland… that’s reach & stretching too far . It sounds I don’t mean to be rude but sounds idiotic & doesn’t play into leaving to Switzerland bec she said she was diagnosed . If that were the case then her & her trolls screaming that she wasn’t allowed a last deathbed visit w/ her girls . Just more lies!!!
I can go through this comment proving it’s all falsely written by someone who wants to believe Catherine was a saint & Allan a villain ! Do you give Allan the same leeway you extend to Allan that maybe he was pushed to the edge by her abuse of not just him but her girls to the point they were no longer safe ! Why are her raging videos acceptable but not his . His are expressed towards herb, her videos are directed at her children . Allan could have maybe handled matters better but time was of essence to save his oldest daughter while juggling her numerous court motions suits .
She was an attorney who was familiar w/ state court than Allan was !
Catherine did not put her career on hold to be a loving mother ! She took a short break still having Nannie’s & a housekeeper !!!
Yea, okay Allan lol
See how you respond you are such a typical abuser it is so apparent in every comment you put on Here
She did not make the announcements of ending her life and stating that it was because of family court and a cancer diagnosis until she was actually at the facility preparing to die…. Add exact day.
So again maybe she was diagnosed since Switzerland and she didn’t want to call her family and friends and tell them and that is her choice she has a right not to share that information…. And maybe she decided to share it in her last post before she killed herself….
God forbid someone places doubt on your statements Allan…
You have no proof that she did not have cancer and you have no proof that she did have cancer that’s what this article states stop trying to share it everywhere with people and claim that this is fact when it is not fact look at the heading of this article…. Do you see the big bold QUESTION MARK?????
I know that you’re grasping at straws but you really should just be quiet because you’re a textbook abuser.
Show me evidence other than Catherine saying it that he was an abuser
Anonymous
September 26, 2023 at 11:20 am
GO WATCH THE VIDEOS FOR THE EVIDENCE THAT ALLAN IS, NOT WAS, AN ABUSIVE PIECE OF SHIT.
What videos? Him yelling as Catherine taunts him with a camera? What about her videos of real abuse? Oh right ur part of the people that her videos were reactive abuse. Couldn’t possibly be videos of him were reactive bc Catherine could do no wrong. U must be deaf bc u probably didn’t listen to the videos of her yelling at her kids currently and in the past.
Do u even realize the videos of Allan r over 6 years old?
Show me the abuse not a taunt and then hit record video?
There are a lot of turbo cancers going on so Catherine being clear for cancer in 2022 doesn’t mean anything as people who have had cancer in the past are most susceptible to getting turbo cancers after taking booster shots. https://substack.com/@makismd
If that were the case then y didn’t she drop the diagnosis along with everything else in her infamous Dropbox. If that were the case then how come not one person has come forward verifying that Catherine told them of her terminal illness. I am impressed with how far u can stretch her lies
As if this entire thing wasnt kooky enough….here come the anti-vaxers!
Turbo Cancer has been considered false by many outlets ! It is NOT proven ! Regardless type of cancer that Catherine would have had would have to have been diagnosed ! She doesn’t show that in her Dropbox nor is it recorded in her health insurance policy under her spouse
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZPR76Sxvk/
Difference is Catherine not Allan brought this into the public limelight. Robbie not Allan decided to make this crusade public. And Allan and the girls suffered he had no choice but to fight back to save his family
Why is it that we always fault the person making abuse public – why do we applaud the person trying to keep it private? That is where abuse thrives, in private.
Some people actually want to maintain their kids’ privacy. By it theory how come we applaud the person who comes out first with a limited Dropbox when there r thousands of filings in this case?!
Maybe we applaud the one who’s private bc they were the ones actually abused.
As a victim of DV I can categorically tell u no one who was abused behaved the way Catherine did
When I recorded my ex he bashed my phone then my face
I will ask I Catherine supporters again where’s the abuse by Allan?!
Just because you did not react to your abuse the way that Catherine did does not mean she is not showing reactive abuse…
I behaved just like her, I fought to the nail.
So here I am making a statement as a DV Victim that her behavior is a replica of my own and many others That I know who are Mother’s of domestic violence and are going through the court system and had their children removed to an abuser for Financial gain.
We also have medical doctors saying that her behavior is reactive to abuse…
We also know that you are Alan’s girlfriend so just sit down cause honestly your opinion doesn’t mean anything…
You do research right maybe you don’t if you did then you would know that most new girlfriends of abusive men believe that they are actually the victims until it’s too late for them… Then they find out the hard way that their new wonderful boyfriends are actually abusive…
Family court criminals exploited this family. Neither parent acted well. Many don’t when at the point of a divorce but those with money get targeted and feed into the court corruption.
Some, like Ambrose, drive and secure the corruption from the start. Many others, fall prey to it.
I believe Allan was taken for his money and fell into the pattern reinforced by the courts. It could have ended long ago.
I do have serious concerns about what the nanny’s have reported, the drinking, the chocolate bar incident and treating her adopted daughter differently.
Just a sad outcome. From what I hear his girls love him very much and I pray he takes good care of them. ❤️❤️❤️
Dr. McKay I’d a sick bitch. This all contact suspended until further order of the court can last for months. While ignoring Catherine’s psychiatrist!
I think this report is what put her over the edge. A mother can only bear so much.
Having said this, her conduct is far different than I was aware. But it does not result in severing parental bonds. No way.
And yet even her psychiatrist didn’t know of her terminal illness. So maybe she wasn’t exactly forthcoming with her psychiatrist and therefore the psychiatrist didn’t have enough information to opine on whether or not she was or wasn’t fit. Also, that letter from the psychiatrist read like Catherine wrote it and she just signed her name.
The psychiatrist she never told that she allegedly had terminal cancer ?!?
Please … nothing out her over the edge ! She didn’t wake up one morning & decide to kill herself in Switzerland! Read Franks report . Before the alleged terminal cancer diagnosis , before McKays report , before Mother’s Day , this was the planning & setting into motion the biggest LAUNCH of propaganda material put together over months not on the spur of the moment !!! She wasn’t pushed over the edge rather she parachuted her way out enjoying knowing the carnage she was leaving behind
Do you think Raniere thinks bologna sandwiches are piquant by now?
Why are we focusing on Catherine’s cancer?
First of all, HIPPA prohibits a doctor from sharing patient information for 50 years after the patient has expired. Thus, the “revelations” of the treating oncologist in speaking to Catherine’s husband, Allan, about whether or not Catherine was given a new diagnosis seem highly suspect. A doctor can lose their license to practice medicine if they violate HIPPA.
Second, with all the dirt hurled at Catherine, particularly this latest attack on her reason for ending her life, I still haven’t seen any mention of her neglecting the needs of her children. In fact, miraculously in the midst of a highly contentious, combative marriage Catherine attended to her children quite well. She nurtured them successfully and put her own career on hold to do so. That certainly defies this trope that she was a “narcissist”.
Third, considering the trial by affidavit strategy and the various ex parte TROs, and the three arrests for trying to see her children, perhaps she was at the end “driven crazy” and believed she was terminal having endured two bouts of the disease already. Her behavior of buying a house and then ending her life shortly thereafter, pleading with the court for a Mothers Day visit and then not showing up, asking her therapist to urge for visits while Catherine was presumably making suicide plans, shows a woman so terribly beaten down by the court that her behavior naturally shows poor planning and decision making as she is operating in a highly traumatic mode. She was made a quarry, a hunted animal, by a vicious court system. That can be shown by the record. Unjustly, her detractors then asses her presumably erratic behavior in this severely beaten down state in order to retrospectively extrapolate to her mothering when indeed there is NO evidence that Catherine ever fell short of nurturing her children in the first place. That is where the reader must focus when analyzing this case. Lastly, it is not an impeachment of her credibility if she initially thought her breast cancer emanated from IVF treatment to conceive but later learned that the kind of cancer she had was genomically linked to her exposure to particulate matter in the wake of 911. The studies of 911 cancer consequences came years after the 911 tragedy as it took years for the data to be analyzed. Thus, it makes sense that Catherine later learned her type of cancer was 911 related and not IVF related. In fact, she was awarded the cancer compensation around 2022 or so because that was how long it took for the federal government to complete its study of the carcinogens that affected the health of victims. In short, Catherine did not scam the Government because she would have had to tender pathology results to warrant receipt of an award to compensate her for the 911 induced cancer.
All in all, I ask the intelligent readers to think things through and focus on the welfare of the children, which cannot be served via vilification of their late mother. And by villifying her the children are deprived of memories of her warm embraces, sweet smile, and maternal love.
OK, said Catherine. Is this Catherine’s ghost or cathrine herself or cathrine Yuseff
Wow. Powerful. Are you an attorney? A court advocate? What is your background to explain so clearly what has occurred? Ty
clear reportage of first order facts. thank you.
What it shows to me is a woman who finally grasped that her campaign of stalking, harassing and smearing people was never going to get her what she wanted. If this was really about separation from her children, well she was given every opportunity to have a relationship with her children but she wouldn’t accept the terms the court put in place to protect them. A mother who really loved them and wanted to be with them would put that interest above the interest of getting at her ex and turning the kids against him. She could never do that.
But she wasn’t living or working near ground zero so the 9/11 cancer claim was bunk.
She worked at ground zero. She was granted the compensation after going through a review process
But it’s ok to vilify the father , have him lose his job so he can’t provide for the children – post a Dropbox w/ videos & your children’s medical records unalive yourself for the children you allegedly love to clean up the mess you left behind !
FR & others don’t vilify the mother , rather the mother created & unfortunately left her own legacy
They never had warm embraces and hugs. They had a tiger mom who threw her oldest against a radiator, who told her she was adopted at an age she couldn’t process it, who made her feel not a part of the family. She told her children they were disgusting and liars. U all who don’t know this family could pretend she was a loving mother but her kids and the nannies all tell a very different story.
Maybe u all can help the family and get their sole provider a job instead of labeling him an abuser off of a 5 minute TikTok when there’s evidence to support to the contrary
How is it good for these children to have these articles up? Do you ever think about that Frank? Do you ever think about the psychological damage your writing has on survivors? For you this is a story, that is their Mother.
You call that a mother?
Allen is a demon. Him and Clare “Horseface” Bronfman shall BURN IN HELL!!!!
This is just my opinion and I ain’t judging anyone. I believed that It is still not okay to verbally abuse anyone specially in front of your kids. People don’t really need a physical weapon to kill someone.. Our voice can be use as a weapon too to cause someone depression and eventually making the person end their life. This is how I see in this case.
Except that Catherine was the abuser. He yells more in frustration. Watch the videos. O mean really watch them. U think he just started yelling out if the blue?! And her videos r her saying durebtlt to the oldest horrific things. I know she unalived herself but don’t murder a man, as u like to say, with words when u don’t know 99% of what actually transpired. Better yet send me the video footage of u from 6 years ago. Those videos r old. And on repeat bc that’s all she had. Videos of her berating the kids can be seen from less than a year ago
Something just didn’t sit right with me from the beginning of this story but I kept it to myself and kept reading the articles posted here.
I’m now convinced that Catherine was the true devil in this story. I’m not saying that Allen was in any way an angel but he at least put some effort into trying to protect the kids.
You have to be truly evil to let your kids find out about your death from social media! She could have easily left letters for them to say goodbye, but then again those probably would have been filled with hate at the father.
In the times we live in, when anyone can post anything it’s easy to make snap judgments but sometimes it’s not a bad thing when the father gets custody.
This is the opposite of the Ambrose case. That man needs to be locked up for life!
Alen continue to post all over the comments.
Not Allen, sorry. Maybe she was pushed to psychosis, but in the end, IF the stories of a false cancer diagnosis is true, I stand behind what I said. She wasn’t thinking about the well being of her children with this final act. She obviously needed some psychiatric help but instead chose to end her life. Yes, she CHOSE this action. Without even hinting to anyone close to her that she was doing this.
I’m hungry for succulent jew fish
I am not clear what you mean. There was such a fish known as a jewfish and the name has been changed to Goliath grouper. I caught a young one once fishing by accident and thought it was a larger grouper.
But if your comment is anti-Semitic I would greatly appreciate it if you would not make further similar comments.
RE: Jewfish Origin:
Some linguistic believe the origin is from the Italian, giupesce, means “bottom fish“.
So when you sound it out, it sounds like “jew-pesce”, and “pesce” means fish in Italian.”
***
Frank are you now using barbless
inline hooks and circle hooks?
I use inline and circle hooks on nearly everything except my
fish finder rigs, e.t.c.
I haven’t noticed any real decline in my catch ratio.
No hero shots – I eat my catch even junk fish.
So now you’re saying it’s a Dago Fish? Like what junk fish do you eat?
It’s me nice Guy who commented on the J-fish!
Nice Guy is too elegant to make such a comment. This sounds fishy to me. It also smells fishy.
The whole point ☝️ of the Kassonff case is the currupt players in the game. Both Alen and Catherine appear to have wrong doing. How much did the court players do to increase the drama? That’s the point ☝️
For those of you waxing on about he said, she said, this is the difference between journalists and influencers. If you have been following along, Frank has not reported the one sided innocent terminal cancer mother martyr suicide narrative. Frank did not encourage his readers to contact the employer and clients of a private citizen to get them terminated from their job. Frank did not MOCK a child desperate for peace in an unthinkable situation. Allan Kassenoff is not reading and commenting on this blog, hate to break it to you. You will also notice that instead of flooding this blog with unverified facts and information, Frank has found other cases that support families fighting the family court system. Read the summons and complaint folks. Then maybe you will understand how, by simply saying you have the facts, based solely on one party and a small set of documents, created a lynch mob that went after a father and his children. I see nothing wrong with this story, questioning a one sided, “fact”, other than it doesn’t fit into the, “Catherine was a victim Allan was an abuser” narrative for those of you that are desperately seeking a Robbie Harvey point of view. Too bad Harvey has to move on to sensationalize the abuse of other women under the guise of a “former narcissist”. I come here to get the fair fact based reporting. I suggest to those of you that are upset it doesn’t fit your narrative, go find an opinion that does. I hear the internet is full of them.
To the commenter saying that Allan Kassenoff is not on Frank report making comments.
I’m going to refute that and I have evidence.
In fact he is so consumed by this that he is actually messaging strangers to try to convince them to be on his side and not believe Catherine….
He has a lot of time on his hands and he is actively online looking at Facebook and other social media posts concerning him that don’t paint him in a good light and that also includes the Frank report.
He is also reaching out to strangers to try to convince them to be on his side; people he has never even met but knew his wife and knew her situation.
So anybody that is stating that Allan is not on this Frank report and making comments, you are very very wrong and in fact I’m sure you’re either Allan, Allans attorney or his girlfriend or one of the many women on Facebook that are supporting him.
Question, are you all being paid by him to actually believe his lies and that hes just such a great ex-husband and he was a great husband and hes a great father because that would make more sense than you just believing his statements and not believing the actual evidence of him abusing his wife and his children on video.
Having your children taken from you with little hope of being in their lives would make many parents consider suicide.
It’s an unconscionable situation to be subjected to. It is unjust and inhumane. Even convicted murderers get access to their children.
Why people are blinded by our court system is what’s troubling. Our government is not our own!
They are stealing our children, stealing our money, and poisoning us with bio weapons. So why exactly are we going along with court orders that violate the rights of children and parents?
Yes, but all hope was not lost according to the article, it was only a temporary adjustment. Her less than grandiose goodbye sealed her own fate.
As painful as it may be I find it hard to believe you’d leave your kids.
Also find it hard to believe you’d leave your own mother and Catherine’s mom is still alive.
Suicide is hopeless and helpless. Catherine’s family was not supportive. She apparently did not have a close relationship with her. She knew she was never going to be free from this.
At least we know she didn’t learn how to play suicide from her mother
Why are we focusing on Catherine’s cancer?
First of all, HIPPA prohibits a doctor from sharing patient information for 50 years after the patient has expired. Thus, the “revelations” of the treating oncologist in speaking to Catherine’s husband, Allan, about whether or not Catherine was given a new diagnosis seem highly suspect. A doctor can lose their license to practice medicine if they violate HIPPA.
Second, with all the dirt hurled at Catherine, particularly this latest attack on her reason for ending her life, I still haven’t seen any mention of her neglecting the needs of her children. In fact, miraculously in the midst of a highly contentious, combative marriage Catherine attended to her children quite well. She nurtured them successfully and put her own career on hold to do so. That certainly defies this trope that she was a “narcissist”.
Third, considering the trial by affidavit strategy and the various ex parte TROs, and the three arrests for trying to see her children, perhaps she was at the end “driven crazy” and believed she was terminal having endured two bouts of the disease already. Her behavior of buying a house and then ending her life shortly thereafter, pleading with the court for a Mothers Day visit and then not showing up, asking her therapist to urge for visits while Catherine was presumably making suicide plans, shows a woman so terribly beaten down by the court that her behavior naturally shows poor planning and decision making as she is operating in a highly traumatic mode. She was made a quarry, a hunted animal, by a vicious court system. That can be shown by the record. Unjustly, her detractors then asses her presumably erratic behavior in this severely beaten down state in order to retrospectively extrapolate to her mothering when indeed there is NO evidence that Catherine ever fell short of nurturing her children in the first place. That is where the reader must focus when analyzing this case. Lastly, it is not an impeachment of her credibility if she initially thought her breast cancer emanated from IVF treatment to conceive but later learned that the kind of cancer she had was genomically linked to her exposure to particulate matter in the wake of 911. The studies of 911 cancer consequences came years after the 911 tragedy as it took years for the data to be analyzed. Thus, it makes sense that Catherine later learned her type of cancer was 911 related and not IVF related. In fact, she was awarded the cancer compensation around 2022 or so because that was how long it took for the federal government to complete its study of the carcinogens that affected the health of victims. In short, Catherine did not scam the Government because she would have had to tender pathology results to warrant receipt of an award to compensate her for the 911 induced cancer.
All in all, I ask the intelligent readers to think things through and focus on the welfare of the children, which cannot be served via vilification of their late mother. And by villifying her the children are deprived of memories of her warm embraces, sweet smile, and maternal love.
So what’s the point exactly?
If Catherine chose to end her life due to frustration with family court, loss of access to her children, and so on, wouldn’t some people have more sympathy for her, not less? On the other hand, if she did have cancer we can understand the stress which might have caused her to seemingly act irrationally sometimes. So it’s “six of one, half-a-dozen of the other.” There are other things in this case that are more important.
The point ☝️ is the court system curruption.
McCays report is what put Catherine over the edge. And a single report from a custody evaluator eliminated a mother from the lives of her children.
This is insanity. The whole AFCC court cabal- with their created positions – “reunification therapists, custody evaluators, supervisors, parental planning experts”. It’s a lucrative enterprise that violates our constitutional rights.
Violates the 14th amendment and no one cares. It’s all about money.
Anon 9:11 pm. Thank you. Smartest comment on here. And people forget that McKays report — TERMINATING PARENTAL RIGHTS WITHOUT ANY VERIFIED CLAIMS OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT – was essentially a rubber stamp of Abrams report, a man removed from the panel of forensic evaluators.
People are losing sight.
How do any of u know the contents of McKay’s report?! It was over a 100 pages single spaced and not in the Dropbox. How do y know that mckay didn’t have verifiable proof in the report if the continued abuse and neglect on behalf of Catherine?! I know u never read the report bc it’s under seal and only the court and the attorneys have a copy of the report. Neither Allan nor Catherine have a copy themselves. So I ask u again, how do you know what mckay did it didn’t write.
If u actually read the complaint which u clearly didn’t, Allan references in the complaint where Mckay states that Catherine’s goal to annihilate Allan (yes she used that word) supersedes her love for her children. Read that statement over and over again. It’s the only line in the entire report that matters. It’s the core of who she was and it’s the core to explain her last act of revenge on him. She had one goal and her kids were collateral damage
And for the record, mckay didn’t suspend her access permanently. It was temporarily. It was u til they found a new supervisor. Again if u read the complaint u would know that Gus proposed multiple new supervisors to ensure that Catherine remain in the girls’ lives. It was Catherine who wouldn’t entertain anyone other than Ms Culley. Y? Bc Culley allowed Catherine free rein to do whatever she wanted even to the detriment of the kids. Again read the complaint. It was Catherine not Allan who chose to not look for a new supervisor.
READ THE COMPLAINT before trying to pin this outcome on anyone other than Catherine
Anonymous
September 25, 2023 at 6:52 am
Hi Allan.
Number one I can tell that it’s either you or your girlfriend by the way that you are writing and also because you seem to know specifics about this case….
And it weird that your girlfriend jumps on here and claims you’re not on any social media Refuting the claims against you but yet we all know that you are… And here you are.
She had to be supervised with them because she was emotionally abusing them. No one “terminated her parental rights”.
From the first NYP article, you tell she was lying about the whole thing. Women are prone to mental illness and perpetrating domestic abuse much more than men and this one had all the tell tale signs of those disorders. Cancer has long been used by women to garner sympathy and shield themselves them from criticism and boy did she bet right. Just look at how the readers of this blog fell for her story and viciously attacked her husband on her testimony alone.
Men commit suicide, women threaten suicide to get what they want. It’s horrifically manipulative and a tactic unique to women.
Soon there will be an article that states “Would someone fabricate suicide? If she did, it could be to protect her legacy and shield herself from the stigma of abandoning her children when she was healthy enough to continue the fight.”
Labeling and engaging in the deflimation character of women. Men statistically suffer from narrsatic personality disorder or characteristics of narsasim. There is a huge push to paint women as liars and alienators. Women are not generalizing men as abusive. The continued insistence to paint women in a poor light. This is an alienation industry person. Tossing information into universe to justify the court system horrors going on. We see you.
Please site your source for your statistics. Thanks.
Sage publication. Dsm 5 reports 75%of the diagnosis of Narrsatic personality disorder are men. The recovery village. 75 % of the statistics of NPD are men.
This article is finally a start about the real face of Catherine. She was manipulative and liar. She pushed Allan to his limits and then recorded him. But no one knows except a few people who shared their life, how she treated badly one of her kids.
She was a mentally abuser. SHE WAS the abuser and not Allan.
Stop defending her when you don’t know all the facts.
She could be bat-shit-crazy. It doesn’t mean Allan wasn’t a prick. Where’s the evidence that shows Allan was even half-way decent? I haven’t seen it.
Despite the court temporarily suspending all access until a new supervisor is found Allan agreed to let the girls see Catherine on Mother’s Day with her mother as a “supervisor”. He got the girls up and ready and she didn’t show
Bc the court suspended all access until a new supervisor was in place, Gus immediately gave recommendations so there wouldn’t be a big break in her visits, Catherine wouldn’t agree to anyone but culley who the court said was not an appropriate supervisor in this case. That’s not a prick that’s a guy trying to keep her in the kids lives despite her constantly trying to destroy his
Allan on numerous occasions trying to reason with her to listen to the kids so that the visits would go better instead she would insist on things that she knew would trigger a bad visit. For example the 2 biological kids refused to get in a car with her (fear she would kidnap them or worse) so instead of just going somewhere in walking distance (isn’t the point to just spend time with them and build from there) the visit would become a battle over the car
I could go on but Allan isn’t a prick. He’s a guy trying initially to protect his kids from becoming the headline of the NY post where a mom kills her kids and instead became a headline of abuse and through it all stayed silent bc all he cares about is protecting the kids.
U want to see a prick?! Look at all the people who destroyed this family of very limited information from a mentally ill woman narrated by a narcissistic pig named Robbie Harvey. Allan is a good man and u all destroyed him
Allan agreed to let the girls see Catherine on Mother’s Day with her mother as a “supervisor”…
Controlling statements.
So Allan did control the access Catherine had to her children.
ABUSE!!!!
Excellent point Richard. All the evidence points in the opposite direction. Any man that continues litigation for longer than one year against the mother of his children is a psychopath. It’s not a high conflict divorce it’s abuse ! They obviously both had severe mental health issues.
Did it occur to u all that she was the one prolonging the divorce. Look how many motions she filed vs him. Look how many times she asked for extensions vs him. Stop assuming and start researching. She prolonged it in order to financially drain him
He’s decent because the kids will forever eat chocolate bars without some crazy manipulating woman yelling at them about it.
I read that Kassenoff is making the accusation that his late wife Catherine lied. I did not read any evidence to support that other than what Mr. Kassenoff is reporting from his own mouth. Garbage article with no evidence to support it.
7:09am- Garbage comment with no evidence to support it. Just because you didn’t read it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Be a part of the solution, not the problem. Please take a seat.
She had a Dropbox with everything but her cancer diagnosis. She violated her children’s right to privacy. Ok she’s a real gem and an honorable person. 🙄
Why do I feel like she’s still alive?
You feel that way because you can’t grasp the depth of how evil her actions were that you’re thinking she couldn’t have possibly gone through with it !
Nope, that’s not it. I could see, by her following Allan around, while antagonizing him, that she was trying to manipulate her audience. Robbie Harvey fell for her antics and now thinks he’s a legitimate reporter.
She’s in Cuba drinking piña coladas with Tupac!
Sounds about right, wish I had one
Lying about cancer is no so bad. I like to lie and make people feel sympathetic. The more I lie the more I can get away with things. You make it out like Catherine was wrong to lie. She weren’t. If she did not lie about cancer who’d give a fuck. She did the right thing. The goal was to destroy her husband. She did it. The kids were collateral damage. That shit happens.
I admire Catherine because she had a goal and stick to it. She wanted to get Allan. She got him. She did what it took to get him.
This is the point that all you people do t get. If she were a hired killer and she killed her target she was paid to kill she got the job done. If a couple of worthless bystanders get in the way to had.
If she had to play Taft the kids counter that was needed because she needed that to get her target in place. One smart lady. If she weren’t dead I would hire her to destroy my husband. He is real filth. My kids like him better so I hope they rot in hell. Catherine I love you. This is about getting even bit kids. Fuck kids. They sided with Allan. He got fired. She got him fired. Kids should have been loyal to their mom.
This post makes a good point. You have to hand it to the lady., she wanted to wreck her ex and she absolutely did. Sure it’s evil & psychotic but one should give a bit of a hat tip for a successful effort.
You’re clearly a MRA/MVAW defender in disguise ti undermine DA campaigners and feminists….
The more we learn about Catherine, the more her victim act seems to have been a charade. As crazy as it sounds, it’s more likely that the fake “cancer diagnosis” was one last twist of the knife in Allan’s back. People who are that vindictive, even in death, do exist, which is why we need be careful before jumping to hasty conclusions. Can’t help but feel bad for Allan. I hope he and the kids are rebuilding and doing well. May they finally have some peace.
Lying about cancer is nothing new for women. How many women of the early 2000s breast cancer rage actually had cancer? And who was going question it? It made them virtually untouchable which is why it was such valuable currency. You were nothing unless you were a breast cancer survivor. And yet today it is very rare. Was a cure found? Nope, it’s simply that now the favored illness Multiple Sclerosis but I prefer to call it Münchausen syndrome.
I trust Frank will bring out all the facts. These psychopaths and sociopaths can paint their partner with their brush very effectively.
It’s starting to look like Catherine may have been painting Allen with her brush- that she may be the one projecting. Geez.
So maybe everything else about Catherine is good and she is an angel in heaven. She only lied about cancer.
I see her winging about blessing the good people there. But you persuaded me she lied about cancer. Other than that and her ruining her children future heaven is blessed to have her.
The more I see about Catherine Kassenoff, the more I am beginning to believe something doesn’t add up. It doesn’t mean her husband isn’t a prick. But things just don’t smell kosher.
Did you take your trash out? Some times I forget too. 😉
I’m Oscar the Grouch. I don’t have that problem!
There are a lot of Catherine’s out there lots of lies. Lots of more lies to follow up on the lies, and so on, and so on spiraling the scenario into deep depths. Damaged goods spilling onto her children.
Absolutely correct. There are far more women with unbridled mental illness out there than we are willing to come to grips with. Women are by far the largest consumers of antidepressants. I guess we lack the requisite coping skills to be content with life. Men are hardwired to have much better control of their emotions and thus are less prone to mental illness. Look at how they just let things roll off them, things that would keep us anxious for days on end.
I sincerely hope Catherine is alive and is getting the help that is available to her.
What according to you doesn’t add up ? What do you find not to be kosher ?
Please elaborate – don’t leave us in the dark ? You seem to read people well
You must be a proud grouch as you speak like you know everything , without backing up your claims !
Where was Allan a prick ?
*When he put up w/ her obsession to get even w/ an old boyfriend pre their marriage
*When 2x she had a meltdown about being a bad mother & he’s heard consoling her
*nobody talks about how Allan was a prick when Catherine had breast cancer & they were already at odds he drove her to each dr appointment at Sloan bec her immediate family bailed on her & he still felt as a husband it was his obligation
* nobody cares to hear what a prick he was(n’t) when during her 2nd bout w/ cancer she had a mastectomy, he once again drove her to appointments made sure she ate & drained the fluid from the tubes attached to where the breasts were removed . This he did feeling sorry for her that once again her family bailed & he set his personal feelings aside – bec she was still his wife & mother of his children !!!?
*when he took on the family health insurance when to spite she dropped everyone from her plan offered through her work
*When Allan picked up the health insurance payments for himself ,kids & even her
*when he paid her car insurance throughout divorce proceedings
*was he prick not suing for spousal support or child support which he was entitled to
* was he prick driving his children who didn’t want to go drive an
1 1/2 hr drive each way for supervised visits w/ Catherine bec that was the only supervisor she agreed to
* was he a prick covering his youngest private school but when it was agreed he no longer had to send them he still kept the middle child there 1 more year so she’d better transition into middle school
*yea you label him a prick from a distorted email saying he will never stop etc until … this was a father protecting his daughters where it was proven in court she abused them … this was an email that followed I will never stop until you get help & then you can rebuild your relationship w/?your children
Telling her , her wanting to destroy him trumped her love for her children !
She could’ve had it all if she wasn’t such a P_ _ _ K !
Allan was a prick to himself bec he never withheld money from her , picked up many expenses , bec that’s how he was raised ! For her it was a game bec somewhere she states “she never really wanted this divorce !”
How about after she had Is her surgery for cancer and he threw her across the bed and onto the floor and then he was trying to help her get up….
Don’t just share a portion of that situation, which you just did.
He was only assisting her to get up after he was the one that pushed her down and physically attacked her, Causing injuries which is very clear on the audio.
Also it is known that domestic violence victims blame themselves quite a lot and it is not the first time that I have heard an abuse victim claim that they want to die, that they’re not a good mother, that they’re going to leave the home…
She felt helpless and she was unable to protect her children from the ongoing abuse by Allan.
That is a reaction to abuse and gas lighting.
Now you can continue to try to gaslight the public but it’s not gonna work on me and it’s not gonna work on any other victim of domestic violence going through the family court and knows what your game is Allan.
Also it was Allan Was being recorded, so of course he did not want to sound like he was an abusive ex verbally, of course he wanted to try to come across like he was helping her get up….. If he continued to batter her while he was being recorded that would not look good for his evidence would it?
Everyone needs to start going back and looking through all of her documentation and actually reading the reports like I did, So that you can clearly refute all of these ridiculous claims that Allan and his girlfriend are stating on this website in the comments….
And yes we know it is you Allan because of the specific statements as to the “goings on” that no one would know about except for you and Catherine.
Keep grasping those straws but the video evidence can’t be refuted
Yep. And if she lied about cancer, what else would she lie about to make herself appear sympathetic? Answer: Anything and everything.
She lied to get 9.11 compensation funds. That’s about as low as you can get.
Yet , no outrage from anyone ?!?
The 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund is/was rife with fraud – much of it perpetrated by attorneys – as is/was the COVID-19 Paycheck Protection Program. Gotta wonder if Catherine feared being caught, for her misrepresentation, which likely would’ve resulted in felony charges and the suspension/revocation of her law license.
This is a powerful article ! For months influencers , media outlets , social media , bloggers & more have been posting even narrating claims made by Catherine Kassenoff against her spouse (there was never a finalized divorce) , his attorney , Westchester family court , judges , children’s lawyers ,evaluators etc
Many of whom have been sued even multiple times .
With technology advancing laws are not set in stone & are being modified & new laws are coming into play . Reading people’s comments below to those who rant nonsense should leave the platform along w/ their nonsense comments & behavior . You people are were the problem ! This is not a serious matter in your life just a fun outlet to try to prop yourself up to either hurl nasty comments at Allan & even Catherine . Maybe if you all would’ve minded your own business from the get go we wouldn’t be writing here !
For starters Robbie Harvey’s suit as most like to believe isn’t solely based on defamation . It seems many ramble w/out having read the complaint & are just spewing off of attention grabbing headline articles.
It would be interesting to survey how many pple would’ve rallied or even noticed Catherine’s claim had she not “launched” the ultimate crescendo in not just dying by assisted suicide bec she “temporarily” lost contact w/ her girls , but spicing it up by stating she had terminal cancer (or an unspecified terminal disease) she bec different from other women who she surrounded herself w/ , she bec the martyr bec she died having cancer & leaving the notion that not the courts , nor her husband would give her the opportunity on her deathbed to say goodbye to her girls! Catherine like most narcissist is a pathological liar, overall a bright one & she knew her audience was compiled of broken vulnerable men & women & when her past attempts at getting noticed & destroying her ex she went for the big outlandish exit which she knew as she planted the seeds would not ignore ! Catherine as stated told no one about her diagnosis not even the Quack Dr who interviews her via zoom ! Catherine’s lie is important bec as Frank pointed out her plan to commit ASD was hatched BEFORE she ever claimed to be diagnosed & therefor she has no strength to cont to fight for her girls . So from Sept up until her death she cont the charade of wanting to see her girls , filing motions while she still had time to try another attempt to disbar & destroy her spouse (not caring the effects on her girls) .
Pushing the agenda to have her girls Mother’s Day knowing she wasn’t going to show & her mother had no plans to come in either , was her last hoorah . She didn’t show up Mothers Day making herself appear the victim giving all reasons why not ! Yet Mother’s Day would’ve been the perfect time to speak to her girls , tell them that she was sick again , tell them she loved them , prepare them w/ lessons of life … instead they waited by the door , no phone call , nothing , she was a no show as was her mother who had no idea the girls were expecting her . Allan , who the courts never labeled him as abusive prob felt awful & foolish at the same time having woken them up , had them dress , & talked them into agreeing to see her (he didn’t have to she was on no contact) as they resisted but finally gave in ! As one of the daughter’s expressed to Robbie Harvey to please stop he knows nothing is a revealing moment bec he chose to ignore her the same way he chose to ignore evidence in Catherine’s Dropbox that would show she was abusive . She left videos but there was no consent from her minor children to post him , they asked him not to , he did anyway !
In one of his videos you can deduce that he posted his videos relying on 47 pages of documents when there were over 3,000 filings in this case . He not only bought into Catherine’s lies but his own !
So did many other media outlets pre & post her death . Videos of older interviews by Micheal Volpe & Megan Fox a perfect example of how Catherine had them so wrapped in believing her lies that she controlled the interview , they took everything she said at face vale never challenging her . If you watch on YouTube The Proper Person when reading Catherine’s suicide post & Dropbox he sees right away there are 2 sides . He questions as did one of the judges, which Volpe & Fox didn’t was why would Carherine need to be surf couching & living out of her car . They didn’t ask ? You knew she had a job ? If you were following the case you knew she was receiving money from Allan who after she didn’t tell him she was dropping the children & herself from her health pan placed everyone on his & paid her premium as well as her car insurance . Sleeping in your car , claiming to be evicted from 2 homes makes for a better victim , a better story !
Catherine’s lies are crucial bec she brilliantly navigated everyone into her web & who w/ cancer would do that ? Catherine ! Who w/ cancer a supposed loving mother give up her last day w/ her girls on ironically Mother’s Day ? Who – Catherine . Anything that elevates her victim status was fair game even at the expense of her children ! Look back on the evaluations reported , in the end regarding this case Kassenoff vs Kassenoff they were correct ! She didn’t live in a real sense of reality & mostly her desire to annihilate her husband outweighed everything anything including her girls !
These lies continue today to be retold & that’s why this article needs to posted & heard ! Everyone cried for Catherine , for awhile even the girls , but when the complaint was seen it still did not stop the spread of her lies . Michael Volpe , the NY Post , many others still tow the line “terminal cancer “ in their reporting , why ? I ask you Michael Volpe & the NY Post why at this injunction when writing , speaking about this case even Robbie Harvey , do you feel the need to keep the lie running ? I guess Frank has proven to be a true investigative reporter! It seems something didn’t sit well or click for him & he went to uncover the truth! Other’s didn’t care , they were fine acting blindly bec they all know Catherine even w/ all the evidence coming out against her , they know the line that she had “Terminal Cancer” will still be a draw & gloss over her actions (especially documented abuse towards her girls) & they can continue to use as the Poster Child of Court Reform instead of admitting they were scammed , hook , line, & sinker !
This 👆🏽comment is hysterical! Not saying it’s Allan but it does read like the comment of someone who would also rant out a 110 page civil complaint
Sorry it’s me ! A wannabe attorney like Robbie Harvey is a wannabe journalist if it were Allan posting there wouldn’t be run on sentences lol but good try !!! Now the question is “Are you Catherine ?”
This is the comment section bossy pants, not the freaking essay section. The crazies are here to stay. Next time you rant please add emojies 🍑
I’ll accept your criticism of my interview with Megan Fox of Catherine in December 2021. The interview lasted for a half hour and the only thing you could find wrong was that when she said, in passing, she couch surfed, after being kicked out of her apartment which was after she was kicked out of her home. Is there any more criticism, because the interview went for a half hour. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKvsN4ravOw it starts thirty-five minutes in.
The days of silent abuse are over
It is not the 60s and 70s anymore.
We all have learned that silence fuels the violence.
So the louder we are the more changes gonna happen to sit here and actually make a statement that nobody should be making this their business proves that you don’t know s*** about abuse and you don’t know anything about how staying silent actually makes it worse for women who are in abusive relationships we need our communities we need our neighbors we need our families to start stepping in and stop making this about privacy there is nothing private about being abused.
The more that domestic violence is outed to the public threw these court cases and threw the mouths of the children and through the mouths of the victim mothers the better off future victims are going to be.
Never remain silent if you are being abused expose it to the world no matter what the children are going to be hurt anyway if you’re silent about it the abuse is gonna continue which is going to harm your children even more there are medical research reports that state exposure to violence children the age 5 and under causes brain damage and other damages as well especially long-term violence on children being exposed to it…
But I guess Allen being the great dad that he is forgot all about that when he was yelling at his wife all the time and having the song mommy is a dead duck on Christmas song in front of his children and also all the statements that he made screaming about how much he hates Catherine and how she is a fat f****** loser that is not okay to behave like that in front of children especially your own it’s abusive and it also causes animosity and it’s also part of parental alienation to bad mouth a parent in front of another parent.. Proof that domestic violence is parental alienation, not the other way around.
Parental alienation is not domestic violence, it is protecting your children from violence.
Domestic violence is parental alienation.
I think this is the first accurate story about the case I have seen
How many time are you going to post the same thing over and over? We get it, she was a manipulative lying psycho. Who cares at this point? She is dead. None of this matters for the defamation case. She said (and published) she had cancer…Harvey can rely on that info.
I’ll agree. Frank, you seem to have lost sight of the point and what I’d hoped your goal was- to show how family court decimates families, not helps them
Sorry but there is another story here: how unchecked unethical “influencers” and online hate mobs can destroy the lives of innocent people. Including children.
Robbie obviously didn’t take Allan’s or the children’s side into consideration
🍑
How can Frank using this case push court reform when the evidence doesn’t show that . What we see here is how in the end the courts were correct in their decision ! Catherine wasn’t interested in a United family . You her child crying on the audio that each time they see her it’s daddy this daddy that , say this to Dr Abrams & Ms Most . She was so tangled up in wanting to destroy that she didn’t seize the moments she did have w/ her children to talk about school their day , maybe ask the supervisor if there were activities they can do together !
I read many cases & you know you don’t know all the facts ! What backfired here was Catherine’s call to finish her fight for court reform was just to entice pple to destroy her ex & bec pple like Robbie Harvey are making money on views or like the NY Post selling more papers ran w/ the more profitable story bash the husband & court reform is boring doesn’t attract as much interest thus less profit !!!
Hopefully now people will begin to see the truth and understand why multiple medical professionals and judges restricted her access to the kids. Everyone was quick to pile onto a one sided description so let’s see how long it takes to admit things were not as originally portrayed.
Are you new to the internet? No one is ever going to admit that.
The judges and court appointed vendors are still working in collusion –
Whether or not she had cancer doesn’t undermine all the wrongs of the court.
You do not cut off parents from their children.
Exactly. Frank, when will you return to journalism instead of airing the ugly he said/she said of one divorce?
Frank just reports the she said side, never the he said.
Where did you ever get the impression Frank was anything but a shit stirrer?
You do when they are a danger to their kids.
No – hopefully now someone makes those children feel loved and cared for and not the pawns in this divorce show.
You don’t think Allan was abusive? Really?
What medical professionals? Marc Abrams who was removed from the FE panel after multiple complaints of impropriety?
What planet are you on Frank ??? The whole point of the case is this family and those children were completely decimated simply because two people no longer loved each other.
Both parties in this case were mentally ill and never should have been tortured by their attorneys with a litigation that lasted over four years! These children are the victims! The courts need to protect the children at all costs – and make it clear that NO litigation should take longer than one year – and then trial. Pedophiles get to trial faster. Wake up people- this is legalized child abuse.
It’s one of the few cases that got any traction in the media. The criminal activity that is alive and well in the Westchester Family Court system is what needs to come to light!
This is the very case to show it.
This. This article misses the point.
Agreed.
This article is a deflection and pretty sick. The family court is a criminal extortion racket set up to alienate children from their protective parent. Too many of us are living the nightmare. We know this article is rubbish.
If only it was that simple ! Many divorce cases drag on bec usually one party is litigious & plays games & there’s nothing the other party can do to stop them or speed up the process !
I think to be dismissive of what happened in this divorce case does not help court reform . But to help understand court reform you need to unravel the layers of the case!
Have you read the court documents or even the complaint ? Where is it stated they both were mentally ill ? It is stated no where that Allan was mentally I’ll or abusive . He was cited over 6 years ago for bad behavior resulting from the videos but NEVER abusive ! You saw in the video & from Robbie Harvey’s narrative what he wanted you to see , an abusive Allan even though she’s following him around w/ a camera even into the shower area , she’s egging him on while involving her children by prompting them w/ questions . Children whom she knows are terrified to disobey her ! Where was Allan abusive bec he yelled . He was in the privacy of his own home , never Kaye’s a finger on her or his children . Where was Allan abusive ? When he tried protecting his eldest daughter from abuse ? When you hear him trying to calm Catherine down when she’s raging at her oldest saying she wants to giver her back or Allan can take her ? Was Allan abusive when Catherine is saying she’s a bad mother her kids don’t need her etc & he tries to calm her down ?
People are misconstruing Allan’s determination to eventually protect his child the oldest who was the brunt of Catherine’s abuse & the youngest who were also suffering from her need to control , to manipulate them against their father etc to him being called abusive – all bec you saw one video spliced to decide omg he yelled none of us ever yell in front of our kids ! There’s no divorce happening where most children are hiding in their rooms as their parents can’t be in the same room w/out yelling !
The reason the lies and the videos are important is bec they play off one another & Robbie Harvey having been in media & an influencer knew that by playing the videos loudly & constantly & screaming his narrative lies that it would draw more viewers suck people in & he cinched a great deal for himself . He knows that repetitious playing of propaganda will at some point be received as truth . That’s how the human brain works . And as an adult we question less ! And if ever he had the forum to play this psychological game it was w/ the #justiceforcatherine Facebook group of vulnerable women whom he became their leader ! Listen folks I need your help I can’t do this Aline – women who felt no purpose had a purpose ! He played those videos over & over again capitalizing on them to destroy Allan ! A person he never met nor his girls . He ran w/ the story w/out fact checking bec he new timing is everything & he needed to be first !
So who was abusive a vengeful wife or a father who paid for almost everything , writes an email that gets twisted bec he lets her know he will never stop fighting for these kids but everyone conveniently leaves out that he’s begging her to get help so SHE CAN REPAIR her relationship w/ her girls ! No let’s abuse Allan by keep repeating the phrase “ I Will Never Stop!” What parent would stop if their spouse is hell bent on destroying him & their children ! She needed help – her brother even begged her . They lived w/ her mental illness their entire lives ! They lived w/ her pathological lies & worse when you read her response to her brothers email it’s pure Catherine – threatening & vengeful !!!
So what should Allan have done ? Waited until something frasic happened ?
Where is the outrage from people mothers fathers who see now that they holy shit maybe we were wrong & instead of brushing it off realize there can’t be court reform until we are open enough to admit when we are wrong & have wronged . Catherine’s lies are NOT acceptable – Destroying for no reason just another woman’s a stranger to all of you vendetta to have him lose his job is NOT acceptable ! Threatening him , his girls NOT acceptable !! When people start self reflecting & try to admit & undo a wrong then maybe you have a leg to stand on demanding court reform but when your behavior is worse than a video from over 6 years ago , you will achieve nothing & cont to have the same shit !!!
Where’s the evidence or diagnosis that Allen is mentally ill?
Exactly. Nothing requires any parent to be a perfect, unflawed individual in order to have access to their children. Whatever flaws Catherine had, that did not mean that she should have no contact whatsoever with her children –and Allan was in no way the gold standard of a parent whereby only he should have access to his children. Drug dealers and pedophiles have access to their children. Allan was not flawless by any means. He certainly put his own perceived interests over that of his children –he did everything he possibly could to excise Catherine from his children’s lives and erase anything that “reminded” him of her or anything she had encouraged –such as the violin lessons, French school, etc. Yes, Catherine was Canadian, so it was important to her for her children to be bilingual –he made sure to put an end to that. What parent actively decides to deny their children the opportunity to be fully bilingual? Or decides to make sure they are never able to qualify for any kind of musical scholarship/opportunity? They were very talented violinists. He decided they would “no longer celebrate Easter” when they had their whole lives.
He also did his damndest to “annihilate” Catherine as she is accused of doing to him –and he succeeded. She is dead. He won, he got his way. His children will never have their mother again as he wanted. In the year or so leading up to this, she lost her job, the one relatively “normal” factor she had left in her life throughout the divorce all due to Allan’s false allegations that lead to her arrest –and she never got that job back even after the charges against her were dropped. This complete destruction of her life may have led anyone to suicide, cancer or not. The courts were 100% responsible for allowing things to escalate to this degree.
Where do u get ur information from? Even on the things u commend Catherine for she was abusive. Only her first biological child was put in the French American school. She never sought to make the other 2 bilingual. The first biological child was not the oldest she was the golden child in Catherine’s eyes. When the oldest asked to take violin like her 2 sisters who were biological Catherine told her no bc the other 2 r playing violin she can play viola. Wow that’s some great parenting let’s keep making the adopted child feel less then. Speaking of her Canadian citizenship only the 2 biological children have Canadian citizenship not her oldest child who was adopted again great parenting let’s continue to make the adopted child feel less than
Speaking of Canadian citizenship and this article, Catherine was entitled to free MAS in Canada as a citizen with a terminal illness so y would she opt to pay $11K in Switzerland 🤔oh bc that facility with that quack Dr Brewer will pass u MAS without a terminal illness diagnosis
Allan kept the child in the French American school until middle school bc it was a natural transition into a new school so psychologically wouldn’t be so traumatic for her, but with Catherine suing him in multiple courts and being the only provider for the kids it was becoming financially impossible to keep her in and he felt it was time she be treated like the other 2 children not held on a pedestal like Catherine did. If it was so important to Catherine to keep her there y didn’t she pay? He paid $40k a year for her to be in that school plus all the extra curriculars. R u aware that the violin school that Catherine kept the 2 biological children in was like $20k a year per kid?! Again she paid for nothing
So once Covid hit and the kids did virtual lessons for a while, they, not Allan said they hate violin. Allan wasn’t going to force them to play if they hated it. He felt they r going through a lot and have no free time. Keep in mind every visit to culley was an hour and 15 minutes away. Plus the visits these kids had limited free time.
As I have said and will continue to say 99% of the story we don’t know so save ur judgments and recognize that maybe this man, unlike their mother, actually had the kids best interest at heart
Side point if Catherine didn’t waste so much money fighting Allan for these things they wouldn’t need scholarships and if u people didn’t destroy him so he doesn’t have a job they wouldn’t need scholarships. Wake up and see the carnage team Catherine has done. I wouldn’t be so proud to post #iamcatherine. Just saying
If you have been through family court, you would know a terminal illness would make no difference to the judge.
I don’t believe that ! Deathbed supposed confessions & writings tend to be the most believed & sway peoples opinions . Too much credit is given thinking a person dying wants to go out w/ a clean heart ! Not sure why that is since numerous people use death as a means to get back at people while they are gone & untouchable . Just look how many wills are contested each year !!! Even Catherine down to her will screwed her girls which furthers the notion that she wasn’t a loving mother , rather a vengeful one . If she is dead she is dead physically & sadly in many people’s heart who were tired of her shenanigans! She believes her final curtain reveal killed Allan , his career , etc she forgot one thing he is not dead & will rise above this & be an advocate that social media cannot be a tool to destroy someone or even a business .
Unlike Catherine whose family I am somewhat shocked has not made a statement , haven’t had a memorial for her even if you had differences during her lifetime she’s still your child , your sibling , an aunt , etc , Allan’s family is supportive, their home whether his mother or sister is opened to ALL of them ! His family is warm kind & know these girls need to heal as does Allan . Another interesting point is Catherine would send the oldest w/ Allan to his family on holidays , but wouldn’t allow him to take the two youngest … now the all 3 kids go as a family , as sisters & Catherine has lost control over being spiteful ! She also thought she could break Allan’s bond w/ the girls & the girls w/ one another – that spiteful act she failed at too . They are like a pretzel bound & twisted together !!!
This women clearly lied, repeatedly