CT v Paul Boyne: Landmark First Amendment Case Should Land CT Family Court in National Spotlight

The old boomerang might be coming round…

CT v Paul Boyne may end up being a landmark First Amendment case and bring national attention to Connecticut Family Court.

Boyne is being held without bail in Virginia, while CT authorities arrange to extradite him to CT on charges of cyberstalking based on writings on his blog, the Family Court Circus.

A Virginia judge denied Boyne bail, stating he might be dangerous to one or more judges.

FR is seeking a copy of the warrant.

According to a source, two judges named in the warrant are Judge Jane Grossman and Thomas Moukawsher – frequent targets on Boyne’s blog.

Judge Thomas Moukawsher

Neither Virginia nor CT authorities have provided Boyne with a copy of the warrant. So, though he has been in jail for a week, he does not know the details of his charges.

Earlier this week, New Haven State’s Attorney John P. Doyle, Jr. announced to the media that Boyne’s arrest was based on 18 felony counts of Stalking and Electronic Stalking for the cyberstalking of three unnamed Connecticut Superior Court judges.

Last Monday, Boyne appeared in Fairfax County General District Court in Fairfax, Virginia. The State of Connecticut told the Virginia court it would extradite Boyne to CT to face charges.  

Boyne’s arrest comes after a multi-year investigation into his website “thefamilycourtcircus.com.”

For more than a year of the investigation, which started in or around 2020, a server hosted the Family Court Circus outside the USA and would not respond to CT subpoenas.

When the server changed to one in Florida, CT obtained information about Boyne’s connection to the blog. This information allowed them to go to a judge in Virginia and persuade her to authorize a search warrant.

One of the more tame memes on Boyne’s FCC

A predawn raid based on CT and Virginia authorities raising the specter of Boyne, based on his writings, having artillery at his house, saw more than 20 State Police in full SWAT gear – bust down the front door and point their rifles at a newly awakened Boyne.

Police did not find guns, but they did find, in addition to Boyne, his two 87-year-old parents. The SWAT team seized a cell phone and two laptops.

CT alleges Boyne, a former Connecticut resident, authored and maintained the website from his home in Virginia.

Boyne’s blog had operated since at least 2017 when it first promised to “shine a light on the cockroaches of Family Court.” 

Since Boyne’s arrest, there have been no new posts.

The issue will be the constitutionality of CT’s cyberstalking law and its application in Boyne’s case.

A jury will hear the case, unlike the jury-less cases in family court. 

Boyne believes a Jewish cabal runs the CT Family Court, and he extols violence against the judges in language that might be construed as parody, but probably far from amusing to the targets of the blog.

Boyne lost custody of his children due to a protracted battle in CT family court which began in 2007 and continued for years under Judge Gerard Adelman, and Judge Lynda Munro, and through the machinations of therapist Dr. Robert Horowitz, whose expertise the judges used to determine which parent should have custody.

The courts de-fatherized Boyne. He has not seen his children in years.

Boyne with his daughter years ago

Boyne has been writing against CT judges for six years without committing any act of violence against them.

FR knows of no one whom Boyne’s writings have inspired to commit any act of violence against any CT Court judge.

The CT charges allege that the thefamilycourtcircus.com postings contain “threatening and intimidating speech directed at specific Connecticut state judges, court personnel, State of Connecticut legislators, and private citizens.”

FR condemns antisemitism and writing, whether satirical or not, that calls for violence against anyone.

Where do you draw the line?

Most would call it satire if Boyne wrote that Judge Grossman should be tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail.

Boyne writes the “monsters who control’ “the most evil court in the land” and “torture children, protect paedophiles, plunder family savings, destroy parent-child bonds,” in their “jewdicial discretion” should be shot.

He wrote, “nothing changes until bullets start flying. Since 1776, bullets raise the issues and settle the score, from a colonial musket ball to a .50 cal max of today, bullets really do work wonders…. “

In talking about the guardian ad litem system, where courts appoint attorneys to take control of the destiny of children often recommending the children be removed from the home of the primary attachment parent and into the home of the parent they claim is abusive, who bill by the hour, Boyne writes:

“Why take an entire day off work to go to the state house to wait in line to speak for 3 minutes on how a jewish lawyer appointed as a GAL plundered the family savings account while providing unfounded recommendations? A .50 cal to the head takes care of the problem. Not only is there no GAL left to file a motion of contempt for non-payment, the word gets out quickly that GALs are not immune to bullets.”

He addressed the idea that court-appointed custody evaluators who barely meet the children then recommend life-altering decisions about custody – often removing children from their primary attachment parent -and into the hands of the parent the children claim is abusive – most often based on what will make the most money for the lawyers who recommend her.

Dr. Marc Abrams, custody evaluator, who has separated countless children from their protective parent

Boyne writes: “Tired of the court scam of appointed ‘psychologists’ to charge ridiculous amounts of money to apply jewish psycho-babble in the fraudulent form of a ‘forensic evaluation’, more precisely known as a ‘baseless biased opinion’ directed by the judge? Pop! A .45 right between the eyes provides a cranial therapeutic probe, which not only cures the delusion of expertise, it also serves to discourage other quacksters from promoting similar snake-oil in a public forum.”

He writes about how lawyers collaborate with each other to manufacture divisiveness between the divorcing spouses and make everything into a war as they bill by the hour. 

He writes: “Had enough of the court sponsored character assassinations brought on by opposing counsel in the name of protracted litigation and billable hours? Pop, pop! Two 9 mm’s to the head, eliminates the need to file a reply brief, saving ink and paper, while giving a more pronounced definition to frivolous and vexatious litigation.”

He also names names writing about the paid actors who got into the money-making world of a high conflict case, which ended in the death of Jennifer Dulos.

Fotis Dulos was charged with his estranged wife Jennifer Dulos’ murder and then killed himself

Boyne wrote, “the world would be a better place had a modern day Dick The Butcher popped Attorney Reuben Midler, Attorney Michael Meehan and Judge Donna Heller preventing them from destroying the Dulos family. Properly lined up, a single .50 cal would have done all three at once. What a prettier world it would be, if Jen was still with us.”

He also wrote about a case where a father got custody then killed his child.  

Boyne wrote, “Dick The Butcher would have been righteous in employing a meat cleaver to sever the head of Judge Barry Pinkus prior to Baby Aaden being tossed off the Middletown Bridge. The little bambino would be six years old now had it not been for the incompetent and quite jewish Pinkus.”

Tony Moreno threw his infant son Aaden off a 100 foot bridge then tried to kill himself but survived the fall

Boyne wrote about the CT Judiciary Committee, which recommends the reappointment of judges who seem conflicted insofar as many of them are attorneys who appear before the same judges they recommend, and who accept contributions from attorneys who appear before the judges. 

“Dick The Butcher would have a chop fest with the judiciary committee. Handing up a nice fillet of Representative Rosa Rebimbas, the notorious GAL who masturbates to the cries of children separated from mothers based on her perverted recommendations. Nice sausages, rich in fat, from the ground up Senator John Kissel, shadow architect of statutes designed to hide GAL fees from the IRS. Some dark offal for the wolves from the putrid Eric Coleman, cock sucker to the great white paedophiles of the state. And what say the Old English Butcher with regard to the jews, dykes and queers in black robes? Fine meat pies with gravy from Bozzutto, Adelman, Murphy, Munro, Wetstone, Suarez, Emons, Williams, Albis, Ficeto and the like? Hannibal Lechter would add a fine chianti.”

“The word gets out quickly as to the demise of the racketeers, the talmudic tyranny and the Butcher’s remedy … bullets….

“To affect the Butcher’s philosophy with minimal left wing objections, simply apply blackface, carry signs to suggest black lives matter, demand social justice for the poor and oppressed, loot a few stores, burn a parking garage, spray paint BLM in indigo orange on the sidewalks, smash some windows, demand student debt cancellation, while marching down Washington Street in Hartford … simple. Celebrate Shakespeare and protect the children in the new year, shoot a lawyer!”

While FR condemns the idea of violence and any racial or religiously biased speech, it is hard pressed to advocate for the speech being made illegal.

What does seem illegal however is the conspiracy of selling custody to children and it needs investigation. Maybe the arrest of Paul Boyne will quicken the investigation into the much larger crime – perpetrated ironically by the very judges who complained about Boyne.

This may be the greatest show of them all — a real spotlight on the for- profit adversarial jury-less Family Court. 

About the author

Frank Parlato


Click here to post a comment

    • Will “far-right” in the news many times in many ways take the spotlight off of Sidney Horowitz’s invoices? says:

      🎪 It will be another circus. The Hartford Courant will print paragraphs such as …

      “… The Nazis loved “Boneface,” whose real name is Kent McLellan. They adored his look and were enamored by his tales of how he allegedly [sic] traveled to Ukraine and fought with the Azov Battalion, an infamous battalion with Ukraine’s National Guard that has deep neo-Nazi ties. Like many other far-right figures, he’s also released horrific rap songs. 

      But Boneface’s unique look was his downfall. He was spotted by far-right influencers who were attempting to portray the rally as a false flag operation put on by the federal government to discredit the far-right wing. …“

      Apparently, “far-right” means anything anyone wants it to mean.

      We’re supposed to believe Kent McLellan is far-right and … “The Azov Battalion is far-right.” “Nazis are far-right.” “Neo-Nazis are far-right.” “Far-right influencers are far right.” “Orthodox Christians are far-right” “Laura Loomer is far-right.”

      So, Laura Loomer is far-right, too? Even though she’s Jewish?

      James Comey was the FBI guy from Connecticut who was supposed to lead the 2013-2015 investigation and prosecution of everyone involved in the “The Connecticut Chapter of AFCC, Inc.” federal crimes.

      James Comey persecuted Laura Loomer instead of prosecuting the AFCC, Inc. public-private for-profit networks in Connecticut family courts. Maybe the current FBI director will figure it all out?

  • “… If one loves democracy, the argument runs, one must crush its enemies by no matter what means. And who are its enemies? It always appears that they are not only those who attack it openly and consciously, but those who ‘objectively’ endanger it by spreading mistaken doctrines. In other words, defending democracy involves destroying all independence of thought …“


  • “… Dr. Luigi DiRubba was living the American dream.

    He had six children, a thriving business, and he was worth millions.

    After approximately six years in the Connecticut family court system, most of it is gone.

    He told me he was worth approximately $4 million when it started, and all that’s left is his chiropractor business.

    Worse than that, he no longer has any contact with any of his six children.

    All of it, he told me, was due to the rulings in court.

    Not only did he have to pay exorbitant legal fees to his own lawyers, but he was regularly ordered to pay his ex-wife’s legal fees, along with all fees for numerous third parties appointed by the court. …

    … Dr. DiRubba believed his ex-wife, Anna Maria, was cheating on him and a private investigator proved it. …”


  • Elon Musk on Twitter …

    “ .. @elonmusk
    Based on what we’ve heard from advertisers, ADL seems to be responsible for most of our revenue loss.

    Giving them maximum benefit of the doubt, I don’t see any scenario where they’re responsible for less than 10% of the value destruction, so ~$4 billion.

    Document discovery of all communications between The ADL and advertisers will tell the full story.
    7:04 PM · Sep 4, 2023 ..”

      • Senator Murphy or one of his friends, perhaps?

        Stop dividing Americans to wage war on the world. Your 2014 efforts to destroy The Ukraine and Russia with World War III is a war against all people and your efforts are in vain.

        American people will not be divided.

        If you purposely deceived and then showed support for only certain kinds of American people to divide our great nation, pack your bags and go away. Or, surrender to a local law enforcement office for committing treason and take your colleagues with you.

        If you’re still wondering what this comment is about, call Kent McLellan aka “Boneface” to ask him. Maybe you know him? Kent is “Intelligence” like Jeffrey Epstein was/is.

        2012 was two years before you and your friends helped start the war in The Ukraine. Boneface was training at the Osceola County compound in Florida at that time. Maybe you visited that compound when “American Front” members were conducting military training there?

        Perhaps you flew with Boneface over to the Ukraine? Maybe you’ve already met with him and/or his friends at the Nazi rallies in our once great country?

        You can’t miss him. He has tattoos all over his face.

    • Actually I suspect Annamaria Mongillo might be arrested next on charges of perjury and racketeering conspiracy. If federal agents stop by, she should turn evidence on her coconspirators, particularly the lawyer lady.

  • Where’s the headline news about the Connecticut family court judges’ case against Paul A. Boyne?

    Why are only Paul J. Boyne’s divorce case details (starting 2006) available on the state’s judicial branch website?

    What happened to Paul A. Boyne’s divorce case details (starting 2007) on the state’s judicial branch website? 🤔

  • 229.00 09/20/2010 P AGREEMENT
    RESULT: Order 9/20/2010 HON HARRY CALMAR
    230.00 07/13/2023 P MOTION FOR CONTEMPT
    230.50 07/27/2023 C ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
    231.00 07/24/2023 P MOTION FOR ORDER OF NOTICE
    231.10 07/27/2023 C ORDER OF NOTICE

    Scheduled Court Dates as of 08/25/2023
    MMX-FA06-4005321-S – BOYNE, MARY ANN v. BOYNE, PAUL, J.
    # Date Time Event Description Status
    1 09/11/2023 2:00PM Resolution Plan Date Proceeding


  • I bet these weirdo black robes go down to visit Paul, like in the movies, and say things like “oh how’s that blog of yours doing now!”
    I’m sure the black robes don’t know how to turn off their abusive use of the law and show the dislike to Paul bringing attention to the corruptness! They want to shut us up! Take away our 1st amendment.

    • A more significant problem:

      Family court judges who wear white aprons and/or red robes with hoods hide that information from the public.

  • “… ‘The question before the Court and you, Gentlemen of the jury, is not of small or private concern. It is not the cause of one poor printer, nor of New York alone, which you are now trying. No! It may in its consequence affect every free man that lives under a British government on the main of America. It is the best cause. It is the cause of liberty,’ Hamilton pleaded.

    Hamilton concluded by making the argument that truth is the best defense against libel. ‘The laws of our country have given us a right to liberty of both exposing and opposing arbitrary power (in these parts of the world at least) by speaking and writing truth.’

    The judge told the jury to ignore most of Hamilton’s statement and to only decide whether or not Zenger printed the statements. After recessing for about 10 minutes, the jury returned with a not guilty verdict, despite the judge’s instructions. …“


    • Were The Fusion Center employees willing and able to sift through the vulgar words and phrases to find the truth about the corruption in Connecticut family courts and elsewhere in America?

      If Fusion Center employees found actionable evidence of corruption in Connecticut family courts, their first, second, third, fourth and fifth obligations are:

      1. To determine Paul’s intent by asking him about his goals.
      2. To secure the lives of ALL citizens, NOT just the emotional well-being of three judges.
      3. To count the victims in Connecticut family courts since 1984.
      4. To contact all victims of family courts to record eyewitness accounts of crimes and corruption in the family courts.
      5. To do their jobs as though they live in a nation called America (not the USSR under Stalin and not China under Mao).

  • “… 229.00 09/20/2010 P AGREEMENT
    RESULT: Order 9/20/2010 HON HARRY CALMAR
    230.00 07/13/2023 P MOTION FOR CONTEMPT
    230.50 07/27/2023 C ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE This motion, document or order was filed 14 days ago.
    231.00 07/24/2023 P MOTION FOR ORDER OF NOTICE
    231.10 07/27/2023 C ORDER OF NOTICE This motion, document or order was filed 14 days ago. …”


    • All on 7/13/23: Paul’s former wife files motion for contempt; The Court files a motion to show cause; The Court files an order of notice

      7/21/23: Judge Rodriguez and Judge Nieves denied Ambrose’s motion for restraining order against Karen Riordan

      New Haven State’s Attorney Office published press release re: Paul’s arrest

      CT Court Superior Judge Thomas J. O’Neill issues restraining order against Karen Riordan

      • Anyone know anything about Paul’s former wife’s motion for contempt; the Court’s motion to show cause; and, the Court’s order of notice — all filed on 7/13/23?

        Under which circumstances would a Connecticut family court respond to a party’s motion on the same day with the Court’s motion to show cause and an order of notice?

      • I think you’re right. The judicial branch website says, the Paul J. Boyne divorce case opened in 2006.

        This article says Paul’s divorce case opened in 2007.

        If Paul J. Boyne’s case opened in 2006 and is listed on the state judicial website, where are the case details for Paul A. Boyne’s divorce case? When were Paul A. Boyne’s case details removed from the state judicial website? Was that removal of the case details in error, for a good reason or spoliation?

        “… Paul Boyne, a Connecticut father of four, says the CJE’s ruling comes too late for his children, who he says have not been allowed to visit him in years. Boyne says that since his divorce case opened in 2007, the custody case has remained open due to the fact that the judges who currently serve as corporate directors for the vendor refuse to establish a custody or visitation schedule.

        These same judges have ordered his family to patronize various vendor affiliated services from Dr. Sidney Horowitz, who does not have a State contract to provide therapeutic services on behalf of the Judicial Branch. Court transcripts show that in July 2012, Judge Holly Abery Wetstone recused herself from hearing the Boyne matter, then authorized payments from the Judicial Branch to an unnamed vendor, despite the fact that there were no motions for fees pending before her to rule on at that time.

        Judicial Branch billing records are kept separately from the court case filed in the Court’s administrative offices, and parties who wish to see the invoices submitted by professionals appointed to their cases are required to request them under the State’s open records laws. The heavily redacted records Boyne obtained from the Judicial Branch show that Horowitz had billed over $4,200 to the state on the Boyne case, however, Boyne and his ex-wife’s attorney confirm that Horowitz did not provide them with copies, nor did the Judicial Branch seek their approval for the charges Horowitz submitted.

        Boyne says that Horowitz failed to provide all the services and reports outlined in the court order, then recused himself from his appointment to the Boyne case in May 2012. Yet in fall 2012, Judge Lynda B. Munro and Judicial Branch Manager Mary Kay West administratively authorized payments to Horowitz at more than twice the state rate, even though no court order on record had approved the payments. ..”

  • Did Mr. Moukawsher or someone else arrange for Paul to be placed in a “Fusion Center”? 🧐 says:

    “… For almost two decades, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has supported the development of a national network of 80 fusion centers. Operated by states and localities, fusion centers incorporate federal, state, and local law enforcement personnel, first responders, and select private-sector representatives to collect, analyze, and distribute intelligence. While the federal government initially promoted them as hubs for sharing counterterrorism information, fusion centers quickly expanded their missions to include any crimes or hazards.

    DHS provides these centers with funding, personnel, and access to federal intelligence, but it has failed to ensure that they have used these resources appropriately. As a result, fusion centers have long produced flawed analysis, abused their authorities to monitor people engaged in First Amendment–protected activities, and leaked sensitive law enforcement information. This domestic intelligence model has undermined Americans’ privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties. …”


    • “… Fusion centers are meant to serve as hubs of intelligence to flow between federal government, private sector, state, local, tribal and territorial partners. However, in a recent investigation, the Brennan Center for Justice uncovered not only flawed analyses from the centers but also abuses of their authority and instances of the surveillance of people engaged in First Amendment-protected activities. Under the guise of counterterrorism, they have historically targeted American Muslims and claimed that activists are threats. …”



      CTIC is the designated fusion center for the State of Connecticut and is one of 80 fusion centers in the country. Fusion centers were developed after September 11, 2001 in an effort to increase collaboration and information sharing between all levels of government. Fusion centers serve as the focal point for the receipt, analysis, and sharing of threat-related information between State, Local, Tribal and Territorial (SLTT), federal, and private sector entities. CTIC currently has representatives from the following organizations assigned to the unit which include, however, is not limited to:

      Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
      Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)
      Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
      High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area program (HIDTA)
      Connecticut National Guard
      Connecticut Department of Correction
      Connecticut Judicial Branch 👈
      Connecticut State Police
      Several Local Law Enforcement Agencies
      Fire/EMS …”


    • “… Cybercrimes are criminal offenses committed on the internet or by means of computer technology. The Connecticut Intelligence Center (CTIC) works to protect entities in the State of Connecticut from cyber-attacks by providing tactical intelligence that can be used to detect malicious behavior and by providing strategic intelligence aimed at reducing potential vulnerability. The Connecticut State Police (CSP) Cyber Crimes Investigation Unit also assists is the investigation of cybercrimes in Connecticut. The goal of this unit is to create a dedicated entity within CSP that is responsible for investigating and pursuing the perpetrators of cyber crime. Furthermore, the Cybersecurity Committee Working Group, which includes representatives from state, local, and federal agencies and private sector partners, was established from the DEMHS Advisory Council to help address cybersecurity concerns in Connecticut. …”

      “… Beyond serving as a focal point for information sharing, fusion centers add significant value to their customers by providing a state and local context to help enhance the national threat picture. Fusion centers provide the federal government with critical state and local information and subject matter expertise that it did not receive in the past – enabling the effective communication of locally generated threat‐related information to the federal government. Integrating and connecting these state and local resources creates a national capacity to gather, process, analyze, and share information in support of efforts to protect the country …”

  • “Section 1-215 requires law enforcement agencies to disclose:
    (1) blotter information – name, race and address of the person arrested, the date,
    time, and place of arrest, and the offense for which the person was arrested;
    (2) i) In the case of an arrest by warrant which has not been judicially sealed: the arrest warrant application, including the affidavits in support thereof.
    ii) In the case of a warrantless arrest: the official arrest, incident or similar report. iii) In the case where the court has ordered an affidavit or report sealed in whole
    or in part:
    a. the portion of the affidavit or report that has not been sealed,
    if applicable and
    b. a report summarizing the circumstances that led to the arrest of the person in a manner that does not violate the court sealing order.
    * The only redactions permitted in this area are:
    (1) the identity of witnesses and
    (2) specific information about the commission of the crime, the disclosure of which law enforcement reasonably believes may prejudice the pending prosecution or a prospective law enforcement action. For example, information only the perpetrator of the crime would know.

     Public Records Documenting or Depicting the Arrest or Custody of the Arrested Person – such as dash camera and body camera images – must be disclosed during the period in which the prosecution is pending unless they are otherwise subject to an applicable exemption.
     Notice to State’s Attorney:
     Law enforcement agencies must provide notice to the local state’s attorney when they receive requests for records documenting or depicting the arrest or custody of an arrested person.
     This notice requirement does not give the state’s attorneys the power to prohibit or delay a law enforcement agency from disclosing a record.
     Opportunity to Intervene:
     The State’s Attorney’s office will have an opportunity to intervene in Freedom of Information Commission proceedings regarding requests for records documenting or depicting the arrest or custody of the arrested person.
     Finite Time Period:
     Section 1-215 applies only to a finite time period: beginning with an arrest and until a prosecution or prospective criminal law enforcement action is no longer pending against the person arrested.
     After that time, the FOI Act’s general rule applies, that all public records must be disclosed unless subject to an exemption contained in any provision of the general statutes.“


    • That would be a ridiculously horrible thing to do.

      Most inmates there would have no idea why he wrote what he wrote.

      They have no idea who Ted Taupier is. They have no idea that the Connecticut Supreme Court jailed Ted for emailing satire to his friends.

      Paul’s over-the-top-to-the-point-of-absurdity blog to prove his point about free speech would be totally misunderstood by that already politically vulnerable population.

      It would probably start a race riot — good for those who profit from conflict. Horrible for the rest of the world.

      • I see….so Paul only stands behind his right to free speech in anonymous cowardice. I hope he gets his evil ass kicked in jail. You have to do some serious mental gymnastics to categorize anything he writes as satire. It’s hate speech, plains and simple. Hate speech is free speech, but it’s not a free pass for stalking and harassment. The first amendment also won’t protect you from a much-deserved punch in the face in jail. That’s me just exercising.my right to free speech. It’s satire, get it?

        • Are you writing to be clever, to be cruel or to prove a few good points?
          If you’re proving a few points, what’s the basis of the debate?

          The corruption that poisons Connecticut Family Courts?
          The father in a family court case who went to prison for venting in an email?
          The other father who went to prison for sounding the alarm about the crimes and cover-ups?

          Your hopes, dreams and descriptors tell us nothing about causes and less about solutions.

          What started all of what happened? Do you know where it all began?

      • Why shouldn’t I send the blog posts to his jailmates?
        Are you trying to suppress my right to free speech???

          • @6:03: I don’t care if Boyne feels he unjustly lost custody. Even if it was unjust (which I HIGHLY doubt given what a psychotic whackjob he is) that is no excuse for spreading hate and trying to turn people against Jewish people and blame them for everything. It’s also no excuse for a years-long campaign of cyberstalking and harassment against anyone he decides to target. And it’s not an excuse for taking advantage of vulnerable parents in the middle of custody battles, twisting their minds about an imagined grand Jewish conspiracy against them and destroying their changes of getting custody with his idiotic advice and nonstop motions he files on their behalf. The man is evil. I’m sure his anger is more about not being able to control his ex-wife than it ever was about being involved in his children’s lives. If he was in their lives, let’s face it, he would have been a terrible influence.

          • Anonymous August 8, 2023 at 12:54 pm wrote:

            “@6:03: I don’t care if Boyne feels he unjustly lost custody.”

            Do you care that ALL of this is ALL about the crimes judges, lawyers and private vendors committed in family court?

            “Even if it was unjust (which I HIGHLY doubt given what a psychotic whackjob he is) that is no excuse for spreading hate and trying to turn people against Jewish people and blame them for everything.”

            It WAS unjust. It’s about the crimes judges, lawyers and private vendors committed in family court.

            “It’s also no excuse for a years-long campaign of cyberstalking and harassment against anyone he decides to target.”

            Those judges, lawyers and private vendors who committed crimes in his family court case have committed those same crimes for the past forty years. How would YOU address their crimes when state law enforcement have ignored those crimes for the past forty years?

            “And it’s not an excuse for taking advantage of vulnerable parents in the middle of custody battles, twisting their minds about an imagined grand Jewish conspiracy against them and destroying their changes of getting custody with his idiotic advice and nonstop motions he files on their behalf.“

            The same judges, lawyers and private vendors who committed crimes in his family court case committed those same crimes for the past forty years against tens of thousands of vulnerable parents and children. Many of the judges, lawyers and private vendors who committed crimes in family court are Jewish. Maybe some are actually prejudiced. Some Jewish people actually consider everyone who isn’t Jewish to be an unreliable witness. Maybe everyone of every religion, color and gender who witnessed the crimes of those judges, lawyers and private vendors hasn’t been willing or able to stop the crimes. Maybe Paul was upset about everyone doing nothing to appropriately address the crimes committed. Maybe Paul’s theory is: everyone of every religion, color and gender is to blame, so everyone is fair game for the satire.

            “The man is evil.”

            I don’t know Paul. Never met him. Never spoke with him. I think Paul is probably a hero.

            The crimes some of those judges, lawyers and private vendors commit are probably more evil than you could ever imagine.

            “I’m sure his anger is more about not being able to control his ex-wife than it ever was about being involved in his children’s lives.

            Whatever. You clearly have no idea what any of this is about.

            “If he was in their lives, let’s face it, he would have been a terrible influence.”

            Go tell the judges, lawyers, evaluators — and state officials — who took those tens of thousands of dollars from Paul and his family to give back all that money they took from them plus a hundred times that amount for all the crimes committed against that family and for all the damage done.

            Then check in with them a year later to see what kind of influence that has.

          • I have seen zero evidence of crimes committed in the Connecticut Family Court. Just a bunch of insane conspiracy theories. And guess what? Even if there were crimes in court, that doesn’t make Paul a hero because he mostly focuses his virulent antisemitism on lawyers and judges. And he also attacks their innocent spouses and children. He also attacks private individuals involved in custody disputes.

            “Maybe Paul’s theory is: everyone of every religion, color and gender is to blame, so everyone is fair game for the satire.”

            No, actually he only targets Jews, Blacks, Asians, women, and gays. In other words, only people who aren’t like him. He’s an evil hateful bigot.

            You clearly are also a racist antisemite yourself. What are you doing posting here? Shouldn’t you be ironing your bedsheet for the next klan meeting?

          • If you’ve seen zero evidence of crimes committed in the Connecticut Family Court, count yourself among the fortunate.

            Connecticut family courts are hell.

          • 10:59 pm:

            Paul lampooned every color, creed, gender, religion, body weight, facial feature, breathing habit and personal preference.

            Most people all over the world do the same to varying degrees, with different styles and intent throughout the day and night.

            “What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.”

      • “Most people all over the world do the same to varying degrees, with different styles and intent throughout the day and night.”

        Speak for yourself. I don’t sit around calling people racist slurs all day and night.

        How is calling someone a racist slur “lampooning”? You are nuts. and clearly racist.

        But the issue here is not the racist language anyway, as disgusting as it is, it’s the stalking and harassment. I hope he gets at least a year in prison. That will give plenty of time to distribute his works to his fellow prisoners.

  • I’d like to see Paul talk to his new jail mates the way he talks to people who are different from him in his blog. But I’m sure he’ll fit in perfectly with the white supremecist prison gang. This is your hero, people?

    • Like MSM would write about the CT Family Court corruptness!!!!!! Go through the system and you will be very familiar especially if it becomes contentious! Do not be so blind! Maybe you work for the courts and state.

      • Yeah okay. So if I hate bigotry, racism, antisemitism, cyberstalking, harrassment…that means I must work for the courts and state? You’re 100% wrong.

        • Look at the result yesterday! I do not know you and you do not know me! Just have an open mind and see that he brought the spotlight on to the corruptness that all were ignoring! Maybe method outside the lines! Maybe he knew where it would lead! Go check out family court for yourself!

          • Pail brought a spotlight? I only read about this b.s. here. Are you Paul’s mother or something? you are giving him way too much credit.

  • “Search for an inmate’s location and release date if they are incarcerated and under the custody of the Virginia Department of Corrections (VADOC). Inmates who are not under VADOC custody will not appear in the search results.

    For all searches, you will be required to enter:
    At least the first letter of the inmate’s first name AND their full last name
    The inmate’s seven-digit Inmate ID # …”


    • Which people of how many religions in what kind of government allow such blatant family court corruption?

      Topics (not targets) …

      Caroline, Queen, consort of George IV, King of Great Britain, 1768-1821
      Frederick Augustus, Duke of York and Albany, 1763-1827
      George IV, King of Great Britain, 1762-1830
      Jersey, Frances Villiers, Countes
      Jersey, George Bussey Villiers, Earl of, 1735-1805

      “Enchantments lately seen upon the mountains of Wales, or, Shon-ap-Morgan’s reconcilement to the fairy princess …

      On a small plateau on the top of a mountain the Princess of Wales (left) reaches up to kiss the Prince of Wales (right), who has the body, horns, and beard of a fat goat. He kneels on one knee, his forelegs round her waist; her arms are round his neck. A star and ribbon are indicated on his body. She wears her coronet with three tall feathers, and her draperies swirl about her. In the middle distance are two rocky pinnacles; on one (left) three men dance hand in hand … British Museum online catalogue.”

      “A star and ribbon are indicated on his body.”
      Is it the star of Anu?

      James Gillray must have known something about the star of Anu and Phrygian hats.


      From Walter Veith’s lecture,The Herodian Mind

      1:46:06 … “It is war, from the beginning. ‘And, I will put enmity …’. This war hasn’t stopped. But I have good news for you. It’s coming to a head.

      This is the Black Oblisk of Shalmaneser III showing Jehu paying tribute. … This was a Prince of Israel … So this man Jehu, who was ruling and who was king in Israel, was only ruling as king subject to whom? … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehu

      Now, if you take Shalmaneser down the line of history, you go through the Babylonian kings … the same authority stayed with them, then the Medo-Persians then the Greeks then the Romans … they all followed the same line and anybody who rules and wields the sword must be subject to the king of Babylon. Now, there’s something else that’s fascinating about this. You can’t see the whole of it here but there’s a little bit more in this reconstruction. They’re all wearing cute little hats. Jehu’s wearing one – – there it is – – and those carrying the tribute are also wearing some, can you see that?

      What is also interesting is that these people have beards Jehu has a beard. And these have beards. But these two servants of Shalmaneser – – and that one – – don’t have beards. What does that tell you? They were eunuchs in the court of the King. And because they have those little – – this little funny little hat, if you take this hat through – – all the way through history it has a connotation with the god Mithraism. Mithra – – but Mithras is just a further continuance of the sun god — and in a sense, later it became the Phrygian cap and it became the cap of the revolution in France, where freedom was given to the citizens.

      So, the hat – – the Phrygian hat – – is a symbol of subservience to the Sun God, but, it is also a symbol of being a free man. And as a free man, you could procreate. You weren’t castrated. You could procreate and you could rule and you could be free on one condition. And that was?

      You can only be free and a free man if you are subject to the ruler who has the sign and the mark of Anu …”


      “The Annu People.—Besides these types, belonging to the north and east, there is the aboriginal race of the Anu, or Aunu, people (written with three pillars), who became a part of the historic inhabitants.”


      “… And they brought the sacred pillars out of the temple of Baal and burned them. Then they broke down the sacred pillar of Baal, and tore down the temple of Baal and made it a refuse dump to this day. Thus Jehu destroyed Baal from Israel. However Jehu did not turn away from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who had made Israel sin, that is, from the golden calves that were at Bethel and Dan. And the Lord said to Jehu, “Because you have done well in doing what is right in My sight, and have done to the house of Ahab all that was in My heart, your sons shall sit on the throne of Israel to the fourth generation.” But Jehu took no heed to walk in the law of the Lord God of Israel with all his heart; for he did not depart from the sins of Jeroboam, who had made Israel sin.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeroboam


      “Address at the Mithras Lodge of Sorrow, Washington, November, 10, 1881 : in memory of James A. Garfield
      by Loring, George Bailey, 1817-1891

      … I need not remind you that in all his life he accepted the emblems of our order, significant of deep religion, high morality and well organized and well rewarded toil — of faithful labor and just compensation — of strength of purpose, rectitude, equality, brotherly love — the keystone of the arch, the plumb, the level, the trowel — the pot of incense as the emblem of a pure heart. As we plant the rosemary and the cassia on his grave, we may thank God for the rich record he has given us, and for the example he has left to all who would serve their country faithfully and bravely, and in accordance with the best doctrines upon which the American people can develop and perpetuate the Government bequeathed to them by the fathers.” https://archive.org/details/addressatmithras02lori/page/n12/mode/1up


      Who bequeathed what kind of government to whom?

  • These AFCC idiots in Connecticut are using the access and visitation grant. The Daddy says he’s innocent. Runs to family relations and ask for an application. Friends of the court reimburses them for the custody evaluators and the therapy. Originally back in Paul’s days the courts were not running 100 percent on the fatherhood funding. Besides Gus’s cases and the Manchester dad. How many Daddy stories have been told on here. These AFCC know all about the federal funding. I’m wondering if the FBI is looking at Paul’s stuff? Cause it was pretty spot on. Maybe he can flip to an informant? The AFCC is just a part of it. Connecticut custody for sale. Just get a grant. It’s not based on income. The federal government could be paying for Chris Ambrose’s all over the country. We need grants for towels in Madison Connecticut.

    • How do you know the Family Relations offices offer “access and visitation” grant applications?

      What does “friends of the court reimburses them for the custody evaluators and the therapy” look like in real life?

      Which “friends of the court”? What kind of reimbursement?

      Can you explain the federal funding process?

      Does all of that cash go through the Connecticut Support Services Division?

      Does “AFCC, Inc.” still take state and federal funds?

      🕵️‍♂️: “What message did Stephen Grant’s secret hand signals send to whom during that meeting in the state capitol?”

      And, what kind of sign language was that?

  • Mr. Adelman didn’t mention AFCC Inc. at the Connecticut Judiciary Committee Hearing on February 23, 2009.

    What’s the timeline of Mr. Adelman’s involvement with the AFCC Inc business network?

    At some point, he was the “Director”.

    “… REP. GONZALEZ: What kind of practice do you have, you know, what kind of training do you bring to the bench?

    GERARD ADELMAN: Well, I — I have 26 years of practice as an attorney, as I indicated in my opening statement, with a wide variety of legal activities. I have — I worked as a schoolteacher for 12 years with — with eighth grade — eighth grade students. I never knew anybody different, but every — every other teacher told me eighth grade was the worst ones to have. But I —

    REP. GONZALEZ: Okay.

    GERARD ADELMAN: I did that fine; I liked that.

    I’ve — I’ve had other jobs over the years. I have wide experience in — in different, you know, different fields. I’ve — I’ve been a father and now I’m a grandfather. I think I’ve — I’ve served in a variety of committees and — and social service agencies. I’ve been a Rotarian for over 25 years. I’ve — I’ve been a — on — on the Board of Education in my town for eight years. And I — I think I have the experience of my age and — and the experience of my lifetime to help me act as a Superior Court Judge.

    REP. GONZALEZ: Rumors in the Judicial Department is that the administration, you know, they said that a lot of times they control judges. And what do you feel about that, you know, knowing that if you did — if you don’t agree with the administration, you might, you know, they might come after you or whatever, you know, retaliation? What do you say about that?

    GERARD ADELMAN: Well, not having been part of the judicial system before, I — I’ve never heard that. And I — so I — I’m really not sure that I could comment on that in an —

    REP. GONZALEZ: Okay, my —

    GERARD ADELMAN: — effective way.

    REP. GONZALEZ: My question is: Let’s say that you made a decision, and somebody in the administration said, Well, that’s not the right decision and we don’t want you to go that way. And after you made a decision but they come after saying, Sorry, but we don’t — we don’t like that, what you will — you will stick to your decision or you will go with them because they are the administration?

    GERARD ADELMAN: No, I think that, you know, if I am lucky enough to be confirmed, I’ll take an oath to obey the Constitution of this state and the United States, and I — I — I will be an independent jurist. I — I can’t imagine that I would — that anybody could give me enough pressure to make me change a — a — a position that I’ve taking publicly and — and then made a decision.

    REP. GONZALEZ: Thank you.

    GERARD ADELMAN: Thank you, Representative. …”


    “… According to William Silk, a staff attorney for the Connecticut Secretary of State’s office explained that in most cases, the Connecticut Nonstock Corporations Act requires all nonprofit businesses to file registration documents with his office, the IRS, and the Attorney General’s Office before conducting business in the state.

    Documents obtained from Silk’s office show that Jessica Pearson, Ann Milne, and Frank Orlando (a Florida judge) first registered the AFCC with the Connecticut Secretary of State in 1982 while Pearson was under contract to set up the court’s mediation services.

    However, the AFCC has not been registered to do business in Connecticut because in 1985, its application was withdrawn by then AFCC president and Judicial Branch manager Anthony Salius. The IRS’s website does not list the Connecticut AFCC as an approved charity.

    But Judicial Branch employees may also be facing bigger problems from the CJE [Committee for Judicial Ethics], who recently decided that it would also be a violation of canon for family court judges to join the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, an organization similar to AFCC. Documents obtained from the State of Illinois and both these organizations show the AAML and AFCC are cross affiliated through founding officials and current members. The AFCC is also cross-affiliated with pedophile friendly militant fathers rights groups, such as the Children’s Rights Council.

    According to their websites and newsletters, these organizations promote and operate various policy driven projects, such as crafting legislation and industry guidelines, lobbying, and training court industry officials. According to documents obtained from the IRS, various Secretary of State’s offices, and a 2002 report released by the California Chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW), the AFCC has a checkered past with authorities, and their right to do business in California, Florida, and Kansas has been revoked (and sometimes reinstates) at various times.

    AFCC newsletters state that a Judicial Branch vendor, Pearson and the AFCC set up several demonstration projects family courts around the country, including Connecticut, which were funded by the state, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the U.S. Department of Justice. But Pearson was also a co-founder of another company called the Center for Policy Research, which Pearson admits writes reviews of these same projects for the funding federal agencies.

    Records obtained from the Judicial Branch show that the corporation continued to transact routine business in the State and serve as an often relied upon Judicial Branch vendor well after Salius withdrew their application in 1984.

    Vendor reports show that between 2007 and 2010, the Judicial Branch paid the AFCC over $70,000 for services provided to the family court by Dr. Klein Pruett, her assistants, and the Charter Oak Group.” …

  • If we are like you in the rest, we will
    resemble you in that. If a Jew wrong a Christian,
    what is his humility? Revenge. If a Christian
    wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be by
    Christian example? Why, revenge. The villany you
    teach me, I will execute, and it shall go hard but I
    will better the instruction.


  • “Political satire is satire that specializes in gaining entertainment from politics; it has also been used with subversive intent where political speech and dissent are forbidden by a regime, as a method of advancing political arguments where such arguments are expressly forbidden.“


    • Counsellor O.P, – defender of our Theatric Liberties.; A Calm
      by James Gillray

      Counsellor Clifford outside the new theatre at Covent Garden, which is on fire.

      Clifford versus Brandon
      Verdict by Blunder £5.

      In the Sketch above, we find,
      The Face an index of the mind,
      But this Face and body are
      By nature destin’d for the Bar,
      If in his proper sphere he’d shine
      We recommend th’ Old Bailey-Line!”

      The Crown Court in the Old Bailey hears criminal cases in Central London. As in America, trials are open to the public.

      As in Connecticut, intrigue and politics are not open to the public:

      “Thomas ‘Jupiter’ Harris: Spinning dark intrigue at Covent Garden theatre, 1767-1820

      Thomas Harris (1738-1820). Until now, little has been known about his life. He was most visible as the man who controlled Covent Garden theatre for nearly five decades, one of only two venues in London allowed by law to perform spoken drama.

      Harris presided over one of the most eventful periods in the history of the English stage; uncovering his involvement provides new perspectives upon landmark events in London’s history. But this career was only one of many: he became the confidant of George III, a philanthropist, sexual suspect, and a brothel owner in the underworld of Covent Garden.

      While deeply involved in Pitt the younger’s government, Harris worked as a ‘spin doctor’ to control the release of government news. Only through understanding his career is it possible to appreciate fully the suppression of radicalism in the period. As novelists created elaborate storylines with fictional intriguers lurking in the shadows, Harris was the real thing.

      Harris’s career intersects many of the hidden worlds of the eighteenth century including the art of theatre and theatre management, the activities of the Secret Service, radical protest, and sexual indulgence. This narrative of detection brings together a hoard of newly discovered manuscripts to construct his numerous lives.“

      • “This is the first biography of Thomas Harris: confidant of George III, ‘spin doctor’, philanthropist, sexual suspect, brothel owner, and the man who controlled Covent Garden theatre for nearly five decades. Unlike Garrick, Harris has remained largely in the shadows — seemingly by choice. Warren Oakley drags him out into the light in his notable biography […] Yet, “Jupiter” Harris was perhaps more than just a theatre manager: Oakley has taken considerable pains to unearth the details of his deep involvement, while running Covent Garden with considerable success, in the British Secret Service […] Oakley convincingly shows up a deficiency in the conventional eighteenth-century theatre narrative: the overlooked Harris, when mentioned at all, has usually been cast as a bit part or the villain of the piece.’
        Times Literary Supplement, January 2019

  • … “Everyone in Westchester is talking about Kassenoff, ” said a White Plains-based attorney. “We’re all in shock.”

    The Post spoke to several defendants in custody battles playing out in the Westchester court system, which one mother, currently mired in a protracted divorce, called “corrupt.” A campaigner said the court system was used to perpetuate “abuse” by monied spouses.

    Many spoke of a court system dominated by forensic custody evaluators, who often favor the wealthier parent in bitter custody battles. ..”


    • Will The New York Post tell the public about Connecticut AFCC Inc perversions, fraud and racketeering? says:

      … 18 U.S. Code § 1346 – Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”
      U.S. Code

      For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services …

    • So still no death certificate? Cathy’s getting so desperate she’s now linking her old stories in the comments.

  • Is Paul fighting extradition? Is a court date set?

    The most recent mainstream news articles were 8 days ago …

    • “by any means necessary” = the most horrific damage they do doesn’t matter

      How many major cases did Norm Pattis set to win and lose for politically strategic court precedents?

      Here’s another:

      “ORDER 434447

      No Counsel Present. No Parties Present.

      The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby: ORDER: GRANTED

      Having disbarred Nickola Cunha, the Court is required by Practice Book §2-64 “to take such action as seems indicated to protect the interest of the attorney’s clients.”

      This grants the court jurisdiction to protect clients by making sure monies that may be due to them are collected under the protection of the trustee and disbursed in accordance with law.

      While Ms. Cunha disputes the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, relying on D’Attilo v. Statewide Grievance Committee, 329 Conn. 624 (2018) her reliance is mistaken. That case only held that grievance matters are between the committee and the lawyer and that the court has no jurisdiction to hear a claim that the court should intervene in a grievance proceeding, undo some of its conclusions, and act in a way more satisfying to the lawyer’s dissatisfied former clients. Id. at 625-32. The two situations are entirely dissimilar. In this case, the court is required to take steps. In the D’Attilo case the parties were specifically not entitled to take steps.

      John and Lim Skura claim they are owed money regarding a claim involving State Farm Insurance. State Farm Insurance claims it has money that both the Skuras and Ms. Cunha claims. State Farm wishes to pay the money to the trustee and the Skuras ask to intervene to make a claim on this money adverse to Ms. Cunha’s claim.

      The court grants the requests. No later than July 3, 2023, State Farm will pay to the trustee in this matter the sums it claims are disputed. The court grants John and Lim Skura status as intervening parties in this matter for the sole purpose of asserting their claim to money held by the trustee. The court finds from their statements, their motion, and Ms. Cunha’s statements that they have a genuine dispute over their entitlement to this money and that this money is under the jurisdiction of the court.

      This matter will be an adjunct to the process of protecting the interests of Ms. Cunha’s former clients. It is not a separate proceeding. Any judgment related to what to do with the funds held by the trustee will supplement the prior court judgment and be subject to the same rights of appeal as any other judgment.

      Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order.


      “… ORDER 434447

      All Counsel Present.

      The following order is entered in the above matter:

      Ms. Cunha must produce any additional exhibits no later than July 28, 2023. Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order. 434447




      No Counsel Present. No Parties Present.


      7/26/2023 ORDER 434447
      The following order is entered in the above matter:

      The hearing that commenced on 7/21/2023 will resume on 8/7/2023 at 9:15 A.M. for the purpose of closing arguments.

      Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order. 434447



      Too often, those in full control communities, states or nations allow only their own opinions to be shared in public.

      Now that Paul Boyne isn’t allowed to satirize the outcome of that next hearing from prison, Paul’s political theater should remind us of the importance of freedom of speech two thousand years ago, when a different and totally unoffensive Paul was also jailed for criticizing the same kind of unbelievers who controlled this same world back then.

      • The first Christians were Jews.
        The Herodian dynasty was of Edomite descent.

        • “In his first talk at the Sovereign Nations Mere Simulacrity conference in Phoenix, Arizona, in December 2022, James Lindsay introduced the idea that there is a long, running current of “Secret Religions” in the West.

          These are the Modern and Postmodern manifestations of the Esoteric Religions like Gnosticism and Hermeticism as they developed through what we might consider the Middle Age’s “New Age” period, famously codified by G.W.F. Hegel.

          In the second lecture in his “Secret Religions of the West” series, Lindsay explains that these “philosophies,” including Marxism, are actually mystical Esoteric cult religions posing as science, economics, and politics, and that their success in infiltrating our religions, societies, and institutions is down to their intrinsically parasitical nature.”


          • Does that explain in part the motives and goals of parasitical “family courts”? A few well-funded political groups — Marxists, for example — do want to destroy families.

            So, who funded and orchestrated the devastation done to so many families for the past several decades? AFCC Inc’s for-profit private partnership extracted billions and maybe trillions from families in “family courts” around the world.

            AFCC Inc. pro-pedophile vendors destroy children, families and traditional cultures — and, the political and cultural agenda in “family courts” mimics the agenda seen in public schools.

            What’s practiced in “family courts” isn’t law. It’s a political/cultural coup.

      • Another hearing was held today to try to crush Attorney Cunha for speaking up about the corruption in Connecticut family courts. The judicial branch encouraged her former clients to crush her, too. Her case is political persecution. The message: any other attorneys who also notice the perverts in control of the family courts will be equally crushed. The same dynamic in public schools, the entertainment industry, the corporate world and politics means: Anyone speaking out against sick trends will be silenced one way or another.

  • “What’s life like as a judge? Well, there are a lot of adjustments to make.
The biggest adjustment is you have to learn to keep your mouth shut.”

    (laughter from the audience)

    “You can’t talk in public about issues of general interest. You can’t make political donations – – maybe that’s a good thing. ‘Sorry. You know, I’m a judge can’t do that. Go see my wife.’ …”

    (more laughter from the audience)

    “You can’t put signs up in the yard. You can’t write letters to the editor …”

    (Note 👉 You CAN be the Director of the Connecticut Chapter of AFCC Inc. from 2013 to 2015 without being investigated or prosecuted. Before, during and after that, you CAN send lucrative family court cases to your corporation’s Treasurer, your corporation’s Secretary and other members of your corporation for twenty years without registering as a corporation and without paying taxes on earnings. Your corporation’s Treasurer CAN testify at a public hearing against medical insurance company oversight for the family court evaluator industry. And, the state of Connecticut and the federal government CAN fund your private business AND ALSO fund your corporation.)

    Mr. Adelman’s long history of breaking countless state and federal laws while everyone in authority looked the other way, make the following lines not funny, at all.

    “You know, I was in private practice, you know for about 30 years. So that meant that every day I’d be around town and court. I mean, I knew everybody. I knew the judge, the judges – – I also knew the fire chief and chief of police and the mayor and so on …”

    • Mr. Adelman tells the audience he has a Master’s Degree in American History. He says he was admitted in 1982 to the Connecticut Bar — and the Federal Bar, too. It doesn’t make any sense that he doesn’t know why Connecticut hasn’t used the Grand Jury system except “one time in the last thirty years”.

      Mr. Adelman says he was there at the Senior Center with his “wife and her two friends”. Was it that he, his wife and her two friends didn’t want to talk about Connecticut Grand Juries?

      If so, could a Connecticut Grand Jury be the best way to address “CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC”?
      G. ADELMAN: … so that’s my schpeel and I’ll be happy to answer any questions you might have.

      MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE: You’re doing a good job.

      G. ADELMAN: Thank you. Yes ma’am. (pointing)

      MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE: One thing that you didn’t address was the Grand Jury, which I served on once but I lived in Rhode Island at the time. Does Connecticut have a Grand Jury program as well?

      G. ADELMAN: We do, but it’s rarely used.


      G. ADELMAN: Very rarely used. (nodding, dismissively)


      G. ADELMAN: I can’t think of – – I can only think of one time in the last thirty years (he lowers his voice) that I’ve heard about.

      MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE: Rhode Island uses it – – I – – regularly …

      G. ADELMAN: Yeah, New York uses it – – you know. (nodding, dismissively)

      ANOTHER MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE: Why isn’t it used?

      (At the 5:39 minute mark, the video recording device gets jostled around a bit. A ring or some small metal object of some kind taps the recording device quickly four times — as though whoever’s holding the camera is trying to attract Mr. Adelman’s attention.)

      G. ADELMAN: Uh, I actually don’t know. That’s a – – (chuckles) you know, my time in criminal law I did in 2010.

      (He smiles a wide smile and turns away from the two women who asked those questions. He looks happy and relieved to not have to discuss Grand Juries in Connecticut. Lightly brushing a few fingers across his closed lips, then stroking his beard, he looks like he’s sending a subtle message to whoever’s filming as if to say, “Ha ha – – I got this!”)

      Casually pointing at someone else, he’s in full control again without missing a beat. How funny he must have thought that inside joke would be.

    • Question: “Why are the Supreme Court judges appointed for life …”

      Answer: “Well, that’s how our Constitution was written. Um, and, uh you know, there’s a bunch of articles that were written by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison and the framers of the Constitution called The Federalist Papers where they talk about different aspects. And in reality, the reason they wanted them to have lifetime appointment was so they would not be – – you know – – prone to public opinion. You know, they can’t lose their job unless they’re impeached — and you know, that’s a hard concept …

      … you know, I could talk to you about the dog, you know – – the abusing animals. You know – – I had a – – I had a. – – I’ll tell ya, I had a judge come to me the other day who was getting ready to do a hearing where she might have to uh, incarcerate this woman who was just absolutely refusing to give the father any – – his access to the children. … And she said to me well, you know I’m up for reappointment in two years. I’m not sure I’d want to have that kind of controversial case. So she – – I mean, she was really concerned about the public opinion.

      To her credit she – – I said, ‘Well I’ll do it for you.’ She said, ‘Would you?’ I said, ‘Yeah.’ So then she called me about a half hour later and said, “You know, no, no. That’s not right. I’m gonna do it myself. I can’t be a judge and worry about what people think.

      So she did the right thing. But you know, public opinion is strong …

      • Did Mr. Adelman happily offer to incarcerate a mother in another judge’s family court case? 🤔

        If that’s an actual Connecticut family court case, can we find that case and know more about the details of that case?

  • … The warrant authorized a search for evidence of threatening or intimidating electronic communications at the request of detectives in Connecticut after years of alleged hateful Internet messaging targeting judges.

    July 05, 2022 •  Edmund H. Mahony, Hartford Courant

    (TNS) — In a case with free speech implications …

  • Hi Frank, I am someone that has some intelligence and want to bring up interesting conclusion. As many of us get divorced today and have the experience of going to family court you kind of meet others that had similar experiences. In one of my discussions i concluded that some lawyers, finch, get favorable treatment in court and with decisions with certain judges, name starts with the letter “G”, because named lawyer firm provides the GAL’s. I am sure if someone did some research, they would conclude that an “odor” exists!!!!! Maybe an investigative reporter would like to look into this?

  • According to the AFCC website: “The Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) took root in California in the spring of 1963 … California has become a model for conciliation services as a part of the judicial function for other states to emulate and each year we find jurisdictions creating such services … Family Court Review … is read by thousands of subscribers around the world in countries including Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Meanwhile, AFCC has grown from a handful of California counselors and judges to an international association of judges, lawyers, mediators, custody evaluators, parenting coordinators, parent educators, court administrators, counselors, researchers, academics, and other professionals dedicated to the resolution of family conflict … as an agent of change and a catalyst for the needs of families, and especially children, in conflict.”

    Especially in conflict? What kind of conflict does AFCC Inc know how to resolve? Which politics and which morals inform AFCC-style “conciliation” in America’s family court child custody cases? Who gets richer and who gets poorer from AFCC Inc family court “services”?

    And, how did AFCC Inc networks astroturf across the world so quickly?

    Did legislatures in Connecticut and California also give up their authority for oversight of family courts? Did that giving up of oversight happen after Jessica Pearson’s HHS-funded experiments and surveys made way for AFCC Inc’s for-profit public-private networks in California, Minnesota and Connecticut? 🤔

    According to one former member of the Minnesota House of Representatives, “… It was in the early 70s that the legislature gave up their authority for oversight over the judiciary. …”

  • “Hello, my name is Kathleen Raskin, and I’d like to share my family’s story about corruption in Alabama’s DHR and court system. My sister spent years raising a foster child who was then removed from my family by the court system despite the fact that we were on the right side of the law and had a court order to return her to us. The child was returned to a home in which she was abused, and because of this I became determined to fight stop DHR corruption.

    The judge involved refused to even hear our case, after I flew over 2,000 miles to be present in the courtroom. Since this child was wrenched away from us and placed directly in harm’s way, I have contacted every media outlet and regulatory agency within my power, and I, Kathy Raskin, won’t stop until these terrible wrongs have been righted to my satisfaction and I am confident this child is safe. The “Good Old Boy” network and the corrupt court system and DHR agency must be stopped, and until they are, this cause will continue to gain momentum.

    These organizations have gotten away with too much, for too long, and it is time for regular people like us to band together to demand a complete overhaul of the system. I, Kathy Raskin, and thousands of other families just like mine have had their lives torn apart by child protective services agencies, along with having our rights violated and having our loved ones put in harm’s way. Whether you are here in Las Vegas or anywhere else in the country, it is time to use your voice to stand up and say, “No more!” to these corrupt judges and social workers.

    Groups like DHR and CPS and the courts have put countless children at risk due to their inexcusably bad decisions, and now it is time for them to be put under the Feds’ microscope and placed under the scrutiny that is required to get them back in line. If you have a story about your family being affected by the incompetence and corruption of these groups, I’d love to hear it. Keep fighting for your rights, and don’t give up until justice is done. Together we will make a difference! Visit me, Kathy Raskin, at StopDHRCorruption.com to join our fight!

    Specializing in:

    Fighting corruption in child protection agencies
    Fighting corruption in courts
    Protecting children
    Protecting families
    Fighting injustice
    Stopping child abuse

    Las Vegas
    Anywhere children and families need protection

    Kathey Raskin”

  • “… GREENWICH – A Greenwich Public Schools investigation obtained on Friday through a Freedom of Information Request clears former Cos Cob School Assistant Principal Jeremy Boland of claims of discriminatory hiring.

    The investigation, which was completed in October 2022, was launched shortly after a video of Boland bragging of discrimination against older workers, Catholics and conservatives was made public. The video, which was released in late August 2022, was the work of Project Veritas, a self-described journalism nonprofit run at the time by James O’Keefe, a conservative political activist.

    The investigation, conducted by the district’s Chief Human Resources Officer Jonathan Budd, is based on four interviews with Boland, 38 interviews of past and present employees involved in the hiring process, and an analysis of emails and documents obtained from Boland, including interview questions for successful hires.

    The report concludes that the district’s investigation “corroborates that Mr. Boland’s statements on the published video were, in fact, inaccurate.”

    In the 12-minute edited video published Aug. 30, 2022, Boland tells an undercover Project Veritas employee that he does not hire Catholic and conservative candidates as “they’re brainwashed,” and said he did not interview candidates over the age of 30 because “the older you get, the more set in your ways, the more conservative you get.”

    But during a Sept. 8, 2022 interview, Boland discounted his taped statements, telling investigators that he had embellished his views to make himself “seem more intelligent, more capable, more of an authority figure” to a woman “…he had met on three occasions through a social media application.

    Boland also claimed that he would have “absolutely no way” of knowing a job candidate’s political leanings or religion through the interview process.

    On Friday, CT Examiner asked Superintendent Toni Jones to explain the scope and the district’s approach to the matter, the choice of Budd to lead the investigation, and whether the district had interviewed job candidates not hired by the district – the alleged victims of discrimination. …”


  • Will Paul’s blog follow the guidelines of political commentary? Judges are and continue to be elected to the bench by political figures in the state of Connecticut. The criticism of the elected judges are a reflection of the political agenda in CT. Would Paul’s blog be considered an editorial of the family court system? Where these judges intimidate? They continue to come to the court house . They continues to rule in favor of the party ? Did the judges receive psychiatric services related to the fear and intimidation? Did there any incurred personal experience related to the fear. Prior to filing and arrest? I would hope evidence beyond the blog would be considered. I would hope a jury would be able to hear the documents in the blog that were used to bring evidence and social awareness to the state run family court. Testimony and hearsay are only part of what a jury may consider. Who in the public defender’s office will be given the task to provide defense for Paul Boyne in the case. How many people will contact the public defender’s office with information to add to Paul’s defense? How much pressure will the public defender’s office have from the state and the people who have been damaged by family court?

  • I think the intention of the cyber stalking is in question. Was the blog ment to intimidate or harass? Was the intention to bring justice and social awareness to what Paul perceived to be crimes against the people he published as victims? Did he use names and addresses to provide the location of individuals who he believe to be engaged in illegal acts? Was his true intentions to bring harm or justice to a system he perceived to be endangering children?

    • He used entirely public information. And his intent is irrelevant when he did not even communication anything TO anyone. You can’t threaten or harass people in their must seek out your words by typing in a url or clicking a link to go find them and offend themselves. He configured bits and bytes on a server somewhere. It doesn’t matter what he said, it’s not a crime.

      • “And his intent is irrelevant when he did not even communication anything TO anyone”

        Dream on. He communicated it to everyone on the Internet. Ted Taupier communicated his threats in a private email group, not directly to the judge, and they locked him up for it. So good luck with your logic-defying theory.

        • Then why are the feds refusing to touch either case, fool?

          In the sandbox of perverts that is CT even the small hat tribe judge had to invent a new imaginary legal standard, found in fn17 of the verdict, where he admits that Taupier did not say or do anything illegal.

          Boyne didn’t either and CT doesn’t control residents of VA. They will have to extradite, which is controlled by federal statutes, in order to give him the rough equivalent treatment there too.

          Meanwhile CT can sit there and cry more that the internet exists and that people outside of their little dungeon of horrors can say things they don’t like.

          • Connecticut is definitely a little dungeon of horrors and the general public has no idea.

          • @10:48pm: It’s a bit too early to conclude the feds aren’t interested in touching Boyne’s case. Feds like to take their sweet time to build their cases. Fool.

          • Foolish Nelly, the documents show that they declined to file charges and told CT that it’s not a criminal matter, both Taupier and Boyne cases. I don’t think 10 years of this is too early to conclude what they already said plainly, but do keep making yourself look like an idiot…

        • Posting online is not considered communication according to very clear and explicit caselaw on this subject. It just sits there, unread and unknown, all alone in the void of non-space. It doesn’t magically render on people’s computer screens by itself. It doesn’t knock on anyone’s door, or ring them up, or deposit a letter in their mailbox. When someone has to take action in order to read something online, they have done to themselves whatever sad feels they get about it because they sought it out.

          • You are so wrong. Say if I post a clear and specific threat to the president on my own obscure blog, if someone tips off the feds to it, you better be damn sure they’ll be knocking on my door. Or say if it’s a threat to a private citizen, The local cops will be talking to me.

            you live in a dream land of wishful thinking where common sense doesn’t apply. Fool.

          • What if they didn’t seek it out but a friend or relative saw it and brought it to their attention? Get a clue.

          • Then their friend or relative communicated to them, dummy. If they then clicked a link or typed in a url to see the scary words then they did it to themselves. Under no circumstances did the blog communicate anything to them.

          • @1235 I live in a land where controlling caselaw has already settled this exact issue MANY TIMES.

          • @2:44pm: sorry, but if someone put a plan to kill me online and I find out about it, I’m going to the police and they better investigate it, whether it was directly communicated to me by the person who wrote it or not. Snap out of your delusions. I’m guessing it’s your legal “expertise” that landed Paul in jail? Shows what you know.

          • There was no plan, retard. Shakespeare quotes and allusions to past settled cases are not a plan to do anything.

          • @12:29: so much for your legal expertise. The FBI moved to arrest a man for making threats to the president online, even though the man used just pixels and bits in the ether of cyberspace. By some wizardry, those pixels and bits were actionable! and now the man is dead. Maybe you should’ve explained to the FBI that pixels and bits aren’t real and don’t communicate anything and it’s the FBI’s own darn fault for looking at what the man posted.

    • I think the use of the phrase “intention of the cyber stalking” is in question. Was the blog meant to intimidate, to harass, to inform or to send the signal: “SOS” to all Americans?

    • The blog has not only served as advertisement, but has excited a spirit of inquiry into the principles of government, and a desire to read the RIGHTS OF MAN, in places, where that spirit and that work were before unknown.

  • Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920, pg. 5

    Zionism Versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People
    By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill

    Some people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.

    Disraeli, the Jew Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to his race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.”

    Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia, where of all countries in the world the Jews were the most cruelly treated, and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country, which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times, we must admit that nothing that has since happened in the history of the world has falsified the truth of Disraeli’s confident assertion.

    The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jewish race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified. We owe to the Jews in the Christian revelation a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all other wisdom and learning put together. On that system and by that faith there has been built out of the wreck of the Roman Empire the whole of our existing civilisation.

    And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.

    There can be no greater mistake than to attribute to each individual a recognisable share in the qualities which make up the national character. There are all sorts of men – good, bad and, for the most part, indifferent – in every country, and in every race. Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual, on account of race or origin, his right to be judged on his personal merits and conduct. In a people of peculiar genius like the Jews, contrasts are more vivid, the extremes are more widely separated, the resulting consequences are more decisive.

    At the present fateful period there are three main lines of political conception among the Jews, two of which are helpful and hopeful in a very high degree to humanity, and the third absolutely destructive.

    First there are the Jews who, dwelling in every country throughout the world, identify themselves with that country, enter into its national life, and, while adhering faithfully to their own religion, regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them. Such a Jew living in England would say, “I am an Englishman practising the Jewish faith.” This is a worthy conception, and useful in the highest degree. We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the “National Jews” in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the Allies; and in our own Army Jewish soldiers have played a most distinguished part, some rising to the command of armies, others winning the Victoria Cross for valour.

    The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and useful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain.

    In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

    There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

    Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin’s authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews. The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, in relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms.

    The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated. This is an injustice on millions of helpless people, most of whom are themselves sufferers from the revolutionary regime. It becomes, therefore, specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jewish movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations. And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time.

    Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism, it presents to the Jew a national idea of a commanding character. It has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and a centre of national life. The statesmanship and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity. Declarations have been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain. The fiery energies of Dr. Weissmann, the leader, for practical purposes, of the Zionist project, backed by many of the most prominent British Jews, and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby, are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement.

    Of course, Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race, nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.

    Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.

    It is particularly important in these circumstances that the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them in England have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jewish movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jewish race.

    But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jewish national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe, but which will also be a symbol of Jewish unity and the temple of Jewish glory, a task is presented on which many blessings rest.


    • At this point, we still know nothing about Gerard I. Adelman’s intent — except that he doesn’t care what the public thinks of what he’s done in Connecticut family courts.

      After thirty years of Mr. Adelman’s destructive interference in the private lives of thousands of families in state, no member of the public can predict what Mr. Adelman might think or say if Paul Boyne were to write this on his website about Mr. Adelman’s public vs private religion:

      “… It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical …“

      How much of the history of “family courts” in Connecticut has been a secret since at least 1984?

      Many think, say and write that Saul of Tarsus who was Paul the Apostle wrote from prison about 2,000 years ago:

      “Have no fellowship with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. But everything exposed by the light becomes visible, for everything that is illuminated becomes a light itself.”

  • Keep your faith in God, but keep your powder dry.

    I would have been glad to have lived under my wood side, and to have kept a flock of sheep, rather than to have undertaken this government.

    Not only strike while the iron is hot, but make it hot by striking.

  • Paul Boyne, like so many parents throughout the US are never found to be unfit. No claims of abuse are even filed. But family courts take children under the fallacy of a child’s “best interest”

    Laws are morphed and twisted into weapons against parents.

    How can isolation from one parent ever be in a child’s best interest?

    This concept violates the 14th amendment and federal law takes precedent over state law.

    This is a Money making racket courtesy of our government to take every penny from families and destroy children.

    It is government promoted and the government attaches itself to unsuspecting families for years after the divorce is final.

    The crimes and abuse are clear.

    It’s good v evil.

    Their time is coming.

    Thank you Frank Parlato for being one of the few fearless enough and compassionate enough to value our children over the power and threat of the government.

    Herzog, Ambrose, Nusbaum and many other child abusers, have brought suits and threatened you personally. Some have claimed victimhood in your federal case which reveals their desperation and fear- trying to get you so you can’t continue to expose their criminal conduct.

    Parent and child victims of court abuse applaud you and follow you. You are the light that is needed to take down the vultures of family court.

  • First Amendment my left foot. Making direct threats against specific individuals is not protected speech

    This Boyne character not only named, he gave addresses and posted pictures. As for specific threats, he specified the caliber of the bullets to use. He wrote himself a ticket to prison.

    Case law and Supreme Court decisions are crystal clear on this.

    • He wasn’t making direct threats. The posts were “over-the-top” to prove a point about a state Supreme Court case having to do with freedom of speech.

      It’s a long story Paul should be allowed to explain for himself. He’s not a “character”. He’s a father from Connecticut who went through the family court nightmare there. You’ll understand when you hear the whole story.

      • He has so much to tell. That’s why they’re desperate to silence him. Went out of their way since 2014 to incarcerate him. It’s a danger to their child trafficking enterprise.

        Child trafficking through Connecticut is a huge problem and the judiciary participates.

      • Or they were over the top because he’s an insane person with violent fantasies which might have something to do with why he lost custody of his children…

      • Oh please. He wanted to intimidate these judges and the litigants opposing his harem of non-custodial mamas + attempt to persuade people to blame the Jews for all their problems instead of taking personal responsibility for being fuckups. This is your hero, people??? You all are sick snd evil.

          • The fact you accuse everyone of being a pedophile proves all you Paul Boyne supporters are batshit insane. Get help, sicko.

          • Not everyone. Just people who come here to cry for mafia thugs who literally do sell children to pedophiles for bank. Normal people don’t do that. Normal people don’t care how psychopaths who destroy children and families feel.

          • 8:54 pm,

            What would you think if a judge such as Gerard Adelman … or a psychologist such as Sidney Horowitz … or psychologist such as Robert Horwitz … or psychologist such as Bruce Freedman … or psychiatrist Richard Gardner were to sit you down in an office somewhere to tell you:

            “The Draconian punishments meted out to pedophiles go far beyond what I consider to be the gravity of the crime. The younger the survival machine at the time sexual urges appear, the longer will be the span of procreative capacity, and the greater the likelihood the individual will create more survival machines in the next generation. There is good reason to believe that most, if not all, children have the capacity to reach orgasm at the time they are born. The sexually abused child is generally considered to be the victim though the child may initiate sexual encounters by seducing the adult. The child is likely to fabricate so that the adult will be blamed for the initiation. It is extremely important for therapists to appreciate that the child who has been genuinely abused may not need psychotherapeutic intervention. The determinant as to whether the experience will be traumatic is the social attitude toward these encounters.Sexual activities between adults and children are a universal phenomenon which may be part of the natural repertoire of human sexual activity. Such encounters are not necessarily traumatic and the determinant as to whether the experience will be traumatic is the social attitude toward these encounters.”?


        • You sound hostile and angry. “Harem of Non-custodial mamas”?

          I don’t believe he has a harem. And theft of children by family courts impacts both men and women. It’s about the money.

          It seems you play a direct role – are you one of the opposing litigants he’s sited on his blog?

          I don’t think anyone is intimidated by him. I think everyone hates the exposure of court crimes that are against all children and families.

          Those who walk away with children and deny those children their parent are far worse off than they realize. Karma is real.

          Kids will know in time all that was wrongly taken from them.

          • “are you one of the opposing litigants he’s sited on his blog”

            No, I am not.

            I’m a person who doesn’t support racism and antisemitism. And threatening people’s lives.

            Imagine that!

        • Is Tony Mareno one you feel badly for? is Fotis Dulos? Chris Ambrose? Jeff Herzog?

          On the flip side John Sakon had his son taken for no reason. He was incarcerated and all money taken. What about all the fathers who have suffered? Are they part of the harem?

          Look at the real issues at hand.

        • You get married, have children then you are a bad person because the family court gang deems it! 3rd rate law schools in play! All part of the global destruction of families! Younger men are avoiding marriage and do not want any of this! Bring in RICO!

        • The term gender apartheid prefers to economic and social discrimination against individuals by their gender or sex. It’s systems enforcement by using legal practices to regulate individuals to subordinate positions.

    • Can you please provide your Supreme Court decisions?

      I don’t read a direct threat. Can you provide me with the direct threat?

      I’ve only read Franks articles and I don’t see a direct threat.

      Thank you.

    • Public information is public, fool. Everyone with google knows everyone else’s address. People acting in a public forum are not private citizens. Everyone who threatened themselves by seeking out and reading words on the internet is gonna need their blankie and a comfort toy when they find out that no one did anything to them at all.

      Caselaw *is* clear, and he did specify the caliber, every single one of which was a reference to caselaw that has already been ruled protected political speech. That, and Shakespeare. But that’ll be over your head too…

      • Yes, he tried to find a workaround to common sense by cutting and pasting the words of his threats. Guess what? It is still harassment and cyberstalking.

    • But ignore the actual harm and yes murders too, that is promoted by judges and attorneys to the cost of many children and mothers is what? Not crime? Pedos say things like that and Connecticut is rife with pedophiles

    • A joke! Black Robes threaten mom and dad’s everyday hiding behind the curtain! If this brings light to the matter of the corrupt family court system and did not harm anyone, then it’s done its job because no one else will address it! the media turns their back as do lawmakers! Go through it and you will have a different attitude! better yet go sit in family court proceedings! I hope you never have the experience of losing someone whether kid or family member or friend to these are bad people! Dulos kids have no mom and dad now! Yes, they are demonic! No law! It’s a money court!

  • Frank,

    Are you going to post patriot God’s letter?

    All haters of pg back off. I am not asking you of your opinion. if you don’t like someone then don’t read it. I am not speaking to you nor do I want to hear your whining and complaining.

    • “During the Revolution of 1905, the symbolist writer Vyacheslav Ivanov and the anarchist George Chulkov, future author of The Veil of Isis (1908), preached mystical anarchism, by which they meant revolt against any and all constraints that are external to the individual, including government, law, morality, and custom. They opposed individualism but championed individuality, creativity and self-expression. Love and a new religious synthesis, a new myth, would unite the new society. Occult beliefs, mingling with the Joachimite idea of a Third Revelation, led Merezhkovsky to believe that the Revolution of 1905 was the beginning of the Apocalypse that would usher in the new heaven and the new earth.” https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/1993-806-03-Rosenthal.pdf

      • A government office must make a list of the Connecticut judges and vendors who favor parents living in that kind of anarchy.

        All parents and children entering family courts have a right to choose what kind of people, morals and standards will control their families’ lives.

        • Good luck with that. The same people over and over again. There are no choices. They put who they want on cases starting with the GaL. There is NEVER a list of psychologist. They toss who ever they want on the case.

          • Sort of like the federal government. How many Americans even know that the most harmful swamp creatures hang around for decades?

            The wars the most corrupt wage in family courts last as long as the wars the most corrupt in federal government wage on the world.

  • I think it’s sad the family court judges destroyed him being a father and now they take his life.

    • It is. This is what Connecticut does. It sells custody, enriches court appointed fraudsters, and criminalizes parents.

      Parents who think they’re going for a divorce enter family court and rarely, if ever, get out.

      Honest, law abiding parents with no history of mental illness or incompetence are deemed “crazy” by attorneys and a sole custody evaluator (psychologist) and have their kids taken. They’re denied access to their money, they lose their home, and struggle to survive –

      If the parent does not die, leave the area, and submit to the punishment of the court (meaning agree that you are crazy and can’t parent) then they’ll find cause to arrest and incarcerate you. They’ll call upon their police cronies to misinterpret a civil order and make it criminal.

      The arrest is designed to intimidate and ruin your livelihood. To use as evidence that you are crazy and bad as the custody evaluator said you were.

      Thanks for taking interest in what is an epidemic in family courts throughout the US. Connecticut is one of the leaders in such abuse and corruption.

      Many parents are dead as a result of these attorneys and judges.

        • What is his fate? I’m sorry, are you new to this story? Maybe try actually reading the blog where you post your questions.

          • “You actually know his fate, 9:42 am?”

            You don’t understand the full meaning of fate, obviously.

            Fate: the circumstances that befall someone or something.

            Hopefully you get it now.

            If not, too bad.

          • In response to:

            “August 1, 2023 at 10:21 pm
            You actually know his fate, 9:42 am?”

            Is what you wrote just grumpy or cruel? You wrote: 👇

            “You don’t understand the full meaning of fate, obviously.
            Fate: the circumstances that befall someone or something.
            Hopefully you get it now.
            If not, too bad.”

            👆 Doesn’t that look sort of bitter?

            Did 10:21 pm write something that upset you? 🤔
            Are you being a little too sensitive?
            Do you think maybe you overreacted to a simple question?

            What’s going on?

  • I believe the Family Court System just made a fatal error in having Mr. Boyne arrested. Their entire cabal and activities are about to become international news. I think Mr. Boyne is about to end some careers and maybe cause legal justice to finally arrive.

    • I agree! He set out to do what many have not! Shine the light! Eventually the media, lawmakers cannot turn their backs on it! It will take time. I am sure they will drag out until these Judges get their pensions and exit! they get full pay and benefits after 10 years! You are a bad lawyer become a judge! Where’s our CT AG??? Going after someone claiming that the Vax is crap??? Waste of our tax dollars!

  • I think the real crime here is saying these folks are Jewish. It has nothing to do with Jews. It is about money.

  • Parents who have had their constitutional rights violated by Connecticut family court must start bringing forth cases in FEDERAL COURT/THE SUPREME COURT FOR VIOLATIONS OF YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS! STOP PLAYING WITH THE CORRUPTION AND GET THE FEDERAL JUDGES TO MAKE THE STATE COURT JUDGES OBEY.

    This must be handled in the federal courts you all must start filing for violations of your rights violation to do process violation of equal protections, etc.

    If you do not know the Constitution please start studying it and learning it please know what your rights are so that you sound credible when in court….

    There is a saying; “if you don’t know your rights, then you don’t have any rights”.

    • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, (1966)
      “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.”

      Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, (1803)
      “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.”

      70 Am. Jur. 2nd Sec. 50, VII Civil Liability
      “An officer of the court may be held liable in damages to any person injured in consequence of a breach of any of the duties connected with his office …The liability for nonfeasance, misfeasance, and for malfeasance in office is in his ‘Individual Capacity’ , not his official capacity…”

      Williamson v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 815 F.2d. 369, ACLU
      “When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their “individual” capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity.”

    • Very true. We assume lawyers and judges are honoring our rights. It’s just the opposite.

      They are licensed to lie.

      They are criminals. There’s no recourse in family court. Don’t kid yourself wasting time with Bar complaints. It won’t happen.

      The judiciary committee is also a joke. They use the info submitted to cover up the crimes and then bounce your complaint.

  • Great story. He used vibrant words to ignite his arrest. This article got me thinking of the metaverse. Maybe, “Ready Player One by Ernest Cline, later made into a movie by Steven Spielberg, was another novel that helped popularize the idea of the metaverse. The 2011 dystopian sci-fi novel is set in the year 2045, where people escape the problems plaguing Earth in a virtual world called The Oasis. Users access the world using a virtual reality visor and haptic gloves that let them grab and touch objects in the digital environment.” Will rapes and murders in the metaverse also lead to arrest?

  • There’s still no Justice for Jennifer because with all the press coverage the media failed to report on the family court criminals or created the conflict, fear, and prolonged litigation.

    The custody psychologist quackster who destroyed Jennifer, the denials of protection from the courts.

    And Jennifer’s law – public act 21-78 is not being enforced.

    There are plenty of laws to protect but when they are not followed and there is no oversight – when all of the court actors have immunity—/ when the system is set up to prevent accountability by putting judges in the position of condemning other judges, and attorneys in the position of reprimanding other attorneys- the game is clear.

    In no other system would we hand our children over to people who do not have to report abuse and neglect of children, to people who don’t accept insurance even though they are qualified to do so, to people who end services as soon as the money runs out, to people who deny you a copy of the report you paid for, and to people who have complete immunity and protection both civilly and criminally.

      • They don’t even have cameras in the hallways of CT courts! And God forbid you record a hearing!

        Status conferences- where back room deals are made- are often not recorded. The client has no clue as to what occurs and no recourse when they’re sold down the river by their own attorney!

  • Arrest the judges that had illegal businesses set up and running through the judiciary.

    Is there a statute of limitations in that?

    • “… In February, 2023 he filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Carol Pulliam v, University of Southern California, Case No. 22-782 to end the corruption of the California and related federal court systems from the unlawful county and court payments to California trial judges.

      Upon denial of the petition in April, 2023, Dr. Fine filed a Petition for Rehearing.
      Dr. Fine has also drafted legislation for California to establish a commission to oversee the judiciary and compensate the victims of judicial misconduct and judicial abuse of power, can be adopted to other states.

      * Short Resume of Dr. Richard I. Fine, Ph.D.

      Dr. Fine holds the following degrees, diplomas and certificates – Degrees: Ph.D. – Law (International Law) – University of London, London School of Economics & Political Science, 1967; Doctor of Law – The Law School, University of Chicago, 1964; B.S. – University of Wisconsin, 1961; Diplomas: Diplome d’Etudes Superieures du Droit Compare – Faculte Internationale pour L’ Enseignment du Droit Compare – Strasbourg, France, 1967; Certificates: Certificate of Comparative Law – International University of Comparative Science – Luxembourg, 1966; Certificate of Private International Law 1966 Session – Hague Academy of International Law, The Hague, 1966; Certificate of Public International Law 1965 Session – Hague Academy of International Law, The Hague, 1965.

      He is the author of numerous publications on the subjects of antitrust, international and comparative law.

      Dr. Fine is presently a Strategic Consultant (Richard I. Fine & Associates, http://www.richardfinelaw.com) with emphasis in the areas of judicial corruption and anti – corruption, legal services oversight and international and U.S. law.

      Dr. Fine was the Consul General of the Kingdom of Norway to Southern California from 1995-2010. He practiced law for over 45 years in state and federal courts, including cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and as an international lawyer. During such time, he was a prosecutor in the U.S. Department of Justice – Antitrust Division, Founder and Chief of the Antitrust Division of the LA City Attorney’s Office (the first municipal antitrust division in the U.S.), Special Counsel to the Governmental Efficiency Committee of the LA City Council where he was retained to investigate the former mayor and his administration for corruption, worked in the London office of a large international law firm and maintained his own practice of the Law Offices of Richard I. Fine & Associates.

      Dr. Fine is known for having been a leader in the legal profession. He was a member of the BNA Antitrust Advisory Board (Washington, D.C.) and the Executive Council of the American Society of International Law in addition to being Founder and Chairman of the Antitrust Trade Regulation Law Committee and Section and Organizer of the International Law Committee of the State Bar of California, Founder and Chairman of the Antitrust Section, and Chairman of the International Law Section of the LA County Bar Association and Chairman of the Committee on International Economic Organizations of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association, amongst other things.

      In the civic area, Dr. Fine has been on the boards of various charities and has been a Distinguished Visitor to the Claremont Graduate University – School of Religion.

      Dr. Fine received numerous awards for his work, including a Certificate of Special Congressional Recognition – awarded by the U.S. Congress “in recognition of outstanding and invaluable service to the community”; a California State Assembly Certificate of Recognition – awarded “for outstanding services to the community”; a California State Board of Equalization Resolution Certificate of Recognition – awarded for “sincere and grateful appreciation for outstanding dedication and service to the taxpayers of the community”; a Lawyer of the Decades 1976-2006 – awarded by the Black Republican Women’s Council and the Judea Christian Alliance; a Champion for Court Reform – American Hero – awarded by the Full Disclosure Network; and a Champion of Truth and Justice – awarded by Freedom Law School. …”


    • Quoting someone’s words does not mean you do not carry the intent of those words when you quote them, dummy.

  • >>What does seem illegal however is the conspiracy of selling custody to children and it needs investigation. Maybe the arrest of Paul Boyne will quicken the investigation into the much larger crime – perpetrated ironically by the very judges who complained about Boyne.<<

    They're never going to arrest themselves. 🙄

    • “When the state was unable to incarcerate Reguli on Aug 3 2022, DA Kim Helper indicted reguli for perjury on a hearsay affidavit and a request from Judge Woodruff who launched his own investigation by a secret letter.
      June 14 2022 the DA finally admitted that the state has no evidence to carry their burden of proof.

      So understand this.

      Prosecutors initiate cases for political reasons.”

    • The feds are in on it, as is the DOJ and all the other agencies. They couldn’t even find out who brought cocaine to the White House…..the system is not designed to protect the people. It’s designed to protect those who profit from being a part of the system.

      • “In politics, regulatory capture (also agency capture and client politics) is a form of corruption of authority that occurs when a political entity, policymaker, or regulator is co-opted to serve the commercial, ideological, or political interests of a minor constituency, such as a particular geographic area, industry, profession, or ideological group.

        When regulatory capture occurs, a special interest is prioritized over the general interests of the public, leading to a net loss for society. The theory of client politics is related to that of rent-seeking and political failure; client politics “occurs when most or all of the benefits of a program go to some single, reasonably small interest (e.g., industry, profession, or locality) but most or all of the costs will be borne by a large number of people (for example, all taxpayers)”.”


    • Agreed. It goes all the way to the top. The FBI is complicit.

      Idk if homeland security can intervene.

      Now that child trafficking and the war against our children is being raised through Sound of Freedom – the message is the same Frank has been sending- Our Children Are Not For Sale.

      See his story on No “Custody for Sale” re Jessica Biren Caverly.

      The truth is coming.

  • This whole arrest is over the ADL and its policy wing trying to push their ALI project. They want a precedent case they can use to toss out 1A but they are going to once again end up with even more caselaw in the long line of caselaw upholding it. The Taupier case only worked in CT, so the greedy little hand-wringers want more more more.

    • There is not going to be a fair trial. I think we all know that. Connecticut is designed to protect themselves. They want to hide what is happening at all costs. This is beyond the family court houses and the state of Connecticut.

      • I don’t think CT will survive the extradition process. They’ll end up having to cry in their little sandbox that the internet exists and that people can say things online they don’t like.

      • https://www.ali.org

        Their “Model Penal Code” is being pushed through state legislatures. Their objective is to “modernize” the penal code to suit their agenda. One major push is to change free speech standards to those of the USSR. They have succeeded in getting about half of states to adopt this shite, and there has been something of a battle going on to get a state with ALI model penal code upheld at SCOTUS. It has not happened yet, but some of the people who have been activists for ALI are also involved in in prosecuting Paul.

        We can see evidence of this when Clarence Thomas whined in a dissent on an (I think) Ohio speech case that he thought it should be more like the Taupier case, which had been declined to be heard by SCOTUS previously. That case upheld constitutional free speech standards and the ALI crowd had to go back to the drawing board for a new one. Enter the crosshairs on Paul…

        • This information will probably be censored soon — and the late Dr. Judith Reisman was Jewish.

          “… The Kinsey Coverup refers to the paid efforts of the mass media and the Kinsey Institute scientific establishment lobby to hide the facts of child sex abuse and fraud as the basis of Kinsey’s alleged “scientific data” on human sexuality. …”

  • I pray that the criminal acts that judges and attorneys commit are brought out of this smoke and mirror: the blog is not everyone’s preferred reading, and those who want to read it merely have to search and click- that isn’t harassment- that is people opting to read the content. I find Connecticut’s actions far more appealing- Boyne is one person- the Connecticut family court is a whole corporation.

  • Unless a legal team with a conscience and testicular fortitude covers him, and even so, he is likely to be crucified. The family court will do anything to silence people talking about their corruption. I have heard of challenging attorneys being murdered during proceedings. The court has to go. There are WAY WAY TOO MANY STORIES about them stealing the wellbeing of entire families and enriching attorneys that are literally the Only reason the divorce isn’t dissolved peacefully. Because they profit from it! So does the court.

    Judges in CA will straight up tell you they are going to violate your civil rights and protect the attorney. You guys worried about CT are really looking at the wrong state.

      • Discovery will be spectacular if he’s pro se.

        God willing, if the AFCC people don’t harm him, he will probably demand a jury trial.

        Let’s start a fundraiser for the video depositions. Which platform won’t steal money raised?

        Maybe GiveSendGo? Can his friends do this for him?

        “We Love Freedom
        Even if we do not agree with you, we will defend your right to fundraise for the causes and people you love.

        We Love To Give Back
        Each month, GiveSendGo designates some of our operation expenses to ‘Give Back’ to active campaigns on our site. We love being Givers!

        We Love to Pray
        The only crowdfunding site with a Pray button, and personal phone call from our Prayer team, letting you know that we are praying for you.” < ❤️ That’s what Paul and all of us need the most.


        • It’s the ADL.not AFCC, who is attacking him, but yeah. I’d donate to a fundraiser…. The discovery will benefit the public interest for sure. Way bigger than Paul’s case.

          • 12:02 am,

            My family is Christian. The Nazis took my grandmother’s farm in Poland. They killed my relatives who tried to save Jewish neighbors from the Nazi genocide.

            Just a few decades later in Connecticut family courts: judges, attorneys, evaluators and supervisors with Jewish last names almost killed me and my family.

            Who is to blame for the harm done to my relatives and to me?

  • The state’s long-hidden – – briefly official – – then hidden again association with the for-profit business networks of “CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC” will be in that spotlight. State-funded private vendors acting with judicial authority and judicial immunity for profit is a federal crime.

    The state AG office represents Judge Moukawsher in Attorney Cunha’s case against Mr. Moukawsher.

    Gerard Adelman plays a leading role in Ms. Cunha’s case against Mr. Moukawsher because Mr. Adelman was the Director of “CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC”.

    “CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC” was a small group of for-profit vendors who still act — without their registered corporation — with judicial authority and judicial immunity for profit. They did that behind the scenes for the past few decades, then officially from 2013 to 2015.

    In 2013, The Connecticut Judicial Ethics Committee decided what CT AFCC was doing was unethical. Mr. Adelman stepped down from his position as Director. It appears the New Haven DOJ office might have had something to do with the dissolution of that corporation in 2015.

    A little over a year ago, when Attorney Cunha complained about corruption in Mr. Adelman’s family court, Mr. Moukawsher disbarred Ms. Cunha. Are there no records of Mr. Moukawsher’s requests for a formal investigation of the corruption Ms. Cunha alleged in Mr. Adelman’s family court?

    If not, perhaps he was blinded by bias. It could also be that the subject of private networks acting with judicial authority and judicial immunity is a sore spot for Mr. Moukawsher. What’s said to be the most famous official cover-up of a “hit and run” case in the nation happened in New London, Connecticut:

    “Several weeks after Kevin’s death, his mother, Lucille Showalter, showed up at the New London police station to retrieve his personal effects, but was told they had been lost and that the case would probably never be solved. In response, Lucille spent the next few years relentlessly lobbying for a proper investigation. In 1976, the governor of Connecticut finally ordered a one-man grand jury headed by Superior Court Judge Joseph Dannehy. …

    Even though Judge Dannehy ruled that Mallove was the “probable” driver of the hit-and-run vehicle, he did not recommend criminal prosecution since there was no hard evidence to tie him to the scene. … The Day of New London newspaper decided to launch a new investigation and attempted to obtain the transcripts from the original grand jury proceedings, which had been sealed from the public since 1978. Even though the transcripts were 12 volumes and over 3,000 pages long, it turned out they had mysteriously gone missing from the files in New London Superior Court without explanation and there were no copies available. …”


    Too much information for some is too much to handle. Ignoring all we know is surely far worse.

    • There are countless coverups in CA. CT is NOT the source CA is. Judge Gary in Sacramento killed a legislation writer on a bicycle with his truck which had an illegal push bar on it. He forced the responding CHP officer to conduct the investigation knowing STAR was supposed to take that investigation and temporary judges keep lying for him about having deputies beat and arrest two indigent disabled in pro per people being forced to act without representation against court employed temporary judges (there is actually a standing order violating the California rules of court which demands we are given equal representation, but only in Sacramento).

      The state has its own BAR Court. That does nothing. The state BAR which is supposed to be overseen by the state, has no oversight. They have a 200,000 complaint backlog last time I checked, and responses are generally never doing their job, even with mulitiple false arrests, sexual assault, forgery, bribery etc. It happens so much they stopped trying to hide it.

    • State-funded private vendors acting with judicial authority and judicial immunity for profit is a federal crime and also:

      “regulatory capture”, “agency capture”, “clientelism” and, “client politics”.

      “Power does not corrupt. Fear corrupts … perhaps the fear of a loss of power.” John Steinbeck

  • Is there a sign up list to testify to the accuracy of the reports on family court? Minus the threats and name calling. Will the media coverage will it be filtered? Will there be a documentary? Can the victims of family court sign up to tell the world 🌎 what is happening in Connecticut family court? This should be interesting 🤔.

    • I heard that a few years ago, parents testifying at the public hearings re: family courts wrote “Paul Boyne” on the lists of speakers waiting to speak to:

      1. spoof the complicit legislators who’ve obstructed family court investigations
      2. request a few minutes of the legislators’ time

      • I think for years now the entire state of CT has had its shot spotters calibrated to Paul’s name, and the mere mention of it within the state would have deployed swat to the location just in case he was there.

        • Deep down these people are afraid they may be laughed at if they take a stand, or may be denied an invitation to some social climber’s cocktail party.

    • “… ‘Out of Shadows’ is a documentary that was released a few years ago, that helped wake up people into the manipulation and propaganda coming from Hollywood and mainstream media.

      If you haven’t seen it yet, it’s worth watching. …”

      It’s on Bitchute — and might explain what happened in a few of the cases.

  • “Criminal threats are made with the intent of placing someone in fear of injury or death. It doesn’t matter if the defendant intends to carry out the threat. Also, many states don’t require proof that a victim actually experienced fear or terror. Rather, it’s the intent of the person making the threat to place another in fear that typically matters.”

    • Cry harder. Connecticut is sitting there in its little sandbox screeching that the internet exists and that people outside its control can speak freely about what goes on there.

      Riddle me this: why have the Feds not involved themselves in this case? They’ll throw grandma in a dungeon for loitering in a public space but they refuse to touch this with a 10′ pole. 🤔

      Why has CT had to use their backchannels through ADL to slap some cuff on Paul?

      • Why haven’t the feds involved themselves (yet)? Because they take their time building a case. Often they investigate for several years before making an arrest.

        • I’ll type slowly so that you can follow along this time: the feds have said explicitly to CT that they decline to file anything against either Taupier or Boyne because it’s not a criminal matter. They told CT to fuck off. It’s been 10 years. Keep taking the hopium hits that scary words will become federal crimes someday, but it’s not today.

          • didn’t Paul start his sad excuse for a blog in 2017? Maybe I’m bad at math, but that does not add up to 10 years to me.

          • The feds started in 2013 with the Legislative hearings. They have repeatedly told CT to fuck off because speech is not criminal. CT cried to ADL and the hand rubbing commenced.

    • @throw the book at him-
      Do you feel the same way for all of heh mothers and children who actually for subjected to abuse and murders by these judges? It’s actual injuries and deaths that these judges and attorneys are not held accountable for- what day you about that? The casual unread idiot misses the jokes- much like one would miss the Simpson’s allusions- the more read you are the better it is. Too bad people confuse the actual inflammatory words as the crime and not the thousands of actual crime committed

    • Boyne, like all of us know, the judges have no fear. They are protected.
      Adelman admitted in Cunha’s case that he knew of BOYNE’s alleged blog and didn’t take it seriously. He dismissed any concern for the blog.
      But now he’s in fear. I don’t think so.

      • 1. If Mr. Adelman is afraid, he should have recused himself from the Ambrose case.
        2. If Mr. Adelman isn’t afraid, maybe he asked Mr. Moukawsher, Ms. Stewart and Ms. Grossman to file the complaint against Mr. Boyne to silence Mr. Boyne so the Connecticut AFCC crimes Attorney Cunha mentioned in Mr. Adelman’s court wouldn’t be exposed?

        • Is Mr. Adelman more afraid of the possibility of a Grand Jury in Connecticut discussing the public-private for-profit networks in courts?

          Why aren’t professionals outside of those networks complaining about the AFCC monopoly — and the dragging of their profession into the ground?

          Did Dr. Hiebel turn a patient into a girlfriend to keep a girlfriend in town — did he then claim she was crazy?

          How did Logan Green invent a new way to diagnose and use it in a juvenile court case with no oversight or peer review?

          Who allowed Nicholas Sicinolfi to supervise dangerous “family court” visits without a valid pistol permit?

          Why did Kenneth Robson’s “Custody Primer” tell guardians ad litem and attorneys for minor children to NOT report child abuse to the police?

          Why did a a Connecticut training video teach guardians ad litem and attorneys for minor children to ignore reports of child sexual abuse?

  • Paul is free to make his threats, and police are free to arrest him for making the threats, especially when it amounts to stalking and harassment.

    Just like a man could stand outside my house one day and try to chat me up when I’m on my way to my car. Perfectly legal. But if he starts showing up there every single day and wont stop even when I tell him he is frightening me and he needs to stop, he can get charged with stalking and harassment.

    More judges and lawyers are killed who are involved with the family court than any other aspect of law. these judges have good reason to be concerned for their safety when a noncustodial parent is making threats to them.

      • His motives are he lost custody, for good reason obviously, and he is a typical narcissist, incapable of taking responsibility for one’s own bad actions. So he’s launched a years-long hate campaign of intimidation and cruelty, not just against court actors, but against anyone different from him, and he’s tried his best to toe the line of legality with his terror campaign, but it looks like he has finally crossed that line.

        It’s pathetic that you are all supporting this sick evil man just because you also lost custody. It makes it totally clear to me how Hitler rose to power.

        • If the judges and their appointees don’t want to be scared, all they have to do is stop selling children to pedophiles. The solution is very simple, and it’s in their hands. They have the keys to their own release.

        • Supporting hate speech and violence is not what people are supporting. People are supporting an avenue to have the public to know about family court. There is truely a problem. Some people obviously have lost custody for good reason. The process it’s self and the uneithical conduct is what people are complaining of. People are dragging their former spouses to court for years at great expense. Children are forced into relationship with abusive parents. The family court doesn’t run on laws or evidence in several cases. The expensive litigation is bankrupting people. People forced to settle for unsafe situations for children and/or unfair terms of a divorce. Children are not the priority. There are gender bias laws. Federal funding attached gender specific. Biasing court and placing people in danger. Judges are on the bench who should not be. I am not even going to get started on these GALs. . These Attorneys are not monitored for billing. Charging for nonsense. Failure to bring zealous representation to the table. All swept under the rug. A problem for years now. No Court ombudsman. Judges, Attorneys and court employees abusing authority. No real redress and labeling of people filing complaints that are valid. Dismissed because of immunity or no good reason. The same people over and over again. People are absolutely upset. Unfortunately Paul became completely unhinged.

          • “The expensive litigation is bankrupting people.”

            Those judges, attorneys, guardians ad litem, evaluators, mediators, supervisors etc. know the expensive litigation is bankrupting people.” They know the bills for tens of thousands — and hundreds of thousands — cause more stress on already stressed families.

            When guardians ad litem, attorneys and evaluators consistently and collectively make more than the children in each case they mismanage, the goal is: to bankrupt and destroy families.

            When they do that while also favoring perpetrators of sexual abuse, the political agenda of all of that describes itself.

        • “tried his best to toe the line of legality”?

          In what ways did he toe the line and in what ways did he cross the line?

    • They are killed for a good reason too. And they should be removed from the court and selling hotdogs. None of the criminals even know the law, let alone maintain education on legislation. They do not apply the law. They block the application of the law and remove any avenue of relief for their victims. When they are murdered, it is an act of mercy to that corrupt person’s countless victims and any future victims. I am of the mind that they should be tried, top-down for treason. These employees acting as a criminal org are directly responsible for more trauma than any other life long criminal. Even serial killers have killed less people than most family court judges. They do not deserve to feel safe. They are monsters and they SHOULD BE AFRAID. EVERYONE SHOULD BE AFRAID OF HARMING ENTIRE FAMILIES. Fuck them. If they weren’t committing crimes for profit they wouldn’t be getting countless posts about them doing so. This isn’t about fear. This is about stifling any speech outing that court system for acting in corruption as legislators help to hide it. Fuck them all. We didn’t get a say in who becomes judges, but we do have a right to bare arms and protect our families from rape.

      • John, we’re all in quite a predicament after the “long march through the institutions”. Be patient. We the People are waking up. If you haven’t yet, please find Charlotte Iserbyt’s work about “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America” and Edward Griffin’s interview with the late Norman Dodd.

        Norman Dodd was Chief Investigator in the Reece Committee. About a hundred years ago, foundations and the largest corporations decided to take over the world. More people need a better understanding of what’s happening. When more people have a better understanding of what’s happening, it will be easier to take back the rights we lost. There’s more power in numbers than anything else. Walt Disney captured entire populations for the largest corporations without a shot fired.

        The Democrat Party of the United States of America declared they offer one candidate. They announced they will participate in no debates. One candidate. No debate. Not many noticed and not many care. It’s not possible to win back that kind of population.
        “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” George Orwell

      • John this type of talk landed Paul Boyne in jail. You are risking your own lock up. Do not jeopardize Frank’s blog for your anger. We need the Frank report to continue to report on family court . You can be angry but you have no rights to threaten people and obstruct the ability of others to have an opportunity to speak out. You look dangerous and mentally unstable. That paints others here in the same light. Please stop. We have little places to go to get the information out.

    • Most family court ordered non- custodial parent paid for that privilege. Normal people don’t want to eliminate a parent from their children. It’s usually the abusers who have custody because they are the people who pay. Doesn’t anyone remember attorney Paul Greenspan’s testimony that it costs $25k for custody? He was offered! A sum that can be confirmed looking into most bank records of parents or their close friends and family members.

    • Why doesn’t it ever occur to these judges and lawyers to stop selling children to pedophiles? It’s an easy solution.

      • Unfortunately, for many people social status comes before intellectual honesty. Although they would never admit it, social position is more important to many people than is the survival of freedom in America.

      • $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. These lawyers and judges are grads from 3rd tier law schools! Like getting a medical degree in the Carribean! Anyone worth their weight wouldn’t be a CT judge or practice Family Law! Go sit in a family court for a day and you will want to vomit! Whatever percentage of divorces that are contagious they need to exploit! Attorneys will even sue his own ex clients for moneys owed in civil court. Go to the judicial website and check it out! These attorneys file motion after motion and prefer trials to fatten wallets! They brainwash their clients and instigate and bully the other spouse with ongoing battles! I think he was a collection attorney before he figured out an easier way to make money!

    • Frank seems to mistake First amendment with the right to risk individuals lives. You don’t have the right to yell “Fire” in a crowd and then pretend you’re not responsible if someone gets hurt. These judges and people are REAL people. They have lives and families and make decisions that people don’t like. They are chosen by elected representatives. To call for their death is not about free speech. Hate speech is a crime for a reason. Want to talk about the system and how it sucks – nobody will stop you. Want to complain about the government that’s fine. But nobody gets to call for the death of anyone else and get away with it. Frank has become to comfortable using his platform to attack his perceived enemies that he thinks it’s ok. Frank is just better at hiding the racism than Paul is.

      • The fire in a crowd trope has never even even once been the standard of speech in the US. That is entirely fabricated. Political speech has never and still does not turn on how anyone feels about what is said.

        If these real people judges don’t like being spoken about in nasty terms, they should not have stepped into public life. It might also be advisable to stop conducing a mafia enterprise through public offices, violating public trust. That is, if they really are so afraid…

      • I think the only thing people here are truly racist about is FAMILY COURT and the illegal activities. Oh, and probably the way they traffic so many kids. Save the racist bs. That’s so overplayed at this point. Get real. The real issues at hand have nothing to do with race. Paul just used his freedom of speech to get attention to the real crimes going on. Wake up. This is apples and oranges. Race? Really? Kids are being sexually abused, trafficked through the system, judges, GALs, evaluators, “experts”, all getting paid off. Kids for cash. But yeah, let’s pretend it’s about a racist blog. Gag me with a stick.

        • So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.

    • The GAL in my case made veiled threats after talking my kids. The judges make threats and intimidate regularly.

      Are these crimes as well? The threats of never seeing my children again if I dare to communicate that I love them- this is what these animals do.

      To suggest there are direct threats against a life is serious. Let’s save it for people who are actually committing this crime.

      It seems CT has adjusted and passed laws for the sole purpose of arresting Paul Boyne to prevent exposure of the crimes of family court.

      • Those veiled threats are what Connecticut considers to be a therapy some call, “Threat Therapy”.

        June 24 , 1999, Open University, Breda, The Netherlands. A One Day Symposium led by Richard A. Gardner M.D. on The Parental Alienation Syndrome. …

        “… Now let me say something about the treatment um and uh emphasize very important points.

        (Clears throat.) The Parental Alienation Syndrome has become politicized. It has become adversarial uh… in part because anything that goes into a court of law, almost, almost automatically becomes adversarial as one lawyer supports one parent’s position and one lawyer supports the other. So it behooves one of the lawyers to come up with garbage, with lies, with misrepresentations in order to support that lawyer’s position. Another reason why it’s become politicized, is that, because women were the ones who were more often the programmers up until a couple of years ago, I was criticized as being sexist, as biased against women for claiming that women are more often the programmers.

        And my answer was, “That’s the reality. Let’s not deny this reality. To call me names for describing the reality, is it loses sight, what’s the reason for it?”

        The reason was that the women were the primary caretakers primarily, and the children wanted to be bonded more with the mothers because they want the mothers to have more availability, more access and the children wanted to stay with their mothers, they were more strongly bonded with their mothers.

        Uh, and uh, but with time now fathers are becoming equally bonded and the children now it it’s evening out.

        The… the problem that I have found is that the courts have been unreceptive to coming down heavily and being properly restrictive of the programming parent. Um. This is the central problem.

        🚩(Lowering voice. Speaking slowly, deliberately.) Um. Inducing The Parental Alienation Syndrome in a child is a form of abuse. In a way, it may even be worse than physical abuse and sexual abuse. 🚩

        (Speaking more casually.) You see, in physical abuse, there comes a time when the child reaches a point where the child can s…stop the parent. You… you’re twelve you… you’re thirteen, you’re fourteen, you can fight back, you can resist, you can run away. You’re old enough to call the police and you can protect yourself somewhat. And, so it certainly reaches a… a point when it stops. Not that there aren’t ongoing psychological consequences after but it… it can stop.

        (Less seriously. Raising the pitch at the end of each statement as in questioning.) Sexual abuse uh, can certainly damage any child, psychologically to varying degrees from very little to very much depending upon the… the… the trauma associated with it. But ultimately the child can… is old enough to stop, to report it and bring about a discontinuation of it.

        (Slowly, seriously, emotionally.) In psych… in PAS, you get life-long alienation. The bonding is eroded, it’s corrupted, it’s destroyed and if… if after eight, ten years, you’re strangers. It’s like an alumni meeting. The brain is just filled with hatred in the brain circuitry and all the loving, tender feelings all the… all the positive, loving experiences have evaporated. They’re replaced by the campaign of denigration. And even if there is contact then, it’s a lost. It’s lost. It’s never again the same. And it’s… it’s a… it’s a form of abuse that may not be as easy to detect as physical abuse where you see bones and broken fractures and you see abrasions and you have medical reports or physical abuse, where you s… you may see evidence in… in… in medical examination. Here it’s psychological but it is… it is very detrimental.

        Now, the courts have the power to cure the PAS. If a judge were to treat a PAS indoctrinating parent… like, let us say a father who reneges on paying his support or alimony. In the United States, and I’m sure here too, if a father doesn’t come up with his support and alimony payment, they can be taken from his salary or uh automatically or he can be put on notice that if he doesn’t pay, he’s on house arrest for the weekend so that from Friday afternoon to Monday morning he must stay at home and if he’s out of the house, he’s in contempt of court, he can be arrested. They can put shackles on his ankle, electronically communicating with the police department. Uh, random telephone calls 24 hours a day. No answering machine to ensure that he’s there. They do that routinely to fathers who have not properly paid for their uh, their monetary obligations.
        If a judge were to say to a mother, “If the children are not… if the children… if the children are not at the father’s house at 5:00 on Friday, the car … there’s a court order here at 5:01, for the police to come and arrest you … for not getting your children there. And you will spend the weekend in jail …to help remind you that those children must be there.” ⬅️

        I haven’t gotten one judge to do that. Not one.

        I haven’t even gotten one judge to say to a, such a mother, “I order you to take a tour of the jail just to see what it’s like to give you an idea of where you’re going if those children don’t go.” ⬅️

        I had a child in the early eighties, a seven-year-old boy, who was a PAS victim himself… boy is …the children are victims too. (As afterthought.)

        (In the voice of a young adoring child.) “Dr. Gardner, is it true that if I don’t go and see my daddy, uh the judge is going to put my mommy in jail? That’s right, isn’t it true the judge is going to put my mommy in jail?”

        Oh my, the kid was begging me. Every cell in his body was begging me to say, “Yes, the judge will put my… your mommy in jail.”

        I said, “Well, you know that’s a possibility, he has the power to do that.”

        “Okay I’ll see, I’ll see my daddy. Mommy, Dr. Gardner says the judge will put me in jail if I don’t see daddy, my daddy, so I’ll go see my daddy.” (Note: According to Gardner’s categories, such behavior in a child would indicate a total absence of the “Parental Alienation Syndrome”.)

        He was begging me for the excuse. I beg the judges, the kids need the excuse. They want to be able to say to the alienator “I hate him. But I’ll go anyway to protect you.”

        The judges won’t do it. Because it’s not the politically correct thing to do in the United States in 1999 to put a woman in jail, for not visit… visiting. Put a man in jail for not paying the money, it’s done every minute. Put a woman in jail, politically incorrect…look bad in the papers.

        Now that men are starting to induce PAS, it’s easier… it will be easier. There are so many cases all over the United States of PAS… hundreds of thousands. There’s an epidemic, there’s no question. It has to happen. And once it happens, it’ll probably be easier if the man is the first one because then it will be easier for the judges.

        So what I’m saying is this, the judges have the power, if anybody is in contempt of court, to put in jail. In other words, if… if… if somebody before a judge in the United States were to not appear … [Audio 45:28 – 45:31 missing]… to work within those guidelines. Contempt of court in general, the judge has power to incarcerate. ⬅️

        There’s only two states in the United States that I know where the judge is empowered to incarcerate up to six months a parent who is in contempt of court for a visitation uh… order. And once that happens, there will be very, there will be a rapid shrinkage of PAS.

        So, I started this presentation saying, what I said about the cure of PAS is the legislators empowering the judges to impose penalties, meaningful, humane penalties, on PAS inducing parents – regardless of the gender of the parent. This is the only cure I know of. Psychotherapy will not work. Nothing else I can think of will work and I’ve certainly been giving a lot of thought to this over the last fifteen years. And there’s nothing in my experience to suggest that there’s any other route to cure and my hope is that what I’ve said today will play some role in bringing about this change here.

        Thank you.


        • “And you will spend the weekend in jail …to help remind you that those children must be there.” I haven’t gotten one judge to do that. Not one.“

          Gerard Adelman lectured a group of seniors at a senior center few a months ago, telling them he does that — and offered to do that to a mother in a case for another judge.

          He also told the seniors: he doesn’t care about public opinion.

          • Gerard Adelman sounds a lot like Richard Gardner when he speaks. With the same content, tone and cadence, they’ve both repeated the same schpeel.

            Claiming protection from sexual abuse is “alienation”, both criminally mismanaged cases with the notion that “alienation” is more harmful to children than sexual assault.

            Both used family courts to commit their crimes.

            Here’s why Mr. Adelman didn’t care to discuss the use of Grand Juries in Connecticut:

            “A grand jury is a jury—a group of citizens—empowered by law to conduct legal proceedings, investigate potential criminal conduct, and determine whether criminal charges should be brought. A grand jury may subpoena physical evidence or a person to testify. A grand jury is separate from the courts, which do not preside over its functioning.”


        • Nonsense. There are abusive parents using parental alienation all day everyday in family court. It’s used and abused to cover up abuse. Do you have any idea what it’s like to be told you you have to force a child to go with a pedophile, drug addict or raging full blown alcoholic? Many of mothers and fathers I’m sure have not been given a chance to speak in court. By the abusive alienation industry access over the best interest. Pushing parental alienation industry in complete control of family court. All of a sudden years worth of research and conventional therapy is no good? The parental alienation industry is feverishly trying to control the narrative in family court. Money and power. Do you want justice and the truth or do you want to embark on a a mission to control the family court system? I’m not applauding.

      • In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.

        Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd president of the United States

        I wish that every citizen of every country in the free world and every slave behind the Iron Curtain might read this book.

        Ezra Taft Benson, Former Secretary of Agriculture

        NDCC is an admirable job of amassing information to prove that communism is socialism and socialism (a plot to enslave the world) is not a movement of the downtrodden but a scheme supported and directed by the wealthiest of people. If enough Americans read and act upon NDCC, they really can save the Republic from the conspirators — whose plans for the destruction of our country are galloping fast toward completion.

        Dan Smoot, Former Assistant to J. Edgar Hoover

        Now that NDCC is available, I no longer need to answer “no” to the question which is often put to me, namely: “Mr. Dodd, is there a book which I can read so I can know what you know?” No higher praise is possible for this book.

        Norman Dodd, Chief Investigator Reece Committee to Investigate Foundations

        This book concerns the way in which our nation and other nations are actually governed. As Benjamin Disaeli said, this is not the way in which most people think nations are governed. The whole subject of the Insiders who so largely control our political and economic lives is a fascinating mystery. For the reader who is intelligent but uninitiated in the literature of superpolitics, I can think of no better introduction to the field than NDCC.

        Dr. Medford Evans, Former Chief of Security for the Atom Bomb Project

        Since people of the Jewish faith have been the number one historical victims of the Communist Conspiracy, we wish every member of our faith would carefully read this book so they will become aware of the forces which often attempt to manipulate them.

        Dr. Barney Finkel, President, The Jewish Right

        Whatever one dares to call the apparatus described and documented in this book, he will ignore it at his peril. 1972 may well be our last chance to defuse this destructive device. This book tells you how you can expose and demolish it.

        Dean Clarence E. Manion, Former Dean Notre Dame law School


About the Author

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in hundreds of news outlets, like The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CBS News, Fox News, New York Post, New York Daily News, Oxygen, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, The Sun, The Times of London, CBS Inside Edition, among many others in all five continents.

His work to expose and take down NXIVM is featured in books like “Captive” by Catherine Oxenberg, “Scarred” by Sarah Edmonson, “The Program” by Toni Natalie, and “NXIVM. La Secta Que Sedujo al Poder en México” by Juan Alberto Vasquez.

Parlato has been prominently featured on HBO’s docuseries “The Vow” and was the lead investigator and coordinating producer for Investigation Discovery’s “The Lost Women of NXIVM.” Parlato was also credited in the Starz docuseries "Seduced" for saving 'slave' women from being branded and escaping the sex-slave cult known as DOS.

Additionally, Parlato’s coverage of the group OneTaste, starting in 2018, helped spark an FBI investigation, which led to indictments of two of its leaders in 2023.

Parlato appeared on the Nancy Grace Show, Beyond the Headlines with Gretchen Carlson, Dr. Oz, American Greed, Dateline NBC, and NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, where Parlato conducted the first-ever interview with Keith Raniere after his arrest. This was ironic, as many credit Parlato as one of the primary architects of his arrest and the cratering of the cult he founded.

Parlato is a consulting producer and appears in TNT's The Heiress and the Sex Cult, which premiered on May 22, 2022. Most recently, he consulted and appeared on Tubi's "Branded and Brainwashed: Inside NXIVM," which aired January, 2023.

IMDb — Frank Parlato

Contact Frank with tips or for help.
Phone / Text: (305) 783-7083
Email: frankparlato@gmail.com


Discover more from Frank Report

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading