New Haven, CT – New Haven State’s Attorney John P. Doyle, Jr. announced the arrest of Paul Boyne, 62, of Springfield, Virginia, on 18 felony counts of Stalking and Electronic Stalking for cyberstalking three Connecticut Superior Court judges who handled divorce and custody matters.
Boyne appeared on Monday in Fairfax County General District Court in Fairfax, Virginia. The State of Connecticut told the court it will seek to extradite Boyne to CT to face charges.
Boyne’s arrest comes after a multi-year investigation into his website “thefamilycourtcircus.com.”
Boyne, a former Connecticut resident, is alleged to have authored and maintained the website from his home in Virginia and used online postings to stalk and threaten judges.
The website additionally provides commentary on attorneys, family court litigants, and court proceedings in Connecticut.
Connecticut State Police Computer Crimes Unit and Hate Crimes Unit investigated the case. The Fairfax Commonwealth’s Attorney in Fairfax County, the Virginia State Police, and the U.S. Marshals Service, Eastern District of Virginia, assisted in the investigation and arrest of Boyne.
Boyne lives in Springfield, Virginia.
Last year, a SWAT team of more than 20 Virginia State Troopers, working with CT law enforcement, raided Boyne’s home and seized two computers and a cell phone in a predawn raid.
CT Judge Gerard Adelman, a frequent target of his website, presided over Boyne’s own case in family court. In 2007, Boyne went through a contentious divorce and custody dispute.
The CT charges allege that the thefamilycourtcircus.com postings contain “threatening and intimidating speech directed at specific Connecticut state judges, court personnel, State of Connecticut legislators, and private citizens.”
Law enforcement officials cited postings on thefamilycouncircus.com website to obtain a search warrant for Boyne’s home.
Here are some examples cited from the website:
A post dated October 16, 2020:
Assistant State’s Attorney Denise B. Smoker… might be upset that such personal jewdicial misconduct makes her house on Bayberry Lane in Branford a target of F35 smart bombs, death rays from the space station, and a gun toting army of angry mothers with large capacity magazines, not to mention her house being a flammable protest site for mothers wearing Black Lives Matter tee shirts.
A post dated December 31, 2020, titled Shoot the Lawyers.
“Tired of the court scam of appointed ‘psychologists’ to charge ridiculous amounts of money to apply jewish psycho-babble in the fraudulent form of a ‘forensic evaluation’, more precisely known as a ‘baseless biased opinion’ directed by the judge? Pop! A .45 right between the eyes provides a cranial therapeutic probe, which not only cures the delusion of expertise, it also serves to discourage other quacksters from promoting similar snake-oil in a public forum.”
From the above article with the caption: “Belt fed reform!!”…
A post dated February 5, 2021:
“Perhaps a .50 cal to Bozzuto’s head would focus the attention of the judiciary on executing its duties to the people’s standards without covering for the human filth in black robes passed off as judges to an unsuspecting populace. Put shit on the bench, lead shot will eliminate it.”
A post asked about Judge Grossman:
“Is she begging for a .308 shot to the head thru two panes of window glass from an oath keeper, concealed in the woods behind her house?”
As part of the investigation Judge Grossman told CT investigators, “that the Paul person knew the layout of my house, my property and the neighboring properties was terrifying. I focused on the amount of specificity and planning that went into this: was he actually at my house at some point, or in my yard, or my neighbor’s yard? I worried about when this might have happened, I scoured my security camera history and examined our property for evidence of someone’s presence. The room described in the threat is actually a favorite part of my home. It became difficult for me to relax in that space…. l found myself scouring the areas, looking for people hiding in the woods.”
A post about Judge Eric Coleman stated:
“Only the Second Amendment remains for the sovereign people to protect the children. There lies the constitutional case for the assassination of Judge Eric Colemen. A .50 cal to the head, a .308 sniper shot from the grassy knoll through two panes of window glass, complete and rapid discharge of a high capacity magazine in a dark alley. Burn the courthouse to the ground, bring body bags.”
Judge Coleman told CT investigators, “I do not know what the author of the article or the administrator of the website is capable of. Moreover I do not know anything about the website’s audience and who among that audience may be inspired to act on the suggestion to harm or kill me.”
A post, dated February 17, 2021, identified Linda Allard, who was nominated to be a Connecticut state court judge. The post disclosed her home address and a picture of her residence.
“Another blackish puppet doing her jewish master’s bidding. . . . The woods behind her house provide cover and concealment for disgruntled white litigants who will appear before her black bench, to hurl racial slurs with a night scope. Paint ‘black lives matter’ on the sidewalk. Wake up her white neighbors with megaphones and gunshots, remind them of their evil whiteness that oppresses the fat black lady next door. … Only the Second Amendment can save the people from these political parasites, .308 ball ammo preferred.”
A post dated March 8, 2021, read:
“Happy .308 day! More justice can be dispensed in one bullet than by all of Family Court. Celebrate the Second Amendment as protection from the pedophiles who run family court. Judicial discretion falls to the report of a rifle.25
A post dated December 22, 2021, titled Hunt Deichert!
The post identified Connecticut Assistant Attorney General Rob Deichert.
“Do not underestimate the force of a single .308 ball to the head, or the accuracy of a well adjusted night scope, and fine trigger control.”
The post included a picture of AAG Deichert with his family and listed his home address.
A post dated January 6, 2022
The post identified Connecticut State Superior Court Judge Gerard Adelman.
“Judge Gerard Adelman gets a .50 cal to the head.”
A post dated May 1, 2022, again identified Judge Adelman:
“Adelman proves beyond a reasonable doubt, jews of Connecticut hijack courts, rule from the talmud, victimize children in worship of their money god. He begs a patriot’s .50 cal to the head.”
Judge Adelman told investigators, “I have serious concerns about this blog as it repeatedly calls for someone to kill me. Almost every entry speaks about a .50 caliber bullet to my head.”
A post dated June 8, 2022
This post identified Connecticut State Superior Court Judge Thomas Moukawsher (a/k/a “Mouk”) and his picture superimposed in a crosshair.”
“It is JUST CAUSE when Mouk gets a .50 cal to the head.”
A photo of Judge Moukawsher has the caption, “Given the domestic terrorism, several bullets needed.”
To date, FR knows of no one who has taken violent action against any of the targets of Boyne’s articles.
Boyne defended his posts as protected speech on the website:
“the morons in black robes get annoyed by public expressions on court matters, protected by the First Amendment… The State of Connecticut uses public funds, deploying its agents to hunt down blog contributors, even crossing state lines to pursue persons suspected of blogging about the jewdicial cesspool of Corrupticut and its paedo players. Free speech is the enemy of the Judiciary… A jewish enterprise designed to destroy the rights of a sovereign people, eliminating opposition to the jew mission…
“State sponsored terrorists … should fear the power of a sovereign people who hold Second Amendment rights for the sole purpose of defending themselves against such tyranny. A .50 cal to the head does an excellent job of readjusting the attitude of tyrants and their elite masters, while defending the Constitution. When the hunters of free speech become the hunted, there is liberty and justice for all.”
My View of the Case
CT v Boyne may boil down to CT v First Amendment.
Can a person write blog posts exhorting people to shoot another person based on their public actions with impunity?
Was Boyne seriously advocating for members of the public to commit acts of violence? Was he being reckless?
Were the targets in actual fear for their safety?
Though violence has harmed no one based on his blog, as far as we know, what if someone did get inspired to shoot a person identified in the blog?
I seriously doubt anyone targeted thought Boyne would travel to Connecticut and act on his own violent suggestions.
Does Boyne have the First Amendement right to advocate for what is tantamount to assassination for political reform?
These are questions for a jury and perhaps in time the US Supreme Court to decide.
For my part, I condemn inciting violence through speech and all forms of racial and religious bigotry. I condemn the language used in thefamilycourtcircus.com that speaks of using violence and denigrates people based on religion or race.
I find it lamentable that some of the good work Boyne has done or otherwise might do to expose corruption in CT Family Court is undermined by his extreme language.
I will reserve judgment on whether his speech should be criminalized.
If Boyne directed this same speech to my family, friends or myself, I might be unsettled about it. Especially if he gave my address.
I doubt I would file a police complaint. I doubt I would have the slightest concern that Boyne himself would act out his threats.
But I would think the man who made the threats a vulgar and savage being. He might be expressing a deeper point and might think his extreme language might help bring attention to the political point, but I would offer up a prayer for him that he might find a better way to do it, one that people might really take to heart and view the far deeper issue – the extreme corruption of the jury-less American family court.
Is Boyne’s speech one that will help the reform of Family Court by bringing a spotlight on the corruption as this story takes on a national level of importance?
I rather suspect that CT undertook this prosecution more as retaliation than actual fear of bodily harm, or rather the fear of financial harm was the motivating factor that drove them to snatch Boyne from Virginia and send him north to CT.
It might backfire for just as the public will condemn his speech they might also examine the substance of his criticism – a corrupt family court and if even one on a jury votes for his acquittal there may be more focus on the corruption of CT Family Court than the foul and vulgar voice of one man crying out “against the most evil court in the land and the monsters who control it.”
In short, in exposing the monster foul mouthed Boyne, did the monsters set the spotlight upon themselves? For Boyne only spoke evil, the corrupt ones in Family Court do real evil.
As it has been observed by others, and I submit it to you in this fascinating CT v Boyne, “the devil always takes a step too far.”
Who took that step in this case remains to be seen.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
“For almost two decades, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has supported the development of a national network of 80 fusion centers. Operated by states and localities, fusion centers incorporate federal, state, and local law enforcement personnel, first responders, and select private-sector representatives to collect, analyze, and distribute intelligence. While the federal government initially promoted them as hubs for sharing counterterrorism information, fusion centers quickly expanded their missions to include any crimes or hazards.
DHS provides these centers with funding, personnel, and access to federal intelligence, but it has failed to ensure that they have used these resources appropriately. As a result, fusion centers have long produced flawed analysis, abused their authorities to monitor people engaged in First Amendment–protected activities, and leaked sensitive law enforcement information. This domestic intelligence model has undermined Americans’ privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.”
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/policy-solutions/ending-fusion-center-abuses
It’s been about a week since Virginia state police arrested Paul Boyne for the state of Connecticut. Last year, it took less than a week for mainstream news outlets to publish details and opinions when a judge disbarred an attorney for complaining about corruption in family courts.
If Mr. Moukawsher was one of three (with Ms. Grossman and Ms. Stewart) who filed the complaint against Mr. Boyne, will more details about Mr. Boyne’s complaints also travel across the nation in less than a week? Maybe not.
January 31, 2022 ABA Journal:
“… Judge Thomas G. Moukawsher disbarred lawyer Nickola J. Cunha in a decision last Tuesday, report the Hartford Courant, the New Haven Register and the Journal Inquirer … Moukawsher said Cunha and her client had claimed that the system is broken and corrupt, but in reality, the system had indulged Cunha too much … ‘In a quest to achieve fairness and give the benefit of every doubt, the system has allowed itself to be tied in knots,’ Moukawsher wrote. …”
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/this-state-allows-a-single-judge-to-summarily-disbar-lawyers-it-just-happened-in-a-divorce-case
Indeed, the system has most definitely allowed itself to be tied in knots.
For example, Robert J. Deichert is an Assistant Attorney General in the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General. He represents Mr. Moukawsher in Cunha v Moukawsher. According to former New York State Attorney General Bob Abrams, “… you know, as long as there is colorable authority to defend the state, it’s the Attorney General’s obligation to defend the state. That’s your oath of office. You’re there to defend the state. If there, there is no authority to defend the state, you know, there can be a certain set of circumstances where you say, well, I’m not going to do it. The state still can get representation. It gets outside counsel.”
Connecticut Assistant AG Robert Deichert’s obligation is to defend the state. That’s his oath of office. He’s there to defend the state. If there, there is no authority to defend the state, you know, there can be a certain set of circumstances where he says, well, I’m not going to do it. The state still can get representation to address the state’s association with “AFCC Inc”.
In fact, the state must get representation to honestly address:
1. the state’s association with “CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC” AFCC”
2. the extenuating circumstances leading to Ms. Cunha’s concerns and Mr. Boyne’s concerns
3. justifications for all valid complaints about collusion, extortion, racketeering and fraud upon the courts
Given the state of Connecticut’s business ties to “CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC”, the AG’s office must retain outside counsel in all cases involving any individuals associated with CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC.
Friendly reminder: “Gerard Adelman was Director of CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC”
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/47421472/Cunha_v_Moukawsher
Nobody enjoys being put in the position of accusing prominent people of conspiring to enslave their fellow Americans, but the facts are inescapable.
“So, the criminal stuff we have um – – you have felonies. Felonies are crimes that are punishable by more than a year of incarceration.”
About freedom of speech so long ago:
Speech We Loathe Is Speech We Must Defend
By Bret Stephens
New York Times Columnist
July 11, 2023
In the late 1950s, the Rhode Island legislature created a commission “to encourage morality in youth.” One of its practices was to send notices to out-of-state distributors and retailers of publications it deemed obscene, asking for “cooperation” in suppressing them. The notices warned that the commission had circulated lists of objectionable materials to local police departments, and that it would recommend prosecution against those found to be purveying obscenity.
Four publishers sued. The case went to the Supreme Court. With one dissent, the justices in Bantam Books Inc v Sullivan (1963) held that the “informal censorship” violated the 14th Amendment. …”
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/11/opinion/biden-covid-misinformation.html
Did someone use keywords “biden” covid” and “misinformation” in that URL for an opinion about free speech? 🤔
The governor’s counsel on women and girls. Co chaired by Lt. Governor Susan Bysiewicz and Vanessa Dorantes Department of children and family services. The council of agencies ( fatherhood funding most of them) take guidance from committee counseling non state agencies to achieve optimal collaboration on centralizing over all goals of the counsel. What exactly are the goals of this commission? It doesn’t appear to helping women and girls in Connecticut. Women of all colors don’t trust the agencies designed to help them. The family court issues are human rights issues. Women are being oppressed in the state of Connecticut. No matter what color. When women advocate for themselves they are meet with resistance in family court matters. The minority community is marching because CPS is playing snatch and grab with minority children. The family court is playing snatch and grab with the others. The conditions in Connecticut for women as a whole are unexpectable. We are being discriminated against. Our civil rights are being trampled as well as human rights. This council and agencies are stuffed with father’s rights money. No body wants to contact this agency because of it. When women come forward they are labeled. Toxic feminist. Crazy litigants. Hysterical . You have shut women and girls out. Your counsel is not designed to hear the issues of women and girls. No agencies in the entire state are. Because we as a collective group don’t generate funding for the state.
Constitutional rights for women are not upheld.
Constitutional rights for anyone and everyone (not just women) aren’t upheld anywhere and everywhere small groups of very wealthy power-hungry people try to conquer and control entire nations.
Correct. However when you have laws and funding targeted towards a specific gender that’s discrimination. These laws and funding are being used to targeting a specific population. Used to control and limit their rights. The entire family court system is being run off of it. Including children support. PPE loans and access grants. Policy and procedures taking presidency over constitutional rights. State laws superceding and the best interest of the children are not mentioned placing father’s rights over mother’s and the children. Equal opportunity to address and access our courts. Biasing court decision due to gender specific laws surrounding federal funding.
The goal of “fatherhood initiatives” to get more fathers to be more responsible is a good thing. And, when any funding pays for some of the worst fathers to do so much harm, whoever funded those harmful “custody battles” must face accountability for harm done. Which office provides oversight and accountability for federal and state fatherhood initiatives?
This is the problem. The entire family court system and related agencies are run on fatherhood funding. The same people putting in the cookie jar are taking cookies out. The access and visitation grant is being used to financially place father’s at an economic advantage in family court. Labeling women as dangerous alienators. Maternal gatekeeping is a primal instinct of mothers to protect their children. Exploited by the alienation industry. As well as the AFCC. Women who are labeled are put on supervised visit and can not get money to visit the children. The friends of the court running the grant program are designed to influence the court. Have no interest in child welfare. It’s being run through family relations in Connecticut. Conflict of interest in that office related to the gender bias funding. It’s connected to the child support office. Governor by state policy and not law. Unwed mothers and women filing for martial disillusion are having the grant and welfare reform act used as a weapon against them. Triggering custody flips. By father’s who don’t want to pay child support. The government in Connecticut is not going to do anything about it or investigate due to the millions of dollars being brought into the state. This is a human rights issues. Discrimination and weaponization of the government run welfare reform act on women of all colors religion and socioeconomic status. The AFCC and the entire family court system and agencies are aware of how the funding works. This is one of the main reasons women are loosing custody. The therapist involved in family court are financial benefiting. The access and visitation grant are not disclosed. The money is given to the father’s after for reimbursement. Only women in many cases are burden with paying for the therapist. The war on women is being financed through the federal government in several cases through family court matters. The state of Connecticut has perfected it.
If someone anyone in the government is going to look into it. Please don’t involve the government officials in Connecticut. They are well aware of the funding. The are aware of what is happening to women and children. They are ignoring it. They label women filing complaints and ignores violations of the law. The are more concerned with the state finances. Loss of life parental rights, civil rights, constitutional rights and children welfare is taking a back seat to the best interest of children. Responsible parenthood is not the objective. It’s financially driven
“we must never punish speech in this house only acts” Tom McClintock California. Paul Boyne was all speech. The family courts act. We can spend time money and resources on investigation of Paul Boyne. We are not spending any time money or resources on investigation of family court. Priorities. Threats and hate speech are not what people should resort to. There are more than a few discruntaled litigants. There are years worth of documentation of legal abuse in family court by thousands of people in Connecticut. Yet the privileged people in Connecticut are the only ones getting action and resources. Let it sink in. This is absolutely politically motivated. No one is protecting the most venerable members of society. The children. The privileged legal community is being protected. Our state has not prioritized innocent victims. Children. Prioritized it’s residents. It’s prioritized money and power. Let it completely sink in.
Rosa Delauro is calling Republicans “terrorist”. Has she seen what has been happening in her state? Has she seen the terror going on in the state of Connecticut family court. The democrats are claiming the republicans hate gay people. Has she seen the hate towards women in the state? Run by democrats. People in glass houses are tossing stones.
You think a sea hag monster like DeLauro isn’t part of it? She doesn’t notice the terror her tyrant gang are doing to the people whose screams it is her job to she stifle?
Let’s hope she Takes notice. She is an avid supporter of getting funding for the LGBTQ community. ( Nothing wrong with that) let’s see if she can support women who don’t generate funding. I’m sure the dad’s don’t want to hear it, but there is a war on women happening. It’s definitely playing out in the family court system.
You haven’t been paying attention. She is one of them.
“… In May 2010 Greenberg was linked to a controversy involving White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. As a House member, Emanuel had lived rent-free for five years in a basement guest room in the DC house owned by Greenberg and his wife, Democratic House member Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut. During this time, Emanuel served as chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which awarded large polling contracts to Greenberg’s firm. Greenberg’s former corporate clients include British Petroleum, British Airways, Monsanto Company, Boeing, General Motors, and Microsoft …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stan_Greenberg
British Petroleum, British Airways, Monsanto Company, Boeing, General Motors, and Microsoft and
Democrats.
Time for people to get woke in Connecticut.
Robsinon created a whole new department, complete with comic book villain lair name, just to deal with Paul called the “Office of Predictive Intelligence”, which employs 7 people full time just to read his blog. They reeeallllllyy don’t want anyone explaining to the public about their ALI project…
Justice Robinson, Now that you have successfully had Paul Boyne arrested. How about a task force to investigate your family court judges? They are destroying the public trust in the judicial system. The Frank report has demonstrated that there is a problem. Are you willing to go after the bad judges in family court? Just like you went after Paul Boyne . You need a good look see at the GALs running around your court house. If Mouck can disbarre Cunha. Lets go ahead and disbarre some other attorneys. Plan an open forum and have 7 people to take the complaints. Maybe in a year we can clean up family court.
Yes, that’s it. Ask them again to arrest themselves. 👍🏻
The year before the summer of 2002, in the summer of 2001:
“… A routine investigation by the TPD Chief Lively raised questions about the legality of Sicinolfi’s pistol permit application and the business activities of the Nicholas-James Company. Information on the pistol permit application was “incomplete or deliberate”. For example, Sicinolfi did not list his alias “Nick Sarno” in his application when asked to “List all names by which you have been known”. Nick Sarno’s pistol permit application also stated that he had served in the Armed Forces, where he purportedly gained experience with pistols and revolvers, but TPD Christopher Paulette determined that the Department of Defense had no record of the plaintiff serving in the military. It was later determined that Nicholas Sicinolfi spent only 29 days in the U.S. Army before his discharge on medical grounds, and that he did not receive training in weapons use. …
… Chief Lively contacted the Connecticut State Police Special Licensing and Firearms Unit to inquire as to the legality of Sicinolfi’s business activities, especially the legality of providing the self-described “supervised visitation services.”
In reply, Lively received a letter dated June 28, 2001, stating that the Plaintiffs were violating Connecticut law by providing such security services without a license.”
Snow, K. H., & Grossman, K. (2015). The Nicholas-James Company. In The worst interests of the child: The trafficking of children and parents through U.S. Family Courts pp. 92–93
If those who plan to control the world with the “ordo ab chao” political tactic they’re the kind of people who organize corruption, crimes and wars for control of the world.
The goal of “family courts” appears to be to destroy families and to change cultural norms.
Those were also the goals of the Bolsheviks and Mao in China — two “Western projects”.
After Lenin, Stalin and Mao took over, millions died in those two nations under the Bolsheviks and Mao.
How many children and parents in America were destroyed in family courts so far? Has anyone counted?
It is difficult for the average individual to fathom such perverted lust for power. The typical person, of whatever nationality, wants only to enjoy success in his job, to be able to afford a reasonably high standard of living complete with leisure and travel. He wants to provide for his family in sickness and in health and to give his children a sound education. His ambition stops there. He has no desire to exercise power over others, to conquer other lands or peoples, to be a king. He wants to mind his own business and enjoy life. Since he has no lust for power, it is difficult for him to imagine that there are others who have … others who march to a far different drum.
But we must realize that there have been Hitlers and Lenins and Stalins and Caesars and Alexander the Greats throughout history. Why should we assume there are no such men today with perverted lusts for power? And if these men happen to be billionaires is it not possible that they would use men like Hitler, Lenin, Mr. Adelman and Mr. Moukawsher as pawns to seize power for themselves?
Test
Family court jesters are now the thought police.
“ … After my dealings with family court – more specifically, my forced patronage of an unethical corporation [The Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Inc., or AFCC] where judges are in business with professionals who appear before them – I am left devastated, bereft, penniless, traumatized, and disabled with complex PTSD. …”
https://frankreport.com/2023/03/25/the-dark-side-of-connecticut-family-court-system-afcc-members-conflict-of-interest/
CT mirror. More sunlight on judicial nominations. Governor Ned Lamont. Seems to have a focus on public defender’s office and defenders of crimes. . Attorney Mark Alterman. Specializing in corporate defense. Including sexual assault and massive physical injury of CHILDREN!!!!!!!! Corporations involved in defense of horrific crimes against CHILDREN!!!!! Wake up Connecticut. Trying to legalize abuse of children. Who wants this guy defending child abuse on the bench?! Pay attention Connecticut they are slipping these things under the nose of Connecticut residents blindly trusting our state government. None of the judges Paul spoke about in the blog were injured. How many children have been hurt by the family court system. Not an excuse for Boyne just a reality check on the priority of our state government. It’s a disgrace. The state officials care only about money and themselves. The residents of the state are silenced and in the dark about our state government. As well as our discusting excuse of a family court.
2019 governors counsel on women and girls. Plenty of women have come forward about family court. This is the governor’s office answer? Criminal defense attorney on the bench that has been defending sexual assault and physical injury of children. Domestic violence reported and children delivered to abusers? Women punished for reporting sexual assault. Perhaps that’s why your DV numbers look good and have gone down? Just a guess. Is this why you are putting public defender’s in every office? Sexual assault and violence are a crime. Mainly against women. What is going on in the state of Connecticut? Look what happened to a female legislators in Hartford. This is exactly what is happening in your state. Labeling women and girls who dare to come forward.
It’s not just Connecticut. My case started in Connecticut and New York is just as bad. There is no protection for women or children. Even when CPS substantiates it. And it’s one gag order after another.
It’s started with welfare reform. The federal funding to the states through the courts. A gender bias federal funding to promote marriage. They don’t want women to have autonomy. They want to force women into marriage. Because it’s what is financially beneficial for the country. Too many single mother household. Men don’t want to pay child support or alimony. The country doesn’t want to support children born out of wedlock or a household without a father’s income. Connecticut is the leader in welfare reform.
The war on women. Florida recently received a great deal of fatherhood funding. Now they want to pass alimony for a 5 year limit. There hosting a make women great again seminar. Connecticut is flipping custody of children in Connecticut at an alarming rate. No evidencary hearings. Not informing alimony or child support orders for women. Police department in forcing custody orders at their discretion. The Connecticut state police are under investigation. Millions of dollars donated to Connecticut colleges from men involved in divorce and custody. Custody and divorce outcomes for sale in family court? Welfare reform. If mother’s don’t have custody no need to provide financial assistance. Welfare reform has placed women and children in to extreme poverty. Is the countrys answer to flip custody to the father? The AFCC publishing articles on custody based on financials for father’s to receive custody. Our divorces decided based on welfare reform and signal motherhood because father’s don’t want to pay child support and alimony? Labeling them toxic feminist.
If you Google Paul Boyne. Someone has posted a website with his parents name and address. His sister name and address telling people to harress them. Private citizens. 🤔 Is anyone going to investigate the source? Cyber stalking and harassment of his relatives.
That’s Chris Ambrose. He owns both sites. Dumbass thinks he can out-Paul Paul, but he crossed the line by dragging people into it who are not on a public forum. He literally is inciting and threatening but he’s too dumb to understand the boundaries.
Seriously? Is Ambrose out for revenge?
I’d characterize it as shaking his little impotent fists at the sky more than revenge, but sure.
Mr. Sidney Horowitz might describe that as, “rattling his cage”.
Then, Mr. Horowitz might overlook objectionable behaviors and/or alleged crimes committed against the children. He might say something like, “sometimes bones need to be re-broken to heal” and then recommend medicating all children who refuse to submit to his process. He might also recommend hospitalization for the children who continue to resist. Mr. Horowitz actually did that in a different case.
He was also the “evaluator” in Paul Boyne it’s case.
Mr. Boyne was sounding the alarm about the Connecticut “family courts”. The Connecticut Attorney General must know that.
By the way, the Connecticut Attorney General is still working on addressing the discrimination against conservative-leaning people in Greenwich Public schools.
Could the AG be working on discrimination against conservatives in public schools and family courts at the same time? Is that what’s taking the AG’s office so long? 🤔
“… GREENWICH – With no clear end to the Attorney General’s own investigation into claims of discriminatory hiring practices in Greenwich Public Schools captured in a hidden-camera video at the end of last summer, the town told CT Examiner that it plans to publish the findings of its own investigation in August. …”
https://ctexaminer.com/2023/06/29/greenwich-wraps-up-investigation-of-school-discrimination-claims-no-end-in-sight-for-tong-investigation/
To achieve the socialist dictatorship of the proletariat, three things would have to be accomplished:
The elimination of all right to private property (mortgage fraud)
The dissolution of the family unit (family court racketeering)
Destruction of what Marx referred to as the “opiate of the people,” religion (in Greenwich public schools, for example)
“… Corliss Lamont (March 28, 1902 – April 26, 1995) was an American socialist and humanist philosopher and advocate of various left-wing and civil liberties causes. As a part of his political activities, he was the Chairman of National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, starting from the early 1940s …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corliss_Lamont
Matthew Couloute went after Paul’s family with Bill Grohs. Couloute went after Paul’s sister at her job, and got his parents kicked out of their parish.
And now the she-Bill is dead and Baby Dragon lives in squalor in GA and has a restraining order not to go near his punching bags. Same will happen to Chris, just give it a little time.
The problems with Family Court ranked:
1. Judges
2. Divorces
3. Attorneys
4. Arbiters
5. Guardian Ad Litem
6. Expert Witnesses
***
Custody evaluators are up there. It is upon their reports of fraud that custody is flipped- and document sealed to prevent exposure to the fraud.
We the People is somewhere there, too.
It looks like the bad guys who weaseled their way into positions of authority might have ordered Paul Boyne’s arrest because of Nick Bryant’s interview with Keith Harmon Snow. Look out, everyone. Effective family court investigators and activists: protect and distribute copies of your evidence for safe keeping.
Absolutely. Send your information to several people.
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1683948652710993926?s=20
Boyne just helps confirm the stereotype of the vocal critics of family court being absolute loons and dangerous whackos. He really confirmed his own family court judge was correct in keeping his children far away from him.
Do you have children? Did you ever have them taken away from you? One day you are in their lives blowing out the birthday candles and the next you can’t see or talk to them! Miss little league, dance, soccer, graduations, religious ceremonies, etc… I have not experienced it but have some empathy! At least he brought attention to what is going on! maybe you missed his intentions! You think those players Family Court are saints!!!! They just protect one another! The details will eventually come out and you will be shocked at who the dangerous people are in this sham of a judicial system!
Right, he’s so out of it and wrong that CT has tried obsessively to shut him down for years now. Courthouses, law firms, and ADL offices from around the world sit there and hit refresh over and over like little girls. Countless ddos attacks subpoenas, threatening letters to hosts, more ddos attacks, yet never a takedown notice… Curious, that. All those manhours, all that tax revenue spent, definitely not because he’s the most effective force right now kicking their shit in… 🙄
I think it’s a better discription of the judges and GALs on the bench. There are several news outlets putting out articles on the nomination for judges in Connecticut. A giant red flag. I think as more people learn about the case the more the judicial system and the government in Connecticut. Boyne probably going to get the courts in the media.
Really? You must be an abuser. The description given to minimize the oppression and crimes of family court actors is that there’s a “small number of disgruntled litigants”.
All vocal critics of family court are disgruntled litigants. Half of them are racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamophobic in a basket of deplorables clinging to guns or religion. The racketeering they talk about is totally irrelevant.
should not be winner takes all! especially lawyers when it comes to fees! why does someone have to be labeled if they do not agree with you! then you must be a “lefty” right? come on! labeling is for you to feel better about yourself! what do you label yourself “let government take my freedoms away”! family court is about taking ones freedoms away! just because someone manipulates the courts, doesn’t mean the other persons loses! Incarceration is used by court for threats for litigants to go along with the usual or else! I am sure if you opened the curtain a little you will see that males are incarcerated many times more than females for violating a court order. female’s may be threatened but not incarcerated. males are threatened and incarcerated far more times. missing 1 child support can get you incarcerated! one judge will do it for $1 and another might not! where’s the equity! that’s what your missing! I recommend to all newlyweds to go and visit a family court prior to tying the knot!
Thank you for being a sound of reason.
The judges have confirmed the stereotype of privilege. Sitting on the bench punishing women for filing for divorce and having children out of wedlock. Welfare reform. The promotion of marriage and cutting down of children born out of wedlock. Men have access to birth control. There is a 24 hour convenient store in every town. Yet women are blamed solely for pregnancy. Men are perfectly capable of understanding how the reproduction system works. The have the ability to control themselves. Often told they are tricked into fatherhood by sexist attorneys and mens rights groups. The welfare reform act is targeted to strengthen men in the work force. Women can get tossed out of the house labeled crazy and the kids are traffic to Dad. Women to live in poverty encourage to find another husband. No promotion to educate and get anything but minimum wage jobs. Left with no relationship with the children they gave birth to and cared deeply for. The promotion of marriage. It took an Hispanic judge to clean up the Ambrose v Riordan mess. Declared a mistrial. A mess white privilege judges made. You tossed Mini Gonzalez a Hispanic women off the judiciary committee. You have appointed white women of privilege in every organization that is supposed to help women. All fatherhood funding in organization surrounding family court. The police department in Hartford tried to downplay an attempted sexual assault of a Muslim woman. The attorney general’s office tried to play it off on Facebook as a possible hate crime. The state police are under investigation. The fatherhood initiative is giving the Catholic church ( a religious organizations)in Hartford funding. Found to have a bunch of priest (men) that committed pedophilia. Paul Boyne may have some problems and did things he should not have. Connecticut is using him to deflect the states family court system and use of federal funding. How many parents have been threatened to have their children taken away if they don’t agree to or pay enormous legal fees. Cherry picked court vendors. The court labeled loons are sick and tired of the abuse of power and control. The use of children to gain financing for the privileged in Connecticut.
All good people at DOJ and AG offices must piece together the timeline of what happened to Connecticut’s family courts. The first determinations must identify all hostile witnesses.
After Judges Adelman and Grossman filed their complaint, the state’s case against Paul Boyne didn’t happen in a vacuum.
Most people in Connecticut have never even heard of “AFCC”. The good people of Connecticut who know about AFCC and AFCC’s history in Connecticut family courts should actually probably revolt if DOJ and AG offices can’t or won’t address the history and legal implications of all relevant factors.
July 6, 1984: “CT Dept. of Revenue Services notifies the AFCC that they must file their Application for Withdrawal with a statement that the AFCC has made arrangements to pay the Department all unpaid taxes”
December 10,1984: “CT Judicial Branch Manager and AFCC President Anthony Salius and Milne file an Application of Withdrawal of Foreign Corporation for the AFCC with the CT Sec. of State”
1984 – 2012: “The AFCC (had) not been registered to do business in the State of CT since 1984, but has conducted business there consistently for 30 years. AFCC history shows it is doing business with the Judicial Branch. AFCC is run by Judicial Branch employees, contractors, from the Court’s administrative offices. AFCC has a long history of run ins with authorities, revocations, tax problems, etc in many states.”
https://www.scribd.com/doc/134247461/AFCC-CT-Judicial-Branch-Taxpayer-Funded-GAL-Training-Boon#
2009: “… SENATOR McDONALD: And is there any field of law or area of the state that you would prefer not to see on a regular basis as a judge?
GERARD ADELMAN: Aside from the driving situation, no.
SENATOR McDONALD: I do represent Stamford, by the way, so.
GERARD ADELMAN: I know.
SENATOR McDONALD: You know, one of the things that we ask new nominees — and you said it, you addressed it somewhat in your opening statement — is, is there anything in your background that you can possibly conceive of that has not been disclosed to this Committee which if known would prove to be an embarrassment to yourself, to the Governor or to the General Assembly?
GERARD ADELMAN: No, I can’t think of anything. The Governor asked me the same thing.
SENATOR McDONALD: Good question.
GERARD ADELMAN: Yeah.
SENATOR McDONALD: Thank you, very much. …”
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/juddata/chr/2009JUD00223-R001000-CHR.htm
May 2012: “Sidney Horowitz failed to provide all the services and reports outlined in the court order, then recused himself from his appointment to the Boyne case …”
Fall 2012: “Judge Lynda B. Munro and Judicial Branch Manager Mary Kay West administratively authorized payments to Horowitz at more than twice the state rate, even though no court order on record had approved the payments. … Boyne says that his correspondence with DCF show Horowitz had billed the State for a report the doctor made against his ex-wife, which was rejected by DCF because Horowitz had never met the Boyne children.”
March 26, 2013 9:00 AM: CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC Certificate of Incorporation: Nonstock Corporation Filing #0004828917 … “THE NATURE OF THE ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED OR THE PURPOSES TO BE PROMOTED BY THE CORPORATION: The Connecticut Chapter of AFCC, Inc, (The Chapter”) is established to promote a collaborative approach to serving the needs of children among those who work in and with family law systems, encouraging education, research and innovation and identifying best practices. Its members include judges, lawyers, mediators, evaluators, mental health professionals, academics, researchers, court administrators, and public policy makers. …”
March 2013: “Connecticut AFCC’s incorporation documents filed with the Secretary of State’s office on March 26 show that founding board members include Judge Munro, Judge Wetstone, Judge Gerard Adelman, as well as Judicial Branch managers Kulak, Giovannucci, and Phyllis Cummings-Texiera.”
March 27, 2013 to December 31, 2013 and after: the CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC, PO BOX 9135, NEW HAVEN, CT 06532 tax forms claim their organization is a “Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation”
April 19, 2013: Was the CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC already a registered nonprofit organization and registered as such with the IRS? The Connecticut Committee on Judicial Ethics, “with one member recused, unanimously determined that service on the nonprofit organization’s board of directors would violate Rules 1.2, 1.3, 3.1 and 3.7(a)(6)(B).“
Spring of 2014: Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto, managed the family court docket in Hartford. “[She] became involved in the defendant’s dissolution proceeding. Judge Bozzuto assumed sole responsibility for the management of the case in order to ensure that it would be adjudicated in a timely manner. On May 23, 2014, Judge Bozzuto ordered the Family Services Unit of the Court Support Services Division (family services unit) to conduct a comprehensive custody evaluation. Shortly thereafter, the family services unit informed Judge Bozzuto that the defendant was interfering with the evaluation by injecting his personal views and opinions concerning the family court system into the process.”
June 18, 2014: “In response, on June 18, 2014, Judge Bozzuto conducted an in-court proceeding attended by the parties. Judge Bozzuto told the defendant that he was free to express his political beliefs and views of the family court system, but ordered him to refrain from doing so during interviews conducted by the family services unit.”
June 19, 2014: The DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, P. O. BOX 2508,
CINCINNATI, OH 45201 sent a letter to the CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC, 385 ORANGE ST, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511, Employer Identification Number: 46-2716503 stating, “Dear Applicant :
We are pleased to inform you upon review of your application for tax exempt status we have determined that you are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. …“
October 6, 2014: “Lynda B. Munro, who retired from the Connecticut Superior Court in fall 2014 after 20 years of service, has joined Pullman & Comley, LLC as a member … Prior to her retirement from the bench in 2014, Judge Munro created a mentoring program for judges and led the continuing legal education program for the branch for eight years. In each case she heard, she focused on women’s issues and biases against both women litigants and lawyers in the courtroom setting.”
March 26, 2015: United States District Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer states, “… allegations against state court employees are also barred by immunity. When court employees perform official duties integral to the judicial process, undertake actions pursuant to a judge’s direction, or implement judicial orders, they are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity of the same character as the immunity enjoyed by judges.”
November 3, 2015: U.S. Attorney Deirdre M. Daly announced “new supervisory appointments within the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Connecticut. Assistant U.S. Attorney Liam Brennan ’07 of the FFPC (Financial Fraud and Public Corruption) Unit has been asked to lead the Connecticut Public Corruption Task Force, which investigates corrupt public officials, the misuse of public funds and related criminal activity.”
March 10, 2017: Judiciary Committee votes on new bill HB-5742, “An Act Concerning Threatening of a Judge … Sponsors of bill: Judiciary Committee … Reasons for bill: Numerous Judges have reported receiving threats, in varying degrees, as a result of the performance of their duties … RESPONSE FROM ADMINISTRATION/AGENCY: Judicial Branch: Supports this bill. Our Constitution guarantees free speech, even if it is critical or offensive. Our judges believe in the First Amendment, have upheld it as a constitutional right and recognize that criticism goes with the job of being a judge. However, when free speech crosses over to a threat, then that is a different matter entirely. When language is designed to try to intimidate, harass and put a judge in fear for his or her own life with the goal of influencing a judicial decision, then such language is an assault on the rule of law …”
April 6, 2017: “The first ‘TheFamilyCourtCircus’ blog post … “A blog to shine a light on the cockroaches of Family Court.”
January 25, 2018: State v. Taupier argued in the Supreme Court of Connecticut
October 16, 2020: TheFamilyCourtCircus blog post: “Assistant State’s Attorney Denise B. Smoker… might be upset that such personal jewdicial misconduct makes her house on Bayberry Lane in Branford a target of F35 smart bombs, death rays from the space station, and a gun toting army of angry mothers with large capacity magazines, not to mention her house being a flammable protest site for mothers wearing Black Lives Matter tee shirts.”
July 26, 2023 at 1:17 am: Anonymous comment on FR: “Just what they did to Ted Taupier. The affidavit used to raid his home and steal his belongings referenced that Paul was in touch with Ted T – who was convicted of threatening a judge.”
“… a target of F35 smart bombs, death rays from the space station, and a gun toting army of angry mothers with large capacity magazines, not to mention her house being a flammable protest site for mothers wearing Black Lives Matter tee shirts. …” looks like something from The Babylon Bee.
Two simple questions for Connecticut to answer on this day in history:
1. Why did Paul Boyne write what he wrote?
2. Why did Judges Adelman and Grossman file their complaint?
It actually might have been Ms. Grossman, Mr. Moukawsher (for Mr. Adelman?) and Ms. Stewart who filed the complaint. Are Mr. Moukawsher and Mr. Adelman members of the same fraternity? Why didn’t Mr.Moukawsher look into the corruption when the issue was raised? Why did he disbar the attorney who raised concerns about the corruption?
Mr. Moukawsher must know about the AFCC public-private partnerships acting with judicial authority and immunity in family courts. He must know that’s been illegal since 1984. He’s mentioned several times that he sees many problems with Connecticut family courts. So disappointing to see him not blowing the whistle.
“Judiciary Committee
JOINT FAVORABLE REPORT
Bill No.: HB-5742
Title: AN ACT CONCERNING THREATENING OF A JUDGE.
Vote Date: 3/10/2017
Vote Action: Joint Favorable
PH Date: 2/27/2017
File No.:
SPONSORS OF BILL: Judiciary Committee
REASONS FOR BILL:
Numerous Judges have reported receiving threats, in varying degrees, as a result of the performance of their duties.
RESPONSE FROM ADMINISTRATION/AGENCY:
Judicial Branch: Supports this bill. Our Constitution guarantees free speech, even if it is critical or offensive. Our judges believe in the First Amendment, have upheld it as a constitutional right and recognize that criticism goes with the job of being a judge. However, when free speech crosses over to a threat, then that is a different matter entirely. When language is designed to try to intimidate, harass and put a judge in fear for his or her own life with the goal of influencing a judicial decision, then such language is an assault on the rule of law. …
… Peter T. Szymonik, Glastonbury, Ct.: Opposes this bill. My family, especially our sons with special needs, have been victimized and harmed by the family court system in this state. Our children have been denied the benefit of our equal parenting to their extreme detriment, the detriment of our family, and to the detriment of our town and state. I along with many parents I work with on social media and in the area of advocacy for Constitutional rights and family court reform, are against this bill. This bill is completely unnecessary. It would serve to only further embolden the abuses we, our children and our families have been subjected to and suffered at the hands of abusive family court judges in this state. Our State’s judges already enjoy significant special protection, including complete immunity from being held accountable for any of their misdeeds and violations of law, even if their action should cause the death of a child, which has happened all too often in this state.”
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2017/JFR/h/2017HB-05742-R00JUD-JFR.htm
“[Connecticut] spent millions prosecuting me while they ignored a real crime.” — Ted Taupier
Very true. But the public is not aware of how you were tortured and targeted.
… Ernst was influential. He served as a “personal representative for President Roosevelt during World War II.”
Moreover, he was well credentialed as a legal radical for serving as a founding member of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Ernst was also the attorney for Kinsey, Margaret Sanger, the Kinsey Institute, the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and Planned Parenthood of America.
Ernst had close ties to influential and progressive Supreme Court Justices Louis Brandeis, Brennan, Frankfurter and Judge Learned Hand, among others. Through the considerable efforts of Ernst, the Kinsey study would have special salience in the courtroom as its findings were plied there. In 1945, Ernst declared, “[w]e had fun educating juries and judges” with their new “scientific” sex information …
As noted, in his 1945 book, “The Best is Yet …,” Morris Ernst provides a preview of the forthcoming sex information that will, he says, change the nature of society. 👈
Ernst and Guyon had each prepared legal constructs to replace America’s sex offender laws before these arguments and Kinsey’s science appeared in the 1948 Male volume. Sections of Kinsey’s language regarding law reform appear to be copied from Guyon’s 1934 “The Ethics of Sexual Acts”, discussed later in this chapter. Ernst’s 1945 biography sheds further light on the source of Kinsey’s legal construct in the Male volume. Kinsey’s second authorized biographer, Christenson, reports that Ernst and Loth were taken to task in a Kinsey Institute press release for revealing their privileged access to the Kinsey data prior to the publication of the allegedly embargoed Male report. Kinsey biographer Cornelia Christenson, states: “The authors of this vitally significant article have long worked closely with Dr. Kinsey and his associates … Here they present for the first time the facts to be revealed in the new report.” [Christensen protests] In view of this [claim] the Institute issed a press release stating that the authors had not been given any special access to the material for the forth-coming book. That Ernst was Kinsey’s lawyer was hushed up … 👈
Dear Department of justice, we have been trying to get your attention for a while. Many good residents voters tax payers and no violent citizens would like you to come to Connecticut and do a real investigation. We are Americans. Paul went over the deep end. However if you have a look at what is really going on it would give you insight. I don’t think he’s a narrasist. Suffering court induced psychosis. . We allow daddy pedophiles to go free and have access to children. We don’t give Paul access to an attorney? We can’t figure out out who brought drugs in to the white house? The most secure place in our nation. The country is a mess. Paul went over board because his life was destroyed after his service to the country. He lost his children. He should not have said some of the thing he did. The family court system is a dangerous disgrace to our nation. Please start investigation and start charging people for the white collar crimes. That are harming people.
Just be nicer to them and they’ll definitely investigate themselves and hold themselves accountable for their crimes this time. Good plan. 👍🏻
Threatening and getting yourself arrested probably is not the way to go. Paul Boyne brought to light what is happening in family court. He put a lot of people in contact with one another. Because of the same family court system players. His blog was a staple read for even the attorneys. However he went to far.
Which world, precisely, are allowed to be used to describe the selling of our children by public officials? Tell me the words that are legal, please.
Atrocity crimes. A widespread systemic attack directed against a civilian population including murder, enslavement and torture. I think that sums up the family court system in Connecticut.
His suggestive thoughts v.s reality
Isn’t hate speech free speech? I wonder why they want him silenced?
2016: Connecticut Prosecutors Are Gone Baby Gone:
For the past several decades nearly all criminal prosecutions of consequence in Connecticut have been brought by federal prosecutors who have successfully pursued a succession of spectacular cases involving municipalities, high level politicians (including a sitting governor), police departments, and other significant cases. During this time Connecticut prosecutors, and the grand juries which act as their powerful investigative arm, have stood idly by, demonstrating little activity or interest in bringing sophisticated prosecutions of their own.
In these post Ferguson days – where the quality of criminal justice is a matter of needed public debate – it is time in Connecticut that someone acknowledges the elephant in the room; namely, where have all of Connecticut’s prosecutors gone? And in addressing this question, who is it that decides whether someone should be charged with a crime anyway?
https://spinella-law.com/pg/blog/June-2016-B.php
Why does that matter?
Crime pays. Over and over again. You are absolutely right. The public defender’s office has it’s hands in everything. The prosecutor office is a gost town. Under funded and understaffed. Connecticut is heaven for criminals it discusting
When people step into a public forum they are not protected from blistering criticism. Their actions are fair game to speak about in the most shocking, graphic, nasty terms we want. It is a proud boast of our jurisprudence that enjoy the freedom to express our hate. The standard does not turn on anyone’s feelings about what we have to say or how we say it.
I have literally been told that family court is not a public forum. In CT and NY. Lots of gag orders.
Those have to be challenged every single time. They know it cannot withstand a challenge so they rely on intimidation and threats to wear you down. Never let that go without filing a suit for prior restraint.
“The mission of the Connecticut Judicial Branch is to serve the interests of justice and the public by resolving matters brought before it in a fair, timely, efficient and open manner.“
Family court is a public forum unless a judge closes the courtroom or seals a case file.
Anyone can visit a courthouse to sit in on most any family court hearing or trial.
Most family court opinions are online — and many Connecticut AFCC family court opinions should be overturned (non-violently, of course) because of all that fraud upon the court.
Where is the warrant from the last year’s confiscation? It’s doesn’t exist- yes that’s right- no warrant can get your house raided as far as Connecticut is concerned
Well where exactly would Virginia file an out-of-state warrant that goes *poof* at the Connecticut state line? The whole thing was a backroom deal because the feds told Joette and company to kick rocks, the blog is all 1A protected speech. Several times, in fact.
Is that true?
“Well where exactly would Virginia file an out-of-state warrant that goes *poof* at the Connecticut state line? The whole thing was a backroom deal because the feds told Joette and company to kick rocks, the blog is all 1A protected speech. Several times, in fact.”
Which sources confirmed all of that?
Where’s the out-of-state warrant that went “*poof* at the Connecticut state line”?
Who says, “the feds told Joette and company to kick rocks, the blog is all 1A protected speech”?
“Several times, in fact.”?
When did all of that happen?
The documents said. Over the past few years. CT did get its way with the federal channels so they instead coordinated backroom deals through ADL.
*DID NOT
“CT didn’t get its way with the federal channels so they instead coordinated backroom deals through ADL.”?
Out-of-state warrants went “*poof* at the Connecticut state line several times?
“the feds told Joette and company to kick rocks, the blog is all 1A protected speech”?
Is all that on pubic record or is all of that a secret?
Has anyone filed a FOIA request for the Fairfax County records?
Ted Taupier was doing the forensic accounting on CT afcc- look where that got him. While I don’t think people should be called ethnic, racial, or religious slurs- I don’t see anyone being threatened.
I think it’s just another stunning example of what courts do to to circumvent issues in a case- all of the cases blogged about were not helped with the blogs- in fact the blogs were used to color the intended family court victims to avoid the actual wrongdoing the judges and attorneys are doing to children. The same thing here- make it sensational about some crank but avoid the actual crime and mistreatment – abuse of children and parents, the extortion that is taking place. It’s more CT smoke and mirror to keep people from looking at the actual appalling conduct: the people and systems who are paid with taxpayer money who are abusing and defrauding. But the crank is the news? Nah
Does it get much attention when you don’t call them names?
It apparently gets ZERO attention unless you call them names.
The state should make a fortune if they sell tickets for the family court reform public hearings from now on.
March 26, 2013:
CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC Certificate of Incorporation: Nonstock Corporation Filing #0004828917 … Filed March 26, 2013 9:00 AM … “THE NATURE OF THE ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED OR THE PURPOSES TO BE PROMOTED BY THE CORPORATION: The Connecticut Chapter of AFCC, Inc, (The Chapter”) is established to promote a collaborative approach to serving the needs of children among those who work in and with family law systems, encouraging education, research and innovation and identifying best practices. Its members include judges, lawyers, mediators, evaluators, mental health professionals, academics, researchers, court administrators, and public policy makers. …”
Note: “Political activities and legislative activities (commonly referred to as lobbying) are two different things and are subject to two different sets of rules and have different consequences of exceeding the limitations. The rules applied in a given situation depend on several issues: The type of tax-exempt organization (different rules apply to private foundations than to other section 501(c)(3) organizations); The type of activity (political or lobbying) at issue, and
The scope or amount of the activity conducted.”
https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/political-and-lobbying-activities
March 27, 2013:
“Calendar year 2013, “or tax year beginning 03-27-2013 and ending 12-31-2013” the CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC filed taxes as a 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation.
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/462716503
April 19, 2013:
Committee on Judicial Ethics Teleconference: “… the Committee (with one member recused) determined that the prohibition on serving as an officer, director, trustee or nonlegal advisor of an organization concerned with the law, the legal system or the administration of justice if the organization “will frequently be engaged in adversary proceedings in the court of which the judge is a member” applies, not only when the organization is a party to adversary proceedings, but also when the organization supplies witnesses and reports for use in adversary proceedings. Based upon the foregoing, an appearance of impropriety would arise if a Judicial Official serving on the board of directors of a nonprofit organization or member of the Judicial Official’s staff were to refer clients to the nonprofit organization. Further, the nonprofit organization may use or attempt to use the prestige of the Judicial Official’s office when seeking additional contracts with the Judicial Branch or others. Accordingly, the Committee, with one member recused, unanimously determined that service on the nonprofit organization’s board of directors would violate Rules 1.2, 1.3, 3.1 and 3.7(a)(6)(B).“
June 19, 2014:
“INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
P. O. BOX 2508
CINCINNATI, OH 45201
Date: Jun 19 2014
CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC
385 ORANGE ST
NEW HAVEN, CT 06511
Employer Identification Number: 46-2716503
Dear Applicant :
We are pleased to inform you upon review of your application for tax exempt status we have determined that you are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. …“
Online Connecticut Business Search: CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC
https://service.ct.gov/business/s/onlinebusinesssearch?language=en_US
… 7/6/1984 CT Dept. of Revenue Services notifies the AFCC that they must file their Application for Withdrawal with a statement that the AFCC has made arrangements to pay the Department all unpaid taxes
12/10/1984 CT Judicial Branch Manager and AFCC President Anthony Salius and Milne file an Application of Withdrawal of Foreign Corporation for the AFCC with the CT Sec. of State … 🤔
In 1984, IRS employees decided members of Connecticut AFCC businesses had to pay taxes on their earnings made in those for-profit activities of their corporation. Connecticut AFCC closed up shop … and stayed in business.
In 2013, they hung the “OPEN” sign in their window again. They didn’t pay taxes on their earnings made in those for-profit activities of their corporation. They closed up shop again in 2015 … and stayed in business again.
Before the whole state sinks with the exposure of the massive cover-up of all that fraud on most every court in the state, can someone on the Judicial Ethics Committee offer a comment about what looks like a tip of an iceberg up ahead?
For example, does ANYONE on the Judicial Ethics Committee think the New Haven DOJ “Public Corruption Task Force” should investigate the entire history of the Connecticut AFCC Inc. network and prosecute as necessary?
Can someone from an IRS office explain why CT AFCC Inc had to pay taxes in 1984, but not 2013 – 2015?
Can someone from the Secretary of State’s office explain why they weren’t registered to do business in the state from 1984 to 2013 … and after 2015?
Do any AFCC offices have a list of all members dues, state funds, federal funds, admission fees and the value of business generated with client referrals since 1984?
What ledger shows how the $50,000 grant in 2002 and the $50,000 grant in 2005 were spent?
Do investigators at The Connecticut Mirror know about the public-private corporation in family courts?
Has The Connecticut Inside Investigator investigated?
What does The State Comptroller know about it? The State Comptroller’s website looks like they’re fully committed to transparency now. Let’s write a few letters and post the responses we receive:
https://osc.ct.gov/openct/
Office of the State Comptroller
State of Connecticut
165 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, Connecticut 06106
Telephone: (860) 702-3300
Please copy (and maybe send it to the New Haven DOJ office?) before it’s censored:
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/462716503/201501399349100000/full
Committee on Judicial Ethics Teleconference Friday, April 19, 2013 ⬅️ :
“… V. The Committee discussed Informal JE 2013-15 concerning whether a Judicial Official may serve on the board of directors of a nonprofit organization ⬅️ that provides services to court-involved clients and receives the majority of its funding from contracts with the Judicial Branch.
The nonprofit organization ⬅️ has multiple contracts with the Judicial Branch to provide various assessments and services to, inter alia, litigants in family, juvenile and criminal court matters (hereinafter “clients”). Clients may be referred directly by the court, as well as by probation and family services personnel. Various contracts require the nonprofit organization to provide reports to the court and to have personnel appear in court to testify regarding a client’s success or failure to complete the services and programs provided by the nonprofit organization ⬅️.
Rule 1.2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct states that a judge “should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the … impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety. The test for appearance of impropriety is whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge violated this Code or engaged in other conduct that reflects adversely on the judge’s honesty, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge.”
Rule 1.3 of the Code states that a “judge shall not use or attempt to use the prestige of judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others or allow others to do so.”
Rule 3.1 of the Code states that a Judicial Official may engage in extrajudicial activities, except as prohibited by law; however, a judge may not participate in extrajudicial activities that will (1) interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties, (2) lead to frequent disqualification, (3) appear to a reasonable person to undermine the judge’s independence, integrity or impartiality, or (4) appear to a reasonable person to be coercive.
Rule 3.7(a) provides that a judge “may participate in activities sponsored by organizations or governmental entities concerned with the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice… including,…(6) serving as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of such an organization or entity, unless it is likely that the organization or entity: (A) will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before the judge; or (B) will frequently be engaged in adversary proceedings in the court of which the judge is a member or in any court subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the court of which the judge is a member.” The rule’s commentary states that “[e]ven for law related organizations, a judge should consider whether the membership and purposes of the organization, or the nature of the judge’s participation in or association with the organization, would conflict with the judge’s obligation to refrain from activities that reflect adversely on a judge’s independence, integrity, and impartiality.” Rule 3.7, cmt. (2).
In discussing Rule 3.7(a)(6)(B), the Committee (with one member recused) determined that the prohibition on serving as an officer, director, trustee or nonlegal advisor of an organization concerned with the law, the legal system or the administration of justice if the organization “will frequently be engaged in adversary proceedings in the court of which the judge is a member” applies, not only when the organization is a party to adversary proceedings, but also when the organization supplies witnesses and reports for use in adversary proceedings. Based upon the foregoing, an appearance of impropriety would arise if a Judicial Official serving on the board of directors of a nonprofit organization or member of the Judicial Official’s staff were to refer clients to the nonprofit organization ⬅️. Further, the nonprofit organization ⬅️ may use or attempt to use the prestige of the Judicial Official’s office when seeking additional contracts with the Judicial Branch or others. Accordingly, the Committee, with one member recused, unanimously determined that service on the nonprofit organization’s board of directors would violate Rules 1.2, 1.3, 3.1 and 3.7(a)(6)(B).“
🦗🦗🦗 (crickets)
“… Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation
Do not enter Social Security numbers on this form as it may be made public.
By law, the IRS cannot redact the information on the form …
… For calendar year 2013, or tax year beginning 03-27-2013 , and ending 12-31-2013 ⬅️
Name of foundation CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC
Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address)
PO BOX 9135
Room/suite City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code
NEW HAVEN, CT06532“
Check type of organization: Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation ⬅️
Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation …”
🦗🦗🦗 (crickets)
“INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
P. O. BOX 2508
CINCINNATI, OH 45201
Date: Jun 19 2014 ⬅️
CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC
385 ORANGE ST
NEW HAVEN, CT 06511
Employer Identification Number: 46-2716503
Dear Applicant :
We are pleased to inform you upon review of your application for tax exempt status we have determined that you are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. …“
🦗🦗🦗 (crickets)
Can a few good lawyers please explain what happened?
A Connecticut Judicial Ethics Committee was somehow under the impression that CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC was “a nonprofit organization” as of April 19, 2013. Was it actually a nonprofit organization?
Were they operating as a for-profit or a non-profit before — and after — June 19, 2014?
Who established CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC, when and for what purposes?
… thinking many “what about” thoughts regarding almost twenty years of New York AG machinations. 🧐
All those years these judges lived I fear 😱 of Boynes
It’s amazing how simple the solution really is, but it never occurs to them: STOP RAPING CHILDREN. 🙄
“CT Court Employees Face Tough Questions Over Conflicts of Interest …
… Boyne says that Horowitz failed to provide all the services and reports
outlined in the court order, then recused himself from his appointment to
the Boyne case in May 2012. Yet in fall 2012, Judge Lynda B. Munro and
Judicial Branch Manager Mary Kay West administratively authorized
payments to Horowitz at more than twice the state rate, even though no
court order on record had approved the payments.
Through an open records request, the Judicial Branch provided the same billing records on the Boyne case which were less redacted than the records the state provided to Boyne himself. The copy showed that Horowitz made calls to the Connecticut Department of Children and Families the day before he recused himself from the Boyne case.
Both Boyne and his ex-wife’s attorney, Daniel Kennedy, confirmed in emails that prior to being contacted, they were unaware of any communications Horowitz may have had with DCF about the Boyne case. Boyne says that his correspondence with DCF show Horowitz had billed the State for a report the doctor made against his ex-wife, which was rejected by DCF because Horowitz had never met the Boyne children. ..”
https://www.scribd.com/document/254535614/CT-Court-Employees-Face-Tough-Questions-Over-Conflicts-of-Interest-Washington-Times#
The books are in care of ROBERT HORWITZ PHD … https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/462716503/201501399349100000/full
Dear New Haven DOJ office,
Please see “Full text of “Full Filing” for fiscal year ending Dec. 2013“ …
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/462716503/201501399349100000/full
… and compare those numbers with your findings in your 2015 Connecticut Public Corruption Task Force mission.
“Connecticut (November 3, 2015) – U.S. Attorney Deirdre M. Daly announced on November 3, 2015 new supervisory appointments within the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Connecticut. Assistant U.S. Attorney Liam Brennan ’07 of the FFPC (Financial Fraud and Public Corruption) Unit has been asked to lead the Connecticut Public Corruption Task Force, which investigates corrupt public officials, the misuse of public funds and related criminal activity.
Mr. Brennan joined the Justice Department’s Fraud Section in Washington, D.C. in 2007, and moved to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in 2011. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame in 2001 and Yale Law School in 2007.
“Our office is fortunate to have many experienced and talented attorneys dedicated to keeping our communities safe, enforcing federal laws fairly and consistently, and representing the interests of the United States in court,” said U.S. Attorney Daly. “The AUSAs stepping into these supervisory roles are highly qualified and possess the skills and qualities to be effective and respected leaders. I am honored to work side by side these men and women as well as all the members of our supervisory team.”
The U.S. Attorney’s Office is charged with enforcing federal criminal laws in Connecticut and representing the federal government in civil litigation. The Office is composed of approximately 65 Assistant U.S. Attorneys and approximately 50 staff members at offices in New Haven, Hartford and Bridgeport.
For more information about the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut, please visit http://www.justice.gov/ct. …”
The Connecticut DOJ website says, “Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher M. Mattei, who is Chief of the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s Financial Fraud and Public Corruption Unit, is coordinating the Task Force. The FBI has committed resources to support all Task Force investigations and serves as the lead investigative agency.”
Would Liam Brennan and/or Christopher M. Mattei be willing and able to meet with Paul Boyne and Ted Taupier to discuss what everyone knows about the issues raised?
A series of panel discussions aired on LIVE TV would be a great venue and could realistically save the state of Connecticut trillions of exponential dollars in the long run.
I, Ted l. Gunderson, hereby swear under the pains of penalties of jury that the following statements are true and correct.
My name is Ted L. Gunderson
I am the owner and operator of Ted L. Gunderson & Associates an international security and consulting firm based out of Santa Monica, California. I am currently a licensed private investigator in the state of California .
Previous to my work as a private investigator I spent nearly three decades in the FBI Between 1951 and 1960, I was an FBI Special Agent. In 1960, I was promoted as a supervisor at FBI Headquarters in Washington, DC, where I was in charge of Organized Crime and Racketeering investigations covering 26 Offices nationwide.
Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, I was re-assigned to Special Inquiry White House Matters at FBI Headquarters. In 1965, I was promoted again to Assistant Special Agent-In-Charge of Internal Security and Anti-Terrorism of the FBI New Haven, Connecticut Field Office.
In 1970, I was promoted to Assistant Special Agent In-Charge of the FBI Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Field Office. On July 12, 1972, I successfully negotiated with two terrorist hijackers of National Airlines Flight 496 for the release of 119 passengers at Philadelphia International Airport. In 1973, I was promoted to Chief Inspector at FBI Headquarters. I also served as Special Agent-In-Charge of the FBI Memphis and Dallas Field Offices. I retired from the FBI as Senior Special Agent-In-Charge of the Los Angeles Field Office of the FBI with over 700 employees and a budget of over 22 million dollars in 1979.
Based on my investigative work, which includes intelligence from sources such as active and former members of the Intelligence Services (including the FBI, the CIA, the NSA and Military Intelligence), information from informants active in criminal enterprises, and, victim testimonies, l have come to the conclusion that thousands of victims have been targeted by an illegal government rogue criminal enterprise that is active 24 hours a day within the US. This conspiracy is far too active to be controlled or operated by private enterprise whose goals are achieving financial gain. These operations require extensive financing with no return on the investment. This program’s operations are financed by illegal black operations, i.e., narcotics, prostitution, child kidnapping (children sell at covert auctions for up to $50,000 per child), human trafficking, gambling and other rackets.
I have documentation and know that throughout the U.S., operating 24 hours-a-day and 7 days-a-week, there is a Central Command, located within the US, with multiple satellite offices, whose administrators can instantly initiate surveillance, phone taps and harassment against any individual in the country. They have the technology, financing and manpower to dispense illegal surveillance and harassment against anyone at any time day or night. I have files on numerous cases of active, programmatic, illegal government harassment currently being conducted against thousands of Americans. This makes the FBI’s former COINTELPRO program, which I worked on, including in a supervisory capacity, look like a Sunday school program by comparison.
I firmly believe that most individuals working in the FBI, other intelligence agencies, and the government overall are honest, law-abiding public servants. However, a sophisticated network of rogue operatives has secretly infiltrated the FBI, other intelligence agencies including the CIA, and other key government positions. This rogue element seeks personal power and wealth and they consider themselves above the law and the Constitution.
They are carrying out the aforementioned surveillance and harassment activities in conjunction with organized crime, the cult movement in America including Satanic cults, other commercial and political interests, and even misguided civic organizations and neighborhood groups.
This illegal surveillance and harassment program is being called gang stalking and organized stalking by the victims targeted by it. The Victims are targeted for a variety of reasons, including government and corporate whistleblowers, parties to financial and employment disputes, parties to marital disputes (usually divorced women), and even jilted paramours. Journalists, covering controversial issues, and, even attorneys and private investigators representing unpopular clients or interests, have been targeted by this program.
Individuals targeted by this program have been subjected to illegal and unconstitutional phone taps, illegal re-routing of business and private phone calls for purposes of harassment, illegal audio “bugging”, surreptitious entry into home, office, and vehicle, visual surveillance in the home conducted by illegal placement of miniature remote, wireless cameras (often accessible via internet), illegal internet spyware, illegal GPS tracking (often through their own mobile phones), regular fixed and mobile surveillance, mail misdirection, mail theft and tampering, financial and employment sabotage, slander campaigns and community ostracizing, internet disinformation and smear campaigns, poisoning, assaults and murder, illegal set-ups on drug charges and other felony charges, amongst many other civil rights abuses.
In addition to high-ranking members of the FBI, other intelligence services, and the government overall, wealthy, powerful members of criminal syndicates, multi-millionaires and the corporate elite are using the government gang stalking program to harass enemies. They can get a targeted individual harassed for the rest of that individual life (individual cases of gang stalking lasting for over a decade are common), The higher status members of the gang stalking conspiracy initiate the gang stalking and coordinate logistics and funding. Lower echelon government rogue operatives, lower ranking members of the military (in violation of Posse Comitatus), petty criminals and street thugs perform the actual grunt work of daily monitoring and harassment of individuals targeted by the program.
Based on my professional experience, extensive intelligence information and belief, It is my professional opinion that the FBI is involved in and, has investigative files on the subject of gang stalking, related gang stalking methods, and gang stalking groups in the FBI’s vast intelligence files, that are responsive to Mr. Labella’s FOIA Complaint.
Furthermore, I have personally referred numerous victims of gang stalking to the appropriate agents at the F.B.I. for investigation of their cases. I have also furnished the FBI with documentation of an active, international child-kidnapping ring probably operated by rogue CIA agents. The FBI has ignored my requests to investigate even though it is their responsibility to investigate kidnappings. I have a contact in Germany who advises me that the CIA has set up secret operations on US military bases for the kidnapping, sale and tracking of children worldwide.
The FBI may be using a unique codename and nomenclature for the gang-stalking phenomenon in its records. The FBI and other intelligence agencies are administering and covering up the rogue, covert, government criminal enterprise of gang stalking.
The gang stalking phenomenon appears in the records of both the FBI and the NSA in their records pertaining to the Echelon Program, Carnivore System, and Tempest Systems. In addition, the gang stalking phenomenon appears in the records of both the FBI and the NSA, in their records pertaining to information collected by Narus systems. Narus is a wholly owned subsidiary of defense contractor Boeing that produces sophisticated, mass surveillance computer systems currently being used by both the FBI and the NSA.
Dated this 23 day of April 2011.
Los Angeles, California
“… Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, I was re-assigned to Special Inquiry White House Matters at FBI Headquarters. In 1965, I was promoted again to Assistant Special Agent-In-Charge of Internal Security and Anti-Terrorism of the FBI New Haven, Connecticut Field Office …”
Mattei left the investigation and went private within months. Bill nardini criminal prosecutor for ct doj got rewarded with second circuit fed judge spot- life time appointment. Connecticut has bought and paid for it’s continued illegal action- look at the federal bench in ct!
Are the criminals reading Frank report? No not enough slides for them to have interest
It’s 2023. Anyone with 18 bucks and google maps can see your house and the layout of the area.
I really dislike most of the language used. And the insane, pointless racism. For me it’s enough to call family court judges rampant civil rights, child human trafficking and favor trading scumbag criminals that need replacing with a real system of justice that doesn’t leave a child almost invariably in worse conditions than they began in before entering their courts.
It’s really time for legislators and people in positions to make change to start paying attention, because apparently the angry and not too afraid to say it are going after justice they are currently being refused.
While I believe in peaceful protest and peaceful actions, not everyone does, and the longer they ignore the problem the more people like this they are helping to create. Law enforcement isn’t for use to subvert protest or squash rights. That is government overreach. A judge has power only in a courthouse, and it should never be as much as they are allowed already without any oversight.
Want to not be targeted for protest? Act how you are expected to by law, judicial code, court rules, and with as much impartiality as possible. You know, the bare fucking minimum you are expected to do. Actually read filings. Admit conflict and recuse yourself before wasting our time and money. Stop selling our childrens futures to your attorney friends. That might reduce your problems.
The much bigger problem isn’t the protest site so much as nobody providing anyone victimized by these corrupt people any avenue of relief, and in some cases people are choosing to kill themselves over this trauma of essentially becoming a slave to someone you wanted to be away from while being tortured and pariahed to the community in some cases.
The children are almost invariably the bearers of the biggest impacts from the court, with every negative life experience possibility going up by huge percentages. But the big news sources are owned, and the judges don’t want what they do public. So it is never talked about. There are no human rights, evidence standards, or requirements by anyone to obey your civil rights in family court. The attorney that the judge just traded favors with will lie for them, because that is their meal ticket and the CA BAR doesn’t do their job, acts illegally with immunity as it has no state oversight and my opinion requires third party independent oversight for the amount of money and extremely small number of complaints they handle.
The clerks, reporters, “mental health specialists” everyone, is corrupt. Lawmakers not only let it get this bad, they have been turning away from complaints and making loopholes to excuse government from having to observe civil rights for decades. Creating laws and making it harder to get relief while making fake placative legislations that claim the same corrupt business is somehow going to start telling on itself. It’s all bullshit. We need real change and we needed it in family and probate court for at least 3 decades.
John,
Here we have something that almost everybody agrees is bad, but we cannot agree on just what it is we are against.
How would this work in a football game, for example? Can you imagine how effective the defense of a football team would be if the front four could not agree with the linebackers who could not agree with the corner backs who could not agree with the safety men who could not agree with the assistant coaches who could not agree with the head coach as to what kind of defense they should put up against the offense being presented?
The obvious result would be chaos. You could take a sand lot team and successfully pit them against the Green Bay Packers if the Packers couldn’t agree on what it is they are opposing.
The first principle in any encounter, whether it be football or war (hot or cold), is: Know your enemy. The American people do not know their enemy.
They do if they read Paul’s blog…
April 6, 2017:
The first “TheFamilyCourtCircus” blog post … “A blog to shine a light on the cockroaches of Family Court.”
It seems that blog was Paul’s good faith (adolescent) effort to support his brother Ted in the literal “family court” war against children and families in Connecticut.
January 25, 2018:
State v. Taupier argued in the Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Taupier was about a private email exchange among friendly friends and acquaintances. Ted might have had a beer or two next to his keyboard. He wrote a fairly creative paragraph in that email thread flaunting his writing skills, his manliness and his knowledge of weaponry (it’s what many men do in America).
That email conversation was about the blatant and horrible — in some cases literally unspeakably evil — corruption in Connecticut family courts at that time.
Parents in family court cases were unable to do anything about that blatant and horrible — in some cases literally unspeakably evil — corruption at that time and Ted simply provided a creative outlet for himself, his friends and his acquaintances in that friendly email thread.
Breaking news: Many grown men act like adolescents, sometimes.
The same New Haven DOJ office that this year plans to extradite Paul announced a “Public Corruption Investigation” in 2015. Victims of family courts submitted evidence of corruption in family courts to FBI offices. The New Haven FBI office might have evidence of corruption in Paul’s case and many other cases involving many of the same family court judges, attorneys and vendors — many associated with Connecticut AFCC, Inc.
Parents called the “FBI Hotline number” provided. They called in information about the corruption. That was 2014 – 15 and then … everything stayed the same.
Many said the corruption the DOJ had to have noticed was too big to address in public. Mr. Adelman and many others were involved — many with roots and acquaintances in the New Haven area.
The DOJ was ignoring the blatant corruption. Those two men obviously couldn’t do anything about the corruption without help from the authorities. They were helpless victims and they still are. That’s one of the most sinister things about this.
The authorities punished both fathers for expressing their intent to address the corruption — just as the “family courts” punish protective mothers for trying to protect children from sexual abuse.
Good mothers and fathers were trying everything at that time. Billboards, petitions, speaking at public hearings in the state Capitol and the DOJ announced a “public corruption investigation“.
Someone representing the sentiments of several of the corrupt judges, attorneys and vendors the family court wrote an editorial. The Hartford Courant published it with the title, “A Call to Arms”. Good parents who complained about the corruption were to be known as “disgruntled litigants”.
That was then. It’s still the same corruption now. Parents still can’t battle the corruption without help from mainstream news and the authorities. Ted handled it his way. Paul seems to have handled it the way Ted handled it in that creative email comment to amplify the point about free speech the Connecticut Supreme Court should have upheld.
Catherine Kassenoff in New York handled it a different way. Look at what Jennifer Dulos wrote in a few of her Patch articles. Jennifer handled it that way. Family courts destroy families. That’s what looks like some kind of very big, very offensive and very premeditated plan.
“The New Haven FBI office might have evidence of corruption in Paul’s case and many other cases involving many of the same family court judges, attorneys and vendors — many associated with Connecticut AFCC, Inc.”
With excerpts from documents about Connecticut AFCC 1984 to 2013 – 2015 posted in public comment sections on FR, will some New Haven FBI office employees learn for the first time about the corruption in Connecticut family courts?
“The New Haven FBI office might have evidence of corruption in Paul’s case and many other cases involving many of the same family court judges, attorneys and vendors — many associated with Connecticut AFCC, Inc.“
“Boyne only spoke evil, the corrupt ones in Family Court do real evil.”
Thats what I kept thinking. He only wrote what a part of society is thinking. He wrote words into the ether. It literally hurt no one physically. Grossman, Adelman Muckshit etc do actual harm to humanity not Boynes loose fingertips.
Courtroom stalking by CT family court judges.
I’ve been threatened, intimidated, and had my child taken from me by Grossman.
Where is my criminal recourse? I assure the public Grossman has terrorized parents and children – and had her flying monkeys hunt them outside of the courtroom.
Grossmans orders REQUIRE parents to abuse their children.
She’s no victim. This is a joke. They hate the exposure.
I believe we will find Paul Boyne to have experienced a “terrible accident” or alleged “suicide” .
It will be a long awaited trial and these thugs in black robes cannot handle discovery.
They needed him silenced. Their infrastructure is being compromised. There are employees within the system who wish for the abuse to end. He had informants in nearly all the courthouses. The judges couldn’t risk it anymore.
Sound of Freedom … watch it.
I agree! She is pure evil! I think she was that girl in school that was unpopular and now wants revenge! Reasonable individuals dont make matters worse they make things work out! Divorce is not a criminal activity but it’s a money court supporting their kingdom and jobs including their pensions! The Child Support Enforcement (CSE) program was enacted in 1975 as a federal-state program (Title IV-D of the Social Security Act).
The judges in CT fear exposure of their criminal enterprise. Gerard Adelman is protected. It was already determined that he was a leader of criminal activity- running the AFCC as a business through the judiciary.
No one touches him.
He stole Paige Styvan’s daughter and made a divorce decree that ensured Paige would never see her daughter again.
Attorney Nancy Aldrich followed the playbook with Adelman. Got plenty of bank they violated all due process. Snatched her daughter from school as she appeared in court.
Paige was a healthy, loving mother with no history of child abuse or mental health issues.
She was dragged through regional family trial docket where most child abductions are finalized- tormenting living mothers through a sham of a legal process.
Final orders require mother to jump through hoops with no basis, no objectives, no medical doctors expertise – controlled entirely by adelmans buddies- court appointed child molesters abc abusers like Robert and Sidney Horowitz.
And Paige made the lethal mistake of being in contact with adelmans nemesis- Paul Boyne.
That put an end to Paige. That little girl had her mother snatched from her life. Never to see her again after leaving for elementary school that morning.
Paige and her family resided in the wealthy town of Westport, CT, where attorney vultures prey upon unsuspecting victims.
Paige’s husband- the financier of the child abduction, had Hollywood connections. Sound familiar?
Adelman also destroyed the life of Susan Skipp, a mom who had her children stolen and was hunted and tormented by the police working wrongfully as an extension of a civil court.
Adelman lied during his judicial reappointment hearings- saying he had no interaction with Susan Skipp. He was called out in this lie but he was still pushed through to continue his abuse of power and tyrannical rule.
Adelman orders sticks to be liquidated without a mothers consent- he orders they be liquidated and given in whole to the financier of the family court child abduction scam. He did this in the Ambrose case. It’s larceny by judicial rule.
Adelman breaks child bonds. He condones child abusers and isolation. He’s done it for decades as he violates all statutes put in place to protect the exploitation of children and family bank.
In all cases Adelman insists the gals sit through trials. At rates as high as $3200 per day. Adelman helps himself to a chunk of that change. He does it in all cases. And it doesn’t matter if you protest or object to the gal sitting through trial daily with no purpose other than billable hours- he did that in the Ambrose case. The wife left homeless and no access to funds. Adelman and Grossman set up the scam. Daddy Ambrose controls the bank. Mom has no access. Who cares if she rejects the court appointed experts. As long as daddy Ambrose has access and pays in demand, she’ll ge locked out until her part of the family fortune is divided among the courts den of thieves.
Adelman and Grossman are child abusers. Grossman abducted many children in the fraud of custody evaluator Buren Caverly. Grossman denied being familiar with her work even though she had multiple cases of child snatching before her.
Grossman took Riordan’s kids and Joriz Tiberi’s kids on caverly reports. She has another caverly case before her — now six years post judgement and the court still hangs in to these cases! Jocelyn Hurwitz is involved as well. She and caberly are thick as thieves. And gal Lisa Knopf is the post judgment gal which is not supposed to exist. She’s been draining funds and isolating the kids for six years now with grossman smiling all the way to the bank.
Adelman and Grossman instill fear and hunt mothers and children.
Grossman is a criminal. She’s hunted mothers to silence children.
Wretched, evil conspirators in the CT family court system. They are not victims but perpetrators of crimes.
The vile terms and references suggesting they beg for bullets to the head do not rise to a criminal level.
CT is trying to pass legislation that prevents anyone from criticizing judges. The fact that all court appointed experts get immunity- when they are in highly paid positions encourages the rampant child abuse.
This is s vendetta against Paul Boyne.
If the prosecutors and the ct government spent a fraction of the time investigating the criminal acts — the child abuse, violation of civil rights, lack of due process and blatant larceny – at the direction of family court judges- our family courts would change dramatically.
Instead our government turns a blind eye and decent judges are tarnished by the reputation of those in the family court cabal.
Minnie Gonzales knows it all. Legislatures have to meet in secrecy to even field credible information because of the power of CT child predators that fund the ct family court system.
The arrest of Paul Boyne was done to silence him and instill fear in anyone who reports and exposes their bad acts.
Judges take children when they learn any parent has shared court information with Paul Boyne. Freedom of association is not allowed. Paul Boyne knows all. He is part of an intelligent network that runs throughout the country – a network that includes constitutional scholars and parents previously destroyed by family courts. They work in unison to share information and halt the madness. This is why they worked so hard to get Paul Boyne.
Dr. Robert Horwitz, PhD, Treasurer, CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC INC
Dr. Sidney S Horowitz, fan of a game called “Angry Birds”
Robert Horwitz… child trafficker. Adelman’s sidekick. Protected by federal govt.
Now that Paul is in jail and Catherine is dead, who is going to write the thousands of motions these “Disgruntled litigants” file? 😀
The suspense is just killing you.
Someone needs to take over the blog!
This is 1000% correct. And anyone outside of CT who speaks to him as well- or who they want to accuse of speaking to him. He and the blog are used to strip children away from mothers repeatedly, most cases involving abuse. All cases have GALs or AFCs. All cases bankrupt mothers and turn mentally stable mothers into broken humans because these courts and people involved in specific cases are comparable to torture chambers. No matter what you do to try to stop it, the more you are punished. Mostly mothers, and their children are waterboarded to be silenced about what goes on, and how no one protects the children (or mothers) from severe torture and abuse- FOR YEARS. Only to demand psych evals at your own expense by THEIR “professionals”. It is worse than being in a war zone. One of my psychiatrists explained that our military comes home from the war zones. The mothers and children are forced to repeatedly be exposed to severe trauma and abuse day after day, living in constant fear, losing their children- which is not natural per human nature or God/ or whomever you believe in. Their process is satanic. And the money they are all making on these cases far exceeds the salaries reported. Back door deals day after day. Kids for cash. It’s pay to play, and no one is allowed to speak of what goes on. Connect the dots. It’s the game you have to play here. And follow the money. People are so offended by Boyne’s WORDS; why are they not offended by the ACTIONS that go on destroying women and children? Words? Really? Get a grip. Our children and their mothers are being mutilated one court order after another.
Connecticut has already done this to Ted Taupier. They’ll do the same to Boyne. This is a blatant violation of hus first amendment rights, but CT has a history of doing this.
Just what they did to Ted Taupier. The affidavit used to raid his home and steal his belongings referenced that Paul was in touch with Ted T – who was convicted of threatening a judge.
This is such bullshit.
Corrupt family court judges steal, chest and lie to destroy families and profit.
When parents like Ted, Paul and Susan Skipp stand up for their rights, and the rights of others they are vilified and targeted.
Ted went to prison for s private email exchange saying that a judge deserved to be harmed/die etc. it was s private email! It was his opinion! No threat anywhere.
Connecticut is getting exposed for the evil it promotes. They destroy families- Christmas and Easter come and go and we are denied the god given right to raise our children.
The animals of family court-
“The West Midlands Police officer told the campaigner that he had to caution her and then asked her: ‘What are you here for today?’
‘Physically, I’m just standing here,’ Mss Vaughan-Spruce, from Malvern, Worcestershire, replied.
‘Why here of all places? I know you don’t live nearby,’ the officer asked.
She responded: ‘But this is an abortion centre.’
The officer said: ‘Okay, that’s why you’re stood here. Are you here as part of a protest? Are you praying?’
She denied she was protesting but when asked if she was praying she said: ‘I might be praying in my head, but not out loud.’
The officer then arrested her on suspicion of failing to comply with a public spaces protection order.
She is now due to appear at Birmingham Magistrates Court on February 2 charged with four counts of failing to comply with a Public Space Protection Order.“
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11571487/Catholic-woman-arrested-charged-PRAYING-outside-Birmingham-abortion-clinic-buffer-zone.html
They’ll have to survive through the extradition process first.
Michael,
Can you find Paul and interview him?
Can someone update us on Paul’s status and well-being?
He’s ok. He is tough and I expect he’ll endure this and find a way to come out of it with a few more scalps in the end.
It’s a secret.
Well
We know you haven out addresses on your blog as well. I believe that is poor form.
“We”?