Justice For Catherine Kassenoff or Witch Hunt? Allan’s Friend Speaks out

Allan Kassenoff

Editor’s Note:

I get a fair amount of hate mail. And sometimes it begins angry, then turns around. I received the following in a series of texts. I think the person who sent these texts has something important to say. It is an insight into the private lives of America’s most scrutinized divorce and custody dispute – Allan Kassenoff v Catherine Kassenoff. The dispute may well be over. No one has heard from Catherine since she posted on Facebook that she planned to commit suicide in Switzerland on May 27 – the day of her final post.

If there is proof that she went through with her medically assisted suicide, I have yet to see it. That does not mean she is not dead. It only means that until FR has proof, she is, at best, a presumptive suicide. All FR has is her last Facebook post as evidence.

Meanwhile, people are coming down pretty hard on Allan Kassenoff and his girlfriend. Maybe many people know her name. It’s out there on social media. I will refer to her by another name — Judith. Please don’t name her in the comments section. She is being doxxed and threatened. As is Allan. Below is a text she got. I cut off the bottom of it since her address was on it. Obviously, they had the phone number.

I am not justifying what Allan has done, but I think there is a better way than terrorizing him, or his girlfriend. Perhaps we can consider reforming the family court system by not being lower than the people we wish to reform.

A Friend of Allan Kassenoff and His Girlfriend, ‘Judith’

By ‘Miriam’

You hide behind your article, using it to profit your agenda!

What kind of language and you posting it online is considered crossing the line?

Allan met Judith when Catherine was already out of the house, and he had filed for divorce.

Judith is far from a home-wrecker. Allan’s girls love Judith, her children, and our extended family, who treats them with kindness and warmth.

I saw the youngest daughter dressed beautifully the other night, enjoying her time laughing and adoring all the attention showered upon her. No one brought up her mother. We just let her have a breath of fresh air.

No one went on any vacation. Who has time?!? And now the trolls call Judith at her workplace and post on her workplace’s website. But their attempts aren’t working, because Judith is not a trashy yoga teacher. She uses her job as an instructor to raise money for many causes!

You allow her to be trashed without any proof or evidence to these claims.

Why isn’t anyone writing about Catherine’s affair with some guy named ‘Jeffrey’ who she dated pre-marriage, and he was married, then dated him again while married to Allan?!?

They did not have an open marriage until she started seeing that guy again, and the texts Catherine is upset Allan saw on the computer were steamy texts between Catherine and ‘Jeffrey.’

Had it been reversed, trust me, Catherine would have posted them!

Allan got Catherine’s password and secretly spied on her emails and texts for several years. A friend of Allan says Catherine was upset about his spying and reading all her texts, especially since it was proof she was cheating on him.  

Are you and Robbie Harvey satisfied that you destroyed a good man, his girlfriend (not a mistress who thank gd lives in her own home) and their children, especially his?

TikTok celebrity Robbie Harvey, along with Frank Parlato, are blamed for ruining a good man, Allan Kassenoff’s life.

Allan Kassenoff, a good man, his friend says.

Not Real Domestic Abuse

Go online. I viewed domestic abuse videos. Allan’s so-called domestic abuse is lame compared to these.

Baloney to someone who posted “parents fight behind closed doors.” Every parent has lost their cool in front of their children!

It needs to stop

Allan Paid $1 Million Legal Fees, Not $3 Million as Catherine Says

Read the evidence. Just because Catherine says Allan paid $3,000,000 in legal fees, it must be so?!?!

The judge granted Catherine over $500,000 to even the playing field, as stated in the evidence, compared to Allan’s fees of just under $1,000,000! But that doesn’t make for a good story.

Other misinformation

Allan’s middle daughter told her mother she knew her password because Catherine set up the account for her!

Allan never told the children to tape supervised visits with Catherine. The girls did it on their own, claiming no one was listening to them!

Allan went for sole custody around the time Catherine started telling the girls to lie!

This whole thing needs to stop! People are posting their own narrative, projecting, with many false facts!

Judith Doesn’t Wear Catherine’s Clothes Either

People have said Judith moved in, and actually started wearing her clothes after Catherine was removed from the home.

BTW, Judith, as thin as she is, was still not as thin as Catherine, and could never have fit into her clothes to borrow!

Out of Control Catherine Supporters

Look what you and Robbie Harvey have started!

Who was Catherine to these people that to forward her cause they need to threaten and incite violence?  Real macho of them that the threatening text sent to her was from a fake number!

This is spiraling out of control, and you abetted it. You should take responsibility and reign in these people!

Funny how they labeled Allan an abuser because he called his skinny wife fat. They are OK with threatening anyone who isn’t on par with their cause, to a point where they started a private group Justice For Catherine, and only members who think like them can join!

No wonder most of these people in the group lost their kids – clearly the judges saw their character.

Judith is an amazing person, like my mother! These girls know it, and they relish every moment she’s involved with them!  Allan’s girls just want normalcy!

Divorce is never good, but this takes the cake!

About the author

Guest View

146 Comments

Click here to post a comment

  • I read the entire case. I watched all the videos.
    But you know what caught my attention?
    It was the line of proven LIAR mothers who lined up almost shoving to claim their spot in the abuser queen throne
    #iamcatherinne and they even number themselves!

    We will have to wait. Because Catherine is gone. But Alan still remains.
    Here is the truth about mental illness so awful that no one can stand to live with you: it is a lifelong affliction and no one gets better.
    Follow along and know that if Alan is the abuser those kids will never even be able to act well-adjusted. But if mom was causing all the conflict and now mom is gone, those kids have the chance of a lifetime that their own mother was too sick to give.
    So we will wait to pass the final judgment after these next few years where dad shows us all what he is really about.

  • Videos speak volumes. There is absolutely no credible justification for the very obvious mental and emotional abuse inflicted by Allan Kassenoff. Can you balance the playing field with any videos he may have produced? Via one of Catherine’s videos, it’s clear he made some. Also, can you refute the obvious “personal, professional and financial” connections each of those individuals who provided prejudicial evidence against Catherine Kassenoff?

  • “… and then shall many be stumbled, and they shall deliver up one another, and shall hate one another …”

  • The girlfriend is guilty of interfering in the custody matter. She is going to continue the flying monkey routine in the comments.

  • For the sake of this comment, I shall referred to the girlfriend as “his other resident”aka “hor”. Hor and her sister taunted Catherine’s FB page. We all have seen it. Hor or “paramour” as Catherine referred to her in a 54 page brief were discovered in the children’s playroom playing hide the pencil (I am taking liberty with the size). Hor interjected herself into the scenario. And bear in mind, without confirmation of Catherine’s parting this world, Allan remains married & he is conducting an affair with said Hor.

  • Oh please. the mother is presumed dead this so-called friend comes out. Claiming he’s all innocent and then we’re villainizing him. He’s done that himself with his girlfriend and her family. This is about his abuse of his position, Emailing a law firm saying why would you take that case when she owes money already. I could care less about him or his girlfriend or her family. But it’s upsetting to see the Family Court this way. He abused his power used his money to keep the mother of his child away from her children. He’s a really nice guy I can tell. Not. She’s not here to defend herself regardless if she’s alive or if she’s not. I think she’s dead and to keep on with the scenario that she alive is just crazy.

  • I saw the videos and his behavior is definitely abusive, so unless you are saying that was not really him and those were not really his kids in the videos, then he is quite sick individual. His wife may or may not have been abusive too, but from the evidence in the video I saw, this man has some serious problems. Verbal & emotional abuse is abuse.

  • I’m saying this as someone who knows the family court system is stacked in favor of abusers, and who’s seen a lot of corrupt nonsense: some of the people supposedly pulling for Catherine are NOT helping. You do not threaten people. You do not dox people. What, exactly, do you think you’re achieving here? What, you drive his girlfriend and him into hiding and then what? Other abusers and the corrupt system will go on and you have done exactly ZERO to change that.

    And the people trashing Catherine are being hypocrites. You complain about people spreading stories and here you are gossiping, speculating about her family of origin, and saying she’s “crazy” (hey, Allan had a Tiktok with a video about men with depression. Stop that stigmatizing and gross nonsense, mental illness is not something to mock.)

    Catherine’s siblings may not post much on FB. They may have held their peace because they figured it would not help for them to get into fights on her behalf. Or maybe they have other reasons. They may have not released an obituary because don’t want goofy weirdos from the internet hounding them. They may be mourning in private. I don’t know. And neither do you.

    People in these comments calling others “crazy”, evil, “C U Next Tuesdays” (great, a misogynist slur, that really convinces me of your point). Go outside and touch grass. Do something constructive with your time. You all are embarrassing yourselves.

  • You got one thing correct, his friend, in singular, because only someone as stupid as his yoga girlfriend, who just wanted to attach herself to a guy who had lots of bucks, and when she found out he hated his children, hated his wife, and hated his life, she stuck around. He is too ugly for any sane woman to find him attractive, so, she is there for the bucks. Now that he is out of work, maybe she will realize all the screaming he does reveals his immaturity and mean ways.

    • “He is too ugly for any sane woman to find him attractive, so, she is there for the bucks.”

      I thought Catherine’s backers were up on their high horses about corruption in the courts? You clearly have a personal axe to grind. Did your ex cheat on you and you are projecting your own issues onto Allan and his GF? Or maybe this is Catherine. Someone seems very really Allan’s choice in a GF. Grow up already.

      • I have to agree with Anonymous one. There is ugly and then there is fugly. Allen falls into the ladder.

  • This entire story is a truly heartbreaking example of two parents that love themselves more than their children. As the child of a narcissist, I can’t imagine having two narcissists as parents. Catherine’s suicide is not the answer any more than going after these girls sole surviving parent. Honestly, he’s all they have left. All the commenters stating that he doesn’t deserve those girls, they surely deserve him. The hell this family is experiencing is more than enough pain to endure for many lifetimes. The outcome of this horrific situation is the direct result of the family court system that allowed this to begin with. The family court system that allowed the highest bidder control. There is no innocent party here. Leave these people alone, they will suffer the remainder of their lives, especially those children who no longer have a mother. Grant them some mercy, and mercy for them means mercy for him too.

    • At some point the situation needs to be addressed. If no one is charged then these situations continue. This discusting divorce and custody battles are fueled by greed and connections..

  • Why is the girlfriend getting involved? If the emails show she was engaged in the battle she should be charged with custodial interference. It’s hard enough to be in dispute with the other parent. This woman […] is unfortunately to blame for assisting in the on going battle. She has no legal rights to these children. For the courts to continue to allow her to be involved is another matter in it’s self. All to often new partners are engaged in the battle. Escalating the situation. Assisting in the alienation of the mother in this case. A restraining order should have been placed against […] for antagonizing Catherine. Using the term loser in addressing the mother, red flag. Winner take all including the children. These are the sick and twisted situations. She went above and beyond supporting Allan. Engaged herself in the divorce and custody dispute. Shame on Allan and the court system for allowing this. These flying monkey new partners should be eliminated from the battle. The courts failed to address this. It’s tough enough to fend off one bully but two. […] had no legal right to get involved and she should face charges for interfering with this custody case.

  • ALLAN KASSENOFF RUINED ALLAN’S LIFE. NO ONR ELSE! DON’T BLAME ANYONE BUT ALLAN. AND SHIRA THE GF WAS NASTY TO CATHERINE AND WHATEVER HEAR SHE IS TAKING IS BROUGHT ON BY HER OWN HORRIBLE BEHAVIOR!

    • No, you and the uninformed angry Internet mob straight out of an episode of Black Mirror caused Allan to lose his job. However, I don’t think his life is ruined. I’m sure he will bounce back.

  • Dear Frank Readers, There is life for women over 50. There is a level of freedom. Survived divorce court. No envy for these young ladies. I’m free. My smart now adult child wasn’t turned against me despite the effort. Moved on to a healthier life. So no need to label all of us . Your dismissal of what is happening to women and mothers because we’re jealous and over the hill is just isn’t gonna cut it. Let’s get to the legal issues of family court. The thread is nothing more than the gender war created to distract from the real issues.

  • RE The Worst Father Award:

    I wonder who a worse father is:
    Allan Kassenoff or Scott Johnson.

    Allan Kassenoff made a lot of money and berates his children.

    Scott Johnson tortured a mentally ill woman, plays video games and draws cartoons for a living. Plus he scammed family members via Amway…..

    Looks like the loser of all losers Scott Johnson finally won a contest.

    Yay! Scott is a winner now!

    • I reluctantly agree with you on your point. Scott is by far the worse father, even though he never had any children.

      • No kids? Them Mormons breed like mice. Poor guy must be sterile.

        To be fair, Scott claimed to have kids before.

        I hope his Dungeons & Dragons campaign goes well. He plays with two other midlife losers.

  • Allan and Catherine married in 2006 and were together for a year or 2 before the wedding. They started the divorce process in 2019. Catherine was evicted from her home in March 2020. Meaning there was a very very long history before Allan’s girlfriend and her family came into the picture starting about 2 + years ago. More than 15 years of history. As much as they would like to take control of the narrative defending Allan with endless posts berating everyone on here and telling us how we all know nothing, it is simply untrue. I do think the perspective of this writer is failing to see the bigger picture – it really only touches upon the most superficial aspects of this tragedy (clothing, weight, affairs, etc). Catherine, however flawed, was a devoted mother. Most of us have yelled and can relate to the anger. Where this all takes a sadistic turn is the fact that he took her children and for that reason alone, she lost all hope. I’m sure it was unbearable. He used 1 to 3 million dollars and a seemingly corrupt court system to do it. I have never met ANYONE who fought so hard to have those children to begin with. She was devastated that her cancer treatment in 2008 might lead to infertility. With that being said no one should feel unsafe or terrorized or that a lynch mob is out to get them. For that alone I’m sorry for what the adults of the family are going through. I mainly hope the kids are safe and that they all have really good therapists.

  • After reading all of this I am starting to question if she was ever actually a lawyer. What lawyer constantly goes against the court orders and posts personal information about their family and then acts surprised when the courts punish them for it? When she gets back from her Swedish Spa trip she should be disbarred.

    • Enjoy. You and the spin committee are not fooling anyone. Cloging up the comments. Deflection and manipulation. How much did you pay Frank for the career repair article?

      • The categories of unprotected speech include obscenity, child pornography, defamatory speech, false advertising, true threats, and fighting words. Deciding what is and is not protected speech is reserved to courts of law.

        Court orders Trump your silly free speech every time.

        • Right, court orders from biased Judges will trump the Constitution? How stupid are you, do you understand the hierarchy of law? Clearly you don’t

    • Exactly. Forget about even being a lawyer how about just being a rational person? So many of these mon-custodial parents think they can just violate court orders and that the judge should say well that’s OK here’s the kids ma’am/sir. They are usually typical narcissists who believe they are above the law. News flash: They’re not.

  • I think it’s important to be even handed here. Some of the women that are cheering her on knew her from her home town and remember as a sweet super quiet valedictorian of her high school. Plus some of these women likely legitimately were victims of a corrupt court system and domestic abuse. Women who are seeking advocates don’t want to believe that another woman might bend the truth. When I saw the posts at first (the first one was pictures of the inside of her car) my thought was that she was literally the LAST person I would have thought that would share this kind of information publicly. Her family was always super reclusive and she and her brothers were “super kids”; smart good looking (their mother was British and their Dad Egyptian). All I know is her one brother that is on FB doesn’t even have photos of her on his page but they are “friends”. Not sure what to read into that, is it that they tried reasoning with her and perhaps asking her to take a different approach and that was enough for her to cut them off from association? Was it that they were always “the golden boys” and their family was very patriarchal and that led to estrangement? Had she lied to them or their mother and they drew a line in the sand or were they just plain embarrassed by her online behavior.

    My guess here is that part of this is that on some level she was a survivor of abuse. Possibly not in the conventional form but I know she had children late in her life and likely endured horrendous treatments in order for that to happen. I can also say from looking at her pictures it comes across that SOMETHING happened to her. I know pregnancy can be tough on women but combine that with cancer and that could have been enough. You also have to imagine what it must have felt like to have your husband cheat on you or ask for a divorce when you went through all that to have children with him. I always got the sense from her videos that what hurt her the most was what he said to HER and she referred to his girlfriend as his mistress despite the fact that they were separated. It seemed like she didn’t want the marriage to end and that was what angered her the most. Let’s also remember that if she has/had a personality disorder those things don’t develop in a vacuum, they are typically the result of major trauma. It’s just sad all around. Part of me hopes this isn’t real for her sake. I hope she gets treatment, heals, stays off social media and gets herself to a better place and can have a relationship with those girls when they turn 18.

    • No surprise Catherine’s family are keeping their heads down. They know she’s not dead but if they say a word publicly then she will attack them like she attacked Allen. She’s a scary woman.

      Women like Catherine with BPD are usually estranged from all family, they cannot have long term, stable relationships with anyone. I’m sure her family is very sympathetic to Allen, they are familiar with Catherine’s toxicity. I’m sure her family fears making a peep because Catherine would try to ruin their careers too.

      It’s obvious that all of her rage and anger is due to Allen wanting a divorce and she would accept it. She doesn’t even seem to like her children, she’s cold and angry towards them, but her rage towards Allen is white hot.

      The third child and “cancer scares” didn’t keep Allen in the marriage, neither did her custody/divorce war, so she had to up the ante to “terminal cancer” and a fake-suicide with manic PR campaign.

      Catherine looks terrible in most of the videos, but I think it may have more to do with drinking wine instead of eating. The drinking aged her considerably and made her erratic to the point she lost her job. All that effort and IVF just to have kids she can’t love and resents. BPD and narcissists usually have major issues with their children once they are old enough assert their own personality and wants. Only mirroring, parroting and obeying mommy is allowed. If she followed the pattern she would have chosen one child as a favorite over the other two “bad kids”. Usually it’s the youngest and it’s an attempt to sabotage sibling solidarity. I hope the girls can heal with the toxic mother permanently removed from their life.

      • Clearly, this is not the girlfriend or her sister – more likely one of the legal or psychiatry cronies – this post is more well written than theirs are. Gus, is that you? Now that the heat is on, do YOU need a bottle of wine? The bottom line is Catherine missed her girls and she fought and fought and fought for them. The evidence shows that Allan rated higher on the narcissism and anger scales than Catherine did. Just sayin. Isn’t the youngest Allan’s favorite?

        • She missed her girls so much that in order to see the she “kills her self” with out even telling them goodbye, please

      • If she is/was BPD, that doesn’t explain away Allan talking directly to those small girls and referring to their mom a “thing.” That’s psycho, and there’s no way around that.

    • Unfortunately, there ARE out of control Catherine supporters, some quite rabid. I had one tag me on Facebook all day because I disagreed with her attack on those looking to get “2 sides”. I guess objectivity is construed as taking a stand against her, it’s ridiculous. Sadly, there are many mothers who’ve had their kids crooked from them in every county of NYS. With that said, that’s not the case with all cases though, many are truly dangerous to the children and unfit…..it’s these that are attacking even objective people 😳 🙄.

      I pray 🙏 Catherine is alive and free of cancer. It’s hard NOT to feel her pain.

      I don’t think it’s a stand against someone because you refuse to bash the other…..

      This whole family situation is sad, jumping Allan without more facts may make those doing it feel better, but it won’t help his kids.

      Prayers to everyone in the family all of this is upsetting

      • Oh I know there are (out of control supporters). I merely stated that I worry that what she’s doing (posting these videos) wasn’t achieving the results she desired/ I was met with insults calling me a “miserable childless woman” and they started looking at my page calling my dogs “ugly”. I just had to laugh. I must say though I don’t feel one ounce or pity for Allan (I probably keep spelling his name wrong). Let’s say she is mentally ill, a man worth his salt never would have talked to the mother of his children like this. I mean the guy acts like a spoiled toddler and also seemed like her more concerned in getting her on tape than what this all looked like to those girls.

      • Autumn rose. There is only one side of a story when there is an abuser involved. There are not 2 or 3 sides to the story. No wonder people are tagging you to get you to Stfu because you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about.

        Also, Catherine is dead so you’re wishing her to be well and not have cancer is a bunch of BS. Why don’t you go find something more productive to do. Thanks!

        • That’s incorrect. Abusers usually count on the victim NOT being able to tell their side of the story. You aren’t “educating” ME on shit. I don’t get bullied Janay, I beat mfers back. Troll someone else 🤣

          You bitches keep coming at me because you think I’m young….I AM NOT YOUNG 🥳🥴

        • There’s yet to be proof she’s deceased Janay. It’s YOU who is unproductive. See You Next Tuesday. You Twats in the legal world act like you can do wtf you please untouched. The System was JUST fine with the system until it was HER. WOMEN, LIKE HER AND YOU. LIBERAL LOONS STAND IN FAMILY COURT ROOMS EVERYDAY AND HELP DESTROY FAMILIES FORVER

          I AM NOT IT BITCH. NY IS NOTHING BUT CRIMINALS. IN GOVERNMENT AND OUT.

          WHOEVER DOESN’T GET CAUGHT WINS

          FUCK YOU BITCHES. FAKE FEMISM SERVES ONLY THE FREAJ PROMOTING IT

        • Sorry bully Janay, we still don’t have evidence that she is deceased. Get off your high horse you nasty bully.

          • #jenayisabully go get served with more lawsuits for shop lifting you nut

        • The other side of the story is that Catherine was the abusive one. So by your logic, that’s the one side of the story, Catherine was the abuser, huh?
          We must all turn our brains off and stop thinking critically or ax murderer Janay will show up at our doors.

        • https://fb.watch/ldHGTXgrrv/?mibextid=NSMWBT

          Nothing you are doing is “productive”. Abusers count on their victims to either 1. Not be able to tell their side or 2. Make sure nobody believes them

          Stop speaking like you’re an expert when you clearly don’t know what you are talking about.

          And GIRRRRL, you and your rabid minions DEFINITELY DON’T want to focus any further on ME.

          I PROMISE. I’ll run you right offline BABY

          • How ironic that Janay is going on about the evils of abuse while being extremely abusive herself and telling everyone to turn off their brains or face her wrath.

    • Terminal cancer. Ms. Yoga it’s obvious you are obsessed with spinning the story. It takes 7 times to get it in people’s heads. For every time you attempt to create a narrative we will be there to get the real story out. The real moms

    • HeatherJ you are out of your F’ing mind. You friends with Allan?? FOUR qualified doctors gave Catherine a clean psychiatric bill of health. 🤬🤬🤬

      • Janay, you sound like the kind of person who would beat a child for asking a question about something you told them. Because according to you, there is only one side to a story, your side. You are a sick bully.

  • Honestly I was troubled by the videos. But after reading the transcripts Catherine released I’d make nearly a 180. A mother with no lawyer could have done better if they just were respectful in court and followed the rules. After 12 lawyers and an uncountable number of violations of court orders it was never Catherine’s fault. It was Allen’s the therapists the multiple judges etc etc. Catherine is obviously her own worst enemy even if everything she said has some level of validity.

    • This is the playbook for most of the “high profile” CT divorces/custody cases. The ones screaming abuse by the judicial system (Riordan,Joriz Tiberi, Rookasin, Doyle). It’s never their fault. Their former spouses are the crazy ones. YET, they don’t follow court orders and clearly have zero desire to reunite with their kids based on their behavior. It’s a shame.

      • What’s really a shame about those characters you mention above
        Is that they drag their kids into everything. Like this blog, FCC, Michael Volpe. Those kids will suffer having their information splattered online but their “parent” does not care. They only care about themselves.

        • Have you ever noticed that the people advocating for these non-custodial mothers are all sleazy men? It’s a way for them to get crazy women in bed.

      • The system never will reunited these people with their children. I been through the system. The therapy is designed to conflict the children. No issues are ever addressed. It’s more the blame game. Putting children in the middle. It about excusing bad behavior and telling children in many cases abuse is ok . You are have no rights to a voice. These cases are dragged on and on. Not everyone complaining is telling the truth, but not everyone complaining is a liar.

    • Man you are an idiot. Clearly you and your opponent were poor, so there was not much of fight, you moron

  • Why hasn’t Catherine’s two brothers, or mother, said a peep about their dearly departed Catherine? Is she not worthy of an obit or funeral? I bet she was estranged from her blood family too.

    Why aren’t the crazy Karen’s having obits published for their grand martyr? Could it be because newspapers require more than a FB to confirm a death?

    I think most of these unhinged Karen’s know she’s alive and approve of her psycho behavior. She’s living the sick revenge fantasy they had. This will be a blow to mother’s custodial rights for years to come. Congrats!

    • Because I am pretty sure they were estranged from her even prior to this. Her one brother is on social media but never comments on her page or anything. Her other brother does not do social media at all. You could construe the following 1) they were never really particularly close 2) they gave up on her because I’ve witnessed people try to talk sense into her and it gets nowhere or 3) she’s not dead, they know she has mental health issues and they are waiting for this to go away. I grew up in their home town and they were always a super private family

      • So deep in mourning they can’t post an obit, hold a funeral or even post a few kind words about their dear departed sister? Give me a break. They are in hiding from the storm their mentally ill sister created with her fake suicide stunt. I’m sure they are appalled by Crazy Cath’s latest stunt and asking where she went so wrong.

    • Only Facts. Ok psycho! I have emails from her trusted lawyer Wayne Baker CATHERINE IS DEAD!! I have offered these emails to Frank & he refuses to acknowledge me. He also refuses to contact Wayne for confirmation. It will take 4-6 weeks for a death certificate. So, STFU

      • Without a death certificate, how does Wayne Baker know for sure that she is dead? Was he with her and took her pulse after she suicided?

  • “Presumptive suicide” LMAO. A woman who went to extreme lengths to publicly post a “suicide note” and alert all the media about it conveniently forget to list Allan, her lawyer, or anyone, the embassy…on the legally required contact form at her posh Swiss suicide spa? Give me a break, she would have had the center immediately call Allen, and a press release to her lawyer, making sure everyone knows she was dead and it was all Allen’s fault!!!!!

    Catherine has now been playing this sick game for over three weeks because she’s a BPD narcissist having a two year long narc tantrum.

    At least Allan can be comforted by his pretty, younger girlfriend who isn’t a toxic nut case.

    It’s very obvious why the children wanted nothing to do with this toxic mom. Allan might not be the world’s best dad, but Catherine makes Mommy Dearest look like June Cleaver.

    • Unfortunately people can’t use critical thinking. What you wrote here was exactly what I was thinking a couple weeks ago already!

  • So this was an unhappy marriage- and both parties were terrible to each other. We saw the tapes she took of him. And, he doesn’t look great. But what about the tapes that he took of her. Clearly this is what the court saw and resulted in the limitation in visitation rights. He was a screamer. How was her behaviour towards the kids, particularly the eldest.

    And how does this publicity help the children? He loses his job and this helps the children how??? In the mother’s final email, she says that her children have mental health issues. With no job, no healthcare, how is the father suppose to provide good quality therapy. Why did the mother not give her kids a heads up. And they still don’t know for sure if she is dead. How is this in the childrens’ best interest.

    Why doesn’t her mother confirm anything? Has her family reached out to the children?

  • Of course, it is a witchhunt by a bunch of uninformed, idiots or people who lost custody and are projecting their issues onto this case

  • You don’t get to repeatedly call your wife a fat old loser and then be shocked when you find out, from breaking federal laws, she seeks love and attention elsewhere.

  • Surprise, surprise. Vilify someone in the most extreme way, help their messy, ugly contested divorce become a spectator sport, encourage the dogpiling… and the villains of the piece get doxxed and threatened.

    “We have you in our crosshairs. And we know where you live. And we’re going after your family too”

    Gee, who coulda thought this would happen…

  • So he verbally abuses the mother in front of the children and tries to cut her completely out of her children’s lives and then try and replace her blatantly with a new woman and none of this is going to traumatize those children for life? Geesh. What a great dad. Maybe don’t date and don’t be a jerk and try to love on those kids and get them into some counseling.

    • People are permitted to decide that they don’t want to be together anymore. Perhaps they brought out the worst in each other and Catherine was always free to seek her own companionship. He’s not wrong for wanting someone in his life he’s wrong for how he spoke to the mother of his children in front of them.

  • Fighting cancer and being in the process of a contentious divorce/custody battle each one individually probably ranks in the highest category of stressors . Imagine the stress the combination causes -off the charts . Not buying the mental illness -being thrown around . I am sure a lot of her behavior was a result all the stress-not mental illness . She was not diagnosed with any mental illness . Dr Abrams could not even classify which personality disorder she supposedly had .Allan’s lawyer should be quiet he is not doing himself any favors with his comments . She was able to prevail in her complaints about the ethical/professional behavior of Judge Lubell and Marc Abrams . She was evicted from the family home with 20 minute to get her possessions why did not Allan pack up her stuff and send it to her ??? Family court is a disgrace and so are most of the players in this and in my opinion they brought all this on themselves . I am not condoning all of Catherine’s behavior there are 2 sides to every story but I am appalled by the lack of compassion for her by all the players and the impact on those girls .

    • She was not battling cancer throughout the divorce. Supposedly it only very recently “came back” in a virulent form, with an allegedly “life ending” prognosis. It must have literally only come back within the month before she allegedly went to Switzerland, since she bought a nearly 1 million dollar house in cash on April 18th. And logically, she probably received the diagnosis after May 14, 2023, or she would not have blown off the unsupervised Mother’s Day visit with her girls.

  • Some of you say Allan is a narcissist. I don’t think he is. If he was he would be acting differently. You say Allan is an abuser because he yells at his kids. You people don’t know about abuse.

    • Speaking to small children, referring to their mom as a “thing,” yes that’s abuse, no matter what Catherine did. If she is crazy and vindictive, so is he. Poor kids.

  • Reading that felt like I was sitting in the gallery of a courtroom, listening to Miriam testify on behalf of Allan. This is a good thing. We need as much truth as possible at this point in history. Failed “family courts” are a big part of why America is falling apart.

    How many families in Westchester County went through the same kind of nightmare the Kassenoff family endured?

    Does anyone remember when ABC reporter Amy Robach said, “I’ve had the story for three years … We would not put it on the air. Um, first of all, I was told, ‘Who was Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story.’ Then the palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways.” At that point in history, mainstream headline news should have been: “The British are Coming!!!”

    Do the British threaten reporters covering the NXIVM and the national family court scandals, too? What kind of horrible people are threatening Allan’s girlfriend? Who adds drops of blood to comments, and why?

    Wherever the threats are coming from, all we need now is for the New York Times to report the national family court crisis six months after FR broke the story — and everything will be fine!

    Thank you, Frank! 💐

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtroom

  • Allan has a group of raging, menopausal,”Karens” attacking him. I think Catherine is the one attacking the hot yoga instructor. Pretend suicide isn’t a good look for Catherine.

    • Lol. No one cares about the stretched out yoga instructor. They care about the kids. Have you seen some of these mom’s their pretty young and smoken.

      • You must be boomer old to use the term “young and smoken” but we’ve seen Catherine’s videos her looks and vitality look like the departed thirty years ago. No one cares what her angry FB wine moms look like.

        • Most victimized moms are under 40. Intelligent and are the one’s who filled. Dad’s mad cause Mom is moving on. Dad’s angry and using the courts to get back at Mom. Realize your demographic. The older women suffering from change of life ran to Florida. Never looked back. On the midnight train to Georgia and beyond. FREEDOM!!

  • Alan went for sole custody when Catherine was telling the girls to lie? Give me a break. But it’s ok to teach one of his daughters to sing Mommy is a dead duck. Really? Is it true Alan had an affair with is Nanny? Karma

    • “Alan went for sole custody when Catherine was telling the girls to lie? Give me a break.”

      Um, she was probably telling them to lie about serious charges, such as that he was abusing them. It’s good cause to limit a parent’s access to children when they are engaging in that behavior, which is illegal and extremely damaging to the children.

    • Yes, it is. Catherine was pregnant with Charlotte at the time and Ally was an infant. She had also just finished cancer treatment. She filed for divorce in 2010 but didn’t follow through with it.

  • The girlfriend and her sister are nothing but enablers of Allan. They are just as culpable as he is and they have absolutely been complicit in turning Catherine’s girls against her. Clear proof exists of the girlfriend calling Catherine a loser in an email (that she wasn’t expecting the world to ever see) then when people are looking acts innocently. Anyone who buys that act needs to look at a bridge that I have for sale. I can tell by the attitude that this is the sister behind this article. They are from a family who commits FRAUD and you arebelieving thatthey are innocent victims. Really? Certainly not your best work Frank.

  • Look, let’s be honest here. Allan’s behavior was definitely not appropriate. He crossed the line with verbal abuse, and that’s something we can’t ignore. However, it’s hard for me to believe that the entire legal system was completely one-sided. I mean, we’re talking about five judges, independent evaluators, psychologists, and even Catherine’s own lawyer (whom she eventually fired). What about Catherine’s own inner circle of powerful lawyers? And her own knowledge of the legal system? Yet it wielded no power? What about all the thousands of documents that were not released during Catherine’s document drop? And let’s not forget about the context. Allan was going through a messy divorce while shouldering the responsibility of parenting three children, one of whom had high needs according to Catherine’s own documents. It’s not an excuse for his behavior, but it adds complexity to the situation. Catherine also engaged in similar behavior. Making her child repeat an awful song just to capture it on video. Tell me that’s in the best interest of the child. There’s more to this story than meets the eye.

    Now, let’s shift our focus to the children stuck in the middle of this bitter divorce and custody battle. They’re already going through an emotional rollercoaster, trying to make sense of their changing family dynamics, and now dealing with their mother’s death in such mysterious circumstances. Just imagine the additional burden they face when subjected to constant vilification and public scrutiny. It’s a recipe for long-term psychological damage.

    And let’s not forget about the consequences that directly impact these children. The media attention surrounding this case led to Allan losing his job, which brings financial uncertainty and instability into their lives. As if that weren’t enough, intrusive reporters showing up uninvited at their door only intensify the children’s trauma. Robbie Harvey celebrating this and riding the wave of fame on tiktok is nauseating. It’s heartbreaking to see how these repercussions worsen their already fragile emotional state and further destabilize their lives.

    The vilification he faces should not overshadow the well-being of the children involved. They deserve a chance to heal and move forward without the added burden of constant media attention and intrusive reporters.

  • I didn’t realize Judge Lewis Lubell is Jewish.

    So is Allan Kassenoff, but Catherine wasn’t.

    Doctor Susan Adler is Jewish. So is Dr Marc Abrams. So is Dr Kathleen McKay. So is Dr Carolyn McGuffog. So all four evaluators/psychologists.

    Is Attorney Carol Most? Guessing Judge Nancy Quinn Koba isn’t.

    • Yes. Carol Most is Jewish and actually overtly dislikes anyone who is not. Nancy Quinn Koba is not Jewish but was probably afraid of being accused of being anti-Semitic.

    • What does their being Jewish have to do with it? Antisemetic conspiracy theories isn’t helping Catherine or others in her situation.

  • […] gets EVERYTHING that she deserves. FR you failed to mention the fact that we have proof that she called Catherine a loser in an email then turns around and acts like she is so innocent. I’ve seen her type time and time again. Pick me girls like her will do anything to please their meal ticket. Catherine’s girls were influenced against her with the help of […] and her sister. You’re going too far in this article Frank.

    • OMG she called her boyfriend’s vindictive ex a loser in a private communication? THE HORROR! WE SHOULD BURN HER AT THE STAKE IMMEDIATELY.

      Not really.

      • 😂 👏 🎯

        People literally project their crap on other people.

        Let’s see what Catherine called HER.

        Nah Robbie Harvey won’t allow overwhelming evidence ruin his narrative and take money he’s been counting on away.

        The guy literally puts somber music in the background of extremely short clips mashed together to paint a monster.

        If that’s not disingenuous…..

    • You people send her death threats rape threats and harresent 24/7 but calling someone a loser is where you draw the line. Get a grip Rhonda

  • Allan can we hear your side? I don’t hate you or your hot girlfriend. Those negative Nancy’s are totally jelly.

  • This woman is clearly related to ‘Judith’.

    Ok, maybe Catherine was no saint either. But you cannot deny the abusive litigation that went on for 4 years, and still no divorce?! And no access to her own children? Explain how that could possibly be right, even if Catherine was ‘manipulative’? And it seems like Allan was pretty sneaky too- who goes through someone’s text messages and hooks up with a new ‘mommy’ before being divorced?

    Fyi it’s gOd
    All the petty rules and this source completely miss the much greater ethical lapse here. Her friend ‘Judith’ was sleeping with a married man and taking another woman’s children…

    • No access? For one, she had three hours of unsupervised visitation on Mother’s Day and she was a no-show. So much for your “no access” gossip.

    • “Judith” has her own children per this blog post. She doesn’t need to “take” anyone else’s.

      Catherine was sleeping with a married man. Pot, meet kettle.

  • “Presumptive suicide” Give me a break. Catherine releases a suicide note to media outlets but doesn’t put her lawyer or family on the contact list to be notified of her death by the center immediately? A woman so set on revenge suicide would ensure Allan got that notification asap, probably with another “it’s your fault” note. The Swiss are just happy to keep her corpse on ice for weeks without contacting anyone about storage fees or burial/cremation?

    Frank is not this much of a schmuck. Frank, and the slime bag TikTok grifter, know she’s alive.

    Where are Catherine’s brothers and mother? Why have they not confirmed her death or made any funeral plans or said one iota about this? Because Catherine has humiliated her own blood family with this insane stunt.

    Catherine needs psychiatric help, not the media feeding a mentally ill woman’s manic revenge fantasy.

    • It was odd that the doctor who approved her assisted suicide made no mention of any terminal diagnosis. If Catherine lied in her FB post about being terminally ill, she can lie about anything.

  • Look, let’s be honest here. Allan’s behavior was definitely not appropriate. He crossed the line with verbal abuse, and that’s something we can’t ignore. However, it’s hard for me to believe that the entire legal system was completely one-sided. I mean, we’re talking about five judges, independent evaluators, psychologists, and even Catherine’s own lawyer (whom she eventually fired). What about Catherine’s own inner circle of powerful lawyers? And her own knowledge of the legal system? Yet it wielded no power? What about all the thousands of documents that were not released during Catherine’s document drop? And let’s not forget about the context. Allan was going through a messy divorce while shouldering the responsibility of parenting three children, one of whom had high needs according to Catherine’s own documents. It’s not an excuse for his behavior, but it adds complexity to the situation. Catherine also engaged in similar behavior. Making her child repeat an awful song just to capture it on video. Tell me that’s in the best interest of the child. There’s more to this story than meets the eye.

    Now, let’s shift our focus to the children stuck in the middle of this bitter divorce and custody battle. They’re already going through an emotional rollercoaster, trying to make sense of their changing family dynamics, and now dealing with their mother’s death in such mysterious circumstances. Just imagine the additional burden they face when subjected to constant vilification and public scrutiny. It’s a recipe for long-term psychological damage.

    And let’s not forget about the consequences that directly impact these children. The media attention surrounding this case led to Allan losing his job, which brings financial uncertainty and instability into their lives. As if that weren’t enough, intrusive reporters showing up uninvited at their door only intensify the children’s trauma. Robbie Harvey celebrating this and riding the wave of fame on tiktok is nauseating. It’s heartbreaking to see how these repercussions worsen their already fragile emotional state and further destabilize their lives.

    The vilification he faces should not overshadow the well-being of the children involved. They deserve a chance to heal and move forward without the added burden of constant media attention and intrusive reporters.

  • No threats or acts of violence are appropriate. Under no circumstances should anybody threaten or commit any acts of violence to Allan or Judith. I hope those threats cease immediately.

    The truth should be exposed, and the results of the exposure clearly have ramifications on Allan (deserving) and the children (undeserving). What Allan is enduring now is a result of his own fault and lies on the shoulders of Gus Dimopoulos who took Allan down this ugly path. There is an old saying, you must expect to get dirty when you play in the pig pen. Every case is a pig pen, when Gus is the lawyer for one of the parents. This is what Gus likes to do, he creates storylines and plays them out. He hires his friends (i.e. John D. Pappalardo, jr. and Howard Benjamin) to play out roles as characters in the play. Gus does not care what the results are, as long as they inflict significant harm to his client’s spouse. Even though Gus knows that the results may and likely will have a detrimental effect on the children, he encourages and promotes this conduct to try to win it all costs. That is the Gus playbook. As a client of Gus Dimopoulos, the client ultimately has the decision to let the play go on or to walk out during the performance and put an end to it. In Catherine’s case, Allan let the play go on and he sat on the sidelines and enjoyed his popcorn while watching. Catherine suffer, as well as his daughters suffer. And in this play, it appears the result is the death of Catherine and the loss of a mother.

    Miriam, it is true that children are resilient. However, underneath that resilience, are significant scars. These three girls will live with the scars forever. Yes, even during horrible divorces, children laugh, children appear to be happy. At some times, children put on a good look in public. That is not evidence that the children have not suffered nor that the children would not have been better off with two parents that could co-parent through a divorce. Additionally, who cares if either Allan or Catherine had an affair. That is wholly irrelevant to determine if a mother or father is or will be a good parent. Additionally, an affair is not a basis or grounds to spend a million or more on a divorce to try to get even and destroy the other parent.
    Over a year ago, I was told that Alan had already spent over $2.5 million on the divorce. I know Gus Dimopoulos’ billing very well. I have seen his bills and have seen how he bills his clients. There were multiple trials, forensic evaluations, depositions, and significant motion practice in this case. Even the cheapest of matrimonial lawyers would have charged over a million dollars for the work perform for Allan in the divorce. Therefore, I know you are not speaking the truth.
    As to Judith, she does not deserve the treatment you have described. I hope those who have been performing those acts stop. However, she absolutely was part of Allan’s plan and Gus’s playbook. What you’ve described is Judith replacing Catherine as the girls’ mother. You have described another one of Gus’s acts of his manuscript. You have described Allan as the dad, Judith, as the replacement mom, and both living with the girls in a little community…is there a white picket fence surrounding the house?
    Miriam, I did not hear you state that one of the girls walked downstairs and saw Allan and Judith naked having sex. This was several years ago, at the early stages of the divorce. Again, it doesn’t matter when they met, but discretion and privacy for sexual encounters would be a responsible act of both.
    Yes, if not for a friendly judge, who made an initial ruling on the emails that Allan accessed, in all likelihood, Alan would have been found to have trespassed and illegally accessed Catherine’s emails. Again, a friendly judge, and let’s see who was involved with her judicial campaign.

    I end this reply hoping that all will cease the threats, violence and harassment of both Allan and Judith. However, do not fool yourself, Allan is not a good person because he did awful things to Catherine, and to his daughters. Judith is just collateral, she probably didn’t even know that she was a part of Gus’s performance.

  • As a person whose been a target of this very same online abuse, except it was locals doing it, I am not quick to judge or condemn anyone without all the facts. I’m sad for this entire family. I hope everyone heals 🙏😞

  • Look, let’s be honest here. Allan’s behavior was definitely not appropriate. He crossed the line with verbal abuse, and that’s something we can’t ignore. However, it’s hard for me to believe that the entire legal system was completely one-sided. I mean, we’re talking about five judges, independent evaluators, psychologists, and even Catherine’s own lawyer (whom she eventually fired). What about all the thousands of documents that were not released during Catherine’s document drop? And let’s not forget about the context. Allan was going through a messy divorce while shouldering the responsibility of parenting three children, one of whom had high needs according to Catherine’s own documents. It’s not an excuse for his behavior, but it adds complexity to the situation. Catherine also engaged in similar behavior. Making her child repeat an awful song just to capture it on video. Tell me that’s in the best interest of the child. There’s more to this story than meets the eye.

    Now, let’s shift our focus to the children stuck in the middle of this bitter divorce and custody battle. They’re already going through an emotional rollercoaster, trying to make sense of their changing family dynamics, and now dealing with their mother’s death in such mysterious circumstances. Just imagine the additional burden they face when subjected to constant vilification and public scrutiny. It’s a recipe for long-term psychological damage.

    And let’s not forget about the consequences that directly impact these children. The media attention surrounding this case led to Allan losing his job, which brings financial uncertainty and instability into their lives. As if that weren’t enough, intrusive reporters showing up uninvited at their door only intensify the children’s trauma. Robbie Harvey celebrating this and riding the wave of fame on tiktok is nauseating. It’s heartbreaking to see how these repercussions worsen their already fragile emotional state and further destabilize their lives.

    The vilification he faces should not overshadow the well-being of the children involved. They deserve a chance to heal and move forward without the added burden of constant media attention and intrusive reporters.

    • Isn’t it possible that the public attention could actually be beneficial to the children? ‘Miriam’ indicates that *they* decided to record their supervised visits with Catherine because “people weren’t listening to them”. Well, “people” are listening to them now. Assuming Allan has custody in perpetuity he will hopefully be less abusive given the family’s newly public profile. Plus, maybe the girls can take solace in the fact that many folks now realize how they suffered from being, in effect, pawns in a messy divorce. This isn’t (certainly not any more) an expose of Allan on behalf of Catherine or vice versa; it’s an expose of both parents on behalf of the kids.

    • Did you type “… that’s something we can’t ignore. However …”

      instead of “… that’s something we can’t ignore. Period.” to engage and then re-direct your reader?

      “… However, it’s hard for me to believe that the entire legal system was completely one-sided.” looks like an attempt to convince your readers that there’s no corruption in Westchester County family court.

      For the sake of progress and not argument: let’s say there’s no corruption in family court, the Abrams evaluation was perfect and no one took advantage of that family in crisis to take as much money from them as possible.

      For entertainment purposes only: How would you address corruption and crimes committed in family court cases?

      Would you go to the media for help? The governor? The local police? The feds?

      Who would help?

    • Allan comes from a strict patriarchal religious family and followed his father by becoming a patent lawyer. He rebelled against this by marrying a highly intelligent lawyer but with a Christian Egyptian background, his family would be horrified as it’s prohibited under Talmud and wouldn’t be recognised as marriage. Down the line Allan returned to his religion and banned his children from enjoying Christmas celebrations. Catherine had to cope with this along with her cancer diagnosis, in the video where he calls her ‘disgusting’ for being in her pyjamas, is this because he found mastectomy repulsive? Catherine was cancelled by Allan, his family and his religion. So when Allan found a ‘nice Jewish girl’ from an equally religious background, she and her family were welcomed if Facebook friends are anything to go by! There won’t be a ghet, Catherine was a Christian with an Egyptian father.

  • “I am not justifying what Allan has done, but I think there is a better way than terrorizing him, or his girlfriend. Perhaps we can consider reforming the family court system by not being lower than the people we wish to reform.”

    “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.“

    • Yes, Catherine slept with a married man.
      She got her “eye for an eye” when another woman slept with her husband.
      Karma has been fulfilled.

  • He’s entitled to his side. I’m not convinced but it is fair to let him speak out. I’m inclined to believe it is a flying monkey. The emotional aspect of the story have been told. it’s never a good idea to move a new partner in to the house and engage them in your children lives newly separated. Allan added another complications and situation for the children. Another person attacking Catherine. Judges should note these things. Cause that’s what vindictive people do. Now this woman is posting all kinds of negative comments in the frank report . She tossing another dog in the fight. Has anyone looked at the legal aspects? There are so many questionable things with the legal tactics in family court. I think if we can table the emotional side. Each party has people who will stand up for them. It’s the process and the players.

    • “ it’s never a good idea to move a new partner in to the house”

      The girlfriend has her own home.

  • While I have zero doubt that this person feels they are genuinely helpful in their defense of their family member, they’d be very well placed to:

    1) Research Narcissistic Abuse, with specific focus on ‘flying monkeys’ and ‘triangulation’ and then look, as objectively as possible, at themselves and their actions.

    2) Take a breath and look deeply at the issue and reflect on how they will feel and react when Allen treats their loved one in the ways in which he treated Catherine in the released info, eg the videos and monitoring phone, laptop, etc. Because he will.

    3) Take a minute and reflect on their own use of language and what that reveals about themself, their attitude and their focus in this situation: (among other examples)
    A) I saw the youngest daughter dressed beautifully…adoring all the attention…no one brought up her mother
    B) I viewed Domestic Abuse videos and Allan’s is lame in comparison

    The reality is that, neither Allan being bad makes Catherine good nor Catherine being bad makes Allan good. What we do know is that Catherine was successful in having more than one professional involved on this case removed due to unprofessional conduct, which is incredibly difficult. Catherine released a lot of evidence en masse, likely knowing the backlash that would ensue. Allan, meanwhile, is being incredibly strategic in his ‘cover my *** countermoves, and showing absolute proficiency in deployment of DARVO, which is standard operating proceedure with that type of abuser.

    This person feels there is more than Catherine’s side to the story, yet is quite masterful in denying, loudly and viciously, that there is more to it than Allan’s.

    • Yes, I agree with this. From what I saw, including his material, Catherine was the protective, nurturing parent. Allan took her kids from her, substituted his girlfriend for their mother! This is just wrong.

      More broadly, the family court system is deadly.

    • Does make you wonder what evidence Allan had that caused the courts to make the rulings. Wonder what videos he has of her. I think this is much more complicated and messy than we would like to believe.

    • @4:02am: Please take your own advice, especially this part: “1) Research Narcissistic Abuse, with specific focus on ‘flying monkeys’ and ‘triangulation’ and then look, as objectively as possible, at themselves and their actions.”

      You are Catherine’s evil flying monkey, carrying out her bidding of destroying her estranged husband’s life as well as the childrens’, because you’ve been manipulated into believing her story and it also probably helps you carry on your delusional “narrative” that you are an innocent victim of family courts when really you likely lost custody because you are delusional and vindictive and unable to accept responsibility for your own actions.

  • You eliminated a mother from her children’s lives – against their will, against her will. Reap what you sow. A mother is not some walking womb you can rip out without consequences. Get out of here.

    • You people are sick and you lost custody of your children because you are sick in the head and evil.

  • I see not a single shred of evidence from Allan Kassenoff supporting this bogus story. Oh btw […] referred to Catherine Kassenoff as an idiot in an email, Allan and […] repeatedly gaslighted Catherine Kassenoff, Allan Kassenoff was a cheating bastard trying to get his dick wet instead of raising his daughters, he cheated on Catherine Kassenoff incessantly

    • Catherine cheated on him.

      Oh my god, she called Catherine an idiot? Did Catherine ever refer to the girlfriend by any less-than-flattering names? If so, they should both be burned at the stake.

      Get real.

        • “Eve was not taken out of Adam’s head to top him, neither out of his feet to be trampled on by him, but out of his side to be equal with him, under his arm to be protected by him, and near his heart to be loved by him.” Matthew Henry

About the Author

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in hundreds of news outlets, like The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CBS News, Fox News, New York Post, New York Daily News, Oxygen, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, The Sun, The Times of London, CBS Inside Edition, among many others in all five continents.

His work to expose and take down NXIVM is featured in books like “Captive” by Catherine Oxenberg, “Scarred” by Sarah Edmonson, “The Program” by Toni Natalie, and “NXIVM. La Secta Que Sedujo al Poder en México” by Juan Alberto Vasquez.

Parlato has been prominently featured on HBO’s docuseries “The Vow” and was the lead investigator and coordinating producer for Investigation Discovery’s “The Lost Women of NXIVM.” Parlato was also credited in the Starz docuseries "Seduced" for saving 'slave' women from being branded and escaping the sex-slave cult known as DOS.

Additionally, Parlato’s coverage of the group OneTaste, starting in 2018, helped spark an FBI investigation, which led to indictments of two of its leaders in 2023.

Parlato appeared on the Nancy Grace Show, Beyond the Headlines with Gretchen Carlson, Dr. Oz, American Greed, Dateline NBC, and NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, where Parlato conducted the first-ever interview with Keith Raniere after his arrest. This was ironic, as many credit Parlato as one of the primary architects of his arrest and the cratering of the cult he founded.

Parlato is a consulting producer and appears in TNT's The Heiress and the Sex Cult, which premiered on May 22, 2022. Most recently, he consulted and appeared on Tubi's "Branded and Brainwashed: Inside NXIVM," which aired January, 2023.

IMDb — Frank Parlato

Contact Frank with tips or for help.
Phone / Text: (305) 783-7083
Email: frankparlato@gmail.com

Archives

Discover more from Frank Report

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading