Dr. Brandon Porter Pleads With Judge: ‘Use What Powers You Have’ to Prevent Keith Getting ‘Murdered in Prison’

Dr. Brandon B. Porter filed a letter to the Hon. Eric R. Komitee, United States District Judge
Eastern District of New York. He writes about Keith Alan Raniere. And he writes about a matter that does not directly involve the judge.

Judge Komitee is the presiding judge in the matter of Edmondson v Raniere, which is the civil lawsuit that Sarah Edmondson and about 65 others are suing Clare and Sara Bronfman based on their financing of the abuses that Raniere and other leaders of NXIVM allegedly did to them. Neil Glazer represents the plaintiffs.

Judge Eric Komittee

Judge Komittee has no involvement in Raniere’s incarceration, his placement in the SHU, or his possible transfer to another prison. He has no control over what the BOP does or does not do to Raniere. He has no authority, other than moral, but that did not stop Dr. Porter from calling out for his help.

Raniere is a defendant in the Glazer lawsuit before Judge Komittee, but Raniere has not retained an attorney to defend him in that case.

Raniere has a team of lawyers representing him on his appeal, a Rule 33 motion for a new trial before the Judge Garaufis criminal, and other lawyers who represented him in a lawsuit recently dismissed in Arizona against the Bureau of Prisons.

Though a medical doctor by education, Dr. Porter lost his New York State medical license in 2019. The New York State Health Department revoked his license based on charges that he conducted human experiments without informed consent.

Codefendants Brandon Porter, Danielle Roberts and Nicki Clyne, who are codefendants in the Glazer lawsuit, before Judge Komittee, pictured with colleague Eduardo Asunsulo.

Brandon Porter 

Here is Dr. Porter’s letter

Hon. Eric R. Komitte:

I am writing because I am concerned about Keith Raniere’s safety and his ability to interact with lawyers so that he can defend himself in this court. It is my understanding that he might be moved to another prison.

If transferred, his travel time will hurt his ability to interact with lawyers. But, more importantly, moving will place his life in greater danger because of his conviction for child pornography. This is particularly concerning because the child pornography
charges were based upon digital data that was manipulated while in FBI custody and supported by perjured testimony by an FBI analyst (US vs Raniere, 1:18-cr-00204: Dct 1176 and Dct. 1178).

I do not know what powers you have to protect Keith Raniere from this abuse, but I am
asking you to do what you can to ensure that Raniere stays in USP Tucson and has time to
engage with his lawyers.

As you are aware, three digital forensic experts discovered irrefutable evidence that the child pornography evidence presented in Raniere’s criminal trial was fabricated while in the hands of the FBI (US vs Raniere, 1:18-cr-00204: Dct 1176 and Dct. 1178). Since this information was submitted to the court, three more forensic experts evaluated the evidence and agreed with these conclusions (https://makejusticeblind.com/tampering/).

Three of these six experts are former FBI forensic examiners. It disturbs them, greatly, that individuals in the FBI most-likely performed these acts. It appears that people in the DOJ committed crimes in order to gain a conviction.

Presently, the DOJ appears to be using their powers over Keith Raniere to thwart his ability to challenge their illegal acts against him and against the principle of the rule of law.

Keith Raniere’s lawyers submitted the Rule 33 motion with the evidence of FBI evidence
tampering on May 5, 2022. Raniere experienced immediate punishment for his action. First, he was no longer able to make phone calls or receive visits from his friends who were helping him fight his criminal legal battle.

Then, on July 26, 2022, he was assaulted and sent to the Special Housing Unit (“SHU”). He has been in this unit, since. Raniere’s legal meetings have been limited, even cancelled. Now, he received word that the prison plans to move him to another prison… a prison where his physical safety will be further compromised. It is well known that conviction for a sexual crime against a child places a person at increased risk for being murdered
in prison.

In addition to this additional risk, previous transits took weeks. These are weeks that he cannot interact with his lawyers and fight the charges that placed Raniere at increased risk of being murdered in prison.

It concerns me, greatly, that nobody in the Federal government appears to have done anything to investigate this crime. Raniere’s claims against the DOJ in his Rule 33 motion are languishing in procedural delays. It appears to me that the DOJ is using its power over Raniere to limit his ability to challenge their wrongdoings in criminal court. He has yet to appear in this court, suggesting to me that their efforts are working here, too.

I have not discussed this note with any lawyers. It pains me to bring this to you because the only reason this letter is necessary is because others are abnegating their oath to defend the U.S. Constitution, and some, are actively compromising the power of the Constitution by making its protections from tyranny meaningless.

I ask you to use what powers you have to protect Mr. Raniere’s rights to counsel and that he be moved to the general population at his current prison, USP Tucson. Also, please consider this note before making a summary judgement against Mr. Raniere. I understand that there is no motion for a summary judgement now. Nonetheless, it appears that the government agents who performed these crimes against Mr. Raniere’s constitutional rights to due process are continuing to compromise Mr. Raniere’s constitutional rights. In my opinion, the lack of action by others is effecting the ability for justice to be performed in this court. I find this concerning and hope you take this information for your consideration.


/s/ Brandon B. Porter

Brandon B. Porter

Cc: All Counsel by ECF


About the author

Frank Parlato


Click here to post a comment

  • It is not uncommon for people to have strong loyalties and commitments to their friends and loved ones, and it is likely that Dr. Porter feels a sense of loyalty or obligation to Keith Raniere. However, it is also important for individuals to consider the impact of their actions on their family and loved ones, and to strive to balance their own interests with the needs and well-being of their family.

    Making decisions that cause harm or reputational damage to one’s family, especially when those decisions are based on loyalty to someone else, could be considered selfish. It is important for individuals to consider the potential consequences of their actions on those they care about, and to try to find a way to balance their own needs and desires with the needs of their family.

    It is also important to remember that individuals may have different motivations and reasons for their actions, and it is not always possible to fully understand another person’s perspective or experiences. In any case, it is important for individuals to try to communicate openly and honestly with their family and to be mindful of the impact of their actions on those around them.

    The letter appears to contain various allegations and assertions. It is important to note that the letter appears to be written by an individual who has lost his medical license and who is a codefendant in a civil lawsuit, and as such the credibility and reliability of the information contained in the letter may be questionable.

    It is not appropriate or ethical for medical professionals to conduct experiments on human subjects without informed consent. The informed consent process involves providing potential research participants with information about the nature, purpose, and potential risks of a study, and obtaining their voluntary agreement to participate. Failing to obtain informed consent is a serious violation of ethical standards and can cause harm to research participants.

    If the allegations against Dr. Brandon Porter are true, his conduct in conducting experiments on human subjects without informed consent was highly inappropriate and unethical. Conducting experiments without informed consent is a serious breach of trust and can cause harm to research participants, both physically and emotionally. It is important for medical professionals to adhere to ethical standards in their research and practice in order to protect the well-being of their patients and research participants.

    Selfishness can manifest in many different ways, including putting one’s own needs or desires above the needs of others, failing to consider the impact of one’s actions on others, or ignoring the rights and well-being of others.

    It is not uncommon for individuals to have strong beliefs about their own ethics and character, and to strive to live in accordance with those beliefs. However, it is also possible for individuals to be unaware of how their actions may be perceived or experienced by others, or to be unable to recognize when their actions may be causing harm or damage to others.

    When an individual feels that their ethics and character preclude them from being selfish, but their behavior causes harm to others, it may be because they are not fully aware of the impact of their actions or they may be unable to see how their actions may be perceived as selfish. This may be due to a lack of self-awareness or an inability to consider the perspective of others.

    It is important for individuals to try to be mindful of the impact of their actions on others, and to strive to balance their own needs and desires with the needs of those around them. It may be helpful for individuals who are struggling to recognize when their actions may be causing harm to others to seek guidance or support from a trusted friend, family member, or mental health professional.

    There are several potential benefits to consulting a lawyer before writing a letter to a judge, such as:

    A lawyer can help ensure that the letter is written in a way that is legally accurate and complies with all relevant laws and rules.

    A lawyer can provide guidance on how to effectively communicate the intended message and present the information in a clear and concise manner.

    A lawyer can advise on the potential impact of the letter and whether it may be advisable to take certain legal actions or make specific requests in the letter.

    A lawyer can help to protect the individual’s rights and interests by reviewing the letter and identifying any potential legal issues that may need to be addressed.

    Consulting a lawyer before writing a letter to a judge can be especially important in cases where the letter relates to legal proceedings or raises legal issues. A lawyer can provide valuable guidance and support to help ensure that the individual’s rights are protected and that their interests are effectively represented.

    If Dr. Porter did not consult a lawyer before writing the letter and chose to send it anyway, this could be seen as a display of arrogance towards authority. This behavior may suggest that Dr. Porter does not fully understand or respect the legal and ethical standards that apply to his profession, and may be unwilling to seek guidance or adhere to the rules and regulations that are in place to protect the well-being of research participants and the integrity of the legal system.

    Sending a letter to a judge without consulting a lawyer could also be seen as a lack of respect for the authority and role of the legal system, and could potentially have negative consequences for the individual and for the legal proceedings involved. It is important for individuals to consider the potential impact of their actions and to seek guidance from legal professionals when necessary in order to protect their rights and interests.

    Here are a few potential steps that a person like Dr. Porter could take to work on becoming more aware of their arrogance and how their actions may be affecting his wife and children:

    Seek feedback from trusted friends, family members, or a mental health professional. This can help to provide insight into how others perceive the individual’s behavior and may identify patterns of thought or behavior that the individual may not be aware of.

    Engage in self-reflection and self-examination. This can involve setting aside time to consider one’s own values, motivations, and actions, and asking oneself how one’s actions may be affecting others.

    Seek guidance or support from a therapist or other mental health professional. A therapist can help an individual to identify and address any underlying issues or concerns that may be contributing to their behavior, and can provide support and guidance as they work on making changes.

    Make an effort to consider the perspective of others. This can involve actively listening to others, seeking to understand their perspective, and trying to see things from their point of view.

    Adopting the attitude that there are no ultimate victims can have some potential benefits, such as:


    It may empower individuals to take responsibility for their own actions and circumstances, rather than feeling like a victim of circumstances or other people’s actions.

    It may help individuals to develop a sense of agency and control over their own lives.

    It may encourage individuals to seek solutions and take action to address problems or challenges, rather than feeling powerless or helpless.

    However, there are also some potential drawbacks to adopting this attitude:


    It may minimize or dismiss the experiences and feelings of individuals who have been affected by abuse or harm, and may make it more difficult for them to seek support or hold accountable those who have caused them harm.

    It may discourage individuals from seeking help or support when they are facing challenges or difficulties, and may lead them to feel like they have to handle things on their own.

    It may foster a sense of denial or avoidance of difficult or painful experiences, and may prevent individuals from acknowledging and addressing underlying issues or problems.

    It is important for individuals to consider the potential pros and cons of adopting any particular attitude or perspective, and to strive to find a balance that allows them to take responsibility for their own actions while also being open to seeking support and help when needed.

    It is not appropriate or ethical for medical professionals to conduct experiments on human subjects without obtaining informed consent. Informed consent involves providing potential research participants with information about the nature, purpose, and potential risks of a study, and obtaining their voluntary agreement to participate. This process is in place to protect the rights and well-being of research participants and ensure that they are able to make informed decisions about whether or not to participate in a study.

    Dr. Porter’s decision to conduct experiments on human subjects without obtaining informed consent is a serious violation of ethical standards and can cause harm to research participants. Using footage from extreme violence movies as part of the experiment is particularly concerning, as it exposes research participants to potentially disturbing and traumatic material without their knowledge or consent.

    Additionally, Dr. Porter’s rationalization that the footage came from movies that are publicly available does not justify his failure to obtain informed consent. It is the responsibility of the researcher to provide potential research participants with information about the study and obtain their consent before proceeding.

    Failing to obtain informed consent is a dangerous and unethical choice, as it violates the trust and rights of research participants and puts their well-being at risk. It is important for medical professionals to adhere to ethical standards in their research and practice in order to protect the well-being of their patients and research participants.

    If Dr. Porter is concerned about the harm that he may have caused through his failure to obtain informed consent for his experiments, it may be appropriate for him to apologize to any individuals who were affected by this and to make efforts to make amends for any harm that he caused. This could involve apologizing to individuals directly, seeking to repair any damage that was done, and taking steps to prevent similar harm from occurring in the future.

    Additionally, if Dr. Porter is still involved with Keith Raniere or NXIVM, it may be advisable for him to consider the impact of this association on his own reputation and well-being, as well as on the well-being of his family. It may be helpful for him to carefully consider his involvement with these individuals and organizations, and to make choices that are in the best interest of himself and his loved ones.

    There are many books that may be helpful for Dr. Porter to better understand the impact of his choices, depending on his specific needs and interests. Here are a few examples of books that may be particularly relevant:

    “The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion” by Jonathan Haidt: This book discusses the psychological and evolutionary roots of moral judgment and how they shape our political and cultural divisions. It may help Dr. Porter to better understand how his own values and beliefs shape his decisions and how to better understand the perspectives of others.

    “The Empathy Exams: Essays” by Leslie Jamison: This collection of essays explores the concept of empathy and how it shapes our relationships and understanding of others. It may be helpful for Dr. Porter to better understand the impact of his actions on others and to develop a greater sense of compassion and understanding.

    “The Road to Character” by David Brooks: This book discusses the importance of humility, empathy, and self-control in building strong character and leading a fulfilling life. It may be helpful for Dr. Porter to consider how his own choices and actions are shaping his character and how to make decisions that reflect his values and principles.

    “The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined” by Steven Pinker: This book discusses the long-term decline of violence in human history and the factors that contribute to this trend. It may be helpful for Dr. Porter to better understand the larger context in which his choices and actions are taking place and to consider the potential consequences of his behavior on a larger scale.

    I leave Dr Porter this poem:

    Kind Dr. Porter, hear my plea
    From the depths of your despair
    You must snap out of your reverie
    And face the truth, however fair

    Your choices, they have led you here
    To a place of darkness and despair
    But it’s not too late, my dear
    To rise above and mount the stair

    To a place of clarity and light
    Where you can see with clear sight
    The impact of your actions on the night
    And make a change, for it’s not right

    To continue down this path so dark
    To let your ego be your mark
    You must awaken from your stark
    Slumber and see the truth, and embark

    On a journey of self-reflection
    To understand your own imperfection
    And make amends, with deep affection
    For those you’ve harmed, with no dejection

    So rise up, Dr. Porter, from your sleep
    And face the truth, don’t you keep
    Hiding from the pain, don’t you weep
    It’s time to awaken, and take the leap!

  • The subject matter at hand is the safety and legal defense of Keith Raniere, who has been convicted of child pornography charges. The writer is concerned that Raniere may be moved to another prison, which would put his life in danger due to the nature of his conviction and would also hamper his ability to interact with his lawyers. The writer also alleges that the evidence against Raniere was fabricated by the FBI and that the DOJ is using its power over Raniere to limit his ability to challenge their wrongdoing in court.

    The main conflict at play is the alleged misconduct of the DOJ and FBI in the handling of Raniere’s case and the concern for Raniere’s safety and ability to mount a legal defense.

    The psychological aspect of the letter involves the writer’s concern for Raniere and their belief in his innocence. The writer also expresses frustration and outrage at the alleged misconduct of the DOJ and FBI.

    The legal appropriateness of the letter is questionable, as the writer makes several allegations against the DOJ and the FBI without providing any evidence to support these claims. It is also not clear what the writer’s relationship is to Raniere or what legal authority they have to advocate on his behalf.

    The ethics and dilemmas involved in the letter include the alleged misconduct of the DOJ and FBI, and the potential for injustice if Raniere is not able to mount a proper defense. The letter also raises the ethical dilemma of the potential for abuse of power by government agencies.

  • The reason why everyone hates NXVIUM is because they manipulated, groomed and hurt people. They did so so much that they convinced people to harm themselves to prove loyalty and commitment.

    So I think the lesson learned is to be fair and considerate to ourselves and to others.

    We all have to pay the price for everything we do. Karma. But that also includes the words we choose and what we write.

    I do believe that this was a sick and even criminal operation but that doesn’t mean they should be put in a position that might end anyones life.

    If we do that, are we not then of the same negative mentality as NXVIUM? Vindictive and cruel?

    Fair is fair and this is not.

  • Moral of the story is people are way too obsessed with sex and power. It’s over rated and addictive. Everyone needs to just chill the f out man.

  • FBI and law enforcement does stuff like this all the time. Whatever Keith did, I agree that he could have been set up for this part because it happens all the time. He doesn’t deserve to be in fear of being murdered. He doesn’t deserve murder. He just deserves to be penalized for what he actually did do. He did not get the death penalty.

    My take on all of this is that people need to learn from this horrible story and rise above the evil. He clearly had some deep perverse resentments towards women and severe insecurities that he never healed and so he hurt countless people. So rather than mirror his horrid mentality, people should learn from his mistakes. I don’t enjoy seeing the posts from all these people that are full of hatred. This is the cycle of destruction.

    If we lay down with dogs, we’ll get fleas.

    • He became a prisoner accused of sexually abusing a child because he sexually abused a child. He also assured a stay in prison when he kept child porn as a trophy. He’s in his situation through his own actions.

  • But if Porter had bundled his malpractice insurance, he would be covered for mayhem like this, paying only for what he needs.

  • Raniere lost his freedom forever. Why isolate him in the SHU and subject him to constant threat and torture.

    We shouldn’t celebrate the degradation of any human being.

    We are endorsing brutality and psychological torture of those in prison. They suffer, their families suffer, and constitutional rights are obliterated.

  • Thank God for these morons. Keith can really pick them can’t he. Each and every one of them a doozy. The defence lawyers, this idiot Porter, the ugly branding female doctor, Nicki and the dancing solid gold dancers. Suneel, Eduardo and the rest of the ‘is there a shag in it for me’ squad. At this rate Raniere will be serving the whole 120 years, well, unless his genius mind cures ageing. You know, telomeres, the book Daniela read that he memorised the synopsis from. Personally I am loving the fact this hirsuit orc is stuck in Seg. No nookie, no nocturnal walks, no volleyball, no group BJ’s, no private planes to Fiji, no nice bed, no nice food. And the best part, Santa doesn’t visit the Feds, because they are on the ‘naughty list’.

  • To Mad Doc Porter,

    Poor, poor chomo Vanguard.

    Wake up loser! Worry about providing for your kids. Get a job!

  • This letter makes me wonder how Bandon Porter made it through medical school and got a PhD in research.
    Did he copy off of other people tests and have someone else do his homework?
    Does he not understand that a Judge in a civil matter, not even Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, has anything to do with a prison transfer within the BOP?

    What is with these NXIVM dead-enders? At any point, can they rub their brain cell together and come up with an understanding of how the legal system works? It appears they are so used to spoon-fed what Raniere thinks that they can’t form their knowledge anymore.

    The problem is that Raniere won’t let his legal counsel do their job. He has to be in control of everything. He always fucks up. He hires the best of the best, and he still fucks it all up.

    Maybe being on a bus to another prison for a couple of weeks would do his legal case some good. Let the big guns with the paid-for education take control of the situation and do the job they were paid for, for once.

    No one has the BOP said they were going to transfer Raniere. It’s only been Raniere in his court documents whining that he would be sent elsewhere. The BOP returned and said it was within their legal right to do so; if they wanted to move him, they could.

  • Gracetopia’s Twitter and Instagram accounts and her website have all gone private. Grace seems to have gotten a little too much notoriety from the Frank Report after all, and seems to have become cautious about what she writes publicly as a result. Grace probably hasn’t had many readers and visitors to her social media pages with normal judgment.

  • I think the biggest liars are Chet Reddit Hardin and his gal pal Toni Karma Natalie. They’re worse than the Raniere followers. At least the dead-enders put their name on things. It’s time you out them. All the lies they have put in their horrible book of lies. Chet wrote it. Chet is a reporter? He was a stenographer. Now Chet acts like he is the authority on everything incorruptible. LOL. Out that fool. I have a lot of info on both of them I can share.

  • Brandon’s letter is very poorly written. It’s repetitive it reads very cut and paste. It’s not persuasive. The content is all over the place . The ask is buried beneath a bunch of baseless accusations . And he sounds a bit crazy. The Keith loyalists continue to make themselves and Keith look even worse and that is really an accomplishment.

    It’s very challenging to accept Brandon Porter was ever really a licensed doctor.

    Be careful out there in healthcare y’all. This kind of man and mind could be “treating” you medically.

    Wow. That is a scary, scary thought.

    That should have been included in the fright experiment. Imagining Brandon is actually your doctor and your health and maybe even your life depend on this man. Truly the most terrifying image.

    • Oh no, Mr. Bill, Its the letter police AGAIN!!!!

      Are you a licensed doctor that you can speak to how challenging it is to believe he passed the rigorous requirements?

      Or currently working at all?
      What’s your career Assnonymous?

      • Thank you for acknowledging my authority in letter policing. I’m also qualified to critique blog comments and yours sucks. Please support your local letter policing Union. It’s how we work together to keep this universe safe from inferior writing. Every donation counts and you will receive a free calendar that features a terrible letter writer every month.

          • But you are reading this blog and commenting. How is stating that someone works for Frank report such a sick burn in your tiny mind if this is a Blog that you’re very actively participating on? You’re just jealous because you could never be an officer for the letter police because you would not pass the psych evaluation.

  • Wow Brandon, I’m sure the judge will get to it right away. But you forgot to add in the part about “by the way, you’re being watched” . Judges love that shit.

  • All of these KR loyalists continue to embarrass themselves with their childish publicity stunt riddled campaign. According to this medical charlatan, poor KR is a victim of the “government agents who performed these crimes”. He pleads to a judge who has absolutely no jurisdiction in the matter.

      • Once again…

        “Zebras are like Sicilians—they’re 1/2 black, 1/2 white and of no use to anyone.”

        That’s why you like zebras, dumbass.

        I bid you good night! 🙂

          • Frank-

            My sweet nephew hasn’t been seen since he went to Nigeria to visit his online Czech girlfriend
            SpeeraChukza Borovsky.

            He had grown so much as writer.
            I wish he’d return. You’d think the Little Dipshit would drop us a dime.

  • Assuming the letter’s genuine, Porter should’ve lost his license for pure stupidity lol! Why didn’t he use that electroencephalography device on his own brain to see if it was even functioning?! Of course he was too stupid to think about it.

  • Can you please describe the human experiments this quack doctor conducted….IMHO, anyone getting involved with Rainere is a quack, in my book.

    • It’s a series of video shorts, a few ads, nothing too shocking until the last one, which is a snuff movie. The were put together to ‘test’ the subjects response – all very pseudo-scientific. It was probably a Raniere test to find out which Nexians were sufficiently psycho for higher office.

      I wouldn’t recommend anyone watch this last clip in the series. It’s the kind of thing that could result in PTSD for the fainter-hearted. For the rest of us it’s just a horrific reminder of the sick depravity some people are capable of after they’ve been pumped full of drugs and paid a few greenbacks to make Raniere a little movie for use in his little ‘experiment’.

      Sorry, docs, and that goes for you Danielle too: when you breach your medical oaths, you prove that you are not fit to practice. You make your bed, you better lie in it.

About the Author

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in hundreds of news outlets, like The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CBS News, Fox News, New York Post, New York Daily News, Oxygen, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, The Sun, The Times of London, CBS Inside Edition, among many others in all five continents.

His work to expose and take down NXIVM is featured in books like “Captive” by Catherine Oxenberg, “Scarred” by Sarah Edmonson, “The Program” by Toni Natalie, and “NXIVM. La Secta Que Sedujo al Poder en México” by Juan Alberto Vasquez.

Parlato has been prominently featured on HBO’s docuseries “The Vow” and was the lead investigator and coordinating producer for Investigation Discovery’s “The Lost Women of NXIVM.” Parlato was also credited in the Starz docuseries "Seduced" for saving 'slave' women from being branded and escaping the sex-slave cult known as DOS.

Additionally, Parlato’s coverage of the group OneTaste, starting in 2018, helped spark an FBI investigation, which led to indictments of two of its leaders in 2023.

Parlato appeared on the Nancy Grace Show, Beyond the Headlines with Gretchen Carlson, Dr. Oz, American Greed, Dateline NBC, and NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, where Parlato conducted the first-ever interview with Keith Raniere after his arrest. This was ironic, as many credit Parlato as one of the primary architects of his arrest and the cratering of the cult he founded.

Parlato is a consulting producer and appears in TNT's The Heiress and the Sex Cult, which premiered on May 22, 2022. Most recently, he consulted and appeared on Tubi's "Branded and Brainwashed: Inside NXIVM," which aired January, 2023.

IMDb — Frank Parlato

Contact Frank with tips or for help.
Phone / Text: (305) 783-7083
Email: frankparlato@gmail.com


Discover more from Frank Report

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading