Suzanne’s Three Critical Points – Danielle Roberts Not Keith’s Partner and Is Nancy the Most Ignorant or Biggest Liar

Suzanne is back and has a hard time agreeing with Kevin and others that Danielle Roberts is a victim. It was suggested Danielle was a business partner of Keith Alan Raniere. Suzanne tore into that. She does not quite buy into the concept that the long-term low-cal diet is medically supported.

By Suzanne

Business Partners? Nonsense

Keith Raniere was Danielle Roberts’ business partner? LOL.

Danielle has his initials burned into her snatch. Danielle made graphic pornography for this cult leader.

Danielle Roberts dances in front of her Vanguard’s prison.

Danielle danced outside his prison cell like a Manson girl. Danielle gave life-ruining blackmail to this grandmaster of DOS slaves.

Danielle Roberts performs for Keith Alan Raniere

Danielle Roberts doing a forearm stand, as part of her yoga practice.

Danielle bikini-clad in Fiji

No matter how you try to spin it, this is not just Danielle’s business partner LOL

Maybe you’ve been in ESP too long to understand that that’s not how most business partnerships work?

You cannot be anyone’s partner in anything if you are their slave and are blackmailed.

By definition, that’s not an equal relationship. Danielle’s business partner LOL! You dead-enders are too much.

Danielle practices yoga.

Danielle leads an exercise class AKA exo/eso

Danielle in a bikini that covers her brand.

Why was Danielle branding her business partners initials on her vagina?

Why was Danielle lying to women and burning her business partners initials on to other women’s vaginas?

Why was Danielle’s business partner blackmailing her sexually and otherwise?

Why was her business partner lying to her about the entire structure of the Master-Slave organization that Danielle was an enthusiastic participant in? And still supports?

Dead-Enders are constantly trying to reframe reality, but anything in person can see right through it. You can’t be partners with someone if you’re their slave

Lauren Salzman and Allison Mack both were courting health risks, some say, by a diet that is lower in calories than what concentration camp prisoners consumed.

Doctor Danielle’s Diet for DOS Slaves Not Healthy

Every doctor who does not want to lose their medical license will advise people not to go on a starvation diet unless they are under a doctor’s care.

Were all the women starving in DOS under Dr. Danielle’s medical care? Not everyone can just go on to a starvation diet.

There are so many factors. And not eating while you’re basically asleep does not count as a starvation diet. Waiting a few hours after you wake up before breakfast and then embarking on a normal caloric regiment has absolutely no relation to the extreme prolonged everyday starvation the dos slaves were doing, and why their hair was falling out and why they stopped getting their periods and suffered severe physical and mental consequences from actual starvation.

Miss Clyne ate between 500-800 calories in a day.

Comparing the DOS slave practices of total starvation and caloric restriction over many years, and having to ask somebody for permission to eat, and a non-slaved person routinely stops caloric intake after dinner and waits a little bit in the morning to eat breakfast, or just not comparable in any way.

The most important factor is that in the second description, the person is responsible for their own medical, physical, and health food.

If you have a master telling you what weight you should be, and making it about your appearance, and some kind of weird sacrifice and discipline, and it has nothing to do with your actual health, and most importantly, you’re being blackmailed into doing it that has nothing to do with the person who chooses to fast from time to time for their own reasons. And again, all changes in diet, especially extreme, are always recommended to be discussed with a personal medical physician, who can look at your overall health picture and underlying conditions that you may or may not have medical history.

Nancy talks about having to manage Keith’s many women.

A Word on Nancy Salzman Ignorance

Nancy Salzman is a sterling example of why attorneys advise clients not to give interviews. She pretends to not know anything about Keith’s sexual exploits, but in the next breath she talks about having to manage all the women who are having relationships with him.

It would have been great to get Ivy to issue a rebuttal to Nancy.

Frank should repost the letter Ivy wrote about Nancy for her sentencing. Nancy was culpable in all the weird stuff controlling various women. Weighing Ivy everyday? In her underwear?

Nancy even admits she knows that Keith promised a baby to a wide range of women. How could she possibly feign shock that he had sex with all those women?

How else does Nancy think a baby is made? And how could Nancy be surprised Lauren was also promised a baby if she knew that was part of Keith’s MO?

Nancy knew eveything?

If you knew a man acted like that toward women, how could you ever feel comfortable with your daughter hanging all over him and being so close to the guy? Likewise, if you knew Keith was such a prolific predator of women, why would you let the community believe he was a renunciate?

And how could you ever let young girls be around him hanging all over Keith?

Nancy is far more culpable than she is trying to portray herself.


About the author

Guest View


Click here to post a comment

  • It was validating to hear Nancy Salman state that all of the community members who wanted a close relationship to Vanguard were, “jealous of one or more of the sisters”.

    It really supports the suspicion that a lot of the animosity toward Camilla and the callous dismissive attitude about the insane abuse heaped on Daniella comes from a place of competitiveness and envy.

    Daniela is gorgeous. Frank described her as fashion model level beautiful. And Daniela is a genius. Keith wanted her around all of the time.

    Camilla, Nancy described as “everyone’s favorite.” Young, adorable, smart and clearly Keith wanted to own her.

    Mariana who is routinely described as lazy. Lives with Keith and ends up having the baby that Keith promised to so many other women.

    All of the other female cult followers (and some male) were doing literally anything and everything to get Keith’s approval, time and attention and these sisters had it. And in a tragic irony at least two of the sisters did not want it and were punished for wanting a different life

    In Camilla’s texts with Keith about the lifetime slave vow commitment and other potential slaves, Camilla strongly says that she wants, “anyone other than Nickii” Clyne to be in their lives that much and forever.

    And it’s very clear that Nicki Clyne has a personal problem with Camilla. Daniella too. Camilla probably felt that hot jealousy seething out of Nicki Clyne back then.

    Keith did pit people against each other and use triangulation and love followers competing for him.

    The dead- enders have tried to cast dated and misogynistic tale of “a woman scorned” narrative on some of the abuse victims of Keith Raniere.

    Why can’t the same lens be turned on the dead end women’s motivations now? Who’s to say that they are not just deeply, deeply vindictive and jealous of these beautiful and intelligent women who did not want Keith when the dead-ender slaves themselves wanted Keith so badly?

    • If Daniela was top model material as Frank says then why does Marie White always paint her like she has a cleft lip?
      We’ve seen Camila photos TY.
      And wasn’t Lorena Bobbitt of Latina descent, they can be hot headed. Js.

  • Why Allison Mack is Currently ROTTING in Prison

    In this video, we’re going to take a look at How Allison Mack Became a CRIMINAL.

    How Allison Mack Became a CRIMINAL… – Video Introduction
    At 18, Allison Mack was about to have the biggest hit of her career as an actress. Fresh-faced Allison was about to star as the witty, pretty Chloe Sullivan, the sidekick to a young Clark Kent in the hit series “Smallville.” Never could she have imagined that in a couple of decades, she would be facing federal indictment. As a teenager, Allison felt a void inside her that her career could never fill. But on one fateful weekend, she would have an experience that would completely alter the course of her life. This is the story of Allison Mack’s spectacular fall from grace.

  • Allison Mack: NXIVM cult leader who branded s*x slaves with her initials

    Ex-NXIVM member Kelly Thiel from The Vow discusses her time in the cult led by Keith Raniere and Smallville actress Allison Mack, who branded s*x slaves with her initials. Leader Keith Raniere and his assistant Allison Mack ran the cult and even branded slave women with hot irons in the secret inner sanctum called Dos.

    The cult was on the surface a multi-level marketing group that had various levels of memberships. Its members would learn a lot about self-help stuff, such as how to find purpose and be happy. Its methods were said to have been somewhere between those of Tony Robbins and the cult of Scientology, and there was even some stuff about going back to your childhood or past lives.

  • Nancy Salzman is guilty as sin both then & now. She knew, and trying to gain some “sympathy” in her interviews on The Vow, is pathetic. I think she is a “sociopath”, like Keith.
    When she said in her interview “ when everything started to blow up, & she really didn’t know why” in her company, well it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand why. If everything was “above board” in your company, then there should be NO explosions.

    • Honestly, she could just be really sick… who knows. Sadly I see a lot of people in the world around me trying to ignore or refuse to acknowledge the problems around them. And sometimes it’s ok – sometimes problems go away. Or maybe the “weird” things going on aren’t that weird. Isn’t that the gaslighting they had going on anyway?

      Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s really messed up and she did terrible things and I genuinely hope she’s remorseful and honest in her interviews.

      Sometimes I get worse vibes from Mark, who was in a cult before NXIVM, and Sarah who clearly made a tremendous amount of money eating fancy food in her high rise Vancouver condo and driving around a Range Rover >.<

      Who knows, who knows. I wish people would take responsibility. Maybe they are. Maybe they’re faking it. I don’t know.

  • The DOS die-hard slaves are trying to normalize Daniella’s confinement.

    Foisting the blame on her parents even though Keith is recorded touting both shunning in general and shunning Daniela specifically.

    But let’s say reality doesn’t exist and those recordings don’t exist. And it was Daniela’s parents…

    How the f*** did anyone else ever go along with that?

    If a stranger to me was a 24 year old girl confinef in a room in my community I would call authorities.

    Why didn’t anyone ask for a wellness check?

    A 24 year old woman is being kept from going to a doctor or a dentist or mental health professional? For about 2 years?!

    No one in the community goes to authorities and reports Daniella missing?

    No one does an exhaustive search to find out what happened to this young woman from another country who is now disappeared from their very close-knit community?

    These same cult dead-enders are always moaning and groaning about Keith being isolated.

    Keith has had access to lawyers Keith had visitors all day everyday on the weekends. Keith is allowed phone calls. Keith was allowed email. And snail.mail. Keith has been seen by doctors.

    Daniella had nothing. She didn’t even have a prison bed she slept on the floor.

    How could anyone know that a 24 year old woman was being kept in a room with a blacked out window in a neighboring condo and not get her help?

    Absolutely despicable and just repulsive to try to normalize that kind of abuse by the dossier project slaves

    These loyalists to Keith are so out of touch with reality that they believe other human beings are going to say oh okay it was her parents who decided to keep her in a room with no contact no Outlets whatsoever no mental or physical doctors overseeing her no contact with the outside world or ever leaving the room. Oh okay then that’s fine. Are you f****** for real? Idiot cult followers.

  • A TV commercial Larry David wishes he had never made.

    Don’t Miss Out on Crypto: Larry David FTX Commercial
    Don’t Miss Out on Crypto: Larry David FTX Commercial

    The next big thing is here, even if Larry David can’t see it. Don’t miss out. Download the FTX app, the safe and easy way to buy and sell crypto and NFTs.

    Highlighted as one of the best 2022 Super Bowl commercials by Good Morning America, The Today Show, and many more.

  • One of the most telling comments Nancy made was that Keith Raniere never liked Nancy’s daughter Michelle.

    What the f*** Nancy? How was that not a deal breaker?

    Most mothers would never pair up and get all smoochie face with a strange man who randomly decided they did not like one of the mom’s intelligent, creative, lovely daughters.

    Nancy. How was that not the biggest red flag and a really good reason to run?

    Some dude shows up and is like, “Hey one of your daughters sucks and I don’t like her.”

    And Nancy (the mom) is like, “Oh, I believe you man who just appeared. You are the most ethical and smartest man in the world. How could I never have realized that my daughter Michelle sucks so badly before you appeared? Let’s start a business together! And you shall have full access to my family.”

    • Susan – I understand that, at best, Nancy had her head in the sand. Is it possible that she simply wasn’t ready to see the truth when you warned her?

      • When the money is flowing like wine, you’re willing to screw anyone. Her head wasn’t in the sand. She’s a control freak. She had to know everything. She’s an OCD controlling maniac.

        And how could you not know your daughters were both screwing your co-founder that you were also screwing, and that your daughters were bi-sexually with everyone else and branding and otherwise doing crazy things. You didn’t see everyone losing weight and getting delirious from lack of food and sleep? You didn’t see anything? Really?

        You were either in on it or were frankly dumb as a rock – but knowing that you were running a 17,000 person company and MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of dollars internationally moving around, you couldn’t be that dumb.

        You were complicit.

        It’s called DAMAGE CONTROL ladies and gentlemen it’s called, trying to get off the hook and get sympathy from others.

        AND, don’t forget, Nancy is a master hypnotist and neural linguistic programmer. Her job is to manipulate and convince people of things. She’s a professional in this. She’s a scam artist. And she is able to talk her way out and in to things. She’s a genius. She’s actually very smart and very manipulative.

        She’s able to walk out of anything…it was Keith, Lauren, and Allison that were the wildcards and screwed it up for Nancy. If the three of them weren’t so sloppy (personally and in business), Nancy could have kept the scam going. Don’t forget…they had like 50 shell companies…she really had no idea that a scam was brewing? She had no idea that one million dollars in cash being transferred all over the place every month was normal?


        How did half a million end up in shoeboxes in my attic? Why did i give much of my cash to other family members to hide? Like really? Even if we can believe she knew nothing of the sexual escapades and orgies….she can’t claim stupidity on the business end. She had lawyers, accountants, computer experts, and other professional advisors and CEO’s in her circle. She had plenty of knowledge and plenty of intel on her people. In the end – she’s a scam artist. It’s that simple.

        • I asked Susan because I know she will be straight up in her answer. She won’t exaggerate or have any need to make up lies. The truth is bad enough without doing what many on FR feel the need to do.

        • *** AND, don’t forget, Nancy is a master hypnotist and neural linguistic programmer. Her job is to manipulate and convince people of things. She’s a professional in this. She’s a scam artist. And she is able to talk her way out and in to things. She’s a genius. She’s actually very smart and very manipulative.***

          long time stalker, first time poster, and this just makes my blood boil. Enough to actually emerge from the shadows.

          Why tf is this not even remotely eluded to, much less openly discussed on The Vow? I swear to Jesus tap-dancing Christ that this wretched woman is being given an outlet to manipulate and excuse some pretty atrocious behavior and not a single person is offering an ounce of pushback? Why?

          I sincerely believe that Nancy was an integral part of the formation of and development hereof the educational materials as well as the curriculum development down to the correct verbiage employed. She is a very skilled expert and knows full well what she’s doing.

          The saving grace is, almost no one is watching this train wreck of a series, so at least there’s that.

          I’m beyond baffled at how she’s being allowed to portray herself and cannot for the life of me understand how tf she isn’t being given even the slightest resistance to her insane claims.

        • Psychology Today

          5 Signs That You Are Dealing With a Control Freak
          They never, ever admit that they’re wrong.
          Posted April 4, 2016 | Reviewed by Abigail Fagan

          [ … ]

          What kind of disorder might this type of person have? Control seekers are often obsessive-compulsive, angry (either overt or passive-aggressive), phobic, or even mood-disordered. These people need control because, without it, they fear things would spiral out of control and their lives would fall apart.

          How can you spot a high-control person? You can spot these types in every walk of life, in settings from home to work to social gatherings. Do high-control people think of themselves as control freaks? Because these individuals need a high level of control, they also need to control their image, so while they will usually acknowledge that they need a lot of control in situations, they will reject the “freak” part of the label—the association that there is something wrong with them or that they need too much control. In fact, many high-control men and women will often justify their need for control in the following ways: “I have to be this way to do as much as I do,” “People need people like me because so many people are actually incompetent,” and “Things would fall apart without me.”

          Needing a high level of control in situations is often not psychologically healthy because so much in life is beyond our control. If you need total control even though you and everyone else knows that it is impossible to achieve, then you are going to have more anxiety because of the bar you set for yourself. Consider the signs below and you may find yourself in some of the examples.

          1. Correcting people when they’re wrong. People with a high need for control often feel the need to correct others when they’re wrong. They correct someone due to an irrational argument; they correct spelling or pronunciation; they correct details of what happened in the past; they correct bad manners; they correct people when they do something wrong or inappropriate. It’s important to understand, though, that underneath the motivation to correct others is the belief that they are usually—or always—right.

          2. Always trying to win the argument or have the last word. High-control men and women are difficult to have relationships with because they like to set the rules—and subsequently enforce them. They act superior to others and are determined to show everyone that they are the most practical, logical, and intelligent person in any crowd.

          3. Refusal to admit when they’re wrong. Hands down, one of the traits that most annoys friends, romantic partners, and colleagues is the refusal on the part of high-control men and women to admit when they are wrong. It could be the smallest, simplest issue, but high-control people don’t care—they just want to make sure they don’t admit they were wrong. Their thinking is distorted to the point that they believe others may use their admission against them or will perceive them as incompetent or foolish because of one simple error. As a rule, these individuals present all-or-nothing, black-or-white thinking; dealing with anything in between is uncomfortable for them.

          4. Judging or criticizing others. Some of the most judgmental individuals you will ever meet are men and women with a high need for control. They are highly principled, with opinions on everything from how people should hold their forks to how people should live their entire lives. These men and women have an answer for everything, and they come across as sanctimonious or hypocritical to those who know them well.

          5. Driving with rage. People with a high need for control often get very frustrated while driving. They believe they are the only ones who know how to drive correctly. They often put other drivers down, make nasty faces at them, or even curse or issue profanities when someone on the road does something that bothers them. Yet the most common problem with high-control men and women on the road is their own impatience. They get annoyed because drivers go too slow or too fast. They treat pedestrians as interference getting in the way of accomplishing their goals. Again, in the minds of these individuals, it’s all about them and they don’t spend time trying to imagine what anyone else thinks or feels in the same situation.

          [ … ]

        • “When the money is flowing like wine, you’re willing to screw anyone.”

          Awesome quote!

          You don’t have to put on the red light. You don’t care if it’s wrong or if it’s right

          • Bro, I saw it. Nobody else has said it, and I say it from the bottom of my heart, you’re a lousy troll.

  • Miami New Times

    NXIVM founder Keith Raniere claims the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is trying to “silence” him for going public with his evidence tampering claim against the FBI in his 2019 conviction.
    By Story Console

    Raniere is a high-profile inmate serving 120 years for racketeering, fraud, and sex trafficking crimes. He claims he has suffered retaliatory actions at a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility in Tucson since the day after documents were filed suggesting FBI personnel tampered with key evidence admitted at his trial: photographs on a hard drive and camera card used to convict him of the heinous charges of possession of child pornography and sexual exploitation of a child, all for the alleged taking 22 photos of a fifteen-year-old in 2005.

    Reports of three computer forensics experts, including a former FBI special agent and examiner were filed, demonstrating photo dates were altered and photos were planted on a hard drive that the government claimed belonged to Raniere. Photo dates were how the government argued the photos were contraband. Experts also found that the camera card had been modified while in FBI custody.

    Raniere’s evidence-tampering claim is in a Rule 33 motion before the U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas Garaufis, who will not decide on it until after the 2nd Circuit rules the appeal, classifying the alleged government crime as not a “substantial” issue.

    However, Raniere’s attorney Joseph Tully claims the “level of government malfeasance is extreme” in Raniere’s case – in the form of the planting of alleged contraband photos with manipulated dates and perjury. Those claims have now elicited several retaliatory responses from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), including solitary confinement, loss of phone privileges with defense attorneys, and the latest being his possible transfer from United States Penitentiary, Tucson (USP Tucson).

    Raniere, 62, wrote in new court documents that an impending transfer from the USP Tucson would leave him vulnerable to security risks and put his life in danger. “Because of the high profile nature of my case, and the nature of my crimes of conviction, I believe this transfer will expose me to the likelihood of being assaulted or killed by other prisoners,” Raniere said in an affidavit filed in court.

    Raniere’s attorneys have asked a federal judge in Arizona for a temporary restraining order blocking the transfer of their client from USP Tucson.

    The BOP said it could not give any comment regarding the transfer of inmates due to security and privacy reasons. But attorneys claimed their client was told the reason he was being shipped out of the prison was that he receives “too many legal calls and visits.”

    An earlier lawsuit filed in May in the U.S. District Court of Arizona by Tucson-based attorney Stacy Scheff alleges USP-Tucson prison officials engaged in unlawful interference with Raniere’s First Amendment right of access to the courts. The lawsuit also alleged prison officials engaged in retaliatory action by scrubbing or deleting several people from Raniere’s list of approved callers and visitors.

    And more recently, prison officials barred Raniere from calling Battlestar Galactica actress Nicki Clyne, claiming he had abused his phone privileges, according to documents filed in court.

    In his affidavit accusing BOP of retaliation, Raniere described in detail being locked up in solitary confinement in a restrictive part of USP Tucson called the Special Housing Unit, or the SHU. He claimed, “the room was contaminated with feces.” And that “the odor was overpowering and nauseating.”

    • The Miami New Times says right at the top that this is a paid article. Been telling Frank report readers is from the beginning most of the press that the dead Enders have procured for Keith are paid pieces.

  • The Mercury News

    SPONSORED CONTENTAdvertiser Content
    The Court of Appeals overlooks damning evidence of FBI corruption in the Keith Raniere case

    Sponsored Content
    Second Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes denied a request to stay the appeal of NXIVM founder Keith Raniere despite new forensic evidence showing FBI corruption. The stay would have kicked the case back to the district court, presided over by Clinton-appointed Judge Nicholas Garaufis. It has been five months since this damning evidence was filed, yet the appellate court’s refusal to grant a stay means that no ruling has been made. The government has not offered any proof to deny the allegations of malfeasance or filed any substantive response in court.

    The basis of the request was the unanimous findings of three forensic experts that the photographic evidence used to convict Raniere of child pornography and sexual exploitation of a minor had been “manufactured and planted” in an attempt to “frame” Raniere for these heinous charges.

    The forensic experts, led by Dr. J. Richard Kiper, a former FBI Special Agent, Computer Forensic Examiner, and FBI Instructor, discovered that certain key evidence used against Raniere had been “manipulated and planted” — and that the “analysis demonstrates that some of these alterations definitely took place while the devices were in the custody of the FBI.”

    The team of forensic experts has since expanded to six experts, including three former FBI examiners. They all claimed to have never seen government tampering before the case of US vs Raniere. “In my 20 years as an FBI agent, I have never observed or claimed that an FBI employee tampered with evidence, digital or otherwise”, Dr. Kiper stated in his report. “But in this case, I strongly believe the multiple, intentional alterations to the digital information I have discovered constitute evidence manipulation.”

    The central charge in the case, before the government superseded eleven months later with a child porn charge, was sex trafficking, based on a single witness. Until the superseding indictment containing the child porn charges, it is believed that all the co-defendants in the case were planning to go to trial. Harvard Law School professor Ron Sullivan, who is representing a co-defendant, argued new evidence “suggests photo manipulation” by the government. He claimed the manipulated digital evidence — which he said was entered in the “11th hour” — was “so prejudicial” that it resulted in a guilty plea by his client, Seagram’s heiress Clare Bronfman.

    An exhibit in support of the motion asserts that a hard drive and a camera memory card both exhibited “anomalies” when examined by defense experts.

    The exhibit says that prosecutors used metadata to convince the jury that Raniere committed the racketeering acts of possession of child pornography and sexual exploitation of a child. At issue were “22 nude photos found on a backup hard drive” – purportedly of a Dell Dimension that was never found – which depicted the female identified as “Camila” at trial.

    After the trial, three top-level digital forensic experts were brought on to analyze the relevant photo evidence central to secure convictions for the racketeering acts of possessing child pornography and sexual exploitation of a minor. “All three experts, to their surprise and dismay, found a multitude of anomalies that evidenced that the alleged contraband photos were manufactured and planted”, the exhibit indicates.

    The defense said the “level of government malfeasance is extreme,” the goal of which was to link Raniere to the photos and that the dates were intentionally tampered with to make it appear that the subject, “Camila,” was underage at the time the photos were taken.

    Because the implication of FBI corruption is significant and weighty – alleged altered evidence was a proverbial linchpin to the entire case – this could overturn the conviction on the basis of outrageous government misconduct, and the defense attorneys are demanding there be an evidentiary hearing for this to be fully investigated, and the responsible parties be held accountable.

  • Latest important news:

    East Bay Times
    SPONSORED CONTENT Advertiser Content
    Keith Raniere’s case appears to be the product of manufactured evidence, according to FBI experts
    November 16, 2022 at 1:00 a.m.
    Sponsored Content
    The Appellate court has chosen to ignore the evidence-tampering charge against the FBI filed by an attorney for Keith Raniere. If his conviction goes unchallenged, Raniere will spend the remainder of his life in prison.

    After the trial, the Raniere defense team recruited three top digital forensic experts to analyze key photo evidence central to secure convictions for the racketeering acts of possessing child pornography and sexual exploitation of a minor. “All three experts, to their surprise and dismay, found a multitude of anomalies that evidenced that the alleged contraband photos were manufactured and planted,” the exhibit indicates.

    NXIVM founder Raniere is serving a life sentence after the jury found him guilty of a raft of charges, including racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, forced labor conspiracy, sex trafficking, sex trafficking conspiracy, and attempted sex trafficking.

    Keith Raniere is seeking to get his conviction vacated on grounds the FBI allegedly tampered with photos on a hard drive and camera card, including photos of a nude woman known as ‘Camila’ at trial, to make it seem as if she was underage – key evidence against him – and gave false testimony in his 2019 trial.

    A team of six highly regarded forensic experts including Dr. J. Richard Kiper, who was a former FBI Special Agent, Computer Forensic Examiner, and Instructor, discovered that certain key evidence used to convict the former NXIVM leader had been “significantly manipulated” and even “planted” — and that the “analysis demonstrates that some of these alterations definitely took place while the devices were in the custody of the FBI.”

    The guilty as-charged sex cult leader claims the outcome of his original 2019 trial would have been different had jurors been aware of the alleged FBI corruption, especially as his five co-defendants only pleaded guilty after the eleventh-hour, supposedly accidental discovery of the photos.

    Attorneys and experts retained by Raniere are arguing the FBI allegedly manipulated the dates of photographic evidence used to convict their client of child pornography and sexual exploitation charges, to make it appear as if it was taken in 2005 – when she would have been under the legal age to give consent to have her nude photo taken.

    “There is evidence that computer data related to digital photographs taken of a nude female were materially altered to make it appear that these photographs were taken in 2005,” Raniere’s attorney Joseph Tully wrote in his filings to a federal appellate court. “The government used the year 2005 to establish the female as being under the age of eighteen, making the photographs contraband.”

    “All of the anomalies all favor the government’s narrative that Camila was underage at the time she started a relationship with Keith Raniere,” Tully continued. “It just leads you to the conclusion that the FBI was engaged in this tampering.”

    Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, who is also part of Raniere’s defense, said the team’s allegations against the government are “very credible and serious”. He urged the U.S Department of Justice to live up to its mandate to pursue justice and not merely convictions. He believes the right thing to do going forward is for the DOJ to at least agree to an evidentiary hearing on the defense evidence-tampering allegations.

  • In terms of Danielle, should I believe her mentors, teachers, co-workers, and patients, all of whom describe her as a generous, caring, loving person and competent Doctor, going back decades?

    A person dedicated to healing others and addressing the root causes of illnesses and ailments, instead of just addressing the symptoms?

    A woman who paid dues to earn her degrees, who worked her way through college, back when work was seen as a virtue and a sign of character?

    Should I believe in my judgment, which is that all of the positive terms used to describe her above are true? That she is a scapegoat, and never profited or benefited from any illicit activity? That the branding ceremony was meaningful to her, and a symbol of her belonging to a community, which is something we all desire?

    Or should I put my trust in a Government that lies about everything, that can’t be trusted to spend our money properly, keep us safe from street crime, or even count our votes properly?

    And should I trust a media that enables all of this, and considers us an enemy of the state if we don’t see things exactly the way they do, on every issue, ranging from complex subjects like race, to simple subjects like why the pothole on main street hasn’t been fixed in eight years when taxes went up in each of those eight years to pay for the repair?

    A media that tells us to “stand with Ukraine.” Why? Because they tell you to? Because you think you’ll get a pat on the head and a gold star? You can’t even locate Ukraine on a map, but you stand with Ukraine? How about standing up for your community and telling your Member of Congress to take those billions and put them to work here at home, and that if she doesn’t, that she can find another job?

    Who knows, maybe Ukraine is offering to help us find the weapons of mass destruction from 20 years ago. You know, the ones that were used to start a war that got our young men who couldn’t afford college killed? Who Bush 43 and his opponent in 2004, John Kerry, both mocked and ridiculed after their deaths? Except the football guy, of course, he’s different, he played football, you know?

    A media that includes cable networks, podcasts, and book publishers that took subjects as serious as rape, sexual assault, blackmail, coercion, and turned them into entertainment, into, forgive me, a brand for the protagonists in these stories who control the narratives, who control what you see and what you hear, and more importantly, what you don’t get to see and hear.

    Maybe instead of shaming Danielle, you should ask Mark and Sarah how many people they recruited into the organization, how much money they made from their recruits, and from their down lines.

    Ask Mark if his wife still sleeps on the floor. Ask Mark and Sarah why Allison and Danielle and Nicki are taking a fall for India having had a bad experience, when Sarah and Mark were her direct mentors in the organization?

    Ask Sarah how long before she got her brand that she planned this whole thing out. Because we all know how normal it is for your first move to be contacting HBO and setting up cameras and microphones all over your house if you believe the boss who made you rich is a predator.

    Because the police in Vancouver are controlled by the Bronfmans, right? Because every detective and beat cop had so much of that Bronfman money, despite there being no evidence of that.

    And if I’m wrong, and the Bronfmans owning Vancouver police is true, then Sarah knew that long before she had her “awakening.” So why didn’t that bother her beforehand?

    Picking on someone like Danielle while refusing to question anyone or anything else about this case or the people involved, especially those pointing fingers and filing lawsuits, is shameful. Danielle lost her career, her house, her community, and many opportunities. For Allison, the same.

    How about making an attempt to see Danielle as a real person, and not as a villain in a series of one-sided commercials for people who have a lot more to hide and a lot more to be ashamed of than she does.

  • You filthy chauvinist pig. Keep showing Danielle in a bikini to objectify her.

    I must ask all true feminists to boycott this website in solidarity with our sister Danielle.

    • Feminists are crazy. If Danielle wasn’t showing off in a bikini, no one could take a picture if her in a bikini. When Danielle takes sexy selfies of her own body with boobs and ass hanging out…. it’s empowerment. But when she chosses to dress sexy and someone else sees it and takes a pic, it’s chauvinistic? Here’s a hint, don’t dress like a slut. Have self respect at the get go, and you’ll earn respect.

        • If she’s always covered…then no one is being chauvinistic. Right? Bottom line…if she wears minimal clothing (and bikinis and yoga clothing) all the time and SHE posts the pictures…whose fault is it?

          • You do realize not all comments here are from NXIVM past or present, my comment never mentioned chauvinism just pointed out something to someone who claims her boobs are hanging out and her ass isn’t covered. Just a simple correction on my part.

  • Nancy didn’t know about Keith. She loved him. But she did not know him. She thought he was noble and helping her and her daughters.

    That’s why they had to shun Michael the girls’ father.

About the Author

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in hundreds of news outlets, like The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CBS News, Fox News, New York Post, New York Daily News, Oxygen, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, The Sun, The Times of London, CBS Inside Edition, among many others in all five continents.

His work to expose and take down NXIVM is featured in books like “Captive” by Catherine Oxenberg, “Scarred” by Sarah Edmonson, “The Program” by Toni Natalie, and “NXIVM. La Secta Que Sedujo al Poder en México” by Juan Alberto Vasquez.

Parlato has been prominently featured on HBO’s docuseries “The Vow” and was the lead investigator and coordinating producer for Investigation Discovery’s “The Lost Women of NXIVM.” Parlato was also credited in the Starz docuseries "Seduced" for saving 'slave' women from being branded and escaping the sex-slave cult known as DOS.

Additionally, Parlato’s coverage of the group OneTaste, starting in 2018, helped spark an FBI investigation, which led to indictments of two of its leaders in 2023.

Parlato appeared on the Nancy Grace Show, Beyond the Headlines with Gretchen Carlson, Dr. Oz, American Greed, Dateline NBC, and NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, where Parlato conducted the first-ever interview with Keith Raniere after his arrest. This was ironic, as many credit Parlato as one of the primary architects of his arrest and the cratering of the cult he founded.

Parlato is a consulting producer and appears in TNT's The Heiress and the Sex Cult, which premiered on May 22, 2022. Most recently, he consulted and appeared on Tubi's "Branded and Brainwashed: Inside NXIVM," which aired January, 2023.

IMDb — Frank Parlato

Contact Frank with tips or for help.
Phone / Text: (305) 783-7083


Discover more from Frank Report

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading