Alan Dershowitz, arguably America’s most famous living constitutional and criminal attorney, is now representing Keith Raniere on the FBI tampering issue.
He also represents Clare Bronfman.
Dershowitz was part of a Zoom press conference today, attended by the Frank Report, the New York Times and other media representatives.
Dershowitz called upon the media to take notice of what appears to be a “historic attempt to frame somebody based on manipulation of data. That’s just unacceptable in an American court and in the American legal system.”
Joining Dershowitz on the Zoom press conference was Raniere attorney, Joseph Tully; former US Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Harry Bud Cummins; retired FBI agents J. Richard Kiper, and Stacy Aldridghe; and Bronfman attorney Ron Sullivan.
Podcaster Chase Geiser hosted the Zoom press conference.
Cummins called for criminal prosecution of DOJ employees if the tampering allegations, which he believes are true, are proven.
He said if this happened in his district when he was US Attorney, he would not delay an investigation, as the EDNY has done.
Cummings said, “This is more than enough to deem this a matter of high priority… The FBI should immediately get to the bottom of this. The government should not circle the wagons.”
Eldridge, a retired FBI agent, said, “actions of person or persons in the DOJ or FBI resulted in significant tampering of evidence.”
The evidence of “alteration of evidence is indisputable.”
In addition, she said FBI employees violated policies and procedures and that these “violations are atrocious.”
Dershowitz reinforced the seriousness of an issue that the DOJ previously dismissed as “frivolous.”
Dershowitz said, “Multiple experts have concluded that government tampering of digital photos is, at the very least, a highly likely conclusion.
“If true, this represents a level of corruption that is so unprecedented, so high, by whoever may be responsible. The current situation is simply untenable. There must be immediate action. There should swiftly be an evidentiary hearing that will determine the truth.
“Appropriate relief may include a new trial, obviously. But it may also include dismissal of the indictment on the basis of outrageous government misconduct. There are cases supporting that form of relief. If there is a hearing, Mr. Raniere wishes to attend by video conference rather than be transported.
“But this is a really important test of our legal system. Whether you like Mr. Raniere or not, the question is, can we be fair even to those who are despised?”
I challenge the media to vigorously and critically examine and evaluate all the facts until it is fully heard and addressed. That’s the appropriate role of the media. If this alleged historical government malfeasance is true, then every additional day that Mr. Raniere and Miss Bronfman spend behind bars waiting for this evidence to be heard in a court would be a furtherance of this injustice.
Attorney Tully spoke of how the government appears to be retaliating against Raniere by assigning him to the SHU at USP Tucson.
Earlier today, Tully filed a motion with the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, asking the Court to hold Raniere’s appeal pending disposition of Raniere’s Rule 33 motion in the district court.
See YouTube video of several experts opining on the alleged tampering:
thttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gGU12pvPLce FBI tampering.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
[…] [Link to the Frank Report story about Dershiwitz joining the appeal.] […]
[…] Alan Dershowitz is Keith Raniere’s newly-engaged attorney in light of the revelations of the FBI a… Dersh has been saying the attorney-client privilege is “mostly dead” for years. […]
Where is the motive for tampering? Also I have yet to see this indisputable evidence of tampering. What is the evidence? Someone said it was difficult to change data. That means nothing. If FBI had it, they could tamper with any data on a level much greater than this. This just wiffs of the cult crap of saying something hard enough makes it so. Without motive, this is hogwash.
The dead Enders would tell you nebulous motives like promotion or acknowledgment within their profession. Ironically the dead Enders would also argue that such rewards are not enough to motivate someone into criminal behavior in the Master Slave organization.
Oftentimes they will argue that unless Cold Hard Cash was transferred that it cannot be considered sex trafficking when in fact anything of value can make it a transaction. As they well know because that’s their argument for why the FBI and the prosecutor’s office allegedly did any kind of tampering. But there career salary is their career salary regardless of if the case is successful or not. So there is no direct
Financial benefit to them whatsoever. It is important also to note that there would have to be multiple motives at Play.
Because multiple organizations would be involved in this alleged conspiracy as well as civilians. And it’s pretty hard to believe that the FBI is going to believe that a former cult member is a good partner in a conspiracy. So it’s absolutely ridiculous on every level there is no benefit to tampering they had plenty of evidence. Keith is guilty.
Keith is a pedophile. Keith will live out his life in sex offender prison.
I’m glad to see that this seems to be gaining traction. I think the allegations of tampering need to be thoroughly investigated by the authorities and either disproved or affirmed. It has nothing to do with Raniere being innocent or not. It has to do with making sure the feds are held to the standards they’re meant to embody.
I thought there was something wrong when I first heard 2+ years ago that the FBI’s expert witness said it was difficult to change EXIF data. I’ve changed/removed the EXIF data on my digital photos in adobe photoshop for years, for extra privacy protection.
Some intelligent FR commenters have said this is all much ado about nothing. Personally I would still like to see an official response to this.
Frank himself posted a demonstration video by Suneel showing how easy it is to change EXIF data and the dipshit commenters here only said Suneel looked like an alien.
It’s good to see the tribal ninnies here, who are incapable of thinking for themselves, beginning to wake up.
Jesus Christ it takes a lot of time and effort.
Probably too much.
Alanzo
Alanzo-
“Frank himself”. Isn’t Frank himself?
You’re a special kind of tardo.
Alanzo don’t call Frank Jesus.
Frank’s better than Jesus!
……No one ever nailed Frank for a crime.
I also don’t believe in trolling. For years I paid my people extra so they wouldn’t do that kind of business.
😇
Gaining traction? Where?Aside from the FR, nobody reported on this press release. Crickets.
This isn’t news. It doesn’t signify.
As for an official response, the DOJ already gave its official response. It said the evidence tampering claim is frivolous. And it is frivolous.
There’s no actual evidence to back it up. It’s Chakravorty’s fever dream.
Bronfman money bought four or five self-proclaimed experts to say they “believe” the tale. Now Bronfman money bought has-been octogenarian Alan Dershowitz aboard. So what? The media isn’t interested. Nobody cares.
Raniere and his merry band of dead-enders dream of building a mass movement around his “cause”. A groundswell of popular support. For that he needs publicity.
The plan failed. The only publicity the Free Raniere cause gets is on the Frank Report.
It’s going nowhere. It’s a dead end.
But does your changing EXIF data leave a trace that it has been changed?
LOL. Why do deadenders think they’re not so obvious?
Shouldn’t the “journalist” who “cracked the case” by blackmailing “victims” into “talking” or “turning” to “sharpen his axe” against his former employer be pretty worried about this case being re-opened?
Which journalist are you referring to and how did this journalist blackmail Catherine and Sarah?
Wow, even people our side of the pond know who Alan Dershowitz is…
OK, I can understand much of the horrified reaction here. Of course, this guy has represented some dubious clients down the years, and some may say his own family history is a little checquered. That’s not to say that he has also proven himself one of the finest and most famous constitutional lawyers in US history.
OK, he’s getting on a bit (82/83?), and they say age dulls the sharpest of minds, but there’s really nothing to suggest he’s past it yet, and in law there is often no substitute for experience.
So why is this such a coup for the Raniere camp? It’s not just that he’s a fine constitutional lawyer with a lifetime of experience fighting on ground on which he has very sure footing; it’s his fame (some might say infamy) that gives Raniere such a massive boost. His involvement is more likely to mean that the case breaks into the mainstream media pretty much globally, and that’s not good news for the FBI or the DOJ.
Whatever you think about Raniere (and there is no one who loathes him more than I do), this case may have potentially constitutional implications for how federal authorities are regulated, and on their powers to act. It may in the future be much harder to flout procedures or brush things under the carpet, and perhaps that’s a good thing in terms of justice and accountability.
Whether Raniere will get a new trial is another question. Given the weight oof the other evidence against him I think it unlikely, and any reduction in his sentencing is jst as unlikely to make a difference. However, it may be argued that the plea deals extracted may be judged as unsafe, so who knows?
One thing’s for sure: if members of the FBI/DOJ scratched their noses when they weren’t sopposed to, Dershowitz will expose it and it will be loudly reported. They had better get their ducks in a row.
“Goombas are people too. We’re just as discriminated against as moolies, homos, zipperheads, kites, retards, and Polacks!”
-Franky Big Balls
And then Nice Guy comes along with his fish and chips voice, and wanker charm.
I love fish and chips
Very strong wanker vibes with Nice Guy.
No question.
You’d know….
…..You love my big wanker.
Frank-
I love Fish ‘n Chips with beer!
And I’m a wanker; I wank it everyday so my balls don’t blow off!
God bless you!
Parlato-
I said, “Franky Big Balls” not,
“Frankie No Nuts”.
Everyone knows, you,
“Frankie No Nuts”, would never use such contemptible language….
You’re too woke.
It’s true, I have a lot of friends who are woke, but they wouldn’t be friendly very long if they knew my business was encouraging un-woke trolls instead of operating a blog, which they rule that as a — harmless vice. But encouraging un-woke trolls is a dirty business.
Marvellous. If I could have a dream list of ways in which KR could empty the coffers of C. Bronfman, paying Dershowitz to defend him would come close to the top. Only right that her filthy money should go to a filthy lawyer. And may it bring him as much joy as it has ‘bought’ nxium.
Isn’t Dershowitz like 84 years old? Why is he involved with this? Are the Brofman sisters looking for the best lawyer from 1994?
Yes!
Yes!
Yes!
In T-Rump’s first impeachment trial, former law professor Alan Dershowitz, a lawyer for Trump, went so far as to argue before the entire Senate that Trump could have done whatever he wanted to get himself reelected if he believed that his own reelection would be in the public interest, a sweeping claim of executive power.
Unprecedented corruption?
Probably created by Keith Rainere, himself. The mastermind. The smartest man in the world!
Just watch how he will single handedly expose corruption in the FBI! And let’s together marvel at his independent audit of their internal procedures!
Yuck.
PS: at least 2 of his supporters on frank report believe people can consent to the unknown. They believe this perversion of consent can be called sexy time.
Mr. Parlato,
With all due respect, why are ghosting me on emails again?!
Please read and respond to your emails.
Thank you kindly.
Dershowitz ?😆😆😆 good luck with that Keith.
This is big news! Congratulations Frank.
You’re the only one that “sucks”!
Patriot God is one of the best things to ever happen at FR!
When Frank grows a pair and stops acting like a little bitch by censoring him and go back to how Frank report originally was before he started listening to commies, Frank Report will be the greatest it ever has been!
🖕🏻So fuck you, asshole!🖕🏻
You do not have to be intelligent to be a troll. No, but it helps. It helps to be intelligent no matter what you are.
“You do not have to be intelligent to be a troll. No, but it helps. It helps to be intelligent no matter what you are.”
But Patriot God is intelligent! Matter of fact, he’s brilliant!
When are you going to stop hating him (even though you hypocritically complain about his “hatred” of others) and finally accept him into the FR family as one of the best commentators on here and let him speak unhindered by you?
Matter of fact, when are you going to go back to the way that FR originally was with no censorship?!
What happened to you, Frank?! You used to genuinely respect the 1st Amendment and now you’ve sold out to libtard censorship culture and cancel culture! Everybody wants this shit from you to stop (except for pussies)!
Nobody is going to die if you stop censoring people! That’s one of the things that made your blog so great to begin with! You were a maverick in going back to The U.S. Constitution! Now, you’re just the same Orwellian douche bag that you claimed to be against!
Look into the mirror and see the monster that you’ve become!
When are YOU going to be a true patriot again, Frank, just like the good old days?!
I liked the old Frank better! This Frank, I’d like to sucker punch in the face!
FR is going to hell in a hand basket because of this new commie sympathizing asshole!
I’m a little worried about this Patriot God fella. I want to find out what he’s got under his fingernails.
“I’m a little worried about this Patriot God fella. I want to find out what he’s got under his fingernails.”
What are you worried about and how do you plan on getting “under his fingernails”?
You said in other posts that he’s “harmless”?
What are you so paranoid about?
Let’s face it, and all due respect, Patriot God, may his racist ideas rest in peace, was slippin’. fifty years ago could I have censored him?
Frank, I know the intelligence quotient of patriot gourd is not all it should or could be, but I think you should consider their artistic skills – who wouldn’t want one of their “Patriotic Gourds” on the Fall table centrepiece this year? Come on.
https://gourdarttalk.com/inspiration-for-your-own-patriotic-gourd-project/
Can minorities like myself have a Patriot Gourd?
“Let’s face it, and all due respect, Patriot God, may his racist ideas rest in peace, was slippin’. fifty years ago could I have censored him?”
That’s right. You could’ve. So why try to revolt against the constitution now? Especially since you claim to support it.
You know we got to stop Patriot God at the beginning, like they should have stopped Hitler at Munich.
They should’ve never let him get away with that. They were just asking for big trouble.
“I am sorry to inform you, but I spoke to the Grand Cyclops, who appointed two Nighthawks, a Grand Turk, a Grand Sentinel, Grand Magi and a Grand Ensign in addition to his Grand Scribe and they decided to punish you. You will be given an appearance ticket to appear at the Den.”
I’m sorry to inform you, that I have no affiliation with the KKK or anybody that does!
But based on common knowledge, I would imagine that it would be safe to say that if you even dared tried talking to the KKK as the foreigner that you are, you wouldn’t be here to be bragging about it. They aren’t in the business of listening to “guidos” about punishing white men.
I’d also highly advise you that you don’t know who reads your blog comments and I wouldn’t be saying this shit as a “guido” on your blog and making up blasphemous stories in their eyes of how they listen to you about punishing a white man or you’re probably going to wind up with that fate, if not even worse if you’re not careful.
If KKK people are truly here, you’re poking a bear, dude! If I were you, I’d stop while it was still sleeping! But if you want to be stupid and wind up brutally mauled and missing, that’s up to you, but don’t say that you weren’t warned, you stupid jackass!
Heed my words, daughter, if you ever mean to be happy: Never give yourself to a man in the KKK.
“When Frank grows a pair and stops acting like a little bitch by censoring him and go back to how Frank report originally was before he started listening to commies, Frank Report will be the greatest it ever has been!”
Yeah, couldn’t agree more! Maybe one day, Frank will learn to be a real patriotic boy and the guido fairy will grant him his century long wish of actually having a penis! 🧚🪄🤥🤭🤗🫠
Wait a minute. I’m talking about a troll that’s mixed up in Knight Riders. I’m talking about a dishonest troll, a crooked troll who got mixed up in the KKK and got what was coming to him.
“You know we got to stop Patriot God at the beginning, like they should have stopped Hitler at Munich. They should’ve never let him get away with that. They were just asking for big trouble.”
So break his constitutional rights and be a just a bad as Hitler in order to stop “Hitler”?!
Sounds a bit hypocritical to me!
Also, what if Patriot God is right and the Jews lied to us about Hitler and he was actually a really good man and Holocaust was made up propaganda that never happened?!
“Wait a minute. I’m talking about a troll that’s mixed up in Knight Riders. I’m talking about a dishonest troll, a crooked troll who got mixed up in the KKK and got what was coming to him.”
It’s *Night* Riders, Frank, because they rode at *night* time on horses with torches.
I have to be historically honest, Frank. Patriot God is correct in his statement that the KKK used to be one of the most honorable institutions in American history and made most of our monuments and other buildings. The foundation of America was in fact built by them and we can’t just throw the baby out with bath water about that.
But despite what you believe, even KKK lovers and even members are still entitled to free speech in this country, Frank!
Also what is it about Patriot God that makes him “crooked” and “dishonest”? It sounds like to me that he’s the most honest guy around here to the point that even if you ban him, he’s still going to stand up for what he believes in even if he’s hated for it! That’s sounds nothing like “dishonest” to me! It’s more like commendably honest in my book!
O.K., here is what I would tell Patriot God. When you write, just don’t kill yourself— don’t go too fast. Get there swiftly, but don’t go too fast. Be polite to everybody— and above all things don’t write in all CAPS.
Writing controversial things is different from writing about nice stuff. Taking on hate to hateful people is liable to scare a fellow right into anonymity. Well, don’t let it scare you into anonymity.
People are people. Don’t be scared of them. Patriot God will be sixteen in two years. Then he should be able to put his name on what he writes, and I will publish it gladly. If anything comes up in the meantime that you don’t understand, write to me.
“O.K., here is what I would tell Patriot God. When you write, just don’t kill yourself— don’t go too fast. Get there swiftly, but don’t go too fast. Be polite to everybody— and above all things don’t write in all CAPS.
Writing controversial things is different from writing about nice stuff. Taking on hate to hateful people is liable to scare a fellow right into anonymity. Well, don’t let it scare you into anonymity.
People are people. Don’t be scared of them. Patriot God will be sixteen in two years. Then he should be able to put his name on what he writes, and I will publish it gladly. If anything comes up in the meantime that you don’t understand, write to me.“
All of this is a bunch of garbage, Frank.
Here’s what I would tell you,
1. Learn how to write like an adult and actually address the things that are said instead of ignoring them or being evasive with made up fictional shit like a child like you do and did here and just blew over everything that I said and didn’t address anything.
2. Don’t be a pussy and be afraid of long texts and all caps on words if you’re going to call yourself a “blogger”.
3. When you attack people (like you’re doing Patriot God here) at least have the dignity of yourself to attack them correctly by accurately representing what they believe in your epistemology and not build a straw man to light up the whole room and make all the smoke alarms go off and make yourself look stupid in the process.
4. Don’t call other people “scared of people” when you censor mere words and won’t even accurately represent what the people that you don’t like believe. It makes you look like you’re projecting.
5. The first amendment applies to everybody in this country, even those whom you don’t like and the only people that try to take it from somebody is when they’re scared! Our soldiers took bullets and agonizing deaths and cut their lives short to preserve our Constitutional Rights while you’re such a coward that you can’t even take words. What does that say about you and what’s going on downstairs in your pants, Frank?! So don’t be a pussy!
Learn these five golden nuggets of wisdom and then you will finally be on the long awaited journey of being a real patriotic boy! And who knows, maybe the guido fairy will actually make your big fat vile smelling clit-pussy an actual penis before you die, like that other guy said. So that your wish of being a real man may finally come true and you can actually feel like you’ve accomplished something in this life before you die.. But if you don’t start now, the chances of even having a remotely decent sized penis will never happen!
And you’ll die a communist hermaphrodite with a big fat droopy smelly clit curtain the size of a wrinkly blanket for Venus!
Now so you honestly want that?!
I didn’t think so. So you better start now before it’s too late!
Food for thought,
Look I am not into fighting about Patriot God. I think he is a good boy.
Comes from a good, poor family on Santa Clara Avenue. No father. No one quite sure who the father is.
Brother in prison. Mother works in the sex industry in the summer. Sister goes to State College pays her tuition by taking her mother’s clients in the fall and winter.
“Heed my words, daughter, if you ever mean to be happy: Never give yourself to a man in the KKK.”
I’m not a “daughter”, asshole!
They aren’t meant to make you “happy”! Even though I have no desire to deal with of them, I think it safe to say, that as a white man, I’d be fine in their eyes.
You’re the only one that needs to worry about your means to be “happy” with them and so far, your means to do it has come across as pretty reckless about it by censorship, lying, trolling, sensationalizing, and mockery of them and their fellow allies of the institution like Patriot God and his friends are and has demonstrated how little you value your life!
As I’ve said before, it was nice knowing you, Frank! And when you wind up missing, we all know what truly happened despite what fake news says!
Dysfunction comes when we intertwine Patriot God and you and view them as one.
“Look I am not into fighting about Patriot God. I think he is a good boy.”
I’m really concerned about your mental health, Frank! I seriously am!
You just said that he was “dishonest”, “crooked”, and basically called him “Hitler” when you said,
“You know we got to stop Patriot God at the beginning, like they should have stopped Hitler at Munich.”
You admitted to trying to “stop him” by using the same methods that Hitler used to “stop” his enemies! Making YOU no better than Hitler, by your own clusterfuck logic!
Now you say,
“Look I am not into fighting about Patriot God. I think he is a good boy.”?!
Frank when was the last time you were checked by a mental health expert?!…… You are really manifesting strong warning signs of dementia and fast declinations into worsening symptoms of it I am afraid! You need help!
And if you’re seriously “not into fight about “Patriot God”, why are you going really out of your way to censor him?! Especially since he’s a “good boy”?!
Do you see why I’m very concerned about your brain, Frank?!
You constantly intellectually shit all over yourself and show not even the slightest hint of even being able to acknowledge that you’re doing it in the first place when you stink to high Heaven like pig who rolled around it! And to make it worse, you think that this is a “good quality” of response?!
Do you have any ability to feel embarrassed or process shame?!
Any person with even the slightest hint of just basic common sense would be embarrassed to respond to thing like you do! You’re like a mentally retarded 10 year old who can’t even color in the damn lines in a conversation! You really need help, bro! Your brains doesn’t work right!
“Comes from a good, poor family on Santa Clara Avenue. No father. No one quite sure who the father is.”
“Brother in prison. Mother works in the sex industry in the summer. Sister goes to State College pays her tuition by taking her mother’s clients in the fall and winter.“
Once again, Frank not even a message later, you’ve already broken rules 1 & 2 on the logical fallacy list that I told you work on!
You know that’s not true and only a figment of your own delusional imagination!
So next time before you even reply, please think about what you write and try to sound like you have some type of ability of an attention span!
Please try to look at what I’ve already said to you and respond to those things like an intellectual adult would!
Your mental faculties seem damned to hell into in a hand basket and you appear to be psychologically unfit and even mentally unstable to be in a position of leadership to free speech! You don’t even seem to understand what that even is!
So please do what was asked and stop making up fake stories about Patriot God and let him say what he want under the laws that command you to fight for his freedom of speech and expose those who try to take it away instead of joining in with those forces who to take it away!
Please think about this and actually give a sensible reply to this without evading this topic given you and just stop censoring Patriot God and his friends and family that also have something to say, also! Please get help, and remember if you can’t follow all 5 rules to how you should interact me or anybody else, Then I’m afraid that you shouldn’t even be talking at all!
Just think about that before you open your mouth ever again!
Please go get a doctor’s help and medication!
Thanks!
I don’t expect you to understand anything I’m telling you. But I know you will remember this — that nothing good ever ends. And there is nothing good in Patriot God.
“I don’t expect you to understand anything I’m telling you. But I know you will remember this — that nothing good ever ends. And there is nothing good in Patriot God.”
– Frank Parlato at 2:30am
“Look I am not into fighting about Patriot God. I think he is a good boy.”
– Frank Parlato at 10:15pm [which was only 4 hours and 15 fucking minutes ago!]
Oh to the contrary, Frank.
I understand very clearly what’s going on with you! I strongly urge you once again, please go seek mental health treatment and have your doctor check specifically for dementia!
This in turn, will get YOU to truly “understand”!
Patriot God is the most childlike girl I’ve ever known. I’ll never forget the day when she said she wanted to quit school: “It doesn’t seem right to just go to school when the KKK is out lynching and gouging eyes out. I sometimes wish I was a man, so I could be in the KKK. We could have a lot of fun together, I bet.”
‘Patriot God is the most childlike girl I’ve ever known. I’ll never forget the day when she said she wanted to quit school: “It doesn’t seem right to just go to school when the KKK is out lynching and gouging eyes out. I sometimes wish I was a man, so I could be in the KKK. We could have a lot of fun together, I bet.”’
Now he’s a ‘girl’, huh?! After all of the times you called him a ‘he’?! Seems like more projection on your part! I think you give him a hard time and persecute him all because you’re just jealous of him!
Let’s face it, honey! You’ve wanted to be known as Captain America for many years and even though you were never politically pure in your philosophy, you had somewhat of a good start, then you started loving more communist shit, you started becoming woke, and then you decided to make your uniquely censorship free website more like china’s social approval system but with words!
So then somebody comes along with style and flair! Not boy is he a better Captain America than you ever were, even at your best of times, he’s a fucking *Patriot God*!
And he called you out and exposed you as a patriotic fraud and really pointed out that not only boy are you a poser in patriotism, but you’re truly an enemy to this country and don’t even have a real right to be here!
You didn’t like that one bit did ya, buddy?!
So you did what you’ve always done with people that you didn’t like, sensationalize their life even to the point of making up pure trolling fiction! And then when you outsmarted you with that, you desperately ran to your new favorite political tactic straight of a communist handbook, the most pathetic and cowardly way out of a fight with somebody you can’t fight with words and don’t want to embarrass yourself in front of your readers by letting them see the fight and your logical failures, the most pathetic and cowardly thing you could ever do to a man far worse than kicking them in the balls, biting, and/or hair pulling in a brawl, you censored him! The lowest thing you have ever done, especially to a man greater than you will ever be!
Now you troll him with this petty shit and don’t give him a chance to defend himself! Because you’re scared of him!
But to be honest, Frank you’re not that hard to debate! A 10 year old could beat you in a battle of wits!
First of all, Patriot Gods never said that he was a part of the KKK, he said that he is a close friend of the institution and that they greatly admire him for his calling!
Second of all, Patriot God would say that your pathetic attempt to stir up emotion by focusing only on the KKK ‘lynching’ and ‘gouging eyes out’ is red herring to distract from what the crimes were of the people they did that to! He would ask YOU what about all of the murdering, raping, ‘lynching’, and ‘gouging eyes out’ that those foreigners did to the real inheritors of this country just for the fuck of it?! What about what they did to their families and all of their suffering of no closure because they fled so that they wouldn’t be brought to justice, Frank?! What about that?! What about the fact that if the justice system did catch them, that they would’ve ‘lynched’ them for the same shit too! It’s funny how people never answer those questions and I highly doubt you have a logically sound response to it either!
You must also remember that everybody didn’t just press back buttons back then and say, “Help me! I’m scared!” Most people handled their own shit back then because the feds and the police state didn’t take over like they have now and it was legal! If somebody stepped on your property and realized to leave you could just shoot them no questions asked! We also had volunteer bounty hunters that followed the law and were approved by them! Some if not, many of those bounty hunters were KKK members at the time! Meaning that they did it legally!
The KKK was also a very well respected group highly regarded by both the government and society as a whole and built many national monuments like Mount Rushmore. So a lot of times people in the institution were recruited and deputized by the government to help out with wanted dead or alive cases that foreigners caused! So should we go blame the government for that, Frank?! Should demolish and dynamite Mount Rushmore because you don’t like them, Frank?! How come you never address any of those things?! You only point out what happened to the foreigners but you don’t want to ask what the foreigners did to instigate it or if they even deserved it?! I bet you’ve never read one case of a KKK ‘lynching’ in your life in your life and especially never investigated why it was done in first place! So what right do you even have to talk about this when you won’t even be honest with this and only pull red herring stunts like you just did?!
You call Patriot God a ‘childlike girl’ when you gossip and slander him in the most juvenile ways on a blog that you control and censor him while you do so so that he can’t fight back and vomit pathetic red herrings lien you just did and you seriously want to talk about a ‘childlike girl’?!
Can’t think of a more ‘childlike girl’ thing to do than what you’re doing, pal! And if Patriot God is truly a ‘childlike girl’ while you act as if you’re the archetype of ‘manhood’ and you censor him all because you’re afraid him responding back to you while you gossip about him like a little bitch, well what does that make you, seeing the fact that you’re afraid of this ‘childlike girl’ so much?!
And don’t give me this whole ‘I’m not afraid of him’ bullshit because nobody censors somebody that they’re not afraid of! That would be the ONLY reason to do it in the first place!
So once again, Frank, you’re a pot calling the kettle black while you’ve once again demonstrated that you haven’t even started YOUR own journey of becoming a real patriotic boy! You’re running out of time in this world to do it too! You’re not going to get a real penis like you’ve wanted from the guido fairy until you start on your journey of this and complete it! Not to mention your set of balls dropping because you haven’t even got any yet! Getting those balls to drop will be a whole other long journey in of itself!
Looks like you really need Patriot God here to help you, after all!
Then we are agreed. The trolling will be permitted but controlled, and Don Francesco will give protection on the web and there will be the peace.
Ya know what, Frank?
I think Patriot God is actually growing on ya! I think deep down on the inside, you love the heck out of him and you’re just too big of weenie to admit it!
Why don’t you just sincerely apologize to Patriot God for censoring him and actually stop doing it forever? Then admit that you’re a worthless nigger that doesn’t belong in this country and shake hands with him. Then we can all plan a FR get away field trip with Patriot God to Mount Rushmore, stand on top it, hold hands tougher and scream “I HATE NIGGERS” for the whole world to hear and to get the t out of our systems, let Patriot God and his KKK buddies give you a couple of good whip lashes on your bare back for censoring him and your disrespect towards him.
Then let them brand your ass as a testament of peace, and then we all go the nearest bar and cat house get some beers, fuck some hookers, and just have a good old fashioned American night out together and squash all your drama that you are fully responsible for creating with him!
What do ya say? 😉
Fair enough?…………
I don’t want him near social media. I don’t want his word salad available to the woke. That’s an infamia.
On my website, we would keep his message limited to trolls. They’re anonymous, so let them lose their composure.
“I don’t want him near social media. I don’t want his word salad available to the woke. That’s an infamia.”
That’s not a something you can invoke in our modern country of America, sweetheart!
“On my website, we would keep his message limited to trolls. They’re anonymous, so let them lose their composure.”
You know what, honey. I was only trying to find a better solution for you outside of being a deadman walking for screwing over a man involved the KKK. It sounds like you prefer that more instead.
We will miss you, Frank!
You poor hopelessly stupid and greedy bastard!
I cannot allow such willful mischievousness to go uncorrected or unpunished. I must ask you to
order Patriot God to report to the Grand Tital or, I shall have to take the matter into my own hands and speak with the Imperial Wizard.
“I cannot allow such willful mischievousness to go uncorrected or unpunished”
What “willful mischievousness”?! Saying what he believes?! How would you honestly defend that in a civil court?! It’s subjective and it’s pure bullshit!
Ok so you’re a vigilante who doesn’t understand free speech is unconstitutional and has nothing to do with going “uncorrected” (which you never correct him because you can’t even debate him which is how what would be required to do that. Not censoring him) or “unpunished” (which is violation in this country to take away their free speech as a form of “punishment” and it never teaches anybody anything outside of making you look like a pathetic coward)!
This is a wrong approach to this and if you truly want to change his mind, then you would allow free speech to “correct” him via the battle of ideas. Censorship never “corrects” or addresses anything. It just hides it.
This demonstrates how very little you understand the philosophy behind free speech as well as your incredibly low, if not nonexistent, value and regard of it. It’s very obvious that you don’t take the U.S. Constitution of this country very serious, dude! So I think it would best for you to move to another country that beats suits your mindset. How about China?
“I must ask you to
order Patriot God to report to the Grand Tital or, I shall have to take the matter into my own hands and speak with the Imperial Wizard.”
You’re very ignorant! I’m not connected with Patriot God nor am I in any position to “order” Patriot God to do anything. I’m just a reader on this blog calling your bullshit out! That’s all I am!
You honestly think that you can “order” them without any authority to do anything in their group’s world?! Wow! You are an extra special kind of stupid! You as a “guido ginzo” (as Patriot God would call you) don’t have a dog in the race to hunt YOU! You can’t even spell *Grand Titan* correctly!
So how do you think “tak[ing] the matter into [your] own hands and speak[ing] with the Imperial Wizard as a “guido nigger” and a target of them to take a highly regarded white man who is also their great friend’s free speech away to appeal to woke people and blacks when the KKK make you take an oath renouncing “negro equality”, going to work out for you, dipshit?!…………
Again, I wish to say my goodbyes to you now! When you wind up missing and are never found, just be rest assured that we all know what truly happened!
I am sorry to inform you, but I spoke to the Grand Cyclops, who appointed two Nighthawks, a Grand Turk, a Grand Sentinel, Grand Magi and a Grand Ensign in addition to his Grand Scribe and they decided to punish you. You will be given an appearance ticket to appear at the Den.
Dershowitz makes my skin crawl.
New Headline:
“Alleged pedophile and sex trafficker defends pedophile & sex trafficker “
Can’t make this shit up people…
“You have no right not to be vaccinated. You have no right not to wear a mask. You have no right to open up your business … and if you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.”
Constitutional lawyer, human rights defender or a ubiquitous seller of superfluous terms?
https://youtu.be/GEL8k-ktnHs
Truth is stranger than fiction.
Truth is stranger than fiction….
….And Alonzo is stranger than either.
I have my doubts about Dershowitz.
This Harvard Law Professor claimed to have consul;ted Jeffrey Epstein while he was writing several of his legal books and articles.
Two problems with that claim.
1.) Epstein never attended law school. Nor did Epstein graduate from law school.
2.) Epstein never even received a Bachelors degree from any university in any subject.
As for Dershowitz representing Donald Trump in his first impeachment trial, Trump was being impeached for the act of encouraging Ukraine to investigate government corruption in that country.
Much of that corruption involved the criminal acts of Hunter and Joe Biden.
Trump did nothing wrong ito justify that impeachment.
It was a political vendetta against Trump.
Trump said to Zelenski: indict Biden or you don’t get the (already approved by Congress) military aid.
That is not the same as “encouraging Ukraine to investigate government corruption”.
However, the fact that Biden’s son was in the board of Ukraine’s energy company is very, very sketchy. I mean, what the fuck is he doing in a company in Ukraine other then lining his pockets and in return providing some influence because he’s the son of a US president?Same with Kushner and his 2 billion dollar deal with the Saoudi’s. Or Ivanka and her Chinese license for her products. Disgusting.That’s the reason why people don’t like politicians.
Yup
Corruption on both sides!
Perhaps Dershowitz should represent his former client (Trump) instead of Raniere: the same accusations (FBI planted documents). These losers are all going down……..
Are those nine or ten photos on Dershowitz’s left, portraits of himself? How many such photos does one need to display in a single room one’s house to qualify as a narcissist? Oh! Maybe he just collects crime scene police photos of murder victims, as a hobby. Forget what I said about narcissism, Alan’s a nice guy (no pun intended).
Oh! Maybe it was indeed him the photos, it’s just that he looked like a murder victim. I am confused now…
Wow, even people our side of the pond know who Alan Dershowitz is…
OK, I can understand much of the horrified reaction here. Of course, this guy has represented some dubious clients down the years, and some may say his own family history is a little chequered. That’s not to say that he has also proven himself one of the finest and most famous constitutional lawyers in US history.
OK, he’s getting on a bit (82/83?), and they say age dulls the sharpest of minds, but there’s really nothing to suggest he’s past it yet, and in law there is often no substitute for experience.
So why is this such a coup for the Raniere camp? It’s not just that he’s a fine constitutional lawyer with a lifetime of experience fighting on ground on which he has very sure footing; it’s his fame (some might say infamy) that gives Raniere such a massive boost. His involvement is more likely to mean that the case breaks into the mainstream media pretty much globally, and that’s not good news for the FBI or the DOJ.
Whatever you think about Raniere (and there is no one who loathes him more than I do), this case may have potentially constitutional implications for how federal authorities are regulated, and on their powers to act. It may in the future be much harder to flout procedures or brush things under the carpet, and perhaps that’s a good thing in terms of justice and accountability.
Whether Raniere will get a new trial is another question. Given the weight of the other evidence against him, I think it unlikely, and any reduction in his sentencing is just as unlikely to make a difference. However, it may be argued that the plea deals extracted could be judged unsafe, so who knows?
One thing’s for sure: if members of the FBI/DOJ scratched their noses when they weren’t supposed to, Dershowitz will expose it and it will be loudly reported. They had better get their ducks in a row.
It seems the media has not jumped all over this “bombshell development” like Bronfman and the rest of the Free Raniere Club had hoped. As far as I can tell this alleged “news” has been met with crickets. Googling Dershowitz this is about all I found under News:
Kidnapped Migrants More Popular On Martha’s Vineyard Than Alan Dershowitz
Shocking no one, the community is much more welcoming than the law professor constantly pretends.
By JOE PATRICE
September 16, 2022 at 2:14 PM
“Like the swallows returning to Capistrano, you can set your clock to Alan Dershowitz publicly complaining that no one on Martha’s Vineyard likes him. He’s not invited to concerts. The library doesn’t give him an open mic anymore (he might even sue them!). And the famously chipper Larry David is yelling at him.”
https://abovethelaw.com/2022/09/kidnapped-migrants-more-popular-on-marthas-vineyard-than-alan-dershowitz/
Deshowitz’s championing Raniere’s cause changes nothing of course because there’s still no evidence the Feds cheated. And this isn’t news since it’s been known since Aug. 2020 that hiring Alan Dershowitz to his cause was part of his plan:
“I’ll be in here for the rest of my life if we don’t do something,” Raniere said in an April 8 call to a supporter, Suneel Chakravorty, adding that the witnesses in his trial “all lied.” “[And] the rest of my life might not be that long considering the way things are in here, you know,” he said.”
Raniere then proceeded to push for a pundit to speak out against the judge, suggesting Dershowitz, who is best known for representing Jeffrey Epstein.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-judge-needs-to-know-hes-being-watched-nxivm-leader-keith-
“So. Now we gotta figure out the next step with Dershowitz” is what Raniere told Chakravorty in that recorded prison telephone call.
Evidently they figured out the next step with Dershowitz, which was to get Bronfman to hire him with her millions. But the plot fizzled, like so many things incompetent Raniere tried over the years.
Nobody in the media much cares about Dershowitz or Raniere anymore.
It won’t matter. KR made a nuisance of himself and it’s doubtful he will see freedom in this life. But if he does, he can retire to Fiji, to live a life of quiet abstinence with his remaining followers.
He’ll bring the attention warranted to this case. Hate him, hate Raniere, it doesn’t matter.
The focus must be on the corrupt and illegal Cindy t of our FBI and prosecutors who repeatedly stack the deck with false narratives and trumped up charges.
If the evidence tampering allegations are proven, what happens to the incarcerated co-conspirators who took plea deals based on child porn evidence that they had nothing to do with, or as it might turn out, didn’t even exist?
Early release? Their records expunged?
If the child porn evidence wasn’t on the level, what else did people lie about?
Frank, did the NY Times reporter who broke the branding story, did that person ever try to contact the other people who were being written about? Was there any follow up that wasn’t a lazy copy and paste “good guys/bad guys” hit job?
Ms. Penza’s side hustle, that might have been something worth telling the public about much, much earlier. And the numerous defense attorneys, considering it’s evidence they could have used to defend their clients.
Keith’s co-defendants did not accept a plea deal based on evidence of pornography of a child because they were not charged with the sexual exploitation of a child.
The other defendants chose to admit their guilt on different charges.
Unless you are saying that they are liars?
Keith’s former co-defendants may or may not have severed their case from Keith’s because of some of his charges.
But you absolutely do not know that for a fact. When Keith describes what happened in previous writing he goes into great detail of other reasons that he personally believes that they plead guilty. Unless you think that you know them better than Keith knew them?
Another possibility is that upon getting other information through the course of discovery leading up to their trials, the other co-defendants came to realize that Keith was guilty of those crimes.
Because all of the evidence presented lined up with things that they already knew to be true. In which case, maybe it did factor into their decision to take a plea. Because at that point they knew h
Keith was guilty. Of multiple heinous acts.
And they’d come to see the part they played in a criminal Enterprise. The bottom line is you’re not in their heads nor is anyone else (including this commenter right here!)
Legally they had other options. In addition to fighting the case they could have pleaded no contest or made a deal, but not admitted guilt. That happens all the time.
Based on their own words in open court, they seem to believe in their guilt, accept their guilt and take responsibility for their guilt.
Ultimately, given the choice between believing the words from their own mouths or your speculation. Or mine. Or Keith’s. Or anyone else, it’s most rational to go with believing their own account of reality.
But no their charges will not be thrown out for the reasons that you laid out. Because they basically already swore and gave detailed accounts regarding their guilt. As part of their cooperation there’s a lot of documentation backing up their guilt and participation. They didn’t just walk into court and say I’m guilty. They had multiple meetings with law enforcement and attorneys and they gave corroborating evidence and detailed their own Criminal actions. There’s no coming back from that it’s over for them
This is interesting reasoning for why a person would plead guilty to something they are not guilty of. You are saying that we should “believe their own account of reality”.
And yet all the collateral Raniere held on them made them delusional.
The magic of coercive control through threats of punishment only has an effect on a person’s view of reality when “cults” do it. But when the government threatens you with the loss of decades of your liberty and huge fines, your reasoning can be trusted to be facing reality.
Michele Hatchett detailed the threats of prosecution Moira Penza laid against her if she testified as a witness for Keith Raniere. Isn’t it safe to assume that these same threats were applied to witnesses who ended up flipping and testifying against Keith Raniere?
If you compare the coercive control of exposing a letter you wrote about your mom’s behavior with the coercive control of threatening decades of prison time and huge fines – which has greater coercive control?
So tell me again: why should we trust the reasoning of someone who faces coercive control from the government, but not trust the reasoning of someone who submitted collateral to her sorority sisters in DOS?
Alanzo
You know what? This argument I’ve presented here sucks.
Here’s a better one:
When the government threatens you with imprisonment why wouldn’t you lie to avoid it?
There. That’s better.
Alanzo
Because it’s not like in the movies or what you’ve seen on TV. It’s not a simple matter of just saying, “I’m guilty.”
There is extensive cross referencing of information. Seeing if evidence lines up. Sworn statements. Signing binding legal documents that is your own verbal or written narrative of the crimes you’ve committed is truthful.
Multiple opportunities are afforded to give truthful testimony.
By the time a defendant gets into court and pleafs guilty. Much has gone into investigating their claims.
This is just a partial answer to the legal question.
Much work goes into a criminal case of this magnitude. It’s actually not to any Prosecutor’s best interest to procure a hasty possibly false confession.
Criminals could even use it to their advantage.
Remember when Allison Mack lied to the media and took full responsibility for every aspect of the ppubic branding? She fully lied.
Well that kind of false admission of guilt would be problematic in a criminal court case.
So they do not stop at there. It’s investigated.
With these 6 criminal cases they interviewed many, many people. And have copious amounts of other information in many forms.
Statements of guilt are heavily vetted. Just as are claims of innocence.
Nobody ‘sucks’ better than you Alanzo!
…..That’s some Sunday evening
double entendré
You really do make it your job to comment on all responses for “Kevin”.
Very quickly.
It’s okay for readers here to have a back and forth without you refereeing. Or being involved every time.
Take a knee.
Let people communicate
In 1997 Dershowitz wrote an oped advocating for lowering the age of consent.
https://forward.com/fast-forward/428588/creepydershowitz-alan-defends-his-argument-age-of-consent-minor-epstein/?amp=1
Yes, he is the perfect lawyer to defend Keith in his appeal for a crime that involves statutory rape.
Dershowitz had no issues with getting Epstein off the hook in 2007 despite the scale of his abuse of teenage girls, a fact that Dershowitz must have known at the time.
Dershowitz is accused by Epstein’s most known victim, Virginia Roberts.
They are in a legal battle. It is without question she was pimped out to numerous men by Epstein, prince Andrew among them, but I have seen no corroborating evidence Dershowitz was one of them.
In an interview Dershowitz acknowledges he got a massage in Epstein’s – now demolished- Palm beach mansion. From an old Russian lady. And he kept his underwear on.
https://www.rawstory.com/amp/trumpster-alan-dershowitz-admits-got-therapeutic-massage-old-old-russian-home-child-rapist-2649259989
“In 1997, Dershowitz argued against statutory rape laws, saying the age of consent should be 15…’There must be criminal sanctions against sex with very young children, but it is doubtful whether such sanctions should apply to teenagers above the age of puberty, since voluntary sex is so common in their age group,’ he wrote in a Los Angeles Times op-ed”
https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2019/7/30/20746983/alan-dershowitz-jeffrey-epstein-sarah-ransome-giuffre
Dershowitz is 85. His star set years ago. At this point he is a joke, sometimes reviled, often just laughed at.
He’s made threats to sue the public library on Martha’s Vineyard, the poor old dear.
He’s currently on a crusade against “cancel culture”. When he was still lecturing at Harvard, students were aghast at elderly Dershowitz’s seeming obsession with rape law. He’d bring it up even in cases that had nothing to do with rape.
His take on rape law is it’s unfair to men. Far too many men are falsely accused of rape by lying women, he thinks. We need heavier penalties for women who bring these false allegations, he believes.
He also believes adult men should be able to have sex with 15 year old girls. He penned that in an opinion piece for the LA Times. No wonder Raniere wanted Dershowitz on his team, they think alike.
Dershowitz lost the narrative years ago. Defender of Weinstein and Epstein, he’s discredited, an eccentric, a crank. Raniere got Bronfman to hire him for the same reason he used the Bronfman millions to buy the Dalai Lama’s personal endorsement. Difference is, people actually like the Dalai Lama.
I wonder if Bronfman paid $2 million for Dershowitz like she did for “His Holiness”?
Who is Dershowitz?
A fighter for individual and constitutional rights?
A brilliant Harvard professor?
A narcissist who loves attention and will do the outlandish to acquire it?
Someone who believes in democracy but undermines it simultaneously?
A guy you can bump into at the Harvest in Harvard Square several times a week?
All of the above?
Dershowitz is someone who ups the ante. NYT and everyone else will be listening now. Frank Report will have new life and Frank can retire in a exclusive tax haven.
Yes! Exactly.
Look at his notable clients.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Dershowitz#Notable_clients
Well if you were thinking Clare Bronfman has never cut ties with Raniere, you were correct. Dershowitz does not come cheap, only someone with extra deep pockets or extra special connections can afford him so that leaves only the Bronfman family. Regular rich cannot afford him, only the 1% of the 1% can.
Raniere wouldn’t have been able to get this lawyer on his own. It also dramatically increases his odds of a retrial.
Not because Dershowitz is necessarily going to be better then some previous lawyer but because judges have over the years been trained to give him a higher degree of deference then they might other lawyers so whatever he says will carry more weigh and be given greater consideration even if said identical things as say some lawyer practicing for a decade. The odds of Raniere getting a retrial just increased dramatically.
I disagree. He’s had great lawyers thus far to no avail.
Bad facts make bad law.
Is that how it works, Erasend? Court outcomes based on individual deference rather than statute or case law?
I’m speechless… I think I need to go and buy some anti-nausea tablets.
If what he says is given greater consideration just because of who he is rather than due to the content of what he says, then that is antithetical to the purpose of the law. The odds of a retrial do not increase dramatically or even a little bit just because of who a lawyer is that takes on the case, but only if the argumentation and evidence he presents makes it so. If you watched the press conference, Dershowitz didn’t seem to commit to the alleged evidence at all. In fact, he seemed to always precede some assertion with an “if” such and such is the case.
Spot on as ever Erasend. Also the fact that he’s so well known is going to mean the case gets way more publicity.
“Alan Dershowitz is a Jew lookin for another big payday.”
-Scott Johnson
Didn’t you respond, “Then you give your loyalty to a Jew before your own Amway downline?”
Scott Johnson once said,
“I’d give my loyalty to a Jew before my own Amway downline because if the Jew made me a penny, it’d be a penny more than my entire downline makes me.
Scott then promptly added,
“I truly make no money off my downline. My wife, son, and neighbor are lazier than
cotton pickers!”
***
How did things ever get so far? I don’t know. It was so — unfortunate — so unnecessary. Scott Johnson lost his Amway downline — and Nice Guy got stuck with a garage full of Amway Duck Biscuits.
And if Johnson agrees, then Nice Guy is willing to let things go on the way they were before.
Frank, did you get to ask any questions?
Yes, I was one of three journalists who asked a question. The second question was from Shaila Dewan from the New York Times. She asked about the absence of a scar. I forgot who asked the first question.
I asked the final question about the testimony about metadata.
Mr. Parlato,
With all due respect, why are ghosting me on emails again?!
Please read and respond to your emails.
Thank you kindly.
Why so few questions? Were more questions not allowed, or did you not think of more questions, or because everything was explained so well that no further questions were necessary?
The way to ask questions was a bit cumbersome for me. They had to be written out, and that took time, and it took me a while to figure it out. And as I recall, you had to stop watching the press conference when you wrote out the questions.
I see it a little different. Dershowitz means it won’t be swept under the carpet.
Unprecedented!?? I wonder what terminology he used when describing Trumps corruption.
Curious minds want to know the total amount of Bronfman money paid to lawyers and retained experts to persecute Raniere’s enemies, pursue Raniere’s absurd claims against AT and T and Microsoft, represent him at trial, and now pursue these post-conviction applications.
How many of these lawyers sat Clare Bronfman down and told her what they knew or should have known? “Raniere is a con artist and you are his biggest victim.
He has offered to pay me premium rates to do his bidding and be part of his manipulation of you but I won’t do it because I do not want my credibility to inure to his advantage and I am afraid that while the court, in the end, won’t believe his bullshit, you will, to and I do not want to take advantage of you because that would make me a accessory to his abuse of you, which was far more hideous than his abuse of the women that became his slaves.”
The answer to that question is none of the lawyers did that. I make the over/under on the total of the Bronfman money paid to lawyers to buttress Raniere’s credibility, punish his victims and free him from the consequences of his deeds to be 100 million dollars and I confidently take the over! And as for Alan Dershowitz- he has proven me wrong again
I did not think he could go lower than the My Pillow guy. Shame on me! I should l have seen it coming.
Pedophile and Jeffery Epstein friend Alan Dershowitz sued….
….Virginia Giiuffre the victim of
Jeffrey Epstein.
Frank is Alan Dershowitz a pious attorney?
Please investigate!
****
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_von_B%C3%BClow
I think it is reasonable to look at the history of the lawyer.
So your answer is yes?
Time permitting the answer is yes.
RE Alleged Pedophile Dershowitz:
The Dershowitz/Epstein connection
Jeffrey Epstein?
Alan Dershowitz?
Bill Clinton?
Woody Allen?
Bill Gates?
Pedophile Kieth Ranerie…..
LMAO! Dershowitz is a wonderful man compared to Judas……
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-01-17/alan-dershowitz-named-to-trumps-impeachment-legal-team
***
Frank will you be exploring this issue?!?!??!?
Thanks!
He has represented some fairly dubious characters. But criminal lawyers often represent dubious people.
His constitutional and due process arguments, which I have read, are brilliant.
I am not familiar with the Guthrie accusations. Have they been proven?
You forgot weinstein and trump
Dershowitz is a total scumbag, reviled by all who actually know him. He’s in the same club as Guiliani – they had a moment in the sun, but don’t have any character or integrity and now will do anything to keep get on television. He was also tight with Jeffrey Epstein, enough said.
At the Democratic Convention, I was taking photos for the paper I worked for while Oprah interviewed Obama. Can I imply I’m in the same league with her professionally the way you do with the Times? Pathetic.
I will go toe to toe with any reporter anywhere. I broke the DOS story. The New York Times cited me for that four months later.
I broke the alleged FBI tampering story more than a year ago. The New York Times attended a press conference yesterday on it.
A writer is a writer. Our ability to write the truth or try to do it is the only metric worth anything.
It is not mere readership that qualifies anyone.
But my readership may be as great as many individual writers at the New York Times.
So why should I adopt an inferiority complex? If you had more confidence in your Oprah days, you might be known today for your compelling photos.
There is a tampering “story”, but that is all it is. A made up fiction by a conman paid for by Bronfman money for one purpose only — to sow seeds of doubt in order to get a guilty client off. A gaslighting attempt by a narcissist to project his own corruption onto others who have far more integrity. It has nothing to do with truth, due process, or justice. It’s just another disgusting scam created by liars.
Either way it is a story. If what you say is true than it is an outstanding example of how money can influence the system.
It’s a story. We seek the truth.
“But my readership may be as great as many individual writers at the New York Times.” In your dreams. Stylistically, you’re a 3rd rate hack. You don’t write truth or even try to. You create scandal by printing lies and salacious insinuation, all without corroboration. Then when you’re called on it, you claim you have “evidence” and will publish a response but then never do. You’re a charlatan and a fraud, which is why two months from today it’s off to Club Fed for you. That’s a call I’ll be sure to be on!
Keep posting. I have the most improved troll trap on the market. It holds the troll aloft without damage to brain or body.
No squeezing, cutting or crushing. It operates on the principle of dislocating the troll from its base and thereby rendering it powerless. Besides, S, H & N may not be at home.
Frank,
I believe in your journalistic integrity. Your sources are vetted and your voice is original. Anyone who wants to tear you down most likely just doesn’t agree with your viewpoints. It’s juvenile.
Thank you, Mary.
There are also those who comment who have hidden agendas and are interested in influencing the results.
On your other posts re: family court- he’s involved there, afcc member and speaker, used alienation tactic to drive wife to jump off a bridge – he’s a vile gaslighter
Dershowitz offers his services because he smells Clare’s money. Much like Suneel offers his services when he smells her behind.
One of these men does honorable work — the other has visited Epstein’s Island.
This scum bag has defended OJ, Trump, Weinstein & Epstein hahaha! Safe to say he likes taking cases of rich/guilty pieces of shit.. KR is still burning through the Brofman’s money lol.
Burn baby burn.
Lol Dershowitz! The rogues gallery is complete.
More “infamous” than “famous” at this point.
If. If. If.
IF
Why wouldn’t Clare pay for whatever Keith wanted? She always has and probably always will.
Keith has a right to an attorney. And there’s always an attorney willing to take any case.
But that will not change the fact that Keith is guilty. On many charges.
IF = A conditional clause.
If if if if if
Its iffy…
Video presenting the statements from Alan Dershowitz, the former FBI senior forensic examiner Stacy Eldrich, Steven Abrams, Wayne B. Norris, Steven Bunting, William Odom, and former US Attorney Bud Cummings – with many others.
Are they all ‘disgruntled former employees’ of the FBI with an axe to grind?
No. They are all experts, though.
Listen to what they have to say after examining the evidence of FBI Evidence tampering in the Keith Raniere trial.
Video by Make Justice Blind.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gGU12pvPLc&w=560&h=315%5D
William Odom !
Wow. Keith asked his minions to get Dersh involved years ago. It seems he finally gets what he wanted. Clare must have written a mega cheque. Dersh is so old he probably doesn’t see this one through. It won’t make any difference…….
Homo say what?
Hey loser! No matter how hard you try nobody in justice blind is ever gonna like you or be your friend!
Wasn’t Mr. Dershowitz Edgars B. Attorney?
WOW
I hope they find the person/ persons responsible for this!
Did people with no morals hijack the world?
“… Ghislaine Maxwell’s socialite sister Isabel Maxwell married Dale Djerassi …”
https://nationalfile.com/alan-dershowitz-admits-to-visiting-epstein-island-with-his-wife-and-daughter/