Government Files Response to Raniere and Bronfman Appeal

The US Government has responded to Keith Raniere’s appeal of his conviction along with his supplemental brief and Clare Bronfman’s appeal of her sentence in one 175 page-long document.

During Raniere’s six-week jury trial, the government called some 15 witnesses. Among these were cooperating witness Lauren Salzman, Daniela, and DOS victims Sylvie, Nicole and Jay.

The government also called Mark Vicente, James Loperfido, Rick Ross, Steven Herbits, Kathy Russell’s landlord, a BDSM online sales manager, an expert in clinical and forensic psychology who specialized in interpersonal violence and trauma, several custodian witnesses, and four law enforcement witnesses.

Keith Alan Raniere

Following the close of the government’s case, counsel for Raniere made an oral Rule 29 motion attacking the sufficiency of the evidence as to the sex trafficking and racketeering counts. The district court denied the motion.

On June 19, 2019, the jury convicted Raniere of racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, forced labor conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, sex trafficking conspiracy, sex trafficking, and attempted sex trafficking and found that the government had proven all 11 racketeering acts identified in the indictment..

Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis sentenced Raniere to 120 years’ imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

Bronfman pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement with the government, to two counts:

  1. conspiring to conceal, harbor and shield from detection one or more aliens [Sylvie] for financial gain
  2. the unlawful transfer and use of a means of identification of another person [Pam Cafritz] with the intent to commit and in connection with attempted tax evasion.

Judge Garaufis sentenced Bronfman to 81 months’ imprisonment, a $500,000 fine, and, as set forth in the plea agreement, over $6 million in forfeiture and restitution.

On appeal, Raniere asserted that:

(1) the jury instructions for the sex trafficking offenses and related racketeering acts were erroneous and the government failed to present sufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict as to those counts;

(2) the government presented insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict on the forced labor, child exploitation, obstruction of justice, identity theft and racketeering offenses

(3) Judge Garaufis denied Raniere a fair trial by admitting certain evidence related to

  1. his sexual abuse of a minor victim;
  2. limiting defense counsel’s cross-examination of cooperating witness Lauren Salzman
  3. requiring the parties to refer to certain victim-witnesses by their first name or nicknames only.

Bronfman asserted that the court committed procedural error in sentencing her to a three-times the Guidelines sentence of 81 months’ imprisonment.  Her sentencing guidelines were 21-27 months.

The government responded that:

None of Raniere or Bronfman’s dozens of arguments and subarguments covered in more than 37,000 words of briefing. have the slightest merit and that, naturally, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals should affirm the judgments.

And more specifically for the following reasons:

• Raniere did not preserve his challenge to the district court’s sex trafficking instruction regarding the phrase “anything of value,” and there is no merit to his claim that the court erred by using “because of” rather than “on account of” or by adding a sentence not found in the “Sand instructions” that counsel agreed was a correct statement of the law.

• The government adduced sufficient evidence to support Raniere’s convictions of sex trafficking, child exploitation, obstruction of justice, identity theft and racketeering offenses;

• The district court did not err under Rules 401 and 403 in admitting certain communications between Raniere and Camila, evidence of Camila’s abortions and photographs of Raniere’s other sexual partners.

MK10Art’s painting of Lauren Salzman

• The district court did not abuse its discretion in ending the cross examination of Lauren Salzman, in light of counsel’s repetitive and irrelevant questioning and, in any event, any error was harmless given Raniere’s failure to call Salzman as a witness himself when given the option and his failure on appeal to identify any line of questioning he would have pursued.

• The district court did not err in permitting victim-witnesses to testify using only their first name or a pseudonym to protect their privacy, where the defendant had access to their identifying information and could fully investigate prior to their testimony.

• The district court did not apply the legal concept of willful blindness to find that Bronfman “bore culpability” for DOS and the court’s substantial upward variance is supported by the § 3553(a) factors.

Before we get into more detailed arguments of the appeal, let us in our next post look at the government’s extraordinary description of NXIVM, Raniere and his cohorts.


About the author

Frank Parlato


Click here to post a comment

Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us! (Email & username are optional. To leave a name, click on the email icon)

  • They did not respond to this point: “Bronfman asserted that the court committed procedural error in sentencing her to a three-times the Guidelines sentence”

  • Not to put too fine a point on it, but the fed’s 29,932 word brief answering the appeals represents nothing less than tearing Raniere, Bronfman and their attorneys new assholes.

    • I was disappointed that the government couldn’t find a way to work in the phrase “and the horse you rode in on”…or something like that.

  • On Account of and Because of his attorney’s shitty appeals arguments, Raniere is never going to walk the earth a free man.

    “…the court did not err by “replacing the language of ‘on account of’ with ‘because of’ without further explanation.” (SRBr11). Indeed, as the Supreme Court has explained, the two phrases mean the same thing: “The words ‘because of’ mean ‘by reason of: on account of.’” Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs., Inc., 557 U.S. 167, 176 (2009) (emphasis added) (quoting 1 Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 194 (1966) and citing other dictionaries).”

About the Author

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in hundreds of news outlets, like The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CBS News, Fox News, New York Post, New York Daily News, Oxygen, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, The Sun, The Times of London, CBS Inside Edition, among many others in all five continents.

His work to expose and take down NXIVM is featured in books like “Captive” by Catherine Oxenberg, “Scarred” by Sarah Edmonson, “The Program” by Toni Natalie, and “NXIVM. La Secta Que Sedujo al Poder en México” by Juan Alberto Vasquez.

Parlato has been prominently featured on HBO’s docuseries “The Vow” and was the lead investigator and coordinating producer for Investigation Discovery’s “The Lost Women of NXIVM.” Parlato was also credited in the Starz docuseries "Seduced" for saving 'slave' women from being branded and escaping the sex-slave cult known as DOS.

Additionally, Parlato’s coverage of the group OneTaste, starting in 2018, helped spark an FBI investigation, which led to indictments of two of its leaders in 2023.

Parlato appeared on the Nancy Grace Show, Beyond the Headlines with Gretchen Carlson, Dr. Oz, American Greed, Dateline NBC, and NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, where Parlato conducted the first-ever interview with Keith Raniere after his arrest. This was ironic, as many credit Parlato as one of the primary architects of his arrest and the cratering of the cult he founded.

Parlato is a consulting producer and appears in TNT's The Heiress and the Sex Cult, which premiered on May 22, 2022. Most recently, he consulted and appeared on Tubi's "Branded and Brainwashed: Inside NXIVM," which aired January, 2023.

IMDb — Frank Parlato

Contact Frank with tips or for help.
Phone / Text: (305) 783-7083