CT says he crossed the line into stalking when he wrote that a Jewish conspiracy controls Connecticut Family Courts, which, combined with references to guns, historical remedies to tyranny, and ruminations on certain judges meeting such a fate puts it into a category of hate crimes.
Boyne claims his speech is protected under the First Amendment.
Boyne told FR that his court-appointed attorneys, from-Kirschbaum Law Group, derailed a plea dealhe believes would have allowed him to walk free after more than a year in jail.
The judge was prepared to sentence him to time served, which would have meant his immediate release, he said. Instead, his court-appointed lawyers, Jennifer M. Buyske and Alice M. Osedach Powers, without his consent, raised Boyne’s mental competency to stand trial.
Boyne believes this was a deliberate move to keep him incarcerated.
Attorney Jennifer M. Buyske
Attorney Alice M. Osedach Powers
New Haven, CT state court Judge Gerald L. Harmon
His lawyers’ claim of incompetence was bolstered by a concussion Boyne suffered in jail almost a month ago during an altercation with another inmate. Boyne says the injury had no impact on his present mental state or ability to understand the proceedings.
Attorneys Buyske and Osedach Powers declined requests for comment.
Boyne said, “My attorneys met with me before the hearing, which was supposed to be a motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss. Alice Powers went off begging to be fired, claiming I argue too much, and I don’t understand. Then she launched into this concern about competency. And then she tells the judge that I have a concussion, and I believe [former Connecticut Supreme Court Justice and DCF Commissioner] Joette Katz is involved, and that it had already been arranged. It was a five minute hearing.”
According to Boyne, Powers misled the court by telling the judge Boyne has a concussion, instead of explaining the concussion was in August.
“She was just throwing mud at the wall.,” Boyne said. “It didn’t matter. And then the judge said, ‘Okay, I order the evaluation.'”
With the court-ordered competency evaluation, the trial schedule is suspended.
“It’s a page right out of the Nutmeg Playbook. My lawyers weren’t ready for trial. We don’t even know what the nature and cause of the accusations are. We have no particulars. I was just trying to plead out.
“I told my lawyer, I said, ‘I’ll plead out to being the gunman on the grassy knoll.’ And she says, ‘Well, I don’t think we understand the charges against you.’ And I said, ‘Yeah, I understand the stalking charge is bullshit. So let’s plead out, and I’m going home.'”
Boyne said Judge Gerald L. Harmon had agreed to impose a sentence of time served.
“If my lawyers had gone and got the plea, I would have gone home. It would have been over. But now everything’s off the table.”
FR was unable to confirm if Boyne’s understanding that he would have been sentenced to time served was accurate, what plea deal he was offered, and whether he might have been sentenced to additional time over and above time served if he had accepted a plea.
His lawyers request for a mental competency evaluation will delay the matter for some time, and Boyne remains in jail for a charge he has not been convicted of, and which, though his speech is, by most standards, deplorable, may indeed by protected by the First Amendment
Hear Paul Boyne’s voice in his interview from jail with Rich Luthmann.
This is what should happen to antisemites everywhere.
Richard LuthmannSeptember 16, 2024
Paul Boyne has a former Connecticut Supreme Court Justice saying just that. And he believes that is the cornerstone of his defense.
What’s your angle?September 16, 2024
The term 'anti-Semitism' was unsuitable from the beginning for the real essence of Jew-hatred, which remained anchored, more or less, in the Christian tradition even when it moved via the natural sciences, into racism.
It is doubtful whether the term which was first publicized in an institutional context (the Anti-Semitic League) would have appeared at all if the 'Anti-Chancellor League,' which fought Bismarck's policy, had not been in existence since 1875.
The founders of the new Organization adopted the elements of 'anti' and 'league,' and searched for the proper term: Marr exchanged the term 'Jew' for 'Semite' which he already favored. It is possible that the shortened form 'Sem' is used with such frequency and ease by Marr (and in his writings) due to its literary advantage and because it reminded Marr of Sem Biedermann, his Jewish employer from the Vienna period.
Zimmerman, Moshe (5 March 1987). Wilhelm Marr: The Patriarch of Anti-Semitism. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 112.
After that, all Jews were to be considered the same. All Christians were to be considered the same. All individuals were to be grouped into one category or another. They were to be considered as though they all thought the exact same thoughts and shared the exact same beliefs … until Klaus Schwab predicted “an angrier world”. And, the world became angrier. The anger spread, the immorality spread and the warfare spread to establish the new world “order out of chaos”.
AnonymousSeptember 17, 2024
What’s a “Semite”?
Gary Cohen fanSeptember 17, 2024
The definition of a semite does not matter. Everyone knows that antisemitism refers to racism and hatred against Jews. It is the only form of racism that seems to be acceptable in America today. Fortunately, the CT court system is one of a few places where it is not.
Convenience of who does and doesn't get protected.September 18, 2024
They ignore many forms of discrimination when it is in there best interest not to.
“hatred” and/or fear of which kind of “Jews” in what kind of “race”?
AnonymousOctober 11, 2024
What happened to the human race?
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
Sounds like he was assaulted in jail. Why would they wait an entire year plus to claim he is not fit? I read somewhere he treated his attorney. Any truth in that?
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
Total set up. Everyone is sane until they enter lawless CT courts.
These two attorneys were no doubt told exactly what to do- CT is not going to let Paul out- he’s exposed the racketeering enterprise that Tong and Lamont turn a blind eye to- it’s far too lucrative to interfere with and in CT children are a commodity and a parent can be discarded once their life savings is plundered.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
James, Kent and David might know which:
judges
lawyers
“public-private” vendors
legislators
and politicians
want (the state government’s version of) Mr. Boyne “out of the way”.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
Have any mainstream journalists asked Mr. Boyne why he did what he did?
LocoSeptember 18, 2024
He’s a racist asshole. Apparently, so are you.
👆 .September 18, 2024
So Loco,
You think all people who write horrible insults about other people should go to jail?
LocoSeptember 19, 2024
No, sweetheart. It’s the cyberstalking
and making threats to murder people that got him put in jail. Personally, I think he is pond scum with a peabrain and he is a disgusting white supremacist. Your hero. Do you have a picture of Hitler on your wall? Paul‘s hair looks about as greasy as Hitler’s.
Loco,September 20, 2024
Are you cyberstalking me? 😐
AnonymousSeptember 24, 2024
Grow a brain cell.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
These attorneys are sellouts. Handing a man’s life over to a court appointed evaluator- it will be a social worker or psychologist – no chance of a psychiatrist as they have standard of care –
The judge will rubber stamp whatever is recommended which will likely be serious medication and lock up in the dungeon of a psych ward
Thank you for your continued coverage of judicial abuse of power and corrupt attorneys in CT.
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
Hospitals for the criminally insane could be a worst fate then the maximum security prison he's been in.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
Paul is in danger because he knows too much. If anything happens to him, blame:
The Connecticut Post (161,658 readers)
Shoreline Times (40,936 readers)
Southbury Voices (39,000 readers)
CTNow (37,595 readers)
The Hartford Courant (36,387 readers)
for not investigating and reporting the “family court” racketeering in 2014.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
If Helen Bennett asks her reporters to investigate and report the whole truth about Connecticut’s conflicts of interest in the criminal case against Mr. Boyne, she will rebuild The Hartford Courant’s circulation waaayyy past 2018’s circulation. She should and could do that.
Who and what would and could stop her?
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
Knows too much about what? Crackpot Antisemitic conspiracy theories? Get real.
Who was the judge of that hearing?September 16, 2024
Richard,
In what ways should The Fourteenth Amendment direct that criminal case?
Paul asked the judge: “So, The Fourteenth Amendment doesn’t apply in your courtroom?”
According to the scholars at Wikipedia:
A Due Process Clause is found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibit the deprivation of “life, liberty, or property” by the federal and state governments, respectively, without due process of law.
The U.S. Supreme Court interprets these clauses to guarantee a variety of protections: procedural due process (in civil and criminal proceedings); substantive due process (a guarantee of some fundamental rights); a prohibition against vague laws; incorporation of the Bill of Rights to state governments; and equal protection under the laws of the federal government.
The First Amendment applies to the CT courts through the Fourteenth.
Paul Boyne believes the case should be dismissed under First Amendment jurisprudence and Dombrowski v. Pfister.
Boyne has a point. The CT courts should have already inquired whether the prosecution has a chilling effect on the practice of journalism and can do so under the Fourtenth Amendment.
It would be comical for one of the CT stooges to try to justify the Boyne case's lack of a chilling effect on journalism and inquiry into the CT Family Courts.
Reporter Mike Volpe was named in an FBI report about the Boyne case. Why should Volpe or anyone else who reports on the CT Family Courts worry that they will be extradited for speech? Volpe is in Illinois. Boyne was in Virginia.
The commenter above, who shows the circulation of the CT papers, makes a good point. The fact that none of them are reporting this story gives weight to a chilling effect on speech in Connecticut. This case is a First Amendment flashpoint in their own backyard. Why is the press avoiding this story?
I wouldn't be surprised if Professor Eugene Volokh started covering it.
It’s a very old chilling effect.September 17, 2024
“It would be comical for one of the CT stooges to try to justify the Boyne case’s lack of a chilling effect on journalism and inquiry into the CT Family Courts.”
LocoSeptember 18, 2024
Except Boyne is not a journalist. If you think he is a journalist, then my composing and publishing a comment here makes me a journalist too I suppose.
A journalist is one who is engaged in gathering, preparing, collecting, writing, editing, filming, taping or photographing of news intended for a newspaper, magazine, news agency, or other professional medium or agency which has as one of its regular functions the processing and researching of news intended for dissemination to the public. News is defined as written, oral, or electronically recorded information or communication concerning events or other matters of public concern or public interest or affecting the public welfare. See Am. Sav. Bank, FSB v. UBS PaineWebber, Inc. (In re Fitch, Inc.), 330 F.3d 104, 105 (2d Cir. 2003).
So you're saying the Second Circuit has no common sense? That might be true. But their definition of journalist is what matters.
LocoSeptember 19, 2024
“Or other professional medium or agency”
I do not view his blog as professional. Trying to call him a journalist and argue that his cyberstalking charges are going to have a chilling effect on the practice of journalism is wackadoodle.
Unless you consider making threats on the lives of judges and their families as an integral part of journalism.? Yeah, in that case, there is a tiny risk the making of obsessive threats by “journalists” might be chilled. I guess they will have to add a new page to the journalistic ethics book. “No longer can we personally threaten the lives of public officials.”
Get real.
Is Jeff Gannon a professional journalist?September 19, 2024
What kind of “new page” would you call this, Loco?
AnonymousSeptember 20, 2024
…
AnonymousSeptember 22, 2024
Many locals paying attention to the case say Paul’s journalism was to break through the silencing. The crimes and corruption in those family courts have gone on for decades and the mainstream outlets haven’t reported the damage done.
His obviously vile words seem to have been an attempt to affect the state’s politics — just like most journalism today. So much corruption, deceit and the worst kinds of politics need attention. He definitely got their attention.
Who decides what harm public statements do to whom?
The lies the “Connecticut AFCC, Inc.” cabal published about children and families are actionable offenses. Who’s going to arrest Gerard Adelman the director, Robert Horwitz the secretary and Bruce Freedman the treasurer?
Who’s going to arrest all the journalists nudging all of us closer and closer to World War III?
What about all the horrible politicians whose words have divided our nation in two?
Rick Dunham worked for Bloomberg. Jeff Gannon had something to do with the “Plame affair” which was apparently instrumental in the lead up to the bombing of Iraq when hundreds of thousands of people there were actually killed.
Roger Stone can probably tell us more about the Texas politics involved in those actual crimes against so many.
He wrote a book about that. I wonder if he knows why it sounds like the guy at the end of that C-SPAN video was complaining about Ken Melman.
AnonymousSeptember 24, 2024
“ His obviously vile words seem to have been an attempt to affect the state’s politics”
Oh please.
Boyne is a white-power nazi to the bone. He was not role playing on his blog. The imbecile blames everyone who isn’t a white Irish-Catholic for his problems.
Terrorism and/or racism?September 18, 2024
Is that terrorism and/or racism — and is censorship the solution?
The lawfare started a long time ago.September 16, 2024
… In Dombrowski v. Pfister, the Court appeared to change the policy somewhat. The case on its face contained allegations and offers of proof that may have been sufficient alone to establish the “irreparable injury” justifying federal injunctive relief. But the formulation of standards by Justice Brennan for the majority placed great emphasis upon the fact that the state criminal statute in issue regulated expression. Any criminal prosecution under a statute regulating expression might of itself inhibit the exercise of First Amendment rights, he said, and prosecution under an overbroad statute, such as the one in this case, might critically impair exercise of those rights. The mere threat of prosecution under such an overbroad statute “may deter . . . almost as potently as the actual application of sanctions. . . .”
In such cases, courts could no longer embrace “[t]he assumption that defense of a criminal prosecution will generally assure ample vindication of constitutional rights,” because either the mere threat of prosecution or the long wait between prosecution and final vindication could result in a “chilling effect upon the exercise of First Amendment rights. …
No more plea? No more trial? No more offer of “time served”?
Will the judge choose Sidney Horowitz as “evaluator”?
Richard LuthmannSeptember 16, 2024
Paul Boyne is considering taking up a collection to get his own evaluation and evaluator. Stay tuned.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
IF Connecticut’s employees try to force Paul to submit to an evaluator they choose, state and federal law should compel those same state employees to allow:
His requested witnesses to be present during the evaluation Reasonable accommodations Video/audio of the forced evaluation Copies of all raw data recorded The complete record of any and all communication re: the evaluation
Connecticut Courthouse CrazySeptember 16, 2024
Didn't Norm Pattis do the same to Nichola Cunha? Everyone is crazy in Connecticut.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
Somehow, Mr. Pattis and his associates have managed to monopolize the most politically significant cases in Connecticut … and then steer each case to favor the posers-that-be.
Peter says, he was offered a position as a GALSeptember 17, 2024
Pattis is friend of the friendless. Has a problem with the court system.
” I am the last friend of the friendless, a worrier for the despised, a thorn in the side of the popular and powerful”. My Dad fled town when I was about 8.
“Pattis is particularly angry about court policy on people accused of possession of child pornography. In the dozens of cases sex offenses cases I've handled, I've yet to see a link between looking at pictures and molesting actual children”
” We live in a sexophrenic culture” Pattis knows he isn't making any friends in the courthouses with his attacks on judges for “intellectual cowardice ” prosecutors who he says are given too much power, and unaccountable police officers.
April 2014 Middle town press No jail time for dad who molested daughter a good thing: Norm Pattis
Victims will likely have no friends in Norm Pattis and Associates.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
This makes zero sense to me. If he was going to take a plea deal, what does it matter if he is competent to stand trial? Also, how would he know the judge would sentence him to time served? Can anyone explain that?
I think his lawyers are correct about him likely being incompetent.
Actually, it's just the opposite. The SCOTUS case of Godinez v. Moran confirmed that a criminal defendant must be competent to stand trial AND to take a plea, thus waiving a panoply of constitutional rights:
Also, Boyne has a letter from counsel where he is informed that Judge Harmon communicated that he was inclined to sentence Boyne to time served. Stay tuned. We intend to publish much more about this. Stay tuned.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
OK, thanks for filling in that info for me. I Do not work in law, nor have I ever faced being on trial myself, so I have no clue about this stuff.
So he could be deemed incompetent to even accept a plea? What if they did deem him to be incompetent? What would happen then? Would he need to have a guardian appointed to make the decisions for him? Or what?
In most cases, the defendant is committed to a state mental hospital until they are once again deemed competent by the medical personnel. That usually takes years.
It's the state's way to “ice” someone without a silencer and a drive over to the water to make fish food.
I think this series on Boyne will be enough to show beyond the shadow of any doubt that he is fully competent and, hopefully, make some of these First Amendment and pretextual prosecution issues national news. We'll see.
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
If he is indeed fully competent, it proves he is simply a purely evil individual.
I would agree. The legal question is whether the government has identified Paul Boyne's specific speech that constitutes a true threat, and is thus outside the protections of the First Amendment.
ConnectiSeptember 16, 2024
Boynes lawyers are under pressure. Paul Boyne is a threat to national security. He can blow the lid off the curruption in Connecticut.
AnonymousSeptember 17, 2024
all of that could be true.
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
How? By blaming the Jews? Hahaha. Too funny.
Re: April 19, 2013September 16, 2024
How many know who used to conduct all the training for guardians ad litem/ attorneys for minor children before the Connecticut’s Division of Public Defender Services Office agreed to take on that task?
Those with an interest in Mr. Boyne’s case who don’t already know why the Public Defenders office took over that training should look into what led up to that change in order to understand:
It’s not “the state’s case” against Mr. Boyne.
It’s the criminals’ case against him.
AnonymousSeptember 17, 2024
… You asked for a description of the training and oversight of guardians ad litem (GALs) in child neglect and related cases (juvenile court) vs. those in divorce and related cases (family court) and the rationale for these differences. You also asked (1) whether family court GALs have total immunity and, if so, why and (2) why family court GALs do not conform to their state practice guidelines? …
The state is following contracts and agreements. The statues can be twisted.. Appears to be business up front financial party in the back. What agreements has the judicial branch made? What are the agreements and contracts? It's not straight forward as statues would have you believe.
AnonymousSeptember 16, 2024
The Connecticut AFCC, Inc. public-private for profit partnership “designed and delivered” GAL/AMC training — monopolizing all the most damaging cases until parents exposed that monopolization and racketeering in 2013.
In 2013, Connecticut’s judicial ethics committee officially decided that racketeering was unethical. Different people then took over the “design and delivery” and the public defenders office stayed involved — as they had been right along.
Question: Does the public defenders office do more of the “design and delivery” since 2013 when Paul Boyne and other parents investigated the “Connecticut AFCC Inc.” racketeering?
Judge Lynda Munro, Gerard Adelman, Robert Horwitz and Sidney Horowitz are personal friends. Before 2013, Lynda and Sidney flew to the AFCC Inc. party together … Robert was the secretary and treasurer for AFCC, Inc. while Gerard was the director. Gerard and Robert still monopolize some of the worst cases — and the behind-closed-doors politics, apparently.
Still no DOJ investigation/prosecution of AFCC, Inc.
Still no mainstream news coverage of that public-private racketeering.
Still no apologies to children and parents for all the harm done.
Lynda Munro stepped down from the bench “for personal reasons” and started working for a law firm with state “representative” Steven Stafstrom, co-chair of the judiciary committee.
AnonymousSeptember 17, 2024
There is way more to what is happening in Connecticut. Stafstrom, Whitfield, Kissel these guys are all a part of it. The state is making money off all this. There is no possible way any of this has been possible without the support of the Connecticut politicians.
AnonymousSeptember 17, 2024
Where’s your proof?
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
Connecticut politicians have failed the foundation of the ideals that America was built on. The land of opportunities where hard work was rewarded. They have bypassed the ability to ability to fair , equal justice and persute of employment. Prosecution is weighted by fairness to the victim and the accused perpetuators of the crime. Altered for cost savings to the state. The politicians have used contracts and agreements to decide custody cases based on the economic benefits to the state. These are decisions made by public officials without presenting substantial information to the public. Failure of transparency to the voters and taxpayers. Our court system is not based on the fundamental rights of the American people. They are based on the political projects bringing money into the state. Failure to provide due process and forced financially draining appointments. Using unregulated services that have no professional recognition.The denial of the ability to address grievances. The bar association is no place to go with complaints. They are dismissed immunity due to the policy of the state rather than the guidelines for attorney conduct in family law matters. The entire system is designed on the economy rather than the rights of people. The best interest of children is based on the funded projects in the state.
AnonymousSeptember 19, 2024
Connecticut has been a giant government experiment for some time. Dispite the failing experiment they keep going. The self reported studies should be the first clue. The failure to break down statistical data. The use of equity and inclusion is for state benefit. The money is not going to the people. It goes to the state for it's projects. As soon as people complain they are engaging in hate speech. Unfortunately Boyne was. His information was tanted but probably very accurate in regards to the cases. Hundreds and thousands complaining. It's causing a great divide among gender and race. They brought religion in government affairs. There is no separation of church and state that is because of the state of Connecticut.
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
What kind of good data has Connecticut state government gathered? 🤔
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
Any evidence available to prove any of that?
White PowerSeptember 17, 2024
Stay strong brother Boyne! We will use ALL the freedoms afforded to us by the US Constitution to free you. ALL the amendments!
* 🤔 *September 17, 2024
Is that you, Divide and Conquer?
Boyne’s a eugenicist?September 17, 2024
Before embracing spiritualism, Besant was well known as a Fabian Society eugenicist and social reformer.
After discovering spirituality through Theosophy, she continued to promote eugenics, except now infusing the racist doctrine with a thick coloring of spiritual Aryanism and the ‘root race theory’ invented by Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton and promoted by Blavatsky. During this period, Annie’s brother in law was Sir Walter Besant, an intimate of Sir Charles Warren who acted as Treasurer of the Palestinian Exploration Fund, member of Quatuor Coronati Lodge and expert in Kabbalism.
Connecticut has you coming and goingSeptember 18, 2024
If you are white and complain you are a racist. If you are black and complain you are using black privilege.
We’ve ALL been fooled.September 18, 2024
Connecticut’s coming and going … black this and white that … yadda, yadda, yadda. That kind of chaos has been on purpose all over the world for a very long time. In “Order out of Chaos”, the chaos is to be the prompt for the mandatory “new world order”. Everything’s all lined up for the chaos and the order to be lucrative business ventures. BlackRock will do very well.
Remember Peter, Paul and Mary? Puff the Magic Dragon? Blowin’ in the Wind, peace, love and all that? Mary passed away a few years ago and the sale of her home is pending. Photos of her home and belongings to be sold in the estate sale this weekend are online.
A Ukrainian flag flies in front of her home instead of a flag for peace. Her friends and family might have a good explanation for that. Maybe some are Ukrainian? Still, peace is peace — not war.
And, what kind of leaders set everyone at each other’s throats?
Was Margaret Sanger a racist? Why wasn’t she jailed for saying horrible things about people and jailed for infanticide? Did Burton-Marsteller play a role in the chaos of the 1960s and 70s?
“Family courts” destroyed hundreds of millions of families all over the world and we’ve been fooled. We’ve all been fooled. Not one “side” or the other. All of us, all together.
AnonymousSeptember 21, 2024
”so high and so deep” … yet we are many and they are few.
We’ve ALL been fooled.September 18, 2024
“…Margaret Sanger worked as a visiting nurse in the slums of the East Side …”
“… By the turn of the twentieth century, the neighborhood had become closely associated with radical politics, such as anarchism, socialism, and communism. It was also known as a place where many popular performers had grown up, such as Eddie Cantor, Al Jolson, George and Ira Gershwin, Jimmy Durante, and Irving Berlin. Later, more radical artists such as the Beat poets and writers were drawn to the neighborhood …”
More information about the unworthy families, unworthy children and “the world population problem”.
Gotta say, I’ve never felt such sweet, sweet schadenfreude.
Paul Boyne is a vile, evil individual, modern day Nazi, and I’m glad to hear he got punched in the head in prison.
#sorrynotsorry
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
What was the purpose of The Family Court Circus website?
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
An outlet for a racist antisemite to present his evil belief system to the world, make threats on people’s lives, and its great evidence that he takes zero responsibility for losing custody of his children all those 18 years ago. Would you trust Boyne to watch your kid? He lost custody because he is an evil, sick individual. That Had jack shit to do with any “jewish conspiracy.”
So I guess you are also an antiSemite who believes he lost custody because of a Jewish conspiracy? If blaming da Jews is what you call exposing court corruption, you are seriously deluded.
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
All I asked is: What’s the purpose of his website?
Mirror, mirror on the wallSeptember 18, 2024
That sounds just like the William Tong speech. Equity and inclusion is no longer used for college admission. When the same issue is brought up for employment. Complaining about it at a college level is alright, just don't bring it up for employment. The hint of questions and you are a racist. It's difficult to tell in the Connecticut family court system who is really the narrastist. It's definitely not a Jewish conspiracy. I would not want several of the judges, guardian ad lithiums, attorneys or custody evaluators watching my children either.
Mirror, mirror on the wallSeptember 18, 2024
What's your opinion on judges and attorneys handing children over to sexual predators?
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
My opinion is you are a cuckoo Q-anon antisemite dum dum.
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
How much are you paid annually for this opinion?
LocoSeptember 22, 2024
More evidence you’re a Q-anon nut. No wonder you adore Boyne.
AnonymousSeptember 23, 2024
No one adores Paul Boyne. Maybe they can sympathize with Paul discussed with the Connecticut family court. The distrust that has continued in the state of Connecticut. The lack of support from public officials. The lack of transparency. The fact that the Connecticut attorney general has the influence over a department of justice investigation. The state denied the residents a fully functional inspector general's office. Equity and inclusion is used to obstruct people from speaking out and programs that don't serve the public.
Excuses to call people namesSeptember 24, 2024
Who is giving money to the Catholic Church to defend sexual assault cases? Who is using a minority platform to change the legal system for sex offender who are prodomitly white? Who decided Paul was denied access to the library to help his defense? In all of the comments the continued focus has been on his racist and antisemitism. Where is the concern for the fear of the people speaking out about the courts? The lives that have been lost to a failing system? The focus on the color of one's skin to change the judicial system when it effects all community members? Who decides that father's should be the main focus of the welfare of children. How much money is Connecticut collecting in HHS funding to keep the entire mess going? Who is really benefiting? It's not the minority community collectively still living in poverty and violence. The money has just been funneled in a different direction. People are being pitted against one another. Economic growth and development over justice, peace and a civil society.
And Pullman and Comley has the collateral.September 25, 2024
Who is giving money to the Catholic Church to defend sexual assault cases?
Parishioners.
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
They receive money from the state of Connecticut
AnonymousSeptember 26, 2024
They also received money from the Roman Catholic Church to collect, store (and probably share without permission) the “History of Clergy Sexual Abuse of Minors in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Bridgeport and the Diocese’s Response to that Abuse, 1953 to the Present”.
How did Mr. Holzberg pull off that trick?
“The Long March Through the Institutions”October 8, 2024
Imagine what Connecticut’s “family court” cabal could do with all the information Robert Holzberg gathered.
The real story in ConnecticutSeptember 18, 2024
The censoring of the press in Connecticut
Where is the outrage article from Norm Pattis? Perhaps censored from the Connecticut Judicial press. In 2024 Norm Pattis was interviewed by the Middletown press in the promotion of criminal justice reform related to child molestation and sexual assault of children.
“A Delaware Judge Jane Jurden just helped to destroy the market for human souls, and for that I am grateful. She refused to send a self- confessed child rapist to prison, letting him instead walk out of the courthouse doors, to begin a lengthy period of probation and treatment as a sex offender.”
” Robert H. Richards an heir to the DuPont chemical, plead guilty to sexually abusing his 3-year-old daughter. The allegations came to light when his ex-wife sued him for money damages. ”
” If there is substantial evidence that prison rehabilitates people, I've missed it. Prisons are a human warehouse. For some, they serve as crime schools, a place to mingle with other living outside the law to learn better how to frustrate the law's process. ”
” For others, too many others, prison is the place to be ignored, their mental health issues placed out of sight and out of mind. For many, prison is a place to mark time, a region of suppressed violence where boredom is the biggest challenge faced. Prison is a waste land.”
It is very interesting to me that the state of Connecticut has gone to great links to silence the coverage of Paul Boyne's case. A racist antisemite that converses with a Jewish journalist from Chicago. Nichola Cunha lock up in women's prison over the weekend for expressing discrimination from Jewish attorneys, yet Boyne is not allowed in the law library and continues to rot is prison. While Connecticut focuses on the rehabilitation of child molesters.
Criminal Justice reform doesn't just affect petty crimes. Is the fear of judges and the secrets of family court more important than crimes committed against children in the state? Is the criminalization of Paul's speech less newsworthy than keeping child molesters out of jail? We can plea bargain mentally unwell child molesters freeing them from jail, but Paul Boyne remains in prison for hate speech and intense suggestions of harm to family court judges?
With little to no media coverage in Connecticut and no outrage from Norm Pattis fearless friend of the friendless. Friend of the public defender's office taking responsibility for the state of Connecticut Guardian ad
litems in the state. Is Paul Boyne a threat to judges or a threat to the state? Exposing the family court system and criminal justice reform project in the state.
Is Paul less worthy of friends than a child molester? Are children molested in Connecticut less worthy of friends than the perpetrator of the crime?
AnonymousSeptember 18, 2024
Correction 2014. Who decides which humans are worthy of friends at the court house?
Selective program that serve the stateSeptember 19, 2024
Criminal justice reform is for the convince of the state of Connecticut. It doesn't apply to everyone. The prison system is just what Notm Pattis says it is. The prison system was made to keep the dangerous people some where away from the public for safe. These people are not getting rehabilitated on the outside either. Where is the effort to reform Paul Boyne? He's locked in the wasteland, unable to get to the law library. A year and a half in no psychologist or physicist? He's “delusional” The state of Connecticut is concerned with the stigma of sex offeners . Yet they never miss an opportunity to stigmatize the thousands of people complaining about family court. The state of Connecticut is not serving the residents. They are serving themselves.
Re: Connecticut’s attorneys and psychiatristsSeptember 19, 2024
2015
“… Defense attorney Andrew Bowman read to the judge during Friday’s hearing a psychiatrist’s evaluation of his client. Bowman said Collins had no history of sexual deviance or a propensity for violence or psychopathy, indicating his client does not suffer from being a sociopath. …”
2021
Former Westport Lifeguard Arrested Again; Charged with Stalking at Compo just Years after Hundreds of Voyeurism Counts
“… Bowman said Collins had no history of sexual deviance or a propensity for violence or psychopathy, indicating his client does not suffer from being a sociopath …”
AnonymousSeptember 19, 2024
Why is “the state” handling the Boyne case and the Grillo case so differently?
The AG office’s different approaches in those two cases prove:
There’s something weird about West Haven.September 19, 2024
Does West Haven politics have something to do with it?
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
What in today’s politics doesn’t have something to do with it?
Is it “family court” — or something else?September 19, 2024
“Bowman said Collins had no history of sexual deviance or a propensity for violence or psychopathy, indicating his client does not suffer from being a sociopath. “
Tong is a friend of the stateSeptember 19, 2024
Tong responds that defending state officials and departments is his job.
He cannot comment on specific pending or recent cases. But in general, he argues, ” when the facts support that somebody's been harmed. there is a process for us to make it right. That's why we have cases. That's why we have courts. That's why we have judges, …
' I's not the judge, jury and executioner. I am the state's lawyer. I have a constitutional, statutory and ethical obligation to represent my client zealously.”
Krayeske argued that the Attorney General's “client” isn't just the government officials, in question, or generic “taxpayers” but citizens harmed by the state as well. ” Oct 26.2022 The New Haven Independent
AnonymousSeptember 19, 2024
☝️ this mentality is heavily influencing the department of justice. Connecticut Attorney General William Tong vice president of the United States attorney general's. Protecting the ” projects” not the people.
Silence 🤫September 24, 2024
☝️ The FBI is part of the department of justice. The homeland security. All heavily influenced by Attorney general William Tong. Boyne left out of media coverage , locked in the cell. Probably found unfit and placed into chemical restraints.
State of smoke and mirrorsSeptember 19, 2024
The covering up of news coverage in Connecticut
NARSOL National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws Cindy Prizio sitting on the editorial board of the CT mirror. Cheerleading for sexual offenders to be allowed off the sex offender list. Grateful to the office of policy and management for conducting studies. Including programs in our schools.
” Connecticut should not settle for the destructive legacy, of Connecticut's sex offender registry list which has been unable to demonstrate any success at reducing sexual assaults and is counter to rehabilitation. PEOPLE ON THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY HAVE A HARDER TIME FINDING EMPLOYMENT. In the last 25 years a variety preventative, stopping it before it occurs. Three quarters of children are assaulted by someone they know (usually a parent). According to the latest statistics. For the last 25 years the court system has been using parental alienation. Since 1999 about the time of welfare reform act.
Cindi Prizio is with one stand for justice
50% of child sexual assaults are committed by other children (no appointments in the Antar case)
Children are less likely to report than adults, (usually report to the other parent.) People who have been assaulted should receive restorative justice, INSTEAD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE. Called the victim offender dialogue. So, they can heal. (no one is healing Connecticut is a war zone)
Who wants to move past the stigma and dehumanizing labels?
Liar, brainwashed, malicious alienator, Munchausen mother, Narcissists, borderline personality, unspecified personality disorder, perhaps that is how they plan to get out of the stigmatizing label. For about 20 years now. Stay tuned for the contempt hearing for Machelle Tricones, for exposing the custody evaluation. How many children reporting sexual assault were labeled “not creditable ” like Mawhinney's former spouse. Other forms of domestic violence are no different. Criminal justice reform and family court. Lowering recidivism rates or lowering reporting? ” The leader of criminal justice reform and the one of the worst family court systems in the nation. 7th safest state according to reports.
This is complete and total bullshitSeptember 19, 2024
Victim and offender dialogue is when the victim, there family and the perpetrator meet face to face in a safe setting. Welcome to reunification therapy.
Connecticut MommaSeptember 20, 2024
If these sexual predators don't like the consequences and the stigma of their actions it's to bad. When is someone going to step up for the victims?. Paul Boyne may not be perfect, but he stood up for children who were molested. I'm not a racist or an antisemite. I don't condone violence. I condone prosecution of the court appointed so called professionals for covering it up. Shame on the Connecticut family court judges. There are several assisting to allow the cover up. Shame on the public officials. Thanks to Paul Boyne people are being let in on the sexual predator reform movement to cover it all up. ” Criminal justice reform” is not just for the dispersion of incarcerated of black/ brown people. Connecticut has decided to lump the pedophile/ sexual batter project in. ” I wish everyone was as progressive as I am” Steven Stafstrom
Move out of ConnecticutSeptember 20, 2024
Philanthropy: the sexual offender reform projects. Our new CT supreme Court justice is less about equity and inclusion. More like the sexual offender reform.
AnonymousSeptember 21, 2024
the controlling of the media by the Connecticut Mirror
The stretch of criminal justice reform and made into a minority issue.
September 10,2023
Twenty -five years after Connecticut required them to register as a “sex offender” ex post facto, they hope legislators will soon take action.
If anything, the threat of being put on the offender list has helped. The threat of being on the lifetime registry has put the ” if you can't do the time, don't do the crime in perspective.
The article goes on to state:
Furthermore, research shows that polices passed in response to sex crimes have disproportionally affected black men who comprises more than a quarter of the people on the registry.
Travor Hoppe. a sociologist professor at the University of North Carolina Greensboro who studies of race and the registry, think its coincidence given all the country has invested into protecting white children.
In Connecticut half of the sex offender registry list are white and the largest number of children who are victims are white, according to Connecticut's data.
” You never investigate whether having a registry as you have it makes a safer or not” said Gary Winfield D-New Haven ” you just assume so because you believe the punishment is harsh, and I don't think that's a smart way for us to operate”
The registry is the least of the sex offender problems, just look at Connecticut Family Court. The majority of these case are not minority involving accusations of child sexual assault in family court. It's being labeled a minority issue by the Connecticut Mirror and the state of Connecticut.
When do the victims get to have a say? When do the children or their parents of the children victims get to have a say? Why and when has this been made into a minority issue? For the convenience of criminal justice reform?
Who Connecticut is trying to cover up sexual assault?”. It's not Paul Boyne.
PhilanthropySeptember 22, 2024
The rich white daddy cover up. Has anyone seen Norm Pattis or his associates down at the criminal court house with Black or Hispanic defendants living in poverty? Better yet, has anyone seen Norm or his associates with a White defendant living in poverty?
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
“progressive” isn’t always what some think it is
No more silenceSeptember 25, 2024
A mother and two children landed in the hospital in Bridgeport today due to a domestic situation. No names in the article, perhaps in family court. . Complaints against the Bridgeport police department detective investigating rape, police officer in Bridgeport on trial for rape. The police chief collecting pension in the job. Administration involved in high conflict family court cases. Criminal justice reform and progression? A re evaluation of Connecticut politicians is in need. Sexually assaulted, and almost dead for federal funding and cost savings.
Liu BinjieSeptember 20, 2024
Justice is the soul of the news.
AnonymousSeptember 20, 2024
If Paul’s so smart, why did he write “Jews” instead of “Freemasons”?
If two questions to be answered here are “What is journalism?” and “How free is The Freedom of Speech?”, maybe it will help to take a few steps back to look at the bigger picture and the longer history. For example, random Wikipedia contributors report:
On September 16, 2003, the CIA sent a letter to the United States Department of Justice (DoJ), requesting a criminal investigation” of the Plame “matter”.
At some point around that time, the Justice Department questioned Jeff Gannon, “the journalist” about the Plame case. Before or after that, George W Bush told Americans in a January 28, 2003, State of the Union Address:
“The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”
Was that the truth or was that a lie?
The Bush administration invaded Iraq on 20 March 2003. About a half million people were killed and actual warmongering got worse and worse.
I hope every morally sound person in state and federal offices reading this will think about this question:
Who’s introducing the most potential for violence in Connecticut, across America and in the Middle East: Paul Boyne or state and federal offices?
Another question: Which employees in which state and federal offices think it’s a good idea to jail Paul for over a year without properly investigating any of his complaints and without prosecuting anyone involved in the blatant corruption in Connecticut family courts?
If the Justice Department didn’t ask “Jeff Gannon” real questions — and then moved on to provoke war by omission and/or commission … which led to division and radicalization in America and war after war after war (how many has it been since 2003?) … that should worry every thinking person.
Continuing to jail Paul without addressing what Connecticut AFCC, Inc. etc. did in the family courts for the past 40 years won’t make the public less prone to radicalization.
Please do the next right and honorable thing, everybody.
Who said Paul is smart? I’ve never heard that said by anyone.
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
His teacher who taught him when he was young.
GeorgeSeptember 20, 2024
“The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism.”
AnonymousSeptember 20, 2024
Department of justice: Smart Rodger Przbyiski sex offenders are 30 to 45x more likely to get re-arrested than the general population. Connecticut, Massachusetts and Maryland are reporting the least amount of sexual assaults per population. Has Connecticut done something incredible with crime? Or covering it up in the family court system?
AnonymousSeptember 20, 2024
Oji source 30 % recidivism after 10 years. 52% recidivism after 25 years. Connecticut says they are not at risk after 5.
Dear Richard,September 21, 2024
… Wyatt DuBois, the school’s director of University Public Relations, told The Associated Press on Friday that Penn State is not challenging the distribution of newspapers on the racks or otherwise. However, it is prohibiting the newspaper’s sale of advertising space on university premises that is occurring outside of the actual publication, since that violates two university policies. …
Okay, that makes sense.
Here’s what doesn’t make sense: Lately, those with objections to objectionable content have gone after website hosts — the platform providers— asking them to “de-platform” objectionable content creators. YouTube warns content providers with three strikes, right?
When did those who objected to Paul’s vile rants contact the web host of “The Family Court Circus”? Did anyone, ever?
What took so long for authorities to silence Paul the publisher — and did anyone ever contact the web host of “The Family Court Circus”?
His lawyers should at least wonder why the vile content is still online while Paul Boyne sits in jail.
AnonymousSeptember 21, 2024
Has anyone FOIAed communications between Connecticut state authorities and WordPress? Isn’t Connecticut’s new Inspector General providing any kind of oversight? Which law enforcement office hasn’t asked for the content to be removed?
AnonymousSeptember 21, 2024
Connecticut inspector general is limited to the deaths occurring in police custody and corrections. He has given no authority to investigate fraud and waist. Connecticut citizens were denied an inspector general for years . Conveniently for the state of Connecticut.
AnonymousSeptember 23, 2024
Do Connecticut legislators and the governor not see the need for an inspector general to investigate the deaths and destruction in the “family court” networks?
When will the Mawhinney trial begin? Who will investigate “Dr.” Stephen Herman? He was supposed to conduct a proper investigation in the Dulos case and didn’t.
On September 9, 2015, task force members discussed federal funding of state programs, the value of fact-finding to achieve their goals and the importance of data collection to determine how federal funds are used in the state agencies handling various aspects of domestic violence and abuse cases involving minor children.
Stephen Grant, Executive Director of the Court Support Services Division, stated that every discipline with Court Support deals with domestic violence. He listed his priorities as being:
1) Identifying and addressing barriers to interagency communication and information • Increase amount of information across spectrum • Provision of timely thorough and accurate information to key decision makers
2) Look at trauma informed evidence based care • 78% of children were either direct victims or witness to domestic violence • These children need support on multiple levels
3) Emphasize prevention strategies
In follow-up, Karen Jarmoc asked Mr. Grant if there were differences in policy between the different divisions of CCSD, and whether there is a guide for the 1500 employees.
Mr. Grant replied that the themes are the same, but the policies of different divisions are slightly nuanced based on its own statutory charge.
He also stated that guidance for the employees is embedded in the over 800 policies of the CCSD. Clinical guidance is provided as well.
At about the 1:01:58 minute mark, Mr. Grant communicates with someone off-camera with hand gestures.
What were those gestures?
Is Mr. Grant still a state employee? Were his gestures used to hide important facts about the federal funding of state programs? Did employees of CSSD deceive the public four years before Jennifer Dulos disappeared?
If Kent Mawhinney’s former law partner, Mr. Mawhinney and Stephen Grant are all Freemasons, the public might not ever be told the truth about what’s been happening in the “family courts” — especially if those three men all swore oaths such as:
… Nor will I talk of the vices or defects of another brother mason, but will apprise him of his errors in private; also keep secret all things which should remain so. …
… 🙄September 24, 2024
…
AnonymousSeptember 26, 2024
“Has anyone FOIAed communications between Connecticut state authorities and WordPress”
You don't understand how websites work.
If I recall correctly, Paul had web hosting on an overseas server that couldn't be subpoenad from the U.S.
WordPress wasn't hosting any of his content.
It's kind of like…if Paul were an artist, WordPress is the crayon. The overseas server is the museum where Paul's drawings were stored. And that overseas museum doesn't have to obey a subpoena from the United States to turn over all of Paul's artwork or to take it down.
AnonymousOctober 2, 2024
“Powered by WordPress”
means the authorities can contact WordPress to ask them to remove any content they find to be offensive.
Kind of like the worst authorities can do whatever they want to do.
AnonymousOctober 2, 2024
Sorry, but no. WordPress is literally just the template used in this case. WordPress has zero access to the content on the web server.
AnonymousOctober 4, 2024
If certain individuals involved in the Connecticut “family court” racketeering and cover-up contacted Detective McCord to arrange for a fishing expedition a few weeks ago, they should be ashamed of themselves. They won’t be ashamed of themselves.
In the past, Detective McCord had the courage to go after human traffickers and now, Connecticut’s “family court” human traffickers expect Detective McCord to investigate “family court” victims who visited The Family Court Circus website? Is that what’s happening now?
Will Detective McCord help the “family court” human traffickers or will she investigate the victims of human trafficking?
Sidney Horowitz and his colleagues worked to destroy Paul Boyne’s family. As the father of his family, Paul should have been angry that Sidney Horowitz tried to destroy his family.
I hope and pray that Detective McCord will be smart enough to investigate Sidney Horowitz and his network to find out what Mr. Horowitz had to do with the writing of the 2014 GAL/AMC training materials.
Detective McCord and her colleagues should note:
In Connecticut, GALs and AMCs are taught to ignore allegations of “child porn” on computers. In Connecticut, GALs and AMCs have consistently ignored allegations and disclosures of sexual assaults of children involved in Connecticut’s “family court” cases.
If Detective McCord is good and smart, she will eventually find the “kids for cash” racketeering networks in Connecticut “family courts”. She will find those public-private networks started in the 1970s. She will find those networks have promoted the sexual abuse of children and she will find that the New Haven FBI office ignored the actionable evidence they gathered in their 2014-2015 “public corruption” investigation.”
In Summary:
Connecticut AMCs and GALs are taught to ignore “child pornographers” … who are human traffickers … and Detective McCord is supposed to investigate human traffickers.
What happens next?
AnonymousOctober 8, 2024
Looks like Detective McCord is part of the problem or is now afraid to address it as she once did.
Notice all the purple in politics.September 22, 2024
Does the corruption in Connecticut family courts have something to do with the Canaanites calling themselves Phoenicians in the 12th century BC?
This Day in HistorySeptember 24, 2024
… Devils Tower National Monument was the first United States national monument, established on September 24, 1906, by President Theodore Roosevelt …
… The name “Devil's Tower” originated in 1875 during an expedition led by Colonel Richard Irving Dodge, when his interpreter reportedly misinterpreted a native name to mean “Bad God's Tower”.
All information signs in that area use the name “Devils Tower”, following a geographic naming standard whereby the apostrophe is omitted.
Maybe Paul’s mad about the crimes Sidney Horowitz and others committed against him and against his family.
Is the state spending so much time and money to hide the crimes committed in the Boyne case?
Simple solution:
Investigate the crimes committed in the Boyne case. Prosecute the criminals who committed those crimes. Investigate the 40 years of racketeering in Connecticut “family courts”. Prosecute the criminals involved. Ask Paul to apologize for getting so mad about the racketeering. Ask WordPress to remove all illegal content. Learn from this process and do better in the future.
Yesterday, Dr. Lee testified as a witness in Karen Riordan’s children’s case.
As Mr. Ambrose questioned Dr. Lee, I saw and heard Dr. Lee tell the Court about fifty times in common terms that she is afraid of Mr. Ambrose. Throughout her testimony, she asked the Court for protection for herself and for her colleagues. She looked and sounded perfectly reasonable when asking the Court for that protection.
Instead of acknowledging Dr. Lee’s concerns and directing the witness to follow the state’s procedures whenever witnesses intimidation is a factor in a case, the judge coldly and simply directed Mr. Ambrose to continue his questioning.
After Mr. Ambrose asked Dr. Lee to answer certain questions, Dr. Lee turned to the judge and asked the judge to allow her to present that specific information to the Court privately. Dr. Lee didn’t ask the judge to accept the requested information to the Court “under seal”.
Instead of using legal terms to ask for commonly used procedures in cases such as that case, Dr. Lee asked the Court to accept her information privately.
Dr. Lee is a psychiatrist, not a lawyer.
Since Connecticut’s family court system doesn’t expect nonlawyers to know legal terms and procedures, what was said and done yesterday looked and sounded very much like the judge attempted to use Dr. Lee’s use of common language against her.
Two or three times, the judge told Dr. Lee she would need to ask a lawyer for advice about protection as a witness in the case. I don’t remember the exact words he used. He might have told Dr. Lee to hire a lawyer … to discuss her request with a lawyer … to find a lawyer …
My general impression of the words the judge used told me that he wanted Dr. Lee to know how difficult he would make it for her to continue to be involved in the case.
When most Connecticut judges hear laypeople testifying and asking for protection in non-legal terms, how do most Connecticut’s judges respond?
How should they respond? What does the law say about witness protection?
Are there specific procedures Connecticut judges can and do follow to protect testimony and evidence non-represented laypeople offer to the Court?
The judge could have closed the court, yesterday.
He could have told Dr. Lee: the Connecticut court allows witnesses to present information “under seal”.
The judge could have stopped the hearing to allow Dr. Lee to file the information she wanted to present “under seal” at the next closed hearing.
Journalists covering that case should order the transcript of yesterday’s hearing. They should count the exact number of times the judge offered Mr. Ambrose advice during the hearing, even though Mr. Ambrose is an attorney.
Turning to Dr. Lee, the judge told her that he would consider using her refusal to answer the questions in public against her.
I tried to check my email this morning and was denied access to my email account. That has never happened to me before.
If anyone reading this has any recommendations for good and honest law enforcement officers/detectives, please post those recommendations in the comment section or send those recommendations to The Frank Report.
Specifically, I would like to know who might have accessed — or tried to access— my email account after that court hearing.
Thank you.
* see comment aboveSeptember 25, 2024
Still shaken by what I witnessed at the hearing yesterday, I was logging into my email account, missed a few characters and hit return. I also missed the details in the message posted in that screenshot up there. That message wasn’t intended for my account and all’s well so far. I hope it stays that way.
100%September 28, 2024
…
AnonymousSeptember 29, 2024
The firm in which Judge O'Neill comes from received millions and in ppp loans during covid. Right before he was nominated to be a judge. These are the things that make you wonder if people have alligence to serving the public or is there a greater influence at hand. Kinda funny how he was put on the case right away.
Not funny at all.October 1, 2024
Did he have any experience with cases such as that case when someone put him on that case? Who put him on that case and why did they put him in charge of that case? His involvement looks like lawfare.
The boys clubOctober 3, 2024
I don't think it's about the money at this point. Connecticut is not going to admit fault. They are going to protect future financial interests.
I totally agree.October 4, 2024
It’s a cover-up.
AnonymousSeptember 30, 2024
Dr. Bandi Lee is sick.
All she does is diagnose anyone who disagrees with her. No wonder Yale fired her from her unpaid position. You know you’re incompetent when they don’t even want you working for free.
By the way, is she even still a doctor? last I heard, her medical license was expired.
I would trust Brandi Lee over the court appointed ones. Yale is a fatherhood funding school. Heavily invested in parental alienation in there psychology department. Hartford is the same. Brandi Lee didn't fit in at Yale. It's a for mysognist and women haters . Anyone who has a had a different experience?
Back scratcher boy's club in CTOctober 3, 2024
****** Thomas O'Neill was a top donator to senator Gary Winfield also sitting on Connecticut judiciary committee in 2014***
The boys clubOctober 3, 2024
Why Gary Winfield didn't need to keep talking. Gary Winfield is a “special interest” senator that doesn't represent the public. He dominated the state of Connecticut with special interest. Has Gary Winfield ever been to a women's prison? Has Gary Winfield been to a domestic violence shelter? He dominates all the hears. Anyone who dares speak out against criminal justice reform. If you you are not a ” special interest” politician your outcast. Other demographic need not speak out or it's hate speech.
The boys clubOctober 3, 2024
Correction. Hearings. Gary Winfield has obviously not hit the streets where people live. Most inner City residents will tell you the juveniles are the problem. Lack of consistency legally for the parents with children gone wild. The gangs are using children because they get in less trouble and records go away. The police officer are scared to do their job. . Definitely some bad cops out there.. Racism exists and antisemitism. Not on the level perpetuated. More funding increasi
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
Of course there are a few spiritually sick souls in control of Hollywood. However, no spirituality sick souls control anything else. 👀
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
Everyone working in Connecticut “family courts” knows what’s happening.
AnonymousOctober 3, 2024
All targeted if they open their mouth doesn't matter what color.
AnonymousSeptember 25, 2024
Dr. Lee said about 50 times in court she is afraid of Chris Ambrose??
Dr. Lee is an incompetent nutjob. I would have more compassion for her if she wasn't trying to weaponize her credentials for use against innocent private individuals.
She needs a mental health evaluation. Early onset dementia is one possibility.
Still shaken by what I witnessed at the hearing yesterday, I was logging into my email account, missed a few characters and hit return. I also missed the details in the message posted in that screenshot up there. That message wasn’t intended for my account and all’s well so far. I hope it stays that way.
I’m currently looking for good and honest authorities/detectives anyway with the authority to appropriately address the unaddressed “family court” corruption and actionable crimes committed in Connecticut.
If you have suggestions, please post them in the comment section or send the info to Frank Report.
Thanks again!
AnonymousSeptember 24, 2024
Michael Volpe reported:
The judge had been prepared to sentence Boyne to time served, which would have meant his release that day. Instead, he says his Connecticut court-appointed lawyers, Jennifer M. Buyske and Alice M. Osedach Powers, blindsided him with a competency claim.
Richard, has anyone ordered a transcript from that hearing? The pages with the details about the proposed plea deal would help. Do we have a copy of that transcript?
Since someone involved decided incompetence is now the focus of the case, someone should identify who, among all involved, was incompetent first.
Most of the world considers the immoral to be incompetent. After we define morality, let’s wonder how many incompetent individuals were involved in the Boyne case.
When did Paul first complain about corruption in his family court case and who received that complaint? Then what happened? Keep going to find out exactly where the incompetence began.
Paul Boyne advocated for the protection of children in family court cases involving substantiated sexual abuse. What do the local authorities think about that?
Were his efforts to protect children in those cases not worthy of help from local authorities?
Whether or not the Boyne case is currently as mishandled as most of the most horrifying “family court” cases are: Which state and/or federal officials are looking into his concerns about crimes committed under the auspices of Connecticut “family court”?
State prosecutors should consider the obvious: The direction local politics and this case seem to be going most definitely isn’t competent.
Connecticut is silencing a nationSeptember 25, 2024
Paul Boyne is accused of cyberstalking family court judges. He's not on sitting in jail for antisemitic and racist comments. Did any of these judges go into hiding? Did the stop public appearances? Only Paul can truly answer the question as to the point of the blog. For most Connecticut residence the blog was a warning about the corruption in the states family court system.
As most who have been public about the court proceedings, is to bring awareness to the unethical administration of marital disillusion. The tactics used in the courthouse to strip of you of your assets. As well as the children held hostage for a price tag.
I use the word disillusion for a good reason. That it is an accurate summation of the house of smoke and mirrors. The continued support of the government in Connecticut to allow it to continue. The legal harassment and name calling of the people who are complaining about it.
All these attorneys and so-called psychological professionals have made a real mess here in the state. Leading to questions, is Attorney General William Tong misusing his power and position to cover it up? Are the state legislators misusing their position on the judiciary committee to cover it up?
Good luck finding a jury that has not been affected by the family court system in Connecticut. Everyone knows someone, who has been through the trenches of Satan's kingdom. How many people have been harassed during court procedures, by attorneys, GALs, AMCs, court appointed psychologist and judges? How many have feared for their lives and wellbeing? The safety and well-being of their children? How much of Paul's case, the investigation into Volpe is William Tong's influence over the department of justice? How much is William Tong's position as the small state of Connecticut's attorney general effecting the entire countries family court system? How much influence does Richard Blumenthal have over the Boyne case? The silencing of Connecticut residence and the entire country about the family court system?
The Blogs was over the top and much of the linguistics were not supported by the Connecticut residence. The exposure of the people creating the hell hole was and still is. Why are Connecticut politician's working so hard to silence people around the country? Why did all those republican attorney generals leave the Attorney Generals association? Why was William Tong promoted to Vice President of the U.S, Attorney Generals?
If ever there was a case for a defense attorney this would be it. However, they would lose their license to practice in all likelihood. Is Paul Boyne being tossed under a Connecticut bus? Is Mike Volpe next on the hit list? What about Luthmann and Parlato?
Who decides which people have friends?September 27, 2024
Norm Pattis suspension was overturned in May of 2024. He has withdrawn from representing Alex Jones. He no longer represents Nichola Cunha. The black lives matter 860 took a run at Norm Pattis law license for using the N word in a stand up routine. The Christian legal society has requested the removal of eithical standards so they are free to express their opinions on personal matters. Family court litigants are still seeking counsel for having assets and having their children taken in family court proceeding, for expressing concerns over the well-being of their children.
AnonymousSeptember 29, 2024
Lisa Kouzoujian is one of the worst GAL’s out there. She openly touts her friendship with judges when someone challenges her and omits material things during status conferences, This stupid disgusting old hag, who wobbles into the courtroom should be disbarred.
AnonymousSeptember 29, 2024
Which case(s) do you think she mishandled?
Lack of competence for a plea deal.September 25, 2024
Lack of capacity to accept a plea? 🤔
Sec. 53a-13. Lack of capacity due to mental disease or defect as affirmative defense. (a) In any prosecution for an offense, it shall be an affirmative defense that the defendant, at the time the defendant committed the proscribed act or acts, lacked substantial capacity, as a result of mental disease or defect, either to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to control his conduct within the requirements of the law.
(b) (1) It shall not be a defense under this section if such mental disease or defect was proximately caused by the voluntary ingestion, inhalation or injection of intoxicating liquor or any drug or substance, or any combination thereof, unless such drug was prescribed for the defendant by a prescribing practitioner, as defined in subdivision (28) of section 20-571, and was used in accordance with the directions of such prescription.
(2) No defendant may claim as a defense under this section that such mental disease or defect was based solely on the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosure of the victim's actual or perceived sex, sexual orientation or gender identity or expression, including under circumstances in which the victim made an unwanted, nonforcible, romantic or sexual advance toward the defendant, or if the defendant and victim dated or had a romantic relationship.
(c) As used in this section, (1) the terms mental disease or defect do not include (A) an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct, or (B) pathological or compulsive gambling, and (2) “gender identity or expression” means gender identity or expression, as defined in section 53a-181i.
It’s called “lawfare” for a reason.October 4, 2024
Incompetent now because of a concussion? 🤔
Why did his defense attorneys reject the plea deal offered (1 1/2 years time served) if they’re so concerned about his health and well-being?
How does incompetence at the time the defendant committed the alleged act or acts have anything to do with a concussion affecting his abilities now?
The pre-trial judge thought time served is enough.
It looks like someone somewhere in Connecticut with political connections wants to silence Paul — and whoever that is has the most to hide.
White PowerSeptember 26, 2024
Thank you for staying strong and exposing the evils of the Jews and their minions, Brother Boyne!
You are doing God's work!
AnonymousSeptember 26, 2024
You posted a few short comments such as the comment above. Will you tell us more about your concept of “white power” and Paul’s connection to your organization?
Or, are you a trolling to divide our state and our nation?
AnonymousSeptember 26, 2024
Hi there Connecticut, looking for damage control. Stop posting these types of games. We are well aware of the color cover up. Connecticut is exploding the minorities to make money. Using Biden's equity and inclusion program. The money is going to enrichment of the state. Paying for the benefits, retirement and ” perks”. It's time for the Republicans to speak up. Bipartisan agreement on the ” money maker” . HHS funding and nonprofit organizations. It's not God's word to divide a nation.
Quick questions for “White Power”September 27, 2024
What do you think of those who say they are something and are not?
Do you think Francis Bergoglio says he’s a Christian and is not?
Note: In 1973, at 36—just three years a priest—he was named the head of the Society of Jesus in Argentina and the boss of Jesuits many years his senior.
Do you think we should blame all for the sins of the few?
What’s your heritage, if you don’t mind answering?
“Birds of a feather flock together.”September 27, 2024
…
Go Red this fallOctober 1, 2024
Hate speech and hate crimes. Targeting an entire group of people and excluding them.
AnonymousOctober 1, 2024
Connecticut is conveniently leaving surtain people out of the conversations.
AnonymousOctober 8, 2024
Who are ”surtain people”?
Some say they’re Christians & Jews and are not.October 9, 2024
That snake building’s 1/2 in Vatican City and 1/2 in Rome 🤔
… Lange’s Commentary says: “Peter’s words, literally, mean: ‘I regard you as a man whose influence WILL BE like that of bitter gall [poison] and a bond of unrighteousness [lawlessness], or, as a man who has reached such a state’.” (Vol. 9, p. 148). … It is also interesting to note Peter’s statement that Simon was to become a “gall of bitterness.” People today may not realize the exact meaning of such a phrase, but no Jew in the First Century was in any doubt as to its meaning. It was a figure of speech adopted from the Old Testament which denoted going over to the idols and abominations of the heathen. Read Deuteronomy 29:16-18 and see how plainly this figure of speech is used. When the Apostle Peter applied to Simon Magus the phrase “gall of bitterness,” he meant that Simon would be the responsible party for the introduction of heathen beliefs and idols into Christianity. The prophecy takes on a new and important scope when we realize this real meaning of Peter’s prophecy.
No wonder Jude later says, speaking about the very men who followed Simon Magus (including Simon himself): “For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ORDAINED to this condemnation” (Verse 4). What Did Simon and the Samaritans Believe? One of the most scholarly of early church historians was Harnack, who wrote an extensive seven-volume work titled The History of Dogma. This man is recognized as one of the top authorities in the world on this subject.
He states: “Long before the appearance of Christianity, combinations of religion had taken place in Syria and Palestine, ESPECIALLY IN SAMARIA, insofar as the ASSYRIAN and BABYLONIAN religious philosophy . . . with its manifold interpretations, had penetrated as far as the eastern shore of the Mediterranean” (Vol. 1, pp. 243, 244).
The Bible tells us in II Kings 17:24 that most of the Samaritans had been taken to Samaria from Babylon and adjacent areas. Later on, Ezra informs us that others who were mainly of Babylonian stock came to Samaria (Ezra 4:9-10). These people amalgamated their Babylonian religious beliefs with some of the teachings from the Old Testament. But they NEVER DEPARTED basically from their own Babylonian-Chaldean religious teachings.
… There were originally five Babylonian tribes who had been transported to the area where Northern Israel once lived before Israel’s inglorious defeat and captivity by the Assyrians. When these five tribes moved INTO the vacant land of Samaria, they brought their Babylonian and Assyrian gods with them.
… “So these nations feared the Lord [calling themselves God’s people], AND served their graven images, both their children, and their children’s children: as did their fathers [the Babylonians], so do they unto this day” (II Kings 17:41).
These people called themselves the worshippers of the True God, but were actually Babylonian idolaters. What Deities Did the Samaritans Worship? It will pay us to notice the gods and goddesses that these forefathers of Simon Magus brought with them to Samaria. The people from the City of Babylon adored SUCCOTH-BENOTH; the Cuthites: NERGAL; the Hamathites: ASHIMA; the Avites: NIBHAZ and TAR-TAK; the Sepharvites: ADRAM-MELECH and ANAM-MELECH. The first deity is SUCCOTH-BENOTH, a goddess. It was Semiramis in the form of Venus. Listen to Jones in his Proper Names of the O.T., p. 348. He says the name signifies “Tabernacles of daughters.” It means: “Chapels made of green boughs, which the men of Babylon, who had been transported into Samaria, erected in honor to Venus, and where their daughters were PROSTITUTED by the devotees of that abominable goddess. It was the custom of Babylon, the mother of harlots, and therefore HER SONS DID THE SAME THING IN SAMARIA.”
What about the god NERGAL of Cuth? We are informed by McClintock and Strong’s Encyclopedia that the name signifies “the great man,” “the great hero” or “the god of the chase,” i.e., the Hunter. In other words, as the Encyclopedia further points out, he was a form of NIMROD. This Hunter-god was honored by the people of CUTH for Arabian tradition tells us that CUTH was the special city of NIMROD (vol. VI, p. 950). The next god was that of Hamath: ASHIMA. Jones shows us that he was the great pagan god of propitiation, i.e., the god who bore the guilt of his worshippers (p. 42). This god was the pagan REDEEMER — the OSIRIS of Egyptian fame or the dying NIMROD.
The Avites worshipped NIBHAZ (masc. — the god of HADES) and TAR-TAK, “the mother of the gods”. This last-mentioned goddess was supposedly the mother of the Assyrian race, or, as Jones says, she was SEMIRAMIS (see p. 354). The fifth Babylonian tribe worshiped pre-eminently two gods. ADRAM-MELECH and ANAM-MELECH. The first was the “god of fire,” the Sun or the Phoenician Baal (Jones, p. 14); the second was “the god of the flocks” or the Greek HERMES, the Good Shepherd (p. 32).
… SIMON MAGUS was a Babylonian priest. He was a part of the Babylonian community that had been living in the land of Northern Israel ever since the Northern Ten Tribes were carried away captive by the Assyrians. God tells us that these Samaritans, as they were called, were claiming to be the true people of God while at the same time practicing many heathen rites which came directly from Babylon (II Kings 17:41). … This was the type of religious environment in which Simon Magus was born. This was the environment in which he commenced his own ministry and was finally proclaimed the “great one . . . the great power of God” — that is, God Himself (Acts 8:9-10).
… Harnack a church historian, states that Simon Magus “proclaimed a doctrine in which the Jewish faith was strangely and grotesquely mixed with BABYLONIAN myths, together with some Greek additions. The mysterious worship . . . in consequence of the widened horizon and the deepening religious feeling, finally the wild SYNCRETISM [that is, blending together of religious beliefs], whose aim WAS A UNIVERSAL RELIGION, all contributed to gain adherents for Simon” (Vol. 1, p. 244).
Simon can be classified among the major group of so-called Christians (and Simon called himself such), called by Harnack the: “decidedly anti-Jewish groups . . . . They advance much further in the criticism of the Old Testament and perceived the impossibility of saving it [that is, the Old Testament] for the Christian UNIVERSAL RELIGION. They rather connected this [universal] religion with the cultus-wisdom of BABYLON and SYRIA” (VoI. 1, p. 246).
With this background, we can understand why Peter so strongly rebuked Simon for his Babylonian ideas. Peter prophesied that this was the man who was to be the “gall of bitterness, and bond of iniquity” to the True Church. Simon’s attitude was corrupt in the extreme!
The Bible shows he had been working through demons. And yet, he finally called himself a “Christian.” Dr. McGiffert, speaking of Simon Magus, says: “His effort to rival and surpass Jesus very likely began after his contact with the Christians that Luke records. His religious system was apparently a SYNCRETISM of Jewish and Oriental elements” (Hasting’s Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, Vol. 2, p. 497)…
… “Two independent traditions profess to preserve the teaching of Simon, the one betraying the influence of Alexandrian allegory, the other of Syrian and Babylonian religion” Dictionary of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 11, p. 516). …
A Few Questions:
Was Simon Magus one of the first Freemasons to fool Jews and Christians into Gnosticism?
Paul Boyne kept writing about the Talmudic influence on Connecticut “family courts”. Is he right about that?
What kind of Judaism and Christianity do the most corrupt in Connecticut “family courts” practice?
If the Middle East is leveled into “glass” or a “parking lot” will we have allowed the corruption of a few to destroy this world’s three largest monotheistic religions?
Which small group of people decided open and honest discussions about religion in politics is more dangerous to the world than the destruction of this world’s three largest monotheistic religions?
PaulOctober 12, 2024
And no wonder. For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light.
AnonymousOctober 10, 2024
Since that hasn’t been in the news, how many know what it is?
Gary Cohen fanSeptember 29, 2024
The “whites” have been losing power in America for some time now. America is now a country where whites are the minority, and it’s not thanks to the Jews, it’s thanks to other whites!
🤔 Oh?September 29, 2024
Which “other whites”?
AnonymousSeptember 30, 2024
The rich white man are controlling everything. It's a puppet show. Where is all the money going? We are sitting on a surplus, yet the mess of DCF in the group homes. Federal funding not making it to where it is needed and belongs. Children sexually assaulted, trafficed and staff locking themselves in the car because it's out of control. The town resources over taxed and no help for the higher ups. Where was the DCF commissioner and the attorney general's office. Emergency funding with a plan to gain control over the place. Yet, Connecticut is holding to surplus? Everyone is getting out of jail on criminal justice reform. To the crime infested streets. The Hartford police officer are afraid to arrest anyone. Crime is down?
AnonymousSeptember 27, 2024
…
AnonymousSeptember 27, 2024
This case is more about protecting the AFCC than the harassment of Connecticut family court judges. If it goes to trail maybe people can sign up to testify. Did the blog inspire violence? Was it inspiration for Connecticut residents to demand an investigation and prosecution? Which William Tong has ignored. Along with the department of justice. Is William Tong and the state of Connecticut representing the people collectively or the AFCC? Thousands complaining and nothing is done. Three judges engaging in AFCC tactics reported on and the man hunt is on for the journalist reporting on it. Suggestions of violence not required.
Read this twice, two different ways.September 27, 2024
Lawfare damages more than blogs.
Impeach William TongSeptember 27, 2024
Under state statues and Connecticut Constitution, the attorney general has authority over civil matters. Responsibility for representing the people of Connecticut and the broader public interest.
AnonymousSeptember 27, 2024
Who is going to do something about the online crazies? Isn't that what they said at the conference? What better way then stop the press . I would think twice before voting in these Democrats.
Dear common flock,September 28, 2024
Now, at the present time, using violence would be premature. We are not yet ready to confront such an assault. Money must first of all seek maximum protection in schemes and in legislation.
Let us make use of the courts. Let us go forward as fast as possible at perceiving debts, at foreclosing (depriving of recourse to justice when a certain time limit has been transgressed) on debentures and mortgages.
When, through the law's intervention, the common people shall have lost their homes, they will be more easy to control and more easy to govern, and they shall not be able to resist the strong hand of the Government acting in accordance with the orders of the central power of imperial wealth, under the control of the leaders of finance.
Our top leaders are perfectly aware of the truth. They are presently working at establishing an imperialism of the capital to rule the world. But while they are implementing this plan, they must keep the people busy with political antagonisms.
We'll therefore speed up the question of reform in the custom rates by the political organization called the Democratic Party; and we'll put the spotlight on the question of protection and of the reciprocity by the Republican Party.
By dividing the electorate this way, we'll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever, and on which we only touch upon as instructors of the common flock.
It is thus that, through discreet acts, we can maintain what was so generously projected and executed with such a remarkable success.
Dear common flock,September 28, 2024
See one response on page 217.
… 🤔September 29, 2024
Here’s a response to the accusations of corruption in the banking and political systems.
Has anyone representing Connecticut family court administration published any response at all to the (how many thousands of?) accusations of crimes and corruption in the family courts? It started in the 1970s.
The high spirit of patriotism and of public service …
US taxpayers owe interest on $35 trillion in debt to whom?
Re: The Permissioned vs. The PermissionlessOctober 5, 2024
To the few now able to conquer this world
with “distributed ledger technology”.
AnonymousOctober 8, 2024
No apologies from anyone representing “family court” for all the harm done since the 1970s. So much harm done and no apologies should tell legislators something about the current state of “family courts” … eventually.
By the way, anyone recognize those two guys?
AnonymousOctober 9, 2024
Robert Horwitz and Jim Horwitz. Jim wrote, “Bystander Emotional Distress in Medical Malpractice Cases: An Update”, Greater Bridgeport Bar Association , News Brief, Vol. 13, No. 5., May, 2001
If Jim is Bob’s brother, Jim’s probably learned a lot about emotional distress from Robert’s bizarre psychology applications in his “family law” malpractice.
With no oversight for Robert’s cases since the 1970’s, Robert playing CT AFCC, Inc. “secretary” and Gerard Adelman playing CT AFCC Inc. “director”, it’s been one malpractice case after another.
Someone please tell me that Scott Gerard of Shipman and Goodwin didn’t join The Center for Children’s Advocacy board of directors to cover for Joette Katz of Shipman and Goodwin because she helped prosecute Paul Boyne behind the scenes after Paul exposed the CT AFCC Inc. public/private partnerships. 😳
It looks like Scott doesn’t have a whole lot of a lot of experience with children’s advocacy in this piece online:
Scott Gerard practices in the areas of commercial finance, corporate law and real estate. He has more than 30 years of experience representing commercial financial institutions in structuring and closing a wide range of sophisticated loans, including permanent and construction loans; tax credit financings; and asset-based and commercial real estate mortgages for hotels, multi-family residential projects, health care/senior care facilities, manufacturing facilities, public/private partnerships and retail properties. In addition, he has extensive experience advising clients on loan restructures and workouts.
Scott also serves in the capacity of outside general counsel to a variety of businesses, where he advises clients on matters such as business formation, structuring new business entities and forming joint ventures. In this role, he also provides guidance on mergers, acquisitions and the disposition of businesses.
In the area of real estate, Scott has represented major developers in all phases of real estate development.
Trafficking hubOctober 12, 2024
The children's law center is one of the is one of the most corrupt organizations in the state
AnonymousOctober 12, 2024
Have you seen more evidence of corruption in the Children’s Law Center or more evidence of “advancing progressive goals”? There’s a difference, you know.
What the blog represented to the publicSeptember 28, 2024
The public interest is a broad concept that refers to the general well-being of society as a whole. It's a key concept in the democratic theories of government, and it's often used in legislation and by the courts. The public interest is important because it helps to balance individual and collective rights. Ensures fairness in public authority decisions and built trust in the legal system.
When policymakers act in the public interest, they consider the broader implication of their decisions on things like health, safety. education and environment. The public interest can be applied to many areas.
Law, communication, politics,
Areas of public interest include freedom of expression, freedom of the media, public health and national security, and preventing and detection crime and fraud.
Wider public interest means the potential of proceedings to produce real benefits for individuals other than the client (other than any general benefit which normally flow from proceedings of the type in question).
What the family circus represented to Connecticut residence despite the suggestions, racism and antisemitism:
The general welfare of the public that warrants recognition and protection from the family law industry, the judicial employees, judges. Something in which the public as a whole has a stake, especially an interest that justifies.
AnonymousSeptember 28, 2024
Which public?
AnonymousSeptember 28, 2024
The entire public who may or may not have to go to the family court in the state of Connecticut.
AnonymousOctober 1, 2024
Wonder 🤔 what really happened. In 2012 Connecticut had a very big production on ” parental alienation” Joan kloth Zanard did a write up in the There was media coverage, I guess the media committee did not think those children had a right to privacy? Norm Pattis's client hadn't seen his triplets in 2 years. No alligations were brought up in the case, at least that were made public. Fast forward to 2024. 4 children were allegedly sexually abused by one of those children marked as alienated. It happened at a town Parks and recreation camp. The people in the town and the parents of the children were outraged that they were never informed of the alligations. The matter was being kept quiet 🤐. . It really makes you think what was really going on in that case? . Why did they try to keep the sexual assault alligations of 4 children under wraps for everyone? Who is hidding sexual assaults from the public?
Women for equal justiceOctober 2, 2024
☝️ Judges punishing mothers for breaking the silence. The judicial Media committee has noooooo problems allowing publicity on the Masterangelo case. Bias and the perception of the fatherhood funding narrative. Connecticut Cherry picking what the media reports on. DCF cases for fatherhood media campaign. 30 million dollars for hate crimes. No conversation on the war on women in the United States. No advocacy for women from attorney general William Tong.
1984 …October 2, 2024
How To Start a Court Watch ProjectNCJ Number 96648
Who graduated from Yale law School? The class of 1973. Who is influencing the government? Related to sexual assaults and family court.
Yale School of sexual predatorsOctober 6, 2024
Politics. Class of 1973.
The Jewish conspiracyOctober 6, 2024
The effects of the Jewish bar association/American Association of Jewish lawyers & Jurist Greater Wahington. The failure to separate church and state in the United States.
The American Association of Jewish lawyers and jurists were founded in 1983 and is affiliated with the international Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists. the American Jewish legal community, defending Jewish interest and human rights in the United States and abroad.
The effects of Jewish divorce on family law litigants by Alexander Leichter 2020
The “get” The get has become a tool to extort huge sums of money from a wife and/or her family, to force the wife to forego civil property rights and support or force her to cede custody of her children.
Looks a lot like exactly what is happening in Connecticut family court and the AFCC
Huh?October 6, 2024
🤔
The democratsOctober 6, 2024
The mission of Israel through the AAJLJ. specifically tailored interest of Jewish Americans law community. Including meetings with predominate Israeli leaders, such as supreme court justices, government officials, law professors legal and commentaries, and leading attorneys from across the Israeli politics, religious and ethnic spectrum. Another word using religion to influence courts. Using the ” get ” to extort money from people.
Shipman and Goodwin is where Katz went after her horrible running of DCF. Shipman and Goodwin received millions in ppp loans. Which were reviewed by Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy. The problem is not being Jewish. It's extorting money from United States citizens in family court, United States tax dollars to fund another country. Using religion as a defense. It's not fear so much as the ” get ” being exposed in family court.
AnonymousOctober 8, 2024
No offense, but when you blame an entire category of people for the crimes of a few, you’re part of the problem.
AnonymousOctober 9, 2024
One category of people is not the problem. It's the use of individual categories of people to protect a varied set. You are missing the point.
AnonymousOctober 10, 2024
When we clarify our points with specifics, examples and actual data, it’s easier for readers to not miss our points.
AnonymousOctober 11, 2024
Approximately 3 % of Connecticut practices the Jewish faith. 1/3 of the attorneys practicing in the state of Connecticut are Jewish. There are no statistics on psychologist providing court services. There are Jewish , Catholic and other referral services for attorneys. It's not that far fetched that Nichola Cunha would feel discriminated against. She was the only non – Jewish court professional in the court cases. Referrals are made in the legal industry. Including based on religion. Religion is a bias, does bias perceptions of marriage and divorce. There are multiple bar associations influencing law in the United States. The Jewish bar association appears the only bar association based on a religion. Influencing law including religious bias. Nichola Cunha didn't fit in to a specific bar association to protect her. There is legislation and organization assistance protecting fatherhood in family law. There was no legislation protecting Karen Riordan as the Mom in family law. There is all kinds of discrimination and bias in the legal system and the court of equity.
AnonymousOctober 11, 2024
51 % of the United States are women. 48 % of Connecticut's population are women. William Tong and Richard Blumenthal are heavily influencing law not just in Connecticut, but the attorney general's office. The Biden administration is heavy on equality and inclusion. Using this as a platform to influence law. Beyond protection of hate crimes. The number of people complaining out weighs the the number of legal professionals complaining, but William Tong and Richard Blumenthal are is ignoring it. A Big problem in Connecticut are not just the legislators. It's the Senitors and Congress. If you watch the hearing for the Connecticut supreme Court justice family court was brought up. Representative Fishbein brought up women in family court, then proceeded to bring up a story about a woman lying on a restraining order application. Giving a bias perceptions. Then brought up constitutional rights probly knowing that the ERA hasn't been archived, Not once did Representative Fishbein bring up child welfare and safety. The human rights of children. Connecticut continues to ignore the United Nations report. Continue to allow no choice in GALs. The supreme Court justice choosen in part by equity and inclusion. Let's hope he doesn't forget the broader spectrum of public Interest and safety.
AnonymousOctober 13, 2024
Craig Fishbein divorce attorney, state representative, ranking member of judiciary committee. Republican lock step legislation. In addition, legislative assignments public safety, and security committee, regulation review committee.
Steve?October 14, 2024
At a hearing, Craig seemed to wonder how O’Neil could go from corporate law to family law so fast.
Steve (almost giddy with excitement) predicted close to exactly what happened next. Was that just interesting, just a coincidence or just more back room deals kept hidden from We the Peasants?
AnonymousOctober 16, 2024
It's the same politicians coming up time and time again. On judiciary committee. Winfield and Stafstrom failed to let sexual assault legislation pass. Winfield is putting bills forward to protect pedipiies. Steven Stafstrom Bridgeport PD. Fishbein is on the safety committee. I smell something fishy in the nutmeg state. It's not coming from Boynes cell.
We need help 😭 from the FBIOctober 19, 2024
Connecticut inside investigator. The FBI an independent organization has a larger number of crimes statistics for Connecticut then the state is reporting. These politicians are sitting on judiciary committee. On public safety task forces. Many have reached out to the New Haven branch about Connecticut family court. How many crimes are being committed in the state family court system not reported?
FYI: Freemasons aren’t Jews or Christians.November 1, 2024
So much harm done to so many children and families after so many back room deals makes me wonder if Representative Stafstom (from Pullman and Comley, LLC) wore that black and white checkered tie as a symbol of his allegiance to lodge “brothers” somewhere at the expense of We “the profane”.
AnonymousOctober 9, 2024
How much of the United task Force have to do with family court? As well as psychologist using parental alienation? The unregulated practice and no limitations on billing.
AnonymousOctober 9, 2024
If you are paying attention to the political climate and projects in the state of Connecticut. The projects are based often on financials. Cost savings and added revenue. These are projects based on equity and inclusion. An important platform, but has been taken to another level. The alterations of statistics( not broken down) and the legislation being passed in the state. Not allowing people to identify as a mother or father. Changing birth certificate. Not allowing people to identify as they wish. Placing the rights of one person over another. It's unknown why Paul Boyne believes it is a Jewish conspiracy. It's well documented that the religious faith is playing a role in politics. As well as influence in the legal system. Their is bias in beliefs and beliefs of Sub groups are effecting politics under the Democratic party. Laws and legislation affecting the entire public interest that are based on a smaller group not the public as a collective group. . These are often based on financial insensitive and not based on overall population. Paul suggestions were made against a broad spectrum of legal system professionals. The shutting down of the speech beyond hate. The blog represents more than suggestions and hate speech. . It's the abuse of the judicial system and application of benefits the group in the legal system collectively financially benefiting over the broader spectrum of the public.
AnonymousOctober 11, 2024
Even the American Bar Association is fighting with William. Tong.
* 🧐 *October 14, 2024
Says who?
At the convenience of William TongOctober 16, 2024
6/20/24 William Tong with several other attorney generals office defending equity and inclusion to the American State bar and other companies. Programa that benefit a smaller group over the mass majority. Several of Connecticut programs receiving federal funding. They don't want to cut funding to violence against women. Equity and inclusion is at the convenience of William Tong and the Democrats. It's biasing many things including family court.
Falling on deaf earsOctober 19, 2024
They are trying to cut the funding that is critical to the group of victims in the state.
Should be from The Hartford Courant …October 6, 2024
… Meanwhile, Boyne insists that his prosecution is a politically motivated attempt to suppress his First Amendment rights. …
He's not wrong. The family court is all political .
AnonymousOctober 8, 2024
Beth Din of America (a court of Jewish law) which services Jews throughout the United States of America as a forum of arbitration dispute, through din torah arbitration disputes, obtaining Jewish divorces and Jewish personal status issues. As well as financial disputes. The Beth Din is affiliated with the rabbinical Council of America.
In Israel, the father's rights counsel advocacy group (IFRAC) represents divorcing fathers, grandparents, and children effected by divorce, in Knesset, congress Parliament and social welfare ministers. Some say Parental Alienation theory has had a negative effect on legal responsibility to assess children's safety and best interest.
August 1,2023 The Times of Israel blog. Alan Fishman
Reem Alsalem is the UN Human Rights Counsil Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls. On April 13, 2023, she issued a report on “the abuse of the term “parental alienation” and similar pseudo concepts. What does it have to do with Israel?
It's so happens that over the past decade at least and especially in the last 5 or 6 years, this dangerous and abusive pseudo concept has become all but the default mode of operation in many Israel's family court.
It is no secret that the social workers responsibility for best interest of the child recommendation in family court in custody dispute cases “parental alienation pseudo concept” as an undisputed truth was vigorously applied. When I was teaching these social workers for the ministry of welfare and suggested Gardener was controversial, I was abruptly removed from my teaching by a former student, no less.
At one point in time, the difficult dispute was referred to the special Assistant Unit, part of the court itself, highly trained NEVER inclined to the Gardener theory approach. The entire unit was “recast” and devoted towards the Gardener approach by the Justice Ministry Ayelet Shaked about 6 years ago.
I have been shocked by several cases where mothers pleaded that an evaluation of a child complaints that the noncustodial father abused them in visitation. When I reported that my best clinical judgement was the abuse was real, custody was abruptly awarded to the alleged abusing father on Gardnerian claims that were made.
Some of the children were teenagers that were treated for alienation. One daughter has filed suit against a social worker and the court for abuse. Another young man has come forward for dispel of damages for “treatment ” clearly inflicted with PTSD inflicted by the courts.
Channel 13's legal reporter, Baruck Kra made a two-part inquiry into the activities of Tel Aviv Family court justice and devotion to Gardner alienation extreme. Otherwise, the media seems to want nothing to do with it.
A mirror of what is happening in the United States, especially in Connecticut. The new term is child and Mother sabotage. It's a lucrative and increases the cost of family court cases.
Jewish and American Law. The religious liberty and equity are integral to American democracy. The US constitution protection of religious freedom and modern anti-discrimination laws have enabled the Jews to flourish in the US. Is it being used to cover up extortion in family court far beyond Jewish Court professionals? Is equity and inclusion being used to discriminate against the entire interest of the public in the legal system in the state of Connecticut?
Where is the investigation and protection to the entire greater public interest in the state of Connecticut? Antisemitism and racism are no good, neither is extortion to a large number of citizens from a system that is supposed protect them.
AnonymousOctober 11, 2024
It’s all political and/or all religious?
AnonymousOctober 12, 2024
and/or all a spiritual battle?
AnonymousOctober 8, 2024
Please explain the ways in which family court is “all political”.
AnonymousOctober 9, 2024
The politics of family law. Manasota journal of family Law
Fran Olsen 1984
Family Law like law in general, has two different aspects: an apologetic aspect and utopian aspect. In the apologetic aspect, family law tends to justify dominating women by men and the opposition of children by parents. Family law reinforces the most common forms of male dominance and patends to pacify family members by counseling from their scrutiny how damaging and restrictive family relationships often are. Furthermore, family law makes are present our present family relationships life seems “natural” and therefore unlikely to change very much. Family law encourages minor reforms and individual adjustment, while discouraging imaginative speculation or creative change in family structure. We forget that a radically different form of social life would seem equally natural once we had established it.
In utopia aspect, family law records successfully efforts to make reality of human association live up to our hopes and aspirations. Legal struggles have resulted in a variety of family reform and have increased options available each individual. Lawyers and judges have introduced notions of fairness into family life, they have created vocabulary necessary to argue for justice for women and children (now men). Most law scholarships focus on utopian aspects of law and ignore laws apologetic, legitimatizing roles. In family law, perhaps more than any other field of law, the
the literature tends to rationalize and criticize existing doctrines on a low level of abstraction. Focusing attention primarily on some purpose for reform.
The liberation of the family, the phenomenon I refer to should be understood in the context of these complex effects. The pre-liberal family, which I characterize loosely as the “feudal” family continues to exert an influence on law. The “feudal” family was a social, economic, and political unit of feudal society. The image of “feudal” family has continued to influence on law.
The father was the head of the household and still the hierarchy superior, but the hierarchy becomes more open to question.
Healthy marriage, fatherhood and economic growth of the nation.
Wake Up Call ☎️October 9, 2024
Joette Katz: “At a certain point, it stops being about free speech and becomes about real threats to personal safety,”
Sort of like the real threats in the Jennifer Farber Dulos case. After so much harm done in that “family court “ case, where were the apologies from the higher ups who ran that show? Did Ms. Katz ever mention anything in The Connecticut Law Tribune about the harm “family court” lawyers and evaluators did in the Dulos case?
Go to the 28:00 minute mark in the video of the ADL panel discussion. When it’s Josette Katz’s turn to speak, she hits the microphone with her hand to mimic the sound of the gavel and says, “All rise.” with a solemn expression on her face. It looks like she’s actually waiting to see who in the audience will stand to show her respect. Her audience is smart enough to know they’re not sitting in a court of law. She then says she was just joking. She wasn’t joking. She’s unhinged and her audience didn’t laugh at her joke.
Thanks to Richard for his courage. So many see the many little emperors who have no clothes. So few have the courage to say what needs to be said out loud.
Don't forget about Michael Volpe. He is one of the pioneers of the injustice of family court. Demonstrating courage to tell the truth dispite Jewish heritage. He went into the state of Connecticut with an open mind. Despite criticism from his own personal struggles, has not waivered from his view on the false alligations of ” coaching” and running the court house on a broad and undefined hypothesis. With out Mike Volpe very few would be interested in the injustice in family law industry. Richard has come in with some important facts. Frank has given an opportunity when Paul Boyne was shut down. The voice of the people. Thanks for the opportunity, even if we disagree on the points.
AnonymousOctober 11, 2024
You’re not allowed to disagree in America, anymore.
AnonymousOctober 11, 2024
When it’s Josette Katz’s turn to speak, she hits the microphone with her hand to mimic the sound of the gavel and says, “All rise.” with a solemn expression on her face. It looks like she’s actually waiting to see who in the audience will stand to show her respect. Her audience is smart enough to know they’re not sitting in a court of law. She then says she was just joking
She actually did that. Where are the yearly mental competency tests for government employees and unelected officials wielding so much power and control over so many people? Absolute power still corrupts absolutely.
AnonymousOctober 8, 2024
Maybe now, The Connecticut Post’s writers and editors will care enough about investigating and telling Connecticut’s residents about the state’s pathetic “family court system”.
Most residents have no idea what a nightmare it is until it’s too late. Thanks to Paul Boyne for working so hard to get the conversation going. Maybe now, the conversation will get going. Still, those heavily involved in the corruption will try to keep a lid on it. It will be up to the whistle-blowers in every office — especially the New Haven FBI office.
Whatever happened to Stephen Grant?October 8, 2024
… According to Boyne, the April 19, 2022, email involves multiple law enforcement officials, including Detective Samantha McCord, Assistant State's Attorney Brian Staines, Attorney Yuri Min, and Judicial Branch Court Operations Director Carl Chichetti. The email reportedly contains the note, “Katz Speak to Only,” suggesting that Joette Katz was directing communications or strategy related to Boyne's prosecution. …
Honorable Elizabeth A. Bozzuto succeeded the Honorable Patrick L. Carroll III as Chief Court Administrator on January 1, 2023. Can she tell us if it was Pat or someone else in that room who looked at Steve while Steve sent his secret hand signals? Everyone there was distracted by Steve’s hand signals. Did anyone there ask for an interpretation or just consider Steve to be crazy? Maybe they all use hand gestures to communicate with each other?
Anyone know what was going on in Connecticut’s Capitol and Legislative Offices that day? Is Connecticut state government keeping secrets?
This isn’t about “anti-Semitism”.
It’s about blatant corruption in the “family courts” for the past 40 years.
Any Jew, Christian or Muslim who knows about the corruption in Connecticut “family courts” and is too afraid to talk openly about that corruption is a coward and complicit in the harm done.
May Stephen Grant be in a witness protection program,
willing and able to tell us all everything he knows.
According to Tong's office, executives at competing companies communicated frequently via phone, email and text, with messages describing “how they unlawfully discouraged competition, raised prices and enforced an ingrained culture of collusion.”
Where’s the mainstream news reporting?October 8, 2024
I did have a chance to speak to Paul Boyne today about what happened. He explained to me that this week they were supposed to start jury selection for his case. However, Jennifer Buyske and Alice Powers weren't prepared to proceed with trial. They hadn't submitted any lists of witnesses, sent out any supoenas or prepared a list of exhibits for the court. In essence, they had done nothing. Instead, they spoke to the judge in chambers without Paul present and agreed to request a competency evaluation instead. Later, Alice Powers went to speak to Paul and informed him of their intentions.
Upon arriving in open court, his attorneys submitted a verbal motion to the court, but they didn't bother to submit a written motion. This gives me the impression that the move to examine Paul for competency was an off the cuff motion to obscure the fact that the attorneys weren't prepared. The grounds they provided were that Paul Boyne considered Joette Katz, former head of CT DCF, as part of the reason for his arrest. Also, they stated he had suffered a concussion, which did occur when he was attacked by another inmate. However, the doctor who examined him at the time did not indicate the concussion interfered with Paul's competency.
Another interesting fact Paul Boyne shared with me is that Kirschbaum Law, the firm his attorneys are associated with, is not contracted with the New Haven Judicial District public defender to provide services. It is contracted with Hartford and Waterbury, but not New Haven. I consider it a very questionable practice to provide services without a proper contract.
As a point of interest, I did look up whether it is legal for a judge to order a defendant to have a competency evaluation in criminal court. Apparently, it is legal. Apparently, “a court in Connecticut may order a competency exam for a criminal defendant if there is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the crime and the request for an exam is justified.” Justification for such an exam would be 1. the defendant appears delusional or incoherent; 2. the defendant has a mental disease or defect; 3. the defendant is unable to understand the proceedings against them; 4. the defendant is unable to assist in their defense. Number two appears to me to be unusually broad–like any kind of mental disease or defect? Any? Wow.
It does appear that the attorneys here are not acting in Paul Boyne's best interests when they nullify an advantageous, though unjust, plea deal in favor of a competency exam. This has led Paul to question whether Alice Powers and Jennifer Buyske of Kirschbaum law can continue to represent him legally since they appear not to be acting in his best interests.
In Connecticut, several state and federal offices can address crimes and corruption in family courts. Here are some key entities:
State Offices:
Connecticut Judicial Branch: The state court system itself has mechanisms for addressing misconduct within the courts. Complaints can be filed against judges or court personnel.
Connecticut State Police: If there are allegations of criminal activity, such as fraud or corruption, the state police can investigate these matters.
Connecticut Office of the Chief State's Attorney: This office oversees the prosecution of criminal cases in Connecticut and can investigate allegations of corruption or misconduct.
Connecticut State Ethics Commission: This commission handles complaints related to ethical violations by public officials, including those in the judicial system.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families (DCF): If the issues involve child welfare, DCF can investigate and intervene in cases of abuse or neglect.
Federal Offices:
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI): The FBI can investigate federal crimes, including corruption and fraud, that may involve family court proceedings.
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ): The DOJ can take action in cases involving civil rights violations or other federal offenses related to family court matters.
U.S. Attorney's Office: The local U.S. Attorney's Office can prosecute federal crimes and may become involved if there are allegations of corruption that cross state lines or involve federal laws.
If you suspect corruption or criminal activity in family courts, it may be advisable to consult with a legal professional or contact one of these offices directly for guidance on how to proceed.
AnonymousOctober 9, 2024
The Court held that the First Amendment protects the right to make comments that are so controversial that they may stir a crowd into anger. The Court set a high bar for public comments to be considered so disruptive to public order that it can be limited.
Only 5% of pt bruise from Botox. The bruising is not usually that large. Usually only last for 2 or 3 days. Some time 7. That's a large bruise for Botox. Not close to the eye , forehead or lip.
AnonymousOctober 10, 2024
Thanks for that information.
AnonymousOctober 12, 2024
The small bruise does look like it’s over “crow’s feet” wrinkles and those wrinkles are still there, right? How long does it take for Botox to work and how long does it take for a small bruise to form from a Botox injection?
Whatever happened to that lovely family, thanks for shining a bright light on “scumbag lawyers” who exploit family problems for profit in “family courts”.
Family courts shouldn’t destroy children and families for profit. Who designed that mandatory process of using government offices to destroy children and families for profit?
Can Paul Boyne save The Hebrews? 🤔October 10, 2024
…
Time to face this sad fact:October 10, 2024
We’ve all been fooled, in one way or another.
AnonymousOctober 13, 2024
Are objections to Talmudic law (as practiced in certain Connecticut “family court” cases) an existential threat for some lawyers and judges who favor Talmudic law over state criminal laws in child custody cases? If so, which state and/or federal office(s) should be available to host friendly public discussions about that?
Has any state government office offered to hear the concerns of citizens who have been victimized in “family court” mishandling of child custody cases?
When will Connecticut purge all of Richard Gardner’s theories and practices from all “family courts” and why hasn’t that been done already?
The problem isn’t Paul Boyne. The problem has been the total distain shown to citizens from the state’s executive, legislative and judicial branches.
In …
DOCKET NO. CV 22-6123129
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
v.
NICKOLA CUNHA
OCTOBER 10, 2024
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION …
Senior judge James W. Abrams wrote:
The court is convinced that much of the Respondent’s behavior was undertaken in the name of what she unfortunately viewed as zealous advocacy.
If that statement doesn’t do it, what else can eventually lead us to an official opening of much-needed public discussion?
(Apparently Paul Boyne’s blog hasn’t achieved that noble goal yet.)
Did Joette Katz write that article?October 14, 2024
“hot”?
Translation:October 20, 2024
Increased protection for criminals who target children.
Paul probably doesn’t associate with Freemasons. Kent probably does.
(note: the problem isn’t “the Jews”.)
WHICH federal/state employee did that?!!!October 13, 2024
“They’re using my conversations with Paul to establish probable cause in a search warrant,” Volpe said. “It’s a blatant attack on both free speech and press rights.
Will The Hartford Courant tell us what happened?October 13, 2024
Why is Yuri Min (working in the appellate court office) in those communications Mr. Cicchetti sent?
Ms. Min was admitted to practice law in 2021 and started working as a temporary assistant clerk in the appellate clerk’s office.
Where did those emails about Paul Boyne’s case go once they arrived in the Connecticut appellate court clerk’s office?
Were details of the New Haven office’s case against Boyne sent to the Connecticut appellate court clerk’s in Hartford for a valid reason?
Is Shipman and Goodwin and/or Ms. Katz on record representing any state office in Paul Boyne’s case?
Can anyone prove why those notes on the emails say what they say?
It looks like someone connected to Ms. Katz and/or just Ms. Katz told the public defenders to reject the plea deal offered in order to label Mr. Boyne as “crazy” for saying Ms. Katz has been steering New Haven’s case against him.
Is that what happened?
Re: Free SpeechOctober 14, 2024
FYI:
Hackers are gunning for the digital history of the internet after a targeted attack against the Internet Archive knocked out billions of archived webpages.
Non-profit digital archivist The Internet Archive is best known for running the Wayback Machine, a flagship library tool which provides users free access to archived versions of websites, many of which are otherwise no longer available online.
A pivotal platform for researchers, journalists, and anyone interested in the historical preservation of the world wide web, the Internet Archive confirmed it suffered a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack on Wednesday.
Charged … and then … <>October 14, 2024
< crickets >
Mawhinney is also charged with conspiracy to commit murder. Troconis was the first to stand trial beginning in January 2024.
Was the first female leader in the Connecticut Bar Association’s 137-year history railroaded for protecting children and families in Connecticut’s “family courts”?
“Judge Bruno was an attorney for 34 years before her nomination. Her state service included work as a special counsel to the Secretary of the State’s Office and she previously worked as a deputy chief clerk in New Haven Superior Court.
She previously served as (the first female) executive director of the Connecticut Bar Association and she served on the Federal Grievance Committee for District of Connecticut.”
… she has a Masters in social work. 🤔
She said, ““I was assigned to domestic violence docket in the Judicial District of Hartford in July of 2015,”
… with a Masters in social work. 🤔
Remember when the new corporate white-collar crime expert Thomas O’Neil somehow mysteriously replaced Judge Gladys Nieves in the Ambrose case right before Needle and Cuda’s “Jennifer’s’ Law” hearing?
In case anyone at The Hartford Courant is taking notes …
Judge Nieves is a graduate of Yale University, Class of ‘94 and the New York University School of Law, Class of’ ‘99. Nieves currently serves as a Connecticut Superior Court Judge. Prior to serving as Superior Court Judge, she worked for the CT Judicial Branch as a Family Support Magistrate, and as a solo practitioner with the Law Office of Gladys I. Nieves specializing in Family and Child Welfare litigation since 2007. Before starting her law practice, she worked for three years as the Senior Staff Attorney with the Center for Children’s Advocacy, as well as with the Legal Aid Society, Juvenile Rights Division in New York City. Ms. Nieves also worked as a litigation associate at the law firm of Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn and the New York County District Attorney’s Office, Family Violence Unit.
(back to what could have been Connecticut “family court” cabal’s case against Judge Bruno) …
The justices appointed Robert Devlin, the retired judge and federal prosecutor recently appointed as the state’s new Inspector General, to direct the investigation. He is given broad powers, including the authority to collect all of Bruno’s personnel and health records and order her to submit to further medical examinations, the ruling says. The order also requires all judges and judicial branch employees to cooperate with Devlin, something one judge called “significant and unprecedented” 🤔
… Bruno alleged in the filing that, “While I was in the doctor’s office Judge (Anna) Ficeto continued the harassment directed by Chief Court Administrator Carroll in leaving a voice mail on my phone that was critical of my taking time to attend to health issues.” 🤔
For the note takers: If Mr. Carroll worked with Mr. Goulden in the Milford court, is it possible there’s some shenanigans going on somewhere there?
Can Mr. Cicchetti persuade someone to ask Mr. Devlin to investigate how and why Mr. O’Neil presided over Mr. Goulden’s Jennifer’s Law hearing with Mr. Cuda instead of allowing Judge Nieves to hear those arguments? (Unless no one in the Connecticut executive, legislative and judicial branches is allowed to break the rules.)
Is Paul partly right? Can so many be so corrupted?October 15, 2024
From Connecticut’s government website:
Robert J. Devlin, Jr. Appointed Deputy Chief State's Attorney, Inspector General
September 27, 2021
The Honorable Andrew J. McDonald, Chair of the Criminal Justice Commission, announced today that the Commission has appointed Robert J. Devlin, Jr. as Deputy Chief State’s Attorney, Inspector General.
The appointment, for a four-year term, was approved by a 5-0 vote of the Commission at its meeting today at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford.
“The Criminal Justice Commission congratulates Judge Devlin on his appointment as Deputy Chief State’s Attorney, Inspector General,” Justice McDonald said. “We are confident that Judge Devlin’s long and distinguished career in the judicial system will help him take on this very challenging and important job. The Commission was very fortunate to have four extraordinary applicants come before us today. We want to thank those outstanding applicants who stepped forward and sought this important position.”
The Deputy Chief State’s Attorney, Inspector General, is responsible for leading the Office of the Inspector General, conducting investigations of peace officers in accordance with C.G.S. §51-277a, as amended by the Act, prosecuting any cases in which the Inspector General determines a peace officer used force found to not be justifiable pursuant to C.G.S. §53a-22 or where a police officer or correctional officer fails to intervene in any such incident or to report any such incident, as required under subsection (a) of C.G.S. §7-282e or C.G.S. §18-81nn, as applicable. The Inspector General also will make recommendations to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council established under C.G.S. §7-294b concerning censure and suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of a peace officer’s certification.
Did the new Inspector General only investigate Connecticut “family courts” in Alice Bruno’s case? Not before? Not after?
His investigators didn’t see any corruption in the “family courts”? 🤔
AnonymousOctober 18, 2024
The “Chair of the Criminal Justice Commission”? 🤔
Has any state and/or federal office ever investigated obvious corruption in Connecticut’s “family courts”?
If some kind of small mysterious Connecticut/New Haven group is investigating Michael Volpe because of his independent investigating and reporting, how many others will that small mysterious group investigate next?
Is their list available for public review or does that secret group keep secret lists?
If you want to fix the curruption in family court it starts with the public safety committee. These people are responsible for ensuring the safety of the public. Looking into organized crime.
AnonymousOctober 21, 2024
Why haven't the 600 women in the state of Connecticut contacting the public safety committee? Who's now advocating for women in the state? Equity and inclusion doesn't apply to women. Equity and inclusion apply at the convenience of the state of Connecticut. Running gender bias programs attached to the MOU. Couresive control laws apply in family court at the convenience of the state of Connecticut. Karen Riordan was drained of her finances by an attorney making emails and phone calls. Ran to the head of the family court bar association with information that was attorney client privilege. This is far beyond the attorneys . These are deep seeded political projects bringing money into the state of Connecticut. The public is not benefiting for the legislation. Congress is the start of the problem. The Senitors and Congress people kick it to the legislators.
When will another look save lives in Connecticut?October 20, 2024
October 2024:
Texas' junk science law was the first of its kind in 2013 and a model for other states across the country, according to legal experts. California, Connecticut, Michigan, Nevada and Wyoming have similar “junk science” statutes
Evaluations based on nothing, which provides no medical benefit, that insurance doesn’t cover (because the medical community does not recognize them), and parents are fleeced tens of thousands of dollars to pay for, under threat of sanction, losing their kids, or in some cases, potential imprisonment.
A problem the local PA industry leaders are pushing with custodial interference. They say it is the ” court professionals” this group has definitely been instrumental in the Connecticut family court system problems. Often guiding the government in Connecticut with financial insensitive. They are using a discrimination platform to silence Paul. I don't think these judges are really threatened. They have not cleaned up one bit. They are using the government resources to shut everyone up. The major law firms seem to be getting hired and benefiting. The majority of the state is aware of the family court system collision/ corruption. A jury trial is going to bring it to a head. Every gender, race and economic class knows this. Even BlackLivesMatter 860 Hartford put out a statement. Blogger Paul Boyne may not have been justified in his actions, but he is not wrong about…,….. So they are going to toss him in the Looney Bin.
Joette Katz and who else sent Boyne to jail? 🤔October 20, 2024
Why did the lawyers kill the plea? Why isn’t Kent Mawhinney in jail? Why are Joette Katz and Samantha McCord involved in the Boyne case and the Mawhinney case? 🧐
December 12, 2018
Harford Courant
The wife of a man described by police as a self-professed dungeon master who sought sex with an underage girl said she was “absolutely stunned” to learn of her husband’s secret life. In a phone interview Wednesday, Laurie Hessler described herself as “devastated” when state police detailed the charges against Simon Hessler, her husband since 2003. … Hessler also said he had been training slaves for 20 years and had many customers between New York City and Boston, the warrant said. Police said they later found that Hessler's dungeon was located in the Vernon business he owns, New England Hospitality Management, Inc., 615 Talcotville Road. A search warrant was served there. Laurie Hessler said she knew nothing of the dungeon or anything else about her husband’s alleged predilection for sadism and underage sex slaves. In addition to running the hotel and the hospitality business, Hessler also was a leader of the volunteer ambulance corps in Ellington. “He came home every night,” Laurie Hessler said. “There wasn’t a night when he wasn’t home.” The two were married in July 2003 in Niagara Falls, N.Y. They have one biological child, a daughter born in February 2007. … McCord scheduled a drop-off of a “sixth-grade” girl at the trailer. The agreed-upon price for two days of “limitless sex (but no bruises)” – was $500, police said. The girl was to be handcuffed, gagged and blindfolded with equipment Hessler left in the trailer and a photo sent to him once that was done, the warrant said. When he received the picture, Hessler wrote in an email, he would reveal where the money was hidden in the trailer, the warrant said. … McCord enlisted the help of “a very petite narcotics officer from East Hartford.” At about 12:50 p.m., she sent Hessler a photo of the handcuffed detective wearing a black hood and lying in a fetal position on the trailer floor, the warrant said. Hessler “immediately texted back that the money was above the kitchen sink,” the warrant says. He was arrested after he drove up in a pickup truck, got out and approached the trailer, police said. Laurie Hessler turned over flash drives she found in the couple’s bedroom, police said. A state marshal served the divorce papers to Simon Hessler at Garner Correctional Institution in Newtown on Nov. 28. …
⬆️
⬇️
Simon Hessler was sentenced in 2020 to nearly 30 years in federal prison on several state and federal charges related to the creation and possession of child pornography, including images he had taken on his cellphone as he sexually abused a girl under the age of 12, federal court documents said.
Mawhinney, a suspended attorney who is awaiting trial on a conspiracy to commit murder charge in the death and disappearance of New Canaan mother Jennifer Dulos, is suing Hessler in state court over a defaulted mortgage originally backed by a third party.
Mr. Hessler is a Capgemini Fellow and Chairman’s delegate. He focuses on business transformation, business technology and the digital enterprise. He is also a board member of Bureau Veritas SA and head of Actideas. Pierre Hessler joined in 1993 Cap Gemini, where he served in several executive positions, notably as a member of the Directoire and as chairman and CEO of Gemini Consulting. He served on the board of directors between 2000 and 2012. Pierre Hessler started his career in 1965 in IBM Switzerland, holding executive positions in Europe and in the United States, notably as corporate vice-president for marketing, and general manager for marketing, services and operations of IBM Europe. Swiss and French citizen, aged 70, married with 2 children, graduate of the University of Lausanne with degrees in law and economics, author of “Media and Corporate Scandals”.
Paul Boyne needs to be in a witness protection program ASAP.
AnonymousOctober 22, 2024
I heard Argentina takes guys like him
It’s looking like a cover-up. 👀October 23, 2024
Have you heard about the corruption in Connecticut family courts and Sidney Horowitz illegal money making in the Office of the Public Defender’s AMC/GAL “training” when the “family court” destroyed Paul’s family?
writing articles isn’t a crime.
What Sidney Horowitz has been doing for decades in Connecticut “family courts” is a crime. Surely someone in the public defenders office remembers the crimes Sidney Horowitz and others committed against Paul Boyne.
Unfortunately, the public-private Kids for Cash industry sucked in so many unsuspecting participants. I don’t think Debora Del Prete had any idea what kind of “training” that was going to be. And she probably was too busy to find out how harmful that trading was. If she’s reading this, I hope she can find Robson’s “Family Court Primer” and the “Gavel” video.
AnonymousOctober 28, 2024
The public defender office is involved in the state curruption for sure.
AnonymousOctober 31, 2024
How so?
Also looking like a cover-up …October 23, 2024
when Paul’s “public defenders” refuse to defend him.
AnonymousOctober 27, 2024
Looks more like Paul is refusing to allow them to defend him. He is indeed mentally incompetent.
* 🧐November 12, 2024
They defended him .. by hijacking the plea agreement?
AnonymousOctober 20, 2024
Can a public records request tell us who called Leslie Lothstein?
Did Mr Lothstein and Mr Robson collect the data?October 27, 2024
Father Maskell was at the Institute of Living in Hartford, Conn. from October 1992 until April 1993, he told The Sun. He returned to Baltimore after an evaluation found no psychological or sexual abnormalities, and he was named pastor of St. Augustine's in August 1993.
An official for the Institute of Living said the cost of treatment at the Connecticut facility averages $ 900 a day. Officials of the Baltimore archdiocese have refused to say who paid for Father Maskell's six-month treatment in 1992.
Q: “And in an hour or half hour you get all the info and the form of DSM diagnosis?” asked Jim Smith.
A: “I do. Once in a while, I don’t. But for the most part, I do,” answered Dr. Robson.
Q: “Okay. And there doesn’t have to be a rapport developed or some…”
A: “Yes, there does.”
Q: “…in a psychiatric process?”
A: “Oh, yes.”
Q: “Does this take place in a half hour or an hour?”
A: “It takes place in three minutes.”
Q: “Three minutes. And in three minutes, your patients open up to you, right, to the deepest parts of themselves?
A: “Not all of them, but most of them.”
For those who still don’t know what happened:October 23, 2024
Former President Barrack Obama II said:
Look, I do not watch cable news. I really don't. There are times where I just, I don't understand how we got so toxic and just so divided and so bitter.
Dr. William Edward Burghardt Du Bois understood.
Read his letters to and from Joel Elias Spingarn.
The letters are archived, free and online (for now).
Coincidentally, Yale University has those letters.October 26, 2024
Will Judge Brown bow to powers-that-shouldn’t-be?October 23, 2024
… According to Boyne, the judge appears fixated on his refusal to undergo the evaluation while ignoring broader constitutional issues at play in his case.
The competency question stems from Boyne’s allegations that former Connecticut Supreme Court Justice Joette Katz has been secretly involved in his prosecution. Boyne’s refusal to drop these claims has raised concerns with the court about his mental state, but Boyne insists his accusations are grounded in fact. …
It’s the kind of state where powers-that-shouldn’t-be persecute good police officers instead of prosecuting the public-private “nonprofit” for profit Kids for Cash cabal in Connecticut “family courts”.
AnonymousNovember 7, 2024
STAMFORD — A family court judge has stricken from the record testimony and a psychological evaluation report that Fotis Dulos’ attorneys touted as being favorable toward their client.
If court evaluator “Dr.” Stephen Herman, Fotis Dulos’ lawyer Kent Mawhinney and/or Michael Meehan are members of some kind of secret loyalty oath club, Jennifer’s family, Michelle Troconis and Ms. Troconis’ family all have a right to know what kind of political machine they’ve been up against.
If Paul’s attorneys are so worried about “incompetency after a concussion”, why didn’t they accept the plea for time served (14 months) and/or let him go home with an ankle monitor?
That case is political.
AnonymousOctober 28, 2024
Yes it is. Goes in to the department of justice.
AnonymousOctober 25, 2024
Please post the latest article. Your coverage is important
🛅 …October 26, 2024
Richard Luthman asks the best questions.
Meanwhile, how can The Hartford Courant’s reporter and Paul Boyne’s attorneys have no idea about the most interesting rabbit holes surrounding Joette Katz’s case against Mr. Boyne?
The judicial Media committee has corrupted the press in Connecticut.
Please prove it.October 28, 2024
What’s the “judicial media committee”? Who formed that group and why? Where are their minutes and reports published?
judicial media committee membersOctober 29, 2024
We don’t need no stinkin’ minutes and don’t need no reports.
AnonymousOctober 29, 2024
When Inspector General Robert Devlin provided an overview regarding his role and responsibilities, did he happen to mention that he’s allowed to investigate corruption in the state “family courts”?
AnonymousOctober 30, 2024
Does someone in Connecticut think the inspector general’s only job is to intimidate well-meaning police officers?
Where’s the 2024 official list of “peace officers”?
According to the attorney general, “the performance of criminal law enforcement duties, police duties and police functions is property seen as encompassing one or more of the following activities: (1) enforcement of criminal or traffic laws, (2) preservation of public order, (3) the protection of live or property, and (4) the prevention, detection or investigation of crime” (Opinion 1993-028, September 21, 1993). Based on this definition, the attorney general listed the agencies and people in the state with police powers. We have updated the list to include Bureau of Child Enforcement officials, state and judicial marshals, and investigators in the State Treasurer's Office (see Table 1).
That’s a still from Anthony Mandler’s Run This Town film.
Is it a photo of a Marxist student from the 1960s or it it a young Mao Tse Tung? Whoever’s on that jacket, flashing so many revolutionary images for a few seconds looks like someone today is targeting already rebellious youth around the world today with subliminal stimuli.
Isn’t subliminal messaging illegal in the music industry or is it just illegal in advertising? At this point in history’s timeline, it’s hard to tell whether Hollywood or Connecticut family courts destroyed more families and more religion. Destroying families and destroying religion are Marxist goals and Hollywood is as good at destruction as Connecticut “family courts”.
Anyone looking for information about the photo in “Jay Z’s” video, searching online for “Marxist student image” might expect to see old photos from the early days of Mao — or photos from the “Chinese Cultural Revolution” around 1966 – 1976.
How many people in Connecticut would be surprised to see that a search for “Marxist student image” doesn’t produce old photos from China or the old USSR?
That search leads to new photos. New photos of the exact same social engineering. By the way, a lot of social engineering began and continues in New Haven, Connecticut with too much corruption, too much Complicity and too many coverups. Where are all the brave Hartford Courant reporters to report what’s been happening for far too long?
Who hides political and religious messages in public entertainment?
Those who control people with deceit.
AnonymousOctober 28, 2024
On Halloween, the State of Connecticut will seek to send Paul Boyne to a mental institution, never to be heard from again. He will be drugged up and silenced because certain Connecticut elites consider him dangerous. All of his conduct has been within the bounds of the law.
The Communists, we still let that happen calmly; and the trade unions, we also let that happen; and we even let the Social Democrats happen. All of that was not our affair. — Martin Niemöller
The Inspector General is a “peace officer”, tooOctober 30, 2024
How many mainstream news reporters, editors and publishers called the Connecticut Inspector General’s office to ask them for all public files regarding their 2022 investigation of potential criminal activity in Connecticut “family courts”? How many mainstream news reporters, editors and publishers know the Connecticut Inspector General is actually a “peace officer” — just like all the other peace officers that office is supposed to investigate. How many mainstream news reporters, editors and publishers know a Connecticut judge ordered the Inspector General’s office to investigate Connecticut family courts in 2022? How many mainstream news reporters, editors and publishers know that Paul Boyne has been complaining about corruption in Connecticut family court since around 2014? How many mainstream news reporters, editors and publishers suspect that a few involved in criminal activity in the state’s family courts might have an interest in keeping Mr. Boyne in jail to throw away the key?
Connecticut residents and taxpayers have a right to know whether or not the Inspector General’s office found actionable evidence of criminal activity in the family courts in 2022.
Connecticut residents and taxpayers also have a right to know whether or not actionable evidence of criminal activity in Connecticut family courts was sent to the DOJ in 2022.
Connecticut residents and taxpayers should also know whether or not any actionable evidence of criminal activity in Connecticut family courts was sent to the DOJ in 2014. (see the Connecticut Chapter of AFCC, Inc. records)
2014 was around the time Ted Taupier was arrested for complaining about corruption in the family courts in an e-mail to friends.
Did Paul Boyne start publishing details of actionable evidence of criminal activity in Connecticut family courts before of after Mr. Taupier was silenced?
Mainstream news reporters, editors and publishers must ask the Connecticut Inspector General’s office: What did the Inspector General’s office know about the racketeering in Connecticut family courts and when did they know it?
AnonymousOctober 31, 2024
The Inspector General’s job is to notice, investigate and refer actionable evidence of criminal activity — such as racketeering— to the DOJ.
Why hasn’t he done that yet? Maybe it’s because he doesn’t know which objectionable preferences and practices direct “family court” cases. Maybe he defers to what he assumes is the wisdom and experience of the providers of the “services” who submit bids for contracts with the state judicial branch.
For example, maybe he has no idea that one vendor who has “trained” thousands of individuals expresses extreme anti-Christian views online.
Maybe the Inspector General doesn’t know about what could be Isis worship pushed on Connecticut children and families. Does anyone even know what Isis worship would look like? If Isis worship were to subvert judicial branch training, who would notice? Who would know whether or not the governor might be okay with a little Isis worship subverting judicial branch training?
Maybe the governor’s okay with Isis worship If the governor’s okay with an Isis worshiper training family court vendors and family court employees, maybe the new Inspector General needs to be okay with that to keep his job. You know, go along to get along.
There’s no way to know what’s going on in Connecticut state government when so much governing is done behind closed doors.
Where are the erev rav today?November 1, 2024
How many people in Connecticut know who Helena Blavatsky is?
How many know why she would write: “… the kabalistic author of Genesis … “?
According to contributors at the Wikipedia site: Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology was published in 1877.
… When the Israelites left Egypt, they were accompanied by an ʿerev rav … Exodus 12:38
This information is also online:
… Rav Nathan bar Abba said in the name of Rav: “The wealthy [Jews] of Babylonia will be going to Gehennom.” When Shabtai bar Marinus came to Babylon, he looked for work but could find none. He asked for food, but no one fed him. He (Shabtai) said regarding them: “They must be descendants of the ʿerev rav, for it says (Deut 13:18), ‘and show you compassion to make you compassionate’—anyone who has compassion on people, it is known that he is a descendant of our father Abraham, and anyone who does not have compassion on people, it is known that he is not a descendant of our father Abraham.” …
Who knows who wrote what?
Here’s what we know for sure: We know who has compassion on people and we know who doesn’t.
AnonymousNovember 4, 2024
You know, sometimes it seems that the resistance to new evidence that changes history forever has to do with entrenched power in different institutions clinging to a version of the past that they've learned to benefit from for hundreds of years.
Connecticut taxpayer dollars at work …November 4, 2024
…
AnonymousJanuary 18, 2025
Everyone with extreme anti-Christian views
has been
Connecticut family court’s best friend.
All we can do is do our best and watch what happens next.
BTWNovember 1, 2024
Auditors said in the report released Wednesday the 2023 event at Holiday Hill in Prospect was attended by 340 people, including 142 PDS employees and 198 spouses, partners or children. An agenda for the meeting said the event included food, a rock wall for climbing, an airbrush tattoo station, a basketball shot contest, cornhole games, hula with a DJ, a ping pong tournament, musical dances and other family entertainment.
Does the of State of Connecticut still house prisoners in Virginia institutions?
Why did Ms. Katz & friends decide to jail Mr. Boyne in Connecticut for 1 1/2 years … and then tell a Connecticut judge that Mr. Boyne was too “incompetent” to accept the plea offered a few weeks ago?
What will Ms. Katz, the Kirschbaum office & friends do to Mr. Boyne next?
The New Haven Advocate (the Advocate) and the Hartford Courant (the Courant) haven’t reported Connecticut’s mishandling of the case against Mr. Boyne. Why haven’t they?
If Marxists control the press in Connecticut now … who would be surprised?
Marxists control Connecticut and lawfare’s the law of that state.
How did the case go from Harmon to Brown?November 8, 2024
In this article …
“Boyne said Judge Gerald L. Harmon had agreed to impose a sentence of time served.”
In the other article …
“Mahoney described what happened at a recent hearing, “Brown told Boyne there will be no further movement on his case, including resolution of his motions to reduce his bond, dismissal of the charges or suppression prosecution evidence, until the competency question is resolved.”
and …
Paul recently told me that when his lawyers first brought up competency, prosecutors washed their hands of it and said it was up to Jen and Alice to make the argument.
That recently changed, Judge Brown told prosecutors to “dig up dirt,” as Paul characterized it, at his last hearing, and everyone would come back to argue competency on Halloween.
In the May 16, 2023 State v. Gould, CR93-0383652 CIU #: 2022-0316
Preliminary Staff Synopsis and Findings, Ms Katz and Mr Kirschbaum worked together in the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney to reduce a sentence.
Did Ms Katz and Mr Kirschbaum work together — maybe with the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney to hijack Judge Brown’s plea offer?
Did Paul Boyne’s case go from Judge Harmon offering an agreement to Judge Brown blocking the agreement because of something Ms. Katz and Mr. Kirschbaum did?
Could a FOIA request disclose the roles Ms. Katz, Mr. Kirschbaum and Mr. Tong play in Paul Boyne’s case?
AnonymousNovember 9, 2024
Would the case ordinarily go from Mr. Harmon to Mr. Brown
~ or ~
were Ms. Katz and Mr. Kirschbaum just judge shopping?
Do the Barriaults know the Hesslers?November 14, 2024
It’s twenty-three miles from Manchester to Bristol, right under Hartford’s nose.
Wake up, Connecticut!November 16, 2024
The Connecticut “Democrat Shadow Government” (as some now refer to themselves) created many politically expedient myths to take the place of important facts about crimes committed against children and families in the state family courts. State employees call victims of the family courts “disgruntled litigants” and the “Democrat shadow government” prosecution of Paul Boyne is another example of the kind of myth Connecticut state administrators use to achieve political goals.
The Democrat “shadow government” first limited criticism of family court corruption with Ted Taupier’s private emails.
At that time, Taupier and Boyne were two of a few courageous men willing to speak up publicly about a horrific case involving what seemed to indicate some kind of “MK ULTRA” abuse of a young boy in a “ family court” custody case. Ted was furious about the cover-up of that case. His anger was a righteous anger. He didn’t act on that anger. He wrote about it in the email that the “shadow Democrat government” then used to arrest and jail him.
Paul Boyne’s response to the state’s restrictions on Ted Taupier’s freedom of expression took the form of over-the-top offensive speech on a blog to gain attention and to prove a point about the importance of freedom of speech.
Boyne seems to have been asking Connecticut residents to wake up about the reality of the state “family courts”. His outrageous, extremely offensive statements seemed to shout, “Look over here!!! The Connecticut family court system is a dangerous institution that’s destroying families! They punished Ted Taupier for speaking about the destruction of families! Pay attention! This is serious!”
Paul Boyne is now in jail. Pay attention. This is serious.
Late on the night of October 6, 1998, twenty-one-year-old Matthew Shepard left a bar in Laramie, Wyoming with two alleged “strangers,” Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson. Eighteen hours later, Matthew was found tied to a log fence on the outskirts of town, unconscious and barely alive. He had been pistol-whipped so severely that the mountain biker who discovered his battered frame mistook him for a Halloween scarecrow. Overnight, a politically expedient myth took the place of important facts. By the time Matthew died a few days later, his name was synonymous with anti-gay hate.
Stephen Jimenez went to Laramie to research the story of Matthew Shepard’s murder in 2000, after the two men convicted of killing him had gone to prison, and after the national media had moved on. His aim was to write a screenplay on what he, and the rest of the nation, believed to be an open-and-shut case of bigoted violence. As a gay man, he felt an added moral imperative to tell Matthew’s story. But what Jimenez eventually found in Wyoming was a tangled web of secrets. His exhaustive investigation also plunged him deep into the deadly underworld of drug trafficking. Over the course of a thirteen-year investigation, Jimenez traveled to twenty states and Washington DC, and interviewed more than a hundred named sources.
Connecticut’s Democrat shadow government still push myths for political goals. Look at the press conference after the election. Mr. Tong is supposed to defend the state, the people of the state and the law — not partisan politics. His oath isn’t to protect and defend the people of the state. It’s to achieve his own personal political goals, by any means necessary.
Good to know …November 21, 2024
The FOIC makes determinations about whether access to records have been improperly denied or whether exemptions to the law have been improperly claimed. It does not have the authority to determine whether public records are being kept improperly or destroyed prematurely.
That’s where the Office of the Public Records Administrator (OPRA) comes in. OPRA will review instances where records are potentially being destroyed improperly.
… By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The American people have witnessed the previous administration engage in a systematic campaign against its perceived political opponents, weaponizing the legal force of numerous Federal law enforcement agencies and the Intelligence Community against those perceived political opponents in the form of investigations, prosecutions, civil enforcement actions, and other related actions. These actions appear oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives. Many of these activities appear to be inconsistent with the Constitution and/or the laws of the United States, including those activities directed at parents protesting at school board meetings, Americans who spoke out against the previous administration’s actions, and other Americans who were simply exercising constitutionally protected rights. …
… By the administration’s count, Lamont gave 98 of the 179 judges their jobs. They include 51 women and 47 men, with diverse racial backgrounds …
Fascinating stuff, right?
From Andrew Kreig, author of Spiked: How Chain Management Corrupted America's Oldest Newspaper:
… CIA: As of today, 95% of the CIA documents within the JFK Act records collection have been released in their entirety, and no documents remain fully redacted or withheld in their entirety.
MISLEADING: The remaining 5 percent of documents amount to more than 3,000 records with redactions. These records include
— 44 ‘denied in full’ documents from the Joannides files;
— Schlesinger’s censored memo;
— Close-door testimony of CIA officers responsible for the surveillance of Oswald in Mexico City;
— Testimony of a senior CIA officer about why Oswald was not debriefed on his return from the Soviet Union;
— A 1963 job description for Anne Goodpasture, a CIA officer who handled a tape of Oswald’s voice, remains redacted.
— FBI report on a “daring” marksman identified by friends (and Cuban intelligence) as a Dealey Plaza gunman …
Knowing what we know about the history of corruption in government and mainstream news outlets, what should we expect from the release of the JFK files? Was Andrew Kreig right about the above documents? Did those documents ever exist?
Definitions of government and news don’t include terms such as “secrets”, “deceit”, “purposeful division” and “order out of chaos”.
AnonymousMay 16, 2025
The Court on OCTOBER 3, 2024
… Petitioner Paul Boyne (“Petitioner” or “Boyne”), a pretrial detainee incarcerated at MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution, filed a habeas corpus action challenging the constitutionality of his pre-trial detention. On June 14, 2024, the Court granted Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that the court should abstain from hearing the case under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Boyne filed a notice of appeal on June 17, 2024, and then filed ten motions for clarification, a motion to vacate judgment, a motion for reconsideration, a “motion for writ,” a motion for immediate injunction, and a motion for immediate hearing. …
An article from MAR 07, 2025
… New Haven State’s Attorney Jack Doyle is bringing in a secret out-of-state witness to testify against Paul Boyne—but why?
In a letter to the court, Doyle announced that the prosecution had secured “an additional witness” to provide “relevant testimony” on Monday, March 10. …
Note:
According to the court transcript, that additional witness’ relevant testimony was about the MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution recording and storing all of Mr. Boyne’s communications.
Were all of those communications shared? If so, with whom?
For example:
An article published May 15, 2025 says …
… A woman has filed complaints with several Connecticut agencies after she discovered an intimate video she sent to her husband who is an inmate at MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution was allegedly circulated among correction officers and others in the prison. …”
The article examines how years of media coverage labeling OneTaste an “orgasm cult” shaped the context around the forced labor conspiracy case against Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz.
Rev. J. Benjamin Hardwick and Curtis Somoza created a life insurance program for poor South Los Angeles congregants, funded by investors and insured by Transamerica. Early deaths, delayed payouts and federal intervention turned the plan into a fraud case.
