Daily Mail Report: Sandusky Appeal Alleges Prosecutorial Conflict Over Trust

Target and manufacture victims. Get a therapist to enjoin the prosecutors in fraud scheme- Take financial control over millions in trust for the victim and oppress the victim further by requiring two of the three con artists to relinquish control

Well done Frank! How did Fina manage to keep his filthy hands concealed? Pure arrogance?

Predetermined outcomes that rule our federal system so criminals like Fink and McGettigan act with impunity?

This needs to be tossed Who knows if he’s guilty or innocent but the real criminals are the three trustees of the victims trust

Jerry has served enough time and justice was not served

… Kane appointed former federal prosecutor H. Geoffrey Moulton Jr. to investigate Governor Tom Corbett's handling of the Penn State child sex abuse scandal (an investigation which showed that no legal wrongdoing by Corbett took place …

… Kane believed former state prosecutor Frank Fina was behind a March 2014 story in the Inquirer that disclosed that she had secretly shut down a sting investigation that had recorded Philadelphia Democrats accepting cash, money orders, or gifts from an undercover operative. Fina, for many years the head of corruption cases for the Attorney General's Office, launched the sting before Kane took office in 2013. …

… In searching for information to discredit Fina, she discovered a trove of emails containing pornography and other offensive content that were exchanged among state prosecutors, defense lawyers, and judges, including two former Supreme Court justices. Porngate, as it came to be called, led to the retirements or resignations of more than a half-dozen high-profile public officials, including onetime Supreme Court Justices Seamus P. McCaffery and J. Michael Eakin. Kane said repeatedly that she believed her criminal case was “corruptly manufactured” by a club of “good ol' boys” bent on preventing her from making those emails public – although many of them were eventually released. …

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Kane

As the comments on the Daily Mail article show… people aren't buying this.

Guilty. Convicted. Sentenced.

End of story.

… “That very well may be true, that you don’t solicit money directly to the Biden Center, but China has not given the University of Pennsylvania all these millions of dollars for their music department,” Kamenar continued.

“No. It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out that they’re giving the money to the University of Pennsylvania to run their China programs, and they have several of them. And the Biden Center is part of that program that they have that’s called Penn Global.”

Against the backdrop of the Chinese money to the Biden Center, there’s the revelation that multiple Biden family members received money from Chinese sources and the new allegation that Joe Biden received a $5 million bribe from Burisma. Joe Biden is the most corrupt and compromised president in American history. …”

When “American history”, “American culture” and “American traditions” like Penn State football, Joe Paterno and Jerry Sandusky disappear from everyone’s memory, international social credit scores will be all that matter. The guy who said: “Water is, of course, the most important raw material we have today in the world. It's a question of whether we should privatize the normal water supply for the population. And there are two different opinions on the matter. The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That's an extreme solution. The other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other, and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value.” shall be your hero, under penalty of law.

Powerful affidavit you submitted. It’s clear this was not a fair trial and clear there was prosecutorial misconduct if not criminal misconduct

Is there a way “peace” can be made by limiting Jerry’s sentence given these new finding? Write it off as time served?

Given his age does he want to make an agreement and enjoy the years he has left in this world or is his priority fighting to prove his innocence?

Curious what Sandusky wants at this point – ideally both, but that’s unlikely