Alanzo Defends Dr. Danielle Roberts in Her Quest to Get Medical License Back
Allen ‘Alanzo’ Stanfield has a lot to say on many topics. Here are some of his comments on Dr. Danielle Roberts’ right to fight to win back her medical license. These thoughts came from various comments he made with slight editing and arranging by topic.
Allen Alanzo Stanfield
Check out his blog — https://alanzosblog.com/]
Do the patriotic thing and please lend Alanzo your ear...
Do the patriotic thing and please lend Alanzo your ear…
Allen Alanzo Stanfield
Mr. Allen Alanzo Stanfield
By Allen ‘Alanzo’ Stanfield
I applaud the Frank Report for giving Dr. Danielle Roberts a voice here. I support her in taking every avenue to rectify whatever injustice she can. Members of minorities have rights against mainstream persecution, and it is in all of our interests to support those rights.
If we allow mainstream persecution to ruin the careers and livelihoods of innocent people, simply because they do something that is completely legal, but not mainstream, you could very well be next.
She’s defending herself, her rights, and her livelihood against an onslaught of mainstream conformity waged by tribal ninnies.
Dr. Danielle Roberts
We’re talking about a highly educated, highly disciplined, highly accomplished human being here. Most here on the Frank Report are dehumanizing her, and placing their reductive projections of what they think NXIVM is onto her.
She Wasn’t Branding as a Physician
Dr. Danielle Roberts answer when asked about branding women.
Dr. Roberts wasn’t operating in a medical setting at all. No one, physician or non-physician, operates in a medical setting when they perform branding. No one came to her to be cured of anything or to treat an illness.
By contrast, I know of a surgeon in California who performed surgery in a hospital on a patient. The patient developed complications after the surgery, but the surgeon didn’t want to pay the hospital fees for follow up corrective surgery. So he performed surgery on her on his kitchen table.
His patient died of sepsis.
He was sued for malpractice and lost. He did not lose his license to perform surgery. In fact, the California state medical board hid his history of malpractice from the public.
Contrast this with what they did to Dr. Roberts, and you’ll see that the element of CULTS was the motivating factor in taking action against her.
It’s OK to Brand If It’s a Fraternity
Here’s an article in a fraternity magazine on how and why to conduct branding ceremonies in your local chapter.
https://www.watchtheyard.com/opinion/burning-brand/
Do some of their members act as “wing men”, helping their leaders, and each other, get laid? Do the pitchers of beer these wingmen earn in return constitute commercial sex trafficking?
Do any of these fraternity members have multiple sex partners?
Will the feds go after them with a RICO prosecution in a government show trial, complete with allowing evidence that has a broken chain of custody, articles in the New York Times, followed by multiple documentaries on Showtime and HBO?
Come on. People are being emotionally manipulated to engage in a moral panic, and the result is that they hand the government more power to violate all of our rights to live the lives we choose.
How many of those fraternity members are physicians, though? No one here seems to apply the medical board of the State of New York standards to them.
Why not?
Withheld Info About Brand
As reported here on the Frank Report, is this testimony in her hearings with the NYS medical board:
“Roberts knew the symbol included KAR to represent Keith Raniere’s initials as one of its meanings. Roberts said she did not disclose it to the women because she believed it wasn’t her role to do so, and believed they may have already been told by their DOS masters, as she was. She says she was not the lead in the organization and her role was branding technician in an initiation ceremony.
Edmondson Had a Legit Beef About Not Being Informed
The point about not being informed of the meaning of the brand [that it was Keith Raniere’s initials] is a valid point, which I acknowledged when I spoke about Sarah Edmonson’s wholly justified participation in SuperStar Neil’s BigPayDay® Lawsuit.
Neil Glazer, plaintiffs' attorney
Super lawyer Neil Glazer does have a lawsuit or rather 81 lawsuits against some 11 NXIVM defendants.
Sarah Edmondson filed the original complaint against Dr. Danielle Roberts
Sarah Edmondson filed the original complaint against Dr. Danielle RobertsSarah Edmonson went to the New York Times and commercially published a book about this branding ceremony.
Sarah Edmondson
s book about her experiences in NXIVM
Taking a Differing View Is Not Abusing Anyone
She is not the only one who has a right to comment on it, especially since she herself made this branding ceremony very very public and has benefited commercially from doing so.
Those people who had careers and lives which were harmed by Sarah Edmonson’s commercial media blitz have a right to discuss it, too, from their side.
The characterization of the purpose of commenting on Sarah’s branding ceremony as solely existing to “discredit” Sarah Edmonson is false. Everyone has the right to discuss this, especially Dr. Danielle Roberts.
Any attempt to make any other opinion or experience other than Sarah Edmonson’s seem abusive, or even criminal, is illegitimate.
I see the fact that the brand was not disclosed to her as Raniere’s initials as the whole problem here, legally. And I commented on that, too.
Was that an attempt to discredit Sarah Edmonson?
Why or why not?
Sarah Edmondson was displeased when she learned that the brand was not the four elements but Raniere's initials.
Did Edmondson Weep Throughout the Branding Ceremony?
According to the New York Times, Sarah Edmondson told them of her branding experience, “I wept the whole time. I disassociated out of my body.”
The New York Times reported that Edmonson told them that she ‘wept the whole time’ during her branding ceremony. The edited version I saw on Twitter showed no weeping.
So, if I saw a video – even an edited one – that showed many minutes of Edmonson not weeping, I judge that to mean she didn’t weep the whole time.
Dr. Roberts is telling the truth: Edmonson did not ‘weep the whole time’, as she told the New York Times.
But Edmonson told me she was not told she would be branded with Raniere’s initials. She told me she would never have agreed to that. I believe her.
To me, this makes Edmondson’s participation in SuperStar Neil Glazer’s BigPayDay Lawsuit® fully valid.
That’s the full-on, nuanced, non tribal, messy truth.
And it ain’t for ninnies.
Brainwashing is very real and very dangerous as this image proves. All it takes is a feeble mind.
Brainwashing is very real and very dangerous as this image proves
Finally…
The Dossier Project women wrote, “Despite extensive testimony during Dr. Roberts’ license revocation hearing – from women who either received the brand or were about to receive the brand from Dr. Roberts, who said they were not her patients and never once considered Dr. Roberts to be acting as a physician, the panel of three judges chose to side with the one woman [Edmondson] who launched the complaint and claimed the opposite. It is our belief that the board members succumbed to media and political pressure to choose the popular side of a salacious narrative over doing what is ethical and right within the purview of their authority.”
Is this evidence of yet another governing body that believes in “cult brainwashing”?
Let me guess, the one witness they sided with, Sarah Edmondson, had anticult deprogramming, and the multiple others hadn’t. Those others who gave factual testimony about their own experience were considered by the panel to be brainwashed sex slaves, only 3/5ths human.
I tell you, anticult deprogrammers should start their own cult.
They can sell their services to people who are about to engage in some kind of court case or judicial review:
“Deprogramming makes you more understandable to a jury and YOU WIN EVERY TIME!!!”
Keith Raniere in this rare picture where he is caught on camera brainwashing three of his students' brains.
Keith Raniere is caught on camera brainwashing three of his followers’ brains.
Behold the crypto-marxist mindset.
‘The person who wrote this comment embodies all the ideals of late stage anticultism.’
Ah! So you’re Alanzo! It’s your leg that is constantly humped by some of the idiots on here! I’ve heard about you! But now I see that you being the one who wrote this imbecilic comment, are the one who embodies all the ideals of the beginning stage of marxism!
‘When you start out in anticultism, you think you are fighting to free the minds of deluded cult members. You start targeting anyone who doesn’t think, or believe, or look, like you as belonging to a “cult”.’
When you start out in marxism, you think you’re fighting to free the ‘poor minorities’ over the original design of a country! You start targeting everybody who holds true patriotic nationalism as a ‘racist’, a ‘nazi’, ‘intolerant’, and ‘full of fear’!
‘Then your self-righteous spleen starts running you, you get a rush believing you belong to something larger than yourself, and by humiliating, discrediting and destroying the lives of “cult members” you are saving the world from evil.’
Hey you spelled out what the Marxists like you do, point blank! I know that you’re trying to project it into me like a true marxist does, but I'm already aware of your tactics!
‘Pretty soon that process ends you up like this guy.’
Yeah pretty soon the marxist process ends you up like this overrated, pseudo-intellectual joke!
‘In a free society, intolerance must not be tolerated. It’s a paradox outlined by the mathematician and philosopher of science Karl Popper.’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
Oh! Karl Popper! The anti-nationalist piece of fucking shit! Of course somebody like you would quote him! Wow! You use Wikipedia as one of your sources?! You must not have really good sources do you?! You know what’s cute?! All the idiots who spew this garbage like you are never ‘tolerate’ of our views! Isn’t that the ultimate irony in your discussion on ‘tolerance’?! Who are you going quote next?! How about Karl Marx?! You can use his Wikipedia page too! 😉
Yeah sure, why don’t we ‘tolerate’ murders, rapists, thieves, and all sorts of degenerates?! Oh wait! We already do! And F.B.I. statistics say the vast majority of them ARE THE MINORITIES! Should we ‘tolerate’ Rosa Parks and many of the civil rights activists being marxists who encouraged blacks to ‘kill all white people’?! Should we ‘tolerate’ BLM, Antifa, and all the other radical domestic terrorist groups that have been allowed to form by idiots like you?! We’ve been forced to do your bullshit for decades and look at the hellhole our country has become! Look at how we’ve lost our jobs, income, and benefits because of all of this! Look the crime rate and degeneracy of our society now! I know you don’t know shit about history, but if you study history, you will find that any tyrant who wanted to weaken a country to invade it, would use multi-culturalism and use idiots like you to do their bidding to convince the public into it with the exact same type of recycled platitude garbage that you spew! You’ve given right into what the Deep State wants and you are a hatchet man for the New World Order!
‘So anticultists – get out now while you can.
Anybody who listens to this idiot and reads his bullshit website, get out while you still can! Start practicing ‘tolerance’ of Nationalism and putting the success of your country and its rightful race first!
‘Start practicing tolerance of those who believe and appear different than you do. Allow people to live the lives they choose, and defend their right to do so.’
Oh yeah sure, the typical what they ‘look like’ platitude argument! What about they themselves promoting an evil group think amongst their own race and bullying and shunning those of their race who don’t truly ‘represent’ them?!
For example, if another black doesn’t agree with the ghetto survival of the fittest mentality and that ‘pussy’, ‘money’, ‘street smarts’ and ‘dope’ is all that matters no matter who you step on, steal from, or even kill to achieve it and that morals don’t matter! And if any black disagrees and dares attack that evil ideology, then they ‘aren’t black enough’ and are acting like a ‘white boy’! They’re shunned as ‘uncle toms’ and ‘coons’!
What about the Aztecs and them holding festivals of child sacrifice?! Maybe we should’ve been more ‘tolerant’ of them and let them ‘live the lives they choose’ also! We were just being so ‘hateful’ to stop them! Should we also be more ‘tolerant’ of the conquistadors and their way of live when they thought that what the Aztecs were doing was evil and wiped them out or should we be more ‘tolerant’ to the ones killing the infants and eating their hearts in front of other children and their community while they all ‘celebrated’ their festival?! Gee wiz! Decisions, decisions! 🤔
Should we ‘tolerate’ the fact that if we followed what the founding fathers wanted for this country and took a stand against multi-cultural issues to begin with, that all the evil that NXIVM did would’ve never existed?! And we wouldn’t even be discussing the shit Danielle Roberts did under the influence of kikes! Without the Jews, Keith Raniere and Nancy Salzman and the Bronfmans to back them up, all the pain, hurt, and devastation that they caused would’ve never happened! Also Keith wouldn’t have raped Camilla and she would’ve been in her own country without having to have gone through any of the hell that she went through and in Mexico ‘living her own live the way that she chooses’! Should we ‘tolerate’ the fact that anti multi-culturalism protects not only the race of the nation, but also protects minorities from abuse by other minorities?! No of course not! That’s ‘hateful’ to even propose that! It certainly isn’t irresponsible and evil to ‘tolerate’ something like that!
We should in fact be more ‘tolerate’ about all of that! We should also be more ‘tolerant’ of every kind of political system, ideology, religion and way of life! how about nihilism and cannibalism?! We certainly should not have any kind of objective morality as a standard to distinguish right from wrong, right?! No we shouldn’t ‘tolerant’ that! Much like you can’t even ‘tolerate’ a joke I made, despite the fact that it wasn’t even as big of a bad joke as you are!
‘Distinguish between what is illegal and what is only immoral to you. Help prosecute specific criminals for their specific crimes, but distinguish between those criminals and others who are innocent.’
So who gets to ‘distinguish’ that?! Is there any kind of objective standard to achieve it?! Should we ‘tolerate’ the government making oranges illegal if they chose and therefore ‘distinguish’ those who would dare drink a glass of orange juice with their waffles at breakfast as a ‘criminal’?! You may laugh at that, but the government has banned many plants before, so why not?! What if they ban ‘meat’ (vegans don’t even start your shit with me)?! Should we ‘distinguish‘ those as ‘criminals’ who cookout a steak on their grill and their family members and children with them as ‘accomplices’?! Should we ‘help prosecute’ those ‘specific criminals for their specific crimes’?!
Who gets to decide who’s ‘innocent’?! Is it political parties with an agenda who want to let loose and bunch minorities who raped and killed people point blank and now want them out and if you don’t agree, then you’re ‘racist’?!
If you haven’t noticed the whole point of the criminal law to begin with, WAS to hold ‘immoral’ people accountable! The law is supposed to be based upon an objective standard or morality and to criminalize what is immoral to stop degeneracy in society! I get so tired of these idiots like you who do this ‘criminal vs subjective morals’ argument! You obviously are pitifully historically illiterate! Otherwise morality is subjective and whoever has the most money to legalize and/or criminalize whatever they want as long as they have the money, resources, power, and influence to do it! You can make anything illegal and slap somebody with the label ‘criminal’ that you want and likewise you can legalize anything you want and call anybody ‘innocent’ that you want, with that mentality! You sound fucking ignorant, just stop talking, you dumbass!
‘Defend the rights of minorities, and do not engage in the intolerance of anticultism.’
And what ‘rights’ are those, you little marxist piece of fucking shit?! The ‘right’ to take our jobs, steal our tax dollars so they can sit on their ass while they collect welfare and promote thug behavior amongst our youth and murder against other minorities and to ‘kill all white people’ through our music, movies, and pop culture and if you don’t shut up about it, then you’re not being ‘tolerant’?! What ‘rights’ did our founding fathers, who CLEARLY wanted this country to be a white nationalist republic, think they had?! What ‘rights’ do I have to go to China or any other country and demand citizenship and control over their politics (and rightfully so)?!
Hey here’s a question for you! Why are you so focused on the bullshit marxist political philosophy to ‘defend the rights of minorities’ instead of fighting to ‘defend the rights’ of the descendants of the founding fathers who established this country?! What about their ‘rights’?! I really think you’re not white or you are a traitor! Hey what about the law stating that people like you are to be arrested, given a fair trial, and once lawfully convicted, executed! Where’s your ‘tolerance’ on that?! Oh wait! That’s right! You don’t have any while you sit here and hypocritically yap about ‘tolerance’!
The truth is what you really want people to ‘tolerate’, whether you acknowledge it or not, is a philo-semitic marxist, pro multi-culturalism, zionist zog being used by the Deep State, and every other tyrant throughout history, as weapon to weaken and overthrow this country! A weapon they they have boastfully admitted countless times in their books and interviews while laughing at idiots like you who bought it and nobody cares to see the truth even though the very people who established it and pedaled it have already boldly and shamelessly publicly admitted their evil intentions! And if we don’t go along with it, then we are all ‘intolerant’ much like you are ‘intolerant’ to what the principles established this country and that’s why you want to help overthrow it right along with our constitution instead of ‘defend the rights’ of its existence! But we just need to ‘tolerate’ it all and be good little ‘white-knight angels’ like you standing up for the unconstitutional ‘rights’ of paper-‘Americans’ rather than ACTUAL Americans by their blood and birth right! What a perfect little inspirational angel you are! 😇👼😇
The paradigm of ‘Pro-cultism vs anti-cultism’ is a false dichotomy who enslaved idiots like you and your listeners who fail to see the Hegelian dialectic that it is! Once again, who defines what is and isn’t a ‘cult’?! On what basis do they judge that?! The true answer is this: the pro-cultists want have their lives dictated by an objectively evil systematic authority, while the anti-cultists want to be their own narcissistic god and make their own choices for themselves without any authority outside of themselves, which is impossible, seeing the fact that every single person on this planet is both consciously and unconsciously motivated and influenced by external forces! The latter being far worse than it’s conspicuous former because it’s of its subliminal permeating infections while under the guise of ‘true freedom’! Unless you have an objective standard of morality, then it will be society, culture, and emotions that dictate the spectrum of each, then their ultimate supreme authority: the God-vernment will enforce it and if you don’t obey it’s systemic whims, then you’re a ‘criminal’ which is the true and whole paradigm and spectrum of a cult!
An outcome of which you help propagate under the guise of a falsely balanced mindset of the kind of thinking that you hypocritically claim to be against! The overthrow of this country and our rights will be because of idiots like you and your ‘tolerance’ of it! But thankfully, they will not succeed and we will take this country back and put to death all people like you and silence all of your thought crimes against our country and have what our founding fathers wanted ONLY for the whites of this country, ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’! If the minorities want that, then they can have it in their own countries that they will be deported back to!
‘Alanzo’
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
✊🏻IF WE BELIEVE!✊🏻
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
✊🏻THERE’S A BETTER WAY!✊🏻
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸