Frank Parlato
Earlier this year, OneTaste Inc. retained me to investigate the federal prosecution of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz.
I have completed my preliminary investigation and, consequently, OneTaste no longer retains me. However, I will continue to publish my findings.
The federal prosecutors at the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York blame OneTaste for the information I am uncovering and publishing on FrankReport, as if OneTaste disclosed information under a protective order.
In a civil case in California, OneTaste v Ayries Blanck, her lawyers blame OneTaste for what I am uncovering – as if they revealed information covered by a civil protective order.
Both the EDNY and the civil lawyers’ remarks taste like herrings, red in color.
Ongoing Coverage and Legal Accusations
To date, I have written 37 articles about OneTaste and its motley group of critics.
In the California case, Blanck’s attorney, Christopher Donovan, accused me of writing unfairly about the skinny little woman who started the whole prosecution.
Donovan said a blogger is “continuously monitoring this case and attacking our client.”
He said in open court:
“There is a blog out there that is following this case, that is attacking Miss Blanck and her sister in very graphic and lewd ways, including posting pictures of her.”
Claims of Improper Disclosure
Ayries’ sister, Autym Blanck’s attorney, Randy Lopez, also accused OneTaste of providing me with information covered under a protective order.
He said in court:
“The main concern being this information being disseminated to sources outside of either cases.·For example, in the past there has been writings by a blogger by the name of Frank Parlato from The Frank Report, who has written some information about Autymn Blanck, her sister, and others, including making references to the documents that Autymn Blanck has produced in the litigation.·
Another day, another herring.
Federal Concerns and Witnesses
Assistant US Attorney Gillian Kassner said the government was “monitoring very closely” The Frank Report, and they were reluctant to hand over legally required discovery to the defendants because they said, without evidence, the prosecution was seeing the names of witnesses written about in the Frank Report.
It’s a funny thing. The Assistant US Attorney wants to avoid turning over its legally required discovery, including disclosure of witnesses, because they are worried I might write about their witnesses.
Profiles of Potential Witnesses
So far, they have revealed five remotely possible witnesses in their doomed, evidence-free case through publicly filed documents.
- Ayries Blanck
- Mitch Aidelbaum
- Andy Cortado
- Kara Cooper
- Adam Jacobowitz
I would be surprised if the prosecutors call any of them.
Ayries Blanck’s Public Persona
Ayries Blanck made a public spectacle of herself in the media long before the indictment of Daedone and Cherwitz as a critic of OneTaste. In my opinion, she is the source of the criminal case against Daedone and Cherwitz.
I wrote all the telling information about Ayries Blanck in my post, Journal of Lies, on June 2, 2024, more than a month before the protective order in the civil case came out on July 9, 2024.
Ayries’ bullshit came out in a Netflix documentary where her sister Autymn appeared years earlier.
No protective order was in place when I wrote about Ayries’ phony journal and how her sister Autymn got paid $25,000 to collaborate in defrauding Netflix and possibly lying to FBI Special Agent Elliot McGinnis – not that he’d care.
Additional Characters in the Narrative
Mitch Aidelbaum illegally hacked into the OneTaste server, stole attorney-client-privileged documents and handed them to FBI Special Agent Elliot McGinnis, who illegally used them.
All of this came out in public filings. Just like it came out that dirty cop McGinnis told Ayries Blanck to delete her email account and told Autymn Blanck to hide the phony journals by secreting them to him so he could obstruct justice, and no one might find out they were phony.
No wonder they threw this cat off the NYPD back in 2009.
Ayries did not write the journals as she said in 2015 – and everybody knows it.
Andy Cortado, who I have mentioned in passing, got copies of the stolen documents but is entirely irrelevant to the case.
Cooper’s Follies
Kara Cooper is another person who got her hands on the illegally stolen documents and turned them over to McGinnis, who probably deposited a brick when she offered it to him because he had already secretly and illegally had them for nine months.
Cooper is a character. She made herself known to me (and the world) not through OneTaste violating any protective order but when she publicly sued OneTaste based on her bizarre story of abuse.
I wrote about her lawsuit.
The most bizarre and funniest part of her lawsuit is that she is suing because she was unhappy about her lifestyle in San Francisco, where she shared housing with several OneTaste students. What made it bizarre is that she volunteered to sleep with three male roommates in a marathon session, either in tandem or in such rapid succession that it was likened to a choo-choo train.
She slept with the men to get entry past others, waiting for a room in the rooming house.
We all know what she is. My writing about her was just me trying to determine the price.
As for Adam ‘Teddy Bear’ Jacobowitz, Esq, my information about him comes from a OneTaste Medium article. The ethically challenged lawyer with a fetish for his stuffed animal is the subject of a grievance by OneTaste CEO Anjuli Ayar. Not the teddy bear but Jacobowitz himself.
I have also written about other OneTaste former students or employees who the prosecution has not named as witnesses.
Some of the others I wrote about are the devious opportunist Michal Neria and her broken-hearted beau, Mike Safyan, who I found, amusingly, was the caboose in Cooper’s choo-choo train ride into the rooming house.
(I heard it said that that horny Cooper woman used those poor men like fuck toys. Found them, felt them, fucked them, got into the rooming house, then forgot them – except to name them in a lawsuit. But then again, others see her as a forlorn victim. One person who knew about her train ride into a new room, asked me if I heard about Kara Cooper and added, “poor thing, she’s flat on her back.”
A Crew of Ninnies
There were others. And Lord, preserve the prosecutors if they call these highly impeachable witnesses in the trial.
Mark Gottlieb and Caitlin D’Aprano, who outed themselves in a civil lawsuit; Ravi Agrawal, Ayries’ rich boyfriend whom she falsely accused and who made a blessed escape from her; Hamza Tayeb, who, to hear him tell it to Bloomberg Businessweek, left his baby on a doorstep; the drunken Audrey Wright – who appeared in Netflix in a rare moment of sobriety and, finally, let us not forget the world’s most handsome man by his estimation, the peacock Ruwan Meepagala, who loved sharing with Bloomberg almost as much as he loves looking at himself in the mirror.
I am trying to track down a rumor that Meepagala broke his nose when he hurriedly kissed the mirror.
A Fair Offer
If the prosecutors or civil lawyers can show me one instance of my publishing anything that would have required me to have access to anything covered under a protective order to publish, I will pay them $10,000.
I have just one condition: if someone accuses me, they must do so with specificity. If I show them how I obtained this evidence from public documents or media interviews of these “victims,” or anywhere else that any good reporter could obtain, they must pay me $10,000.
Everything I published was obtained from publicly available documents and interviews with people who witnessed various events.
Sure, from time to time, my writing has been enhanced by simple deductive reasoning, something that the lawyers, FBI Special Agent McGinnis, and regrettably the prosecutors in this case are entirely inadequate at.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Cooper is one hell of a train conductor. But who wants to ride her ?
No “double dipping” – Once a gloved finger has touched a woman’s
genitals it is not to be dipped back in the lube jar for more lube. Should
this occur the lube can be considered contaminated and should be
disposed of.
If this case is all BS, why did OneTaste close down?
How much money is the new company Eros Platform by OneTaste making now?
Onetaste: the company that offered classes on partnered clit stroking, until a bunch of rich sex freaks showed up to cancel them.
The defendant’s are freaking out because their efforts to stall and delay the trial and their latest Motion to Dismiss were soundly rejected by the court last week and the trial is proceeding as scheduled. A lot of current cult members who hang on Frank’s every word and think he’s some brilliant investigative journalist (rather than a paid OT shill) are in for some serious surprises and sad trombone sounds pretty soon.
But meanwhile, keep maligning the very people you’ll eventually find yourselves commiserating with when the veils over your eyes eventually fall and you realize every house Nicole has ever built has a foundation made of sand.
How many houses has Nicole built?
Did you want live in one of them?
You can feel it starting to slip and shift underneath, can’t you? You should pay attention to that unsettling knot in the pit of your stomach. The sooner you heed it and get out, the better, trust me.
Are we in one of Nicole Daedone’s houses right now?
You’d do well to order the transcript from the court that day and read it very carefully. The judge made some very specific statements about why she did what she did and she opened a few more doors that I’m sure Frank noticed… but you didn’t. Keep that popcorn warm, sport.
How about you cultsplain it to us poor unwashed outsiders?
Do you have any facts or evidence you’d like to contribute to your tough talk? 🤣
The approaching trial is making you nervous. There’s a good reason for that feeling in your stomach. Trust it.
Hmm… what evidence of “freaking out” do you have? How is this defined? Have you observed behavior indicative of “freaking out”?
Look in the mirror.
Here comes the cult of victimization…
Putting your faith in conspiracy to do a crime is wild. when the chips fall I just hope the FBI foot the lawyer bills and damages
Nothing but net, Frank’s on a roll
This is amazing. The clarity and truth just pours through. Thank you for the hard facts that cut through the squid ink of false lies and drama
EDNY needs an exit strategy
I like herrings in sour cream. Really good. As for ayries and company looks like sour grapes
No way that fat girl Ayries is 98 pounds!! She is full of shit.
You’d still do her, Pilgrim. Admit it!
Even OneTaste wouldn’t take your money. Being too much of an incel is rare for them, but you are too incel even for them.
Incel ain’t a term in ‘Merica. And I’ve got no problems there.
Oh, looks like they are trying to set you up Frank. The prosecutors could be using you to prove their case, that witnesses are “in danger” of ridicule and persecution by the defendants. Then they could claim “witness protection” for the witnesses and the whole trial would have to be argued without them ever disclosing who their witnesses are. All Jane and John Does. They are just trying to prove their case to the judge before they ask for the protection. Nicely done, because they were probably forced to “show their hand” earlier than they had hoped.
Thoroughly amusing and well deserved mockery.
Can we vote on superlatives? Worst witness? Best ride on Coopers train? Reddest herring? Easiest to impeach? Most likely to become McGinnis’s protege? Future spokesperson for weight watchers?
Prediction: Date the Prosecution’s Case will Officially Cease to Exist?