Richard Luthmann
Virginia blogger Paul Boyne has been in the custody of the Connecticut Corrections Department for more than a year, waiting for trial.
He faces 18 counts of stalking and electronic stalking for blog posts published on his Family Court Circus, which condemned CT family court judges Gerard Adelman, Jane Grossman, Thomas Moukawsher and others.
CT says he crossed the line into stalking when he wrote that a Jewish conspiracy controls Connecticut Family Courts, which, combined with references to guns, historical remedies to tyranny, and ruminations on certain judges meeting such a fate puts it into a category of hate crimes.
Boyne claims his speech is protected under the First Amendment.
Boyne told FR that his court-appointed attorneys, from-Kirschbaum Law Group, derailed a plea dealhe believes would have allowed him to walk free after more than a year in jail.
The judge was prepared to sentence him to time served, which would have meant his immediate release, he said. Instead, his court-appointed lawyers, Jennifer M. Buyske and Alice M. Osedach Powers, without his consent, raised Boyne’s mental competency to stand trial.
Boyne believes this was a deliberate move to keep him incarcerated.
His lawyers’ claim of incompetence was bolstered by a concussion Boyne suffered in jail almost a month ago during an altercation with another inmate. Boyne says the injury had no impact on his present mental state or ability to understand the proceedings.
Attorneys Buyske and Osedach Powers declined requests for comment.
Boyne said, “My attorneys met with me before the hearing, which was supposed to be a motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss. Alice Powers went off begging to be fired, claiming I argue too much, and I don’t understand. Then she launched into this concern about competency. And then she tells the judge that I have a concussion, and I believe [former Connecticut Supreme Court Justice and DCF Commissioner] Joette Katz is involved, and that it had already been arranged. It was a five minute hearing.”
According to Boyne, Powers misled the court by telling the judge Boyne has a concussion, instead of explaining the concussion was in August.
“She was just throwing mud at the wall.,” Boyne said. “It didn’t matter. And then the judge said, ‘Okay, I order the evaluation.'”
With the court-ordered competency evaluation, the trial schedule is suspended.
“It’s a page right out of the Nutmeg Playbook. My lawyers weren’t ready for trial. We don’t even know what the nature and cause of the accusations are. We have no particulars. I was just trying to plead out.
“I told my lawyer, I said, ‘I’ll plead out to being the gunman on the grassy knoll.’ And she says, ‘Well, I don’t think we understand the charges against you.’ And I said, ‘Yeah, I understand the stalking charge is bullshit. So let’s plead out, and I’m going home.'”
Boyne said Judge Gerald L. Harmon had agreed to impose a sentence of time served.
“If my lawyers had gone and got the plea, I would have gone home. It would have been over. But now everything’s off the table.”
FR was unable to confirm if Boyne’s understanding that he would have been sentenced to time served was accurate, what plea deal he was offered, and whether he might have been sentenced to additional time over and above time served if he had accepted a plea.
His lawyers request for a mental competency evaluation will delay the matter for some time, and Boyne remains in jail for a charge he has not been convicted of, and which, though his speech is, by most standards, deplorable, may indeed by protected by the First Amendment
Hear Paul Boyne’s voice in his interview from jail with Rich Luthmann.
Richard Luthmann is a writer, editor, and investigative journalist.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
The Court on OCTOBER 3, 2024
An article from MAR 07, 2025
Note:
According to the court transcript, that additional witness’ relevant testimony was about the MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution recording and storing all of Mr. Boyne’s communications.
Were all of those communications shared? If so, with whom?
For example:
An article published May 15, 2025 says …
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/ct-prison-video-macdougall-walker-20327569.php
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-the-weaponization-of-the-federal-government/
Weaponizing news outlets, too.
Mark Pazniokas, reporter at CT Mirror:
… By the administration’s count, Lamont gave 98 of the 179 judges their jobs. They include 51 women and 47 men, with diverse racial backgrounds …
Fascinating stuff, right?
From Andrew Kreig, author of Spiked: How Chain Management Corrupted America’s Oldest Newspaper:
… CIA: As of today, 95% of the CIA documents within the JFK Act records collection have been released in their entirety, and no documents remain fully redacted or withheld in their entirety.
MISLEADING: The remaining 5 percent of documents amount to more than 3,000 records with redactions. These records include
— 44 ‘denied in full’ documents from the Joannides files;
— Schlesinger’s censored memo;
— Close-door testimony of CIA officers responsible for the surveillance of Oswald in Mexico City;
— Testimony of a senior CIA officer about why Oswald was not debriefed on his return from the Soviet Union;
— A 1963 job description for Anne Goodpasture, a CIA officer who handled a tape of Oswald’s voice, remains redacted.
— FBI report on a “daring” marksman identified by friends (and Cuban intelligence) as a Dealey Plaza gunman …
Knowing what we know about the history of corruption in government and mainstream news outlets, what should we expect from the release of the JFK files? Was Andrew Kreig right about the above documents? Did those documents ever exist?
Definitions of government and news don’t include terms such as “secrets”, “deceit”, “purposeful division” and “order out of chaos”.
Connecticut Inside Investigator:
https://insideinvestigator.org/the-struggle-to-compel-agencies-to-produce-records/?utm_campaign=cii_email&utm_source=mailchimp&utm_medium=email&utm_content=11202024_wednesday
The Connecticut “Democrat Shadow Government” (as some now refer to themselves) created many politically expedient myths to take the place of important facts about crimes committed against children and families in the state family courts. State employees call victims of the family courts “disgruntled litigants” and the “Democrat shadow government” prosecution of Paul Boyne is another example of the kind of myth Connecticut state administrators use to achieve political goals.
The Democrat “shadow government” first limited criticism of family court corruption with Ted Taupier’s private emails.
At that time, Taupier and Boyne were two of a few courageous men willing to speak up publicly about a horrific case involving what seemed to indicate some kind of “MK ULTRA” abuse of a young boy in a “ family court” custody case. Ted was furious about the cover-up of that case. His anger was a righteous anger. He didn’t act on that anger. He wrote about it in the email that the “shadow Democrat government” then used to arrest and jail him.
Paul Boyne’s response to the state’s restrictions on Ted Taupier’s freedom of expression took the form of over-the-top offensive speech on a blog to gain attention and to prove a point about the importance of freedom of speech.
Boyne seems to have been asking Connecticut residents to wake up about the reality of the state “family courts”. His outrageous, extremely offensive statements seemed to shout, “Look over here!!! The Connecticut family court system is a dangerous institution that’s destroying families! They punished Ted Taupier for speaking about the destruction of families! Pay attention! This is serious!”
Paul Boyne is now in jail. Pay attention. This is serious.
https://www.amazon.com/Book-Matt-Hidden-Matthew-Shepard/dp/1586422146
Connecticut’s Democrat shadow government still push myths for political goals. Look at the press conference after the election. Mr. Tong is supposed to defend the state, the people of the state and the law — not partisan politics. His oath isn’t to protect and defend the people of the state. It’s to achieve his own personal political goals, by any means necessary.
It’s twenty-three miles from Manchester to Bristol, right under Hartford’s nose.
In this article …
“Boyne said Judge Gerald L. Harmon had agreed to impose a sentence of time served.”
In the other article …
“Mahoney described what happened at a recent hearing, “Brown told Boyne there will be no further movement on his case, including resolution of his motions to reduce his bond, dismissal of the charges or suppression prosecution evidence, until the competency question is resolved.”
and …
Paul recently told me that when his lawyers first brought up competency, prosecutors washed their hands of it and said it was up to Jen and Alice to make the argument.
That recently changed, Judge Brown told prosecutors to “dig up dirt,” as Paul characterized it, at his last hearing, and everyone would come back to argue competency on Halloween.
In the May 16, 2023 State v. Gould, CR93-0383652 CIU #: 2022-0316
Preliminary Staff Synopsis and Findings, Ms Katz and Mr Kirschbaum worked together in the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney to reduce a sentence.
Did Ms Katz and Mr Kirschbaum work together — maybe with the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney to hijack Judge Brown’s plea offer?
Did Paul Boyne’s case go from Judge Harmon offering an agreement to Judge Brown blocking the agreement because of something Ms. Katz and Mr. Kirschbaum did?
Could a FOIA request disclose the roles Ms. Katz, Mr. Kirschbaum and Mr. Tong play in Paul Boyne’s case?
Would the case ordinarily go from Mr. Harmon to Mr. Brown
were Ms. Katz and Mr. Kirschbaum just judge shopping?
How many “family court” vendors
and “family court” judges
took how much property
from how many families
all around the world?
Marxists control Connecticut and lawfare’s the law of that state.
Does the of State of Connecticut still house prisoners in Virginia institutions?
Why did Ms. Katz & friends decide to jail Mr. Boyne in Connecticut for 1 1/2 years … and then tell a Connecticut judge that Mr. Boyne was too “incompetent” to accept the plea offered a few weeks ago?
What will Ms. Katz, the Kirschbaum office & friends do to Mr. Boyne next?
The New Haven Advocate (the Advocate) and the Hartford Courant (the Courant) haven’t reported Connecticut’s mishandling of the case against Mr. Boyne. Why haven’t they?
If Marxists control the press in Connecticut now … who would be surprised?
https://casetext.com/case/young-v-new-haven-advocate#p261
…
Connecticut residents and taxpayers have a right to know whether or not the Inspector General’s office found actionable evidence of criminal activity in the family courts in 2022.
Connecticut residents and taxpayers also have a right to know whether or not actionable evidence of criminal activity in Connecticut family courts was sent to the DOJ in 2022.
Connecticut residents and taxpayers should also know whether or not any actionable evidence of criminal activity in Connecticut family courts was sent to the DOJ in 2014. (see the Connecticut Chapter of AFCC, Inc. records)
2014 was around the time Ted Taupier was arrested for complaining about corruption in the family courts in an e-mail to friends.
Did Paul Boyne start publishing details of actionable evidence of criminal activity in Connecticut family courts before of after Mr. Taupier was silenced?
https://portal.ct.gov/dcj/about/inspector-general?language=en_US
Mainstream news reporters, editors and publishers must ask the Connecticut Inspector General’s office: What did the Inspector General’s office know about the racketeering in Connecticut family courts and when did they know it?
The Inspector General’s job is to notice, investigate and refer actionable evidence of criminal activity — such as racketeering— to the DOJ.
Why hasn’t he done that yet? Maybe it’s because he doesn’t know which objectionable preferences and practices direct “family court” cases. Maybe he defers to what he assumes is the wisdom and experience of the providers of the “services” who submit bids for contracts with the state judicial branch.
For example, maybe he has no idea that one vendor who has “trained” thousands of individuals expresses extreme anti-Christian views online.
Maybe the Inspector General doesn’t know about what could be Isis worship pushed on Connecticut children and families. Does anyone even know what Isis worship would look like? If Isis worship were to subvert judicial branch training, who would notice? Who would know whether or not the governor might be okay with a little Isis worship subverting judicial branch training?
Maybe the governor’s okay with Isis worship If the governor’s okay with an Isis worshiper training family court vendors and family court employees, maybe the new Inspector General needs to be okay with that to keep his job. You know, go along to get along.
There’s no way to know what’s going on in Connecticut state government when so much governing is done behind closed doors.
How many people in Connecticut know who Helena Blavatsky is?
How many know why she would write: “… the kabalistic author of Genesis … “?
According to contributors at the Wikipedia site: Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology was published in 1877.
Here’s that book on Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/isisunveiledama02blavgoog/page/421/mode/1up
This information is from another book online:
… When the Israelites left Egypt, they were accompanied by an ʿerev rav … Exodus 12:38
This information is also online:
… Rav Nathan bar Abba said in the name of Rav: “The wealthy [Jews] of Babylonia will be going to Gehennom.” When Shabtai bar Marinus came to Babylon, he looked for work but could find none. He asked for food, but no one fed him. He (Shabtai) said regarding them: “They must be descendants of the ʿerev rav, for it says (Deut 13:18), ‘and show you compassion to make you compassionate’—anyone who has compassion on people, it is known that he is a descendant of our father Abraham, and anyone who does not have compassion on people, it is known that he is not a descendant of our father Abraham.” …
Who knows who wrote what?
Here’s what we know for sure: We know who has compassion on people and we know who doesn’t.
…
Everyone with extreme anti-Christian views
has been
Connecticut family court’s best friend.
All we can do is do our best and watch what happens next.
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/audit-ct-public-defender-office-misused-funds-19874581.php
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/exclusive-audio-paul-boyne-delivers
The Communists, we still let that happen calmly; and the trade unions, we also let that happen; and we even let the Social Democrats happen. All of that was not our affair. — Martin Niemöller
Please post the latest article. Your coverage is important
Richard Luthman asks the best questions.
Meanwhile, how can The Hartford Courant’s reporter and Paul Boyne’s attorneys have no idea about the most interesting rabbit holes surrounding Joette Katz’s case against Mr. Boyne?
https://substack.com/home/post/p-150732067
The judicial Media committee has corrupted the press in Connecticut.
We don’t need no stinkin’ minutes and don’t need no reports.
When Inspector General Robert Devlin provided an overview regarding his role and responsibilities, did he happen to mention that he’s allowed to investigate corruption in the state “family courts”?
Does someone in Connecticut think the inspector general’s only job is to intimidate well-meaning police officers?
Where’s the 2024 official list of “peace officers”?
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/rpt/2008-R-0670.htm
That’s a still from Anthony Mandler’s Run This Town film.
Is it a photo of a Marxist student from the 1960s or it it a young Mao Tse Tung? Whoever’s on that jacket, flashing so many revolutionary images for a few seconds looks like someone today is targeting already rebellious youth around the world today with subliminal stimuli.
Isn’t subliminal messaging illegal in the music industry or is it just illegal in advertising? At this point in history’s timeline, it’s hard to tell whether Hollywood or Connecticut family courts destroyed more families and more religion. Destroying families and destroying religion are Marxist goals and Hollywood is as good at destruction as Connecticut “family courts”.
Anyone looking for information about the photo in “Jay Z’s” video, searching online for “Marxist student image” might expect to see old photos from the early days of Mao — or photos from the “Chinese Cultural Revolution” around 1966 – 1976.
How many people in Connecticut would be surprised to see that a search for “Marxist student image” doesn’t produce old photos from China or the old USSR?
That search leads to new photos. New photos of the exact same social engineering. By the way, a lot of social engineering began and continues in New Haven, Connecticut with too much corruption, too much Complicity and too many coverups. Where are all the brave Hartford Courant reporters to report what’s been happening for far too long?
https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2003/11/07/for-god-for-country-and-for-china/
Who hides political and religious messages in public entertainment?
Those who control people with deceit.
If Paul’s attorneys are so worried about “incompetency after a concussion”, why didn’t they accept the plea for time served (14 months) and/or let him go home with an ankle monitor?
That case is political.
Yes it is. Goes in to the department of justice.
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/exclusive-paul-boyne-speaks-after
When a “state” misleads good judges,
what kind of “state” is that?
It’s the kind of state where powers-that-shouldn’t-be persecute good police officers instead of prosecuting the public-private “nonprofit” for profit Kids for Cash cabal in Connecticut “family courts”.
If court evaluator “Dr.” Stephen Herman, Fotis Dulos’ lawyer Kent Mawhinney and/or Michael Meehan are members of some kind of secret loyalty oath club, Jennifer’s family, Michelle Troconis and Ms. Troconis’ family all have a right to know what kind of political machine they’ve been up against.
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/local/article/Jennifer-Dulos-divorce-Judge-tosses-psych-exam-14455385.php
Former President Barrack Obama II said:
Dr. William Edward Burghardt Du Bois understood.
Read his letters to and from Joel Elias Spingarn.
The letters are archived, free and online (for now).
“The pen is mightier than the sword.”
https://collections.library.yale.edu/catalog/16732372
Can a public records request tell us who called Leslie Lothstein?
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16584623/25/united-states-v-hessler/
https://www.bishop-accountability.org/news3/1994_08_01_Nawrozki_EmbattledPriest_A_Joseph_Maskell_1.htm
Q: “And in an hour or half hour you get all the info and the form of DSM diagnosis?” asked Jim Smith.
A: “I do. Once in a while, I don’t. But for the most part, I do,” answered Dr. Robson.
Q: “Okay. And there doesn’t have to be a rapport developed or some…”
A: “Yes, there does.”
Q: “…in a psychiatric process?”
A: “Oh, yes.”
Q: “Does this take place in a half hour or an hour?”
A: “It takes place in three minutes.”
Q: “Three minutes. And in three minutes, your patients open up to you, right, to the deepest parts of themselves?
A: “Not all of them, but most of them.”
Paul Boyne needs to be in a witness protection program ASAP.
I heard Argentina takes guys like him
Have you heard about the corruption in Connecticut family courts and Sidney Horowitz illegal money making in the Office of the Public Defender’s AMC/GAL “training” when the “family court” destroyed Paul’s family?
writing articles isn’t a crime.
What Sidney Horowitz has been doing for decades in Connecticut “family courts” is a crime. Surely someone in the public defenders office remembers the crimes Sidney Horowitz and others committed against Paul Boyne.
Unfortunately, the public-private Kids for Cash industry sucked in so many unsuspecting participants. I don’t think Debora Del Prete had any idea what kind of “training” that was going to be. And she probably was too busy to find out how harmful that trading was. If she’s reading this, I hope she can find Robson’s “Family Court Primer” and the “Gavel” video.
The public defender office is involved in the state curruption for sure.
How so?
when Paul’s “public defenders” refuse to defend him.
Looks more like Paul is refusing to allow them to defend him. He is indeed mentally incompetent.
They defended him .. by hijacking the plea agreement?
May this not be what it looks like.
Paul Boyne’s in jail while Kent Mawhinney isn’t.
Does Mr. Rubin know Mr. Hessler?
https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/Dulos-defendant-Kent-Mawhinney-sues-convicted-17242820.php
⬆️
⬇️
https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/Dulos-defendant-Kent-Mawhinney-sues-convicted-17242820.php
Markowitz & Mawhinney
October 2024:
https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/texas-junk-science-law-is-getting-another-look-19849478.php
October 2023:
https://frankreport.com/2023/10/15/joette-katzs-stance-on-junk-science-in-criminal-cases-a-contrast-to-family-court-practices/
A problem the local PA industry leaders are pushing with custodial interference. They say it is the ” court professionals” this group has definitely been instrumental in the Connecticut family court system problems. Often guiding the government in Connecticut with financial insensitive. They are using a discrimination platform to silence Paul. I don’t think these judges are really threatened. They have not cleaned up one bit. They are using the government resources to shut everyone up. The major law firms seem to be getting hired and benefiting. The majority of the state is aware of the family court system collision/ corruption. A jury trial is going to bring it to a head. Every gender, race and economic class knows this. Even BlackLivesMatter 860 Hartford put out a statement. Blogger Paul Boyne may not have been justified in his actions, but he is not wrong about…,….. So they are going to toss him in the Looney Bin.
If you want to fix the curruption in family court it starts with the public safety committee. These people are responsible for ensuring the safety of the public. Looking into organized crime.
Why haven’t the 600 women in the state of Connecticut contacting the public safety committee? Who’s now advocating for women in the state? Equity and inclusion doesn’t apply to women. Equity and inclusion apply at the convenience of the state of Connecticut. Running gender bias programs attached to the MOU. Couresive control laws apply in family court at the convenience of the state of Connecticut. Karen Riordan was drained of her finances by an attorney making emails and phone calls. Ran to the head of the family court bar association with information that was attorney client privilege. This is far beyond the attorneys . These are deep seeded political projects bringing money into the state of Connecticut. The public is not benefiting for the legislation. Congress is the start of the problem. The Senitors and Congress people kick it to the legislators.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19LLhaRkkvRbrbBBvfVMrUGug9HQHZOLZ
many can guess which “family court” judges and administrators know about it.
What do Simon Hessler, Kent Mawhinney, Samantha McCord (and Joette Katz?) know about that “sex dungeon”?
Also, is Kent Mawhinney blackmailing blackmailers?
https://trellis.law/doc/73114101/complaint
…
business established: 1999
arrest: 2018
https://www.oxygen.com/crime-time/simon-hessler-connecticut-hotel-owner-allegedly-tried-to-buy-preteen-sex-slave
BTW:
November 20, 2023
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael H. Sussman on behalf of Simon Hessler
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/connecticut/ctdce/3:2023cv01270/156124
The Connecticut cartel clearly “has everything on lock”, too.
https://casetext.com/case/gonzalez-v-bad-boy-entmt
If some kind of small mysterious Connecticut/New Haven group is investigating Michael Volpe because of his independent investigating and reporting, how many others will that small mysterious group investigate next?
Is their list available for public review or does that secret group keep secret lists?
https://substack.com/home/post/p-150362922
From Connecticut’s government website:
Did the new Inspector General only investigate Connecticut “family courts” in Alice Bruno’s case? Not before? Not after?
His investigators didn’t see any corruption in the “family courts”? 🤔
The “Chair of the Criminal Justice Commission”? 🤔
Has any state and/or federal office ever investigated obvious corruption in Connecticut’s “family courts”?
https://portal.ct.gov/dcj/about/criminal-justice-commision?language=en_US
Was the first female leader in the Connecticut Bar Association’s 137-year history railroaded for protecting children and families in Connecticut’s “family courts”?
“Judge Bruno was an attorney for 34 years before her nomination. Her state service included work as a special counsel to the Secretary of the State’s Office and she previously worked as a deputy chief clerk in New Haven Superior Court.
She previously served as (the first female) executive director of the Connecticut Bar Association and she served on the Federal Grievance Committee for District of Connecticut.”
… she has a Masters in social work. 🤔
She said, ““I was assigned to domestic violence docket in the Judicial District of Hartford in July of 2015,”
… with a Masters in social work. 🤔
Remember when the new corporate white-collar crime expert Thomas O’Neil somehow mysteriously replaced Judge Gladys Nieves in the Ambrose case right before Needle and Cuda’s “Jennifer’s’ Law” hearing?
In case anyone at The Hartford Courant is taking notes …
(back to what could have been Connecticut “family court” cabal’s case against Judge Bruno) …
For the note takers: If Mr. Carroll worked with Mr. Goulden in the Milford court, is it possible there’s some shenanigans going on somewhere there?
Can Mr. Cicchetti persuade someone to ask Mr. Devlin to investigate how and why Mr. O’Neil presided over Mr. Goulden’s Jennifer’s Law hearing with Mr. Cuda instead of allowing Judge Nieves to hear those arguments? (Unless no one in the Connecticut executive, legislative and judicial branches is allowed to break the rules.)
What happened to all the good FBI guys?
Ted was a great man.
< crickets >
https://connecticut.news12.com/michelle-troconis-files-petition-for-release-claims-constitutional-violations-contempt-case-continued
FYI:
Why is Yuri Min (working in the appellate court office) in those communications Mr. Cicchetti sent?
Ms. Min was admitted to practice law in 2021 and started working as a temporary assistant clerk in the appellate clerk’s office.
Where did those emails about Paul Boyne’s case go once they arrived in the Connecticut appellate court clerk’s office?
Were details of the New Haven office’s case against Boyne sent to the Connecticut appellate court clerk’s in Hartford for a valid reason?
Is Shipman and Goodwin and/or Ms. Katz on record representing any state office in Paul Boyne’s case?
Can anyone prove why those notes on the emails say what they say?
It looks like someone connected to Ms. Katz and/or just Ms. Katz told the public defenders to reject the plea deal offered in order to label Mr. Boyne as “crazy” for saying Ms. Katz has been steering New Haven’s case against him.
Is that what happened?
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/trump-appointee-judge-kari-a-dooley
Paul’s in jail. Kent isn’t.
Paul probably doesn’t associate with Freemasons. Kent probably does.
(note: the problem isn’t “the Jews”.)
…
We’ve all been fooled, in one way or another.
Are objections to Talmudic law (as practiced in certain Connecticut “family court” cases) an existential threat for some lawyers and judges who favor Talmudic law over state criminal laws in child custody cases? If so, which state and/or federal office(s) should be available to host friendly public discussions about that?
Has any state government office offered to hear the concerns of citizens who have been victimized in “family court” mishandling of child custody cases?
When will Connecticut purge all of Richard Gardner’s theories and practices from all “family courts” and why hasn’t that been done already?
The problem isn’t Paul Boyne. The problem has been the total distain shown to citizens from the state’s executive, legislative and judicial branches.
In …
DOCKET NO. CV 22-6123129
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
v.
NICKOLA CUNHA
OCTOBER 10, 2024
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION …
Senior judge James W. Abrams wrote:
If that statement doesn’t do it, what else can eventually lead us to an official opening of much-needed public discussion?
(Apparently Paul Boyne’s blog hasn’t achieved that noble goal yet.)
“hot”?
Increased protection for criminals who target children.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ctd.137240/gov.uscourts.ctd.137240.48.0.pdf
https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/terminiello-v-chicago
Only 5% of pt bruise from Botox. The bruising is not usually that large. Usually only last for 2 or 3 days. Some time 7. That’s a large bruise for Botox. Not close to the eye , forehead or lip.
Thanks for that information.
The small bruise does look like it’s over “crow’s feet” wrinkles and those wrinkles are still there, right? How long does it take for Botox to work and how long does it take for a small bruise to form from a Botox injection?
Whatever happened to that lovely family, thanks for shining a bright light on “scumbag lawyers” who exploit family problems for profit in “family courts”.
Family courts shouldn’t destroy children and families for profit. Who designed that mandatory process of using government offices to destroy children and families for profit?
https://divorceinconnecticut.blogspot.com/2024/09/update-on-paul-boyne.html
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/federal-judge-denies-paul-boynes
Honorable Elizabeth A. Bozzuto succeeded the Honorable Patrick L. Carroll III as Chief Court Administrator on January 1, 2023. Can she tell us if it was Pat or someone else in that room who looked at Steve while Steve sent his secret hand signals? Everyone there was distracted by Steve’s hand signals. Did anyone there ask for an interpretation or just consider Steve to be crazy? Maybe they all use hand gestures to communicate with each other?
Anyone know what was going on in Connecticut’s Capitol and Legislative Offices that day? Is Connecticut state government keeping secrets?
This isn’t about “anti-Semitism”.
It’s about blatant corruption in the “family courts” for the past 40 years.
Any Jew, Christian or Muslim who knows about the corruption in Connecticut “family courts” and is too afraid to talk openly about that corruption is a coward and complicit in the harm done.
https://youtu.be/LeBhhANOcQY?si=_1XFGRTi2cdNdmxM&t=173
May Stephen Grant be in a witness protection program,
willing and able to tell us all everything he knows.
https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/ct-drug-companies-price-fixing-settlement-tong-ag-19877564.php
Maybe now, The Connecticut Post’s writers and editors will care enough about investigating and telling Connecticut’s residents about the state’s pathetic “family court system”.
Most residents have no idea what a nightmare it is until it’s too late. Thanks to Paul Boyne for working so hard to get the conversation going. Maybe now, the conversation will get going. Still, those heavily involved in the corruption will try to keep a lid on it. It will be up to the whistle-blowers in every office — especially the New Haven FBI office.
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/abdulrahim-sulaiman-family-court-documents-19816008.php
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/paul-boynes-bombshell-former-ct-supreme
He’s not wrong. The family court is all political .
Beth Din of America (a court of Jewish law) which services Jews throughout the United States of America as a forum of arbitration dispute, through din torah arbitration disputes, obtaining Jewish divorces and Jewish personal status issues. As well as financial disputes. The Beth Din is affiliated with the rabbinical Council of America.
In Israel, the father’s rights counsel advocacy group (IFRAC) represents divorcing fathers, grandparents, and children effected by divorce, in Knesset, congress Parliament and social welfare ministers. Some say Parental Alienation theory has had a negative effect on legal responsibility to assess children’s safety and best interest.
August 1,2023 The Times of Israel blog. Alan Fishman
Reem Alsalem is the UN Human Rights Counsil Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls. On April 13, 2023, she issued a report on “the abuse of the term “parental alienation” and similar pseudo concepts. What does it have to do with Israel?
It’s so happens that over the past decade at least and especially in the last 5 or 6 years, this dangerous and abusive pseudo concept has become all but the default mode of operation in many Israel’s family court.
It is no secret that the social workers responsibility for best interest of the child recommendation in family court in custody dispute cases “parental alienation pseudo concept” as an undisputed truth was vigorously applied. When I was teaching these social workers for the ministry of welfare and suggested Gardener was controversial, I was abruptly removed from my teaching by a former student, no less.
At one point in time, the difficult dispute was referred to the special Assistant Unit, part of the court itself, highly trained NEVER inclined to the Gardener theory approach. The entire unit was “recast” and devoted towards the Gardener approach by the Justice Ministry Ayelet Shaked about 6 years ago.
I have been shocked by several cases where mothers pleaded that an evaluation of a child complaints that the noncustodial father abused them in visitation. When I reported that my best clinical judgement was the abuse was real, custody was abruptly awarded to the alleged abusing father on Gardnerian claims that were made.
Some of the children were teenagers that were treated for alienation. One daughter has filed suit against a social worker and the court for abuse. Another young man has come forward for dispel of damages for “treatment ” clearly inflicted with PTSD inflicted by the courts.
Channel 13’s legal reporter, Baruck Kra made a two-part inquiry into the activities of Tel Aviv Family court justice and devotion to Gardner alienation extreme. Otherwise, the media seems to want nothing to do with it.
A mirror of what is happening in the United States, especially in Connecticut. The new term is child and Mother sabotage. It’s a lucrative and increases the cost of family court cases.
Jewish and American Law. The religious liberty and equity are integral to American democracy. The US constitution protection of religious freedom and modern anti-discrimination laws have enabled the Jews to flourish in the US. Is it being used to cover up extortion in family court far beyond Jewish Court professionals? Is equity and inclusion being used to discriminate against the entire interest of the public in the legal system in the state of Connecticut?
Where is the investigation and protection to the entire greater public interest in the state of Connecticut? Antisemitism and racism are no good, neither is extortion to a large number of citizens from a system that is supposed protect them.
It’s all political and/or all religious?
and/or all a spiritual battle?
Please explain the ways in which family court is “all political”.
The politics of family law. Manasota journal of family Law
Fran Olsen 1984
Family Law like law in general, has two different aspects: an apologetic aspect and utopian aspect. In the apologetic aspect, family law tends to justify dominating women by men and the opposition of children by parents. Family law reinforces the most common forms of male dominance and patends to pacify family members by counseling from their scrutiny how damaging and restrictive family relationships often are. Furthermore, family law makes are present our present family relationships life seems “natural” and therefore unlikely to change very much. Family law encourages minor reforms and individual adjustment, while discouraging imaginative speculation or creative change in family structure. We forget that a radically different form of social life would seem equally natural once we had established it.
In utopia aspect, family law records successfully efforts to make reality of human association live up to our hopes and aspirations. Legal struggles have resulted in a variety of family reform and have increased options available each individual. Lawyers and judges have introduced notions of fairness into family life, they have created vocabulary necessary to argue for justice for women and children (now men). Most law scholarships focus on utopian aspects of law and ignore laws apologetic, legitimatizing roles. In family law, perhaps more than any other field of law, the
the literature tends to rationalize and criticize existing doctrines on a low level of abstraction. Focusing attention primarily on some purpose for reform.
The liberation of the family, the phenomenon I refer to should be understood in the context of these complex effects. The pre-liberal family, which I characterize loosely as the “feudal” family continues to exert an influence on law. The “feudal” family was a social, economic, and political unit of feudal society. The image of “feudal” family has continued to influence on law.
The father was the head of the household and still the hierarchy superior, but the hierarchy becomes more open to question.
Healthy marriage, fatherhood and economic growth of the nation.
Joette Katz: “At a certain point, it stops being about free speech and becomes about real threats to personal safety,”
Go to the 28:00 minute mark in the video of the ADL panel discussion. When it’s Josette Katz’s turn to speak, she hits the microphone with her hand to mimic the sound of the gavel and says, “All rise.” with a solemn expression on her face. It looks like she’s actually waiting to see who in the audience will stand to show her respect. Her audience is smart enough to know they’re not sitting in a court of law. She then says she was just joking. She wasn’t joking. She’s unhinged and her audience didn’t laugh at her joke.
Thanks to Richard for his courage. So many see the many little emperors who have no clothes. So few have the courage to say what needs to be said out loud.
https://youtu.be/TpXVuvX6PsE?si=Pl-j_zq6zdbB8tVz&t=1682
Don’t forget about Michael Volpe. He is one of the pioneers of the injustice of family court. Demonstrating courage to tell the truth dispite Jewish heritage. He went into the state of Connecticut with an open mind. Despite criticism from his own personal struggles, has not waivered from his view on the false alligations of ” coaching” and running the court house on a broad and undefined hypothesis. With out Mike Volpe very few would be interested in the injustice in family law industry. Richard has come in with some important facts. Frank has given an opportunity when Paul Boyne was shut down. The voice of the people. Thanks for the opportunity, even if we disagree on the points.
You’re not allowed to disagree in America, anymore.
She actually did that. Where are the yearly mental competency tests for government employees and unelected officials wielding so much power and control over so many people? Absolute power still corrupts absolutely.
The effects of the Jewish bar association/American Association of Jewish lawyers & Jurist Greater Wahington. The failure to separate church and state in the United States.
The American Association of Jewish lawyers and jurists were founded in 1983 and is affiliated with the international Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists. the American Jewish legal community, defending Jewish interest and human rights in the United States and abroad.
The effects of Jewish divorce on family law litigants by Alexander Leichter 2020
The “get” The get has become a tool to extort huge sums of money from a wife and/or her family, to force the wife to forego civil property rights and support or force her to cede custody of her children.
Looks a lot like exactly what is happening in Connecticut family court and the AFCC
🤔
The mission of Israel through the AAJLJ. specifically tailored interest of Jewish Americans law community. Including meetings with predominate Israeli leaders, such as supreme court justices, government officials, law professors legal and commentaries, and leading attorneys from across the Israeli politics, religious and ethnic spectrum. Another word using religion to influence courts. Using the ” get ” to extort money from people.
Shipman and Goodwin is where Katz went after her horrible running of DCF. Shipman and Goodwin received millions in ppp loans. Which were reviewed by Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy. The problem is not being Jewish. It’s extorting money from United States citizens in family court, United States tax dollars to fund another country. Using religion as a defense. It’s not fear so much as the ” get ” being exposed in family court.
No offense, but when you blame an entire category of people for the crimes of a few, you’re part of the problem.
One category of people is not the problem. It’s the use of individual categories of people to protect a varied set. You are missing the point.
When we clarify our points with specifics, examples and actual data, it’s easier for readers to not miss our points.
Approximately 3 % of Connecticut practices the Jewish faith. 1/3 of the attorneys practicing in the state of Connecticut are Jewish. There are no statistics on psychologist providing court services. There are Jewish , Catholic and other referral services for attorneys. It’s not that far fetched that Nichola Cunha would feel discriminated against. She was the only non – Jewish court professional in the court cases. Referrals are made in the legal industry. Including based on religion. Religion is a bias, does bias perceptions of marriage and divorce. There are multiple bar associations influencing law in the United States. The Jewish bar association appears the only bar association based on a religion. Influencing law including religious bias. Nichola Cunha didn’t fit in to a specific bar association to protect her. There is legislation and organization assistance protecting fatherhood in family law. There was no legislation protecting Karen Riordan as the Mom in family law. There is all kinds of discrimination and bias in the legal system and the court of equity.
51 % of the United States are women. 48 % of Connecticut’s population are women. William Tong and Richard Blumenthal are heavily influencing law not just in Connecticut, but the attorney general’s office. The Biden administration is heavy on equality and inclusion. Using this as a platform to influence law. Beyond protection of hate crimes. The number of people complaining out weighs the the number of legal professionals complaining, but William Tong and Richard Blumenthal are is ignoring it. A Big problem in Connecticut are not just the legislators. It’s the Senitors and Congress. If you watch the hearing for the Connecticut supreme Court justice family court was brought up. Representative Fishbein brought up women in family court, then proceeded to bring up a story about a woman lying on a restraining order application. Giving a bias perceptions. Then brought up constitutional rights probly knowing that the ERA hasn’t been archived, Not once did Representative Fishbein bring up child welfare and safety. The human rights of children. Connecticut continues to ignore the United Nations report. Continue to allow no choice in GALs. The supreme Court justice choosen in part by equity and inclusion. Let’s hope he doesn’t forget the broader spectrum of public Interest and safety.
Craig Fishbein divorce attorney, state representative, ranking member of judiciary committee. Republican lock step legislation. In addition, legislative assignments public safety, and security committee, regulation review committee.
At a hearing, Craig seemed to wonder how O’Neil could go from corporate law to family law so fast.
Steve (almost giddy with excitement) predicted close to exactly what happened next. Was that just interesting, just a coincidence or just more back room deals kept hidden from We the Peasants?
It’s the same politicians coming up time and time again. On judiciary committee. Winfield and Stafstrom failed to let sexual assault legislation pass. Winfield is putting bills forward to protect pedipiies. Steven Stafstrom Bridgeport PD. Fishbein is on the safety committee. I smell something fishy in the nutmeg state. It’s not coming from Boynes cell.
Connecticut inside investigator. The FBI an independent organization has a larger number of crimes statistics for Connecticut then the state is reporting. These politicians are sitting on judiciary committee. On public safety task forces. Many have reached out to the New Haven branch about Connecticut family court. How many crimes are being committed in the state family court system not reported?
So much harm done to so many children and families after so many back room deals makes me wonder if Representative Stafstom (from Pullman and Comley, LLC) wore that black and white checkered tie as a symbol of his allegiance to lodge “brothers” somewhere at the expense of We “the profane”.
How much of the United task Force have to do with family court? As well as psychologist using parental alienation? The unregulated practice and no limitations on billing.
If you are paying attention to the political climate and projects in the state of Connecticut. The projects are based often on financials. Cost savings and added revenue. These are projects based on equity and inclusion. An important platform, but has been taken to another level. The alterations of statistics( not broken down) and the legislation being passed in the state. Not allowing people to identify as a mother or father. Changing birth certificate. Not allowing people to identify as they wish. Placing the rights of one person over another. It’s unknown why Paul Boyne believes it is a Jewish conspiracy. It’s well documented that the religious faith is playing a role in politics. As well as influence in the legal system. Their is bias in beliefs and beliefs of Sub groups are effecting politics under the Democratic party. Laws and legislation affecting the entire public interest that are based on a smaller group not the public as a collective group. . These are often based on financial insensitive and not based on overall population. Paul suggestions were made against a broad spectrum of legal system professionals. The shutting down of the speech beyond hate. The blog represents more than suggestions and hate speech. . It’s the abuse of the judicial system and application of benefits the group in the legal system collectively financially benefiting over the broader spectrum of the public.
Even the American Bar Association is fighting with William. Tong.
Says who?
6/20/24 William Tong with several other attorney generals office defending equity and inclusion to the American State bar and other companies. Programa that benefit a smaller group over the mass majority. Several of Connecticut programs receiving federal funding. They don’t want to cut funding to violence against women. Equity and inclusion is at the convenience of William Tong and the Democrats. It’s biasing many things including family court.
They are trying to cut the funding that is critical to the group of victims in the state.
Who graduated from Yale law School? The class of 1973. Who is influencing the government? Related to sexual assaults and family court.
Politics. Class of 1973.
How To Start a Court Watch ProjectNCJ Number 96648
Date Published 1984
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/how-start-court-watch-project
How To Start a Court Watch ProjectNCJ Number 96648
Date Published 1984
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/how-start-court-watch-project
Wonder 🤔 what really happened. In 2012 Connecticut had a very big production on ” parental alienation” Joan kloth Zanard did a write up in the There was media coverage, I guess the media committee did not think those children had a right to privacy? Norm Pattis’s client hadn’t seen his triplets in 2 years. No alligations were brought up in the case, at least that were made public. Fast forward to 2024. 4 children were allegedly sexually abused by one of those children marked as alienated. It happened at a town Parks and recreation camp. The people in the town and the parents of the children were outraged that they were never informed of the alligations. The matter was being kept quiet 🤐. . It really makes you think what was really going on in that case? . Why did they try to keep the sexual assault alligations of 4 children under wraps for everyone? Who is hidding sexual assaults from the public?
☝️ Judges punishing mothers for breaking the silence. The judicial Media committee has noooooo problems allowing publicity on the Masterangelo case. Bias and the perception of the fatherhood funding narrative. Connecticut Cherry picking what the media reports on. DCF cases for fatherhood media campaign. 30 million dollars for hate crimes. No conversation on the war on women in the United States. No advocacy for women from attorney general William Tong.
The public interest is a broad concept that refers to the general well-being of society as a whole. It’s a key concept in the democratic theories of government, and it’s often used in legislation and by the courts. The public interest is important because it helps to balance individual and collective rights. Ensures fairness in public authority decisions and built trust in the legal system.
When policymakers act in the public interest, they consider the broader implication of their decisions on things like health, safety. education and environment. The public interest can be applied to many areas.
Law, communication, politics,
Areas of public interest include freedom of expression, freedom of the media, public health and national security, and preventing and detection crime and fraud.
Wider public interest means the potential of proceedings to produce real benefits for individuals other than the client (other than any general benefit which normally flow from proceedings of the type in question).
What the family circus represented to Connecticut residence despite the suggestions, racism and antisemitism:
The general welfare of the public that warrants recognition and protection from the family law industry, the judicial employees, judges. Something in which the public as a whole has a stake, especially an interest that justifies.
Which public?
The entire public who may or may not have to go to the family court in the state of Connecticut.
This case is more about protecting the AFCC than the harassment of Connecticut family court judges. If it goes to trail maybe people can sign up to testify. Did the blog inspire violence? Was it inspiration for Connecticut residents to demand an investigation and prosecution? Which William Tong has ignored. Along with the department of justice. Is William Tong and the state of Connecticut representing the people collectively or the AFCC? Thousands complaining and nothing is done. Three judges engaging in AFCC tactics reported on and the man hunt is on for the journalist reporting on it. Suggestions of violence not required.
Lawfare damages more than blogs.
Under state statues and Connecticut Constitution, the attorney general has authority over civil matters. Responsibility for representing the people of Connecticut and the broader public interest.
Who is going to do something about the online crazies? Isn’t that what they said at the conference? What better way then stop the press . I would think twice before voting in these Democrats.
Now, at the present time, using violence would be premature. We are not yet ready to confront such an assault. Money must first of all seek maximum protection in schemes and in legislation.
Let us make use of the courts. Let us go forward as fast as possible at perceiving debts, at foreclosing (depriving of recourse to justice when a certain time limit has been transgressed) on debentures and mortgages.
When, through the law’s intervention, the common people shall have lost their homes, they will be more easy to control and more easy to govern, and they shall not be able to resist the strong hand of the Government acting in accordance with the orders of the central power of imperial wealth, under the control of the leaders of finance.
Our top leaders are perfectly aware of the truth. They are presently working at establishing an imperialism of the capital to rule the world. But while they are implementing this plan, they must keep the people busy with political antagonisms.
We’ll therefore speed up the question of reform in the custom rates by the political organization called the Democratic Party; and we’ll put the spotlight on the question of protection and of the reciprocity by the Republican Party.
By dividing the electorate this way, we’ll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever, and on which we only touch upon as instructors of the common flock.
It is thus that, through discreet acts, we can maintain what was so generously projected and executed with such a remarkable success.
See one response on page 217.
Here’s a response to the accusations of corruption in the banking and political systems.
Has anyone representing Connecticut family court administration published any response at all to the (how many thousands of?) accusations of crimes and corruption in the family courts? It started in the 1970s.
https://archive.org/details/bankersmagazine101cambuoft/page/217/mode/1up
US taxpayers owe interest on $35 trillion in debt to whom?
To the few now able to conquer this world
with “distributed ledger technology”.
No apologies from anyone representing “family court” for all the harm done since the 1970s. So much harm done and no apologies should tell legislators something about the current state of “family courts” … eventually.
By the way, anyone recognize those two guys?
Robert Horwitz and Jim Horwitz. Jim wrote, “Bystander Emotional Distress in Medical Malpractice Cases: An Update”, Greater Bridgeport Bar Association , News Brief, Vol. 13, No. 5., May, 2001
If Jim is Bob’s brother, Jim’s probably learned a lot about emotional distress from Robert’s bizarre psychology applications in his “family law” malpractice.
With no oversight for Robert’s cases since the 1970’s, Robert playing CT AFCC, Inc. “secretary” and Gerard Adelman playing CT AFCC Inc. “director”, it’s been one malpractice case after another.
Someone please tell me that Scott Gerard of Shipman and Goodwin didn’t join The Center for Children’s Advocacy board of directors to cover for Joette Katz of Shipman and Goodwin because she helped prosecute Paul Boyne behind the scenes after Paul exposed the CT AFCC Inc. public/private partnerships. 😳
It looks like Scott doesn’t have a whole lot of a lot of experience with children’s advocacy in this piece online:
The children’s law center is one of the is one of the most corrupt organizations in the state
Have you seen more evidence of corruption in the Children’s Law Center or more evidence of “advancing progressive goals”? There’s a difference, you know.
…
Thank you for staying strong and exposing the evils of the Jews and their minions, Brother Boyne!
You are doing God’s work!
You posted a few short comments such as the comment above. Will you tell us more about your concept of “white power” and Paul’s connection to your organization?
Or, are you a trolling to divide our state and our nation?
Hi there Connecticut, looking for damage control. Stop posting these types of games. We are well aware of the color cover up. Connecticut is exploding the minorities to make money. Using Biden’s equity and inclusion program. The money is going to enrichment of the state. Paying for the benefits, retirement and ” perks”. It’s time for the Republicans to speak up. Bipartisan agreement on the ” money maker” . HHS funding and nonprofit organizations. It’s not God’s word to divide a nation.
…
Hate speech and hate crimes. Targeting an entire group of people and excluding them.
Connecticut is conveniently leaving surtain people out of the conversations.
Who are ”surtain people”?
That snake building’s 1/2 in Vatican City and 1/2 in Rome 🤔
A Few Questions:
Was Simon Magus one of the first Freemasons to fool Jews and Christians into Gnosticism?
Paul Boyne kept writing about the Talmudic influence on Connecticut “family courts”. Is he right about that?
What kind of Judaism and Christianity do the most corrupt in Connecticut “family courts” practice?
If the Middle East is leveled into “glass” or a “parking lot” will we have allowed the corruption of a few to destroy this world’s three largest monotheistic religions?
Which small group of people decided open and honest discussions about religion in politics is more dangerous to the world than the destruction of this world’s three largest monotheistic religions?
And no wonder. For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light.
Since that hasn’t been in the news, how many know what it is?
The “whites” have been losing power in America for some time now. America is now a country where whites are the minority, and it’s not thanks to the Jews, it’s thanks to other whites!
Which “other whites”?
The rich white man are controlling everything. It’s a puppet show. Where is all the money going? We are sitting on a surplus, yet the mess of DCF in the group homes. Federal funding not making it to where it is needed and belongs. Children sexually assaulted, trafficed and staff locking themselves in the car because it’s out of control. The town resources over taxed and no help for the higher ups. Where was the DCF commissioner and the attorney general’s office. Emergency funding with a plan to gain control over the place. Yet, Connecticut is holding to surplus? Everyone is getting out of jail on criminal justice reform. To the crime infested streets. The Hartford police officer are afraid to arrest anyone. Crime is down?
Lack of capacity to accept a plea? 🤔
Sec. 53a-13. Lack of capacity due to mental disease or defect as affirmative defense. (a) In any prosecution for an offense, it shall be an affirmative defense that the defendant, at the time the defendant committed the proscribed act or acts, lacked substantial capacity, as a result of mental disease or defect, either to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to control his conduct within the requirements of the law.
(b) (1) It shall not be a defense under this section if such mental disease or defect was proximately caused by the voluntary ingestion, inhalation or injection of intoxicating liquor or any drug or substance, or any combination thereof, unless such drug was prescribed for the defendant by a prescribing practitioner, as defined in subdivision (28) of section 20-571, and was used in accordance with the directions of such prescription.
(2) No defendant may claim as a defense under this section that such mental disease or defect was based solely on the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosure of the victim’s actual or perceived sex, sexual orientation or gender identity or expression, including under circumstances in which the victim made an unwanted, nonforcible, romantic or sexual advance toward the defendant, or if the defendant and victim dated or had a romantic relationship.
(c) As used in this section, (1) the terms mental disease or defect do not include (A) an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct, or (B) pathological or compulsive gambling, and (2) “gender identity or expression” means gender identity or expression, as defined in section 53a-181i.
https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_951.htm#sec_53a-13
Incompetent now because of a concussion? 🤔
Why did his defense attorneys reject the plea deal offered (1 1/2 years time served) if they’re so concerned about his health and well-being?
How does incompetence at the time the defendant committed the alleged act or acts have anything to do with a concussion affecting his abilities now?
The pre-trial judge thought time served is enough.
It looks like someone somewhere in Connecticut with political connections wants to silence Paul — and whoever that is has the most to hide.
Paul Boyne is accused of cyberstalking family court judges. He’s not on sitting in jail for antisemitic and racist comments. Did any of these judges go into hiding? Did the stop public appearances? Only Paul can truly answer the question as to the point of the blog. For most Connecticut residence the blog was a warning about the corruption in the states family court system.
As most who have been public about the court proceedings, is to bring awareness to the unethical administration of marital disillusion. The tactics used in the courthouse to strip of you of your assets. As well as the children held hostage for a price tag.
I use the word disillusion for a good reason. That it is an accurate summation of the house of smoke and mirrors. The continued support of the government in Connecticut to allow it to continue. The legal harassment and name calling of the people who are complaining about it.
All these attorneys and so-called psychological professionals have made a real mess here in the state. Leading to questions, is Attorney General William Tong misusing his power and position to cover it up? Are the state legislators misusing their position on the judiciary committee to cover it up?
Good luck finding a jury that has not been affected by the family court system in Connecticut. Everyone knows someone, who has been through the trenches of Satan’s kingdom. How many people have been harassed during court procedures, by attorneys, GALs, AMCs, court appointed psychologist and judges? How many have feared for their lives and wellbeing? The safety and well-being of their children? How much of Paul’s case, the investigation into Volpe is William Tong’s influence over the department of justice? How much is William Tong’s position as the small state of Connecticut’s attorney general effecting the entire countries family court system? How much influence does Richard Blumenthal have over the Boyne case? The silencing of Connecticut residence and the entire country about the family court system?
The Blogs was over the top and much of the linguistics were not supported by the Connecticut residence. The exposure of the people creating the hell hole was and still is. Why are Connecticut politician’s working so hard to silence people around the country? Why did all those republican attorney generals leave the Attorney Generals association? Why was William Tong promoted to Vice President of the U.S, Attorney Generals?
If ever there was a case for a defense attorney this would be it. However, they would lose their license to practice in all likelihood. Is Paul Boyne being tossed under a Connecticut bus? Is Mike Volpe next on the hit list? What about Luthmann and Parlato?
Norm Pattis suspension was overturned in May of 2024. He has withdrawn from representing Alex Jones. He no longer represents Nichola Cunha. The black lives matter 860 took a run at Norm Pattis law license for using the N word in a stand up routine. The Christian legal society has requested the removal of eithical standards so they are free to express their opinions on personal matters. Family court litigants are still seeking counsel for having assets and having their children taken in family court proceeding, for expressing concerns over the well-being of their children.
Lisa Kouzoujian is one of the worst GAL’s out there. She openly touts her friendship with judges when someone challenges her and omits material things during status conferences, This stupid disgusting old hag, who wobbles into the courtroom should be disbarred.
Which case(s) do you think she mishandled?
Incompetence?
Since someone involved decided incompetence is now the focus of the case, someone should identify who, among all involved, was incompetent first.
Most of the world considers the immoral to be incompetent. After we define morality, let’s wonder how many incompetent individuals were involved in the Boyne case.
When did Paul first complain about corruption in his family court case and who received that complaint? Then what happened? Keep going to find out exactly where the incompetence began.
Paul Boyne advocated for the protection of children in family court cases involving substantiated sexual abuse. What do the local authorities think about that?
Were his efforts to protect children in those cases not worthy of help from local authorities?
Whether or not the Boyne case is currently as mishandled as most of the most horrifying “family court” cases are: Which state and/or federal officials are looking into his concerns about crimes committed under the auspices of Connecticut “family court”?
State prosecutors should consider the obvious: The direction local politics and this case seem to be going most definitely isn’t competent.
Michael Volpe reported:
Richard, has anyone ordered a transcript from that hearing? The pages with the details about the proposed plea deal would help. Do we have a copy of that transcript?
https://substack.com/@michaelvolpe/p-149256431
Please note:
Still shaken by what I witnessed at the hearing yesterday, I was logging into my email account, missed a few characters and hit return. I also missed the details in the message posted in that screenshot up there. That message wasn’t intended for my account and all’s well so far. I hope it stays that way.
I’m currently looking for good and honest authorities/detectives anyway with the authority to appropriately address the unaddressed “family court” corruption and actionable crimes committed in Connecticut.
If you have suggestions, please post them in the comment section or send the info to Frank Report.
Thanks again!
https://www.wtnh.com/news/connecticut/hartford/interval-house-to-host-jennifer-farber-dulos-memorial-walk-to-end-domestic-violence/
Yesterday, Dr. Lee testified as a witness in Karen Riordan’s children’s case.
As Mr. Ambrose questioned Dr. Lee, I saw and heard Dr. Lee tell the Court about fifty times in common terms that she is afraid of Mr. Ambrose. Throughout her testimony, she asked the Court for protection for herself and for her colleagues. She looked and sounded perfectly reasonable when asking the Court for that protection.
Instead of acknowledging Dr. Lee’s concerns and directing the witness to follow the state’s procedures whenever witnesses intimidation is a factor in a case, the judge coldly and simply directed Mr. Ambrose to continue his questioning.
After Mr. Ambrose asked Dr. Lee to answer certain questions, Dr. Lee turned to the judge and asked the judge to allow her to present that specific information to the Court privately. Dr. Lee didn’t ask the judge to accept the requested information to the Court “under seal”.
Instead of using legal terms to ask for commonly used procedures in cases such as that case, Dr. Lee asked the Court to accept her information privately.
Dr. Lee is a psychiatrist, not a lawyer.
Since Connecticut’s family court system doesn’t expect nonlawyers to know legal terms and procedures, what was said and done yesterday looked and sounded very much like the judge attempted to use Dr. Lee’s use of common language against her.
Two or three times, the judge told Dr. Lee she would need to ask a lawyer for advice about protection as a witness in the case. I don’t remember the exact words he used. He might have told Dr. Lee to hire a lawyer … to discuss her request with a lawyer … to find a lawyer …
My general impression of the words the judge used told me that he wanted Dr. Lee to know how difficult he would make it for her to continue to be involved in the case.
When most Connecticut judges hear laypeople testifying and asking for protection in non-legal terms, how do most Connecticut’s judges respond?
How should they respond? What does the law say about witness protection?
Are there specific procedures Connecticut judges can and do follow to protect testimony and evidence non-represented laypeople offer to the Court?
The judge could have closed the court, yesterday.
He could have told Dr. Lee: the Connecticut court allows witnesses to present information “under seal”.
The judge could have stopped the hearing to allow Dr. Lee to file the information she wanted to present “under seal” at the next closed hearing.
Journalists covering that case should order the transcript of yesterday’s hearing. They should count the exact number of times the judge offered Mr. Ambrose advice during the hearing, even though Mr. Ambrose is an attorney.
Turning to Dr. Lee, the judge told her that he would consider using her refusal to answer the questions in public against her.
I tried to check my email this morning and was denied access to my email account. That has never happened to me before.
If anyone reading this has any recommendations for good and honest law enforcement officers/detectives, please post those recommendations in the comment section or send those recommendations to The Frank Report.
Specifically, I would like to know who might have accessed — or tried to access— my email account after that court hearing.
Thank you.
Still shaken by what I witnessed at the hearing yesterday, I was logging into my email account, missed a few characters and hit return. I also missed the details in the message posted in that screenshot up there. That message wasn’t intended for my account and all’s well so far. I hope it stays that way.
…
The firm in which Judge O’Neill comes from received millions and in ppp loans during covid. Right before he was nominated to be a judge. These are the things that make you wonder if people have alligence to serving the public or is there a greater influence at hand. Kinda funny how he was put on the case right away.
Did he have any experience with cases such as that case when someone put him on that case? Who put him on that case and why did they put him in charge of that case? His involvement looks like lawfare.
I don’t think it’s about the money at this point. Connecticut is not going to admit fault. They are going to protect future financial interests.
It’s a cover-up.
Dr. Bandi Lee is sick.
All she does is diagnose anyone who disagrees with her. No wonder Yale fired her from her unpaid position. You know you’re incompetent when they don’t even want you working for free.
By the way, is she even still a doctor? last I heard, her medical license was expired.
Ok Chris.
I would trust Brandi Lee over the court appointed ones. Yale is a fatherhood funding school. Heavily invested in parental alienation in there psychology department. Hartford is the same. Brandi Lee didn’t fit in at Yale. It’s a for mysognist and women haters . Anyone who has a had a different experience?
****** Thomas O’Neill was a top donator to senator Gary Winfield also sitting on Connecticut judiciary committee in 2014***
Why Gary Winfield didn’t need to keep talking. Gary Winfield is a “special interest” senator that doesn’t represent the public. He dominated the state of Connecticut with special interest. Has Gary Winfield ever been to a women’s prison? Has Gary Winfield been to a domestic violence shelter? He dominates all the hears. Anyone who dares speak out against criminal justice reform. If you you are not a ” special interest” politician your outcast. Other demographic need not speak out or it’s hate speech.
Correction. Hearings. Gary Winfield has obviously not hit the streets where people live. Most inner City residents will tell you the juveniles are the problem. Lack of consistency legally for the parents with children gone wild. The gangs are using children because they get in less trouble and records go away. The police officer are scared to do their job. . Definitely some bad cops out there.. Racism exists and antisemitism. Not on the level perpetuated. More funding increasi
Of course there are a few spiritually sick souls in control of Hollywood. However, no spirituality sick souls control anything else. 👀
Everyone working in Connecticut “family courts” knows what’s happening.
All targeted if they open their mouth doesn’t matter what color.
Dr. Lee said about 50 times in court she is afraid of Chris Ambrose??
Dr. Lee is an incompetent nutjob. I would have more compassion for her if she wasn’t trying to weaponize her credentials for use against innocent private individuals.
She needs a mental health evaluation. Early onset dementia is one possibility.
Chris, you’re an asshole.
It’s clear the good doctor should have hired Gary Cohen, then perhaps she would have been treated better by the judge!
Would he have gotten her gas money?
Ambrose has likely run out of money a long time ago. His landlord recently filed an eviction action against him. Look it up on the judicial website.
if Ambrose has run out of money, why is this judge still so deferential to hi ?
It’s deeper than the attorneys. God forbid Connecticut own their mistakes.
Maybe Paul’s mad about the crimes Sidney Horowitz and others committed against him and against his family.
Is the state spending so much time and money to hide the crimes committed in the Boyne case?
Simple solution:
“… always oppressive, always anti-spiritual. …”
Interesting, right?
Does the corruption in Connecticut family courts have something to do with the Canaanites calling themselves Phoenicians in the 12th century BC?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devils_Tower
Who’s the guy with the purple tie?
That’s Ric Grenell. He’s a great American.
Thank G-d.
(I thought it was Peter Thiel.)
Connecticut inspector general is limited to the deaths occurring in police custody and corrections. He has given no authority to investigate fraud and waist. Connecticut citizens were denied an inspector general for years . Conveniently for the state of Connecticut.
Do Connecticut legislators and the governor not see the need for an inspector general to investigate the deaths and destruction in the “family court” networks?
When will the Mawhinney trial begin? Who will investigate “Dr.” Stephen Herman? He was supposed to conduct a proper investigation in the Dulos case and didn’t.
What were those gestures?
Is Mr. Grant still a state employee? Were his gestures used to hide important facts about the federal funding of state programs? Did employees of CSSD deceive the public four years before Jennifer Dulos disappeared?
If Kent Mawhinney’s former law partner, Mr. Mawhinney and Stephen Grant are all Freemasons, the public might not ever be told the truth about what’s been happening in the “family courts” — especially if those three men all swore oaths such as:
…
You don’t understand how websites work.
If I recall correctly, Paul had web hosting on an overseas server that couldn’t be subpoenad from the U.S.
WordPress wasn’t hosting any of his content.
It’s kind of like…if Paul were an artist, WordPress is the crayon. The overseas server is the museum where Paul’s drawings were stored. And that overseas museum doesn’t have to obey a subpoena from the United States to turn over all of Paul’s artwork or to take it down.
means the authorities can contact WordPress to ask them to remove any content they find to be offensive.
Kind of like the worst authorities can do whatever they want to do.
Sorry, but no. WordPress is literally just the template used in this case. WordPress has zero access to the content on the web server.
If certain individuals involved in the Connecticut “family court” racketeering and cover-up contacted Detective McCord to arrange for a fishing expedition a few weeks ago, they should be ashamed of themselves. They won’t be ashamed of themselves.
In the past, Detective McCord had the courage to go after human traffickers and now, Connecticut’s “family court” human traffickers expect Detective McCord to investigate “family court” victims who visited The Family Court Circus website? Is that what’s happening now?
Will Detective McCord help the “family court” human traffickers or will she investigate the victims of human trafficking?
Sidney Horowitz and his colleagues worked to destroy Paul Boyne’s family. As the father of his family, Paul should have been angry that Sidney Horowitz tried to destroy his family.
I hope and pray that Detective McCord will be smart enough to investigate Sidney Horowitz and his network to find out what Mr. Horowitz had to do with the writing of the 2014 GAL/AMC training materials.
Detective McCord and her colleagues should note:
If Detective McCord is good and smart, she will eventually find the “kids for cash” racketeering networks in Connecticut “family courts”. She will find those public-private networks started in the 1970s. She will find those networks have promoted the sexual abuse of children and she will find that the New Haven FBI office ignored the actionable evidence they gathered in their 2014-2015 “public corruption” investigation.”
In Summary:
What happens next?
Looks like Detective McCord is part of the problem or is now afraid to address it as she once did.