MK10ART's painting of Allison "Pimp" Mack

Allison Mack Will Be Sued for Being a Pimp for Nxivm

By Shadow State

Neil Glazer represents scores of Nxivm victims in an expected lawsuit against Nxivm and its leaders.

Allison Mack will likely be one of the most prominent Nxians to be sued.

In Glazer’s excellent article, Nxivm Victims’ Attorney Neil Glazer Speaks Out on Defamatory Commenters , he points out a number of important points including some good advice on what is defamatory.

So, let me go on record to state some facts about Allison Mack, gleaned from Glazer’s client, Jaye, and her truthful testimony. It may help people understand why Allison will be included in the civil suit.

MK10ART portrait of Allison Mack and her favorite brand.

1.) Jaye testified that she had to provide new collateral every month.

And it was due on the 1st of every month – “just like rent” according to Jaye.

Most of the collateral that Jaye provided involved nude pictures and movies.

MK10ART’s painting of Allison Pimp Mack

2.) Jaye’s required “acts of care” included buying manicure-pedicure sessions for India – and small gifts of jewelry for India and Allison.

She also had to run various errands for both India and Allison.

And she, of course, was never paid for any of this work.

Under the Flag of Nxivm — MK10ART’s lovely painting of Allison Mack and her protector and guide Keith Alan Raniere [behind her].
3.) Jaye described The Source training sessions as being “very expensive” but noted that “there was a payment plan” (We know from other witnesses that NXIVM’s “payment plans” often turned into indentured servitude).

Jaye went from being a highly-compensated model in Los Angeles, CA to an $18/hour “go-for” working for Delegates, a NXIVM-related company run by India Oxenberg.

MK10ARt’s depiction of Allison Mack reflecting on her threesome with Keith Raniere and Dani Padilla. She gave herself permission to enjoy it.

4.) Jaye also took The Source Intensive that was taught by Allison Mack and Mark Hildreth in Vancouver – and a Jness weekend in Clifton Park at Rosa Laura junco’s home.

Heiress Rosa Laura Junco, the DOS front line slave who lived in this mansion and who offered her virgin daughter to Keith Raniere to be his successor, used her mansion to host Jness weekends.

The 5-day intensive cost $5,000, The Source Intensive cost $11,000, and the Jness weekend was a bargain rate of $500.

Also in attendance at the Jness weekend that Jaye attended were the underage Mexican girls who Raniere and others were grooming for him.

MK10ART’s painting of Allison Mack with her mentor, Keith Alan Raniere.

5.) Jaye hoped Allison would help her learn about the acting business. But she went from thinking that Allison was a good person to later believing Allison was vindictive, hurtful, and manipulative.

As a member of DOS, Jaye was expected to recruit slaves.

Painting by MK10ART

6.) At one point, Jaye had to fill out a lengthy questionnaire about her sexual preferences.

One day she attended volleyball without a bra and Allison scolded her for that, saying the older women were offended.

MK10ART Allison with branding pen and Nxivm love arrow.

7.) Jaye was told by Allison and India how lucky she was to have this great guru (Raniere) taking an interest in her.

Allison was grooming Jaye and other women to serve as sex slaves.

Allison Mack will perhaps be more remembered for her work with Dr. Danielle Roberts [r] than for her acting career. [MK10ART]
8.) Allison told Jaye that she must seduce Keith subtly [as if he did not know this was planned with Allison] but Allison added kindly to Jaye, “And I give you permission to enjoy it.”

(Wasn’t that kind of Allison to give her slave permission to enjoy sex?)

The two faces of Nxivm – Allison and Keith – by MK10ART.

9.) What was Jaye thinking about Allison when she was ordered to seduce Keith?

“You fucking bitch” was her thought, she testified.

Allison was re-traumatizing her [Jaye testified that she experienced sexual abuse as a child]. And clearly Jaye did not want to do this obscene act with Raniere, but she pretended she would.

From this moment on, she planned to escape DOS.

https://frankreport.com/2019/06/12/trial-tuesday-jaye-assigned-to-seduce-vanguard/
https://frankreport.com/2019/06/12/a-few-more-tidbits-from-jayes-direct-testimony-and-then-on-to-her-cross-examination/

So what true facts are we to glean from Glazer’s client Jaye?

1.) Allison Mack is a PIMP.

2.) Allison grooms women to serve as sex slaves.

3.) Allison is a SEX TRAFFICKER.

4.) “Allison PIMP Mack is a “fucking bitch.”

Allison Mack is very likely going to be sued under the civil provisions of the RICO Act for her PIMPING activities.

Treble Damages.

 

About the author

Correspondent

58 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

  • Protocol was broken.
    Epstein was on suicide watch as recently as Thursday (two days ago.)

    “Despite that, Epstein had been taken off suicide watch, a special set of procedures for inmates deemed in danger of taking their own life, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters. He was on suicide watch as late as Thursday, the source said.”

    “At the MCC, two jail guards are required to make separate checks on all prisoners every 30 minutes, but that procedure was not followed overnight, according to the source, who was not authorized to speak on the record.”

    “In addition, every 15 minutes guards are required to make another check on prisoners who are on suicide watch.”

    “SEX TRAFFICKING INVESTIGATION TO CONTINUE
    After Epstein’s arrest, prosecutors said a search of his townhouse, conducted under a warrant, uncovered evidence of hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of nude photographs of “what appeared to be underage girls,” including some photos cataloged on compact discs and kept in a locked safe.”

    “In a court filing on July 25, the government said it was pursuing an “ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals” in connection with the case against Epstein.”

    “That investigation, in the U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan, will continue despite Epstein’s death, a different source familiar with the matter said.”

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-jeffrey-epstein/disgraced-u-s-financier-jeffrey-epstein-killed-himself-in-jail-source-idUSKCN1V00GM

  • “Allison PIMP Mack is a ‘fucking bitch’.” That sums up your feelings. Maybe leave it at that? What do you hope to accomplish with these relentless posts?

    Shadow, what did Allison do to you personally to get you so emotionally involved?

    Does she remind you of some hated person from your past?

    • ““Allison PIMP Mack is a ‘fucking bitch’.” That sums up your feelings.”

      Actually that sums up the feelings of witness “Jaye” the witness who experienced Allison Mack’s criminal behavior first hand.

  • According to a post on Reddit, in Sarah Edmondson’s book, she says that Allison took off for Albany with Lauren the day after her very first intensive and stayed there. Seems Allison drank the Koolaid Lauren poured right away.

    • The story in the Hollywood Reporter is that Allison Mack flew to Albany in a Bronfman jet.

      “Dones says that Lauren Salzman attached herself to Mack that weekend, eating meals with her. “By the end of the weekend, Lauren and Allison were like best friends,” she says. When the seminar concluded, Mack accepted an invitation to fly on the Bronfmans’ private jet back to Albany, New York, to meet Raniere in the flesh. They told her Raniere could help her with her acting career. This was a rare development, even for a VIP; most high-profile initiates had to complete at least one 16-day “intensive” at a cost of $7,500 before being granted an in-person meeting with Vanguard. ”
      https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/how-smallvilles-allison-mack-went-actress-sex-cult-slaver-1112107

    • If she said that, she is a liar…Her boyfriend said they decided not to continue because it was creepy.

      Kristin convinced Allison to continue and after a few Week, they managed to change Allison.

      And another fictional book on the shelf…

      Lauren flew with Allison for Albany only in 2009 (Susan Dones and many others said that).

      • Donnes and Edmondson said the same thing. Chad never said what you are suggesting. Allison was treated like VIP by Salzman and Sarah Bronfman. The only thing Kristin did was introduce her to NXIVM.

  • Tragically Shadowstate has become like a Stanley Kubrick or Stephen King character.

    There is not going to be a happy ending.

  • Reading these articles now leave me with a tinge of sadness…what kind of life must Shadowstate have? Sitting around obsessing over new ways he can portray AM as evil and the devil… He truly is a prisoner to it all 🙁

    It really just acts to shine a light on Trump’s America, a man desperately in need of mental health treatment and support but unable to access it due to his lack of wealth 🙁
    I hope you find peace Shadow and don’t waste your remaining years with this obsession and vendetta…

    WHEN the defamation lawsuit comes, others will bear some accountability for enabled and promoting this behaviour…

    So with that in mind, I am no longer going to post on FR… I feel somewhat guilty for getting caught up in point-scoring off a clearly vulnerable and un-well older man…

  • No he is not…Neil Glazer represents his client for the Defamation and did represent-ish his clients in the already done trial…

    Allison’s Trial is DONE ! Frank himself said that if there is NDNY trial coming, Allison isn’t listed as one of the defendant.

    You use the “she will be on trial for this” as an excuse but you are accusing her,wrongfully now! She isn’t a pimp and nothing that you said here or will say will change this!

    You are described (even if Glazer isn’t pointing his finger at you)… You are broadcasting exclusively lies and deform the truth to fit your fantasy.
    You are abusing the 1st amendment (and you too Frank, you are just doing that while you worried about the implication for you…publishing his article is a defamation)

    “So, let me go on record to state some facts about Allison Mack, gleaned from Glazer’s client, Jaye, and her truthful testimony. It may help people understand why Allison will be included in the civil suit.”
    So once again, Jayes was INDIA’s SLAVE AND NONE OF THE ACCUSATION ARE PRECISE…THE ONLY VICTIM (for Allison) IS NICOLE.
    Also a civil suit ? TRIAL IS OVER? NOTHING WILL BE DONE ANYMORE…This testimony was “usefull” for this trial but would lead to absolutely nothing else.

    1) And ? Providing collateral was never questionned, i said Allison is guilty of collecting collateral (under coercion because she had herself to give collaterals).

    2) Yet nothing precise…The only developped info was that INDIA received jewelry and not a GIFT, she asked to Jayes to pay for it…
    The testimony is not refering this action for Allison, Jaye point Buyin jewel for india and errand for Allison (unprecised and disputable as once again, the whole forced labor is an absurd accusation)

    And i don’t see you blaming India for this…it’s only a crime when Allison is doing it? shows once again who you are shadow.

    3)And so? Everything was expensive in Nxivm and not by Allison’s design but by Raniere’s design…You keep trying to make believe that Allison had any power but systematically fail to prove it and worst, ignore the facts.

    And once again, you cite India who make Jayes do the “forced labor” for a ridiculous fee but it’s not Allison (nor India)…Raniere also took over the Delegates.But let’s ignore this again, right?

    BTW see the ressemblance between Jayes and Allison? going from highly paid job to almost nothing? Allison sure is a mastermind…I’d ask you to think for a second but you live in a permanent lie so you would find a way to twist everything around against Allison, yet again.

    4)Excuse me but you already said that and the price are still not Allison’s decision…I don’t see you blaming Hildreth for giving course. This is still no prove of anything…
    And more so, nothing important against Allison. you just try to pretend you read the court documents (you just did it once today) but in reality , i expect (in the following lines) to read you twisting what was said.

    Once again that Chihuahua story…a story that was never proved (just discussed in court), with no link with Allison but the ridiculous link Frank made due to a typo in the “Pacer” program.
    A TYPO! none of the official document (let’s put back in place that Pacer is for the eyes of everyone, but indictment and such are the official documents…none of them contained the Typo)

    You, of course, are jumping on this typo to try to link Allison to a pedophilian crime but the truth is SHE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF THOSE CRIMES.
    SHE COLLECTED THE COLLATERALS ,period.

    5) And it’s jaye’s opinion! The same as Glazer, her lawyer said here, IT’S AN OPINION, NOT A FACT. She BELIEVED is different than ALLISON WAS.
    And for the member of DOS, SO was Allison…She was A SLAVE TOO, It’s not even disputed by most of the prosecutor

    Allison was under coercion, collateralized, received message telling her what to do, punished if she wouldn’t do it, She was also under a severe diet and sleep deprivation …
    And that is just for what i remember!
    Hardly the display of a mastermind Leader…Raniere was the leader, Raniere was controlling everyone and forced Allison to do what she did, it’s not disputable, there is enough proof of this.
    But once again you ignore this and consider the situation individually and ignore the potential crime (if we forget the coercion they had behind) of their actions.

    Even if Jayes was lucky not to go to the point of really recruiting she almost did. Nobody is disputing that she did it in fear of the release of collateral.
    But it’s impossible to imagine the same for Allison. Allison’s collateral were not just a few nude pics, it was about to destroy everyone she love and everything.
    More than anyone, she had a lot to loose so the coercion isn’t even disputable.

    6) Which is Raniere things, once again!

    And for the volleyball , the point? I mean Allison just transmit a message from “older women”…i don’t see the crime here!

    7) And so did all the people who were in Nxivm…They all believed he was a great and it was luck .
    Dani herself said that she was flattered to be noticed by Raniere.

    And how saying this makes Allison grooming Jaye and other women? First, there is one official victim ,that’s Nicole…Then there is a attempted victim (conspiracy) and that’s Jayes.

    Let it be clear, i’m not saying Jayes was not a victim to a certain level but i’m saying that she isn’t a victim of ALLISON…
    And certainly not in the pimping part as first, it wasn’t pimping (i advice you to read a dictionnary) and Allison has pleaded guilty and in her guilty plea, signed by both Prosecution and the Judge, no mention of this.

    What you are doing here is once again Defamation per se! Prison , remember this…

    8) Excuse me but she said “seduce” and that is not “have sex”…Lauren also showed that it was a “common” assignement given by RANIERE.
    And the second part of the statement might be silly at best but not a proof of ANYTHING.

    Once again, you are trying to twist what was said and even if it meant sex (which in my vocabulary doesn’t)
    Also i have a hard time to believe fully that Allison was the one who said that as you willingly cut a part of the testimony that say that it was INDIA and Allison that gave this assignement.

    An assignement that Lauren herself had to give to one of her Slaves…I don’t see you accusing Anyone of pimping but Allison.

    Also , just a reminder, the position of Allison, if you want to give it a prostitution image, would protect her as there is a special statut in the US law to protect the Prostitute that supervise the other.
    It is because the JUSTICE RECOGNIZE THE COERCIVE PRESSURE ON THIS PERSON AND THEREFOR SHE IS A VICTIM HERSELF.

    But this isn’t prostitution and Allison didn’t do anything special here…keep trying.

    9) And once again, it’s her opinion, nothing more!

    Allison didn’t asked her to have sex…She interpreted the order as such. And she didn’t had sex so i don’t see the point, once again.
    Also she wasn’t punished for this!

    She didn’t escape DOS, she said “i’m out” and Allison didn’t threaten her of anything…

    The true fact is that you proved nothing…you repeated what was said and twisted it the worst possible way…making unimportant detail look like it’s a major things but forgetting ALL THE FACTS AND CUTTING PART THAT DIDN’T FIT YOUR NARATIVE!

    You never change and even when “quoting” partially what is in court document, you manage to lie! i have to admit that i’m impressed that even with proofs you manage to continue to Lie (and Also impressed that MR parlato is still not understanding that publishing this absurd article makes him guilty of defamation)

    1) Nope, not proved, definately not

    2) Nope, Not proved either…you cited thing that have absolutely no link to this …i don’t even have to explain this as you make no sense when you pointed this part

    3) Nope, That’s a defamatory statement (another to add to my list of NUMEROUS DEFAMATORY STATEMENT)…
    BTW check the court document further, you will see that it’s not in the crime she will be sentenced for!!!
    There is a reason (although it might evade you)

    4) “Allison PIMP Mack is a “fucking bitch.”
    And another defamatory statement…It might be your (useless) opinion but it’s not a fact.

    “Allison Mack is very likely going to be sued under the civil provisions of the RICO Act for her PIMPING activities.”
    THE TRIAL IS OVER !!!
    Get a life old man, it’s done, game over, she is not a pimp, never was and never will be suit for your fantasy…go back to sleep so you can imagine your sick dreams.

    BTW i doubt Mr Glazer appreciate you cite him while you do exactly what he said he was going to fight against.
    It doesn’t matter who his client are.
    What matter is that you stain his credibility (well not really, you are nobody for most and i’m sure most just ignore you , i should do the same but i take pleasure in making you look like a fool)

    He is fighting against defamation and you drag him in one of your defamatory rant. you are such a genius!

    • I am sure you may have a good response to this “article”, but I cannot get past your poor grammar and terrible spelling to even finish reading what you said…. (If you are going to advocate for your NX pals, then perhaps you could spellcheck first. Just a thought…)

      • I think that’s “Frenchy” the anon, who is not a native English speaker.

        They’re also apparently from a country where the legal system lowers the bar for bringing defamation and libel charges, compared to here.

        And they seem to get really worked up trying to defend Ally as more the sort of girl-next-door she played on Smallville.

        • “I think that’s “Frenchy” the anon, who is not a native English speaker.

          They’re also apparently from a country where the legal system lowers the bar for bringing defamation and libel charges, compared to here.

          And they seem to get really worked up trying to defend Ally as more the sort of girl-next-door she played on Smallville.

          Read the article from a couple of days ago,..

          IT’S IN THE US LAW!
          Defamation charge for people accusing of crimes not committed is called Defamation per se in the US code.
          It’s is also in the US code that you get a potential prison sentence depending the seriousness of the accusation.

          Continue to pretend it’s not , The fact is a few days ago A US LAWYER threaten to take seriously the defamatory declaration made against is US CLIENT in a US COURT.

          Advice, buy a brain, learn to read before you go after me.

          “where the legal system lowers the bar for bringing defamation and libel charges, compared to here.”
          seriously? wow, that’s giving a lot about who you are!

      • Excuse me but that is your defense against my response?

        How old are you? because this is the kind of answer i expect from a 12year old troll, not from a sane adult.
        Don’t like my grammar, ignore me!

    • “Neil Glazer represents his client for the Defamation”

      What Defamation?
      Glazer sure as hell does not represent Allison Mack.
      Glazer represents Daniela, Jaye and Nicole.
      All witnesses for the prosecution, not witnesses for Allison Mack.
      And I did not defame Danniela, Jaye or Nicole.
      Those three women were defamed by NXIVM trolls like you.

      You’re just a NXIVM troll who makes up allegations.
      Neil Glazer represents numerous clients who have been harmed by NXIVM and its leaders.
      Glazer is not suing for defamation.
      He is suing for the harms committed by NXIVM and NXIVM DOS.
      Harms involving sex trafficking.
      https://frankreport.com/2018/09/11/analysis-of-glazer-letter-protecting-victims-of-bronfman-raniere-and-a-list-of-bronfman-raniere-lawsuits/

      And Glazer is suing not just Allison Mack but also:
      Keith Raniere
      Clare Bronfman
      Nancy Salzman
      and
      Lauren Salzman.
      —————————————————

      The following next several paragraphs come from the Frank Report
      Analysis of Glazer letter protecting victims of Bronfman-Raniere – and a list of Bronfman-Raniere lawsuits
      https://frankreport.com/2018/09/11/analysis-of-glazer-letter-protecting-victims-of-bronf

      “FR: Neil here reveals: 1. He represents numerous clients who he claims are both “victims” and “witnesses” concerning crimes charged in the indictment. 2. He represents victims and/or witnesses to crimes not yet charged. This implies his clients are cooperating with the Feds and that there will be another superseding indictment.”
      “Glazer is a civil lawyer. This suggests that, in addition to his clients being witness/victims of crimes, which might make the world safe from Bronfman-Raniere, the victims have a champion who will help bring them recompense for the time and money they lost and the pain and suffering they endured.”
      “FR: We get an idea of how many ex-NXIVM members have retained Glazer: “dozens.” This means at least 24 – and probably more. How many of these will be witnesses in the criminal case will be seen. Some of them are likely some of the Jane Does mentioned in the indictment.
      —————————————————————————–
      “Allison’s Trial is DONE ! Frank himself said that if there is NDNY trial coming, Allison isn’t listed as one of the defendant.”

      Where did Frank Parlato say that?
      Quote and citation?
      Has Frank Parlato seen the indictment?
      Until the indictment is filed and released to the public you can not say who is in the indictment and what they’re being charged with.

      Moreover, the trial that is done in the EDNY is a CRIMINAL trial.
      You fail to understand that this is a CIVIL trial.
      The RICO law has both CRIMINAL and CIVIL components.
      The people like Jaye and Nicole harmed by Allison Mack’s PIMPING can sue her in Federal Court CIVILLY.
      Do you understand the difference between Criminal and Civil?
      ———————————————————————–
      “She isn’t a pimp and nothing that you said here or will say will change this!”

      It’s not what I say.
      Read the truthful testimony of Jaye and Nicole.
      Both women describe conduct by Allison Mack that can only be regarded as sex trafficking.
      Is Allison Mack going to sue Jaye and Nicole for defamation?
      ———————————————-
      “FR: This is interesting: more than 100 people were subjected to human fright experiments of Dr. Brandon Porter – financed by Bronfman – and said to be similar to fright experiments of Mexican Drug Cartels. Indeed, they may have been sponsored by Emiliano Salinas on behalf of the Mexican Drug Cartels.”

      NXIVM and NXIVM DOS victimized not only the sex slaves but also the 100 or so people exposed to Dr. Brandon Porter’s Fright Experiments.
      The same Dr. Brandon Porter who is now living in Clare Bronfman’s mansion.
      The same Dr. Brandon Porter who worked with Allison Mack to recruit a teen age girl to the NXIVM sex slave cult.
      How Dr. Porter and Allison Mack worked to recruit a teenage girl to the sex slaver cult of NXIVM
      https://frankreport.com/2018/05/19/how-dr-porter-and-allison-mack-worked-to-recruit-a-teenage-girl-to-the-sex-slaver-cult-of-nxvm/
      ———————————————————–

      “SHE (Allison Mack) COLLECTED THE COLLATERALS ,period.”

      This one quote of yours demonstrates what a LIAR and FOOL you are.
      ALLISON MACK COLLECTED BLACKMAIL MATERIAL TO COERCE THE SLAVES INTO HAVING SEX.
      That makes Allison Mack a SEX TRAFFICKER.
      Collateral is what the bank demands to secure a loan.
      PICTURES AND VIDEOS OF NAKED WOMEN ARE NOT COLLATERAL.
      —————————————————
      “What you are doing here is once again Defamation per se! Prison , remember this…”

      What you are doing is protecting a PIMP AND SEX TRAFFICKER named ALLISON PIMP MACK.
      ——————————
      ” “Allison PIMP Mack is a “fucking bitch.”
      And another defamatory statement…It might be your (useless) opinion but it’s not a fact.”

      It’s Jaye’s opinion.
      And Jaye knows Allison Mack from personal experience.
      How do you know Allison PIMP Mack?
      Were you in NXIVM with her?
      ———————————–
      “THE TRIAL IS OVER !!!”

      The Criminal trial in the EDNY IS OVER.
      But as I said before the Civil Trial has yet to begin.
      And the NXIVM DOS ‘slaves’ have the right to sue Allison PIMP Mack and all of the other leadership of the sex slave cult.
      ——————————————
      “He is fighting against defamation ”

      Neil Glazer is fighting to protect the rights of his clients Daniela, Jaye and Nicole.
      And Jaye and Nicole were ABUSED AND EXPLOITED by Allison PIMP Mack.

    • “She collected the collateralls” you make it sound like she was selling raffle tickets.

      Collateral: blackmail pictures of vulnerable women’ genitals, over which they are forced to perform the nexium rictus grin.

      She knew all about the modus operandi of KAR. She knew what that blackmail evidence involved. There is nothing innocent or usual about collecting degrading porn images from young women who believe you ultimately have their best interests at heart when you are actually their slave OVERSEER.

  • May Allison Mack go bankrupt and her faux wife be arrested. Emiliano Salinas and his sister need to be extradited. Lastly why is India often portrayed as a victim? She knew what she was doing when she was also being such a disgusting degenerate.

      • And? So if Allison’s mother fought like a pit bull, Allison wouldn’t be your target?

        OF course not! you started to jump on Allison since the beginning

        As for the OP:
        India, much like Allison, Is a victim.
        They were coerced to do what they did (and Jayes who is recognized as a victim of Raniere, was close to do the same…once again because of the coercion)

        It’s pretty much like having a gun on you head.

        The only unfair part is that for Allison, it’s rarely considered (despite the seriousness of her collaterals).

        India Don’t deserve Jail time (no more than Allison) so i Don’t see why you want a victim to pay for Raniere’s crime.

  • Every single post by Shadowstate:

    “Blah blah Blah, Allison Mack, blah blah blah”

    Even broken records offer more variety, Christ …

  • As an illustration of a RICO civil suit the victims of Harvey Weinstein’s abuse over the years have filed a RICO civil suit against him.

    “A recent complaint that shows how broadly the law can be applied to areas far outside organized crime is the RICO lawsuit filed in December against Harvey Weinstein, the Weinstein Company and its directors, and others. The complaint accuses them of helping Mr. Weinstein cover up a pattern of sexual harassment through what it calls the “Weinstein Sexual Enterprise.” The class action, filed on behalf of women who dealt with Mr. Weinstein, claims that the enterprise was designed “to harass, threaten, extort and mislead both Weinstein’s victims and the media to prevent, hinder and avoid the prosecution, reporting or disclosure of his sexual misconduct.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/16/business/dealbook/harvey-weinstein-rico.html

  • NEWS FLASH EVERYONE INCLUDING GOD!

    Allison Mack’s immediate future is in the judge’s hands not any of yours or even God’s.

    All of you are fighting about nothing. Ironically, just like the show about nothing…

    …..Seinfeld.

    • Excuse me but in my case, I fight for Something…He fights for Nothing.

      He just tries to make sure that once this is behind her, she loses her whole life.

      He lies about her actions, her behavior, he defames her perpetually…

      I doubt Allison cares about a no lifer like Shadow and it probably wouldn’t have any impact but between his stupid lies and the morons from Pizzagate trying to link her to one of the biggest (and stupidest) conspiracies ever created…

      and once it’s behind, Allison can count on her friend so we’ll forget about all this and move on…(yes, Shadow, contrary to you, Allison has friends! maybe that’s why you are hurt)

      • “He just tries to make sure that once this is behind her, she loses her whole life.”

        Allison PIMP Mack pissed her own life down the drain.

        “and once it’s behind, Allison can count on her friends so we’ll forget about all this and move on…(yes, Shadow, contrary to you, Allison has friends! maybe that’s why you are hurt)”

        Oh, So you’re one of Allison Mack’s friends.
        How many sex slaves did you brand on behalf of Allison PIMP Mack?

  • Interesting. I wonder if Allison Mack shot herself in the foot by pleaing guilty.

    Maybe she had a better shot of pleaing some sort of insanity defense.

    With a guilty plea, perhaps she shut the door on all defenses?

    Hmmm…

    • What a stupid statement:
      First in “interesting”, there was Nothing interesting but an old man yelling at cloud

      Second : “With a guilty plea, perhaps she shut the door on all defenses?”

      It wasn’t going to be a fair trial…
      She was supposed to be able to defend herself to her best and tell her side of the story but prosecution decided to bring false accusation

      When Allison pointed that this happened WAY BEFORE her time, Prosecution said that they’ll do their best to connect it to Allison.

      This plus the perpetual obsessive behavior of one of the Prosecutor against Allison…

      I remind that a few days ago, Scott told me “it wasn’t Allison’s trial”

      Can we check back the amount of time irrelevant info were given about Allison and how prosecution ignored several info about her?

      1.Coercion is a fact, they published partly her collateral so it’s not disputable.

      They consider some of the person who committed the crime as victim because of the collaterals but for Allison, it’s never even considered once
      2. Vicente clearly stated the abuse that Raniere did to Allison (specifically) and how she was in a terrible shape…Yet , prosecution ignored willingly this

      They tried to charge Allison while she was not called in and while it was not her trial.
      Didn’t gave her a chance to explain anything and this on purpose.

      It’s factual that Allison was fully cooperating but the prosecution willingly took the risk to lose the trial …

      She had no way out and was even forced to plea for more than she did (forced labor is a joke…I’m sorry but i fail to see how one can still consider this as a serious charge)

      • “They tried to charge Allison while she was not called in and while it was not her trial.
        Didn’t gave her a chance to explain anything and did this on purpose.”

        Allison Mack had the opportunity to stand trial and present her case.
        But Allison PIMP Mack is as guilty as sin and took the easy way out.

        “She had no way out and was even forced to plea for more than she did (forced labor is a joke…I’m sorry but I fail to see how one can still consider this as a serious charge)”

        Allison PIMP Mack had no way out because she is as GUILTY AS SIN.
        “Forced Labor is not a serious charge????????????????????????????????????”

        Someone should make you go out in the hot sun and pick cotton.
        Or serve as a sex slave for Keith Raniere.

        • “Allison Mack had the opportunity to stand trial and present her case.
          But Allison PIMP Mack is as guilty as sin and took the easy way out.”
          No she didn’t but nevermind that, it won’t stop you from spreading your stupid lies.

          “Allison PIMP Mack had no way out because she is as GUILTY AS SIN.
          “Forced Labor is not a serious charge????????????????????????????????????”

          Someone should make you go out in the hot sun and pick cotton.
          Or serve as a sex slave for Keith Raniere.”

          No she is not, that’s the whole problem, the lack of proof except for COLLECTING COLLATERALS

          Excuse me, i understand that ,since you have no friend , you Don’t know what it is to give a hand (plus with your awful nature, i doubt you would care to help anyone but yourself)

          SHE DIDN’T FORCED THEM TO WORK IN A COTTON FIELD
          You are trying to connect the shamefull history of USA to a story that has Nothing to do with it!

          Nicole said that Allison asked her to correct a text for Cafritz funeral (if i remember correctly)

          Ok, that’s picking cotton?

          In the same time, Allison helped 3 times Nicole

          When asked in court “Don’t you think you should have paid Allison for her service?” She said ” she was my mentor…”
          SO?
          If What Nicole obtained is not true forced labor (on Allison), What Allison asked is Nothing more that a service (especially since Nicole considered herself a friend of Allison (atleast back then))

          Now to Jayes testimony…She said that Allison gave her some errands …You do know what is an errand? it’s cotton picking?

          It’s a little job!
          BTW i remind that for Jayes, she was a member of the DELEGATES. A group of “Slaves” underpaid to do errand for Nxivm members…

    • “With a guilty plea, perhaps she shut the door on all defenses?”

      You’re absolutely right.
      Allison Mack’s guilty plea in a Criminal RICO case can be used against her in a Civil RICO suit.

      • Perry mason to the rescue…
        Too bad you are wrong!
        It would work the other way around (from civil to criminal)

        The only civil suit coming doesn’t include Allison, Sherlock!

        • Because a criminal charge has a higher standard of proof (beyond a reasonable doubt) a guilty plea in a criminal case is more serious than in a civil case (a preponderance of the evidence.).

  • One question Mack Daddy:

    In your next lecture on the law as you understand it, please (or possibly a practicing attorney could) explain what comfort a plaintiff might take in an award of treble damages where the defendant is indigent?

    You seem to be a big Seinfeld fan: Maybe Ms. Mack could be sentenced to be a servant to the plaintiffs who prevail in any lawsuit against her?

    Take a deep breath and imagine: Allison, dressed as a French Maid, chasing you around with a cauterizing pen.

    Now go take a few well earned moments away from the Frank Report and take matters into your own callused hand…

    • “You seem to be a big Seinfeld fan: Maybe Ms. Mack could be sentenced to be a servant to the plaintiffs who prevail in any lawsuit against her?”

      Mack is still getting residual payments for her now moribund acting career.
      The plaintiffs will try to attach those residual payments to satisfy any judgment.

      • I checked. If I wanted to watch my first ever episode of “Smallville” (I don’t), I could go to either Hulu or Amazon.

        It’s not like Smallville is running five nights a week at 11 pm on WGN.

        I do not think Mack’s attorney fees (if any) will be paid by Clare Bronfman going forward.

        So instead of your usual repetitious rants, which are becoming rather tedious, why not try to uncover what Mack’s Smallville residuals amount to?

        Hint: if I was a NXIVM “victim” seeking civil redress, I would be focusing on Bronfman, not Mack.

    • “Blackmail is very serious and pernicious crime.:

      It sure is.
      Almost everyone has unpleasant secrets. Embarrassing secrets.
      To use those secrets to extort property and services from people is reprehensible.
      And Allison Mack was extorting sexual services under the threat of blackmail.

    • You are right, and guess who was a victim of this? Allison…She never blackmailed anyone, there isn’t a statement saying that Allison threatened ANYONE

        • And Allison HAD TO THREATEN THEM FOR THE BLACKMAIL TO BE REAL…
          Allison was herself Under a serious collateral, WAY WORST THEN A FEW PICS OR VIDEOS.

          But continue to ignore this fact…

          • “Allison HAD TO THREATEN THEM FOR THE BLACKMAIL TO BE REAL”

            No she doesn’t.
            As long as the women know the blackmail photos and videos and stories exist they know the threat is real.

About Frank Parlato

About Frank Parlato

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in major publications all over the world, including The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CNN, Fox News, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, and more.

Frank Report is dedicated to Frank's investigative journalism and the pursuit of truth.

Read more about Frank Report's mission.

Got A Tip?

If you have a tip for Frank Report, send it here.
Email: frankparlato@gmail.com
Phone / Text: (716) 990-5740

Archives

     
     
%d bloggers like this: