Thanks for the interest, just a quick general response. First: I live in a rural area of a small country, very prone to copper cable theft. My ADSL line was cut and stolen on November 25 2020, and I’ve been offline since then. It’s just a fact of life around here. Shots have been fired in this war, I’ll tell the story sometime. One reason I make such wordy posts is that I don’t know if I’ll be online the next day, so I make hay while I may.
I don’t use wireless, so I’ve just stayed quiet. I reckon it’s been very good for my health all round.
I download just about everything I see online, so I’ve spent the last 10 months reverse-surfing my archives, including reading through many lengthy debates on this forum, always entertaining. I know some of you better than you might imagine.
I’m currently busy with a vast editing job for the United Nations, a demographic and econometric blockbuster, hundreds of pages, thousands of references. I have to check every single name, date and city of publication. For this, I had to capitulate and use a wireless connection—carefully shielded, surrounded with orgonite and using the same noise field technology that the US military uses to protect its radar operators. Nonetheless, I spend as little time online as possible. But having paid for the bandwidth, I did check in on Frank Report, hence my comment on the RFK Jr. article (which Frank published a couple of weeks after I wrote it, he was very busy with all the NXIVM news).
Anyway: I am really serious about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. I’m glad someone posted some of his Berlin speech. According to Robert Dallek’s biography, talking about JFK’s historic visit to Berlin in 1963:
Kennedy departed Germany with a sense of exhilaration. He told the crowd bidding him farewell at Berlin’s Tegel Airport that he “planned to leave a note for my successor which would say, ‘to be opened at a time of some discouragement,’ and in it would be written three words: ‘Go to Germany’. I may open that note myself some day.”
In the not too distant future, RFK Jr.’s speech in Berlin may be rated as being equally significant as his uncle’s. A true challenge to tyrrany, a worse tyrrany than Soviet Communism and German Nazism combined.
Take a good look at the 1996 Telecoms Act, signed into law by Bill Clinton. I’ve often called this the most fascist law in US history. This literally forbids any local authority from saying a single word, let alone taking any action, against a tower or other wireless facility that is irradiating the environment and the population, so long as it is doing so below the FCC guidelines.
Specifically, Section 47 USC 322(c)(7)(iv) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 forbids jurisdictions from regulating the placement, construction, or modification of Wireless Communications Facilities based on the environmental effects of RF emissions, “to the extent” that these emissions comply with FCC standards.
So if there is a cluster of cancers around a tower, no one can do anything about it, if that tower is radiating below the FCC level. Any local authority that makes a single move to protect its citizens opens itself to being sued by the wireless industry under federal law.
The FCC radiation guidelines are the very worst in the whole world as far as protection goes. They are tens of thousands of times higher than levels associated with all kinds of illness, including cancer, and more than a billion times higher than the levels associated with brainwave changes.
Section 47 USC 322(c)(7)(iv) will be directly responsible for killing more Americans than any other cause in history, period. That section of the 1996 Act is a true legal death sentence.
So when I see Robert F. Kennedy Jr. directly challenging the FCC in court, and winning, I know, this guy is truly fearless and is going straight for the jugular.
Here’s one for the books. On 15 September, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted a motion from the Children’s Defense Fund and ordered the FCC and the government to pay the CDF $14,351.98. This was the cost of the 11,000 pages of documents that the CDF was forced to print and submit to the court, because the FCC wouldn’t acknowledge their existence, let alone read them, let alone take them into consideration when developing radiation guidelines.
These 11,000 pages are all scientific studies showing clear and consistent evidence of harm from low-level microwave radiation. I always say, the mark of the contemporary “conspiracy theorist” is that we quote lots of scientific papers. Just one link to a peer-reviwed scientific study is enough to get you banned on social media, in the name of “evidence-based fact checking” and “community standards”. Global censorship way beyond what the Communists or Nazis ever achieved.
Your career as an FCC lawyer depends on the fact that you do not under any circumstances set eyes on any of this “evidence.” It’s all “conspiracy theory,” according to the FCC lawyers.
Only ignorance is invincible.
You can close your eyes as tight as you like, but there are catastrophic health problems with wireless technology, and these problems will have to be addressed at some point by the human race, such as coping with the coming catastrophic pandemic of birth deformities among the grandchildren of pregnant women now in wifi fields.
The most malignant entities in covering up and perpetuating these problems are the WHO and the FCC.
I’ve detailed some of my battles with the World Health Organization and its International EMF Project.
I’ve also mentioned some of my research into the FCC, to the effect that if you ever do manage to pin these bastards down, they immediately say—oh, but WE don’t have any expertise with health, we’re just tech regulators. We rely entirely on the FDA and the engineering industry for guidance on health.
To the best of my knowledge, gleaned from an activist who pursued the FCC for years, there was actually just one guy, one single guy in the whole FCC, who was in fact directly responsible for health. His name was Mr. Ed Mantiply. He’s retired now, and again, to the best of my knowledge, after making direct enquiries of the FCC to no avail, he has no successor.
Just for the record, I wrote to Edward Mantiply, on 22 July 2020. This is part of my mail:
Dear Mr. Mantiply
I hope this finds you well.
I am a journalist in [redacted]. I have been researching issues of health and insurance around mobile phone base stations for many years. I recently came across a document regarding a 2014 meeting you attended, where an insurance industry representative said the following, which I find very interesting and important:
“Roger Egan [chairman of Risk Strategies Co.] explained that property insurers will not accept a partial solution. Unless a comprehensive solution protecting the needs of all the wireless stakeholders is implemented that would not only be limited to roof-top sites, insurers will react in a predictable manner by denying coverage to property owners who host wireless antennas. He concluded that exclusions would be very disruptive to network expansion demands at a time when all consumers want and need increased wireless capacity and coverage.”
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7521097088.pdfI understand you’ve left the FCC now, but I would be very interested to know how the insurance situation with wireless towers stands, as you see it.
The UK lawyer Alan Meyer, who is probably the world’s leading expert on the legal implications of towers, has said that the balance of liability is tending towards the landowner, as being responsible for any harm (including loss of property value) to neighbors.
…
The world’s top reinsurers are rating claims for damages caused by wireless technology as one of the biggest possible risks facing the global insurance industry.
With the planned proliferation of base stations and microcell antennas, I really would appreciate your comment on the balance of liability and risk, especially that facing the wireless industry, if they cannot obtain insurance for their operations. The insurance industry itself is obviously not happy with the lack of clarity in this crucial area.
…
I really would appreciate your input.
Otherwise, perhaps you can indicate who would best be able to answer this question at present within the FCC.
Thanks for your attention
All the very best
Yours
“FRED”
Needless to say, I never received a reply from Mr. Ed Mantiply. But I am still glad that I emailed the one guy at the FCC who used to know anything about health. Just another fruitless attempt at breaching the fortress.
As someone who has watched this issue evolve over the decades, and watched so much effort being wasted trying to protect the world’s population, I can confidently say that no one has cut through the crap quite like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Children’s Defense Fund. This crack in the FCC’s impenetrable facade is beyond all precedent. I am not prone to hero worship, but RFK Jr. really and truly is a hero in my book.
Sirhan Sirhan, convicted of killing Robert Kennedy Sr., recently won a parole hearing and may be released from prison. RFK Jr. was the one member of the family who visited him in jail, talked to him for hours, and emerged convinced that Sirhan was not the real killer. No one on this planet knows better than RFK Jr. the risks of speaking out against the cabal. Again, this is a very, very brave man. And thanks again to Frank Report for highlighting his work.
You can say what you like, but time is longer than rope, and history will judge who was right and who was wrong, and which lawyers were lying through their expensive teeth, along with their biggest pals, the talking heads of the mainstream media.
John F. Kennedy
