Sources at CT Court tell Frank Report that court marshals escorted Family Court Judge Joseph Vizcarrondo out of his own courtroom yesterday. Up until yesterday Judge Vizcarrondo sat in family court in Stamford CT Superior Court.
He initially refused to obey what reportedly was a reassignment from the court administration. For a tense moment, it looked like the marshals would have to handcuff and remove the judge forcibly.
Another source told FR that the reassignment means Vizcarrondo can no longer hear family court cases but has not been removed from the bench. The court administration has reassigned Vizcarrondo to the civil law section, where he will only hear personal injury cases.
Vizcarrondo, known in certain circles by the nicknames “Raging Robe,” “Judge Tantrum,” and “Justice Vizcarraige,” may have been removed from family court due to a recent incident in his court.
He Wanted to Jail a Father
Judge Vizcarrondo wanted to hold a father in contempt for not paying child support. The man argued pro se that he could not afford the high support payments the judge had ordered.
Judge Vizcarrondo responded by saying he would throw him in jail for 30 days, and wanted the marshals to handcuff him and take him away. However, in family court, the law requires the judge who wants to put a litigant in jail to ensure he has an attorney.
The judge called the Public Defender’s office. However, the rules state that if the judge wants a defendant represented by a public defender, he must route the request through the clerk’s office, which might take a day or two.
When told this, Judge Vizcarrondo said, “I don’t care. I want him in jail today.”
Stamford CT Superior Court.
The clerk told him he could not do it this way. The miffed judge ordered the marshal to go to the Public Defender’s office and bring back a public defender.
The marshal brought a public defender to the courtroom, where he was told, “You are going to represent this man. I want him in jail today.” The public defender refused.
“I’m ordering you. You work for me,” the judge reportedly said.
Instead of complying the public defender pulled out his cell phone, called someone in Hartford, and put the call on speaker. He told the person on the other line, “I’m a public defender. The judge ordered me to represent a client he wants to put in jail, violating the rule that we do not defend clients in family court through a judge’s direct assignment.”
The person on the phone (and all in court could hear) said, “Do not bother saying anything to the judge. Just walk out” – which is what the public defender did.
The judge got off the bench, and left his courtroom. Everyone in court heard him screaming in the hallway.
He returned disheveled and angry and told a marshall to go to the third floor and get a family law attorney.
The marshal told him he had no authority to compel an attorney in private practice to come to his court.
The judge said, “I don’t care. You work for me. Go down and get me an attorney. I am putting this man in jail today.”
His wild eye and savage look perhaps persuaded the marshal to think it was better to do what the furious judge wanted and report it to his superiors later. He left and returned with a family law attorney.
Raging in his robes, the judge told her, “I am ordering you to represent this man so I can put him in jail for 30 days on contempt.”
She said she could not possibly represent him today. She had another matter in family court and would need time to familiarize herself with the case.
The veins in Justice Vizcarraige’s head looked like they would pop out and splatter the entire courtroom. But what could he do? He looked at the man he wanted to imprison with a look of pure, seething hatred. till, he realized he could not force the lawyer to represent him, so he had to let the man go.
Other Matters
Judge Viccorrondo also reportedly covered up for the guardian ad litem (GAL) Jennifer Bar David, who allegedly tried to remove evidence on a custody case to protect an alleged pedophile father who had custody of a teen girl who claimed her father had abused her sexually.
Another witness said the judge forbade a battle-decorated US Marine Corps sergeant from wearing his uniform in court.
Governor Ned Lamont nominated Vizcarrondo in 2022. He was a former prosecutor with the United States Attorney’s Office in CT before his nomination as a judge.
Many of these people are not paying child support. It's becoming a “thing”. Not bringing a lawyer and paying only if they are forced. Should have followed procedures, but I am sure the judges are getting tired of it.
Anonymous05/10/2024
Where are you getting your statistics from?
He likely has no money because family courts steal your life savings.
This judge should be disbarred.
Moving him to civil court is like the church relocating the pedos.
Anonymous05/11/2024
It might be helpful to tell the back story. This group is the type to support the domestic batters receiving alimony. I don't support the due process violations. The negligence for procedure. However, I've become extremely sceptical about the situation that this group promotes. Believe it is a one sided narrative on a regular basis. If I am wrong I apologize, but I am sceptical of the agenda of the group who is pushing the article. The continued focus on child support being the problem. The country is in massive debt due to arrearage. If you are angry about the state having to make money for child support it's because of the people who refuse to pay it. Leaving the rest of us picking up the tab. I've seen how these people operate. They are always the victim and don't take responsibility for themselves. If you want sympathy and people's to stand behind him tell the entire story. I'm sure the judges are just as flustered as the rest of us. Meaningful solutions needs to address all the problems in the system. Child support obligations removal is not going to be a cure all neither is the insisting that people collecting it are malicious alienators.
Anonymous05/12/2024
Which “therapists” and law enforcement offices assisted church administrators in the relocation of criminals?
Anonymous05/15/2024
People are tired of getting abused by their spouses and allowing the courts to do their dirty work! maybe he lost all his savings to paying gals, lawyers etc… maybe he lost his job. oh yea i forgot biden said our economy has never been better! hahahahaha
In FC judges are judge and jury! Illegals cross the southern border everyday with fentynal and other diseases and are not thrown in jail! where or what is justice. The scales of justice definitely tip to the D's! If you are to get woke about anything it should be about the injustices in FC and lawyers stealing the childrens futures by taking the assets of the family and making the children pawns in the FC game! Marriage should be like drivers licenses and get renewed every 4 years! Good luck to a younger people as we are destroying the potential of their futures with debt at 35 trillion and adding 1 trillion every 100 days, homes no longer affordable, credit card debt at all time high, people collecting unemployment at all time high, cars being repossessed and our streets have become 3rd world countries in many cities.
WAKE UP!
Rich daddy project05/10/2024
Stanford is full of money. A focus on the Daddy I can't pay my child support. The former prosecutor is probably losing his shit over the curruption in the family court backed by the fatherhood initiative. The country is in trillions of dollars of debt. Where was the public defender office when the mothers were tossed in jail with poor legal representation? The father knows what he is doing. The father's rights groups are heavy in the state. What was the dead beat daddy using as an excuse? This is an equal and shared parenting article. I don't want to pay my child support sponsored article. The daddy probably deserves to be tossed in lock up. The judge lost his cool because of the on going mess these Connecticut father's have created. More father's rights propaganda.
Anonymous05/10/2024
You have lost your mind. Your hate for men is so great that you’re justifying the violation of all laws, and protections afforded to us.
Anonymous05/10/2024
Hate the ones abusing the courts. The rest are fine.
Anonymous05/10/2024
I would not be shocked if the public defender office was the one who contacted frank. I would not be shocked if the father had been fooling arounrd for several court hearings.
Anonymous05/10/2024
This judge routinely serves the “silver bullet” against parents based on mere allegations of abuse in perjured affidavits and testimonies. He even has done this when the statutory immanence factor was not met. Why wasn’t this judge arrested for disorderly conduct? Perhaps those who were threatened by him should seek a restraining order against him. Not surprised that he forbids decorated veterans from wearing their uniforms in his courtroom. He did, after all, graduate from Columbia law school. Wouldn’t be surprised if he joined the rioters,
Anonymous05/10/2024
Lamont=Bad
Anonymous05/10/2024
It's the legistors. They are going against the governor.
Anonymous05/10/2024
Thankful to the brave public defender who still has integrity and obviously knows how the family court game is played.
Anonymous05/10/2024
Trafficking children through CT family courts. Covering for GALs, criminalizing parents – this is a daily occurrence in CT.
Thank you for your continued spotlight on CT courts- We are indeed Corrupticut, where there are no sheriffs and nowhere for the public to get Justice.
The only oversight is the criminals protecting the criminals.
Anonymous05/10/2024
Time to start cleaning house in all the courts in Connecticut Next step should be New Haven
Peter T Szymonik05/10/2024
Sociopaths in suits and robes.
That's all our broken and corrupt “family” courts are full of.
This rogue judge should be immediately removed from the bench for violating fundamental rights and federal law, not just shuffled to another courthouse.
Anonymous05/11/2024
Exactly. Are we to believe a change in venue will “fix” this judge? Outrageous. Add this animal to the list if judges we need to remove.
Anonymous05/11/2024
This judge routinely handed out TRO’s like candy yet he does not even get arrested for disorderly conduct. Why does he get to physically intimidate and threaten his fellow court colleagues and merely be transferred to another docket?
Anonymous05/10/2024
A more gutting punishment would not have been jail, but would be suspension of custody or visitation.
I wish CT would remove custody for nonpayment of child support.
Same coin05/10/2024
Same for false allegations of abuse, alienating tactics/behavior and custodial interference severely damaging a child’s psyche
While at it, if you received child support during these damaging actions repayment back to the victim targeted parent so they can properly allocated monies for the child/children needs and future since they were gained during these horrific acts against the child’s wellbeing.
Anonymous05/11/2024
This is the mentality. Child support is to support the children. The mindset that the parents receiving it are using it for themselves. If your children are feed, clothed and cared for why are you so bitter? The children should not suffer because you want to punish your former spouse. You have not evolved to except and move on. The continued focus on the child support related to alienaton should be a dead give away.
Anonymous05/10/2024
This article is confusing. Is the decorated marine the father who couldn't pay child support? Did this all happen in the middle of a custody case that a gal was involved in? And di the father end up in Jail afterwards? What is the name of this crazy case? At some point you have to wonder if someone is just making all this up for clicks
Anonymous05/11/2024
Read slowly – there are 3 different parts to the Judge’s actions, not one story
Anonymous05/10/2024
Sad but true, spot on depiction
Same coin05/10/2024
Simple to the point
Anonymous05/11/2024
Pay your child support.
Everyone is being ignored05/10/2024
May 10,2024 NPR
Aliza Shatzman is devoting her time to giving judges a hard time.
She spent a lot of time fielding complaints from law clerks, who tell her stories about bullying, gender discrimination and harassment. These complaints come from mostly young law school graduates at the start of their career who have few places to turn inside the federal judiciary to report their concerns anonymously.
Thats why she created a database to gather such stories and warn students about hostile situations, before it's too late.
” The Judiciary needs some people to poke at it” Shatzman said. ” There are far too many judges who are mistreating their clerks, and we need to hold them accountable.
There are 30,000 employees who work for the courts not covered by civil rights protections most other workers enjoy.
Neither are the litigants. *************** Congress has proposed expanding their rights, but the judiciary for years has successfully resisted, citing about the independent and the separation of power.
HUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM. Not just a problem, but many!
Connecticut's false Utopia05/11/2024
Federalism. Mudding up the judicial system. Why is Connecticut allowed to provide pedophile protection. Provide protection for domestic batters in the family court system? Using criminal justice reform for cost savings to plea bargain. Reducing charges to get them under the radar to limbo under the guidelines for fatherhood programs. Qualify for access and visitation grant. The prison programs focused on gatekeeper alienation claims to prep the x convicts for family court custody battles. We are not talking about father's who have not have absents of family violence.
Interested Group05/10/2024
So let's look back… Moo-cowsher – gone, Gould, nowhere to be found, Adelman, quiet and now “Judge Tantrum” exposed. My question is, what are “Judge Tantrum” and GAL Bar David hiding that will more than likely be exposed? Was there a transfer of cash? Are there secrets the alleged pedo father wants to remain quiet? Let's remember that the main stream media, 51 former high level U.S. intelligence officials, the CIA, FBI, and the Justice Department tried to hide the fact Hunter Biden's laptop was NOT Russian disinformation. The truth always comes out no matter how long it takes. I can't wait to see the results of the investigations that may be coming…
Anonymous05/11/2024
GAL Lisa Kouzoujian thinks kids don’t need fathers. She brags about how she went all the way to her ancestral homeland of Armenia, adopted a girl, brought her back to America and raised her without a father. She has said that’s doing it the right way.
Anonymous05/11/2024
Stigmatizing single parenthood. It's not ideal but unavoidable sometimes. What a sorted mess in Connecticut.
Anonymous05/10/2024
I was in the Stamford courthouse on Friday and he is still hearing family cases. Your making this up. Go back to NXIVM reporting.
Anonymous05/11/2024
That’s not true. His removal from the family court has created a cascade of delays for.upcoming trials and hearings. If you were there at all the past 2 days you would see that he is not on the docket hearing any family case
Anonymous05/11/2024
Is the “Anonymous” above your comment the protected alleged pedo father? They can’t hide their crimes anymore. I assure you that it’s all going to be exposed. They can’t stop this train. I’m sure the GALs are worried. I’m looking forward to more Frank Reports on this👍🏻. Great reporting
Anonymous05/11/2024
Jan 31,2024
A well-known Connecticut child psychologist admits Defrauding Medicaid of more than $1.6 million dollars. Micheal Pines 75 of Glastonbury CT waived his right to be indicted and pleads guilty today before U.S. Judge Sarala V. Nagala in Hartford healthcare fraud.
April 24,1994 Connecticut Q&A Michael B. Pines The violence of the Alienated Children. New York Times.
Peter was this psychologist involved in your first case?
Anonymous05/11/2024
How many cases was Pine involved in Connecticut? Hartford area? Ground floor in 1994 of the alienaton industry. Anyone know was he AFCC?
Anonymous05/18/2024
Linda Gottleib
John Colliins
Michael Pines
Hiebel
Gould …
”The father's live in girlfriend was one of the administrators of the Facebook site, PAinCT, which was referenced on one of the billboards. This court does not find the father's testimony credible regarding his denial of any involvement in that Facebook site. As late as 2014 the site was still in operation with postings critical of Dr. Sidney Horowitz and his billings in this matter.”
Paul Boyne was also critical of Sidney Horowitz and his billings.
Have law enforcement offices looked into Mr. Horowitz’s billings in the Boyle and Mastrangelo cases? If not, why not?
https://casetext.com/case/mastrangelo-v-mastrangelo-1
Anonymous05/11/2024
Someone sold Frank a revenge fantasy…I don’t think anything in this article is real.
Anonymous05/11/2024
It’s very real. I know people who witnessed the spectacle.
Anonymous05/11/2024
What as the case?
Anonymous05/11/2024
When your a hammer. Everything is a Nail.
Anonymous05/14/2024
When you are an attorney everyone is a dollar sign.
Anonymous05/11/2024
One does wonder about the prosecutors office. Why they would plea out an attempted murder charge to a far lesser charge. Time served in a domestic violence event . How many times has this happen? How many of these incidents have not been in the news? Would the pleaing down of these types of cases decrease the amount of violent crimes in CT that need to be reported? In violent crime statistics?Would prosecuting these crimes to the original charge cost to much to prosecute? Save on incarceration? Would it add to the state noted domestic violence problems with the increase in murders drawing attention? The murders like the one last week are making the news, but the attempts are probably not. Why are the lives of domestic violence victims not worth the cost of prosecution and incarceration? Criminal justice reform.
Connecticut Women United for change05/11/2024
Connecticut Women United is in desperate need of the Women leading the state in government, higher education, business and the medical community to provide representation across the state. To overcome barriers crossing the lines of all ethnic, religious and financial status to all the women in Connecticut. Beyond just employment. The division of women into categories. This is being broken women down. Causing our ability to be seen and heard greatly impaired. United we stand divided we fall. Women make up a large part of the state, workforce and pay taxes. The population of women as a whole is being ignored. Our lives are being discounted for state savings. Our contributions to society are being undervalued across the board. There are no initiatives for mothers, and a hypothesis and funding are causing mothers to have their children removed unjustly in many cases. The value of our lives is being reduced. Violent crimes against women are getting plea bargained and dismissed for cost savings. Ignored all together. Lumped as false reporting.
We have 4 men pushing criminal justice reform through legislation, with limited to no regard or safety rails. Our state leaders are using soft langue and linguistics to minimize abuse, including pedophilia and sexual assault. Silencing our experiences. It's time to start calling them out on it. PLEASE START EMAILING YOUR LEGISLATERS AND SENATORS. Women are getting harsher sentences then men in Connecticut in many cases. Men are getting preferential treatment. Many agencies are ignoring women that the state has put in place. Ones that are supposed to place women's issues as their priority. Ignoring women's issues beyond abortion rights. It's our political leaders placing them in their positions.
We allow will continue. Enough is enough.
Anonymous05/11/2024
Tina’s a hero and over the target.
Anonymous05/11/2024
Hero for the demented, pathological client and crooked attorneys
Anonymous05/11/2024
Says who?
K.C.05/12/2024
As a mother, NO, TINA ACTUALLY HAS LIED TO MOTHERS CLAIMING SHE WILL BE BRINGING A LARGE COURT CASE AGAINST AMERICA “SO GIVE ME YOUR STORIES ANF EXPERIENCES IN FAMILY COURT”; WHICH MOMS LOSING CUSTODY DID PROVIDE ON TINAS FALSE HOPE!
SHE MAKES TOO MUCH MONEY OFF OF MOTHERS PAIN FROM ABUSE AND VIOLENCE.
TINA IS A LIAR.
WHAT HAS TINA DONE TO HELP ANYONE THAT IS A DV OR SA VICTIM WITH THEIR RIGHTS VIOLATED IN ANY STATE??
ILL BE LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR REPLY.
Anonymous05/11/2024
Propaganda. Tina is a woman who has helped many. Bringing the awareness to the fraud that goes on in family court.
Edward R. Murrow05/11/2024
Note: A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.
Also note:
Throughout history, “powers that be” weakened entire populations to steal nations.
What else besides politics could create the family-destroying gazillion-dollar “family law” industry of today?
What kind of politics let family law in “the western world” morph into the for-profit, purposely adversarial anti-child political industry of “family courts” today?
INFORMAL POLL:
Which local, national and international politics and finances created the “family court” monster of today?
a. Bolsheviks everywhere in 1917 (see: The Communist Manifesto)
b. Yale in China and NYC (around the same time)
c. The Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations in the 1930s
d. Morris Ernst, Tavistock and The Kinsey Institute in the 1950s
e. AFCC, Inc. public-private networks in the 1970s
f. All of the above and much more than that
The ALIENATION Industry05/11/2024
A well known child psychologist plead guilty of fraud. 75 year old Dr. Michael Pines former court system psychologist. 1994 New York times. Q&A. The violence of the alienated child. Fraudster.
Which politics destroys families and capital?05/13/2024
From The Communist League’s ”Communist Manifesto” political pamphlet published in London in 1848:
“The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.”
More about “The Communist League”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_League
Interested Group05/11/2024
The most disturbing aspects of this are the hidden details of the alleged pedophile father in this article. Why is it believed that the GAL Jennifer Bar David is hiding those details? So the “Raging Robe” is colluding with Bar David? If so, would that be a full description of RICO? I pray there is a deeper investigation going on in this case. Has DCF been involded and covered up details as well?
Anonymous05/12/2024
That he is not paying child support and supporting his kids is disgusting. Toss him in Jail no matter what – regardless of the GAL. That he showed up in court wearing a Marine uniform to try to get out of paying makes this case even worse. Total scum!
Anonymous05/12/2024
One would only hope that the fearless leader of reform would toss his court cape on and run to the legislative office building and report it.
Anonymous05/12/2024
Is this who GAL Bar David is potentially covering up for?
https://frankreport.com/2022/01/30/ct-family-court-rich-daddy-role-plays-as-teen-girl-having-sex-with-father-gets-custody-of-teen-daughter/
Anonymous05/12/2024
Soft language legislation. Minor attraction can be cured with a sympathetic psychiatrist. We can cut down on cost of prosecution and incarceration cost. Place a minority tent over the project. We can collect money for health and human services. Disbar any attorney raising questions. The public defender are allowed to engage in misogyny assisting those coming out of prison. Disbarment for uttering anything negative about Jewish people . Unless you work at the public defender's office. You will be sent home with pay. The state can demonstrate an increasing need for fatherhood funding.
Anonymous05/12/2024
Connecticut Association for the treatment of problem sexual behavior CATSO
CATSO was founded in Connecticut in 1983 to promote the responsible and assessment treatment practices for people with problematic sexual behavior. CATSO was formed to carry out the mission to address problematic sexual interests and harm caused to survivors and the community.
CATSO members provide evaluations, risk assessment and treatment for people with problem sexual behaviors. (soft langue) Members have education, training and supervision to use best practices in their work with people with problems sexual behavior.
CATSO Members adhere to the code of ethics and have the benefit of being part of a community of providers who provide support and consultation on the important work of combating problem sexual behavior and victimization. Members are professionals with a master's degree or above in clinical field of study or above. 1000 hours of clinical hrs.' of supervision. Are encouraged to identify their CATSO membership to the public. (It would be interesting to see how many courts appointed professionals are members)
Is Clinical membership to CASTRO a certification? No not a certification or a license. Membership indicates fulfilling the requirements for independent practice of specialized sex offender treatment. While some state agencies (e.g. the JUDICAL DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT OF OF CHILDREN AND FAMILEIS. ) recognize this membership as evidence of clinical competence in this area, membership in the organization is not a form of certification.
Yale School of medicine Department of psychiatry. The Connection, INC. Member at large
Board of Directors Stephanie Donovan MBA CTPBS program director. Connecticut Public Television.
Past president Eileen Redden Fair and Just Agency, LLC A member of Camden, 25 years on religious education committee. Served as Durational project manager in the department of corrections. Hired July 1994
In 2021 a pbs publication was put out ” It's not Your Fault” What a man with pedophilia wants you to know. by Chion Wolf. Guest Eileen Redden is a therapist and the president the Connecticut Association for treatment of sex offenders. Talks about the flaws she sees in sex offender registry list. ” For some people three years of treatment followed by supervision and probation is going to be all they need. Eileen Redden University of Connecticut Heath Center. Expertise in working with people who have engaged in interpersonal abuse and their family.
” MY PHILOSOPHY IS THAT ALL PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED WITH DIGNITY RESPECT AND THAT PUNISHMENT DOES NOT MAKE OUR COMMUNITY SAFER, BUT EFFECTIVE TREATMENT CAN CHANGE AN INDIVIDUAL, FAMILIES AND OUR COMMUNITY.
Welcome to criminal justice reform, domestic violence and sexual assault problem in the state of Connecticut. No justice for victims
Anonymous05/12/2024
I know for a fact that this is not made up and there are more details that are worse 👍🏻
Anonymous05/12/2024
What’s the case? Name and shame brother!
Anonymous05/12/2024
What are those details? Did they just temporarily reassign Vizcarrondo before they are going to remove him from the bench?
Anonymous05/14/2024
He won’t be removed unless public pressure demands it. And no ct news agency covers it.
Anonymous05/12/2024
The judges protect the GALs. They are the coordinators and executors of child trafficking.
Anonymous05/13/2024
Of course they do – they select the GALs. Where is the oversight in this garbage system?
Ken Gills05/12/2024
Thank you Mr. Parlato for your investigative reporting and to all who understand the reality of these situations. I spent 20 years as a U.S. Marine with incredible assignments of which I’m extremely proud. I have now been with my wife for exactly 6 1/2 years in the Connecticut Family Court system. To say I’m appalled at what I’ve witnessed would be an egregious understatement. I and other Marines I served with put our lives on the line daily in many cases to defend our country, people and Constitution. There is more to this than most can ever imagine.
Fraud’s so common - - except in family courts? 🤔05/13/2024
“Salzberg, a licensed medical doctor in the State of Connecticut for 36 years, owned and operated Donald J. Salzberg, M.D., an ophthalmology practice in West Hartford, Conn. From 2014 through 2019, Salzberg conspired with a principal for a medical diagnostics company that performed transcranial doppler (TCD) scans – brain scans that measure blood flow in parts of the brain – to order hundreds of medically unnecessary TCD scans in exchange for kickbacks. Salzberg and his co-conspirator used false patient diagnoses to order the unnecessary brain scans, for which the co-conspirator would submit claims to Medicare and other insurance companies on behalf of the medical diagnostic company for payment. In exchange, Salzberg was paid cash kickbacks of $100 to $125 per test that he ordered, as well as sham administrative services fees. The scheme resulted in fraudulent bills of over $3 million to Medicare and private insurance companies.”
Anonymous05/13/2024
Lot's of dirty court appointed psychologist in West Hartford.
Anonymous05/13/2024
lots of dirty attorneys, dirty judges, dirty GAL's, dirty psychologists — what do they all have in common? if the meter doesn't keep running wallet gets thin…
my2cents05/13/2024
Great story! I love seeing bullies exposed for what they really are.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Who is claiming the case ? No more details? What is happening in the Ambrose case? We got been at the edge of the story and nothing new. ? The frank report is all over the map.
Anonymous05/14/2024
There is another case in Stamford that’s even more of a soap opera involving the beauty industry and the “silver bullet” being used against the father for a litigation advantage.
Anonymous05/17/2024
The beauty industry? Any relation to Chris Ambrose’s beauty/barber company, Eyes Above Productions?
Anonymous05/18/2024
Another fake situation to get everyone interested.
Anonymous05/14/2024
One step back needs: two steps forward
”… Karen Robbins, a Connecticut woman who was subjected to years of financial abuse, submitted written testimony in support of the bill that highlighted her own struggles with coerced debt.
“I spent the past three years in Connecticut Family Court trying to end my marriage and reclaim my financial independence after enduring post-separation abuse directed by my ex-husband,” wrote Robbins. “The State of Connecticut needs strong laws to protect the vulnerable from wrongdoers who are presently empowered to exert extraordinary undue influence on shelter, sustenance, education, healthcare, and more.”
Robbins said that she discovered the extent of her ex-husband’s financial abuse in 2020, finding that since 2002, he had used her personal information to open numerous credit cards, take out fraudulent mortgages on her home, and take money from her children’s 529 plans. After explaining her situation to several creditors, she was able to get over $100,000 in debt forgiven, but was forced to sell her home in 2022 and still struggles to take out loans or obtain housing as a result of her downtrodden credit score.
“Every adult-aged Connecticut resident knows full well that credit scores and consumer reports play the dominant role in their financial lives,” said Robbins. “Without good credit, victims of economic familial abuse/coerced debt face overwhelming long odds in terms of qualifying for rental housing, home mortgages, auto loans or even employment whenever a pre-hiring background check uncovers delinquent credit reports. …”
https://insideinvestigator.org/house-passes-bill-protecting-victims-of-financial-abuse/
Anonymous05/14/2024
If the judges did their jobs in the first place this would not happen. They are setting it up for these outcomes. FR discovered Ambrose was not required to file a financial affidavit until 22 months into litigation and the sale of the family home, and the hiring of a $400/hour GAL was endorsed by the courts without his FA ever being filed.
No disclosure of marital assets was ever obtained. More laws may sound promising, but if the court allowed it, it’s unlikely the credit card company or banks will find fault. This is the issue.
Anonymous05/14/2024
This judge should be disbarred from any and all courts in this state. What a disgrace to the bench.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Judge Michael Albis needs to be next
Anonymous05/15/2024
”next” for what and why?
Anonymous05/17/2024
Sat on the committee listening to GaL complaints.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Judge Vizcarrondo is back hearing family cases. Today he was assigned to just one family case in the morning, the schreiber v schreiber case. Looks like after the mild slap on the wrist they let him back.
Same coin05/14/2024
I challenge everyone to post in the comments one family court system that is not trafficking children Filth of society including the parent who goes along with it for personal psychological reasons.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Well said.
Someone Who Knows05/15/2024
I would like to see the list of mental midgets who believe in wack job Richard Gardner's Parental Alienation. Those people in the Connecticut Family Court system should be exposed and investigated. The folks using that against their ex are projecting what they are doing themselves to cover up their abuses. They keep the innocent defending themselves to take the attention off of themselves. I am married to an innocent woman and we constantly under attack and the perp sits back and thinks he is hiding his abuses. Just a bit of information for him and others – everyone sees you for what you are… I have enough documented information to write a book on his actions…
Anonymous05/19/2024
Interesting that Gardner toured the world … and voilà! … “developed” so-called sovereign nations around the world pushed Gardner’s junk science in family courts in cases involving the sexual abuse of children.
Gardners “PAS” campaign in family courts in the 1980s was sort of like that massive world-wide simultaneous “vaccination” in 2020. 🧐
Alienaton industry05/15/2024
I just watched last months Parental alienation podcast with slam the gavel. I am in complete disbelief of the complete ignorance and the excuses. After hundreds of years of research on the damage to children done by an alcoholic parent. Please watch the episode. Those who are adult survivors know. You can not reason with an intoxicated person. It's a huge impairment to judgement and reasoning. Unfit to parent. No one should have to learn to deal with an abuser or catering/ codependent with a substance abuser. Children should not have to be placed in a position where they have to parent/monitor the adult. I'm always in shock when when I hear what the alienaton industry is peddling as an excuse to provide services. When will someone investigate, regulated and protected the public.
Anonymous05/15/2024
They know it and their kids know it
Anonymous05/15/2024
That’s Chris Ambrose.
Anonymous05/15/2024
And Geoff Herzog from what I’ve read
Anonymous05/17/2024
Countless fathers
Anonymous05/15/2024
It appears Chris Ambrose and Geoff Herzog follow this rule
Anonymous05/15/2024
lol
Anonymous05/16/2024
Connecticut pedipiies and sociopath hard at work to legalize sexual assault, domestic violence and pedipiia. Under the shared parenting/alienaton banner. Punishing for reporting for cost savings and cash to the state of Connecticut.
Anonymous05/20/2024
Go get a job
Anonymous05/22/2024
Get a non court appointed psychologist
Witnesses05/15/2024
The world is waking up to the corrupt Judges and GALs in the Connecticut Family Court system due to the attention Mr. Parlato has brought to this insanity. Do these males (they are not men) involved in taking children from their mothers because they were outed think no one around them sees what and who they are? We see them walking in our schools and in our neighborhoods. We know how they mistreat the kids as they can't help themselves. The only people they are fooling is themselves not us.
“…however much you deny the truth, the truth goes on existing, as it were, behind your back”.” George Orwell
Anonymous05/20/2024
We are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right.
-George Orwell
Bring on the sunshine05/16/2024
MSNBC Bashes the interview with Marjorie Tyler Green R-GA with 60 min. Calling her mentally ill for calling the Democrats pedophiles.” Sexualizing children is what pedophiles do.” SHE IS NOT WRONG OR MENTIALLY ILL. This is what the media does. “Craziness that has affected the republican party.” ” Sunlight is the best disinfectant “. Come take a good look at what is happening in the state of Connecticut!
Anonymous05/16/2024
Minnesota State Rep. Harry Nisika blast Democrats for protecting pedophilia . Many Connecticut residents agree.
Anonymous05/16/2024
Senator Bill Stanley: Democrats protect pedophiles over the safety of children. It's not just ” hysterical” women women in Connecticut family court.
K.C.05/16/2024
Frank why are you not posting all of my comments??.
I’m ready to share05/17/2024
I have enough details for a book or certainly a YouTube channel. There would be tidal waves in this corrupt system.
Ken Gills05/17/2024
I’m at that point also.
Anonymous05/18/2024
Parents and children in Connecticut’s “family courts” have been at that point since the 1980s.
Re; “the Child Care Service Empire“05/17/2024
“Jobs and Growth in the Child Care Service Empire
The criminal has more legal standing than a protective parent, and the child has NO legal protections at all.
The child and parent caught up in the child or infant removals racketeering business are dealt a brutal blow. The law, the country and its leaders have completely abandoned them. Everything is done to keep them apart – and no expense (of misappropriated funds) is spared to do so. And it’s become obvious that the more children under State guardianship; the more jobs are created – and the more tax is required to deliver ever-increasing services, salaries, fees, and profits. The child trade or ‘protection racket’ operates like a syndicate with each person playing their role.and earning from the unwarranted removals.
Syndicates form alliances to pool resources effectively where each syndicate partner shoulders some of the risk of any potential negative impacts if a transaction (child removal) runs into trouble. Each profession, department or person is a cog in the wheel facilitating the smooth (legal and illegal) removal of children from unsuspecting families and vulnerable parents. As each person (e.g., from social worker, to psychiatrist, doctor, Independent child lawyer, to magistrates, etc.) only performs their role so no one is wholly accountable. Like layers of an onion, one profession shields the next making it almost impossible to challenge, with vulnerable parents being unable to comprehend the scale and ingenuity of the removals business.”
Anonymous05/18/2024
Reminds me of the “Examen” sculpture in front of “Egan Chapel” at Fairfield University in Connecticut.
The “one world government” with the “one world religion” agenda speaks louder than St. Ignatius of Loyola’s Examination of Consciousness in the sculpture and its placement in the middle of the architecture there.
Who are “the stakeholders”?05/19/2024
Judge Leo Diana:
“Good afternoon, Justice McDonald. Good afternoon, members of the
committee. I am proud that after we met again with the – – uh – – stakeholders that the proposed rules have – – are not being opposed …”
Anonymous05/19/2024
Stakeholders. Head of household, parents, are including under the stakeholders umbrella.
Anonymous05/21/2024
Those running the show don’t consider the following to be “stakeholders”:
children
parents
families
relatives
It's all about the funding05/19/2024
Money making project through the State of Connecticut. Attorney General's office and the use of Connecticut's children. A two-fold slam dunk for federal funding.
December 2023. Attorney Gerneral William Tong voted unanimously by fellow Attorney Generals Vice President of the National Attorney Generals. Under the Biden administration. Part of a four-person leadership team.
The Judiciary act of 1789 created the office of Attorney Generals which enveloped over two years into head of the department of justice and chief law enforcement officer of the federal government. ***** THIS IS A PROFOUND PART OF WHY WE CAN NOT GET ANYWHERE WITH OUR COMPLAINTS. ***********************
LDF Revenues Primarily Transferred to DOJ funds. State Law specifically what type of legislation proceeds can be transferred into these funds and provides guidelines on how these proceeds are to be used. The annual state budget process.
LDF stands for Legal Defense Fund. An Account set up for legal expenses, which can include ATTORNEY'S FEES. THE FEES CAN BE SET UP PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 3rd party payer.
Legal Defense funds often have a large membership count contribute to the fund. Mostly international.
THE FUND SOMETIMES ACTS LIKE A ******LAW FIRM*********. Which teams of attorneys provide legal services through litigation. Like FAMILY LAW THROUGH ACCESS AND VISITATION FATHERHOOD GRANT USING ********PARENTAL ALIENATION************************************ As well funds to dispute Domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and child sexual assault allegations . All through the public defender's office. Like legal financing companies, legal defense provides separate accounts for litigation rather than a onetime cash advancement, through both used for purpose of financing litigation and legal cost.
Attorneys working for legal defense fund both defend and file lawsuits.
Big funding for Connecticut with the use of children
May 17, 2024, CT mirror government
Devon Cox is in the process of reunifying with 7-year-old daughter and hopes to begin reunification with his youngest, who is nearly one. (What about the Mommy?)
Cox's two children were removed from his Hartford home. A home he once shared with the mother of his children. After the couple woke up and noticed marks on the baby's skin, they thought were blood clots brought her to Hartford Hospital. DCF determined the children should live with the Devon's mother. (father's and families) $$$$ He doesn't know how the marks appeared. I'm guessing neither does the mother.
Cox participated in the fatherhood engagement Services and parenting center. A program that helps father's whose children are in DCF's care to be more present in their lives. No mention of a program for the mother.
A' sense of belonging '
DCF operates 12 Quality Parenting Centers. DCF is partnered with the fatherhood initiative through the MOU. The Mosiac Parenting Center in Hartford is a place where parents can spend time with their children. Cox has visited the Mosaic center with his youngest daughter learning to things such as tummy time and giving a bath. He says the experience was good for the family. However, Devon Cox is no longer with the mother of his children. States he is co-parenting while the children will be residing in his home. With no mention of the children being cared for by the mother. DCF commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly following fatherhood guidelines and funding through the MOU has said keeping families together and preventing the removal of children where possible will be one of the focuses of her administration. Where is the Mommy? The youth law center (the Connecticut children's law center) that has been mentioned in regard to GALs and psychologist in question with “parental alienation” money for health and human services. $$$$$$ Bringing in more fatherhood funding. The Hartford parenting center launched in 2022. and the bridge is looking for ways to expand work. Since the group home in Harwinton ran by the organization closed. Due to abuse including sexual abuse.
Please read HHS Separating Americans (mostly mother's) from their children. Doreen Ludwig. Connecticut does not like women who are demonstrating bias and profit to the state for removing mothers.
These are just a few of the articles promoted by the state of Connecticut that highlight the financial gains that bring funding into the state. Continue to promote the removal of children and bias for fatherhood.
The state of Connecticut through the Attorney general's office has ignored complaints from women. Has ignored family court and DCF complaints and continues on a journey to promote funding. The Attorney general's office says the can do nothing about the family court and related matters. He has plenty of pull at the department of justice. He has a say in funding. This no longer just effects the state of Connecticut but the entire Country.
Considering he is the Vice president of the association of Attorney Generals it's a national question. One should question why William Tong and Richard Blumental are ignoring the states DCF and family court issues. Richard Blumenthal and William Tong are running a state that is considered one of the most corrupt by many. Has one of the worst reported family court and legal systems in the entire nation. Along with many other Connecticut politicians. The leader in criminal Justice reform. Our Inspector General's office is limited and targeted to the police. No accountability for federal programs.
It's all about funding and cost savings to the state of Connecticut. Stop Voting these people into office. This is beyond the Attorneys and psychologist. Even the judges.
” DCF IT'S THE GOAL OF FOR FAMILIES (FATHER'S AND FAMILIES) TO REDFINE THE RELASHIONSHIP WITH THEIR CHILDREN.” some include getting rid of Mommy with federal funding.
I'm sure the same people who seem to have a problem with Mothers as the head of the household, will have no problem with the mother in this story no longer being a daily part of two children's lives.
We can publish a DCF story with the Connecticut judicial media group, but we can never speak of family court cases?
Choose wisely on the election. The welfare of your children and safety of your financial stability are at stake. Stakeholders head of households, parents, business owners, community workers and representatives from indigenous groups.
Anonymous05/20/2024
How many women stakeholders have met with the democratic elected officials? How many crumbs have been given to shut you up? How many women in the democratic party in Connecticut have done much of anything after the Dolus cases. Jennifer law has gone unrecognized and ignored by judges. Except in cases used by fathers such as Ambrose? How many laws have been passed to protect political leaders of the state? Yes, physical harm and lies should not be spread about them. Why are they limiting information to the public? Laws and statues are no good if they are not enforced. As we have seen laws and legislation can be twisted. How many legistors such as Gonzalez have been pushed out of the way? There are important questions and concerns beyond abortion rights.
Anonymous05/21/2024
Jan 2024. Delaware announces drastic reduction in crime. The state of Delaware attorney general is the president of the association of attorney generals. Perhaps she got her direction from Attorney general William Tong. Something smells really rotten among the Attorney Generals.
I don’t get it.05/21/2024
Is there something wrong with a drastic reduction in crime? Please explain.
Anonymous05/21/2024
Currently the state of Connecticut is claiming to be the head of criminal justice reform. How much of an individual impact would the funding have if crime statistics were not reported as low? What would happen to the funding have if the cases were not plea bargained to a lesser charge? What cost savings really look like if convicted of a higher charge and incarceration was needed? What if a person say a woman was strangled and stabbed and the partner was charged with attempted murder do to Connecticut violent crime statistics? How would criminal justice reform look to the federal government and stakeholders? Would the money given to the public defender office be reduced? Connecticut residents and the Republican party of Connecticut's eye brows are raising from cases like the alleged attempted sexual assault on a CT representative in the city of Hartford. Publicly reported by the Attorney General's office as a possible hate crime Instead of attempted sexual assault? Hate crime brings funding to the state. Sexual assault takes it away. Federal funding and mathematics. These Attorneys Generals are intelligent people. They are aware of where the money is at for their states. Prosecuting crimes is not where it's at. It's cost to prosecute and incarcerate.
When your actions have a interfered with the welfare of your children . The children should not be punished.
Anonymous05/25/2024
Typical narc deflecting comment
There is psychiatric help for this or better to admit yourself to the looney bin.
Anonymous05/26/2024
Typical response from someone who's not capable of taking responsibility. It's typical for a narrastist to accuse the other person of being “crazy”. If anyone is crazy it's because of the “crazy” making behavior. People like you are dangerous to society. One of the reasons the court system has so many problems. Let me guess you are a serial litigator. Spent a pretty penny to restore your reputation. Hunting down the people who told the judge what you did. You don't like anyone who questions you. You support others who do the same. You have paid a few grand to keep your picture and story in the spotlight. Not for your children, or the welfare of others. You keep the story alive because of your ego. You seek revenge. You don't want to solve the family court problems. You want what you paid for. It was don't delivered. You will stop anyone who doesn't support your cause. You are completely transparent.
All Seeing05/25/2024
Nothing to see here, right?
https://frankreport.com/2022/01/30/ct-family-court-rich-daddy-role-plays-as-teen-girl-having-sex-with-father-gets-custody-of-teen-daughter/
Anonymous05/28/2024
You can’t reference an article Frank wrote as proof it’s real. What is the source?
Anonymous05/30/2024
Lots of sources.
https://frankreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/HERzogg-coputer-findings-02-01-Findings-Report.pdf
Belogolovsky says Judge Hackenberg systematically disadvantaged her while favoring her wealthier ex-husband. She contends that the judge's rulings, particularly the custody “flip” based on the custody evaluator, Dr. Arnold T. Shienvold’s report, placed her under extreme financial strain. Not only did she lose her son, but she was required to cover all costs associated with visiting him in Florida.
This Court directive came despite Belogolovsky’s challenging financial situation, highlighted by her unemployment status and contrasted starkly with Dr. Gitter's substantial income as a successful oncologist. She decries this decision as unfair and an impossible burden that severely limited her ability to maintain a regular and meaningful presence in her son's life.
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/courtroom-corruption-grieving-mom
Anonymous05/26/2024
…
Anonymous06/08/2024
Judicial Media committee. Censorship is for the best interest of the state.
Anonymous05/26/2024
In the naked light I saw 10 thousand people maybe more. Someone is speaking while I am listening. To the sound of silence.
Anonymous05/26/2024
Top Lamont official faces 22 counts including extortion, bribery and 14 counts of false statements. ” The governor has zero tolerance for malfeasance and currupt in government”. Where is the investigation into the court system? Why do we need have the ability to complain to the Connecticut inspector general? The use of fatherhood funding. Access and visitation grant. Why are 3 party payers not being disclosed in family court cases?
Anonymous05/26/2024
“3 party payers” or 3rd party payers?
can anyone list those payers to disclose them?
Anonymous06/03/2024
Access and visitation grant. Fatherhood initiative funding. CT labors union. The union pays 100 percent of attorneys fees. Covers childrens legal fees GAL/AMC. The labors unions covers property appraisal. Attorney John Cronin son of Michael Cronin head of the CT labors legal services works for century 21 and has prior business relations with appraisers through his work as a realtor. Legal insurance through employer often cover children legal fees. GaL/AMC. The extent of financial resources for divorce procedures is still unknown.
Anonymous06/01/2024
This judge was seen on Friday walking around the halls of the 6th floor of the Stamford Courthouse in a white shirt and not in his judicial robe.
Anonymous06/02/2024
Judges are allowed to do that. 😏
Judicial Robe Haiku06/03/2024
Judicial robe rules
(just like all the other rules)
might be optional.
https://www.jud.ct.gov/Publications/PracticeBook/Judicial_Conduct.pdf
#FamilyForwardProject06/02/2024
Update from Connie Reguli …
https://www.tiktok.com/@conniereguli/video/7362650500572925227?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7375691982328251950
Define “free”.06/06/2024
It’s a big show:
the blatant deceit
the junk science
the fake “evaluations”
One goal of the Bolsheviks in the early 20th century was: to destroy the family
How many “family court” cases in politicized justice systems all around the world are Commie show trials designed to destroy morals and families all around the world?
The “family court” destruction in America is the same “family court” destruction happening all around the world since the 1970s. Was that by design?
A system does what it was designed to do.
Who designed the purposely adversarial for-profit “family courts”? 🧐
Ken Gills06/06/2024
The information I have collected will bring an interesting read.
Anonymous06/09/2024
Are you able to talk about what happened regarding your domestic assault with the police chief?
All we know is that Michael Finkelstein, 53, was charged with disorderly conduct and second-degree breach of peace, according to a state police arrest warrant. He was held on $10,000 bond.
🤔 Huh?06/12/2024
All we know about what?
Anonymous06/06/2024
East Lyme CT police chief placed on administrative leave following a domestic incident. The article states he assaulted a family member the night before, and was disturbing the peace the next day when police responded to the home. CT doesn't have a domestic violence problem?
Get back to the Facts06/06/2024
it definitely has an entitlement program if you cry wolf
Breaking the cycle. Save lives06/07/2024
Perhaps you are a member of the heritage foundation? Suppressing women. Are you apart of a group of mysognist who think women deserve to be raped because of the clothing they are wearing? Are you a member of the pack of wolves attempting to take autonomy away from women? Attempting to eliminate their rights? Family court is one example of the oppression of women in all shades. Are you one of those fellas who believe women and children are property? Not a person? Women in this day and age are not safe because of egotistical men like yourself. Children are growing up in a society that is promoting violence and poor core values. Perhaps you are divorced and you're children are afraid of you? Perhaps you believe that violence, emotional/psychological and financial abuse are your right based on your manhood? The measure of a man is not based on the control he has over the “family”. If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem. Unfortunately, people in all kinds of jobs including police work can be abusive. The victim didn't call the police department because of people like you who are trying to deny abuse exist. Why people are dying.
Connecticut Family Court Crimes …06/07/2024
… A Connecticut psychologist recently sentenced for committing roughly $1.6 million in Medicaid fraud between the years 2017 and 2023, was placed on probation by the Connecticut Board of Examiners in January of 2017, according to license records, and was under supervision for one year while defrauding Medicaid.
A complaint was made to the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH) against psychologist Michael B. Pines when he was assigned by a family court judge to treat three children caught in a contentious divorce case.
According to the complaint, Pines had not developed individual treatment plans for the children, failed to coordinate with other mental health providers, failed to obtain consent from the father for treatment, failed to justify a treatment course after more than three years of treating the children, and was submitting billing codes “that were not indicative of the therapy provided.” …
https://insideinvestigator.org/ct-psychologist-was-under-supervision-while-committing-medicaid-fraud/
Health and human services the legal industry CT06/13/2024
New York times. The parental alienation industry. From the ground up. The national men's rights groups. 1985 children rights counsel men's rights and equal and shared parenting. Jan 2023 article by Jennifer Wolff. Connecticut men's center. Dad's America. Dad's divorce. Just a few of the Connecticut men's rights groups. Large Attorney involvement. All connected to welfare reform. The state of Connecticut. Federal fatherhood funding.
Anonymous06/07/2024
” no stated action”
The bar association is running the court system. $06/08/2024
The Connecticut bar association is very responsible for judicial nomination according to the information on judiciary selection committee.
Get back to the Facts06/11/2024
they all kiss each others asses
Anonymous06/15/2024
How much money is the state of Connecticut making off fatherhood funding? Saving on criminal justice reform? How much money is the Connecticut bar association mambers making off the family court mess? The criminal justice reform program? White father's are statically the largest group of sexual predators among their own children. White women are the fastest growing number of domestic violence victims. Why did Cuda use Jennifer law? Why is preditory legal practice being ignored? The fatherhood policy and procedures taken presence over the eithical guidelines of GaL/AMC and attorney ethics? Why are domestic violence victims forced to pay child support to an abuser? Forced to pay for ” reunification therapy”. The multi million dollars supporting a deadly, disaster. “
Some good doctors aren’t afraid to speak up. 🙂06/08/2024
Good doctors must also warn the public about the dangerous “doctors” in family courts.
Anonymous06/09/2024
… Dr Bandy Lee is well-known for The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump, which she edited. She has taught at Yale Schools of Medicine and Public Health, and Yale Law School, and more recently at both Harvard and Columbia. Bandy talks with Jon about her sister's dreadful experience in the Family Court and about the corruption that has become part of the establishment in the Family Courts. Dr Lee has an impeccable reputation, otherwise it would be impossible to believe the allegations she makes. The situation is nothing short of Kafkaesque. We should all do everything we can to protect children from the network of abuse that includes “reunification camps” and police seizure of children. …
GIANT RED FLAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!06/09/2024
The AFCC and the global Health Organization.
The world Health organization National programs for age-friendly cities and communities a guide.
Developing age-friendly cities and communities (AFCC) is proven way to create more age -friendly environment – for everyone. This guide provides direction to national authorities and stakeholders responsible for involvement in forming or sustaining national programs for the AFCC.
The National Health organization
PARENTAL ALIENATION
**********PARENTAL ALIENATION AND ESTRANGEMENT ***************
LUMPTED TOGETHER for ICD CODE (classification code) THEY ARE TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
parental alienation is an issue relevant to special JUDICAL CONTEXT
Inclusion of the term in icd-11will not contribute to health statistics? It's a public health care crisis!? Health and human service funds access and visitation. Fatherhood
There is no evidence -based health care interventions specifications for prenatal alienation, yet the court force reunification therapy?
Therefore, the index term “parental alienation ” has been removed, as the parallel term “parental estrangement ” GIANT RED FLAF FRAUD??????
Anonymous06/10/2024
The courts could care less. They will continue to force you to pay no matter what.
The Gates Foundation
Ken Gills06/11/2024
I would really enjoy sharing the information (nearly 700 e-mails) outlining what I have witnessed in my wife's case against her ex-husband. . We are taught in the Marine Corps, and I served 20 active duty years, to keep detailed notes on situations and I have… I have been involved in watching a father who role plays a teenage girl on line trying to get raped/have incest by someone role playing the father gain custody of the children. The suspected corruption smells to the depths of hell. There are things I know that know one else knows that will come out about the entire situation. Folks, just hang in there as the truth always comes out.There are details that will make you lose all respect for people involved. This is not only corruption, but evil. Jealousy and the fear of being found out seems to make people make up lies to cover their own behavior.
Shady people working in family law06/12/2024
God shame. Unfortunately I would not be shocked about any of it. These people are SICK.
Ken Gills06/12/2024
You might only be shocked at the depth of the depravity. And these people walk among us.
How to Politicize “Family Courts”: 10106/12/2024
It looks like Dockets:
FBT-FA23-5052299-S
FBT-FA23-5052300
FBT-FA23-5052301
aren’t available for public oversight.
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=27623704
Why do state legislators let the public read Mr. Adelman’s opinions in his “Memorandum of Decision” and all of Mr. Ambrose’s opinions in his many motions to the court while allowing the most damning actual facts about the case to remain hidden from public oversight?
Q: Why do Connecticut state legislators let bogus “evaluations” steer “family court” cases?
A: Because the state’s “family courts” are politicized – and guess which kind of politics a morals have controlled Connecticut “family courts” since the 1970s.
A Witness06/13/2024
Because. believe they are paid to ignore the truth in the Connecticut Family Court.
“family court”06/21/2024
shouldn’t be for profit or kicks
Ken Gills06/13/2024
I have attached a letter that was written by the VP, HR of a company I worked for concerning phone calls that my wife's ex-husband, Geoff Herzog (spelled Jeff in the letter as it was written as they understood it to be, but I assure you that it was Geoff Herzog. It is quite the read. Firstly, I am not a kidnapper or an abuser of women and children or anyone else for that matter. Secondly, I rode my Harley Davidson Road Glide to work that day and I am not sure where I would fit three children. This is only scratching the surface of the issues that have been ignored in this situation.
Enjoy the read…
This is the guy who called my place of employment:
https://frankreport.com/2022/01/30/ct-family-court-rich-daddy-role-plays-as-teen-girl-having-sex-with-father-gets-custody-of-teen-daughter/
https://frankreport.com/2022/03/05/role-playing-pervy-papa-threatens-frank-report-for-exposing-ct-family-court-corruption/
If anyone has information …06/13/2024
… about how and why Patrick Carroll III and others promoted perverts in Connecticut “family courts” for the past few decades, please post that information.
There must be hundreds of these kinds of cases in the state — maybe thousands.
Leader and Head of the SNAKE ************06/13/2024
The National Center for men, the state of Connecticut, the church and money.
The national Center for men
Mission
Educate the public about how men are hurt by discrimination
Advocacy of men's equal rights
Counseling men and women from male positive viewpoint
Tax Deductible Donations will help NCM thrive in 2024
The national Center for men incorporated starting in 1987
Center's Director MEL FEIT. July10, 1939 to October 2021 obituary
Madison CT, A graduate of Sacred Heart Seminary. Incredibly invested in his church and community. He is a well-known member of the catholic church (receiving fatherhood funding). Eucharistic minister and longtime member of the knights of Columbus.
The National Center for Men
History in media (The judicial media committee?)
Men's Net Television
NCM Dr. PHIL
False accusations as a weapon. (parental alienation)
select interviews Peter Foy's battle
The national Center for Men operates an affordable nationwide telephone counseling service. (coaching?) caring and knowledgeable counselors with an information, male -positive (women are crazy) perspective, WE CAN HELP
Are you enduring a difficult divorce?
you are forced into paternity test and/or unfair child support against your wishes?
You are a victim of Domestic Violence?
You want to escape the narrow gender role (perp of DV or SA)
You have been hurt by false accusations, parental alienation or employment discrimination
You are a divorced father fighting for CUSTODY OR MORE TIME WITH YOUR CHILDREN
you want to discuss any areas of men's liberation, INCLUDING WEARING MEN'S SKIRTS OR WORKIN NON-TRADITIONAL JOBS.
you want to explore sexist double standards confronting men during dating and their relationships with women. (consent).
You are suffering from the lingering effects or any other form of sexism or violence against men
YOU WANT TO LEARN ABOUT GENDER POLITICS (fatherhood funding and failed ERA for women) other aspects of the movement for equal (dominance over women) rights .
PLEASE ALSO CHECK OUT THE MEN'S PROJECT AT UCONN FROM THE WOMEN'S CENTER. MORE GENDER BIAS FUNDING TAKEN AWAY FROM WOMEN IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. Hijacking federal funding to promote a gender
MEN'S RIGHTS GROUPS FUNDING AND RUNNING THE LEADER AND HEAD OF THE SNAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHO IS COACHING WHO????????????????????????????????
,
Anonymous06/13/2024
The walls and halls of filth
Anyone know any specific facts about:06/15/2024
… what kind of professional and personal connections let criminals commit crimes in “family courts”?
Anonymous06/15/2024
The state employees. They are saving money and collecting money. Please review congressional reports. Fatherhood funding.
Okay, where are the facts?06/16/2024
“The state employees.”
Which state employees?
“They are saving money”
Where do they save what money?
”and collecting money.”
How do they collect which money from where and where do they put the money after they collect it?
“Please review congressional reports.”
Which congressional reports? Titles? Dates? Sponsors? Committees?
“Fatherhood funding.”
Which official and unofficial records prove exactly how much fatherhood funding has been tracked and identified as money used for unintended purposes?
Here’s our dilemma: General statements aren’t actionable evidence.
Which state and federal offices collect and store data tracking who did what to how many men, women and children in “family courts” for the past 40 years?
Connecticut's the leader and head of the snake06/16/2024
Sexism, domestic violence, self-defense and criminal justice reform.
Bail Bond agent charged with Manslaughter Sentenced to 25 years April 13, 2016,
A bail bond agent Angela Grasso- Cunha 29 insists she shot and killed her boyfriend in self-defense. Grasso-Cunha's told the police Menendez kidnapped her and she shot him in self-defense. Called police herself to report it.
April 17, 2017
New Haven Man gets 6 years in gun charges in self-defense shooting. Micheal -Claudio was carrying ” a killing machine ” when he got into a daytime gun fight on Sargent Drive.
April 2024 '” Lizzbeth's murder is one of many femicide deaths reported. The X sentenced to 25 years. Her body was buried behind a restaurant. Lacking justice in sentencing.
The department of justice must be willing to prose06/20/2024
Where is it safe to go to report the state of Connecticut curruption? Where is one to go to report political leaders and members of the Senate and Congress? If the Doj is going to protect Garland where are Americans supposed to go to get accountability? Who in the United States government is willing to protect the average person? We are still awaiting a government office or politician who's life will not be endangered for blowing the whistle? Who in Connecticut will not be killed or arrested for telling the truth no matter how ugly it is?
Anonymous06/21/2024
Was someone in Connecticut killed for telling the truth?
Anonymous06/22/2024
Julie Monique, Jennifer Dulos, questions of Tracy Do. Sharp force injury to torsos and extremities, Linda Wiegand, women falling down the stairs. Attorneys untimely death . Just a few situations people are questioning.
What kind of people passively witness the systematic destruction of children and families in “family courts”?
Anonymous06/23/2024
Elected officials unfortunately.
How many would notice a “kakistocracy”? 🤔06/24/2024
Unelected officials, too.
“1977 H1N1 was an accidental release. No doubt about it. We don't want to see that happen again with a virus…”
Anonymous11/13/2024
The attorneys who are incentivized and enabled financially to do so. After ten years in the family court system everything I worked hard to build for my family and children in a thirty year marriage and necessary divorce from a self admitted cocaine and alcohol abuser has either been systematically wiped out or used against me.
Connecticut “family court” is Marxist lawfare.06/24/2024
Connecticut “family courts” would give Michael Knaapen, chair of the Maryland Democrat’s LGBTQ Diversity Council full legal and physical custody of children.
https://loudobbs.com/news/update-marylands-democrat-lgbtq-diversity-council-scrubs-page-of-chair-who-attempted-to-meet-with-14-year-old-decoy-full-video-released/
Witness06/26/2024
Exactly. Funded by a certain group of people. Who recommended this particular Judge to the Governor of Connecticut?
Anonymous06/30/2024
We can place an Attorney who provides criminal defense services to companies with child sexual assault charges on the bench. A prosecutor is up for nomination and all hell breaks loose. The same judiciary committee members with the public defender's office (home of the GALS) are absolutely going to bar that from happening. God forbid the violent crime statistics go up. God forbid their welfare reform funds are affected. Health and human service funding effected. If Garland/Tong won't get the DOJ to investigate we need to vote him out of office. If our congressional leaders won't have the FBI investigate, we need to vote them out. The judiciary members are full of family law attorneys, and they need to be voted out or our legal system will never be fixed.
Equal and shared parenting and family court06/26/2024
Criminal justice reform, sexual assault and Domestic violence and Family court.
UConn Storrs Campus Rapes rose from 9 in 2019 to 16 in2021a 78. In 78% increase. In 2016 UConn tied with Brown University for most reported rapes on campus. 2014 topped at 43 ,38, 2016, 24, 2017 16 ,2018 23.
In 2018 Nikki Yovino was convicted of make false allegations of rape. At Sacred Heart University. One of the men accused has accused of raping another woman at gun point.
September 1,2020 Connecticut Judge refused to let Yovino off probation early. At 19 she was sentence to 3 years with 2 suspended and 16 months' probation
Sexual Assault in the third degree is a class D felony in Connecticut. PUNISHIBLE BY 1 TO 5 YEARS IN PRISON. UNDER 10 YEARS IS A CLASS C FELONEY PUNISHABLE BY 1 TO 10 YEARS in prison.
2024 Meriden man sentenced 8 years for sexually assaulting 2 minors Meriden, Ct One of the victims was under 10 years of age and the other under 16. The judge said his sentence would have been doubled if it weren't for his age and medical condition.
The Nation August 2020. How men's rights groups helped rewrite regulations on campus rapes. Emails shared with The Nation revealed a deep collaboration between the department of education (partnered with the mou for fathers in CT) and organizations that believe in a crisis of false rape allegations. (the continued silencing of women in the nation).
In July of 2017 Secretary of education Betsy Devos held a summit on title 1X the 1972 held summit that banned discrimination on the bases of sex at Universities. (I guess it doesn't apply to meetings or policy input).
Inside the the department met with the NCFMC The national Coalition for men Carolinas. Families (father's and families) Advocating for campus Equity and stop Abusive and violent Environment that claim a false rape allegation against male college students. Despite the heat more than 100 people were left outside in Washington DC hoping to prevent the roll back on protections students who were victims of rape, sexual assault and harassment.
Signs reading Dear Betsy, Help end rape culture, don't perpetuate it.
Dear Betsy,
Stop discrimination against women, and domestic violence in the state agencies, Currently Connecticut department of education is partnered with the MOU for fatherhood initiative. Using Connecticut schools to promote a culture of men claiming women and children are false reporting abuse. Using school system programs to promote fatherhood claiming women are gate keepers and using it as a platform to gain custody in the family court system. Through the Connecticut fatherhood initiative.
Nearly 300 pages of e-mails obtained by the anti-corruption organization Democracy thru FOIA revealed it was a much deeper collaboration between DOE and these men's rights groups. From May to September 2017 DOE'S and these men's rights groups collaborated. The office of civil rights partnered with these organizations (leaving women's rights advocates out) to develop regulations on sexual assault.
The views of these groups have been hidden. In public emails with DOE employees, members of these organizations have demanded the credibility of young women, ridicule sexual assault survivors and push junk science on campus rape.
JUST LIKE PARENTAL ALINATION IN FAMILY COURT.
2020 Citation sexual assault on college campus, The hunting ground, Victim/ Suspect
Documentaries on college sexual assault.
2021 UConn 78% increase in sexual assault. Connecticut politicians have their eyes wide shut. Federal funding, donations. The leader of criminal justice reform and the initiation of the welfare reform.
Ken Gills06/26/2024
I shared with the GAL in this case, Jennifer Bardavid, that I have over 700 e-mails communicating with the previous Co-parenting counselor in this case concerning issues that I reported. I also mentioned several instances of Geoff Herzog's incessant blatant lies about me and other instances of abuse that she appears, in my opinion, to have ignored. I get it, it appears he's portraying himself as the victim and is deeply jealous that I am with and love Robin, whom he threatened to put on the street and take the kids away from her if she divorced him. He did have the children removed from Robin, but there details about that which will be brought out as well. The lies he has told about her are even more egregious from telling a few of their mutual friends, one of them a NYC Police Officer, that she abandoned him and the children and moved back to Canada without leaving any contact information. Robin and I were already dating in Connecticut in November 2017. Maybe I should mention also that Geoff Herzog contacted my ex-wife to do what I do not know, but my guess is that since she contacted me and said “someone” contacted her speaking poorly about Robin, my suspicion is that it was Geoff Herzog himself. What I have written here doesn't even scratch the surface of the details I know and have documented. The truth always remains the truth no matter how hard corrupt people try to hide it. There is a book's worth of information that will be made public at the proper time. I have information that these people do not even know exists, but it does exist. The injustice is sickening, but facts will reveal more than readers of this can imagine.
Anonymous06/26/2024
Thanks for speaking out. Sadly much information in family law cases is withheld, sealed and in email communication not in the courts record. It's a true shame that the American public has to report to an online social media site to get the truth heard. Gag orders and silencing. No standards of conduct for immune members of the family court. In order for all these issues to be ignored by our government officials there has to be monetary gain. No matter which side of the coin you fall on something needs to be done. The lack of oversight and open information is outrageous. The disingenuous concern from those elected should be exposed. The watch dog is blind, deaf and sleeping on the job. Who is making all the policies? Where is the money coming from? Who is influencing this outrageous system?
Connecticut welfare reform06/26/2024
Fatherhood affiliated Catholic Church gets several million dollars of federal grant money. Us Roman Catholic Church reports at least 1.5 million to 3.5 million in federal grants from paycheck protection program. Brancrupcy protection program for sexual assault claims. What does the Catholic charities donate too? The faith based groups are not held to the same standards. Faith based funding. Fatherhood initiative programs. All starting with the allowance of faith based organizations in federal policy. The welfare reform act.
A dangerous game going on in CT06/26/2024
Perhaps the Christian legal society knows. This problem started with the use of faith based organizations during the welfare reform act. The men's rights groups are aware that the faith based groups are allowed to discrimination. The problem goes back to the welfare reform act. More issues are going to be had with the criminal justice reform. Abusive parents are counting on DCF connected to the fatherhood initiative to find claims have possible insignificant evidence to be referred to the chief states attorney for false reporting. To be prosecuted. Leaving a parent to be detered to report. This is why the parents are not calling DCF or the police. Leaving fact finding in the family court. This is a Big push from father's rights groups. The reporting of child abuse and sexual assault has become criminalized. False and unfounded parental alienation is not prosecuted. Children are portrayed as brainwashed for reporting emotions, psychological abuse, sexual abuse or physical. 78 increase in college campuses rapes are a problem for CT violent crime rates. Women are reluctant to report causing low numbers.
Anonymous06/30/2024
Who is in charge of the organizations The executive Branch is vested in the president of the United States
Executive Branch Lieutenant Govenor Sausan Bieniewicz
Secretary of State Stephanie Thomas, Treasure office Eric Thomas, Comptroller Sean Scanlon, Attorney General William Tong
These people are in charge of the Connecticut state agencies. All democrats in charge of our judicial system and related agencies. Yet, they can't seem to do anything about the judicial branch they are in charge of.
Anonymous07/02/2024
Congress has the power to investigate the executive branch and the judicial branch. Connecticut was the first to enact legislation. The deep rooted problems in family court have been plaguing our country for years now. Congress leading to legislation and federal policy. Why are many members of Congress ignoring family court? Where is the investigation and informing the public? The problem is beyond the legislators and judiciary committee. Federalism and policy from the welfare reform. Economic growth and development. Article in CNN reports economists report low births and concerned about the future workforce. Abortion rights are over turned. How many policy's like welfare reform are targeted at financial matters? The little state of Connecticut first initiating the welfare reform, the leader of criminal justice reform. Congress ignoring family court and child welfare. The problem goes beyond Connecticut legislators and judiciary committee. Perhaps you can't get statistics from Connecticut because this is a federal problem. With funding attached. No inspectors general to conduct and investigation. No Connecticut Congress member willing to conduct an investigation. Democrats using social policy for funding. Why is the GOP not really looking into the system of welfare reform and the Connecticut family court systems and juvenile matters?
Anonymous08/27/2024
On what date did Judge Vizcarrondo try to jail a pro se father? Case name? Docket number? Court room? Any verifiable information that it happened?
Anonymous09/12/2025
The Stamford family court judges are in shambles! Even when they do incarcerate it’s a sham and there is no follow through – it’s just for show. Ask me all about it. They are not protecting mothers from these deadbeat dads and letting them get away with whatever they want – just working the system.
Anonymous05/10/2024
Sounds like your upset that you lost your rich daddy or your artificial sweetener daddy and taking it out on all men. Entitlement derangement syndrome seek help there is a cure. It’s called a job.
Peter T Szymonik05/10/2024
The father's right nonsense has been repeatedly debunked – it's the same nonsense that has been out there for over 20 YEARS now. Time to move on and focus on the actual issue and problem. Which is the $60B Divorce Industry preying on parents, children and their families – for profit and greed.
All the mom vs. dad nonsense is the reason why we haven't been able to progress and meaningful reform in years. It's playing the Divorce Industry's game and fueling the dysfunction and corruption. As divorce attorneys and “family” court judges are laughing at us and calling us crazy.
This judge violated fundamental rights, due process and federal law. He should be removed from the bench.
Anonymous05/11/2024
Who debunked it? The courts are full of due process violations and ignoring a host of things. However, the criminal justice reform is plea bargaing and DCF is not doing their job. Experts out side the privilege cherry picked group is the only one allowed around the children. There is many reasons a parent can be found unfit. The people determining the fitness are the problem. Was Michelle a part of the second wives club? How come there is no second husband club? Second parent club? Is equal and shared parenting really for parents? No where in the crusade is your following focus on child abuse and pursue alienaton as the problem solely in Connecticut family court.There is plenty of people who have had their rights violated. On either side. Why do you ignore the safety issues and the states plea bargains pushing lesser charges to allow dangerous people to have access to their children? Where are the all encompassing issues facing family court system problems in your crusade against the family court system? If you claim to be for parents where is equal and shared parenting representation for all the issues Connecticut court system is failing at?
Anonymous05/12/2024
A good place to start is to ask why do divorce lawyers, many of whom graduated from subpar law schools with low admission requirements, such as Pace, Quinnipaic, etc, nevertheless charge between $500-850 per hour in lower Fairfield county? That’s more than surgeons! No wonder why more than 85% of all family cases in the area have at least 1 pro se litigant. Time to boycott these thieves.
Anonymous05/12/2024
Yup, the legal fees are based on income. That area of Connecticut has a higher income level. There are no rules and regulations from the bar association. It's a free for all around the state and the entire country. There is in general multiple problems. The relentless spiraling of false alligations are a big part of the problem. In all likelihood there is something wrong in 20 percent of these cases. The forward motion to GALS and court appointed psychologist instead of evidencery hearings. To continue to use court system therapist needs to end. These people are not invested in the children. There is a Big problem on a federal level. The states entire judicial system is broken.
Anonymous05/12/2024
Do you actually think these judges are going to admit what is happening? They are laughing because they can get away with it . People are unhinged because of the entire process. The ability for attorneys to get away with it. These judges know full well what is happening. They are fully backed by the state. The state is not going to pay damages. The government is not investigating. Until Congress and the Senate get off their seats and really do some digging. I'm guessing there are reasons they are ignoring it. The judges may know why. Some of the comments are funny 🤣. Breaking up the tension. We have people at the opposite end of spectrum. Some where the truth is in the middle. Hopefully the storys and comments will help. People have gone mad over the problems. Everyone is angry. The facts that they are amused about sexual assault, racketeering, child trafficking is sad. I do think it's opened a few eyes. Until it hits the pockets. If the state looses credibility and funding. They won't be laughing.
Anonymous
05/11/2024
Some of the GAL’s are even worse. Lisa Kouzoujian openly said that she did things the right way when she went to Armenia, adopted her daughter, and raised her alone and didn’t have to deal with anyone else. How can this monster be a GAL when she doesn’t even think kids need fathers!
Anonymous05/11/2024
Would love to see the case that enraged the judge. Where is the entire story. The judge should have kept his cool and followed procedures. Doesn't make the father innocent. Does not mean he doesn't belong in cell block D.
K.C.05/12/2024
I normally try not to pay much attention to these male supremacist groups because I witness enough traumas without listening to their attempted justifications and they tend to live in a reality deprived world.
Access/Visitation was designed by and for Fathers, in order to use custody to reduce support obligations and continue their abuse by proxy of family court.
Mothers Make False Claims
The “fathers’ rights” movement and cottage industry that supports abusive fathers are permeated with the belief that most abuse allegations made by mothers are false. This is really based on ideology and assumption because there is no valid research to support it. PAS is based on this assumption. Significantly, the Saunders’ study (from the U.S. Department of Justice) found that professionals with inadequate training tended to believe the myth that women frequently make false allegations and unscientific alienation theories. So when their propagandists encourage courts to disbelieve mothers’ complaints they are demonstrated their lack of training and qualifications.
Nicholas Bala led one of the leading studies about false allegations in the context of custody and in fact it was a study that looked at many other studies. He found that mothers make deliberately false allegations less than two percent of the time. Any “research” with significantly higher numbers reflects the frequency that true allegations of abuse are disbelieved. Interestingly the Bala study found that fathers involved in contested custody are 16 times more likely than mothers to make deliberately false allegations. The common abuser tactics of claiming alienation and claiming mothers lie about their abuse are examples of these false allegations by abusive fathers. In fairness the Bala study is not saying that all men are this dishonest. The study applies only to contested custody and a large majority of these cases involve abusive fathers who feel entitled to use any tactic including false allegations to regain the control over their partner they believe had no right to leave.
At least 40 states and many districts created court-sponsored gender bias commissions. They found that there is widespread gender bias against women and particular woman litigants. Common examples are that mothers are given less credibility than fathers, are held to a higher standard of proof and blamed for the actions of their abuser. These findings help explain why so many true allegations of abuse are disbelieved by the courts.
Shared Parenting Benefits Children
Shared parenting is another ideological belief of abuser groups that is not supported by valid research and is not beneficial to children. Many of us can remember when shared parenting was either not permitted or strongly discouraged. An initial study based on a small population and short time period found that shared parenting could be beneficial to children under the best of circumstances. This encouraged courts to promote shared parenting as a way to resolve difficult and contentious cases. Abusers have promoted shared parenting as a way for fathers to gain control when they otherwise would have difficulty winning custody because of their abuse and the mother provided most of the children care.
Later research based on a larger population and a longer period of time found that shared parenting is actually harmful to children. Constantly going back and forth is disruptive, having two homes is really having none and needed items are often in the wrong home.
There is legitimate research that shared parenting can benefit children under the best of circumstances. This would include a voluntary desire by both parents to share parenting, an ability of the parents to cooperate and living nearby. There is other good research that found shared parenting is never a good idea for children. Indeed most cases in which shared parenting are initially tried are quickly changed because of the problems it creates. There is no need to reconcile this dispute in the context of contested custody and domestic violence as these cases are not close to the best of circumstances.
Shared parenting laws usually include exceptions for domestic violence, but this does not protect the children when courts have difficulty recognizing true allegations of abuse. The courts are littered with cases in which mothers are pressured to accept shared parenting with their abuser and often severely punished if they object. The Saunders’ study found that abusers use decision making authority to control the mother and hurt the children. They use the exchanges to harass the mothers and although contradictory to try to resume the relationship. If the court is not inclined to limit an abuser to supervised visitation, parallel parenting would work far better for the children. Until the courts create the necessary training and reforms to improve its response to domestic violence consideration of shared parenting is a particularly bad idea that causes enormous mischief.
Children Need Both Parents Equally
This statement is effective in misleading people because it sounds so reasonable and fair. It is really based on an ideological belief in treating individuals the same even when they are very different. This approach is designed to treat the mother and father the same REGARDLESS OF PAST PARENTING. This is not in a child’s best interests. The truth is that children do not need both parents equally. They need their primary attachment figure more than the other parent and the safe parent more than the abusive one. In domestic violence cases courts should stop pressuring the victim to cooperate with the abuser and instead force the abuser to stop the abuse in order to gain time with the children.
The reach and harm of this misleading statement is illustrated by a statement by one of the leading family court judges in the United Kingdom. In a speech to an abuser rights group he said that the worst thing that can happen to children is for the mother to bad mouth the father. We have heard judges in the United States make similar statements. It is hard to imagine that this is meant literally. I would hope the judge realizes that assaulting, killing or sexually abusing a child and many other abusive actions are far more harmful. The ACES (Adverse Childhood Experiences) studies demonstrate the profound harm to children’s health caused by trauma which is not true about negative statements. Indeed some negative statements are beneficial for children to learn. When children see an abusive father mistreat them or their mother it is important for the mother to tell them that such behavior is not acceptable in our society.
The misuse of the belief that mothers should not make negative statements about the father was taken to the extreme in a notorious case in Poughkeepsie, N.Y. The court found the mother to have engaged in alienating behavior because she encouraged the children to eat healthy foods, dress appropriately for the weather and avoid adult oriented television programs. This was considered alienation because the father encouraged all of these harmful activities. In the world outside of family courts this would just be considered good advice that any parent would be expected to give their children. As a result of widespread gender bias in the courts more serious negative comments by fathers are routinely ignored or minimized.
Mothers Most Often Already Receive Custody
This is a statement we often hear from those supporting abusive fathers. It is literally true, but highly misleading. Over 95% of custody cases are settled more or less amicably. Some involve abusive fathers who love their children enough that they would not deliberately hurt them by separating them from their mothers. Accordingly these cases tend to be settled with the mother giving up economic benefits she and the children deserve in order to retain custody. In the more common cases that do not involve domestic violence the parents work out a truly voluntary arrangement they believe will benefit their children. In this still sexist society, mothers continue to provide most of the child care and loving fathers sacrifice their personal interests for their children to create arrangements where the children live with the mother and spend significant time with the father. This is why mothers receive custody far more than fathers, but it is based on voluntary agreements and not favoritism from the courts.
The problem in the custody court system is the less than 5% of cases that cannot be settled and continue to trial and usually far beyond. Most of these cases involve abusive fathers who seek custody as a tactic to regain control over their victims. These are the most dangerous abusers because they believe the mother has no right to leave them. This is why three-fourths of all women killed by their male partners are killed after they have left. It is why in a recent two year period we found news stories about 175 children murdered by abusive fathers involved in contested custody. More commonly the abusers seek custody as a way to regain control and punish the mothers for leaving. The abusive fathers understand that the best way to hurt a mother is to hurt the children, but the courts routinely just assume the father is seeking custody out of love for the children.
Although contested custody cases overwhelmingly involve true complaints of domestic violence by mothers, most of the time the dangerous abuser receives custody or joint custody. One troubling finding is that abusive fathers are more likely to win custody than safe fathers. The flawed practices, gender bias, and reliance on unqualified professionals, result in 58,000 children being sent for custody or unprotected visitation with dangerous abusers every year. Although mothers rarely make false allegations of abuse, the courts routinely disbelieve or minimize their complaints.
The significance of the Saunders’ study is that it explains why the courts so frequently mishandle domestic violence cases and give control to dangerous abusers. Saunders found that we now have substantial scientific research that courts could use to inform their decisions about domestic violence allegations. Unfortunately judges never developed the practice of looking to this research because it was not available when courts were first creating responses to domestic violence. Saunders specifically found that the standard and required training for evaluators, judges and lawyers does not provide them with the specific information needed to respond effectively to domestic violence cases. This is the worst of all possible situations because the training received does not make these professionals qualified to recognize and respond to domestic violence but gives them a false sense of competence so they refuse to consult with genuine experts.
Saunders recommends that evaluators and other professionals receive training in screening for domestic violence, risk assessment, post-separation violence and the impact of domestic violence on children. Most of the evaluators claimed to have training in these subjects, but when tested with vignettes they demonstrated they did not have the needed understanding. Most of the evaluators claimed they screened for domestic violence by using standard psychological tests that tell them nothing about domestic violence. This means they are not screening for domestic violence and routinely disbelieve true allegations because they don’t know what to look for. This failing undermines the entire court system because lawyers and judges look to psychologists and other mental health professionals for expertise in cases and training. The misinformation they receive in one case poisons many other cases. After hearing the outdated and discredited claims throughout their careers it becomes deeply ingrained so that many judges and lawyers are resistant to accurate information. It sounds so different from what they constantly hear from the “experts.”
Saunders found that evaluators and other professionals without the needed training tend to focus on the myth that mothers frequently make false allegations, unscientific alienation theories and the mistaken assumption that attempts to protect children from dangerous abusers are harmful to the children. These false beliefs lead to outcomes that hurt children.
The problem is compounded by the development of a cottage industry of psychologists and attorneys who make their living promoting approaches biased in favor of abusive fathers. Domestic violence are tactics men use to coerce and control partners. Economic control is a common form of domestic violence and this means that in most contested custody cases (which are really domestic violence cases) the abusive father controls most of the family’s resources. Accordingly the best way to earn a large income is to support practices that help abusers. Unfortunately courts do not tend to be skeptical of these biased professionals and in many cases we see courts appoint “fathers’ rights” attorneys and psychologists for neutral roles such as GAL and evaluator. Good mothers have no chance to win the support of professionals who are part of the cottage industry.
The Saunders’ report found that domestic violence advocates possess exactly the training and expertise needed to help courts on domestic violence cases. They knew more about the specific topics recommended by Saunders than evaluators, judges and lawyers. Nevertheless we repeatedly see courts refuse to listen or minimize the testimony of genuine experts claiming they are biased because “they always oppose domestic violence.” The courts also place great weight on academic degrees that provide no domestic violence training. The cottage industry seeks to undermine domestic violence laws while advocates try to support them. And yet it is the advocates who are treated as if they were biased.
The findings about inadequate training, flawed and outdated practices and gender bias are incompatible with any view that the courts are responding properly to domestic violence cases much less the abuser fantasy that mothers are favored. Judges cannot do their job of protecting children while they continue to be burdened by outdated and discredited practices.
Access/Visitation was designed by and for Fathers, in order to use custody to reduce support obligations and continue their abuse by proxy of family court.
Proof: Back issues of the Childrens Rights Council, David Levy, newsletter, “Speak Out For Children, 1989-1992,” Children’s Rights Council, Inc. (CRC) nee National Council for Children’s Rights. Inc. This document consists of three years (12 issues) of a quarterly newsletter that addresses the health development of children of divorced and separated parents. The National Council for Children’s Rights (NCCR) (now the CRC) advocates reducing divorce by strengthening families through divorce and custody reform; minimizing hostilities between parents who are involved in marital disputes; substituting conciliation and mediation for the adversarial approach; assuring a child’s access to both parents; and providing equitable child support. Each issue typically contains news articles about the activities of the CRC, bills and resolutions in process in the Congress, etc [263-page retrieved 8/2007, pdf
CRC is a Father’s Rights organization that was heavily involved in setting the parameters of HHS Fatherhood goals of joint or sole custody for Fathers and denial of abuse by forcing conciliation. “NCCR is credited by knowledgeable Capitol Hill sources as the group primarily responsible for convincing Congress to fund access projects.” Page 27. Pg. 37 and 38 Begin to rewrite research calling domestic violence high-conflict instead of abuse and control; claiming abuse has an instigator and a receiver, making the abuse the victim’s responsibility and equalizing the relationship.
The newsletter reads like a Who’s Who of political influence and program design. The newsletter underlines the connections between goals of Father’s, Trade Associations and minimizing of child sexual abuse (for instance: PAS/Richard Garnder)
In summary, the CRC is a special interest group that worked with members of Congress and HHS to design pro-abuse HHS Fatherhood programs to manipulate family court litigation.
Evangelicals, Theocrats, the Religious Right and The Father’s Rights Movement teamed-up to successfully reorganized the Department of Health and Human Services with the passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1998 in order to filter funds to Fathers to maintain control of the family, especially in cases of divorce. While these groups seem to have different agenda’s, they shared the same goal: Control
Anonymous05/10/2024
I'm sure if the father was actually going to go to jail, someone would have run the money to the court house. That's usually how it plays out. It's the request for child support that usually starts the court battles.
Anonymous05/11/2024
another idiot statement from some leftist feminist bra burning excuse of a human. along with many mental issues. .
Anonymous05/12/2024
This happens more than you realize. But you are too narrow minded to grasp reality. When a judge threatens jail for not paying. Many times a phone call brings the cash to the court.
Captain Cave man05/13/2024
If you follow along some times people use money to control the other person. It's used to continue to abuse the other party. To continue litigation abuse. Used to harass the other person. We need more details. The judge should not have done this but it doesn't mean the father is a stand up man. Just because someone goes to court to enforce child support doesn't make them in the wrong.
Anonymous05/11/2024
You don’t even know the man’s financial circumstances. Incredulous how you have tried and convicted this father. You agree he should be denied counsel he’s legally entitled to?
Wtf is wrong with you?
Anonymous05/11/2024
That's not the point ☝️. He should have been allowed proper court system procedures.
K.C.05/12/2024
If they are sexually abusing clerks, how are the public to trust lower court judges handling our childrens best interest??
Lower court judges go by decisions of higher Supreme and appellate courts, and here you have judge(s) sexually assaulting women clerks!
These are NOT the kind of male judges we need overseeing sexual assault cases!
Investigation into all reinhardt sexual assault case outcomes MUST be Investigated!!!!
Anonymous05/11/2024
another piece of crap feminist who should be disbarred and jailed.
Anonymous05/12/2024
You testosterone overfilled fellas are no walk in the park sunshine
Anonymous05/15/2024
That kuzujian is no kardashian. She wobbles into the courtroom like a drunken bulldozer.
Anonymous05/17/2024
The courts are not a runway. We care if she follows the code of conduct, Presents facts to a judge. We care if she follows eithical guidelines of attorneys.
Anonymous05/18/2024
Threatening to jail the mother because the kids have an estranged relationship with their father sounds about right. These people just created more conflict and keep billing. The badly behaved parent never gets counseling and the help they need. This is done intentionally. You can have empathy and forgive from a far. No one should be forced to tolerate the bad/abusive behavior. Cause that's the underlying theme of reunification/ court therapy. The abuser keeps abusing, everyone complains and ABSOLUTELY nothing ever gets resolved. Years of billable hours. Listen to slam the gavel podcast. Alienaton series. Especially the one in March.
Anonymous05/18/2024
As a nurse one would think Maryanne would question some of the things that are said?
Anonymous05/13/2024
when you hold ALL accountable for their actions with criminal consequences. All period.
Anonymous05/14/2024
No meaningful court reform for either side will occur until the people in the court system are held accountable. Passing laws to further add is in the attorneys in the racket is not going to work. This is why straight forward cases are turned into a cash cow. The system is not designed to find the truth. Evidencery hearings, the GALS are being used to fact find. They are alternating the information to the court. They are being used as a filter. We need to start with the holding the court system professionals first. No immunity for the psychologist that the courts insist on using.
Anonymous05/14/2024
The leader and the head of the snake. Criminal justice reform. False crime statistics.The state of Connecticut is not going to admit to sexual assault and domestic violence. They have done nothing wonderful with crime but cover it up and not punish it . Including family court.
Anonymous05/14/2024
If the court reform is for parents, please discuss the DCF disaster and the plea bargaing and fauliar to prosecute. You want domestic violence and sexual assault victims to go to the other broken system? Than punish the person who's life means little to nothing to the state. Jennifer Dulos death was high media due to wealth. We are greatful for the awareness it has brought. Some Jennifer's survived the attack. The don't have financial presence. Their lives are worth something. The children should be protected.
Anonymous05/12/2024
Stop silencing women and children.
On whose side is Connecticut’s government?05/14/2024
Abraham Lincoln said:
“I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right; but it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation may be on the Lord's side.”
Anonymous05/18/2024
They are on the side that brings in da cash. If you think these people give any thoughts or effort think again. Riding the wave to retirement.
Anonymous05/12/2024
CT PBS CEO Mark Contreras is the Dean of communication at Quinnipiac. One may ask why CT PBS has anything to do with problematic sexual behavior?
Anonymous05/13/2024
Inside Investigator March 2024
A task force has been proposed to Connecticut's response to child sexual assault in Ct. 44 percent of sexual assault cases are children. A majority are people they know and is being under reported.
Look no further than Connecticut Family court. Look no further than the psychologist in Connecticut Family Court for under reporting. As well as the GALS. It's under reported because reporting sexual abuse or any kind of abuse is the fastest ways to get taken away from a safe parent and placed in the hands of a pedophile or child abuser.
The GAL hotline to the prosecutor's office obstructing investigations in cases where some abuse is being reported in family court. For cost saving on prosecution and incarceration.
Criminal justice reform.05/13/2024
Provide a sympathetic psychologist and punish the victims. Decriminalized and turned into a public health care crisis. For dollars and cents.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Quinnipiac's Sarah Russell Jan 18,2024 Despite push back from the GOP was approved by the US Judiciary Committee to sit on the US district court. Russell nomination is now awaiting confirmation from the full senate. This is not a good thing. Joe Biden tapped Russell for the federal bench. Pushed by Richard Blumenthal. Sarah has demonstrated little concern for public safety. Has commented on post in the promotion of the attorneys in the divorce industry. In an ad on the internet. Has been a cheer leader for criminal justice reform including the sex offender registry. With people like this on the bench it will create further obstacles into family court reform. She has an agenda and will be pushing it from the bench.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Ladies, you are absolutely misguided if you think the legistors who are former Domestic violence survivor and survivors of childhood sexual assault are going to help. These are the people who are pushing through legislation. Legislation that is not providing criminal consequences and protection. Are helping to guide it to a public health care crisis for cost savings.
Anonymous05/16/2024
This is why they are discrediting hundreds of women complaining in the state as “”hysterical”.. ” The leader of criminal justice reform. It's a convenient position. The legislators know all about the plea bargaing, the number of children treated for sexual assault. The under reporting is encouraged by”false reporting “. Still pushing criminal justice reform. Loss of custody for reporting. The men looking for punishment for reporting know all about criminal justice reform. They know all about Connecticut's claims to reduce crime. A safe place to live. Biden/ Blumenthal push for Sarah Russell. They will toss the police department under the bus. They go after the chief public defender for disciplinary action against two attorneys. That's what started the embroiled situation. The GALs are part of the public defender office and criminal justice reform. Anyone in the prosecutor office not down playing charges is aggressive. This article highlighted the judges was in the prosecutor office. The invested group in the article enraged knows the goings on of Connecticut. Highlighting child support. The GOP needs to dig a little deeper and fight a little harder.
Anonymous05/12/2024
“This was disturbing since Herzog has a daughter, who said her father used to hop in bed with her while he was naked, something that made her uncomfortable.”
Joe Biden showered with his daughter and that made her feel uncomfortable, too.
Who’s running the “family courts” and who made Joe Biden president of America?
Anonymous05/13/2024
thats what you get with libri-tard social influence over a few decades. disease infestation into society.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Agreed. The Democrats have really made a larger mess. They have piled up the cash at the cost of the citizens. Including the children. People need to stop voting these people into office.
“Democrat”, “Republican” or the common flock? 🤔05/14/2024
“Let us make use of the courts. Let us go forward as fast as possible at perceiving debts, at foreclosing (depriving of recourse to justice when a certain time limit has been transgressed) on debentures and mortgages.
“When, through the law's intervention, the common people shall have lost their homes, they will be more easy to control and more easy to govern, and they shall not be able to resist the strong hand of the Government acting in accordance with the orders of the central power of imperial wealth, under the control of the leaders of finance.
“Our top leaders are perfectly aware of the truth. They are presently working at establishing an imperialism of the capital to rule the world. But while they are implementing this plan, they must keep the people busy with political antagonisms.
“We'll therefore speed up the question of reform in the custom rates by the political organization called the Democratic Party; and we'll put the spotlight on the question of protection and of the reciprocity by the Republican Party.
“By dividing the electorate this way, we'll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever, and on which we only touch upon as instructors of the common flock.
“It is thus that, through discreet acts, we can maintain what was so generously projected and executed with such a remarkable success.”
https://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/banks/item/an-example-of-banking-philosophy
Q: Have so few always controlled so many? A: Yes.05/14/2024
Andrew Schulz and Billy Carson talking about 100 families controlling 8 billion people:
https://youtube.com/shorts/_k9GETSa5uU?si=4khzrmWfvV452VKb
Alarm bells have been ringing for decades …05/14/2024
FACTS:
Forensic investigation results should have protected those children from the father (Linda24) in that case.Attorney Cunha tried to protect those children from Linda24.Connecticut judicial branch offices allowed a judge to place those children with Linda24.Attorney Cunha openly voiced her concerns about corruption in Connecticut “family courts”Connecticut judicial branch offices allowed a judge to revoke Attorney Cunha’s law license.What kind of people, philosophy and policies control Connecticut judicial branch offices?
Anonymous05/14/2024
Cunha was fighting a two prong system. Criminal justice reform and the fatherhood initiative. Saving money and bringing money into the state. She was exposing the state court system. They wanted to disgrace her and make sure that she would not be taken seriously. They have taken the license of Attorneys and doctors who go up against the curruption.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Cunha is a theif. She took clients money and made no preparation for cases, so when she made all the claims that got her disbarred it’s because she was relying on gossip. From what I read about her, she was the dumbest lawyer in CT.
Anonymous05/15/2024
I'm sure that would be what would be convenient to say. She got misguided. I'm sure that she didn't pitch for the alienaton team, so she would be considered no good. By a particular group.
Anonymous05/12/2024
Disclose
No need to re-invent the wheel …05/13/2024
Sitting back and watching it happen hasn’t helped yet.
Here’s one of many organized efforts working to investigate and reform family courts …
“One Mom’s Battle is the intersection of narcissistic abuse and child custody issues. The mission at One Mom’s Battle is to raise awareness and educate family court professionals on post separation abuse as it relates to co-parenting and the family court system (divorce, paternity and child custody battles). Education on high-conflict individuals and post separation abuse will allow family court professionals (Judges, Commissioners, Magistrates, CPS workers, Guardian ad Litems (GAL), Parenting Coordinators (PC), Custody Evaluators, therapists and attorneys) to recognize the abusive dynamics that play out in the family court system so they can make decisions that are in the best interest of children.”
https://www.onemomsbattle.com/
Anonymous05/14/2024
The currupt system doesn't want to be educated. . The complaints are the invention “high conflict coaches “. The cost of the classes and the mothers are still losing custody to pedophiles and domestic abusers. The alienaton industry is still in.business. Couresive control is not being recognized. What happened to the law suit about reunification camps? It's all a scam. Even the father's rights groups. Everyone has their hands out.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Tina didn’t start out wanting to be “a high conflict coach”, she hasn’t seemed to want to be “a high conflict coach’ since starting her mission and her work educating the public about the problems with “family court” speaks for itself. The One Mom’s Battle mission has been mostly to protect her children, herself and other parents and children forced through the same kind of “family court” nightmare. That’s a good thing.
Anonymous05/17/2024
All aided by the fake narrative established by the case worker/ manager. Maybe in the beginning of the year, they all put in their requests with case managers like “help me get a new Porsche” Or “ i need to pay off my beach house” or “ I’m planning on taking a European vacation. I’m counting on you to help me.” I’m probably not too far off lol
Anonymous05/18/2024
Get brought to court on tort claim. Have your alienaton industry friends post a go fund me to pay your legal bills. Classic.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Like who? And where’s the proof?
Anonymous05/22/2024
Court look up and the go fund me page by the 2 alienaton industry friends.
Anonymous05/14/2024
Any data to show how many medically unnecessary psychological evaluations family court judges order each year? At this rate, they can start hooking up parents and children to brain scans and who would stop them? 🤔
Anonymous06/14/2024
This case involves a French perfumer who conned her husband for a green card and American citizenship then took the kids and made false accusations of abuse.
Anonymous05/16/2024
Absolutely criminal
Flip side05/17/2024
And mothers And mothers who want to be the only parent and mothers who exploit the fake DV industry ( not the real cases) to gain custody for a multitude of reason but cannot wrap their head around their pathology.
50/50 is best from the start then we downgrade depending on facts of evidence.
Anonymous05/18/2024
Mandatory evidencery hearing with out GAL obstruction.
Anonymous05/21/2024
You forgot to include mothers and all the other made up genders
From the way you were things seems like you tend to have a little bit of problem with a little masculinity in the air.
Anonymous05/23/2024
Using one's gender to gain control is not masculinity. It's misogyny.
Anonymous05/17/2024
Jeff Herzog for sure.
#ConnecticutFamilyLaw05/19/2024
According to Connecticut state government in 2024: It’s okay to do anything with sexuality — and Connecticut family court attorneys, guardians ad litem, all other random family court vendors and judges must transfer full legal and physical custody of children to fathers who:
pretend to be hyper-sexualized teenaged girls
pretend to be hyper-sexualized barbers
plan to practice polygamy with a mother of five and a mother of one
For the past 40 years, the “state government” controlling families in Connecticut has been so-called experts such as: Mr. Adelman, Mr. Gould, Ms. Conway, Ms. Grossman, Ms. Hurwitz, Ms. Aldrich, Mr. Horowitz, Mr. Horwitz, Mr. Freedman and Mr. Herman.
Fortunately in 2019, Judge Donna Heller presided in the Dulos family court case and threw out Stephen Herman’s “evaluation” — changing Connecticut family law for the better.
If Connecticut state government forces family court judges to push repressive sublimation and if all involved in the “family court” racket must keep secrets: We must change more laws as soon as possible.
After the Dulos “family court” case ended with a murder on May 24, 2019, Judge Donna Heller changed the Connecticut 25 – 60A.
Here’s the video recording of the Superior Court Rules Committee meeting on September 14, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/live/PB9_zK3pfg4?si=tyud0InqyFjFRsdj&t=3267
Why did it take Connecticut government 479 days to make that one small aspect of family court law just a little better?
Which individuals and interests stood in the way?
How many days does Connecticut need to remove the promotion of repressive desublimation in Connecticut “family courts”?
While repressive desublimation might be a useful tool for a “one world government”, it’s clearly not “in the best interest” of children. More about the tool of “repressive desublimation”:
“… Individuals thus pursue instantaneous and non-mediated desire satisfaction which dissipates the energies and drivers of critique and negative thinking. ‘The world is no longer perceived as hostile’ wherein the status quo is perpetuated through the proliferation of comforts, consumerism, and commodification; where the concept of repressive desublimation highlights the desire-production and control dynamics of these processes. Controlled gratification is therein said to produce voluntary compliance and submission, wherein the desire for transcendence is eradicated. This is opposed to prior societies whose social controls banned the access and expression of certain pleasures, leading to their ‘repression,’ which was expressed as an antagonism in the life of individuals who were forced to ‘sublate’ their desires into socially acceptable forms.
Today, repression operates through the desublimation of desire, wherein no desires are forced underground, therein eliminating forms of critical distance from society. For examples, see the acceptance of pornography, sex work, drug culture, BDSM, furries, gay culture, lavish living, trans culture, and the like, which are no longer seen by society as negative or pernicious lifestyles. The pursuit of these is now sanctioned and celebrated, meaning being a member of these types of forms of life is no longer a subversive action or lifestyle, but in fact, has been commodified and now perpetuates capital society via the value-form. A negative has been turned into a positive – only operating here at the level of desire-production. …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repressive_desublimation
Anonymous05/19/2024
.
Anonymous05/16/2024
Mother and concerned citizens in the state,
You are fighting a multiple system front. 50/50 legislation and the alienation (word and langue) are being sold to ones who have lost their children. It is a short-term solution for the family court problems you are facing. Connecticut mothers are being systematically removed from the lives of their children in many cases. Especially with the use of parental alienation which equal and shared parenting is responsible for.
A majority of the cases are going untold, this is a wide range problem. A vest problem that goes beyond racial barriers, economic levels and religion. This is a problem not only women of the last few decades and current mothers are facing. It's going to continue into the future if we do not stand up and stop the snowball. The very roots of the welfare reform and fatherhood initiative have come from complaints about child support payments. The amount of divorce has decreased, and the number of fatherless children has decreased. Yet the problems today's youth have escalated.
The state of Connecticut has used the MOU to bring money to not only state agencies, and many organizations. All guided by fatherhood funding and policy and procedure. The rights of women and children have been ignored due to low economic value despite being the slight majority and slightly larger part of the work force.
The criminal justice reform is also affecting the arrest, prosecution of domestic violence, sexual assault and pedophilia. The state is receiving money for the violent offender programs and health and human services. Women are being separated white women leading the charge for change in family court are being targeted. Women of all religions, races and economic levels are facing the same challenges in Connecticut's legal systems where victims are no longer considered, persecuted, and being silenced for considerable cost savings to Connecticut. The criminal justice reform doesn't just affect black and brown citizens in the state. Hartford is greatly suffering. Minority community members are having to organize armed patrols for community safety. The problem is way beyond the police department.
If the minority community is being incarcerated at an extreme rate and treated unfairly in the judicial system, why is it so hard to believe women are suffering the same fate as a class of people? Parental alienation is being used as a blanket excuse to treat women unfairly and label them mentally altered in all these cases. The family law circuit is making a tremendous amount of money off the wheels of justice the state of Connecticut has allowed. Cost savings and money poured into the state.
Please, know the multiple overwhelming system barriers you are facing. Consider your positions wisely. 50/50 will not stop the multiple financially guided driven wheels if you are fighting for the safety of your children. When you seek the courts assistance for relief the deck will still be stacked against you. You and your children remain at great risk for the financial gain to the state. The entire welfare reform has biased the state. Criminal justice reform, fatherhood funding and the financial incentive is not going to go away.
DCF continues to be financially driven and guided by the Attorney general's office. DCF is partnered with the fatherhood initiative. Attorney General William Tong despite the loss of almost 10 million dollars of Connecticut's funds, and $1.4 million to be paid back by Connecticut DCF was elevated to vice president of Attorney Generals. The Attorney general's office is involved in the collection of child support. They have a say in Department of Justice funding.
I's sure this is also known to equal and shared parenting, yet they want you to go to criminal court and DCF for assistance?
Many different system failures need to be addressed before any more family court legislation should be past. Connecticut is not focused on children. These systems are fueled by money. Including problem sexual behavior. Many children are reporting sexual assault and under reporting is a problem due to the criminal justice reform and the relentless group who wants to criminalize reporting ignoring to children and parents' safety concerns.
Stop the downplaying domestic violence/ family violence, sexual assault/pedophilia as problematic behavior for cost savings to the state. Increased funding to call it a health crisis to sweep it under the radar of the public.
Look into who recommended the above Judge for his Judgeship.
Anonymous05/16/2024
In Connecticut to become a judge you need to first fill out a very long application, provide 6 attorney references, law school transcripts etc and the file goes before a committee. If the committee approves then it goes higher until the governor just signs off.
Anonymous05/19/2024
i believe judges have such a narrow history to truly understand what i real life. how much real life experience have they had! definitely a disconnect from what happens in real life and what is perceived in courts. i do not think putting a judge, a former attorney, with a gavel an in many cases not having the real world experience and only knowing case law, working 80 hours a week, being brainwashed that we are all guilty until proven innocent, thats why i have more respect for criminal defense attorneys as they know what really happens in life, going from home to office to court to me shows how narrow minded they are and do not see many things for what they are. Have any run a small business or did something out of law???
Anonymous05/22/2024
I wonder how the police feel when they put their lives in the line of fire. Conduct an investigation and gather evidence to have the case plea bargained, excused and expunged? The war on drugs is over. Slap on the wrist, back out pushing on the streets. Real life situation. Innocent even when proven guilty. It goes both ways
Anonymous05/16/2024
If people are so concerned, why are people willing to vote back in the Republican pedo-in chief”. He kept wanting to have sex with his daughter! You can call it fake news or you can just watch him say it in the video!
https://fb.watch/s65QNzmpYE/?mibextid=z4kJoQ
Anonymous05/17/2024
We all know Trump can say something crazy. The problems in this country have been out of control since Biden got his bus rolling. No one really cares what happened with Stormy Daniels. We are over the Biden administration.
How many double story buildings are in your town?05/18/2024
Wikipedia:
Markus Johannes Jooste (22 January 1961 – 21 March 2024) was a South African businessman and the CEO of Steinhoff International. He was an avid horse breeder, and in 2016 was reported to be one of Africa's richest people, worth $400 million.
Joining forces with Christo Wiese in 2014, they embarked on an aggressive international expansion programme. The share price of their conglomerate reached a peak in March 2016, favouring their strategy of paying for dividends and acquisitions by sales of stock …
… Jooste died by suicide on 21 March 2024 near his home in Hermanus. The suicide occurred a day before he was to hand himself over to law enforcement …”
Wide Awake Podcast on YouTube:
… sorry it was driving me crazy I'll bleep that I promise you'll
19:58
have believe I'm out as well yeah okay cuz people will know okay
20:03
< Markus Jooste >
okay so he approaches you to start this church the satanic church and then you
20:09
he they fund it you start it and then yeah so he he bought a building in
20:15
Century City which used to be a very nice um Car Sales like show room double
20:22
story …
Anonymous05/20/2024
If many women are head of household, parents why is the state of Connecticut ignoring them?
Hold the line.05/20/2024
Women fighting family court. You must get organized as you did for Jennifer's law. Many are traumatized by the on going court system battles. Women are stakeholders. Equal and shared parenting doesn't represent the entire head of household and parents. You need to make your voices heard. Enough plea bargaing, using federal funding for fatherhood interest. Enough family court system parental alienation to hijack family court cases. You need to hold the line to fix the family court system. Enough trying to silence women in the state of Connecticut.
Upside down flags05/20/2024
In recent years the group (NAAG) has been accused of being increasingly aligned with democratic party, 5 republican Attorney generals resigned since 2021. In 2022 Attorney General of Kentucky Daniel Cameron led a multi-state letter expressing concerns. The letter stated the NAAG needs structure reform, greater transparency, and less partisan reform, less partisan programming, asking NAAG to explain how its holding of capital from enforcement settlements is consistent with state constitutional and statutory restrictions. in Sept 2022 12 Republican Attorney Generals and various consumer advocates called for NAAG to return $280 million in assets to the states.
Anonymous05/21/2024
William Tong at times looks like he is using his food post like the middle finger to residents complaining about problems in Connecticut.
Anonymous05/27/2024
Time to flip William Tong a food post in the next election. He has the power to lead the department of justice for his investigation into funding biasing family court system. He has the power to lead a charge into investing access and visitation grant. An investigation into the bar association. The child welfare attorneys in the public defender office. He helped to lead an investigation into the embroiled chief public defender. Her “team” lead her into request for funding. She tried to stop misogyny and antisemitism in the state public defender office. Many women incarcerated in prison are domestic violence victims. Where is the department of justice funds for program to provide services for custody upon release? Where is the public defender office on providing legal services to Women especially domestic violence victims in criminal justice reform?
Anonymous05/21/2024
Hartford Hospital is affiliated with the University of Connecticut part of the fatherhood initiative. Real Dad's are for ever and the fatherhood funded programs. Hartford healthcare. Doug Edwards . I wonder how much funding from the fatherhood initiative Hartford healthcare receives? The community renewal team?
Anonymous05/29/2024
Superior court judges Democrat Eric Coleman is part of the community renewal team/ fatherhood initiative. Running for the Mayor of Hartford.
Anonymous05/22/2024
The fatherhood initiative is NO different. The more the need the more money. The article in the mirror is advertising. Glad for the children and the father. But what about the mothers in Connecticut? The privacy of the “family” children for a DCF case, but we can not discuss the family law custody issues?
Anonymous05/24/2024
3 days ago ” several cars were damaged by gunfire in Norwalk”. Around 11:30 am several rounds were recklessly discharged in a busy street. 7th safest state in the nation. Leader in criminal justice reform. Connecticut has done something remarkable with crime?
Who is really benefiting?05/27/2024
28 year old woman drives herself to the hospital after being shot while driving her car in Bridgeport. Our City's are not safe. Just driving down street is dangerous. Day or night. Criminal justice reform. Go after the police departments, reduce funding. Set up cameras to issue tickets. Transfer funds to the public defender office. ONCE AGAIN The LAWYERS GET ALL THE MONEY. Destruction of property and life threatening situations facing the residents of Connecticut. Armed patrols from citizens in Hartford. When has the power to protect the law abiding citizens going to be restored? We need law and order. The Democrats have given over the state to Criminals. For profit to the legal system.
Anonymous05/28/2024
You must be one of those serial litigator. You call everyone nuts until you get what you want.
Anonymous05/30/2024
Deflecting. It's common practice in divorce to attempt to make the other person appear “crazy” to deflect from their own actions and conduct. I like to call it the firecracker technique. It's what abusive mostly father's do. Claim alienaton as a diversionary tactic. To divert the attention from their own conduct they engage in the victim role. This is the strategic planning of the father's rights groups and fatherhood initiative. The united states and various countries have been focused on the financial wealth of the country. The Democrats have taken it to a level that is harmful to the entire population in the United States. Our youth. It's got nothing to do with the children. It's all focused on the welfare reform act. The attorneys know the system. So do the groups promoting alienaton. The issue of children growing up in single parent household is not the focus instead the United States has invested almost a trillion dollars in to promotion of a gender. False alligations of parental alienation and some times abuse are used not only by litigants but attorney to gain Coercive control. The attorneys use mostly alienaton and industry professionals like the AFCC. It's a scam. Like pathways leading cases into expensive evaluations and therapy that lead to more court system involved processes. Bringing the need for more funding to the state. These programs are absolutely useless in abuse cases.. More billable hours. It's a carefully orchestrated and executed scam. Coaching in the father circle to use the court system has been going on for a long time. They are enraged because Connecticut protective mothers and Jennifer has brought education and a spot light to the public about the abusers tactics in the legal areana. As well as the highly manipulative attorneys including GaLs, as well as psychologist to use alienaton to guide the family court. The entire state of Connecticut judicial branch knows who is buttering their bread. So does the legislators, attorney general, and related agencies. It a deep seeded problem being exposed. This article may or may not be true. I'm sure the father knew that he was not going to jail due to lack of representation. Child support and alimony are not being collected in cases. Equal and shared parenting have knowledge. Many monitized white men know about the incarceration of black/brown men of low income. The Wonder Bread committee has jumped on the band wagon. The country is deeply in the red over child support and a lot of the equal and shared parenting members don't want to pay child support. Use extended family members and new partners to join the fight. ” Father's and family” It's a very complex problem in the court. All the leaders in fatherhood initiative are of minority statues. It is placing a tent over the problem. As well as the criminal justice reform. It's absolutely all related. A gaint mess.
See how it “works”? 🙄06/22/2024
Those on the Connecticut Judicial Media Committee know:
”Family court” judges’ opinions based on “family court” evaluators’ bogus reports aren’t censored.
Those on the Connecticut Judicial Media Committee also know:
”Family court” judges’ opinions based on “family court” evaluators’ bogus reports are published on the “Connecticut Judicial Branch” website for all to see.
Those on the Connecticut Judicial Media Committee also know:
Connecticut “family court” bogus cases result in bogus case law setting bogus precedents.
A few people on the Connecticut Judicial Media Committee might also know:
Jennifer filed motions in Connecticut “family court” to complain about Mr. Meehan (the “guardian ad litem” in that photo up there) and Mr. Herman (the “family court evaluator”) in her children’s “family court case” about a week before she “disappeared” in May 2019.
Has anyone in law enforcement read her May 2019 motions to the court, yet?
Can the public read her May 2019 motions to the court?
Mr. Meehan and Mr. Herman probably don’t want her May 2019 motions to the court falling into the public realm in any way.
Did anyone on the Connecticut Judicial Media Committee read Jennifer’s May 2019 motions to the court? If so, what good to they do? If not, what good do they do? 🧐
***GOP****06/05/2024
GOP, please check into the campaign donations for the labor union to the democratic party in CT. How many cases they have going on in the system. The welfare attorneys assigned their cases. Perhaps this is why William Tong and the Democrats at the department of justice want Connecticut to “handle it”. I watched some of the hearing with Attorney General Garland. It's not conspiracy theory. It's a lack of confidence that political positions are not possible interfering with the judicial system. The American public is looking for transperacy and accountability. The best interest of the public and to ensure preferential treatment for political affiliation. Monetary gain through misguided court system
🤔?!06/12/2024
Why ask the GOP?
Don’t good Democrats provide oversight for not-so-good Democrats, anymore?
Anonymous06/13/2024
I have lost faith in the democratic party 🎉. They need running the show for some time. Take William Tong for example. The DCF nightmare, the family court nightmare, the funding trail. The criminal justice reform. Connecticut has been given more money for the police department, however the prosecutor's office was overlooked. Punishment for the court system so called professional have not happened. Many of the people in the system have retired. Including the office of child support enforcement. Martin Looney is responsible for the appointment of the commission on women, children and seniors. In small print is equity and opportunity. There was one a permit commission on women. That has gone to the waist side. Senitor Gary Winfield is focused on criminal justice reform and is ignoring minority womens issues. Blumenthal is pushing protecting pedophilia and pushed Sarah Russell. They keep up the false Utopia. Follow the funding. Follow the language in the state legislation and contracts. This problem has been going on for years under the watchful eye of the Democrats. Other than Gonzalez who is willing to allow the truth of the family courts and related matters to be public. The Connecticut constitutes have to dig around to see what happens in the state. Who is going to step up?
Anonymous06/15/2024
Women have attempted to contact Gonzalez. She never responded. Women have gone to Susan Bysiewicz and Robin Porter. Women have gone to Attorney general William Tong. The democratic elected Senitors they send you back to the legislators. The legislators call women complaining ” hysterical”. They are so busy with criminal justice reform they don't want to jeopardize the money they are recovering and saving. There is not enough organization for women. The fatherhood initiative has been spreading hatred towards white women. Dividing the woman into colors. We have so many bar association for based on ethics groups. Women's issues as a whole don't bring money to the state the Democrats already know this.
Anonymous05/28/2024
Abuse of Domestic Violence programs, abuse of the criminal system to advance in family court. custody finances, assets, and court abuse The law profession would close up if they didn't have all these falsified , fabricated cases by certain demented individuals who are coached by their ambulance chasing so called attorneys.
Anonymous05/29/2024
This is absolutely not true. There is little money dedicated to domestic violence. It places both mothers and children in difficult and impossible situations in family court in many cases.
Anonymous05/30/2024
Thank you for confirming your biased stance that there is no DV against men/fathers, there is no money allocated for them,it DEFINITELY places men/father at a SEVERE difficult and impossible situation… gender disadvantage in family court in majority of cases.
Family Law: Clear Evidence of Legal Bias Against Men and Fathers
Bill Corbitt May 24, 2024
Family law, a legal field that resolves matters such as divorce, child custody, and alimony, has faced enduring criticism due to its inherent prejudices. These prejudices often appear in ways that have a greater impact on men and fathers, leading to concerns about the fairness and equality in legal procedures. In this article I will explore the several aspects of this bias, backed by thorough academic study and empirical evidence.
The origins of the gender-based prejudices against males and dads in family law can be traced back to long-established gender roles and societal conventions. Traditionally, women were perceived as the main providers of care, while males were regarded as the primary earners. This division has significantly influenced the creation of family law statutes and the outcomes of judicial rulings (Nielsen, 2011). The “Tender Years Doctrine,” in effect until the late 20th century, stated that young children should stay with their mothers unless there were extraordinary circumstances requiring a different arrangement (Kruk, 2012).
Custody and Visitation BiasesThe issue of custody is a crucial domain where prejudice against dads is apparent. Although there has been a trend towards more gender-neutral laws, mothers still tend to be more frequently granted primary custody of children. Fabricius et al. (2010) found that dads are awarded exclusive custody in a mere 8–14% of instances, while mothers are granted sole custody in 70–85% of cases. This difference is attributed to persistent prejudices regarding gender roles and care giving capacities.
Furthermore, visitation arrangements frequently demonstrate a subordinate and less impactful position for fathers. According to Lamb (2012), a significant number of fathers express dissatisfaction with visiting patterns, claiming that they are inadequate and fail to foster a strong parent-child bond. These agreements can enhance the belief that fathers have less significance in their children’s lives, thus continuing a cycle of exclusion.
Alimony and Financial ResponsibilitiesAlimony, also known as spousal support, aims to alleviate the financial inequalities between spouses who are getting divorced, enabling the spouse with lesser income to sustain a comparable quality of life as they had before the marriage. Nevertheless, in actual implementation, alimony rulings frequently exhibit and perpetuate gender prejudices that put males at a disadvantage. This section delves into the intricacies of alimony in family law, emphasizing how these choices unfairly impact males and reinforce old gender norms.
The concept of alimony originated during a period characterized by rigid gender roles, where males were commonly the main earners and women fulfilled the role of homemakers. The historical background has had a lasting impact on contemporary alimony legislation, which, despite attempts at change, frequently continues to operate on the premise that men bear the financial responsibility for their former spouses. According to Brinig and Allen (2000), women’s involvement in the labor field has experienced substantial growth, and homes with two incomes have become the standard. However, the legal system has been sluggish in adapting to these shifts in society.
Empirical research indicates that men are disproportionately assigned the responsibility of paying alimony compared to women, even in situations where both partners have similar earnings, or the wife receives a higher income. This disparity can be ascribed to the persistent belief that males should fulfill their conventional role as providers. For instance, Rogers and Bieniewicz (2000) revealed that in almost 97% of cases, males are mandated to provide alimony, irrespective of the wife’s financial situation. This attitude not only imposes an unjustifiable financial burden on men but also perpetuates the antiquated belief that women are intrinsically reliant on males for economic sustenance.
Economic Impact on MenThe financial implications of alimony for men can be profound. Paying alimony can significantly reduce a man’s disposable income, affecting his ability to maintain a similar standard of living post-divorce. This economic strain can lead to long-term financial instability, especially if the man is also required to pay child support. Furthermore, the obligation to pay alimony can hinder a man’s ability to invest in his future, whether through saving for retirement, purchasing a home, or furthering his education and career prospects (Weitzman, 1985).
Gender Bias in Judicial DiscretionJudicial discretion plays a significant role in alimony awards, and judges’ implicit biases can influence their decisions. Research suggests that judges may unconsciously adhere to traditional gender roles when determining alimony, resulting in decisions that favor women over men. This bias is particularly evident in cases where the wife is capable of self-sufficiency but is nonetheless awarded alimony due to the judge’s perception of her financial need relative to the husband’s perceived financial capacity (Starnes, 2011).
Case Law and Statutory ReformsRecent case law and statutory reforms have sought to address some of these biases by promoting more equitable alimony awards. For instance, several states in the U.S. have enacted laws that consider the earning potential and financial independence of both spouses, rather than defaulting to traditional gender roles. However, the implementation of these reforms is inconsistent, and many jurisdictions still exhibit a strong bias towards awarding alimony to women (Ellman, 2012).
Impact of False AllegationsFalse allegations of domestic violence or child abuse represent a significant and troubling issue in family law. These allegations are particularly prevalent during contentious custody disputes, where the stakes are high, and emotions run deep. Fathers often find themselves at the receiving end of such accusations, which can severely damage their case and lead to unjust restrictions on their parental rights.
Empirical evidence underscores the prevalence of false allegations in custody disputes. For example, a study by Johnston, Lee, Olesen, and Walters (2005) revealed that false allegations can be strategically used to gain an upper hand in custody battles. These allegations, often made during highly contentious disputes, typically by women against men, exploit the legal system’s protective stance towards claims of abuse.
The consequences of false allegations for fathers are profound and multifaceted. Once an allegation is made, even if it is ultimately proven false, the accused father often faces immediate and severe repercussions. These can include restraining orders, supervised visitation, or, in extreme cases, complete loss of contact with their children. The legal process for disproving false allegations is lengthy and arduous, during which time the father’s relationship with his children can be irreparably harmed.
The legal system’s response to allegations of domestic violence and child abuse is designed to protect the alleged victims, which is an essential and necessary function. However, this protective stance can sometimes lead to a presumption of guilt rather than innocence, particularly in the emotionally charged context of custody disputes. Fathers accused of abuse often encounter significant procedural challenges in clearing their names and restoring their parental rights.
The standard of evidence in family court is typically lower than in criminal court, making it easier for false allegations to gain traction. Judges, operating under the principle of erring on the side of caution, may impose restrictive measures on the accused parent to safeguard the child’s well-being. While this precautionary approach is understandable, it can result in unjust outcomes for fathers who are falsely accused (Johnston, Lee, Olesen, & Walters, 2005).
The psychological and social implications of false allegations for fathers are severe. Being accused of domestic violence or child abuse carries a significant stigma, which can affect a father’s personal and professional life. The stress and anxiety associated with defending against false allegations can lead to mental health issues such as depression and anxiety. Additionally, the social ostracization that accompanies such allegations can further isolate fathers, compounding their emotional distress (Dutton, 2006).
For the children involved, false allegations against a parent can create confusion, fear, and emotional instability. Children may be coerced or manipulated into believing false narratives, which can damage their relationship with the accused parent. The long-term effects on children’s mental and emotional health can be profound, affecting their trust and attachment patterns (Kelly & Johnston, 2001).
Addressing the issue of false allegations in family law requires comprehensive reform and robust advocacy. Legal reforms should focus on establishing clearer standards of evidence and ensuring that allegations are thoroughly investigated before restrictive measures are imposed. Additionally, there should be legal consequences for those who knowingly make false allegations, as a deterrent against misuse of the legal system.
Advocacy groups play a crucial role in highlighting the issue of false allegations and advocating for the rights of falsely accused fathers. These organizations can provide legal support, raise public awareness, and lobby for legislative changes that protect against the misuse of abuse allegations in custody disputes. Ensuring a fair and balanced approach in handling allegations is essential for upholding the integrity of the family law system and safeguarding the rights of all parents involved.
False allegations of domestic violence or child abuse, combined with judicial bias in custody disputes, represent a significant challenge in family law proceedings, disproportionately affecting fathers and leading to unjust outcomes. The legal and psychological impacts of these allegations are profound, necessitating comprehensive legal reforms and robust advocacy efforts. By addressing these issues, the family law system can better ensure fair and equitable treatment for all parents, ultimately serving the best interests of the children involved.
Judicial Discretion and Implicit BiasJudicial discretion is an essential element of family law, conferring judges with the power to provide judgments based on the distinct facts of each individual case. Although the flexibility in making rulings allows for subtle and situation-specific decisions, it also creates the possibility for personal opinions and unconscious biases to have a substantial impact on the outcomes. This section explores how judicial discretion might contribute to the perpetuation of bias against males and dads. It examines the impact of judges’ personal opinions, unconscious biases, and cultural prejudices.
Judicial discretion pertains to the authority of judges to interpret and enforce the law according to their own discernment and comprehension of the circumstances provided in each individual case. Within the realm of family law, this level of decision-making power is especially evident because of the intricate and fluctuating nature of matters such as child custody, spousal support, and visiting privileges. When making decisions, judges must consider several aspects such as the child’s best interests, the financial situation of each parent, and the past caregiving responsibilities within the family (Kelly, 1994).
Studies suggest that judges’ personal convictions and unconscious biases can have a substantial influence on their rulings, frequently resulting in unfavorable outcomes for fathers. Implicit biases refer to unconscious views or prejudices that impact an individual’s comprehension, behaviors, and choices. Within the realm of family law, these prejudices have the potential to cause judges to exhibit a preference for mothers over fathers, especially when it comes to custody battles (Maccoby & Mnookin, 1992). For example, a judge who unconsciously links caregiving with motherhood may be more likely to grant primary custody to the mother, even if the father is equally competent and committed.
Empirical Evidence of BiasSeveral studies have highlighted the presence of gender bias in judicial decisions. Maccoby and Mnookin (1992) found that judges often unconsciously favor mothers in custody disputes, reflecting broader societal prejudices that view women as the primary caregivers. A comprehensive study by Emery, Otto, and O’Donohue (2005) corroborated these findings, revealing that fathers are less likely to be awarded primary custody and more likely to receive limited visitation rights, even when they have demonstrated a strong commitment to their children.
Moreover, research by Bartlett and Stack (2009) showed that judges’ decisions in family law cases are influenced by traditional gender norms and stereotypes. Their analysis indicated that judges frequently rely on outdated assumptions about gender roles, such as the belief that women are naturally more nurturing, and men are less emotionally available as parents. These biases can result in decisions that unfairly disadvantage fathers, perpetuating the perception that they are less competent or less deserving of custodial responsibilities.
Broader Societal Prejudices and Judicial TrainingWider societal biases also have a substantial impact on determining the attitudes and rulings of the judiciary. The societal norm that women are more adept at caregiving and that men should emphasize their professional pursuits not only impacts public sentiment but also shapes the viewpoints of judges. Overcoming these deeply rooted preconceptions is challenging, despite making deliberate attempts to encourage gender neutrality in the courts (Rhoades, 2002).
Implementing judicial training programs that specifically target implicit biases and foster a deep understanding of gender equality is essential in effectively reducing these biases. Nevertheless, the efficacy of these programs varies, highlighting the necessity for continuous teaching and reinforcement of impartial decision-making methods. Research indicates that although there has been considerable improvement, there are still substantial obstacles to completely eliminating gender prejudice from family court proceedings (Pruett, 2001).
Case Studies and Legal ReformsCase studies provide further insight into how judicial discretion and implicit biases affect family law outcomes. For example, in the case of Doe v. Roe, the father, despite being the primary caregiver during the marriage, was awarded limited visitation rights based on the judge’s perception that the mother was better suited to provide a nurturing environment. Such cases highlight the need for legal reforms that emphasize the importance of evidence-based decision-making and the consideration of both parents’ care giving roles and capabilities.
Legal reforms aimed at reducing judicial discretion and promoting standardized guidelines for custody and alimony decisions can help mitigate biases. For instance, the introduction of shared parenting laws in several jurisdictions has been shown to increase the likelihood of fathers receiving joint custody, promoting a more balanced approach to post-divorce parenting arrangements (Bauserman, 2002).
ConclusionThe prejudice against males and fathers in court processes related to family matters is a multifaceted problem that stems from historical, sociological, and legal influences. Notwithstanding attempts to attain gender neutrality, substantial discrepancies endure in domains such as child custody, visitation, and financial obligations. To counteract these biases, it is crucial to question and confront old preconceptions, guarantee fairness in legal proceedings, and advocate for equal treatment of all parents within the family law system.
Advocacy groups and governments have a vital role in tackling the inherent prejudices present in alimony rulings. Advocacy groups supporting men’s rights have demanded revisions to guarantee that alimony awards are determined by objective factors such as income, earning potential, and contributions to the marriage, rather than relying on assumptions based on gender. Implementing policy reforms that promote joint financial accountability and acknowledge the economic contributions of both partners is crucial for ensuring equity in the determination of alimony (Doolittle, 2000).
Alimony rulings persist in demonstrating and strengthening gender prejudices, disproportionately impacting men by reinforcing antiquated assumptions of financial obligation. Alimony payments can impose a significant economic strain on men, potentially resulting in enduring financial instability and perpetuating conventional gender norms. To guarantee fairness and equity for all parties involved, it is imperative to implement extensive legal reforms and enhance the knowledge of judges and legislators about alimony awards.
Judicial discretion, although offering essential flexibility, also allows personal convictions and unconscious prejudices to impact rulings. The prejudice against males and fathers is a substantial problem, sustained by judges’ subconscious biases and social preconceptions. To tackle these biases, it is necessary to provide extensive training to judges, implement legal changes, and demonstrate a strong dedication to advancing gender equality in every element of family law. Implementing such procedures is crucial to guarantee impartial and just treatment for all parents. The prejudices present in family law have significant psychological and societal consequences for dads. The exclusion of fathers in custody and visitation agreements can result in emotions of powerlessness, despondency, and a reduced perception of their role as parents (Doucet, 2006). Furthermore, the active participation of both parents is advantageous for children, and any prejudices that restrict the relationship between fathers and children can have a detrimental effect on the development and welfare of the children (Amato & Gilbreth, 1999). Addressing these biases is essential not only for the welfare of dads but also for the comprehensive growth of children.
By applying these measures, the legal system can strive for a more equitable and harmonious approach to family law, which will benefit all parties concerned and cultivate a more robust societal framework for future generations.
References
Amato, P. R., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children’s well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(3), 557–573.
Bartlett, K. T., & Stack, J. C. (2009). Gender and Judicial Decision-Making. Law and Society Review, 43(1), 89–128.
Bauserman, R. (2002). Child Adjustment in Joint-Custody Versus Sole-Custody Arrangements: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1), 91–102.
Brinig, M. F., & Allen, D. W. (2000). These boots are made for walking: Why most divorce filers are women. American Law and Economics Review, 2(1), 126–129.
Doucet, A. (2006). Do men mother? Fathering, care, and domestic responsibility. University of Toronto Press.
Doolittle, M. (2000). Gender bias in alimony awards. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 33(1–2), 139–154.
Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking Domestic Violence. UBC Press.
Ellman, I. M. (2012). The theory of alimony. Family Law Quarterly, 46(3), 227–248.
Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2005). A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1), 1–29.
Fabricius, W. V., Braver, S. L., Diaz, P., & Schenck, C. (2010). Custody and parenting time: Links to family relationships and well-being after divorce. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 201–240). John Wiley & Sons.
Johnston, J. R., Lee, S., Olesen, N. W., & Walters, M. G. (2005). Allegations and substantiations of abuse in custody-disputing families. Family Court Review, 43(2), 283–294.
Kelly, J. B. (1994). The Determination of Child Custody. The Future of Children, 4(1), 121–142.
Kelly, J. B., & Johnston, J. R. (2001). The alienated child: A reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Family Court Review, 39(3), 249–266.
Kruk, E. (2012). The equal parent presumption: Social justice in the legal determination of parenting after divorce. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Lamb, M. E. (2012). The father’s role: Applied perspectives. John Wiley & Sons.
Maccoby, E. E., & Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Harvard University Press.
Nielsen, L. (2011). Father-daughter relationships: Contemporary research and issues. Routledge.
Pruett, M. K. (2001). Fathers and Divorce. Men and Masculinities, 4(3), 349–367.
Rhoades, H. (2002). The “No Contact Mother”: Reconstructions of Motherhood in the Era of the Post-Divorce Family. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 16(1), 71–94.
Rogers, R., & Bieniewicz, D. (2000). The economics of divorce: Economic consequences and public policy. American Economic Review, 90(2), 67–71.
Starnes, C. (2011). Alimony theory. Family Law Quarterly, 45(3), 271–298.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. U.S. Department of Justice.
Weitzman, L. J. (1985). The divorce revolution: The unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. Free Press.
The old supremacy tail05/30/2024
85 percent of domestic violence victims are women. 20 percent of high conflict litigation involve accusations of abuse. These are 20 percent of family law cases. Self reported surveys and false information has been passed around. The financial resources and insensitive towards fatherhood and criminals. According to custody statics and united nations concluded the bias is against women. The statistics being used are based on the alienaton industry. The normal average cases are normal cases who can make rational choices. The statistics point to the major of cases are men engaging in domestic violence behavior. With a minimum of women engagement of dishonest reporting. The problem is the legal industry preditory practices. The federal welfare reform act. The white fathers engagement of supremacy over women. It's an old tail with a different spin.
It's coming to focus06/01/2024
The majority of the studies for fatherhood are funded and directed to the AFCC. The biggest problem works for the Biden administration in Florida. Any one in the white house besides the Democrats. It's all goes back to Martinez. Follow his attorney and the AFCC. The federal funding was targeted at one thing. It's bias research. Self reported. Alienaton industry propaganda.
Completely false06/13/2024
Please look into the portions of laws and legislation passed and report on the impact of fatherhood funding. Domestic batters in the majority of cases are gaining custody. More important information to come for women in Connecticut on the lack of funding for domestic violence. There are significant monitized men's rights groups operating in Connecticut. Child support is the focus. Laws not passed to assist domestic violence victims ( majority women) the collection of child support. Our democratic party leaders know what is going on. Look into studies around 2009ish. Continue lack of funding for domestic violence.
Get back to the Facts06/07/2024
you are in a demented state, seek help.
Anonymous06/07/2024
There are angry management programs available.
The Wonder Bread factory06/08/2024
Ms. Magazine 2/8/24
Project 2025 The Right's Dystopian Plan to Dismantle civil Rights and what it means for women.
Wealthy right wing think tank The Heritage Foundation has published a detailed plan for the next republican president to use the executive branch of federal government to attack the rights of women, LGBTQ people and BIPOC community, by eliminating the agencies and offices responsible for enforcement of civil rights laws and placing training right -wing ideology in staff positions throughout the federal government.
Was The Weimar Republic “left” or “right”?06/13/2024
How about the Wilhelmine Empire? The Bohemian Grove? The Kinsey Institute?
Left? Right?
How about Kinsey working with Hitler’s “scientists”?
What about Operation Paperclip?
Is everything and everyone only “left” or “right”?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiOlx_MJ1DY
Anonymous06/07/2024
Her word versus her words!
Anonymous06/07/2024
When her/she uses words it's for entitlements? I hope that people are
06/11/2024
According to AFCC literature it's not the “job” of the reunification therapist to decipher between alienation and estrangement. The courts are forcing domestic violence victims to pay for reunification therapy. Bill Gates donates 88% of the funding to the world Health organization. A BIG THANK YOU TO MELINDA FRENCH GATES FORSTEPPING UP IN A BIG WAY FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS since her divorce from Bill and leaving the Gates foundation!!!!!!!!!!
Bill Gates increased his wealth during the covid pandemic, the Wall Street Journal reported Gates as the latest Billionaire tied to Epstein.
Where is the World Health Organization involved with the AFCC, Parental Alienation, and Family Courts from around the globe?
Why do you write and post ONLY about gender? 🤔06/13/2024
Did someone coach you into thinking that “family court” crimes and corruption are ONLY about gender instead of … “family court” crimes and corruption?
Anonymous06/14/2024
Congressional Research service Fatherhood Initiative. Connecting Fathers to their Children. Carmen Solomone -Fears Specialist in Social Policy. Jan 2014.
There is a war on women going on in the United States.
Specifically
11th congress and the laws not passed to protect women and domestic violence. There are many men's rights groups loads of money pumped into the system. Biden never did what he was supposed to do with the ERA. ” Make women great again “, really? Assassinating the character of women unjustly. Taking their children away unjustly in many cases. CHILDREN ARE BEING ABUSED AND SEXUALLY ASSULTED. Including in DCF. Men have been given millions in media campaigns; criminal Justice Reform is all about men. What is the government doing for moms in jail? Many Domestic violence victims. Access and visitation grants for men only? Where The Hell are the Women in government? Stop fighting over eyelashes and bleached hair! Follow the supreme court rulings. Women are being suppressed. Men have plenty of support. Follow the extremely wealthy men and what they are doing with their money. Time to march
Anonymous06/15/2024
Congress has the reports on the cost savings for investment in the father's. The cost savings for not collecting child support. Cost savings. The government program income out weighs the lives of women and children. The reports are clear. We have the exact numbers.
Anonymous06/15/2024
110 Congress
Anonymous06/26/2024
108 congressional reports on the fatherhood initiative
Expand your perspective, please.06/21/2024
The war hasn’t just been on women, men and children. The war has been on the United States — and on God’s entire world.
Witness06/14/2024
The weakness of our society is when organizations like this come into being. Who makes money off of this?
Anonymous06/15/2024
Religious organizations. The AFCC, the attorneys, the state for fatherhood programs, father's using access and visitation grant. Psychologist, child support enforcement. DCF. Any organization partnered with the MOU in Connecticut. Connecticut state colleges. Yale, . Health and human services. Campaign donations. The same thing is happening in Florida as Connecticut after they excepted large amounts of money for fatherhood funding. Children are ultimately the ones suffering from the gender war. The government has used fatherhood as a minority project. Just like criminal justice reform. The majority of the father's rights groups are wealthy men of a lighter color. Our courts are being run of the welfare reform policy and procedures. Legislation in Connecticut based on gender. Child welfare has nothing to do with it. The blanket application of father involvement under any condition. Children are sexualized. Property. Our economy is in the toilet. People are suffering. What are the TNAF blocks grant money being used for? Who is benefiting from the Grant money being passed out to non profit organization? ” Child welfare attorneys are not representing children. There representing the programs. DCF ECT. So many problems. Self reporting studies? The welfare reform act was brought about from men's rights groups. Congress healthy marriage and the economic growth and development. How much money is Connecticut making and saving on criminal justice reform? Where is the permit committee on women in Connecticut. Why did Senitor Martin Looney appointed the head of the commission on women, children and seniors? Dividing women into the colors of their skin. Partnered in the MOU. Read the statues on the commission receiving federal funding. The commission is supposed to represent women, children and seniors in legislation, how ever their federal funding depends on the position they take. Advocacy?
Tip of the iceberg06/15/2024
Men's rights groups operating in the state of Ct.
CT statewide collaborative fatherhood Initiative, Connecticut
Office of early childhood support for fathers
Fathers and family coalition of America New Haven CT
The Father's rights Movement
Ct Family counseling Dad's group
Ct renewal Team
The village for family's fatherhood engagement
Equal and shared parenting
Children's rights counsel
The National parents' organization
Dads Divorce
The father's rights Network
Fathers 4 kids
Open men's group Newtown Ct
Father's help Network
Spiritual groups for men Mercy by the Sea Madison Ct
Urbin Community Alliance MIN male involvement network
Connecticut Men's center
Fixing Fathers INC.
Real dads are forever
Mankind Project USA
A call to men
Southern Poverty Law Male supremacy
Causeway Collaborative mentorship therapy for young men CT & NY
Intergrated Parish Communities ” men and families ”
New Friend new life
The national Coalition of the freemen Inc. New Milford CT
The Crucible project
Dads group Ct counseling LLC Farmington Ct
The national Ministery to men
Cordell Cordell
The National Center for men
Anonymous06/15/2024
$400 billion dollar annually is collected for fatherhood.
Anonymous06/26/2024
Tip of the iceberg06/16/2024
2016 UConn faculty grants frozen over claims of misuse. UConn health and human services Fatherhood initiative Dianna Ditunno wife of Joseph Ditunno family services, violent offender program, former co-chair of the CCADV. Partnered with the Mou fatherhood funding. How much money is given to the judicial branch for fatherhood funding? Violent Offender programs? UConn kids the shared and structured parenting approach, UConn Foundation seeks to strengthen parent engagement. Who from UConn is on the shared parenting committee? Who are the persons involved in the self-reported funded studies? Who is attempting to attach school shootings with fatherless households? Was there DV in the home prior. Wasn't both parents in a household held responsible for a mass school shooting? Who is paying for the research grants? Who is in charge of National Parents organization? These are 20 % of cases where blanket 50/50 legislation is not needed. Yet being insisted upon by identified in media father's rights groups. Does UConn law school teach about domestic violence or parental alienation? Privileged white women?
Sponsor of CT HB05342 Joint Custody
Juan Candelaria D
Travis Simms D
Anne Hughes D
Minnie Gonzalez D
Anthoney Nolan D
Larry Butler D
All Democrats. How much money does it bring to the state? Criminal Justice reform? Cost savings on child support arrearage? Hartford rates in the
top 100 most dangerous city's, Hartford has a high population of poverty 37% of children in Hartford live in poverty.
2012 Counselman Travis Simms was arrested for failure to register a high-capacity magazine, Norwalk Police Union filed a complaint on the Counselman due to his behavior during an arrest, Norwalk police released a video of Travis L. Simms during A DISTURBANCE IN FL*** H** ROAD HOME 3:33 am A LARGE FIGHT AT THE ADDRESS. 2015. December 2015 Travis Simms appeared in court over a misdemean (ASSULT CHARGE FROM AN ALLEGED ALTERCATION AT A BIRTHDAY PARTY. Norwalk news
Anne Huges Licensed Master Social Worker, LIASON WITH FAMILY COURT, agency, community service etc. op ed about Connecticut corrections system Author. (Criminal justice reform and fatherhood funding.)
Larry Butler Committees: Finances, Revenue and bonding, HUMAN SERVICES, legislative management
More information on the way.
Tip of the iceberg06/17/2024
Anthoney Jenkins and Doug Ewards Winter 2023 Professional Development. ' Partnering with family men. Snap, formerly known as food stamps, assistance eligible single fathers in purchasing groceries, ensuring their children have access nutritious meals. – 2014 Ct won't prosecute workers in D-snap food stamp fraud case.
2016 allegedly workers in DCF arrested for stealing snap benefits. v2023, we welcome dads to wic. Dads guide to healthy children Wic. Dads can offer assistance in the weaning process. National Wic association DADS to build strong families. WIC is receiving fatherhood funding 3 amazing free resources to help engage dads through wic. Engaging men and dad's toolkit. HHS STUDY OF FATHERS IN NUTRICITION AND HEATH PROGRAMS. California wic more men's rights money in health and human service. self-reporting studies these programs are not targeting parents. It targets men
Why we talk about gender06/21/2024
Connecticut fatherhood initiative. Dianna Ditunno. Health and human services UConn. Please see articles on UConn . CT Inside Investigator Aug 2023. UConn audit repeats violations bylaw state statues. Connecticut law Review. Tawdry Tale of Corruption and gifts to public Officials. Connecticut public 2013. Allegations at UConn Corruption in Connecticut a New Cheshire Murder Film. Allegations of sexual abuse. Family services, violent offender program Joseph Ditunno. Judicial is partnered with the fatherhood initiative through the Mou .
Anonymous06/21/2024
What’s “the Mou”?
Anonymous06/21/2024
Memorandum of understanding between state agencies in the state of Connecticut for FATHERHOOD. This is attached to funding. You receive funding if you support it. All agencies would have to agree to desolve agreement. The entire state funding is running on it. Department of education, labor, judicial branch, child support Domestic violence collision. All state college , Uconn, Yale and many others. Health and human services funding.
Why we talk about gender06/21/2024
Leo, the heritage foundation and fatherhood. Yale Federalist society, originalism, the overturning of abortion rights, Ron Desantos 70 million for Floridia's fatherhood program, NFL coach Tony Dungy appearing with the governor. Democrats took out references to fatherhood from 2016 and 2020 platform. Progressive avoid public debate (but they have taken all the funding they can get their hands on in Connecticut) about marriage and fatherhood because they believe social outcomes are mainly driven by public policy and systemic forces, not individual decisions.
Attorney General William Tong refused to change the langue in the MOU prioritizing fatherhood. The democrats have passed legislation for all father's to be engaged in the lives of their children. DNA trucks drive around the south Brox ” Who's your Daddy” but not Martha's Vinyard or the rich suburbs of Connecticut. Pushing DNA test in inner city hospitals like Hartford Hospital and St Francis in Hartford, CT.
Connecticut Democrats need to come out of the closet. Welfare reform funding, the leader of criminal justice reform, domestic violence and trafficking children in the family courts. sexual violence in state colleges, and pedophilia/ minor attraction.
Anonymous06/23/2024
2025 180 pages.
Anonymous06/26/2024
Frank is missing some important information in the comments. The Catholic Church funding and legal advice. No separation of church organization. Labeled as faith based organizations.
Anonymous06/16/2024
August 2017 glass door review of community renewal Team. Former employee for more than a year. corruption abound. Pro 35 hr work week. Con No investment in managerial training. The good managers were overworked and underpaid. The bad managers were bullies and didn't know how to talk to people. The good ones that were assets were not taken care of and forced out. The main office was raided by federal agents (story in the Hartford Courant) because funds were misused. THE WHISTLEBLOWER WAS FIRED. The person a 5,6 figure salary living in Miami did not work, Fatherhood flames is now in Floridia. Have the whopper your way.) 9not a good place to be. Community renewal team pays $362,000 to settle False claims Act. United states Attorney General's Office.
Community Renewal Team Real Dads, real men Hartford, CT what is happening with the federal funds ? Saint Francis and Hartford Health care?
Anonymous06/17/2024
What is/was “community renewal Team”?
Anonymous06/17/2024
CRT is running out of Hartford Ct. Multiple programs including the fatherhood initiative. Doug Edwards real Dad's are forever or Anthony Jenkins CT fatherhood initiative should be able to help contact the organization.
Anonymous06/19/2024
Anyone contact them yet to ask them for details about where those dollars go?
Anonymous06/20/2024
Once you start inquiring about an agency and their money. Legislation is slipping under the radar to protect the agency. Complaints go unanswered they let the statues of limitations for accountability run out. Connecticut has been at the game for years.
Actually,06/21/2024
“… there’s no statute of limitation for a fraud on the court claim …”
https://www.stjohns.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/18_vandoren_memo_24.pdf
Anonymous06/21/2024
SMH06/18/2024
“Fatherhood funding” LOL you are a joke need your head examined pathetic excuse for a woman. believe all woman. you go girl!.
Let it sink in Mr. Mysognist06/19/2024
The funny part about living in America. If you are a law abiding citizen, female and not addicted to drugs you don't fit into a category for funding. Your tax dollars are going to everyone else. I'm a joke or on the money. How would you like to live in a state that promotes a gender, using minority funding for a gender in the minority community. Pays for legal services for criminals and leaves victims unprotected? Tells the minority community you're privileged because you live above poverty. I'm a pathetic excuse of a woman? Have I educated myself on how things are running behind the curtain? Are you enraged because I am not interested in tolerating the nonsense and mistrueth you want me to tolerate? Sorry you are so bothered by the expression of the truth.
Captain Cave man06/19/2024
Are you enraged that the public is learning about the funding being used to traffic children in Connecticut and the United States? Are you upset about being held accountable for responsible fatherhood?
Anonymous06/26/2024
If this is how you spoke to your wife I understand why she felt she needed to break up the marriage.
Know how the government works06/22/2024
It's my personal opinion the department of public health and human services should be held responsible for their role in the family court system. How many complaints about psychologist have gone ignored? Leading further harm? criminal prosecution for the board of examiners involved with the psychologist. Criminal prosecution for the Attorney General's office for ignoring complaints. Tong and garland should not be held above the law. The department of justice works for the Attorney General's office. The problem is in congress and the welfare reform. The FBI is overseen by Congress. John Larson, Joe Courtney, Rosa DeLaura, Jim Himes and Johana Hayes. VOTE THEM OUT.
The senators need to go as well. Clean Slate for Connecticut.
Anonymous06/24/2024
When will the committee reviewing GaL complaints be reviewed? If you look at some that have been talked about in the Frank report. Multiple complaints, yet they keep getting put on cases by the judges. Is everyone crazy and discruntaled? When will the danger to the public be considered? Will they continue to be appointed until a child is seriously hurt or dead?
Anonymous06/26/2024
Increase in human trafficking reported in Connecticut as well. Where is the money going? Is there any increased funding going to prosecute these types of crimes in CT from Garland? Is William Tong advocating for it?
Anonymous06/27/2024
Ct substitute Conn stat 53a-180c June 5,2024
Kent Mawhinney the original attorney for Fotis Dulos. Accused of assisting with Jennifer. Mawhinney is awaiting trial for alleged a role in her murder.
Jan 10,2020 Jennifer Dulos case Mawhinney's wife worried he wanted her dead.
June 17,2022 CT insider Ex-wife of Dolus defendant Kent Mawhinney claims he abused her.
June 20,2022 Mawhinney's wife claims she was approached Dulos after Jennifer's disappearance.
Mawhinney ex-wife reported being raped by Mawhinney to the South Windsor Police department. Prosecutor's office stated she was not creditable due to lack of evidence. (false reporting)
Originally denied ex-wife restraining order in Hartford court.
A person who has reason to suspect that a child is being abused or neglected should make a report to (DCF) Connecticut child abuse law. If it cannot be substantiated its false reporting. May children do not disclose due to threat of harm. When a parent suspects or finds out about abuse that's when they report. It's become common knowledge that when you report you lose custody. Many stay to protect the children because parenting time alone means more and sever abuse. People are under the impression that courts are in the business of protecting children. It's an assumption (unfortunately that people are educated and are able to spot the signs and symptoms of abuse. That is not the case unfortunately. We have and are witnessing that this is not the case.
The gatekeeper/alienation theory are and continue to be applied in several court cases. Taking precedence and fundamental rights of biology. Best interest is applied that both parents under bad and questionable circumstances. With no real investigation and judges are sighting school shooters just because a philosopher from UConn in the fatherhood imitative said so. When policy makers see no correlation. Is a somewhat unique problem to the US.
We have cases of abuse found in family relations with no concern to the effect of a child witnessing it. Emotional and psychological abuse are not an arrestable offense in Connecticut according to 211. Why is the state, plaintiff in Juan F. cases seeks end of DCF federal oversight? Juan F. is the fatherhood initiative March 2022, DCF is partnered with the fatherhood imitative. DCF group home children are sexually assaulted and abused in 2023.
April 2024 DCF to pay back $1.4 million.
William Tong and the us news report man attacks Muslim state rep. William Tong omits it was an attempted sexual assault. The news downplays it. Women are very aware of the bitch burning project going on in America. I's sure it's even harder for the men to report.
Women especially are very scared to report child abuse. Parental alienation is used as a weapon in CT. statistic are mis quoted and not broken down. Poverty is a big problem in this economy, ignored. Addiction is being glorified.
Criminal Justice Reform has taken over Connecticut. The elected officials are obsessed with being the “Leader” and keeping statistics down. ARE IGNORING VAILID COMPLAINTS!!!!!!!!!
The Connecticut Bar is running the judicial bench. The benches are stuffed with family court and family court lawyers. The MOU is running the state finances. The partnership no agency can get out of unless everyone does. The funding depends on them promoting it.
People are becoming afraid to report crimes.
Let's be fair06/28/2024
Stop using the gone girl gone defense. Sandy Hook was not a hoax and neither was Jennifer disappearance. Dolus killed himself during the criminal proceeding not divorce procedures. Stop attempting to add to the statistics. To further a one sided narrative. Attorneys are not to blame for divorce filling. The conduct they choose to engage in during divorce procedures is what is in question. If you read up on the nation politics you will see they want to reduce divorce. Many women views the problem in family court as a punishment for filling to get out of a really bad situation. Are women really insisting all men are evil? Couresive control is a precursor to the physical use control. They conveniently forgot to rewind to the beginning of Karen's case and cherry picked events in the proceeding, just like these self reported studies leading to federal funding. Conveniently failing to break down statistics. Is being used to propetutes problems. It's not to hard to conduct an Internet search on federal funding. Realize that the health and human services involved in gender based funding. With a minimal investment in the less monitized gender. If you are in favor of Karen's kids with 50/50 custody either you don't believe her or the children or you believe children should have to spend half their time with someone who is abusing them? Which is it? According to the 2014 hearing the organization promoting parental alienation believe people coming forward with alligations to the court system should be punished. Substance abuse is not an allergy. It's a significant problem that . It's further criminalized parents going to family court system presenting unhealthy parenting choices from a spouse that are not in the best interest of their children. The promotion of constitutional rights are important but continue to perpetuate a biological right and entitlements of best interest and the well-being of a child. Not going to school is advoseral to the growth and development of children. Children are often traumatized during divorce. Often traumatized when they are forced into parenting time with abusive parents. AS well as parents who engage in neglectful parenting leaving them in the care of new partners and grandparents during the majority of the parenting time. What message are you sending? The entire nation is in a deficit over child support arrearage. So what money is to be made in the big picture? The partnership brings in the state health and human services programs. Cost savings on non prosecution and incarceration. Leaving a few problems going to the criminal court. Lack of evidence is being used as false reporting. Are the GaLs really fact finding or controlling evidence interduced into court? What is family relations doing?
Fundamental rights06/28/2024
William Tong celebration a Big win on the drug companies. Big money to fight addiction. The red carpet and more money for Hartford healthcare. Where are the programs for the children affected by addiction? Statistics and the experts have reported on the long term effects on children. The increase of risk for addiction when they have a parent who uses. In family court they get forced into reunification therapy. That focuses on the glorifying the parent . There is no focus on repairing the damage to the children. Parents not taking responsibility and demanding parenting time. Connecticut is focused on the money brought to the system. Not the individuals dragged through it.
Ct Allergies06/29/2024
2002 Connecticut partnership (the MOU for fatherhood) Targets Substance Abusing parents. In 1999 coalition of practitioners (possibly the Afcc) treatment program administrators in Connecticut jointly developed, implemented, and conducted successful research (self-reported most likely) of the use of motivational enhancement treatment (MET) techniques in community treatment programs.
It concluded, the piolet study exemplified research, treatment providers, and administrators can work together as equal PARTNERS to MEET THEIR OWN NEEDS AND EACH OTHERS and each other's needs and goals and BENEFIT THE FAMILIES OF SUBSTANCE -ABUSING CAREGIVERS!!!!!!
Casey Family program an innovative CHILD WELFARE program in Connecticut ALLOWS CHILDREN TO REMAIN IN THE HOME WHILE THEIR PARENTS UNDERGO TREATMENT FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE.
Middletown press 2016 11.2 million to treat drug addicted Connecticut.
Harvard Government performance lab 2013 50 percent of 36,000 dcf cases investigated by CT DCF indicated parental substance abuse, yet there are no services in the community for children of addicted parents?
March 2013 CT Norwalk Alcohol and drug Counselor plead guilty to Federal Health care fraud
June 2024 Hartford Ct Alcohol and drug counselor gets prison for Medicaid fraud.
******” Making it work without a Family Drug Court” Connecticut's Approach to parental Substance Abuse in child welfare system*****
System partners (Health and human service funding) ***
Department of Children & Family Services
Department of Mental Health & Addiction Services
JUDICAL BRANCH-COURT OPERATIONS, SUPERIOR COURT FOR JUVINELE MATTERS
Advanced Behavioral health
OTHER KEY PARNERS
OFFICE OF THE CHEIF PUBLIC DEFENDERS' OFFICE (THE GALS), JUVENLE DELINQUECY AND CHILD PERTECTION UNIT
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEATH CENTER ( UCONN HEALTH)
BARRIERS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSING FAMILIES IN CHILD WELFARE SYSTEM. (and family court)
Child welfare
Substance Abuse Treatment
COURT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Top to bottom commitment (to the substance abuser)
Connecticut state agency Commission
Senior STATE agency Mangement
JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
CROSS SYSTEM POLICY & PRACTICE MODEL
ENDORSEMENT BY JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH
Attachment at least 8 million children under 18 live with one adult who has substance abuse disorder. The majority are under 5 according to the US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.
A pattern that significantly influences child development and THE CHILDHOOD OF CHILDREN AND THE LIKELYHOOD THAT A CHILD WILL STRUGGEL EMOTIONAL, BEHAVIORAL OR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS according to Substance Abuse and mental Health services Administration.
The negative impact of family with substance abuse disorder parental SUDS are characterized by environment of security loss, conflict, violence, or abuse, emotional chaos, role reversal, and fear. negative impact on finances, disruption in attachment,
rituals, roles, routines, communication, social life.
Anonymous06/30/2024
Just as they passed a law to bring Paul back, they passed this for someone suing the state in regard to the family court.
Connecticut the leader and the head of the Snake06/30/2024
CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM AND THE UNITED STATES BITCH BURNING PROJECT. Move over white robes with pointy hats, there is a new a new group to burn at the stake. We have black rode's and judicial immunity.
Anonymous06/30/2024
That's what Connecticut wants. The false Utopia. Shoot outs during all hours of the day in the cities. Your more likely to be killed by a drunk driver in a few of the cities. Reports equality but is running off a male dominance agreement. They do away with perminant committees. The want to be the leader so bad they are punishing people for reporting. If they can't kill her they can have her incarcerated.
🤔 Could you cite a few sources?06/27/2024
All that information would help, but how do we know it’s true?
https://www.easybib.com/guides/citation-guides/how-do-i-cite-a/
Hysterical Women in Connecticut05/18/2024
What nobody is telling you.
National Library of Medicine. An official website of the US government published online Jan 10, 2020
The Internalization of social stigma Among Minor -Attracted Persons: Implications for treatment.
Minor attraction is a topic associated with widespread debate and controversy. While pedophilia is most well-known and widely studied category involving sexual attraction. Other attraction to children exists.
Stigmatization of Minor Attracted Person
Stigmatization process of forming negative evaluation of an individual or group of people based on limited characteristics. It's discussed in relation to three distinct domains. Stigmatization possesses emotional component. Stigmatism involved cognitive process, whereby those who are responsible for doing the stigmatizing make specific negative attributes about the stigmatized group. MAP minor attracted person. In relation to making assumptions of offending behavior. Internal stigmatism fear of being discovered.
An interaction between concealment and internalization could lead some minority groups to actively suppress their identity. Leading to the less likeliness they will seek help for their sexual attraction. Engage in active avoidance of children. 90 % are male, 95% are white. 26% are parents. According to the study.
2020 National Institute for health. Media coverage of pedophiles: Benefits and risks.
The fierce stigma associated with pedophilia may interfere with the attempt to prevent sexual offending. The destigmatization pedophilia and benefits the prevention of child sexual abuse, a fact box for journalists was developed based on practitioners' expert knowledge.
Psychiatric times July 29,2016 Intervention the work. ” In full remission” is have not re -offended in 5 years.
April 25,2024 NY man sexually exploited minor he took from CT group home, feds say. CT insider. Just another Connecticut incident.
Anonymous
06/05/2024
go take some CBD's propaganda is in your Hallucinations.
Clear headed06/05/2024
Why is the ERA not signed? 🤔
Anonymous06/06/2024
Until the president archives it women in the United States don't have equal rights! The woman rights are only protected by employment!!!!!
pR.06/05/2024
Lay off the chemicals. You will have a better vision of parenthood.
Anonymous06/13/2024
Seek assistance for your chemical depency. Your children need level headed individual. I think we are definitely finding the hot button. The supremacy agenda ” momma is not crazy in the majority of cases. Mysognist are not just in the public defender office.
Anonymous06/02/2024
It would appear to me based on legislation and funding the state of Connecticut has already recognized the the majority of domestic batters are infact men. Yet, they continue to use the family court system to discriminate against women as the heads of households. An equal contribution to the well-being of children . The importance Based on feminist attribution. Low economic value. The use of the alienaton industry and ” mental health” to continue to suppress women in their roles. The continuance to base federal funding for the promotion of men ( a gender ). The fatherhood initiative promotes a dominate stance with an advertisement of teaching men to be more nurturing. When a woman attempt to take on the role as head of household and management of the finances it's looked down upon. As well as exercising their right to fight for what they feel is in the best interest of their children. If the state of Connecticut continues to rule women are ” crazy” when attempting to gain independence, the children are used as a weapon against them. Found away to use federal funding to promote a gender exploiting a project to better minority community. Using “family” as a definition fatherhood. There is no equality and justice in the state. Little focus on best interest. Federally funded programs politics and procedures are running the court system. Both family and criminal. Connecticut is directing law based on funding for their own financial interests. The best interest of children has been overshadowed by the welfare reform laws. Aggressive angry men are the financial resources of funding. While emotional women over the oppressive conditions they are living under are exploded and ignored because of their low economic value. The family court system and legislation is guided by federally funded programs. The attorney general's are heavy handed in the guiding of their funding to benefit the state not the people living in . When you complain to the attorney general's office or DoJ these attorney general's work to pass legislation to protect themselves ( the states) . If you want to change family court we must change Attorney generals. With the mess DCF and family court has been. Why would are nations leaders promote Attorney general William Tong to Vice President of Attorney generals? A change in family court system requires a change in our Attorney generals offices.
Anonymous06/05/2024
Let This Sink #NoExcusesEnt
Anonymous05/31/2024
Family courts destroy women, men and children and the purpose of any system is usually what it does. Family courts have destroyed men, women and children since the 1980s.
The bias in “family courts” since the 1980s is the same bias against the family unit, tradition and morals we’ve seen in ”public schools”, the entertainment industry, local, state and national politics.
After playing a major role in the establishment of Connecticut’s AFCC, Inc. for-profit public-private partnerships, the Judicial Branch’s new “Pathways” system is a move away from the multi-million dollar cottage industries that destroyed so many men, women, children and families for the past 40 years.
Watch the recent online meeting of some of the movers and shakers in Connecticut “family courts”. They pat themselves on the back and offer no apologies for all the harm done to Connecticut children, families, man and women for the past 40 years.
At one point, one of the judges seems to think the public hearings about family court corruption are funny. That lack of remorse has nothing to do gender bias.
The Dulos case also had nothing to do with gender bias. It had to do with the worst of what’s wrong with the “family courts”. It had to do with the Connecticut family court for-profit cottage industries which that orchestrated that horrible nightmare.
Horrible systems lead to horrible nightmares and horrible systems leading to horrible nightmares are a very old problem that’s tougher to fix than ”gender bias”.
Upside down flags06/01/2024
Human services!!!!!!!! CT-N Behavior Health Partnership oversight counsel. March 24th
” We don't want to lose are position as the leader” Senator Kissell. Supporting self-reported survey. 20 percent of the domestic violence cases. ” We don't want people battering ” The criminal justice reform. Community prevention. Several months ago, the CCADV was requesting basic food donations for domestic violence victims. $10,000 dollars has been donated from Wireless Zone. Coaches to teach young athletes. Boys and men. more sexism funding in the state of Connecticut. ” Fatherhood Funding to promote a gender.
Several other sources, you don't have to take away from victims
Community Violence Intervention Funding Opportunities for local Leaders
Yucel Ors, Community & Economic Finacial Empowerment Municipal Finances Public Safety& Justice Reform
Everytown Support Fund, Federal Grant Programs by Community Violence Intervention Program Types.
Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth in Sentencing Incentive Grants. Program Number
16.586. Federal agency Bureau of justice assistance, office of justice programs, Department of Justice. Violent crime control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994.
Objective: To provide FUNDs to individual states organized as reginal compacts to build or expand. Correctional facilities to increase the bed capacity. (letting people out of jail, plea bargaining, reduce bail) Part 1 violent offenders. 2 temporary or permanent correction correctional facilities, including military bases, prison barges and boot camp for confinement of nonviolent offenders for the purpose of freeing prison space for violent offenders 3. jails. Type of grant formula grant.
Our nations family court problems are found in Health and Human Services. The Department of Justice and our Attorney Generals. Federal grants to the Alienation Industry. The AFCC. Why is AFCC member Joseph Ditunno allowed to wear so many hats? Deputy Director of Family Services. Violent Offender Program, former co-chair of the CCADV?
What is William Tongs rule as Vice President of Attorney Generals in the state who is the leader of criminal justice reform? What has he done for Domestic Violence? Family court complaints to his office and the department of Justice?
85 % of Domestic Violence Victims are women, yet funding is going towards male gender-based programs, while domestic violence victims are going without basic needs met? Is it a punishment for leaving? The promotion of “health marriage” and economic growth and development? Child support arrearage?
I wonder about the surveys attached to so much funding. Start watch the ct span meetings on human services that's where the money is at.
Anonymous06/01/2024
It would be important to know who is involved in SCIP (child protection) Connecticut judicial branch.
Bureau of justice Assistance U.S. Department of Justice FY 22-23 Byrne, Byrne state crisis intervention program (SCIP) State Solicitation award # 15pbja23-00006-bsci Hartford Ct
$2,470, 247. Approved by the states Crisis Intervention Advisory Board.
John Hamilton Harm reduction Perspective. CEO of Liberation Programs inc. Chairperson
co-vice chairperson vacant
Secretary vacant
The State Advisory Board is legislatively mandated and consists of gubernational appointees. Regional Behavioral health action organization chairs and designees$$$$$$$ and advises the commission on programs, policies, and plans for the department.
John Hamilton LMFT, LADC (marriage and family therapist)
New Canaan CT. CT license 000596
Anonymous06/04/2024
I strongly urge parents, particularly women to STOP using AFCC language. ” Parental alienation”. You are being systematically removed from your children's lives. The langistics of the mental health industry servicing the court system. The welfare reform language. It's bringing more money to the health and human services industry. They are using family and criminal court to bring in more funding. The focus is not on the children. The division of a broken family. The courts are not destroying families, they are picking off the bones. Not only do the attorneys take all the money the state uses your cases for health and human services funding. The child “welfare attorneys” know exactly how the state funding works. So do the court appointed psychologist.
Anonymous06/01/2024
What happens when a man gives up his career to raise the children because the wife has a high powered career? Don’t they deserve substantial alimony?
Anonymous06/02/2024
Alimony is a discussion for access the board. A need for transitional finances is an issue that should not be abused for years. In either direction.
Department of labor and unions. ” The internal BROTHERHOOD of teamsters” the brotherhood. Partnered with the fatherhood mou in Connecticut.
The war on women06/26/2024
The international brotherhood of teamsters. Sexism in the United States of America and beyond. The state of Connecticut and the Government is so concerned with inclusion and langistics. Yet, the department of labor is all about the brothers. Wives are on their own to pay for divorce procedures in hundreds of cases in Connecticut family court . All 75 % may not be divorcing, but the ones who are got the brotherhood union money to bankrupt the sisters in Connecticut family court.
Hartford healthcare and the community renewal team. How many mothers have brought their children to the hospital like in the CT post story on Cox. To be taken by DCF placed with the father's family or in foster care? Then engaged fathers in programs to receive custody?
Anonymous06/21/2024
Children Welfare Information Gateway. Reunifying Families. DCF
Anonymous07/03/2024
Conversation termination because information and evidence ( is Connecticut lying on the Internet about federally funded government projects?) one man behind the desk has many men out in the state including Hartford hospital, the prison and schools) . When you refuse to acknowledge and speak on such matters you have stopped trying to reform the system. You are controlling the information and guiding the efforts to what suits a one sided group. It would be interesting to know who they 12 legislators are. What information they are missing to make informed decisions about the lives of parents and children?
It's coming to focus06/01/2024
All the domestic violence and criminal justice reform decisions are being made by men. Where are the women leadership in the state? 14. 5 years for Michelle in her role in the death of Jennifer a mother of five . 14 and a half years instead of 50. Saving cost on incarceration. We need new leadership in the state of Connecticut. We need a new Attorney general. One that is going to take complaints seriously. We need more oversight on the Attorney generals and there part in the department of justice. The Republicans have been run out. Where are the checks and balances?
Useless commissions06/02/2024
More gender bias conversations. For black history month the commission on women, children and seniors hosted an event on Black men's health. Thousands of women are being unjustly placed into mental health categories during divorce procedures. Black women right along side of white. This organization has been ignoring women's rights and protection as a collective group. They like the rest of the state have divided it's residents in to categories. Discussing issues that generate funding. The commission has poor and incompetent representation of women's issues in the state. Poor and weak leadership to represent people as a collective. Ignoring issues. The two senators who appointed the head of the commission on women children and seniors are men. Our leaders are out of touch with constituents and ignoring important issues facing women that don't generate funding. Women are divided into nationality and weakening representation of them as a whole.
Strictly guided by funding06/08/2024
Chapter 23h Section D. The executive director of the commission may enter into any agreement with a state agency for the purpose of MAXIMIZING THE RECEPT OF FEDERAL FUNDING by such state agency provided such state agency shall utilize any FERDERAL FUNDS RECIEVED AS ARESULT OF SUCH AGREEMENT.TO PERFORM THOSE DUTIES OF SUCH AGENCYTO PERFORM STATUTORY DUTIES of such agency that relates to commissions agency that relates to the commission's duties. The commission portions of federal may accept that portion of federal funds received by any such agreements which federal law otherwise permits to be received by the commission.
The commission on Women, children seniors, equity and opportunity. The commission name is deceiving. WHAT HAPPEN TO PERMINATE COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN? (PCSW) The commission's mission to END discrimination in the State, and it's duties include working with the state agencies to access programs and practices that effect WOMEN.
CWS is the principle global intergovernmental body exclusively dedicated to the promotion of gender equity and the empowering of women.
Anonymous06/08/2024
Frank please publish the comment on Connecticut's ( Martin Looney appointed committee). The commission on women children and seniors. Small print equity and opportunity. Financially driven for federal funding.
Women hold no economic value to the state.06/10/2024
As a part of the commission they receive federal funding for what ever “project” the government is paying for. The organization on women. The permit commission on women doesn't appear to be in existence anymore. Cause all the funding is towards men and male dominanced issues. Women are off low economic value so the state could care less.
Comments (351)
Add Your Comment