In the Interest of Justice, We Must Rename the Department of Justice

September 21, 2025
Call it what it is

Stop Calling the Prosecutor ‘Justice’

The name is a masterstroke of propaganda. 

An honest name would be the “Department of Prosecution.” Its function: to act as the government’s advocate and win convictions.

The current name – the Department of Justice – implies their job is justice. But everyone knows that justice is supposed to be the outcome of an adversarial but fair trial (prosecution vs. defense), not the characteristic of one side.

Calling the prosecution the “Department of Justice” presumes the outcome it seeks is always just. Justice is supposed to appear at the end of a fair trial. Call the prosecution “Justice,” which is the outcome of the trial, then you bless every ambition it has. If that is the case, why bother to have trials at all? 

Suppose you had a football game and you called one team The Winners? Slap “Department of Justice” on the prosecution, and you’ve declared in advance who’s right. “Department of Justice” assumes what it aims to prove.
Imagine a courtroom where justice is meant to emerge from two opposing forces. Now, rename one of those forces “Justice.” 

It frames every prosecution as righteous and every acquittal as a failure of the system.

A word has been stolen by the government’s half of the fight. A theft of language that assigns virtue to power before the evidence is heard.

Too often, the department’s activities are the opposite of just.

  • It overcharges and seeks longer sentences to force plea deals (the trial penalty).
  • It hides evidence that could help the defense.
  • It incentivizes witnesses to lie by offering them reduced sentences or immunity.
  • It employs prosecutors who are promoted based on their conviction rate, not their “justice rate.”

To call this win-at-all-costs adversarial institution the “Department of Justice” is an example of Orwellian doublethink—where the name of something is the opposite of its true nature.

The Department says its duty is to ‘seek justice, not just wins’; the incentive structure too often rewards convictions.

Even if you believe the Department of Justice is not ever weaponized, not overly powerful, and always populated with ethical prosecutors, the name is still deceptive.

Its job is not to ensure justice.

Renaming it the Department of Prosecution would signal to the public (and the jury): “This is the government’s team of lawyers whose job is to convict people it accuses of crimes.” An agency whose primary function is to accuse, prosecute, and imprison.

To smell its Orwellian odour is to take the first step in seeing the federal criminal justice system as it truly is.

author avatar
Frank Parlato
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
5 3 votes
Article Rating

Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] prisoner-turned journalist on prosecutorial abuse. “They should just be honest and re-name it the Department of Prosecution or Persecution, depending on the day and the […]

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 months ago

Words are weapons Perfect example and so obvious once pointed out What fools the American people have been played for

trackback

[…] NOTE: This piece was first published on FrankReport.com. […]

Emile Zola
Emile Zola
3 months ago

Lordy he is right. This asshole is right. words are potent. Parlato is right

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 months ago

Thank you for making the propaganda of our judicial system so crystal clear!

The American public has been played for fools for decades! From family courts that self serve to create conflict and divide children from parents for profits to the probate courts that steal life savings to criminal courts that rule again in the self serving money making interest of the government—- having nothing to do with due process, or the American people

Brilliant piece – pointing out the obvious as we’ve followed blindly without questioning our own government

Don't Miss

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x