Richard Luthmann
Family Court Blogger argues his prosecution violates the First Amendment
NOTE: This outlet condemns anti-Semitism and all species of hatred. However, this condemnation does not include restricting all speech expressing that hatred.
By Richard Luthmann
Paul Boyne, a pretrial detainee in Connecticut, argues his prosecution violates his First Amendment rights. Boyne, held at MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution for over a year, faces 18 counts of stalking and “electronic stalking.”
Three Connecticut Family Court judges claim his blog posts on FamilyCourtCircus.com threatened them and caused them to fear for their safety.
Boyne, 63, insists that the U.S. and CT Constitutions protect his speech and that federal courts must release him.
Virginia resident Boyne was arrested in July 2023 and extradited to CT, where he was held without bail. He says he will file an emergency application to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, seeking an injunction to stop the prosecution and order his release.
Boyne was charged with 18 counts of felony Stalking and Electronic Stalking for allegedly cyberstalking three Connecticut Superior Court Judges who preside over family court matters. The stalking and cyberstalking are limited exclusively to posts Boyne made openly and. notoriously on his blog, FamilyCourtCircus.com.
The case may shape up as a test of free speech protections and the authoritarian trend of Family Courts.
Relying on Dombrowski v. Pfister, a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision granting federal courts to intervene in state prosecutions that infringe on constitutional rights, Boyne sought relief from the US District Court.
Boyne claimed the State of Connecticut aims to silence dissent about the Family Courts and punish him for his views on Connecticut’s “Jewish” Family Court judges.
He alleges that Connecticut’s judiciary operates like a “Jewish Gestapo,” making it “impossible for anyone to speak against them.”
“This is about silencing any critics of the family court judiciary,” he said. “The actions of the State Attorney fundamentally threaten free speech and political discourse.”
He is trying to convince the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that Connecticut’s actions violate the First Amendment.
Though no judges were accosted, Connecticut prosecutors allege Boyne’s blog posts encouraged violence against them. Boyne often used anti-Semitic language, replacing Judiciary with Jewdiciary, which elevated his posts into a category of hate crimes.
One post reportedly stated, “Is [redacted name] so retarded he cannot recognize that he begs for his lynching…Amazing that a well-regulated militia…has not already popped his skull.”
Boyne took his First Amendment argument to U.S. District Court Judge Kari A. Dooley in Bridgeport. She dismissed Boyne’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus in June, citing the Younger v. Harris (1971) abstention doctrine, which typically prevents federal courts from intervening in state prosecutions based on the legal principle of comity or mutual respect and recognition between different judicial entities and processes.
“The federal courts are generally barred from interfering in ongoing state prosecutions unless there are extraordinary circumstances,” Judge Dooley wrote.
Boyne argued the judge was wrong.
“The abstention doctrine is not applicable because ‘offended’ Connecticut judges can have anyone locked up for clearly pretextual reasons,” Boyne said.
In Dombrowski, the Supreme Court stated, “We hold the abstention doctrine is inappropriate for cases…where….statutes are justifiably attacked on their face as abridging free expression, or as applied for the purpose of discouraging protected activities.”
In opposition to Boyne’s federal motion for release, the State of CT argued that Boyne could raise his First Amendment argument in state court.
Boyne said that the U.S. Supreme Court held that ordinary defenses a defendant might assert during a criminal prosecution would not provide an adequate remedy at law where bad faith prosecutions would have a “chilling effect” upon the exercise of First Amendment rights.
Boyne represents himself in federal court because he says his state-appointed lawyers “admitted they knew nothing about the First Amendment.”
Acting pro se, Boyne had to file a handwritten Habeas Corpus Petition because he lacks access to a law library, legal books, a computer, or a word processor in jail.
“If I had my laptop for eight hours, I could give the Court everything it needs,” Boyne said.
Boyne argues that these conditions of confinement, coupled with Judge Dooley’s dismissal of his petition without a hearing, violate his Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights to Due Process and Effective Assistance of Counsel.
He points to Article First, Section 8 of the Connecticut Constitution, which states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have a right to be heard by himself and by counsel.”
Boyne said. “Under the Connecticut constitution, I have a right to be represented by counsel and be heard by the courts. I am being denied that right. I cannot meaningfully advance legal arguments or marshal evidence under my current conditions of confinement.”
Boyne’s legal strategy is to convince the federal appeals court that Connecticut prosecutors are chilling speech by criminalizing the publication of opinion and will deter others from criticizing Connecticut’s judiciary.
The State maintains that Boyne’s speech, which includes his opinion that violence against specific judges for their actions is warranted, constitutes threats outside First Amendment protections.
Boyne’s use of anti-Semitic language and rhetoric that includes discussions of guns and ammo complicates his defense, making it a contentious test of the First Amendment’s protections.
Images from Boyne’s website.
“I believe the federal courts must act to protect free speech,” Boyne said. “If they don’t, it sets a dangerous precedent that allows the State to silence political dissent through prosecution. At that point, the State of Connecticut’s power is limitless. They snatched me from Virginia. Next, it could be you or anyone else.”
Meanwhile, Boyne sits in jail with no trial date in sight. If nothing else, even if the appeals court dismisses the case, the CT judiciary got to punish Boyne with more than a year in custody, which may have been the plan all along.
Richard Luthmann is a writer, editor, and investigative journalist.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
If Connecticut prosecutors know about crimes against children in public schools and “family courts”, when will they prosecute the perpetrators?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2W_e4aVIIkw
https://divorceinconnecticut.blogspot.com/
Never mind everything else. Mark Zuckerberg has a new hairstyle.
https://okeefemediagroup.com/new-zuckerberg-tapes-leaked-audio-of-rockefeller-foundation-staff-reveals-facebooks-500k-ad-credit-scheme-to-boost-biden-aligned-covid-health-narratives/
Some might say, many guilty CT AFCC, Inc. collaborators should escape unpunished so Paul Boyne can suffer as silenced. Their reason might be because it’s of more importance to their community that their objectives should be protected, that their guilt should be unpunished; for guilt and crimes are so frequent in the world, that all of them cannot be punished; and many times they happen in such a manner, that it is not of much consequence to the public, whether they are punished or not … for virtue itself, is no security.
https://www.scribd.com/document/442153090/Kent-Mawhinney-Arrest-Warrant#fullscreen&from_embed
https://www.jud.ct.gov/committees/ethics/#Agenda
The Founders never intended for Americans to trust their government. Our entire Constitution was predicated on the notion that government was a necessary evil, to be restrained and minimized as much as possible.
“… My name is Jack Doyle i am a uh well in
1:08
a part-time uh capacity i’m an adjunct
1:10
instructor at Quinnipiac University 👈
1:13
in the uh legal studies in the in the
1:15
criminal justice departments
1:17
um i’ve been uh at quinnipiac for about
1:20
20 years 👈 they just uh informed me an
1:22
email the other day i’ve been teaching
1:24
her every semester one course or two for
1:27
the last two years in the criminal law
1:28
and
1:29
mock trial and public order crimes uh
1:32
areas
1:33
uh in my regular uh day job i am
1:37
currently an executive assistant states
1:39
attorney in the state of Connecticut division
1:41
of criminal justice which means i’m a
1:42
state prosecutor i’ve been a state
1:44
prosecutor for 23 years 👈 now
1:48
most of my career was assigned to the
1:50
new haven geographical area court 👈 then
1:52
the new haven judicial district court 👈 uh
1:54
and now i’m assigned to the chief states
1:57
attorney’s office in rocky hill
1:58
connecticut we’re having a lot of
1:59
different uh
2:00
cases and different responsibilities
2:03
that’s it
2:07
thank you what exactly is a prosecutor
2:10
and what made you choose prosecution
2:12
over defense
2:15
i uh a prosecutor on behalf of the
2:18
citizens of the state and on behalf of
2:20
crime victims
2:22
we
2:23
look at police investigations
2:25
we determine based on conduct that
2:27
occurs
2:28
one whether we want to pursue criminal
2:30
charges
2:32
and then we investigate further and we
2:34
present those cases before the superior
2:36
court so we made the decision on which
2:38
cases to prosecute which cases to
2:40
decline
2:42
we make recommendations to the court we
2:44
make charging decisions and we have the
2:46
ultimate decision on whether to pursue
2:48
or not pursue
2:49
criminal charges against somebody. …”
In 2014-2015, many victims of the blatant racketeering in Connecticut “family courts” found each other, got organized and begged the state for official investigations and prosecutions.
Mr. Doyle and his coworkers probably won’t tell the judge at the next hearing about how the New Haven offices received many complaints about the blatant public corruption in the family courts. 😐
Mr. Doyle and his coworkers probably also won’t tell the judge about how Paul Boyne filed official complaints and requests for help from local and state authorities about ten years ago when Paul and his family were victims of blatant criminal racketeering in the family courts.
Mr. Doyle and his coworkers probably won’t ask Sidney Horowitz why (also around 2014-2015) “Dr.” Horowitz joked on Facebook about “Angry Birds” being his favorite game to play. 🙄
from Yale Daily News in 2015:
… Since the announcement of the task force last week, billboards promoting the initiative have appeared in some Connecticut cities with the most cases of government corruption: Bridgeport, Waterbury and Hartford. According to the Connecticut Post, motorists driving south on I-95 can now view a sign encouraging them to “report corruption now,” providing details of how to contact the task force.
Along with the new task force, Daly announced that there is a new hotline where citizens can report and provide tips. She added that there was no resource more valuable to this cause than local citizens urging people with knowledge of corrupt officials to reach out to the FBI by calling 1-800-CALL-FBI. https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2015/02/12/task-force-investigates-corrupticut/
One rumor going around about a year after the DOJ public corruption investigation was: The public-private CT AFCC Inc racketeering was “too big to fail”. The idea was that prosecution of so many public employees involved in the (kids for cash) racketeering with for profit offices would destroy citizens’ trust in state government … and the economy of the state would then suffer from all that bad press.
It’s about ten years later. Has Jack Doyle ever heard about CT AFCC, Inc. racketeering in Connecticut family courts, yet?
What does Mr. Doyle know about the circumstances leading up to those ten years of “The Family Court Circus” articles about the continuing blatant criminal racketeering in Connecticut’s family courts?
How many employees working in judicial branch offices are surprised that ten years of New Haven prosecutors ignoring the public corruption in family courts haven’t led to more than just shock jock blog posts?
I hope Jennifer Dulos’ children eventually sue the state of Connecticut for knowing about the blatant corruption and doing nothing about it.
Two weeks before Jennifer “disappeared”, Jennifer’s attorney filed a motion asking judicial branch employees for an investigation of “Dr.” Herman’s role in her children’s family court case.
That motion also asked the state for an investigation of the corrupted guardian ad litem in the Dulos case.
No official investigations followed. What does Mr. Doyle think about that?
The judge in the Dulos case could have ordered an official investigation, sort of how the judge in the Cunha case ordered the Inspector General’s office to look into the allegations made in the Cunha case.
Have there been no official investigations of family courts, ever?
And owners of mainstream news outlets really haven’t noticed?
How many more actual fatalities in family court cases will news reporters report this new year? How many was it last year? Did anyone even notice?
At about the 8:00 min mark, Mr. Doyle seems to reference what might have been his involvement in the DOJ “public corruption” task force investigation in 2014-15. That DOJ should have investigated and informed the public about the misuse of state and federal funds in the family courts via the public-private kids for cash CT AFCC, Inc. racketeering in-state and across state lines. The feds had jurisdiction because “CT AFCC” research and activities crossed state lines.
Mr. Doyle says in the interview he was born and raised in New Haven.
Does Mr. Doyle know CT AFCC Inc. director Adelman, secretary Horwitz and treasurer Freedman? Probably.
And … the Boyne case sure looks like a coverup to hide state employee complicity in the kids for cash “research” and racketeering since the 1980s.
If Mr. Doyle:
took part in the 2014 – 2015 DOJ public corruption investigation
knew about complaints filed with DOJ re: family court crimes/racketeering
knew/knows about Mr. Boyne’s complaints filed against Mr. Horowitz etc.
Mr. Doyle should excuse himself from the case ASAP.
If Mr. Doyle doesn’t excuse himself from the case, which reporter has the courage to ask Mr. Doyle about his role and intent in the state’s involvement with AFCC, Inc. and the prosecution of Paul Boyne?
… 🎪 …
It is most definitely a circus. A horrible circus.
“… Committee on Judicial Ethics Teleconference
Friday, April 19, 2013
Members present via teleconference: Justice Barry R. Schaller, Chair, Judge Edward R. Karazin, Jr., Vice Chair, Judge Maureen D. Dennis, Judge Christine E. Keller, and Professor Jeffrey A. Meyer.
Staff present: Attorney Martin R. Libbin, Secretary. 👈 NOTE
MINUTES
I. With the above noted Committee members present, Justice Schaller
called the meeting to order at 1:02 p.m.
II. Although publicly noticed, no members of the public were in
attendance.
III. The Committee approved the Minutes of the March 22, 2013 meeting. (Professor Meyer abstained.)
IV. The Committee ratified Emergency Staff Opinions JE 2013-13.
V. The Committee discussed Informal JE 2013-15 concerning whether a Judicial Official may serve on the board of directors of a nonprofit organization that provides services to court-involved clients and receives the majority of its funding from contracts with the Judicial Branch.
The nonprofit organization has multiple contracts with the Judicial
Branch to provide various assessments and services to, inter alia,
litigants in family, juvenile and criminal court matters (hereinafter
“clients”). Clients may be referred directly by the court, as well as by
probation and family services personnel. Various contracts require the nonprofit organization to provide reports to the court and to have
personnel appear in court to testify regarding a client’s success or
failure to complete the services and programs provided by the
nonprofit organization. …
… In discussing Rule 3.7(a)(6)(B), the Committee (with one member
recused) determined that the prohibition on serving as an officer,
director, trustee or nonlegal advisor of an organization concerned with the law, the legal system or the administration of justice if the
organization “will frequently be engaged in adversary proceedings in
the court of which the judge is a member” applies, not only when the
organization is a party to adversary proceedings, but also when the
organization supplies witnesses and reports for use in adversary
proceedings. Based upon the foregoing, an appearance of impropriety would arise if a Judicial Official serving on the board of directors of a nonprofit organization or member of the Judicial Official’s staff were to refer clients to the nonprofit organization. Further, the nonprofit organization may use or attempt to use the prestige of the Judicial Official’s office when seeking additional contracts with the Judicial Branch or others. Accordingly, the Committee, with one member recused, unanimously determined that service on the nonprofit organization’s board of directors would violate Rules 1.2, 1.3, 3.1 and 3.7(a)(6)(B). …”
https://www.jud.ct.gov/committees/ethics/ethics_min_041913.pdf
More about that for profit “nonprofit organization” …
Can a few mainstream news reporters please ask Mr. Libbin if he’s willing and able to discuss the mitigating factors which should be disclosed to the Court in Mr. Doyle’s case against Paul Boyne?
Also, has Mr. Tong’s office not ever investigated CT AFCC, Inc.?
“… WASHINGTON, May 20, 2013 – Several Connecticut state employees may soon find themselves in hot water for using their positions as judges and Judicial Branch managers to promote a Judicial Branch vendor that they personally founded and operate from their State offices.
In April 2013, the Connecticut Commission on Judicial Ethics issued an informal opinion stating that it would be a violation of judicial canon for court officers and their staff to serve on the board of directors of nonprofit organizations that provide services to court-involved clients who appear before them and receive the majority of their funding from contracts with the Judicial Branch.
The Connecticut Secretary of State’s office has confirmed that at least one such business was not properly registered and may face sanctions.
Paul Boyne, a Connecticut father of four, says the CJE’s ruling comes too late for his children, who he says have not been allowed to visit him in years. Boyne says that since his divorce case opened in 2007, the custody case has remained open due to the fact that the judges who currently serve as corporate directors for the vendor refuse to establish a custody or visitation schedule.
These same judges have ordered his family to patronize various vendor affiliated services from Dr. Sidney Horowitz, who does not have a State contract to provide therapeutic services on behalf of the Judicial Branch. Court transcripts show that in July 2012, Judge Holly Abery Wetstone recused herself from hearing the Boyne matter, then authorized payments from the Judicial Branch to an unnamed vendor, despite the fact that there were no motions for fees pending before her to rule on at that time.
Judicial Branch billing records are kept separately from the court case filed in the Court’s administrative offices, and parties who wish to see the invoices submitted by professionals appointed to their cases are required to request them under the State’s open records laws. The heavily redacted records Boyne obtained from the Judicial Branch show that Horowitz had billed over $4,200 to the state on the Boyne case, however, Boyne and his ex-wife’s attorney confirm that Horowitz did not provide them with copies, nor did the Judicial Branch seek their approval for the charges Horowitz submitted.
Boyne says that Horowitz failed to provide all the services and reports outlined in the court order, then recused himself from his appointment to the Boyne case in May 2012. Yet in fall 2012, Judge Lynda B. Munro and Judicial Branch Manager Mary Kay West administratively authorized payments to Horowitz at more than twice the state rate, even though no court order on record had approved the payments. …”
Did Mr. Doyle know about the coverups back then? 🤔
Did Mr. Doyle and his colleagues participate in the coverups? 😳
https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/connecticut-judicial-misconduct-complaints-18570520.php
From Connecticut’s Judicial Branch website:
“… Information is accurate as of January 04, 2025 05:13 AM
Search By: Defendant = BOYNE, First Initial = P
Record Count: 3
New Haven GA 23 Motion/Hearing 01/10/2025 10:00 AM
https://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/Images/Docket.gifN23N-CR23-0250215-S
New Haven GA 23 Motion/Hearing 01/10/2025 10:00 AM
https://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/Images/Docket.gifN23N-CR23-0250216-S
New Haven GA 23Motion/ Hearing01/10/2025 10:00 AM
https://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/Images/Docket.gifN23N-CR23-0250217-S
Arrest Date:10/19/2023
Court: New Haven GA 23
Number of cases: 3
Bond Amount: $25,000 for each case
Bond Type: Set
WHICH INDIVIDUAL(S) decided to arrest Paul?
WHICH INDIVIDUAL(S) decided on 3 cases against Paul?
Are those records available for all to see?
Did anyone in particular ask Judge Moukawsher, Judge Grossman and/or Judge Stewart to complain about The Family Court Circus blog?
Which employees at the New Haven GA 23 office most wanted to arrest Paul?
After Paul’s arrest, who decided the bond would be $25,000 for the three cases?
Paul thinks Ms. Katz might want to use the justice system for politics. He’s clearly right about that and can prove it. People use the justice system all the time for politics.
What seems most disturbing is Mr. Doyle’s role. Did Mr. Doyle participate in the coverup of the public-private racketeering enterprise of CT AFCC, Inc. while tax dollars paid him to be a state prosecutor acting on behalf of citizens of Connecticut and victims of crimes in the state?
The judge in the case can decide to allow the 10% option for each case.
WHICH judge will hear Paul’s case on 1/10?
Does Mr. Doyle decide which judge will hear the case on 1/10/25?
Who keeps moving the hearing dates?
How involved is Mr. Doyle in the case?
State employees MUST keep an eye on the higher-ups managing Paul’s case because whistleblowers help keep local government transparent.
In Paul’s latest conversation with Richard: Paul said Jack Doyle will try to raise the bond amount in each case.
If Jack Doyle is steering the case, the case is probably mostly about the coverup of all the crimes committed in the “family courts” as posted between all the vulgar insults on The Family Court Circus blog.
The more time passes, the more the case against Paul looks more and more like political prosecution.
The case looks less and less like Joette Katz’s political case against Paul and it looks more and more like Jack Doyle’s cover up of the CT AFCC Inc. Kids for Cash racketeering in “family courts”.
A Hartford Courant reporter should ask Jack Doyle what he knows about CT AFCC, Inc.
Here are a few sample questions:
Does Mr. Doyle know Gerard Adelman was director of CT AFCC Inc. while Robert Horwitz was Secretary and Bruce Freedman was Treasurer?
In an interview from 2021, Mr. Doyle told the interviewers he’s worked at Quinnipiac for 20 years. Does Mr. Doyle know Ms. Munro?
How about Sidney Horowitz? And, Kenneth Robson?
Does Mr. Doyle know about Mr. Robson instructions to participants in the 2014 AMC/GAL certification training?
Does Mr. Doyle know Mr. Robson thought children’s disclosures of sexual abuse should be reported to guardians ad litem in child custody cases instead of reporting those disclosures to local police departments?
Does Mr. Doyle know about any of what are probably hundreds of thousands of crimes CT AFCC Inc. members committed against citizens of Connecticut?
Is Mr. Doyle hiding those crimes with his prosecution of Mr. Boyne?
How many affiliates of Quinnipiac University know about CT AFCC, Inc Kids for Cash racketeering?
What do Juda Epstein, Richard Blumenthal, Governor Lamont and William Tong know about New Haven’s case against Paul Boyne?
The problem isn’t the religion, color or gender of anyone.
The problem is secrets and deceit in Connecticut government offices
Info for “the profane” about bail and bonds from Connecticut’s Judicial Branch website:
… it’s because the family law
2:02
section of the Florida bar wants to make
2:04
the resolution of family disputes as
2:07
expensive as possible so they’re able to
2:09
grift off that system the greatest
2:10
extent so they don’t want it to be easy
2:12
to resolve those disputes …
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/ct-roger-barriault-rape-dcf-bristol-19895209.php
What do we do when those who control us, ignore us and silence us, too?
When will Ms. Katz and her colleagues openly discuss leveraging the criminal justice system to combat all the anti-Catholic attacks in Connecticut “family courts”? About ten years ago, Sidney Horowitz involved himself in Paul Boyne’s “family court” case. Mr. Horowitz also involved himself in the Connecticut’s Public Defender Office’s AMC/GAL training.
Paul Boyne identifies as Catholic. Did Mr. Horowitz design the sample “Gavell case”? How many Connecticut judges, lawyers, administrators and vendors actively hid the anti-Christian agenda reflected in that training, in Connecticut’s “family courts” and in the Boyne case?
The anti-conservative bias in Greenwich public schools is the same anti-conservative bias pushed in Connecticut family courts.In the context of mandatory Connecticut “family courts”, that bias has been brutal.
Is Connecticut hiding that harm in their case against Mr. Boyne?
Judges, lawyers and private vendors have had their way with children and families forced into and through the “family court” process — under penalty of the worst kind of something called “judicial discretion”.
Forty years of that harmful and sometimes fatal “judicial discretion” can be swept under the rug if the powers-that-shouldn’t-be get away with silencing Mr. Boyne forever.
Someone should count all the fatalities, all the physical and emotional harm done and all the taxpayer dollars propping up what Mr. Boyne has called “a circus”. He has mocked them. He placed a bright spotlight on that horrible racket with what some might call “dirty tricks”. He succeeded in drawing attention to one of the biggest scandals in Connecticut’s history and the mainstream news dropped the ball.
The Hartford Courant is the only news outlet reporting about the state’s case against Mr. Boyne — and the only news is about a few basic facts of the case. No context is shared with the public. Just like the superficial coverage of the Dulos case. No details in the news yet to explain how that “family court” case ended in two fatalities. And, Kent Mawhinney was set free.
Connecticut family court administrators have recently introduce a new “Pathways” process for family court cases. Someone somewhere must have admitted the need for improvement in the family courts. Why has no one apologized for all the harm done?
Until someone apologizes for all the harm done, shame on them all.
Here a mandatory Connecticut AMC/GAL TRAINING sample case summary:
To: GAVELL FILE [Justine/Kevin/Amy]
From: ATTY. GAL/AMC
Date: 12/4/09
Re: BASIC FACTS
I have the initial pleadings and have heard briefly from each of the parent’s lawyers and have been informed of the following:
Mona (mom) and Howard (dad) Gavell were married on April 15, 1990 and have three children: Justine, age 13; Kevin, age 6; and Amy, age 18 months. Both parents are 42 years of age and in good physical health.
The parties are currently residing together during the pendency of the action, but this may not be working out well.
Education/Employment
Mom is a college graduate and dad went to tech school. Dad is an HVAC technician and has been self-employed for the past 2 years. Mom maintains the books, runs the office and has set up a website for the business, which is run from the family home. Mom had been employed until Justine was born and has been a stay at home mom ever since aside from working as of late with dad in the new business. Dad is also a volunteer firefighter.
Religion
Mom is a devout Catholic and an organic earth mother. Dad was born a Catholic but has not stayed very active in the Church. The parties did agree to raise their children in the Catholic faith before Justine was born.
Extended Family
Mom’s parents own the house mom and the family live in and they also own another house and live near by. Dad’s parents are divorced and do not live nearby. (Texas, I think.) Dad and his father are close as his father raised him after the divorce (he was 13 when they separated). His mother is apparently an alcoholic.
see the video to understand how those participating in that AMC/GAL training were taught to ignore allegations of child abuse images on the father’s computer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5P8kx3l5iKk
In the same training, Kenneth Robson’s “Custody Primer” instructed participants to report child abuse disclosures to guardians ad litem INSTEAD of reporting child abuse disclosures to the police.
Apparently, “an organic earth mother” is someone today’s “Democrats” are supposed to deceive and hate so Big Pharma, Big Agra and the military industrial complex can exploit the world while making lots of money from genetic engineering! 😀
Anyone happen to know how many shares of Microsoft Sidney Horowitz owns?
We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow by any means necessary.
Translation:
5 x 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑 = 💴💶💷💵💰
More than five years ago, someone (with help from how many others?)
dug a grave.
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/paul-boynes-bombshell-former-ct-supreme
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/bridgeport-assault-abdulrahim-sulaiman-arrest-19794505.php
18 months in prison for assaulting a police officer.
How many months have New Haven lawyers had Paul Boyne in prison so far?
Have Connecticut state employees punished Paul Boyne more than they punish child predators?
Compare and contrast Connecticut’s prosecutions of two men:
Has the state considered house arrest in the Boyle case? If not, why not?
Is the deep state in Connecticut waiting for another, more successful assault .. when prison guards will be asleep and cameras will be turned off?
https://greensboro.com/children-need-protection-of-amendment-judge-says-judge-speaks-out/article_f1187a1c-626b-531e-9d12-659ff6e1e6a0.html
The bigger picture and backstory of “family courts” is much darker.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/making-the-radical-seem-reasonable-what-is-a-think-tank-20191202-p53g3m.html
“practice lead at LMI”?
LMI, Yale … and Lowy, too?
Was Anton Levey ever arrested?
Where was Child Protective Services?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Satan
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/former-ceo-abercrombie-fitch-and-two-other-individuals-charged-sex-trafficking-and
Why is Paul Boyne in jail and Kent Mawhinney isn’t?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jennifer_Dulos
Good question .
Would Kent, David and James hide each other’s crimes?
https://www.mayimachronim.com/israels-greatest-enemy-the-erev-rav/
True. The public has yet to realize the Dulos case was tacketeering with a fraudulent psych eval of Dulos to keep the battle going- using the kids as pawns. That’s why there’s a 40 year gag order on the case.
CT media worked hard to keep the public focused on blood and scandal instead of the failure of family court for not protecting Jen and her children. Instead they branded her as crazy.
One of the biggest thing people keep forgetting Mawhinney was getting divorced also. His former wife went to the police and reported she was raped and feared for her life. The prosecutor office did not take it seriously.
Boyne for Chief Justice of the Connecticut family court.
No one at The Hartford Courant asked Paul Boyne why he did what he did?
The Mawhinney case poses a real problem for Connecticut prosecutors office and the government in Connecticut. The evidence is likely to demonstrate the curruption in the family court. Michelle Traconis exposure of the custody evaluation is the tip of the iceberg. How do they prosecute without exposure of the system? The question will have to be well thought out and not leading to the all the factors leading to the murder of Jennifer . The incompetence of guardians ad lithiums and the fraudulent custody evaluations. All protected by the powers that be in the state of Connecticut. Maybe this is why Robinson retired?
As nasty as some of the writing on The Family Court Circus was, that grossly over-the-top blog probably helped parents and children in Connecticut’s family courts more than the FBI helped parents and children.
Did the FBI ever appropriately address the corruption in Connecticut’s family courts? It looks like the FBI didn’t help. If the FBI never helped, someone can probably prove at some point that Boyne’s blog helped expose the corruption in the family courts more than the FBI exposed the corruption.
Has anyone asked the FBI about what kind of consequences would be appropriate for the decades of CT AFCC Inc. racketeering and damage done to Connecticut residents and the state’s economy?
The AFCC, Inc. lawyers and vendors ran a “kids for cash” racket — a lot like the “kids for cash” racket in Pennsylvania. The lack of prosecution in Connecticut might be because CT AFCC Inc. racketeering was a public-private for profit “nonprofit” — using federal funds — that started in the 1970s.
Blumenthal and Tong need to step out of the way. Who in the government is brave enough to help the American people? This is a long standing problem. You will always have people that are not legitimate complaining. Enough people are coming forward across the country. Is the United States government alligence and duty to it’s citizens or an industry causes destruction for profit?
http://www.ctfamily.org/ct-govt-vs-children-starts-at-the-top-with-tong/
Where is Washington? Under the control of William Tong in the attorney general’s office and the federal judiciary committee with Richard Blumenthal. Democrats gone wild. We need a better balance of power. Important American issues are being kept away from Americans. Voices are going unheard. Paul Boyne in a dysfunctional way was attempting to get the attention of the public. Unhinged or not the realities of family court between the hate speech and comments was undercover operations of a broken, dangerous and currupt system.
Ted Taupier and Paul Boyne were investigating that racketeering.
👉 Look at what happened to them.
Attorney Cunha was connecting dots, too.
A Connecticut judge then:
https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2023cv0037-22
“Freedom of speech for some, not for all.” in that weird state.
https://www.tiktok.com/@oficial_thiagolima/video/7410810860974771461?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7412712148034029099
Do Connecticut family courts promote Talmudic law, Jewish law, Christian law, Islamic law and/or Masonic law in family court cases with the worst outcomes?
Fotis Dulos wanted to practice polygamy. GAL Michael Meehan was okay with that.
Jennifer Farber wasn’t okay with polygamy and she expected the family court to also not be okay with Fotis’ expectations.
Which laws do judges, lawyers and GALs follow in those worst cases?
The wasband was practicing polygamy unknown to me. Brought the girlfriend around for ten years. They put the girlfriend’s family attorney on the case as the GAL. The Father had three children out of wedlock, we lived together for 10 years before we got married. His lawyer grandstanded in front of the court his client was a devoted catholic. You just can’t make this shit up.
…
Of course.
The majority are criminals. Belong in prison. I’m beating that Jennifer was killed after the bogus custody evaluation was tossed out. Sociopath for hire. No guilt, shame or remorse.
The Court appointed Michael Meehan as guardian ad litem in 2019.
Was someone else appointed GAL before, during and/or after 2019?
Different case same situations. 2019. ” Family” anything goes in Connecticut. Michael Meehan is just one of the custody flippers for hire in Connecticut.
It’s a shame such a person as Jennifer had to loose her life. The coverage of her case has been imperative to demonstrate the dangerous divorce industry in Connecticut. This is not exclusive to the “rich people” in the state. This is an epidemic in the United States. Still being ignored by the government.. Much effort has been given to silencing the entire problem. Including some groups saying that they want to fix it. Are continuing to attempt to silence people. Everyone is pointed to the legislators to fix the problem. The problems have not been fixed yet. Probably because the AFCC members are deeply entrenched in the system. Some of the people attempting to “fix it” are a big part of the problem.
FBI agents:
Please ask David Markowitz
what he doesn’t know.
The cases against Ted Taupier and Paul Boyne are the same kind of political lawfare at the federal level. Had the DOJ/FBI investigated and prosecuted Connecticut AFCC, Inc. during the “public corruption investigations” from around 2013 – 2015, Ted and Paul’s Excellent Adventures would have never even started.
At this rate, all we can do is check our local newspapers each week to catch the latest news about more “disgruntled litigants”, more broken families and more tax dollars paying for all the damage Connecticut “family court” cottage industries do so well with all that federal funding. What a racket.
It Tong and Blumenthal obstructing the investigations. They have all the power and control. It’s imperative to vote these two out of office. Then we can begin to get somewhere.
Politics as usual.
Thanks for removing the Jew article polluting this website, Frank. Was that based on a real change of heart or just image management?
Wake up, indeed.
You want the problem with obvious corruption in the state to look like a problem with religion?
Connecticut family court crooks don’t discriminate. The truly religiously inclined of all faiths abhor the damage those crooks have done to children and families.
After a year in jail, does Boyne know what a new world this is?
Did Google/YouTube demonetize and ban Candace’s YouTube channel …
or not?
She’s on Rumble for now — and building an independent platform.
The biggest problem Paul Boyne faces.
Richard Blumental and Vice president of the Attorney Generals Association Head of federal Judiciary Commitee which has oversight of the DOJ, CIA, FBI, CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION. These two men have way too much power.
2020, 2022, 2023 the most deaths in state care since 2016. Inspector General states the Connecticut system is a total failure. Yet these two remain in office and hold significant power in the United States.
William Tong almost 10 million dollars missing , record number of deaths. No 😔 investigation into family court system can complaints. Until these two Connecticut politicians are evicted from office the United States court system won’t be fixed. Still using parental alienation and reunification therapy. Junk science running the court system. Using HHS funding.
Fotis Dolus was put under house arrest at home before he killed himself. Paul Boyne is not allowed to go to the law library. No one died from the family court circus blog
Paul’s case is much more serious than murder. At least three Connecticut Superior Court Judges almost or actually did shit themselves after reading a public blog post commenting on their actions as public officials.
I told Paul he should represent himself and subpoena their soiled underwear as proofs for trial.
Paul Boyne is considered a threat to national security. Because he was exposing family court operations in the state of Connecticut. Is it his religion that causes the blame of Jewish people? Was it his hatred for the state of Connecticut people of color? He’s the Archie Bunker of the reform movement. If he just stopped applying the blame a skin color or religion he may have gotten a lot further into what is really happening behind the nations family court system problems.
He couldn’t stop applying blame to religion or skin color because that is his true, entrenched racist belief system.
People who tried to say his blogs were some form of satire were deluding themselves.
However, if he wants to shit all over the Internet with his racist beliefs, That’s not a crime.
He crossed the line with his relentless threats to murder specific people. He foolishly believed he was untouchable if he selected his words from previously published texts. Idiots like Paul forget that we live in a world where common sense applies.
He was definitely wrong about blaming it on skin color and religion. Curruption has no boundaries
Division has no boundaries, either.
We can blame that on the welfare reform act. Everything surrounding marriage and family comes from there. Connecticut is the first to run the failing experiment. Evidencary hears must be mandatory. Caps on billing.
Hey Ritchie!
Is that Frank Report profile pic the one you use for Grinder?
Love the Batman T-shirt! You look like a incel.
“… Dodd served as general chairman of the Democratic National Committee from 1995 to 1997. He served as Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee from 2007 until his retirement from politics. …
… Dodd then served as chairman and chief lobbyist for the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) from 2011 to 2017.In 2018, Dodd returned to the practice of law, joining the firm Arnold & Porter. In addition to being a member of the ReFormers Caucus of Issue One, Dodd is a close advisor to President Joe Biden and served on his vice presidential selection committee. …”
”… The MPAA said Friday that their board will gather Saturday to name Charles Rivkin as successor to Dodd, who is resigning Sept. 4.
Rivkin was previously the U.S. assistant secretary of state for economic and business affairs and a U.S. ambassador to France and Monaco.
Dodd led the MPAA for six years, and one of his main concerns was preventing digital piracy and protecting copyrights. He also helped expand the presence of U.S. films in the Chinese market and revise the revenue-sharing model to benefit Hollywood studios.
Disney Chairman Alan Horn said in a statement that Dodd transformed the MPAA into a global association for the digital era. …”
Will he be thrown in jail for more than a year waiting for a trial?
https://www.wfsb.com/2024/09/04/man-accused-threatening-assassinate-connecticut-judge/
Looks like another Gould/Adelman/Tindall catastrophe. 🙄
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=AANFA235023047S
… arrested 5:00 am, while working to pay the child support …
Should he land in the clinker and loose his job as a result of his actions, we will all be paying his child support.
https://www.thehour.com/news/article/derby-ansonia-nicholas-supple-assassinate-judge-19748286.php
These guys think that court orders only apply to women. Many interfer with the mothers parenting time and run to the judge claiming that the mother is not supporting the relationship. I’m sure some mothers have tried it to. These high conflict situations are subject to these types of games. It doesn’t have to have an attorney involved. Judges need to be on alert for the tricks.
Where is the prosecutiona Grand jury evidence?
Anyone have a link?
Everything I have read in this story points to Boyne’s First Amendment rights being violated.
I believe that there is more to the story than the narrative being put forth by Boyne.
However:
If true Boyne’s rights were violated.
***
Seriously:
Rich good article!
Joking:
You smug cunt!
Rich honestly I like this story.
It brings an important subject to the for front.
Forefront…..
Going blind sucks
Boyne is a racist. Frank Report may not condemn hate speech but I do. Inciting hate against any ethnic or religious group is justifiably punishable as it harms the their rights and is capable of inciting hatred and violence against all ethnic groups. Furthermore, Boyne’s hatred is based on a delusion. There is no Jewish conspiracy. The courts are not controlled by Jews.
Why is his case sealed?
Standard to seal during plea negotiation or some such.
Probably because it’s a pending criminal trial.
All of that maybe true, it doesn’t take away from Connecticut exploiting the minority community for federal funding and cost savings. Fatherhood funding and the fatherhood initiative legislation is benefiting mostly monitized white man in the family court system. Boyne actually wrote a lot about child abuse cases .
RE Boyne’s knowledge of Abuse:
My guess(belief) is Boyne has a PHD in abusing his own family.
Listen to his speech. Does she sound like a loving father and husband?
***
Regardless of whether or not he has children would you want him as your dad?
Please don’t pretend your answer is yes.
***
Re Free Speech & Boyne:
If you’re not threatening someone or something with violent speech your speech should be protected.
It’s the way the old ACLU viewed speech.
Who decides when speech is wrong?
This rhetorical question is why free speech needs to be protected!
It’s why it’s the First Amendment!
Hate speech is legal in the US. You can condemn but that’s a lit different than being put in jail.
Hate speech is legal. Threats to murder someone are not.
First, Paul never threatened to kill anyone, only suggested tge world would be a better place if certain judges were dead. Second, even if he did threaten, it probably still wouldn’t be a crime. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/07/us/police-school-shootings.html
OK, so you would not mind if I posted every day how the world will be better if you were dead and I wrote about caliber of bullets that could be used and put your home address and pictures of your car and your family on my website And pictures of you with gun targets on your face? What if I was creating post like that obsessively about your mother, Assuming she is still alive. You would think that was all hunky-dory and she should have no reason to be afraid?
Get real.
Maybe the main issue in Paul’s case is:
“Boys will be boys.” Some men sometimes act like boys. Most FBI agents know that. Who decided to target Ted’s sci-fi email instead of the family court corruption victimized parents were exposing around 2013-2015? Ted was in the process of doing a forensic evaluation of Connecticut AFCC Inc. and associated individuals who were — and still are state employees.
Did the FBI agents involved ever ask Paul Boyle about the evidence of corruption he found? Boyne wrote about the corruption in his blog and exposing corruption in family courts seems to be the reason he started the “Family Court Circus” blog.
If FBI/DOJ already investigated Connecticut AFCC Inc.’s circulation of child custody cases among their preferred — and perverted — attorneys and vendors, why isn’t that investigation all over the headlines?
The timing of the case is interesting because Kim Dotcom was also exposing corruption in governments. That case should be in the headlines, too.
Also, if The Family Court Circus blog is so dangerous, why is it still online? The About page is about free speech in the context of exposing corruption.
https://thefamilycourtcircus.com/about/
I hope this anti-Semitic racist animal never dares to say anything negative about the great Gary Cohen!
Where are you getting your info? https://www.pressreader.com/usa/hartford-courant/20240313/281573770669274
Boyne’s bail was recently reduced from $750,000 to $95,000, which is low for a cyber stalker who should have probably been conserved a long time ago.
How does one cyberstalk by writing blogs? Also, show me where $95,000 is low for cyberstalking.
I think it’s $95,000 in ROBLOX money. CT could be converting to ROBUX by Jan 1. It would give the Family Court more credibility.
https://www.roblox.com/upgrades/robux
When did they decide to go off the fortnite vbucks standard?
Dude what’s your problem?
You white or something?
Richard! Why are you NOT exposing FBI evidence tampering in the Kieth Raniere case!? You fucking asshole! I will brand “KAR” right across your fat lardass, you Luciferian dickface!!
HOW DARE YOU NOT EXPOSE THE TRUTH IN THE KIETH RANIERE CASE!! I BRANDED 18 WOMEN WITH HIS INITIALS! I WILL BRAND 1800 MORE ONCE NXIVM IS BACK UP WHEN KIETH IS RELEASED! KIETH AND I ARE GETTING MARRIED AND WILL HAVE CHILDREN!! KIETH LOVES ME! HE TOLD ME!
KIETH, I WILL ALWAYS LOVE YOU!!
How? Exactly the way Boyne did it.
Next question.
The Crime of Stalking usually covers any behavior that has no purpose other than to annoy the target of harassment.
And the price of a bail bond for $95,000 in CT would be $6,950 as quoted by https://www.connecticut-bailbonds.com/calculator/
I know it’s tough to put a price on Freedom, but to me anything less than five figures is quite low. If this man doesn’t have anyone who will cough up the price of a used car to get him back into the world, that’s just society voting with our pocketbooks to cut our losses on this case.
Rich wasn’t a cyber stalker!
He was a cyber impersonator!
Boyne’s blog wasn’t “cyberstalking”.
It was an over-the-top exercise in freedom of expression to prove the importance of freedom of expression when fighting corruption. Ted Taupier’s arrest was in response to Taupier’s participation in a casual email thread among friends. Parents were fighting back against the corruption in 2014 and the family court cottage industries fought back.
Ten years after those marathon public hearings, many of the same worst of the worst “family court” attorneys and judges still stalk children and parents.
Add up the harm “family courts” have done to see who’s been stalked and harmed the most.
Ed Vargas was one of Connecticut’s best legislators!
You seem more familiar with the case than anyone else here.
Did Paul get snatched up with no warning over what you are referring to as a political demonstration of sorts?
Or did Paul ignore several Cease and Desist requests before ending up with multiple restraining orders, and was jailed only after unrepentantly refusing to comply with those court orders?
Overall it is sad to see this man in jail, but not because of First Amendment issues. This is a clear case of someone who should have been saved by the men in white coats as soon as it was clear that being declared an unfit parent was too much for his fragile psyche to handle.
What we’re seeing here isn’t the criminalization of free speech, it’s the criminalization of insanity.
Paul has never been “declared an unfit parent”. Nor have most of the people whose children have been kidnapped and trafficked by CT. Nice try, pedo.
The former representative resigned sadly. The state of Connecticut is very much lacking people like Representative Vargas. There is a lack of eithical politicians in the state of Connecticut. They say Paul Boyne was a threat to Judges and causing hatred. In the reality of things is Paul only brought attention to the bigger threats to our society. Anyone who that does this type of damage to the up and coming generation is a much bigger threat. What they are going to hundreds if not thousands of children and the parents is the bigger crime.
Dearest-
“It was an over-the-top exercise in freedom of expression to prove the importance of freedom of expression when fighting corruption.”
I bet that logic makes a lot of sense, in your trailer, when you share it with the wifey.
Pour another beer on your cornflakes,
then take a nap. You fat fuck!
Which nerve was struck, NiceGuy?
The bullshit nerve….
It wasn’t an over the-top-exercise.
Threatening people with death is not an ‘exercise’ no matter what the reasoning.
Get a clue.
Has you BS nerve ever heard of the importance of backstory and context?
Paul and Ted’s Excellent Adventures started around 2013-2014, when Connecticut “family court” victims started finding each other, comparing notes and seeing patterns of criminal activities that destroyed children and families with that “family court” BS.
Ted was auditing the “family courts” and the FBI arrested him for sending an email to friends. The email included references to his anger about the corruption — with a little science fiction thrown in for dramatic effect.
Norm Pattis showed up in time to lose Ted’s case — which served the politics of the powers-that-be and The Hartford Courant did its predictable non-reporting of the Liberti case … which was part of the back story and context of Ted’s frustration with the lack of sufficient law enforcement in the state.
Here’s an excerpt from a book about the crimes and corruption in Connecticut “family courts” at that time:
Paul and Ted did their best to help expose that corruption.
The FBI didn’t. < — I hope that’s not a clue.
Connecticut AFCC, Inc. had multiple highly profitable contracts with the Judicial Branch to provide various assessments and services to, inter alia, litigants in family, juvenile and criminal court matters (hereinafter “clients”).
Parents and children in family court cases were — and still are — referred directly by the court, as well as by probation and family services personnel. Various contracts required — and still require — members and associates of that profitable nonprofit organization to provide reports to the court and to have personnel appear in court to testify regarding a client’s success or failure to complete the services and programs provided by the profitable nonprofit organization.
https://www.jud.ct.gov/Committees/ethics/sum/2013-15.htm
The criminals are those judges who violate all laws and create a courtroom environment where innocent parents are openly demeaned, threatened, and deprived of all assets.
With no medical findings or determinations of unfitness judges brand innocent people crazy, and steal their children. The brand then as not credible without evidence to support their conclusions of slander. Divorce decrees read like trash novels.
It’s a sick game that Boyne exposed.
This is why he’s in jail.
Boyne is in jail cause he went overboard.
https://connecticut.news12.com/heated-debate-over-proposed-changes-to-connecticuts-abortion-regulations
…
Would Connecticut judicial employees and law enforcement let her do that — with no investigation and no arrest?
Those who consider themselves to be “the elite” do whatever they want to do.
He’s the biggest threat to the racketeering industry of CT. They’ve done everything in their power- including the creation of cyber stalking laws, to give them a mechanism to go after Boyne.
They won’t give him access to a law library or computer because he will destroy this case against him.
WHO won’t give him access to a law library or computer?
Jews
Reminder to those who don’t study history:
All the different kinds Christians, Muslims and Jews practicing all the different kinds of Christianity, Islam and Judaism aren’t Christians, Muslims or Jews anymore when they join and submit to Masonic cults.
From the author of The Six-Pointed Star:
We’re not allowed to discuss any of that.
Shadowstate1969 is that you from the dead?
Or you the ghost of Christmas past?
Do you happen to know where the closest porn shop is to Schumer’s house?
If that means you’d like to discuss what John Dee’s practices have to do with today’s national and international politics, let’s start with:
and …
and … do you happen to know if those are orbs or dust particles in that photo?
Why does Alphabet Inc. (via YouTube) offer context for only a few subjects? Why not just go ahead and tell us what to think about everything?
…
Connecticut “government” released Fortis Dulos and his girlfriend on bail — allowing BOTH to prepare for trial.
HOW will state posers-that-be and corporate news outlets handle fallout from Paul Boyne’s trail and fallout from Kent Mawhinney’s trial at the same time?
It’s amazing the posers-that-be still allow them both to live.
RE The Boyd Website Graphic:
Business is what led to the creation of our nation…
Nothing you have today would exist without capitalism.
Get a clue!
Welfare reform and the economic growth and development of the States.
I am writing about why/how the country was formed.
Welfare reform?
The biggest money maker is the Connecticut experiment. Allowing the door open for financial opportunity in family law. The Gary experiment. Beyond decreasing poverty.
Stop trolling me turd burger.
Judge Dooley was no doubt pressured to make that ruling. Those who control the courts and the money and the corruption in large part happen to be Jewish. But none of them had any fear of Boyne or retaliation from others bc of his blog.
The only thing the family court judiciary feared was being exposed – and Boyne was one of the very few who dared to expose their blatant violations of law and abuse to children – as evil judges literally steal children from healthy parents as money is moved from the monied parent to court appointed criminals.
Boyne saw the same charade played out for years and tried to stop the abuse and warn the public.
There is no free speech in CT. We are a lawless state – there are no constitutional rights. Atrocities happen daily under the guise of best interest – it’s a criminal enterprise.
Thank you frankreport and your investigators who continue to expose the corruption that steals childhoods and inflict trauma and abuse upon the innocent.
Is that why Boyne lost custody? His wife was the “monied parent”?
Boyne’s children lost their dad because the public-private Connecticut AFCC, Inc. cabal was the monied nonprofit for profit corporation that sort of incorporated, but didn’t, then did, then didn’t again.
That looks to me like Paul lost custody because of refusing to cooperate on grounds of being a sovereign citizen who believes laws don’t apply to him.
“sovereign citizen”?
Where’d you find that information?
Or, did you just make that up? 🤔
Was Dr. Horowitz (who was not a State contracted mediator according to CSSD) being paid in the Boyne case from Federal funds meant for Court Appointed Attorneys in New Haven Juvenile Court to conduct mediations in Bridgeport?
What does your question have to do with sicko Boyne losing custody?
“sicko” ”losing custody”
Was he always a “sicko”?
Who took his children from him?
How did an engineer lose his job and his family?
What do you know about the case?
People have to unite and stand together- publicly. Paul is an example of what could happen to any of us living in CT.
It is the most corrupt state and its legal system is comprised of sociopaths and amoral self-serving scavengers.
The AG, William Tong knows the game and looks away. Lamont is no better.
The system needs a complete overhaul and people should not live in fear of the government.
If CT is so corrupt and dangerous as you claim, then why do you still live there? There are many other states to choose from!
https://www.wtnh.com/dulos/hole-appearing-to-be-human-grave-bags-of-lime-found-on-land-of-gun-club-founded-by-one-time-dulos-attorney-kent-mawhinney/
The greatest number of readers of Paul BOYNE’s website was the CT judiciary! Not because anyone feared for their life, but because they monitored it to see what criminals and crimes of family court were being exposed.
Anyone who dared to tell their story was hit with retaliatory action from the courts- including taking custody of your children.
…
Why is a former governor/ambassador allowed to write death threats on bombs?
Because we can’t write mean things on blogs,
but we can write mean things on bombs
to help others drop bombs on entire
🛩️
.
.
.
… neighbor .. hoo.. d ..s
The family court circus despite its hate speech has been an important tool for Connecticut residents to be aware of the curruption in family law court system. I think Connecticut is more afraid of the publicity and the details then Paul Boyne himself. It’s too bad it was littered with the hatered cause it was spot on. The information was golden.
The information was incoherent gobbledygook mixed in with threats on people’s lives.
Read between the lines. He definitely went off the deep end. If you follow the information surrounding the gobbledygook you can see the problems in the system. The great deal of money taken from people.
The information helped
family court victims see
how much of Connecticut’s mainstream news
is propaganda.
The Jews have got Boyne right where they want him. America needs to wake up and take care of business. I wish patriot Boyne the best in his legal cases but you can’t beat the Jews through the very system they designed and control. Americans need to exercise ALL their constitutional rights in order to free Boyne. And I mean ALL of them.
What part of “those who say they are and are not” don’t we understand?