Nancy Salzman, the former president of NXIVM, is set to leave the U.S. Bureau of Prisons’ custody on March 19 and begin her five-year probation period.
Known as “Prefect,” Salzman has served 25 months of her 42-month sentence. She reported to Hazelton prison in February 2021.
Upon her release from the Bureau of Prisons’ custody, Salzman will be under the supervision of the U.S. Department of Probation, an agency of the judiciary branch of the government.
Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, who sentenced Salzman to a significantly harsher sentence than she had hoped for and much longer than her daughter Lauren—who received only probation—will have ultimate supervision over her. Both mother and daughter received five-year probationary sentences, with the distinction that Salzman had to spend 19 months in a medium-security prison and six months at the Horizon’s halfway house in Albany, while her daughter remained at home, transitioning from the NXIVM world to dog grooming.
Last September, Salzman left Hazelton prison to reside at the Albany halfway house. This move allowed her to leave the facility during the day to handle various work opportunities and attend medical appointments. She had a curfew and fulfilled all requirements. In just two short weeks, she will be a semi-emancipated “Prefect.”
As part of her probation, Salzman is forbidden from associating with other NXIVM individuals, except for her daughters, son-in-law, and anyone else deemed appropriate by the judge or probation department.
Meanwhile, Clare Bronfman wishes to also partake in freedom. She has requested a sentence reduction, and a reply from Judge Garaufis is pending. Bronfman has been making a case for a reduction based on her behavior as a model prisoner. However, her loyalty to NXIVM founder Keith Raniere, which she emphasized in her communications to the court presentencing, may affect her appeal. In her recent application, Bronfman did not mention Raniere, only that she shovels snow and cleans the administration facilities as a janitor and is trusted.
Bronfman was sentenced to 81 months, which is triple the sentencing guidelines. The federal government recently reduced the standards for sentencing guidelines by six months for first-time offenders, and Bronfman hopes this will be applied retroactively to her case, potentially setting her free (with five years’ probation).
Ultimately, Salzman is set to become a free woman, though her future remains uncertain. Whether she has learned from her experiences and will lead a wiser life post-Raniere and NXIVM is yet to be seen.
As for Clare, the road to her freedom lies with the renunciation of Raniere, who has 96 years of his 120-year prison sentence to finish before he can rejoin her.
The chief reason Nancy Salzman will be free this month, and Bronfman remains in a max security facility, is that Nancy repudiated Raniere.
Clare Bronfman might consider an early exit would be enhanced if she followed suit.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Frank,
Any update on this? Accuracy? News story.
BOP
NANCY SALZMAN
Register Number: 25533-052
Age: 69
Race: White
Sex: Female
Located at: Pittsburgh RRM
Release Date: 03/19/2024
She is getting out on Tuesday.
Why no national press coverage?
Is she out today? I need to know to when to lock up my house and protect my family.
As we all know, Nancy salzmans brother in law is CEO Steve Kass of Tofutti. Steve supposedly held much of Nancys money in life insurance policies, in his home, and throughout different cities he travels to. Tofutti sells vegan products. This supermarket chain sells his products and also offers food “coaching”. What are the chances NXIVM had something to do with this?? https://www.naturalgrocers.com/contact/request_a_coaching_session
That group existed way before NXIVM. Not sure this is true about the brother in law at all. Easy enough to have been discovered by now. Several disgruntled past and current Tofuttians including travel buddy/ roomies are loving this. It’s Nothing more than revenge legends.
Which one of the many could I be? If Steve was a nice person, he wouldn’t have so many people who dislike him and his condescending egotistical power tripping hot headed lying lack of self-control maniac.
Frank this is an excellent piece!!!
If only are beloved Mr. Johnson was around to read it……
Mr. Parlato,
When Claire isreleased from the big house, do you think she will fund any/all legal attempts to free him? Does she still have money to do this? Does she have any other living relatives other than her half-wit sister? I can just see Claire spending every last dollar to free “the smartest man in the world”, living in a run down trailer close to his prison, visiting him at every opportunity to gain wisdom, Do you see this as a possibility? She needs a financial conservator, do you think her parole will forbid her to contact that wingnut keith,
I believe she still has the funds to pay for Kieth’s shitty attorneys. She literally hired the worst lawyers in N.Y. Her layers are so bad that she was sentence ABOVE the guidelines. Imagine that! You hire an attorney and they get you MORE TIME than you deserve.
She has a dimwitted half brother named Edgar. He is just as stupid as Horseface and Sara. He signed the Vivendi Deal which removed a massive portion of family ownership from Seagrams, in exchange for a failing film company. The Vivendi Deal is considered by many, to be the worst business deal in history. Edgar is a complete fool, just like Clare and Sara.
Her father Edgar Sr. was a racist who disowned Edgar Jr. because he fell in love with a black woman.
The entire Bronfman Family are evil, cruel sub humans. They are all as dumb as a box of rocks. The grandfather Samuel was the only one with brains.
Edgar Sr. cheated on his wife with the maid, whom gave birth to Clare and Sara. She was a very stupid maid, with the IQ of pocket lint. Which is why Clare and Sara are so stupid. They have the brains of a gnat. Two nearly retarded morons with money.
Clare and Sara are so stupid they let Kieth piss away $65 Million in the commodities market. Then they blamed Edgar Sr.
Edgar Sr. was not very bright either. He was a very stupid man who knew very little about business. He fathered five bumbling morons who drove the family business into to ground.
They look like inbreds.
Understand what you mean by saying that they are stupid. As soon as I read their mum is a maid it rang a bell. That said, there are many people who are forced to clean to get by. It doesn’t mean that they are necessarily stupid. In fact, it proves that they are hard workers. I dont like my first response to this. We all have to stop being so narrow minded. Look at Bush Jr., look at Hunter Biden, look at most people in politics —a bunch of egomaniacal sheep..
I think of Cuban people – most are much more educated then Americans and yet they are lucky to be able to drive a taxi. A doctor will make little $$$
I am NOT saying maids are stupid. I have a blue color background and come from a blue collar family. I have nothing but respect for anyone who works hard and takes care of their family, regardless of what they do to earn their paycheck. The fact that she was a maid is incidental, the point of mentioning it is because Edgar Sr. was cheating on his wife with the help. He was a disgusting racist, cheating piece of trash.
I understand what you mean. Some maids might very well be studying at college. But in reality, a lot of them are not. It’s just a sad truth.
Look, she looks like a hoi pollo potato. Her face, her body, her demeanor seems mushy. And she looks like that annoying aunt at that Thanksgiving dinner you stopped by when you didnt have anywhere else to go one year. I can just see her…” Ohhhhh. And WHO are yooooouuuu??” She’d ask in a shrill, condescending way. Her eyes peeled back, smirking, waddling in a tightly wrapped polyster apron, carrying a mound of burnt marshmallow sweet potatoes “Sooooo, you didnt have anywhere to go? Your parents live far, or..are ya just short on caasssh?
You know the type. The bitch incarnate. She’s that lady, but with boat loads of cash,
Cuban people wouldnt like her. She’s got a crooked stick up her ass. And she looks like a pasty gargoyle. In fact, she doesnt look like a maid, she looks like the trash.
Weord Frank said the girls Mother was a waitress/ barmaid? That isn’t hired help
She can not be that dumb, any norm person would be in high facility prison fir much longer
She is that dumb, and then some.
Clare Bronfman cannot even pass her GED courses. She is a high school dropout, a failure, an idiot.
Again, nothing AGAINST people who dropped out of high school. High school just isn’t for everyone, I get that. But with Horseface, she was just too stupid to pass even the most basic classes.
All she knows how to do is destroy things.
Bronfman v. Pullen (3:23-cv-00619)District Court, D. Connecticut______________________________
Case 3:23-cv-00619-OAW Document 1 Filed 05/12/23 Page 1 of 29
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case No. 23-cv-619
CLARE BRONFMAN,
Petitioner-Plaintiff,
v.
TIMETHEA PULLEN, in her official capacity as Warden of FCI Danbury; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; BRYAN ANTONELLI, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Northeast Region; COLETTE PETERS, in her official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons,
Respondents-Defendants.
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Petitioner-Plaintiff Clare Bronfman (“Petitioner” or “Ms. Bronfman”), by and through her attorneys, The Law Office of Michael L. Chambers Jr., Ronald Sullivan Law PLLC, and Levin & Associates PLLC, as and for her Petition against Respondents-Defendants Timethea Pullen, in her official capacity as Warden of FCI Danbury; the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Bryan Antonelli, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Northeast Region; and Colette Peters, in her official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (collectively, “Respondents”), alleges as follows:
[ … ]
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ctd.154385/gov.uscourts.ctd.154385.1.0.pdf
United States v. Raniere, (1:18-cr-00204-NGG-VMS)
District Court, E.D. New York
Document Number: 1238
Date filed: Mar 7, 2024
MEMORANDUM & ORDER, The court DENIES Mr. Raniere’s motion for reconsideration and second post-conviction motion to compel. The court further sets a final deadline of April 22, 2024, for Mr. Raniere to file his reply in support of his pending third Rule 33 motion for a new trial. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/6/2024. (TLH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
-against-
KEITH RANIERE,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM & ORDER 18-CR-204 (NGG)
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. Before the court are two motions filed by Defendant Keith Raniere: (1) his motion for reconsideration of the court’s November 6, 2023, Memorandum and Order denying his motion to compel production of evidence, (see Mot. for Recons. (Dkt. 1225)), and (2) a separate motion to compel production of evidence. (See Post-Conviction Mot. to Compel dated December 21, 2023 (“Second MTC”) (Dkt. 1230) .) For the reasons set forth below, both motions are DENIED. The court further sets April 22, 2024, as the final deadline for Defendant’s submission of his Reply in support of his pending Rule 33 motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The court assumes familiarity with the background of this case. In brief, Mr. Raniere was convicted on June 19, 2019 on seven counts, including racketeering, racl,eteering conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, forced labor conspiracy, sex trafficking conspiracy, and two counts of sex trafficldng. (See Jury Verdict (Dkt. 735).) On October 27, 2020, he was then sentenced to 120 years in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. (See October 27, 2020 Minute Entry (Dkt. 968).) Since his conviction, Mr. Raniere has filed three motions for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.
1
P. 33. (See, e.g., First Rule 33 Mot. (Dkt. 851); Second Rule 33 Mot. (Dkt. 956); Third Rule 33 Mot. (Dkts. 1169, 1176).) The court denied the first two of the these. (Mem. and Order dated July 17, 2020 (Dkt. 902) (denying first Rule 33 motion); Mem. and Order dated October 23, 2020 (Dkt. 963) (denying second Rule 33 motion).) His third remains pending. Since filing his latest Rule 33 motion, Mr. Raniere has made two requests to the court to compel the Government to produce information relating to his child exploitation and child pornography predicate acts. (See Post-Conviction Mot. to Compel dated April 14, 2023 (“First MTC”); Second MTC.) On November 6, 2023, this court denied Mr. Raniere’s first motion to compel the production of evidence. (See Mem. and Order dated November 6, 2023 (Dkt. 1224) (denying First MTC).) Mr. Raniere then moved for reconsideration of this denial two weeks later. (Mot. for Recons; see also Opp. to Mot. for Recons. (Dkt. 1229).) He then filed his second, separate request for the court to compel production of evidence on December 21, 2023. (Second MTC; see also Opp. to Second MTC (Dkt. 1231); Reply (Dkt. 1233); Supp. Reply (Dkt. 1235).) The court considers the motion for reconsideration and the latest motion to compel in turn.
II. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
The standard courts apply when considering motions for reconsideration “is strict, and reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked-matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court.” Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255,257 (2d Cir. 1995). A motion for reconsideration “is not a vehicle for relitigating old issues, presenting the case under new theories, securing a rehearing on the merits, or otherwise taking
2
a second bite at the apple[.]” Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P., 684 F.3d 36, 52 (2d Cir. 2012). Courts in this Circuit have thus generally held that parties seeking reconsideration may not advance new facts not previously presented to the Court. See In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Secs. & Derivative Litig., 43 F. Supp. 3d 369,373 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (noting that a “party seeking reconsideration” may not “advance new facts, issues, or arguments not previously presented to the Court.”) (quoting Schonberger v. Serchuk, 742 F. Supp. 108, 119 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)); United States v. Morillo-Vidal, No. 10-CR-222 (RWS), 2011 WL 4072173, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2011); see also Local Civil Rule 6.3 (“No affidavits shall be filed by any party unless directed by the Court.”) Mr. Raniere does not cite to any controlling law that the court overlooked. (See generally Mot. for Recons.) He asserts that the court overlooked two items that Defendant argues are “critical”-(1) that it was fundamentally unfair for the court to consider the Loveall Declaration and (2) that the Loveall Declaration was incorrect. (Mot. for Recons. at 1-2); see also Loveall Deel. (0kt. 1213-3).) But neither of these arguments were overlooked or alter the conclusion reached by the court. The court, in denying the motion to compel evidence, found that Mr. Raniere did not have “(1) Brady rights to this information; (2) post-conviction due process rights to this information; and (3) the right to this information under principles of ‘elemental fairness.”‘ (Mem. and Order dated November 6, 2023 at 5.) The Loveall Report was considered by the court in the latter “elemental fairness” analysis alongside the “ample evidence at trial” when finding that “even assuming” a standard premised on “elemental fairness” applied, Mr. Raniere could not meet this standard. (Id. at 8-10.) Specifically, the court found that: Mr. Loveall’s report, refuting Kiper’s key findings, offers a far more plausible and convincing explanation of any anomalies
3
in the photos’ metadata. Mr. Loveall’s report is further supported by the ample evidence presented at trial and Camila’s declaration that she is certain of the circumstances and timing of the photos. In sum, the evidence presented at trial, the Government’s expert report, and Camila’s declaration substantially outweigh the arguments raised in the Report and Mr. Raniere’s motion. Mr. Raniere therefore does not raise a reasonable probability that testing the evidence would demonstrate he did not commit the offense. (Id. at 10.) Mr. Raniere’s arguments in the present motion questioning the veracity of the report are better characterized as attempts to relitigate old issues. See Analytical Surveys, Inc., 684 F.3d at 52. The court therefore DENIES Defendant’s motion for reconsideration. III. SECOND POST-CONVICTION MOTION TO COMPEL This Second MTC has much in common with the first. Mr. Raniere again requests information that he argues will demonstrate that the Government fabricated evidence relating to his conviction of racketeering acts of child pornography and child exploitation. (See generally Second MTC.) 1 And he again argues that withholding this information violates his due process rights and principles of “elemental fairness.” (Id. at 9-12). The court thus incorporates its discussion concerning the relevant standards to Mr. Raniere’s request to compel production of
______________________________
1 In his First MTC, “Mr. Raniere request[ed] (1) two forensic copies of the camera card and corresponding FfK log files; (2) a file listing of the Hard drive that contained the images of child pornography (the “Western Digital hard drive”); and (3) CART examination notes.” (Memorandum and Order dated November 6, 2023 at 3 n.1.) In his Second MTC, Mr. Raniere requests: “all information pertaining to the unknown photograph technician who, prior to trial, and without authorization, changed and forensically manipulated an unpreserved, essential piece of evidence – the camera card.” (Second MTC at 1; see also Second MTC, Ex. A (Requested Information Relating to the Photograph Technician) (Dkt. 1230-1) .)
4
evidence from its November 6, 2023 order. (See Mem. & Order dated November 6, 2023 at 5-11.) In considering Defendant’s present request under these standards, the court finds that Mr. Raniere does not have post-conviction due process right to the requested information and DENIES his motion. Mr. Raniere again does not cite any law showing he has a right to the information requested. He primarily relies on U.S. v. Abuhamra 389 F.3d 309, 322. (2d Cir. 2004), for the contention that the Government must hand over this information. (See Second MTC at 9-10). InAbuhamra, the Second Circuit found that the respondent’s right to a fair hearing was violated when the district court relied on information presented ex parte and in camera when denying respondent’s bail application. Id. at 332-33. Abuhamra is thus inapplicable to this case where the court did not rely on arguments presented ex parte or in camera and does not concern access to information relevant to a party’s bail application. This motion instead concerns a request for information relevant to Mr. Raniere’s post-conviction motion for a new trial. His rights to this information therefore “must be analyzed in light of the fact that he has already been found guilty at a fair trial, and has only a limited interest in postconviction relief.” Dist. Attorney’s Off for Third Jud. Dist. v. Osborne, 557 U.S. 52, 69 (2009). And Mr. Raniere again does not demonstrate that “elemental fairness” should lead the court to compel the Government to grant him access to this information. Mr. Raniere’s counsel had an opportunity to review and test the veracity of the photographic evidence prior to trial. (See Mem. and Order dated November 6, 2023 at 10-11.) The evidence requested would thus not support his Rule 33 motion because he cannot show that ‘”the evidence could not with due diligence have been discovered before or during trial.”‘ (Id. (quoting United States v. Forbes, 790 F.3d 403, 408-09 (2d Cir. 2015)). And Mr. Raniere is unable to
5
show that the evidence raises a reasonable probability as to his innocence in light of the substantial evidence supporting the relevant charges in addition to the photos, including: messages from [the victim] where she referenced her sexual relationship with Raniere beginning in 2005 when she was fifteen years old; communications from Mr. Raniere referencing the photos; testimony from [the victim’s] sister that she was aware of the relationship prior to Fall 2006; a folder containing nude pictures of the other women with whom Mr. Raniere had a sexual relationship and in which the pictures of [the victim] were found; testimony that Mr. Raniere sought to take similar pictures of other women; [the victim’s] medical records, which included statements indicating she was in a sexual relationship with the same partner since she was underage; and testimony from [the victim’s] sister identifying her as the person in a sanitized version of the photos. (Id. at 2.) The Government provided additional information rebutting the claims of fabrication including: a declaration from the victim verifying the photos and the Loveall report discussed above. (Id. at 4, 9-10.) Considered together, Mr. Raniere is unable to demonstrate a reasonable probability that he did not commit the offense. The court therefore finds that “Mr. Raniere provides no legal support for his request, and even if applying his desired standard of ‘fundamental fairness,’ Mr. Raniere fails to show that access to this evidence violates fundamental fairness.” (Id. at 11.) IV. RULE 33 MOTION Mr. Raniere was convicted in June 2019 and his third Rule 33 motion for a new trial has been outstanding since May 2022. (See Third Rule 33 Mot.) The court has not ruled on this motion primarily due to his filing of separate motions that the court
6
considered and decided. (See e.g., Not. of Mot. for Recusal (Dkt. 1170); First MTC; Second MTC.) The court also granted multiple requests to extend the deadline for Mr. Raniere to file a reply in support of his third Rule 33 motion due to logistical challenges presented by Mr. Raniere’s incarceration. (See Def. Mots. for Extension of Time to Reply (Dkts. 1217, 1220, 1221, 1222, 1226).) This court granted the most recent extension of time to file a reply on November 28, 2023, at which time the court noted that it would update the deadline for the Reply when ruling on Mr. Raniere’s motion for reconsideration. (See Min. Entry dated November 28, 2023.) The court now sets the deadline for April 22, 2024, approximately 45 days following the release of this order. The court will not grant an additional request for an extension beyond this date. Mr. Raniere has had ample time to consider and respond to the Government’s response to Mr. Raniere’s third Rule 33 motion and now has an additional 45 days to do so. Any potential prejudice in not granting an additional extension is outweighed by an interest in the finality of his conviction.
7
V. CONCLUSION
For the reasons discussed herein, the court DENIES Mr. Raniere’s motion for reconsideration and second post-conviction motion to compel. The court further sets a final deadline of April 22, 2024, for Mr. Raniere to file his reply in support of his pending third Rule 33 motion for a new trial.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
March 6, 2024
s/Nicholas G. Garaufis
_____________________
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS
United States District Judge
Thanks. I have never understood why his few remaining supporters think he had any chance with an appeal. They almost seemed to think you can re try cases.
Times Union
Chris Churchill
Churchill: Bitten by bonus scandal, Soares suggests Dan McCoy delivered the hitThe Albany County district attorney claims “lingering animosity” motivated the county executive’s move; McCoy’s spokeswoman vehemently pushed back on that allegation
By Chris Churchill
March 5, 2024
[ … ]
Or does Soares claim that there’s a broader conspiracy here?
[ … ]
https://www.timesunion.com/churchill/article/churchill-bitten-scandal-soares-suggests-mccoy-18702444.php
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
MIAMI DIVISION
CASE NO. 09-22341-CIV-ALTONAGA/Brown
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL MOSBERG, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant, Yeruchum Winer’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) [D.E. 34], filed December 17, 2009. The Court has considered the parties’ written submissions and the applicable law.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 7, 2009, Plaintiff, Principal Life Insurance Company (“Principal Life”), filed suit against Michael Mosberg (“Mosberg”), as Trustee for the Lorraine Loshin Family Trust (“Loshin Trust”); Yeruchum Winer (“Winer”); and Eli Deutsch (“Deutsch”). (See Compl. [D.E. 1]). Mosberg is trustee for the Loshin Trust. (See id. ¶ 32). Winer and Deutsch are life insurance producers. (See id. ¶ 21). Principal Life seeks declaratory judgment and alleges breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and civil conspiracy arising from an insurance policy on the life of Lorraine Loshin (“Loshin”).
[ … ]
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-flsd-1_09-cv-22341/pdf/USCOURTS-flsd-1_09-cv-22341-0.pdf
How can you guarantee a bond for which you do not have sufficient financial resources? Perhaps only a small amount? Or are Nancy’s parents so rich that they own 5 million dollars?
United States v. Salzman (1:18-mj-00414)District Court, N.D. New York
Document Number: 6
Date Filed: Jul 26, 2018
Appearance Bond in case as to Nancy Salzman. Bond in the amount of $5,000,000.00 co-signed by sureties Steven G. Messing, Milton Loshin and Lorraine Loshin. (mab) (Entered: 07/26/2018)
Heard the loshins used to keep it in their basement and upstairs in their spare room.
Is Carole Kass hiding money for Nancy? If so, how much?
This post is all from what i hear:
It’s not Carole…..it’s Steve Kass hiding it. Carole is too stupid. Carole isnt allowed to do anything without Steve Kass telling her how and when. Steve controls her and the rest of the family by buying them things and taking them on vacations and othewise being mr. Knowitall condescending narcissist. He was a ghost leader of nxivm. It’s a messed up family. Glazer….go get your money from the Kass and Loshin family. Dirty money hiding there. What are you doing glazer. Where is the fbi??? I mean Steve has lots of police family relatives and tons of lawyers. That might explain it all.
Deena or is it Carly or whatever other alias. “From what you hear?”From whom? Sounds like you know him intimately. How else could u know all his family and financial details and behaviors? Lovers talk? Sounds like deep revenge toward him-an affair gone bad?. Why here on this forum? It’s a waste of your time. If you really think this low of him you’d get him where it mattered. Posting here is useless bs He must know who you are. He knows who knows his secrets. Seems dangerous of you. You’re prob not the only one he screwed though in some way or the other so maybe he can’t know for sure.
Frank Report
Caught Red-Handed? Nancy Salzman’s Letters of Support Are SuspectOctober 11, 2021
https://frankreport.com/2021/10/11/nancy-salzmans-letters-of-support-are-suspect-writers-say-they-did-not-want-letters-filed-with-judge-for-sentencing/
Frank Report
Nancy Salzman in Big Trouble? — Evidence Suggests She Forged Her Own Mother’s Letter of Support!October 13, 2021
https://frankreport.com/2021/10/13/nancy-salzman-in-big-trouble-evidence-suggests-she-forged-her-own-mothers-letter-of-support/
Frank Report
Nancy Salzman in Big Trouble? — Evidence Suggests She Forged Her Own Mother’s Letter of Support!October 13, 2021
[ … ]
Lorraine Loshin
51 Stratford Terrace
Cranford, NJ 07016
July 4, 2021
The Honorable Judge Nicholas Garaufis
Federal District Court Judge
United States Courthouse
225 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Re: Nancy Salzman Federal Sentencing
To the Honorable Judge Garaufis,
My name is Lorraine Loshin. I am Nancy Salzman’s mother. I am 92 years old. I would like to share some things about my daughter that I hope you will consider in your evaluation of her. From the time Nancy was a little girl she was a caring person who always wanted to help those around her. She started caring for me when she was 6 years old and I was bedridden for 3 weeks. She got up each morning and emptied my bedpan and brought me food. It was no surprise that she chose to go to nursing school.
In the last 3 years, as we began to age and things started to slip around the house, Nancy noticed and stepped in. She began shopping with me and cooking for us, taking both of us to our doctor’s appointments helping with medical decisions and doing our book keeping.
As my husband’s health began to fail, Nancy spent more and more time with us, taking him to his doctor’s appointments and administering his medications. In June of 2020 when my husband had pneumonia, Nancy was here in those critical moments and she called an ambulance. He was having a heart attack in the ambulance on the way to the hospital. This decision actually saved his life. They admitted him to the cardiac lab and performed a procedure where they inserted 2 stents.
Nancy has been with us almost continuously for the last 18 months.
When my husband feels anxious he calls for her, she has a calming effect on him. She takes care of all of our needs, shopping, cooking, giving my husband nursing care and she provides all the information that we wouldn’t know how to do. She solves all of our problems. We wouldn’t have been about to stay in our home of 70 years if not for Nancy and all she has done. This was our wish, to stay in our own home and not go to a facility.
I love my daughter very much and would ask for you to give her any consideration you can so that she can stay with us and continue to provide a loving environment. I do not believe we can survive without her help at this juncture of our lives.
Thank you in advance for your consideration. I believe my Nancy is one in a million.
Sincerely,
Lorraine Loshin
[ … ]
Is it Lorraine Loshin, Nancy Salzman’s mother, or another person with the same name?
Case 1:09-cv-22341-CMA Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/10 11:14:15 Page 1
of 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
MIAMI DIVISION
CASE NO. 09-22341-CIV-ALTONAGA/Brown
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL MOSBERG, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff, Principal Life Insurance Company’s (“Principal Life[’s]”) Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) [D.E. 85], filed April 16, 2010. Defendant, Michael Mosberg (“Mr. Mosberg”), as trustee for the Lorraine Loshin Family Trust, opposes the Motion. (See Def.’s Resp. in Opp’n to Pl.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“Resp.”) [D.E. 108]). The Court has carefully considered the parties’ written submissions, the record, and the applicable law.
I. BACKGROUND 1
This case involves a Principal Life insurance policy on the life of Lorraine Loshin. In 2004 or 2005, Mrs. Loshin was contacted by Reuven Tabor, her niece’s husband, about purchasing life insurance. (See Aff. of Lorraine S. Loshin (“Loshin Aff.”) [D.E. 101-1] ¶¶ 9–10). Although Mrs.
________________________________
112] ¶¶ 22–24), who called and visited her (see id. ¶¶ 25–26), whether she authorized anyone to create a trust (see id. ¶ 29), whether her signature is a forgery (see id. ¶ 30), and when she has traveled to certain locations (see id. ¶¶ 30, 32). But Mrs. Loshin has personal knowledge of her own actions and what she has perceived with her senses. See FED.R. EVID. 602 cmt. 1972 Proposed Rules. Moreover, Mrs. Loshin confirmed these facts in her deposition. (See Dep. of Lorraine Loshin (“Loshin Dep.”) [D.E. 88-3] 165:10–16).
[ … ]
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-flsd-1_09-cv-22341/pdf/USCOURTS-flsd-1_09-cv-22341-1.pdf
____________________________
____________________________
Lorraine S Loshin’s New Jersey Voter RegistrationCranford, New Jersey
Lorraine S Loshin (age 95) from Cranford, Nj and is affiliated with the Democratic Party. Lorraine is registered to vote in Union County, New Jersey.
Lorraine Loshin’s Voter Registration
Party Affiliation: Democratic Party
Registered to Vote In: Union County, New Jersey
Registration Date: 09/23/1954
Voter Status: Active
Ward: 0
Congressional District: 10
House District: 22
Senate District: 22
____________________________
____________________________
Nancy’s brother in law Steve Kass reportedly hides money in life insurance policies and cash in shoe boxes. Glazer and fbi….go subpoena him already.
Yes, really? Is something going to happen?
On page three, lines 17 and 18 it says ‘¶ 22). Mrs. Loshin likely could not have paid the annual premium for the Loshin Policy because her annual income, including her husband’s, is only $36,400. (See Loshin Aff. ¶ 4). ‘
How could Mr. Milton and Mrs. Lorraine Loshin guarantee Nancy Salzman’s $5 million bond in 2018 when the combined household income of Mr. Milton Loshin and Mrs. Lorraine Loshin in 2007 was only $36,400? Where did the assets they used to guarantee Nancy’s bond in 2018 come from?
Mrs. Lorraine Loshin née Sattler
Whether Nancy has served all or part of her short sentence does not change the fact that she is a criminal. And she will remain a criminal after her release. She will still have a criminal record. And the fact that she has lied and cheated her entire life shows her true character. That’s all you need to write to briefly characterize her. Prefect has lied and cheated all her life, that’s what she has in common with Vanguard.
Does anyone know if Nancy Salzman mother is still alive?
Frank have you heard if her mother is still alive?
She was pretty ill according to Salzman before she went to prison?
Nancy will have to ask permission to go to NJ for any reason while she is on probation.
To see her mother, if she is still alive and can even remember Nancy with her failing memory.
To collect any of the cash she left at her sister & brother in laws.
Wouldn’t it be funny when she shows up to ask for her illegal cash & her family says, “What cash”. Whose Nancy gonna call, the police?
That would serve Nancy right to get a taste of her own medicine and the money she was banking on her her retirement was gone.
What’s that called, hum…. Karma I think.
Spot on. But Stevie definitely saved some for Nancy. Most likely in insurance policies and bonds and cash in different cities like lauderdale, boca, and vegas, and shifted to other families. The cash in his attic is long muled elsewhere. He also pays for most things in cash.
He travels on planes frequently and has ups/fedex deliver random boxes to and from his hotel rooms. He also used to share hotel rooms with his office manager. Why hasnt Glazer gone after nancys sister? Where is the fbi? All of this post is hearsay and speculation, but sounds legitimate. Speaking of glazer, what is the status of the civil suit?
When she goes to nj so see her sister where the money is, I hope the parole officer checks nancys car for cash before she pulls into her house back in ny.
Nance is “perfect “ Like the day care monitor said at her little low security club house.
Sigh. What pleasures it is for us mere commoners to only imagine what it might be like to even consider such perfection as does she breathe.
Oh Nancy. Oh Nancy. You, Super(Salz) man, we are all so humbled by your super-performance ( conning us all lol ) in the not so big house.
You are surely rehearsing, er-hum, erg, I mean rehabilitated! Yes, yes, that’s it! Rehabilitated! Of course you’ll never call any of those bad meanie NXVIUM-ers!
( At least none of the fall guys. It’s okay if you call the Clintons or any of the gals from the economic forum that we don’t know about! That’s just fine)
Now we know you are perfect, a true aristocrat, like the Nobel street sweeper Martin Luther King Jr spoke of;
“ If man is called to be a street sweeper, he should sweep streets even as Michaelangelo painted….” “ He should sweep the streets so well that all the hosts of heaven and earth will pause by to say, ‘ Here lived a great street sweeper who did his job well”
Oh yes Nance, this is you. MLK Jr couldn’t have said it any better.
We need fear not you shall contact any NXVIUMERS. Ohh, of course not! You are reformed-through and through.
NXVIUM truly is synonymous with Smallvilles Super-man. Absolute perfection.
Yes, yes, yes! Your past life’s leader, Adolf Hitler would be so proud of you. ( that is what you and Kieth fancied you as right ? A Nazi in a past life?)
‘Dolfy’ loved him some Superman didn’t he?
In fact Adolf Hitler glorified, the mentally ill philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche’s concept of Perfect- (People like you ) so much, it was said that Dolfy based his whole save the world agenda ( by enslaving, exploiting, experimenting on, torturing millions of people) based on his (tweaked out ) understanding of Fried’s philosophies: “GOD IS DEAD! No one is equal. Don’t have to follow the law.”
Nietzsche’s Ubermensch, or Nietzsche’s superman. He was speaking about you!
Oh yes, that sounds just like you doesn’t it? An Uber-wench, I mean mensch, just like you, one who doesn’t have to obey the laws of others.
I m so glad we finally figured this out.
Heil Salzman! Heil SUPER(Salz)MAN!
Release date from prison/halfway house for 25533-05 is Tuesday, March 19, 2024.
Where is she moving to? Staying with her daughters in NY or going to her sisters in NJ?
SusanDones MA
I often asked where Dani was as she didn’t attend any NXIVM functions even before her being held prisoner in her parents’ house.
First, the answer was that she was busy working on projects with Vanguard. (I want to throw up everyone I use that title for Raniere)
After a while, I started getting the answer that Dani was working on her breach against Vanguard.
Once I heard that, it was the thing no one could ever heal. No one ever understood what their breach really was. In nit understanding it, you could never come up with the “breach plan” the heal you breach. It was NXIVMs perfect mond trap.
I’d place money that Ben knew about Dani imprisonment. If memory serves me, I think I read somewhere he asked for her release. He himself had a breach with his Vanguard.
Dani did take the money but returned it before anyone knew it was missing. She was honest with Keith Raniere & he used that against her by lying to everyone he needed to get her locked up because she kissed someone else. Raniere didn’t mention the kiss or the money being returned.
Nancy Salzman had to have known. She knew everything.
Ben Meyers was one of the inside players with NXIVM and did a lot of computer shit for NXIVM. Some day, maybe that will come out.
As far as others knowing about Dani, I don’t think many beside maybe the inner inner circle knew about her being held prisoner. Look how long they keep branding women a big secret. Almost two years, and it was a growing group of them.
https://www.reddit.com/r/theNXIVMcase/comments/1b6d3dp/ben_myers/
Of course Ben knew. He’s a loser and he needs to be punched in the face a shitload of times.
But I disagree on why Dani was in there. After years of following this case, I’ve realized that all this happens simply because keith is just a dick. Everything keith did was to torment, humiliate, and destroy. It’s that simple.
So once you know that, you know that Dani was not in that room because she kissed Ben Myers, or stole money, or any other ethical breach or whatever you call them. Those are just excuses keith could use to justify his own amusement. Maybe he cared a little tiny bit for about five minutes.. But really he just liked that Dani was suffering and that Lauren was making her do it.
I think the end game was that wanted to see if she’d eventually kill herself, and all of it was just for sport too. He’s just a dick, that’s it.
Thought that didn’t start till after Pam died which was The End of 2016. And stopped in mid 2017, so maybe 6 months?
Ben myers and michelle salzman should be investigated by the fbi. Wtf are they waiting for??
Odin & the Sphinx
Why promote this POS?
When will the NXIVM remnants finally sell signed autograph photos?
I don’t have any yet.
They are still locked up in a room for a few years. The photos are held hostage. Oh wait….was it photos or girls Lauren Salzman and Michelle Myers locked up??
I really want to see a woman of NXIVM calendar. Featuring Lauren, Alison, Nicki,, India, Sarah E, and all those gorgeous girls that Sarah recruited. A topless calendar would be nice.
They are all flat chested.
NXIVM memorabilia is worth its money and has great potential to increase in value.
What could Nancy’s parking sign be worth? It’s simply priceless. I would have kept it and not given it away.
________________________________________________________________________
Odin & the Sphinx Paperback – January 1, 2007
by Keith Raniere (Author)
Product information
Publisher : Ethical Publishing LLC; First Edition (January 1, 2007)
ISBN-10 : 0979873207
ISBN-13 : 978-0979873201
Item weight : 998 g
Amazon Bestseller Rank: #5,702,852 in Books
Buy used $247.50
(The book is only available second-hand.)
________________________________________________________________________
goodreads
Odin & the Sphinx
Keith Rainiere, Ivy Nevares
5 stars
1 rating0 reviews
Book by Keith Raniere
Paperback
Published January 1, 2007
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35685763-odin-the-sphinx
Let’s hope Salzman’s probation officer keeps a tight leash on her and doesn’t fall prey to her juju juice of “I’m a nice old woman who was taken advantage of” BS.
She has a way of play acting with people using her NLP skills.
She broke most of her pre-sentening conditions and got away with talking to people she was court ordered not to talk to. Nancy also was ordered to not use NXIVM technology but did EMs up until right before going to prison. Even bragging about how much money she was making.
Those people she wasn’t supposed to be talking to were were out pimping her EMs for her to anyone they get to earn her money.
Salzman has been ordered to only speak to family members of NXIVM members (this includes any programs that fall under the NXIVM organization). This by a court of law means blood family or married to blood family. Not NXIVM family Nancy. She can twist this in her her mind and get confused easily.
If she runs into an Ex-NXIVM member in the store she could have an uncontrollable desire to say “Is that you” and run up and hug you.
If that happens, call the Albany probation office.
Nancy was also court order to change her work and have nothing to do in the “counseling field.
Salzman was never a certified counselor or therapist in the state of NY or any state in the US.
Salzman is a well known lair and fleeced students out of millions of dollars.
Everyone who left and got sued for whistle blowing, got sued by Nancy Salzman. That right folks. It might have been Keith Raniere who master minded the lawsuit, Clare & Sara Bronfman who paid the legal bills, but it was Nancy Salzman who signed ever lawsuit of NXIVM vs whoever.
Nancy claims she knew nothing and Raniere is to blame. This is such bullshit. She singed every and approved every legal case whistle blowers.
What she knew is beyond human decency. She is no victim here.
She is mommy dearest
The mere fact she didn’t get more time is beyond many of us.
I doubt, if watched closely she can make it through probation and not break the rules.
NXVIUM slaves were just a means to an end. NXVIUM is still happening under different names.
I got sued by Sara Bronfman, her ex husband Basit Igtet and their 2 companies for speaking out. They got me broke.
Why doesn’t Clare just join the club and lie. Renounce KR is the get out of jail card. Nance, her daughter Lauren, and Allie Mack all did it.. This was the best avenue to take. You may still believe in KR (which I think they all do), just tell the judge you renounce him. Your sentences get reduced. And in the case of Lauren no sentence at all.
And sister Michelle Salzman Myers didn’t even go to trial!! She’s the genius of the 3 of them.
Everyone hates Clare. She was known as a ruthless, dictatorial, heartless and cruel bitch. Keith used her for her money. If her and Sara were broke, they would have been thrown away like trash.
Kieth and Nancy took full advantage of Clare’s extremely low intellect and extremely large bank account.
She thought if she forked over enough money, people would respect and love her. It was quite the opposite. She pleased Kieth and Defect by suing their perceived enemies, but it turned the whole world on her.
They were effectively buying friends and love. Insecure people or people who aren’t nice need to dish out money, vacations, and food in exchange for power and control of the person they are giving out money and favors to.
Where do you think Nancy hid most of her money? We all know about Nancy’s sister Carole Kass in NJ already. What other places? Florida? Nevada? In life insurance policies or Israeli bonds?
Jew Bonds for the win
Hi Scotty!!!!!
“Gone but not forgotten….” Aye there toolbag.
Jew Bonds?!? I betsthat’s like money in the bank – much like powdered detergent or Amway water filters….
Do you remember when you were selling broken down water filters to other losers?
Yah scum!
Scotty- Jews have the one thing you wish you had—money.
You screwed over your friends and family never made a dime. LOL
You’re just a poor inbred Mormon, loser, who plays video games and has a podcast no one listens to. LOL
Boo-hoo, boo-hoo!!!!
Here’s Nancy’s sister Carole Kass of NJ. Nancy will be in Monmouth County NJ frequently!!!!
Photo credit : idcrawl
🤢
She’s looks exactly like what your lunch looks like after you upchuck it.
That looks like the result of a child between Heath Ledgers Joker and Nick Noltes arrest picture. Good grief.
Looks like the Phantom of the Opera fucked the Crypt Keeper, then botched the back-alley coat hanger abortion attempt.
Well said!
Thanks, Snorlax.
https://makeagif.com/i/Y05h2_
Try this one on for size. She’s so hot.
Photocredit: idcrawl
And she is a lock down zealot. What a sicko. The vaccine is DEADLY!!
I hear Carole and her daughter still wear medical masks everywhere. Now they have an excuse to hide their ugly faces.
Not surprised. She looks retarded.
She’s a whole prettier than Scotty’s wife….
…..Less manly too.
Who is Scotty?
He’s a former commentator….
Scotts wife puts the “ug” in “ugly”.
nice.
If you are trying to criticize or disparage Scott Johnson, please leave his ex-wife out of it. She has nothing to do with her feud with Tex Johnson. This is simply the opinion of an outsider.
Anonymous-
Scott tormented a woman whose sister committed suicide…. He tormented her for years.
***
Scott’s wife has as much interest in NXIVM as she does/did in having sex with Scott….
I know that’s true, because Scott looks like a hick gas station attendant.
She’s not on this website….
***
I’ll stop mentioning Scott’s wife it offends your sensibilities.
The poor woman served as Scott’s beard. She’s been through enough.
If you are trying to criticize or disparage Scott Johnson, please leave his ex-wife out of it. She has nothing to do with your feud with Tex Johnson. This is simply the opinion of an outsider.
If you’re an outsider, how do you know they’re divorced dummy…
If I had to guess this is nut job
I think he once expressed that himself in a comment. He is so direct and tries to be impertinent. nut job and Scott Johnson are not personally known to me.
I’m offended you’re not spelling my name correctly. The one thing I’ll share about Scott’s wife is she’s a squirter.
My sincere apologies NutJob!
Wife = 💦
***
After the next NXIVM story I shall be leaving a Big Scotty reveal comment!
Scott was never a cartoonist…
On other chat groups he pretended to be Scott Johnson the famous superhero cartoonist; all to get an audience for his MLM BS. LOL
I thought when I brought it up here he’d cop to it. Nope! LOL
Scott spent 8 years in Amway & 20 years verbally assaulting and accosting people on the internet….
Why do I care? Because I’m a crank who loves to shit on tool-bag assholes!!!!!
And Scott tortured a woman whose sister committed suicide. He is beyond repugnant!!!! He is the embodiment of human scum.
Plus the fact I need a life! And have plenty of time on my hands to shit on his loser ass. 🤣
Anonymous-
I respect your opinion and will not mention her anymore.
***
Interestingly Scott has claimed to be childless then claim to have children, he’s claimed to be married and not married….He’s not a cartoonist or a web streamer….
Scott is a looser…..
He’s reading these comments and laughing……
The big reveal is coming…..
Compliments of “Narco”!!!
Scott will get the joke!
Niceguy and Nutjob seem very emotional about Scott Johnson no longer commenting and probably no longer reading. Niceguy and Nutjob can’t seem to get over Scott, for whatever reason. It seems to be a trauma for both of them.
Scotty-
Can’t forget, more like can’t forgive!
You tortured the sister of a victim of Raniere.
You are a smelly douce bag, loser. Did you tell Frank about your halitosis?
LOL
How’s the diggs at the YMCA?
You have a PO Box at Mail Box, etc.
LOL
BTW Your kids hate your guts. Literally, they hate you.
Have a great day loser!
Will Nancy be in NJ with her sister Carole Kass and brother in law Steven Kass of Tofutti?
Photo credit: instagram
Looks like Carole fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down…
Looks more like Michael Jackson married a walking penis with glasses.
Their kids must be cute 😝
Two negatives make a positive?
https://frankreport.com/2024/01/08/nxivm-co-founder-nancy-salzman-to-be-released-from-custody-in-100-days/
https://frankreport.com/2018/12/14/some-stray-thoughts-on-nancy-salzman/