Frank Parlato
An MSN opinion-editorial “How Judge Aileen Cannon once again ruled in Trump’s favor” written by former Connecticut Family Court Judge Thomas G. Moukawsher discusses Trump’s trial of alleged mishandled classified documents at his Florida home.
Moukawsher claims:
Trump’s strategy is to delay his trials past the 2024 election. Trump’s lawyers use delay tactics by:
-
- filing motions,
- challenging jurisdiction,
- challenging the legal interest of the plaintiffs,
- attack the legality of the prosecution’s claims
- appealing the trial judge’s decisions
Moukawsher suggests the Judge Canon should combat these defense strategies by:
- Managing the flow of motions by combining them
- Taking charge of the discovery process.
- Recognize defense efforts as delay tactics and seeing things up.
Moukawsher writes:
The first way to delay a case is to drop a hailstorm of motions. First, you challenge where the lawsuit is located. For instance, Trump has claimed his election fraud case should be moved out of Washington, DC, because he can’t get a fair trial there. Next, you attack the people suing, claiming they have no recognized legal interest at stake. Trump just attacked the election fraud case on this ground. Next, you attack the way the claim was drafted. It’s defective and should be dismissed. Trump is using that one in DC and in Georgia, too….
[E]ach motion can take months to resolve….
Trump can keep the cases marching in place… until after the 2024 election….
What’s more, Trump can use the number of pending motions to justify motions that he needs more time. That’s the thing Cannon just fell for: You create work and then complain about the volume of it.
Moukaswher has a remedy:
A judge [can combine] challenges on the legal sufficiency of the claims, attempts to move the case and efforts to change the trial date….
Compressing pre-trial motions just takes care of the first wave of delay tactics.
The longest part of lawsuits is often the exchange of evidence between the two sides — what’s known as the discovery process. Both sides demand documents from the other side. The other sides object. They take the matter to court. And so on. There are always more documents, so there are always more opportunities for motions.
To slay the discovery beast, judges should take charge of the process…. Since most of the documents and witnesses the parties will require are obvious, the judge should… simply issue a court order listing the documents that must be exchanged between the parties within 30 days and ….what depositions of witnesses are allowed within 60 days…
In particularly complex cases, the judge can schedule a couple hours each week to ride herd on the evidence gathering process, hearing and resolving the parties’ claims from the bench on a single day instead of waiting weeks or months after a hearing to decide them…
Trump’s strongest timeout card is… an appeal. It used to be that you would appeal after you lost a case in the trial court. But the new rules of asymmetrical court warfare say you appeal every major ruling at every point in the proceedings. No one can stop him from appealing unfavorable final results. Normally this appeal process would buy Trump years — until long after the 2024 presidential election. But it doesn’t have to be this way. When the national interest is at stake, appeals courts should simply expedite the appeals by hopscotching other cases on their dockets…..
Moukawsher’s viewpoint reveals a disregard for due process and constitutional rights.
Motions and challenges are not mere delay tactics, but elements of the constitutional right for a defendant to attack overreaching or flawed prosecutions.
Moukawsher’s oversimplification of labeling legitimate legal maneuvers as tactics to stall proceedings fails to recognize the decisions lawyers make to win the case for the defendant – just as the prosecution, which has many inherent advantages, seeks to win its case.
Moukawsher’s suggestions to combine motions, and take control of the discovery process, reflect an enormous misunderstanding of judicial responsibilities in an adversarial system where a defendant’s liberty is on the line.
The parties have the right to present their case as they see fit. Moukawsher’s proposal to have judges dictate the exchange of documents in discovery fails to consider the complexity and nuance involved in litigation. A judge cannot predetermined the discovery process at the beginning of a case.
Another point that rises to the absurd is when Moukawsher calls appeals a delay tactic. Appeals provide a mechanism to rectify errors or injustices in lower court decisions. Suggesting that some appeals should be expedited by hopscotching over others would simply expedite some cases and delay others, and is not unfair and impartial justice.
I understand. Moukawsher wants Trump to lose, and go to prison. Lots of people do. I can imagine Moukawsher can see himself on the bench during a Trump trial, deciding the sentence first, and doing the trial afterwards. In this, he reminisces of his days as a family court judge, where there was no jury and little due process.
In family court, judges often decide which party should win and which will lose before the trial. He didn’t need a trial. He made his decision in advance. Discovery and motions were unnecessary. Appeals are merely a joke.
It doesn’t work that way outside of family court. In fact it shouldn’t work that way in family court but always will until family court tempers judge’s unbridled power with a jury.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
The main reason for fatherhood absence according to the fatherhood initiative. Is separation and divorce. PARENTAL ALIENATION, poverty and developmental difficulties. According to THERIES. There is no mention of substance abuse or domestic violence.
The family court system is fraud, exstorsion and medical malpractice. We are no longer land of the free. Thanks to the reporting we are still home of the brave. This country is supposed to be the land of opportunities. The bar card holders have taken opportunity to a whole different level. Long live the freedom of speech. Patiently waiting the next article.
Even the wall Street journal is pushing fatherhood funding. They were on Fox news. Unwed mothers and incarceration. Yet no explanation how the information is arrived at. Critical of the Republicans because they aren’t pushing it.
Misogyny is running the nation
As the state of Connecticut worries about getting information in the minority community to gain funding. Someone needs to reach out and get women of all colors and religion to vote. These court issues surrounding a specific culture. The department of labor and corrections. Many of the women who are loosing children like in the Joshua Komisarjecky case. It’s affecting women of all walks of life in Connecticut. Women are not understand how the funding works. How the department of labor in Connecticut is failing them. Involved in the state family court system. Knowledge is powerful. Voting is imperative. Women are the majority of the labor force in Connecticut. Working at McDonald’s, Dunkin donuts and family dollar. You tax dollars are funding these family court system. Women are slightly over the majority of the population. It’s time to stand up to the Connecticut politicians and demand the gender bias funding stop. We are financially contributing to the family court system problems with our tax dollars.
Perhaps the National women’s law association would take an interest? In such important matters as discrimination against women in family court? Perhaps they would take an interest in the legislation passed in Connecticut and MOU? Perhaps they would be interested in the hypothesis targeted at women in the family law industry? The access and visitation grant from the fatherhood funding? Perhaps they could look at 400 cases in the state of Connecticut.
CT.gov. the statewide collaborative the fatherhood initiative. ” Over the last several years fatherhood programming has been funded by federal grants through the department of social services budget. Pilot programs such as problem solving court and the employment pilot have been funded through the judicial branch. “
Are ALL fathers the problem?
Are ALL feds the problem?
Are ALL social service offices the problem?
Are ALL judicial branch employees the problem?
What does the data say?
Who are the victims? Who are the perpetrators? Who benefits?
If the lack of morals and decency is the actual problem, how did that happen?
Opm single Father households have increased by 76% in the last 10 years. OPM . No concern for the importance of mothers. Not all father’s are the problem. The safety and importance of mothers in family court is vanishing for funding. . The department of labor has focused on a host of topics. Including father’s working from home. Varied hours for Dads. For Mom’s they are stuck on breastfeeding. Some talk about child care. It’s above morals and decency. There being paid for. All court related agencies are a problem. Not all cases are a problem. There are key players. It’s no accident some judges are on cases. There are reasons no choice of GaL. The pushing of surtin psychologist. There are people ignoring it. For the financial benefits.
Judges will order the mothers to stop breastfeeding.
Misogyny running the country.
The office of child Advocates. 165 capital Ave. Hartford CT. Sarah Eagan. Maybe the collection of complaints against the GALs and psychologist would possibly be addressed? With a single complaint is a splash. 29 complaints could be a title wave. Maybe this office can help with the psychologist? Changing the legal landscape may be best served through accountability rather than bringing more legislation and funding? Funding for mismanagement. Wonder why this is not happening?
What authority does The Office of the Child Advocate have to prosecute 40 years of fraud and racketeering in family courts?
A group complaint about the documented abuse where cases have put children at risk to possibly get assistance. There may be a whistle blower to help. With the documented funding.
We’re going to need many whistleblowers. If ever there were a good time to be a whistleblower, this is it.
Medical malpractice with in the state court system
Many of studies have been done in high conflict divorce. The the effects on children. PTSD. The studies of false alligations. Equal distraction of false alligations by men and women. Judges are ill equipt. The GALs and psychologist are tantrrd. These children are pones in a game played by the so called family court professionals. All the pressure is on the children. It’s time for the American board of psychologist to get involved. The nations health care systems. The damage to the public from these people. Collecting thousands and yet here we on the frank report spinning our wheels. We need people who are not profiting off the system. It’s deeply in trench in our state agencies. This is why we don’t get anywhere. Our natiions family court system is developed into a health care crisis all on it’s own. It’s destroying the economic growth and development of the people as individuals in the nation. Shut down the AFCC.
Don’t forget about the surplus, raises and missing millions.
The Current lineup of the board of examiners in charge of reviewing complaints
Considered a member of the pubic
Joy Gary Esq. Staff attorney with the Connecticut prosecutor’s office.
Stacy Serraino Esp. Staff attorney Connecticut Department of banking.
Howard Oakes jr. Neuropsychologist Hartford Hospital and institute of living.
Nacy Horn Psychologist. Marriage and family. New Haven CT
Stacy Schulman. Management Resource Department at the united way. Partnered with the fatherhood initiative.
Anthoney Campagna New Haven. Marriage and family therapist
.
Hypothesis running family court.
211 The United Way. Domestic violence/Partner abuse. Under Connecticut law family violence between family members and household members either results in physical injury or fear of physical injury is going to happen. Verbal abuse by itself is not is NOT considered family violence. ( So emotional and psychological abuse is perfectly legal) . Disapline of children by their parent or guardian is not considered domestic violence unless the child is abused.( Dead or near dead). No mention of financial abuse or cohesive control. Apparently you will need to be dead or near dead for the state of Connecticut, the United way and the department of public health board examiner to take things seriously.
It’s not just the domestic violence statistics. The children suicide rates have increased nationally. By 62 percent. The reporting of the deteriorating mental health of children in the state. The statistics of children hospitalized in family law disputes is not given to the public. How much does Dr. Oakley and the family therapist know about the hospitalizations? How many complaints have been filled in regards to the privileged family court psychologist forced on the ” high conflict case” How much do these people know about the funding to health and human services from the federal government that effect family court system. How much do they know about the lack of education these people have involving abuse. The relentless push towards the hypothesis of parental alienation.
The united Way and big pharma. Representatives from phizer are all over the United Way board. Pushing vaccinations. Probably why they want to inact legislation to vaccinate children without parents permission. Probably why they don’t want to recognize psychological abuse. So they can push antidepressants. A call to 211 for help. Yet, they don’t recognize emotions and psychological abuse.
The past president of the United Way left amongst a scandal. Having sex with sisters elegidly. One was under age. Used funds for hush money. It would appear pigs are running things surrounding family court. Partnered with the fatherhood initiative.
A world wide connection. The United Way seeks to improve mobilizing the POWER of communities around the world to advance. Building EQUITABLE communities across the globe. Ignoring emotional and psychological wellness for the economic growth and development of multiple countries in the Connecticut department of public health? If the FBI is investigating. Perhaps a good look at the person reviewing complaints. Ignoring the complaints of court psychologist for the economic growth and development of the state of Connecticut? Ignoring emotional and psychological abuse as well as financial. Former president possibly having sex with minors? The economic growth and development across the globe 🌎.
1 8 million dollars donation to the health and human services of the state of Connecticut by the United Way to legalize emotional, psychological and financial abuse in the state of Connecticut? White men with fatter wallets.
Rockhill Ct, Father’s are taking an active role in in their children’s. Classrooms at CREC school to strengthen their bond with their children. Led by Anthoney Johnson. “They say it takes a village and we want to lead it” (Dads in control). ” I am going through the court system to try to establish CUSTODY and a consist parenting agreement. I just saw the disparities of fathers (because it doesn’t happen to mothers) not having the same rights in the states that mothers have. (apparently, he hasn’t read the MOU or legislation) a family (father) and community engagement coordinator. ‘ Johnson (SEEKING CUSTODY) is the mastermind of the program. There is dad exclusive movie night. Not only is it strengthening relationships, but it helps fathers meet other fathers in similar situations. (seeking CUSTODY). Fatherhood funding in the Department of Education.
The Connecticut department of labor is responsible for the fatherhood initiative. Maybe a good place to start looking at funding.
The fatherhood initiative and the department of labor is not concerned with the catastrophic damage it’s caused to women and children. The goal is not to improve these men. It’s a financial tool to gain power and funding. The use of access and visitation grant to remove custody from legally defenseless and financially disadvantage women is the cost of doing business.
How do we know that? Where’s the proof?
Take a good look at family court. Do you see these financially wealthy dads getting sent to programs? Do you see the resolution of cases? There dragged out for years. Women are instantly labeled as alienators so they don’t qualify for the access and visitation grant. How did Joshua Komisarjecky get custody? After he raped and killed his child was not returned to the mother. There is absolutely a pattern. Look at the Connecticut childrems law center. If you call to report a GALs uneithical conduct they won’t answer the phone cause of caller ID. They rather ignore the proof and information. Let the racket continue. They rather ignore the complaints filed with the department of public health. Why? Cause it may impact the funding because they don’t follow eithical conduct and policy and procedures.
Perhaps some one should let the Pedit foundation know the family court history. Since they donate to the Connecticut childrens law center. Perhaps Mr. Pedit should know how Joshua Komisarjecky got custody of his child just prior to Joshua Komisarjecky acts upon his family. How the funding and gatekeeper/alienation claims are allowing people with the potential to be just like Joshua Komisarjecky to gain sole custody of children in the state of Connecticut.
HHS office of inspector general. 330 independence Ave. SW Washington DC 20201 international investigation. Whistleblowers.
I wonder how long Elizabeth Thayer and the board of examiners from the Connecticut department of public health have been allowing a person with a doctorate in education to be providing educational services on public health care crisis? I wounder how long Mr Edwards has been providing education on psychological issues such as grief and loss in Saint Francis and Hartford Hospital? I wounder how long he has been providing education on the public health care crisis to the family court system? I wonder how long a non medical professional has been doing rounds in obgyn? I 🤔 wonder if Attorney Brody wonders about this. I wonder if Attorney Brody knows even license psychologist with degrees in psychology with education in domestic violence are not training the court system? I would think the Connecticut childrems law center would be concerned about this? Maybe because of the fatherhood initiative federal welfare reform funding they just don’t bother to think about it?
So many good, common sense statements about the “family court” system in the comment sections here. 🙂
Many of the most pressing issues mentioned have already been raised and rejected in the Connecticut legislative process. For the past few decades, good bills submitted with all the right intent and potential have been at the state and federal level. Looking at all the never-ending complaints from the public about family courts, one of the most important questions about “family courts” in each state has to be:
Which state officials and legislators would want “family courts” to destroy families?
Lots of good legislators and officials out there. Many authored and pushed through good laws, recently. Meanwhile, some of the same lawyers, officials and private vendors who harmed children and families for decades are still allowed to still harm children and families today. Another important question to answer is:
How are they allowed to still harm children and families in “family courts”?
On the bright side, lots of progress has been made thanks to a few good people.
For example:
https://www.law.gwu.edu/national-family-violence-law-center
Perhaps the National family violence law center could assist in cleaning up the state of Connecticut. Starting with the Board of examiners for psychologist in the state of Connecticut. Ignoring and falling to follow up on complaints filed against AFCC members? It’s not just Calvary. Perhaps the reduction of family violence in Connecticut could start with the people who are covering up and ignoring it? Possibly for federal grants. Legislation does little good when people are allowed to engage in conduct that increases the risk and is using hypothesis to increase profit. Maybe cleaning up the agencies surrounding the family court is needed a change so the legislation can actually have an effect on the situation? The law center in charge of the legal representation of at risk children needs to be under the watchful eyes of people who are not financially gaining from the court system? Legislation is important and so is acceptability to ensure the legislation is being used as intended? Legislation such as Jennifer’s law is not misused by the family law attorneys. Being allowed to engage in preditory legal practice. Using AFCC members guiding cases into alienation and cohesive control through questionable evaluators and GALs. Not monitored by people who rely on the federal funding for their lively hood and future retirement benefits.
Oversight and following through with much-needed accountability will help. Who gets paid to do that and who volunteers for the job?
Unfortunately, Jennifer’s law was misused in one of the first cases to feature “Jennifer’s Law” in Connecticut. So, who has the courage to truly investigate in order to report exactly how Mr. Cuda, Mr. O’Neill, Mr. Goulden and Mr. Nusbaum turned Jennifer’s Law into another family law insider joke?
Was Mr. Stafstrom at Pullman and Comley part of that stunt? Did Ms. Munro and/or Mr. Holzberg at the Bridgeport Pullman and Comley office ask for favors to cover for Mr. Adelman? Ms. Munro and Mr. Adelman were two lead players in the Connecticut AFCC Inc. racket. Mr. Stafstrom and Ms. Munro are colleagues at Pullman and Comley. Mr. Stafstrom led the judiciary committee confirmation hearings in which the state representative somehow predicted Mr. O’Neill’s managing of the Ambrose case.
Apparently, Mr. Cuda, Mr. O’Neill and Mr. Goulden didn’t know:
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2023/rpt/pdf/2023-R-0107.pdf
Did Mr. Cuda, Mr. O’Neill and Mr. Goulden not need to let the “victims” testify?
New owners and managers at The Hartford Courant are the same as the old owners and managers at The Hartford Courant. Do Hartford Courant writers interested in finding the root of Connecticut family court news know they can write only fluff and no substance? Do they know the destruction of so many families in Connecticut family court is the direct result of inadequate mainstream news?
The twenty or so individuals who ran that destructive family court racketeering in Connecticut for the past forty years knew no one would stop them. They knew The Hartford Courant wouldn’t investigate or report what they were doing.
What does the new owner of The Hartford Courant know about Connecticut family court corruption? Will The Hartford Courant report the Connecticut AFCC Inc. racketeering in the Boyne case?
Such devastating destruction of so families in family courts doesn’t happen by mistake.
Please list the twelve.. I think there’s many more behind the curtain 😞. This is a well organized group of people who put Dan Brody in place to help assist in the cover up. In my opinion. Perhaps copper head Cuda step down from the bar association cause Frank heated up the publicity. Is there any focus on the document Paul Boyne was in possession of? Will it be ignored because of his written comments? There is plenty going on in Hartford behind the curtain. There is a separate bar association who has tons of people from the attorney general’s office, and even child support office formally. Does this bar association take complaints? Maybe senitor Gary Whitfield and attorneys general William Tong knows if they review complaints? This bar association may have a better working knowledge of violations of policy and procedures, codes of conduct and eithics due to their background.
He’s on the board of directors at The Children’s Law Center of Connecticut.
How can he help?
I don’t think he can help the people complaining. But if he wants to be of assistance maybe he needs to help weed out these AFCC members. There should be more oversight in the actions and conduct of these so called court professionals. Is there a standard for child legal representation other than the very brief education Linda is running? Maybe Lynda should not be running the GAL training. How much culture and gender specific training is influenced a system servings multiple cultures and genders?
Attorney Brody, As a member of the board of the Connecticut childrems legal services what do you plan to do in a system reported as currupt and the worst in the country? Why would you ask a while collar crime attorney take on the position of council at the Ccadv for restraining orders? Racettering and the possible misuse of government funding are your specialty to defend against. I think the domestic violence community and family court litigants deserve an answer. With all due respect your strategic nomitions and placement in significant organization is questionable. The top criminal defense is for nonprofit and government organization involved in investigation of white collar crimes. Which people are asking the government to investigate matters of criminal conduct in our state surrounding family court system.
https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/connecticut-river-holyoke-massachusetts-sewage-18519294.php
April 2020. Brown state of Connecticut comptroller office. Regarding blowing the whistle on the states benefits and retirement. It appears that the question as to the state benefits and retirement. The right to free speech.
Board of Members Connecticut Children Law Center. THE GALS
Patricia Magnano- President
Cara Hardacker- Vice president
Johnathan Fink-Vice President
Carolyn Fink- Secretary
Melissa Arkus
Peggy Boissoneau
Dan Brody SUPER LAWYER WHITE COLLAR CRINIMAL DEFENSE, PBRO PROJECT (restraining order project) CCADV. Business litigation, GOVERMENT ENFORCEMENT CRIMINAL DEFENSE at Robinson & Cole.
Tim Buckley
Fatime Lobe
Patricia Pheanious
Patricia Proctor
Rashani Swaby
Elizabeth Thayer A co parent counselor Psychologist involved in family court matters. A Beacon of hope. Behavioral health. Board member for the Connecticut department of public health board examiner for psychology. Unclear if she remains on the board. Strongly opposed to proposed legislation HB6267. She believes she is best to review if a psychologist has violated the American Board of psychologist Ethical standards. Former PRESIDENT OF THE AFCC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why is a criminal defense attorney regarded as the best white collar crimes involved in the Connecticut child family law center? A lawyer in charge of defending non profit organizations against white collar crimes. Department of justice probes and FBI investigations? Involved in the Ccadv? A criminal defense attorney providing counseling on restraining order? Intimate knowledge of the worst family court cases run through the Connecticut family court. I’m sorry but this makes no sense. Is a giant red flag during the “soap opera” . Is there something to defend against? Why is this Uconn grad high powered white collar criminal defense attorney so involved with family court system agencies?
Elizabeth Thayer. West Hartford CT. Co founder of the peace program. Education in collaboration with Barbara Aaron. Megan Freed and Kristen Marcroft. Freedmarcrof is one of the largest costliest legal firms in the state. Reported to engage in preditory legal practice. Divorce mediation services. Access and visitation grant pay for mediation services as well as psychological services for non custodial parents. Deeply involved in AFCC matters. On the board of examiners for the state department of public health for psychologist. In all likelihood why the complaints go no where. It’s a stand of practice to only provide services in an area you are compliant in. Many of these psychologist involved in family court have no advanced training in their education in relivent matters such as domestic violence. The family court system is running on the hypothesis of parental alienation. Not recognized by the American board of psychologist. Elizabeth Thayer doesn’t seem to think that’s something to be concerned about?
Compitant means you have been educated to be compitant in the areas of psychology you are practicing in. Is being a member of the AFCC bypass continuing education? Does it allow you to negate eithical practice guidelines because it’s court related? Keep filling complaints people. We shall see if the department of public health examiners office for psychologist in the state of Connecticut are protecting the public? These court professionals have a free pass and no real oversight. ? This is beyond the family court system. Billions of dollars in federal funding from grants is involved.
As long as state/federal law enforcement doesn’t actively investigate and prosecute, why would family court lawyers, family court judges, family court evaluators and/or administrators blow the whistle on racketeering in AFCC, Inc. public-private closed-to-everyone-except-themselves for-profit networks?
Please pay specific attention to the representation of the board of education and fatherhood initiative funding. The department of public health and grant funding. The specific protection granted to the AFCC psychologist and exclusive use and lack of accountability from dph. The financial resources to Uconn health and human services
The Connecticut Child Law Center. Manage and presents a training program for child advocate to support and educate ATTORNEYS, MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS INVOLED WITH CHILDREN. WHOSE FAMILIES ARE INVOLVED IN FAMILY COURT DISPUTES. With a gender specific fatherhood initiate leader within the culture of his choosing. There is plenty of reasons to believe there is gender bias in the state of Connecticut. The state of Connecticut it’s financially and educationally in every aspect of the Connecticut Family Court system. Doug Edwards Real fathers are forever and there will be multiple mothers. Federal Funded welfare reform act fatherhood initiative. Past president of the Connecticut Child Family Law Center. The representation of minors in the family law courts throughout the state of Connecticut.
Could you be a little more specific about the reasons to believe there is gender bias in the state of Connecticut?
Which cases? Who did what and who was harmed? We can use initials to openly discuss the case(s) without the drama. Open discussions don’t usually happen without drama when there’s so much corruption involved. There’s so much corruption in the courts and we so need open discussion about it. The generalizations are interesting, but don’t tell us about specific violations of law in specific cases.
Laws ( general statues) and agreements have been made in the state of Connecticut focused on a specific gender. These agreements are attached to funding. The fatherhood initiative has been instrumental in guiding cases into alienation cases. While one mother with substance abuse that got help is declared unable to be the custodial parent. Hand cuffed to hospital beds. The red carpet is rolled out for a father who has an ongoing battle. Ignored by the court. It’s connected to the department of labor. Contributing to democratic campaign funds.There is definitely a discrepancy in the management of cases. Attorneys can withhold funds, fail to disclose third party payers. Attorneys sign off on financial affidavit then sign off on mortgage with a different income and different employer. The point being some attorneys are allowed to engage in any conduct they wish. Judges will defend and sweep it under the rug. Reporting these things could result in loss of funding and prevent the Attorney from continuing to engage in these types of tactics. Using funding to attempt to financially subdue opposing clients. No idea if grant funding was used for the forced “reunification therapy” . These judges and complaint agencies brush these things off. If you are a well connected Attorney and represent an agency connected to a larger organization you case will be handled in an all together different fashion. When you complain about misconduct, violations to general statues and conflicts of interest and discrepancy you are threatened as uncooperative. Judges have the fundamental right to create fear and intimidation with judicial discretion to litigants and their Attorneys.Guide cases into any direction with the assistance of a guardian ad lithium who was patently awaiting in the hallway to get assigned to the case. A guaranteed payment. A now well known AFCC player that is assigned to case by judges with out being provided a list. Pushing for an AFCC psychologist to keep the entire case going even after they abandon it. Right down the road from former psychologist that was the head of the AFCC taking complaints. Attorney will withhold evidence from a judge to stretch cases out. When you complain you will get a lecture on father’s rights cause you don’t have any. Your complaints will be brushed off and unfortunately these types of situations will be allowed to continue to the next unsuspecting victim who is forced to go to court in Connecticut for divorce and custody issues.
You can contact Attorney general William Tongs office for further details. They know all about it. They have no power over curruption in the family court system. He’s busy Christmas shopping with the comptroller. Taking photos and sampling food around the state.
2008. Robert Patterson received probation for standing by and allowing his child to be starved and dehydrated. Represented by Jane Grossman. 2018 Natatashia Figuerora sentenced to 3 years in prison for standing by while her boyfriend burned the hands of her daughters. They both belong in jail. Yet the daddy who’s son died is on probation. This is typical of the state of Connecticut. The fatherhood money maker.
There is no room for discrimination in the USA. Who is being discriminated against? Are court rulings both civil and criminal beings based on gender and culture? Not just the monetized individual? Look no further than the fatherhood initiative at Uconn. Video already on the frank blog. Targeting white women with designer hand bags. Privileged. Creating and fueling racial division of America. Segregation of men and women.As well as the based on color. Our country has no room for hate and encouraging racial divide. No room for promotion of the importance of one gender. Until the profit of funding is strictly monitored we can not fix Connecticut. Jane Grossman has known for a long time about funding I’m sure. How numbers work and how they effected by rulings. I’m fairly sure they all do. Including the political leaders. Who is this funding benefiting? Not the children in Connecticut. The political leaders don’t want to look into it. Benefits, retirement and surplus.
. The courts are going to the gals because they are not mandatory reporters. The family services division is being bypassed. The family services until would have to report. The aligations of abuse are never investigated and the court appointed psychologist. These children are hidden away from other professionals. A list of GALs past and present from the child family law center of Connecticut must be available. The dates that Doug Edwards was the president are important. Who is the current president? These gals are not fact finding for the courts. They appear to be stopping pediphia and abuse from being investigated and prosecuted. Keep at list of all the case where no choice of gals. These cases will be important for the future.
I’m pretty sure Attorneys don’t qualify to be engaged in mental health services. I’m pretty sure they are not qualified to decide services are needed. I guess you can in Connecticut if your AFCC.
Tampering with a witness.
It’s pass time for a lawsuit. The state of Connecticut is intentionally leaving out gender as a protected class in anything other than employment. A mass filing with chro to change the legal landscape in Connecticut. Is the ACLU interested in eliminating discrimination? So far the haven’t answered the call to action. It would appear there are hundreds of women to lead the mission of equality in family court. To protect thousands.
Maybe the ACLU could use their project flashlight to gather family court system injustice? Transparency.
Connecticut culture center around men. The majority of financial contribution to the economic development of the country. Old fashion values outdated father’s the head of the family. Father’s and families. Mothers are second class citizen. With less earing potential. Birthing person. Linguistics. Women are be seen and not heard along with the children. They are property of the fathers. Less equal due to decrease earning capacity. Lives are worth less than that of the father. Risked for the economic development. Cultural perception that women are a financial drain on society. Dad is less likely to require financial assistance. Women are culturally perceived as hysterical, vengeful and alienators based on gatekeeping. To blame for unwed pregnancy.
Has anyone asked them for help, yet?
Yes, multiple times
What did they say?
A few years after a handful of lawyers established The American Law Institute in 1923, pedophile Rene Guyon and ACLU lawyer Morris Ernst created new American Model Penal Codes. How the most perverted created today’s family courts is anyone’s guess.
The entire family court system has been fueled by funding to allow discrimination. It’s allowed for vengeance . To enacting of a privatized family court system to secretly gain power and money. This is a deeply entrenched in politics. Protected to ensure wealth to privilege. There is no insensitive to straighten this system out. The removal of the people ignoring and continuing to control and silence the public. It’s the elected officials. The few minutes people are given during open hearing will not resolve this. People are being ignored. . Neither will more legislation to bring more money to the state. It must be brought to the attention of the people. Social media has begun to open the eyes of people. The violations and misuse of state contracts surrounding the child support office, the health and human services. Fatherhood initiative. It is being used as a weapon. The majority of the family court system problems rest with the department of public health, department of education and the department of labor. The state government is responsible for the failure to protect the public from the business model that is being manipulated by the family court system and preditory legal practice. The preditiry family law attorneys are taking advantage of the state system. The judges are protecting them. The political leaders are protecting the judges. It’s a cruel and inhumane conditions in the family court system that is rooted in government funding. The senitors are ignoring it with the help of legislators. Connecticut has been leading the way. As long as it’s politics as usual. If you want accountability it starts with the election poles. We need senitors willing to address the funding. We need to get the publics power back to place responsible judges on the bench. The bar association complaints need to be made public and more community members need to be involved in oversight to hold the preditory Attorneys accountable. The secret business of family court needs public oversight. These politicians are not doing their job. The election poles need monitoring. We need a legal system straightened out for the economic growth and development of the public at large. We need a safe place to live and speak out and important things effecting people. Tossed in jail, financially destroyed and dead in some cases. Why has this become exceptible? MONEY 💰.
workshops/training presentations
Staff development training Dept of social services and JUDICAL DEPARTMENT, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
Fatherhood training classes ST. Joseph’s college school of social work, Goodwin college Early childhood program
Staff development training for voluntary paternity testing (Manchester Community College, Tunxis Community College, Housatonic CC, Three rivers CC, Asnuntuck CC.
Staff development training for Capital Regional Education Council and State Department of Education.
Staff Development Training for East Hartford, Manchester, Bristol. Board of Education Head Start
Fatherhood Workshop for state department of education, school, family and community partnership administration
Staff Development Training for Community renewal Team Head start/early learning programs
Staff Development training for Thames Valley Counsil for community action. Norwich CT
Presenter ‘ parental involvement /parent leadership Conference training institute. 100 black men of America annule Leadership conference, Miami FL. Jacksonville Mississippi, Los Vagas Navada.
Presenter ‘Transcending Fatherhood Challenges” Corrigan-Radgowski, MacDougall Walker at Suffield. Osborne at Somers, Correctional Institutions of Connecticut.
Keynote Speech in California DSS, Parent Leadership Conference /Sacramento CA.
Development conducted and presented “A need assessment. A father’s perspective. Issues related to grief. Area Health education Center East Hartford CT.
GRAND ROUNDS WITH OB-GYN PHYSICIANS AND MATERNITYNURSES. Hartford and St. Francis Hospital. A father’s perspective on grief and loss.
Workshop on THE ART AND SCIENCE OF ENGAGING MEN IN THE LIVES OF THEIR CHILDREN. AT THE TOGETHER WE WILL!!!!!! CONFERENCE IN CROMWELL.
Presenter: Why do children need fathers need MEN. child conversation in Windsor CT.
Workshop presenter The value of MEN in the lives of a child. CT association of foster and adoption parents.
The presenter Connect Forever: Centering pregnancy with real dads. Heathcare conference in San Antonio TX
Why do you do to help your child succeed in school. Ct association Education Stratford
Engaging Dads and men. Marlboro Ma
Paternal Prenatal Early Attachment MATERNAL CHILD HEALTH New Haven, CT
Do kids really need Men. UConn NEAG school of education PACT
The L.I.F.E conference, The Childs workshop Tauten MA
Together Dad and MOM build a nest. (this is the forced sharing living space approach) for family Workers, MSPCC. Fathers and families Network. Holyoke MA.
Children need healthy and safe moms and dads.
Corruption, greed and Marxism pushed on children and parents in family courts is what’s wrecking families. Zero oversight and zero accountability have kept it going. Men, women and children have all been destroyed.
“For the wages of sin is death: but the gift of God is eternal life …
Maximus inc contract. The economic development of the state. Modeling the state insurance after the companies that provide minimal benefits and red tape coverage. Reduction of Medicare benefits. They are also reducing TANF benefits. There is no focus on a safe plan how. Reducing the number of mothers head of household with children in need of assistance. Through family court? DCF? Maximus inc contribution to organization. Possibly the fatherhood initiative. Maximus inc is a business plan focused on to increase money to the state. How is the state of Connecticut going about that? It would appear reduction of incarceration costs, welfare assistance to mothers including domestic violence victims. Awarding custody to the monetized parent. The states slashing of benefits for the people. Increase pay for political leaders. Balance budget for benefits and retirement funds. Surplus. The ignoring of the needs of the public. I’m sure that the police are pressured to pass out tickets in Connecticut. The bogus tickets scam just didn’t come out of nowhere. While state employees receive raises and great benefits. Secure retirement funds the little people paying taxes and working to fill low paying jobs are quickly facing insecure future. The ACLU is focused on individual groups effected. Is aware of politics hurting the minority community. Yet, the larger number of women effected of all colors and religion and background is not being addressed. State is making money off child support. Crimes, the family court system and reduction of blanket immunity. This is effecting women, men of all colors and religion. The intentions of welfare reform act was to reduce the government cost. Allowing for enough money to address the issue facing the country. The people in the United States are suffering financially as the state employees are benefiting. No one wants to investigate or bring suit and case law to address it or possibly expose the problem. Because it would reduce state surplus for “filling in the budget gaps” trips to the beach. GALs over the family relations office. Evidenceless family court. A court of equity. It’s all about the economic development of the top and sacrifices to the less prominent members of society. A good look at the federally funded welfare reform act and the criminal justice system is long overdue.
Where do we focus first?
Maybe narrow those generalizations to a few specific causes >>> effects >>> results?
You are absolutely right. Maximus inc is a business. Health care is going to hell and so is the family court. The only one it’s beneficial to is the state employees and the attorneys working the system. The insurance is ruling your health and human services are helping to rule the family court system. All profiting at the expense of people.
Some one should ask William Tong why he has allowed a gender and culture specific program to be run through out state business without out equal representation for the opposite gender and leaving out other customers?
Maybe start with a letter to his office to publish the letter and the response? 🤔
Reaching out to the state of Connecticut can become dangerous. People are landing dead when they ask too many questions and bring forward questionable information. There are Soo many stories. Even two young men who brought forward police brutality. The mans children were taken years later by DCF and his wife was forced to divorce him to get the children back. They were run out of the state. There is a long list of information that brings concern for your life over these types of issues. There are billions of dollars involved
The “gender and culture specific program” you reference is The Fatherhood Initiative funding, right?
Let’s find actual data to show in a clear and convincing way:
How all state and federal funds have been misused in family courts
For example:
Where’s the data to show exactly how many dollars from which state/federal funds were used to destroy families and/or benefit lawyers and private vendors in family court cases?
Gerard Adelman, Robert Horwitz, Sidney Horowitz, Lynda Munro and other beneficiaries of the Connecticut AFCC, Inc. racketeering ran the “training” programs for the state’s family courts for years. That was quite a deal.
How much money did those involved make off of “family court” cases they passed to and from each other — with judicial authority, judicial immunity and judicial contacts?
Fortunately:
Question:
How much longer is Patrick L. Carroll III to be called “Honorable” if he knew about the Connecticut AFCC, Inc. public-private court racketeering and did nothing to stop it?
Doug Edwards rounding in obgyn. Unwed mothers. The social worker in the hospital encourage unwed fathers not to sign birth certificate. Father’s age approached multiple times. Insinuating that the unwed mothers are of poor moral character. Once is enough, yet they approach them multiple times. Discuss that signing the birth certificate is a child support obligation. So if you don’t want to pay child support don’t sign the birth certificate.
According to the website. Real dad’s area forever it’s gender specific and services culture. Connecticut organization and the court system services all genders and cultures. Education and promotions of responsible fatherhood are a multi cultural issue. Motherhood has no voice in the family court system and no funding. Women have been systematicly through funding being discriminated against, devalued and turned into a birthing person and no longer considered a parent. Is a multi cultural problem.
The Bias and discrimination in the family Law courts. The head of the sneak. May I interduce you to Doug Edwards. Real Dads are forever hailing out of Manchester Connecticut! Doug Edwards is the founder of Real Dads are forever, A fatherhood strategies Development organization. He has facilitated for and consulted for the department of social services,
State department of Education
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Department of Corrections
School readiness and head start
Many public and private schools
Family Development Centers in New England
FOCUSING ON FATHERS AND FAMILIES
Doug is a founding member of the Advisory Council of the Fatherhood Advisory Council of the fatherhood initiative of Connecticut and members of the executive committee. AS WELL AS THE PAST PRESIDENT OF THE CHILDRENS FAMILY LAW CENTER OF CONNECTICUT!!!!!!!! (the GALS)!!!!!!!!!
He was formally the statewide Coordinator For parents supporting educational excellence,
and master facilitator trainer for the parent leadership training in addition he has received and certified Family Development credentials. He provides for triple P. (positive parenting program). He is a trainer and consultant for the department of social services.
He currently chairs the advisory board for family development Network in Manchester and is on the BOARD ADVISING BOARD OF THE CONNECTICUT JUDICAL SYSTEM PARENTING EDUCATION PROGRAM!!!!!!!
Doug travels throughout the country presenting at conferences, developing conferences, developing and facilitating workshops. Providing professional development, training staff and motivating parents
MOST OF ALL!!!! Doug Edwards IS A MEMBER OF THE CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADVISORY BOARD FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH ADVISORY BOARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A member of fetal infant mortality cases and community review teams.
He is an author of the curriculum, parental prenatal early attachment. He designs and facilitates the fatherhood curricula and father and parent workshop. He has spoken to hundreds of groups and thousands of MEN. Dozens of school groups.
Welcome to the reason women’s complaints in Connecticut don’t go anywhere and why the department of public health complaints against the psychologist go nowhere.!!!!!!! Why the FBI has to investigate CALVERY. Why the ” gatekeeper/parental alienation ” keeps alive and well in Connecticut family court. The labeling of Maternal (mothers) as mentally altered during divorce proceeding continues. More fatherhood programs and recruitment more federal funding for the state. No domestic violence training or legislation to include mothers in Connecticut. GAL complaints go nowhere!!!!!!
What is the education this gentleman 😮 involved in family court and state programs? Women have no representation or funding for mothers and families.
The near-total lack of public participation in government is what got us into this mess, not criminals who weaseled their ways up to the top of the heap for profit and prestige.
Comments, likes and complaints help in public forums, but they don’t help enough. Speaking at public hearings helps more, but it hasn’t helped enough. We need better people in government and better people in law enforcement. Millions of crimes have been committed against children and families for decades in family courts and who’s addressed those crimes?
Would grand juries help? The former director of Connecticut AFCC, Inc. seems to be afraid of grand juries. If he’s afraid of grand juries, is it because grand juries would help?
A small law firm in Pennsylvania took on the kids for cash scandal in Pennsylvania and justice snowballed from there. May all of New England get lots of snow this winter.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
The public is absolutely in the dark. The Media is censored. The public is labeled as discruntaled. People appear to be tossed in jail, run out of the state or murdered. Silenced. Grand jurys don’t exist in the state.
Grand juries don’t exist in Connecticut? 🤔
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2017/TOB/h/2017HB-07257-R00-HB.htm
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/OCPD/Bills/Bills2017/7257GrandJuryFNLpdf.pdf
Federal funding for a specific gender and culture . There is a unilateral problem in the state of Connecticut. It’s not being addressed. Financially disadvantage women are being tossed in the trash 🗑️ by the system
“Federal funding for a specific gender and culture. …”
It is listed on the website. Specifically states genders specific. A federally funded program. Would be interesting to see the content. Cultural specific. The education is about father’s. It’s applied to all cultures. There is no equal education on motherhood.. The important of mothers. It’s definitely federal funding to promote a specific gender effecting the family court. Wonder how they define culture? It’s definitely effecting women of all colors and religion. It’s a fatherhood initiative program collecting funding. It’s gone nationwide. It’s would running through the prison system. Moms loosing custody with out counsel. Women are reporting discrimination by the school system. Department of education. Two documented cases in Connecticut. Unanswered complaints with the department of public health.
Access and visitation grant. Look at the prison program. PPE loans. Look at the number of women going to court unrepresented. Women who have attempted to get a lawyer for legal aid who were denyed. Need to speak up. Why was Karen not given a family law attorney. The public defender did a good job despite his lack of family court experience. No family law experience. Why are these Gals and psychologist not under heavy oversight? Look at DCF. Shameful.
Can Rhonda Stearley-Hebert do more to help Connecticut courts than Tom Moukawsher?
https://epaper.theday.com/article/281797108743935
If she knows about CT AFCC, Inc. crimes, can she even say she knows?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UuY19WNovwiGGYFG9ktZAhTaT-eXfJGa/view?usp=sharing
https://sz.linkedin.com/posts/susan-bassi-48783879_i-cried-when-i-read-the-coroners-report-activity-7054299158119137280-oH9e
“ A judge cannot predetermined the discovery process at the beginning of a case.”
Welcome to Connecticut! 😂🤣😂🤣
Everyone can name today’s monopolies.
Call today’s governor’s office and ask the staff how Microsoft will monopolize business in the state in the next few years. The worst politicians, judges and lawyers protect monopolies, not citizens.
It’s gone on for quite a while.
“… In 1645, he obtained title to lands in southeastern Connecticut and founded New London in 1646, where he settled in 1650. He built a grist mill in the town and was granted a monopoly on the trade for as long as he or his heirs maintained it. This was one of the first monopolies granted in New England. …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Winthrop_the_Younger
Does Mr. Moukawsher only write to pontificate? Will he ever write to prompt effective investigations and actual court reform?
For example, yet another case:
https://portal.ct.gov/DCJ/Press-Room/Press-Releases/09142023Gardner
If Mr. Moukawsher knows about the Gardner case, does he wonder how the state failed that child for so long?
Who in Connecticut wants to seal that case?
Which state office should have protected that child and didn’t?
Mouckwsher appears to want to fast track the states most concerning cases. Does he even mention the safety of the in his book?
Bernadette Conway and Gerard Adelman probably ordered this therapy for the teens:
“… Through his initial questions, Koetsch seemed to try to shed doubt on the victim’s memory by asking questions about things like what Gardner was wearing and what color the walls were in a room during acts of sexual abuse the victim claimed occurred …”
https://www.newstimes.com/news/article/danbury-teacher-kenneth-gardner-sex-abuse-trial-18338488.php
Something’s wrong with Connecticut family courts.
Was it this past spring when Gerard Adelman offered a lecture to (the Middletown?) Senior Center? After his lecture, he opened the floor to a question and answer session. The first question from his audience was from a senior who asked him about the grand jury system in Connecticut. Whoever was filming Mr. Adelman’s lecture tapped loudly (with a ring, maybe?) on the camera a few times. Mr. Adelman looked toward the camera as though som kind of message was received. He answered the question saying something about Connecticut not using grand juries, something about the grand jury system being used rarely — “very rarely” — he then moved on to answer the next question from his audience.
Is the grand jury system used “very rarely” in Connecticut?
I just read this in the news today:
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/weston-man-embezzled-890k-from-milford-company-18497423.php?src=rdctpartribbon
Records of:
should be stored in some office, somewhere.
Which office has those records?
Judge Gerard I. Alderman On How Ct. Courts WorkAt The Senior Center Tuesday April 25th
The last video shows the audience questions … and Mr. Adelman’s interesting answers.
https://patch.com/connecticut/middletown-ct/judge-gerard-i-alderman-how-ct-courts-work
April 25th is “Parental Alienation Day!”. 🇺🇸
According to the Connecticut judicial website statewide lega.l aid is supposed to provide low income residents legal services. Including in civil matters.
Be careful. When my child’s custody case started, I asked Connecticut Legal Services for help. At the time, I had no idea how the corrupt networks work in Connecticut.
My child’s father was mentally ill and dangerous so I asked Connecticut Legal Services to file motions for a guardian ad litem and a psychological evaluation. I thought the guardian ad litem would know how to protect my child. A CLS attorney who seemed to be a decent person took the case and filed the motions.
The guardian ad litem assigned to the case refused to look at the police records — about 50 incidents. I gave her two huge file folders of information when she took the case. She told me to go to her office and when I got there, she gave me the files and told me she didn’t look at them. She told me her children couldn’t wait to see their father at the end of each day. It was so totally bizarre. I remember crying in her office, thinking “how is this happening?”.
The whole case was then so mishandled and a total nightmare. That total nightmare approach seemed to be deliberate. Horrible people somehow control the “family courts” in Connecticut. If your children are in danger, leave the state if your case isn’t in “family court” yet.
Find a list of the best states/countries that protect children in family courts. Raise your children in one of those states/countries if you can.
Many of women have been wondering ” ,why this is happening to them and their children”. Connecticut is no place to keep your self or your children safe.
Just wondering how come people act like conneticit is worse than other place. NYC /WASH /LA ARE INCOMPREHENSIBLE
FR is covering a few cases in Connecticut, New York, California … You’re right. The same corruption/racketeering is in so many family courts all over America and many nations, too. New Hampshire, New Jersey, Maine, Florida, Texas … Canada, The Netherlands, Australia, Spain … the same exact pattern of corruption hit family courts all over the world — just like the mandatory masks and mandatory injections… Hmm.
The Fall of Connecticut the leader is the key. They are legalizing pediphia and abuse. Once the government of the state Connecticut falls and the curruption is predicted. It will all be exposed. . Several states employees and government officials need to be prosecuted for crimes against humanity. It’s the policy figures. The warfare reform. Fatherhood initiative funding. The biggest criminal and problem in family court appears to be senitor Richmond Blumenthal. The leader and the head of the snake.
Why do you think Senator Blumenthal is a big part of the problem? I wouldn’t doubt it – – just wondering if you have evidence of something actionable.
What’s the explanation for that?
Look into the Wilkinson case. He’s attempting to inact legislation to protect pedophiles. He promotes Sara Russell doing the same. He represents a state allowing legislation promoting a gender with funding attached. He keeps screaming about hate but doesn’t address discrimination. Attorney general William Tong office is attempting to turn a sexual assault into a hate crime in the media. Crimes against women in Connecticut are ignored and the courts are labeled a soap opera. Used as an excuse to ignore the violent crimes occuring in the state. There is a surplus of money floating around in Connecticut. The political leaders bragging. Marching on the campus of Uconn. A long history with a “rape trail”. Home of the health and human services fatherhood initiative. Rewarding themselves with a trip to the beach. While child care cost are skyrocketing. The state assistance declines. Making quality child care for single moms or fathers impossible. There is a large reduction in the prosecution of crimes. A huge amount of criminal records are being excused. The state has a big surplus of money. If it were not for a lawsuit DCF Warehouseing children in a facility raping and beating children would remain open. Hysterical people. This is disgusting. The FBI is investigating the Berlin turnpike in Newington for sex trafficking. Reported to be one of the largest sex trafficking operations. Including children. Yet only two rapes were reported. The navy seals had a sting operation where thousands responded in 24 hrs. Richard Blumenthal is trying to protect them with legislation. Pushing Sara Russell who wants the same in a federal bench. He’s attended Communist party gatherings. He could care less about happening in his state legal system. He doesn’t appear to be at all concerned about public safety. Especially for women and children. He’s all about the money pouring into the state. In the last 10 years 76 percent of single father’s households. With the help of fatherhood initiative funding. Women are going to family court unrepresented with out knowledge of the court. He brushes everything off as drama as an excuse not to address the family court system problems. Because it financially beneficially to do so. Deeply inbeded in the country government and leading the way. People working in the state offices say he is most concerned with power and not the people. Which appears true considering he is ignoring problems in the state and focusing on gathering a surplus.
Maybe it should be a day of self reflection.
Only one percent of the world population has hystronic personality disorder. 1.5 have borderline personality disorder. 5 percent have narrsatic personality disorder. The majority of these cases are a narrsatic parent. Narrsatic personality disorder is the inability to see how one’s actions effect another. Grandiosity and placing one’s self as more important than another. Narrasist are unable to see their self as being at fault in any way. I don’t think judge Mouckwsher is knowledgeable and savvy enough to see what is happening in his family court. He’s been blaming women for the family fall out. He appears to want to skip over the fact finding and ignore it.
Moukawsher is a scumbag appearing to play a god role protecting other scumbags in the Connecticut Family Court system. Just criminal
So says the judge Moukawsher that never awarded and respected the parental rights of a mother to have a relationship with her children and also let a man off the hook on paying alimony that he was actually supposed to pay!
Then allowing that father to continue to have custody after the GAL made on the record onTranscript specifically that the only reason that the children do not speak to the mother is because they are afraid of the WRATH OF THEIR FATHER….. So the judge allowed the father to continue to have custody even though the CHILDREN ARE AFRAID OF THE WRATH OF THE FATHER, AND IS THE ONLY REASON THEY ARE NOT IN CONTACT WITH THEIR MOTHER.
This SO CALLED judge Moukawsher did absolutely nothing to help facilitate, encourage, support, and nurture a relationship between the 2 children and the mother, by NEVER reversing custody and allowing the mother to continue to raise these children in a loving nurturing manner!
Instead, Moukawsher the LAME AND PUPPY OF THE CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL SYSTEM allowed the father to continue his abuse and put fear into these children with his WRATH; and so the children decided that living with him and the abuse they endure whenever they speak if their loving mother was just too much to handle and so felt they have to cut off contact to the mother.
Screw this CONNECTICUT CORRUPT PUPPY JUDGE MOUKAWSHER!! He is full of shit, and he’s retired now, and he’s writing books to make MORE MONEY, AS IF MONEY LAUNDERING AND FRAUD DOESN’T MAKE JUDGES IN CONNECTICUT ENOUGH MONEY, HES OUT TO BLEED THE VICTIMS UNTIL THEYRE DRY.
NOTICE HOW NO JUDGES SAY A WORD ABOUT MORE PROTECTION FOR MOTHERS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE??
NOT ONE!
Moukawsher is DELUSIONAL, thinking he is just the big man in the big seat, wanting to be the savior of all people in family court having their rights violated and he was a horrible judge he’s a horrible book writer and he’s a horrible person to take advice from.
Why don’t YOU JUDGE MOUKAWSHER just go on your trips like you want to and just stop making comments on what is best for the courts and the cannon to follow and to run things, because if you believed any of this JUNK YOU’RE SAYING IN YOUR INTERVIEWS you maybe would’ve done it all yourself instead of actually assisting in being a corrupt judge and ruining children’s lives and parents lives, especially mother’s lives.
GO RETIRED AND JUST DISAPPEAR, PLEASE 🙏
You suck.
Muck is a gender bias over inflated ego. Connecticut is only concerned about father’s rights because they were bought and paid for. There is no honor in the majority of judges sitting on the Connecticut benches.
Muck is another CT judge pushing the scam of parental alienation.
Again, we have the gender groups always looking at things one-sided
You should use the word parent, not mother or father, because it happens both ways and he’s not the only judge who violates parent rights.
The system thrives on causing the vision they only look at the money to see how to extract as much as possible if they got a throw one parent under the bus to get more money that’s how they will do it they couldn’t care less on who is the more stable parent
Stop with the mother and father crap
When the state of Connecticut stops enacting gender bias legislation and MOU I will stop. I’m for humane rights. I’m NOT supposed to father’s rights. Even helped a father who was taken back to court for more money by a greedy x wife. Using the children. The linguistics are being changed to discriminate against women in particular. The number of cases reeking of curruption is significantly against women. When we can agree pedophilia and abuse are recognized as accruing we will better be able to close the divide. When the funding for the court system is not based on gender of the parents and directed to the children. We can close the divide. When I see the support for the safety of children . When I see judges equally concerned about the relationship of children with their mother I will stop using mothers. When I see the state of Connecticut being concerned about Mothers of low income socioeconomic status not having legal counsel I wil start using the parents. When I see the state of Connecticut taking sexual assault complaints seriously. When I see the council on women, children and seniors advising legislators on the needs of women and children in the state involved in family court I will stop using the word mother. When I organization funded by the state standing up for the women I will use the word parents. Discrimination is ramped and real. When you have been discriminated against solely based on gender. Your entire case is focused on false alligations of parental alienation, The GAL and the judge ignoring everything else . When I can call an attorney office for legal assistance to sue for fraud and not get a lecture on fatherhood initiative I will stop talking about the discrimination against women/mothers in the state of Connecticut.
Probate fraud, DCF under federal supervision AGAIN! Connecticut family court curruption and discrimination against women. I would say that that Karen and the co chair should be FIRED! Despite his Pacific ilander status. You are discriminating against women. Failing the state. Your Pacific ilander status doesn’t give you the right to discriminate against women. Stop the failing appointments in the state of Connecticut. People belong in jobs who can actually perform them.
Why don’t you tell the father’s rights groups to stop funding the bias against women/mothers, or the hhs program FATHERHOOD. GOV, or the CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ACCESS AND VISITATION GRANT PROGRAM, or the MURDERED MOTHERS CONNECTED TO FAMILY COURT, or better yet Congress who passed GENDER SPECIFIC PROGRAMS.
THEYRE FUNDING THE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MOTHERS.
HOW MANY FATHERS ARE MURDERED BY MOTHERS CONNECTED TO FAMILY COURT IN CONNECTICUT?
YOU DONT WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE VERY CLEAR AND HISTORICALLY KNOWN BIAS AGAINST WOMEN/MOTHERS BY STATES, EVEN THOUGH THERES A TON OF RESEARCH ON IT?
THATS NOT MY PROBLEM, THATS YOUR PROBLEM.
I MEAN MOST ABUSIVE MEN “LOVE” TO MAKE FALSE STATEMENTS AND REDIRECT ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE CLEAR AND KNOWN BIAS AGAINST MOTHERS, ESPECIALLY MOTHERS/WOMEN WHO ARE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS.
YOU KNOW LIKE ABUSIVE FATHERS RIGHTS GROUPS ATTACKING VAWA, CLAIMING 8TS BIAS, GETTING THE REDIRECTED FUNDING FOR MEN NOW.
WHY WOULD FATHERS RIGHTS GROUPS OF MEN EVEN ATTACK VAWA WHEN ITS MEANT FOR VICTIMS OF ABUSE, NOT ALL WOMEN IN FAMILY COURT.
JUST FROM YOUR BULLSHIT REPLY TO MY POST, PROVES TO ME YOU’RE MORE THAN LIKELY AN ABUSIVE FATHER YOURSELF.
IF SO, PLEASE SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP.
WE NO LONGER CARE ABOUT YOUR RHETORIC.
OBVIOUSLY YOUR SO BIAS AGAINST WOMENS RIGHTS THAT YOU JUST NEED TO “TELL ME WHAT I SHOULD WRITE AND NOT WRITE”.
MY ANSWER TO YOU IS “SHUT UP, ILL SCREAM THE TRUTH ABOUT THE BIAS AGAINST MOTHERS AND WOMEN AND THERES NOT ONE DAMN THING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT. GO EXPEL YOUR BULLSHIT SOMEWHERE ELSE YOU ABUSER, CONTROLLER, LIAR, MISINFORMER”!
FACTS ARE FACTS. TRY TO DISCREDIT EMPIRICAL RESEARCH, I DARE YOU!
ILL DROWN YOU WITH SO MUCH PROOF OF BIAS YOU’LL DROWN.
To whom did you write your comment?
Well as the biological mother I am broke I don’t get any child support and I’m disabled from my abusive ex who is the father of my children abusing me physically.. So there was no money to make on my case except through fatherhood funding especially the access and visitation grant program funding that is handled by child support enforcement. So sit down and shut up with your oh which parent has the most money that’s where the courts decide b*******. Not saying the courts don’t enjoy money when parents do have the money but even as somebody who is low-income and disabled still having bias against them because they are the mother and a woman it does not always have to do with which parent has the most money it actually has to do with the fact that historically we all know Congress has created programs and policies and procedures that are biased towards women get your head out of your a**
I think by even using these fatherhood funding programs helps perpetuate these family court frauds. This article is a look into Mucks inner thoughts and exposes him. This should help build his victims case to make a very strong point of his corruption.
Women are under attack in the state of Connecticut!
There is probable cause to believe that family court is gender bias. Women as a class of people have the right to speak out and stand in unity. It’s doesn’t have to mean we are anti men. Against fatherhood. We are being systemically punished for divorce. “Healthy marriage” and the prioritizing of fatherhood over motherhood. Organization are receiving funding and failing women and children. Abuse is being ignored and swept under the rug. We have the right to be angry, the right to express opinions that don’t want to be silenced and labeled any longer by the political leaders, dominating men. So called professionals labeling us alienators and gatekeepers. We are loving caring mothers advocating for our children and ourselves to live free from the threat of abuse and harm. So called women’s work and raising children is worth something. We are fed up with being silenced and treated poorly in the legal system.
Barry Goldstein was pushing the idea that gender bias is the only problem in family courts.
Does he still? Don’t we all understand by now that gender bias, religious bias, racial bias, economic bias are all too broadly focused, too insulting and too unproductive?
Why did Evan Stark think the term “coercive control” was needed in legal dictionaries and new laws to describe the lack of human decency in some families? How did “Coercive Control” become the new “Parental Alienation Syndrome” for money-making strategies in public-private for-profit purposely adversarial Kids for Cash networks in family courts?
Judicial authority and immunity protecting money-making strategies in public-private for-profit purposely adversarial child custody cases (in some cases, guaranteed profits in litigation for 18 years) is a great deal for willing participants in that Kids for Cash scandal. The willing participants are both genders. Their victims are both genders, too. In the national family court Kids for Cash scandal, gender bias, religious bias, racial bias, economic bias doesn’t matter — except when economic bias matters most.
For example,
Since ”family courts” have been an official business for the past 40 years, is there a calculator for expected profits for the “family court” attorneys “family court” random vendors in that “family court” case?
https://pagesix.com/2023/11/22/parents/elon-musk-filed-custody-case-in-texas-to-get-better-deal-on-child-support-lawyer/
We agree that the courts don’t need anymore labels buzz words. Financial indicated legislation. Muddying up commons sense. The father’s rights groups are just as bad. Buying of the court with funded programs. Coercive control is natural. Fatherhood initiative is not. The courts are financially insensitivrsed.
It is money driven. Most mothers get isolated bc the father enters court with control of the finances.
As FR pointed out, attorney Nancy Aldrich told gal Jocelyn Hurwitz, “my client holds the accounts. Is it a $7500 retainer? he’ll write the check”
Game was over then.
This is beyond monetized cases. We have been seeing low income mothers suffering the same fate. The father’s are not wealthy. No legal aid for these women. All father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children. Languestics. The Connecticut mirror has received donations from John s. ? John s Martinez. Why would a federally funded welfare reform program donate to the media? The Media outlet in Connecticut are not reporting doners. The money in some cases are not as significant but it crosses socioeconomic lines. This is not to say men are not victims, however it appears predominately an issue for women. The alienation industry has repeatedly targeted women. Women are remaining silent in the advice of organization due to retaliation. The number of cases reported in the frank report has been limited due to the retaliation of the court. It’s predominately discrimination against women for federal funding.
Where is Connecticut protective Mothers in all this? Why if there is such a large group and Connecticut is soooo bad why isn’t their a discrimination case against the state? The woman in New York, New jersey, and California have been waiting to see what happens. Jennifer’s law is now a weapon. There has to be enough cases of fraud. Using parental alienation.
I’m wondering the same. Controlled opposition, maybe? Or, maybe grants are only given to those who won’t mention the obvious extortion, racketeering etc.?
Why hasn’t The Hartford Courant told the public about CT AFCC, Inc.? 🤔
The CT AFCC, Inc. public-private purposely adversarial mishandling of obviously dangerous cases for massive profits should have been all over headlines by now.
Mr. Moukawsher disbarred a Connecticut family law attorney for raising the issue of corruption. What followed next was all over the news for the next few weeks. So, only the consequences of speaking up about corruption in the family courts is newsworthy?
Fully documented corruption in a state’s family courts isn’t newsworthy?
Reporters at The Hartford Courant can easily find information about CT AFCC, Inc. online.
Any dangerous custody case involving (AFCC Inc. director) Gerard Adelman and (AFCC Inc. treasurer) Robert Horwitz should have been a big red flag. The Ambrose case involves both of those individuals. A formal investigation of CT AFCC, Inc. should have been all over national headline news by now — just as Mr. Moukawsher disbarring Attorney Cunha was.
Paul Boyne’s arrest was in the headlines, too. So far, The Hartford Courant has framed that case as a case involving the issue of the freedom of speech.
Where are the headlines about his radicalization stemming from his victimization in the public-private purposely adversarial CT AFCC, Inc. “family courts”?
If Mr. Boyce was truly radicalized — rather than proving a point about Ted Taupier’s freedom of speech — does The Hartford Courant no longer consider causes of radicalization to be interesting or important?
None of it makes sense. The Pennsylvania Kids for Cash scandal was all over the news. Why isn’t the Connecticut Kids for Cash scandal all over the news?
The only thing that makes sense is: There’s something very wrong somewhere.
What is it?
When “family courts” destroy mothers, say that.
When “family courts” destroy fathers, say that.
When “family courts” destroy children, say that.
When “family courts” destroy families to destroy nations, it will be too late.
Connecticut doesn’t want people to be free. They want a communist country. Power and control. The country is not being run for the people. It’s run for selected few.
Same experience. He’s barbaric.
Judges in CT hate when people exercise their rights-
Mouk who violates the 14th amendment daily by severing mother child bonds.
He’s a sick man
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/vatican-confirms-ban-catholics-becoming-freemasons-2023-11-15/
Mao was a Yale guy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes
Today’s Exercises:
A quick check online shows that like many jurisdictions Connecticut family courts are courts of equity and not law. Equity uses different standards than law. Common words used to describe equity are “fair” and “equal.” While the rules of evidence are the same, the standards by which the court rules are different, as are the remedies available to the court when ruling on disputes. It reads to me like Moukawsher is suggesting equitable remedies for legal proceedings. They are two very different arenas.
Fair and equal— nit sounding like any CT family court 🤣
That’s right equity for the attorneys as long as they’re getting their cut that’s the equity that’s important.
Their cut. The aren’t done until they get the entire pie. Not just a piece. Preditory legal practice in the court of equity. Land of the lawless.
We need people like you to straighten things out. We need the help of honest attorneys who wish to practice in a fair and just system. We are in desperate need of assistance in Connecticut to cut through the misuse and currupt system we are forced to use to get out of bad situations. People continue to weigh in if you are an attorney dedicated to unraveling and straightening the family court system out.
We need attorneys interested in a balanced and just legal system in family court. We need attorneys to speak up. Those who are interested in fixing the family court system.
Attorneys interested in a balanced and just legal system in family court don’t want to have anything to do with the current “family court” kids-for-cash charade.