Richard Luthmann
By Richard Luthmann
Last week, Frank Parlato reported on a lawsuit in federal court filed by Theodora Antar, a Connecticut law school student and mother. She filed the case with the best intentions, “to stand up for my little girl,” Antar said.
We have had a chance to read and digest the 98-page filed court document, a true testament to modern word processing programs. It is not your typical lawsuit in federal court.
Admittedly, the complaint, which rings in fraud, civil conspiracy, and RICO violations, is grandiose but still incomplete.
“I am going to add everything else with the amended complaint, and it will be much more detailed and “well-pleaded” just trying to do what I can as a pro se desperate mom who has not seen her daughter in 2 months and has not been able to talk to her in 5 days.😞”
Antar is in her second year of law school at the University of Connecticut School of Law. No one is more litigious than a 2L, and her pleadings drip with the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Antar Lawsuit in Federal Court: “Sue Everybody”
You don’t have to pay for law school to know that you “Sue Everybody.” The crank-call comedians, the Jerky Boys, reminded us about this a generation ago. Antar takes it to a new level.
In the first nine pages of her document, she names the defendants – people she wants to sue, having sued everyone and their uncle, literally.
One named defendant is Connecticut resident Abdelghany Antar, Theodora’s biological father. She says the Connecticut system is corrupt because she watched her father bilk it for “millions of dollars through a series of intricate RICO schemes that he orchestrated.” In 2011, Abdelghany Antar was sentenced to 37 months in federal prison for a mortgage scam scheme.
Another named defendant is Diamanto Antonellis, Theodora’s mother, who “lost custody of plaintiff when plaintiff was fourteen years old, forcing her to then live under the care and custody of [her father], who then proceeded to neglect plaintiff for the four years,” according to the papers.
Antar’s story gets more convoluted as she discusses her own experiences as a minor. “Plaintiff was not only abandoned by Defendant Antonellis and then by Defendant Antar, but ultimately it was the Department of Children and Families who abandoned plaintiff and failed to protect her from the ongoing harm.”
She has an ax to grind against DCF, which she alleges “receives billions of dollars in grants from the federal government that is supposed to go toward the protection of children, however every single day children like plaintiff and plaintiff’s minor daughter A.L. continue to be victimized, and then re-victimized by the system.”
But Antar fails to reconcile how DCF and her parents were all bad actors AND parties to a larger conspiracy to steal federal money earmarked for “the protection of children” at the same time.
Lawsuit in Federal Court: “Get the Corrupt Connecticut State Judges”
Antar names and blames over twenty Connecticut judges for corruption as if they were a huddle of penguins on the march. The emperor, in Antar’s eyes, is Judge Jane Grossman.
The law student says the Presiding New Haven Family Court Judge for post-judgment matters “abused her authority and conspired with other defendants and orchestrated an intricate scheme involving obstruction of justice, tampering with witnesses, intrinsic fraud upon the court, and other acts in violation of state and federal laws, including but not limited to bribery, racketeering, and trafficking of children into homes where they were more likely to experience sexual abuse in an alarming pattern and trend.”
Judge Grossman is familiar to FR readers. Her name has repeatedly been related to family court cases involving Christopher Ambrose and his teenagers, Luigi DiRubba, Paul Boyne, and others.
Other judges are notably mentioned, including “timid” Judge James Kenefick. He folded like a cheap tent when Attorney Marianne Charles stormed into his chambers. “I Want My Fucking Bill Paid!” Charles screeched, and Judge Kenefick acquiesced.
Antar does not allege what Judge Kenefick said or did that makes him corrupt beyond being a poor, old, inept soul bullied by his brethren and sistren on the bench and bar. Nowhere in the 98 pages and over 200 paragraphs does she detail with any specificity what Kenefick, Grossman, or any of these other judges did that was corrupt.
Corruption is actionable. Ignorance and arrogance are not. And Antar’s papers do not detail the judges’ corruption in any way. She presents no specifics of who, what, when, where, why, and how. A lawsuit in federal court is required to be specific.
Not For Profit Organizations
Antar also inexplicably includes several not-for-profit charities and their directors as defendants. These charities include Connecticut Protective Moms, BHcare Inc., BHcare Foundation Inc., Center for Children’s Advocacy Inc., Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc., Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence, and Access Health International Inc.. She asserts that these organizations are caught up in the fraudulent enterprise. She admits that her complaint doesn’t explain how.
“The same people are on the executive boards for all these nonprofits getting billions, the same state actors who are corrupt are stealing money and laundering cash and stealing from poor women and children and men who are not able to fight back,” Antar said.
The law student may have problems proving that “none” of these organizations “actually help.” Many in Connecticut believe these groups are helpful, and there will be no shortage of witnesses to tell their stories.
RICO and Overt Acts in a Lawsuit in Federal Court
FR previously asked whether the Connecticut Courts operate like a crime syndicate.
Frank Parlato argues that certain members of the CT Family Court “enterprise” appear to work together to achieve common objectives and pursue the enterprise’s mission. In legal parlance, they call these “overt acts,” necessary predicates to a RICO conspiracy.
Frank Report identified several categories of potential overt acts:
- Manipulating family court decisions for financial gain
- Suppressing the voices and rights of children and parents, especially those of financial or legal disadvantage.
- Advancing their financial and personal interests by corrupt and illegal means
- Using the label “parental alienation” as a weapon against less influential parents contrary to evidence and expert opinions.
- Facilitating and endorsing the financial manipulations of more affluent parents.
- Systematically dismissing evidence, neglecting abuse histories, and rejecting expert advice that did not align with their desired outcomes.
- Coercing parents under threats of stripping visitation rights without a genuine cause.
Antar’s pleadings claim RICO liability but do not even contain the words “overt act.” Nor do they allege that any specific individuals engaged in any of these activities in concert or in furtherance of the enterprise goals.
Federal Court pleadings require specificity of factual claims when a plaintiff alleges fraud. Antar’s papers do not meet that burden as they stand.
Amended Pleadings and Storytelling
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow for a liberal amendment of pleadings. Antar would be well advised to use this process to focus on her claims and the defendants involved. She says this is her intention.
“I will be amending this initial complaint and including the required supplemental filing to establish further details. I have substantial proof to back up all that I am saying, clearly shows that the state of Connecticut is misusing federal funds in the sum of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS in nonprofit tax-exempt organizations that are supposed to help poor people like me get a lawyer, but none of them actually help,” she said.
One of the abilities that great lawyers understand is central to the lawyer’s craft is storytelling. Abraham Lincoln knew it and perfected the art of spinning even the most mundane points into memorable tales.
The American Bar Association Section of Litigation has publications on this very point. “At every stage of litigation, the art of the advocate is crafting a good story and telling it effectively so that the listener prefers your client’s story over that of your opponent.”
2L Theodora Antar has produced 98 pages and over 200 paragraphs. But she has yet to tell a compelling story. She says there is smoke but fails to describe what brought about even the smallest embers.
Antar Must Amend
Until she amends her lawsuit in federal court and tells a relatable story, her manifesto is a ream of papers that the federal court will unquestionably ignore. Antar’s case is little more than a mother with some legal training’s frustration with the Connecticut system,
I hope she does amend and has the facts to support her claims. To make these allegations against the Connecticut Family Court establishment, to bring this kind of smoke also requires real fire. Theodora Andar has aspirations of becoming a lawyer. She may have her career suffocated before it begins for failure to provide plausible proof of her claims.
Richard Luthmann is a writer, editor, and investigative journalist.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
[…] Lawsuit in Federal Court By Antar Against CT Will Require New Amended Filings […]
Ms Antar was arrested last night- accused of attempted
Kidnapping of her daughter. So much for her being a victim
How common are FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE in custody disputes?
How many parents are delayed/heldback seeing their children due to these false allegations?
How many are held ACCOUNTABLE after the allegations are found to be false and/or fabricated especially in DV false claims made by woman??
Does the parent who was falsely claimed EVER get the time back that was lost with the child? Is the child ever truly comforted that the “bad” parent was falsely charged ( the trauma/doubt lingers into adulthood) this is just one tiny aspect of PA behavior by target parent.
NOW DO YOU SEE THE PROBLEM?
Mr. Luthmann is correct…. keep it short, simple and to the point with plenty of evidence……. BTW… it is a fact that nearly every “State Bar” in this country are nothing more than “racketeering enterprises”…. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A2RIQHz0qw
Grossman must retire! do no call her honorable or judge! she never earned it! QU should release her! I would not recommend anyone going to QU if they have professors like her there! Sad! Her brother-in-law Jay Grossman keeps her out of the medias eye! The peoples voice have been heard and will continue to be heard until the children are safe! Thank you Frank and team!
she is white turd.
Case is being dismissed. Class action being filed against the petitioner, who is now on trial for a felony. Pro-police advocacy groups will be demonstrating at the hearing.
“…100.30 09/06/2019 P VISITATION APPLICATION …”
Four years later …
“… 493.10 10/14/2023 C ORDER This motion, document or order was filed 6 days ago.
RESULT: Off 10/14/2023 HON JANE GROSSMAN
494.00 10/04/2023 P REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR MODIFICATION
RESULT: Denied 10/4/2023 HON JANE GROSSMAN
495.00 10/04/2023 P REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR MODIFICATION …”
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=NNHFA195046828S
Access and visitation grant started for the fatherhood initiative in 2019.
“Background About Pathways
During 2021, Connecticut transitioned to a new process for family cases, including custody, visitation, dissolution of marriage, and legal separation cases. Entitled “Pathways,” the process seeks to give each case the level of court resources it needs, and to reduce the number of necessary court appearances by setting a schedule at an early point in each case. The process is also designed to better assist parties who want to try to resolve their cases by agreement, rather than engage in lengthy litigation. One feature of Pathways is the early scheduling of a court event called the Resolution Plan Date. …”
These two were never married. There is no division of assets. The matter before the court is the custody of the child. Antar notice signs and symptoms of sexual abuse on her minor child. The child went on a short interviews at Yale. Yale is partnered with the fatherhood initiative and receives private and public funding for men’s rights. They are home to the federalist society. By Antars account the father was given custody prior to a rape kit being performed. The court blocking anymore investigation into the claim after the short interviews. . Grossman did not put the matter into any one else”s hands. Appearing to block a criminal investigation. In Luigi’s case the GaL called the prosecutor’s office and blocked criminal investigation to be done. Charges were dropped. The prosecutor office continues to have to back off because of the family court. The state strong arming the police departments. Good police chiefs and officers are resigning. Including the chief in Newington CT with a huge sex trafficking problem. With minimal reports of rapes. Reduction of violent crimes statistics and prosecution. These are cases involving children. We got big problems in Connecticut.
The price to be paid to live in a Socialist utopia in formation.
Oops! https://www.ci.milford.ct.us/sites/g/files/vyhlif9226/f/uploads/october_19_2023.pdf
Judge Jane groomsman and the pedestrian set her up. Because they are a defendant in the law suit. The pediatrician office told her to come for the appointment and she never had contact with the father. Jane groomsman is going to do what ever it takes to protect themselves. From the information being reported.
Oh please. If the dad has a restraining order against her, she knows damn well she shouldn’t show up to the child’s appointment, which the dad would obviously be taking her to.
She is clearly another kook.
She’s a mother.
Why — and how — did the father arrange for a restraining order against her?
Do not put anything past the courts!
To whom it may concern:
I am the father of said little girl. First, I will say that my daughter is finally safe from the abuse of her mother. There is a very clear distinction between facts and fiction. I encourage anyone who is genuinely curious or concerned about our case to down load the transcripts from the court proceedings. From there, you will see what are the facts and why Ms Antar lost custody of our daughter. Also all police reports are public record . Ms Antar has a lot of psychological issues that are not being managed. It is the states job to determine what is in the child’s best interest and make decisions based off that, not what people are feeling or wishing. Facts matter. Here are some of the facts
Since our split, Ms Antar has been doing everything and anything she can to try to ruin my life. In doing so it skewed her better judgement and started significantly hurting our child. Ms Antar has made contact with Every immediate family member of mine, friends and acquaintances and potential love interest. Ms. antar has sent hate messages, threatening messages. She’s even sent pornographic images and videos that she and I shared together while dating, to my mother, father, family and friends. None of my family nor friends ever responded back with anything hateful back. She has messaged people I haven’t talked to in over 20 years, just because they have left comments on pictures and stuff I posted. Friends don’t even want to pose in pictures with me anymore for fear of her retaliation. She has contact people I’ve dated since her and has harassed them. She’s even gone as far as contacting where they work saying everything and anything she could to try to get them in trouble.
She has filed 15 different protective orders on me in four jurisdictions all were found to false and denied. She has since filed 7 new ones that we still have to go in front of a judge for. She has filed twenty contempt motion all found to be false. She has filed 9 ex parte emergency custody all found to be false and denied. The system is not against her at all. The facts of the case are what’s against her. My oldest son baby sits regularly when I have work or engagements. She didn’t want him doing so. So then he became a target of her attacks. She has made four allegations of sexual abuse against him towards my daughter. After 2 forensic interviews and 4 detective investigations and DCF being involved with all. They were all found be false and done in retaliation. Not being satisfied she took my daughter to have a rape kit done on her. Which was negative. Imagine that. Imagine your 4yr old little girl being subjected to a rape kit based off of her mother’s delusions. She even left a fake review at my son’s work, leaving to his termination. You knew the review was fake because it was at the wrong location, and gave the wrong job description of my son. But they said the backlash from her is too much of a risk for them to keep him.
She has tried to sue me and my company.
Ms. Antar is currently on supervised visits and supervised phone calls only. She still continues to harass me and my family constantly sending the police to do “wellness checks” at our home.
Think about it. Do you really believe that every judge in multiple jurisdictions, every DCF employee, every police officer and detective, every childrens hospital and pediatrician , and everyone in her and my own family are all just trying to make Theodora’s life difficult? We all just want what’s in the best interest of my daughter
Ms Antar is on trial right now for filing a false report and disorderly conduct. It is her second time on trial for filing a false report against me. Both times she was arrested for that, she was the one who called the cops. The disorderly conduct charge is because she was harassing me and my children during an exchange of our daughter. I encourage anyone to go down to the Orange Police department, New Haven Police department, Woodbridge Police department, Waterbury Police department and to look into the police reports and see what the issues really are. She also was recently arrested for violating the protective order I have against her for showing up at our daughter’s doctor appointment. She was told multiple times not to be there by the doctor’s office and by myself.
Ms. Antar has not seen our daughter in 2 months because she refuses to follow the court order and do supervised visitation. She demands that Angelina be brought to her immediately upon request without supervision.
2 weeks ago I was arrested for interfering with an officer and risk of injury. The reason that this happened was because upon Ms Antar speaking with our daughter during one of their phone calls. Our daughter claimed her butt her from not wiping good since she wipes herself. Ms Antar called the police and said Angelina was being molested at my house, again. When the police came they came with many units demanding I open the door so that they can have the medics and police come in our home strip down my daughter and subject her to have her private parts checked again. Upon refusal they forced entry, arrested me and took my daughter to the hospital. She was cleared at the hospital again and allegations were found to be false and sent back home to us the same night I’ve since terminated phone calls between Ms Antar and my daughter until these issues can be addressed in court.
She hasn’t paid one child support payment since I’ve taken over custody. She claims to be unemployed and have no income and at the same time claiming to have $1,700 a week in bills. Her financial affidavits are public record.
The allegations that she made about me drinking and driving with my children is completely false. It’s just something she says. She is willing to say and do anything to make our lives a living hell. All we and anyone wants is for her to just be a good mom and just be there for our daughter. Just to leave everyone alone and focus on what she needs to be focusing on.
This is just some of what has been going on. There are so many other things I miss antar has done to a multitude of other people. Anyone who has ever dated her in the past couple years has faced retaliation from her once that relationship ended, especially litigiously. Though the court system has its flaws it is not corrupt against Ms Antar. It has just listened to the facts from both sides and has been doing what is in our daughter’s best interest.
My daughter is doing so much better now. She is happy and is well adjusted. She is learning so much while growing and getting better every day. All I care about more than anything is the well-being of my children and I will continue to do so
Why would she take a phone call from a pediatrician she is suing? Much less think she could tag along to the appointment?
Because she is a mother who loves her child. She is concerned for her daughter. According to the state of Connecticut all women are batshit crazy during divorce or custody. A mother is going to be included to fall prey when they are able to see their children. It’s not rocket science. People love their children.
Here’s what the notice says:
“MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAILY PRESS RELEASE 2023 430 BOSTON POST ROAD, MILFORD CONNECTICUT PREPARED BY THE MPD COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT UNIT
October 19, 2023
CAUTION: USE OF THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE AT YOUR DISCRETION; SOME NAMES AND ADDRESSES MAY NOT BE ACCURATE AT THE TIME OF THIS RELEASE. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT INCLUSIVE OF RECENT EVENTS OR ARRESTS.
INCIDENT:
DATE: TIME: REPORT #: OFFICER: LOCATION:
ARRESTEE(S): CHARGE(S): BOND:
Domestic Violence – Violation of a Civil Protection Order
10-18-2023 1141 9055-23 Vakos
88 Noble Avenue
Theodora Antar (W/F, 32) 856 Shagbark Drive, Orange
Criminal Violation of a Civil Protection Order
PTA COURT: 10-19-2023
On October 18, 2023, officers were dispatched to 88 Noble Avenue. The victim stated that they have a protective order against Antar, who was currently at the location. After an investigation, it was determined that Antar had violated the order. She was taken into custody and charged accordingly.”
Theodora’s case is in Milford. Bridget Burke’s case is in Milford, too. In all of those kinds of cases in Connecticut family courts, it’s important to ask:
1. Which judges and attorneys are involved in the case?
2. Was the mother simply trying to see her child?
3. Was the mother “gaslit” to look crazy?
4. Who/what prompted her to do what she did?
5. If a protective mother fell for “bait”, did court-associated employees and vendors collude to sabotage the mother to protect a “brotherhood” or “fraternity” of some kind?
Bridget Burkes’s case June 9, 2023:
118.00 06/09/2023 D APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY EX PARTE ORDER OF CUSTODY
RESULT: Granted 6/9/2023 HON AUDEN GROGINS
119.00 06/09/2023 D MOTION FOR ORDERS BEFORE JUDGMENT – PENDENTE LITE
RESULT: Granted 8/14/2023 HON ERIKA TINDILL
Last Updated: Legend Code – 06/28/2023
Note:
The Milford Police Department posts mugshots of the recently arrested on their Facebook Page. A mugshot of Bridget Burke is in the Weekly Arrest Log September 16-30, 2023 — along with photos of those who committed serious criminal offenses. Bridget’s label is: “Warrant – Domestic Violence; Criminal Violation of a Protective Order”.
Horrible, right?
Note:
June 20, 2023 …
“… Appearance was E-Filed LARRACUENTE & GOULDEN LLC (419147)
311 BRIDGEPORT AVENUE
MILFORD, CT 06460
Appearance For: Both (Family Superior Court & IV-D Child Support) File Date: 06/20/2023 …”
Judge Tindill is presiding in Bridget Burke’s family court case. It looks like Judge Tindill thinks national best practices are a good idea and she appears to be a family court reformer — not part of Mr. Adelman’s horrible cabal:
150.00 10/19/2023 C MEMORANDUM OF RESOLUTION SCREENING (FORM JD-FM-290)
https://jud.ct.gov/family/pathwaysprocess.htm
Did Mr. Moukawsher order the Pathways to Resolution protocol in any of his family court cases? Why did he left the Middletown Regional Family Trial Docket as of 10/16/23?
Why didn’t Mr. Adelman follow the Pathways to Resolution? Why did Mr. Adleman not order a Family Relations Study in the Riordan case? Family Relations Studies are recommended in the Pathways to Resolution Protocol. Why is Mr. Adelman still at the Regional Trial docket?
If Judge Tindill and Mr. Adelman are the only two judges left at the regional docket, may Judge Tindill be as good as she seems to be.
The mother filed a lawsuit against the medical center at that address. She’s not innocently showing up thinking it’s time for her child’s annual physical.
However, one of the few coherent and explicit complaints in her 98 page opus appears to something about the misery of her ADHD…how life is hard because of it. I believe her, because the list of those she is suing is so gloriously long that eventually her ADHD kicks in and she stops bothering to name positions or addresses. You can see when the light switch clicks off.
What I’m saying is: it’s possible she genuinely forgot she was suing the medical office. I wish I were joking.
Her brief, as is, is a bad first draft of…something. Maybe one of the commenters here with similar problems can help her write cogent complaints.
But fuck whomever was babbling about pro-police counter protests. Wut?
I’m sorry she bred herself into a police officer adjacent family, and now regrets this. However she’s the one picking with whom she bones. Maybe she’ll blame the ADHD for this? Or blame those pesky domestic violence groups rolling in gubbmint cash? Maybe squirrels? Squirrel!!!
8:27 pm,
What’s your relation to the case and what drew you to this website??
“She’s not innocently showing up thinking it’s time for her child’s annual physical.”
If you’re an attorney 8:27 pm, you probably already know:
“… Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a type of informal fallacy where adverse information about a target is preemptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing something that the target person is about to say.
Poisoning the well can be a special case of argumentum ad hominem, and the term was first used with this sense by John Henry Newman in his work Apologia Pro Vita Sua (1864).
The etymology of the phrase lies in well poisoning, an ancient wartime practice of pouring poison into sources of fresh water before an invading army, to diminish the invading army’s strength …”
It’s been hard to imagine for many people who have navigated the family court system the incompetency. There are billions of dollars appropriated to organization each year tossed at organizations. Yet, here we are. Complaints go in circles, the state failure to disclose financial information and gender war. The fallacy that “99 percent of domestic violence reports are untrue”. Children in the middle. Laws and funding surrounding a specific gender to promote economic development of the government and not the people. The state of Connecticut ignoring DCF and family court system significant problems. Conflicted interest and failed mission statements. The ignoring of crimes against humanity to save on incarceration costs. The government is labeling people to fit a narrative to bring financial wealth to provide increased salaries, benefits and retirement. Unsure where the case will go. Unsure why an indepth investigation by the government of there funding is not a priority. Where there is smoke there tends to be fire. Little to no national news or local Connecticut coverage. Censorship that protect the privileged in the state. Sad state of affairs in Connecticut. No investigation and no accountability.
Government offices can’t openly separate families at the border, anymore.
Government offices can ONLY openly separate families in family courts.
“Under the proposed settlement, new standards will be established to limit family separations in the future. The settlement provides for continued family reunifications, immigration relief, and certain support services for separated families, including behavioral health services, targeted legal support related to immigration claims, limited housing assistance, and certain medical coverage.
The settlement does not involve the payment of monetary damages.
Those who believe they are class members may submit claims of class membership to the Family Reunification Task Force through the Together.gov website.“
Can/should/must parents unjustly separated from children in “family courts” also contact the “Family Reunification Task Force through the Together.gov website”? 🤔
If that program is only available for immigrants so far, which state and/or federal programs are available for parents unjustly separated from children in America’s “family courts”?
Sounds like this child was actually saved from her, despite her claims online. Not a single law enforcement entity is backing up the allegations. It’s all an elaborate ruse for her to feel better about the fact that she’s a loser who isn’t a good mother.
Good luck starting a non profit with non of the skills required including funding sources. She ruined her chances there when naming every major non partisan funding source as her supposed defendant. No one, nationwide or even internationally, will want anything to do with someone who filed legal actions lying about RICO when they don’t get there way.
this…… this is spot on. I know for a fact that poor child has been put through the ringer because of her mothers argumentative and combative nature.
How do you “know for a fact”?
This…. Spot on.
Your name probably isn’t “Betsy”, right?
Antar, I have been following since she bought The Plymouth Connection and has published hit and negative pieces along with the website The recent issues have been indictments and stories of abuse in the courts. Her earlier stuff was glaring in support for all things government and the courts. Now an intricate misinformation campaign to be a champion for the victims of a clearly corrupt court and dcf agency! A white knight or deciever? An imbalanced, well funded activists who wants true critics to believe in her and her causes. A disrupter of the highest talents. She will use her legal education to enlist others to take down anyone she identifies or black balls. A real class act.
Give Theodora a chance to perfect her claim. She has tried to challenge a dangerous system.
She’s the criminal. You seen her arrest record? Her past history? She’s one of the people the system is designed to atop
I think the father of the child has an arrest record, too. There are allegations of drunk driving, which are extremely problematic if the children were anywhere near a father getting behind the wheel impaired.
Me exes bf was charged by police with cocaine, assault, child abuse, killing an animal, dv, public drunkenness, and tons more. And the mom and son called cops on each other during a fight between themselves. And court said it wasn’t enough to even get a custody evaluation. Courts simply don’t care. And dyfs is worthless too.
this whole thing seems to be a lot of allegations……
News flash. People involved in custody battles are criminalized by the system. Obviously she is a target 🎯. If you have been reading the frank report. A recognized special education teacher is in danger of being made into a criminal. That’s how the state of Connecticut rolls. Perhaps she reached out to CPM and they ignored her and kicked her out of the group because she wanted to call the curruption.
You have abandoned moms who have come forward. You are obstructing woman from protesting. You have failed to address the landscape discriminating against mothers rights. You failed to let mothers know about legislation that would allow you to sue GALs. You have all the case information on judges attorney and cases. Including mom’s who have been murdered. You have allowed women to be spoken to by your board member in the same abusive manner that their abusers have. Plenty of people have been character assigned because they don’t agree with how we change the landscape. The entire narrative of the family court system has been betrayed to focus on women of wealth. When in fact it is happening to women in the entire state. There has been no objective to getting the sexiest gender MOU or legitimate repealed. That is ruling the family court system with fatherhood funding. There is no information on access and visitation for moms who are in desperate need of it. A cousidial parent is eligible. Women should not be the only one baring the financial burden in Connecticut divorce cases.
I have over 3000 phone calls and have exhausted all of my resources in the state of Connecticut where I have informed all of them about the violations of my rights by a attorney law enforcement agents, No one has lifted a finger not even the mandated reporters that I’ve spoken to in fact it was state advocates that provided me wrong information on my own rights stating that my federal protectsons don’t supercede state statutes.
That is not true.
The point is is I can actually prove that no one does anything to help victims especially victims that are the most vulnerable. In fact I was told what happened to my child and I was absolutely agregious and that they hope I get the Justice I deserve but because I am in a Gray area they cannot help me at that time.
What the hell is a Gray area???
So, in Connecticut, victims of strangulation and long term stalking etc. fall into a Gray area where not one organization that is funded to help victims of such acts cannot help.
Yeah she can definitely prove that these organizations do nothing.
In fact what I believe a lot of these organizations do is the use us as numbers just for funding….
My child and I were in one of the domestic violent shelters under BH care, There I witnessed atrocities happening to these mothers.
Number one if a mother that is new to the shelter went to knock on the office door in need of direction of what she should be doing from the staff that is assigned to her and is supposed to be offering her help and direction, The staff will yell at the mother and threaten the mother to have a negative report made. Basically threatening a consequence for looking for help. When I arrived there I went to knock on the door the 2nd day and a woman was sitting in the living room and told me don’t knock on that door unless you want to get yelled at and I was shocked.
Also no one did any kind of group therapy whatsoever there was no healing offered to these women at all there was nobody helping these women apply for state assistance or housing they just sat around all day.
It wasn’t until I complained to the person that I knew at BH care that groups actually started to happen and it was about twice a week, One group.
It’s a start.
It was me that also started bringing the mother’s down to the library and teaching them how to use a computer and how to apply for hud housing snap and TANF.
To help them get a little bit of independence so that they would not have to go right back to their abuser.
I also witnessed the director yell at a young mother who was an immigrant with an infant child that woke up in the middle of a night meeting a bottle.
The director was angry that she was in the kitchen making and warming up a bottle and yelled at her and told her to get the f up back to her room.
Why would a director verbally abuse an immigrant mother who has no one in the country and is relying on them as a lifeline?
Because I was so supportive of the mothers and teaching them at the library and I made the complaint about how we got yelled at if we knocked on the office door and that no group therapy was happening and I knew they were being funded for that…
The director asked me to leave the shelter and they played and put me Am I child up in a hotel…. Where there is no shelter laws and no staff and nothing to protect us like a DV shelter…. All because I was helping these mothers.
Now whats that tell everybody here?
It’s a final system, This shelter I believe is set up for women to funnel right through the system and back again, I say that because a few women actually where they are multiple times at that shelter.. Because I kept going back to their abuser.
It don’t offer any services support or help to these women because they want them to go back to their abuser so that they can come right back into the shelter so the shelter has more numbers to report in their annual report and they get more money the next year….
Connecticut is a sad sad state.
I was in a different state when I was in my first domestic violence shelter and we had groups all day everyday support anything that we needed honestly everything for our health are mental, spiritual, physical we had everything We needed to be able to be supportive of each other and he’ll and actually grow through the abuse that we just suffered from and come out stronger on the other side because we had strong women showing us the light and the truth and helping us to process it instead of just sitting around doing nothing and just thinking I’m bored and not doing any growth internally whatsoever like in Connecticut shelters…
The comparison I would say is that the first shelter I was in was like an all inclusive resort and Connecticut shelter was like jail… Only jail has more programs and supports and services then a DV shelter.
SICKENING
I will never forget the first Project Charter I wrote. My manager said to me the same exact thing: tell your story. Took me years, but I’ve found my written voice with Agile Development. These things take time.
Ms. Antar is developing, growing and needs support.
Richard, how is this for a story in a legal document? (All references to violence are FIGURATIVE)
This 300 headed beast feasts off of money, lust, greed and the souls of children and powerless mothers. It places children into to tightening grip of pedophiles, child-molesters and rapists.
The breath of this creature can melt iron and steel, then take that same steel and mold it into handcuffs around the wrists of helpless children and traffic them back to their abusers.
This monster knows only how to reap riches and inflict pain on the weak and pain on the downtrodden. Pain on all who do not worship at its altar, known as the Connecticut Family Court System.
The captives must obliterate the shackles of their captors. The enslaved and entombed minority must take back the freedom they were born with, which was savagely ripped from them by the Connecticut Family Court System.
Thpughts?
Hey Pilgrim, how’s this?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
PILGRIM, Plaintiff,
v.
Connecticut Family Court System, Defendant.
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff, PILGRIM, brings forth this complaint against the Defendant, the Connecticut Family Court System, and alleges as follows:
1. Nature of the Case: This action seeks to address and rectify the serious concerns and alleged improprieties in the procedures, actions, and outcomes of the Connecticut Family Court System pursuant to federal law, whereby a private cause of action is afforded.
2. Jurisdiction and Venue: This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter. Venue is proper in this Court because Connecticut is where the actions took place.
3. The Connecticut Family Court System: The Defendant has a duty to ensure the welfare, safety, and best interests of children and families within its jurisdiction. Yet, there have been numerous instances where the actions or decisions of the Defendant have allegedly been inconsistent with these duties.
4. Alleged Misconduct: The Plaintiff alleges that certain actions and decisions by the Connecticut Family Court System have jeopardized the safety and well-being of children, placing them in situations that are not in their best interest. The defendant has committed these overt acts:
a. The defendant is a 300-headed beast (the “Beast”) who illegally and improperly feasts off of money, lust, greed, and the souls of children and powerless mothers.
b. The Beast It places children into to tightening grip of pedophiles, child molesters, and rapists.
c. The Beast is directed by certain judges and lawyers, and the stank breath of these creatures can melt iron and steel.
d. The Beast molds iron and steals into handcuffs, real and invisible, around the wrists of helpless children and traffics them back to their abusers.
e. The Beast knows only how to reap riches and inflict pain on the weak and pain on the downtrodden, inflicting pain on all who do not worship at its altar, known as the Connecticut Family Court System.
f. The Beast enslaves shackled captives, an enslaved and entombed minority who have had stolen the freedom they were born with, and which was savagely ripped from them by the Beast, viz. – the Connecticut Family Court System.
5. Request for Investigation and Accountability: The Plaintiff requests a thorough examination of the practices and decisions of the Connecticut Family Court System to ensure that all actions are conducted fairly, lawfully, and with the best interests of children and families at the forefront.
6. Relief Sought: The Plaintiff seeks damages in addition to specific relief, including injunctions, policy changes, and other remedies to ensure that the rights and welfare of children and families are upheld.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grants injunction, awarding damages, etc.].
Respectfully submitted,
PILGRIM
Thanks, Richard for adding the finishing touches.
I think it is ready.
And yes, “policy changes” and “injunctions” are in order.
“Request for Investigation and Accountability: The Plaintiff requests a thorough examination of the practices and decisions of the Connecticut Family Court System to ensure that all actions are conducted fairly, lawfully, and with the best interests of children and families at the forefront.”
I want to make something very clear- yes it is being amended, and I am no longer pursuing a career as an attorney. After seeing the way that attorneys operate and the unethical nature of their careers, I do not want to be an attorney anymore. I do want to complete my JD and start a non-profit of my own that will ACTUALLY help people and have it operate nationwide. THOSE are my goals. And to save my child and possibly help save millions of others by advocating for changes in legislation, etc. I was told that I can never pass the BAR in any state due in June 2023 by UConn Law Dean and I have accepted that. But I have different dreams and if anyone has anything to say feel free to contact me directly on social media or email me theodora.antar@uconn.edu
Lmao! They clearly saved one child already. Keep up the good work CT courts. The scamming Apple didn’t fall far from the tree.
Why lyao John? What’s with the personal insult?
The angry dad committee. Jennifer Dulos would still be alive if her wealthy mother would have given him assets. The children used to continue to control Jennifer. ” The welfare reform charged the family court system” . She is not crazy.
Yikes.
I hope she amends her papers and reads those mom who came before her first. Fed judges know all about CT antics.
Contact and provide the information. The more cases the better
Tuesday, October 17, 2023
“… Superior Court
Regional Family Trial Docket
1 Court Street, Middletown, CT 06457
Tel (860) 343-6570; Fax (860) 343-6589
Gerard I. Adelman Judge Trial Referee Regional Family Trial Docket
Erika M. Tindill Superior Court Judge PJ-Regional Family Trial Docket …”
FR University is better than UCONN.
Maybe you should wait to see the amendment with more plaintiffs and information prior to writing another article.
Why? The fact that this document was filed is newsworthy.
The public has a right to know that this document, containing serious allegations, was filed AND that the full complaint was not readily available on the Connecticut District Court’s website the last time I checked. Maybe there should be a follow-up as to whether the Clerk’s Office is up to mischief. I’ll give it a few more hours for them to get their ducks in a row.
If there is an amended pleading with more information OR if such substantiating information is acquired through newsgathering, then there will most likely be a follow-up.
Just because it is filed doesnt mean its is fact or that it will not get immediately dismissed.
She says she has more evidence. It’s only fair to give her the benefit of the doubt.
If a domestic violence victim comes forward, we don’t tell them to “go away” because it’s not “fact” or a claim might “get immediately dismissed.”
If her claims are a “nothing burger,” then that will become apparent.
Check past cases my dude. its already been determined to be “nothing burger” in multiple different cases- in multiple different court houses- in multiple different police departments.
This whole case is just the temper tantrum of a crazy person with a history of psych and legal issues. Imagine trying to sue everyone who ever looked at you wrong! How embarrassing for her to air her dirty laundry out and pretend to be the victim while real people are actually being exploited!
Yep. And leave it to the Frank Report to enable her illness and lead her to her destruction.
Are certain individuals who post personal insults in the FR comment section trying to “lead to her to her destruction”? Who posted the insulting comments?
THAT. My heart breaks for people who are actually victims- after reading that suit I feel it is more a slap in the face to people who are actually victims. Cant wait for the amended version.
How so ?
Controlling the information. Pay no attention to the women behind the curtain. The lost women from CPM have not gone off the deep end.
You think the “Betsy” commenting is Betsy Keller from the “Connecticut Protective Moms”? Could it be a different Betsy or someone else using that as a pen name?
Just the kind of person we should receive the information on the corrupt Ct courts. How about the testimony from aggrieved Family matters litigants? See General Assembly Hearing from , maybe 10 years ago. We have met the enemy. Some judges are managing to get it right, others should be more transparent with thier decisions including cases brought by Ct Dcf agency by all those Ct Ass. Attorney Generals. Then all the Ad Litem Attorney s picking up cash too. The contractors get on board too. The courts hide behind secrecy. Privacy issues. You understand. Righteous cause, wrong person to lead. There must be a Bible quote to explain. Paul from Plymouth