In a shocking development, we learn from the government’s sentencing memorandum that the applicable federal sentencing guidelines for Allison Mack are a whopping 14–17.5 years!
It had been supposed that her sentencing guidelines would put her in the range of 3-to-5 years in prison. She has no previous criminal record. Allison Mack now is 38 years old.
The maximum sentences for the two crimes to which she pleaded guilty – racketeering and racketeering conspiracy – are 20 years each. Thus, the absolute maximum sentence the judge could impose on Allison is 40 years.
The US Dept. of Justice filed its sentencing recommendation on June 21 and is asking US District Court Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis to mete out a sentence lower than the 14-17.5 years suggested in the guidelines because Mack provided “substantial assistance” in their case against Keith Alan Raniere.
At the time of her plea deal in April 2019, Judge Garaufis advised Mack that he would “take into consideration” federal sentencing guidelines, which are calculated by the Federal Probation and Pretrial Services Department and included in their presentencing report [PSR].
The judge told Mack at the time, “I may ultimately decide to impose a sentence that is more lenient or more severe than the one recommended by the guidelines…Do you understand that?”
Mack replied, “Yes, Your Honor.”
***
The guidelines suggest a sentence of well over a decade and, as I understand it, if she is sentenced to more than a decade, she will serve her time in a maximum security facility.
This means that the formerly wealthy, famous and comfortable actress will be living in hellish conditions, alongside some of the toughest female prisoners in the nation. She may be physically abused and forced into sexual contact against her will.
The judge will have to depart steeply downward from the guidelines to bring her to a lower security level prison.
As for cooperation, the government said that Allison Mack provided information:
- About crimes committed by first-line DOS “masters,” including seduction assignments” and efforts to find Keith Raniere a virgin “successor.”
- About Raniere’s role in requesting nude photographs and setting up his own “seduction” assignments.
- About Clare Bronfman’s attempts to harass and threaten DOS victims and an individual who had been critical of Raniere.
- Provided emails, documents and recordings including one used at trial that proved Raniere came up with the ceremony for branding women.
- Mack provided racketeering evidence against Bronfman and Kathy Russell
- She agreed to be a witness against Raniere. The government prepped her but never called her to testify.
Let us hear what Assistant US Attorney Tanya Hajjar has to say: The complete memorandum is here:
Below is an excerpted version with [my comments in brackets and bold.}
Dear Judge Garaufis:
The government respectfully submits this letter… to apprise the Court of the substantial assistance provided by the defendant Allison Mack and permit the Court, in its discretion, to impose a sentence below the … Guidelines range based upon the substantial assistance she provided to law enforcement.
Mack is scheduled to be sentenced by the Court following her April 8, 2019 guilty plea to racketeering conspiracy… and racketeering…. The applicable advisory Guidelines range is 168 to 210 months imprisonment.
[That’s 14- 17.5 years.]
I. Background and Criminal Conduct
The facts underlying the offense conduct in this case are set forth in the Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) prepared by the United States Probation Department on May 7, 2021, to which the government has no objection.
[The PSR is summarized below and it seems to have been pretty brutal for Mack. This suggests that there were several victims who weighed in heavily.]
… Allison Mack was a first-line DOS “master” who recruited several women into DOS as her “slaves.” … DOS was a secret organization led by Keith Raniere and comprised of “masters” who recruited and commanded groups of “slaves.”…
Allison Mack recruited her own “slaves” by approaching young women and falsely describing DOS as a secret women’s empowerment group or sorority while intentionally concealing Raniere’s role in the organization….
First-line DOS “masters,” including Mack, required prospective “slaves” to provide “collateral”—including damaging confessions about
themselves and loved ones (truthful or not), rights to financial assets, and sexually explicit photographs and videos—to prevent them from leaving the group or disclosing its existence to others….
The first-line of DOS recruited women to make a “collateralized vow of obedience” to them, and by extension, to Raniere, and then directed their “slaves” to perform labor, take nude photographs, and in some cases, to engage in sex acts with Raniere. As directed by Raniere, Mack and other first-line DOS “masters” required their “slaves” to be branded with a symbol that, unknown to the “slaves,” represented Raniere’s own initials.
DOS “slaves” were also controlled … including [by] physical isolation (by being required to stay in Clifton Park); forced participation in “readiness” drills; requirements to seek permission from Raniere or their “master”; sleep-deprivation and extremely restrictive diets…
DOS “masters” also benefitted financially from recruiting and maintaining DOS “slaves.” DOS “slaves” were coerced into providing labor and services for their “masters” under the threat of the release of their collateral, including editing and transcription work, taking naked photographs, and other tasks. DOS “masters” were expected to receive approximately 40 hours of labor each week from their “slaves.”..
[The memorandum cites the testimony of Lauren Salzman that Raniere decided that “if we each had six slaves who each had six slaves under them . . . you would have 40 hours, approximately 36, but approximately 40 hours of work per week for life from these individuals”).]
A. Nicole
[Most of the next section comes from Nicole’s testimony at the Raniere trial — testimony readers might note that was cross-examined by Raniere’s attorney but not by Mack’s attorneys. Mack did not plead guilty to sex trafficking Nicole.]
Nicole, an actress in her early 30s, began taking Nxivm classes in 2015, including acting classes with Allison Mack… In February 2016, Mack invited Nicole to join a “women’s mentorship group,” but asked that Nicole first provide collateral…. At the time, Nicole was living in Brooklyn, New York. Nicole was told, and believed, that the organization was women-only and had no connection to Nxivm.
After Mack made some suggestions of sufficient collateral, Nicole wrote a series of letters falsely alleging sexual abuse by a family member and other damaging allegations…. After Mack falsely assured Nicole that the letters would be “locked in a box” where nobody could see them, Nicole provided the letters and a sexually explicit video of herself to Mack…..
Once Nicole had provided this collateral, Mack told Nicole about DOS, referring to it as “the Vow.” … Nicole agreed to become Mack’s DOS “slave.”… When Nicole agreed to join DOS, she was not aware and was not told that she would later be required to provide additional collateral….
Nicole was later required to provide, and did provide, additional collateral on a monthly basis, including credit card authorizations and the right to her grandmother’s wedding ring…. Mack directed Nicole to be celibate for six months and subsequently assigned Nicole to contact Raniere… One night when Nicole was staying with Mack in Clifton Park, New York, Raniere called Mack.
Mack told Nicole to go outside and meet Raniere, which directive Nicole obeyed. Raniere blindfolded Nicole, led her into a car and drove her to a house. Raniere then led Nicole, still blindfolded, through some trees and inside a building, where he ordered her to undress and
tied her to a table. Another person in the room,unknown to Nicole, began performing oral sex on Nicole. Raniere asked if Nicole was okay and told Nicole that she was “very brave” and not to tell anyone what had happened.
Unknown to Nicole, the individual who performed oral sex on Nicole was Camila, one of Raniere’s firstline “slaves,” and the sexual abuse took place at 120 Victory Way.
[Mack did not plead guilty to participation in this sex crime – yet it is mentioned as evidence of her criminality and provides proof that a federal defendant may craft a plea deal for certain crimes and be sentenced for other crimes.]
Nicole met the other DOS “slaves” under Allison Mack, including India [Oxenberg], Michelle [Hatchette] and [Dr.] Danielle [Roberts]. Throughout Nicole’s time in DOS, Mack regularly required her “slaves” to pose for nude photographs, including close-up photographs of their vaginas, either as assignments or collateral These photographs were sent to Raniere. Mack also assigned her other slaves—India, Michelle and Danielle—with the task of “seducing” Raniere, all of whom had sexual interactions with Raniere or attempted to
do so.
B. Jay
[Based on Jay’s testimony. Mack’s attorneys never got to cross examine her.]
Jay [Jessica Joan] is an actress and model who began taking Nxivm classes in or about 2016, during which time she became friendly with India, one of Mack’s slaves. (Jay’s testimony). In approximately November 2016, India recruited Jay into DOS. [India was one lucky girl that she had her mother, Catherine, working to get her out of DOS or she would have been charged and be standing where Allison stands now]
Jay was told that DOS was a women’s-only organization. After several months, Mack and India gave Jay a “special assignment” to “seduce” Raniere and have Raniere take a photograph of Jay to prove that she had done it. Mack told Jay, “I give you permission to enjoy it,” and Jay understood the assignment as a direction to have sex with Raniere. Jay asked Mack directly if Raniere was part of DOS, which Mack denied. Jay refused to engage in a sex act with Raniere. Before leaving DOS in approximately May 2017, Jay obtained images of collateral belonging to other DOS “slaves,” believing that she could protect the release of her own collateral by having other DOS members’ collateral as leverage.
II. The Guidelines Calculation
The government respectfully submits that the Guidelines calculation set forth in the PSR, reflecting a total offense level of 35 and an advisory Guidelines range of 168 to 210 months’ imprisonment, is accurate and should be adopted by the Court.
[The government agrees with the PSR report — and 35 is a very high level. as this chart shows:
III. Applicable Law
[In this section the law is cited that a judge may choose to consider a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines when a defendant has provided assistance to the prosecution.}
IV. Allison Mack’s Cooperation with the Government
The government recognizes the seriousness of the offense conduct in this case which, as reflected in the victim statements provided to the Court and defense counsel under separate cover, caused extraordinary harm and pain to the victims in this case.
[This is not a good sign – and it probably influenced the presentence investigation report – that there are victims who filed victim impact statements on Mack.]
… As set forth below, the defendant provided substantial assistance to the government in the prosecution of certain of her co-defendants.
Mack was arrested on April 20, 2018, pursuant to an arrest warrant issued in conjunction with the unsealing of the initial indictment in this case. Mack was released on bond at her arraignment. Shortly after her arraignment, and periodically until her guilty plea, Mack requested and received the discovery material to which she was entitled.
On April 2, 2019, approximately a month before trial was scheduled to commence, Mack began to proffer with the government. During these proffers, Mack admitted to the criminal conduct described above, as well as related criminal conduct of which she was aware.
Mack also provided details regarding crimes committed by other firstline DOS “masters,” including assignments to “seduce” Raniere and efforts to find Raniere a virgin “successor.”
Mack detailed Raniere’s role in devising assignments for Mack’s “slaves,” including, among other things, Raniere’s repeated requests for nude photographs from Mack’s DOS “slaves”; Raniere’s instructions regarding the “seduction” assignment; and Raniere’s encouragement of the use of demeaning and derogatory language, including racial slurs, to humiliate DOS “slaves.”
[Mack supposedly told the government that Raniere used the ‘n—r’ word for Michele Hatchette.]
Mack also provided information regarding [Clare] Bronfman’s attempts to harass and threaten DOS victims, as well as Bronfman’s efforts to initiate a criminal cybercrime investigation against an individual Bronfman believed to be critical of Raniere and Nxivm Mack also provided relevant emails, documents and recordings to the government.
Perhaps most significantly, Mack provided the government with a recording that, at trial, served as crucial evidence of Raniere’s role in devising the branding ceremony in which DOS “slaves” were branded with a symbol that, unknown to them, represented Raniere’s own initials:
Raniere: Do you think the person who’s being branded should be completely nude and sort of held to the table like a, sort of almost like a sacrifice? I don’t know if that, that’s a feeling of submission, you know. So, [unintelligible]
Mack: Yea
Raniere: Ah, you could also of course videoing it, and videoing it ah from different angles or whatever gives collateral.
Mack: Mmhm
Raniere: So, it probably should be a more vulnerable position type of a thing.
Mack: OK
Raniere: Laying on the back, legs slightly, or legs spread straight like, like feet, feet being held to the side of the table, hands probably above the head being held, almost like being tied down, like sacrificial, whatever.
Mack: OK
Raniere: And the person should ask to be branded.
Mack: OK
Raniere: Should say, please brand me it would be an honor, or something like that. An honor I want to wear for the rest of my life, I don’t know.
Mack: OK
Raniere: And they should probably say that before they’re held down, so it doesn’t seem like they are being coerced.
Mack: OK
The government was not previously in possession of this recording.
Following lengthy proffers on April 2, 3, 4 and 7, 2019, Mack accepted responsibility for her criminal conduct by pleading guilty to racketeering and racketeering conspiracy. She specifically admitted her involvement in her criminal conduct relating to Nicole and Jay.
The information and materials Mack provided substantially assisted the government in its prosecution of this case. As mentioned above, the recorded conversation between Mack and Raniere was introduced at Raniere’s trial and provided critical evidence of Raniere’s role in DOS and his requirement that DOS “slaves” be branded with his initials, facts which Raniere repeatedly denied after the existence of DOS became public. The portion of the recording in which Raniere states that DOS victims should say “please brand me it would be an honor” before they were held down, so “it doesn’t seem like they are being coerced” was referenced in the government’s opening and closing statements.
Although Mack could have provided even more substantial assistance had she made the decision to cooperate earlier, Mack provided significant, detailed and highly corroborated information which assisted the government in its prosecution.
While the government did not call Mack to testify at any trial or hearing, she met with the government numerous times at the government’s request in order to prepare for potential trial testimony and was available to testify at Raniere’s trial if requested to do so.
In addition, while Mack’s cooperation was never publicly announced, it is highly likely that the fact of her public guilty plea was a factor in other defendants’ decisions to plead guilty.
Mack could have given racketeering proof at a trial against any of her co-defendants who pleaded guilty after she did, including Clare Bronfman and Kathy Russell, who both pleaded guilty on April 19, 2019.
V. Conclusion
For the reasons described above, the defendant Allison Mack has provided substantial assistance to the government in the investigation and prosecution of others. Therefore, the government respectfully requests the Court impose a sentence below the applicable Guidelines range.
Respectfully submitted,
JACQUELYN M. KASULIS
Acting United States Attorney
By: /s/
Tanya Hajjar
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Finally read the full text of Allison’s cooperation.
Allison substantiated India’s claims that Keith Raniere instructed her to use racial slurs to demean her slaves. Allison and India were not in contact when Allison made her proffer; nor was India privy to this cooperation on Allison’s behalf.
So… That’s true. Point to India for being reliable in her info.
Allison also stated that Danielle, India and Michelle were ALL given the seduction assignment. They ALL had or attempted to have sexual contact with Keith.
So those dossier project women are caught lying in their zooms. Again.
I maintain that this is also why Nicki won’t come out strongly in defense of her marriage. She has no idea what Allison might say. And Nicki knows that it was immigration fraud. Nicki must be praying that Allison stops talking.
While some of us hope that Allison has A LOT more to say.
Many have speculated that Allison caved solely because of the Cami information.
A slightly different take This revelation really further woke Allison up to how much detailed evidence the prosecution possessed. And how the world outside the cult would perceive these revelations.
It was the totality of Allison’s actions and crimes that kept her from wanting to go into a trial. All of those texts, the fraudulent marriage, e-mails, her shared relationship with Keith, photos, witnesses, recordings, victim testimony, group sex with Keith, her finances and so forth. It was a decade of disturbing behavior and choices.
As it stands now, we only know but a fraction of what Allison actually did as a DOS frontline slave and pimp for Raniere.
Every aspect of Allison would be under a microscope. Her whole life on display. Dissected in a courtroom. We would see And hear EVERYTHING. And the whole ugly saga then put on permanent record for the wide world (and mom, dad, etc. Specifically) to review.
This way Allison (and her family) can pretend it wasn’t so bad. A trial would remove that last doubt and deniability.
Allison’s decision seems shame-based.
Haven’t seen any meaningful contrition. But unlike some who seem proud of their Nxium reign of terror, Allison seems… Embarrassed.
People will do a lot to save face. And protect their family’s image of them.
When the whole world labels you a monster, it becomes vitally important how the remaining few loyalists view you.
Especially for a personality such as Allison Mack.
To me, the most significant paragraph is here: “Although Mack could have provided even more substantial assistance had she made the decision to cooperate earlier, Mack provided significant, detailed and highly corroborated information which assisted the government in its prosecution.” She did not choose to cooperate until a month before the trial. That’s significant and will impact sentencing.
I predict, with all the info at hand presently, 10 years. Boom. I think that should be a close number.
“Before leaving DOS in approximately May 2017, Jay obtained images of collateral belonging to other DOS “slaves,” believing that she could protect the release of her own collateral by having other DOS members’ collateral as leverage.”
So Jessica Joan (aka Jay) — who was only in NX a year or so and not subjected to the decade of Nancy and Keith’s mind conditioning “torment” and “victim denial” that Allison and other uncharged inner-circle acolytes were, gave herself a little back door to ensure HER “collateral” would never see the light of day. Well, not unless ALL the slaves collateral were also exposed.
Pretty Foxy. I’d say Jaye beats Allison for brains by a mile except Jaye and Nicole were also a decade older with far more adult life experience than Allison when she was hooked and, remember BB’s “slow boil” frog story….
…How does the DOJ, however, know Jaye’s intent wasn’t nefarious, wasn’t to sell it or coerce anyone herself? BC she said so? Oh, OK, then.
Will be interesting to see what happens. (this is in a UK newspaper https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9713415/Allison-Mack-helped-convict-NXIVMs-Keith-Raniere-branding-tape.html )
Someone knew the “degree of penalty” long before anyone else…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Allison_Mack
The funny thing is has Frank ever tried to contact the Bronfmann sisters to establish what their side of the story is?
Mr Nike’s involvement caused one to pass out in court like it was a total surprise to her so you have to wonder if someone else is pulling the strings on team Nx as it doesn’t appear to be ending well for certain members.
The incommunicardo is not going as expected.
To the black hole of Calcutta, and step on it.
Snorlax-
You and Frank must be chummy!
“Oh! Calcutta!” is Frank’s favorite musical.
https://m.ok.ru/video/313546314211
Check out the 1:40:18 Mark!
Frank is partial to the crescendo. 😉
I think the judge, prior to sentencing, should ask if the brand was removed.
To Just Saying
Unlike tattoos that have can be removed with laser surgery or piercing holes that can heal, branding is permanent. Branding isn’t a do-it-yourself, at-home activity. It’s a painful process that should only be done by professionals in a sanitary environment who are trained in handling sterilized equipment.
RE Allison Mack Sentencing:
The fact that Allison Mack or (via) her parents has not publicly denounced Keith Raniere and NXIVM speaks volumes.
Allison Mack played a key role in the sexual assault and oral rape of Nicole. Nicole was blackmailed and coerced by Allison Mack into being orally raped.
Mack is well-deserving of a 5-year sentence.
And to those who sympathize with Allison Mack — if Allison was a man, you’d be calling for his head.
Could Nice Guy really be the shadowstate ? Hmmm. Bet he doesn’t want the old lady to know.
16 Months for Mack. Already decided.
Anonymous 2:34pm
Do you, honestly, believe 16 months for blackmailing someone into getting sexually assaulted is justice?
I wonder how you’d feel if you were blackmailed into letting someone blindfold you and tie you down…..
…And then, some unannounced, random dude shows up, and he starts blowing you.
\\\\\\\\\
Do you even understand how violated scared Nicole must have felt?
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
By technical legal definition, Nicole was raped.
If something like that happened to my sister, I’d be out for fucking blood!
Could Nice Guy really be the shadowstate ? Hmmm.
No.
I am the one and only shadowstate.
I would give her ten to twelve years even if she cooperated.
Shadow-
If you were tricked into being tied down and blindfold, by a friend…
……And then, some unannounced, random dude shows up, and he starts blowing you.
How many years in prison should your friend and said dude, be given?
(Seriously)
I’m being both serious and sarcastic.
\\\\\\\\\\\\
I do not believe that any of Allison Mack’s defenders on this website have given any thought to the ordeal Nicole was put through.
///////////////////////////////
Anyone believing that Allison Mack should only do a year in prison is a loon.
Just imagine what happened to Nicole happening to you — you fucking morons!
If anyone’s wondering why I paraphrase myself with two comments….
…Because I’m trying to get you people to actually look at what happened correctly.
The reality is very grim…
I predict a light touch. 4-7 years on top of time already spent in home detention. I wouldn’t mind if she got about ten years in addition to what she’s already served.
What is the nature of this “substantial assistance”?
Mack failed to even testify in court.
Failing to testify wasn’t the choice of Mack. The prosecutor, likely wisely, decided her testimony would only hurt the case. What was important for this guideline was that she was willing to testify. It’s the same reason India still didn’t get charged despite herself not testifying. Of course, in India’s case having a famous mother probably more than anything is what saved her bacon from charges. If Mack had been more famous, she likely would have gotten the same deal as the prosecutor would want to make sure the case focused on Raniere and only Raniere (In the press, always remember that cases like this are 2 fold front of jury and public perception management) but since Mack was “a remember when?” it was not an issue.
Mack, at least in the end dropped dime and did what’s right.
Unlike the cowardly liar Kristen Kruek, whose virtue signaling and recruitment of teenage girls on the net were nothing less than despicable.
“Failing to testify wasn’t the choice of Mack.”
That doesn’t mean anything…..
…The prosecutor was probably worried she’d become a hostile witness. People seem to forget that POSSIBILITY!
Like I said, the fact that Mack or her parents have not spoken out against Keith Raniere and NXIVM speaks volumes!
Assuming this:
https://www.vulture.com/2021/06/allison-mack-keith-raniere-tape-nxivm-sentencing.html
Shadow- Supposedly it was a copy of the tape India turned over to the authorities.
It’s laughable at best.
“Substantial assistance” in her parralel reality, ShadowState.
Shocking? Doesn’t shock me. I have been predicting ~18 years for Mack. For the very reasons the prosecution cites here.
Mack pleaded guilty to racketeering and conspiracy. What was the nature of this criminal racket? Here, the prosecution summarizes the facts. And they are particularly ugly: cruel, systematic, long-term, vicious abuse and degradation of unsuspecting victims.
The nature of the racket, the nature of the conspiracy, matters in her sentencing.
Just read the exchange between Raniere and Mack regarding the branding ceremony. Pure cruelty, vicious and obscene.
Raniere got 120 years for his part in this racket. Why shouldn’t Mack get 17 years?
He was the Capo at the top but she was the faithful lieutenant eagerly carrying out his orders. He literally couldn’t have done it without her. So why doesn’t she deserve 17 years, a mere 14% of Raniere’s sentence?
She was the one in the trenches, doing the dirty work. She was eager to advance the criminal aims of this cult, this criminal conspiracy, this illegal racket. Loyal, unquestioning, devoted. For years. Even after the arrests. After her arrest. It took her a full year for her to deviate from her loyalty.
So why shouldn’t she get 17 years? Out of a possible 40?
If her lawyers hadn’t finally been able to talk some sense into her and make her plead on the eve of her trial, she would have faced the original sex trafficking charge alongside Raniere. Then she would’ve been looking at a life sentence just like her friend and mentor and partner in crime, Keith Raniere.
She’ll be lucky to get 17 years or less. Looking at Garaufis’s sentencing pattern in this case, I think it’s more likely the judge will give her a sentence above what the prosecution is asking.
I predicted 18 years, and I’m sticking to it