Is It Virtue Signalling to Call Kristin Kreuk a Virtue Signaller?

For some time, commenters on Frank Report have debated the important topic of whether Kristin Kreuk, that marvelous taxpayer-funded Canadian actress, is a class A virtue-signaller.

Kreuk, the brilliant actress who currently plays a heroic attorney who fights litigious bullies and a pedophile father in her Canadian TV series, has taken to social media to condemn men who abuse women – and advocate for women taking the law in their own hands – including cutting off the penises of and murdering rapists without a trial.

Her condemnation of Harvey Weinstein, and her advocacy of Lorena Bobbit, and the India mass murderess, Phoolan Devi – who schemed the slaughter of  21 men, some of whom were possibly innocent – without a trial – on her word alone that they raped her – show that Kreuk has fixed social justice ideals and is prepared to Tweet them out to the world.

Some have thought it a tad bit hypocritical of actress Kreuk, who was a longtime member of the Nxivm sex-slaver cult [she was a coach, not just a student], to condemn Weinstein for abusing women but saying not a word about the man she endorsed for almost a decade – Keith Alan Raniere – who certainly rivals Weinstein in his abuse of women.

While Raniere raped women and girls, Kreuk never once brought her “take the law in your own hands” doctrine – the kill or dismember a rapist or abuser without a trial – advocacy against Raniere.

And while taxpayers toil at their drudgery, presumably most happily because they can go home from their work and be privileged to watch the brave-acting talented lady play a fearless lawyer who tackles bullies and sex perverts on TV, Kreuk has been criticized on Frank Report for Tweeting virtuous notions about others – yet when the call came to help her lost friends in the sex cult – and say something publicly to save them – she chose to be wholly uninvolved.

And then Tweeted more about other social justice issues.

Recently, however, a commenter, believed to be her most ardent supporter, Sultan of Six, raised a defense of Kreuk by attacking the attackers.

Depiction of the noble defender of Kristin Kreuk, Sultan of Six

 

Kristin Kreuk has never met Sultan. It is unknown if she is aware of his existence.

Sultan [or so he is believed to be, though he signed his name Sea Husky] says that not only is Kristin Kreuk right not to speak of her long role in Nxivm and to Tweet out her beliefs about others – but that anyone who calls her a virtue signaller is actually a virtue signaller himself!

Here is a recent exchange between Sea Husky [believed to be Sultan] and a commenter we call Kreuk Buster [KB]:

Sea Husky [S]: Kreuk wasn’t at Sarah Edmondson’s wedding as far as I know.

Kreuk Buster [KB]: Why would you know or not know? There was a video posted to Frank Report a while ago.

S: Not sure she would have even been invited at that point.

KB: She was a member of the cult at least as recently as 2016, so yes she would of been invited. And she was invited. And she attended.

S: Don’t think Mark Hildreth was there either. Mark Vicente was one of the groomsmen and I think Jim Del Negro went as well. Allison Mack was definitely there as she sang.

KB And how do you know about Vicente, Del Negro and Allison Mack but not Kristin Kreuk and Mark Hildreth?

S: You keep repeating the same thing about the Times Union story.

KB: Anyone who reads the Frank Report knows about the Times Union stories.

S: But you know very well that Kreuk was only mentioned in the February 11 article about NXIVM courting the rich and famous and that article contained nothing about the rape allegations or the suicides.

KB: The Times Union articles were a SERIES of FOUR articles.

• Part 1: An overview of Raniere and his unusual life.

• Part 2: Relentless litigation wrought against NXIVM defectors.

• Part 3: Raniere’s multi-level marketing mind.

• Part 4: A history of Raniere’s sexual conquests.

Kreuk was named in that series, ergo, she was named in the same expose that spoke of rape, pedophilia and other crimes. Don’t piss in a wine glass and tell people its champagne.

S: That explosive, damning article about Raniere’s pedophilia came out one week later on February 18 and contained no mention of Kreuk.

KB: Kristin Kreuk was named in one part in a SERIES of FOUR articles that made up the expose. You cannot roll that turd in glitter, no matter how you try and re-frame it.

S: The February 11, 2012 article was basically just a summary of some of the ‘name’ people associated with the group over the years and included Roger Stone, Richard Branson and the Dalai Lama.

KB: And Kristin Kreuk and some of the others named in that section of the expose continued to support the cult, including Allison Mack and Mark Vicente.

S: Kreuk wasn’t even considered a big enough name to warrant a picture or even the headline of the “actress” section. The picture and bolded headline distinction went to one Linda Evans.

Image result for linda evans
Linda Evans seems to have attended some Nxivm courses but switched cults – preferring the Ramtha cult.

KB: Kreuk was the biggest name and draw in the Vancouver branch. Kreuk’s name was used to recruit at least one branded sex slave in 2013. The author of the Times Union articles would not of known much if anything about individuals and their roles in the NXIVM criminal cult. Here on Frank Report, we have learnt quite a bit.

S: You obviously have been obsessively following this actress for years.

KB: Okay Sultan. Don’t forget about Nancy Salzman, Sara and Clare Bronfman, Allison Mack, Nicki Clyne and the other ‘names’ in NXIVM too. People casually reading the Saratoga In Decline blog before Frank Report took over the anti-NXIVM coverage and learning about key figures in the NXIVM cult seems to upset you and touch an emotional nerve.

S: Otherwise how would you know what her fans were doing 8 years ago.

KB: Because the idiots (like you), were posting on the Saratoga In Decline blog in the comments like flies around shit and when internet searching Kreuk’s NXIVM affiliated group “Girls By Design”, among other NXIVM affiliated groups, you could see what the loser fans (like you) were saying and posting online.

S: Are you sure you aren’t Sultan?

KB: No Sultan. I am not you.

S: So while you may have known Joe O’Hara threw her name in his list of people who MAY have possibly known or done something, since she, along with those 50-60 other people were never served, you have no idea what she was aware of.

KB: NXIVM knew who Joe O’Hara and John Tighe (of the Saratoga In Decline blog) were. NXIVM went after them. On the SID blog, John Tighe posted an article about O’Hara’s lawsuit with a picture of Kristin Kreuk mentioning she had been named. Of course, Kreuk knew about the blog, there were private pictures of her posted on that site and her fans (like you) posted about them.

S: And by omitting people like Nicki Clyne and Sarah Edmondson from his list of names, all O’Hara demonstrated was that he didn’t really know anything about the people.

KB: Joe O’Hara omitting certain names he didn’t know of does not mean he didn’t know anything about anyone and does not render those he did name as clean. Unknown terrorists not put on a Most Wanted list does not mean those that are on said list don’t deserve to be. Just being named on a list like that, especially when in the public eye, should be a red flag. Also, Sarah Edmondson’s husband Anthony Ames was named, along with his nickname “Nippy”.

Kristin Kreuk at Necker Island – 2010 – at a Nxivm retreat.

S: And with every batch of photos that Frank publishes from Necker Island, all he does is show that you didn’t have to be that involved or high up in the group to garner an invite to that gathering, i.e., MIA, Ben Bronfman, Georgiana Bronfman, and all of those people no one can identify.

KB: Actually, you did. Ben Bronfman and Georgiana Bronfman were invited as they were cousin and mother to the Bronfman brats. MIA was engaged to Ben Bronfman and as for the others you cannot identify, you have no idea who they were, how high up they were or anything else for that matter.

S: If Sara B wanted to party and impress, she obviously was going to invite some beautiful actresses over the likes of Kathy Russell.

KB: And yet she invited Emiliano Salinas, Nancy Salzman, Mark Hildreth and Alejandro Betancourt…  Kristin Kreuk is a prolific virtue-signaller and a hypocrite. Virtue signaling and hypocrisy are not necessarily the same thing but they often go hand in hand.

Example, Kristin Kreuk being asked by her fellow NXIVM cultists to help fight her cult (after they were personally affected), which was branding sex slaves. A cult led by a pedophile rapist.  Kreuk refused as her “career” is much more important to her. Instead, she took a huge chunk of taxpayer dollars to pretend to fight a pedophile, rapist, “racist” on TV and on social media, she spoke all big about women’s issues, Harvey Weinstein, Phoolan Devi (a criminal murderer), etc.

That is mega virtue signaling and hypocrisy. She is still virtue signaling all these leftist “issues”. Nothing you say can erase these facts. It’s on public record now.

S:  Your psycho-babble just proves you don’t know what you are talking about. You are claiming calling out virtue signaling is the other half of virtue signaling like two halves of the same coin. You are saying it’s just a “point of view”, like being anti or pro ISIS, as if it’s the same thing, two sides of the same coin.

KB: Calling out virtue signaling is not about the accuser. It’s not to make the accuser look good. It’s putting the spotlight on the one being accused. It does not matter if the virtue signaller believes 0.1% of the subject or 100%, they want to first and foremost to look good while they are doing it.

S: Someone might be unhappy by an Islamic terrorist attack. However, going on social media to declare your “solidarity” with the attacked city and why Muslims are peaceful, with the intention of looking good to others is hollow empty bullshit virtue signaling.

KB: Saying “fuck these jihadi cunts”, meaning it and not giving a shit about being praised or criticized is NOT virtue signaling. It’s the intention behind it. If you point out a virtue signaling moron like Kristin Kreuk or one of these other leftist celebrities who are desperate to be liked and adored by being pretentious (whether they believe any of their shit or not) and you are not doing so to appear virtuous yourself, then it is NOT virtue signaling. Claiming otherwise is pure projection and makes the virtue-signaller more in need of a mighty slap…

Virtue signaling is ‘hinting’ through empty words that you are morally more righteous than others without saying so, wanting to appear virtuous to others, but not actually doing anything or wanting to do anything to demonstrate it. Empty words. Bullshit behaviors. Like these celebrities at awards shows. All talk. It’s the intention to look virtuous to others as your main motivation.

If your motivation is to point out “what a fake dickhead” she/he is, without being remotely motivated by looking virtuous, then it is NOT virtue signaling. It’s the intention and motivation that differentiates.

When I see a liberal celebrity talking shit about “walls are racist” from behind their guarded mansion walls, it pisses me off. It does not make me feel virtuous and pointing out their bullshit is not an attempt to make myself look good to others, or make myself feel virtuous. I’m stating what an asshole the celebrity is, not how virtuous I am.

It matters not whether the virtual signaller is an actor or not. Virtue signaling is virtue signaling. Calling out virtue signaling is not virtue signaling. The one calling it out is not trying to appear virtuous. Kreuk is.

********

MK10ART’s painting of Nxivm president Nancy Salzman with her “disciple” the snake-bodied Kristin Kreuk with a small brand used on women’s pussies to mark them as slaves in the background.

For 10 years, the taxpayer-funded, adorable actress recruited and was used to recruit women into the sex slaver cult. She claims she knew nothing about any illegal activities in Nxivm in her single Tweet on the subject, following Raniere’s arrest, when it was safe to make a comment.

But her sole comment was misleading. She claimed she was a mere student who took a class or two. She forgot to mention she was a coach and recruited others.

Meantime follow her on Twitter, she has a lot to say about what’s wrong with the world.

 


About the author

Frank Parlato

47 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

  • Sicko Mean girls and Spankyspermtalker with weirdo sicko artwork once again are in a bash fest on Ms. Kreuk who has not been charged.

    Not been investigated and not even involved in this case. These sad dopes have their hair on fire because she continues to have nothing to do with NXIVM crimes, unlike the folks who actually who were charged with and confessed to crimes. Mean girls have to make stuff up to console their twisted souls, who have no rest. They just can’t let go of their pathetic mean girl hate…..sad….but funny. Lol.

    You mean girls will continue to fail to make your twisted dreams come true. And once you realize all the time you wasted on hate, you are gonna feel worse. And just make even more dumb excuses to attack the innocent and beautiful Kristin Kreuk. Deal with it, she has ex-NXIVM folks supporting her and the DOJ and court have the people they want. But that won’t stop the mean girls and spankyspermtalker.

    They will continue to make sad little posts with packs of lies and four-letter words, living in a prison of their own making. Oh well…..TWOP rejects and Smallville site Kristin bashers have found themselves in the same sad fate……nothing new.

    • Surprise surprise, this sad infatuated little worm has to do his online white knighting. You ignore anything and everything that does not paint the subject of your one-way ass licking as the greatest thing since sliced bread. You have no facts, insider information or anything of use. You don’t even know what you are talking about. You are just a worthless groupie who would let Kreuk fart in your mouth and then happily pay for it. Nobody gives a turd about your gay little “fan forums” “smallville sites”. Kreuk is the subject of your infatuation but is just another NXIVM cultist to readers of this website. Do you want to worship Allison Mack too? Any other celebrities? Go shit out a porcupine and get some self-esteem, you insufferable little prick.

  • Is this lazy journalism or an accident? These comments were from one single post from one single poster in response to Sultan Of Shit, Frank has edited it as if some of the words were from Sultan Of Shit. The following was sent to Spanky and was not from Spanky. Not correcting the mistake is lazy.

    “S: Your psycho-babble just proves you don’t know what you are talking about. You are claiming calling out virtue signaling is the other half of virtue signaling like two halves of the same coin. You are saying it’s just a “point of view”, like being anti or pro ISIS, as if it’s the same thing, two sides of the same coin.

    KB: Calling out virtue signaling is not about the accuser. It’s not to make the accuser look good. It’s putting the spotlight on the one being accused. It does not matter if the virtue signaller believes 0.1% of the subject or 100%, they want to first and foremost to look good while they are doing it.

    S: Someone might be unhappy by an Islamic terrorist attack. However, going on social media to declare your “solidarity” with the attacked city and why Muslims are peaceful, with the intention of looking good to others is hollow empty bullshit virtue signaling.

    KB: Saying “fuck these jihadi cunts”, meaning it and not giving a shit about being praised or criticized is NOT virtue signaling. It’s the intention behind it. If you point out a virtue signaling moron like Kristin Kreuk or one of these other leftist celebrities who are desperate to be liked and adored by being pretentious (whether they believe any of their shit or not) and you are not doing so to appear virtuous yourself, then it is NOT virtue signaling. Claiming otherwise is pure projection and makes the virtue-signaller more in need of a mighty slap…”

  • Just for the record, let me clarify a couple of things about the lawsuit that I initiated against Raniere et al back in 2012.

    The named parties in that lawsuit were ones about which I had obtained evidence that showed they had directly participated in NXIVM-related criminal activities.

    There were many other parties that I suspected of participating in those same activities but I did not have enough evidence to include them on the original list of defendants.

    My plan was to add other defendants as I obtained more evidence by taking the depositions of those who were named.

    Because I filed the lawsuit in forma pauperis, it was the U.S. Marshals who were directed by the court to serve the named defendants. I don’t recall exactly who was served and not served – but my recollection is that about 75% of the total were served.

    Before I filed the lawsuit, I had it reviewed by several attorneys – all of whom advised me that they thought it was valid.

    The Trustee in my bankruptcy case was the one who decided not to pursue the lawsuit. I have heard from several sources that he was approached by an attorney representing Clare and Sara Bronfman – and convinced to drop the case. I have never been able to document that link.

    • This is simply not true according to the lawsuit documentation. For example, on page 19 of https://ia800908.us.archive.org/11/items/292927-ohara-v-raniere/292927-ohara-v-raniere.pdf it is stated prior to listing a number of NXIVM-related individuals.

      “Other Individuals Who May Have Participated In Tortuous And/Or Illegal Activities – And/Or Who May Have Benefited Financially From The Operations Of NXIVM/ESP And/Or Other NXIVM/ESP-Related Business Entities

      Based upon information and belief, there are numerous other individuals who have (a) assisted NXIVM/ESP and/or other named and to-be-named Defendants with respect to a variety of tortuous and/or illegal activities – and/or (b) benefited financially from the operations of the various NXIVM/ESP-Related Business Entities. Although many of these individuals will be identified during the course of discovery with respect to this lawsuit, the following individuals have already been identified as likely members of one or both of those groups:”

      Notice the usage of the words “Who MAY have” and “AND/OR”.

      MAY is NOT definitive of anything and to claim that you had “obtained evidence that showed they had directly participated in NXIVM-related criminal activities” stands in stark contradiction to such language. Also, the usage of the word “OR” in the phrase “AND/OR” implies that only the claim in the subsequent phrase may apply to said individuals, but the first MAY not, which means at most the said individuals could have only benefited financially from NXIVM operations, which is hardly illegal. I could benefit financially as an employee of a company that obtains some of its profits illegally without me being aware of it. That doesn’t make me a criminal.

      • John. If only 75% of the “named” defendants were served, I assume that 0% of the “other, may be involved” 100 or so people were not served. So if not officially served, are they notified in some other way that they are indirectly part of your lawsuit…or is it possible that they never even heard of their involvement?

        • I don’t follow your “math” – but as to your question, it is my recollection that the U.S. Marshals only served 75% of the named defendants. Depending on who they were, some of the 25% who were not served may have heard about the lawsuit from someone who was served (All of the named defendants were listed on the lawsuit).

          • Sorry, Joe
            I assumed “named def” meant just KAR and the few others.
            Not the 100 “may be involved” people, who tho their names are listed, they weren’t yet “named DEFENDANTS.”
            my bad

      • Anonymous—

        When an individual files a law suit all parties believed to have a link(liability) are named in the lawsuit. Joe O’Hara’s filing is a textbook example of a plaintiff lawsuit filing. Typically only individuals with insurance or “deep pockets” are named in the lawsuit. Suing someone say, like Jim Del Negro is pointless; Jim has no assets or real income. Joe O’Hara did nothing wrong.

      • The words “may have” were used to distinguish one group of NXIVM-related individuals (i.e., the ones for which I had evidence to show that they had participated in criminal activities) from another group of NXIVM-related individuals (i.e., the ones for which I had some, but not enough, similar evidence). If you have some better words to distinguish those two groups, I’ll be happy to concede that section of the lawsuit could have been worded better.

        As for your “analysis” of the importance of the word “or”, it appears that you failed to take into consideration that this was a civil lawsuit, not a criminal complaint. While someone might be able to benefit financially from NXIVM without committing a crime, that certainly does not make them immune from a civil action that seeks to recover damages.

        • Anonymous,

          Why are you misconstruing the wording of a civil lawsuit as criminal allegations against Nxivm members?

          Anonymous look up the OJ Simpson civil lawsuit, filed by Nicole Brown’s family and the Goldman‘s family. OJ was found innocent; read the language used in the two separate lawsuits.

          You are parsing Joe O’Hara’s civil lawsuit with a lay person’s eyes.

          O’Hara’s language in his lawsuit was not libel or slander or even defamation of character.

          You obviously have an ax to grind with Mr. O’Hara. Maybe if Joe goes on the Scott Johnson radio [podcast], he can make you happy. I am sure you are a rabid Scott Johnson podcast fan[ and host].

        • That’s a poor choice of words. “May” means possibly, and implies either of two equal, but opposite outcomes, i.e., did or did not. It does not imply that you had two strengths of evidence for criminal wrongdoing, one weaker than the other.

          Your explanation of the usage of “and/or” implies a distinction between two types of lawsuits, i.e., criminal and civil, only because it implies a distinction between those two types of activities. These words are logical operators that have to do with the grouping of compound statements, whether both apply or only one of them does. While it may be true that those in b) are liable for civil litigation, the “and/or” phrasing literally means that some of the listed individuals possibly never engaged in criminal activities of NXIVM and only financially benefited from the company.

          • Kristin Kook’s vaginal juices will not glaze your tiny thin brown penis. You need to be exposed and publicly humiliated for your obsessive delusional behaviour. What will it take for you to stop being this mentally deranged? 🐖🇵🇰🐷💣💩👳🏾‍♂️💩💣🐷🇵🇰🐖

          • You seem really mad. Don’t get too angry, otherwise it’s possible that you suffer a hemorrhage in your brain causing a stroke that could lead to your death. The world would then suffer the terrible loss of your worthless comments.

          • Don’t project Spanker. You are very unwell. Your nearly fifty for fuck’s sake! Stop spreading your cuckery incelness everywhere. Wahhhh! Call the whambulance!!!

          • You’re the one responding to Sultan with your juvenile, bigoted trash. And you have no idea how old he is despite all the stalking of him you do on the internet.

          • Stop pretending you are not Spanky, Spanky! You are in your forties, unmarried, single, childless and foreskinless! WHAMBULANCE!!!!

          • You’re a nobody. I’m content with where I am in life because in the end we all get what we deserve.

            You’re an anonymous stalking coward who has nothing but the comment section of this blog to cry on. Your cult is dead. Cry some more. It’s only going to get worse for you.

          • This is the kind of comment I am seeking to try to avoid in the future. Pure name calling. Could we possibly elevate the debate?

          • How about instead of remarking about it in the comments, simply don’t post the obvious vitriol? Was there something informative or more to be said by “Stop being a whiny infidel bitch, Spanky” than the dozens of times he’s said the exact same trash in the past? This has been ongoing for well over year, so excuse me for distrusting the sincerity of the request.

          • “Was there something informative or more to be said by “Stop being a whiny infidel bitch, Spanky””

            Yes, informative and more, aspergers-boy. It’s excellent advice you should follow. You need to immediately stop being a whiny infidel bitch. It’s not healthy. You have given us a few laughs with your cuckerage and incelphilia, but really, you need to piss off now and take drastic steps to grow some testicles.

          • —Yes, informative and more, aspergers-boy.

            There’s nothing intellectually informative in anything you write.

            —It’s excellent advice you should follow.

            Too bad it’s something you haven’t followed, you giant hypocrite.

            —You need to immediately stop being a whiny infidel bitch.

            That’s rich coming from the biggest hypocritical projector and whiner on this website.

            —It’s not healthy.

            Physician, heal thyself!

            —You have given us a few laughs with your cuckerage and incelphilia, but really, you need to piss off now and take drastic steps to grow some testicles.

            Still believing you’re an “us”, eh? The imaginary group solidarity you’ve conjured up to support your pathetic attempts at virtual bullying and emotional tear downs will NEVER give your worthless words any more credence.

            You’re a nobody who can’t engage in anything other that a bigoted, anti whatever your opinion tirades and insults hiding behind anonymity like a coward. You’re one to talk about someone else growing balls.

          • Don’t cry Halal-Spank!!! 👳🏾‍♂️ Call a whambulance!!! Maybe if you send Kristin Kreuk’s daddy another inappropriate email about his daughter and tell him you have aspergers, she might send you a pity-inspired dirty picture… of one of her poos!💩

        • “Could we possibly elevate the debate?”

          Obviously not, Frank. They won’t take your advice. Just…don’t…post…them!
          No one will miss them.

  • This post is a combination of comments from at least 2 different conversations, put in a non chronological order. Skipping certain things and sewing together other bits. Example, Sarah Edmondson’s wedding. What a random way to start the article. Sultan of spank aka Spanky did not say the Muslim part, but you posted it as if he did. You took a section from a comment not written by the spanker and split it as if part of it were. You should correct that. On a somewhat related point, the mad beetle has probably tugged it six times already today.

  • If only Jim Del Negro and Kreuk would breed, we could have a new Vanguard.

    That’s the DNA that could take the Human Race to the next level.

  • How long will it take for the Frank report readers to realize that Kristen Krueks shit doesn’t stink.

  • This article is based on a mishmash of comments from another article, stemming from an initial SOS rant & incorrectly names SOS as the author of comments given in response to him. A lot of the text has been omitted also, thus no context. These two comments were not even from SOS, but in response to him.

    https://frankreport.com/2020/01/16/kristin-kreuk-wants-public-to-think-shes-a-brave-social-justice-warrior-but-cowered-when-nxivm-sex-cult-threatened-friends/#comments

    “Your psycho-babble just proves you don’t know what you are talking about. You are claiming calling out virtue signalling is the other half of virtue signalling like two halves of the same coin. You are saying it’s just a “point of view”, like being anti or pro ISIS, as if it’s the same thing, two sides of the same coin.”

    “Someone might be unhappy by an Islamic terrorist attack. However, going on social media to declare your “solidarity” with the attacked city and why Muslims are peaceful, with the intention of looking good to others is hollow empty bullshit virtue signalling.”

  • Unbelievable. Sea Huskey is not me. There’s no point in wasting my time arguing anymore on a slanted website where some commentators and the owner of the website keep propagating an obvious misinformation agenda against Kristin.

    For example, Kristin never “condemned” Harvey Weinstein. She was asked about him in an interview once, and referred to the entire situation being “heartbreaking”. Second of all, she has never advocated for “taking the law into your own hands” nor for Lorena Bobbit. Third of all, being one of many producers of a documentary about a woman who became a vigilante in India doesn’t entail that she agrees with her methods. Fourth of all, she was part of NXIVM and never part of DOS, so constantly referring to the former as the sex-cult when it is the latter to emotionally slant the conversation to make it look like she recruited for it is not only disingenuous, it is downright wrong. Those are just some of the distorted information that has been presented just in the first some paragraphs of this blog post.

    Also, I wouldn’t know anything about who attended Sarah Edmondson’s wedding.

    The rest of the blog post I didn’t even read.

    Kristin is never going to fight NXIVM. First of all, she stated she never experienced anything bad within it. Second of all, because of the former, there is no point to put her wealth on the line and face the possibility of litigation. Third of all, there is nothing left to do. Raniere is in jail and likely will be for a long time.

    • In his second paragraph Sultan disputes several claims made by SultanBuster. I think SB hyped these “facts.”
      If so, Frank should have checked them before posting.

    • If Kreuk WAS at the wedding, then that was the Sultan I saw hiding in the bushes bopping his miniature sausage.

    • “The rest of the blog post I didn’t even read.” – The Sultan

      Sultan with all due respect, do you honestly think any of the longtime readers believe you? Do you believe you?

      I’m not psychic, but I believe Frank Parlato, after reading your statement, rolled his eyes and quoted Chris Rock, “oh-god n*gger please.”

      • That’s funny.

        After all that I’ve posted here, do you really think I care what particular individuals believe when it comes to what I post?

        Out of what I wrote here, you chose to focus on a statement that was made as an indirect way of saying “I couldn’t comment on the rest because I didn’t read it”. I don’t read everything posted here. I do read more than just what’s posted about Kristin. Often times I don’t even read the entirety of what’s posted about Kristin, especially now, because I get part of the way through it only to roll my eyes due to the repetition.

        Yes, after I read the first three or four paragraphs, I realized there was most likely nothing new to say in the rest of this blog post’s contents. Just the same repeated agendized bullshit by certain individuals against their favorite celebrity target. Shadow attacks Allison as much they attack Kristin. When people no longer can argue a point with someone, they rely on repeating their misinformation and/or attacking their skin color, religion, body, fan-ship, mental stability, or anything else the perpetrator feels they can attack in order to trigger their victim and make them emotionally hurt and/or unstable. They have nothing but their impotent attempts at virtual bullying and gaslighting, because they’re just intellectually bankrupt and morally decrepit individuals. Ironic how the emotional abuse is very similar to the way LGAT trainers execute their tear downs. See the book Cursillo: Little Courses in Catharsis and its section on LGATs.

  • Sultan of Six-

    Will you be defending Kristen Kreuk until she has grandchildren? Or until she is no longer relevant? Or will you be defending Kreuk until one of you passes away from old age? Do you have an endgame?

    Perpetuity? Forever is a longtime alone. No man is an island.

  • “Is It Virtue Signalling to Call Kristin Kreuk a Virtue Signaller?”-Sultan of Six

    Sultan finally made a rational and valid point. I genuinely have to agree with Sultan, on this one point.

    Sultan of Six still needs to find a better more positive and constructive pastime. I am not being flippant. I mean it in a good way.

Frank Parlato Investigates

Frank Parlato Investigates

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in hundreds of news outlets, like The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CBS News, Fox News, New York Post, New York Daily News, Oxygen, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, The Sun, The Times of London, CBS Inside Edition, among many, many others in all five continents.

His work helping take down NXIVM is featured in books like “Captive” by Catherine Oxenberg; “Scarred” by Sarah Edmonson; “The Program” by Toni Natalie, and “NXIVM. La secta que sedujo al poder en México” by Juan Alberto Vasquez.

Parlato has been featured prominently on HBO’s documentary “The Vow” and acted as lead investigator and coordinating producer for Investigation Discovery’s “The Lost Women of NXIVM.”

Parlato will be featured in an upcoming episode of American Greed.

If the whole world stands against you sword in hand, would you still dare to do what you think is right?

Got A Tip?

If you have a tip for Frank Report, send it here.
Email: frankparlato@gmail.com
Phone / Text: (716) 990-5740

Archives

%d bloggers like this: