PART #3: The Framing of Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez by Biden’s DOJ

May 4, 2026
Satirical scene of a man on a throne reading a scroll while banners declare a 'show trial' with 'Verdict is already written' and 'Justice is a performance'.

Part 1 made the geopolitical argument for Trump’s pardon of former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez.

Part 2 examined the case the Biden Department of Justice put on.

Bidens DOJ indicted Hernandez

Part 3 is about how the prosecutors got a biased judge and an uninformed jury. The legal name for what they did is forum shopping.

Hernández was tried in the Southern District of New York. The prosecutors alleged his criminal conduct happened in Honduras, Mexico, and other countries. None of it happened in Manhattan.

For crimes committed outside the United States, Congress wrote Title 18, United States Code, Section 3238. The venue lies in the district where the offender is first brought into the country. 

Former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez center is taken in handcuffs to a waiting aircraft as he is extradited to the United States at an Air Force base in Tegucigalpa Honduras Thursday April 21 2022 AP PhotoElmer Martinez

Hernández was extradited from Honduras on April 21, 2022. His point of entry into the United States was Florida.

The case could properly have been tried in Florida. The Southern District of New York, then headed by United States Attorney Damian Williams, chose Manhattan instead.

Why Manhattan

Why does it matter whether it was Miami or Manhattan? Both are American cities. The reason is pretty obvious to anyone without their rose colored justice glasses on.

SDNY judges, including Judge Kevin Castel, who tried the case, are mostly former SDNY prosecutors. Castel was an Assistant United States Attorney in the office before he was a judge.

Florida federal judges, on the other hand, come from diverse backgrounds, including defense lawyers, civil practitioners, and state court judges. Federal judges in Florida — including judges of Cuban and Venezuelan heritage — would have known of Hernandez and might have been inclined to give him a fair trial.

The Biden DOJ knew it would more likely get a pro-prosecution judge in Manhattan.

The second reason is the jury.

A South Florida jury might have included Cuban refugees, Venezuelan exiles, and Honduran emigrants. A South Florida jury would have known what happens to former presidents in Latin America when their political opponents take power, and might have asked questions in deliberation that a Manhattan jury was less likely to ask.

The DOJ may have wanted Manhattan because a jury there was more likely to accept the prosecution’s word about what kind of country Honduras was and what kind of man Hernández was.

The Stipulation

The Southern District of New York did not present records of Hernandez’s arrival in Florida to the jury. That might have ended the trial in Manhattan.

The defense agreed to a stipulation, drafted and presented by the Department of Justice, stating that Hernández had been first brought to New York. The first point of entry was Florida.

The stipulation was read to the jury. The jury believed it.

A reader may ask why Hernández did not correct the record. Three reasons.

First, American federal venue rules — the rule that says a defendant first brought into the United States in Florida should be tried in Florida — are not concepts a foreign defendant tracks.

Second, Judge Castel had ordered that Hernandez review certain pretrial materials only in the presence of retained counsel. His retained counsel was sick. The visits stopped.

Third, the stipulation system in federal practice works through the lawyers. A stipulation is a document drafted by the prosecution and reviewed by the defense. The defendant typically never sees it before it is signed. He sees it when it is read aloud at trial. By then, the agreement will have already been made.

The system functions because federal prosecutors are presumed to be honest with defense lawyers about basic facts. A defense lawyer assumes that when the United States Attorney’s Office tells him the defendant was first brought to New York, the United States Attorney’s Office is not making it up.

Judge Castel instructed the jury on the venue element of the charges based on the stipulation that Hernandez first landed in Manhattan rather than in Florida.

The defense’s appeal papers state that the prosecution later conceded the venue stipulation read to the jury was false.

What That Means in Plain English

If a defense lawyer did that to a federal prosecutor — drafted a stipulation containing a false fact, induced the prosecutor to sign it, used it to obtain a verdict — the defense lawyer would be disbarred. There might be a criminal prosecution for obstruction of justice.

When the Department of Justice does it, the trial is held in prosecution-friendly Manhattan and not Miami.

Judge P. Kevin Castel, presented with a post-trial admission by the prosecution that he had instructed the jury on a false fact regarding a constitutional element of the case, could have ordered briefing, set aside the conviction, or ordered a new trial in the proper district.

He sentenced Hernández to 45 years.

Part 4 on the show trial of Juan Orlando Hernandez is coming next.

ARTVOICE ART

author avatar
Frank Parlato
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
3.7 3 votes
Article Rating

Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Luthmann
1 day ago

Hernández was railroaded. A false venue stipulation is not a technical hiccup. It is the foundation of where the entire trial happens. Florida entry means Florida venue. Instead, the case lands in SDNY before a prosecution-friendly judge and a jury far less likely to understand Honduran politics, Chinese influence, and Latin American revenge prosecutions. Then, when the venue fact is allegedly conceded to be false, Judge Castel still hands down 45 years. Spare me the sanctimony. Trump’s pardon looks better with every installment. This was not just a conviction. It was a managed outcome. Biden’s DOJ picked the battlefield.

Last edited 1 day ago by Richard Luthmann
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 day ago

The explanation of how stipulations work is accurate—Defendants often don’t see them beforehand. But defense counsel still has a duty to verify key facts — especially jurisdictional ones.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 day ago

Similar to moving OneTaste case from California to New York.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 day ago

If a regular person got caught doing what’s described here, their case would collapse overnight. But there is no accountability for the govt/prosecutors – admission of malfeasance and it’s forgiven and violation of due process ignored

NiceGuy
NiceGuy
2 days ago

“Hernández, who was convicted in 2024 for conspiring to import over 400 tons of cocaine into the U.S., was released immediately following the pardon.”

Donald Trump what an asshole.

Don't Miss

Epstein’s Lawyers Propose $77 Million Package to Spring Alleged Child Sex Trafficker

In what will likely leave many Frank Report readers with…

Actaeon: DOS Slaves Should Have Smashed Allison Mack’s Camera and Slapped Keith Raniere

By Actaeon Nicole testified that when Keith Raniere told her…
5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x