Shadow State: Allison Mack: Welcome to the Rest of Your Life

By Shadow State 1958
We are coming up to Black Friday and the Christmas shopping season. Millions of Americans will pour into stores to buy gifts for family and friends. Children’s faces will light up in anticipation of the gifts Santa will bring.
Most of us will shop in comfort and security.
I, for one, will visit with friends at the local diner and share food and conversation.
“How about those Bears?”
Later, I will drop by the library to check out the new books. Maybe I will drop by Starbucks.
At no point will I feel threatened or the target of scorn or ridicule. And no one will feel threatened by me.
No one will feel that I am about to burn my initials into their skin. No one will worry about me recruiting women into a sex cult.
Until recently, Allison Mack enjoyed such an existence.
If anyone recognized her, it was as an actress in a long-ago TV show. And people who recognized her trusted her. No one feared her. No one saw her as a snake in the grass.
And then the Horror stories came out. Stories like Edgar Allan Poe would write. Stories of women screaming late at night. Screaming in pain and agony and terror.
Stories of a house in middle class America turned into a torture chamber.
Stories of women turned into sex slaves.
And rumors of female children being recruited and groomed into sex slaves. And rumors of young women being hooked on drugs so they are compliant and docile.
And the worst part of the stories and rumors is that an ongoing FBI investigation reveals that many of them are true or have a basis in fact. And all the stories and rumors trace back to Allison Mack.
This sex cult had nothing to do with love or sex. It was motivated by Mack and her boyfriend’s lust for power and control.
Mack and Raniere lusted not for sex, they were drowning in sex, but for power. And to that end, Mack and Raniere were even willing to terrorize a community. And now the chickens are coming home to roost.
Allison Mack is awaiting trial under house arrest.
Her behavior is so beyond the pale of civilized conduct that she serves as a magnet for sociopaths almost as disturbed as her. This story is what the Hindus call Karma. What goes around comes around
Allison Mack is starting to feel some of the terror she inflicted on others.
Ms Mack is the author of her own misfortune.
And if/when Ms. Mack is convicted, she will always be known as  a sexual predator.
A danger to the community.
Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote the “Scarlet Letter” about a young woman forced to wear a scarlet letter A for Adultery.
Ms. Mack will wear the Scarlet Letters K-R-A-M.

About the author

Frank Parlato

Frank Parlato is the founder of the FrankReport, publisher and editor-in-chief of Artvoice, The Niagara Falls Reporter, Front Page and the South Buffalo News.

88 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

  • – “She said there were more roles for women of diversity and it was a “good thing for us” – women of diversity. White men can’t be turned down for female roles.”

    No. She said if you are specifically a WHITE MALE, there is less for you and it’s a “good thing”. Not Chinese male. Not black male. Not even white woman. Singling out white men. She did not say anything about white males being turned down for women’s roles you fool.

    *****

    “You’re just reading what you want into what she said”

    No. What she said is what she said. That is what you did.

    *****

    “because of your imagined status as an oppressed white male”

    The anti “straight white male” culture in the emasculated cucked west is not imagined. It is everywhere. It is the moaning non-whites who imagine themselves as oppressed and of course, they see whites as their oppressors. They get pandered to, when they contribute so much less in taxes, jobs etc. in exchange for giving liberal politicians votes.

    *****

    Kristin is half-white herself and has a white father and a white boyfriend.”

    She is mixed race, not white. She obviously wants people to see her white father who probably did everything for her, as a privileged “straight white male”. And taking a white cock does not cancel out her outrageous comment.

    • It says it right here: “Even for TV stuff, the pilot season of last year, which I didn’t do, but from what I understood they wanted female leads and they wanted diversity. If you were a white guy, there just wasn’t as much available for you which is a good thing for us, I think.”

      *Which is a good thing for us*

      The word “us” is used. She was referring to there being more roles for women of diversity, otherwise she wouldn’t have used “us” as she is of mixed race and woman. The counterfact to this is that in previous seasons more roles have been available for white males.

      “She did not say anything about white males being turned down for women’s roles you fool.”

      I never said she did. If there were mostly roles for women of diversity during that pilot season, then obviously men cannot be turned down for them – which is what *you* suggested – because there aren’t as many roles *for* them.

      “It is the moaning non-whites who imagine themselves as oppressed…”

      You speak as if you hold the majority opinion for whites. Maybe just bigoted ones. The majority of power brokers in the entertainment industry are white males. The fact of the matter is, your view is not the majority opinion among them as they don’t feel the same way as you do. When you talk of white males, you talk only of those that hold your specific views.

      “She is mixed race, not white. She obviously wants people to see her white father who probably did everything for her, as a privileged “straight white male”.”

      I said she is half-white. That’s obviously mixed race. Her father is privileged. She herself has been privileged. Why would she make an enemy out of white people when she has relatives that are both white and Asian? Because she isn’t. Her show makes an enemy out of a particular type of man who happens to be white – a philandering, wealthy father who happens to be a cutthroat lawyer that isn’t as constrained by a moral conscience both in his business and personal life as much as he should be.

      “…her outrageous comment.”

      There’s nothing outrageous about her comment, only with your interpretation of it.

      • For God’s sake, fuck off sultanofspank. You are hopeless and wrong. You are blinded by your infatuation. It’s a diss against white males by both Kreuk and liberal execs. Fact. You are not the one being insulted so shut the fuck up you privileged brat.

      • “The word “us” is used. She was referring to there being more roles for women of diversity, otherwise she wouldn’t have used “us” as she is of mixed race and woman. The counterfact to this is that in previous seasons more roles have been available for white males.”

        You dumb fucking cunt. She was NOT talking about roles for non white women specifically. She was talking about sex AND race. By “us”, she is talking about both women and non whites. By “us”, that would include white women and black men. Anyone but a white man, you fucking insufferable irritating smug piece of shit. I am sick of your fucking mentally deranged autistic psycho babble.

        ——-

        “I never said she did. If there were mostly roles for women of diversity during that pilot season, then obviously men cannot be turned down for them – which is what *you* suggested – because there aren’t as many roles *for* them.”

        Don’t you dare accuse me of anything you arrogant shit skin cunt. Don’t you dare project onto me. I did NOT in any way say she said men were being turned down for female roles. THAT IS WHAT YOU SAID. She said white men were being turned down for roles in general. YOU SAID: “She said there were more roles for women of diversity and it was a “good thing for us” – women of diversity. White men can’t be turned down for female roles.””

        You said that dickhead. You projecting lying piece of third world shit.

        ——-

        “You speak as if you hold the majority opinion for whites. Maybe just bigoted ones. The majority of power brokers in the entertainment industry are white males. The fact of the matter is, your view is not the majority opinion among them as they don’t feel the same way as you do. When you talk of white males, you talk only of those that hold your specific views.”

        White liberals are happy to insult whites. It makes them feel righteous. And most whites including women voted for Trump so shut the fuck up. Jews who make up just 2% of the US population and white liberals run the “entertainment industry”. Foreign fucks like you don’t care if a white person is normal ordinary person or a piece of shit liberal. You think both are “privleged” still.

        ——
        “I said she is half-white. That’s obviously mixed race. Her father is privileged. She herself has been privileged.”

        So now her father is privileged!? For no other reason for being a white male. What a fucking nasty evil cunt you are. She is privileged for never working a day in her life but receiving more money than most people will ever earn, including white men in their own countries.

        “Why would she make an enemy out of white people when she has relatives that are both white and Asian? Because she isn’t. Her show makes an enemy out of a particular type of man who happens to be white – a philandering, wealthy father who happens to be a cutthroat lawyer that isn’t as constrained by a moral conscience both in his business and personal life as much as he should be.”

        No paki. The bad guy has to be a “straight white male”. He is a generic white male. They would never of had her Chinese mother or a Chinese father as the evil one.

        ——-

        “There’s nothing outrageous about her comment, only with your interpretation of it.”

        Yes it is outrageous you inferior foreign fuck. You are not the one being insulted so keep your fucking mouth shut. There is no “interpretation” of the words. Just the words.

        Fuck you, fuck islam, fuck liberals.

        You are NOT and never will be an American.

        • — You dumb fucking cunt.

          Fuck you white racist piece of shit.

          You’re trying to imply that because she said that there weren’t roles for white males that is “good” when it is obvious to anyone who isn’t a racist piece of shit like you that she said it was good for women and diversity, not that it was good that white men didn’t have roles.

          EVERYTHING ELSE YOU SAID BEYOND THIS IS BASED ON THIS UTTERLY BASELESS FOUNDATION.

          — She said white men were being turned down for roles in general.

          No she didn’t you fucktard. She said what she heard for THAT PILOT SEASON.

          — You said that dickhead. You projecting lying piece of third world shit.

          You utterly retarded fucking moron. The fact that casting agents were seeking more roles for women and diversity implicitly presupposes that there are less roles for white males. White males can’t be TURNED DOWN FOR ROLES that don’t exist for them.

          – White liberals are happy to insult whites.

          Like I said, it’s YOUR KIND OF WHITE.

          – What a fucking nasty evil cunt you are.

          No that would be you for TWISTING WHAT SOMEONE SAYS INTO BULLSHIT.

          GO FUCK YOURSELF.

          • *** “You’re trying to imply that because she said that there weren’t roles for white males that is “good” when it is obvious to anyone who isn’t a racist piece of shit like you that she said it was good for women and diversity, not that it was good that white men didn’t have roles.”

            She thinks it’s a “good thing” that white males are getting fewer roles so that women and foreigners get them instead. If there is a role going, irregardless of sex or race, anyone but a white male should get it and it’s a “good thing. That is racist.
            ——
            *** “She said what she heard for THAT PILOT SEASON.”

            White men turned down for pilot season roles in general, irregardless of roles. Not specific to pilot season. It’s not like they stop being virtue signalling liberal pussies after pilot season. You dumb paki. Go blow yourself up in an open field.

            ——-

            *** “The fact that casting agents were seeking more roles for women and diversity”.

            You said it yourself “women AND diversity”, not just foreign women. It could include white women, just as much as black men.

            *** “implicitly presupposes that there are less roles for white males.”

            And Kreuk thinks that is a “good thing”. Too many white males. Deny white men roles so that women (irregardless of race) and non whites get them instead. Racist.

            *** “White males can’t be TURNED DOWN FOR ROLES that don’t exist for them.”

            The roles don’t have to be “white male roles”. They are just roles. A white woman or shit skin paki male like you could get the role. But not a white man becuase he is a white man. No one is going to offer a white male the role of a black woman. The roles are just roles you prick. And white males are being denied them for being white and male. And according to Kreuk, that is a “good thing”.

            ——
            *** “Like I said, it’s YOUR KIND OF WHITE.”

            No. Just whites. They don’t care what kind of white. Just white. LIBERAL white males turned down for roles for the exact same reason NORMAL white males are turned down for roles: becuase they are white. Does not matter how different you are, you are both white. If they give roles to libtard white males but not normal whites males, that would be political discrimination. White liberals are pretentious, low self esteem, self loathing retards. They don’t care about their own race.

          • “You’re trying to imply that because she said that there weren’t roles for white males that is “good” when it is obvious to anyone who isn’t a racist piece of shit like you that she said it was good for women and diversity, not that it was good that white men didn’t have roles.”

            If she simply said it was a “good thing” that women and non whites were getting roles, that would be one thing.

            But she said women and non-whites were getting roles at the expense of white males and that it is a “good thing”.

            The fact she correlates white men being denied roles based on their sex and ethncity so that those of a different sex and ethnicity get the roles instead is offensive to those being turned down for being white males.

            If I was told in my home country: “nope, we don’t want a white male”, I would be offended.

          • — She thinks it’s a “good thing” that white males are getting fewer roles so that women and foreigners get them instead. If there is a role going, irregardless of sex or race, anyone but a white male should get it and it’s a “good thing.

            No she doesn’t. She thinks that it is good thing that there are more roles being opened up for women and diversity, not that it is good that white males had less roles. You can be neutral regarding the state of those who happen to have less opportunities as a result, those who’ve almost always had a higher proportion of roles opened up for them simply because they are the dominant majority. There are only a limited amount of opportunities in a highly competitive industry where supply far exceeds demand.

            — That is racist.

            No it’s not. To be a racist someone has to be maliciously intolerant of others because of their “race” or cultural origins being different than theirs. Not allowing them equal opportunities and equal rights because they find them inferior. Not thinking people belong in “your” country because of the color of their skin due to you being the implicit privilege of being the dominant majority. Calling people “shit skin”, like you do. All of the characteristics you put on display. The majority of the male leads in her show Burden of Truth were white males.

            — self loathing retards.

            Ah yes, the “self-hate” card comes out for those from your race that disagree with you. YOUR KIND OF WHITE.

          • You have lost Paki boy. Kristin Kreuk could fart in your halal cereal and you would make excuses you sad old low testosterone emasculated piss worm. Nothing you can say will change her words. Check your brown privilege.

          • “Ah yes, the “self-hate” card comes out for those from your race that disagree with you. YOUR KIND OF WHITE.”

            They hate whites who don’t surrender to their feminist, gay, trannie, PC cult. They don’t allow people to disagree.

          • If I “lost” – whatever that even means – why do you whine so much on forum that has no power to change anything with respect to what you’re bitching about? Why do you perpetually cast racial slurs and other ad hominems and moan about how people are taking over your so-called “white countries”? It is the epitome of metaphysical ignorance to believe that you are superior to others because of the color of the skin you are born into. Why do you project constantly and act like a narcissistic troll with an obvious agenda irrelevant to the subject matter of this forum?

            Because you’re too much of a coward to put a face in front of the words. The only thing I’ve lost is time. You’ve lost your marbles.

  • Yea stupid let’s have a women put on your strapon and audition as the leading male. What color are the rainbows in your delusional world?

  • And speaking of nonsense lies, I just found this comment on another thread:

    [The “smiley face” freak and Flowers show real signs of dangerous instability. Flowers was actually stalking me online to antagonize me outside of FR. I hope for Frank’s sake these aren’t anyone he’s linked with or beholden to. (Someone said smiley is a “Stefan?” or I woulda called it female or some kinda shemale misogynist with all the “toodles”]

    The nonsense/lie/fabrication part being that I’ve never contacted Heidi (outside of responding to her on Frank Report,) ever. Not even once. Which she should know.

    If she has really been contacted by someone claiming to be me, she should provide that information here, so I can report the fraudulent account and have it closed.
     

  • Frank, can you ban the idiots who keep insisting that Shadowstate is Thomas Sekara? This is getting beyond stupid now. These morons know it’s not Shadow, but they continue to post these lies…..how old are these commenters? These can’t be adults.

      • They are NXIVM trolls. The irony is how they call others stalkers when NXIVM is a MLM. It basically stalks people to bring into the group to scam them and NXIVM in particular is built on real life stalking of women for their fake guru to fuck. They’re projecting fake fucks.

    • Flowers could well be Scooter Johnson. They are both juvenile morons. Please ban them both Frank. Leave shadowperv/Thomas Sekera here. His obsession is amusing. Looking forward to his Dec 7th hearing in Orange County

    • Flowers,
      Thank you for being a defender of the truth.
      Today I celebrated my typical holiday tradition.
      I eat a big breakfast or lunch and then go to the movie matinee.
      This year it was “Fantastic Beasts 2: the Crimes of Grimewald.” starring Johnny Depp and Jude Law.

      I hope you and your family had a great day, I know in Canada you clebrate Thanksgiving on October 12.
      And I hope you and your family have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

      • Flowers is the defender of truth??????????????? LOLOLOL. Stalking Mack has robbed you of any sense whatsoever. Hell buddy maybe you are the one looking in Flowers windows, and here we thought it was her vivid imagination.

          • I guess if you can call harassing and trying to control her entire neighborhood while taking time out to stalk people in the comments section on Frank Report “living”,

            If I cared more, I would go look for the post regarding dangerous instability to agree with it, because it is absolutely true. They are both toxic nutjobs, if they are even two different persons.

          • How am I “stalking” anyone in the comments section, anonymous? Please explain how that is accomplished.

    • Quick question for Shadow – have you ever been to plumbing school?

      BTW – glad to see Flower and Shadow bonding. Maybe they can co-auther an article for Frank? Curious – is it frowned upon for FR contributors to date?

      • Is there some reason for you to be rude to me or to Shadow, Nutjob? You’re the one who started making uncalled for comments about me, and I bet Shadow never made any comments about you either.

        • Yes. You call it rude but that wasn’t the intention. I want Shadow to break a smile and see some humor in the stalking situation… And, in general, I felt this thread needed some humor added to it. You dating Shadow does that for me. Maybe it will to others as well. I’m ok if you are offended as long as others are entertained.

  • Trudeau Government Announces $600 MILLION Media Bailout

    In their economic update, the Trudeau Liberals have announced a series of measures that add up to a $600 million media bailout.

    Instead of letting the Canadian People pick and choose which media companies to support freely, the Trudeau Liberals are forcing you to bail out the media that they pick – using your tax dollars to do it.

    The government has announced a series of ‘tax credits and incentives,’ which will cost $600 million over the next five years.

    While the dollar amounts of the bailout have been announced, the government says the specifics will be decided after they consult an ‘independent panel.’ Among the expected ideas are a ‘tax credit’ (really cheques being sent to media corporations) for labour costs and content creation, alongside a tax credit for subscribers of digital media sites.

    Surely it’s just a coincidence that the Toronto Red Star just put a paywall in and is shifting towards a subscription model…

    Of course, nobody on the panel will recommend not giving the media a huge bailout at taxpayer expense.

    The big problem is that – beyond the waste of taxpayer dollars – the government will be picking which media companies end up getting bailed out.

    The Trudeau Liberals are trying to hide the true nature of the program by saying it will be ‘independent’ from political interference, but everybody who understands life knows that’s a total joke. Whoever picks the ‘independent panel’ has the power, and it’s easy to pick people who will do exactly what you want them to do.

    For example, does anyone really think any true independent voices will be picked by the government?

    And does anyone really think that the prospect of a gigantic bailout won’t influence the news coverage of desperate reporters?

    After all, with the Conservatives opposing measures to bailout the media at taxpayer expense, there is now a massive financial incentive for the media to keep the Trudeau Liberals in power. There’s zero chance that won’t influence the reporting.

    This is disastrous for Canada, because it means that any remnants of a free press we once had will be lost. Nearly all of the media – aside from independent voices like SpencerFernando.com and others – will either be dominated by the state-run CBC, or will be in ‘private companies’ that are surviving only based on government funding, and are thus beholden to the state.

    It’s a serious blow to democracy, and the consequences will be very negative for our country.

    Spencer Fernando

    • There are no masculine men left in Canada. They pander to women, foreigners, poo pushers, “transgender” freaks etc for votes. With the “men” so ball-less and weak, they don’t have to face any opposition whatsoever.

      Burden Of Truth is what you get when you put liberals on the television: Men are bad, whites are bad, token interracial dykes, insulting Christianity (“straight white male” religion), virtue signalling bullshit, from an actual cult member, who filmed that shit while the NXIVM branding story was being exposed. I read an interview with Kreuk promoting this shit saying if you are a white man (in your own country) trying to get into the entertainment industry, there is “nothing for you and it is a “good thing”. So according to Kristin Kreuk, whites don’t deserve millions of dollars for doing nothing like Kristin Kreuk. Whites can stay in their stations, working boring mundane jobs for crap money and have their money taken away and given to Kristin Kreuk to insult us on white tax payer funded CBC. Maybe Kreuk could give us all tips on tax evasion she learnt in NXIVM so that we can cling on to our money and not have it given to her by the piece of shit libtards in power.

      • ” I read an interview with Kreuk saying if you are a white man trying to get into the entertainment industry, there is “nothing for you and it is a “good thing”.
        That’s an outrageous statement, so much so that I suspect that it is out of context and misleading.
        You can make KK look very bad if you can supply a link to the original article.

        • You’re right. It is an outrageous comment. It’s racist isn’t it?

          “Even for TV stuff, the pilot season of last year, which I didn’t do, but from what I understood they wanted female leads and they wanted diversity. If you were a white guy, there just wasn’t as much available for you which is a good thing for us, I think.”

          https://www.okuroku.com/shuyan-saga-kristin-kreuk/

          By “diversity”, they mean NO WHITE MALES. We can’t be the dominant ones in our own countries because liberals and foreigners don’t like it and think they are being oppressed. Liberals going out of their way to hire anyone but a dreaded “white male” and according to Kristin Kreuk, it is a “good thing”. Yet Kristin Kreuk is happy to receive ridiculous sums of other people’s wages.

          Fact: if you want to see Chinese faces on screen, go to China. There are over a billion of them there. Very “diverse”! Lots and lots of brown people in Bollywood. So “diverse”!

          • Thanks for the link to the full quote in context….as suspected it is not quite as bad as the paraphrased quote.

            The section of the interview dealt with the lack of showbiz jobs for women and people of color, like her. KK said that TV Execs (not her) “wanted female LEADS and they wanted diversity.” That’s the choice of Execs, not her.
            Referring to what the situation was like, KK said, “If you were a white guy, there just wasn’t as much available for you, which is a good thing…” but you left out KK adding “…for us, I think.” Of course, as a “diverse” women, what TV Execs wanted was a good thing for her and others like her, so she is correct to “think” that. It may be self serving, but who among us doesn’t want more opportunities for people like “us?”

            If TV Execs think putting on more shows with female leads might be more successful, that is their choice, not KK’s, and she shouldn’t be blamed for welcoming this.
            Maybe diversity is smart business. In movies, for instance, Superheros have always been white men, but two of the most successful recent Superhero movies were “Wonder WOMAN” and “BLACK Panther.” So maybe those Execs were smart to consider leads other than white men. And “Crazy Rich Asians” was a risky movie having a rare all-Asian cast, but became “the top grossing romantic comedy in 10 years.”

            For centuries, white males in North America have had the advantage of white males hiring white males and excluding women and others from rising up in society and in all types of businesses. If you are a white male, you might feel angry that “others” are getting jobs you thought only you deserved.

            Again, thanks for supplying the original article.

          • She said it was a good thing for women of diversity. She didn’t say anything derogatory about white males. After all, her father and her boyfriend are both white males.

          • Kristin Crook is squandering her newfound opportunity. A responsible person in her elevated status would be all over criticizing NXIVM, not making a Raniere-inspired word salad statement. Unless, of course, she is guilty of much more than what she’s sheepishly admitted to doing. I’m confident the FBI/DOJ will sort things out and give Crook an opportunity to do her best acting of her lame acting career.

        • “Nothing for you” is a paraphrase.

          But it is of the same effect: “there just wasn’t as much available for you which is a good thing for us”

          • Not sure if she meant it as a racist comment. I took it as there were less roles for white men (and therefore more roles for women) which was good for women….but yes, it was kind of a dumb remark.

        • “The section of the interview dealt with the lack of showbiz jobs for women and people of color, like her. KK said that TV Execs (not her) “wanted female LEADS and they wanted diversity.” That’s the choice of Execs, not her.”

          There are no lack of showbiz roles for women and non-whites. Most people in white countries going for acting roles will be white and most being rejected will be white. It’s statistics. It’s the same in Bollywood. Those going for roles, getting roles and being rejected will be Indian. Non whites are not being oppressed for being minorities in white countries.

          Execs are forcing liberal PC culture on everyone. White males are portrayed as the villains of the west that need defeating and they pander to women and non-whites (like politicians do) hence Wonder Woman and Black panther that you referenced.

          She said it was a “good thing” so she obviously agrees that white males in their own countries should be turned down for being white males. In Canada, white males are having their hard earned money given to Kristin Kreuk. There is no talk of “diversity” in non white countries. Minorities in white countries are the majorities in their own countries. Where is the white “representation” in Chinese cinema and Bollywood?

          ——–

          “Of course, as a “diverse” women, what TV Execs wanted was a good thing for her and others like her, so she is correct to “think” that. It may be self serving, but who among us doesn’t want more opportunities for people like “us?””

          So they can be “self serving” i.e. selfish, but we can’t put ourselves first in our own countries? When we talk like this, we are called “Nazi”, “bigot” and “racist” by these self serving people, in OUR countries.

          ———

          “If TV Execs think putting on more shows with female leads might be more successful, that is their choice, not KK’s, and she shouldn’t be blamed for welcoming this.”

          It’s called pandering. Yes she should be blamed for welcoming this because we should not be sidelined in our own countries because white liberals want to feel righteous, politicians want to secure voter blocs and non-whites hate whites in our own countries. She is welcoming something that is overtly racist and she thinks it is a “good thing”. Anyone who supports that is to blame, from the execs to the actors and stupid consumers of this PC bullshit.

          ———-

          “And “Crazy Rich Asians” was a risky movie having a rare all-Asian cast, but became “the top grossing romantic comedy in 10 years.”

          It’s not rare in Asia. It’s the norm in Asia to have exclusively all-Asian casts. Even less “diversity” then in white countries. Asians in America make up 6.6% of the whole US population. There are over a billion Chinese in China. They are not oppressed by white people.

          ———-

          “For centuries, white males in North America have had the advantage of white males hiring white males and excluding women and others from rising up in society and in all types of businesses. If you are a white male, you might feel angry that “others” are getting jobs you thought only you deserved.”

          Why can’t we be dominant in our own countries like non-whites are in their own countries? Are women “represented” any more in non-white countries than in white countries?

          ——-

          The fact that she said white males are being turned down for being white males in their own countries is offensive. Non-whites are not victims for being minorities in countries they don’t originate from. This is political correctness and they force it on everyone.

          Seeing as you brought up N. America:

          Blacks make up 13% of the US population. What percentage of them even consider 1) becoming an actor 2) going for auditions and 3) getting the roles?

          6.6% of the US population is Asian American of some kind. Again, What percentage of them even consider 1) becoming an actor 2) going for auditions and 3) getting the roles?

          As for women’s roles, men don’t want to see women on screen pretending to be men. Only feminist buy into that bullshit.

          Being a minority is not oppression.

          • She said there were more roles for women of diversity and it was a “good thing for us” – women of diversity. White men can’t be turned down for female roles. You’re just reading what you want into what she said because of your imagined status as an oppressed white male. Kristin is half-white herself and has a white father and a white boyfriend.

          • Ignoring most of your (white-men-deserve-to-dominate-our-own-country) screed, I’ll just add one statistic to yours:

            White men are the minority in Canada and the US.
            But don’t worry, as some Anonymous wise man said:

            “Being a minority is not oppression.

          • I don’t even care what a bunch of spoiled brat actors think. Most of them are so crazy before they got recruited by NXIVM they should have skipped a few classes and go right for the advanced ones. Except NXIVM didn’t want to leave any money on the table.

        • As of 2016, Asians make up 17.7% of the Canadian population.

          They pay significantly less tax than white Canadians, including the funding of the CBC. Yet they want more roles on television when they contribute such little to the funding.

          Minorities in Europe and the Americas never demand to pay as much taxes as the host people they insult, nor do they demand to be killed or maimed in battle like white soldiers are.

          They are only “oppressed” when it suits them.

        • Didn’t say “men” specifically but “whites”.

          – “White men are the minority in Canada and the US.”

          White men AND white women are the majority. We are one race, one people. Mass immigration fucks that up.

  • Hey mitch ya son of a bitch, what a surprise to see you and scooter fondly replying to another of Thomas Sekera’s obsessed articles. December 7th is Pearl Harbor Day, an appropriate day for your hearing Mitch-shadowperv-Tom Sekera

  • It’s a generalization and I’ll be labeled misogynistic but women are pretty horrible towards each other. Worse treatment than by men. You see it whether they be partners, an office setting or even a group of friends. Judgement, insults and supposition. You see the unprovoked attacks right here in the comments.
    Awful

    • While I agree women that can be real bitches to other women, I didn’t see any of these attacks you mention on the comments section. What women attacked each other here? Mostly I just see the (men?) attacking other men , such as the endless attacks against Johnson and Shadowstate.

      • Really Flowers? You call Mitch Garrity a coward and claim you’re up for a debate and then you resort to this BS? I don’t wish to speak for another but, I believe, he is speaking generally (as he stated) that women posting here can be pretty horrible toward one another. I would surmise he could be referring to Flowers (you) with that observation. The word here most likely refers toi this blog, as a whole, not necessarily in the comments under this particular story.

        I would also add that when someone does not answer one of your taunting, juvenile comments it doesn’t not, in anyway, mean they are afraid of you or that you are correct. I believe it means taking the time to type a response to you is a waste of both time and energy.

  • Sociopaths are created.
    Keith created a sociopath in Allison.
    Over time he didvwhay ect does. Scrambled her brain and rearranged ir to his liking. Whatever critical judgement she once possessed was suspended and done so without her overt knowledge.
    All around her reinforced the new tenets of her life. Reality was replaced by an insular world where up became down, right became wrong.
    Too many years, far too many indoctrinated with this new world view.
    If and when she ever wakens she will scream like no one has heard before.
    Out of compassipn I fear for her on that day of awakening. She may descend into such a madness that is onhuman, harm herself or harm others.
    Saying this does not exonerate her of her crimes and, we suspect, they are many.
    Society will only get justice when she, and the others, are punished.
    There are so many cults of various kinds, religious, pseudo religious, ideological, etc. Different formats yet the same dynamics.
    Note=It is the women who suffer in these groups, the women who are abused and used, the women who, in the end, pay the highest price.
    I ask=where are the feminists who should be protesting these crimes against women?
    Silent.
    Nowhere to be found.

    Even if only half of whst is alleged is true it”s criminal and horrid and, even worse, it”s woman doing this to other women, their own sisters.

  • In light of these stalking allegations.. I don’t think Frank should allow Shadowstate to continue posting these obsessive articles… it’s unhealthy

      • haha this from a man who for 10 years exploited and manipulated for Amway… and now sees himself as some kind of whistleblower??? for years you knew it was going on, and are now sharing stories of just how much you knew… Lock him up!

    • I oppose all violence against people except in very limited legally approved circumstances.
      Ms. Mack’s violent behavior towards other women has attracted to her a mentally unstable element.
      It’s unfortunate that Ms. Mack lacked the foresight to understand how her pathological conduct could create negative consequences for her both before and after her conviction.

      All that said I suspect that Mr. Sekera intended Mack no harm.
      He was released relatively quickly and probably carried no weapons.
      Sekera is probably a deluded fan of Ms. Mack who believes that he will somehow save her from the justice she so richly deserves

      You call yourself truthseeker.
      Here is the truth.
      The FBI is about to bombard Ms. Mack with the truth from thousands and thousands of emails.

      Ms. Mack will not be done in by an ardent fan.
      Ms. Mack will be done in by her own words in the hands of the FBI.

      • look shadowstate/Tom, i want to be clear, i want Alison Mack punished… on some level to know how guilty she is (like you) but stalking isnt cool, writing 1000s and 1000s of word essays with no more information then Joe public is unhealthy.. and badgereing her for years/comic-con/twitter/waiting outside her house is just plain wrong… On some level you have to reach a point where you realise ive nothing useful left to say… Franks turned you into the new “monte blue” village idiot figure… Just like she does with KR, you need to recognise you were once a person before her and can move onto a semi fufulling life without her

        • Good try truthseeker, but shadow/Thomas is too far gone. He may have been born autistic or his mother drank too much while he was in the womb….who knows and who really cares. Bottom line is, celebrity stalkers are basically addicts to their celebrity like a crackhead to cocaine. Most teenage boys have hollywood crushes on certain actresses but grow out of it become a man and interact with everyday woman. Some guys like shadow never get out of that phase. Thankfully he was caught before Mindy Mack shot him. Probation is better than the grave for him. For Shadowperv aka Thomas Sekera, better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6

        • I did not stalk anyone.
          Get a grip on reality.
          Everything I post is publicly available.
          I always give sources so people can look it up.

          If you do’t like what I say, then make your own substantive comments.
          Do your own research.

          • your own investigation, you cheat you only use the information published by frank or by the same allison and edit to support your own narrative, like when you say that allison enslaved and totured 150 women, when we know that most of those women were Mexican and they were recruited by members of NXIVM mexico, and 150 was the number of women who was in DOS at its best and that was before frank published the story, but between that moment and the arrest of allison mack I spent almost a year, time in which there were massive desertions so how is it that the evil allison mack had the power over 150 women to torture them to extort them, but then frank report publishes the story and it’s just a rumor in terms of news in the media and yet all these women they left for fear that their names would appear in the list published by frank VAYA, that yes that is to have power over the others unless shadow forgets the small detail of the brainwashing and indoctrination that NXIVM does to its students and coaches which gives power to keith raniere not to allison mack, and if I’m not wrong allison is a yellow belt and lauren green belt which puts her above allison and perhaps loreta heron was not green to achieve to contain desertions in Mexico, answer that shadow.

          • Anonymous, STFU. You’re being stupid (again). Frank already explained why he values Shadow’s repetitive stories, and your repetitive critical comments about Shadow’s repetitive stories are much worse than Shadow’s repetitive stories. STFU

          • Scooter shut the fuck up. We know that shadowperv’s monotonous bullshit draws comments to that make the Frank Report.far more interesting than shadowperv’s drivel. More readers are interested in the comments than yours and shadowpervs pablum.

  • Hey Shadow i know you’re that middle age man stalking Allison Mack. You need to get some help with that issue. Enjoy seeing Allison in court and good luck. I know you’ll need it and Happy Thanksgiving buddy LMAO!

Archives

     
     

CONTACT

frankparlato@gmail.com
Phone / Text: (716) 990-5740
%d bloggers like this: