Frank Parlato
NEW HAVEN, Conn. — During the pendency of his case, Paul Boyne has spent 18 months in jail. The state offered a plea deal: time served. He turned it down.
His trial starts this week.
Boyne, 62, of Springfield, Virginia, faces 18 felony counts of stalking and electronic stalking for ten posts published on thefamilycourtcircus.com — a website that attacked Connecticut’s family court system.
The jury will decide whether his words were political speech or a criminal threat.
What Boyne Wrote
On January 6, 2022, Boyne wrote about Judge Gerard Adelman: “Judge Gerard Adelman gets a .50 cal to the head.”
On May 1, 2022, again targeting Adelman: “Adelman proves beyond a reasonable doubt, jews of Connecticut hijack courts, rule from the talmud, victimize children in worship of their money god. He begs a patriot’s .50 cal to the head.”
About Judge Jane Grossman: “Is she begging for a .308 shot to the head thru two panes of window glass from an oath keeper, concealed in the woods behind her house?”
About Judge Eric Coleman: “Only the Second Amendment remains for the sovereign people to protect the children. There lies the constitutional case for the assassination of Judge Eric Coleman. A .50 cal to the head, a .308 sniper shot from the grassy knoll through two panes of window glass, complete and rapid discharge of a high capacity magazine in a dark alley. Burn the courthouse to the ground, bring body bags.”
On March 8, 2021: “Happy .308 day! More justice can be dispensed in one bullet than by all of Family Court. Celebrate the Second Amendment as protection from the pedophiles who run family court. Judicial discretion falls to the report of a rifle.”
About Judge Thomas Moukawsher, with his photo superimposed in crosshairs: “It is JUST CAUSE when Mouk gets a .50 cal to the head.” The caption beneath his photo read: “Given the domestic terrorism, several bullets needed.”
He published home addresses. He posted photos of residences. He described property layouts and surrounding terrain.
He referred to the courts as the “JEWdiciary” and to Connecticut as “Corrupticut.” He called the family court system “a jewish enterprise designed to destroy the rights of a sovereign people.”
Boyne’s defense of his speech, posted on the blog: “State sponsored terrorists… should fear the power of a sovereign people who hold Second Amendment rights for the sole purpose of defending themselves against such tyranny. A .50 cal to the head does an excellent job of readjusting the attitude of tyrants and their elite masters, while defending the Constitution. When the hunters of free speech become the hunted, there is liberty and justice for all.”
What the Judges Said
Grossman told investigators the post was specific about her property and the woods behind her house. She said it was terrifying.
She reviewed her security footage. She searched the grounds. She said she could not relax in the room of her home that Boyne had described.
Adelman stated, “I have serious concerns about this blog as it repeatedly calls for someone to kill me. Almost every entry speaks about a .50 caliber bullet to my head.”
Coleman told investigators, “I do not know what the author of the article or the administrator of the website is capable of. Moreover I do not know anything about the website’s audience and who among that audience may be inspired to act on the suggestion to harm or kill me.”
What Didn’t Happen
The facts are that since 2022, when he posted his threats above, no one harmed a judge. No one fired a shot. No assault took place.
Boyne never went to Connecticut to confront anyone. No one acted on what he wrote.
They were words, mean, and vile.
The Prosecution Expands
On February 13, 2026, the State of Connecticut filed a Notice of Intent to Offer Uncharged Misconduct Evidence — a 25-page motion asking the court to let jurors see more than the ten charged blog posts.
Prosecutors want to introduce:
Voicemails Boyne left for Connecticut State Police Detective Samantha McCord after a predawn SWAT raid on his Virginia home seized his computers in June 2022.
Recorded jail calls in which Boyne discussed the blog, its hosting, and its effect on judges.
Eight uncharged blog posts threatening other judges with “.50 cal” and “.308” language and containing racial slurs against black judges.
The Grievance That Fueled the Blog
Boyne went through a divorce that began in 2007. Adelman handled the case and terminated his parental rights. He lost all contact with his children.
Connecticut’s Family Court has drawn criticism from litigants and reform groups for years.
Whatever grievance started the blog, the language changed. It moved from criticism to naming weapons. From general anger to specific people at specific addresses.
But Boyne had been attacking judges by name for years. He was known to them. He was persistent. After several years, the Attorney General decided to act. His investigators went to the judges and collected complaints.
A jury may ask whether the judges feared a literal bullet or if they agreed to cooperate with the AG, who assured them he would silence Boyne.
The law in Connecticut does not require judges to be terrified. It requires that Boyne’s conduct would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety.
The Plea He Refused
The state offered Boyne a deal: plead guilty to misdemeanors and walk free with time served. He said no.
That refusal means Boyne will litigate the First Amendment question.
It also means Boyne chose the risk of additional incarceration (he is out on bail) over a guilty plea — a decision that either reflects principled constitutional conviction or miscalculation.
The First Amendment Collision
He has some precedent behind him. The Supreme Court has protected harsh political speech for years.
In Watts v. United States in 1969, a Vietnam War protester said that if the military drafted him, “the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J.” The Court called it political hyperbole, not a true threat.
In Counterman v. Colorado in 2023, the Court said prosecutors must show that the speaker knew there was a risk the subject of the words would take it as a real threat and ignored that risk.
Boyne’s lawyers will likely say he never contacted the judges, never went to Connecticut, never tried to hurt anyone. They will say the language was metaphorical, anger at a system he believed was corrupt.
The state will say he named names, listed weapons, posted home addresses, and described property. He did it repeatedly. That is not metaphor. That is cyber stalking.
The Slippery Slope
If publishing addresses and invoking firearms in political criticism becomes stalking when no violence occurs, the precedent extends beyond Boyne.
The concern is not that courts should tolerate genuinely threatening language. It is that prosecutors can expand the definition of “threat” to encompass a wide range of legitimate dissent.
Still, if the state cannot prosecute repeated invocations of sniper fire, crosshairs imagery, home addresses, and assassination rhetoric directed at named individuals, what option does the state have to prevent escalation before someone acts?
Antisemitism
The blog’s violent language was not race-neutral, and this is key to the prosecution’s case.
Boyne described the courts as a “jewish enterprise.” He used the term “JEWdiciary” repeatedly. He wrote that judges “rule from the talmud” and serve “their money god.” He called a black judge the n-word and described another as a “puppet doing her jewish master’s bidding.”
Connecticut State Police’s Hate Crimes Unit participated in the investigation.
The antisemitic and racist language is the element that Connecticut’s felony stalking statute requires prosecutors to prove as a hate crime.
What This Case Is
The trial will determine whether Boyne’s violent rhetoric directed at judges, accompanied by their addresses and photos, framed in antisemitic and racist language, and maintained for years from across state lines, constitutes a crime.
Boyne’s words are vile. Nothing in the First Amendment requires anyone to admire what he wrote or respect the man who wrote it.
The question is whether his speech is criminal, and in a free country, vile and criminal are not the same thing.
The First Amendment exists to protect that distinction.
For those who believe the family court system destroys families, Boyne’s prosecution looks like retaliation. For a state that wanted him silenced, prosecution was the only option left.
The website remains up. The old posts are still there. No new threats have appeared. The calls for violence, now four years old, have inspired no one to act.
To the Constitution, it is simpler than that. It is a test.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
The small group of individuals who sent Paul Boyne to prison:
A reasonable person might ask, “Who are these sinister figures, nobody mentions for fear of retaliation, that have aided and abetted these criminal associates since the mid-70s?”
The other day, Larry Noodles wrote the following on his blog:
Asking a judge to define Zionism isn’t a stupid thing to do. To understand what’s happening in the world, we need more communication, not less.
For example, if the group connected to Mordecai Zevi has something to do with the obvious racketeering in Connecticut “family courts”, the obvious cover-up and the obvious Hartford Courant’s complicity in those crimes since the mid-70s, we need to ask more questions, not less.
Another citizen journalist, reviewing a book written by a former member of a “secret society” controlling the world behind closed doors wrote about Zionism on his blog:
https://www.biblaridion.info/blog/the-rise-and-fall-of-a-frankist-monster/
Does Judge Grossman know something Prosecutor Doyle doesn’t know?
https://larrynoodles.com/paul-boyne-convicted-of-all-16-counts-of-stalking/
March 3, 2026 10:38 pm. Naked women attempting to get into the Connecticut Superior Court House. Report she was robbed. Police called and she was given a jacket. Ran off before the police arrived. She probably thought William Tong’ s office would say she asked for it.
Larry Noodles is a great guy. He’s Paul’s friend (and probably Jewish).
https://larrynoodles.com/paul-boyne-testifies-in-first-amendment-case/
“Connecticut’s unfortunate recent history with corruption is well known, but so is this Office’s history of combating corrupt activity,” said U.S. Attorney Daly.
“Our efforts have been aided by a dogged media and courageous, conscientious citizens, business owners and public officials who have provided information about corrupt activity in their midst. We call on public servants, the vast majority of whom are honest brokers, to not look the other way when they see indications of corruption. We cannot overstate the importance of citizen participation in our fight against corruption, and we urge all citizens to assist us in this effort.”
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/federal-law-enforcement-authorities-announce-formation-task-force-fight-public-corruption
It’s not the media’s job to threaten to the lives of the subjects it covers. Simple.
Did Mr. Adelman happen to testify about being the Director of the public-private network of lawyers, judges and contractors monopolizing child custody cases (with judicial authority and judicial immunity) for a few decades?
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/mothers/130520-wash-times.pdf
Do you believe that supports threatening to murder people?
While working with the DOJ in 2015 (during the time of the DOJ’s public corruption investigation) if Judge Dayton noticed Connecticut Chapter of AFCC, Inc. fraud and racketeering, she must inform the jury about all mitigating factors and exculpatory evidence or recuse herself from the case.
If it’s possible that Ms. Dayton now presides over the Boyne case as a white collar crime expert, that’s the same role Mr. O’Neil seems to have played in a parallel case heard in Bridgeport.
If Ms. Dayton’s participation is to further hide crimes committed against the public, the question is: What’s Ms. Dayton’s understanding of her role in the case?
For example:
Does Ms. Dayton know enough about the case to put the Boyne case in context for the jury or will she instruct the jury to ignore what led to Mr. Boyne’s predictable behaviors?
Does Ms. Dayton know about the small network of family court judges and lawyers who ordered their network’s “evaluators”, “therapists” and researchers to participate in and profit from Mr. Boyne’s case?
Does Ms. Dayton know AFCC Inc. founding documents in the 1970s define their activities as human research?
HHS federal records and state records show the CT AFCC Inc. network used state and federal funds in that research.
After having been deeply involved in human research and social engineering since about the same time AFCC Inc. incorporated, Ms. Katz and Mr. Rubin surely know that ”Dr.” Sidney Horowitz and a few members of the CT AFCC Inc. network conducted experiments on Paul Boyne without Mr. Boyne’s consent. Mr. Boyne’s behavior that followed was entirely predictable.
Jury members also have a right and a responsibility to be informed and the 2024 overturning of Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council
means it’s up to judges to decide whether or not networks such as CT AFCC Inc. destroyed children and families in Connecticut’s “family courts”.
More about informed consent:
https://irbo.nih.gov/documents/447/Consent_Forms_and_Processes-_What_Investigators_Need_to_Know.pdf
Must she inform the jury about all mitigating factors and exculpatory evidence or recuse herself from the case?
https://robinsonreport.substack.com/p/janet-mills-named-in-doj-epstein
Hartford Courant
Feb 18, 2026
Man accused of cyberstalking CT judges free on bail. Amount he had to post massively reduced. …
Dear office providing oversight in “Connecticut v. Boyne”,
Kindly ask Mr. Tong, Mr. Staines, Ms. Katz, Ms. McCord and Shipman & Goodwin to preserve all records and emails.
Thank you,
Muchtou A. Fraid
At This Point, Inc.
“Company Name
NEW ENGLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT,INC.
Date of Incorporation
Sep 20, 2010
Record Status
FORFEITED
Citizenship/State Inc:
Domestic/Connecticut
Type
Stock
Latest Report
2018
Business Address
20 TAYLOR STREET, MANCHESTER, CT, 06042, United States
Mailing Address
20 TAYLOR STREET, MANCHESTER, CT, 06042, United States
Agent Name
DAVID J. MARKOWITZ
Agent Business Address
34 JEROME AVE., SUITE 108, BLOOMFIELD, CT, 06002, United States
Agent Residence Address
14 HIGH HILL RD. , CANTON, CT, 06019, United States …”
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25A187/369513/20250812175641703_HESSLER_Application.pdf
Mr. Mawhinney and Mr. Markowitz helped incorporate the Hessler businesses and a few local Freemason offices, too.
Mr. Hessler Sr. worked for IBM and IBM worked for the Nazis.
The Stamford/Norwalk State’s Attorney’s office prosecuted Michelle Troconis and not Kent Mawhinney.
Is Connecticut too ignorant, overwhelmed, distracted or too afraid to notice?
Mr. Mawhinney sharing Mr. Hessler’s jail cell while is also disturbing and mainstream news outlets keep Connecticut residents misled and misinformed. Connecticut is most definitely at risk.
Here’s an hint:
The risk isn’t a blog about corruption in Connecticut’s courts.
“Dude: I just got him to pull the trigger on $400 billion in tariffs on china”
“soon we will be talking real money … Great work”
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00783435.pdf
Note when the video camera was shut off during that friendly discussion:
Is he still charged with communicating threats? If so, his goose is cooked.
Because in the video. when they told him that was the charge, he said “ there was no communication. It was just like if I had posted it on a bulletin board in my front yard”
He never once denied that they were threats. He never once said he had no intent to harm anyone (in the video). He just said he didn’t communicate threats directly to anyone.
He was very creepy when he told the detective, using a voice and stare like he was Hannibal Lecter, “Samantha McCord, get ready, you’re going to be famous.” he said it in a threatening voice, as if it was meant to intimidate.
If he thought nobody involved was going to read his blog and it was just a sign in his front yard, then how can he claim that she was going to be “famous” now that he knows her name and has a grudge against her?
Anyone who thinks that video was not a bad look for Boyne is delusional.
I don’t know if the rest of the testimony and exhibits worked in Paul’s favor or not, but that video was not good.
Looks like you’re hoping to type the words “threats”, “threat” and “threatening” enough to sway public opinion away from reality.
Boyne’s blog was an effective or ineffective attempt to draw attention to the decades-long corruption in Connecticut government. We’ll see if his strategy works.
Connecticut’s judicial branch didn’t prosecute Jeffrey Epstein for his real threats after Epstein literally threatened a writer and editor at Vanity Fair. Those very real threats were in the form of the cat’s head on the Connecticut lawn, the bullet on the Connecticut doorstep and the threat of a hex on children.
Those real threats to actually threaten an editor and a writer at Vanity Fair should have been investigated and prosecuted. The cat’s head and bullet showed up on the Connecticut lawn where Connecticut law enforcement are supposed to protect residents of the state.
Mainstream news outlets could tell the public that Connecticut family court judges used connections and influence to jail a critic of family court corruption. Mainstream news outlets could tell the public about the lack of investigation and the lack of prosecution of crimes those family court judges committed.
For further background and context explaining why editors and writers are so intimidated: read the Epstein files
“ Looks like you’re hoping to type the words “threats”, “threat” and “threatening” enough to sway public opinion away from reality.”
Looks like you are in denial of reality. The video said “you’re being charged with communicating threats.” Paul’s reply was “I didn’t communicate them. I put them on a bulletin board in my front yard.”
You apparently don’t like reality. That doesn’t make it go away.
What in the hell does Epstein have to do with Boyne? Methinks you have scrambled eggs for brains.
Squeezing 5,000 outrageous insults into a 1-page article about family court corruption is probably more to attract attention and to prove a point.
If you’re trying to convince Ms. McCord to form a personal interest in jailing Paul, she probably won’t fall for that.
Just because his personal beliefs don’t match her personal beliefs, she’s clearly a professional. In that video, she acts like she separates her personal beliefs from her profession — and Paul was right about those law enforcement officers being fooled. They clearly have no idea how corrupted state and federal offices have become.
May “Connecticut v Boyne” and the release of the Epstein files start honest conversations to encourage free exercise of religion, speech, the press, assembly and the right to effectively petition our government for redress of grievances.
If I were trying to convince detective McCord of anything, I would contact her directly.. I’m merely sharing my opinion on a case in a blog comment section. Get a grip, KooKoo CoCoPuffs.
Seems your goose doesn’t care either way … since you’re really not taking sides … because you’re not sure what to think (and of course hope for the best for everyone) … just as long as everyone knows Boyne’s a serious threat to the world and he should be jailed for life to stop him from talking about the actual crimes a few individuals working out of the state’s courts committed.
Are you drunk? All I said was that video is definitely not a good look for him. In the video, he made it very clear that he is in fact an antisemite and wasn’t just pretending for “satirical” purposes. That will add credence to the hate crime charges. He also made it clear that he believed his blog has reach since he could make detective McCord “famous.” he also made the mistake of not denying what he wrote were threats.
If his whole trial was based on that video and his blog alone, I put my money on his being convicted. But if he has been able to present exhibits and testimony that painted a different picture, maybe he won’t be convicted. That’s all.
Are you anti-anything or anti-anyone and can the police arrest you for that?
Boyne wasn’t arrested for being anti-anything or anti-anyone. He was arrested for threatening people’s lives.
Boyne went above and beyond in his blog. If he only stated the details and not the suggestions. In 2014 the state of Connecticut held hearings in regards to the family court system. Much heated discussions were had. While William Tong and some court professionals snubbed their noses at the people. Center stage was advocates for parental alienation . The legal defense for pedophiles. Abusive parents and those who claimed victims. The group continues to rally for shared parenting and continue reunification for abused and neglected children . More aggressive moves towards forcing agreements of costly services. Split custody became the judicial norm and the removal of children from parents who bring up matters that most would agree are not the best interest of children. Addicted parents, minor attracted parents, history of abuse of spouses were ignored and allowed. The agreement within the state became stronger to argue custody cases with red flag. Appointments of Connecticut secret society of psychologist became popular and evidencary hearings went to the waist side. Failing criminal justice programs without oversight becomes the norm. Shared parenting becomes the norm even under questionable circumstances. Children are split up from each other. Organization that represents women and children are placed under the umbrella of equity. The national parenting organization formally fathers and families and fatherhood lead the way in financial resources for the state. While children come forward in the town of the summer camp. Sexual assault of minors is alleged by multiple children. Towns people become in an uproar of the town of Bethany’s attempt to keep it under wraps. The commission tasked with representing children in the state and policy. Partnered with equity. While the equity alliance supports the split custody of Connecticut children. Who is on the board of the The national parenting organization Connecticut . A parent of the accused. Shortly after the Jennifer’s deaths Lamont quickly decided that the organization tasked with representing women and children should be partnered with ” equity and opportunity”. What opportunity would this be? What does the state of Connecticut consider equity? Allowing the equity alliance advocating for men in the prison system. Prioritizing fatherhood and promoting legislation around sex offenders. ” Go to criminal court you say”. In a system protecting a gender . DCF train wreck and Connecticut cover ups. Plea bargaining, nullying, violent offender programs and many others. Regularly the state of Connecticut meets to address the legal system. One man is in charge. Women are regularly removed from state agencies by Lamont. Yet one man in charge of the families and programs is allowed to keep his job. Shows up to the hearings with no answers on how to fix the problems. While his wife receives awards for equity. What is equity in the state of Connecticut? Who is benefits. Wealthy white men center stage in the family court house.
“The state of Connecticut v. Boyne” is probably actually: a man named Paul v. the Connecticut chapter of an international cult.
https://ctexaminer.com/2025/05/14/courthouse-heist-remains-unsolved/
“ … the Judiciary Committee never called Emons back for questioning about complaints received after her confirmation hearing. 🧐
“It’s very unusual,” said Rep. Arthur J. O’Neill of Southbury, a lawyer who was elected 30 years ago and now is the longest-serving Republican in the House. “It’s kind of a bizarre situation. …”
https://ctmirror.org/2018/05/04/legislators-using-calendar-kill-judges-career/
Substitute “ATTY. BUSSERT” for ATTY DOWD and “Shipman & Goodwin” for Day Pitney — and Judge Brown could save Connecticut.
“… ATTY. DOWD: Your Honor, Exhibit 1 is a spreadsheet that is created from Day Pitney’s billing system.
THE COURT: Okay.
ATTY. DOWD: We enter our time contemporaneously in an automated system. The time is typically required to be released within three days of the services that those entries relate to having been made.
THE COURT: Okay.
ATTY. DOWD: So they’re made at or near the time that they’re done. This is done in the regular course of Day Pitney’s business. And it is regular for Day Pitney and other law firms to do exactly this. …”
https://ctmirror.org/2026/03/07/chief-justice-robinson-ct-supreme-court/
There’s suddenly a new judge presiding over the case, starting tomorrow. Former white-collar defense lawyer, like Mr. O’Neill. who also suddenly showed up in a connected case … to defend the white-collar racketeering out of … the Public Defenders’ Office which was quite the hot spot around 2014, before the DOJ’s “five agency public corruption task force”. If the family court corruption leading up to 2014 weren’t so embarrassing to the state, it would be criminal.
Will the Connecticut v. Boyne trial be video taped?
The Connecticut v. Boyne trial is as consequential as the Dulos trials. Unfortunately, the Dulos trials won’t include a videotaped Mawhinney trial. Will there be no trial because Mr. Mawhinney has Freemason connections? Does Mr. Mawhinney know what Ms. Katz and Mr. Rubin know? Were the Hesslers and others involved in the trafficking of children in DCF care?
Can Ms McCord tell us more about the Hessler case?
Wherever “family courts” and social service systems destroy so many families for decades, that’s what those systems were designed to do.
The commissioner of health and human services. ” That experience help to solidify my beliefs in leadership isn’t a title. ” ” It’s about responsibility , intention and service. “. Leading will empathy and equity ” more funding to enrich the state of Connecticut. While bancupcting the people living in it.
If you want to fix the family court system one must look into the funding systems. The AFCC is heavily inflicting the trajectory of the family court system. The same people benefiting from the legal abuse forcing people in to services that don’t fix family problems. These families imploded long before they landed on the court house steps. All the kings horses and all the kings men couldn’t put humpy dumpy back together again. Yet, the Connecticut health and human services is going to collect as much funding as possible to make it look like it is happening. Weather Paul Boyne is convicted or not .
Connecticut mainstream news reported the Dulos case with daily updates and video cameras in the courtroom because: ________________________________
Connecticut mainstream news mostly ignored Connecticut’s case against a blogger who wrote about corruption in the family courts because: ________________________________
Did Justice Thomas not know about Albert Pike and his “brother” Freemasons starting the KKK to divide America?
Freedom of speech in America means someone can share the history of what actually happened and others can decide to learn, or not.
https://larrynoodles.com/day-3-of-first-amendment-trial-in-new-haven/
Published Mar 11, 2018
PART 3
Rituals and governance
Governance is much more than the written rules according to which an organization is managed. It is an intricate combination of principles, traditions, rules and habits. Impossible to grasp from the outside, not easy to master inside – because of its historical dimensions, and because personalities – not software – shaped it. The governance naturally reflects the complexity of the enterprise; but it makes complexity work, enabling the organization to function predictably, and to produce the expected results. The slow grinding of the governance’s wheels can frustrate; the wheels might squeak, but the mechanism is usually reliable. …
… Governance and rituals could merely coexist. But this coexistence would be fatal to the rituals – the clay pot against the iron pot. The company’s governance is one of a handful of its pillars; it expresses the way the officialdom works, interacts, exercises power; it sets the stage where the leaders play politics …
The solution is to integrate rituals into the governance as building blocks while eliminating the corresponding elements of the existing governance. For example, client-related rituals should be components of the regular client relationship management rules and processes – getting rid of some tired tools like the traditional account planning.
… rituals will not only help change behaviors, but also become levers to improve productivity. …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
Watch Mr. Mahony and Mr. Doyle and Mr. Tong ignore all of this:
Unfortunately, some in Connecticut who’d like to reshape our mentalities and therefore our behaviors know about the sex dungeon(s) in New Haven.
And, Ms. Katz and Mr. Rubin might know that both Mr. Hesslers have probably known Kent Mawhinney since May 17, 1999. They probably know why the criminal case was dropped and they probably also know whether or not attorney Mawhinney shared a prison cell with his client, Mr. Hessler.
Any or all of the above could have eventually led to the order to silence Mr. Boyne. That, plus the publishing of the details of the crimes against families and children in the “Family Court Circus” blog.
IF … MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, EXECUTIVE
AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS still swear or affirm the oath to “support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the state of Connecticut … to faithfully discharge, according to law, the duties of the office …”
THEN … Connecticut must fire and forever ban all MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS who swear oaths of contradictory loyalties.
When no one openly allows secrets and deceit to control state government offices, which secrets and deceit control state government offices behind closed doors?
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/judge-adelman-under-oath
If this is the time of The Revelation, this could also be the beginning of the exposure of the international “family court” crisis and scandal.
State officials launching “a multi-year investigation” to investigate “postings used to stalk and threaten the judges”
AND
State officials launching “a multi-year investigation” to investigate “commentary on attorneys, family court litigants and state court proceedings”
would’ve been just fine.
Instead, if state officials launched “a multi-year investigation” to hide the many crimes committed and then hid in Connecticut family courts, that means the only solution to the Boyne case is a Truth Commission (like the Truth Commission formed in New Mexico to investigate the cover-up in the Epstein enterprise) as soon as possible.
Like the Wexner/Epstein project in the 1970s – 1980s, “Dr.” Richard Gardner’s pro-pedophile agenda spread via an astroturfed network at that same time. Phylis Chesler wrote a book about the crisis, Mothers on Trial. …
https://www.amazon.com/Mothers-Trial-Children-Custody-Paperback/dp/B015QKA31Y
Phylis’ childhood friend, Alan Dershowitz ignored Phylis’ revelations of “family court” judges, lawyers and various private contractors trafficking children and entire families. “Dr.” Gardner had toured the world to create a network which eventually weakened and destroyed strong families and entire communities in America, Canada, the UK, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and … Israel.
Both networks harmed and destroyed victims. Will they have eventually destroyed nations in the process? Millions, billions and trillions of dollars were made out of blood, sweat, tears and thin air.
Does ANYONE in the Attorney General’s office know what happened?
Note: Samantha McCord from the Connecticut State Police participated in “… The Human Anti-Trafficking Response Team, a pilot task force launched … in Hartford … designed to directly help those who have been victims of sex trafficking in Hartford, West Hartford, East Hartford, Bloomfield, Glastonbury, Windsor, South Windsor and Manchester, with a goal of creating a statewide model. …”
Who wrote the note on that document in Mr. Tong’s case against Boyne directing someone to speak to Ms. Katz “only”?
Is Ms. Katz trying to cover up family court “CT AFCC Inc.” racketeering since the 1980s and/or trafficking of foster children to Simon Hessler?
Did Detective McCord’s office investigate Hessler Jr.’s statements about trafficking and “training slaves for 20 years” for “many customers between New York City and Boston”?
According to the Supreme Court filing:
“… Dr. Leslie Lothstein noted that Mr. Hessler ‘tried to convince me’ that he was ‘rescuing children,’ … that Mr. Hessler ‘understood his story so differently than the police,’ and that Mr. Hessler’s account was ‘more associated with pseudo-logical fantastica than a real plan to be a sex trafficker.’ …”
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25A187/369513/20250812175641703_HESSLER_Application.pdf
It’s absolutely amazing what Connecticut will ignore. Amazing what they will pay attention to. The entire family court system needs to be investigated. Why would the government in Connecticut ignore credible information?
Bingo.
https://www.npr.org/2019/08/22/753390385/a-dead-cat-a-lawyers-call-and-a-5-figure-donation-how-media-fell-short-on-epstei
There is a whole lot more to Connecticut
Interesting results in a search for:
860-
in the FBI Epstein files.
“everyone was in on the joke, other than the victims.”
Some news, government and/or social engineering office somewhere should’ve collected data by now so we can know about how many “family court” lawyers, judges and therapists laugh at traditional families when those families try to protect children.
https://vickyward.com/article/the-venomous-epstein-tapes/
The actual news:
In 2026, long after Mr. Varma described those drug-fueled sex parties under Wall Street, the “Psychology Today” blog tells its readers the following:
Flesh eating pedophiles are running free, while Paul Boyne is prosecuted by the state of Connecticut for posting things about people reported to give custody of children to possible pedophiles.
Stay strong, brother Boyle! ✊🏻
Looks like you never met him and are trying to start trouble.
Looks like you haven’t read Boyne’s website lately where he describes himself as a white nationalist.
They are hiding it all behind the equity programs. They call you a racist if you dare question what is happening.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2025/09/09/people-are-being-thrown-in-uk-prisons-over-what-theyve-said-online-can-free-speech-be-saved/
Follow the sentencing policies. Criminal justice reform. While Violent men are turned loose as well as the crimally insane. Women are doing hard time for nonviolent crimes. The state of Connecticut is a shame. The first and the leader. The entire system needs an FBI investigation. I think that William Tong office needs to be under investigation and the Senators promoting this.
Even the minority community is complaining about Gary Winfield ignoring the issues
I f criticizing judges with extreme language becomes a felony, then whistleblowers and reformers are next. Power always expands definitions in its own favor
Looks like you’ve noticed a pattern. Get ready for a ne’er-do-well commenter to call you “crazy” or “dum dum” for noticing.
I guess you never read his blog posts. He wasn’t arrested for criticizing judges with extreme language he was arrested for making threats to their lives obsessively for years
➡️ “zero mainstream news articles about crimes committed against children and families in family courts since the 1970s” is easy to understand.
Boyne’s circus antics “to attract enough attention so mainstream news reporters will notice and report family court crimes committed against children and families since the 1980s” is easy to understand, too.
Which other massive crimes starting in the 1980s weren’t reported?
🤔
Which Connecticut mainstream news outlet reported about Mr. Mawhinney living (24/7) in a Connecticut prison cell with his client Simon Hessler?
Mr. Mawhinney helped establish “The Windsor Rod and Gun Club in East Granby, not far from the Dulos Family Home in Farmington, Conn. Members of the club stumbled upon what appeared to be preparations for a ‘human grave’ in the woods …”
Does AG Tong know Connecticut sent Simon Hessler to prison after he ordered a child “s*x slave” from DCF?
Does AG Tong know about:
Ms. Katz’s involvement in the AG’s “Boyne case?the “speaking to Katz only” note?a former DCF employee/director managing the “Boyne case”?How and why did mainstream news outlets ignore trafficking and racketeering in Connecticut since the 1980s?
Since AG Tong won’t help, someone somewhere needs to do something to help the victims and Mr. Boyne’s doing his best in his most offensive way.
The Public Defenders’ office represents him in the case and the Public Defenders’ office can’t/won’t tell the whole story because a few individuals in that office were complicit in the trafficking/racketeering in “family court” cases.
Miami Herald’s Julie K. Brown started saving the world from what some now call “the Epstein class”.
Will Mr. Boyne’s extreme way of exposing the Epstein class in Connecticut work?
Who else in Connecticut is even trying?
News reports: “Officials said that the arrest follows a multi-year investigation into a website that featured online postings used to stalk and threaten the judges. It is alleged that Boyne authored and maintained the website. State officials said the website also provided commentary on attorneys, family court litigants and state court proceedings.”
What did Connecticut’s “multi-year investigation” find in all that commentary on attorneys, family court litigants and state court proceedings?
Note for the record:
Nothing to see in the Epstein case until good legislators demanded the release of all those emails.
Mr. Boyne’s push on the boundaries of free speech on purpose was for a “shock jock” effect. Those obviously vile words and phrases eventually did draw at least a little attention. Unfortunately, The Hartford Courant still hasn’t warned the public about the behind-the-scenes slow and steady silencing of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition.
Those who resist the obvious cultural shift toward debauchery in state “family courts” still lose custody of their children, lose licenses, lose jobs, pay fines and go to jail. Some have been killed.
How did such massive destruction of families in “family courts” since the 1980s avoid the mainstream news articles about family court judges feeling threatened by Mr. Boyne’s “threats”?
Attorney General Tong and Ms. Katz know about the destruction of children and families in the profitable public-private AFCC Inc. “family courts”. Why haven’t they spoken in public about it?
Do they know how and why both Connecticut and Minnesota played a major role in the attempted for-profit public-private takeover of public schools and family courts about the same time? Why do Lynda Munro & friends travel so often to Minnesota to promote the AFCC Inc. networks?
If we’re too afraid to ask Attorney General Tong and Ms. Katz about Shipman and Goodwin’s role in the “Connecticut v. Boyne case”, maybe someone could at least ease into a conversation about Shipman and Goodwin’s role in the Boyne case — and in the attempted establishment of Education Alternatives Inc. profitable public-private schools in Connecticut.
“… Pierce proposed “America 2.0”, with a government that embraces technology, and believes technology is the biggest issue for the United States’ future. Pierce has said that he would institute a universal basic income 😀, which could be enabled by digital currencies 🤔. …
… Pierce has also been associated with privately organized conferences focused on Ukraine’s post‑war reconstruction. The Ukraine Reconstruction Summit 2025, held at MGM National Harbor near Washington, D.C., describes itself as a forum for government officials, corporate executives and investors to discuss multi‑billion‑dollar 🤑 reconstruction and investment projects in Ukraine and the wider region …
… In February 2026, an investigation by The Kyiv Independent into newly released U.S. Department of Justice documents on Jeffrey Epstein reported that the files included an email in which a man identified as Pierce, described as a co‑founder of Tether, told Epstein that “a boat in Antigua full of amazing Ukraine’s finest” was waiting for him …
… Collins-Rector and his business partners, Chad Shackley and Brock Pierce, operated DEN out of a Los Angeles mansion. There, they held parties attended by Hollywood’s gay A-list. At those parties, Collins-Rector and others were alleged to have engaged in sexual assaults against teenaged boys. …
… Collins-Rector was a silent partner in the MMORPG service company IGE, which was founded by ex-DEN VP Pierce – who was chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation. 👈
How often do the escort abusive men to the basement conference rooms so no one can hear them screaming Bitch and cunt in the hallways of 90 Washington Street? Perhaps the GALs know.
Bad speech isn’t automatically criminal speech. If there’s no intent, no steps toward violence, and no imminent threat, the First Amendment still applies.
Wrong
Paul Boyne’s vile, disgusting, offensive words and phrases were simply a “shock jock” way to deliver a Paul Revere kind of warning.
Connecticut “family courts” attack families and children.
Most people still have no idea because mainstream “news” is useless.
Even if the public still has no idea that family courts are literally attacking families and children, current and former lawyers, judges, Public Defenders office employees, the AG, FBI employees who know about the exposure of the corruption in 2014-15 and the many public hearings have already put Paul’s blog posts in that context but don’t seem to be willing or able to admit that in public. The above know Boyne wanted to:
The state’s case against Boyne without that context is like all of the above saying “the only thing the public should be concerned about in the Epstein, Wexner etc case is two “child prostitutes” who posted objectionable content on “My Space””.
Many of the above probably tell people that.
Connecticut puts innocent parents and residents into prison if anyone of authority is questioned. There is no due process. There is no free speech. There is no posting on social media or you put yourself at grave risk by the CT judiciary.
Family and probate courts where guardians are the rainmakers for the judges and court appointed experts are the most dangerous places that systematically strip innocent people of liberty, children, assets and lifelong savings.
If fear alone sets the legal line, then whoever holds power gets to decide what speech is criminal. That’s not law—that’s censorship.
I’m pretty sure a jury of Paul’s peers will be deciding what speech is criminal in his case.
Maybe Callaghan, Mosher, and Gilbert-Katz would investigate corruption in the nation’s “family courts”?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_5_(web_series)
Speech protected by the first amendment is being rewritten as thought crimes in both these cases. No one was forced to participate in One Taste programs and no one was forced or coerced into participate in reading a blog.
In one taste the jury was misled into thinking the philosophy and beliefs of two defendants was enough for a conviction – that parties were damaged by these promoted philosophies and beliefs when in reality, they chose to listen – they were free to leave- but felt compelled to continue to listen. How is that a crime? Similarly judges have no duty to read a blog. They have no obligation to continue seeking the free speech of someone who had made no contact with them and for years has written about the illegal conduct of judges and gals to expose court ordered abuse to children and parents that if up to mainstream media would never come to light.
Much like Epstein- the public would be shockingly appalled at the widespread trafficking and child abuse ordered and promoted by family courts. This is why the elites of CT created a statute that violates federal law- to silence and criminalize free speech. Protecting their own actions for billions per year in profit is what this case is about.
Let’s review attorney general Tongs behavior. A few years back a Muslim state representative was attacked in Hartford. Tong’s office tried to put the spin on it as a hate crime. It was an attempted sexual assault. Women are being sexually assaulted at the woman’s prison his office told her she was willing. Reports of pedophiles receiving custody are reported. The mothers are hysterical and mentally ill.
If prosecutors can repackage speech as “cyberstalking” simply because it is repetitive and disturbing, then the First Amendment’s protections become meaningless. The Constitution does not allow the state to do indirectly what it cannot do directly—punish protected speech by relabeling it as another offense.
The Constitution protects ugly speech precisely because the government will always claim it’s “dangerous.”
If the standard becomes “speech that scares officials,” then the First Amendment collapses whenever powerful people feel threatened by dissent. The legal test is not whether judges were offended or alarmed, but whether the speaker crossed the narrow line into a true, intentional threat. Expanding criminal liability based on fear alone hands the state a veto over political speech.
A jury of Paul’s peers shall decide.
Classic struggle of good vs evil in black robes.
Paul’s got 12 of his peers to make the decision.
Same as in Epstein anyone at the top being held accountable? At the lower level someone makes accusations and you can definitely expect the accused to be arrested. The children are at risk when you give them to the state. Anyone that has been through the FC system in CT has experienced the 2 things. The Golden Rule. The one with all the gold rules. And rules for thee and not for me. You are just $$$ for them! Expect to loose 1/3 to 1/2 of the family assets. That’s why they make you file those financial affidavits every 13 weeks. Same BS. Stay safe all stay out of the judicial system and especially the money making family court system. They should be worried to protect the families. Stop all kids sporting and all activities on Sundays and make it family day. Our AG is asleep!
CT AFCC Inc., much like a merchants’ association, is a small group of individuals who’ve monopolized most of the lucrative “high-conflict” family court cases since the 1980s.
They took millions of dollars from Connecticut’s families with “purposely adversarial” charades through state and private offices. Recently rebranding themselves as the “Non-Adversarial Divorce” group, they still pool their resources and contacts to profit as much as they can.
They can totally wreck families and children because public-private entities with judicial authority, judicial discretion and judicial immunity court-ordered can do that kind of thing. Their no bid private contractors risk nothing and they risk nothing.
Representative Tong sat on the 2014 state judiciary committee and as Attorney General, he drives the “State of Connecticut v Boyne” bus.
It looks like higher-ups knighted him AG because he ignored CT AFCC Inc.’s public-private racketeering and Rep. Stafstrom seems eager to climb the same ladder.
Meanwhile, legislators in New Mexico actually serve the public there. They’ve notice multiple victims who want to prosecute viable cases. They noticed the feds “put a hold on investigating Zorro Ranch “to avoid parallel investigations”.
Maybe Mr. Tong knows which feds put the CT AFCC, Inc. investigation on hold in 2014. Maybe he couldn’t care less that New Mexico’s current AG is to cooperate with the Truth Commission there. That interim report is due July 31st and “the final report is due by the end of the year”.
“… To everything there is a season,
A time for every purpose under heaven … “
This!
It’s all been rebranded and repackaged to continue the gravy train. Parental Alienation = Resist and Refuse. So far, nobody has been able to explain the difference, other than it generates a lot of fees for the AFCC insiders, who are still going strong.
AFCC, INC. and Jessica Pearson — with HHS funds — organized those “still-going strong” public-private family court networks in the early 1970s. As a result the bogus theories and practices of Sigmund Freud, Alfred Kinsey and Richard Gardner destroyed tradition and families all over the world.
An article from 2024 explains:
Since the overturning of Chevron, when Ms. Grossman, Mr. Adelman and other “family court” judges allow sexual assaults on children, those judges should expect to explain their disdain for the state’s criminal statutes. Law enforcement has deferred to family court judges in those cases and now family court judges are accountable.
We need good family court lawyers to start protecting families with that new tool asap.
The Connecticut State Police broke the law of Virginia by illegally seizing computers from the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court. The property remains under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Court by power of its issued warrant, which Jack Doyle and Judge Peter Brown refuse to recognize, violating the Full Faith & Credit Clause of Constitution Article IV. Judge Peter Brown defecates on the Supremacy Clause while eschewing Virginia judicial authority of Judge Tania Saylor of Fairfax County Circuit Court. Judge Saylor is the first black female judge of this southern court, where black man Peter Brown ignores her authority by order of his nutmeg masters. Connecticut cannot break laws of Virginia to obtain a conviction, the case should have been dismissed the day Judge David Gold signed the arrest warrant in 2022. Samantha McCord and Jack Doyle committed fraud upon the court.
Rather interesting that three victims of BLOG are three judges who trafficked three minors at the request of Christopher Ambrose. Judge Adelman chose not to be a victim, as did Joette Katz. The binding kosher beliefs of Judges Douglas Lavine, David Gold, Gerard Adelman, Joette Katz, Jane Grossman, Elizabeth Stewart are the very definition of an old testament cabal.
Just as “a tree is known by its fruit”, names and appearances aren’t spiritual beliefs. Mr. Adelman ordered a BLT at the New Haven courthouse lunch counter. BLTs aren’t kosher.
“Skull and Bones” is as close to the Third Reich as Yale probably is. After “Lord” Jacob Rothschild and Ms. Abramović posed for a photo in front of a painting titled “Satan Summoning His Legions”, Jeffrey Epstein smiled for a camera with a crown of thorns (fake) tattoo on his arm. Was all of that funny?
None of that reflects Judaism, Christianity or any other Abrahamic religion. War, experimental pediatric “transgender surgery” and Connecticut’s current administrative offices don’t either.
So all that time in the clink didn’t manage to teach Boyne that his shit DOES stink.
The prosecution is going to have a field day wiping the floor with him.
Yes, sorry but his enduring years-long obsession with his family court judge spurred by personal grievance and with continual specific threats of homicidal violence makes a very strong case against him.
The fact that he turned down that sweet deal and is taking this to trial just shows how mentally f-ed up he is. classic malignant narcissist.
“Yes”… then “sorry, but”?
What does that even mean?
”enduring years-long obsession with his family court judge spurred by personal grievance and with continual specific threats of homicidal violence”
makes a very strong case for screen writers, maybe. not for reality.
I’m sorry your grasp of the English language sucks so bad.
Paul Boyne is a lot of this. A liar is not one of them.
I never said he was a liar. Unfortunately, he is delusional and overly confident in his own ability to interpret the law.
Paul Boyne is a lot of this. He’s not a liar. This is the problem. Children are not just being trafficed at Epstein Island. They are being trafficed through the family court system. The state and bar association know it. Boyne wrote some nasty things cause no one is doing anything about it.
Only bad people who lose custody say that children are trafficked through the family court system. They can’t accept responsibility for their own mistakes so try to say they only lost custody bc of corruption. The only way they can feel better about themselves is by inventing a bogeyman to blame.
Retained custody. I absolutely agree with you that several of these parents are absolutely responsible for their loss of custody. Children trafficking is the explanation of minors for profit. The fact that the state of Connecticut is forcing costly services that don’t work is my complaint. The state is overlooking substance abusers, domestic batters, and sexual divent behavior. Abusing grand parents right to generate funding streams, especially when the other parent is incarcerated. Under the ” family” umbrella. I’ve been through your dysfunctional court system. Your grievance process. You should not be waiting to repremand ” court professionals” until someone is dead. What is being allowed to go on in several cases is wrong. You can not fix everybody. You can not fix every relationship. Paul Boyne went Bananna pants. So are several of these reformist. Please keep this in mind when passing legislation. The judicial branch and the judiciary committee is well aware of who these people are. Please stop letting them abuse the court house.
Child trafficking is the exploitation of minors for profit. You are using family court ” professionals” who don’t meet the criteria of experts. You don’t repremand child attorneys for uneithical conduct. You make sure they are paid well. You don’t have to loose custody of a child to complain about the system. The funding streams and the process. The court system and several people around it profit off children. You don’t have to be a parent who has lost custody to complain about it.
Stalking cannot be accomplished absent repeated direct, unwanted messages sent to a ‘victim’ which instill emotional distress/fear. The State is playing a game, labeling public opinion on matters of public concern ‘criminal’ to defeat the First Amendment. There is no constitutional test here, just rogue state players defeating the rule of law.
Sorry Paul.
It does not matter whether the threats are sent directly to the person or posted on a public blog. Courts look at:
• Is it targeted at a specific person?
• Is it repeated conduct?
• Does it contain threats of harm or language that would make a reasonable person fear for their safety?
• Is there intent to harass, intimidate, or cause distress?
What does the law say about Courts looking at the whole picture?
Offices in Hartford and New Haven are basically showing a photo that tells one story, while hiding the other half of the photo.
The whole picture tells what actually happened. The released Epstein files show the whole story. The depositions show the whole story. The arrests in the UK show the whole story. More information about Philip Rubin’s connections to the Rothschild network would show the whole story. So would an explanation about Fotis Dulos’ lawyer Kent Mawhinney sharing a prison cell with Simon Hessler.
Can anyone at the Office of Public Accounts tell us how many dollars taxpayers pay “family courts” to destroy families each year?
Before the Ambrose case, “family courts” orchestrated the Dulos case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jennifer_Dulos
Connecticut lawyers and judges who know about the context and actual history of the Ambrose case must speak up before state offices ruin the entire state of Connecticut with that one “family court” case.
You’re missing the Counterman element:
Elements Requiring Proof of Threat and Intent: Therefore, in addition to the statutory elements I have described, you must determine two things beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) True Threat – that the defendant’s statements, in context, were a true threat, meaning that they would be understood by a reasonable person as a serious expression of intent to do harm to the victim, as opposed to an idle or figurative remark; and (2) Culpable Mental State – that the defendant himself knew that his statements would be taken as a genuine threat or was aware of a substantial risk that they would be so taken and made them anyway. In other words, the State must prove the defendant had at least a reckless disregard for the threatening nature of his words. If you find that the defendant’s statements were ambiguous or could be interpreted as hyperbole or just venting, or if you find that the defendant might not have realized others would take his words as a real threat, then you must err on the side of free speech and find him not guilty. The burden is on the State to exclude any reasonable hypothesis of innocence that the speech was protected expression.
Specific Intent vs. Legitimate Purpose: Additionally, for the stalking charges (Counts __ and __) the State must prove that the defendant acted with the specific criminal intent (as I defined earlier) where required by the statute. If you find that the defendant was instead acting with a legitimate purpose – for example, he believed he was engaging in political protest, whistleblowing, or legitimate public discourse – then he did not have the intent to harass or intimidate required for a conviction. Acting in good faith for a perceived lawful purpose negates the specific intent to harass. Even if that purpose was misguided or the defendant’s methods were extreme, what matters is his actual objective. A conviction for stalking or harassment cannot be based on communications made for a lawful purpose, such as to alert the community or address a public official’s conduct, even if those communications were communicated in a vehement or unpleasant way. Only if you find the defendant had no legitimate purpose – that his sole intent was to harass, scare, or alarm the victim – may you conclude the intent element is satisfied.
Yes, I believe Paul does meet those two elements. But he thought he could not be prosecuted because he posted them on his website and did not directly send them to anyone. Just as he stated in the body cam video from his front porch.
I’m gonna tell you what your enablers won’t tell you Paul:
It is going to be very easy for the prosecution to convince a jury that you made all those blog posts not as mere public discourse but rather to exact revenge on the judge and court that took away your custody. And that your intent was to intimidate, harass , and instill fear in them as a method of exacting vengeance. They will also easily convince the jury that your posts were spurred by your hatred of Jews and your outrage that a Jewish judge exerted control over your life and your access to your children.
Maybe the trial will prove me wrong. But I doubt it.
(To be read like Ziegler’s pool table scene in Eyes Wide Shut.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Pollack
Mr. Anonymous,
What would you call lawyers, judges and legislators in Connecticut who’ve claimed to be Jewish (or Christian) and are not?
His sole purpose was to expose the corruption of the billion dollar industry of family court and the pedos like you who pay custody evaluators and gals to deliver children per AFCC handbook. You’re the delusional one.
You sound like a paranoid covert pedophile who sees pedophiles everywhere they look because they are one themselves .
I’m not male, not attracted to children, nor have I ever paid a custody evaluator or GAL. I’ve been married once, never divorced. Never had to fight for custody of any of my three children.
What does threatening people with bullets in their head have to do with exposing corruption? He was carrying out a personal vendetta. Stop fooling yourself.
Ronan Farrow exposed Weinstein with credible sources and solid reporting. he didn’t have to post about how much he hates Jews and wants to see bullets through their heads to “get attention” for his cause.
Did Woodward and Bernstein have to threaten to shoot and kill Nixon in order to be effective whistleblowers?
Get a grip.
If Boyne had solid evidence, he would’ve been effective at exposing corruption, but he didn’t have anything credible to expose. That’s why nothing changed. All he did was spout threats and harass the judges who didn’t give him custody.
If Boyne had solid evidence, it would be in the form of a DOJ release of the CT AFCC Inc. files.
When will the public be allowed to see those files?
Paper trails go back to the 1970s.
This is it. Tong office attempt to cover up prison rape. Tong doesn’t work for the people he works for the state. Some one from the department of justice needs to take a deeper look into the puppet master. Diversionary tactics. Attacking immigration, hidding funding streams. Why are the comptroller’ s report so late? Why did Both of Chris Murphy’s interns want to be in the office so bad? Strategies positioning of the state agencies. Show me the money 💰.
Yes- and they’ll do it while violating federal and state laws. Brown punished Paul by throwing him in jail for two weeks (raising bond to 1.5 million) and the day the response to the appeal was due, Brown has a hearing to return bond from 1.5 million to 7,000- freeing Boyne while declaring the appeal “moot”. Classic CT game.
Browm ignores the fraud and violations of Virginia law- CT had no legal authority to seize and remove property from Virginia. It was a coordinated effort between Doyle and McCormick – pre determined outcomes.
The jury instructions are also misleading. This is a stalking charge but jury instruction focuses on true threat nonsense -abdicating judicial responsibility to prevent an appeal of Browns ruling.
CT protects itself. That’s the priority.
Boyne may lose because federal and state laws are being violated and misconstrued to deliver a guilty verdict- labeling Boyne to be a danger and a threat. The dangers and threats are those who signed the affidavits in this case.
The same act powers pushing this case- have been trying to incarcerate and silence Boyne for years.
The FBi told them in 2015 that there was no case and the FBi said it again in 2022 which is why a corrupt state trooper, samantha McCord has been working with Jack Doyle to undermine the law -/
They literally stole the seized property from Virginia and took it to CT.
Samantha McCord brought her girlfriend to the raid of boynes home.
The legal violations of federal and state law abound but CT is determined to silence court critics and intend to make an example out of Boyne.
If convicted, he can appeal, but at 62 and in poor health they will subject him to the worst conditions and deny him his needed meds as they have in the past.
While the United States pedophile ring goes on. Trump will put Maxwell in a nice prison. Connecticut Wil put Paul Boyne in conditions that will kill him.
If they offered him one misdemeanor and time served with no probation then we know it’s a bullshit case. They expected him to take the plea long ago. Still it’s not a level playing field and even with law on your side, it matter little in Connecticut courts.
The articles in question remain on the blog and the blog continues to post new stories that expose family court corruption.
The defendant has never directly contacted any judge with these articles. The judges choose to follow and read the blog.
These judges made themselves willing participants by seeking out a vile narrative.
Ok, so if I post on my Facebook that I’m planning to kill you, and your friend happens to see it and tells you about it, and then you go visit my Facebook and see the threat for yourself, you’re gonna say “oh that doesn’t count it’s not like he emailed it to me directly. No cause for concern here.” ??
There is no plan to kill anyone. If that were the case as is your example, the FB post would be removed and used as evidence to demonstrate a clear plan of murder abd intent. Thats not the case here which is why the FBI refused to take action and why the blogs remain untouched in cyberspace.
You sidestepped my question.
If I wrote that your head would look beautiful with a bullet hole through it, and I had a personal grudge with you because you had fired me from my job, and I wrote day after day after day how you should be shot in the head, with specifics about your home’s layout and photos of your family and your vehicle, you seriously would not report it to the police since I didnt contact you directly? Yeah ok.
So you think if you contacted the police about it, they should just say, no worries. Just stop visiting the site, problem solved. ??? and then what if I as the content creator tried to justify it by saying,” I am just pointing out that it was unconstitutional that white nazi bitch fired me from my job. And they sure would look great with a bullet hole through their head.”
You think the cop should just say oh OK no problem I understand. I’ll just tell them and their family and friends to try to forget about your website and all the threats you post toward them and their family on a daily basis. They are wrong to feel unsafe.
Get real.
get real,
none of that is relevant … except when you’re trying to distract readers.
As you might already know, Boyne’s purposely outrageous statements were to draw public attention to the corruption mainstream news refused to report.
looks like Boyne’s blog worked when nothing else would
now it’s time for Connecticut’s Truth Commission
Will the most corrupt in Connecticut try to refuse to participate in the Family Court Racketeering Truth Commission?
Of course.
So, how long can the worst of the worst convince Connecticut to refuse to investigate such massive corruption in the state’s judicial branch?
Get real,
you misrepresented what he wrote … and why he wrote what he wrote … and misrepresented the context …
and left out the reason he started writing the articles in the first place
Eighteen months in jail before trial over blog posts is a punishment in itself. Even if he’s convicted, that pretrial detention should trouble anyone who cares about constitutional rights. When liberty is taken prior to trial, the defendants fate is as good as sealed.
Wasn’t the pre-trial detention drawn out because Paul refused to cooperate with anything that was suggested to him?
He’ll he convicted based on the biased judges jury instructions.
Hahahaha OK I can see now how the narrative is going to be twisted when an unbiased jury of his peers convicts Paul.
your twisting of reality isn’t funny
biased judges’ instructions aren’t funny, either
Judge Jane Grossman and Adelmsn are well known in the family courts because they deliver children to their abuser- the financier of the litigation. Grossman alone has ripped innocent children from healthy parents and uses Jessica Biren Caverly -as a tool upon which to justify her court ordered child abuse.
Jessica Caverly, Linda smith, Robert Horwitz, and others are psychologists who work for the gals to destroy the targeted parent and then reports are sealed- not to protect the family but to conceal the malpractice. No doctor in CT would ever support the custody evaluations of cash cows Jessica Caverly and Linda smith.
Nor do any of these psychologists make the required 136 report to dcf if they have a concern of child abuse ir neglect.
Instead they await an ex parte hearing where they deliver a seething, vicious report with no evidence to support the heinous claims written to traumatize innocent parents and then insist the judge immediately removes the kids from the targeted parents care.
The playbook is the kids will never be raised by the targeted parent again.
The public has no idea this happens. It’s a well constructed, premeditated, well coordinated plot that family court attorneys, judges and gals know well. They feed off of it and strip families of lifelong savings while destroying the targeted parent for life.
Many are left indigent. Many die young. Many take their own lives because the inhumane court orders are nothing any parent or child should ever be subjected to.
That’s so weird because the way I see it those judges made excellent decisions in every custody case I’ve ever seen covered at this blog. In every case, the parent who was not given custody was demonstrably batshit insane.
But not one was ever diagnosed by a medical professional. Not one case did any psychologist – be it a custody evaluator or court appointed therapist- ever file with dcf for removal of the children.
Your “batshit crazy” is dated and repeated. Copy more credible work. You’re boring.
You don’t need a diagnosis by a medical professional for someone to recognize that you should not have custody of a child. You can observe that parent’s harmful behavior.
Do you seriously think the only reason that a parent should not have custody of a child is if the parent has some kind of medical diagnosis?
When the batshit fits, wear it.
I will give you that some of these people are absolutely crazy. Several are not. Is there a behind the scenes effort to do something about it.
CT created a new stalking law in 2022 with the sole purpose to silence Boyne. And once used on Boyne- if successful- anyone who dares to speak out or put the truth of their experiences on social media to inform the public of the illegal acts and calculated outcomes of family courts- will be prosecuted. As it stands now parents are threatened with jail and restraining orders for telling their experiences and posting recordings of the abuse done by gals and judges in family court.
Yeah, OK as if no other people have ever been cyberstalked in Connecticut. You are such a narcissist you think it’s all about you.
Maybe a new FOIA bill will help 🫤
https://fastdemocracy.com/bill-search/ct/2026/bills/CTB00033629/
You are so de-lu-Lu.
Just don’t threaten to murder judges, and you’ll be all right.
your comments are creepy
Paul Boyne is creepy.
These judges mock and demean Paul Boyne when his publication is raised in family courts. These judges are not afraid of Boyne- they’re afraid of their illegal acts to strip innocent parents of access to children and the money one parent pays to court appointed experts to see their spouse be the subject of vicious character assassination, fraudulent custody evaluations, and the target of court appointed experts who work with counsel for both parties to prolong litigation and take kids from a protective parent.
Parental rights are not taken – the court works around the 14th amendment and lawyers determine the best interest of the children is to never see a parent again – even when there is no finding of abuse or mental illness.
The family courts are a sadistic network much like Epstein- where children are sacrificed and a cloak of silence protects the abuser while silencing and discrediting the children.
You don’t need a medical diagnosis; you can observe from someone’s behavior when they should not be entrusted with custody of a child.
Funny cause the judge didn’t let us in the court much. Especially when my x spouse came in Shorts, baseball cap with blood shot eyes. Puffy face from the big night of drinking prior. That is when you are asked to stay in the hall so the lawyers can talk to the judge. How many people were asked to remain in the hall?
Boyne’s speech is morally repulsive. But the Constitution doesn’t exist to protect moral people — it exists to protect speech the majority hates.
Boyne’s over-the-top speech is for attention. 👈
Has ANYONE at the FBI bothered to ask Paul what point he tried to make with that blog? Probably not. Asking Paul about his concerns about corruption in the state probably isn’t allowed. It’s like the most corrupt family court lawyers and judges “are with intelligence”.
Who among the most wealthy and well-connected jailed Ted Taupier?
Paul started his blog to pick up where Ted Taupier left off:
About 10 years ago, Connecticut silenced Ted Taupier when he (informally) audited Connecticut family courts. Law enforcement ignored Ted’s findings and they ignored victim’s complaints.
As Ted helped parents investigate the corruption, he vented his frustrations in an email among friends and acquaintances. Venting that’s justifiable and creative isn’t malicious. Ted wrote about corruption in the courts … his case … families being destroyed … wicked people at the top … and he wrote detailed descriptions of weapons of war, spaceships and maybe aliens (?). 🚀
Ted’s email was obviously science-fictiony. It was also so long ago, most people seeing Paul’s blog content have no idea that Paul’s blog was in response to Connecticut’s worst throwing Ted in jail instead of throwing the criminals in jail.
Keith Harmon Snow researched and wrote the book, Worst Interests of the Child. He also wrote about the same kind of family court corruption in Maine.
If you look in the FBI Epstein files on the FBI website, information about corruption in Maine is in an article in those files.
Anyone in the New Haven FBI office can look in New Haven files to see information about corruption in Connecticut family courts. Have they even done that yet?
They can see information about the great FBI agent Ted Gunderson. Ted Gunderson helped Linda Weigand try to protect her two sons in the corrupted courts about 30 years ago.
It’s such a nightmare and the cover-up is a worse nightmare because the cover-up helps the criminals who keep harming so many.
When will Connecticut mainstream news teams tell us whether or not Kent Mawhinney shared the same prison cell with his client?
If Ms. Katz and Mr. Rubin know about cover-ups, what will they tell us?
Why did Mr. Hessler make arrangements to have a DCF child s*x slave delivered for his “training”?
What the actual hell?
See page 5:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ctd-3_23-cv-01270/pdf/USCOURTS-ctd-3_23-cv-01270-0.pdf
Oh please. He wrote the way he did because he wanted to harass intimidate and instill fear in his targets. He is a monomaniacal, frustrated little man who chose to live in his parents basement with no gainful employment when his court case didn’t go the way he wanted.
His reason for quitting his job was prob so that his four children would get the absolute minimum in child support – why should he contribute to their support if they would no longer be under his daily coercive control?
When confronted with the reality that he does not actually rule the world, his ex-wife and their children, he dropped out of productive life and set out to relentlessly harass and intimidate the judges who merely did their jobs well by not giving him custody.
I hope he continues with this trial and gets locked up for a long time.
What else do you know/imagine about Paul?
Why insult and threaten him that way?
Your comments are sort of borderline stalkerish. 😳
It can only be stalking if that person emailed their comment directly to Paul Boyne via certified mail with signed verification of receipt.
He got attention. And now he’s on trial. That sounds like a lot of attention to me.
If he had solid, credible evidence of corruption in the court, it would’ve effected changes. He did not and does not have any credible evidence. Just a personal grudge, a hatred of Jews and a vendetta against the judges who did something that narcissist Paul did not like.
You do understand that “creating noise” and threatening murder does not prompt a DOJ investigation into your victims.
That’s like if I started threatening to kill you, and then the police responded to my threats by patting me on the head and launching an investigating into you. Do you really think that’s how the justice system works?
You think if you suspect wrongdoing that you should then obsessively post threats to kill someone and threaten their family every day, and then eventually, the FBI will investigate those people you were threatening?! Based on what??
You really think they’re gonna approach you and say “gee whiz. Why are you making those threats, sweetheart? What, the judge granted your wife custody? And he’s Jewish on top of it all? OMg! This is a clear case of corruption. We’ll investigate them even though you have provided zero evidence to us of wrongdoing. Thank you so much for making all those death threats. That’s the only way to get our attention.”
Bitch, please.
Newsflash: Hate speech is free speech in the land of the free and home of the brave.
But targeted harassment and cyberstalking are not legal
If a Monday snow day cancels State v Boyne proceedings, maybe G-d’s giving complicit state and federal employees time to start telling the truth about what really happened in “the state’s case” against Mr. Boyne.
Mr. Mahoney and fellow news reporters would have that extra time, too.
Everyone who:
ignored CT AFCC, Inc. racketeering
collected (hundreds of?) complaints about harm that network did to families
knows the Judicial Ethics Committee voted against Mr. Adelman’s CTAFCC
knows Mr. Boyne politely asked authorities for formal investigations for years
knows about the DOJ’s 2014-2015 “public corruption investigation” failure
knows all of the above is: exculpatory and mitigating evidence
still has time to repent … and tell the public what they know.
Tax dollars spent on Mr Boyne’s case to cover-up “family court” racketeering could’ve heated crucial segments of Connecticut roads with solar panels. All potholes in the state could have been filled. Free lunch for all state workers every Friday for a year would probably cost about whatever the state spent so far on the Boyne case.
As soon as enough citizens notice which sociopaths run the show 🎪 …
maybe the governor will ask the FBI to release all CTAFCC Inc. emails.
RE: “As soon as enough citizens notice which sociopaths run the show”
The fact that sociopaths or psychopaths “run the show” is only ONE part of the equation. The pack of leading psychopaths/sociopaths do not operate in a vacuum, and never have. There are 2 destructive human pink elephants in the room and they are MARRIED — study the free essay “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room”… https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html
The psychopaths in power are in those positions and do what they do ONLY because of the mostly willful activities, or inactivities, of the majority of self-entitled “decent” or “civil” or “good” or “awake” or “spiritual” or “religious” people — the 90-95% of the herd — and because they do NOT really want the truth but comforting fantasies.
“Our current ‘state’ is the dictatorship of evil. We know that already, I hear you object, and we don’t need you to reproach us for it yet again. But, I ask you, if you know that, then why don’t you act? Why do you tolerate these rulers gradually robbing you, in public and in private, of one right after another, until one day nothing, absolutely nothing, remains but the machinery of the state, under the command of criminals and drunkards?” — from a White Rose Pamphlet, the ‘White Rose’ was a German resistance group fighting Hitler’s Nazi regime
Isn’t it about time for anyone to wake up to the ULTIMATE DEPTH of the human rabbit hole — rather than remain blissfully willfully ignorant in a narcissistic fantasy land and play victim like a little child?
Of course it is but…
“The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduces them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim.” — Gustave Le Bon, in 1895
Without a proper understanding, and full acknowledgment, of the true WHOLE problem and reality, no real constructive LASTING change is possible for humanity.
And if anyone does NOT acknowledge, recognize, and face (either wittingly or unwittingly) the WHOLE truth THEY are helping to prevent this from happening. And so they are “part of the problem” and not part of the solution.
If you have been injected with Covid jabs/bioweapons and are concerned, then verify what batch number you were injected with at https://howbadismybatch.com
“There are large numbers of scientists, doctors, and presstitutes who will sell out truth for money, such as those who describe people dropping dead on a daily basis as “rare” when it it happening all over the vaccinated world.” — Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D., American economist & former US regime official, in 2024
“If we have learned anything in the past six years, it is that vaccinologists, doctors, and the government in general do not have good intentions and never did. The clear intention of everyone concerned was and is to make as much dirty money as possible, letting any amount of collateral damage slide, including a genocide and mass poisoning [with Covid-19 jabs]. The fact [is] that Big Pharma just murdered millions of people, with the full support of government, media, and “science”. With Covid, everyone is part of the fraud, many of them paid off, so no one has any reason to expose it, and big reasons to bury it.” — Miles Mathis, American author, in 2025
Sivam,
I agree. James O’Keefe does too. He’s been saying lately that he blames those who notice the purposeful destruction and do nothing to prevent the destruction from happening.
Paul Boyne tried to attract mainstream news attention with his blog because mainstream news outlets ignored the corruption in the family courts. Mainstream news outlets still ignore the corruption just as they ignored the Epstein/Wexner network.
Mr. Epstein’s “done for mitre corp” email shows what LinkedIn’s role might play in the WEF/Commons Project Foundation’s “vaccine passport” herding process and Yale’s research departments played a role, too. Such small destructive networks did so much harm because mainstream news networks let them.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01954428.pdf
The new term “psychnology” in the email reminds me of the new terms and theories Richard Gardner introduced to family court systems around the world in the 1980s.
Connecticut “family courts” still use Gardner’s twisted theories and practices in many or most of the cases Paul Boyne referenced in his missives.
Low intensity warfare against families is a crime.
Trying to stop low intensity warfare against families isn’t a crime.
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/homeless-deaths-in-ct-2025-21940715.php
Connecticut’s judicial branch wastes so much money … and lets lawyers take so much money from families and the same thing is happening all over America — and in family courts all over the world.
you’d think some group of people somewhere wants to destroy strong families to destroy nations for some kind of new world order, or something.
BTW: The Epstein crowd wants to destroy nations and replace the UN with WEF.
Jeffrey Epstein: Davos can really replace the UN. cyber, crypto . genetics. . . intl coordination, Issues now need to deal with the distributed trust. and internet fallout. …
Step 1
Step 2
“madaras erika , ericka madaras , h= needs to set up a vi transaction”
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02471327.pdf