Frank Parlato
A federal defamation lawsuit filed by Connecticut resident Christopher A. Ambrose against me is facing a jurisdictional challenge in the U.S. District Court for Connecticut.
Ambrose alleges that I defamed him through a series of online articles and seeks $5 million in damages. Because I do not reside or work in Connecticut, the case depends on whether the court can exercise personal jurisdiction over me.
In opposing my motion to dismiss based on jurisdiction, Ambrose argued that I targeted Connecticut readers to create a special kind of jurisdiction. He says I focus on Connecticut because I write about it all the time; therefore, there’s jurisdiction.
As evidence, Ambrose told the court in his December 8, 2025 filing that I wrote the word “Connecticut” 1,332 times in “the 34 articles at issue.”
That’s 39 times per story. That would not be journalistically reasonable, and, if true, it would demonstrate an obsession with the word.
In my reply brief filed on December 23, 2025, I had to dispute that figure, not merely to dispute it. I tried to be polite. I stated that Ambrose made minor mistakes: One, there are not 34 stories at issue—like he says in his lawsuit—but only 21, since the other 13 he mentions were written by someone else. A minor error, easy to make and forgivable, but nevertheless mildly problematic since it is established in law you cannot sue a man for defamation for something someone else wrote.
It sounds unfair, but it is the way it is. If I write, “You’re a stinker,” perhaps because of a lack of bathing, you cannot sue your mother-in-law for defamation.
But the more obvious mathematical error was Ambrose’s counting of the times I wrote the word Connecticut.
He said 1,332 times. That would be like writing Connecticut 39 times in every 800-word story.
Yes, Ambrose counted 1,332 times, but a simple review of the actual stories shows it to be slightly inaccurate. In the 21 stories that I wrote which Ambrose is suing me for defamation over, the word Connecticut appears 82 times, about four times per story. Let me try to catch up.
A Connecticut Story About a Connecticut Man in Connecticut
In March 2025, a Connecticut man and former television writer, Christopher Ambrose, who lives in Connecticut, (also known as a Connecticuter) but wrote many of his fictional scripts outside Connecticut, filed a federal defamation lawsuit in Connecticut against Dr. Bandy X. Lee, a psychiatrist and author who does not live in Connecticut, except sometimes when she is visiting Connecticut, but likes Connecticut. Connecticut is known as the Nutmeg State.
Ambrose, writing from Madison, Connecticut, claims Lee defamed him by publicly accusing him of child abuse, which he did in various places in Connecticut. His kids live in Connecticut or lived in Connecticut. Connecticut is also known as the Constitution State. Most people agree Connecticut is nice because the Constitution is nice, though it is unclear if Connecticut’s nickname, the Constitution State, means the Connecticut Constitution or the U.S. Constitution, which if nobody noticed before, the word Connecticut and the word Constitution are pretty similar—they both start with C and they have four syllables.
Dr. Lee, from outside of Connecticut, previously said her application of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist scored Connecticut resident Ambrose 32 out of 40—two points above the clinical threshold for psychopathy, which is high even for Connecticut.
In Connecticut there seems to be a lot of t residents (Connecticutians) who think Connecticut produces more than their fair share of psychopaths, including several Connecticut residents who are Connecticut family court judges who both live in Connecticut and sit on the bench in Connecticut, and were born in Connecticut, and have already purchased from Connecticut cemeteries plots of land for burial in Connecticut, where many Connecticut residents (Connecticotians) plan to do the same: get themselves born in Connecticut, live in Connecticut, love Connecticut, enjoy Connecticut, and die in Connecticut because Connecticut is a great place to live and connect. People who live in Conncecticut (Connecticutensians) also call Connecticut, the Nutmeg State—because in Connecticut, Connect over a cup of Connecticut hot chocolate, with nutmeg. As for me, I have never yet set foot inside Connecticut.
The end
Ambrose, a former writer of creative fiction for television, usually in the crime genre, is not liable for a slight error. In TV drama, especially crime, one has to enlarge the facts to make the crimes more dramatic, and I think we can all agree that mentioning Connecticut four times per story is not as impressive as 39 times per story.
What makes it dramatic is the figure of 1,332. It’s good, it’s impressive, it’s fiction at its best. It’s literary license. It always worked in TV court scenes.
To penalize Ambrose now for doing what he always does seems a bit unfair, but judges in real life do not always behave the way they do on television.
A judge might just think he lied. But lying for a TV writer is not the same as lying for you and I. He had to lie, for fiction is lying in a sense, and whether he writes fiction for TV or fiction for court, to him it is all the same.
Maybe he will get away with it, but there is a chance he will not.
A Buffalo Story
Where I mention Buffalo 1335 times.
“Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo,” as any good grammarian knows, is grammatically correct and meaningful. I know I’m from Buffalo.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
9 2 million dollar boost for the public defenders office. For 2026 granted by CONGRESS. Yet there is no money from the Democratic lead government in the state of Connecticut to ensure minors counsel is engaged in eithical conduct? The position of chief public defender is still open. The job description says nothing about ensuring employees are monitored for eirhicy. The job description included support for the project that are run by the state. Congress is responsible for passing out money to the state and the state is responsible for the ” projects”. The state of Connecticut is not in compliance with many ” projects” effecting family court. The have not appeared to develop a safe gaurd for the public. They are solely protecting themselves and information is not being made public. All appointment lead back to the governor.
The public defender’s office. Public Defender Service Commission. Fox guarding the hen house. Controlled by stakeholder to commandeer the legal systems in the state: Stake holders running the court system.
Appointed by Chief Justice appointed by the Governor, The governor and legislative leaders, The speaker of the house, and Senate minority leader of the house and Senator. So, when the senators say they don’t get involved in family court this is ABSOLUTLY NOT TRUE.
Honorable Justice Richard Palmer
The honorable Shella Pratts
The honorable Elliot Soloman
Attorney Micheal Jefferson
The Honorable Russell Morin
Attorney Herman Woodard
John Day handling serious criminal defense cases, including DWI, juvenile matters, WHISTLEBLOWER RELATION. I wonder if he understands that parents are being retaliated against by the very people, he is overseeing. FOR TRYING TO BLOW THE WHISTLE. Yet, parents are unable to file a complaint from the very office that doesn’t have to give them immunity.
Ned Lamont and the Connecticut Senators are going to keep it all under wrap by not allowing adults parents of the minors to file complaints.
“… Hollywood, national security, and the stories we are allowed to hear.
Do governments only control movies or do they sometimes silence the people who make them? …”
https://youtu.be/ovHTT-K_GTA
Dear Connecticut Parents, If you have evidence . Public defender misconduct of GALS. Involves unethical behavior, conflict of interest, or neglect of duties, fraud, violation of professional standards, potentially harming a clients case ( the children) . Lying , withholding evidence, misrepresentation of facts. Abandonment of client. Leading to bar complaints to the bar association or commission. DIFFICULT DUE TO OFFICIAL IMMUNITY.
WE CAN ACCOMIDATE THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS TO REMOVE BOWDEN- LEWIS. WILLIAM TONG WILL NOT HAVE INVESTIGATION INTO THE GALS IN THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE FOR THE REDIDENTS IN THE STATE .
The public defenders office doesn’t take complaints from third parties. The parents. This is part of the scam the clients are the children. Who are unable to file complaints themselves.
Often these children are too traumatized to file complaints as they age out. If these GALS part of public defenders office and a danger to under aged minors in the state The policy must be changes in order to protect the minors in the state. Change the policy for third party complaints in regards to minors representation.
It’s way passed due for the GALS in Connecticut to face A DAY OF RECKONING
Where would a now adult child file a complaint about a gal and with whom? It seems it will be buried.
Please explain what you’re suggesting. Thank you.
The chief public defender has independent powers to process complaints against the attorneys. There is a complaint process within the public defenders office. The complaint process must be filed by the person receiving the services. The GALs client is the child/ children. Meaning that the parents including in criminal youth procedures parents are not allowed to file complaints about the attorney, based on that rule of no third party complaints. I can imagine that there would be a fair amount of nonsense complaints, but for parents with legitimate complaints of misconduct it doesn’t appear immunity is necessarily granted here. We can spend millions on studies that are leading the family court system into a crisis, but we can not afford to appointment a committee to review and process complaints for minors counsel? Many of these children are not capable of filling complaints or perhaps even legally able due to their age. Mia is aged out. She is now able to file a complaint with the public defenders office against her GaL. At the young age would she be able to without assistance? Any parent who has attempted to retain counsel to go through the bar association process know that no one is willing to represent them. Even when clear eithical violations have been communicated. It’s extremely costly and time consuming to file grievance. Just to have them dismissed by immunity. Many a parent have filled complaints with the GaL committee. None to date have materialize into disaplinary action or removal from the list. Changes in the education do not reflect best interest standards but leading to extremely costly court battles. Where bar association members are ripping people off, and obstructed by the courts punishing parents for being in high conflict litigation. Forcing agreement. Because they have been in trouble for not resolving cases in a timely manner. They often reflect a chain of appointments. Leading often to the removal of a children. Some justified and some not. It would be fair to say that some people complaining about minor council are not valid, however some are. There are repeat offenders amongst the gals. There is a code of conduct that is supposed to be followed. Several of us know that those codes of conduct are nothing more than a show for the public. THEY ARE NOT FOLLOWING IT. They engage in conduct that is not in the best interest of children. Many have realized that the conduct is often as co counsel for one of the parties. There needs to be a committee working with the chief public defender office. Made up of legislators, a fair amount of regular citizens, member of the prosicuters office. There is absolutely no reason that names can’t be redacted to provide privacy for the minors. THESE COMPLAINTS MOST BE PUBLIC, even if the gals name is redacted. The GaL reform doesn’t appear to have yeilded results that are of benefit. The GALs are supposed to be the eyes and the ears of the court. Many know that they act as a filter. They are also leading to costly services. Child parent contact problems. This is nothing more than a fancy rebranding. Yes, the state and federal government is forcing services through the family court, even when it’s not in the best interest of children. The state has insentivised the problem .
People with affection to funding should absolutely not be involved. Including family relations, equal and shared parenting, ccadv, ( one former gal is already on the GaL grievance committee) Equity alliance, to the commission on women children senior equity and inclusion. Any one partnered with the mou. No AFCC members. The public defenders office has an obligation to the public paying taxes to support it. It’s being manipulated to please the stakeholders profiting.
If the public defenders commission can get a hearing to remove Bowden – Lewis they can have a public hearing to protect the minors in family court. Bowden – Lewis wasn’t immune from getting fired. The commission should send the GaL commiting significant eithical violations packing.
https://www.wfsb.com/2026/01/09/troconis-trial-continues-she-seeks-release-prison/
If WFSB is the only news station with a camera in the courtroom, may WFSB turn up the volume, evaluate the evaluators and ask those lawyers what kind of law they actually practice in Connecticut’s so-called “family courts”.
When will news outlet owners, editors and reporters want to know more about the obvious racketeering in family courts since the 1970s? The “Connecticut Chapter of AFCC Inc.” director, secretary and treasurer are still available for comment. So are a few state employees who helped organize that public-private for-profit business — with state funds, judicial authority, “court discretion” and judicial immunity. Any reporter wanting to know what actually happened to Jennifer Dulos — and the thousands of other victims of Connecticut “family court” racketeering — can easily report the truth.
When will they report the truth?
Ambrose is/was a writer. He has to be getting payments through the WGA– Even with his plagiarism, he’ll get residuals for decades to come. For him to state he receives no income is a provable lie. Time for a federal charge.
About 31 billion dollars a year in Tanf block grant funding a year in the United States. Most appears to be going to fatherhood research for the psychologist. To profile women as gatekeepers, malicious alienator and mounchouen by proxy. Interesting 🤔 Marsha and the gang at the Affcc have sure generated. Children 49 billion dollars for children and families. There is no public information on how much money is spent to collect child support individually.$113 billion dollars in arranges. The collection of child support is not the problem. It’s the health and human services funding hyjacked by the psychologist and the fatherhood initiative.
H.Res 487 a distraction of the fight for 50/50 and custodial interference while State Representative Owen Burgess dons a minority mask over the United States Congress. More money to ensure dominance over mothers in the United States . Introduced on 6/06/25.
House – Education and workforce Judiciary Ways and means
H.S.RES
“Fatherhood is essential to the development of all children, AND THE THE INCREASED INVOLVEMENT OF THE FATHER IN THE HOME WILL LEAD TO*******************Economic prosperity***************************
education, excellence and improved SOCIAL MOBILITY for children across*******************ALL RACIAL AND ETHNIC GROUPS***********!!!!!!
Because these men have decided women should take no role in children’s lives WITHOUT THEIR PROMISSSION. THIS IS A CONGRESSIONAL BILL THAT HAS COMPLETELY ELIMINATED ANY IMPORTANCE OF MOTHERS AND GIVES ALL THE BLAMES OF THE COUNTIES FALURES ON WOMEN.
ABSOLUTLY NO ACCOUNTABILITY TO FATHERS FOR THE PROBLEMS HAPPENING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
THE ENTIRE PROBLEM IS IN CONGRESS
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
GEOGRAPHICAL AREA NO. 19 AT ROCKVILLE
TSR-CV24-5001865-S
MICHELLE TROCONIS
V.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
DECEMBER 1, 2025
Petitioner’s Witness List
Under Practice Book § 23-28(a)(1), the petitioner may call the following witnesses:
(1) Attorney Andrew Bowman
(2) Attorney Richard Colangelo
(3) Attorney Jon Schoenhorn
(4) Attorney Audrey Felsen
(5) Attorney Michael Meehan
(6) Attorney Michael Rose
(7) Attorney Michael Fitzpatrick
(8) Sgt. Bob Hazen
(9) Sgt. Kenneth Ventresca
(10) Det. John Kimball
(11) Det. Corey Clabbey
(12) Dr. Stephen Herman
(13) Dr. Stephen Humphrey
(14) Claudia Troconis-Marmol
(15) Daniela Troconis
(16) Marisela Arreaza
(17) Dr. Carlos Troconis
(18) Herbert King
(19) Daniel Markle.
(20) The petitioner, Michelle Troconis.
Respectfully submitted,
Michelle Troconis
The Petitioner
https://connecticut.news12.com/troconis-habeas-trial-begins-in-attempt-to-vacate-conviction-in-dulos-death
Criminals everywhere! Colangelo leading the pack
“Colangelo leading the pack” ?
If you have evidence of that, could you post the evidence, a hint or a theory?
https://ctnewsjunkie.com/2025/08/06/former-state-official-pays-7000-to-resolve-ethics-complaint-denies-wrongdoing/
No fan of Michelle, however it’s right up the state of Connecticut alley to railroad a woman to prison. The shady attorneys who helped Fotis and get off free. Mawahinny runs free. Ran free during his divorce thanks to Judge Robert Nastri in family court. Connecticut prosecutor office labeled his wife not credible. They let him off the hook again. The state of Connecticut appears to be developing a pattern of male privilege in the judicial system and everywhere else. If you want to stop court system curruption it absolutely starts at the top. The attorney general’s association being one of them, oversight on the welfare reform act.
Absolutely accurate and true. Thank you for posting what CT buries.
If WFSB was the only camera in the courtroom with the volume turned way down … and if WFSB can/will only share Part 1 of 2:
Lawyers & Evaluators involved in Dulos/Traconis cases who’ve exploited children and families in networks throughout the tri-state area for decades probably hold some sway over mainstream news outlets.
What’s being buried after all these years is the family court racket that destroyed the lives of all members of the Dulos family–in addition to Michelle Triconis. These tragedies are the result of a crooked custody evaluator, family court attorneys and family court judges. This was a kids for sale to move them to Fotis, find Jennifer mentally ill, and have her spend years and millions to get her custody back. She had filed to have the GAL investigated and all of this was buried by the media. Even those who love Jennifer fell prey to the playbook and believed the custody evaluation was sealed to protect her– it was not. It never is. The concept that the evaluation is sealed to protect the targets parent while destroying their lives with orders of isolation and child abuse is preposterous. CT is the head of the snake — one of the most criminal places in our nation, which is quite a title given all that’s going on throughout the country. STAY OUT OF CT AND RUN FROM FAMILY COURT ATTORNEYS.
… “socialite convicted” … “her lover — the victim’s estranged husband” … “luxury home builder originally from Greece” …
The New York Post might as well add … “… Kardashian… ” and “… ICE …” to that article for shallow readers.
It’s 2026.
What happened to all the serious investigative journalists?
Which reporters will be first to investigate and report racketeering and social engineering in Connecticut’s family courts? Who censored that information since the 1970s?
Who allows news about the “progressive” agenda in public schools while censoring news about the “progressive” agenda in state family courts?
Which state and/or federal employees don’t want Connecticut’s residents to know the answers to the following questions?
Did Guardians ad Litem in the Dulos and Ambrose cases promote an “open marriage” lifestyle for those two families?
Which evaluators in the Dulos and Ambrose cases favored certain personal preferences over other personal preferences?
Which politics should children and parents expect in family courts?
Which state/federal employees choose punishment for children and parents who resist “progressive” lifestyles?
Is it a good sign that WFSB fixed the issue with the volume?
We’ll see.
The National Attorney general addiction is tasked with oversight on the welfare reform act. We do not need an Ad hoc committee. We need a Congressional hearing. Where Connecticut attorney general William Tong doesn’t have immunity. Coupled with the the United Nations report and the failure of the civil rights division to address the bias against women created by the ” fatherhood experts”. A democratic lead. If you want to fix family court system. The proper place to do so is in Congress. The reports are there that prove the system is not working, yet the Democrats keep tossing money at it. So , when your Congressional leaders say that they don’t get involved this is not true.
The primary responsibility for oversight the federal reform act (personal responsibility act and work opportunity act of 1996 or PRWORA falls under the U S DEPARTMENT OF HEATH AND HUMAN SERVICES . *****Particularly the ADMINISTRATION OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES*******. Administration of TANF block grant funds, department of labor, agriculture and labor also have a role. The attorney generals role in the welfare reform act enforcement of immigration rules, related provisions, especially concerning public benefit and management of state level implementation, including child support, providing oversight for clarity, consistency & application.
OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES : THE ATTORNEY GENERALS MONITOR CHARITIES INVOLVED IN THE WELFARE REFORM PROGRAMS TO PREVENT FRAUD WAIST AND ****MISS USE OF THE FUNDS ******.USING THEIR AUTHORITY OVER CHERITABLE TRUSTS . THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ENSURE THE LAWS ARE FOLLOWED , ESPECIALLY IN IMIGRATION, CHILD SUPPORT , AND BROADER PUBLIC INTEREST AND INTERSECT WITH THE COMPLEX MANDATES OF WELFARE REFORM.
THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE IS THE CHEIF OFFICER RESPONSIBLE FOR ENFORCING CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS WITHIN EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC ACESS, PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE ( TO AGENCIES ALL PARTNERED WITH THE FATERHOOD INITATIVE A GENDER OF PARENT ) ADRESSING SYSTEMATIC BARRIERS . Mothers are considered the barriers aka the gatekeepers. Working with state agencies to UPHOLD CIVIL RIGHTS protections on a state and federal level.
***** Handling complaints ******************Residents can often file complaints of discrimination based on race, sex, gender, sexual orientation and more .
The Connecticut Office of Attorney General protects and enforces the civil rights of all Connecticut residents promote equal justice under the law ( unless you are a women) and enforce of federal and state civil rights laws .
The office of Attorney General through the civil rights authority can address:
Discrimination in place of public accommodation (health and human services and the court systems ), worker’s rights, educational rights, employment and housing discrimination, disability rights, immigration, and children’s rights. We work closely with with state , federal and local government agencies and community organizations to address civil rights violations alleged to have been committed by state officials acting in their official capacity or state agencies. WE INVESTIGATE AND PERSUE ACTION WHERE THERE MAYBE “PATTERNS OR PRACTICES ” OF CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS. **Including systemic failures to comply with state and federal civil rights laws**************************************************************************
Women are being pitted against one another, because if the collected all the complaints it would demonstrate a pattern and practice.
Concrete though process. All men are domestic violence perpetrators. All women are gatekeepers. ” All Connecticut fathers to be engaged in the lives of their children”. Concrete thinking, Single mothers household are due to family court. All fathers or mothers are fit for care taking of no criminal charges aren’t prosecuted. Not every parent withholding children are being alienators.” All children rejecting a parent are alienated. Alligations are false because their is a lack of substancation. All family court cases are currupt and it is the lawyers fault. All lawyers are engaged in eithical conduct. All judges are fit for the family court bench. All judges are on the take. All psychologist involved in family court are qualified and no mental health professionals out side of family court have valid or unbiased information. People are at the court house because for custody disputes because there is dysfunctional family dynamics. In ability to co parent. For what ever reason. Failure to break down statistics and ignore others doesn’t fix the problem. Basing family court on impoverished communities, Basing the family court on the studies of one race or ethnicity. Basing economic, educational, emotional and social mobility on a gender of a parent. Creating bias to combat bias will fix family court system. We should engage problematic fathers in the lives of their children. Should we continue to fund studies with the tax payer dollars that have lead to a family court crisis? Concrete thinking that one gender is responsible for the problem in the United States. One gender of parent is the solution to the problem. 4-d is responsible for all the family court system problems. The Tanf block grant funding is prodomity spent on fatherhood. THE MAJORITY Of THE WELFARE FUNDS ARE SPENT ON MEN. Through the fatherhood initiative and NOT going to support single mothers household. GIVEN to people like the Pruetts and the Cowens for studies.
Under the AFCC umbrella
Smith College Department of social work Past President of the AFCC and the social science editor for family court review ” fatherhood experts and conflicts of interest. Millions in funding. Congress passed out the funding . National fatherhood initiative . The safe and together institute David Mandell makes millions off the sale of programs.. The family court crisis.
The Fatherhood Initiative 503 c non profit organization for men. Domestic Violence awareness month.
The brief contribution states ” In order to become truly domestic violence informed, child protection systems need not only focus on domestic violence -specifically effects but also committed to becoming FATHER INCLUSIVE in their overall work with families. Fatherhood Inclusion shapes our assessments, ( or dominates them since Marsh Klien Pruett was paid $155 thousand from the Connecticut Judicial Branch to write the assessments behind the scenes appearing in 2013) Minority community leader and Judicial Branch employee Doug Edwards presents a face to hospitals and prisons in the state. With a reported salary of $30,000 grand a year. family engagement strategies
( fathers ) in schools programs funded by the project. Partnered with education and fatherhood funding. How does fatherhood absence effect the family. ( while ignoring the effects of domestic violence ).
Brief points
Low cultural expectations of men as parents limited community resources. IT APPEARS THERE IS NO LACK OF RESOURCES FOR CHRIS AMBROSE. FREE DCF COUNSELING ( THE SOURCE OF MARSH KLIEN PRUETTS FUNDING). ATTORNEY CUDA TAKES THE CASE FORMER HEAD OF THE FAMILY COURT BAR ASSOCIATION. While Karen has a public defender who doesn’t usually practice family law.
In many organizations “family assessments” are really “mother and children assessments” NOT IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT FAMILY COURT CAUSE MARSH WROTE IT. HAS LEAD TO HUNDREDS OF WOMEN LABLED AS A GATEKEEPER RIGHT ALONG SIDE OF KAREN.
IF we are serious about working with families , we cannot just work with women and children. SO THE ENTIRE STATE IS FUNDED BASED ON A FATHERHOOD AGREEMENT AND NO MOTHERHOOD SPECIELIST HAS WEIGHTED IN ON FAMILY COURT ASSESSMENTS AND POLICY. The system is supposed to be based on the child best interest not the father’s .
Combined with limited training and low expectations of men as parents. Funny cause there is no domestic violence training and ” gatekeeping appears to be all the judges focus on. AKA Parental Alienation. Hundreds of women accused of it in Connecticut with Marsh, Kyle and the Cowens at the wheel.
1999 survey of divorcing parents in Connecticut MANY DIVORCING PARENTS AND THEIR CHILDRENVALIDATES CONCERNS THAT THEIR ATTORNEYS FAILDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SERVICES , GUADANCE ,INFORMATION AND QUAILTY SERVICES. Looks like Karen still on the short end of that stick. Along with all of the litigents who have to represent themselves . While the state of Connecticut hides behind the MOU for fathers and doesn’t come forward to the public on their MALE only COURT HOUSE PROJECTS. DON’T ASK DONT TELL POLICIES. THE PUNISHMENT FOR REPORTING AT THE COURT HOUSES. All inter-tanged with the fatherhood initiative the AFCC fatherhood experts.
Father’s rights and anti – Vawa Activist and Feminist Criminology 2008 Molly Dragiewicz Sage Publication, William &Mary Journal of Race, and social Justice May 2015
Digging Beneath the equity Langue : The influence of the father’s rights movement on intimate partner violence Public Policy debate and family law reform.
Fatherhood Studies by Kyle Pruitt appear to be in low income families where poverty is a serious factor. A long History of supporting fathers and claiming women to be the barriers of father engagement . Influencing court systems throughout the nation. While the United Nations reports of parental alienation claims and custody removals to dangerous fathers. No weigh in or solution to the matter except requesting more funding .
Dedicated The Ambrose children, Karen and the countless women fighting to be heard. The children used as pones for state funding and women through out the US gender profiled for convenience , profit and the father’s right movement legalizing abuse in the Nation. To all the women that these so called reporters out there stating they are giving you a voice . Free speech and the truth to set any women , man or child free from abuse and domination at the family court house.
Long live the comments in the frank report and free speech stopping the division of American citizens and saving the children held ransom in family court . Abolish the AFCC
2019 The Connecticut State bar association presentation on parental alienation Linda Monroe AFCC turning gate keeper claims into fatherhood magic. The key players can be found ” teaching” the road map for lawyers in the state of Connecticut. Too much zelous represtaion. ( For the mothers). Pisst it has nothing to do with the best interest of children.
Allan Kassenoff would be grateful of Ambrose would stop calling him.
Allan is an asshole. Call away Chris. Allan is a man of convince. Let Allan come out of hidding
more numbers:
$7.6 million tax dollars spent on political mailings
a few more numbers:
$1 million in 1970 equals about $8,353,659.79 today
https://www.ctinsider.com/connecticut/article/ct-lawmakers-spend-millions-newsletters-mail-frank-21221472.php
Q: How many legislators spending $7.6 million on mailings researched and reported how many millions of dollars Connecticut “family court professionals” took from parents and children between the 2021 and 2025 fiscal years?
Q: How many legislators spending $7.6 million on mailings can spare a few minutes to consider how inflation could further destroy parents and children forced to give millions to a minority in the state’s “family courts”?
At some point, someone will notice the purposeful destruction of families.
While New England political figures attacking the Republican party voted into power they are hiding under dangerous policy, practices and catering to criminals, killing the American families financially and emotionally at the family court houses. What a family should look like is safe, happy, healthy and prospering. It doesn’t have to be a two parent households. We are a country sick with curruption and two govering political parties who can’t get their shit together collectively to run our country properly.
There’ll be no discussion of who started the circus, who kept it going or who was to blame.
https://www.ctpost.com/news/article/michelle-troconis-habeas-trial-jennifer-dulos-21268203.php
Appreciate MK10ART – She captures his anger and outrage
Which economists collect the “family court” racketeering data?
https://www.barrons.com/articles/alternative-investments-are-all-the-rage-even-wall-streets-oldest-names-are-on-board-912bff82
https://www.libsoftiktok.com/p/connecticut-groomer-legislator-exposed?utm_source=publication-search
Out of control demonic Democrats.
It doesn’t get any worse than to have the out of control in control.
Thank you for posting this. CT is indeed leading the charge into pornography, transgender rights, and changing pedofiles to “minor attracted” adults.
It’s demonic and the rights of parents are the states last concern.
Evaluators like psychologist Jessica Biren Caverly are frequently used by the family courts and in dcf investigations to sever custody with healthy parents.
Her methods and assessments are baseless and not supported by science and medicine, but are kept under seal and used to terminate rights and force siblings into foster care and put them up for adoption.
She is a well known player in the racketeering industry and her sole opinion is often used as the catalyst upon which a false narrative is built.
Recently a mother appealed the courts decision to terminate her rights and put her three kids up for adoption – a mother who was willing to do anything to be a part of her children’s lives was cut off completely. She even asked if she could be a part of their lives in any way even when they were adopted and the state of CT told her no.
She appealed and said that Caverlys use of the MMPI was improper and invalid- which it is- and therefore her findings had no basis. The appellate court did not disagree with her, but suggested that Caverlys evaluation was not the only “evidence” considered in terminating her rights to her three children.
Given the deprivation of rights to herself and her three children if an evaluation used even in part to make this decision was invalid – this case should not have moved forward.
The complete disregard for out Constitutional rights to raise our children is out of control in the state of CT. Government overreach and cover-up of actions – where psychologists like Jessica Caverly are making diagnoses and recommendations without a medical license to do so is outrageous and extremely dangerous to parents and children.
Yet AG Tong and the CT family court and appellate court judges are all too familiar with the role that Jessica Caverly plays in the lucrative child trafficking industry that runs through CT and enriches many members of the bar – many of whom serve on the bar grievance committee and the judicial review committee.
When those charged with oversight are part of the club the money flows exactly where it should and the lives of innocent parents and children are sacrificed. It’s been going on for decades.
Thankful for Frankreport for taking on the corruption of our family court systems and the evaluators and gals who work on lockstep with attorneys and court appointed experts to deliver children to their abuser.
Duff gotta go . Clean up Connecticut
Why?
The Constitution-Free Zone: A Satirical Tour of Connecticut Family Court
Where Rights Go to Retire and Discretion Knows No Bounds
Welcome to Connecticut, where the trees are tall, the taxes are high, and your civil liberties depend on which courthouse you happen to enter. In Connecticut, family court isn’t governed by law—it’s governed by legacy, silence, and the limitless imagination of judicial discretion.
The Connecticut Constitution? An optional footnote. The U.S. Constitution? A polite suggestion. In Connecticut, a fit parent can be erased from their child’s life without a hearing, without findings, and without anyone in authority batting an eye. Because in Connecticut, “best interest of the child” means whatever a judge felt like writing that morning—if they write anything at all.
Let’s be honest: due process doesn’t live in Connecticut family court. It visits occasionally, gets lost in the docket, and then quietly retreats across state lines. In Connecticut, a motion for modification can sit unadjudicated for months while the child grows up and the court shrugs, “Oops—too late now.” This is standard practice in Connecticut.
In Connecticut, judges interpret statutes by dartboard, case law by Ouija board, and parenting plans by personal grievance. If you’re a mother in Connecticut asking for enforcement of your rights, don’t forget to genuflect. In Connecticut, respect is a one-way street—and your rights are merely decorative.
You may file a motion in Connecticut, attach exhibits, cite controlling precedent—even from the Connecticut Supreme Court. But in Connecticut, none of that guarantees a hearing. Or a ruling. Or any acknowledgment that you exist.
Meanwhile, if the child ages out, Connecticut appellate courts will call your case “moot,” even if it was their own refusal to act that caused it. In Connecticut, delay is a judicial tool. And mootness? A built-in escape hatch. If you try to appeal in Connecticut, they might tell you it’s premature. Wait a little longer, and they’ll say it’s too late. Welcome to Connecticut, where time itself is weaponized.
The statutory guidance in Connecticut—Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-56—is so vague it practically begs to be abused. In Connecticut, courts “may consider” 20+ factors but “shall not be limited” to anything, including logic. This means that in Connecticut, one judge can ban a mother’s contact with her child for vague “emotional harm,” while another judge three months later can reinstate contact under the same facts—with no explanation needed. Connecticut calls this discretion. Others might call it madness.
Of course, all this happens under the dignified banner of Connecticut justice. Judicial oversight in Connecticut? Largely ceremonial. Accountability? Theoretical. Sanctions? Reserved for mothers who dare to ask the court to follow its own rules. In Connecticut, the family court is a self-policing monarchy, and your filing fee helps keep the lights on.
Attorneys in Connecticut? Some help. Others collude. If you’re pro se in Connecticut, prepare to be ignored, condescended to, or accused of being “vexatious” simply for asserting your rights. In Connecticut, unrepresented mothers are seen not as citizens, but as problems to be managed.
Should you point out a constitutional violation in Connecticut, prepare for swift punishment by delay. The more you cite the law in Connecticut, the more you risk being treated like a criminal. And if you question judicial neutrality? In Connecticut, that’s practically blasphemy.
But don’t worry. Connecticut has mechanisms in place: endless continuances, closed courtrooms, ghostwritten orders, and rubber-stamped dismissals. It’s not dysfunction—it’s the Connecticut way.
So if you’re a mother in Connecticut hoping for justice in family court, bring patience, documentation, and a support group. But leave your expectations at the border.
Because in Connecticut, the law is not a shield. It’s a mirror—reflecting only the power of those who already hold it.
Connecticut is used 41 times in this comment. haha
Margaret, why are you making CT family court abuses about gender? These same systemic abuses you highlight occur against fathers as well. You are doing a great disservice making this about gender and not about the systemic corruption. It makes you appear as someone who is in favor of the corruption in place, so long as it benefits women.
Dear Anonymous, you are absolutely right. I should have used the term safe parents; however, but the recent data does support mothers of late. I have been following the MODs published on the Connecticut Judicial website for over two years.
Connecticut used to publish three years of MODs on the Connecticut site, but now the Connecticut MODsare only available for 90 days and I still keep track-of high conflict Connecticut cases in particular. In over 85+% of cases sole legal and physical custody is being awarded to fathers. There is definitely a pendulum shift.
By the way, Anonymous, I usually do not reply to anonymous people when discussing Connecticut, but I was intrigued by your comment.
As to the corruption, reread my comment and look up the definition of satirical or satire. Cheers
What are “MODs”?
Memorandum of Decision
The benefit is for the children not the parent. When you have weaponized an entire state judicial system against a gender they have the right to call it out for what it is. The fatherhood initiative ” to fix the bias”. That’s an abuse of the project. The project is to engage responsible fathers. Assistant to develop skills. Many irresponsible mothers do walk the earth. Placing a bow on the state judicial system labeling mothers ” maternal gatekeeper/malicious mommy/ mounchouen” for legal control through government contracts is not justice or responsible parenting.
An AFCC conference is being held next week. By none other than Marsh Klein Pruitt on the newly branded money maker child parent contact problems. Along the rabbit hole is the ideas that unless a parent ( a father) is sexually abused or physically abused all relationship can be fixed aka forced. The emotional or coursive abuse will be ignored. Marsha Klein Pruitt the first of it’s kind studies on problematic fathers. Funded by federal tax dollars. Forcing relationship on the behalf of prodemintly abusive men in the nation. Sponsored by sober Link. The AFCC which is really a another name for the fathers rights organization will continue the large billing cycles in the family court system. ” We don’t need to get parental alienation in the DSM” we will continue taking children away from their mothers despite the significant amount of women complaining in the state of Connecticut and throughout the United States.
I think the woman in the state are in to your bullshit. The King 👑 of family court reform. Hiding important information about pushing legislation so you can lock women in a room of the house they pay for. Move your new girlfriend in and run to the family court system and play victim.
I don’t think she condones this happening to men at all. Her position and experience is that in CT it primarily happens to women. I’ve known Margaret to advocate for men and women whose rights have been violated by the racketeering in family courts. Perhaps in this article she did not, but I know she works with and supports all parents who have had their children wrongly taken in collation of due process.
I agree it happens to both mothers and fathers.
They definitely occur against fathers as well. Frankreport has covered stories about fathers in the same position. Margaret made it clear there is systematic corruption. I don’t think Margaret Sullivan appears in “favor of corruption as long as it benefits women.” There’s nothing to indicate that in her comment.
Seems like Margaret and her fan club are denying fathers get targeted too. You can’t complain about the corruption and expect people to take you seriously if you only want one gender, women, not to be subject to it, while being okay with subjugating men to it.
You can not take men seriously when they hide the fatherhood initiative and the significant amount of money and go after domestic violence funding. I think 🤔 that Ryan or James Ryan the tuf Dad/equal and shared parenting crash out on the internet over a domestic violence registry. You can’t take men seriously when they pay public media influencers to bash mothers on the internet. This is absolutely in the wheel house of several of the men in family court reform. When the fraud warriors go after women regularly in their own group. David Weigel group is not for parents or children. David Weigel group is for the purpose David Weigel wants. Classic gaslighting when women attempt to come together as a community. While men are allowed to have men’s rights groups or father’s rights groups. She allowed to identify her self as a mother and advocate for them .
Bitch Burning Warrior under the minority mask:
” But no,no.no you’ve had time to go home and get pissed off and start your bullshit machine up again in your head and now you’re going to show me.” King Weigel
If these pictures showed anything other than a skin condition and THE TYPICAL FUCKING LYING THAT MOST WOMEN DO AFTER THEY LOSE CUSTODY.”
” All you victims I know can’t stop obsessing about your OWN cases. THIS WILL HARM YOU.” Cause it’s not about family court fraud it’s about 50/50 custody and no child support. Men like David Weigel taking control of children and controlling people including WOMEN who dare go to the court house with complaints and concerns.
Peter T. Szymonik CT family court reform ” suffices to say that anyone who makes this a gender issue is playing the divorce game and exploiting people people and their emotions.
Anyone who profits from it and deliberately targets other advocates, is worse. And doing none of us a favor.
2014 hearings pushing parental alienation claims.” fathers are 10x more likely to commit suicide”. UTUBE Peter Syzmonik , Father’s right activist, defends Fotis Dulos, murder says he is a victim. Blaming domestic violence funding and claims there is no funding for fatherhood. Syzmonik has been strongly against coercive control laws. Defends fatherhood funding and denies funding streams . Peter denies all funding streams for the fatherhood funding. The entire psychology of family court is based on it. Blaming all the issues on child support and custody taken from father’s because women can’t pay it. ” I have people claiming parental alienation isn’t real” The 400 women in the women’s coalition for women. We have 18,000 in the alienation group. ( worldwide). Women claiming parental alienation shut down Connecticut Protective Mother’s groups because of the danger it presented to them. Silenced and encouraged and TARGETED to join the warrior project. Attacked by David Weigel and his followers. For the purpose of elimination of child support and 50/50 legislation.
The white wealthy wolf of wall street who took over custody and control of his children. Not 50/50 and attacks women in his own group. Fighting with a couple in New Jersey who report contacted Richard Luthmann who get David Weigel involved. Now it’s reported that Richard Luthmann who defends white Christian Nationalism that want to control women. Using child parent contact issues void of where AFCC psychologist force treatment on children unless they are extremely sexually or physically abusive. ALL BASED ON FATHERHOOD. # The national parenting organization formally fathers and families. The fatherhood initiative ALL MEN’S RIGHTS GROUPS with women who have lost custody under a MALE DOMINATED SYSTEM.
THE WOLF WARRIOR WEARING SHEEPS CLOTHING. A FALSE PROHET.
Fathering after divorce with Marsh Kline Pruett significant bi-costal grant funding / fatherhood initiative ” maternal gatekeeping ” About 30 years ago the state of California child abuse prevention wanted to A LOT money into a big project. nothing has moved the needle and they want to look at supporting father involvement in a positive way. Kyle Pruitt and 2 other colleges were given GRANTS FOR MANY YEARS . IT KEEPS EXPANDING . THE MOTHERS ARE OFTEN THE GATE KEEPERS. The AFCC AND Pushing women out of children’s lives. The parent with more time, environment or money creates the pulse on how it goes children. It’s painful for children not to have contact with their father and idealize it even when their dad’s are compromised. Because it’s half their gene pool. Otherwise their is a chapter missing . ” MISTRUST OF THE FATHER FROM THE MOTHERS ” BUILDING THE TRUST BACK UP OR TAKING THE CHILDREN AWAY FROM THEIR MOTHER AND ABUSE THEM AT THE FAMILY COURT.
Triangle relationship making situations better for fathers. Some much distrust often from the mothers.
The secretary of the AFCC
Marsha Kline Pruett
1996 M.S.L Yale law school ( the welfare reform act was signed into law)
1989 California Berkley
1982 B.A. M.S. University of Pennsylvania
career
1982-84 child guidance clinic Philadelphia PA
1984-88 Research asst. Becoming a family project Berkley California
1984-88 Consult , Allied fellowship for substance abusers and ex-offenders
Consult Allied fellowship services for substance abuse Oakland
1987-88
*****Family court is actively ignoring substance abuse issues *******
1988-89 Predoctoral fellow Connecticut mental health center , department of psychiatry yale .
1989-90 Postdoctoral fellow Connecticut ” the consulting center ”
1990-94 Associate research scientist Department of psychiatry , Yale University
1990-99 Consult trainer Department of community mental health Westchester, NY
1994-02 Research scientist, Department of psychiatry at Yale , New Haven CT ( joint appointment with child study)
1999-06 Faculty in law and psychiatry division , Connecticut mental health center , department of psychiatry, Yale university New Haven
2002-2006 Associate Professor , Department of psychiatry , joint appointment with children studies
2006- Professor at Smith college of social work
2007-10 Visting scholar to Department of psychology Amherst, Ma University of Mass.
2017-21 Associate Dean of Academic Affairs , smith college
PROFESSIONAL LICENSE BOARD/BOARD CERTIFICANTION
1991-2019 Psychologist license Ct
2011 American Board of Professional psychology couple and families
2012 Mass license
2017 American psychologist fellow div:43 society for couple and family
Grants and contracts for fatherhood
Coping with work and family stress. $334,039
NIAA Impact of a worksite intervention $444,740
U.S. Department of Education a substance abuse prevention , approach with high risk use $564,257
Westchester County Department of community Mental Health promoting competence in alternative school studies $98,608
State of Connecticut Department of mental health Transition secondary programs $300,000. Foundation for greater New Haven.
W.C. Graustein memorial fund school crisis prevention $28,500
State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and addiction
$298,178
$78,316
$100,287
Community Foundation of greater New Haven
$89,000
$60,000
$60,000
State of Connecticut Department of mental Health addiction services , Enrichment services $300,000 and $178,000
U.S department of Education Community support $542,984
Community Foundation for greater new Haven $15,000
Smith Richardson Foundation DIVORCE AND LEGAL CONTEXT $55,000
Enterprise Community New Haven $65,000
Academy of Educational Development $11,000
State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health PARENT(GUARDIAN) $37,500
Smith Richardson Foundation Inc. $301,112
Roslyn Milstein Meyer Foundation Inc $10,000
Community Foundation of Northern Connecticut COLLABRATIVE DIVORCE PROJECT $10,000
Smith Richardson Foundation ,INC COLLABRATIVE DIVORCE $277,561
State of California , Department of social services SUPPORTING FATHERS INVOLVEMENT $79,481
University of Berkley SUPPORTING FATHERS INVOLVEMNET $66,439
LAW AND PSYCHIATRY Jochelson in-house scholar$20,000
Roslyn Milstein Meyer Foundation FAMILY LAW EDUCATION REFORM$10,000
Karen Vlock Pritzger Family law and education $15,000
National Science Foundation elderly $15,000
Sesame Workshop Resilience in Military and civilian Families with young$44,677
Clinical Research Institute Smith college The dissemination project$4,000
CONNECTICUT SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION , JUDICAL BRANCH INTAKE SCREEN RESEARCH $155,000
University of California, Berkley Supporting father Involement$353,849
University of California , Berkley FATHER ENGAGEMENT CONSULTATION FOR STATE WELFARE PROGRAM $22,000
First five Fresno county The youth law center$3,000
University of California , Berkley SUPPORT FATHER INVOLVEMENT $353,849
Norlien Foundation .Development and training early childhood EXPERIANCE intervention and FATHERHOOD ENGAGEMENT NO AMOUNT SHOWN
Mass children’s trust COMBINING SUPPORT FATHERINVOLVEMENT AND HOME VISITORS NO AMOUNT Shown
Max Bell Foundation early years program evaluation project
$200,000
Umass life sciences moment fund prenatal intervention for low income $1,500
IAALS: Evaluation of the center for out of court divorce
Second phase of coparenting across family structure Smith college $5,468
Gift of evaluation research FRSC $10,000
” There is no money for fathers ” father’s right activist CT
” SFI aims to reduce child abuse and neglect and enhance family well-being through intervention that encourages father involvement and partnered co-parenting.” Kyle Pruett M.D. Yale school of medicine. Expert in forensic consulting on children, parental and family development, parental involvement , children’s mental health, creativity. And fatherhood. Kyle Pruett is an active member for the fatherhood advisory council. ” Teaching men to father is essential for safety, culture and evolution of societies ” He forgot to mention economics. Because at the end of the day that is what the family court systems driving force.
More proof of DCF fathers rights to wealthy white fathers to increase funding streams. In 2021 Paul Boyne reported that Chris Ambrose was recovering free counseling through DCF partnered with the influence of the fatherhood funding. Chris was not claiming poverty yet back then. How often has the state of Connecticut paid for fathers only services and not reported it? Has any impoverished mother been offered these services? I’m guessing none involved in the family court system in Connecticut. The Pruett experimental psychology failed in this case.
The U.S. office of personal management is the chief human resource agency for federal government agencies, management of the civil services coordination and recruitment of civil service ,employment benefits , insurance and retirement .
OPM fatherhood resources . Fatherhood involvement and guide in the United states bitch burning project .
Fatherhood want to be actively involved in raising their children and stop paying child support . The federal government supports fathers are integral part of their children’s lives both providing for their children. $113 billion in out standing child support. Economic needs and safe nurturing environment. Encouragement in work/life programs . Child mortality has increased in 2019 to 2021, reversing decades of decline. * William Tong Connecticut Attorney general. Fire arm deaths, drug overdose and car accidents . 20 percent in teen deaths between 2019 to 2020. WORSE INCREASE SINCE 2007 COMPARED TO HIGHER INCOME NATIONS . DEC 5,2025 CHILDREN DEATHS UNDER 5 WILL LIKELY RISE.
Failing state structures and federal funding streams
I can’t speak for Frank, but the state of Connecticut is ground zero for the projects. The Welfare reform act, healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood. As well as the ” leader in criminal justice reform”. It is not shocking Chris Ambrose has been given a significant amount of help from the key players from the state.
Frank, just like Keith Harmen Snow likely became aware of the Connecticut Family Court system involving wealthy white men manipulating the system. Ones in which would seem obvious and some less obvious with the use of National programs that are aimed at the economic stability of the nation. The entire state funding, especially the health and human service funding. Creating a large funding stream to the University of Connecticut father first state. Women and children second. Using equity projects to place what appears a minority mask. The ACLU will not touch what points to a legal framework to legally discriminate against women. Included in the funding stream for criminal justice reform. As well as winning a case to get three minority men off the sex offenders list. Despite half the sex offender registry being white majority males. Who has cases much more serious than peeing behind a dumpster. Using United States Senator Gary Winfield to promote legislation and lead Connecticut hearings on Judiciary Committee. While Connecticut father’s rights group leader claims to be a civil right activist. Defending funding streams and joining a lawsuit against the fatherhood partnership and claiming it was never funded. While public information says otherwise. Several hundred women have come forward in Connecticut through the death of the Jennifer’s. Many with proof and connections of Judges and GALS. I have no question Linda Gottlieb has connections in the Judicial Branch.
William Tong now President of the United States Attorney Generals birth right and legal system to burn the rainbow of Witches fighting from being hung at the State Court Houses.
ACLU Involvement: Criminal Justice reform centered on strengthening civil rights enforcement, addressing systematic barriers like prison debt, improving conditions for incarcerated youth and working with state agencies and advocates often through legislation. While it appears, his office is blaming women for being raped, offering them hush money and shipping them to another state. 95 % increase in the incarceration rate of women in the United States 48% white women, 19% Hispanic, 17%black 2%American Indian 0.7 Asian. Black women 1.7 times more likely to be imprisoned, however we do hear Connecticut Senator Gary Winfield or William Tong discuss any of this. Why? Because criminal justice reform is for men and not just the one’s of color. Black women are being taught that white women are to blame for the white men suppressing them. However, it’s the rainbow of men splintering women as a community and turning legal system against them. Using male dominated legislation and federal funding with a minority mask. That is used for all men and sold as a benefit to the minority community. Most women are held in jail having serious consequences for women and their families. While fatherhood initiative focuses on prisons. There is nothing to do with ” families in the social services projects. The are geared towards male dominance. YOU WON’T HEAR CONNECTICUT TAKE ABOUT IT. The leaders in Criminal Justice reform. AKA One of the bitches burning project embarked on by the state.
The ACLU of Connecticut is the main but is deeply involved in burning the bitches in the state. Is in all likelihood unresponsive to women in the state despite the gender bias projects. Deeply involved in Connecticut Fatherhood Initiative.
William Tongs ignoring of what appears to be the civil rights violations of women and promotion into the United States. Through the use of the Attorney General’s office in the state of Connecticut. Attorney General King William Tong is connected to the fatherhood initiative a 503 non-profit organization for men. The kings of family court: legal oversight, inter-agency collaborative and contractual framework designed to resolve barriers for non-custodial fathers in all colors and socioeconomic backgrounds.
Legal policy and guidance. The Connecticut Attorney General’s office provides essential counsel to the department of Social Services, the lead agency for Connecticut Fatherhood Initiative. Including establishing paternity, management of child support (giving custody to fathers to decrease arrearages and the need for TANF grant funding, the majority is kept by the state). The goal is to foster fatherhood paternal involvement. (at any cost).
ROBUST MOU FRAMEWORK FOR FATHERS
Typically, the Attorney General’s offices reviews or authorizes, serve a bridge to support legislation. Department of labor, DSS collaborative. Purchases of service contracts. This list goes on. Attorney General William Tong along with the state of Connecticut is exposed for the Kings Bitch burning project.
It’s no accident that Chris and the key players want to keep the legal battle in Connecticut. It’s a warning to women in the state and children to keep their mouth shut. Cause the state of Connecticut will always have Kings. William Tong has decided it’s his birth right to keep it that way. God help, Frank, Tina and anyone else who gets in the way. The modern-day witch burning project, once again leads to the state of Connecticut.
Richard Blumenthal Connecticut Attorney General 1991 to 2011
George Jepson 2011-2019
William Tong 2019-present.
Are you going to post your court response anywhere? Usually you include a link – maybe I missed it?
How can Ambrose claim any of his lies on his affidavits were errors?
Does he think his daughter lives in his house?
Does he think he has provided for her since August when he confiscated all of her property and her government issued ID?
He’s claiming her snap benefits – literally stealing the money that she is/was entitled to as she’s on the streets trying to survive with nothing- no clothing, no ID, no money —
There’s something seriously wrong with him.
A federal defamation lawsuit filed by Connecticut resident Christopher A. Ambrose against me is facing a jurisdictional challenge in the U.S. District Court for Connecticut.
— Clearly a broken system that works!!!
Math Challenge: The Five Million Dollar Question
FACTS:
Crybaby Ambrose was fired for plagiarism in 2018. Hollywood agents dropped him.
Once a practicing attorney, crybaby’s law license remains suspended.
Ambrose tells young men online that he is a barber and makes unsolicited suggestions as to how their hair should be cut.
It is unclear if he is profiting from his career as a barber.
Crybaby alleges defamation articles were written by Parlato from 2023-2025.
Mystery Question:
If Crybaby had no new income generated from 2018-2023, and continued to have no new earnings from 2023-2025, how is Parlato responsible for 5 million in damages?
Can you explain how Ambrose calculated 5 million in damages?
Based on his inability to count the accurate number of references to Connecticut, I’m wondering what mathematical calculations he utilized to arrive at 5 million?
Ambrose is obsessed with Frank Parlato! Can’t write a motion without casting blame on Parlato- mentions Parlato thousands of times… projection projection projection
As Frank stared, his actions serve to prove Dr Lee’s assessment of him is right on target. He take no responsibility for anything. All three of Ambrose’s federal lawsuits have a common theme –
Nothing is Ambrose’s fault.
He’s good.
Anyone against him is bad.
They must be punished.
He is a victim.
“A comprehensive compilation of all the times Joe Rogan has talked about the great state of Connecticut.”
Connecticut is known as Corrupticut for a reason. It’s one of the few states that eliminated Sheriffs. In 2000 the power of Sheriffs was transferred to the courts, further empowering a corrupt judicial system and taken power from the people.
Special Deputy Sheriffs became Judicial Marshals- basically following the orders of the judges and Deputy Sheriffs became State Marshals.
It’s a tiny, incestuous state, where corruption is known and executed at the highest levels leaving no recourse for citizens. Yale is known to be the home of free masons and secret societies – in a place where pedophilia is accepted and protected and Freemasons have a long history.
Drive through if you must, but don’t settle down – they’ll take your children for profit, incarcerate and drug you into silence, rob you blind in probate court, and torture you for decades for sport.
LUTHMANN NOTE: Christopher Ambrose is not a victim. He is a serial liar hiding behind lawsuits. He abused his children, then abused the courts. Worth millions, he swore poverty while gaming the system. He swore service that never happened. He swore facts his own daughter just shredded under oath. That is not litigation. That constitutes fraud with a filing-fee waiver. Ambrose weaponizes courts the way abusers weaponize control—lies, leverage, and intimidation. When his own child says he stole her documents, sabotaged her education, and lied to judges, the mask comes off. This is not defamation. This is exposure. Sanction him. Dismiss him. Refer him. Courts exist for justice, not as a protection racket for blue blood predators.
I am gonna sue you, Frank!!!
Can someone ask Ambrose if it is indeed true that he never consummated his marriage with Karen? If that is indeed the case, then does that mean Ambrose is a homosexual and therefore fraudulently induced Karen into marriage?
Correct
And when you mention #COCKS, you know you’re from Mansfield, Pennsylvania.
Ambrose appears to be seriously mentally ill.
His world of delusion is exploding everywhere and his obsessive trips to stop and shop reveal him to be the stalker his family claims he has always been. Someone needs to take his manufactured evidence seriously and put an end to his legal abuse
The absurdity of the lies he tells – let’s hope this dangerous psychopath is finally stopped. Too often his dangerous lies are accepted as fact, his narrative memorialized in documents and then acted upon without authorities ever fact checking. His stories and claims are built like the house of sand. It’s all coming down
Thank you for the laugh and pray the judge smacks this clown down as he deserves