Daughter Claims Ambrose Lied on Financial Affidavit He Swore Before Court; Motion Seeks Sanction for Father’s Alleged Perjury

December 17, 2025
Christopher Ambrose

By Timothy Vale

A sanctions motion in a federal defamation case took a turn this week when the plaintiff’s 18-year-old adopted daughter filed a sworn affidavit against him.  The daughter accused her own father of making false representations to courts and government agencies.

The plaintiff, former lawyer and former TV screenwriter, Christopher A. Ambrose has filed three defamation lawsuits in the same federal court: one against psychiatrist Dr. Bandy Lee, one against child-advocacy writer Tina Swithin, and one against the publisher of the FrankReport, Frank Parlato.

In her affidavit, Mia Ambrose sets forth detailed allegations that are consistent with the reporting Ambrose claims is false.

In the case against Dr. Lee, Ambrose sought a fee waiver, swearing under oath that he could not afford the $405 filing fee. He filed a motion to seal his fee waiver application, which Judge Nagala denied.

Parlato has moved for sanctions in his own case, arguing that Ambrose made false statements to the court by claiming he had personally served Parlato with the lawsuit when he had not; and second, by submitting false financial disclosures in the Lee case, which is before the same judge.

Mia Ambrose’s affidavit directly contradicts her father’s sworn representations, stating that she has not lived with him since August 2024, receives no financial or material support from him, and that his claims to the court regarding her residency, education, and dependency are false.

Allegations of False Service

According to the sanctions motion, Ambrose told the court that he personally served Parlato with the lawsuit in September 2025 and sought to use that false assertion to accelerate Parlato’s response deadline.

Ambrose claimed that a deputy had served the lawsuit on an “adult resident” at Parlato’s home, a phrase that, under federal rules, is a key requirement for valid substituted service.

Christopher Ambrose claims dire poverty

However, the sheriff’s return of service states that the deputy spoke with a woman on the property, left no papers, and marked the attempt as “service not completed.” The document does not identify the woman as a resident.

On Oct. 8, U.S. District Judge Sarala V. Nagala denied Ambrose’s request, writing in a text order that the materials submitted to the court showed that Parlato had not been personally served.

Financial Disclosures Challenged

In the lawsuit against Dr. Lee, Ambrose sought to avoid paying filing fees. Under federal law, filing a false financial affidavit constitutes grounds for dismissal and may warrant sanctions, and potentially referral to prosecutors for criminal perjury charges.

Mia Ambrose’s affidavit states that Ambrose, who claimed to have zero income, operates a business known as Eyes Above Productions, Inc., “from which he receives income that he has omitted from disclosures to this Court,” and that he continues to receive checks at a Beverly Hills address “despite representing to this Court that he has no business interests and no income.”

Her affidavit further states that Ambrose falsely claimed a four-person household with three dependents, a rental payment lower than he actually pays, and no assets, while failing to disclose SNAP benefits, investment accounts, retirement withdrawals, and other income.

By listing Mia as a dependent living at home and as a full-time student, Ambrose may have been able to obtain increased public benefits, including SNAP assistance. 

Ambrose has received CT SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) benefits for a family of 4 since Dec 18 2024.

Daughter’s Affidavit Alleges Abuse

In her affidavit, Mia Ambrose states that she left her father’s home permanently in August 2024 — seven months before he signed an affidavit claiming she lived with him.

“I permanently left his home due to ongoing emotional and psychological abuse and a documented and substantiated history of sexual abuse,” she wrote. “In 2021, forensic interviews determined that my siblings and I were victims and unsafe in his care, and legal and physical custody were removed.”

Usually a man who lives in a home like this is not living in poverty Ambrose says he is     

“Since August 2024, I have lived independently in another state at a confidential address known to law enforcement authorities for my protection,” she stated.

She stated that Ambrose has provided “no support of any kind — financial, material, educational, or otherwise” since that time.

After turning 18, she said, she requested her belongings through police email channels. When those requests were ignored, she traveled to Connecticut during winter and required police assistance to retrieve basic items. He did not return her possessions, not even her clothing.

“Mr. Ambrose refused to return my belongings, confiscated my only property, and provided no assistance,” she wrote. “These events were recorded on video, witnessed by law enforcement, and documented.”

“Despite these facts,” she added, “Mr. Ambrose continues to represent to this Court and to government agencies that I remain a dependent residing in his household.”

Mia also stated that her father retained her identification documents, including her birth and adoption records, Social Security card, and Guatemalan passport.

“In February 2025, after I turned eighteen, I attempted to retrieve these documents with police assistance,” she wrote. “Mr. Ambrose refused for several hours, despite multiple accommodations offered by law enforcement.”

She stated that as a result, she has been “unable to obtain lawful identification, employment, or school enrollment without extraordinary effort,” adding that “[t]hese actions actively sabotaged my education and independence and constitute the opposite of any form of parental support.”

Coercive Control Allegations

Mia Ambrose’s affidavit describes conditions inside her father’s home that she characterized as coercive.

“In his residence, he exercised coercive control through alarmed doors and windows, deadbolts, steel bars, concealed audio recording devices, and threats of separation, involuntary psychiatric hospitalization, and DCF confinement,” she wrote. “These conditions and threats were recorded and documented.”

She stated that after Ambrose caused a Silver Alert to be issued for her, she feared seeking employment or attending school.

“I was unable to seek employment or attend school because I feared he would locate me, make false reports to authorities, and force me back into his home,” she wrote.

She also disputed Ambrose’s claims that she and her brother are full-time students, as he claimed on is sworn affidavit.

“His conduct prevented me from completing high school,” she wrote, adding that her brother “also dropped out of school prior to Mr. Ambrose submitting affidavits to this Court claiming we were full-time students.”

“All three of us performed well academically while living with our mother,” she wrote, “and our educational records show a marked decline during Mr. Ambrose’s sole care.”

Mia Ambrose further disputed Ambrose’s claim that he pays for his children’s phone service.

“This is false,” she wrote. “He terminated phone service to each of us when we fled his home independently in April, May, and July 2023, isolating us from friends, support systems, and legal counsel.”

Broader Implications

In the sanctions motion, Parlato argues that Mia Ambrose’s affidavit undermines Ambrose’s defamation claims by corroborating the conduct described in his reporting.

Parlato has asked the court to make formal findings of bad faith, impose a monetary sanction payable to the clerk of court, and warn Ambrose that further misrepresentations could result in additional penalties.

Judge Nagala has not yet ruled on the motion, and no hearing date has been scheduled.

 

author avatar
Timothy Vale
5 1 vote
Article Rating

Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

76 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
News re: Troconis trial 1/9/2026 …
News re: Troconis trial 1/9/2026 …
1 month ago

One camera allowed in the courtroom (NBC Connecticut’s camera).

All other news outlets take their feed from that one camera.

Looks like it’s starting about 11:00 AM.

https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/

Chaos in the New Haven court house
Chaos in the New Haven court house
1 month ago

” I just stabbed my bitch” cause it’s Connecticut . The economic values of the young woman life will warrent less prison time. The young woman’s family goes wild cause they know how the state of Connecticut operates . Perhaps the department of child and family services should invest more money in the system of caring for children. Less money in profiling women as the gatekeeper in family court. Maybe the trauma and cycle of abuse that the accused would not have lead him down a path of killing ” bitches”. Now the cycle of trauma continues for the 3 year old, while Connecticut focues on ” fixing poverty” for the state, not the people living in it. Ignoring the cycle of domestic violence in the family court house. # department of child and family services and the health and human services bitch burning project. They will blame this on the biological father not living in the home.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

LUTHMANN NOTE: Christopher Ambrose is not a victim. He is a serial liar hiding behind lawsuits. He abused his children, then abused the courts. Worth millions, he swore poverty while gaming the system. He swore service that never happened. He swore facts his own daughter just shredded under oath. That is not litigation. That constitutes fraud with a filing-fee waiver. Ambrose weaponizes courts the way abusers weaponize control—lies, leverage, and intimidation. When his own child says he stole her documents, sabotaged her education, and lied to judges, the mask comes off. This is not defamation. This is exposure. Sanction him. Dismiss him. Refer him. Courts exist for justice, not as a protection racket for blue blood predators.

Ed Gibbon
Ed Gibbon
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

If you’re right, who’s surprised that a few Connecticut lawyers and judges hiding behind his lawsuits still refuse to expose, sanction, dismiss and refer themselves?

The various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, were all considered by the people as equally true; by the philosopher, as equally false; and by the magistrate, as equally useful.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

Ambrose’s motion to seal his fee waiver states, “The plaintiff seeks to seal the Application for Fee Waiver because it contains highly confidential information regarding his financial circumstances, including his income, expenses, and other personal facts that are of no interest to the public. This information has never been made public before, and its public disclosure would seriously violate his privacy and likely cause him serious harm.”

Ambrose knew he was lying throughout his fee waiver / and it will cause him harm because his own words will result in charges of perjury – a felony charge –

Free speech if Luthmann allows
Free speech if Luthmann allows
1 month ago

Connecticut the leader in criminal Justice reform , the Bitch Burning State .

Criminal Justice reform (CJR) Increasingly Integrates Fatherhood Initiatives by recognizing fathers critical role in family stability , reducing recidivism and breaking cycles of poverty , but not DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

Programs such as in and out dads. The National Fatherhood Initiative. While the majority of minority fathers are given programs the wealthy white fathers are kept out of jail. Like Chris Ambrose. Father’s like David Weigel are trying to collect data on arrest and doesn’t break it down by gender . David working with Connecticut Family court reform/ father’s rights advocate Peter Szymonik an activist pushing parental alienation along with Dr. Bill Barnet and Joan Koth Zananard. ALL COMPLAINIG ABOUT CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS. Working with the National Parents Organization. Attempting to pass the three strikes role. ” Gifts and Prizes for women filing for divorce and the promotion of keeping women in abusive marriage. Using Mark Ludwig win in Kentucky which has a rate of 1 in every 2 women and 1 in 3 men a victim of Domestic Abuse , while keeping the divorce rate down. Kentucky’s femicide rate is 11th in the nation. One of the highest in the nation.

” Blessing from your father ” using religion in the political fight for legislation .
Kinship & Respite offers $500 a year for health, enrichment development.

TANF a cash assistance program which father’s like Chris can apply.

State Administration General Assistance a cash assistance program unable to work due to medical condition

Individual and Family Grants for disabilities which Kloth Zanard also claims to be an expert in. The use of the Warrior project attempting to use brain scans and using PTSD and CPTSD . Zanard has been at it in Connecticut since Jan 1996. Non profit in 2011. August 1996 is when the Personal Responsibility and work Opportunity Reconciliation act began . Parental Alienation became popular. TANF programs shifted for states to keep a larger portion. 1993 is where the welfare reform began. The state of Connecticut partnered with the fatherhood Initiative in 1999 after passage of legislation bringing founding to the state. One Hundred million dollars to promote one gender of parent. The benefits of the program are not based on race or economic status.

William Tong the Connecticut Attorney General also the head of the Attorney Generals office is directly involved with Department of Justice funding. Has made fatherhood and criminal justice matters profitable for the state. As well as cost effective decreasing the prison population. All based on the gender of a parent. Since 2014 ( Connecticut family court hearing ) femicide rates have been increasing. Since 2020 children’s deaths have increased . Divorce rates have declined , but the out of wedlock births have steadily inclined. $113 billion dollars of unpaid child support in the United States.

It’s not just Chris Ambrose the state of Connecticut, The alienation industry and the men’s rights groups have a investment’s to protect.
” If it wasn’t for the Attorney’s the children would be living half time with dad and halftime with Mom and going to school in Madison .” Peter Syzmonick.

Warrior Luigi CT father of 6 reported to have charges dropped in criminal court by Guardian ad litem housed in the public defender’s office. Leveraging marital property to secure legal counsel for parental alienation case . 6 children have a phenomenon that under minded his relationship , cause it could never have been his behavior. ” a women’s narrative” . Domestic Violence charges not investigated are not false charges.

Connecticut Family court reform father’s rights activist and pushing 50/50 claims that their is no funding for father’s in the state of Connecticut . If he is dishonest about the funding what else has he been dishonest about ?

You find non of this in Richard Luthmann’s family court reporting. Any attempt to free speech on behalf of women in the united states is considered toxic feminist. Intense and some how a lack of respect for him personally.

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays , The New England Broom Stick non funded mother’s right to freedom of abuse and discrimination. In the spirit of free speech please post. Reporter or legal counsel for father’s rights .

RESEARCHER
RESEARCHER
1 month ago

Connecticut has formally embedded fatherhood initiatives into state systems for more than two decades. The Connecticut Fatherhood Initiative was created by legislation in 1999 and is administered through the Department of Social Services as a multi-agency effort. Father-engagement programming is also present in corrections: the Connecticut Department of Correction’s FY 2024–25 reporting documents use of InsideOut Dad, a National Fatherhood Initiative program for incarcerated fathers.
None of that is controversial—it’s in the state’s own documents.
What is controversial is what receives sustained investment and what does not.
Connecticut publishes family-violence homicide reports and tracks domestic-violence-related fatalities, yet women remain the overwhelming majority of intimate-partner homicide victims, and advocates have documented significant child deaths connected to domestic violence in recent years. Tracking harm is not the same as preventing it.
Nationally, child-support arrears exceed $115 billion, a figure repeatedly cited in federal and policy analyses. That represents a massive, ongoing economic injury to children and custodial parents, even as family-court culture increasingly centers narratives of “father access,” “alienation,” and cooperation—often without parallel safeguards for documented abuse.
This isn’t an argument against supporting fathers. It’s an argument about policy imbalance.
When father-engagement and reentry narratives are elevated as tools of “cost-effective” criminal-justice reform—reducing incarceration and recidivism—while domestic-violence enforcement, survivor protection, and economic accountability remain weak, the result is predictable: women and children absorb the risk.
That’s not ideology. It’s a structural outcome of funding priorities, program metrics, and court culture choices that Connecticut itself has put in writing.

Reform that saves money while shifting danger onto women and children isn’t reform—it’s cost displacement.

trackback

[…] LUTHMANN NOTE: Christopher Ambrose is not a victim. He is a serial liar hiding behind lawsuits. He abused his children, then abused the courts. Worth millions, he swore poverty while gaming the system. He swore service that never happened. He swore facts his own daughter just shredded under oath. That is not litigation. That constitutes fraud with a filing-fee waiver. Ambrose weaponizes courts the way abusers weaponize control—lies, leverage, and intimidation. When his own child says he stole her documents, sabotaged her education, and lied to judges, the mask comes off. This is not defamation. This is exposure. Sanction him. Dismiss him. Refer him. Courts exist for justice, not as a protection racket for blue blood predators. This piece first appeared on FrankReport.com. […]

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

Consideration and action on Informal JE 2025-05

Issue: May a Judicial Official serve on a Merit Selection Committee that evaluates applications and interviews qualified candidates for the Federal Public Defender position?

https://jud.ct.gov/committees/ethics/ethics_agenda_121825.pdf

If only
If only
1 month ago

HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) is asking for answers from state judicial branch offices about what they’re doing to protect consumers from family court scams.

Blumenthal is concerned about so-called “racketeering.” Scammers obtain lucrative family court cases and contracts and bank the funds. Victims only discover the fraud after attempting to use the family courts to resolve family matters

“The stronger precautions are very simply better judges and lawyers and detection of fraud before it victimizes consumers,” Blumenthal said. “It is easily doable, but legislators don’t want to investigate to make these judges and lawyers safer. We want to force them to do it.”

https://www.wtnh.com/news/connecticut/hartford/blumenthal-asking-for-improved-consumer-protections-when-purchasing-gift-cards/

Calculation of damages
Calculation of damages
1 month ago

What damages is he claiming? Besides his ego being bruised.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

So he applied for a fee waiver in the first of his 3 federal lawsuits (and requested it be sealed from public) but then when his motion to seal was denied, he decided not to continue to perjure himself when filing his second two federal lawsuits and came up with the $800+ to file both of those. Sounds like Ambrose

State's profiting
State's profiting
1 month ago

AFC’S role in in Administration for children and families part of the health and human services , provides grants to state and organizations to implement Responsible Fatherhood. Primarily through the state budget, with figures varies THE OFFICE OF ATTORY GENERAL in 2022 $33.4 million. while the DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE also received funding with the need for MORE PROSECTURES AND ********************INSPECTORS****************
“Go to criminal court”***********************************************. Funding levels depend on the specific agency ****************************************** ATTORNEY GENERAL VS CRIMINAL JUSTIC DIVISION********************** A DETAILED REPORT IN THE STATE COMPTROLLER REPORTS AND BUDGET DOCUMENTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CRIME IS DOWN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

REVENUE GENERATED the OAG has granted significant revenue ( hundreds of millions in some years ) through settlements to benefit the state .

$100 million dollars to the Creighton University A RECORD BREAKING $100 MILLION DOLLARS IN SEPTEMBER 2025. “FLY TOGETHER “. from the Heider Family Foundation. Creighton University is a Jesuit institution. Catholic schools aka CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM. Existing through Omaha organizations supporting fathers , family unity and positive outcomes alignment with CREIGHTON’S JESUIT MISSION OF SOCIEL JUSTICE AND COMMUNITY SUPPORT.( the wealthy white men hiding behind the minority mask). Creighton University School of Law offers EXPERIMENTAL LEARNING through domestic violence clinics , providing practical family law skills for low income residents and community service . ” CREIGHTEN’S STRENGTHS LIES IN IT’S JESUIT MISSIONS ,COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ”

Association of Family and Conciliation Courts AFCC is the major body of for Children and Families directly related to the Bitch Burning Project. THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FUNDS THE STATE -LEVEL FATHERHOOD INITIATIVE THROUGH GRANTS FORGE to promote responsible fatherhood AIMED AT SHIFTING THE SYSTEM TO MORE FATHER FRIENDLY AND SUPPORT POSITIVE INVOLVMENT through labeling the mother’s of their children crazy and malicious mommies. Maternal gatekeeping. Custodial interference giving the smack down to domestic violence victims or the children. FATHERHOOD INVOLVEMENT ABOVE ALL ELSE .

RESEARCHER
RESEARCHER
1 month ago

The issue is supporting fathers, because the framework itself is male-centered public policy.
At the federal level, the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) within U.S. Department of Health and Human Services administers Responsible Fatherhood grants to states and organizations. Those grants flow through state budgets and agencies, not directly to families, and are explicitly designed to expand “father involvement” as a policy goal.
Connecticut adopted this orientation early. The state created its Fatherhood Initiative by legislation in 1999, and father-focused programming now intersects with multiple arms of government, including the Office of the Attorney General, the Division of Criminal Justice, corrections, and family court. Funding levels, staffing priorities, and enforcement roles are documented in State Comptroller reports and budget acts, not speculation.
What is missing from this framework is balance.
The Connecticut Family Violence Homicide Report (2024) does not show crime is “down.” What it shows is that family-violence homicides remain a persistent and significant share of all homicides. In 2024, family-violence homicides accounted for 20.9% of all homicide victims, which is above the long-term average. The report also shows 81.8% of offenders were male, 57.9% of victims were female, and most victims and offenders had no prior family-violence arrest history, meaning the system routinely fails to identify lethal risk before it is too late. �
family-violence-homicide-report-2024.pdf None
This matters because professional norms shaping family court—advanced by national bodies like the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts and reinforced through state-funded fatherhood initiatives—prioritize father access and involvement while reframing maternal protection as “gatekeeping,” “custodial interference,” or “alienation.”
That is not gender-neutral policy.
It is a male-centered framework that routinely subordinates domestic-violence safety and child protection to father-access goals.
Calling this out is not anti-father.
It is pro-safety, pro-evidence, and pro-accountability—and Connecticut’s own data make that clear.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

When Ambrose isn’t in federal court blaming three professionals for his failed career abd failed parenting – he’s in probate court having temper tantrums because he’s mad at his younger brother Neil Ambrose – Ambrose’s rage toward his younger brother, who the parents wisely made executor of their estate (also not reported in his affidavit to the federal court).
Chris Ambrose is furious he doesn’t have control of the family trust and property because their parents knew Chris was a liar and a narcissist – Neil and Colin, the two younger and successful brothers – manage to get along but the oldest and ugliest, Chris, has loyalty to no one but himself
He called colleagues to attempt to hurt Neil’s reputation as an attorney in CT but got shut down.
Now he threatens Neil with lawsuits claiming Neil mismanaged the trust A he could have invested it to make more profit screams Chris- all the while all three brothers know it was only Neil who cared for both parents for decades A role Colin honors but Chris just wants the most money

Shitty son, shitty husband, shitty father, shitty brother, shitty colleague and has no friends for a reason – get help Chris Ambrose – but at 65 there’s little chance of change

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Um, maybe he wasn’t made executor bc his hands are full with other legal matters? Just a thought.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

The videos if produced for federal court will sink his ship. He portrays himself as father of the year with 2/3 kids being HS dropouts due to his own ineptitude

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Two kids dropping out is due to the Frank Report humiliating them and subjecting them to bullying at school. Get a clue. Frank used their full names on this site so the kids would have a vested interest in reading his and Karen’s abusive tirades against their father.

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

You sure do know a lot about this case and your spin is uncannily aligned with Chris. Could you be Chris?

Any action by Dr Lee?
Any action by Dr Lee?
1 month ago

Is Dr Lee aware of his lies? Has she filed anything against him since he filed the false affidavit in her case?

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago

I do not believe she has made the court aware of his lies in federal court concenring his financial condition. Nevertheless despite claiming to be broke, he sitll has money to hire James McGibney to try to bully me. Not that I mind it. It is good to clean up the floor with a bully now and then. But it does suggest he is nowhere near as broke as his financial affidiavit sworn under oath in federla court states.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Frank Parlato

How come Mr. McGibney is not concerned with children being bullied under the family court system? Perhaps he should do a more in-depth investigation.

Arrogant Ambrose seals his own fate
Arrogant Ambrose seals his own fate
1 month ago

Federal perjury law: Under 18 U.S.C. § 1621

Eventually Ambrose hanged himself.

The End.

$$$ for Cooley, Scully and Dowling
$$$ for Cooley, Scully and Dowling
1 month ago

Based on recent court filing Ambrose secured new legal counsel. Hartford law firm Cooley, Scully and Dowling.

He’s now gone through attorneys Nancy Aldrich (who sued him), Chris Goulden, Alex Cuda, juvenile court attorneys, NY attorneys, and much to Allen Kassenoffs irritation- Ambrose has him on speed dial.

He’s poor but hired attorneys to continue to attack his ex-wife in family court. Three years post divorce and Ambrose is more litigious than ever – signs of the sociopathic predator that he is.

Three federal cases, family court case, and probate case – in addition to NYC case where his attempt to use lies to incarcerate Luthmann backfired on him. Ambrose is fueled by the courts- loves every minute of it as he has no life outside of his litigious fixation on those who dare to expose what he knows himself to be.

House of smoke and mirrors
House of smoke and mirrors
1 month ago

Some one needs to look into the funding to the Connecticut public defenders office. It’s all related to criminal justice reform. The state of Connecticut is not going to allow the scam to be unfolded. They cover it up. They did it in the with Linda Weigland, Jennifer Dulos and in this case. Connecticut is done a good job of using the bar association and psychologist to defend the situation going on in Connecticut. Don’t think for a minute the politicians are not involved. Money talks and the truth often walks . Shedding the spotlight on the fraud within the family court system. Who wouldn’t pay hundreds of thousands to get out of charges. There is a back door to financial resources for people like Chris. The innocent project it’s not just for those with darker skin. Under the minority umbrella holds space for monitized men and fatherhood is the the key to gaining access. If only Sean would come forward with the funding streams. Connecticut is burning up paperwork to cover up rather than the public finding out about all the curruption. Richard Blumenthal own son along with another democrat trying to limit freedom of information request. Pacs for Chris Murphy involving the state comptroller attendance to fatherhood function, William Tong aggressively defending funding that all leads to the department of education. The gentleman defending Allen after Catherine kassnoff was dead. Some of the biggest ” reform” people are in on the secret. The bipartisan manipulation of social projects to gain funding streams for the state. Federal laws be damned. The state will engineer the outcome. They defended coursive programs. Won’t desipline Attorneys or judges. The fire, disbar and incarcerated anyone who casts a light on the operation. Linda Gotlibe has a financial investment in the state of Connecticut. Madison the arm chair psychologist doing some dirty work. Instead of having an in-depth investigation into the reunification camps they will use cases like this. This already happened in Connecticut. The mother went missing presumed dead possibly of cancer. The son committed suicide while on a search for the mother who was painted crazy and a liar. Is Richard Blumenthal and William Tong stopping the FBI from investigation into family court trafficking? The family court system is only as good as the ” professionals” will allow. How much money would be lost if the state of Connecticut was held accountable for it failure within programs? Who has been tasked with investigation into non profit organization? Who spear headed the investigation into ppp loans? Who let Mawahinny off the hook? 33 million to the public defenders office. Child welfare attorneys. Failing DCF. NOTE TO NEW JERSEY. The fast acting reunification bill with DCF oversight. DCF has assisted in much of the problem with child protection. Traffic children and heavy into the programs. If everything is okay why not allow someone outside the state of Connecticut not in bed with the politicians look around. How much power has been given to Richard Blumenthal and William Tong from the department of justice? Richard Blumenthal has been on the ground floor of the projects and has created a significant amount of funding for the state of Connecticut to be the lead on judicial projects. What has governor Lament done to ensure the court system stays under wraps? Luthmann maybe helping with the Ambrose children, but he’s ultimately appearing to be paid to help legislation pass. Promotion of blaming title 4d and domestic violence funding for all the problems. Richard Luthmann is reported to be on the payroll of the family court fraud warriors project. A men’s rights organization and according to the leader of the men’s rights group. Karen and Chris should be splitting custody and the world would be just fine. Another alienated parent just left Maryanne Petri who were accused of parental alienation by the father’s of their children. Who has is protecting funding and working to pass legislation bringing more funding into the state of Connecticut that benefits themselves? New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Vermont, Maine the East Coast. Richard Luthmann is he really an independent journalist?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

You have to eliminate custody evaluators – they are the ones, along with gals who consistently give custody to one parent for no good reason and without involvement of dcf!

It’s a money making scheme and the parent that pays for the report gets custody – it’s proven in case after case with Jessica Biren Caverly – she’s a criminal – she’s not licensed to make or remove medical diagnoses but family court is in on the fix and they all profit from the custody for sale

True predators like Chris Ambrose – serve to expose the racketeering because he cannot take all that he bought and walk away –

Instead he continues to play and victim, abuse his kids, pay attorneys to manipulate and violate rights to secure more money and punish his ex and kids

Very sad

New England Broomstick Association
New England Broomstick Association
1 month ago

Love him or hate him Frank embodies the true spirit of free speech. We the people seek the truth. Everyone gets to weigh in on the family court. All roads of the Warrior project leads to ” I don’t wanna pay my child support”. Make an educated argument for 50/50. Not studies based on volunteer basis with out significant problems. Mr. Mega, The Connecticut government is taking the money to prosecute crimes to push the agenda exploiting the heavily less pigmented fathers of Connecticut. The leader in criminal justice reform and fatherhood legislation. Using coursive financial tactics within the government. This has nothing to do with the best interest of children. It’s all about finances. $113 billion dollars in arrarges. Selling to the government they won’t have to worry about it if they transfer the children to the monitized fathers. Or force 50/50 agreements. We know who is behind the scenes of the group. We have been the victims of their tactics. We will not stand by and allow you , Mr. Luthmann to control free speech for the partnership. We don’t embody the spirit of Paul Boyne targets of color, religious and segestions. Mr. Boyne did give a voice to both genders. He did not seek to cover up funding and attack another. He did shine a spot light on the abuse of minority community funding by the state of Connecticut. Families come in various shades, dynamics and economic status. The use of ethnic origin has been manipulated for the state benefits. As well as religious ideology. It’s not the birth right of Connecticut Attorney general to control the lives of women and children in the state of Connecticut for profit based on gender, race and economic status. Or the entire country for that matter sueing Donald Trump every five minutes and failing to address the family court system problems in Connecticut. Trying to lead the nation in his equity and opportunity programs, gender based funding streams and lucrative experiments. For such a Big Trump lover one would think 🤔 Mr. Luthmann you would want to expose the Democrats abuse of the welfare reform project spear headed in the Pizza state. Which Frank report has been exposing. I’m guessing that the male lead Family court Fraud Warriors project needed to control the media, so they control the information to the public . They did this in 2014 and they are doing it again.

RESEARCHER
RESEARCHER
1 month ago

There are legitimate questions about funding, incentives, and institutional alignment in Connecticut — but the strongest critique is the one grounded in verifiable structures, not speculation about hidden conspiracies.
Here is what can be shown from public records:
Connecticut has, for decades, embedded fatherhood-first policy frameworks into child welfare, family court, corrections, and reentry programming. That orientation originates federally through Responsible Fatherhood grants administered by ACF (HHS) and is carried forward through state budgets, agency grants, and professional standards — not back-room deals.
Those funding streams are real and traceable. They appear in:
State budget acts
Comptroller financial reports
DSS / DCF grant programs
Corrections and reentry programming
Court-adjacent professional bodies
This is not about “letting people off the hook.” It’s about what the system is designed to prioritize.
The data Connecticut itself publishes show persistent, unresolved harm:
Family-violence homicides remain a significant share of all homicides
Offenders are overwhelmingly male
Most lethal cases involve no prior DV arrest history, meaning the system is failing at prevention
That failure coincides with a family-court culture that routinely:
Prioritizes father access and “cooperation”
Reframes protective behavior as “alienation” or “gatekeeping”
Relies heavily on court-appointed professionals insulated from meaningful oversight
You don’t need a grand conspiracy to explain this.
Policy design + funding incentives + professional self-regulation are enough.
If Connecticut truly believed its system was sound, it would welcome:
Independent audits
External investigations
Transparency around grantmaking and professional discipline
Instead, scrutiny is resisted, records are hard to obtain, and accountability is diffuse.
The problem isn’t exposure — it’s that male-centered family policy has been normalized as reform, even as women and children continue to bear the risk.
That’s not a scandal theory.
That’s a structural failure — and it’s documented.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

Funny, the way I see it, he has very solid, logical and legit reasons for every single court action he has pursued. And I’m not the only one who sees it that way; the courts have always ruled in his favor. Why? Because he is IN THE RIGHT.

The brainwashed daughter “speaking out” isn’t doing anything to prove him wrong. It just underscores the exact reasons he didn’t want to lose custody of her in the first place: She would go straight into the hands of unstable and criminal manipulators. Which is exactly what has happened since she left home, apparently

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

You don’t think much of your daughter, Chris, do you?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Frank Parlato

Omg I’m not Chris. Way to continue brainwashing the daughter by making her believe the only one who is on her fathers side is him.

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Let’s hear more from Mia.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

It seems like Connecticut’s liberal judges “have always ruled in his favor” to force his family to submit to totally bogus philosophies.

Those who never experienced Connecticut’s “family courts” have no idea what a nightmare Connecticut “family courts” are.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

A man who truly loves his children would not comment publicly as you are doing.

You are a narcissistic, sociopathic scum.

Marianna
Marianna
1 month ago

Mi Papa is correct. Mr. Vanguard helped us heighten our level of self awareness. Bobo, Fluffy, Virgin Camila and Adriana are better off with ESP in their lives. Before ESP, we were a cohesive family of six. We ate dinner together, vacationed together, bonded over conversation. Also, we studied and took education seriously. We were intellectually curious, well adjusted adolescents, just starting to find voices in the world. After ESP training, we became sex slaves, we got abortions, we dropped out of school, etc. I mean, what would you think is better?

Last edited 1 month ago by Marianna
Hectorr
Hectorr
1 month ago

We do not care about Pussy-boy Ambrose. We want to free Vanguard, my personal savior. Mr. Raniere helped me heighten my level of self-awareness. I pimped out my three teenage daughters to him. We loved Mr. Raniere more than life itself.

Annonymous
Annonymous
1 month ago

Mia should pursue a lawsuit against the CT judicial branch and all the so called actors that put her in this abusive situation.

Women and children vs the state of Connecticut
Women and children vs the state of Connecticut
1 month ago
Reply to  Annonymous

Entrapment , Unlawful confinement, Civil conspiracy based on gender based agreements of Judicial branch and health and human services agreements, civil rights violations resulting in gross negligence . Misappropriation of funding for benefit of the state. Human rights violations conducting research without written consent. pilot programs.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

The affidavit certainly paints Ambrose as a complete sleaze-bag. Thanks for posting it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

He did it to himself. The tell is his motion to seal the affidavit for some bs reasons. He thought he was still in family court where no laws apply.

He wanted it sealed to hide his perjury and hoped to be granted a fee waiver- if he was granted a fee waiver he’d use that to support his false claims that Dr Lee, FP and Swithin destroyed his earning capacity when the world knows he destroyed his own career when he chose to plagiarize when writing for Instinct. He stole and copied Bones episodes and his plagiarism almost made it – but the tv fans recognized the storyline and Ambrose was fired and blackballed from Hollywood

A true psychopath cannot accept fault. So it’s the fault of Dr Lee, FP, Swithin, his ex, and the list goes on

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

It’s so sad that you all keep using Mia even when custody is no longer an issue. Will you ever let her move on with her life or just keep using her as a pawn?

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

I think she is actively trying to save her younger brother.. She is tired of being used by Mr. Ambrose.

Who's looking for gifts and prizes
Who's looking for gifts and prizes
1 month ago
Reply to  Frank Parlato

Brave and beautiful Mia. On her journey to healing 🙏. She has been silenced long enough. One can not dismiss these facts of what appears a fabrication to receive benefits. Denying and depriving the children of the mother who loves, cared for them. The court allowed Karen’s financial resources to be raped from her. Give Mia and the people a voice. If it’s inconvenient for Linda and her gang ‘s ability to court nap and drag other children into her camps for the misleading information. Is Ambrose creditable or was he allowed to spin a tail? Wll the system address the clear nature of the lack of conscious for presenting truthful information?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Mia speaks for herself. Please don’t take away her sense of agency as her father did.

She’s a bright, beautiful, capable young woman who is tired of Chris Ambrose lying to destroy others, as he continues to do to her and her brothers despite being 18.

She has values and ethics and cares for others. Why would she allow her adopted father to continue to use and exploit her? To lie and manipulate the courts suggesting he’s paying for her food, housing, phone line etc, and lie to the courts suggesting he’s about their education when he has sabotaged their education?

Where is your concern for her rights? He’s receiving government benefits in her name. He’s lying to federal court about her whereabouts, and her education. Curious why you believe this to be okay. Unless you are Chris Ambrose, the public understands and is proud and happy for Mia and the independent young adulthood she has forged despite Ambrose’s control and abuse. She believes the truth matters. Maybe you should think about the value of the truth as well. Or maybe your cookies are baked.

Get real
Get real
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

This young woman wouldn’t be getting involved in signing this affidavit (it’s obvious she didn’t write it) if adults were not inappropriately involving her in their court cases. Let the 18-year-old move on with her life already. This is beyond cruel. Her whole identity is about being used as a pawn against her father. Will it never end?
This is going to have a very detrimental effect on her future relationships with life partners.

And btw, that isn’t Mia’s own voice. That is her signing a document someone else wrote for and/or dictated to her. It’s obvious.

She is still being manipulated for other people’s purposes, instead of being allowed to forge her own path in life. It’s very sad and psychologically damaging to her. But obviously nobody cares about her long-term mental well-being. It’s just about Karen getting revenge and a bunch of family court leeches trying to win their defamation lawsuits.

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

You know that is absolutely false. She wrote it and was very careful about it, just as she was with her speech in Washington DC exposing the abuse she said her father had subjected her to.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Frank Parlato

Oh really? So of her own volition, she sits around visiting random federal court dockets, downloading motions that don’t involve her, reviewing them, and then writing multi page affidavits to send to judges? How on earth would an 18-year-old know how to get those documents and know where to send them? Give me a break.
The language in the affidavit is exactly the same as what we’ve seen published at Frankreport. You are basically her puppet master. Great job, your and Karen’s years of brainwashing efforts have paid off.

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

I disagree Chris.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

You’re furious because you have been caught committing a felony. How can you say your daughter resides with you and goes to school full time?

Are you seriously that mentally ill- that delusional? It seems likely. Get help.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

All three lawsuits were filed by you Ambrose.

No one is trying to win except you Ambrose.

You are the only leech as evidenced by your perjury, your lack of employment since 2018 after being fired for plagiarism, and your fraud to the state of CT to secure benefits you’re not entitled to, while exploiting an adult child who you continue to use to secure money – which is all you care about.

Thanks for proving Dr Lees case.

And stop hunting and photographing young men in stop and shop — just like you’ve done at planet fitness (for your brief stint there) you’re disturbed and they’re watching you 🤮🤮🤮

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

I’m not Chris, dum dum. You realize it would likely help his lawsuit if it were nothing but comments here trashing him and none defending him, right? Get a clue.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Just wondering, why not spell the word dumb with a “b”?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

DARVO Ambrose 🤣

Out of business
Out of business
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

I don’t think so. Revenge? What has Karen received from any of this. Eventually this story won’t be published anymore. Chris, the courts, Maddie and Linda have generated fame and took advantage of the situation. Madison looks stoned in her videos. She is making money going on line saying her mother abused her. She says she is trying to reach children, yet her following is of older men in which probably have pedophile among them. She has young children. Linda Gotlibe is exploiting the lawsuit to save her camps. Chris is clearly in search of money. These children are not getting better in Chris’s care. Yet the the lawsuits rage on. Tina exposed the Alienation industry on it’s head. They would support anyone to that kept parental alienation alive and the camps open. It’s time to place an out of business sign in front of the court house doors

RESEARCHER
RESEARCHER
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

STOP WITH THE CRAP. THE CHILDREN’S VOICES MATTER, AND WE WILL SUPPORT THEM WHEN THEY CHOOSE TO SPEAK OUT. WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT MIA HAS DONE. SHE DESERVES A VOICE HEARD, SUPPORT, AND TO FREELY EXPRESS HER EXPERIENCE.
MIA IS NOT A VICTIM, SHE IS A SURVIVOR OF CHRIS AMBROSE AND A MALE CENTERED SYSTEM HE CHOSE TO EXPLOIT TO THE DETRIMENT OF MIA.

KEEP SPEAKING MIA! SPEAK LOUD!

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

You’re the only sad sac Ambrose. And you are using Mia as you affidavit proves. Based on your word she’s lining with you and attending school full time.

Barberinthedell Ambrose
Barberinthedell Ambrose
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Unfortunate you fail to see children/teens as human beings with their own minds. Your need to control is sadistic but it’s all coming to an end. Keep posing as a barber you fucking freak

Report him!
Report him!
1 month ago

Has he been reported for fraud for stealing government funds?

M. Novak
M. Novak
1 month ago
Reply to  Report him!

As Ambrose’s suit is in U.S. District Court, it would be up to the judge to make a criminal referral to either a state district attorney or to the state police for investigation, if warranted. The charge would potentially be first-degree larceny, which is a Class B felony in Connecticut. SNAP benefits are federal dollars, but administered by individual states.

Disclaimer: I’m not an attorney.

Little man ambrose
Little man ambrose
1 month ago

Sadistic abuser – need to control and suppress – prevents his own kids from being independent by confiscating their government issued ID – nearly impossible to get documents when you can’t prove who you are.
Must feel like a big man little guy.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

The time will come when Ambrose will pay the price for all the cruelty he did to those children.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

One word: Karma.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

Ambrose next move will likely to sue Mia for defamation and have her involuntarily committed should he ever learn of her address.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

No doubt.

Urgent Agent
Urgent Agent
1 month ago

Thanks for making the effort to help these children out. He has been an abuser of his children and time is running out for this fool.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

I don;t know Ambrose or his child. But it seems pretty obvious that if he lied on his financial affidavit, then an evidentiary hearing will settle it. If he lied, it is called perjury. I hope he is charged, if he lied.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

Chris Ambrose has been abusing his ex wife and their three kids, who I am informed despise him. He will pay nthe price one fine day for his cruelty. By the way his brothers, who he is suing, also are not that find of him either.

Get real
Get real
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Get real Karen is the only one who is abusive in this situation. Everyone can see it that’s why she didn’t win any of her court motions and instead of getting any custody of the kids got a five-year restraining order slapped on her. Duh. You people have zero common sense.

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

Are these facts accurate?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

Stop feeding into your delusions Ambrose The only 5 year restraining order is in your script

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

Says Chris, as he’s busy stalking young men at Stop & Shop

Annonymous
Annonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

A geriatric looking for Latino boyz in the alcohol section?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

Duh? You’re showing you’re a senior citizen Ambrose

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Newsflash: the majority of people know that Chris is in the right here. Not only Chris. Now are you starting to understand why nothing – zip zero nada – went in your favor, Karen? You are sick and evil.

Frank Parlato
Admin
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Good comment Chris.

Annonymous
Annonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Get real

Chris, is it true that your marriage with Karen was never consummated? If so, why? Are you a homosexual? If you are then why did you marry a woman?

Don't Miss

Hypocrisy In Action: Soares Investigating Cuomo – Part 3

Author’s Notes: (1) Sorry for the delay in getting back…

Clare Bronfman’s Brutal, Ugly, Illegal and Penny Pinching Treatment of Mexican Woman

From the government’s sentencing memorandum, wherein they recommend a prison…
76
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x