Frank Parlato
When Hollywood writer Christopher Ambrose returned home to Connecticut after being caught plagiarizing on INSTINCT in 2018, he was unemployable but sitting on $2 million in marital assets.
He then weaponized a controversial legal theory—“parental alienation”—to flip the script. He documented ordinary family conflict, enlisted paid professionals, and built a case that his wife was turning the children against him.
Ambrose retained Attorney Nancy Aldrich, a political insider whose son sat on the state’s judicial reappointment committee. She and court-appointed Guardian ad Litem Jocelyn Hurwitz steered the case to Judge Jane Grossman — then seeking reappointment and known for separating mothers from children under the alienation doctrine.
was seeking reappointment at the time of Ambroses case and was known for separating mothers from children under the alienation doctrine
The Custody Reversal
On a Friday night, the court ordered the three children—then 13, 13, and 9—removed from the home where they had lived with their mother their entire lives and sent to live with the father they feared.
Hurwitz billed over $200,000; Aldrich, more than $500,000. The mother was silenced—barred from testifying, denied access to the custody report, and cut off from her own children.
Riordan, a stay-at-home mother of thirteen years with no record of abuse or neglect, lost everything: her children, her home, and her life savings. Ambrose kept the marital assets and even seized her $150,000 inheritance. He now lives in a $2.4 million beachfront home, while the mother he branded an alienator, lives without her children and is homeless.
In time, the children’s distress became public—videos, hospital visits, police calls—all ignored by a court system that had already chosen its narrative. Ambrose had won.
Despite the court’s order, the children repeatedly tried to escape to their mother. Ambrose pursued them, using restraining orders and police intervention to forcibly return them to his home, eventually outfitting the home with locks, bars, cameras, and alarms to keep them from escaping.
Finally, Mia escaped at 17, and is now 18 and beyond his legal control.
The Psychiatrist’s Warning
In a May 3, 2023, letter addressed to Ambrose’s ex-wife, Karen Riordan, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee, M.D., M.Div. — a nationally recognized violence expert and former Yale Law and Psychiatry faculty member — reported her preliminary findings after nine hours of review and interviews.
Dr. Lee wrote that, based on Ambrose’s written communications, review of case materials, interviews, and collateral evidence, she found “critical evidence of potential danger to the children, pointing to the need for a diagnostic evaluation.”
“I believe I have enough information to make a preliminary assessment of your ex-husband’s personality configuration—with an emphasis on the extent to which he may manifest characteristics of psychopathic personality.”
Using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) — the standard diagnostic tool for psychopathy — Dr. Lee concluded:
“Mr. Ambrose’s score adds up to 32. This is strongly suggestive that a diagnosis of psychopathy is present and justified—or, at the very least, that disturbing levels of psychopathic features are present.”
A score of 30 or higher constitutes “full-blown psychopathy.”
Dr. Lee noted hallmark features, including pathological lying, a lack of empathy, a failure to accept responsibility, and poor behavioral controls. She wrote that such individuals often exhibit a “manipulative and predatory relational style” and can “mislead, cheat, or otherwise violate the rights of other people.”
“They, through a superficially charming presentation, are often capable of eliciting exceptional levels of sympathy from others as an effective means of escaping accountability for their violence… They may recruit others as ‘patrons’ or ‘pawns’ to help them turn the narrative around to incriminating their victims instead.”
Dr. Lee also warned that
“Separating growing children from their mother and primary caregiver is one of the worst forms of abuse… and can be a sign of this dangerous personality disorder.”
Dr. Lee recommended that a forensic court-ordered evaluation be conducted to confirm her findings:
“This potential for Mr. Ambrose’s dangerousness, especially where children are involved, should not be overlooked.”
Ambrose’s response was to sue Dr. Lee for defamation.
The Affidavit That Gave Him Away
When he filed his lawsuit, Ambrose filed in forma pauperis, allowing him to sue without paying the $405 fee if he could show financial hardship.
He submitted an affidavit describing his financial circumstances.
In his March 2025 affidavit, Ambrose claimed:
“I am not employed… My gross pay or wages are $0.00… I support the kids and myself by invading my modest 401(k).”
Ambrose also claimed he had “no income” — yet acknowledged he was “invading [his] modest 401(k)” to support himself and his children. That statement alone acknowledges taxable income.
Ambrose described the account as “modest,” but family members, including his daughter, say it holds roughly $1 million. Family members describe him discussing tax-loss harvesting, Roth conversions, and outside accounts—hardly the language of financial distress.
Ambrose is in an active lawsuit against his brothers, Neil and Colin, over their parents’ $2.5 million estate, with his share estimated at $800,000. Even though the inheritance had not yet been paid out, federal disclosure rules (28 U.S.C. §1915) required him to report it as an expected asset. He did not.
The Pattern of Deceit
In his sworn affidavit, Ambrose wrote:
“I have been unemployed for three years and unable to find work, mainly because my ex-wife has waged a vicious, very public online smear campaign against me.”
Ambrose has been unemployed for seven years, since 2018, when his career as a television writer ended following a plagiarism scandal that preceded the online accusations he now cites.
By stating he had been unemployed for “three years,” Ambrose shifted the timeline to imply that his job loss was caused by the alleged defamation rather than by his professional misconduct.
It conceals the true cause of his unemployment — a reputational scandal unrelated to Dr. Lee — which is directly relevant to whether she caused any harm.
In his in forma pauperis affidavit, Ambrose wrote:
“I have sole legal and physical custody of our three children: our younger son, SA, is 14; our older son, Matthew, and daughter, Mia, are 18 but full-time high school students. I provide all their financial support.”
This statement was false:
Mia Ambrose, age 18, no longer lived with him at the time of the affidavit (March 2025). She left his home in July 2024, lives in another state, and has no financial support from him.
Matthew Ambrose, also 18, had withdrawn from high school on March 12, 2025 — four days before Ambrose signed the affidavit.
Ambrose rents and resides at 153 Middle Beach Road, Madison, Connecticut — a four-bedroom, waterfront property overlooking the Fence Creek Estuary, directly across from East Wharf Beach Park.
The home’s estimated market value is approximately $2.4 million, and his lease lists rent at $3,750 per month.
In his affidavit, however, Ambrose told the court he paid $2,450 in rent — $1,300 less than the actual figure.
In his sworn affidavit, Christopher Ambrose claimed: “Groceries approximately $750 per month.”
He did not disclose that he was already receiving federal SNAP benefits, which he falsely described as something he “just learned [he was] eligible for.”
State records show he had been collecting SNAP since December 2024—four months before he filed the affidavit.
Failing to list it — while presenting grocery costs as though he paid them out of pocket — misleads the court about his true financial condition.
Had Ambrose accurately reported his benefits, the $750 “expense” would be offset or eliminated.
For a four-person household with no income, Connecticut’s SNAP allotment is about $740 to $770 per month, almost identical to the figure he listed as a personal expense. By omitting that he was on SNAP, Ambrose effectively billed the government twice — once for groceries, and once to the court.
The Clinical Match
Ambrose’s affidavit reveals pathological lying and deception, beginning with misstating his rent by more than a thousand dollars, concealing months of SNAP benefits, and claiming a dependent who no longer lived with him. He understated his assets, downplayed his retirement funds, and misrepresented the reason for his unemployment.
Ambrose did not deny the truth outright—he phrased it artfully, telling the court he had “just learned” he was eligible for food stamps, a half-truth designed to evoke sympathy while obscuring that he had already been receiving them for months.
It was a calculated deceit — manipulative by design.
Threaded through the document is the tone of egocentricity and grandiosity—the man as misunderstood martyr, the sole provider heroically supporting his children, even as he falsifies their circumstances to preserve his narrative. Nowhere does he acknowledge having deprived his ex-wife of marital assets or misled the court; instead, he recasts himself as the casualty of a “vicious smear campaign,” claiming that others’ cruelty—not his own conduct—left him destitute.
His callousness and lack of empathy show in his willingness to use those children as props in litigation, invoking their names and alleged dependence while knowing at least one had fled his home and disavowed his support.
Finally, there is the irresponsibility of a man who claims poverty while living in a multimillion-dollar beach house, failing to disclose income sources, benefits, and control of family assets.
The four bedroom waterfront property on Middle Beach Road overlooks the Fence Creek Estuary and East Wharf Beach Park Ambrose told the court he paid $2450 in rent but the lease lists $3750
Usually a man who lives in a home like this is not living in actual poverty. Ambrose says he is.
The Proof in Writing
If Ambrose lied on his in forma pauperis affidavit, he faces serious legal consequences: the court must dismiss his case under §1915(e)(2)(A) and may refer the matter for perjury.
The affidavit reads less like a plea for relief than an exhibit of the disorder Dr. Lee diagnosed — a document of manipulation, deceit, and self-justification that seems to prove her point more clearly than any test score could. By lying, omitting, and manipulating in a sworn federal filing, he demonstrates the pathological deceit, self-justification, and absence of conscience that define the psychopathic personality Dr. Lee described.
A psychologically healthy person would not risk felony perjury to save $405. A psychopathic personality might — because the impulse to deceive, to control the narrative, and to elicit sympathy overrides rational self-interest.
The man who sued to prove he wasn’t a psychopath proved it himself, in writing, for $405.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
https://www.azsenaterepublicans.gov/post/legislative-committee-releases-report-identifying-needed-reforms-in-arizona-family-court-system
Frank the lawsuit have little to do with Chris Ambrose. They are more to do with the people behind them. I would be careful who you allow in your circle. These lawsuits were hatched last year. Your just part of the fall out. Bad faith it would appear. Is this really about harm done to Chris? Is it more about keeping an industry and a hold of the court house? Chris probably did not have filled these lawsuits on his own. They entire gang of people who are promoting it all have one person in common. Not everyone who says they are your friends are. It takes a specific kinda person to pretend to be your friend and then work with the very people promoting the law suits. All the answers are on the internet and you just need to look for them. Funny how these people promoting the lawsuit. You began reporting on the family court system to protect victims. Now the same people proffessing innocent are out in full force to go against you. There is no better way to control your reporting than to silence you. Just like these people have done to their victims. Chris Ambrose doesn’t appear broke. He is looking for a windfall and the people promoting the law suits are only to Happy to help. Now everyone is sueing every one into silence. A listening ear is a running mouth.
Who’s “promoting the lawsuits”?
The Alienation Industry. It doesn’t take long to search social media before you can see the largest group promotion of Alienation is running through the state of Connecticut. The Frank report has given a window of family court among some of the riches families in the country. The larger picture is the problematic dysfunctional families throughout the United states. The alienation industry has circled the wagons due to much public exposure to what appears to be unethical business practices. Connecticut has one of the largest referral networks for parents attempting to use the legal tactics associated with the industry. The local expert has hosted many of the key players in the industry including Linda Gottlieb. Found on social media platforms encouraging the litigation. Among the group that attempting to keep the legal tactics alive. While many emotionally and financially distraught parents are sold on the idea that the legal industry is completely to blame . The industry doesn’t take responsibility for their part in the matter. No one is discussing the leader of the group.
The sale of coaching services to the group, including attorneys associated with it. No one has been brave enough to unveil the women behind the all the connections. The Alienation education and projects all connected. The Anti Alienation Project which has tasked it’s self with reaching out to children and selling them that all of their conditions are due to alienation and brainwashing. The children involved in the Ambrose case are being told through the industry lens and not in the context of their own words. The women behind the connection and referral services echoes and mirrors the same concept in her own personal relationships with her step children. Painting adults well into the 30s as unable to think rationally.
Her own personal divorce case is never discussed. What appears to be a connections to Judge Bozzuto through her own case in 2007. Which it would appear her degree in government appeared to be useful. A series what appears to be misinformation on her own personal case. Which went to trial appearing high conflict over financials in the state of Connecticut. Even most women involved in family court would perceive she took her former spouse to the cleaners. While many questionable judgements and lack of transparency can be found in the years of claims of advocacy. With the sale of Richard Gardener legal concept and promotes it’s an expertise. The Ambrose case has been discussed by the entire state and has been used and debated on all sides of reform. Including DV and women’s rights groups along with father’s rights and the notion sexual abuse doesn’t take place, and the legal industry is to blame. Promotion that anyone outside of the industry is incompetent and should not be allowed to treat children. This can be seen in the Anti alienation project podcast. Hosted by a women who dedicated herself to presenting the law suit to the public without consulting any of the Ambrose children. Forgot to mention Karen has been isolated from her children. Painted as a women who manipulated her children prior to civil court process. Which is a legal defense tactic. Maddison can be seen with alienation promotors like Robert Garza alluding to request for custody is for gift and prizes like child support. Garza reports $700 thousand in legal fees to clear his name. 43 cps reports by mandatory reporters. The public has no access to. Promotion of the three strikes rule .
Garza can been seen attending the Alienation Industry event in Connecticut last year. Connecticut Alienation Industry expert attempted to promote the three strike rule and time back slightly different in 2014. Case involving DV and contact resistance have already seen arresting of parents for not forcing children into parenting time. Flipping of custody to the domestic batter. The children are used to gain access to the victim. Using the desire to see the children as bait. Under the invitation to engage in events for the children. Appearing to be used for criminal cases to be brought to family court as evidence the perpetrator is not really a threat. Using family court professionals placed on the case that are part of the referral network. Assisting the state in reduction of violent crime statistics . Which is one of the reasons Gals in Connecticut are housed in the public defenders office. Many women are seeing this in real time. Has been exposed by the audits to the state on their management of dv cases.
The entire legal application for parental alienation is to present that criminal acts and abusive behavior is a falsehood. Gaining the upper hand in legal procedures painting victims as child abusers even when charges are founded. Criminal and cps investigations are not performed based on legal notions. With the assistance of the Alienation industry. Which appears only to provide parents services because they can afford them. Family court judges don’t appear to order inner city kids to camps or these premier services. While alienation is being removed from court procedures due to the exposure of the abusive application. The people exposing it are branded detractors , cult members , child abusers and the enemy.
While all this is going on no one is reporting on the main source and the one person who can connect all these people together. The women who has for years gone on platforms telling family court stories under the lens of alienation. Attacking family court judges and professionals who don’t order the services of her friends and colleagues. Frank’s journey into family court system reached beyond the Ambrose case. His relationship highlighted of the law suit. While no one batted an eye at the experts promotion and endless rants about her husbands case. While no one has questioned her own. She stated her child father is dead. Is he? Is there more children? Cause it would appear on is working for an Attorney’s office in a wealthier section of the state of Connecticut.
Are these civil lawsuits about Mr. Ambrose or the attempt to save an industry getting kicked out of the family court house? That only appears to be concerned with children in the wealthiest of families? $200 plus dollars an hour to coach on cases where there are no evaluations? ” If a child has rejected a parent they have been coached” no question. Based on belief and evidence it’s my concern that this expert provided “coaching services ” on my case. Thanks to the family court “professional ” on my case. Part of the alienation industry’s referral network. Presenting the court system with manufactured scenarios, offering linguistics to present a case leading to financial abuse and severing relationships. Further mental health issues to a minor. Which have been significantly resolved years after including the discontinuation of medication. Delayed abilities to reenter society, attend college and the work force. Requiring non court ordered services. I fear the same for the Ambrose children. Who is harming the nations children? It would appear the Ambrose case is one of the largest messes in the states history. Sued into silence, how many others is the pubic never going to hear about? Cause the Alienation Industry doesn’t want anyone to hear about it.
Madi attempts to switch the narrative. The advertising of the camps. The myths of reunification therapy. ” I’m not here to take sides” She took the side of Chris Ambrose. ” Presenting in a neutral way” Chris Ambrose story told through his lens and the industry.” Encourage you to keep an open mind” ” opinion from value” How invaluable is reunification camp to an abuser? The insistence of a manipulative response and custody reversal. Maladaptive responses must change their ways or the children will be taken. I’m not sure what the correct response to abuse should be, but I am pretty sure the answer is not to punish the people reporting it. Rewarding the person who committed it . Madison continues to project her options on complex family dynamics. Which continue to punish the victims and reward the perpitrators. Problematic family dynamics only appear to happen among the wealthy in the Alienation industry involvement . It’s only ordered if you can pay for it. The services for children are based upon the family income. There is little effect to assist families of lower economic values. Children are often flipped to the perpitrators and the response of the victims are focused on. Instead of the conduct of the abuser. Many Connecticut family court judges continue to state the abuse of the victims are irrelevant and the continued relationship with the batter is the priority. Echoing the Alienation industry experts. Court ordered Stockholm syndrome, relationship with the the perpitrators at any cost. Billions of dollars are spent on these government solutions for science. Connecticut is the leader in criminal justice reform and the birth place of the welfare reform. The entire system is based upon money and the effects of the wealth of the nation. If you want to fix family court it’s the politicians allowing this to continue. $113 billion dollars in outstanding child support and a nation not interested in supporting children in an inflated economy. The judges know it, the lawyers know it, and so does the Alienation industry and the people who promote it. Who got Linda Gotlibe involved in the lawsuit?
Who is the local expert? She filled a law suit to get her name off a child abuser list. She said she came to Connecticut homeless domestic violence victim receiving state assistance. She has been an expert since when in parental alienation? Than States she called Richard Gardner during her husband divorce. No one can seem to line up all her statements. She claimed to be a victim and then claimed 99 percent of domestic violence accusations are false. What judges is buying this during education? What legislators are buying into this?
Is it possible to sue Gotlibe and Madison?
If the FBI is interested in stopping child trafficking aka the exploitation of minors for profit in family law cases, they should start in Southbury Ct. It’s the largest referral network throughout the Country.
Southbury, Connecticut?
Attorneys who make money promoting lawsuits.
He’s a creepy, creepy little man.
when do we get to see the affidavits from the now-adult children?
Sit tight.
What if he really can’t afford the filing fee because his rent is too high? Maybe that’s why he lied and said it was lower to make it seem like he is a rational guy. Some lies are justified.
If you’ll read the article, you’ll probably be able to answer your questions.
There is a clear case of perjury here. Will the judge do anything?
Probably not. Connecticut’s “enlightened” allow the worst of the worst to push chaos.
“Sources told The Post that the highly anticipated images won’t be shared by NASA until the government reopens.”
https://nypost.com/2025/11/01/science/manhattan-sized-interstellar-object-3i-atlas-accelerates-and-turns-bluer-possible-signs-of-alien-engine-harvard-scientist/
Where is Mathew? Is he still at Chris’s house? Did he escape?
I believe he remains to protect his younger brother from being alone with the man who has abused them both for years.
If Hurwitz billed over $200,000 and Aldrich, more than $500,000, who scored the highest on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R)?
They may have gotten scores equal to Judge Grossman. Hers is reportedly over the maximum score of 40.
Response to “The $405 Lie”: A Monster in Plain Sight
What kind of man tears a mother from her children, locks those children in a house they try to escape from, and then uses the justice system to silence anyone who dares expose him?
His name is Christopher Ambrose—a disgraced Hollywood writer, a master manipulator, and, according to forensic psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee, a man who meets the clinical threshold for full-blown psychopathy.
Let that sink in: full-blown psychopathy.
This is not a messy divorce. It’s not “he said, she said.” It is documented abuse, backed by professional evaluation, lived by three children who tried over and over to flee the man the courts forced them to call “father.” Children who were stripped from their mother by a corrupt family court system that empowered a liar with money and connections.
Ambrose didn’t just deceive his family—he deceived the courts.
In his federal lawsuit against Dr. Lee, he submitted a sworn affidavit claiming poverty to avoid a $405 filing fee, all while living in a $2.4 million beach house, drawing from a 401(k) worth nearly $1 million, and hiding SNAP benefits and an expected $800,000 inheritance. He lied about his rent. Lied about his children’s living situations. Lied about his employment. The court may have waived his fee—but the truth cost him far more.
And here’s where it gets even more revealing:
After the exposure of his false poverty claims in the Lee lawsuit, Ambrose filed another defamation suit—this time against Tina Swithin of One Mom’s Battle. And this time, he paid the $405 fee.
Why? Because he knew he couldn’t get away with the lie again.
Because he knew he’d been caught.
Because the truth was now public—and undeniable.
A man who once claimed indigence suddenly had no problem paying when the spotlight was on him.
That is not the behavior of a man wronged. It is the behavior of a man exposed.
To Karen Riordan, the mother Ambrose vilified and erased from her children’s lives: You are not alone. You were targeted, not because you failed, but because you threatened his control. Your children’s love for you, their desperate escapes, their courage—they speak louder than any of his lies.
To Mia and your siblings: The world is beginning to see the truth you’ve lived. You are not invisible. You are not crazy. You are survivors.
And to Christopher Ambrose:
You may have the money.
You may have the beach house.
You may even have court orders in your favor.
But you don’t have the truth.
You don’t have the trust of your children.
And you will never again be seen as a victim.
You were willing to commit perjury to save $405.
Then, once exposed, you paid the same fee without a word.
You didn’t just prove Dr. Lee right—you published the proof in your own hand.
There is still time for accountability. The courts can and must act under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(A).
But even if they don’t—your mask has cracked. And what’s underneath is monstrous.
The state Comptroller’s office and attorney general’s office should start an official investigation. They won’t.
State offices should expect all state employees and contractors involved in that case to submit to the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) in order to protect families in Connecticut’s “family courts” from now on. State offices won’t protect families from now on.
How many reading this have heard of the plan to have everyone in the world “own nothing” by 2030?
The exact same deceit that exploited the world’s people 2,000 years ago hasn’t changed a bit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Reset
The state of Connecticut doesn’t want to have there racket exposed. Tong is not here for the public. Neither is the comptroller. There office is to protect the state of Connecticut.
Thank you Margaret. Perfectly said and on point
Frank, please start posting more stories about Vanguard being framed by the FBI. We need Vanguard to be free so he can impregnate Bobo and Virgin Cami so we can have more little avatar children like Kemar. Vanguard is my idol and I am in love with him.
Hector, you are getting obnoxious. But I will try to oblige.
Thats all I ask…
It’s not just felony perjury, but fraud on the court itself. Material misstatements of fact – even within initial pleadings such as in forma pauperis – can be sufficient for outright dismissal of an action. As is often said on the courthouse steps: “A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client.”
It’s also worth noting that the State of Connecticut’s Social Services Department also requires disclosure of all anticipated sources of income (e.g., inheritances, legal settlements, lottery winnings, et al.) in order to qualify for public assistance.
Ambrose is a devious sociopath with no moral compass beyond whatever suits his own greed. Reminds me of a certain president. Where is the governor of Connecticut on this? US or state Senators or Representatives? Where is the local or national press? Others beyond Frank Parlato need to be covering this tragic story. How have so many people failed to protect the children and the mother from this cruel, calculating liar and thief who has repeatedly lied in open court? How are so many people complicit in the destruction of these children’s and this woman’s life?
Riordan is homeless, living on the street and eating out of trash bins? Or do you mean she rents?
You do realize there’s a difference between renting and being homeless, right?
Only the great Gary Cohen can save Ambrose now.
If only family court weren’t a criminal racketeering enterprise- how many children would be protected instead of psychos like Ambrose paying court appointed actors, and the police to look the other way.
I wonder why Mr. Ambrose dedicated so much time and money to have sole custody of his children, is it to ruin their lives, give his (ex) wife a sense of total defeat, it defy’s all logic, prayers to the children and their mother.
I think Dr. Lee figured it out.
It defies all logic that Ms Riordan was a no-show for the supervised visitation that was scheduled at the end of the 90 days. If she had just shown up, she could’ve gotten custody right then and there. Instead, she decided not to show up but then cried victim of the courts?
The woman is clearly mentally ill. That is why the father could not hand over custody of the children. The sad thing is the daughter is special needs and easily manipulated. I watched her “interview” with those two dirtbags Luthmann and what’s his name. The fact the girl seems to think those two guys are the good guys just shows you how much her “mother” has warped her mind.
What is really scary Is she is supposedly in “therapy” with psychopath Bandy Lee, who will further twist and poison her young mind. It’s truly terrifying.
Ambrose- Good to see you’re participating on the very website you’re suing 😂
There’s No court order for 90 day isolation. That’s child abuse. The evaluator is a fraud- she’s made a living writing fraudulent custody evals upon which the court will flip custody to the one who “holds the accounts” – the financier of the child trafficking who in this case – is you.
Caverly is a mandated reporter and never made a referral to dcf because the mom is healthy, loving and a great parent.
Caverly will no longer appear in family court because Frankreport exposed her custody for sale business.
Facts and violations of due process:
The hearing that stole the children was never completed. She was silenced. There was never a hearing and is no transcript re supervised visitation.
This is the racketeering playbook.
You are the only one that’s a danger to society and your lonely, hateful existence will only intensify each day.
I pray for you.
AFCC – 2014 – CT- MA- NY members list Judges – lawyers and various dirt bags of family court …
https://www.scribd.com/document/244271527/AFCC-2014-excel-and-pivot
Phyllis Chester and Alan Dershowitz “grew up together” … and McGraw-Hill first published Mothers on trial : the battle for children and custody in 1986. Someone should have done something about the purposeful destruction of children and families in “family courts” by now.
Does anyone know anything about Connecticut’s case against Samuel A. Magliari Jr.?
https://rumble.com/v70wr8e-kidnapped-samuel-a.-magliari-jr.-back-in-stamford-superior-court-nov.-3.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a
https://longisland.news12.com/norwalk-man-claims-mortgage-company-trying-to-illegally-seize-his-home
A no show for Robert Horwitz’s “supervised visitation” after Gerard Adelman trafficked that family to his friends?
Robert Horwitz: CT AFCC, Inc. Secretary 🧐
Gerard Adelman: CT AFCC, Inc. Director 🧐
… Grossman … Hurwitz … Aldrich … Callahan … Gruen … Nussbaum … Goulden … the same names show up in so many of those illogical, mentally ill, sad, manipulative, dirtbaggy, scary, psychopathic, twisted, poisonous terrifying Connecticut “family court” racketeering cases.
Nice to know that so many good people are coming together from all over America to fix the illogical, mentally ill, sad, manipulative, dirtbaggy, scary, psychopathic, twisted, poisonous terrifying “family courts”.