A paragraph I wrote about Keith Raniere and NXIVM drew the wrath of an anonymous reader, whom I call Mr. Anonymous,
The paragraph was:
I wrote about 5,000 stories about Raniere, and I want to give a tip of the hat to some of the people who helped me expose the grandmaster, such as Catherine Oxenberg, Sarah Edmondson, Mark Vicente, Susan Dones, Kristin Keeffe, Daniela Fernandez, Nicole Isbel, Alejandro Junco, Barbara Bouchey, Toni Zarratini, and others.

Mr. Anonymous warned or should I say threatened me:

Mr. Anonymous
You might want to remove a name or two from this article before you receive a letter from some angry attorneys, Frank.

I replied:
What names?

Mr. Anonymous
The Jane Doe you reference

I replied:
I did not remove any names.

Mr. Anonymous
I sent it to the attorneys. They will be in contact. You should have just removed the name of the Jane Doe.

I replied:
That’s a good idea. Let the attorneys handle it. I do not believe in anonymity for accusers anymore. Unless they are children, I’ll publish any accuser’s name (unless they are underage).
As a journalist, I am not bound to Jane Doe designation by any judge. That designation is only within the courtroom and court filings.

Mr. Anonymous
That is certainly what I expected you to say. Only reputable journalists honor Jane Doe designations out of professional ethics, respect for privacy, and to avoid interfering with court proceedings, but let’s be honest, you are a bottom-feeding “journalist” with absolutely zero integrity. Good day, sir!

Frank:
The court proceedings are long over.

Mr. Anonymous
True, but some of these people are still dealing with the trauma and bullshit that happened to them in NXIVM. Your lack of empathy is palpable. You think being brainwashed… is an easy experience to get over? But hey, anything for a few clicks to my shitty website, right?!

Frank
Brainwashed? What is that? …

Mr. Anonymous
You really are as stupid as they say. Let’s not play word games. ‘Brainwashed’ is exactly what happened—psychological coercion, manipulation, and isolation are textbook cult tactics. … Adults can be manipulated, threatened, and blackmailed into compliance—pretending otherwise is willful ignorance.
And your take on anonymity and accountability? Survivors of sexual coercion, abuse, and cult exploitation don’t owe you their names or faces to validate their trauma. Suggesting that anonymity ‘lets women lie’ is a tired, misogynistic smear meant to silence victims.
What actually does harm is minimizing abuse and pretending it didn’t happen because it makes you uncomfortable. You are a fucking clown, Frank.

Frank
Brainwashing is very real, and you are the proof. It must be hard to have a weak brain…. Please get your brain dirty again. It’s been washed too well. I’ll help you.

Mr. Anonymous
LOL what an insanely idiotic comment. I’m sure I need help from some half-cooked boomer blog writer that has nothing better to do than write crap AI-generated articles about the scum of the earth on the internet all day. You are what you eat, Frank, and you, sir, eat dogshit all day and look what you produce: absolute filth content that serves no value to anyone on this planet.


Mr. Anonymous
Your obituary will read something like “was here.” Anyways, good luck with it all, I guess.


Frank
In another case I covered, defense attorney Jennifer Bonjean stated, “It is far easier to come to court and lie anonymously than it is to stand on testimony with one’s true name.”
The judge, Diane Gujarati agreed.
She said:
“Although the court recognizes that particular testimony is likely to involve highly personal matters, indeed matters that are often kept as private matters, and that there may be some negative consequences of the public airing of those matters, the court is not convinced on the particular circumstances of this case that those factors outweigh the relevant Sixth Amendment considerations here and general considerations of fairness.
“Under the particular circumstances of this case, defendants’ argument that it is ‘far easier to come to court and lie anonymously than it is to stand on testimony with one’s true name’ has some force.”
This legal perspective stands in contrast to the demands of my critic, Mr. Anonymous, who wants anonymity extended indefinitely.
Mr. Anonymous justifies this by calling Raniere’s victims brainwashed.
Raniere’s tools were fraud, collateral-backed blackmail, false accusations, paying lawyers to use their contacts with prosecutors to get people indicted, perjury, and aggressive litigation financed by Clare Bronfman.
To call it “brainwashing” is dangerous not just for Raniere but for other cases in the future.
The law should be simple: punish what people do, not what someone thinks they might have meant.
Keep charges tied to verifiable acts, not speculative mental states.

A free society punishes bad acts (not thoughts) proved in open court. Punishing thoughts (brainwashing) with anonymous “victims” testifying is a recipe for injustice.
When the court allows accusers to be called “victims” before they testify and inform the jury that there is a blackout on the name, that’s not justice.
There’s a workable middle:
- Use neutral terms, such as “complainant” or “accuser,” at trial, not “victim.”
- Issue firm jury instructions that labels prove nothing.
- If anonymity is used, require more rigorous corroboration.
- Remember the judge’s caution: it is easier to lie without a name.
Victim protections are essential, but they are not more important than the presumption of innocence.
I encourage an end to anonymous testimony except for children and the end of calling accusers “victims” before the jury finds guilt.
There will come a time when people will realize that courage is the most important thing – and anonymity is not courage.
No offense, Mr. Anonymous.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.





Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
I appreciate the honesty and openness in your writing.
For a guy who’s spent years milking NXIVM for clicks, it’s wild how Frank still doesn’t get it. Survivors weren’t hiding…they fucking testified in open court, under oath, staring Raniere down and handing over every phone, journal, and laptop to back it up. Keith knew exactly who they were. The jury knew. The judge knew. The only thing they asked was not to have their names plastered all over the internet for bottom-feeders like Frank to serve up to trolls.
I lie in my own name
I will tell the truth in my own name and lie anonymously. It’s perfect. I get the best of both worlds.
I wanted to testify against Vangard, but his lawyers advised me not to.
Once he ghosted me in Puerta Vallarta with those four SLUTS, I decided to turn on him.
Bye bye, Vangard.
The irony of Frank patting himself on the back for sending Keith to prison, but then sneers at the very women whose testimony made it possible. If they weren’t victims, what exactly did they expose?
I am not sneering at the women. I am encouraging them to be more like Sarah Edmondson and Catherine Oxenberg- who used their own names. If not for them – and the using of their own names and putting it out there – this prosecution would probably never happenned. Stand up and use you own name.
I don’t believe either of those women fall into the same category as some of the Jane Doe’s. What happened to many of them was humiliating and the fact they don’t want the world to know their names doesn’t make what happened to them any less fucked up by anyone’s definition. Some of these women don’t want to be like Catherine or Sarah in the spotlight; they want to move on with their lives without this hanging over them forever. Wanting privacy doesn’t erase the abuse…it just means they refuse to let it define the rest of their lives. I am so confused why you dont understand this.
My concern is about the due process implications – the jury being told they are “victims” at the start of the trial when they are supposed to determine if the accuser is a victim. The fact that there is a black out on thier name also influences the jury. Some defendants are innocent.
Also to stand up and say it in your own name – that is powerful – not just for the prosecution but for the individuals themselves.
Laslty I have seen innocent people ruined by anonymous accusers who if they had to reveal their identities would never have had the temerity to lie – and it is not just gender based. I have seen anonymous male accusers lie. Funny too almost always those lies come with a later reward of money. I operate from a world of innocent until proven guilty and that it is better that 10 guilty defendants go free than one innocent suffer.
For god’s sake, Frank…these women weren’t labeled victims out of thin air, and you talk like the word “victim” hypnotized the jury. Get real. Federal prosecutors, a grand jury, mountains of evidence, and brutal cross-examination proved it. The jury didn’t convict on semantics…they convicted because Raniere is guilty. Your “anonymous accusers ruin innocent lives” line doesn’t apply here. This wasn’t rumor mill gossip…it was sworn testimony, backed by devices, journals, and corroboration. Wrongful accusations happen, sure, but dragging that into Nxivm is lazy and dishonest. These women weren’t hiding; they faced him in court and helped put him away for life. That’s not anonymity, that’s courage.
Looks like Frank just gave up on his stupid argument
You’ve clearly done your research, and it shows.
Yeah I know.
Research my ass…lazy ass blogging at best.
This made me rethink some of my assumptions. Really valuable post.
Of course.
What a helpful and well-structured post. Thanks a lot!
If even you can undersatnd it – then it was worth it.
This content is really helpful, especially for beginners like me.
YOu will grow up in time.
I just want updates on the stars of NXVIM.
So many questions…
What’s KRs latest fight?
What’s Nancy doing?
What’s Lauren doing?
What’s Nikki Clyde doing?
Whats Alis Mack doing besides being married?
Is Sarah E ever going to act again?
Is Mark V movie or book coming out?
See below:
What’s KRs latest fight? Fighting with BOP to get access to Nxiuns
What’s Nancy doing? Being fat and repulsive
What’s Lauren doing? Being ugly, single and childless
What’s Nikki Clyde doing? Being single, childless and unemployed
Whats Alis Mack doing besides being married? Having fat, dusgustnng cankles
Is Sarah E ever going to act again? No and her podcast sucks
Is Mark V movie or book coming out? No, he has a good podcast though
Frank loves digging into everyone else’s life, blasting out private details for clicks under the banner of “investigative journalism.” NXIVM members, local politicians, whoever happens to be in his crosshairs but look for his story and the trail goes cold. Born in Buffalo in 1955, dad was a WWII vet and lawyer. After that? Nothing. No schools, no degrees (not surprised), no trace of what he did for decades. He just pops up in Niagara real estate one day and then recasts himself as some kind of blogging crusader.
The guy who demands transparency from everyone else is basically a ghost when it comes to his own life. The irony of the man who makes a living exposing others is the one person nobody knows shit about.
You mock the word ‘brainwashing’ as if it’s some fantasy. Meanwhile, the DOJ, FBI, and countless psychologists use terms like coercive control and undue influence to describe exactly what happened in NXIVM. Pretending that adults can’t be manipulated is the intellectual equivalent of saying fraud isn’t real because people should ‘know better.’ You’re not being brave, Frank. You’re being willfully ignorant. You call anonymity cowardice. Strange…every major news outlet in the world disagrees with you. Protecting survivors’ identities doesn’t silence truth, it enables it. Without anonymity, many would never speak up at all. But hey, if your metric for journalism is clicks over ethics, then sure, dox away clown. You accuse survivors of lying under the cover of anonymity, but you built your entire platform on hiding behind half-facts, speculation, and sensationalism. The irony writes itself.
Frank, I partly agree.
Many of the Founding Fathers wrote anonymous pamphlets and letters, out of fear of being persecuted. To this day, because of cancel culture, some people are better off keeping their name private. I kept my name private all these years on Frank Report just because of professional reasons. It doesn’t mean I do not want to stand by what I say, it just means I dont need the hassle of someone contacting my employer about any “shitposting” I enjoy doing. Many Jane Does are scared that Clare Bronfman will come after them.
Is Nicole Isbel the Jane Doe you and Mr. Anonymous are discussing?
Ignoring the limitless funds, millions of business connections, vast political networks, secrecy, deceit and what’s looked so often like a total lack of morals, the Bronfmans aren’t scary people.
Neither is Sam Altman and he’s controlling a large part of this once beautiful world, too. 🙁
“Sam Altman on God, Elon Musk and the Mysterious Death of His Former Employee …
https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-sam-altman
—I kept my name private all these years on Frank Report just because of professional reasons.
Professional reasons? Running an OnlyFans page called SurferBoy69 qualifies as professional? More like you don’t want
Sultan of Six fire bombing your home.
Incidentally, the ghost of ShadowState1958 will be signing up shortly.
Lol. Its SurferTounge69. Get it tight!
I do miss Shadows NWO theory vids…
Frank,
RE. *This Trick as Bitch of a Critic:
My guess is:
This critic of yours is an AI assisted clod and is most likely the cad Bangkok.
We all love Bangkok, but. boy, does he know how to pull someone’s chain.
The passage, “good day, sir” is a dead give away. I’m surprised he didn’t put his smiley face in the salutation.
It’s elementary my dear Parleto.
Oh BangCalk!
*Note: “Trick ass Bitch” is from the classic black cinema movie Menace to Society.
Wrong. It’s not Bangkok. LOL.
Just not his style of writing. Bangkok doesn’t use AI assisted shit.
On a different note… Bangkok is good at triggering people (he’s especially good at triggering LIBERAL/SOCIALIST cocksuckers and RINOS).
That’s why I know that you’re a fucken Beantown LIBERAL RINO (i.e., a ‘pretend’ republican) who voted for Pocahontas.
Admit it, you fucken socialist asshole!!!!!!!! 🙂
Problem is, you just don’t understand basic economics.
Socialism doesn’t work. It never has. It never will.
Boston is an economic shithole drowning in debt. IMO, Trump should strip that socialist hellhole of all federal funding until it wises up.
I implore you to PLEASE DITCH YOUR SOCIALIST BELIEFS!
Have a nice day! 🙂
Dude, I’m a blue state republican.
A Lover of capitalism!
I love Bush and Nixon!
Sorry, I don’t like Donnie.
Did NiceGuy get triggered?
A. Yes. Bangcock did it again
B. No. He just felt compelled to share random political noise in his head.
B is correct!
LOL. True ‘Republicans’ don’t vote for Pocahontas, sir.
Frank would never do that shit. Neither would I.
You don’t like ‘Donald’ because of deportations — which means you suffer from toxic empathy. That’s a classic socialist mindset.
It makes you feel ‘sad’ to deport people, right? …But that’s only because keeping them here doesn’t cost you anything personally (if you had to pay 25% of your paycheck to feed them each month, you’d quickly change your tune).
Let me ask you a question, sir…
What’s the point of even having a border?
Why do countries have borders?
Why does Mexico have a southern border that prevents massive numbers of Guatemalans from entering illegally?
Why? …It’s because they don’t want them in their country.
Yes, even Mexico is a hypocrite (they keep out illegal Guatemalans while demanding that the USA accept tens of millions of illegal Mexicans).
Grow a backbone. You’re not any more virtuous than me.
Please change your tune or I’m gonna personally ask the Republican Party of Massachusetts to boot your ass right onto the pavement, sir.
Have a good day. 🙂
Good day to as well sir.
People who live in their parents basement and threaten to call ICE on their Guatemalan nanny(63) shouldn’t talk.
I am not afraid to use my own name. Except when I lie.
So you are afraid to use your own name?
Don’t reveal your secret and keep it to yourself.
Frank,
God Bless for what you have exposed, you, sir, have saved lives, often lives of the most those brain-washed by the smartest man in the world, and his G.E.D. money girl(friend?)
Accusers = Victims – Another subtle or not so subtle tactic enjoyed by the prosecutors with the endorsement of the court – pre determination of guilt and blindly we follow…