Frank Parlato
In the beginning, there was love between a man and a woman. Then they had kids. Then came the fighting. Enter Family Court: where people go to lose everything.
There are two magic tricks in Family Court
The Silver Bullet
The first is called The Silver Bullet. It’s not fired from a gun. It comes from her mouth.
The woman says he was violent. Maybe he was. Maybe he wasn’t. It doesn’t matter.
A judge reads the affidavit like it’s the Bible. No hearing. No evidence. A restraining order.
The police show up. They tell him to pack a bag. “There’s a court order, sir.”
He asks when the hearing is. “You missed it,” they say. She went to the judge alone – ex parte.
That’s the silver bullet. Fired once, it finishes the case before it starts. The family court judge rules he is a danger. Have to protect the kids.
She has the kids. The house. He has a suitcase and a bill from a lawyer. Even if she lied—especially if she lied—it doesn’t matter. The children have “adjusted.” That’s what they say. Yes, she lied——it really doesn’t matter. Giving the kids back would be traumatic. The man spends everything he has trying to get them back. Lawyer fees. Evaluators. Supervised visits in rooms with strangers watching. The boy won’t meet his eyes. The girl doesn’t speak. It’s only been a few weeks.
The judge says things like “status quo” and “best interest.” The father is now a visitor. If he’s lucky – at best a visitor – an ever-growing stranger to his children. No more a father.
The Second Trick is Parental Alienation
That’s when the man says the woman is turning the kids against him. Whispering poisonous lies in their ears. Turning bedtime into brainwashing. The boy won’t look at dad. The girl cries when he comes to pick her up. Could be fear. Could be memory. Could be that dad is an abusive jerk.
It doesn’t matter. If the father lies, it is all the better. Abusers will pay more to rid the protective mother.
The lawyers say alienation. The therapists—hired by dad—say alienation. To add cover, they say she has an unspecified personality disorder, she’s the danger, not him.
‘The judge accepts the therapist and the custody evaluator’s findings. Parental alienation. The cure? The judge flips custody – barring the mother who raised the kids from even contacting them. Not even a phone call.
The kids are yanked from mom and sent to live with dad full-time. Therapy is ordered. Not the healing kind. The kind with clipboards, hourly rates, and mom gets supervised visits if she’s lucky. If she behaves. If she pays. But the kids will never live again in the happy home with their mother. Not ever again.
She writes letters. They say she’s harassing. She files motions. They say she’s obsessed. She cries in court. They say she’s unstable. Dad smiles. He’s the victim now. The money flows. The lawyers nod. The therapists shrug. The custody evaluators sigh as they deposit another retainer. Nobody talks about the kid. The kid just floats. Quiet, confused, detached. Doing algebra on the back of a court summons.
The thing is—it works. Beautifully. Like a Swiss watch, if the watch was powered by tears and child support. Family Court is not broken. It’s working as intended.
The system is not there to help families. It’s there to bill them.
In the end…
When the kids don’t talk to one parent, and the house is gone, and the retirement account is gone, and the college fund is a therapist’s Audi, the judge rubs his forehead and says it’s all very tragic. The lawyer smiles. And the clerk closes the file.
And the children forget, which is the point.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
[…] no longer mince words. As one exposé put it, “Family court is not a system in crisis. It is a system in control — by those profiting from […]
So true, happens to women the same as men. A system designed to break spirits and a purring little economic boon for the county’s social services program. There is little incentive for them to change; their clipboards and business cards are usually enough to put the fear of God in a family. Scariest words any governmental agency might utter unannounced and uninvited: We’re here to help.
https://sites.google.com/view/connecticut-rule-of-law-2025/home
https://www.childabusivejudges.com/Click here: IN all 50 STATES.Reported judges
Many judges are accused more than once.
“IT IS OK TO ABUSE A CHILD AS LONG AS IT IS PSYCHOLOGICALLY.” Divisions of child services.
Newest Letter and box containing all 1000 judges sent to the fbi.
The 12 Clear Signs Someone You Love Has Been Abused by Family Court—and the Ex Who Weaponized It
By Michael Phillips | REBUILT
Family court isn’t just a place where divorces get finalized or custody schedules get set.
For many, it’s where lives are torn apart.
It’s where abusers find legal validation. Where manipulation is rewarded. And where the protective parent is vilified for simply trying to survive.
You may not know what they’re going through. But if you pay attention, you’ll see the signs.
Here are the 12 most telling signs that someone you love has been taken advantage of—and abused—by the family court system and an ex who weaponized it against them:
1. They Seem Permanently Exhausted—Mentally, Emotionally, and FinanciallyIt’s not just “divorce stress.” It’s trauma. Court-induced, system-sanctioned trauma. You’ll notice they don’t sleep well. They’re always fighting fatigue. They may have drained their savings or even lost their job. Every dollar and every ounce of energy goes toward survival.
2. They Flinch When You Mention ‘Custody’ or ‘Court’Even the word “court” is a trigger. It reminds them of how powerless they’ve felt. The humiliation. The silence when they tried to speak truth. The fear of losing their child—again.
3. They’ve Been Alienated From Their Child, and No One Seems to CareThey show you pictures of their kid like a grieving parent shows photos of a child who died. Except the child is still alive—just hidden, withheld, and brainwashed by the other parent, with the court’s passive approval.
4. They Speak in Legalese Without Meaning ToThey’ve read more case law than most lawyers. They throw out terms like “ex parte,” “guardian ad litem,” “discovery abuse,” “motion to compel,” and “with prejudice” like they’re talking about dinner plans. Because they’ve had to become a lawyer just to survive.
5. They Can’t Afford a Lawyer—But Their Ex Has One (Or Three)The court expects both sides to be “equal” in a system that is fundamentally unequal. One party comes in with a legal team. The other is a broke parent with PTSD, scribbling notes on the back of old receipts.
6. Their Reputation Is in Shambles—and the Allegations Don’t Add UpFalse allegations are a tactic. A smear campaign. The court doesn’t require proof; just the appearance of impropriety. Suddenly, the loving father is “unstable.” The caring mother is “uncooperative.” The narrative is flipped—and no one checks the facts.
7. They’ve Stopped Believing in JusticeThey used to believe that the truth would win. That the system would protect children. That due process mattered. Now? They know better. They know the system protects itself, not the people inside it.
8. Their Health Has Deteriorated RapidlyStress manifests. Migraines, stomach issues, heart problems, flare-ups of autoimmune conditions. They’re not “being dramatic.” They’re being destroyed—slowly, systemically, and often in silence.
9. They’ve Withdrawn From Friends and FamilyThey’re tired of explaining. Tired of the judgment. Tired of hearing “just go back to court” when court is the very place that’s destroying them. So they go silent. Isolated. Ashamed of a story no one understands.
10. They Seem Paranoid—But They’re Usually RightThey check emails five times. They record every interaction. They save every receipt. It seems obsessive—until you realize their ex has twisted every conversation, every action, and every benign moment into a weapon in court.
11. They’ve Become Fiercely Protective of Their TruthThey document everything now. They keep binders and files and timelines. Because they’ve learned that truth alone isn’t enough. You have to prove it. Over and over. Even when the system won’t listen.
12. They’ve Started Speaking Out—Even if It Costs ThemEventually, many of these parents become advocates. Because staying silent almost killed them. Because they don’t want others to go through what they did. Because their pain has to mean something.
And because the court took so much—but not their voice.
Final Thoughts: They’re Not ‘Crazy.’ They’re Criminalized for SurvivingIf someone in your life shows these signs, don’t dismiss them. Don’t fall for the narrative that they’re “bitter” or “unstable.”
They’ve been abused—by a system that claims to protect children, but too often protects power, manipulation, and silence.
Support them.
Believe them.
And help us change the system before it destroys even more families.
[…] Parlato doesn’t mince words. “Family Court isn’t broken,” he writes. “It’s doing exactly what it was built to […]
They’re also hiding the contents of Jennifer Dulos’ May 1, 2019 motion to the court in which her attorney informed the Court about the illegal activities of the clown called “guardian ad litem” and the clown “who met with Fotis Dulos 14 times as part of an evaluation of the Dulos family to help determine suitable custody of the children”.
Kent Mawhinney probably knows what happened next. One problem with that circus is: Kent Mawhinney knows Simon Hessler and Simon Hessler knows Michael Sussman and the Hesslers and the Sussmans probably both know Ms. Katz and Mr. Rubin via big business connections with the movers, shakers and destroyers in France.
Knowing the antics of the clowns behind the masks, one could reasonably guess that Kent Mawhinney won’t be prosecuted. One could also reasonably guess that the good people who investigate and expose the crimes of “family court” will continue to be prosecuted.
Connecticut family court is the scary kind of circus.
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/local/article/Jennifer-Dulos-divorce-Judge-tosses-psych-exam-14455385.php
What do Connecticut’s local reporters and editors know about the coverup in the Dulos case?
What other vital information have they withheld from the public?
Reporters and editors who know about corruption and do nothing about it aren’t reporters or editors. They’re complicit.
“… Assistant State’s Attorney Michael Nemec told Judge Alex Hernandez he recently had been assigned the case and needed more time to formulate a response. …”
Mr. Nemec worked in the Stamford’s state’s attorney’s office during the Dulos “family court” case.
Maybe he’s one of the good guys and witnessed the politics of the Dulos case.
Maybe he reads the Frank Report comment section and isn’t surprised to see Michael Sussman’s name …
LinkedIn:
“… State’s Attorney’s Office
Assistant State’s Attorney
Deputy Assistant State’s Attorney
Special Deputy Assistant State’s Attorney States Attorneys Office
Associate Cacace, Tusch & Santagata
Staff Attorney Dept. of Mental Health and Addiction Services
Law StudentUniversity of Connecticut
Assiciate Douglas Gould & Co.
Marketing Manager Council for Opportunity in Education (DC?)
Campaign Manager Dan Malloy for Mayor 👈 (politics)
Special Traveling Assistant to the Senator 👈 (politics)Office of Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE)
John Kerry for President 👈 (politics)
Briefing Books 👈 (politics?)
Deputy Director of Internet operations
Michael A. Sussmann isn’t Michael H. Sussman. 🫤
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael H. Sussman on behalf of Simon Hessler (Sussman, Michael)
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/connecticut/ctdce/3:2023cv01270/156124
Jennifer Dulos’ May 1, 2019 motion to the Court: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMOVAL OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM, PENDENTE LITE told the Court: the guardian ad litem Michael T. Meehan violated C.G.S. 46b-7 and P.B. 46b-60A and 46-60A.
Sec. 46b-7. (Formerly Sec. 51-338). Report of investigation or evaluation to be filed. Whenever, in any family relations matter, including appeals from the Superior Court, an investigation or evaluation has been ordered, the case shall not be disposed of until the report of the investigation or evaluation has been filed as hereinafter provided, and counsel and the parties have had a reasonable opportunity to examine it prior to the time the case is to be heard. Any report of an investigation or evaluation shall be filed with the clerk and mailed to counsel and self-represented parties of record.
Jennifer Dulos’ May 1, 2019 motion to the Court: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMOVAL OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM, PENDENTE LITE told the Court:
“… The GAL, then gave and permitted access to the report to the Defendant and his counsel …
“… It appears that the GAL became aware of the contents of the Custody evaluation before he was authorized by the court to see the report. …”
“… Based on the Defendant’s and GAL’s advanced access to and knowledge of the content of the report, the Defendant was given the opportunity to disseminate the findings of the Court to third parties …”
“In addition, based upon the actions of the Guardian Ad Litem it appears that the Guardian Ad Litem has made his own determinations concerning the purported validity of the custody evaluation and has acted upon the custody evaluation assuming that it has evidentiary value under seal … despite the fact that the evidentiary value of the report (if any) is dependent upon a judicial determination that can be made only after the author of the report testifies and is available for cross examination in an evidentiary hearing at trial. …”
“… The Plaintiff also notes, that the GAL who had previously been requested by the Plaintiff to update and to disclose the contents of his file, and who advised Plaintiff counsel that he was going to provide the updated materials, has failed to do so despite being reminded of the request. The requests for the supplemental disclosure by the GAL of his file was made prior to the GAL receiving the Custody Evaluation; prior to his disseminating it to the Defendant and his counsel; and prior to the Court appearance on April 30, 2019. …”
Has Attorney General Tong known about that critical information in the Dulos case for the past 6 years?
How many state and federal employees decided to withhold that information from the public and carry on with the charade since then?
Michelle Troconis’ next hearing is scheduled for next week.
In that hearing and in the news,
no one will mention
Jennifer’s May 1, 2019 pleading.
https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/michelle-troconis-trial-in-limbo-as-state-prepares-response-to-motion-to-dismiss-contempt-charge/3548189/
I like the vultures…
“Family Court Isn’t Broken — But That’s Exactly the Problem”
By Margaret Sullivan, Co-Author of Exposing Family Court Corruption in Connecticut: A System Betrayed
Frank Parlato’s article, “Family Court Isn’t Broken — It’s Doing Exactly What It Was Built to Do,” doesn’t exaggerate. It exposes what many of us already know: family court is not a system in crisis. It is a system in control — by those profiting from our destruction.
I know this firsthand. I am currently on appeal because Judge Gerard Adelman postponed a crucial hearing in my case — a hearing that never happened. That delay allowed my daughter to age out of the system, effectively terminating my parental rights without due process, without a ruling, and without even a hearing. That’s not a mistake. That’s a tactic.
I am also challenging the so-called “best interests of the child” standard — a standard so vague that it can be twisted to fit whatever outcome the judge or the attorneys desire. In my case, two judges — including Adelman — applied the same statutory factor differently within just three months of each other. In what other branch of law would this kind of inconsistency be acceptable?
It gets worse. In Connecticut, Guardians ad Litem (GALs) are legally limited to appearing only once every 90 days, and only in emergencies. Yet in my case, the GAL — Victoria Lanier — was present at every hearing, every status conference, working in direct coordination with the forensic evaluator, the attorneys, and even the judge. At one point during my trial, Lanier testified that my son thought I was dead. Let that sink in. My child — my living, breathing child — had been so cut off from me by this system that he believed I no longer existed.
This isn’t just an isolated tragedy. It’s a systemic blueprint:
Frank said it best: “The system is not there to help families. It’s there to bill them.” And while his language is sharp, the reality is sharper. Judges rub their foreheads, attorneys nod solemnly, and clerks close the file — but it’s our children who carry the scars.
Family court is not broken. It’s working exactly as it was built to: to exploit chaos, profit from trauma, and erase parents one hearing at a time.
But we are fighting back. Through appeals. Through exposure. Through advocacy. Through truth.
Because my children deserve better. Yours do too.
Margaret Sullivan
Author, Advocate, and Mother
Co-Author of Exposing Family Court Corruption in Connecticut: A System Betrayed
#FamilyCourtReform #StopJudicialAbuse #GALAccountability #JusticeForProtectiveParents
Is the legal system the problem? Or, is it the parents who are immature, selfish, violent and self-obsessed who can’t work things out with each other?
Parents need to avoid court at all costs and preferably find solutions using legal counsel only as unbiased, trusted consultants working for the good of both parties.
Systems don’t commit crimes and all victims of crimes committed in Connecticut family courts aren’t “immature, selfish, violent and self-obsessed”.
Parents need to avoid the criminals working in family courts and state government offices should provide protection.
WHERE’S THAT PROTECTION?
Don’t ALL parents want to find solutions using legal counsel only as unbiased, trusted consultants working for the good of both parties?
Which state office is willing and able to provide the complete list of unbiased, trusted legal consultants and counsels working for the good of both parties?
Why isn’t such a list already available to protect the public?
If the attorney general’s office is able to send out a letter to include the following:
1. Please provide a copy of your contract that relates to work for the Connecticut family court system or its agent, contractor or subcontractor.
2. Can your office confirm that it will not violate state and federal laws?
3. Can your office confirm that it will never force children and parents to participate in violations of state and federal laws?
4. Should your office receive payments to serve families, can your office provide proof of the value of all services provided to children and parents?
5. Can your office confirm it will never violate children’s rights, safety and wellbeing?
6. Can your office confirm that it will never violate parental rights, safety and wellbeing?
7. Can your office confirm it will never remove a child or parent from home without a valid reason for removal?
8. Can your office confirm that it will never receive payments to separate children from families?
Who and what’s preventing from sending out such a letter already?
The list of those working in Connecticut family courts who are happily willing to respond to such a letter can be posted on the Judicial Branch website.
Copies of that list can be made available at every Information Desk in every courthouse.
After mainstream news outlets broadcasted the nightmare of the Dulos case across the nation, why hasn’t the AG’s office done ANYTHING to protect children and families from career criminals in Connecticut “family courts” who still haven’t been prosecuted for the crimes they’ve committed for the past several decades.
It’s almost as though a few people in Connecticut purposely destroy families.
What kind of people would do such a thing? 🤔
How many attorneys are involved in equal and shared parenting? The post stopped in 2019. How many biased attorneys are playing custody capture? How much of an investment has the state made for outcomes? Over 400 thousand sexual assault accure in the United States a year. 30 percent are reported. One percent are prosicuted. 200 case were pushing false reporting. According to a documentary. Connecticut has no comment. How many cases of domestic abuse and child abuse are accuring in family in law cases? How many cases are guided by the desired outcome of statistics for the 5 safest state Connecticut? The leader in criminal justice reform. Women are not safe in your state. Children are not safe in your state. Weaponizing government. We have representative sueing the state.
The legal system and the abusive parents are both the problem. The legal system facilitates for the abusive parent to harm the children and financially and emotionally destroy the protective parent using the coercive powers of the court. The court is financed and the lawyers and others are financed to keep going by abusive parents who just want to destroy someone for leaving their toxic behaviour.
This is true in some of the cases. It not true in all cases. Some of the litigants are unreasonable and abusive. Child custody is being used as a weapon for financial agreements. Some of us have tried using attorneys. As I am sure you are aware there are just some shitty lawyers. It told to you that the legal fees are more than you will receive if you actually go to court and get a reasonable settlement. This is why people are going to court and representing themselves . I paid $10,000 dollars for a contempt motion that should have been dropped from the beginning. Instead of at 5 pm the night before a follow-up hearing. Because I finally fired the over priced attorney. 2 more reunification sessions then the session were dropped . Getting the father out of paying for driver’s education. These are the things that are going on outside your court that you are unaware of. It takes one unreasonable vengeful parent to make a case high conflict. ” Custody capture” using the children to bankrupt a divorcing spouse into unfair, in unsafe and sometimes deadly agreements.
It is our system first. Not to say parents aren’t selfish and immature… but once they retain an attorney, the war is on!!! It’s the attorneys who feed the fight and put the parents at each other’s throats and out for blood. The attorneys want to win and will do whatever it takes… regardless of who they hurt. The judges don’t give two hoots about the child or what’s right/wrong, good/bad. They all work together. I watched how that happened and went through it first hand. It starts with a parent, escalates through the attorneys, and then finally ends with the corrupt judges. And it’s all about money. Sometimes you can’t “talk to the other patent” or “work things out”. It’s like talking to a brick wall. And once you get with an attorney, they are going to fuel the fire and keep it going.
Judges are only as good as the information they are allowed to receive. They are only as good as the legislation passed in the state. The education they appearantly want to receive. It’s time to get things actually on the record to hold people accountable. When the fact finder is actually engaged in blocking the court from information and the individual can’t afford to pay the attorney to represent the reality of a case. It beyond the attorneys. They will bankrupt you with nonsense in charge for emails and nonsense. The reason why these vengeful litigants should have to pay for legal fees. Attorney are being encouraged to meditate these agreement to “engage” an abusive parent. It’s beyond immature and selfish. You don’t want to go to jail, but you want to send a parent to jail when they don’t want to force a child to go to these ” selfish, immature parents who are using child access time to to get out of reasonable settlement.” Not holding them accountable. Weaponizing the children need both parents for better outcomes. The government has paid for research on shared parenting among high conflict divorce. That point to adjustment disorder years after the divorce is settled. When you reward the person playing custody capture you are feeding into the emotional toll on the child. It’s time for the judges to start getting educated on the studies we pay taxes for. Not the vested interest of some of the people abusing the court house. Including the professional. We all agree these garduim ad lithium are no good. Are placed on custody cases for desired outcome twisting best interest standards. Family service is in need of new management. Our taxes are paying for a blind system. It’s time to take the blinders off and get to the heart of the matter.
Senor Parlato,
Please post more about my loverboy Vanguard. He is losing life force in prison because he cxnnot dump loads all over VC, Bobo and me. We love Vanguard and want him freed. So does Suneel and Esuardo and Michele.
Great title! “ Family Court Isn’t Broken — It’s Doing Exactly What It Was Built to Do”-
This was BY DESIGN! Laid out by the AFCC and taught by the judges and attorneys and psychologists who participate in kidnapping and child trafficking through family courts!
The ct legislature has laws in place to allow the racketeering to run flawlessly and laws that provide immunity to judges, and “quasi” immunity to court appointed “experts”.
Thank you frankreport for identifying the intentional, calculated hoax that steals children and destroys lives while liking the sadistic pockets of judges and court criminals!!!
Here goes Peter blaming women for the courts problems again.
Here goes Peter’s obsessed stalker attributing anything she doesn’t like to Peter. Did he break your heart? Reject you? Time to let go. No one is blaming women. These are court tactics.
Peter wishes he had a stalker. Have you met Peter?
Pleased to report that substantial progress has already been made so far this year in passing shared and EQUAL PARENTING bills in a number of states across the country.
Because in those states, mothers and fathers joined forces and worked together. Rather than falling for gender bias-based division and conflict promoted by the Divorce Industry to increase conflict and their revenues.
Most notably, a shared parenting bill remains in committee in neighboring New York state.
Robert Gaza’s bill has gained national attention, and been presented to legislators here in CT.
Mark Ludwig has had several highly successful meetings in Washington D.C. about defunding federal laws that promote gender-biased based agendas and the separations of children for federal dollars.
Connecticut legislators say it’s pretty much dead in the water
How many advocates will be threatened if it isn’t? A pattern of threats against judges, and avd is advocates when the desired outcome is not granted. When paying professionals to gain custody of children to control the other parent become costly. When a pattern of lawfare and courisuon. How many restraining order violation does it take for the family court to see what is happening? When will the legislators figure out what is happening?
There is a study published is a study already done in 2021 on shared parenting in high conflict custody cases. In the journal of medicine. The imperial research found that children suffeted poor adjustments for years after divorce. Why are we as Americans paying for research that the government won’t listen to? Special interest group should not take presidency over the research we as Americans are paying for to help assist for legislative policy. The legislators who brings up legislation and judiciary committee do you consider studies tax payer are paying for before perposing legislation or voting on it? Despite state given the power to govern themselves, should they remain ignorant to the research that the constituents are paying for?
National library of medicine March 23 , 2021 Does shared parenting help or hurt children in high conflict families. ” Despite shift in parenting time, childrens adjustment in high conflict families tentative conclusion” ” Higher levels of shared parenting leads to poor child adjustment in sample with high conflict families for years following divorce”.
If you are a man and want to avoid the silver bullet, get custody of your children, and justice for yourself in CT family court, you must retain the great Gary Cohen. At a mere $950 per hour, it is well worth the peace of mind and justice you will attain with the aid of this courtroom legend and brilliant legal mind.
Logically speaking, Convenient, ain’t it? Suddenly, all your problems are someone else’s fault, buried so deep even you can’t find ’em.
Family court civil restraining orders are unconstitutional. They use a civil evidentiary standard, which essentially is what the judge thinks and feels, rather than a criminal standard, which requires actual proof and clear and convincing evidence, to deprive one of their constitutional rights namely to be able to go wherever one wants and possess a firearm. So, anyone can come to court, file an affidavit full of lies, and someone is deprived of their constitutional rights. This is exactly what happens in third world banana republics, and CT family court.
Right on point. And the “no contact” orders which linger for years with no standard of evidence are just as illegal and designed to break parental bonds and traumatize children.
Unfortunately many of these restraining order people have violated them multiple times. They have no boundaries or a healthy sense of ” family”. There often toxic and stress not only the form spouse but the children. Dangerous and escalate. Clug up the courthouse with legal temper tantrums. Don’t and can’t take accountability.
This is exactly how the RICO family court racket works in CT. So, when will the victims of this criminal gang get together and demand the Trump Administration investigate and shut it down?
We need Trump. Look at the hypocritical systems of AG Tong- that no one in CT is above the law! As he attacks the Trump administration.
Meanwhile everyone is above the law in CT. The family court judges, the police, the gals, and family law attorneys!
The two weapons promoted by family court play out day after day, destroying the lives of children and parents for decades.
CT media will not report on it. The democratic state is deeply invested in protecting the racketeering and pedo agenda resulting in huge profits for the same cabal of judges and family court attorneys.
AG Tong and Lamont ignore the thousands of complaints filed every year.
Thank you FP for your dedicated coverage of the silent epidemic which runs rampant throughout our country.
Thank you for putting our children first and for having the fearlessness required to expose these corrupt cowards who prey on the most vulnerable.
Aside from reporting, nothing has been done. Where are the protests? Where are the marches? Where is the public outrage on college campuses?
This RICO racket survives because of a lack of popular protest against it despite the millions of victims it has created. Hopefully someone will bring this to the attention of the Trump administration and convince them to shut this RICO racket down for good.
This happened to me by a woman. Im the man and was screwed by the woman. And because I was blindsided with lies and false accusations, my divorce agreement was not in my favor. I was in effect blackmailed to sign it. And now this woman is dating an actual criminal who has spent multiple visits in prison and has violated dv orders with previous women, and the courts and parenting coordinator won’t remove him from the children. All because she filed a false dv report before filing for divorce. Courts dont have the time to read hundreds of pages of submissions. Court trials are also sometimes 45 minutes long determining the next 18 years of the future.
They have time. They choose to drag out litigation when it results in hundreds of thousands in billable hours to the gal, custody evaluator, and family court lawyers, but then they need the quick result- the push it through so fast and then the train as off and running. The court CHOOSES not to allow for fair hearings or jury trials. It’s all part of the playbook.
You are correct that these two methods of strategic weaponization determine the next 18 years but it is by design.
I’m so sorry you’ve gone through this and your children suffer the loss of a living dad.
What kind of people 🧐
practicing which religion 🧐
would use public family courts 🧐
to destroy children and families? 🧐