By Juda Engelmeyer

I know you are familiar with USA v. Cherwitz, the federal prosecution involving Rachel Cherwitz and Nicole Daedone (OneTaste).

This case has reached a pivotal moment that demands your attention—one that could turn it into a defining example of DOJ misconduct at the highest level.

With President Trump’s executive order directing a review of DOJ activities and his inauguration speech committing to eliminate judicial weaponisation, USA v. Cherwitz has become a relevant test case. The story of this prosecution isn’t just about the defendants, it’s about exposing systemic failures in our justice system at a time when the nation is laser-focused on restoring integrity.

National Context for Reform

The new administration has placed DOJ misconduct front and center, and the OneTaste case is tailor-made to illustrate the broader crisis.

Unlike many cases being scrutinized, this one isn’t clouded by partisan politics or high-stakes criminality. It’s a clean, clear example of misconduct for misconduct’s sake—providing an opportunity to focus on systemic reform without the distractions of political polarization.

Explosive Details of FBI Misconduct:

The scale of FBI and DOJ misconduct in this case is staggering, with court filings and an Inspector General complaint detailing egregious actions over seven years, including:

- Coaching the government’s key witness to delete evidence and conceal information.
- Losing evidence due to unprofessional handling (e.g., using “auto-delete” settings).
- Directly violating attorney-client privilege and mishandling key evidence (e.g., losing a USB drive).
- Manipulating civil attorneys to breach settlement agreements.
- Paying fact witnesses to testify

The most damning aspect? The case against Cherwitz and Daedone hinges on fabricated journals and testimony from a witness with a long record of perjury. The misconduct isn’t a sideshow—it’s the main event.

Judicial Complicity Adds to the Scandal

Diane_Gujarati_(Judge) - Frank Report — Judge Diane Gujarati is in no position to stand up to the FBI Innocent defendants who go to prison are a dime a dozen with the DOJ She knows She was a prosecutor before she was a judge But there is only one FBI and they bite back at judges who get too big for their britches

A Fearful Judge?

The presiding judge, US District Court Judge Diane Gujarati, repeatedly shuts down efforts to investigate the FBI agent’s conduct, even as mounting evidence of impropriety has emerged. Three rulings have swept serious allegations under the rug, raising troubling questions about the judiciary’s role in enabling DOJ overreach.

A Rare Opportunity for Accountability:

The President’s executive order and public focus on DOJ accountability create a unique window for this story to make an impact. This is more than just a court case; it’s a chance to illuminate how these patterns of misconduct affect not just high-profile defendants but everyday citizens.

Public Interest and Sensational Details:

USA v. Cherwitz offers the perfect combination of public intrigue and systemic importance. The backdrop of a controversial self-help organization adds to the story’s appeal, while the misconduct underscores its gravity. For readers, this case is equal parts compelling and consequential.

What’s at Stake:

If the misconduct in the OneTaste Case remains unexamined, it sets a dangerous precedent: the DOJ can weaponize its authority with impunity. Covering this case now could shape the national conversation on restoring trust in our justice system.