Richard Luthmann
Ventura Judge Johnson Blocks Mother’s Goodbye as Bewildered Children Leave Alone With Father to Italy and Beyond
By Richard Luthmann
After being their primary caretaker all their lives, Sara Young, a California mother, lost the chance to say goodbye to her three young children on September 3.
Ventura County Superior Court Judge JoAnn Johnson coldly denied her request for a final farewell. Young’s children, U.S. citizens, were handed over to her estranged husband, Daniel Bichanich, despite his failure to comply with court orders and unresolved issues of alleged abuse.
Bichanich is using his financial resources and legal maneuvering to take the children to Italy and Jordan, where Young will have little recourse to ever see them.
“The court ordered my children be turned over to my ex, even though he didn’t comply with any of the court’s orders,” Young said.
Bichanich, who has greater financial resources and powerful legal representation, manipulates the system using the Hague Convention. Young, who represents herself, was devastated by the decision.
Judge Johnson allowed Bichanich to take the children, waived $5,000 in unpaid child support due to Young and told him he does not have to purchase a plane ticket for their mother to accompany the children to Italy. In fact he does not even have to tell her where they are.
After Young’s request for a stay pending appeal was denied, Judge Johnson ordered her to remain in the courtroom while Bichanich got the children – from the waiting room. The three little ones were expecting to see their mother with whom they came. Instead, their father whisked them away to perhaps never see their mother again.
“She denied my request to say goodbye to my children,” Young said. “She ordered me to sit in the courtroom while my husband collected the children and left the courthouse.”
Bichanich took the children to Italy. The next destination is Jordan, where Young will have no access to them.
Bichanich secured custody of the children through the Italian courts by filing for divorce there without Young’s knowledge. Because Young was unaware of the proceedings, the Italian courts labeled the case “uncontested,” granting Bichanich custody and allowing him to take the children abroad.
Bichanich’s tactics have made it nearly impossible for Young to maintain a relationship with her children. On September 3, he departed the U.S. with the children.
“He has manipulated the Italian courts to grant him full custody, deny me access to the family home, and only let me see the kids via Skype,” Young said.
Bichanich’s February 2022 custody order was obtained while the family resided in Jordan, He left Young homeless.
“He managed to push through those orders and strip me of all custody and access to the house,” Young stated. “I have no access to any marital assets, so I’m homeless and can’t see my young children through his fraudulent litigation.”
Bichanich’s use of the Hague Convention — a treaty intended to prevent international child abduction— has raised concerns about how one parent can weaponize the legal system to deprive the other parent of custody.
The Sara Young custody battle continued as she arrived in Italy on September 6. Bichanich sent her a message warning her not to attempt to see the children.
“If you come to the house, I will call the police immediately,” Bichanich wrote in an email to Young.
Bichanich said he would leave Young’s personal items outside the house and that she could speak to the children on Skype.
Young has received no court orders regarding her access to the children, leaving her unsure whether Bichanich is bluffing about his legal authority.
“I’m going to the house to be with my kids,” Young said. “Cops will be called. I’ll keep you posted.”
Frank Report has not received any further updates. Young may presently be in an Italian jail.
Richard Luthmann is a writer, editor, and investigative journalist.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
FR… KEEP EXPOSING JJJ.
People roughly fall into one of two types, though I reckon more types/groups exist, feel free to add…
The two groups I’m thinking of – the first is comprised of people who ‘rank’, these folks pay attention to social hierarchies of all kinds, and orient their social world in structurally hierarchical ways. They are aware of power, status, and tend to be motivated to attain material success that is congruent with these concepts. Often they are good at strategy, gamesmanship, competition, and in my experience tend to have a bigger share of dark tetrad traits, as well as the following characteristics: black or white thinking, rigidity, lack of self awareness, weaker capacity in displaying affective empathy, though can empathize cognitively, certainty in their views, dogmatic, and self-righteous. Fear is a large influence in their psyche, but they might be unconscious regarding its effect on their decision making. Sensitive to rejection. Prone to being law-abiding and are respectful of rules in general, but are able to break or bend some rules, but the motivations for doing so will follow an overarching logic. Loyal to their groups that they belong to, and can be possessive or protective of those that they perceived as being part of their group. May struggle with recognising commonalities amongst all humans, as they regard people dissimilar to themselves with suspicion. Paranoia is another trait that may show up, and conspiracies and belief are other motivational schema that shape world views for these kinds of folks. Concepts such as a belief in goodness and evil influence how they see reality, as well as winning and losing.
So far what I’ve written to me at least seems fairly negative, but it’s not my intention to judge people as being ‘better’ or ‘worse’ than other people, but I think exploring how people see the world and what is shaping their view of reality is interesting, and it can be useful in considering situations like this family’s.
The other group of people that I think of are what are could be called ‘linkers’. These people tend to be less concerned with status and hierarchy, and more motivated with connecting with other human beings. They are more likely to look upon humanity as one giant collective group, of which there are different variants and kinds, but essentially, are comfortable with the idea of humanity being more or less all the same. They can often struggle to understand how people in the first group that I mentioned operate, as this type of person can also be dogmatic and self-righteous about their worldview’s validity, and will also break the world into good and bad through are more willing to see shades of grey. They have an easier time accepting how people can have both desirable characteristics and also difficult characteristics. They tend to be more self-aware, and are able to reflect upon themselves in an objective way that perhaps the first group may have difficulty doing. This group of folks can also be more understanding of people’s failings and different prerogatives than perhaps the first group. They are more curious than suspicious, and generally do not regard strangers as being inherently a threat.
When these two groups of people meet, mingle, date, marry and procreate – mixing these groups and making new humans likely will prove difficult and unsuccessful for one of the two parents, if not both, and their children will pay for their parents’ unwise choice of mate as well. The cost might be minor or significant.
I feel like Family Court is the central forum of battle for the two groups. Mothers I think by and large are geared towards linking, perhaps it’s in our makeup, being a mom myself, whereas dads often by virtue of maybe their socialization of being men, often of think more in terms of those bigger societal principles, ie. being successful is priority, and so they can be sometimes harsh and/or rigid in terms of how they deal with their children and with their children’s mothers. Judges strangely I think to be really excellent at their jobs, will have to understand both groups of people but my sense is that most judges, if you were to survey, in order to ascend to the position of being a judge, will fall into the former group. The best interest principles lean towards financial resources rather than emotional resources, so this is why mothers are losing child custody. Dads that can’t sort out arrangements before going to court, they tend to want to win when they get into the ‘ring’ and in the ‘ring’ of family court, winners can and will want to take all.
Why is family court the place where families’ futures are decided? I think Family Court itself is an oxymoron. I don’t think that separations should be the purview of lawyers frankly, and then I think that law and family functioning and relationship problems should all be teased apart from one another, and for family therapists to do most of the work before couples call it a day. Family Court could then just sign off on the paperwork.
But really, what would help even more would be for couples to have pre-child arrival counseling, so they could really know if the relationship could support the addition of a child. If not possible, then perhaps as part of mother and baby education, information should be related to all new parents on what good parenting looks like, and how to continue being good parents if the relationship ends.
I went through family court and I think no one comes out of it as a winner, and that everyone that ends up in family court has lost before they even arrive at court. It’s a really lame system and globally needs to be ditched, and something new that’s based on science and research established instead, without lawyers being involved, or any of the other siloed ‘professionals’ that earn a living off of the money that’s currently spent when families end up in formal disputes.
Maybe AI can help? I see lots of text mining for business applications so why is it not here yet for disputing couples? Someone could make a fortune with an AI app that can analyse WhatsApp, etc, and come up with a plan that works for kids, and for parents too, as whichever parent is misbehaving, it’s probably likely that they are misbehaving in other areas of their lives.
Ps. What’s up with all the trolls on this site, posting puerile childish taunts, like schoolyard bullies? Positively jarring for a reader to come across comments that seem to originate from the metaphorical playground… I really don’t understand some people, try as I might to have an open mind about most things. Maybe instead of trolling, these folks could devote their time instead to a goal such as becoming, being amd behaving as a fully grown human being, aka what’s commonly known as an adult.
Did your mommie buy you a wand and cape to match your new Harry Potter glasses?
What an incredibly heartbreaking situation. It’s so tough to hear about Sara Young’s struggle to maintain contact with her children amidst such a complex and cotentious custody battle. On one hand, it’s clear that her estranged husband’s financial leverage and legal strategies have put her at a severe disadvantage,, making it almost impossible for her to stay connected with her children. The decision to grant him custody, despite alleged non-compliance and unresolved abuse issues, raises many questions about the fairness and thoroughness of the judicial process. Sadsadsad…
On the other hand, custody battles are often deeply complicated, and judges have to make incredibly tough decisions based on the evidence and legal standards set before them. While it’s easy to empathize with Sara’s plight, especially given the circumstances described, we might not have full visibility into all aspects of the case that influenced Judge Johnson’s ruling. (?) Maybe give more info-like Frank Parlato does? I dont knw-the actual rulings? Or maybe you did before? Nevertheless, denying a mother the chance to say goodbye to her children feels unnecessarily harsh and inhumane, particularly when considering the emotional trauma for both Sara and her kids.
This situation highlights significant issues with international custody disputes and how legal systems and treaties, like the Hague Convention, can be used in ways that might not align with their original intent. Sara’s battle shows the need for more robust protections and clearer pathways for parents, regardless of financial or legal prowess,os they can maintain a meaningful relationship with their children.
anyways you look at it-the complexities and heartbreak inherent in these situations, and the immense need for fairness, empathy, and justice in family law is obvious-outlandish..that poor child…
Luthmann compares himself to Trump.
Facts:
Trump has never pleaded guilty and continues to fight and appeal guilty verdicts.
Luthmann pleaded guilty. During his trial he blamed this on drugs and alcohol. Now he claims he’s innocent and blames his guilty pleas on PTSD from being raped by Salvadoran gangsters while in jail.
One of the above men is a patriot, the other is a lying pansy. You decide which is which.
Wrong.
I blame it on you FBI Special Agent Paul Tambrino. Don’t you have anything better to do than sit behind a computer screen on taxpayer time as “Anonymous”?
True, I’m not Trump, and I’m not a billionaire. No one who isn’t a billionaire can fight a federal case nowadays, and you know it. You like it that way. And Trump will clean house.
You just want to piss on me because you know that once I start publishing about you and the other dirty feds in your camarilla, it will be like Curcio material on steroids. None of you will work again and dozens of convictions will be vacated.
I ask you, who else can claim to know the facts about me better than the federal agents who fabricated them?
Why don’t you talk about the criminals you knowingly support and fabricate? Why don’t you talk about Frank Rossi?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/frank-g-rossi
Little Double-Stuffed Richie (aka La Pupusa Gorda) will get federal agents in trouble just after he puts out his televised deposition of incorruptible_bk and publishes his interview with Chatterjee’s mom & son.
🤡🤣
Third World bitch. I heard you’re starting a cooking show on how to grill house pets. Curry crusted Chihuahua.
wait, in ohio?
Absolutely, Richard. You hit the nail on the head. It’s ridiculous how regular folks can’t even think about fighting a federal case without insane amounts of money. And calling out the dirty tactics? Totally spot on. These agents hide behind screens and make life difficult for the rest of us while the real issues go unaddressed. Keep pushing back and exposing the truth. More power to you!
Hey fat boy, when are you going to publish your expose on FBI Special Agent Paul Tambrino?
Since you claim he’s lying, why don’t you sue him for defamation?
You are a blow hard whose only talent is squealing like a pig.
In the works. Stay tuned.
I’m working on investigating Saurav Chatterjee and Daniel Nottes’ conspiracy at the moment. It’s THIRD WORLD shit.
Joann Johnson is one sadistic bitch. Traumatizing these kids and killing off their mother and it’s endorsed by family courts everyday throughout our country.
It’s not ok
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/staten-island-attorney-richard-luthmann-sentenced-four-years-prison-fraud-and-extortion
Must have hit a nerve with my reporting here. The same link keeps popping up in all of my stories about corrupt Chicago family law firm Beermann LLP.
J feel like “wire fraud” is a catch all used to get people who disagree with the government.
He got charged with way more than wire fraud. No law license. Convicted felon. Now he just trolls the internet.
A law license is a joke. It is the ultimate muzzle on free speech.
But you’re right. I do troll. I troll American courts and institutions to expose corruption and fraud. I’m not a white knight. I know how the sausages are made better than anyone else, know where to look, and can’t be bought off by their “club.”
And it’s an added bonus to arm others with information about combatting the fraud business model. One of my favorite strategies is evaporating law licenses and judgeships using the person’s own words. Stay tuned…
“A law license is a joke.”
What a desperate cope, Rich.
The joke is you and your penny ante PR consulting racket for failed parents.
Reality doesn’t care about your feelings, Pilgrim.
Stop drinking the woke Koolaid.
Eat some protein and hit the gym.
You’re a convicted felon you dolt
Yes. Just like Trump. And, like Trump, it is a badge of honor.
Don’t forget the part where brave Richard Luthmann threatened to have Chinese gangsters rape one of his female extortion victims.
He’s a real white knight, that Luthmann.
The way he tries to deflect from the truth of his creepy, incel personality by comparing himself to Donald Trump is a desperate cope.
Wrong.
I blame it on you FBI Special Agent Paul Tambrino. Don’t you have anything better to do than sit behind a computer screen on taxpayer time as “Anonymous”?
True, I’m not Trump, and I’m not a billionaire. No one who isn’t a billionaire can fight a federal case nowadays, and you know it. You like it that way. And Trump will clean house.
You just want to piss on me because you know that once I start publishing about you and the other dirty feds in your camarilla, it will be like Curcio material on steroids. None of you will work again and dozens of convictions will be vacated.
I ask you, who else can claim to know the facts about me better than the federal agents who fabricated them?
Why don’t you talk about the criminals you knowingly support and fabricate? Why don’t you talk about Frank Rossi?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/frank-g-rossi
You are repeating yourself because of your post-rape PTSD flashbacks.
Bottoms up, Richie! 🥃💊
Yes. It’s terrible. I keep forgetting the important things. Like the only reason your Third World ass uses his hind legs is because of the wheelbarrow I sent over.
I am Kemar! Kemar!!
Kyeth Ranirre is a brilliant man!
Fuck you all!
Daniell Riberts will brand you!
I am Kemar! Kemar!!
A repulsive, foul, malevolent, and demonic court. Not family court.
My friend lost all her parental rights overnight because her ex is a cop. The officer in question molested their child. The child confided in a school teacher, who then contacted social services. While the piggy-pedophile temporarily lost custody, he soon manipulated social services into believing the mother had coached their child. Despite the child’s red, chafed privates, numerous pleas to social services, and consistent statements to multiple therapists identifying the father as the abuser, they astonishingly dismissed the child’s testimony. My friend fought relentlessly for years.
On one occasion, I went to court with her, and the judge interrogated her about what she would do if her son reported abuse again. When she said she’d report it, the judge, smirking, retorted, “Now, you see… this… is… YOUR problem, Miss. You mustn’t entertain the fanciful delusions of children! This is why we believe YOU need mental health. So, I am suspending all movement forward on this case until you get a 730 evaluation. We must do what is in the best interest of the child.”
The judge had a cheap toupee that kept sliding back, exposing his greasy, splotched head. His face was caked with mauve-colored foundation, which we could identify as makeup when he blotted some of his drooling sweat with a handkerchief, revealing mottled, zombie-white skin underneath. His twisted nose hung down like a limp appendage, and his pitch-black eyes squinted so tightly they resembled two dark a$$holes. He spoke in an affected manner reminiscent of Liberace, delighting in his own theatrics and making grand, over-the-top gestures with his hands. There he was, the Queen on his throne. If he could have, he would have sent her to the guillotine.
It’s been five years since then. My friend was completely cut off from her son. I’ve talked her off the edge a hundred times. I don’t mean in a squishy, “oh, I can’t take it anymore” kind of way. I’m talking about calls at 4:00 AM, hearing her panting, whimpering, then gut-wrenching howls from the deepest, most cavernous parts of her soul. Five years of limbo. She’s not dead. She’s not alive. And imagine what her son feels.
In conclusion, the grotesque failure of this so-called family court to protect the innocent and uphold justice has left a lasting wound on the lives of my friend and her son. The blatant manipulation, and the systemic corruption have turned what should be a sanctuary of justice into a nightmare. My friend remains trapped in a twilight existence, forever haunted by the cruel separation from her child. And the boy? He is left in the clutches of his abuser, pleading for help that continues to fall on deaf ears. This tragic saga underscores the urgent need for reform in the family court system, to ensure that no other family endures such profound injustice and suffering. Until that day comes, we will keep fighting, speaking out, and advocating for change. Until then? Fuck family court in its neck.
Bought through the welfare reform act and donations. It’s time to protest. The Internet has made some difference, but not enough. It’s time to organize a March on Washington. Make sure to plan a special trip by CT Democrat Richard Blumenthal’s office. A good old fashion peaceful protest/ March. It needs to land on the doorstep of these politicians. Protecting and marching to the attorney general’s office wouldn’t hurt either.
Where was that case and who was the judge?
Seems pretty crazy. What’s the side of the story?
Bingo
I’m happy to see Sara having to deal with the consequences of kidnapping her kids.
Jail time won’t make her any smarter or less narcissistic, but at least it will give the kids time and space to heal.
This is a sick outcome. Judges are supposed to unite and heal families not punish and retaliate.
What kidnapping, Family Friend? Or are you actually the father? You’d have to be, or some AI bot-trolling. The point is whats in the best interest of the kids. Not you, old man.
Sara kidnapped the kids. That’s why they were properly returned to their father. When kids are taken without notification to the other parent, and withheld, they are kidnapped. She kidnapped the kids. Plain and simple.
The kids were not deported, they were returned to their home.
Everyone should take notice that Gary Cohen was NOT involved in this case in any manner and is NOT responsible in any way for its outcome.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Relief_and_Development_Inc.
He works with Blumont/IRD. Blumont/IRD works with USAID in Jordan, Syria and in other nations where war-mongering globalists start problems to offer solutions.
Family court war-mongers start problems to offer solutions, too.
The case reminds me of the Kelly Rutherford/Daniel Giersch case — except Daniel Bichanich is a U.S. citizen who CAN live in the U.S. — and everywhere he and Sara can both raise their children.
WHY did he take the children from the mother and why did the judge allow him to do that??
The mother took the kids from their home and kidnapped them and went to the US, where Sara hasn’t lived in 15 plus years.
Sara worked at ird too, in more than one country.
?
She should look into potential legal violations– could span both domestic and international laws.
International Child Abduction
Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: If the children were taken from the U.S. to Italy and then Jordan in violation of custody rights, this could be a form of international child abduction under this treaty.
– International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act (IPKCA) Under U.S. Federal Law 18 U.S.C. § 1204, taking a child outside the U.S. with the intent to obstruct another parent’s custodial rights can be a federal crime.
2. Violation of Custody Orders
Contempt of Court: If Daniel Bichanich disregarded U.S. court orders related to custody or child support, he might be held in contempt by the U.S. court.
Noncompliance with Family Court Orders– Failure to comply with specific orders (e.g., paying child support, allowing communication with the other parent) could also have legal repercussions.
3.Due Process Violations
– ====**Notice and Opportunity to be Heard**:====================== If Young was not given proper notice of the Italian legal proceedings, it might constitute a violation of her due process rights under both U.S. law (14th Amendment) and possibly European human rights law.
4. Fraudulent Misrepresentation=== If Bichanich knowingly provided false information to courts to secure custody and control of assets, it might constitute fraudulent misrepresentation.
Relevant Case Law
1. **Abbott v. Abbott, 560 U.S. 1 (2010)**:
– The U.S. Supreme Court upheld that a parent’s right to decide where a child lives constitutes a “right of custody” under the Hague Convention. This might be relevant in assessing whether Young’s custodial rights were violated.
2. Monasky v. Taglieri, 589 U.S. ___ (2020)
– This Supreme Court case dealt with the determination of a child’s habitual residence under the Hague Convention, which could impact jurisdictional considerations in this case.
3. **Chafin v. Chafin, 568 U.S. 165 (2013)**:
– This case addressed the issue of mootness in international child abduction cases, emphasizing that appeals can proceed even after a child is returned to another country.
### Actions Sara Young Can Take
1. disputes and the Hague Convention.
– **Legal Aid=== Seek out legal aid organizations that specialize in international child abduction cases, such as the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) or reunite International Child Abduction Centre.
2. Hague Convention Application
– **=======File a Petition**: =================================Initiate a petition under the Hague Convention for the return of her children to the U.S. This involves contacting the U.S. State Department’s Office of Children’s Issues for assistance.
3. File for Contempt Request the U.S. court to hold Bichanich in contempt for non-compliance with existing orders, which could include seeking a warrant for his arrest or other penalties.
4. Appeal the Decision= Appeal any unfavorable court decisions in the U.S. and seek modification of custody orders based on changed circumstances or new evidence.
5. International Legal Action
Engage Italian Legal System**: Work within the Italian legal system to challenge the custody determination, particularly if due process violations occurred.
Contact U.S. Embassy: Reach out to the U.S. Embassy in Italy for assistance and support in navigating the local legal system.
She probably shouldn’t look too hard, bc she’s the one that violated it.
huh? wait, what?
The mother paid for this story., so it leaves out how she is the person who is actually in the wrong here. All the stories here about noncustodial parents are paid for by the cuckoo parent who lost custody. It’s completely unethical here at FR. But what else would you expect from a felon like Luthmann?
The mom wanted to pay. Frank and I told her to take her money to a lawyer. We didn’t accept a penny. This is an important and newsworthy story about Hauge Convention abuse.
And yes. I’m a felon. A felon like Donald Trump. My NY case was the blueprint for the Bragg prosecution:
https://frankreport.com/2023/03/22/trump-grand-jury-blueprint-is-luthmanns-2018-case/
See you on January 20, bitch.
You’re not like Trump. You’re a scammer that to caught, got convicted. You have the credibility of felon.
It’s the lawyers, prosecutors and judges who lack credibility.
The Chrisco Kid again. Just ignore him. He’s a burn out.
Don’t talk about Richard like that. Prison rape is not a joking matter.
She wanted to pay???????
She wanted and wants help. Like any good mother, she would beg borrow and steal to protect her babies.
Good newsgathering is not free. It takes time and resources. But in some cases, like this one, it would be morally wrong to take someone’s last dollar when you can help. That’s what the lawyers do.
Is she now shacked up with Frank in the Keys? Karen Riordan, v.8
Ok. Chris. Don’t be bitter you couldn’t service the account.
Oh, right, howzzz it goin Chrisco? Nobody heard from yooouuuu in a long time. Havin fun in your ginger bread house, throwing crubs to your kids in the dungeon?
Sara’s story is unthinkable…..dismissing the whole situation doesn’t address the core issues these kids are facing. AMERICAN KIDS SENT TO ANOTHER COUNTRY ? Come on. Unconstitutional. Let’s not lose sight of the bigger picture—the children’s well-being should always be the priority. Sending them to a foreign country can not be what is best for them.
Accusations against the publication make you look like you have an axe to grind. You seem to have a very personal attachment to this. Sadly for you, your vindictive comment only made me have even more sympathy.
Dumbass
… They lived in the US only briefly during covid. Kids were born in Italy.
International custody disputes like this are incredibly complicated, but there are definitely avenues she could explore:
Look into International Laws
She could investigate whether taking the kids out of the U.S. to Italy and then Jordan might be considered international child abduction under the Hague Convention. It’s worth seeing if she can file a petition under this treaty to bring her children back.
U.S. laws also might help if her ex took the children out of the country to block her custodial rights.
Check for Custody Violations
If her ex ignored U.S. court orders about custody or child support, Sara could potentially get the court to hold him in contempt. This might enforce some legal consequences on him.
Any non-compliance with specific orders, like allowing her to see her kids, could be another angle to consider.
Possible Due Process Violations
If Sara wasn’t properly notified about the legal proceedings in Italy, that might violate her rights. She could look into whether this impacts how things were handled both in the U.S. and in Europe.
Fraudulent Actions
If her ex provided false info to the courts to get custody and control, this might be grounds for challenging the decisions made.
She could start a petition through the U.S. State Department for the return of her kids under the Hague Convention.
Request Contempt Charges
She might ask the U.S. courts to hold her ex in contempt for not following custody orders, which could lead to legal penalties.
Contact International churches-Go to Italy-People in Italy value family much more than in the states. Keeping a child from the momma in Itlay is unheard of. Contact International news outlets.
This situation is heartbreaking. Wishing the best.
This is just awful. How is this ever in the best interests of the children??
“Young, her children, and her ex-husband are all U.S. citizens.”
Which civil or religious law in the U.S. allows a U.S. judge to forcibly deport three children — who are U.S. citizens?
Which civil or religious laws in the U.S. — apart from U.S. abortion and transgender laws — allow American judges to separate children from their mothers?
$ That’s why. Corporate conglomerate.
https://frankreport.com/2024/09/10/california-judge-deports-american-children-to-italy-cancels-fathers-overdue-child-support/#comment-258917
“Trust the science.”
…
Fathers or mothers, who use courts to deprive their children of the other parent have no conscience.
The children are being traumatized and abused by this sadistic judge.
Reporting on these cases to allow the public to understand the corruption and criminality of family court takes time, effort, and dedication. You present it in a way that exposes the truth of what is a daily event in family courts–but is kept private and out of the spotlight under the guise of family “privacy.” In reality, it’s to conceal the criminal enterprise that has taken over family courts since the 1980’s.
The targeted parent is victimized and traumatized– has their children stolen, as a “Legal kidnapping,” is kicked out of their home, and all marital funds and assets go to the paying parent–the financier of the court-appointed criminals.
It’s the same story every time and thanks to FR and your dedicated investigators, family court crimes will be exposed–
And here’s the evidence this is a paid for case. If there was any fairness whatsoever, why does the judge make sure the mother gets nothing? It’s punitive and designed to eliminate this loving mother from the lives of her children FOREVER.
These judges are traumatizing children–this is court-ordered child abuse, and the destruction of families, while these paid criminals violated our constitutional rights to bring up our children–and for children to have both parents actively involved in their lives.
“Judge Johnson allowed Bichanich to take the children, waived $5,000 in unpaid child support due to Young and told him he does not have to purchase a plane ticket for their mother to accompany the children to Italy. In fact he does not even have to tell her where they are.”
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED COVERAGE OF CHILD ABUSE, AND CHILD TRAFFICKING THROUGH FAMILY COURTS.