Frank Parlato
Harvard graduate and former tech entrepreneur Suneel Chakravorty has been a staunch and vocal supporter of NXIVM founder Keith Raniere since his trial and conviction in 2018, which led to a 120-year prison sentence. In his attempt to free his guru, Chakravorty took to social media and podcasts to get his message out, but he went silent around July last year.
A recent review of the docket prompted FR to wonder whether Chakravorty is still devoted to Raniere—helping manage his legal team or writing his pro se motions—or whether he has joined the NXIVM defectors, who concluded their Vanguard was a scam artist.
The last few docket entries in Sarah Edmondson et al. vs. Raniere et al., the civil action against NXIVM leaders (but mainly the Bronfman sisters) led by attorney Neil Glazer, show Chakravorty’s name on the list of Plaintiffs.
This listing of Suneel’s name on the side of those suing the Golden One could be a typo.
There are other errors. For example, Soukiana Mehdaoui’s name appears both as her full name and as “Souki,” one person appearing as two.
Someone might have placed Chakravorty’s name among the 70+ plaintiffs lined up against the Glorious One in error.
After all, Suneel was involved in the case as an “Interested Party” in 2022 when attorney Glazer alleged he was in possession of sensitive materials relating to the case.
However, the docket also displays (above) the Plaintiffs’ attorney, Craig H. Hillwig, of Kohn Swift, as Chakravorty’s attorney.
Yet, the same docket shows Deborah Blum as his attorney. Blum assisted Chakravorty when Glazer demanded he hand over materials in a third-party subpoena.
Blum is one of Raniere’s latest attorneys – one in a long parade of attorneys for the Blessed One.
She made a notice of appearance on May 7 in Raniere’s criminal case filing a Request for Extension of Time to Amend Pro Se Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Raniere’s main efforts to free himself hinge on the weighty evidence of alleged FBI tampering with a hard drive and camera card seized from his library.
So, the question remains: where is Suneel Chakravorty, and what is his stance on Raniere? Could he have come to his senses and reflected that Raniere has done nothing but encourage Chakravorty to throw away his reputation, resources, relationships, and more in the name of justice — when it is in service of Raniere’s delusion?
I have spent many hours with Chakravorty, working with him to investigate the FBI tampering and other aspects of the case. I think he is a good person but misguided in his adoration of the Godly One.
As for the FBI tampering, there are suspicious elements to the handling of the evidence. While I do not doubt Raniere began a sexual relationship with Camila when she was under 17, and more likely under 16, I have serious reservations that the photos of her, supposedly taken when she was 15, came the way the government presented.
I could spend hours explaining why that is so, but that is not the point of this story.
It is probably a mistake in the docket that the plaintiff’s attorney represents Suneel, and he is now suing Raniere. Still, it is there, and it is always fun to conjecture about the things you wish for when they accidentally appear on the page.
I like Suneel and want to see him succeed in life. That will be hard, if not impossible, as long as he continues to hitch his star to that Luciferian glowing in the night whom he calls his Lord, and Vanguard.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Suneel,
Wish you the best in your travels!
He’s going back to his mother ship.
I love how in the screenshot its says “followed by Richard Luthmann…”
Suneel should be so lucky!!
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/feb/23/400-toilet-rolls-how-feels-win-lifetime-supply
Is ye the bloke who wipeth the arse of the banshee, Claire Bronfman?
Many a field house I have cleaned. Yet have neah seen a personal arsewiper, even for lords and nobility.
Sir Suneel may fancy a new job as a full time wiper of the derrier?
Suneel? He’s just a lackey. The real question is, where is Issac Edwards and what is his stance in all of this?
What Ben szemkus NXIVM ?
The Frank Report refuses to investigate his disappearance.
I wonder what their hiding.
Suneel-
I need not insult you this time….
A picture is worth a thousand words….
Take a glance at the top photo….
It’s not an alien; a retard; a tree frog;
a handicap; laboratory escape;
nor lavatory turd.
Yep, that’s you!
Happy 4th of July!
Suneel-
I need not insult you this time….
A picture is worth a thousand words….
Take a glance at the top photo….
It’s not an alien; a retard; a tree frog;
a handicap; laboratory escape;
nor lavatory turd.
Yep, that’s you!
Happy 4th of July!
Frank, I suspect Suneel has been in training for the last year in anticipation of Clare’s release from prison. He has to have have his wiping technique perfected. Think Rocky in Russia in Rocky IV.
Suneel has a life sized mannequin/sex doll. He smears chocolate pudding in the asscrack, asshole and taint areas, then practices wiping it clean with only two wipes. He’s gone through 11 cases of Charmin, fine tuning his craft.
Yea, Suneel wakes up at the “crack” of dawn and works his wiping form.
He has hired trainers to help with complete the Charmin Ultra Marathon.
Suneel haiku:
Wipes Clare’s ass he does
Shit stains on his fingers now
He is an asshole
Beautiful poem!
Is this the young man who has been wiping the keister of Clare Webb Bronfman?
Suneel has not posted on X in over a hear because he cannot use his right arm/wrist or hand because he has tennis elbow and tendonitis from wiping Clare’s ass so much.
Chakravorty Suneel is listed as an Interested Party. He is not listed as a Plaintiff.
Yea, “interested” in wiping Clare’s ass.
In federal court civil actions, interested parties generally don’t have an automatic right to intervene. Intervention is a legal process where a non-party seeks to join the lawsuit because they have a stake in the outcome. There are two main ways someone can be considered an interested party:
1. Interest Protected by Law (Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure):
This is the most common scenario. To qualify under this rule, you must demonstrate three things:
Interest: You have a legal interest that will be affected by the outcome of the case. This interest must be concrete and particular, not just a general interest in the subject matter.
Impairment: The judgment in the case could negatively impact your legal interest.
Inadequacy of Representation: The current parties in the lawsuit are not adequately representing your interests. This means they might not have the same incentive to fight for the outcome you desire.
2. Intervention to Protect the Court’s Interest (Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure):
This is less common but applies when a non-party’s involvement is necessary for a complete or fair adjudication of the case. The court has discretion to allow intervention under these circumstances, even if the requirements of Rule 24(a) aren’t met.
Justifying Your Interest:
To be admitted as an interested party, you’ll need to file a motion to intervene with the court. This motion should detail:
The specific legal interest you have in the case. Be clear about how the outcome will impact your rights or property.
How the judgment could negatively affect your interest. Explain the potential harm you face if the court rules against your interests.
Why the current parties are not adequately representing your interests. This could involve explaining how their goals differ from yours or how they lack the resources to fight for your specific concerns.
Additional Considerations:
Timeliness: There are time limits for filing a motion to intervene. It’s best to consult with an attorney to ensure you meet the deadlines.
Burden on the Court: The court will consider whether allowing you to intervene would unduly complicate the case or delay the proceedings.
Other Factors: The judge has discretion to weigh other factors, such as the public interest and the potential for prejudice to any party.
Remember: This is a simplified overview. The decision to grant intervention is complex and depends on the specific facts of the case. Consulting with an attorney is highly recommended if you believe you have an interest in a federal court civil action.
________________________________________________________
Edmondson v. Raniere, 1:20-cv-00485, (E.D.N.Y)
Interested Party: Chakravorty Suneel
REPRESENTED BY
Craig W. Hillwig
(215) 238-1700
Fax: (215) 238-1968
Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C.
1600 Market St.
Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
TERMINATED: 06/28/2023 (June 28, 2023)
Deborah Jill Blum
(845) 304-5312
Fax: (917) 621-3159
Deborah J. Blum, Esq.
817 Broadway
Flr # 4
New York, NY 10003
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
_____________________________________________
Who are you to judge my vanguard ?
I am who I am. I don’t have to ask anyone or ask for permission.
Furthermore, I hold the ultimate authority over my decisions.
Like Suneel’s “decision” to wipe Clare’s ass?
Yes, exactly!