Frank Parlato
The US Attorney’s indictment of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz on a charge of conspiracy to commit forced labor identifies the business the defendants ran—OneTaste—through which they allegedly conspired to force people to labor. It reveals the cities where they conspired, allegedly.
The prosecution characterized the intended victims of their alleged conspiracy as “OneTaste members.”
Had Daedone and Cherwitz followed through on their conspiracy to force labor, the prosecutors allege they would have forced so-called OneTaste “members” – people who worked for the company, as well as students and clients – to do labor for them out of fear of harm or by force.
The indictment mentions that OneTaste was a business that charged money for classes and other services, so they might benefit if their alleged conspiracy to force anyone to labor had worked.
The indictment does not state, nor does it need to state, what kind of labor Daedone and Cherwitz conspired to make the “members” do, with good reason: The US Attorney does not allege that Daedone and Cherwitz forced anyone into labor.
OneTaste’s Enchanting Conspiracy
The indictment also clarifies when Daedone and Cherwitz conspired to force people to labor: From 2006 to 2018. During these twelve years, the prosecutors allege Daedone and Cherwitz hatched the “scheme.”
Notably, these two women are a little unique among conspiring criminals. In the 12 years they allegedly conspired to force people to labor, they never pulled it off.
IQ question:
Two women conspired to force 112 employees, 232 students, six investors, 236 members, and seven random drunkards to labor.
How many people did the women force to do labor?
A: Based on the question: None. The women only conspired to force people to labor.
Want the proof?
The US Attorney did not charge Daedone and Cherwitz with forced labor. He only charged them with conspiracy to commit forced labor.
Let me give you another example to help you understand why the prosecutors are correct: The judge should not have dismissed the indictment against Daedone and Cherwitz just because the prosecutors failed to name a victim: No who, what, where, or how anyone was hurt.
The prosecutors alleged why. No one needed to be hurt.
Women Charged with Concocting Labor Plot
Here’s the example:
Two women conspired to cast spells on people to force them to work under their spell. The two women gathered at midnight, and with kindlings of mugwort, pine needles, and lavender twigs, they set fire to the ash and willow and placed a large cauldron above it.
Among the items in discovery (along with the FBI notes of their significance in parenthesis):
Eye of Newt – (for seeing who will labor)
Toe of Frog – (to hop swiftly into labor)
Adder’s Fork – (to sow deception among the workers)
Lizard’s Leg – (to make the workers agile and quick)
Scale of Dragon – (to make them invulnerable to harm, so they can work harder)
Witch’s Mummified Finger – (for casting powerful curses)
Mandrake Root – (screams when uprooted and induces being gaslit)
Moonbeam Collected Dew – (to enhance magical abilities)
Goblin’s Earwax – (to repel unwanted attention from the FBI)
Fairy Dust – (for lightness and ethereal movement, so the FBI wouldn’t catch on that these happy workers all believed they were working of their own free will when they were really being forced to labor by the potent spell)
The prosecutors charged them with conspiracy to commit witchcraft. After all, they had collected these items, some of them are hard to find, as most of you witches know.
However, the prosecutors did not charge the two women with the substantive crime of witchery, because, though they agreed to cast spells, none of them ever worked.
No one did any labor they did not agree to do.
No one did anyone do any labor they did not agree to do.
At the trial, the jury, which was made up, I fear, of some closet witches, laughed when the prosecutor tried to show the conspiracy by telling the jury about the types of spells and the exact language they used.
Forced Labor Spell
Incantation: “Chains of magic bind them evermore, close their brains so they can think no more. By the power of slavery’s might, make the spell and begin their forced labor plight!”
Transformation Spell – To transform adult men and women into ninnies who cannot think for themselves:
Incantation: “Mutatio Formae, shapeshift anew, from once smart and independent to blindly obedient and stupid too!”
Summoning Spell – To call forth forced laborers:
Incantation: “Vocatio Entitas, work when I call, breach the forced labor law, obey my thrall and tell the FBI to go pound a wall!”
From OneTaste to No Taste: Feds Forced Labor Fiasco
In the present case, the US Attorney argues that the indictment of Daedone and Cherwitz clearly states the object of the conspiracy.
Why else would anyone have an eye of newt? teach classes on the topics that OneTaste taught?
At the hearing last week, where Judge Gujarati denied the dismissal of the indictment, she set a firm date for trial: January 13th, 2025.
The next conference is on November 15th, 2024.
The bottom line: There was no dismissal of the indictment despite Daedone and Cherwitz contending the indictment does not identify any victims.
But as the US Attorney wrote, “Here, the Indictment clearly identifies the crime which Cherwitz and Daedone conspired to commit.”
And in doing so, he revealed his entire case:
The US Attorney wrote, “[T]he defendants overlook that the instant case charges a conspiracy and not a substantive offense. The defendants could be proven guilty if they never forced any victim to do anything—so long as the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that they agreed to do so….
“[In a] forced labor charge … the specific identity of the victim is of …significance….[I]n a conspiracy case… the proof need not establish that anyone was, in fact, victimized.”
What does it mean?
What does it mean? That Daedone and Cherwitz are accused of a victimless crime.
How will the prosecutors keep the jury from laughing them out of court?
Simple. The prosecutors will try to dirty up the defendants. Talk about sex as if it were very dirty and show what the company teaches – that women can explore their sexuality in ways that are perfectly legal – is dirty and is disapproved of by many.
Lacking a victim and presenting an implausible story of 12 years of scheming to get anyone to do labor and failing, the prosecutors will prove instead that Daedone and Cherwitz are witches. If they get an imbecile jury, they might win.
Have your broomsticks and griffin claws ready. We are about to see a 21st-century witch trial, a case that is really a case against wrong thinking.
And let us commend the US attorney for the Eastern District of NY for making Brooklyn safe from witches and ladies who think they have the right to teach what they want even if there are no victims.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Brooklyn sure has a lot of witchy women these days. Jennifer Lopez who practices Santeria witch craft and Bronfman ..
House of Cards
Evil always falls
To they allow transgenders in trans idiotic ? If a dude who identifies as a woman comes in with a big donkey derd, do they rub him I mean her off too?
I’m all for lawful investigations if they’re doing illegal activities. If they’re a cult and are causing trouble, expose it. It’s a sort of witchy sex magick -all women’s club. They could be up to all kinds of nefarious things. Up for full disclosure. But here’s the thing, the bohemian grove is a “witchy” some say demonic , all men, no women club. They’ve been linked to sexual perversions, soliciting ( sometimes under aged) prostitutes ( even accused of bringing sex slaves. And all kinds of bad things) At worst we’ve all heard about the alleged claims of satanic voo doo like sacrifice. The ridiculously powerful politicians who go there. They literally say they will kill anyone who doesn’t keep their oath to secrecy in their ritualistic oath. The drinking and partying. Men dressed up as women, but they don’t allow women in. The misogynist jokes their Hollywood actors burp out on stage to the ridiculously wealthy and powerful elite. They’ve been doing the same rituals since 1929. The Feds have never investigated them? Can’t help but wonder if they were an all women’s “club “, how long would they have lasted without the FEDS taking THEM task? They’ve been at it since 1929.
Hard 2 look at this “coven” without immediately thinking about them touching pie. Don’t want to think that way. In fact it’s the last thing I want to do. These cults are so cliche. They think they are original but they’re just creepy.
Why pay money for this nonsense?
Just grab your friends and hook up. They think they’re so free and are revolutionary.
People who have to pay money to knock their loads off are just a little pathetic.
They take themselves so seriously. The thought of them at their freak offs is hilarious. I’d laugh my ass off if I saw this.
Maybe One Taste should coin a vaggy-douche called “desperation”
You are not 100% correct. Just because they didn’t PROSECUTE for the actual charge of forced labor doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. And doesn’t mean they don’t have victims who will say it happened to them. It simply means the feds are not 100% confident that it’s enough to get a conviction. The Feds don’t charge if they are not VERY confident they will get a conviction. And they are VERY successful in doing so. Also don’t forget they have past insiders talking. Maybe even cooperating. This example of witches is sexy and makes a good headline but not substantive or analogous to this case.
sexy if you are a freak
Whoever wrote this must be some wonder bread head. The FEDS are part of the problem. They are the elite. They will boil you alive and suck off rose colored “justice “ like the meat off of a bone.
Now, go jerk off on your broom stick somewhere else.
Sometimes Rachel Cherwitz looks semi-attractive – most days she resembles Eric Stoltz in Mask.
Can Frank explain this?
what about rachel chandler
To my dear friend:
A simple Limrick:
“Break 4 Broke White Ladies”
There was a woman named Miss J.
She had a husband in cult ‘A’,
He lost all their cash
Sne had a big white ass ,
Bitch left him for his black friend Ray.
Be careful of the “genius dressed in idiot clothing”. I’m concerned the fed prosecutors are not as naive as they appear. After all, they had years to prepare.
This could be a brilliant approach in which they could bring 100s of victims to the stand as evidence, giving a jury a clear “demonstration” of many people forced to do labor by this conspiracy, yet never having to prove any of them were actually true because their truth is irrelevant. At the same time, the defendant could not touch the “victims” because their actual forced labor claims are “irrelevant” to the case.
Jurers would say “Of all these 100 stories, I’m sure at least 10% of them are true.” The defendant would be forced to do the impossible, disprove 100s of irrelevant untrue claims, which is exactly what they need to do in the public domain right now.
Are there any historic examples of the fed taking this approach towards a conspiracy with “no” victims?
What I cannot understand is, why do Democrats only want to regulate sexual contact between consenting adults? Why are they wholly unconcerned with adults raping children?
This racket was teaching orgasmic meditation and slow sex? Lol! People signed up for this sh1te? Good grief. And, what do you know, the bulk of its market was unmarried women. What a surprise. Not that the unmarried, childless woman is trying to fill any sort of void or anything.
I so happy to say that I know next to jack about this bottom feeding group but something tells me the questionable labor practices weren’t within the call center.
So glad to say I never heard of this degenerate group before today. My life just got worse.
Wait Did not India s mother do this? Oxenburg? From dy-nasty
Brilliant! I’m just about done gathering the ingredients
I enjoyed your last three contribution Frank. Thank you so much for your succinct writing. You had my attention at “adversarial” and for me this a is an important point. Allow me to step back a bit. 8 years ago, in my first exposure to the two defendants in NY. I was struck with their dedication to unmask projections on all levels and the relentless pursuit for honest interactions between individuals. And now I see the dichotomy that an adversarial legal system is so excellently providing us throughout the entire US culture. For now, I am on the side of the two defendants. My personal acid test is the reason for it. It goes like this: What is the endgame of the opposing (adversarial) sides? On the prosecution side is the steeple chase of those involved for money, fame and status (winning at all costs). The other side are seekers for more avenues of the human condition for personal growth. Adversarial systems have a place, but progress comes from new experiences and asking questions relentlessly. Our civilization has much to thank the ancient Greeks for. To me the seeker’s (defendants in this case) the endgame is personal growth for all individuals involved. It is open ended toward the creative of new. The steeple chase is limited to the tip of the steeple, a closed system. I go with open to the creative. What could be more American for our democracy which traces its roots back to the Greeks?
Men 😆 🤣 😂
“You blind-retards! One Taste is not a cult! Beware anti-cultists lest you ye incur thy wrath.”
-Alanzo of Alanzo’s Blog
Yep! He’s back!
“The company-hosted evening OM circles in Manhattan sometimes held 30 or more pairs of strokers and strokees in one room, the fully clothed men concentrating on their moving fingertips while the women, naked from the waist down, moaned, wailed, and sighed. Afterward, Michal and her co-workers would run that night’s OneTaste event, where they set up chairs, jogged the microphone over to attendees, and chatted up more sales leads.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-06-18/the-dark-side-of-onetaste-the-orgasmic-meditation-company
This truly feels like modern day witch trials.
It is a cult. I know someone who was in it. Like many other cults, it runs much deeper into human trafficking. Just the tip of the iceberg.
Frank -Please would you think about writing about the University pro Palestine protests? I believe these students are in a cult without knowing that they are.
They are in a cult
“Anything I don’t like is a cult. Anything I agree with or am paid to agree with is cool.” 👍🏻
Makes total sense.
Anonymous – Look up the signs of being a cult.
I was in one, so I’m well aware. Frank Parlato is the one who seems to have lost t he plot.
…And if Frank disagrees with you – he’s a toady. Sigh.
I do not ever want you to feel uncomfortable, but speaking of cults, did you ever deprogram a certain Mrs. J, whose husband was a member of a cult that began with the letter “A”?
There was a woman named Miss J
She had a husband in cult ‘A’,
He lost all their cash
She had a nice ass
There was a woman named Miss J.
She had a husband in cult ‘A’,
He lost all their cash
She had a nice ass
So She left him for his best friend Ray.
***
I Smelled Limerick Challenge!
Challenge accepted!
Game-match-set winner! 🏆
Don’t forget to watch the U.S. Open!
There was a woman named Miss J.
She had a husband in cult ‘A’,
He lost all their cash
Sne had a nice ass ,
She left him for his best friend Ray.
***
I Smelled Limerick Challenge!
Challenge accepted!
Game-match-set winner! 🏆
There’s no hope for any American if the US Gastapo of Justice sets its sights on you. Off to the concentration camps. Scary stuff
I think the real shame here is the role of the modern “feminist” women who think they are being progressive by supporting this ‘war on sex’…and the 21st century version of a witch trial
Why don’t people just go f&ck? Just wave your freak flag and your hackie sax and call it a day? Everyone wants to blab about it and turn it into something unusual, “ erotic”, feminist, masculine, pronouns, Halloween masks, & bubble wands. Got sad news for yall, ain’t nothing new happening now that hasn’t happened in the past. It’s been done so much, overkill that normal is the new black. One taste is manufactured, boring and desperate at best, mind controlled psychopaths who are laundering money into other channels, trafficking people to the higher ups. All of it is just lame. Ladies, we understand you have clitoris. It’s okay. No one is doubting you. Most people like to f$ck. So just jerk yourself off, each other, do whatever. But stop being dumb asses, acting like your orgasms are unique . Grab some kyjelly. Leave us alone.
Classic witch hunt.
These women have so much courage and always have.
Laughable.
Is female sexuality unleashed so frightening society needs to scare it back into the shadows?
Seems we are stepping back in time to 1600 Salem.
This is the 21st century and we are prosecuting women for trying to empower themselves and harness their sexual energy and calling it witchcraft. For goodness sakes people doesn’t Brooklyn have better things to do with their tax money?
It was more than this. To underestimate is diminishing to the individuals; the organization and most significantly the women. Shame on you for your narrow scope of perspective.
That’s a joke, right?
This case is not about sex. It’s about illegal activity.
Go back to your sex club and sprikle some “goodness sakes” on it, Marcus Aurelius.
My fav line “How will the prosecutors keep the jury from laughing them out of court?”
*claps*
Thank you!!
Bravo. “No one did any labor they did not agree to do. No one did anyone do any labor they did not agree to do.” These are the facts. The rest is as good a fiction as Fairy Dust and Goblin’s Earwax.
Delusional.
The case itself is laughable, yet the impact on those charged so baselessly is so onerous and unjust as to be a major setback for these two pioneering women, and for all of us working to free ourselves from medieval patriarchal sexual morality
Just the cost of defending yourself from federal charges is ruinous alone, never mind the mental and emotional and physical impact
I’m appalled, I’m embarrassed, I’m ashamed and I’m so heartfully sorry
Not baseless or onerous. Dispicable towards the women you apparently sought to honor and worship. You were used as a cog in the wheel. I do thank you for your abundance and desire to bring women to a place of expansiveness. This just wasn’t the credible way.
First of all, I’m curious if there has ever been a precedent for this? Have the Feds convicted anyone simply for conspiracy of forced labor? And if so, were the details also so vague? That would be interesting to know.
If this case really does bring up the “salacious details” of the very clean and consensual practices of Orgasmic Meditation, which have nothing to do with the conspiracy to force labor charges, then it’s a frightening time indeed. It really would be a witch trial before our very eyes.
I have in the past explained, very clearly, OM practices I have participated in, to friends and acquaintances, and the next thing I know is, they are talking about orgies and porn. Which just goes to prove what is going on in *their* minds is not at all what’s happening in my reality.
Sex is powerfully terrifying for so many, and if anything about sex is brought up for the jury in this case that has nothing to do with it (as all the genital touching was consensual among adults!), then we have a clear case of dirty-minded prosecutors muddying things up just because they themselves can’t understand.
The same old story which we, trust me, really don’t want to relive again.
Many cases of conspiracy without the forced labor charge. Yes. The details in the indictment are always minimal. The prosecution only lays out enough to charge. They save most of their best cards for trial.
The Salem trials.
If me and my wife have a conversation about how we are going to get our children and the roommates to do their chores, does that mean that we are conspiring to forced child labor?
When prosecutors nationwide agree that their conviction rate is more important than justice and will do whatever it takes to get a guilty verdict through manipulation of character, loopholes, and other tactics for their own personal gain (ie A conviction rate that will further their political or employment opportunities) at the expensive a defendant, does that equate to a substantive racketeering?
When does the prosecution itself become the perpetrator and the defendant the victim?
I knew there was something wrong with this whole case. The prosecutor got the charges wrong. It is witchcraft.
Someone cast a spell on Daedone and. Cherwitz. They tried to force people to labor for -2 years and failed?
Sounds like sorcery on the part of the FBI.
Ask Jlo, she knows all about the doo and the voo and the FBI. So does Jamie Foxx and Puff Daddy. All the way to South Beach…
You know ever since Salem this country has not had much trouble with witches.
It may have been a little cruel. It may have been a little fast but the stake worked pretty damn good.
You have these women teaching some bad teaching stuff women aren’t supposed to do. The US Attorney is doing the right thing here.
Find whatever law you can find to stop them.
The real thing is you have a serious moral crime.
Sorry Tyler, NO moral crime here.
The OM Practice is THE MOST effective way to drop into one’s vulnerability, in order to mine one’s fears, traumas and blockages. In order to achieve personal growth. Period. And the delivery of that practice, becoming an employee, volunteer, teacher, or even investor, apparently has an additional, albeit advanced set of learnings, should you happen to be low on your discernment skills.
As a practitioner (OneTaste OM Customer) – I’ve never been so out of my comfort zone in my life. But until then, I had never uncovered what stood in my way of furthering my personal development. So yes, there’s some scary shit when you follow your desires, but it’s on you and only you. It’s your work. When you allow yourself to be vulnerable (with boundaries), you grow. Like I said, an awesome practice.
As a teacher (OneTaste OM Coach) – I had to pay money and I had to show up. Both were difficult for me and sure, there is FOMO pressure to do more than you can maybe afford. But if you don’t have good personal boundary skills and you believe someone outside of yourself is going to save you, then spending big bucks on big OM events and/or training to be an OM Coach will perhaps give you even more skills for your tool box.
That IS the whole point.
The spells in this article are humorously close though. They actually address the problem with all of the folks that adopted herd mentality and jumped on the victim bandwagon when prompted with the opportunity in this federal case to do so: pretty much the state of consciousness of our current world. Let’s be clueless. Don’t need no stink’n boundaries; someone better save me.
😂 you taught this sh1te?
“Women aren’t supposed to do” what exactly?
Are you fucking serious? Salem witch trials were absurd and 1000% based in fear and ZERO EVIDENCE. Innocent women were killed based on FEAR AND FEAR ALONE. And that is exactly what’s happening in this trial. It’s 1000% fear based and without evidence.
1st of all witches aren’t dangerous, in fact a lot of modern day practices are taken from paganism which no one talks about.
Tyler Swift do you put up Christmas trees in your house for Christmas? Because guess what, paganism or “witches teaching bad things” created the practice of Christmas trees.
If witches are so dangerous and evil we better tell America and the government to stop using Christmas trees or something bad might happen.
In fact Tyler, I’m a witch and I just put a spell on you. A spell to wake the fuck up.
The other witches got to me and taught me thing woman aren’t supposed to teach.
Witches are dangerous. That doesnt mean that Christians arent. Go back to frying your frogs lady.