Bye-Bye Billables: Shared Parenting Law Threatens Family Court Cash Flow

March 8, 2024
The world of family court and its denizens have a motto of their own -- "Let us prey."
Shared Parenting is a concept that recognizes that both parents should have equal rights to raise, live with, interact and support their children.  It promotes the idea that rather than family court judges deciding which parent should have custody and who should pay support, both parents have to work together and share custody.  The judge would be required only to enforce shared custody (absent extraordinary circumstances).
Presently, custody is solely the judge’s decision, often based on recommendations of for-profit court actors. If shared custody became law, the family court’s multi-billion divorce and custody business would be obliterated. Family law attorneys, therapists, and custody evaluators would lose their livelihoods and have to find another grift to engage in.
Taxpayers would save since there would be far less need for Family Court judges, and courtrooms would close.
Today’s Family Court depends on naive Americans who believe that political judges guided by mercenary lawyers, who are aided by mercenary therapists, guardians ad litem, custody supervisors, attorneys for children, custody evaluators, and other financially motivated court actors, will do a fair and honest job in deciding the future of their children in an altruistic manner.
Foolish parents think the adage “the best interest of the children” means their children. A word of clarification: The best interest of the children means the attorneys’ children.
The silver bullet works great in divorce cases. Merely make up a phony charge against your spouse, and he’s cooked,
Shared Parenting would help eliminate the Silver Bullet (false allegations made by mothers to eliminate the father’s custody) and the misuse of Parental Alienation (usually false claims made by fathers to stop the mother’s custody).

Sean Allen is the CT chair of the National Parents Organization and SPC.

They are “currently working on a project to erect a billboard that advocates for shared parenting and provides solutions for families in transition. This billboard will serve as a beacon of hope and guidance for individuals seeking support and information… By raising awareness and promoting the importance of shared parenting, we can empower families to navigate the court system with confidence and clarity.”

Click here to make a donation

Anthony Cancel is a father who fought in family court to win 50/50 custody of his son.

After so doing, he founded Pro Se Dad to support other parents in similar situations. Visit Dad Connect (https://www.dadconnect.org).

What are the statistics?

Szymonik’s View

Peter Szymonik, a Constitutional and Civil Rights Activist
Autism Advocate writes:

One of the biggest problems we all face is the lack of access to meaningful statistics and metrics.

    • Do mothers get full custody more than fathers?
    • How often do our courts promote and order equal and shared parenting?
    • Does money play a role in outcomes?
    • Who is ordered to pay what?
    • What are GALs paid?
    • What are the attorneys paid?
    • How many cases are returned to court? (That one we know from former Chief State Justice Rogers)
    • What is the average number of motions filed?
    • What is the average length and cost of a custody case?
    • How many cases involve claims of DV?
    • How many of these claims are supported by a finding in a court of evidence and law based on probable cause?
    • How many court orders are appealed and overturned?
    • Which attorneys appear before which judges most often?
    • Does that have an impact on outcomes?
    • Etc.

We all have our personal experiences and (biases), but the hard data is not out there because the states and courts need to track outcomes or costs.

The information IS available, just not readily accessible, or it is being deliberately kept from us.

Some have created surveys, and that’s a step in the right direction, but not broad enough.

There is a site where people can rate their judges (www.therobingroom.com), but few know it exists.

Very shortly, A.I. may help unlock this information.

DiRubba’s View

Dr. Luigi DiRubba
Dr Luigi DiRubba

Luigi DiRubba, who lost custody and the right to see his children after his wife used the Silver Bullet repeatedly on him, has been an advocate for shared parenting. He writes:

Does anyone have CT information? CT is one of the only states without stats listed

Shared Parenting Statistics | TFRM

If you’re on Facebook, join this group regarding custodial interference in Connecticut.

   

Also read this: High Conflict: Is Connecticut’s family court system ignoring abuse?

The Best Interest of the Child LOL

Lawyers and judges discuss “the best interest of the children.”
The child’s best interest LMFAO.

“Shared Parenting” removes the decision from the judges and their mercenary associates. It requires parents to act responsibly to work out a plan (much as they did when they decided to unite) and denies one parent the opportunity to use the financially-driven Family Court system to remove the other parent from the children’s lives.

Family court judges have plenty to be happy about. They live a life of ease without a jury to hamper their unbridled power.

For whatever reason, Family Court attracts a certain type of lawyer.

If Judge Roy Bean were alive, he could explain the due process principles applicable in family court.
author avatar
Frank Parlato
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
5 1 vote
Article Rating

Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

219 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

This what our AG Tong is concerned about! headline chaser like Bloomer!Paying more for groceries? CT investigating if stores are price gouging (news12.com) Going after legitimated businesses trying to pay their employees and ct payroll taxes. Why dont they look into all these fires and accidents at our farms and so called “bird flus”??? Put more Bodegas out of business so they can all go to Amazon, Target & Walmart! How about the price gouging to people going through divorce having to pay $500 hour attorneys and gal’s and the assets FC’s take away from families in CT! AG get the priorities straight! Kids are being stripped from parents and you are worried about things you cant control.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

The fool costello out of business? The court jester! Go to the court judiciary in civil and see how many lawsuits he has against his own clients. Now he is selling his building? Retiring? Quitting ? A client took him to court in Stamford for 1/2 million i think that they lost because he didnt do his job correctly or should i say his little minions! I believe he settled as it disappeared! Maybe the client got his building! Biz dried up? Over the holidays he was advertising like crazy on optimum channel 12! He used to be a credit collections lawyer! https://febbraiocommercial.com/property/1232-post-rd-fairfieldct/

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Propaganda

🤔 Did “family courts” destroy families on purpose?
🤔 Did “family courts” destroy families on purpose?
1 year ago

The body in its entirety would become . . . a thing to be enjoyed—an instrument of pleasure. This change in the value and scope in libidinal relationships would lead to a disintegration of the institutions in which the private interpersonal relations have been organized, particularly the monogamic and patriarchal family.

— Herbert Marcuse

Chief Justice Robinson.
Chief Justice Robinson.
1 year ago

We are all equal and no one is above the law. The state of Connecticut family court is not run on law. It’s run on the fatherhood initiative, policy and procedures. The state of Connecticut has given these people immunity. Placing them above the law. People are purchasing out comes. The courts are letting criminals plea bargain and go free. Where is equal justice in the state of Connecticut when you force psychologist on cases. How is anyone considered an expert in something that doesn’t exist? Unrecognized and unorthodox running your courts. Justice or a hoax?

Two-tiered justice ...
Two-tiered justice ...
1 year ago

“… To be convicted of felony stalking, he must be proven to have “knowingly” engaged in conduct that would cause a “reasonable” person to fear for his physical safety or the safety of a loved one. It would have to be proven that Boyne did so with no legitimate purpose other than harassing, terrorizing or alarming on the basis of “race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity.” The statute also prohibits the disclosure of a victim’s personal identifying information without a “legitimate” purpose. …”

How many Connecticut “family court” judges, attorneys and various private vendors have “knowingly” engaged in conduct that would cause a “reasonable” person to fear for his or her physical safety or the safety of loved one(s)? (Jennifer Dulos wasn’t the only victim of Connecticut family courts who feared for her life and the safety of her loved ones.)

How many Connecticut “family court” judges, attorneys and various private vendors do so with no legitimate purpose other than harassing, terrorizing or alarming on the basis of “race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity.”? (Parents and children with traditional morals and values are often severely punished in Connecticut “family courts”.)

How often does “family court” disclose victims’ personal identifying information without a “legitimate” purpose? (When state judicial branch and private companies publish bogus court opinions and orders from fraudulent court proceedings: Victims’ personal identifying information is disclosed without a “legitimate” purpose.)

https://www.courant.com/2024/03/12/bail-reduced-for-notorious-blogger-who-claims-posts-vilifying-ct-judges-are-protected-speech/

SMH
SMH
1 year ago

The Golden Uterus Syndrome, is a belief held by some mothers, that their child’s best interests are synonymous with their own. They prioritize their role as a parent above all else and derive their self-worth solely from being a mother.
Why does parental alienation happen?
One reason parental alienation can start involves a parent having come to rely on their child for emotional support, a need that intensifies during a divorce. To continue supporting the parent, and without evidence to the contrary, the child comes to believe and internalize the alienating parents’ vitriol. Other motivations include revenge, jealousy, the financial extortion.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/…/parental-alienation
Is parental alienation real?
The psychological community does not recognize parental alienation as a diagnosable condition. However, brainwashing a child to hate a parent does occur and is recognized by the courts (provided there’s robust evidence). Unfortunately, there are also instances of false allegations of alienation for custody or financial purposes.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/…/parental-alienation

One sided ALIENATION INDUSTRY. Cash is King
One sided ALIENATION INDUSTRY. Cash is King
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

The male ego. Father knows best. Women don’t contribute. She wants to leave so I will disgard her. I’ll take over and control. I will not take responsibility for the things I have done. ” She is Crazy”. I don’t want anyone to know what is really going on inside my house. I will tell everyone she brain washed the kids. I’m unable to take responsibility for my own failures. I will punish her take the children because I am competitive and just can’t loose. I will get what I want at all cost. I will mentally and financially drain her. I’ll label her an alienators when my children are reporting and trying to escape when I show them they are my property. Two sides to everyone’s story. It’s depends on who is going to win it. My ego is worth more than my children.

The golden ticket
The golden ticket
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

In 1996 the golden ticket was born. A new weapon in family court to gain leverage in family court cases. Parental alienation. Getting back at women for leaving and reporting. The family law industry quickly fell in love and started the AFCC. We will pretend that domestic violence only happens in low income communities. Pedophiles don’t want to be discovered so we can label children and women crazy and liars. We will be able to change as much as we want and hold these children ransom. We will punish women for not obstaing. Boys will be boys. The government wants to hold people responsible financially. We can create a system that punished women for leaving. Trapping them or sell off the children. Profiting billions.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

The belly of the beast is in the welfare reform act. The leaders and the head of the snake is in the policies and procedures running the courts not the law and child welfare. The fatherhood initiative is running family court. The entire system is running on the MOU and the partnership. The AFCC and ALIENATION industry. Psychological warfare the use of Media and propaganda. Changing statistics and self reporting. Multi millions of dollars. Focusing on cost reduction. The languestics and the gender issues. It’s all related. The culture. Misogyny, money and mayhem.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The pilot program

Fraud upon the court
Fraud upon the court
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

Robust Bank account for fraud and material misrepresention.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

Robust? The wind blows and it’s ALIENATION in family court.

Simple mind
Simple mind
1 year ago

Water ain’t gonna clear up till you get the pigs out of the creek got it

Upton Sinclair
Upton Sinclair
1 year ago
Reply to  Simple mind

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

Simple mind
Simple mind
1 year ago
Reply to  Upton Sinclair

It’s difficult to get a woman to understand when the handouts are discussed being taken away, they get the feeling that they should be entitled

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Simple mind

Hand outs? Get a grip

Living in an altered reality. The false Utopia
Living in an altered reality. The false Utopia
1 year ago
Reply to  Simple mind

Have you been to a domestic violence shelter? Have you tried to live off state assistance? While Connecticut legistors travel to far off lands to turn the penitentiary into a country club. The domestic violence shelters are full. The Ccadv is looking for food donations. The fatherhood initiative is vacationing in New Port. Women are divorcing are blamed for the united states economic problems.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Its disgusting and should stop! FC is abused by the spouse that wants to make the other party look like they are to blame! Its a tool! Young people stay single and figure new and innovative ways to co habitat. Also, where’s the church? If they want families to exist they should fight the crimes in FC! All a scam! Stay safe!

Is Mr. O’Neill Mr. Adelman’s clean-up guy?
Is Mr. O’Neill Mr. Adelman’s clean-up guy?
1 year ago

Mr. Adelman (again) and Mr. Freedman (again) … and Mr. O’Neill?

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=FBTFA124038534S

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

… This is not the only independently submitted tip about Freedman and the Connecticut Family Court system that led to a conversation with Inside Investigator. …

https://insideinvestigator.org/best-interest-of-the-child-one-mothers-fight-against-a-claim-of-parental-alienation/

Wake up America
Wake up America
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Freeman. How many hundreds of dollars an hour is he receiving from judges and GALs ordering his services? Services that assist the state of Connecticut to guide statistics? Guide policy and procedures based on the MOU? Freeman on the ground floor of the golden ticket. Steady paycheck rubber stamping alienators. Held above the law and eithical guidelines of his profession. Education guided towards parental alienation. ” We are all equal in the eyes of the law” . A system based on an initiative this is a falicy. Women are loosing custody of their children based on policy and procedures of the fatherhood initiative. A test program violating the civil rights of women. With deadly consequences and atrocities. All hidden by political motive for money. Children for sale for federal funding. Hidden from public scrutiny and knowledge. The ” culture” economic growth and development at the cost of oppression and lives.

50/50 supporter
50/50 supporter
1 year ago

Children deserve to have both parents in their lives. (I’m not including abusiivle now) Not providing that stability for a parent to have a equal share in their children’s day to day up bringing us such a violation of a God given right. Who are the Courts to intefere in a God given right? Who knows their children better than loving parent who can provide better guidance than a loving parents. Parents might fight with each other during a separation but their anger towards each other cannot affect the child. Using the child as a weapon is further spirited by a poor court decission. Its sad but thats the reality and the only ones that are really suffering are the childten. Courts should stop playing God.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

The state of Connecticut and several other states are hiding abuse. BIOLOGY IS NOT AN ENTITLEMENT!!!!!! IT DOESN’T ENSURE HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS!!!!!!! This is and continues to be a profound and significant clogging up family court!!!!!! Sperm and egg donation. PARHOLOGICAL PARENTING. The inability to meet the needs of children based on YOUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS!! THIS SYSTEM IS A COMPLETE AND UTTTER SHIT SHOW. Get your shit together family court judges. STOP USING MONEY TO DECIDE FAMILY COURT CASES!!!!!!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

How many fit & loving parents have had to prove their parenting ability, yet it was never once questioned or a concern before the divorce?

We are not talking about the same thing!!
We are not talking about the same thing!!
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

WE are Not Talking About those people!!!! We are talking about pedipiies and abusers! Unfortunately fit parents both mom’s and dad’s being eliminated for Money. While proven abusers of all colors, religion gender and socioeconomic status for finding and greed in the family law industry.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

People often don’t put their business on the streets. Domestic violence, sexual assault man or woman. People don’t leave right away. People live under conditions. it takes courage to leave.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Trash education on exploiting marriage , men and society
Believe all woman? lol I give can give you 11 reason not to in a heartbeat. Entitlement society for the pseudo feminist movement.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Women haters. What are you afraid of? You can’t control them? Women have the right to live free from male terrorism. So do children. Stay single buddy before you damage more human life. Get it together.

SMH
SMH
1 year ago

In marriage
She stays: you pay
She goes: you pay
She make false claims: you pay
She cheats: you pay
She lies & steals: you pay
You go:you pay

Single women own 2.71 million more homes than single men
Does the 90% awarding of child + spousal support have anything to do with that? And the fact that 90% of the prison population is men??
Access to government programs that men don’t have and men getting hosed in divorce will do that.
Primarily caused by a sexist divorce, and family judicial system.
How many of the single women r divorcées n bought the home with The guys dollars.

All for equality. 😂

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

Women then Are contributing a greater share through property taxes, interesting. Look at the Dulos case. The money was hers. It goes either way. The government resources contributed to fathers is the largest of just about all the government programs. The law industry knows it. It’s contributing to the problem with in the courts. Because of the welfare reform act it is driving the trafficking train. Changing statistics and guiding policy based on a gender.

SMH
SMH
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Got to back farther than that to get to the cause of the problem

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

Claiming to be leaders. You are attempting to dominate the family court system. Close minds lead to big problems

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The problem is in Congress and the Senate. Stop complaining to William Tong. He represents the state. Not the people. Sitting at the right hand of Richard Blumenthal despensing all the money. If you want to change the legal landscape file the complaints with the federal inspector generals office. The federal department of public health. The family court is run off the MOU and partnership. The health and human services treating domestic violence as a public health crisis. You are wasting your time with the legislators. The courts run on policy and collective bargaining agreements. Judicial discretion. Father’s and families, the culture and use of government funding to promote a gender over another for parenting. Languestics changes and the changes in statistics and reporting.

Blame women ... or, depopulation?
Blame women ... or, depopulation?
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

Single women own 2.71 million more homes than single men.

Age-specific estimates of mean testosterone (T) concentrations appear to vary by year of observation and by birth cohort, and estimates of longitudinal declines in T typically outstrip cross-sectional decreases. These observations motivate a hypothesis of a population-level decrease in T over calendar time, independent of chronological aging.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6732874_A_Population-Level_Decline_in_Serum_Testosterone_Levels_in_American_Men

SMH
SMH
1 year ago

Those are the effects of the feminist movement. Cha Ching

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

Hard work and modern times. Women are legally allowed to have home ownership. It’s legal for women to purchase homes without a man. Does this bother you? Does it bother you that women have demonstrated the ability to be independent? Does it bother you that they are paying taxes and have the right to vote? Does it bother you that women can realize the dream of home ownership and create a stable environment for children? If women owning homes independently and paying taxes into the system bothers you, it’s because you can not continue to label them of low economic value. Why does independence upset you!

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

This is the point to be made. NONE OF US GET A MONEY BACK GUERINTEE IF THE MARRAGE DOESN’T WORK OUT. The issues you are speaking of have nothing to do with the welfare of children. The custody issues are different. The state of Connecticut is a fault state. People choose not to file fault cases believing it will decrease cost and emotional toll. They drag you to trial any way with custody. Man, or women. It’s a tactic to run you out of money and sanity. THE LAWYERS MAKE TONS OF CASH. Infidelity is something the judges and legal community could care less about. Half of them are in open marriages. At some point you got to let go of some things to move on. Equity and the well-being of children are a separate issue. Many women have good jobs and buy their own homes. These are old fashion notions brought into modern day court rooms. Couples have a choice to have a stay home parent and was an implied agreement in the marriage. In the modern court room judges focus on the stay-at-home mothers gain employment. Being a caretaker for children has become unfashionable in today’s society. Often held against a stay-at-home parent the children’s life are turned upside down.
Abuse and controlling behaviors are being ignored and blamed on women and relabeled as a community violence and coveting abusers. Making excuses. MANY ABUSIVE MEN ARE NOT RECIEVING SERVICES. Women often reach out for services and for their children. Reunification IS NOT ADDRESSING ABUSIVE BEHAVIOR OF THE OFFENDING PARENT. Aiding into the cycle of abuse. The victims are being punished by the court for not going along with PIOLET PROGRAM. Reunification therapy and the label of alienation are used to excuse and victim blame. Abuse is not allowed to be brought up in court or talked about. Covering the whole situation up. SAVING ON MONEY. PLEASE READ THE CONNECTICUT FATHERHOOD INITATIVE PROGRAMS. THESE ARE VOLINATARY PROGRAMS. PRISON PROGRAMS AND JUDGES ARE NOT ORDERING ABUSIVE MEN TO PROGRAMS. LEADING TO THE CYCLE OF ABUSE Continue. INSTEAD ORDER THE CHILDREN TO REUNITE WITH UNREGULATED AND ORTHODOX TREATMENT. Better yet, handing the children over to ABUSERS.
CONNECTICUT IS RECIEVING MILLIONS FOR THE PROGRAM AND IS BEING USED, PILIOTED IN THE STATE. PEDIPHILES ARE BEING PROTECTED WITH LANGUSTICS.

It’s all based on economics. THE STATE OF CONNECTICUTE IS BEING USED AS GUINEA PIGS for the piolet program. PEOPLE ARE DYING AND LIVING UNDER ABUSIVE CONDITIONS. INCLUDING CHILDREN. CONNECTICUT IS ATTEMPTING TO REBRAND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND DECRIMINALIZE IT. Receiving millions through the health and human services to treat it as a public health crisis that is why NO ONE IS ALLOWED TO BRING IT UP IN LEGAL MATTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO ONE IS ADDRESSING THE FAMILY COURT PROBLEM. FOR MEN OR WOMEN.

50/50 is another way to BURY the problem.

SMH
SMH
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Says the woman receiving $

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  SMH

Single mom. No child support. Daddy is a financial, emotional, physical and emotional abuser. The money is not worth the abuse

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

File for child support that is when the family court shit show begins!!!!!!!! It’s all about the money. Responsible fatherhood. Father and paternal family. Read the fatherhood initiative paperwork. Motherhood is only allowed if you stay married. Languestics legal discrimination. The government program. It is a Senate and congressional problem.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Does Luigi dirubba pay child support

The Real Deal.
The Real Deal.
1 year ago

The Real Deal told by the mental health professionals outside the Alienation Industry Dominating the United States Court System! A non-recognized hypothesis. Encouraged, condoned and allowed by Connecticut Family court judges and judges across the country.

Psychology Today September 2019

With a parental and judicial focus on “fairness” children discover the must surrender to this “fairness” standard (over best interest). They must do whatever they are told is fair for Dad or Mom.

Children learn to ignore and subordinate their emotion and developmental needs and defer to parents and judicial wants and needs for this fairness. Federalism.

Each child realizes they must endure the difficulties, and sometimes-downright chaos, of alternating of alternating living in two places and solo with two different adults.

Children eventually discover they have their emotional and physical needs met best by one parent. Commonly they are relaxed in one household. With the other parent they discover they must function in psychologically inappropriate ways.

(The mou in Connecticut is focused on the fathers needs rather than the child)

THIS IS NOT NEWLY OCCURING IN DIVORCE, but children must negotiate each parent separately. (including abusive parents) from when they lived together. THIS IS MORE DIFFICULT FOR THE CHILD.

The Emotional fallout of children

In my experience, the children feel tremendous expectations to please at least one parent. The parent who wants their own needs emotional well-being. (read the MOU in Connecticut).

These children describe feeling pressured emotionally. Often become emotionally and physically overwhelmed and exhausted. They suffer anxiety, depression, academic failure, self -devaluation, and reduced self-esteem. In adolescence, they may become substance abusers or attempt suicide. May children forced to live with the other parent claiming alienation have been hospitalized and the Connecticut family court judges are ignoring it.

Part of the suffering and symptoms are due to the continual physical relocation of living in two different households. The message is “put my emotional needs first “. Which can be clearly seen in the Connecticut fatherhood mou. Does happen when children are forced to live with their mother in some cases.

ANOTHER REASON FOR EMOTIONAL UPSET AND ILLNESS IS THE CHILD’S NOT BEING ABLE TO PLEASE THE PARENT THAT MOST WANTS 50/50 LIVING ARRANGEMENT.

When a child is unable to fulfill this parent this parent’s needs, the child becomes anxious and depressed and believes she is a failure or a bad person. WELCOME TO THE PSYCHOLOGICAL WAREFARE OF UNREGULATED UNRECOGNIZED PARENTAL ALIENATION INDUSTRY WAGES ON CHILDREN THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND SEVERAL OTHER COUNTRIES.

FERERALISM OVER BEST INTEREST. EQUIATY OVER BEST INTEREST

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Connecticut believe children should still receive a standard of living in 50/50 . Child support obligation will still be considered. So if that is your objective it’s not likely to happen.

Donald Trump
Donald Trump
1 year ago

Trumpers , I don’t get made I get even. You know the attack you have been experiencing in court. United States citizens have been experiencing the same in family court. Please come to Connecticut and prosicute these Democrats who have been using federal funding. Please investigate the fraud and medical malpractice going on in the state of Connecticut.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Donald Trump

Mr. Trump isn’t the Savior of the world. Oprah isn’t either. Why do Connecticut residents need anyone to rescue them? Can’t they help themselves?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

40,000 state workers in a state of 3.6 mil maybe more with recent influx. I have seen it all in CT. How does a person with a 1 mil property in FL, 500k prop in CT, owns 4 boat slips that rents out, 3 vehicles, trailer, motorcycles get on Husky (knee/hip/carpal tunnel surgeries), subsidized energy and EBT. somethings wrong! Why doesn’t the state have that person liquidate his assets to pay for his lifestyle! All grifters including the State Judicial. Since when should marriage be a crime. I can go on for weeks! I have seen census employees ask me about inhabitants to a neighbor and I wasn’t even sure I was giving the details. They lived together and probably collected benefits and didn’t want to answer the door as 1 had a government job. Its a game here! Lamont to weak to make CT great again! Probably nice guy! Ganim keeps winning BPT???? See???

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Welcome to Corrupticut

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Marriage is not illegal. You are actually punished for being single.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Not under the current government

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

well the story i just told is current and on-going! state is incompetent! maybe some good people but most just want to grift! How Overpaid Are State and Local Government Workers Compared to Private? – MishTalk

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The entire state should be under investigation.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Like they are doing to trump they will come after you! They made it clear! We have more sheep than lions! Fall in line or else!

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Fall in the assembly line of the court system. Cookie cutter divorces. The failure to present legal arguments and evidence to support those arguments. In the best interest of children for either party. This is the obstruction of justice to parents in family court. I’m sure they would like to put a bow on it. Punish the fraud in the court. The people involved in it. This is America land of the free and home of the brave. Stop federalism from taking away the voice of the people. Remember that when you are pulling your electric cars through Starbucks.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Is Oprah advocating for family court change?

Proudly serving and protecting
Proudly serving and protecting
1 year ago

Breaking news from Boston. Corporal Allen Gantor meridian CT. Arrested, suspended for 5 days for reaching in and punching a man in the face. Proudly serving and protecting. These are the people responding to DV complaints.

Just Curious
Just Curious
1 year ago

Why did you post that comment?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Just Curious

Violence protected by violence. Many police department mishandling domestic violence and sexual assault.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Maybe our officers need more help, not less.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Police department definitely need more help. It’s the hired help that is the problem.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

We need police to serve and protect and I am sure they are not having an easy time with whats going on!

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

People are having a hard time. Especially the women falsely arrested because of the Bloomfield police officer. The legislator who was the victim of an attempted sexual assault was having a hard time . People reporting sexual assault and domestic violence labeled false reporting are having a hard time. Connecticut is such a safe place to live and the crime rate is low. What is the problem? Prosecutor trying to prosecute crimes are called aggressive and blocked from sitting on the Court bench. It’s all criminal defense lawyers and family law attorneys on the bench. I wonder why?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

There are a lot of women found dead in rivers and resivors in the last year? There having beyond a hard time. What is going on in Connecticut?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

the hired help”?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

South Windsor. A Glastonbury man a police officer accused of 45 robberies. From CT, Rhode Island and Mass. CLEAN Up the trash in the police department. Stop pushing out the good cops trying to clean up the internal problems. Like Newington. These police chiefs are only as good as the department they are given to work with. Governor Lamont. The courts are only as good as the judges you put on the bench. Stop stacking the courts with criminal laws and divorce attorneys. Put some lawyers who are fighting crimes and injustice in society. Your state is a mess.

🤔
🤔
1 year ago

Was Brian Hill Director of the “ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT UNIT” when he represented Stephen Grant at the January 10, 2017 meeting?

Mr. Grant was director of CSSD for many years. Under which circumstances did Mr. Grant leave Connecticut employment? Nothing’s showing up anywhere online about his leaving.

Did he leave in 2017 when parents exposed for-profit public-private AFCC, Inc. extortion partnerships acting with judicial authority and judicial immunity in the state family courts?

What do Connecticut FBI offices know about The Connecticut Chapter of AFCC, Inc.?

Can we find official records about AFCC, Inc. in the state to see how Connecticut courts became the money-making machines they are today?

Was Mr. Grant the scapegoat? Why is Mr. Adelman still working in the judicial branch?

What does Mr. Grant know and would he share what he knows about The Connecticut Chapter of AFCC Inc.?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  🤔

The Connecticut Judicial Ethics Committee met in 2013 to discuss an unnamed corporation (The Connecticut Chapter of AFCC, Inc.) led by unnamed director (Mr. Gerard Adelman), treasurer (Mr. Bruce Freedman) and secretary (Mr. Robert Horwitz).

Around that time, someone said the FBI guys said that public-private extortion ring was too big and too complicated to do anything about it.

Can the State Comptroller tell us how many millions or billions of dollars Connecticut’s “family court” vendors took from children, families and taxpayers since then?

https://www.scribd.com/doc/134247461/AFCC-CT-Judicial-Branch-Taxpayer-Funded-GAL-Training-Boon

Can someone interpret the sign language?
Can someone interpret the sign language?
1 year ago
Reply to  🤔

On September 9, 2015, task force members discussed federal funding of state programs, the value of fact-finding to achieve their goals and the importance of data collection to determine how federal funds are used in the state agencies handling various aspects of domestic violence and abuse cases involving minor children.  

At about the 1:01:58 minute mark, Mr. Grant communicates with someone off-camera with hand gestures. 

Just Curious
Just Curious
1 year ago

Who was off to the side, receiving those interesting signals?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Just Curious

Where is the inspector general office? That’s right unable to investigate.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Evidence base program is a joke in Connecticut. Charge the state of Connecticut for allowing unregulated practice to guide the family court. If the state of Connecticut wants to address abuse it starts with what is happening at home. Children are are at largest risk to be abused including sexual assaulted at home. Deflecting is the crore objective. The batter program running the Connecticut child welfare system over the best interest of defenseless children in the state of Connecticut.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Self reporting, cherry picking and leaving out information. Bogus evidence. The culture of Connecticut

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

THE FALSE NARRATIVE IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT.

April 2022 Man’s rights & Fathers rights. Gender politics

MOST ALLIGATIONS OF DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE ARE MADE IN GOOD FAITH.

Some law enforcement data mistakenly classifies cases as “false” when victims is unable or unwilling to cooperate, evidence. is lacking, inconsistent statements or the victim is intoxicated. There is confusion between unfounded and false. Genuinely false cases are a subset of these and involve a deliberately false allegation or report.

MRAs assume that all unfounded or unsubstantiated cases comprise false allegations.

MARs take face value the estimate of rates of false allegations made to police and law enforcement agencies, despite researchers’ emphasis on scrutinizing the basis for such estimates.
Mars cherry-pick studies showing higher rates of false allegations, regardless of their methodology flaws and critiques of them, while ignoring showing low rates of false reporting.

False allegations of sexual assault are between 2 and 10 %.

The myth of widespread false allegations cause harm.

Contribute to enormous problem of underreporting by victims of rape and abuse.
Informed negative responses to victims who report.
Excuse perpetrators use of violence.
Feeds into widespread sexist norms about women as lying and malicious.

DO NOT KID YOURSELVES THIS IS POLITICAL. The state of Connecticut has and continues to punish women in and out of family court for reporting. The state of Connecticut is the birthplace of the welfare reform act. The promotion of healthy marriage and the fatherhood initiative. The responsible fatherhood and child support obligations. The state currently touting low crime rates and a safe place for women to live. Much funding in the state has been to promote fatherhood at the expanse of women and children including their lives. While much funding and partnerships promoting men under the father umbrella. Including funding for divorce proceedings. Much effort to reduce public assistance while Mou partners receive unlimited funding to not just promote men through fatherhood but dominate the entire state. It’s one thing to ensure inclusion, however it’s another to place at gender over another.

All fathers to be engaged in the lives of their children is driving best interest. The family court judges are using discretion and parental alienation to promote the welfare reform act as a pilot program. The family court industry making large profit to promote a pilot program allowing for an unrecognized mental health label. This is absolutely a gender problem. As well as an ethical problem in the Attorneys who are encouraged to engage in the program.

Complaints in regard to the program is not a complaint on fatherhood. The importance of fathers in their Childrens lives. It’s the relentless failure to when a program has become bias, dangerous and serving.finacal interest over the rights of individuals, children and the welfare of the public.

This has been an ongoing effort to remove best interest. Continued effort to remove the voices of women in the raising of their children and place the control of the father. If you have any concerns they will be ignored. It’s about child support and gaining control based on a gender. This is already happening. This just makes it legal.

The Syzmonic silver bullet
The Syzmonic silver bullet
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The welfare of act is due to expire in 2028. Peter has 4 years to lead the state of Connecticut into Federalism. Legalize abuse, elimination the dept from child support arrears under a cape of saving the residents from curruption. Curruption he helped to perpetuate with the use of parental alienation.

What is a “woman” and what is “gender”?
What is a “woman” and what is “gender”?
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

If we can’t define “woman” does corruption have a gender? 🤔

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

You catch on pretty fast.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Linguistics. Statistics and reporting.

It's all about the Money
It's all about the Money
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The national fatherhood Initiative July 2020

How the program is measure based on monetary gain rather than the well-being of children. The economic growth and development of the United States

What’s the return investment of a fatherhood program. $$$ return on investment. $$$$

The Fatherhood Reasearch and practice network, just completed a 5-year research and evaluation by the ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES at the Us Department of health.
and interaction with their children
Dr. Chase the Study Value:

” Providing and applies a framework for estimated the potential MONETARY VALUE of non-residential fatherhood program, preforming positive parenting behavior. Promoting healthy child development and enrolling their children in high quality childhood education.”

” the first attempt to MONETIZE THE ECONOMIC RETURNS AND AVOID COST OF A BROAD SET OF POTENTIAL, two generational, long -term child development and family well-being outcomes of responsible father engagement. ”

Per father per child: increasing lifetime earnings, increased taxes paid, and CRIME VICTIMAZATION SAVINGS.

Per child value improved health, savings in fewer students repeating grades, savings in MEDICADE COSTS, and additional INCOME TAX AND SALES REVENUES

ALL TOLTALED STUDY INCLUDED 6 OUTCOMES PER FATHER AND 14 OUTCOMES PER CHILD. Cherry picking

The total ROI per father is nearly $177,000. The total per child ranges from $85,000 to $95,000.

IENCOURAGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD, READ AND SHARE THE REPORT. MOST IMPORTANT, IF YOU RUN OR WANT TO RUN A FATHERHOOD PROGRAM, I ENCOURAGE YOU TO USE THIS STUDY TO AQUIRE FUNDING FOR BROADEN YOUR FUNDING BASE. TOO FEW PROGRAMS HAVE SUCH A BASE TO SUSTAIN THEMSELVES.

I encourage you to use this study to convince PURSE STRINGS holders that investing in fatherhood programs as a wise use of funds. The sale of a program, the sale of gatekeeper alienation claims. Parental Alienation propaganda surfaced in 1996 during the initiation of the fatherhood initiative.
Unlimited funding to MOU partners in the state of Connecticut

Lawless Connecticut
Lawless Connecticut
1 year ago
  • Bill targeting ‘fertility fraud’ would prohibit CT docs from using their own sperm in insemination
  • State lawmakers this week were asked to support legislation that would make it a crime for fertility doctors to use their own sperm to inseminate patients without their knowledge and consent.
  • State Rep. Steve Stafstrom, D-Bridgeport, co-chairman of the Judiciary Committee, told Kraschel that the bill under consideration is narrowly crafted to address the issues that have come to light in recent months.

🙄 “narrowly crafted”?

https://www.ctinsider.com/politics/article/bill-ban-ct-doctors-using-sperm-fertilization-18891625.php

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

CT collision on domestic violence reports seeing 40, 000 victims in CT a year. Say no to parental alienator and no to 50/50. It will save lives.

Concerned
Concerned
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

As always another gender profiler concerned about their incentivized wallet not the best interest of the children. DV claims in CT are abused for financial gains and custody for more financial gain. These chess bra burning groups are are toxic and couldn’t care less about the long term damage to the minds of children

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Concerned

Read the statistics and the truth

Wake-up from your fairy tale
Wake-up from your fairy tale
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The truth is criminalize false allegations and you decrease coercion in family court for financial gain and custody. If you can’t support yourself the wrong person has custody or primary. You can’t suck the other parent dry so you can live on your rear. It’s called equality it’s called being independent it’s called freedom of choice… isn’t that what you want ? Using children as pawns fr your financial and confort gains? Entitled ? Isn’t that what it’s called?

Alienation industry profit seeking industry
Alienation industry profit seeking industry
1 year ago

Psychological warfare. The use of propaganda etc against the controlled oppression. Nightmare hiding behind the alphabet.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

The biggest problem is the people who don’t want to take responsibility and attempt to flip the script. Child custody and 20 % of cases where childrens welfare is at risk. Diversionary tactics. That’s what it’s all about gaining control. Do you have any real idea what children cost? Do you think that it’s more important to make yourself feel better than having your children’s needs met? The majority of people including men who receive child support is based on a calculator. It’s not walking in and requesting a ridiculous amount. These are case we are talking about that are serious in nature. Some how it leads to money. Not the kids. This is exactly why the family court is a mess. It is where children spend time. In the childs best interest. Civilized people work it out. These are cases where someone isn’t civilized. GET THE PICTURE. The inability for the system to figure it out.

Hoops, loops and gender, religion and other groups
Hoops, loops and gender, religion and other groups
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Men are also victims of domestic violence but in a smaller number. Protecting children and residents in the state should be a number one priority. Funding for public assistance and crime victims has gone down due to the decrease in numbers. While discretionary spending has gone up. How much money has the state of Connecticut increase to fatherhood funding and partnership? How much money is prison reform project savings? How much money is reinvested to fight poverty that leads to increase in crime and violent crimes? How much money is invested in raises, state health programs partnered with the fatherhood initiative? How many violent crimes are going unpunished and plea bargained for cost savings and number reduction? How many crimes reported in CT are labeled false due to lack of evidence? Welfare reform or cost savings in Connecticut? Promotion of leadership of leadership that doesn’t take the less fortunate into consideration. Value of income over human life.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Which statistics?

The women's nightmare in the state of Connecticute
The women's nightmare in the state of Connecticute
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

It has been a long-time objective of men’s rights groups to get rid of vowa and funding for domestic violence. It can be traced back to prior to the welfare reform act. Much use of parental alienation has been targeted towards women. Now in statistics as an abuser if they have lost custody to it. Both Joan Kloth Zanard and John Hammel have been hard at work to blame women for DV. The current piolet program is attempting to blame women stating these men have provoked them. It’s in the linguistics of the programs. This has been and continue effort in Connecticut. Since the initiation of the welfare reform act and the fatherhood initiative unregulated and unorthodox treatment of reunification therapy has been ordered from the court. 1996. Under any conditions and most likely escalated the numbers. The piolet program has been underway for years, books, media and all kinds of information has been exposed to the public. The state refusing to redact information and investigate because this a government program. Large financial donations, and lack of legal services for women. They are attempting to make it look like the program is working. self-reporting and cherry-picking cases to report on. It would appear to be an objective to change linguistics to community violence. And divert funding away from women that are the majority victims of it. Reporting rape and violence has been turned into false reporting. A very small percentage are false and much attempt especially in Connecticut to say it doesn’t exist and women are to blame. As well as to flip the scrip and say women are the aggressors and abusing children at a larger rate. We have a very complex problem and lots of money being tossed at Connecticut to make sustain objectives happen.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Concerned

On the contrary. I’m sure you are very upset about the exposure as to what is really happening in Connecticut. Have you stalked or harassed your adult step children lately? Openly bashing their mother on line because your husband had children support orders?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Lets expose who is alternating. The woman who is running the the cult

We got a ticket to ride. Welfare reform
We got a ticket to ride. Welfare reform
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Welfare to work. I’m too busy to come to court. I’m working. Federalism over best interest. Happening in courts across the country.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

alternating”? and is there a cult in Connecticut?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

My brothers keeper.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Chief aposials. Julius Christ.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Check out the lawsuit against Avon highschool

Silver bullet tactics
Silver bullet tactics
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

DCF doggy Doo Doo

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Father’s and family. Third party bullets.

I see you
I see you
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Grandiose self-importance. The inability to have care and concern for others. Lack of empathy, aggression, and a need for admiration from others. People facing narcissistic abuse may experience, gaslighting, intimidation, coercion, and emotional blackmail. It is common for meet with arguments, anger or accusations when trying to set healthy boundaries.

Narcissistic abuser of blame and shift responsibility. They might involve unpredictable responses to engage in malicious gossip, insults. Emotional blackmail.

Narcissistic abuse has a negative impact on both physical and emotional well-being. Being subject to a relationship with a someone with narcistic traits can have lasting effects, even after the abuser is long gone from your life.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Concerned

Father’s rights. It’s a single gender objective. No profiling involved. They identity as

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Concerned

If I have to burn my bra to save the lives of children from living in abusive conditions. Give me a lighter you fraudulent fake phoney and fraudster. I’ll do it on the steps of the Connecticut United States Senitors who are allowing legal atrocities to continue.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

That would be ridiculous. Try something different and be a little kinder, please.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Until the people stand on the doorstep of the members of Senate and Congress this shit shows will continue. They know what is going on in family court and they choose to ignore it. Tell you to call legislators. Who act bewildered and confused about what is happening.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Sounds more like you are more concerned with alimony and child support. And any handouts available
Scavengers of society

Let them eat cake
Let them eat cake
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Concerned about fellow women and man kind is lacking in society. Being a humanitarian is now labeled scavenger. Languestics. Pay attention to the contracts in Connecticut. The public servants and elected officials running it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Blumenthal. Federal funding for the test program. Follow the money.

In the “best interests” of destroying families ...
In the “best interests” of destroying families ...
1 year ago

First file date: 7/22/2019
Connecticut ”family courts” started counting with a “Return of Service” at 100.30 …

After almost five years and hundreds of thousands of dollars taken from the children:

3/7/2024 Motion 672.00 Mother’s request for ADA accommodations
3/8/2024 Motion 673.00 Father’s request to deny ADA accommodations
3/11/2024 Mother’s request for ADA accommodations: denied

On the heels of the Dulos case, Connecticut “family courts” allowed yet another questionable “father” and deceitful attorneys put another mother and three more children through almost five years of hell.

Yesterday, a Connecticut “magistrate” refused to allow that mother two extra weeks to prepare for today’s hearing.

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=FBTFA196088163S

Do We the People help more than “government”?
Do We the People help more than “government”?
1 year ago

The double homicide in February happened only a few blocks from his church, The Walk in the Light Church of God, and it convinced him that an armed patrol was necessary. Burke announced: ‘We are going to bring an armed security that’s going to walk the streets with individuals, help them to the bus stop. Help them to the grocery store and patrol the area. He assured members of the community that members of the patrol are ‘going to have licensed, concealed weapons, [and are] going to assist in fighting crime.’ …

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/galleries/article-13187125/Connecticut-pastor-launches-armed-patrols-streets-clean.html

...
...
1 year ago

Break the rules: start with “because”
Break the rules: start with “because”
1 year ago
Reply to  ...

because to us the wrestling is not against blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.

https://biblehub.com/ephesians/6-12.htm

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Amen. May God help us all. The false Utopia.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Hartford police chief step down yesterday.You know the police are taken a fall for much of the curruption. While the attorney general’s office invesates the public defenders office problem. The inspector general investigates police department. Who is investigating the rest of the state? They let everyone out a jail and cut back on tamp, tnaf block grant funds. William Tong can’t explain where almost 10 million went. The fatherhood initiative ran off to the beach. The fatherhood initiative got more funding to all the partners. The union got raises despite all the public out cry on family court, we have a Police department problem. Several other towns calling for assistance. Rich White Daddy’s don’t want to pay their child support. We should invite these men to family court. Not carrying of course. Cause a bunch of white mice are preying on the mother of their children and their children

🤔
🤔
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

“white mice”?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  🤔

Are you a man or a mouse

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Remember: the color of skin is what matters most. 🤓

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Remember which color, religion and gender are what matters. The division of people.

Biden economics
Biden economics
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The rich get richer the poor get poorer.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Religion and color relations. Follow the committees.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

The false Utopia. The public defender office and family law attorneys are running the state. Look at the judiciary committee and who is elected to the bench. GALs and AMC in the public defender office. Rewards for the secrets of the family court system. STOP ELECTING ATTORNEYS into public office!!!!! Clean up state government clean up the courts.

Please take a good look before you buy in.
Please take a good look before you buy in.
1 year ago

Why men’s groups pushing ” Shared Parenting ” Nov 2017 Dame

Father’s rights groups which as drafted, COULD CAUSE HARM TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTOMS.

The bill would require family courts to grant joint legal custody and equal parenting time in custody dispute and Divorce. The bill would essentially shift custody and discission making standards from centering ” Best Interest.” standards to the rights of the parents. Touted as an equal parenting initiative, the effort spear headed in fathers’ rights groups.
Dads don’t get a fair shake in family court. Which the Frank Report has proven to be untrue in the majority of cases.

Law makers, Judges and Domestic violence advocates have and should be concerned about the blanket application would have on DV victims.

The agenda behind shared parenting legislation is important to understand because, while the legislation is important to understand. The emphasis of the rights of both parents and children. CHILDREN HAVE NO RIGHTS IN FAMILY COURT IN CONNECTICUT AS WE HAVE SEEN.

These efforts are actually fueled by men’s rights groups. Believe that they have been disenfranchised by women and feminism, and the framework in this discussion matters a lot.

As we have experienced and witnessed in Connecticut coming from Peter Szymonik and professed non-licensed “Parental Alienation expert. ” Women are the root of the problem in divorce proceedings. Joan Kloth Zanard based on written information and online interviews women are liars when reporting domestic abuse. 99 percent of the time accusations are false. Both Peter and Joan have been instrumental in pushing the parental alienation claims in the state of Connecticut. Causing irreparable harm to Domestic Violence Victims perceived as lying. The stigma that surrounds women and children reporting. Including rape in the state of Connecticut.

The meaningful conversation surrounding family court should be a real investigation of the Connecticut Family court and the false allegations for both men and women. There are absolutely women who makes false claims. So are a number of men. Joan or Peter appears to believe that doesn’t happen much. However, much effort on shared parenting and alienation in Connecticut has taken over the family court system and legislation. Many stories have been published on behalf of women and books surrounding Connecticut. A meaningful conversation in regard to the family court in Connecticut would be why the public officials are turning a blind eye to the complaints. How a non-recognized mental health condition is used hourly in the family court system and evidentiary hearings are NOT taking place in family court. Making them mandatory in cases when needed. Why William Tong is not investigating the GALS and AMC in the public defender’s office. He is already investigating the office for other reasons. Why the prosecutor’s office is not taking the complaints. The police department doesn’t have any idea what to do with them and say they are administrative. Why Connecticut’s Inspector general’s office is not able to investigate fraud and misuse of the federal funds being used in family court. Why the court system and politicians can’t collect information on who is using access and visitation grants in their cases to see if they are being inappropriately used.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

There is no best interest standard. That was created to allow trafficking of children in family courts. It weakened the 14th amendment and handed over extraordinary power and immunity to court criminals- attorneys as gals- to run scams through family courts, bleed life savings and destroy the lives of children and a targeted parent.

The best interest is a scam by court actors- clearly promoted by the AFCC. It should be eliminated as should the role of all gals.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Vote for shared parenting and best interest goes away legally

wake up
wake up
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

lol another groupy worries about the alimony and child support not truly the best interest of the children.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  wake up

See it’s about the money not the kids. Thanks for demonstrating it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

This not about children it is about getting out of child support.

Bait and switch
Bait and switch
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Arent women and men equal? Why not equal parenting ? No need for child support if both are equal contributing to the health and wellbeing of the children
Why would you child support if you have an able and willing parent stepping up to co-parent?

We know why you don’t want 50/50 or shared parenting lol you you sly dog lol

Bait and switch
Bait and switch
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

If you are concerned about child support switch custody to the dad and he won’t have any problems caring for his children and does want anything from you.
It’s called parenting assuming responsibility, not entitlement, no handouts , no incentives, and you can have every other weekend and dinner once a week. Sounds like fair Shared custody.

Self reflection
Self reflection
1 year ago

Please read the reports you are trying to bury. The world is far from equal. When you choose women who make more than you as a way to keep them held hostage. Several children from multiple mothers who flee because you are using money and children to control them. The example you are setting for your children is poor. You are repeating a cycle that doesn’t promote healthy marriage. Perhaps one day you will self-reflect and understand why you continue to marry women who you perceive financially inferior. If money is an issue for you marry someone your financial equal. There is reason you continue to target a specific of women. You can control. Get some help and stop the bullshit

It's a Syzmonic silver bullet tactic.
It's a Syzmonic silver bullet tactic.
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

It’s discretion not best interest. It’s the judges discretion. You can appeal on that. You can not appeal if you change it to 50/50. It’s a trap. Don’t do it. You can appeal on the judges error. On 50/50 you can dragged back for anything. Nothing changes. This doesn’t answer the family court problems don’t believe it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Federalism and family court. A court of equaity and the removal of “Best Interest “. It’s been 10 years since Joan and Peter have guided family court into parental alienation cases. I wounder how much it will play in to statistics? Peter a twice veteran of the family court system. Has been rocking the healthy marriage pulpit. Two parent household. “Father’s and family”. Many women including Karen Riorden have been the victim of parental alienation claims. How many women have been convinced that equal and shared parenting is the only option because they have lost their children? He is correct that their is the appearance of curruption in case. The ALIENATION push has had a majority to do with it. Welfare reform has generated a significant amount of money for men. The minority community has been focused on the criminal justice reform. No one is paying attention to the public assistance needed for the transition. While the fatherhood initiative and it’s partners are in control of the state systems. Hartford residents are armed and patrolling very impoverished neighborhoods. While Minie Gonzalez was captivated by parental alienation and family court. Giving a leg up to wealthy white men. Crime reduction doesn’t appear to be happening it’s not prosecuted. Yes, folks it effects family court system. Neglect is often a product of poverty which DCF partnered with the fatherhood initiative I’m sure they are aware of. Who is the problem for the minority community. White woman with designer hand bags or the men using the welfare reform to turn Connecticut in to a system based on the federal welfare reform act. Fatherhood above all else. Follow the money trail.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Poverty leads to crime. Poverty leads to neglect. It’s all a big circle. Say no to federalism

Pathetic
Pathetic
1 year ago

Correct there making harm for the true DV cases but the great thing it’s going to filter out the toxic individuals who utilize the criminal system to advance in divorce for financial gain and custody gain, which intern also brings about financial gain

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Pathetic

The criminal system doesn’t handle these cases. They are calling it a public health crisis. Gaining financially through the health and human services. The court judges dismiss domestic violence. They don’t address Psychological and financial abuse. For men or women. This eliminates and changes nothing for high conflict. Except for children

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The state is currupt. Criminal court is no different. The GALs and AMCs are from the public defender office. Criminal defense and family law sitting on the bench.

primordial bond
primordial bond
1 year ago

I havent seen my children in ten years. I was stripped away from them 12 years ago. It has been 2 and half years their father blocked my number. And there are court orders in place that say I shoud see and speak with my children. Father is an abuser.
Courts do not care. My complaints are seen as a nusance. And I am only punsihed for my audacity.

The courts have laughed, while snorting their slime at me, out of the courts. Delays, games, cockamamnie excuses, subterfuge, deep state corruption and all in out bullshit.

I’m debt, beyond imagination. Gone though 7 lawyers.

I have been to court almost 100 times.

Hell. I’ve walked, crawled, begged, wept, shaking, plead, moaned, prayed, screamed, tried to laugh, prayed some more, tried to fake it til ya make it through 12- long- years- as a-slave through incomprehensible hell. I felt like I was going to die, wanted to die, wanted to live, moped, tried to be happy even though I’m not-who could? When your own flesh and blood, that came through you-Whom you love more than life itself, has been ‘legally’ trafficked through the courts by legal criminals ? How can any mother be happy not knowing how her children are?

What a mother does become is strong. Happy I’m strong. Serene, despite the wretched pain that burns every moment apart, KEPT apart from my children. I would not wish this horror on my worst enemy,. Abone that is broken, heals stronger.

We learn to stop taking it personally. We understand that these cowards fear this primodrial bond between mother and child because it has no science, it can not be weighed, calculated, bought, sold, manufactured -destroyed. It cant. It wont. Even A.I. can not and will not ever be able to replicate this bellisma-bond because there is no intelligence more supreme than unconditional love. Meaning no dividines, no quotas, no one-upmanships, no conquering, no debate-EVER! There is n o t h i n g that can opress this love, In fact, the all their goobly gook may have broken my heart. Yes. And then some. I can not begin to count the shreds of hope they shot with their ‘kamakazes’. What they didnt count on is that my love has only multplied for every “bullet” they aimed at my heart. My heart broke, but it broke open into such a vast, ever expanding love, in fact. this love is UNCONTAINBLE. That should not be a threat. It would not be to any functional human being. But it scares the bones out of all of these mashers.

Debra D.
Debra D.
1 year ago

To: 12 years as a slave:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29654470/#:~:text=Abstract,995.51%20%22child%20psychological%20abuse%22.

Parent alienation is deplorable. Anyone who would keep children away from their mother for 12 years should have their bloody face (s) slapped on an American’s most wanted list. There should be a child alienators list, much like the sex offenders list.

Start a blog our strong lady.
Your strength is inspiring. I can’t Imagine how painful this must be on you and your children.

I have 50/50 custody ( really less because it just worked out that way because of work ) and the separation from my kids is the most painful experience I’ve had.

Tell your story.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Debra D.

yes any human keeping a child and brainwashing them from the OTHER parent regardless father or mother should be held accountable to the highest degree This is not a gender thing

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Anyone not protecting their children and abusing people should be held accountable.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Accused of parental alienation?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

All these women were falsely accused I’m sure.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

I’m sorry for your pain and for your children. Their actions are unconscionable and the torture visited upon innocent parents like you is something most refuse to even fathom but it’s happening with sheer cruelty because sociopaths are running out courtrooms.

NiceGuy
NiceGuy
1 year ago

The 2nd reason to use the silver bullet:
Just because you’re getting divorced doesn’t mean the other spouse has to move out of the marital home.

So a great way to get them out is to trump up assault and battery charges and file a restraining order….

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  NiceGuy

The courts cancel hearings to separate the house hold. A year forced to live with someone who is engaging in abusive behavior is unacceptable. It’s not healthy for children. Many of the children land on suicide watch. Most women don’t call the police department until they have to. Calling the police escalates the behavior.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

all you need to say to the police on the phone is “i feel uncomfortable” and they will show up and incarcerate the spouse! notice never any video when that happens!!!!

Concerned
Concerned
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Welcome to modern day Silver bullet divorce Coached and well versed for the drama narrative

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Concerned

Says the accused

wake up
wake up
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

this is the mess you have when you don’t have criminal consequences for false and fabricated claims

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  wake up

Yes, it is also the mess parental alienation has made in the family court system. The scam of century.

Wake-up from your fairy tale
Wake-up from your fairy tale
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Do you homework PA wasn’t even an issue till till divorce became incentivized. Alimony , child support and custody which ramps yup the numbers and the sleeve bag attorneys take their chunk

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

That’s so far from the truth. Follow the conduct of the police when women report. A pattern in the state. Look at Julie Minougue. Over 200 texts. The attitude of the state, including prosecutor office.

silver bullet haiku
silver bullet haiku
1 year ago
Reply to  NiceGuy

What are “family courts”?
Silver bullets everywhere.
Everyone destroyed.

Haiku master
Haiku master
1 year ago

Pedos run the court
Family court traffics kids
Eradicate peds

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Haiku master

Pedos run the state. The state runs the court

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Luigi’s case is old and tired. It’s clearly a demonstration of nothing new. It’s his perspective and the money he spent. It’s been a few years. Where are the kids? They are not coming back. It’s sad but reality. The parental alienation worrier program is not helping.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

That case does demonstrate the ridiculous amount of money. Little conversation on the 6 children who have come forward. It’s hard to believe that all 6 are brainwashed. The money aspect is unbelievable. They robbed him blind. Lots of articles on that one case.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

They have all been brainwashed by the court actors working in unison to protect the money flow lining their pockets. It’s tragic and needs to continue to be told.

It’s happening to so many parents but most are terrified to come forward bc the courts will retaliate and punish you for going public.

Thankful to parents like Luigi who are brave enough to get the truth out to the public

And for reporters like FP who are willing to punish the crimes of family court and the blatant abuse to our children!

Connect the dots, people ...
Connect the dots, people ...
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

State employees are paid to brainwash children in public schools, too.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Yes. Fighting to keep inappropriate books etc.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Check out judicial nomination. Young attorneys with limited experience. Criminal defense attorneys, child support enforcement. One of Luigi’s best buddies. the family law circuit. They are blocking the one from the prosecutor office cause he actually wants to prosecute crimes. Connecticut doesn’t want to spend the money on that kinda stuff. It’s a three ring circus in the state.
.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Nominated for the bench fresh out of legal training wheels.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Child trafficking in family court is a nonpartisan, gendered issue. Men are sometimes the victims. Women are usually the victims. Children are always the victims. The comments show the complication and thus enormous effort needed to reform the system due to lack of any meaningful, independent metrics made available. Lack of accountability in the system. Lack of awareness by the public and those in the system. And enormous profits.

What is known: States to do not want liability for child placement. Third parties stand to make BILLIONS of dollars in trafficking our children. Correction: they are making billions of dollars in a product that lasts 18 years. Our children.

There are no criminal penalties in family court. When abuse is legitimate, there are no protections for mothers and children. Psychopaths, predators, and abusers have learned there are no criminal penalties in family court. Yes, some of these predators are female.

The minority of men who have lost children due to false allegations have projected their situation to believe that “women,” as a category have any power in family court to alleviate the shame of powerlessness that family court brings ALL parents. As a result Mothers are watching their children awarded to Fathers who abuse their children. In 95% of cases the abuser is a family member. It is usually not the mother. This doesn’t mean it never happens. False allegations from predators and psychopaths are allowable due lack of evidence required, lack of evidentiary procedures, untrained judges and billions in profit. The liars are a small part of the problem here. They are not the root cause, despite the pain and anguish they are capable of wielding in FC.

In one case, a private pay GAL/custody evaluator had an average of 8 continuances lasting over three years in each case for FORTY cases in a row. The GAL dissolved all protection orders within two weeks, *with no evidence* in 40/40 cases, claimed AUoC and awarded all children to the father.

Were a couple of these cases false allegations? It’s likely. What about the other 38? Why is evidence ignored and omitted? Why are there no criminal penalties? Who is profiting?

Mothers can no longer protect their children. Fathers can no longer protect their children. Do not let the racketeering and corruption and father’s rights garbage being lobbied—offering protective fathers a false hope— turn this into a worse scenario. Father’s rights is empowering to the individual fathers who have lost children. It is a horrifying experience. Adopting the false hope offered by fathers rights worsens the problem, though admittedly the message is in a shiny package.

There is no dichotomy, here only the fight to protect our children. 98% of women in homeless shelters are there from DV. 85% of women in abusive relationships had a child with their abuser. Where do these cases go? Family court.

Gender based thinking is useful in identifying victims toward policy but is not useful in solving the problem.

Please stop making family court solutions gendered. Family court is the enemy. And the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Protective parents need to be united toward family court reform. Or our children will continue to be sold by strangers. Legally.

The whole truth and nothing but the truth.
The whole truth and nothing but the truth.
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Alot of women will not come to the table until the gender profiling and deflimation of character against them is not relentlessly posted on social media. Until there is a recognition from the warriors that domestic violence exists. Child sexual abusers are infact a significant problems in the state of Connecticut. Women absolutely recognize fathers are family court victims. Women domestic abuse victims are in general afraid of the men yelling ALIENATION. As well as the ” experts” .It’s a huge trigger and very Frightening. These women are suffering from PTSD. So are there children. Until we focus on fraud and medical malpractice it will be hard to get the woman to sit at the table.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

This is a gender issue. The white Daddy abuser and pedophile program.

🙄
🙄
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

how does gender cause the corruption and crimes committed in “family courts”?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  🙄

Parental alienation/gatekeeper. The fatherhood initiative welfare reform act. Mothers. bad. Single mother household are to blame for the world problems .a significant amount of funding is being guided towards a gender. The whopper, have it your way. Women trying to go to court and advocate best interest and protection needed are just labeled and profiled. CT believe all father’s should be engaged in the life under any condition. Cause federal funding says so. Piolet projects. MOU focused on father’s only. Unlimited funding to the organization who follow the practice. The effects of domestic violence are used against the mothers. Domestic violence is all a public health crisis. Crimes are going unpunished, plea deals are made. Cost savings, and the state is promising it’s self as safe. How much money is the state savings for not protecting women and children. Even male victims? The false Utopia. The unions just got raises despite the absolute mess our judicial system and some related agencies are. People are punished and silenced. For the greater good. The money is being directed at fathers to keep them engaged even if they are abusive. The family law industry is making a lot of money on parental alienation directed at women.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  🙄

The funding being given through the fatherhood initiative

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

What about the funding for the DV programs which is abused? What about the funding for the woman advocacy programs?
Why aren’t there any shelters for male victims of DV? Hummm?

Family courts: Of, by and for The People?
Family courts: Of, by and for The People?
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

When was the last time we spoke with our state representatives and when’s the next public hearing on those matters?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

There is discretionary funding for hotels. We are clogging the country will illegal aliens, but we can’t take care of our own. Domestic violence advocate can advocate for a man. Who is abusing domestic violence programs. Many don’t get it. Even when their attorneys know their being abused. There is no information unless you call. Reporting domestic violence is frowned upon in Connecticut. Don’t ask don’t tell.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The state is run on contracts and collective bargaining agreements. The court is run off the fatherhood MOU. Generating federal funding. All for the economic growth and develop. It’s possible cases are decided on income. Finacial’s are required. Some of the fathers may have lost custody based on income. The numbers of women accused of parental alienation are making women look like abusers. This all plays into the statics of the fatherhood initiate and the men’s rights groups claiming children are better off with dad. The surveys are based on self-reporting. Are people engaged in high conflict cases filing out surveys? Reporting fraud to the judicial system. Contracts over best interest and no evidentiary hearings.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

I went through FC. It’s a f ing joke! No kids involved! The plaintiff is usually the aggressor! Files motions after motions with a blood thirsty money pig of a lawyer! Even if 1 parent is sane you still have to defend yourself in FC to get anything! Why can’t the black robes understand when one tries to over reach ! They should be protecting the children and make sure the parents remain stable and not make the situation worse! You have many bad black robes that think they know more about your situation and believe the narcissist parent and take all your money and distribute it! Just vote or be a dem or back the crazy liberal ideals and you will get the wink and nod from black robes! Lawyers are lazy and take you down the road of drawing down bank accounts because they can. The system allows.. The whole system is rigged from fed $ for child support and judges keeping lawyers livelihoods on child support. Don’t get married! Go to country that supports French law not our British system. Our nation is full of laws and police state. They are just following orders.. sound familiar??? Too many people on psych pills today. Social media is a fraud! You can’t defend your self even in marriage. Maybe we should blame it on the fluoride in the tap water! Be a defender! It’s a battle! Be a warrior! Before you get married go and sit in family court for a week. You will comit at the circus whole illegals are welcomed in and protected and slaughter our citizens that’s justice now! Wake up!

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

It’s all about the money.
Mothers and fathers who are fit parents are eliminated from their child’s lives— not through dcf but through family court criminals who appoint guardians and custody evaluators to give custody to the paying parent.

It’s been going on for 5 decades and many parents and children dead as a result.

The targeted parent, like Luigi, is treated as a non-person. His rights violated, children stolen never to see him again, his reputation trashed by fraudulent court orders and false narratives of the gal and custody evaluator-. Both who benefit from “immunity” and cannot be sued.

Their family savings is taken, threatened with incarceration constantly and destroyed by court criminals.

Thank you FR for your continued reporting on attorneys who act with impunity because they know the family court cabal work in lockstep as they torture children by ripping them from the lives they once knew— and from the arms of parents they love.

It’s pure evil.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

6 children have come forward. Accusing Luigi of abuse. Case closed.

Concerned
Concerned
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

lol quite the contrary. The reports are out there and they clearly state children were coerced , they were told what to say and when pressed changed their stories.
You must be either the ex , the sleepy attorney or a paid actor making such an ignorant comment peddling a false narrative for the borderline mother.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Concerned

All the reports say Connecticut children are coerced. AFCC alienation industry racket. So it would be difficult to say what happened

🤔
🤔
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

AFCC isn’t allowed to profit with any kind of industry in Connecticut unless they register as a business. That might explain why Mr. Grant left or was asked to leave the Court Support Services Division around 2016 – 2017. The Hartford Courant should have reported what happened and didn’t — leaving most to guess about what actually happened.

While the details are still a private matter for some unknown reason, Connecticut’s Judicial Ethics Committee decided in 2013 that an anonymous director (who appears to be Mr. Adelman) couldn’t serve as Director of an anonymous “non-profit” (probably “CONNECTICUT CHAPTER OF AFCC, INC.“).
Did AFCC “members” file documents to register and operate their business in the state … again — after 2013?

The service.ct.gov online business search shows:

date formed: 2013
last report filed: 2014

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

That not true.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Yes it absolutely is

🤔
🤔
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

What’s not true?

wake up
wake up
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Sounds like you haven’t done your homework. Clear and convincing evidence of foul play by parent and her connected attorney. When you use the criminal system to advance in custody, you gain the upper hand in support and assets. By the way the shady attorney made sure she cut a nice check of the pie for herself and her paid actors. Family Court Mafia. Its unfortunate he was to naive to understand this, he got hosed and cleaned out by the family court players who knew his ex was unhinged.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  wake up

A criminal system definitely operates in Connecticut “family courts”.

  • Why hasn’t mainstream news reported the “family court” vendors’ crimes leading up to Jennifer Dulos’ murder?
  • Were the guardian ad litem and court evaluator officially granted ”judicial immunity” for the crimes they committed in that case?
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  wake up

Who is unhinged? The woman and the children had to make a run for the boarder.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Family Court bias against mothers’ custody exchange: Is it real or not? Gender bias is when a person is treated differently based on gender.” A study of gender bias in family court found that mothers are often held to a higher standard of proof for abuse claims, are less likely to be believed, and are commonly blamed for their abuser’s actions. Forbs magazine. April 5, 2023. Women are often not believed; one legal whitepaper finds. “Laws meant to protect women and deter further abuse often fail to achieve their purpose. Women telling stories of male partners are simply not believed.

” In my experience 99% of domestic violence allegations are false.” “Since 1996 study and training in psychological abuse called parental alienation.” Joan Kloth Zanard. Equal and shared parenting. Running the largest Parental Alienation nonprofit in the state of Connecticut. 1996 was the year the welfare reform and fatherhood initiative reform legislation has produced a number of positive outcomes. ” Welfare reform reauthorization 10/1/02. Bookings Jan 2001. The 1996 legislation stated that the purpose of the program was to fight welfare dependency by promoting work and MARRIAGE, reduce nonmaterial births, and encourage the formation and maintenance of TWO PARENT FAMILIES. Conversations emphasized the work and family formation issues while many liberals, although appreciating the emphasis on work, were concerned with ENSURING BENEFITS AND ADEQATE INCOME for needy families.

More than 600,000 children are abused or neglected in the United States
8.7 girls 7.5 boys. In 2021 1,820 children died from abuse or neglect. Nearly two thirds of all cases handled CACs handle are sexual abuse. MOST CHILD VICTIMS ARE ABUSED BY PARENTS. NCA NATIONAL STATISICS FOR CT. 1,907 CASES. 406 boys, 1,492 girls, 9 undisclosed. Relationship to the child 418 a parent, 107 stepparent, 116 parent’s boyfriend or girlfriend. 1,578 sexual abuse, 230 physical abuse, 63 neglect, 21 witnesses to the event. 8 drug related . 25 other.

659 were white
289 were black
621 were Hispanic
14 were American Indian/ Alaska Native
14 were Asian/pacific islander
255 other
59 nondisclosed

There is no information on which parent. I think this information is very important. I think it’s being left out on purpose. There is no mention of psychological abuse.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous
  • December 2023 The Harford Current. Preshyous was studying for final exams when she received a call. She was right back to her childhood bedroom where her father allegedly sexually assaulted her. In 2019 her father Juan Carlos Jimenez was convicted of sexual assaulting her. Jimenez appealed. Agreeing to a plea deal serving three years and is now on probation.
  • December 2023 Hector Colon New Britan CT Plea deal for felony risk of injury a minor in exchange for sexual assault charges being dropped. 7 years handed down FULLY SUSPENDED. 3 years’ probation. He will not have to register on the sex offender registry. A series of allegations during the hearing of years of sexual assault psychological and physical abuse. The victim now 20.Detailed the lasting effects. Even attempting to take her own life.” I was a child, and he knew that. “. ‘He became and is a predator. “.
  • ” WHEN PEOPLE DOUBT YOU AND DISMISS YOU, DO NOT STAY SILENT.”
  • New Haven man convicted for the sexual assaulting of two minors under 10. Carlos Gomez. March 4,2024
  • Plea deals and the numbers. How many are dismissed? Lack of evidence/not creditable.
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The statistics in the welfare reform fatherhood initiative is what is driving the family court bus. Blaming single mother households. Children born out of wedlock. All information negatively targeting women. This is more than reconnecting dads. It’s the economic growth and development of the country. No one seems to care how the single parent homes came about. Who is helping these single mothers? WHO IS HELPING THE CHILDREN! The money is going towards pedophiles and abusers in many cases.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

you made your bed …sleep in it. why should the guy support you…. you are free and independent

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Children are not independent.

There you have it.
There you have it.
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

There it is. If your not complacent. Often touted by attorneys and gals. You picked him, you married him. You can leave but the child has to stay. It’s not about children’s welfare it’s about the money. Do you hate your x more than you love your children?

wake up
wake up
1 year ago

sounds like you hate your ex more than you love your children by holding back the children from him

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  wake up

How do you know what him was doing? With evidence, plenty of it.

Know how the state of Connecticut operates
Know how the state of Connecticut operates
1 year ago
Reply to  wake up

Requesting assistance of the family court system to have your children not exposed to substance abuse, physical abuse, psychological abuse or sexual abuse is a responsible parent. These high conflict cases make up 20 percent of the family court proceedings. Where there is smoke there is fire. People going to Connecticut family court system quickly find the state of Connecticut doesn’t address the public health crisis. The label it alienation the preditory Attorneys get the GaL assigned. Obstructing litigants form getting evidence interduced. The immuned gal or AMC apply the all fathers to be engaged in their childrens lives. The psychologist comes on with the alienation fraud. All protected by the state of Connecticut. MOU directing cases to equity not best interest. This is not all but the majority of the cases. It’s absolutely political and tracing back to the fatherhood initiative partnership. The state of Connecticut is very responsible for the mess going on in family court. It’s why they don’t speak about it. Hold anyone accountable. It’s not about people, or children. It’s all about money. The cost of collecting child support. These are 20 percent of the cases high conflict. The equal and shared parenting complaints about child support. They have sold ALIENATION to some of the victims of the fatherhood initiative. The MOU is an experimental pilot program with federal funding. It’s a government project that the government is refusing to investigate. The Connecticut Senitors brush off the complaints. Presenting themselves as heros for low crime rates. Safe place for women and discuss employment. Abortion rights. You don’t have the right to be an equal parent. Express concern over your childrens welfare because of the fatherhood initiative. Ultimately they remove your children because you are concerned about your children or disagree with your childrens father on something.

Maryann Petri
1 year ago

It really should be 50/50 off the bat. The problem is the judges do not look at evidence, the attorneys turn on their own clients and the collusion is rampant. The opposing attorneys want to win at the cost of the child and they don’t care. Family Court should and must be abolished.

Not the answer
Not the answer
1 year ago

Emotional abuse is not recognized in the state of Connecticut. It’s not usually grounds for restraining order. Emotional abuse is one of the most damaging aspects of domestic violence. Having long term effects. Will there be legislation to address psychological abuse? Currently the courts are not allowing outside mental health professionals. This would have little effect on ” high conflict cases”. These are the smaller percentages of cases we are discussing in family court. How will this effect the funding for one gender through the fatherhood initiative? . There is still legislation and financial insensitive to in the extreme cases to hide and ignore abuse.. There are still financial insensitive to ignore all forms of abuse. How does this address absent and neglectful parents? It’s still leaves all the abuse and alligations of abuse on the table.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Not the answer

it seems like if its going to affect your pocket …this is no good because the liars can’t lie because it will hold them accountable?. Sounds like you are woven from the same cloth as the milking attorneys.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Mind Control techniques in the state of Connecticut. The use of techniques for compliance. The threat of the loss of custody of your child if you don’t agree with the ideology. The main focus of the family court problems is and continue to be the failed protection of minor children in the state of Connecticut. As well as women. Allegations and the painting of the perception of individuals who wish to access the court system based on the merits of a case. With evidence. Intimidation to gain control of the situation. I’m not sold on the plan. It has absolutely no financial investment. It’s about not letting people get manipulated. I’m not sold that there are that many false allegations of abuse. The worst interest of the child. The parental alienation defense it is getting exposed. America is getting a good look at reunification therapy and the camps.

Not the answer
Not the answer
1 year ago

They are a lot of abusers who would love this. You can’t force people to be responsible. That’s the problem. Often those claiming silver bullets are often not capable of taking responsibility. These are the same type of people who will engage in domestic violence and go to the supreme Court to keep their guns.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Not the answer

do you hear yourself? there isn’t enough time & chalk to explain

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Not the answer

sorry sweetheart yes you can hold them accountable and responsible by penalizing them and giving the same criminal punishment for falsification of claims
Regarding the Silver bullet you are incorrect , woman/female/gender driven advocates have even written books on how to do it!!! shameful…. and your statement regarding guns and DV is like uhhhh ridiculous and ignorant…

https://www.amazon.com/How-Destroy-Man-Easy-Step/dp/1440107904
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38607065-how-to-destroy-a-man-now-damn

The latest numbers available
The latest numbers available
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

How is a non-recognized mental health disorder being used in the United States court system? Not recognized by psychiatric diagnostic bodies. May 2020 Us Census report. “Custodial parents have become more likely to be fathers over the past 24 years. Increasing from 16% to 20% in 1994 to2018. About $30 billion dollars of child support was supposed to be received in 2017, a decrease of $19.5 billion from 2003.
“Custodial fathers tended to be older 54.6 % over the age of 40. 44.2 % of custodial mothers were white. 28.1% black 24.1 were Hispanic.

62.9 % percent of custodial fathers are white. 15.1 percent are black. 18.4 % are Hispanic. In 1993 36.9 % percent of custodial parents received full child support awarded. 45.9 % in 2017.In 1993 24.2 % received no child support, in 2017 30.2% received no child support that was awarded. 51.4 % of custodial mothers work full time. 74.3% of custodial fathers work full time.

Support and custody agreements. 12.9 million custodial parents have court support orders. 88.2% were formal court agreements. 11.8% were informal agreements. (so 11.8 % of parents are able to work it out). 39.1 % of divorcing couples felt they did not need to make divorce or custody a legal matter. It would appear that the majority of the population feels court interventions are needed. 16.9 % did not want to have contact with the other parent. 15.7 % were unable to locate the other parent.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Another words fix the place. We need to elect the judges . NOT POLITICAL Leaders with financial investment in the state. Something needs to be done about the bar association. No more programs focused on gender. Several of the current line up of people in office in Connecticut need to be tossed out of office.

CT is destination for child sex traffickers
CT is destination for child sex traffickers
1 year ago

Should Adelman and Cuda be reported?

Call the National Human Trafficking Hotline toll-free hotline at 1-888-373-7888: Anti-Trafficking Hotline Advocates are available 24/7 to take reports of potential human trafficking.

Which way the funding blows
Which way the funding blows
1 year ago

April 1998. ” I SEE THE EFFECTS THAT THIS HAS ON THESE CHILDREN EVERYDAY”

The children’s Attorney Mary Bergamini of Enfield. Man jailed for improper conduct with girls. Michael Barile a former Windsor Locks dispatcher was sentence to prison for three years. Convicted for having improper conduct with at least one young girl in his care.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

If Judge Roy Bean were alive,One of his first acts as a justice of the peace was to “shoot […] up the saloon shack of a Jewish competitor”.[2] Bean then turned his tent saloon into a part-time courtroom and began calling himself the “Only Law West of the Pecos.”

Serious question ...
Serious question ...
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Are we talking about law, religion and/or the purposeful destruction of our children and families to destroy our nation?

This is nothing more than a tactic to get out of .
This is nothing more than a tactic to get out of .
1 year ago

There is no destruction of “families”. The families have self distructed prior to the filing . The meaning of family in the context of family court is the father and family. Through the fatherhood initiative. It’s important for people to start paying attention to the languestics being written in to legislation and contracts. The new family such as in the Dulos case. Where Michelle moved herself and her daughter into a house that was part of martial disillusion. Michelle was involved in the custody evaluation and was contacting the guardian ad lithiums in regards to children she had no legal standing. She had a confidential custody evaluation to a case she was not a party to. This is similar to the Kassonoff case. Where a third party moves in to a house that they have no legal rights to. Engages in the custody battle. The harm spoken about is to the father’s financials. The financial obligations to child support and alimony if awarded. This has been a long standing complaint for men’s rights groups. The on going blanket application of legislation over individual cases. As exposed in the comment section of the frank report over the equal rights to present the individual merit of each case. It should be extremely obvious by now that going to court and making false claims of abuse “silver bullet” tactics would be ill advised. The use of lack of evidence is turned in to false reporting. The courts are disallowing out side mental health services. There is ABSOLUTELY no oversight to the psychologist. Granted immunity. Statistics are tossed around with out the breakdown. Single parent household are made up of multiple cases. Widows and widowers. Father’s and mother. Women engaging in new relationships are used against them. The information is used to gender profile cases rather than the individual merit of each case. There is little focus on evidencery hearing and the psychologist are forced on cases. The woman attempting to exercise equal rights to present cases not agreeing to slip custody for what ever reason are labeled as an alienator. Parental rights are over shadowing the best interest of children. Thanks to the MOU and pilot program for the fatherhood initiative it would appear mother’s rights to argue best interest have disappeared. Obvious children do better when both parents are involved. THESE are not those cases! Absolutely no information about forced custody agreements is ever mentioned. No data on the long term effects of the court, we don’t have information on family court until someone is dead. This legislation is to eliminate financial responsibility. ABSOLUTELY nothing will change in high conflict cases. It will still cost to prove your case in a family court. There will still be insensitive to engage in uneithical conduct in these cases.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

another female advocate member trying to put men down to advance themselves… why is it a loss for woman to get 50/50 and win for men??? duhhhh becasue the system is incentivized for false allegations with no accountability. Women and men are equal mothers and fathers are equal as parents… lets switch the shoes and put boundaries on both , you will see how quick falsification of scenarios and narrative s occur, you will see how quickly individuals will cooperate/ co-parent and no more BS embellishment of/fabrication of narratives occur. EVERYONE is held accountable no more gender issues. no more incentivization for upper hand in divorce for alimony, child support, child custody , falsification by utilizing the criminal system to advance in family court. Now we are talking level playing field for parents and the BEST interest oof the children not the best interest of what one party and possible unethical attorney coaching their client.

Equal rights are human rights.
Equal rights are human rights.
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Putting men down? STOP using uneithical tactics to advance yourself. Stop stigmatizing women and using the courts to stop women from moving forward after divorce proceedings. Stop using children to punish the other parent. Stop engaging a third party to gain leverage in cases. Stop using children as your personal possession to be rehomes with a replacement mommy. Because it financially advances you. Stop profiling women like has been done in criminal court to minorities. History is repeating it’s self.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Your comments prove my points. Thank you

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Do they?

Equal rights are human rights.
Equal rights are human rights.
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Since 2018 a majority of cases are 50/50. This law will do what to element high conflict cases? How will it decrease billable hours for attorneys when asset disputed? How will it decrease the accusations of domestic violence? Will guardian ad lithiums and custody evaluation be eliminated when custody is in question?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Using the MOU and statistical data instead of the individual merit of a case. An evidence? Sounds a lot like convicting someone based on the the category they fit. The statistical data related to family court is being messed around with. Due to languestics.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Mothers are family to the children. It’s called discarding. ” Father’s and families” destroying families refers to financial obligations to child support. Alimony in some cases. In the Dulos case, Kassonoff case, Zanard and Syzmonic brought a third party in the case. Zanard is the stepparent. Syzmonic brought legal action not just for himself but stepmother. Using two parent household.. Bringing a third party into a matter. That is not two parents working it out responsibility.

Karl
Karl
1 year ago

Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
Reply to  Karl

Oh, sure: “vanishing of capital”. Like that could ever happen. 🙄

🤔
🤔
1 year ago
Reply to  Anonymous

👆
👆
1 year ago
Reply to  🤔

could be one reason those in control of the game let “family courts” destroy families.

🙄
🙄
1 year ago

There’s been no purposeful destruction of families in America?

Today, around 45 percent of American children spend some time without a biological parent by late adolescence.

https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/republicans/analysis?id=E63AEB04-2C68-40B8-9A8D-9426D4091CF9

Don't Miss

McMahon Double Dipping: Leaked NYPD tape and $600K pension scheme fuel claims that DA and Judge weaponize justice on Staten Island.

The $676,000 Couple: How Staten Island’s McMahons Perfected Public Service as a Family Business

A Staten Island couple — both lifelong Democrats — have…

A $405 Filing May Finally Expose Christopher Ambrose — His Daughter Just Blew the Case Open

A $405 affidavit—and a federal judge’s refusal to seal it—triggered…
219
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x