Richard Luthmann
Was Jennifer Dulos’ Murder Enabled By CT Family Court Greed?
Do In-Court Statements Show A Troconis Trial Defense?
Jennifer Dulos’s shocking disappearance and death captivated the country. It also led to a significant shift in Connecticut’s approach to its legal landscape. “Jennifer’s Law,” named in her honor, was passed. The legislation marked a pivotal change in how domestic violence is defined and addressed in the state.
Jennifer’s estranged husband, Fotis Dulos, and his girlfriend, Michelle Troconis, are the central figures in the disappearance that morphed into murder, state prosecutors say.
Troconis now stands trial in Stamford, Connecticut. She faces serious charges, including conspiracy to commit murder, tampering with evidence, and hindering prosecution. If convicted, she faces twenty years behind bars.
Now, a seemingly mundane statement in a Connecticut courtroom threatens to expose Jennifer Dulos’ disappearance and death and the passage of Jennifer’s Law as a cover-up for Connecticut Family Court greed gone wrong.
Background
On a seemingly ordinary day, May 24, 2019, Dulos, a 50-year-old mother of five, vanished. Jennifer’s final act of dropping her children at school in New Canaan became the starting point of a perplexing disappearance.
Evidence immediately pointed towards Fotis Dulos, Jennifer’s estranged husband. State prosecutors say surveillance footage unearthed a critical lead: Fotis was captured on camera disposing of garbage bags in Hartford, Connecticut. These bags, it was later determined, contained items with Jennifer’s DNA, tying Fotis directly to her disappearance.
As more evidence surfaced, the case against Fotis became one against his girlfriend, Michelle Troconis.
State prosecutors say Troconis is more than just Fotis Dulos’s romantic partner; she became a crucial figure in an affair that spiraled into a scenario much graver than anyone could have anticipated. Her involvement escalated into allegations of participation in Jennifer Dulos’ disappearance and subsequent cover-up, indicative of a love triangle that had gone fatally wrong.
Troconis now stands trial in Stamford, Connecticut. She faces serious charges, including conspiracy to commit murder, tampering with evidence, and hindering prosecution. If convicted, she faces twenty years behind bars.
The trial commenced on January 11, 2024, drawing intense media coverage. Troconis, firmly proclaiming her innocence, confronted the charges head-on. In a pre-trial press conference, Troconis expressed unwavering faith in the justice system and her readiness for the trial.
“It’s been 4 1/2 years since I was wrongly accused,” she declared.
Jennifer Dulos and Jennifer’s Law
The domestic violence-related law that was enacted in Connecticut in 2021 (PA 21-78) was coined “Jennifer’s Law” in honor of two Connecticut victims, Jennifer Dulos and Jennifer Magnano.
This law directly responded to the circumstances surrounding Jennifer’s case, particularly her fears for her and her children’s safety during her tumultuous divorce from Fotis Dulos.
Jennifer’s Law broadened the traditional definition of domestic violence to encompass ‘coercive control.’ This expansion recognized that abuse can extend beyond physical violence, including tactics of intimidation, isolation, and manipulation that abusers use to exert power and control over their victims.
By acknowledging these non-physical forms of abuse, the law aimed to offer more comprehensive protection to victims.
A key aspect of Jennifer’s Law was its implications for restraining orders, and family relations matters in Superior Courts. The law enabled victims experiencing coercive control to seek restraining orders, a legal tool that was previously limited to cases involving physical violence or the threat thereof.
This legislative change provided a new avenue for victims to seek protection and legal recourse. Many hoped that by recognizing the broader spectrum of abusive behaviors, the law would empower individuals in abusive situations to come forward and seek help.
The application of Jennifer’s Law has come into question. The recent Ambrose v. Riordan case revealed the potential for its misuse.
Connecticut Family Court: Cash For Kids
The author has previously opined that if the full factual record in the Ambrose v. Riordan case were to come to light, the “cash cow” and “dark underbelly” of the Connecticut Family Court system would have become fully exposed. We would find in Connecticut what smacks of the racketeering conspiracy described by veteran investigative journalist Frank Parlato.
Parlato published the following about the Ambrose v. Riordan case almost a year and a half ago:
“This is CT, and this is a family court under the shadow of Richard Gardner, who invented a way for well-to-do abusers and pedophiles to prevail – “parental alienation” – and it is used as a weapon to take money from the rich and give the children in return.
Parental alienation and its drastic remedy – once it is determined by any quack or con artist GAL or custody evaluator – is to take the children from the parent they love and order no contact with her – and hand them over to the abuser with money.
For those who say some mothers alienate their children from the father, which is true, I say children can be alienated from a father because he is a cruel ass, a cunning man, that the children see through him and want no part of him.
It does not have to be the other parent who alienates children from the parent. It can be the abuser himself.
But alienated the children, Mia, Matthew, and Sawyer, because the father had the money and because he had CT family court – he could buy the children like you might buy a dozen eggs at the market.
That market is CT Family Court, and it is, arguably, as vicious and sinister a place as the world has known.
In the Ambrose v. Riordan case, damning evidence of abuse and sexual penetration was repeatedly presented to public officials, judges, attorneys, the police, and the Connecticut Department of Children and Families (DCF). It was all ignored.
Reasonable minds disagree about the application of ‘Parental Alienation’ and ‘Coercive Control’ to medical facts. Some argue Parental Alienation is ignorable. Others claim it is firmly rooted in scientific fact. The political circumstances make Corecive Control more lucrative for state family courts because of available federal funding.
Shocking Video Admission About Jennifer Dulos’ Custody Evaluation Report
The video clip below shows how this systemic corruption ate its way into Jennifer Dulos’ case not because of the merits but because of the ‘greenery.’
Jennifer and Fotis Dulos had money. Jennifer had more. If there were no ” bumps in the road” in Jennifer’s legal situation, much less green could be extracted. The Family Court pigs would be ill-equipped to fatten themselves on the Dulos divorce.
Shocking video from inside the Connecticut courthouse where the Troconis case is being heard has gone unnoticed:
“The Custodial Evaluator, the psychologist, had recommended that Mr. Dulos was the better parent. And he was a better, more caring parent than Jennifer. And that, therefore, he was recommending joint equal custody.”
The Custody Evaluator’s Report in the Dulos Family Court case incredibly said Fotis Dulos was the “better parent.”
This is the same Foti Dulos that State Attorneys say murdered his wife and then tried to cover it up by disposing of the body, destroying evidence, and hampering the investigation into her disappearance in coordination with Michelle Troconis.
Not to be trite, but psychologists aren’t weathermen or economists – they are paid to be right. How can this Custody Evaluator have gotten it so wrong?
Jennifer’s Law was enacted to give the Connecticut Family Court the tools to deal with coercive control as a dangerous form of domestic violence. All these facts were in the record the Custody Evaluator relied upon. Jennifer Dulos repeatedly claimed Fotis Dulos’ coercive control was a violent and dangerous threat to her and her children. The language of the statue tracks the violent abuse Jennifer experienced:
Coercive Control
Under the law, “coercive control” includes unreasonably:
isolating the family or household member from friends, relatives, or other support;
depriving the family or household member of basic necessities;
controlling, regulating, or monitoring the family or household member’s movements, communications, daily behavior, finances, economic resources, or access to services;
compelling the family or household member by force, threat, or intimidation, including threats based on actual or suspected immigration status to (a) engage in conduct from which they have a right to abstain or (b) abstain from conduct that they have a right to pursue;
committing or threatening to commit cruelty to animals that intimidates the family or household member; or
forcing the performance of sex acts or making threats of a sexual nature, including threatened acts of sexual conduct, threats based on a person’s sexuality, or threats to release sexual images (CGS § 46b-1).
Upon the passage of Jennifer’s Law in June 2021, there was universal acclimation that Fotis Dulos had engaged in dangerous domestic violence, and the changes to the law now better served victims of serious abuse.
Connecticut Protective Moms emphasized that the bill protects everyone.
We are all Jennifer. Whether we are male or female, black or white, gay or straight, young or not so young, we are all susceptible to the abuse of power that can come from the people we trust the most.
This legislation declares that abuse of power inside a family or household is unacceptable. And all forms of abuse – physical, sexual, emotional, financial, and psychological – will now be recognized. This gives courts, attorneys and individuals the tools to stop Domestic Violence, including coercive control.”
CONNECTICUT PROTECTIVE MOMS
Steven Eppler-Epstein of the Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence said:
This comprehensive measure makes Connecticut the third state in the country to address coercive control in our family violence restraining order law. It addresses the real experiences of survivors with all forms of domestic violence, not just physical abuse, by ensuring court-ordered relief for the many non-physical tactics abusers use to gain and maintain control over their victims.”
STEVEN EPPLER-EPSTEIN, INTERIM CEO, CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Again, how did the Court Evaluator miss it?
The answer is simple. Look at the green.
The Jennifer Dulos Custody Evaluator’s Report was a Sham
By Jennifer Dulos’ disappearance in June 2019, over 520 documents were filed to the court docket. After Jennifer Dulos’ disappearance, the divorce portion of the matter was stayed, but there were still legal issues about the custody of the five children.
The lawyers, custody evaluator, guardians ad litem, attorneys for the child pendente lite, and everyone else involved with a case made a fortune. Why? Jennifer Dulos has the money.
Was the Custody Evaluator’s Report motivated by a ‘fee churn’? Did the psychologist ignore crucial facts and evidence to produce a result that would fetch the most ‘greenery’ for the feeding trough?
The thesis is that the psychologist was “playing ball” by putting together a report that would question Jennifer Dulos’ mental stability and make custody an issue in the case. This way, everyone gets ‘fed’ from the fee churning. If the psychologist doesn’t “play ball,” in the next case, the judge will appoint another one who will.
Did that happen here? It sure looks like it. But the public will never know if the Connecticut Courts have their way.
In June 2019, Fotis Dulos, still alive and before his suicide, was setting up his defense. His story was straight out of the movie Gone Girl.
In the Ben Affleck thriller, the husband returns home to find his wife Amy missing. Amy is quasi-famous because of children’s books, and there is widespread press coverage. The media find Nick’s apathy towards the disappearance suspicious. Ultimately, after evidence, including a diary, is found, he is charged with Amy’s murder. However, Amy is alive and hiding in a campground in the Ozarks. After discovering Nick was having an affair, Amy conceived an elaborate plan to frame him for her murder.
The key to this defense would be to paint Jennifer Dulos as crazy. The custody evaluator’s report did just that. Fotis Dulos wanted it made public. The judge had previously sealed the report and placed a gag order on the parties and their attorneys about the Report’s contents.
“We’re pursuing numerous leads. You heard us say today in court that Jennifer made comments to Mr. Dulos that give us grave concern for her safety and well-being. Um, we are actively contemplating a revenge suicide hypothesis as an explanation for her disappearance,” said Norm Pattis, Fotis Dulos’ defense lawyer.
The judge ultimately decided that all copies of the report and evaluation should be given to Michael Meehan, the court-appointed attorney for the children. Anyone in the case could look at it, but they couldn’t have a copy, only take notes.
Jennifer’s Law is Cover-Up For The Family Court ‘Churn’?
The Custody Evaluator’s Report is still not public.? Why? Several reasons.
First, the psychologist’s factual findings may be disputed. If other medical professionals thoroughly analyze the report and Jennifer Dulos’ records, there may be a consensus that the Court Evaluator’s Report was baseless and beyond the proper and established scientific methodology that should have been immediately disregarded.
Second, if the Court Evaluator’s Report is questionable, so are the psychologist’s motivations. Was this psychologist’s appointment conditioned upon her finding the ‘right way’ in her report? This would be a systemic indictment of the Connecticut Family Court.
Third, the premise of Jennifer’s Law is that Jennifer was a victim of dangerous coercive control. Any insinuation that Jennifer Dulos had psychological issues would have tarnished that narrative. Jennifer’s Law required the perception that the facts showed Jennifer Dulos was an angel, Fotis Dulos was a monster, and that the Court was omniscient, although powerless to act. With the Legislative change, justice would be “better.” The results would be “fairer.”
Nothing is further from the truth. Jennifer and Fotis were human beings. Neither was perfect, but they are now both left to Divine Judgment.
But Michelle Troconis is still being judged by human beings. Twelve of them, in her jury trial. The Court has not allowed, and for systemic reasons, cannot allow evidence of the Family Court’s dark underbelly, the evidence ‘gathered’ there, and the role it might play in Troconis’ defense to enter into the ether – particularly with so many eyes watching, daily on Law & Crime, from Northern California to Southwest Florida to the Midwest, and all points in between.
The Family Court is also a court judged by human beings. And in most cases, one human being – an all-powerful judge with the ability to do just about whatever they want. There are no juries, and few rights can defeat the whims of the man or woman on the bench.
The narrative is that Jennifer’s Law would help the problems in Family Court. Now, judges would have the tools they needed to stop domestic violence. But in reality, was the Family Court concerned with coercive control? Or were the courts, the trial lawyers, and the other parties who make their living on the divorce court dole more interested in ‘controlling the churn’?
After Jennifer Dulos’ disappearance, there were still over 25 documents filed with the Family Court, most concerning custody – the SOLE ISSUE created by the Custody Evaluator’s Report. Was this legal and necessary while the rest of the case was stayed? Or was this churn?
In the comment period before the enactment of Jennifer’s Law, several lawyers, experts, and advocates testified before the General Assembly that the latter was the case. They said that Jennifer’s Law would not help but only further escalate problems in Family Court, “which are notoriously broken in Connecticut“:
Family Court needs to deescalate conflict in matters involving custody of children. However, [the proposed Jennifer’s Law] adds a tool to the arsenal of weapons a litigant has at his or her disposal. In addition to using unsubstantiated protective and/or restraining orders for leverage in custody disputes, public applications for protective and/or restraining orders could be used as vehicles to assassinate characters under the immunity from defamation in court pleadings. Adding weapons to the adversarial process will have a negative impact on the resolution of deeply personal and highly emotional matters involving custody of children.
It is submitted that Coercive Control should be criminalized and reserved for courts of law and evidence, not the Family Courts of discretion and so-called equity which are notoriously broken in Connecticut.
The Ambrose v. Riordan case is a stark example of how laws, even those with noble intentions, can be twisted. The Connecticut Family Court has perverted Jennifer Dulos’s legal legacy, which was meant to protect the vulnerable. They have managed to use coercive control to control ‘The Family Court Churn.’
The law, aimed at protecting victims of domestic violence like Jennifer Dulos, was here turned against the mother, accusing her of “coercive control.” This move effectively muzzled the voices of the Ambrose teenagers, who previously lived happily with their mother away from their allegedly abusive father.
Peter Szymonik, a constitutional and civil rights activist, has been closely following the Ambrose case. He, too, initially opposed Jennifer’s Law. He warned it could be misused, as he believes it is in this case. Szymonik criticizes the legal tactics employed by the father, particularly his use of the family court system to speak on behalf of his children, effectively silencing them and their mother.
“The teenage children effectively had their mouths duct-trapped shut and their hands tied behind their backs,” Szymonik states, highlighting the irony of Ambrose, accused of harming his children, speaking for them in court.
Szymonik describes the plight of teenagers Mia (16), Matthew (16), and Sawyer (13) Ambrose, who ran away from their father’s home, citing abuse. They sought refuge with their mother and even obtained attorneys to file petitions in juvenile court. Despite this, the father used the Family Court to pursue a series of legal actions against the mother, Riordan. The teens were rendered homeless runaways judicially by the Connecticut Superior Court’s application of Jennifer’s Law. Several outlets, including investigative journalist Frank Parlato of the Frank Report, extensively covered this shocking case.
Szymonik points out, “Now, any time a parent is accused of criminally harming a child, all they have to do is run to ‘family’ court and file a motion on ‘behalf of their child’ to dismiss the criminal claims and complaints.”
Release the Jennifer Dulos Custody Evaluator’s Report
The Connecticut Superior Court should release the Dulos Custody Evaluator’s report. The harm to Jennifer Dulos’ family, who may have a legal claim against the psychologist, and to Jennifer Troconis’ legal defense is clear. Also, as many expect, the public has a right to know whether the Connecticut “Family Court Churn” and “Cash For Kids” are a reality. Uncovering systemic bias, fraud, and abuse goes to the heart of the interests of adequately administrating the courts.
Accordingly, the only way that the truth of whether Jennifer’s Law, which is now corrupted in its implementation, was just as bent in its inception will become known is through the power of sunlight and the press.
Jennifer Dulos’s story is deeply personal and tragic. While the criminal justice system may convict Michelle Troconis if a jury of her peers finds her guilty, the family has already said it won’t bring Jennifer back. They want answers. And a conviction may not get them.
Where is the harm in publicizing the Dulos Custody Evaluator’s Report if the Family Court has nothing to hide?
But what if there is something to hide? Is the Connecticut Family Court systemically broken? Is this “broken system” a contributing factor in Jennifer Dulos’ death? Doesn’t the public have a right to know?
I welcome a healthy, respectful, and vigorous debate on this issue. If you believe I am wrong and have evidence that may change my mind, I invite you to transmit it to me and the publishers of this publication.
Most Dangerous Man on Deadline. Turns every filing, feud, and exposé into cinematic showdown—equal parts court drama, news thriller, and Shaolin street fight.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
I grew up never knowing my dad. Or that I had one. I grew up in pure dysfunction that lead to a nervous breakdown at 16. That said, my mother had been beaten by my father and ran. I understand. I tried to do different with my children but found myself in an unhealthy abusive marriage with someone with big bucks. He thrived on being vindictive because he had the financial and legal protection to do so. I feel like its the lawyers who encourage all the abusive vindictive deceptions in courts. Instead of finding the most reasonable action for the children involved. These people should not practice law. So destroying a person’s life out of revenge, like when we call police after being strangled in front of the children, is not the answer. Parents should learn how to stay together. Abusers…should be held accountable no matter how wealthy or powerful they are. And dv victims should be more protected than they are. Cuz battered women’s shelters etc…they love those donations more than victims.
Mom made son, 3, say ‘goodbye to daddy’ on camera before shooting him dead in murder-suicide a day before custody hearing (nypost.com)
The fool costello out of business? The court jester! Go to the court judiciary in civil and see how many lawsuits he has against his own clients. Now he is selling his building? Retiring? Quitting ? A client took him to court in Stamford for 1/2 million i think that they lost because he didnt do his job correctly or should i say his little minions! I believe he settled as it disappeared! Maybe the client got his building! Biz dried up? Over the holidays he was advertising like crazy on optimum channel 12! He used to be a credit collections lawyer! https://febbraiocommercial.com/property/1232-post-rd-fairfieldct/
why is there no mainstream news about the liability of the GAL and the custody evaluator in the Dulos case?
The Federal Reserve (a private company) hasn’t “owned gold since 1934”?
https://youtu.be/fXDO-rB6oYw?si=_5q2E02BrxAomLu6
50 million dollars donated to the university of Miami. Kenneth Griffin. 2015 divorce settlement. Putting the domestic dispute to rest. Florida is the lastest to jump on the fatherhood train. More large donations to state schools.
Two Connecticut court hearings today — the Ambrose case in Bridgeport and the Dulos case in Stamford — will allow discussion of the tragic events following “family court custody evaluations” in each case. The evaluators and evaluations won’t be questioned.
Connecticut’s AG office hasn’t questioned the junk science used in Connecticut family courts for the past forty years and mainstream newsroom bosses might have told their reporters to ignore what’s been happening for decades.
It’s a good thing a few good people have noticed.
Where can we read this? Where can I find an attorney to file a federal deflimation case? I’m tired of the targeting of women in the US.
No mainstream news coverage of either hearing. If you give The Hartford Courant money, they’ll tell you which psychiatrists are paid the most but won’t tell you what the “experts” think about all the corruption in “family courts”.
https://www.courant.com/2024/01/26/see-who-the-highest-paid-connecticut-state-employees-are-and-how-much-they-earn/
Anyone know why so many psychiatrists among the highest paid in the state?
Uconn. Highest salaries in the state. The psychologist are often used in the custody evaluation and reunification therapy. How many are receiving government funding for nonprofit? Filter through the state of Connecticut. it’s a complex problem that is filtered and requires forensic investigation.
Who is buying the whopper? Perhaps operation hamburger is prior to getting to the counter. Ordering the burger your way.
What do we have. A prodomiditly white fathers using a minority program to use statistical data to enact legislation and court procedures to gender profile. Similar to racial profiling in criminal court. Women are guilty of gatekeeping/alienation based on gender. Just like the assumption of guilt due to racial profiling in criminal court. Equity? It’s really sad how history repeats itself. Creation of bias and discriminate continues to run the untitled states. The welfare reform act, fatherhood initiative for the economic growth and development of a gender.
P-01 OLADEJO LAMIKANRA
Attorney: CHARLES HOULIHAN JR (408495)
75 WEST ST.
P. O. BOX 582
SIMSBURY , CT 06070
D-01 FORE GROUP, INC.
Attorney: MAWHINNEY KENT D LAW OFFICE OF LLC (422454)
34 JEROME AVE
SUITE 108
BLOOMFIELD , CT 06002
https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=HHDCV166066527S
…
Anyone ever heard of “Global Village Extra”?
Oladejo Lamikanra sent a complaint to the Connecticut Attorney General’s office around 2016 to complain about Mr. Mawhinney and Mr. Dulos.
If Mr. Lamikanra’s complaints were valid and if the Connecticut Attorney General’s office investigated, where would those records be?
Jennifer filed for divorce in 2017 and filed a complaint in 2019 about guardian ad litem Meehan and evaluator Herman.
Did the family court system investigate Meehan and Herman?
If not, did the Connecticut AG office investigate Meehan and Herman?
Connecticut had at least two opportunities to prevent one murder, one suicide and one or two very long jail terms.
For those who care more about money than life: How much will all of that cost the state?
Attorney general William Tong and the deception of the America public. Attorney general William Tong has yet to make a public statement on the conviction of Michelle and domestic violence. Julie Minougue over 200 text messages. Criminal negligence? Almost 10 million dollars missing in Connecticut. Conspiracy to commit fraud. Misusing public funds.
Seems like some government officials somewhere should say something.
Seem like Maximus inc. , stakeholders and contracts would be looked at. Policy and self reporting survey. Establishing a experimental program from 1999 still running today. Policy over individual cases?
You are not going to hear from them. Over the last several years people have been complaining and they ignore it. Perhaps as they appeared to ignore reporting in 2021. Many people, an increase of women have attempted to reach out to have the door slammed in their faces. Despite the death of the Jennifer’s and Julie’s they continue to operate under the same circumstances. Many parents reaching out to media are punished. William Tong is likely to post a picture of food. The legislators will continue to make him out to be the seventh wonder if the world. Continuing to ignore the people reaching out for help. Closed door and continue to operate out side of the public view. Call the situation a soap opera.
Citizens could quit complaining and start helping government officials investigate the crooks running fatal “family court” industries.
Tomorrow is a good time to start open discussions about the “family court evaluators” and “family court evaluations”.
Someone could ask why Stephen Herman’s evaluation didn’t catch Fotis Dulos’ homicidal and suicidal tendencies,
Someone could find out if Stephan Herman’s evaluation misled Michelle Traconis.
If that evaluation caused her to think Fotis Dulos wasn’t suicidal or homicidal, someone could determine whether or not Dr. Herman’s actions contributed to what happened to Jennifer.
These evaluations are based on policy. There is a blanket belief based upon the welfare reform act and fatherhood initiative. The danger to children is not the focus in majority of cases. The family courts are based on statistics. The data collected. Individual cases are based on probability rather than the individual cases. Equity and evidence are over looked. During the creation and evolution of the federal welfare reform act and fatherhood initiative Congress meet with fathers rights groups. Have the actual members of Congress meet with mothers? Where are women to go to report the family court? Until the woman in the United States learn how the government works, work together to protect their children and themselves for federal policies. There are contracts and policies are used over the rights and protection. Collective bargaining agreements and the language is based on fatherhood. The leaders are aware of contract and bargaining agreements. Until women in the United States starting to educate themselves and work to have your rights and the rights of the children. Children do not have rights because they are not adults.
…
All you folks running around screaming Toxic Feminity. Michelle is the picture of an of it. Entitled to move in the house, complaining to the GaL. In the middle of the divorce and involved in the murder. Perhaps she should have thought about her daughter before she got involved in the ” high conflict ” divorce.
https://nypost.com/2003/05/18/tug-of-love-tempest-conflict-probe-of-custody-experts/
Will there be a moments thought? People have been dying and life and reputation lost. The Dulos divorce is one which ultimately lead to death and unimaginable life altering circumstances for 5 children. The operation has been going on for years. The signs of are ignored.
Guilty as charged!!!!!
… as are Connecticut family courts.
To shea. May part of the Jennifer’s legacy be the unraveling and dismantling of a currupt, dangerous system of greed. How many children are grieving the loss of their a parent that is still alive because of greed is the state immune system. These people are going on as business as usual. Nothing is being done about it. Murder, money and monsters walking the halls of so called “justice” of family court.. Accountability was served in this case to one person . Dying, discredited, and robed of your assets in Connecticut family court. Children held for ransom. May the 5 children know their mother was much more than a law, hope to women that the family court system may possibly be cleaned up. Dispite the courts ignorance and misapplication. Thanks to the effort of a limited group of journalists willing to cover the secret business of the family court.
https://yankeeinstitute.org/2016/10/28/commission-gives-family-re-engineering-committee-a-pass-on-transparency/
March 20, 2019.
The state of Connecticut was “Still Revolutionary”. The Dulos and Farber families were told to “Make It Here” and “Find (Their) Vibe”.
Still no comment from the governor about the state’s role in that “family court” nightmare?
https://jud.ct.gov/Superiorcourt/MOD/DocumentPreview.aspx?RandomKey=470E8F9F-45CA-44F9-A1BA-9CF9089DC856
Participate all you want. (just don’t mention the criminals and crimes of “family court”)
https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2024/02-2024/Governor-Lamont-Announces-Applications-Now-Being-Accepted-for-Parent-Cabinet
Which Connecticut state and/or federal office let so many “family court” evaluators mishandle so many worst and most dangerous cases for so long?
It’s been forty years of such hell for so many.
https://insideinvestigator.org/best-interest-of-the-child-one-mothers-fight-against-a-claim-of-parental-alienation/
…
The question of memories of children and their experiences. How many tactics are used in reunification therapy to discredit children who are traumatized? Michelle is an adult who demonstrated body language with her selective memory.
Yale law school federalist society. We are entitled to bill. Nausbalm emails and phone calls. Yale law school is partnered with the fatherhood initiative. Unlimited funding to it’s members. The supreme court is weighted down with federalist. The division of classes, gender and religion. “The culture”. ” The economic growth and development of the country”.
The belief of federalist favors Federalism. Making the federal government more powerful than the state. The federal welfare reform is running state legislation and guiding family court. Not the best interest of individual children . The blanket languestics. Focusing on the economic growth and development. With the belief that the rich people are entitled because they have worked harder than the McDonald’s employee. There is no reasonable guidelines for attorney billing in the state. The poor people going to family court unrepresented. The federal funding going towards the gender with large earnings capacity. Complaining about providing financial support to children. Not supporting their former spouse/partners. With lower to non existent income. Unfashionable stay at home mothers. Healthy marriage is pushed as a two income household being taxes to the government. The state associate is vanishing. 2019 Washington Post. Unpresidented presence and influence of the supreme Court in the United States of America by the federalist society. 9 of the supreme Court judges. Donald Trump internationally election a federalist to the supreme Court bench. The continued splitting of classes. Family court is an illustration of buying custody. The fatherhood initiative alienation and gatekeeper for federal funding. Being used against women especially with low income status. The overturned abortion rights. There looks to be a lot of dark influence and money in our nations court system.
… The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the collective pseudonym “Publius” to promote the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. The collection was commonly known as The Federalist until the name The Federalist Papers emerged in the twentieth century. …
https://archive.org/details/TheFederalistPapers_201607/page/n3/mode/2up
Who did what to whom, when, where, why and how?
Fatherhood flames. The whopper have it your way. These are definitely the objectives in family court. Father’s are rarely held accountable or to the same standards as the mothers. Claims of leadership of one gender making all the rules. Florida program is aggressively going after dominance in the parenting. Equity?. The impact on domestic violence. These programs and their content is absolutely anti motherhood. What kinda articles are being published in the media campaign.
Are we using federal funding for domestic violence cases? Using a federal program instead of State criminal courts?
Fatherhood engagement in the NFL. Ray Rice honored for his career in the NFL. Years after his knockout punch. We take a knee for our fellow man, we cheer for those who take a hand to women.
…
…
The MOU was experimental. Expired in September of 2023. To be implied by 2024. It was to reduce material mortality rates. That’s why Doug Edwards was on the committee. . Tamp funding reporting just changed days ago . They implemented father’s to reduce domestic violence. They won’t investigate these court cases. Connecticut was the leader and head of the snake. Women’s rights are now in the back seat. This a government project. That’s now in full progress. Healthy marriage and fatherhood responsibility. Just look at Connecticut family court. That’s why no one is getting in trouble. Being protected.
It’s the originalism, the federalist society. Fathrs head of the house hold. Children are property of the father’s. Connecticut was the first to sign up for the project. It’s political. You have to start marching and voting people out of office.
The origionalist and federalist
Connecticut was the first to sign up for which project? 🤔
Yes. Expires in 2028. Maximus inc. MOU and fatherhood initiative. Pilot program.
Who is donating to Maximus inc? What policies and procedures are effecting family court?” The secret business of family court” . Funding the state of Connecticut.
… commitment to excellence has not gone unnoticed. She has consistently received accolades, including being voted the #1 General Dentist by Albuquerque The Magazine and being listed among Albuquerque’s Top Dentists in various categories. These recognitions underscore her impact on patient care and her standing among peers in the dental community. …
The lastest federally funded fatherhood gravy train. Fatherhood flames. 3 day program to implement funding for the govenors. Obama flipped the health and human services funding. Victims assistant programs were reduced and transferred to fatherhood funding. Women are being forced to stay with abusers. For the economic growth and development of the country. The federally funded welfare reform act. The department of justice is funding all this stuff. Who is on the federal judiciary committee. The Senate is deeply involved in the problems in family court. In Connecticut Richard Blumenthal D-CT is a big part of the problem WOMEN are having in family court. As well as Lamont and William Tong. Murphy, Looney and Winfield.
All the Democrats in federal judiciary committee should be investigated. There is only one Republican on the committee. The federalist. They want to increase terms. Reduce power to the states. The fatherhood initiative is a federal government program. Richard Blumenthal D-CT is leading the way in Connecticut to the federalist society.origonalist . Democracy is looking to be in the rear view mirror. Blumenthal D-CT attended communist events. Freedom for American especially women is at great risk. Connecticut has enacted bias legislation. The ACLU and the united states government is ignoring it. The Senate is doing nothing. We are loosing our freedoms.
There is no funding to prosecute crimes. All the financial resources have been directed to men through the fatherhood initiative. This is why Connecticut is operating the way it is. It’s a bias state. The Jennifer’s and the Julie’s are loosing their lives. Connecticut is not going to protect women because the money is invested in men. Through the fatherhood initiative. The state of Connecticut is unbalanced. Unsafe and not going to change anything soon. There changing the way things are reported. It’s all being hidden from the public.
Stop contacting the legistors. It’s your Senitors.This is a federal issue. Because of the funding and welfare reform act.
It’s up to the Senators to uphold democracy, and equity in the court system. The federal funding is buying family court. $500 million donated to Yale and Uconn. From family court vested interest parties. Our system is not based on best interest. It’s based on gender bias funds. Pushed as minority project. The entire federal judiciary committee should have to answer these questions to the American public. The Connecticut and Florida senators as well as governors signing legislation should have to answer for the funding and lack of it. Where all the money is going? Which non profit organization are receiving it. Both criminal and family court civil matters are running on it. The custody evaluation and the continued focus to hid it in the disappearance and death of Jennifer. The original attorney probably knows just were to purchase a favorable report. Considering he is an upstanding Attorney and human being.
Chuck Shumer needs to be voted out of office to fix the family court system. It’s a problem in the senitors.
Fatherhood flames. Florida program. Since they received a large amount of money. Whopper. ” Have it your way”. Male dominance in the parenting arena. It’s another bad mommy, good daddy program.
There is a difference in assurance of equal representation in the affairs and important issues facing the nation. It’s a whole different matter using the nations financial resources to legally lift a leg on the judicial bench.
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/michelle-troconis-trial-live-updates-dulos-day-24-18675946.php?src=sthpdesecp
In April Dulos knew things were going to change. After a court ordered evaluation. Michelle was so upset she was not able to have contact with the Dulos children. Dulos was upset because Michelle was angry that she was to have no contact with his and Jennifer’s 5 children. Jennifer never met Michelle. Delusional Dulos wanted Michelle, himself Jennifer and all children to live together in 2017. Michelle was upset she was unable to have contact with the couples 5 children at the time of Jennifer disappearance.. Dulos was concerned that his relationship with Michelle would end if Michelle could not have contact with his children. The couples divorce and custody court case with Michelle in the middle of it.
The Connecticut Martinez program is in its over 20 years of Bitch Burning project. Nesting. Doug Edwards. Mommy and Daddy built a nest. I wounder if Mr. Edwards is aware of the monetized white Daddy project being run along side the culture specific program. Real dad’s are forever. Dulos and Michelle believe they should be able to live with Jennifer and her money. A hand maiden’s tail apears to be a possibility in these cases. How does a couple divorcing with children involve a third party interest. Michelle an entitled pictures of a woman invested in the minority gain of divorce proceedings. Like the Kassonoff case. Using children for residents and monitory gains. The lack of accountability, decency and lack of morals we are seeing in society today. Ignored by the court hiding behind children. There are no morals in the family court. This is a dangerous situation example of the third party getting involved in disillusion of the marriage of TWO people. The layers of triangulation when the courts allow the interjection of a non party. Financially invested in the outcome of the case. Perhaps Michelle added another layer to the stress to an already at the edge man. Leading to the death of a loving mother trying to protect herself and her children. Because she was unhappy the custody evaluation didn’t work fast enough.
…
…
That could be one reason Michelle Traconis and her criminal defense attorney have a copy of Dr. Stephen Herman’s bogus “family court” report while the Attorney General’s medical fraud office doesn’t have a copy of Dr. Stephen Herman’s bogus “family court” report.
Q: Do Connecticut “family courts” monitor their “family court” evaluators?
A: Why should they?
Since “family court” evaluators aren’t ever held accountable for the harm they do to children and families, why would any state need to monitor the evaluators?
As long as state employees (including those in the AG office) don’t know what Dr. Herman did in the Dulos case, state offices can’t be held responsible for harm done in the Dulos case.
By the way, has no Connecticut Attorney General ever commented on ANY fraud committed in ANY family court case, ever?
Is the harm family courts do to children off limits for a reason?
Time, money and entertaining air time spent on the Traconis case would be far better spent examining the role of state employees and private vendors who were paid to prevent all of that harm done.
Next up for Connecticut taxpayers, the Kent Mawhinney case. The made for TV movie could start this way … “The woman said she met Mawhinney when she hired him to deal with her immigration status. Within a few months, he began pursuing her with flowers and gifts, but she refused to date him until he filed for divorce from his previous wife ...”
https://www.ctinsider.com/hartford/article/Ex-wife-of-Dulos-defendant-Kent-Mawhinney-claims-17249968.php
The glory which is built upon a lie soon becomes a most unpleasant incumbrance.
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.
This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.
There is little to no education to the public on the machine driving the system. It’s people placed in powerful positions operating under the radar of the public. These policies are decided and not shared with the public. Until the machine is unstoppable.
Until the media is allowed to publish the contracts and programs. Publish cases with a redaction in names. The public will continue to believe that the people they elected are serving in their best interest. The greater good is considered the financial interest of the country. These courts are appears based on programs for the country through policy and management. Not really individual cases and the best interest of children. These appear to be government project directed at the financial interest of the nation. The individual rights of children is based on global beliefs. The fatherhood initiative was based on the input of father’s rights groups. Male agenda. With little focus on child development and elimination of assistance to single mothers. Minimal funding for domestic violence victims. Focusing on the abuser.
Let’s move back to Hartford superior family court judge Robert Nastri. Mawhinney was Dulos friend and former Attorney. Mawhinney former wife reported to the police that Dulos lured her to his home. She believes to kill her. Reported being raped to the South Windsor police department looking visibly upset to South Windsor police official Edward J. Klein. Hartford States Attorney Shamese Wilcott told Judge Doyle the rape allegations couldn’t be proved. Stating the allegations were not credible. While another mother reported Judge Nastri, gal and psychologist for engaging in unethical practice. Locking the mother out of court and failure to submit evidence in family court. Hiding funds. Partnered with the department of labor and fatherhood funding. CT family court judge Leo Dianna refused to her the complaint of racketeering and corruption. He never presided over the case. Which involved the Connecticut Labors union. Judge Robert Nastri was appointed by Govenor Dannel. P. Malloy who served 7 years for corruption. Judge Robert Nastri also highlighted in the Family Court Circus for the Reich case. Which Thomas Mouthwshes was then handed.
The original GAL and psychologist on the Reich case was the same as the Laborers Union case. Getting the Alienation claims started. Judge Robert Nastri refused to grant a restraining order to Mawhinney’s divorcing wife a restraining order during proceedings. Everyone is refusing to investigate Hartford Family Court Judge Robert Nastri. The Labors union donates to the Democratic campaign fund. Department of labor thru the Mou for unlimited funding in Connecticut.
The ongoing decline and absence in the state of Connecticut to protect women and children in Connecticut. Federally funded Welfare reform Act and fatherhood funding. Gatekeeper alienation claims. The 100-billion-dollar project illusion driving the state of Connecticut.
The fundamental right to Settle, Die, Rape or lose your children in the state of Connecticut for federal funding.
White woman with designer hand bags. Threatening a project billed as a minority program. Effecting the entire population. Psst. These dangerous Daddies are not interested or invested in the children. Getting away with a crime ( public health care crisis) . Keeping da money. Punish the momma’s for leaving and exposing the family court racket.
Leo Dianna= next train conductor. The prosecutor office. Julie Minougue over 200 text and reached out to the police multiple times. Mawhinney former wife not credible. Perhaps the state of Connecticut is following the California bitch burning project .
Insufficient evidence= not credible/ liar. Gatekeeper, alienator. Punished for reporting. Women have to go to court and represent themselves. Become their own investigator. Document evidence. Called vengeful, vexious , hysterical, and vengeful woman. This is what happened to Karen Riorden. Countless women , and CHILDREN face in the court system. If that’s the direction the powers that be want to take it. Prior to the death of the Jennifer’s and Jennifer’s law women entering the courts had no idea what they were up against. The law has done more than provide financial assistance to domestic violence victims. It’s provided an opportunity for women to understand the family court and the financial funding driving it. How to protect themselves in family court. CAUSE THE ” COURT PROFESSIONALS” are not going to.
Reporting crimes= Enemy of William Tong and a threat to the state. False Utopia. Threat to the financial resources of the state of Connecticut.
“Threat to the financial resources of the state of Connecticut.” ???
Heath and human services through the department of public health. Currently many agencies are partnered with the fatherhood initiative through the MOU. There is department of justice grants. It would appear that outcome of family court cases with fatherhood engagement. If cases were proven to demonstrate that the fathers were an actual danger and threat to well being. Services leading to poor out comes. Would demonstrate that the funding and projects were not working. There appears to be a reason the GALs and psychologist are finding these mothers alienators/gatekeeper. It’s billed to the public as a low income minority project. The fatherhood initiative is effects the entire population. The access and visitation grant are not based on income. There is a huge savings to the state in child support arrears and insensitive former inmates to go for custody. With alienation claims. The access and visitation grant provides financial assistance for just about everything. Attorney fees custody evaluation not just supervised visitation. The actual process to investigate and prosicute raped, pedophilia or physical assault are expensive. The cost to incarceration. There appears to be large donations to Yale and Uconn both father’s rights driven. Both can be traced back to cases of abuse or women’s mental health. Finances on the line. There is a decrease in victims funds. A huge increase to criminal defense. The current set up to the state is for fatherhood engagement. There is no focus on mothers. There is no programs for the children to receive services that have been abused. Reunification therapy requires no insurance oversight. I believe the access and visitation grants asset fathers mainly while the mothers are forced to pay a portion. Parental alienation/ gatekeeper fatherhood funding has lead to funding. The MOU allows many agencies to get funding. The welfare reform limits assistance costly to low income and stay at home mothers. There is a cost savings to the state on not going after the non payment of child support and alimony. Both to be enforced by child support services. 50/50 in case where it would be inappropriate if evidence was truely interduced. The tnaf block grant funds are used for budget gaps. Connecticut was once in the red for budget. The reduction in crimes. Letting a mass group out of jail. Saving in incarceration cost. Saving on father’s incarcerated in child support arrears. There is a cost savings to not prosicute the gals, psychologist and family law industry professionals for what amounts to fraud. Medical malpractice. DCF is partnered with the fatherhood initiative. How much money would be lost through the MOU if father’s abuse was substantially proven. DCF has been gone after by GALs who find a father to be abusive. There is a reason the public defender office houses the GALs. Instead of the prosecutor office. Many GALs are criminal defense attorneys. There is a lot of financial insensitive involved in the state through the MOU to look as if the programs are working. There is money tossed at the non profit. Legislation is attached to all Connecticut father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children. Florida is swimming in funding. Domestic violence victims are forced to remain with abusers. Cause they can’t financially break free. Children are being held ransom by the state. Report and leave loose your children. You are out on the street. Healthy marriage in the United States of America. The bar in Connecticut is connected to the mortgage industry. How many new mortgages are generated through divorce proceedings. There is an extremely complex system going on with lots of money involved related to family court. Even Hartford hospital and Saint Francis connected to fatherhood funding. Involved in unwed births. Encouraging father’s not to sign birth certificate. It’s done out of the presence of the mother.
That MOU ALLOWS CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES TO BEHAVE AND MAKE CHOICES THAT ARE BIAS AGAINST WOMEN, IN FAVOR OF DADDIES, VIOLENT OR NOT, CONNECTICUT DOESN’T CARE.
AS LONG AS DADDIES IN PRISON FOR ABUSING THE MOMMY, AND CHILD TOO AT TIMES, HAS HIS HAND HELD, AND BACK RUBBED, WHILE BEING GIVEN A GET OUT OF “DOING YOUR FULL TIME” CARD, FUCK THE VICTIM, WE DONT CARE BECAUSE THE STATE TAKES OVER AS THE VICTIM ANYWAY.
LET HER TALK, IT MAKES HER FEEL GOOD, BUT THE STATE IS THE REAL VICTIM, NOW BURN THE BITCH.
AMERICA THE NOW OUTLIER COUNTRY, NUMBER 10 AS THE MOST DANGEROUS COUNTRY FOR WOMEN TO LIVE IN, MOST DANGEROUS PLACE FOR WOMEN IS THE FUCKING HOME, BUT IMPREGNATE US. BECAUSE ITS THE EASIEST WAY TO CONTROL A WOMAN; THROUGH HER FUCKING CHILDREN.
WE WILL JUST CALL HER CRAZY, UNRELIABLE, A GATEKEEPER IF SHE TRIES TO PROTECT THE CHILD. THEN STEAL THE CHILD RIGHT FROM HER DEAD HANDS, TO SERVE THE STATE, TO SERVE MEN, TO SERVE AND NOT EVEN BE TREATED LIKE A HUMAN.
CHILDREN ARE OWNED, BOUGHT, SOLD, ABUSED, KILLED, LOST, IN AMERICA.
The state of Connecticut is the leader. Uncivilized society that is pointing the finger at the rest of the world. Tossing money to other nations. Letting God knows who in the country through unregulated boarders. Clean up our country and the court system.
Child support arrears, criminal prosecution, health and human services funding, incarceration costs. The MOU and partnership funding. Large donations to Connecticut University Yale and Uconn, private donations.
It’s a government program. The problem is in the Senate and federal judiciary. They have been transferring money away from victims to men’s programs. Time to clean out the senitors we have entrusted and elected. Election time is around the corner. TIME FOR WOMEN TO ORGANIZE AND PROTEST. LEGISLATION ISN’T GOING to work.
PBS and the “culture changes” Connecticut attempting to transform the prison system. Costing the victims of crime. Prison reform. The current system doesn’t rehabilitate so they are attempting to turn them into country clubs. The nation poverty is not addressed. Poverty has little to do with domestic violence as you can see. It’s an ideal in the United States that men/ fathers lead. The federalist and religion based ideal. The state of Connecticut has the culture ideal that if they focus on the abuser and the perpetrator of the crime we shall fix everything. There is a huge financial insensitive to insist on these programs to work. The “culture” is to place criminals and abusers rights over the victims. For the economic growth and development of the nation. Financial aid to families and victims has greatly reduced and the criminal reform priority. The system is related to family court and abuse. The focus on the abuser, rather than the victims. The focus is not on the best interest of the children. Fatherless household and child support are the focus. These are male dominance agenda. The men leading equals dominance over women and children. Connecticut is a prime example, removal of the guardrail. Leading Connecticut out of financial trouble to an stash of cash. At the cost of innocent people. These are federally funded programs with the states adoption for cash. Family court reform. To element child support. Fast track agreement with the alienation claims. Connecticut ignoring child support arrears. The access and visitation grant are given to abusers. There are no leaders in Connecticut. There are dominant people operating outside public knowledge. With out guardrails and ignoring the crys of the people. With the economic growth and development to a group of people called federalist. Leaving the “little people” to live under their ideals. Dividing the nation into color, religion, gender and economic status. Stakeholder means people buying our nations court system. Federalism has been placed in the supreme Court by presidents and the Senate. The federal policy is the agenda of the state legislation due to the funding. The languestics are being changed. Influence of people who call themselves leaders are guided the system for economics and control. This is not equaity and justice. It’s buying the laws of the land. Freedom and justice for all ?
Evil paid a visit. 11 year fight of a mother Donna . A prominate member of Waterbury community accused. John Regan. Took a change in police chief to get justice. A double life. Charged with kidnapping. Rumors Donna was a liar. This happens to women relentlessly in the United States.
Why does Michelle have a copy of a custody evaluation? For the custody of children she is not a party in the case of. Money talks.
Coincidence is God’s way of remaining anonymous.
Responsible fatherhood has left another woman holding the bag. 5 children with out parents. One with a mommy in the penitentiary.
Any evidence anywhere that Fotis Dulos received “responsible fatherhood” funds?
Those programs are good programs when they help good fathers become better fathers.
How many cases are used for statistics? Perhaps the child support enforcement office should be investigated and comptroller office? Some one should have answers. If not where is the money? How much money is health and human services receiving? The more father’s with custody the more health and human services funding? Who is collecting statistical data? Why is self reporting programs success to see if the program is working? Is the federal inspector generals office looking at the billions of dollar project? The head of health and human services already said that the fatherhood initiative needed to be looked at when he was in office in California. Who is hiding information?
Maximus inc. would be a good place to start looking at where money is coming from. Then the others to see where it is going. Are the family courts running on policy or laws?
I know so many men who have fought for custody of their children. All of them have won at least joint custody. And in all cases, a strange thing happens after their win: They begin complaining that the custody system is biased—a system that worked to get them the outcome they wanted.
This is what male entitlement looks like: not only should you get what you want; you should get it by default, without having to work for it. This entitlement birthed the myth of a family court system biased against men.
The data paints a different portrait. No matter how you assess family court proceedings, women are at a substantial disadvantage, and men who fight for custody almost always get it.
Men don’t want to parent their children until they get divorced
Mothers spend roughly double the amount of time per week caring for their children that fathers do, and this figure does not take into account indirect care, like packing lunches and emailing about play dates. An equitable family court system would base custody awards on the time parents actually spend with their children.
A fundamental disruption in the child’s life and expectations to serve a selfish father, however, seems to be the main goal. States across the country have moved to make joint custody the default. So a man can invest almost nothing in his kids, force his wife to do free labor for years (all the while insisting that she’s just better at it), then do an about face and take his kids from their primary caretaker and use the child custody system to ensure that all the free labor she’s done for him for years puts her at a long-term economic disadvantage.
Men rarely seek custody of their children
Men do less childcare, less parenting, less household labor, less of everything that is involved in tending to a child. So it should come as no surprise that this does not change after divorce. In 91% of custody cases, the parents mutually decide to give custody to the mother. Fathers fight for custody in court in less than 4% of divorces. Twenty-seven percent of fathers completely abandon their children after divorce.
Men who seek custody are more likely than not to get it
Fathers who fight for custody typically get it. Even 30 years ago, 94% of fathers who sought custody got sole or joint custody. Abusive fathers are especially successful. Seventy-two percent win their custody cases. In one study where both parents fought hard for custody, mothers were awarded custody just 7% of the time. Only in a patriarchal society does a 93% win rate somehow equate to male victimhood.
Courts happily place children with documented male abusers, and women lose custody when they report abuse
Dozens of children have been killed by abusive fathers; hundreds more women are eventually murdered by abusive ex-spouses. Despite this, family courts tend to discount even extreme cases of domestic violence. In one review, researchers found that, even in cases of proven, documented violence, family courts aimed to maximize children’s time with fathers, disregarding the danger to children.
Contrary to what men’s rights advocates would have you believe, though, women don’t win custody on false claims of domestic violence. Numerous studies have shown the opposite: women are twice as likely to lose custody when they report abuse, even when the abuse is documented. No such bias exists for fathers, who do not lose custody at higher rates when they claim abuse.
Fathers who abuse their children are more likely to get custody when they seek it
The bias against mothers extends beyond spousal abuse. Courts are also eager to place children with male parents whom the child says has abused them, according to this series of case reports. Fifty-nine percent of abusive fathers were given sole custody, suggesting that abusers are actually at an advantage. And even when the fathers did not get sole custody, not one single abuser was denied contact with the child.
In two-thirds of cases, the court pathologized the mother for attempting to protect the child, punishing her for her protective instincts and reducing her contact with the child.
Tragically, the same review found that 88% of children placed with abusive fathers experienced new episodes of abuse after their father gained custody.
Most men are paying a pittance in child support—or not paying it at all
Just 44% of custodial parents get the full amount of child support they are owed. Men’s rights activists will tell you this is because child support is a crushing burden. The data show instead that child support is a small fraction of the actual cost involved in raising a child, and that women actually pay more in child support than men.
The average father pays $5,181 in average annual support—$431.75 per month, comprising about 9% of the average father’s income. The average monthly cost to raise a child is roughly $1,416. So the average support-paying father is shouldering less than a third of the financial burden of fatherhood. Makes it pretty hard to argue that women are somehow profiting off of this pittance, or that men who pay child support are coming even close to providing for their children.
Mothers pay more child support than fathers
When fathers get child support—which they almost always do when they’re awarded custody—they get more. Census data suggests an average annual payment of $6,526. This is about 16% of mothers’ income, which means mothers who pay child support are paying almost double, as a share of their income, what fathers pay.
This figure, of course, just looks at how much mothers pay directly to fathers when the mothers do not have primary custody. To get the full picture, we have to look at what mothers are spending on their children when the children are in their custody.
The average monthly cost to raise a child is $1,416. For many families, especially those using paid childcare, the figure is much higher. The average father pays $431.75 per month in child support, which leaves the typical custodial mother to pay $984.25. Realistically speaking, though, most are paying significantly more, since nearly 60% of men do not pay the full amount they owe and most single mothers must pay childcare costs. Childcare costs alone in the United States average more than $1200 per month.
Using the courts as a tool of male entitlement
Men’s rights activists aren’t interested in fatherhood, or empowering men, or protecting children, or whatever other nonsense they spew. Their goal is simple: they want men to continue getting away with as little as possible at home. And then they want to ensure women are further punished with economic hardship and time away from their children. They want children with fathers at all costs, even abusive ones.
And when they lose custody in a custody system that is so biased in their favor that they win 93% of the time, they never ask why a heavily biased court denied them custody. They demand even more inequality. They won’t stop until fathers never pay child support, and 100% of abusive fathers get 100% custody.
Men’s rights activists want to protect abusers. That’s all this has ever been.
The legislators, senitors and heads of agencies and family court system professional are or should be expected to know factual statistics. If you are voting sponsoring a bill or involved in a “high conflict case” it’s a responsibility to have knowledge. All to often voting and ruling are based on what appears to be an agenda. Triangulation of interest in civil litigants based on financial insensitive.
You think forty years of sadistic exploitation and millions of fatal family court cases all over the Western world is only a result of men’s rights activists protecting abusers? 🤔
Many other variables also contributed to that purposeful destruction of so many families and unfortunately, the lists of obvious and not-so-obvious causes consists of so much more.
The most obvious gain is financial , religion and politics. Please elaborate if you know more.
The epic failure of the welfare reform act
Yes I do. If you understand money, dark money, if you know how to go down the rabbit hole,8ts all right there for your knowledge. It just takes skill to see how it all plays into itself.
Following the money is only one part, judgements that are bias against women by 99% of the population, even women themselves as assisted, pedophilia has assisted fathers gaining custody, especially of department of Corrections, but the big pushers behind it all, funneling the money, the power were men’s rights groups.
No doubt.
The federalist society.
Connecticut Parenting Education Program Advisory Committee 2023 minutes say:
” … Judge Diana reported that 92% of parties divorced with an agreement. …”
That means:
About 1 out of 10 divorce cases are more challenging than most.
That also means:
About 21 years ago, The Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division conducted a “Family Civil Intake Assessment Screen Project” with a private organization called, AFCC, Inc.
Why AFCC, Inc.? What was AFCC, Inc.?
Did AFCC, Inc. and/or Connecticut CSSD offices design “family courts” to manage dangerous divorce cases with purposely adversarial — for-profit — judicial proceedings?
In which ways did the 2002 CSSD/AFCC Inc. “project” help improve Jennifer’s chances of survival in 2019?
According to AFCC, Inc.’s website:
“… In the summer of 2002 AFCC was awarded a contract with the Connecticut Court Support Services Division (CSSD) Family Services Unit to develop an empirically based screening instrument for the Family Services Unit. The project team conducted site visits; direct observation; review and assessments of services; focus groups with stakeholders; and a literature review on screening protocols. CSSD revised its menu of services on the recommendation of the project team.
The screening protocol was developed, training conducted, and the screen was first piloted, and then rolled out statewide. AFCC was then awarded a second contract to evaluate the instrument over a three-year period. The project was submitted by the Connecticut Judicial Branch and was a semi-finalist in the Kennedy School of Government Innovations in American Government Awards. …”
The Kennedy School of Government. (very impressive)
Listed as the “Project Team” …
Eleven years later, distinguished members of 2013 Connecticut’s Judicial Ethics Committee considered the activities of an unnamed organization. Minutes from that meeting are on the Judicial Branch website.
The unnamed organization mentioned in the 2013 minutes seems to have been the public-private partnership of the Connecticut Judicial Branch and AFCC, Inc. That for-profit cottage industry was operating in Connecticut for decades and registered as a corporation in the state after a journalist investigated and found that they were operating in the state without officially registering their business.
It seems someone brought that public-private for-profit business (acting with judicial authority and judicial immunity) to the attention of the state Judicial Ethics Committee in 2013.
Judge Gerard Adelman was listed as CT AFCC, Inc. “Director”.
Dr. Bruce Freedman was listed as CT AFCC, Inc. “Doctor” and “Treasurer”.
Dr. Robert Horwitz was the CT AFCC, Inc. accountant who filled in their IRS forms.
How many “cases” did Judge Adelman, Dr. Freedman and Dr. Horwitz control?
How long did they extend each “case” with billable hours?
How much money did they make from their corporation’s activities?
How much harm did they do to children and families?
Private businesses aren’t supposed to be allowed to force children and families through mandatory and purposely adversarial for-profit judicial proceedings. Why did state and federal law enforcement offices allow CSSD and AFCC, Inc. to commit those state and federal crimes?
Why did state and federal law enforcement offices allow Mr. Adelman, Mr. Freedman and Mr. Horwitz to make money (tens of thousands? hundreds of thousands? millions?) from their judicial authority and judicial immunity in family court cases?
Why did state and federal law enforcement offices let so many lawyers and other for-profit private vendors involved in the Dulos/Farber case physically, financially and emotionally harm both of those families in such horrible ways?
One reason is:
This year, “the Traconis trial” is on TV and “the Connecticut AFCC, Inc. trial” isn’t.
For anyone interested in following Connecticut’s “progress”…
https://www.jud.ct.gov/Committees/parent_edu/
…
Maybe Ms. Gay who recently resigned from Harvard knows something about it? Perhaps the chief of the public defenders office in Connecticut placed on administrative leave knows something about the GaL program?
The Public Defenders office. The King of Criminal Defense himself Norm Pattis. Accusing Bosses of Being Racist. They Quit? Racial privilege. The public defender’ s office has been playing the gender card for years. Since the enactment of the welfare reform act and fatherhood initiative and the crime reduction project. Women have been labeled liars, mentally unstable and a host of other gender related labels associated with being a female. Women reporting sexual assault and Domestic abuse. The Connecticut Public Defenders office houses the Child Welfare Attorneys. GALs and AMCs.
Hundreds of lawyers in the commission are hiding under their desks after 5 commissioners resigned after allegations of racism. Meanwhile several hundred women are standing Infront of Judicial employees accused of malicious mommy syndrome. Inflated by Attorneys from the Public Defender’s Office. Perhaps Karma?
Meanwhile Attorney General William Tong hires an outside Attorney to investigate the situation at the Public Defender’s Office. Despite a United Nations report on parental alienation, William Tong is Dinning in area restaurants without giving hundreds of women a second thought.
Nicola Cunha complains to the court she believes she is being discriminated against by a group of Jewish court professionals. Disbarred for Antisemitism on the spot without a court hearing. It would appear a host of cards are played in the state of Connecticut. Only to be investigated if you represent a gender-based federal funding initiative, fit a federally funded group named, reduce prosecution costs and decrease incarceration costs for the state.
Where is the investigation for the women not hiding under a desk? In the direct firing line in front of the Connecticut Family Court Bench? Is there equity in Connecticut? If there is I can’t see it. Too bad Norm gave up his Blogg. Maybe he could explain it.
https://ctmirror.org/2024/02/09/ct-tashun-bowden-lewis-chief-public-defender/
What Bowden-Lewis did was sort of like what the state of Connecticut did to Ted Taupier when state prosecutors prosecuted him for a private email he wrote in which he criticized a family court judge.
I think we have seen what happens when Attorneys want to get rid of someone. This woman has been involved in criminal defense for years. Leading offices prior to the chief of public defenders office. Without a problem.. The state of Connecticut is infested and financially invested in saving money on incarceration. Let everyone out of jail. As Sara Russell would like.That’s why the GALs are there. They toss a fit and things happen. The public complains and they are discruntaled. Governor Lamont and William Tong need to be let go by the public. It’s all about power and control. These people don’t give a shit about justice. People are entitled to defense. People are entitled to public protection. It will never happen under the current political line up.
Here we have Mr. Doug Edwards again. Involved in family court system again. A gender and culture based program. Guiding the court system.
Who is doing something with these white daddy’s? They ain’t going to parenting classes. They are buying custody. These classes don’t help sociopaths/psychopaths. Or these personality disorders. The classes don’t fix the 1 in 10 cases.
Nothing. They are spending enough money to slip under the radar.
Doug Edwards is a front for the white dad’s buying family court.
How the hell is Ditunno still running family services? That guy is definitely some one who’s hands have gotten real dirty.
Have any mainstream reporters asked Mr. DiTunno why family courts didn’t protect Jennifer? She asked the court for protection.
Someone in the court system saw Fotis was dangerous and Dennis Puebla is called for dangerous cases supervised outside of a locked office. Too bad the supervisor Puebla sent was so new. A more experienced supervisor might have seen the red flags at that last “visit”.
Mr. Ditunno has a vested financial interest in the family court agenda. He’s running the violent offender program. His wife heads up the fatherhood initiative . Two state paychecks depending on the success or the illusion of success to State programs. Many of times domestic violence victims are intimated and interviewed in front of an abuser or their counsel. Nothing is done when abuse is found. Father engaging in it. The AFCC member former co chair of the Ccadv. He and Karen now the co chair of the commission on women children and seniors. The two of them know very well what is happening. Well positioned and well paid. Looks like Joe is placed on just about everything to keep the balls a rolling. Housed in the same building as the Ccadv and child support enforcement. Running fatherhood access and visitation grants.
Two people running those complicated programs aren’t enough. Maybe they need help getting it right.
a: Evidence-based best practices are diverse, equitable and inclusive.
b: Traditional religion and morals have no place in families and family court proceedings.
c: Everyone who sees the crimes and corruption is too afraid to do anything about it.
d: The wizard of Oz is still behind the curtain and the emperor still has no clothes.
e: Everything is fine in “family courts”. Totally fine.
Disban the partnership and gender based funding
A society with out morals is why the divorce rate is so high in the United States.
The state of Connecticut judicial branch and the governing body have access to the reports and statistical data. Including the department of justice report continue to let the courts run as is they have been. They are choosing to remain ignorant or ignoring the information to continue for some financial benefits.
Maybe the money they are using for legal for the custody battle would be better spent on Mandatory parenting classes. It’s not free. Mr. Edwards program appears to be working in the prison system. Maybe the monetized daddy program should be instituted. Maybe mandatory parenting classes should go hand and hand with a marriage license. Not accompany divorce procedures. Healthy marriage in the United States is used to make these gentlemen more marriageable after divorce. The divorce rates increase with each marriage. If women are the main initiator of divorce and out of wedlock births are on the raise, it would indicate the welfare reform act is not working. Yet, more money gets tossed at it.
My case started off as an agreement. Even though he continued to abuser and our daughter after we finished. Also he grew worse in his tactics once a GAL fueled his ego and ramped up his need for control.
He was arrested for trying to kill me, they still gave him visitation rights that he tortured me with.
But I knew I’d lose my daughter if I didn’t agree, so I did.
Then I ran and I never stopped running, 20 years later he still is stalking us.
Remember it’s not about black eyes, it’s about control.
Agreement or not, abusers abuse.
Forced agreements
Peter and Joanie and shared parenting legislation. CT HB05342/2023. Create a rebuttal presumption of joint custody and shared parenting time in matters involving the care and custody of a minor child. Representatives Juan Candelara. Rep. Travis Simms. Rep. Anna Hughes, Rep. Robin Porter, Rep. Holly Cheeseman. Rep. Trenee McGee, Rep David Michel, Rep. Kurt Val. ( Labor union lobbiest) sent Henri Martin. It’s important to remember that these high conflict cases only accure in 20 percent of cases. This presumption is based on the elimination of CHILD SUPPORT! A men’s rights objective.. Both Peter and Joanie are strongly against child support. A part of responsible fatherhood that has lead the country in to significant arrears Joanie has specifically targeted Domestic violence and attempted to push alienation over the best interest of children. Peter Syzmonic is an intelligent business man working to generate new funding streams in his business practices. Peter has brought attention to waist full spending in the state. What Peter will not discuss is the almost trillion dollar project for fatherhood and financial weaponization against mothers/women reporting abuse in our nation court system. Representatives Kurt Vail is a major advocate for labor unions. 76 percent men with unlimited funding to the members in family law divorce cases. Including child legal funds. Failing to disclose third party payer in at least one case. Using hypothesis of parental alienation, including funding for at least one gal to engage in forced reunification therapy under the presumption of lost custody for not complying( paying). The gal manipulated reunification therapy. Elimination of a mental health professional making recommendations of a parenting plan. Giving herself complete control. Ignoring other mental health professionals that disagreed with her . The department of labor is partnered with the fatherhood initiative. Leading to unlimited funding to the MOU partners. Peter has stated that the fatherhood initiative is one man behind a desk. It’s a 100 million dollar project with a large number of partners. Using hypothesis of gatekeeper/alienation claims when ever there is a child estranged from a father. Real father’s are forever a gender and culture specific program receiving funding. Started in Manchester CT. The fatherhood initiative is a project effecting every religion, color and economic status. With financial insensitive. With the presumption that fatherless household are the cause of numerous problems in the United States. These are blanket statements and appear to be over running the United States court system. A problem in which the United Nations has pointed out. The fatherhood initiative goes hand and hand with gatekeeper and alienation claims. A project the largest nonprofit organization for parental alienation in Connecticut lead by Joanie believing women are the majority of the alienators. Working hand and hand with Peter. Assisting to weaponize the family court. Jennifer law if property applied would help currently defenseless abuse victims protect themselves and their children. Women/Mothers have been going to court unrepresented. While men/ father’s are receiving significant funding for custody battles. Where the focus is on fatherhood over the best interest of children. In the majority of cases people focus on parenting time and responsibilities. The fastest growing number of single parent household due to increase in gatekeeper/alienation claims are motherless households. Blanket nasty statement of the character of women continues to be generalized surroundings divorce proceedings.. Children are suffering from the same problems in father headed households. Stepmother’s are glorified, while stepfathers are demonized. Women continue to be the target of the nation problems. Money continue to be used through funding to weaponize the court system against them while they are trying to protect themselves and their children. This appears to be all about economics benefiting white monetized father’s. The proper application of Jennifer’s law should be the focus and not the elimination. The family courts have lost sight of the best interest of children. Focusing on the presumption of entitlement that brings the most money into the state programs. The judges are appointed by the govenors office. Applying legislation to protect attached funding it appears .The need for it. The judges have not been trained in Jennifer’s law and the majority of the training is influenced by parental alienation/gatekeeper a money generator for the state and legal community through out the country. Especially in the state of Connecticut.
Triumph, tricky and triangulation. Fatherhood initiative and equal/shared parenting. The removal of child support payments. A conviction of abuse and sexual assault leads to costly incarceration. More child support arrears. These are not cases that are the norm. Gatekeeper/alienator , malicious mommy. Munchausen by proxy. Ladies get a psychological evaluation before you file for divorce.
Some criminal courts apply a model that they call a “triangulation of interest.” When they purpose to determine whether a course of action would be fair to the accused. According to this model, which is flawed, the interest of the accused is balanced against those of the community and those of the victim. It is false to suggest a fair trial for the accused is not a community interest. Fair trials for accused person is important for the community, through its laws, recognition that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt before conviction can be entertained. Simmerly fair treatment for a victim is also a community interest.
However, civil trials and criminal trials are different. CIVILCASE CAN BE A TRIANGULATION OF INTEREST. That may mean that proceedings have to continue with some forensic disadvantage (the psychologists) to the party. The court, in these cases, has the task of ensuring any such disadvantage do not amount to civil unfairness in a triangulated sense. Stay the proceedings if there is no other way to avoid an unfair trial.
Family court is a triangulated court of interest through funding and legislation. The use of AFCC, Gals, the psychologists and the use of federal funding through federal initiatives, ECT. Family court doesn’t appear to be a court of equity, but a triangulated court system of interest that generates funding for the states. Children’s best interest is appearing to be overlooked for the economic growth and development of the system. The bias MOU and partnerships. Triangulated interest serving fathers. Not parents. Not children. Parental alienation and gatekeeper hypothesis have been triangulating Connecticut family court for decades. The use of legislation appears to have defiantly triangulated the courts from serving the best interest of children. Lack of and one-sided judicial training to triangulate the family courts.
High conflict cases with triangulated interest attached to funding and create significant income for attorneys are the cases like Jennifer’s. Jennefer’s law isn’t the problem. It’s the triangulated financials incentives running family courts. Federally financed. The blanket legislation with funding attached. The over whelming cost to the nation to collect child support.
A court of equaity allows for the presentation of forensic evaluation not just by hand picked AFCC psychologist. Family court is a profitized political agenda.
The state of Connecticut has also applied triangulation to the criminal court. Using letting people out of jail or going soft on crime. Failure to prosecute based on the financial advantage to the state. This is how they went from being in the red with state budget to a surplus of money. Department of justice grants for second chances. Not necessarily a bad idea or cause. It’s the lack of accountability for fighting the bigger crimes of sexual assault violence and child trafficking. Using the community over the rights of victims .Punishing people for reporting. Stopping people from coming forward and saving MONEY. Creation of what looks like a false Utopia. Using gun laws in an effort to look as if something is being done about it . Jennifer , Julie and many others were not shot. . . Where crimes don’t exist or domestic violence or pedophilia. Despite evidence of it. We have out of date technology at the prosecutor office, yet giving away funds to non profit to update system. All hell breaks loose over open positions in the public defender office but the prosecutor office can go under staffed.
It’s important to keep in context that cases like Jennifer’s are not the norm. The men’s rights groups begin in the early 90s. Complaining about child support and alimony. Shortly after the welfare reform fatherhood initiative began. Shared parenting is the elimination of CHILD support obligations. The sale of parental alienation has been guided towards female abuse victims in desperate situations who have lost custody to an abuser. Selling 50/50 to abuse victims like Karen to remain in the lives of their children. Winning an elimination of CHILD support to stay at home mother. Family court matters and changing the legal landscape. The reform needs to eliminate financially insensitive funding fueling the battle. The largest part from the fatherhood initiative. Peter has been reported to become agitated when women/DV survivors discuss it. Refusing to discuss the funding. It’s a gender problem due to the MOU and legislation. Funding attached to family court system. Child welfare. The relentless claims that DV is not real from the alienation industry. Running after the legislators with the promise of cost savings to collect child support arrears. Under a umbrella of alienation claims. Bringing significant funding to the family law industry. Domestic violence is real. It doesn’t just happen in low income couples. White woman carrying designer hand bags are victims also. The focus needs to be on the problems in the family court system. The gross misuse of fatherhood funding covering up domestic violence.
Peter it’s okay to advocate for men’s rights. Just be honest about it. Your platform follows the welfare reform act. Your second former wife ran under the green party ticket. With the healthy marriage and joint custody agenda.. Fatherhood funding. The advocacy for Judge Mouckwsher retired using alienation to change custody for fathers. We can’t fix the family court until we fix financial insensitive.
Joanie, these families are not intact. Divorce is filed after attempts to repair and make them healthy. There is no advantage for filing for divorce and custody. People make many efforts to keep their family intact. No one places a sign out the front door that an abusive partner lives here. You clearly don’t understand domestic violence. Please stop spreading false information. We know people who were forced to reunification camps. We know what is happening at them. You can try to discredit them. We know what happens in reunification therapy. It doesn’t address abuse. It attempts to get expectance of it. Children don’t refuse to go to school because they aren’t abused there. Children are adverse to being forced into a relationship with an abuser. Not everything is parental alienation. The funding to domestic violence and research is nothing compared to the fatherhood initiative and the sale of “gatekeeper”. Didn’t you receive a degree in government affairs? Years prior to the parental alienation family therapy?
Hey Joanne, Isn’t this you?
September 27,2007 Elizabeth Bozzuto, Judge Kloth v Kloth Kloth -Zanard /George
Joanne filed on July 19,2005. Referred to regional docket September 2006. Special magistrate pretrial January 2007. Failed to reach agreement. 21 witnesses and 200 exhibits.
The plaintiff Joanne Kloth
Defendant David S. Kloth. MD
They have 2 children. The plaintiff a graduate of Skidmore college with B.A degree in GOVERMENT. Worked as a paralegal in Massachusetts, New York and Pennsylvania. The plaintiff has not been employed since 1991. Dr, Resa Fremed provided employment services of career counseling. Effecting no results. The plaintiff’s employment options are bleak. The court finds the plaintiff will not become full self-supported any time in the future. The plaintiff was awarded. $10,000 dollars per WEEK for alimony and child support. She was the caretaker of the children and maintained the house.
Joanne was awarded a substantial settlement and primary custody.
Now Joanne thinks the courts are unfair to fathers and full of alienator.
For further details read the entire case file.
The lastest PSA claim. Parental alienation is to blame for gender identity crisis. Children should be forced into reunification therapy beyond 18. These people want to milk as much money as possible. Has anyone heard or seen a case where a divorced family has harmoniously moved on with reunification therapy? Did children problems escalate with the increase of the forced service? Children did not appear to be having sooo many issues until parental alienation became a thing. Where are the stories demonstrating positive outcomes?
How has Joanne been allowed to operate the largest PSA non profit with out a license in the state of Connecticut?
The Connecticut department of public health is a sleep at the wheel.
Richard,
Why do you nor Frank not have a podcast? Its takes 15 minute to set up free one.
I love my podcast. Its about 20 minutes, twice per month. About 50 downloads per episode. Have on guests. Its fun. Lots of fun.
You need a podcast.
Pilgrim
P.S. So does Frank. Or you two share one.
I want to incorporate more video. I’m more a fan of shorter form stuff. One to five minutes (max). It goes back to one of Nietzsche’s points, to paraphrase: say in a few sentences what others fail to say in tomes. Mark Twain said it well too. He apologized to a friend for writing a five-page letter because he didn’t have the time to write a two-page one.
I think the most effective stuff is short, to the point, intelligent, well-crafted, and entertaining.
In an endless buffet of podcasts, who wouldn’t want an amuse bouche?
Section 53a-12
Reasonable doubt. A doubt based on reason that would govern or control a person in the more weight affairs of life. Michelle is a woman of low mortal standards. Opportunistic women of loose morals. She would have reasonable knowledge of the finances. With reasonable knowledge of abnormal behavior. Using an employee’s truck to illegally dispose of numerous items all over in the city of Hartford. Michelle had reason to gain in the dumping of Jennifer’s body. She tossed the bags. Her DNA is on them. You can defend her all you want. It would appear that Michelle willfully assisted Dolus for personal gain. These types of women look at these acts in situations as a personal gain to themselves. I hope they toss her in the clinker for as long as possible. There appears to be many Dolus type men running around out there. Women like Michelle are all too common these days.
In layman’s terms. The homewreckering hussy jumped on the gravy train, drove around the hood with Dulos illegally dumping. I’m sure the bags stunk of a different oder than normal trash? Not normal affairs of life. Guilty as charged,. Michelle hopefully wins a free trip to the penitentiary. Maybe she should consider herself lucky. She could have suffered the same fate when Dulos grew tired of her.
Let’s not forget that Jennifer’s law is also named after Jennifer Magnano.
Also important to remember:
Such little oversight and almost no accountability for culpable “family court” industry networks set the stage for those fatalities. How many others lost their lives in or as a direct result of exponential harm done by the Connecticut “family court” industry?
Jennifer Lindstrom, Tracy Do and Layla Malon also lost their lives after blatant “family court” mismanagement of their cases. A few Connecticut lawyers decided Tracy should be told to pay $10,000 a month for rent — after dragging her through abusive litigation in the state’s courts. Tracy couldn’t take that kind of pressure. Who decided the lawyers in that case shouldn’t be charged for pushing her over the edge?
Anyone know what happened in Jennifer Lindstrom’s case? Did Connecticut “family court” lawyers push her over the edge, too?
Which state or federal office has already carefully studied the important roles family court employees and vendors play in all the tragic “family court” cases since the 1980s?
Good to know current court administrators admit there’s been a problem with the state’s “family courts”.
Where are the apologies?
Where’s the compensation for all that harm done to so many children and families?
Where is the loss of license and legal ramifications for the conduct? How many more deaths? Before these people are held accountable?
“ culpable “family court” industry networks set the stage for those fatalities.”
I think Fotis killed Jennifer for the money. Not custody. He owed lots of money to her family and other dealings he had were underwater financially.
The custody eval that said he was a better parent, written shortly before Jennifer was murdered, would have meant that he had a good chance of gaining more custody. He didn’t need to murder her to get the kids. It was about money.
The point is the use of children in these cases. If you see these cases the money follows the children. Many of these cases are encouraged to the epic level they become. Why can’t assets be handled separately? Divorce is held up with the custody. I would hope the court system would see that these custody evaluation are suspect. The GALs and judges are responsible for opening the gateway to these psychologist. Domestic violence is considered a Public Health Crisis. This is all heavily connected to the health and human services. These fund’s are directed through the department of public health. We have almost a trillion dollar project and a large amount of dept trillions associated. The AFCC knows where the money is at.
19 days of trial.
How many news reporters have the courage to tell us about the guy at the desk?
“… Conversations between Dr. Herman and the lawyers is neither here nor there. …”
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/michelle-troconis-trial-live-updates-day-21-dulos-18666722.php?src=sthpdesecp
“The language we use is to determine the best interests of the child,” Herman said.
https://www.newstimes.com/news/article/ridgefield-doctor-to-testify-in-brinkley-divorce-66017.php
“Best interests” in the Dulos family court case:
This is part of the trafficking. Michelle has no equity in the process. These lying cheating white daddy’s. Dulos moved Michelle into the house. Attempting to establish a relationship with the third party for the custody flipping. Healthy marriage. Real dads are forever. The birthing person is a memory. The traffing train of property, money and children. The same thing happened in the Kassonoff case. Both dead. What kind of society are our courts breeding? Moral fabric of right and wrong is for sale. Healthy marriage? IT’S A JOKE!! The welfare reform and fatherhood funding. Responsible fatherhood? Psst. It’s about the money. The economic growth and development of the country.
Who is this man? Santa
How dare the state of Connecticut pass a law that helps these liars, sluts, gold digger, hysterical crazy bitches. Birthing tubes. The nerve , ITS ALL about me! The Dad. We make the money, We own these kids
I am the 100 billion dollar man. Dominating the united states court system.
Stephanie Vigil’s bill HB24–1039 allows children to pick their “preferred name” in school without parental knowledge or consent.
Vigil is also trying to pass a law that says that age is arbitrary. As of 2023, in 5 states theres no stats on min age. Cali, Mississippi, NM, Oklahoma & Wash. Child marriage is legal in 80 % of US states. However, kids must be 18 to legally escape the pedophile through divorce. If they pass the law that kids arent even kids, that theres no law that deciphers the diff between adult and child then all the child abusers can legally have sex with whoever they want without marrying a child. If that bill gets passed, then this mentally ill, evil ideolgy can spread . It should not even be open for debate.
Wouldn’t it be something if they televised the Paul Boyne case. We know that the media committee is never going to let that happen.
That would be Must See TV. Are you listening Dan Abrams Law and Crime?
Richard, who is a best of these legal analysts/entertainers:
Vinny Politan
Andrew Napolitano
Dan Abrams
Nancy Grace
Write In
???
I like Vinny Politan. But I think Law and Crime should hire Arthur Aidala. Artie would be classic sitting there and getting apoplectic because defense counsel isn’t objecting or raising an obvious fact or theory of the case.
Yes
Yes, it sure would be “something” – and that “something” would be yet another public humiliation self-inflicted by Boyne.
There is a lot more at play in this matter. Paul was a threat to the current running of the family court judicial branch. Judge Mouckwsher retired in the middle of being sued by Cunha. They dismissed the case based on subject jurisdiction. Mouckwsher retired with immunity. They painted her in the same light as Paul. Paul Boyne should have never introduced violent comments and racist antisemitic comments. Cunha’s frustration got the best of her. The public will never get a chance to see what drove these two individuals to such situations. 2014 got some sunshine on the Connecticut family court system. Quickly shut down with the exposure of the AFCC. Thousands of people complaining are fighting an uphill battle. There are some people who can not see the error in their own way . Not everyone complaining is a victim. It’s not just a group of like minded people complaining . Something is definitely not right with family court in Connecticut.
Of course they painted Cunha with the same brush as Boyne – she was essentially acting as his mouthpiece and spewing the same baseless accusations. I’m sure crazy Karen connected Cunha with Boyne and that is where she got her crazy “its da Jews” theory from. I believe she may have been having some medical and or personal problems that made her vulnerable to Boyne’s manipulation and she majorly fucked up. She deserved the disbarment. Also Paul is only a threat to the courts in that he has made literal threats on their lives and had them fearing for their physical safety and the safety of their families. End of.
Bonne is legally innocent under Counterman v. Colorado. He had a good faith belief that his activity was expressive.
The bigger issue is why judges and the courts believe they are insulated from criticism. Michael Volpe commented about this recently, that by becoming an attorney, you lose your First Amendment right to criticize the courts (and by extension, the government):
https://substack.com/@luthmann/note/c-49272031?r=o2ajl
The Framers never could have conceived of a country with so many goddamn lawyers. They were worried about the physical army. The Lawfare we see in the family courts and elsewhere is an end run around the Bill of Rights. Lawyers today, unlike the brave men who pledged their lives, liberty, and sacred honor, are spineless rats – far and away. There are some exceptions, but everyone one of them is obligated to look the either way for the glory of the Reich…I mean the court system. Don’t believe me? Ask Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, who cooperated with politically motivated and corrupt prosecutors, not because they were wrong, but to save their licenses. You don’t even have to ask them, it’s apparent.
Judges are King and Queen Shit. When you wonder why no one else recognizes the strange stench in American Family Courts, it’s because they are used to going to work every day in a building that is part fertilizer plant and part slaughterhouse.
Criticize the judges all you want but don’t threaten to murder them and their children. It’s that simple.
I agree with you. But the requirement for mens rea in a true threat case is that Paul Boyne was at least reckless in his statements. How can he be reckless in his statements if he believes he is espousing opinion and quoting literature? In his mind, he has a good faith belief that what he’s doing is fully protected speech, as twisted as it may appear objectively.
I’m sorry. He didn’t dox anyone. He publicly fantasized about how a modern Shakespeare character would go about “killing all the lawyers.” I think that this smacks of Thought Police.
If John Grisham and Hollywood screenwriters can come up with plots about Supreme Court Justices getting murdered by the mob (The Pelican Brief, for example) who is to say that Boyne’s platform isn’t expressive activity?
Honestly, the Connecticut authorities arrested him for sedition.
“In his mind, he has a good faith belief that what he’s doing is fully protected speech, as twisted as it may appear objectively.”
I disagree. I believe he knew full well he was making threats and frightening these people and he thought he was smarter than the legal system and that by selecting his words carefully and deliberately, they wouldn’t be able to charge him.
Thank God, common sense prevails and those judges and their families are being protected. Whether they were shitty judges or not, they don’t deserve that. They should not have to live in fear of their lives just for doing their jobs.
So Richard you would have no problem if I published tepeatedly you deserve a specific caliber of “freedom seeds” to your head and your blood should be spilled and by the way here is your address and a photo of your car and family? If I kept posting about a specific caliber of bullet that you should get to your head you would be cool with it? And alao you could tell by my repeated postings that I had a sick obsession with you? You would be like, oh well, they were just quoting Shakespeare. ??
Let’s be real here, what he was doing is wrong, and he knew it. But he is a typical narcissist who thinks he’s smarter than everyone else. wake up call: he’s not.
“I disagree. I believe he knew full well he was making threats and frightening these people and he thought he was smarter than the legal system and that by selecting his words carefully and deliberately, they wouldn’t be able to charge him.”
Wouldn’t this apply to just about anyone in media? Erza Pound? Julian Assange? Tucker Carlson? Matt Taibbi?
Do you really disagree that Boyne wasn’t targeted for what was in his mind? And what he said? If so, that’s sedition. And in America, the First Amendment protects against speech crime sedition. How? By allowing persons of ordinary intelligence to ‘select their words carefully and deliberately.’
What statements were direct incitements to violence? What were acts in furtherance of an actual scheme to see harm done? “I’m afraid. He is harassing me,” isn’t enough. There has to be something objective, in the world of reality and not in Boyne’s mind.
Did he DOX the judges? Did he put out their private information and put them at risk that way? Even then, that alone isn’t enough because they are public officials. Against the family, probably, but Boyne didn’t do that.
Boyne is being punished because in his mind he fantasized about certain people dying, and they happened to be lawyers and judges in Connecticut.
Newsflash – people fantasize about people dying all the time. I have a standing list of at least nine people I would love to see take a dirt nap. That’s not a crime.
What is the crime? Please. Explain it to me like I am a person with a sixth grade level of intelligence – the average Connecticut juror.
“Wouldn’t this apply to just about anyone in media?”
Nope.
His crime is cyberstalking and it is very clear that his intent was to intimidate and harass his targets. However, I think I read that it’s not even necessary to prove tha his intent but to determine if a reasonable person would interpret it as threatening, it qualifies.
Criticism of the public and their court system complaints. Many are actually dead. When will the judges be arrested?
With unlimited knowledge of cases in the high conflict zone. It’s really mentally draining and upsetting that this has been going on for so long. Mouckwsher cases continue to be known. He doesn’t appear to address the relationship between mother and child. Hard on mothers and soft on fathers .There is a group of women who experienced family court system at the same time as Jennifer. THERE IS SOME THING WRONG WITH THE COURT ORDERS! They are leading people down a guided path. The PSYCHOLOGIST are the big problem. Cunha has also experienced a scary incident where someone called her office in a threatening manor. It may not be a Jewish problem, but there is a big problem in Connecticut family court. There is more to the stories involving the state of Connecticut. Especially Attorneys and psychologist involved in children’s safety should be under heavy oversight and public transparency. The Media filtering is well noted. Cunha’s conduct may not have been the most tactful. Misguided, abused in the system, but crazy. No. I’m sure there is more to the story that they don’t want us to hear. It’s really hard to know that children are being used as pawns in the family court game. What they are being subject to. We know there is more to the story that many don’t want to be told. Boynes blog was threatening and wrong in that sense. There was something to be seen in the documents. The people in it.
Paul Boyne is facing possible changes for threatening his own attorney. After many years brought back to family court under contempt motion.
How do you know the custody evaluation in the Dulos case was a sham? I’m not seeing any evidence to back up anything you’re saying here.
Also, even if Jennifer Dulos did have psychological issues, that doesn’t mean she did not also suffer coercive control abuse from her husband.
The UK has laws now to protect people against coercive control abuse. It is not a sham. And it does not only apply to women.
Exhibit A are the 50 custody motions filed after Jennifer was presumably killed.
It is hard to convince some, and impossible to convince those whose livelihoods depend on the systemic lies. How are you connected to the Family Courts?
I have zero connections to the family courts or any courts.
I am just sincerely not following your logic here. What was in the 50 custody motions that shows Jennifer’s law is a sham? I don’t see how these dots are connecting.
It’s “The Churn.” If you can’t see it, it’s usually because you’re in it.
Well, Im not in it. My guess is there were motions filed after her disappearance because her family was trying to prevent a murderer from getting custody of children. Just a wild guess.
Could be. But if the Court Evaluator said she was bat shit crazy before she disappeared (because she could be in Cuba right now living it up with Tupac and Biggie), why would her death make her family’s claim better? According to the report, Fotis was the better parent.
But maybe you’re on to something. Maybe Troconis should argue Jennifer Dulos’s mom was the real mastermind! She killed her daughter to keep her grandkids safe!
Do you even think about things before you take shitty guesses?
Do you know how much blood was found? There is no way Jennifer is living it up in Cuba she is dead. I don’t believe the mother killed Jennifer to get custody. But I believe she would have fought to keep Fotis, a cold-blooded murderer, away from the children.
How is guessing that they were filing for custody to keep children away from a murderer a shitty guess? It seems logical to me. The nanny even testified that she suspected immediately Fotis had done something to Jennifer. It was never a mystery.
The fact that the sarcasm didn’t register means I will stop talking.
Her death would make the family’s claim better because the husband is clearly the murderer and he should not have been given custody. He was extremely dangerous.
If you have never been to a Connecticut family court or know someone who has been involved with a high conflict cas,e I can understand questioning. The state of Connecticut has a long sorted history involving family court. Prodomiditly women have been the target of custody flipping. If Jennifer had mental health issues it was from the abuse and betrayal trauma. Dolus had his hand out for financial assistance From Jennifer’s family. Probably why he started the relationship and marriage. Jennifer supposed him financially and home and family. He was a womanizer and Michelle appeared to be the next one in line to help him. Get rid of Jennifer. He had a sense of entitlement to money. Used the relationship to his advantage. She was a loving mother who was the primary care giver. While he was off fooling around and waisting money. When she tried to end the gravy train and things didn’t go her way looks like he killed her. With Michelle’s help. Sociopath/psychological behavior. Have you ever experienced living with or being married to a this kind of person? If you did you would understand the psychological damage. The shame and guilt for being fooled. The knowledge of the ability this person has to harm the children. The in understanding and see the manipulation these people do to their children. These type of people put on a good act. So do the Attorneys, gals, psychologist, judges ect. The amount of child trafficking in the world is a big problem. These people have no souls. They are sealing cases and hidding evidence. Not everyone complaining is a victim. Men have been subject to abuse. The gravy train leads to the significant money that fatherhood brings into Connecticut. The majority of court victims are women. The children are expolted for financial gains in the industry. If there are hundreds of crazy women running around Connecticut it’s time to test the water. Cause it appears it’s something only effecting women. Living through abuse and than again through family court is an extremely painful, damaging , and a very frightening experience. Obviously you have not lived it. Read the gatekeeper/alienation information. These people are targeting and spreading misinformation and hatred towards mainly women. To cover up and excuse abuse Man or women who ever you are you must not know anyone from Connecticut. There is plenty of books and information out there. It’s all about MONEY.
Also power and control. Not only do the abuser get a high from this. The court people get off on the abuse and power. Connecticut is a political backed financial gravy train. Peter has failed to discuss the weaponizing of fatherhood funding. Why is anyone pissed off about funds for services to abuse victims is a red flag. The government funding for crime victims has been reduced. Jennifer law has brought things to the front line of what is happening to people. Mostly women and children. It’s being misused by key players in the trafficking game in Connecticut. The use of Jennifer’s law in the Ambrose case was the family law industry way of flipping the bird to hundreds of women in the state. These court professionals are going to keep doing these things because there is too much funding at risk. Showing the programs are not working. Sexual assault and abuse are being swept under the rug. Jennifer law is not harming a gender. The fatherhood funding and alienation/gatekeeper is. We need a parenthood initiative. Limit the funding for custody battles. Jennifer law is for much needed services. For both genders. The system needs to straighten up and use it correctly. Most of these judges are intentionally clueless.
One Clue:
Stephen Herman’s report to the Stamford family court describes Fotis as “gregarious” instead of “deceitful, adulterous, homicidal and suicidal”.
A Few More Clues:
Sociopaths/malignant narcissists can be extremely charming and “gregarious.” Means nothing.
Does it mean anything when a “family court” evaluator tells the “family court” to give children to a deceitful, adulterous, homicidal and suicidal parent?
Did Dr. Stephen Herman and Dr. Stephen Humphrey apologize, yet? 🤔
“… Fotis Dulos has undergone two psychological evaluations since his wife filed for divorce in 2017 and has been deemed a “gregarious and confident person” with no psychopathic tendencies, according to the latest in a series of motions filed in the heated custody dispute. …”
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/local/article/Attorney-Jennifer-Dulos-husband-has-passed-2-14412082.php
“… September 11, 2019
The attorney for Jennifer Dulos’ mother spoke exclusively to Channel 3 on Wednesday. ..” for Jennifer Dulos’ mother spoke exclusively to Channel 3 on Wednesday.
https://youtu.be/d54uFRnPvuY?si=imc_shrRQOO6DaDA
“Coercive control” used to be called: ruling the roost, occupying the throne and wearing the pants in the family.
Sometimes it was called: disrespect, intimidation or domination — all considered to be shameful in small town and big cities everywhere in the world. For many or most it was always called “a sin”.
Before recently, “coercive control” wasn’t an excuse for courts, judges, lawyers and therapists to micro-manage children and families. Under penalty of law. For a profit.
In nation-states, “coercive control” takes the form of dictatorships, tyranny and organized extortion and racketeering — just like what’s been happening in family courts for the past four decades. For example, starting around the 1980s with help from HHS, AFCC, Inc. networks of lawyers and “experts” astroturfed in many countries with public-private partnerships. How many know about AFCC, Inc. networks pushing Richard Gardner’s cultural reform? Breaking down families in family courts all over the world to “build back better” was the goal of the Model Penal Code reform of the 1950s — and the Carnegie Foundation goal before that.
In this century, the introduction of new legal terms such as “coercive control”, “gender identity” and “science according to the biggest multinational corporations with the most money” is a slippery slope. New terms are often new tools to control populations. No coercion required when a law is a law.
I am having trouble understanding your thesis here. so are you (Richard) saying you believe Fotis was the victim?
I don’t believe that. But Michelle Troconis has a right to have her lawyers sell that story to a gaggle of nitwits who were too stupid to get out of jury duty. A Custody Evaluator’s Report that says Fotis was the better parent and that Jennifer was Bat Shit Crazy goes along way with the “Gone Girl” defense. And they could win. God Bless America.
Norm came up the gone girl defense from the California case. Bitch Burning in the police department. The American nightmare. It’s being used for people like Dulos who dispose of the body. Remember the wood chipper murder. Richard you are a little scary in your thought process. Along with the theory your buddy has if she just gave up her assets and didn’t receive child support she would still be alive. Jennifer was not crazy. Dolus was a charming cold blooded murderer apparently. Like Ted Bundy. He charmed Michelle into an accessory and accomplish. Got luck 🤞 Connecticut prosecutor office. God bless a conviction. Let’s restore justice in the state of Connecticut.
Are you saying Fotis Dulos was a Keith Raniere-level manipulator? If so, I would think that Michelle Troconis would bring that up as part of her defense. If she can show that he manipulated her into a series of actions that she believed were being done in good faith, then she walks. The state prosecutor has to prove Criminal Intent, and if Fotis Dulos was a master manipulator, that would take away her agency and culpability.
“If so, I would think that Michelle Troconis would bring that up as part of her defense. If she can show that he manipulated her into a series of actions that she believed were being done in good faith, then she walks.”
Tell that one to Allison Mack.
Mack didn’t get 120 years. She didn’t even get 120 months.
She sure as hell didn’t walk.
That’s the point on these charges against Troconis. They are all or nothing. Plus, Mack took a deal.
I personally think Michelle is as manipulative as Dolus. She also stand to gain. Dolus would have gotten away with inheritance. I think she knew ahead of time what he was going to do. They were birds of a feather. Bonded perhaps with the secret. Look at Kassonoff. Gone girl gone. Catherine is dead and the executor has her ashes. The gone girl gone defense started in California. Spread through the criminal defense tactics. Jennifer was never going to disappear on her 5 children. Just like Karen, despite the family court beat down, they are going to stay for the long haul. It’s called being a mother, AKA “crazy” in family court.
They can’t sell that Gone Girl story to a jury because even a gaggle of nitwits can understand that the volume of Jennifer’s blood that was found in the trash bags that Fotis was caught on camera disposing of means she cannot possibly be alive.
That said, so far I don’t see how they are going to convict Michelle of anything unless they are holding onto some bombshell evidence that is yet to be revealed.
That’s a great point and I agree. Gone Girl was serviceable for Fotis Dulos a few years ago. Now that he’s dead and so much time has passed, you would think that Michelle Troconis would have had a private investigator looking for Jennifer Dulos if she was hiding out. You need testimony about the methodology of the search to date and the jurors will probably want to see if you pictures of her sipping a pina colada on a beach someplace.
The State’s case has been a bit of a nothing burger to date. But, you never know.
Wasn’t she in the truck while he was stopping at dumpsters all over Hartford?
Yep. But how can they prove she knew what he was doing?
It would cross a reasonable persons mind that something is wrong. If you know Hartford, you know that these are neighbors you probably want to avoid. If your boyfriend is involved in a bitter divorce, uses someone else truck to stop at several dumpsters when he has access to dumpsters in construction. Any women of sound mind would question what was happening. Did Michelle ask what was going on? These areas of Hartford are not exactly the safest neighborhoods. He has no business illegally dumping in these dumpsters.
OK. But is it a crime if it crosses your mind that something is wrong? I just don’t know if it proves a conspiracy, although the part about writing down the alibi for the day with Fotis is a bit sketch. That sounds like she was possibly helping him construct an alibi which would mean a cover-up I guess.
Her DNA was on a trash bag that he got rid of but it could’ve been that she touched the bag in an inadvertent way. Like they said if she pulled out a new bag and touched the bag that was still remaining in the box, it could transfer her DNA that way onto the bag still in the box. Then they had two ponchos with blood on them, but I don’t believe they said her DNA was on either one. 🤷
God bless the passing of Jennifer ‘s law. The services to abuse victims is long overdue.
Evan Stark’s “Coercive Control” racket in family courts will be the same as Gardner’s “Parental Alienation Syndrome” gimmick as long as good people look the other way.
Mr. Stark & his friends at Yale knew Richard Gardner’s “Parental Alienation Syndrome” gravy train was running out of steam. They also knew the “reunification camps” got bad press — even the camp Lynda Munro ran. (Doesn’t Representative Steve Stafstrom know about the “Overcoming Barriers” camp and AFCC, Inc., yet?)
Linda Gottleib’s junk science and Lynda Munro’s junk science is Sidney Horowitz’s junk science which is the same as Gerard Adelman’s junk science — in the same category of Sidney Gottleib’s junk science and Alfred Kinsey’s junk science.
Didn’t any Connecticut state employees notice when Mr. Nusbaum, Mr. Cuda and Mr. O’Neil didn’t need certifications in the field of “Coercive Control” to use it in the Ambrose “family court” case?
Do any state or federal employees anywhere know or care that some family court “professionals” run mandatory for-profit, purposely adversarial rackets in “family courts” to steal millions of dollars from the families they destroy?
State and federal employees who do notice and do care seem to be too afraid to do anything about it — just like the state and federal employees who knew about the crimes Kinsey and Gardner committed against children and families.
More about Mr. Gottleib: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Gottlieb
There is a lot of funding given to non profits in CT. Did Joanie get grant money for the largest parental alienation non profit? Was federal grant funds for the unrecognized theories of parental alienation? Joanie stated in her experience 99 percent of domestic violence alligations are false. Factually incorrect information. She answers emails from California john Hammel.( California has the largest child 🚸 trafficking operations in the nation). Joanie states she was treated by Gardener as a child in New Jersey. Joanie discusses the connection of mass school shootings to single mothers household. The leading experts and policy makers don’t support that. Joanie and Hammel attempt to change the numbers to portray women are equally responsible for domestic violence. Not supported by research. Slam the gavel podcast. She states a father who shot a mother at the door during a custody exchange was probably because of parental alienation. Is her non profit funded to spread misinformation and weaponize the court system. Possibly provide criminal defense for murder? Where is all the funding going? Is Peter Syzmonic working closely with Joanie to dominate family court with alie alienation industry claims upset because funding is being given to domestic violence survivors? Do Peter and Joan know that federal funding is guiding Connecticut family court? Money giving white fathers custody and not having to pay child support. Both Peter and Joan have complained about child support. These high conflict cases are not the norm. Perhaps both father’s and mother’s are victims of family court. Why are they so concerned about minimal funding for domestic violence victims? Ignoring the billion dollar man fatherhood funding? Where is the federal funding going? Is federal funding going to THERIES and Hypothesis instead of evidence based practice?
A class D misterminor in the state of Connecticut. Any person by advertisment ridicules or upholds any person or class of persons, on account of the Creed, religion, color, denomination, nationality or race of such persons . White woman of privilege carrying designer hand bags, maternal gatekeeper/ malicious mommy syndrome. “There is no room for hate in our state”
” That’s a sign of malignancy… A Cancer in democracy if we fail to stand up and speak out and take action.” “Words are not enough” Connecticut state Senator Richard Blumenthal.
26 million dollars in grant funds aimed to combat hate crimes in our state.
Connecticut Fatherhood initiative. ” White women of privilege” Millions in gender-based funding. The largest non-profit in the United States for a hypothesis using mis- information targeted at women, statistically incorrect. The anger towards a community of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVIVERS for receiving funding?
With all due respect Senator Richard Blumenthal and the other Senators,
How long are you going to ignore the hatred against women in your state? How long will you ignore thousands of residents complaining in your state? If you are unwilling to address the problems in your state, what does that mean for the entire United States? What is really happening with the federal funding and grants awarded to your state? The directions of funding to the other states? 52 percent of your state are women. Your constituents. Jennifer and many others are dead. Children appear to be sold off in your state court houses. Please, get off your political seat if you are going to allow this to continue. We have heard you talk the talk, yet what are you doing to effect changing in your own state?
Has anyone wondered why the Connecticut chiropractor has been allowed to engage in hate speech on the Internet? Joanne’s alienation worrier. Why Joan has been allowed to run her PSA company in Connecticut with out a license? If the hate speech guided towards women in the Internet is any indication of the service provided to “alienated parents” is anyone concerned? DPH?
She has friends. In the GaL industry. DPH has vested financial interest in parental alienation. They don’t go after these kind of people. Minnie Gonzalez is also protecting her. Operating and using a mental health counseling services helping to bring federal funding into the state would be over looked. Joanne and Peter have been protecting the funding and keeping the alienation gravy train a rolling. Hate speech on the Internet is only address for the special people who generate funding. Women are being killed not just feeling threatened but Connecticut doesn’t appear interested in those types of things. There is no money to be made. So the show goes on.
Chapter 383 psychologist section 20-187 License required. Practice defined.
No person shall practice psychology. unless he has obtained a license as provided in section 20-188. The practice of psychology means rendering professional services UNDERANT TILTLE OR DISCRIPTION OF SERVICES INCORPORATED THE WORD PSYCHOLOGIST, PSYCHOLOGICAL OR PSYCHOLOGY TO THE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ORGANIZATION FOR FEE OR OTHER OR OTHER REMUNERATION. Processional psychological services mean the application, by person trained in psychology, of established principle of learning, motivation, perception, thinking and emotional relationships to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, diagnosis, and amelioration of psychological problems or emotional disorders of individuals or groups, including but not limited to counseling of individuals or groups, including but not limited to counseling, GUIDANCE, psychotherapy, behavior modification and personal evaluation, with persons or groups in areas of work, FAMILY, school, MARRIAGE AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS; MEASURING AND TESTING PERSONALITY, INTELLIGENCE , APTITUDE , EMOTIONS, PUBLIC OPINION, ATTIDES AND SKILLS; AND RESEARCHRELATED TO HUMAN BEHAVIOR.
Because the rules don’t appear to apply to Joanne. The state of Connecticut doesn’t appear to be concerned with the health and safety of the residents in Connecticut. Especially in areas surrounding family court.
Gottleib’s mission:
“ … justifications of countless horrific acts, often with no oversight or accountability. …”
AFCC, Inc. mission:
“… research …”
It’s all smoke screens they couldn’t care less about what is right and what is wrong just swindle the case in any direction possible to extract as much financial resources from the case that’s the objective it’s not a male or female issue it’s all about the money twist, the laws twist, the Trajectory of the case as long as they can extract as much money as possible. Wake up Connecticut it has nothing to do with the best interest of the kids.
Lets unseal the cases extract the names and have a public hearing. Lets unseal the case involving grant money. I think the residents deserve a full accountings of the funding. It’s absolutely not about children.
https://thewaronchildren.com/#watch
The state of Connecticut continues to violate the research and data. Going down the rabbit hole of funding. Research and general knowledge continue to go by the waist side. The most common form of maternal mortality per pub med is domestic violence. Yet, Connecticut is reporting differently with Doug Ewards on the board of maternal mortality. A financial interest in Real Dads are forever. Domestic violence has been ignored by the state of Connecticut. Jennifers law hardly evens the Courts. Please see the article Nusbaum’s actions Under Microscope in Ambrose -Riorden case to read the ongoing political involvement in family court. How federal funding continues. Who is involved in providing it. Where the money is and is not going. This a deep seeded government issue and the use of government funds. The government has done away with due process. The states are allowed to discriminate against us. Pease research the supreme court rulings. It’s not just abortion rights. We are becoming a nation that is no longer free. It’s about the economic development of the country and not the people.
The Connecticut Fatherhood Initiative tries to place children with convicted pedophiles.
Where’s the data to prove that?
“Secondary Results Statement:”
“All Connecticut fathers are engaged in the lives of their children”
https://portal.ct.gov/Fatherhood/Core/The-Connecticut-Fatherhood-Initiative/Goal
“All” means PEDOPHILES!
Welcome to Connecticut.
Very good point. With the behavior of Richard Blumenthal and Sara Russell. The numerous cases. The languestics something not so good is unfolding in the state of Connecticut.
That’s not it. When father’s are let out of jail with arrears in child support they are given all kinds of resources like free attorneys. If the mothers are concerned for the children safety they are labeled alienators. Joshua Komisarjecky was granted full custody through the program. She never received custody back after he was convicted of the horrible crime. His parents were granted custody and the child was brought to visit. There is great effort in the attempt by GALs and psychologist in Connecticut to cover sexual abusers up it’s appearing. What happened to the child in the Hartford. The one Sue was on? She retired quickly. Reports that the FBI was poking around to figure out why surtin things were not reported. There appears to be some thing strange and not adding up about family court cases. Not just surrounding pedophiles. AFCC alienation industry stating protection is worse than sexual abuse. There appears to be a great deal of effort to cover it up .
State officials routinely cover up for Pedophiles who rape children within the system, simply because they can be found liable and criminally. They are protecting their system and paycheck. If DCYF is sued, it comes out of their budget.
The GOVERNMENT of Connecticut protects Pedophiles.
There seems to be an overall problem from the top. The triangulation of the system. The police department . The low prosecution of crimes. Saving money. Letting people out of jail. The legislation and department of justice grant money. Blumenthal, Looney, Murphy Winfield, Lamont, Bysiewicz, and William Tong. Culture and gender based project generating funding for the state. What we are seeing is a catastrophic effect on the people as a collective group. Women, children and the average income individual. Law abiding citizens. There is a group of individuals who go after the legistors with the sales of program. If it financially benefits the state they push it. Ignoring the data or not bothering to look at it.These same people spread information that supports their agendas. Not necessarily factual information. There is a reduction of public assistance, the funding to help crime victims. The funding is going to the criminals, abusers and agencies who are supporting the sale of these programs. The state of Connecticut is the leader in an unbalanced system that has taken government funding and used it for public interest groups. Both the criminal court and family court system are a mess. The soap opera. Million dollars donation from vested interest groups. This is triangulation of the court system. What appears to be surtin members of the elected officials making decisions and promoting legislation to bring money in to the state. Ignoring the misuse of government funding especially in family court. The welfare reform act and fatherhood funding. The MOU and partnership receiving unlimited funding. The protection and pushing gatekeeper/alienation industry agenda. Monchouser by proxy ( because they need a recognized diagnosis). It’s pretty clear that the courts are guided by the funding. Best interest and protection to people who are victims of crimes don’t generate money for the state. Jennifer law is a drop in the bucket compared to the money being used for these “committee project”. Where are our tax dollars going? Who are they really benefiting? Pedophiles appear to be one of the groups benefiting. Why and who in Connecticut is involved. Looks like Richard Blumenthal D-CT is ignoring it. He’s got great pull with the funding of these projects. Just saying. The welfare reform, fatherhood initiative and healthy marriage is a mens right agenda. The state of Connecticut has been using it to trianguate the family court system. For economic growth and development. It’s definitely benefits pedophiles.
It’s no shock that the state of Connecticut has snubbed their nose at Jennifer’s law and mismanaged it. The state has insensitivived the court system to turn cases into a giant mess. The department of public health reviewing health and human services funding. Ignoring or dismissive of court evaluation complaints. The use of access and visitation grant funding with the promotion of alienator/gatekeeper hypothesis. The MOU with funding attached. Unlimited funding to it’s partners. The cohesive control funding is running the system. High conflict divorce cases are not the larger percentage. The cases highlighted are rich white men and incarcerated fathers. Many cases in the blog are womens cases. Peter is not a Jennifer. The equal and shared parenting has done sever damage to the Jennifer’s around the country. Pushing the perception women are crazy and turning children against their fathers. Women like Jennifer dealing with abuse are winding up dead or with out children Because of the ALIENATION push both Joan and Peter are helping to sell. Women like Karen and the three kids are suffering. We can agree unseal the case and complaints and redaction of the children and parents name. Same judges, gals and therapist over and over again.
Maunchhousing by proxy is the New money maker the alienation crew is pushing. Because the alienation claims are being discredited. The funding generated by Jennifer law is nothing in comparison to the fatherhood funding. Alienation /gatekeeper maunchhousing by proxy scam. It’s absolutely disgusting that funding is being used over the right thing. Child trafficking in family court is beyond the attorneys, judges and psychologist. It’s the state funding. Unseal the case and start unraveling the players in the trafficking that is happening in the family courts. It’s the same people in these cases.
Munchausen by proxy. There will never be a missed opportunity to insult intelligence and discredit the statement of facts. In the case of Taking care of Mia. A woman was accused of this. The mother killed herself and Mia almost didn’t receive much needed services . The hospital payed millions for the inaccurate diagnosis . The ability to legally hold these psychologist responsibilities is nessacarry. Many Gals like to make diagnosis such as parental alienation. Often mudding up legal matters. A lottery of psychologist that meet very educational standards under constant review including the public should be insisted on. The department of public health has a financial investment in the funding. The AFCC. Our system is unbalanced and endangering the public. False alligations of abuse need to be reviewed by agencies not dependent on partnership with funding attached.
The proof is in the pudding. Fotis was clearly a sociopath/psychopath if he was capable of murdering the mother of his children. Even if he had “good” reasons to hate her, he had zero empathy for how their mother ‘disappearing’ forever would profoundly damage the children. Seems to me he just wanted to win at all costs and didn’t care who he hurt.
I found it really hard to get through all the AI-generated bloat in this article.
Your opinion is noted. That’s not AI. It’s style. If you want a presentation in bullet points, go to grad school.
It’s like they say. Opinions are like assholes. Everybody has ’em and they all stink.
Wise man with the paper “Bunghole you my friend are too Phat”! Evidence always points in the direction you want.Things only happen for a reason in crime. Why deviate
I think the five Dulos children who lost both parents should have some say in whether or not the Custody Evaluator’s Report ever sees the light of day. However, I believe that they’re all still minors – even though two of them apparently appear on the potential witness list in the Troconis trial and may still be called to testify.
I’m sure that Jacob Pyetranker – Fotis Delos’s divorce attorney – could give you 1,001 reasons why the Custody Evaluator’s report should not be made public.
Norm Pattis probably has his own views on the matter, but is prohibited under the terms of a civil settlement with Gloria Farber from discussing any aspect of his representation of Fotis Dulos for 40 years.
The children’s names and any sensitive information could be redacted in a released version.
Troconis may have a trial defense based on the report and the “Gone Girl” claims. Some genuinely believe Jennifer Dulos is alive and well living under an assumed name overseas.
The public also has a right to know whether the custody issues were founded or whether they were baseless fee churning by greedy lawyers and others who feed off the family court teat.
My child signed a medical release with the department of public health for an investigation into Dr. Shrager after they turned 18. It been almost 2 years. They haven’t replied to inquiry about the investigation.
Custody evaluations in family court are not just sealed from the public. Parents who are forced to pay for them are denied their own copy. The reason is to conceal the unconscionable fraud that custody evaluations of court appointed psychologists use to weaponize a healthy parent and keep the money streams flowing for years after a no-fault divorce should be swiftly granted.
The term “high conflict” divorce is a creation of the family court predators, attorneys who work in lockstep with custody evaluators and gals to drag out litigation, create conflict and plunder family savings.
The Dulos case, like many, is a case of racketeering. Jennifer Dulos was a wonderful mother with no history of mental health issues and zero concern for the children in her care.
She thought the courts would protect her. Within a week of her murder she filed to have the GAL and custody evaluator investigated in her case. Jennifer Dulos knew their conduct was corrupt and abusive to herself and her children.
Dulos had all the money. She should have remained the primary caregiver as she had been throughout their lives. There should not have been any question in that. So the court cabal created drama and appointed hat after hat – supervisors, therapists, gals, custody eval- to add billable hours and bring more court appointed strangers into the mix to reinforce the bullshit of the custody evaluator and nonsense promoted by court actors.
The custidy evaluator decided Fotis was a “better” parent. There are no parameters, definitions, or criteria for this subjective finding. He needed to find Fotis the better parent to place the kids in the custody of their abuser.
Jen Dulos had all the money so when they traffic children to their abuser, they do so knowing that their protective mother will continue to fight for her children’s safety.
These scoundrels subject healthy parents to torture by rendering them powerless to protect their children. They sit back and laugh as protective parents are gaslit and defamed while subjecting them to constant stress and rulings from judges that run counter to common sense.
Only in family court are years of parenting often by the stay at home loving parent, ignored entirely. They rewrite history and discredit and defame healthy loving parents.
In the case of Jen Dulos this is exactly what was occurring. You see they were recommending Fotis get equal parenting time, placing the kids in danger and discomfort. This was never in the kids best interest.
It would just keep the Dulos millions flowing through the for-profit business of CT family court.
CT media refuses to report on the abuses of family court. This practice has nothing to do with the privacy or protection of children. It has to do with the privacy and protection of the family court racketeering enterprise that has collected the most money from CT families than all other CT courts combined- something CT government enjoys and has no intention of changing.
CT media did jump on the murder of Jen Dulos but not one investigative journalist assessed the endless family court docket, the conduct of judge Tom Collins (who was rewarded with judgeship after he was the attorney for the father in the Tauck case- the longest divorce trial in CT and maybe nationally- where millions were collected to steal four children from a loving mother with no history of issues. A trial not reported on but Thomas Collins was the star for the prolonged litigation- where after 80 days of a no fault divorce ended with an innocent mother and her children being granted 10 minutes of FaceTime calls per day) was wholly overlooked. He passed it off to the evil Judge Heller, who has mastered the playbook and is an expert and stealing children from healthy parents –
But you will not see Judge Heller speaking about the murder of a protective mother when she has blood on her hands – as does Tom Collins and all the court actors in the Dulos case.
Whatever Fotis Dulos is or was, make no mistake that CT court child traffickers exploited Fotis as well – they emboldened him, and encouraged his abusive behavior.
But for the actors of family court Jennifer Dulos would be alive. The courts failed to protect her and the Dulos children, but they also failed to protect Fotis Dulos.
Instead of fair and positive intervention to build strong healthy bonds, they dragged this couple through years of court hearings, creating a fueling a fire that exploded before our eyes.
But the media spotlight never shone on the court actions or actors. And the state legislatures were all too happy to entertain Justice for Jennifer because they too have s business to run. After all it is our CT legislatures who created the laws that promote the abuse and encourages racketeering.
GALs are not mandated reporters in CT so they can’t be held accountable when they bury the abuse and fail to report. They created the gal “hearsay” law that allows the GALs to present their opinion and interpretation of what others have said as “fact”- to be accepted and memorialized by the court without a shred of evidence required.
The scam is so bold, so blatant that family court attorneys act with impunity, for they know they’ll be protected. GALs and custody evaluators enjoy “immunity or partial immunity” status. But none of this is ever included in contracts or made known to patents. These gals are greedy, immoral attorneys with connections in dcf and the ct police. They are all part of the AFCC that ran their illegal for profit business through the CT Judiciary!!
And when this was finally uncovered, and proven, what happened?
Let’s see… no one was disbarred. No court psychologists lost their licenses. Gerard Adelman had to step down as the director (and continued to traffic children), criminal psychologist Robert Horwitz I believe treasurer had to step down as well, and they laughed all the way to the bank.
Justice for Jennifer was a distraction with a well intended public effort to bring change.
But guess what? The lawmakers delayed and watered down Jennifer’s law that the law designed to protect specifically mothers from the coercive control of men, has already been used as the legislature and family court attorneys knew it would be used— no evidence required in family court to get an RO against an innocent party.
Abusive fathers are now using Jennifer’s law against the very mothers and children it was designed to protect.
Attorney Alex Cuda who received an award for working with victims of DV spent three days violating the law to secure a year king RO against an innocent mother- this was done not because the teenage children were at risk of harm at all, but to coercively control them and force them from their mothers care (which they sought) and back to their abusive father.
Making a mockery out of Jennifer’s Law, Alex Cuda insisted his client speak as if he were the alleged teenage victims and judge allowed this! Jennifer’s law clearly states the victims must speak for themselves unless they are incapable of doing so. These teenagers wanted their position to be known, but were silenced. Jennifer’s law has and will continue to be used as a weapon against the women and children it was intended to protect.
I believe it was a proper application of Jennifer’s law. Karen was emotionally and psychologically abusing those children. Sorry.
Ok Chris. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Do you have your alibi yet?
Chomo
Im not Chris. But you clearly have a sick obsession with the man. Maybe you need to get a hobby?
Ok Chris.
And my hobby is locating and exposing pedophiles.
Check 1600 Pennsylvania Ave in D.C.
You’re the one fellating Jerry Sandusky. Bet you’re cruising the sex offender registry like Grindr
I’m not as interested in Sandusky as I am in Louis Freeh, The Report, and whether Joe Paterno had his legacy wrongfully stripped. Most of the Penn State faithful know that what they did to Joe Pa was one of the greatest snow jobs of all time.
What might the motive(s) be? Who would want to slam Penn State and why?
They continue to be one of the deepest pockets in the state. You’ll have to read the continuing coverage to get the full picture. But in short, the late 1990s and 2000s became a period of institutional attack. The first real wave of political correctness hit the country. Like the recent WOKE phenomenon, those who adopted and made their “extortion payments” and affirmative action hires were left alone. Some institutions were not able.
Joe Paterno was the confluence of a Catholic Church ethos and the old-school, roughneck, gritty sports locker rooms. Penn State would show up dressed like gentlemen. Then they would kick your ass for sixty minutes. At the end, they would shake your hand for the pleasure.
Remember the assault on the Catholic Church and the Title IX assault on College Sports in the era? Joe Paterno was a victim of the left.
Just look at who were his judges, jury, and executioners: the liberal media, the anti-religious statists, and the trial lawyers – aka the Democrat Party establishment.
It’s no coincidence Louis Freeh – Bill Clinton’s FBI Director and Epstein Island frequenter – was the hatchet man.
Stay tuned.
It’s no coincidence you were trying to be a hatchet man and have admitted you like to have sex with underage girls forced into prostitution.
I’m no CHOMO, Chris. You’re the one who likes Latin Boiz.
Your constant use of prison slang is not doing much to help craft a positive public image for yourself. Just saying.
Ok. He’s a sticker of his erect penis into the tiny orifices of children. He injects his throbbing penis into a child’s anus and/or mouth to achieve personal sexual gratification. It is a sickness.
Does that make you ‘feel’ better? Nicer ‘image’ right?
The only image I have of you is right after I shit down your neck, Chris. I wish I didn’t have to waste our time with the courts and we were under DaneLaw. No Yarl would back a kiddie diddling CHOMO child rapist like you. Before I would let you die, I would feed you your member – and that would be justice, if there were DaneLaw.
That sounds completely insane. You don’t even know this man and you are fantasizing about murdering him? There is also zero evidence he ever abused any child. Ever. You sound frighteningly delusional Richard.
I have plenty of evidence that Christopher Ambrose is a sexual abuser of children. I’ve published some of it. I have much more I’m going to crucify him with under the law of evidence. Not even litigation privilege will save him from what I have.
But I would prefer the law of steel to the law of evidence. I prefer divine justice to the courts of man. To that end, I will weeks ecclesiastical remedies. Stay tuned.
there’s plenty of evidence in your underwear that you got your 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘵 pushed in ＢＩＧ ＴＩＭＥ bro
I’m getting under somebody’s skin:
https://open.substack.com/pub/luthmann/p/child-molester-and-psychopath?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=o2ajl
more like you’re getting under a cholo’s foreskin.
how many times did you have to rinse to get the taste of queso de Julio out your mouth?
That’s not how it’s done. They try that and they lose a piece of their Dick. Don’t talk about what you don’t know about and can only dream about.
Dream on. Believe it or not, 99.9% of people are not as thin skinned as you. And this is not Chris who is commenting here. Why would he want to add to the SEO of this site by adding free content to the comment section? He wouldnt. Can the worlds greatest legal mind see the logic in that?
Oh it’s I’m not Chris. 😂. It’s you Chris who is obsessed with Frank Parlato. I believe you admitted that. 😂.
You’re on the obsessive spectrum are you not? 😂 you cannot stop trolling frank report. Sorry to take away from your trolling for hot young Latino barbers.
You sound insane and paranoid. This is not even a post by Frank Parlato it’s by Richard Luthmann. You are the one who is obsessive, clearly. Get a life. 😂😭😂
Take down the steel bars Chris and get a job.
“a proper application of Jennifer’s law”?
How many times was the concept of “coercive control” according to “Jennifer’s Law” properly applied in the Ambrose case? 🤔
Also, how many kinds of “coercive control” are there?
How many times are you gonna ask pointless, vapid questions in this blog’s comments section?
The abuse of power and violation of law to Karen and those three children is egregious. They were silenced. They are young adults and pa 71-78 requires the alleged victims testify.
These young adults were and are against the RO. Chris Ambrose continues to use his money to engage in litigation abuse.
This is a DARVO case and Chris Ambrose is a psychopath.
He thrives on litigation and the court docket with his many adversaries support this. Signs of sociopathy are litigation abuse.
Judge Wilson dismissed his case with prejudice against him regarding Michelle Pawlina.
An attorney for Pawlina is now suing Ambrose because he knows Ambrose is a danger to society and defamed him while abusing the court process.
Ambrose is dodging luthmanns lawsuit and crying victim in all his pleadings (which are pages long and filled with Hollywood fiction writing since Ambrose imploded his own career via plagiarism and theft of intellectual properties).
you want to talk litigation abuse? Look at Karen and her impotent lawsuit against the governor of CT bc she was displeased with her divorce case. I believe she used deranged bigot Paul Boyne as her legal advisor on that one. She is one sane, class-act lady, not!
Ok Chris. 🤣🤣🤣
Whatever, Karen. 😂🤣😂
You are cuckoo just like her.
A mother/ parents going to fight to protect her children. It’s insanity that people are unable to see this. People were turning to Paul Boyne because you CAN NOT GET LEGAL HELP as a woman in Connecticut because of the fatherhood initiative. Desperation to save and protect children. As twisted as the words may have been in his blog he was trying to help people. He just became unhinged and targeted color and religion. Went way to far.
Karen didn’t need to “fight”. She just needed to follow court orders and show up to hearings and visitation and she would’ve had custody of those kids. The route she chose to take instead shows that she is a dangerous person especially to her childrens psychological well-being. And she actually had them out of school for months. Not even homeschooled. She apparently has zero common sense a.k.a. she is nuts.
WRONG!
It’s insanity when people are unable to see that when you defy the black robes it never turns out good for you. do what the court tells you and you will have a great chance of getting custody as long as you are actually a fit parent.
Violate court orders and don’t show up to hearings – don’t expect things to turn out in your favor. to expect otherwise is pure insanity.
In eras of peace and prosperity, yes. We’re entering a World-War era and potentially a Civil War era. Go look at the numbers of how many crooked judges get taken out in those time periods. My money says that in 3-5 years, many crooked judges will be gone, one way or another. A stressed system can’t handle the bullshit. And this system, as bad as it is, will be 10% of its size once the next part of the global correction begins.
If your philosophy is that they are all corrupt then she should have never gone into the court system. But she was already in, and she seemed to enjoy getting in as deep as possible by involving the authorities herself with her multiple DCF calls etc. so she invited them right in. Once you do that, you better cooperate, or it’s never gonna work out for you. Simple as that. Like it or not, you cannot unring the bell once you have the authorities eyes on your family and you’ve given them the job of deciding your fate. If it’s your personality to be a very difficult and uncooperative person, do your best to stay the hell out of family court. It’s not gonna go well for you.
WRONG! Cooperation is a zero sum game. If you cooperate, you accept the authority of the system, and are more likely to be found a fit parent.
If you are uncooperative, you have no respect for the system, and are a shitty parent.
Psychopaths are charming people and are more like to present the façade of cooperation to achieve their ends.
Sexual abusers and child rapists are people who will do anything and says anything to anyone to ensure they have the ability to make children the objects of their sexual gratification. Many like to stick their throbbing, erect penises into children’s orifices to achieve their own pleasure. (See, I said that without using CHOMO).
So what we have in Family Court, in the law, is the best interests of the children.
In reality, judges believe they are the law, so we have a game. It is a zero sum game best played by seals and psychopaths. Bark back what the judges want to hear. Lawyers do it for a living.
What is the recourse for a system that is inherently fraudulent? What is the recourse for the mother whose children are sexually abused because of seal games?
Big question: By signing off on the seal game, is the Judge culpable for the crimes of the Reich…I mean the system? They were following orders right? And they weren’t just simple concentration camp guards…er custody evaluators and court professionals. They are the top of the food chain – the Von Ribbentrops, Himmlers, Mengeles, Görings, and Bormanns of this evil empire.
Let’s call it what it is.
“If you cooperate, you accept the authority of the system, and are more likely to be found a fit parent.”
That is exactly what I was saying once you are in the system you have to play their game if you want a good outcome. It is plain and simple common sense. Besides, it is impossible for them to give custody to a parent who doesn’t even show up. like hello?
And I would add that you could have the most kindhearted, honest, non-corrupt, sincere judges etc, but if you don’t cooperate, you’re not gonna get your kids. Its common sense. It really doesn’t matter if they’re corrupt or not. if you don’t go you don’t get your kids. How do people not understand that simple fact?
Being cooperative means spending endless amounts of money. In a never ending legal battle. ” All Connecticut father’s to be engaged in there childrens lives” . The therapist are forcing relationships. There is no effort to fix dysfunctional parenting. If the problematic parenting is addressed these guys become unglued. It ALIENATION. The documentation on the psychologist reports don’t reflect. It’s the psychologist. The gals. They are going to paint a picture. Cooperation doesn’t help. Until the children are forced to go with the abuser at least part of the time it continues. Until the child custody is flipped or they age out. This is the racket going on in the courts.
How many complaints were dismissed the bar association while Alex Cuda was heading the Connecticut bar association?
Some women have never been given copies of paperwork. The psychologist says that there is no documentation.
The Connecticut Family Court is a child trafficking ring.
Jennifer’s Law has been grossly misconstrued to enrich attorneys. Child trafficking attorneys, judges and social workers.
https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1745581542028529879?s=20